web analytics

Useless and venal

Written By: - Date published: 7:53 am, January 28th, 2014 - 196 comments
Categories: capitalism, making shit up, same old national - Tags: , , ,

Following David Cunliffe’s announcement of Best Start New Zealand’s right wing took it upon themselves to show how useless and venal they are.

It started with Jordon “the new Cameron Slater” Williams and the National front group Taxpayers’ Union’s eviscerating attack on “Middleclass Welfare” (honestly guys that line’s so 2007) only to blame it on” “Labour Party Leader, David Shearer” M-O-R-O-N-S.

Farrar didn’t do his bosses any favours with his “welfare queen” arguments. There’s so much mysogony and bile in that comments thread it’d see National polling at Colin Craig levels if the Natas took their PR advice from their base.

And then there’s the NZ Institute – formerly the Business Round Table. Their argument seems to be that if women get more paid parental leave (weirdly they don’t seem to realise men can take it too), then employers will illegally discriminate against them. As they’re a business representative group the argument is basically “it won’t work because our members will break the law if you put it in place”. And people actually give these freaks column inches?!

But my favorite of the day was Steven Joyce who made his stupid and meaningless “fake money” argument again (and that’s so 2011 – don’t any of these chumps have any new ideas?). That’s despite having just spent hundreds of millions of dollars on a teacher performance pay policy, along with hundreds of millions of dollars on payouts to Warner Brothers, Rio Tinto, Team New Zealand, tax cuts for the rich…

Come to think of it arguing that money shouldn’t be spent on kids when you’ve got a reputation for handouts to any multinational that wanders along is a pretty shit look. No wonder Key didn’t front.

196 comments on “Useless and venal”

  1. Tracey 1

    I see the msm outlets have run with joyces meme that cracks are showing in labour and greens cos they are not identical.

    Hard work ahead for labour and greens to counter the bs…

    Greens getting less media attention than colin craig who is not in parliament.

    • Bill 1.1

      I actually quite enjoy the msm aiding attempts to show cracks, drive a wedge etc. The more they do it, the more they will feed a Labour and Green sense of solidarity.

      • AmaKiwi 1.1.1

        +1

        and when Labour / Green warfare fails to develop, it will further discredit these main stream media neo-liberals who perpetuated the greatest hoax of our lifetimes: trickle down economics.

        Remind the public these were the ardent Shearer supporters who painted Cunliffe as a rat-bag. I was at the speech and so were the MSM. They KNOW Cunliffe is on a roll.

  2. geoff 2

    The messdage from National is quite simple:

    We hate your kids.

    • Tracey 2.1

      it’s even simpler than that.

      Not enough mony? You lazy bastard!

      I see the BS that poor people can’t be trusted with money is alive and well. That good parenting is by coincidence amongst those with money… middle and upper classes have same numbers of shitty parents, but their kids have shoes and food.

      • vto 2.1.1

        From what I see, poor people raise their kids better than the rich.

        • Tracey 2.1.1.1

          shhhhhhhh, don’t tell anyone.

          Rich good. Poor bad.
          Tree good. fire bad.

          • Rob 2.1.1.1.1

            Really , so for the family that has a two year old and earns less than 150K will now no doubt be asked to pay more tax to fund this, and if they have any complaints thay are branded as kid haters. Yep you guys are really on to it.

            • You_Fool 2.1.1.1.1.1

              I will think you will find that the “rich guys need to pay their fair share” top tax rate will be 150K, so the under 150k/yr people who miss out on this will pay the same tax, unless they are selling property that is not their primary residence

    • David H 2.2

      No sorry Geoff the message is…. We hate Poor kids.

      • Rob 2.2.1

        As opposed to we hate all families with kids over 1 and want we them to pay there “fair” share of more tax so families with 1 child under 12 mths old family brining in 149K per annum can get $60 a week to fund free huggies.

        Those poor poor remuera / herne bay strugglers with one child eh. It must be tough doing it on 149K per year.

        Man for our first child, born in the height of the Helen Clarke era , there was nothing, and we did it on one income earning less than 50K per year and then we were asked to pay more tax. Actually David you do hate poor kids.

        • framu 2.2.1.1

          wasnt WWf around then? – and im pretty sure there were no direct tax hikes then either

          your comment has a distinct smell about it

          • Rob 2.2.1.1.1

            WWf maybe but if you mean WFF (working for families) it wasnt around for my first or second child. My first was born at the end of 2001.

            By the way, there is actually no free day care either, thats another Labour propogated myth.

            As for my comment having a smell about it, maybe its because this idea is another poorly targeted give away, being disgiused under the idea that it is only helping poor families. Since when is a poor family regarded as having an income of almost 150k per year.

            • framu 2.2.1.1.1.1

              i actually meant the world wrestling federation, but seeing as your going to focus on incorrect use of a shift key… whatever

              1) “and then we were asked to pay more tax” – considering there where no tax increases during the period (as far as i can remember – happy to be corrected) – thats where the smell comes from – not from something some one else said.

              2) perhaps i didnt see it – but i cant remember this policy being sold as helping poor families. Families both poor and in the middle, yes. But only poor families, no.

              3) not sure why your bringing up free child care

              • Herodotus

                There could be a strong argument that there were tax increases. It was termed tax creep, as the thresholds were belatedly changed late 2007 from memory. As pay increased the portion of tax that was paid increased at a greater %.
                http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/155176
                WFF was to assist those in work, if it was to assist the poor it should have been extended to beneficiaries, better still would have been to lift benefit allowances back then.
                http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/469911

      • AmaKiwi 2.2.2

        “No sorry Geoff the message is…. We hate Poor kids.”

        There are no poor kids (because Nats don’ have a measure for poverty).

        These are families who have “not yet realized their full potential” (which will happen when Nat’s wealth trickles down from their trust funds).

  3. One Anonymous Knucklehead 3

    The polls showed opposition to asset sales.

    Sauce for the goose.

    Oh and perhaps an adult conversation about hate speech. Make the lying Prime Minister justify the bigotry of his party.

    • Tracey 3.1

      You must be mistaken. National and Act don’t do name-calling or such like, they can just let their policies speak for themselves.

      This was a party political message on behalf of Wayne Mapp.

  4. vto 4

    Cunliffe should ask Key why he hates the poor.

    • Tracey 4.1

      cos he would say he doesn’t but he doesn’t like the idea of some lazy new zealanders taking advantage of those who work hard… and around and around it goes…

      • vto 4.1.1

        My point being that Cunliffe should ramp up the rhetoric. Put Key on the defensive. Take it to him. Cunliffe must most definitely not take a careful approach to Key – he needs to stand up, straight back and punch out.

        He should also ask Key why he is happy that the minimum wage is not enough to live on. It is cheaper to pay minimum wage than it is to keep a slave.

        • Tracey 4.1.1.1

          I wonder how key will fare under the new absentee rule?

        • One Anonymous Knucklehead 4.1.1.2

          Yep vto. It is clear from the last twenty-four hours that the defining characteristic of the National Party is hate.

          Cunliffe should rub Key’s face in it every chance he gets.

          • Tracey 4.1.1.2.1

            I agree he should but the impact is not by what he says but what is printed/screened. THAT’s the part that I am afeared.

            • vto 4.1.1.2.1.1

              Do not succumb to the fear.

              Cunliffe should indeed rub Key’s face in shit. My view so far is that he is coming across too soft, a little uninspiring, just more of the same. And that will go nowhere fast.

              Cunliffe needs to really fire up. It will get the headlines, grab people’s attention, start making people think…. if people see the leader of one of NZ’ two main parties stomping all over the other and shouting and getting all het up then it will register. It will cause comment at the bbq.

              Cunliffe is too soft so far.

              Fire up man.

        • Psycho Milt 4.1.1.3

          My point being that Cunliffe should ramp up the rhetoric. Put Key on the defensive. Take it to him.

          That would be suicidal, given that Cunliffe’s just introduced a policy of giving people money to produce children, without including anything to address the rather obvious incentive effect on the production of children to be raised on social welfare benefits. That’s a propaganda gift for the Nats. If your front has a gaping hole in it, going on the offensive is not recommended.

          • Colonial Viper 4.1.1.3.1

            I agree with you in that an overly aggressive stance from Cunliffe is going to be unhelpful. But he needs to place constant, firm pressure on Key and to always frame it from a standpoint of values and fairness.

            I also think that Key would be in a bad spot if he decided to run with the “bludging breeders” line. A hell of a lot of house holds on $60K to $100K pa wont like being told that they are nothing more than paid breeders.

            This is the political beauty of an almost universal scheme 🙂

          • geoff 4.1.1.3.2

            That would be suicidal, given that Cunliffe’s just introduced a policy of giving people money to produce children

            Disappointed to see you spewing out the National party’s line on this one, Psycho. Or do you have evidence from other countries that introduced similar policy that this is what happens?

            Here’s pete’s useful comment from yesterday:
            “Australia introduced their baby bonus in 2002. The birth rate barely changed”
            here’s his link to the data

            http://www.google.co.nz/publicdata/explore?ds=d5bncppjof8f9_&met_y=sp_dyn_tfrt_in&hl=en&dl=en&idim=country:AUS:AUT:USA#!ctype=l&strail=false&bcs=d&nselm=h&met_y=sp_dyn_tfrt_in&scale_y=lin&ind_y=false&rdim=region&idim=country:AUS:NZL&ifdim=region&tstart=-313419600000&tend=1296039600000&hl=en_US&dl=en&ind=false

            • Psycho Milt 4.1.1.3.2.1

              I also think that Key would be in a bad spot if he decided to run with the “bludging breeders” line. A hell of a lot of house holds on $60K to $100K pa wont like being told that they are nothing more than paid breeders.

              Parents bringing in $60 to $100k don’t consider themselves to have anything in common with sole-parent beneficiaries – there isn’t the slightest danger of them thinking Key’s attack lines referred to them.

              Or do you have evidence from other countries that introduced similar policy that this is what happens?

              Given that an increase in something you subsidise is expected behaviour, I think the evidential burden is on those who imagine we can subsidise the production of children to be raised on benefits without seeing a resultant increase.

              However, we do have evidence from this country, in that introducing a payment for sole parenting led to an increase in the proportion of sole-parent households from around 10% in the early 70s to nearly 30% now. Is there reason to assume increasing the payment might not increase that proportion further?

              • geoff

                Given that an increase in something you subsidise is expected behaviour, I think the evidential burden is on those who imagine we can subsidise the production of children to be raised on benefits without seeing a resultant increase.

                Did you look at the graph of the Australian fertility rate in that link I provided above??

                However, we do have evidence from this country, in that introducing a payment for sole parenting led to an increase in the proportion of sole-parent households from around 10% in the early 70s to nearly 30% now.

                What the hell does the break-down of the nuclear family have to do with this discussion?!? Are you suggesting that providing support for solo parents encouraged couples to split up??

                Please enlighten me, Psycho.

                • I looked at it, I just didn’t think it was relevant. I doubt the fertility rate will go up in this country either, but that doesn’t reduce the ease with which Key can paint this policy as a breeding programme for wasters. DPB already has a post up entitled “What the DPB will pay under Labour” – expect more along those lines, and expect it to hurt.

                  Are you suggesting that providing support for solo parents encouraged couples to split up??

                  I’m suggesting that paying people to be sole parents increased the number of sole parents, and paying people more to be sole parents will further increase the number of sole parents.

                  • KJT

                    Of course the fact that so many of the male parents are now out of work, thanks to National, and the reduction in WINZ payments if you have a partner, even an unemployed one, has nothing to do with it?

                  • geoff

                    So now your problem is that this policy can be spun by the right? You don’t care that actual evidence backs it up, that doesn’t matter if National have a way to bag it? Weak bro.

                    Key won’t have to paint this policy as a breeding programme for wasters because you’re doing such a good job for him!
                    If you’re committed to a Labour victory then how about you help to explain the benefits of the policy instead of doing National’s work for them.

                    I’m suggesting that paying people to be sole parents increased the number of sole parents, and paying people more to be sole parents will further increase the number of sole parents.

                    Yeah and your suggestions don’t stand up to scrutiny. You haven’t produced any evidence to back up that this is the case. You’ve also ignored evidence that contradicts that assertion. Your position is based entirely on your own prejudices which are completely contradicted by reality.

                    • So now your problem is that this policy can be spun by the right?

                      What do you mean “now?” It was the basis of my first comment at 12.15. My problem is that they’ll have a point.

                      If you’re committed to a Labour victory then how about you help to explain the benefits of the policy instead of doing National’s work for them.

                      My commitment to a Labour victory is definitely of the “lesser of two evils” variety, but this does strike me as a good policy that just has a bit missing. I’ll be happy to explain the benefits of it on every thread I participate in, once Labour’s done something to address the obvious issue with it: incentivising the raising of children on benefits. Until then, that obvious weakness makes selling it a hiding to nothing.

                      Yeah and your suggestions don’t stand up to scrutiny.

                      Long arguments on other threads already, not repeating them here, suffice to say there’s long-standing disagreement between me and pretty much everyone at the Standard on this subject.

                    • geoff

                      Psycho, if you refuse to use evidence to support your claims and you refuse to acknowledge the evidence that I have shown you then there’s nothing more for me to say to you.

              • Hi Psycho Milt,

                If you’re interested in what correlated with the steep rise in sole parent families you should not look at the introduction of the DPB in the mid 70s but about a decade later. As this study by Blaicklock et al. (2002, section 2.1) makes clear:

                The proportion of children living with one parent is high. In 1981 twelve per cent of all children under 15 years were in one parent families. In 1986 sixteen per cent of all children under 15 years – and 26 per cent of Mäori children and 20 per cent of Pacific children – were in one parent families. In 1991 twenty-two per cent of all children under
                15 years – and 40 per cent of Mäori children and 28 per cent of Pacific children – were in one parent families. In 1996 twenty-four per cent of all children under 15 years – and 41 per cent of Mäori children and 29 per cent of Pacific children – lived in one parent families (Statistics New Zealand, 1995; Statistics New Zealand, 1999a). The proportion of children living in one parent families rose substantially over the period of the economic and social reforms and is high by international standards.

                Section 3 is also worth the read.

          • blue leopard (Get Lost GCSB Bill) 4.1.1.3.3

            @ Psycho Milt

            “…given that Cunliffe’s just introduced a policy of giving people money to produce children”

            No, Labour is suggesting providing money for people who will produce children – not to produce children.

            This argument re production of children in response to $60 is really very ridiculous. People will produce children – that is a fact – a basic fact – it is a strong urge in people – we need to get our heads around that and adapt to it.

            I really do not think there are many people in poverty – if any – who would decide to have a child because they were going to get an extra 60 bucks – if there is, by some small miracle, a person who makes such a calculation – you have to question what the heck is wrong that someone would be so misguided as to think that this was enough money to allow them to suddenly be able afford the expense of having a child. I really do think this scenario would be an extreme rarity and it is on that extreme rarity that this argument is being based.

            If someone in better circumstances – decided that $60 extra a year made the difference and allowed them to be able afford having a child – then the child is hardly being born into poor circumstances and this no longer comes under the point of concern being argued.

            Such a choice is a good thing isn’t it? Another life in a country that judging by stats supplied by others – does not have enough people having children to sustain our population.

            • geoff 4.1.1.3.3.1

              National are just trying to tap into people’s sense of inequity for the bigotted reaction. They amplify the edge cases, (bene’s pumping out kids for dosh, $150,000 families creaming $60 they don’t need) and ignore the vast numbers of families on low-middle incomes who will be significantly helped by this policy.

            • Psycho Milt 4.1.1.3.3.2

              People will produce children – that is a fact – a basic fact – it is a strong urge in people – we need to get our heads around that and adapt to it.

              We’re homo sapiens, not some species of rabbit. We had ways of limiting the number of children we make even before reliable methods of contraception were invented. Since those inventions, children are products of choice, of carelessness, or of just not giving a shit.

              I really do think this scenario would be an extreme rarity and it is on that extreme rarity that this argument is being based.

              Really? We have right now quite a few people with ridiculous numbers of children, under a benefit regime that isn’t exactly generous. But providing more money won’t see even more ridiculous numbers of children produced? Why will it not?

              • McFlock

                Because human reproduction is not really applicable to a $$ supply/demand curve?

                  • McFlock

                    and you have no evidence to the contrary

                    • I personally keep to hand no evidence that human behaviour is influenced by economic factors, no. I have no interest in fishing any out of the voluminous literature on the subject, either – should you wish to conclude that this means human behaviour isn’t influenced by economic factors, feel free to do so.

                      As mentioned above, I’m not going to rehash this same old argument yet again. Bottom line: the policy invites National to play up the incentive effect of this policy on raising children on benefits, it’s an invitation that will be accepted, and Labour really should have some better countermeasure than claiming there’s no evidence people respond to financial incentives.

                    • McFlock

                      So you have no evidence, the australian experience seems to show absolutely no effect, but you and the nats can fantasize a problem so this is labour’s fault somehow.

                      Talk about jumping the shark

                    • One Anonymous Knucklehead

                      We’d better make sure no other Left-wing proposals will meet with opposition from the right, too, because if they say nasty things we’ll just fall to pieces.

              • geoff

                Where is your evidence? Where are your stats? You’re just spouting baseless shit. Your latest comments don’t even deserve reasoned responses.
                Put up or shut up.

      • tricledrown 4.1.2

        But its alright to subsidise
        Billionaires like James Cameron
        $250 million.
        Ironic given the theme of the movie avatar is aboit a powetful force colonizing a poor races land to get all their resources.

      • AmaKiwi 4.1.3

        Believe, sisters and brothers, believe!

        All will trickle down to the worthy in due time.

    • David H 4.2

      Well today is the opening of Parliament. So lets hope for fireworks.

      • vto 4.2.1

        Yes.

        Fireworks is what is needed. Expose the goons for what they are. Do it hard and make no apology.

    • adam 4.3

      It’s not hate the poor question won’t work. , the question should be something like.

      – Why does the Key government continue to make it difficult for hard working families to get a head, and why does he think it is acceptable to attack the children of these families to score political points?

      • Rob 4.3.1

        And why does Labour and the Greens think that taxing these families more in some bizaar way helps them.

        • Puddleglum 4.3.1.1

          What makes you think that these ‘hard working families’ will be taxed more?

          • Rob 4.3.1.1.1

            What makes you think they wont , previous historical Labour Govt performance?

            • One Anonymous Knucklehead 4.3.1.1.1.1

              Are you parroting the lie that the harder you work the wealthier you will be? Because Labour typically targets upper income earners for higher tax, not those who work the longest hours.

              Do you have any reality-based opinions?

              • Rob

                I am not parroting any lie, and actually I have never seen any reality based opinions from you, only links to plagerised web site forums.

                Tell me about your family and what you do that makes you so holier than thou, lets base this on reality based discussions.

                Under Labour I was taxed more, thats reality.

  5. Anne 5

    An election year bribe – Labour buying people’s votes. That’s what they’re saying. Well, what’s this then?

    http://www.3news.co.nz/ACT-leadership-hopeful-Boscawen-targets-Asian-voters/tabid/1607/articleID/329895/Default.aspx

    John Boscawen is “buying” the Epsom seat. And with Nationals blessing! So, we are on the road towards parliamentary seats being bought by right wing rich pricks with huge wads of money. The next step is total corruption on a scale reminiscent of former dictatorships like Pol Pot, Pinochet and others.

    • Tracey 5.1

      That’s different. Bear in mind it says that ACT isn”t the Epsom Party…. I expect to see that on a Tui sign…

    • David H 5.2

      And the 357 Million bucks for the Elite teachers that toe the party line, wasn’t an election bribe?

      • Will@Welly 5.2.1

        That David was “prudent Government spending”. All the children will come home raving about their new principals, their new teachers, and how their learning had improved.
        Expect notes coming home soon to a house near you saying “Help elect a John Key led Government.”

        • geoff 5.2.1.1

          +1 Will, I’m amazed to see the numbers of people buying into National’s spin on this one.

  6. Philj 6

    Xox
    Natrad seems to be getting sillier and more juvenile by the week. Zoe and Suzie are not raising the bar with asanine comments and generally clueless. Is this the result of a funding cap for the last 5 years from Dick Griffin and his commercial buddies on the RNZ board? With Chris Laidlaw and Geoff going, I am not hopeful.

  7. ianmac 7

    Notice that Steven Joyce said on Morning Report that the Baby Policy was good but then launched into the familiar “where is the money coming from.”
    A later comment suggests that National will announce a new Early Childhood Policy. I wonder if they are furiously writing it right now with the aim to cancel Labour’s plan?

    • geoff 7.1

      He said that? Brilliant, now Cunliffe can respond with…”Even National’s Steven Joyce thinks Best Start is good policy, but he wonders how we’ll pay for it…so here’s tax hikes for the wealthy!”

  8. Pasupial 8

    ODT has a weird article:

    “While a Dunedin welfare support agency has congratulated Labour leader David Cunliffe on his ”Best Start” education policy, an education specialist says it is ”not a game-changer at this point”.”

    http://www.odt.co.nz/news/politics/289525/questions-over-labour-policy

    I don’t imagine it has much direct impact on welders or IT techs either. Interesting is the way they frame Labour’s; basic income in at least first year of life, as not an education policy (which it isn’t). All the while ignoring the substance of the Green Party policy which had been announced just the day before and which Cunliffe explicitly stated he supported.

    Instead they prefer to reprint this NZH “analysis” by Trevett:

    http://www.odt.co.nz/news/politics/289421/free-lunch-plan-may-scupper-breakfast-programme

    • andy (the other one) 8.1

      How about this odd little piece. My summary below

      “I don’t like it cause, and stuff, I have enough money so no one should have it, I also live by the beach in Auckland and am a stay at home mum, why are you all not like meeeeeeeee!!!”

      http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11192807

      • Molly 8.1.1

        A suggestion for Eileen Reid:

        Consider it an opportunity to direct government funds to EXACTLY where you would like to see them spent. No government will ever match up with your individual concerns perfectly – you now have $60 from the government to direct to a concern or charity of your choice….

        A couple of worthy causes:
        AAAP
        350 Aotearoa
        Army
        Auckland City Mission
        …. and that’s just the basic A’s…

        I wonder which one she’ll choose?…

  9. rich the other 9

    Labour has lost the plot, this is a trap for those in poverty..
    If we are going to address poverty, what is $60 a week per child going to do for those in poverty today , NOTHING , it’s for the yet to be born.
    In the long term this will cause the numbers in poverty increase, like it or not, some already struggling in poverty will see the $60 a week for new born babies as a quick fix and have more children that they can’t afford.
    Who pays when these children as they get older ?.
    This policy is a serious own goal , take a look at the comments on the stuff article , the latest number of comments 1047 ,the vast majority strongly oppose this policy .
    Keep it up labour , the Nat’s are loving this.

    • One Anonymous Knucklehead 9.1

      Every other country that’s done this has experienced a surge in the birth rate, eh.

      Because if not, your opinion is a fairy-tale. I bet you’re too incompetent to check the facts.

      • Rodel 9.1.1

        rto
        Quick all us right wingers who don’t have shoulders to the wheel and noses to the grindstone, i.e. have executive time on our hands..and computers to play with, write to Stuff to engage in a scientific poll to show what a majority we have in the politic ideas game.Simple logic really. ‘Simple’ being the key word.

      • rich the other 9.1.2

        Who pay’s for the children when they get older ??, answer that.
        This is a poverty trap and that’s why there has been so few comments on this site , deep down labour supporters know this to be true.

        [lprent: That is a pwned style argument. It essentially states that because others don’t do things the exactly the way you want/think that they should do, then they lost. It is an invitation to starting a flame war. It isn’t an “argument”, it is obviously stupid, designed to destroy arguments and the thread flow, and annoys the crap out of me

        Banned for a two weeks for stupidity. ]

        • One Anonymous Knucklehead 9.1.2.1

          A two-week ban should give you almost enough time to research the effect of child-support payments on birthrates.

          • McFlock 9.1.2.1.1

            15 years of education failed dismally, so I’m not sure 2 weeks self-directed learning (aka “reading KB”) will do any good.

            • One Anonymous Knucklehead 9.1.2.1.1.1

              Well, RTO has a two-week ban. Finding the research should take about ten minutes. Hence “almost enough time”.

        • rich the other 9.1.2.2

          Banned ?,

          [deleted]

          Banned ?, normally, easy to respect if it’s justified but this is just censorship.

          [lprent: Nope. Most people around here have seen me stomp on *anyone* who claims “victory” over another. I call it the pwned/owned heresy. I also stomp on anyone who starts to claim victory because others haven’t done what they said they should do to prove their credentials.

          Both are classic petrol on the flames techniques employed by trolls trying to dominate a discussion. I hit them pretty damn hard especially when they are in the context of of a noisy well commented post, as the techniques tend to be infectious and they get in the way of actual arguments.

          You did both in a noisy post, so I didn’t bother to warn. I just treated you as a troll.

          Now you could argue and people sometimes do. But I have a habit of merely doubling up on sentences when I have to exert effort to reply to foolish and ineffectual statements. Your choice on risk. ]

          • rich the other 9.1.2.2.1

            Censorship ,plain and simple

            [deleted whining]

            [lprent: Quadrupled to 8 weeks. He was just warned that I usually double the penalty. I do like to reward real stupidity. ]

            • One Anonymous Knucklehead 9.1.2.2.1.1

              Rich the Other, eight weeks should be almost enough time for you to look for evidence that disproves your opinion, the way a sceptic would.

              You will always be able to find someone who agrees with you, reading those who don’t is a good test of character. After all, you have plenty of practice reading people who don’t agree with your drivel, right here at The Standard, so why not take it to the next level and lift your game?

              This message was brought to you by the Society for the Improvement of Wingnuts.

    • AmaKiwi 9.2

      “some already struggling in poverty will see the $60 a week for new born babies as a quick fix and have more children that they can’t afford.”

      You have obviously never had a child (or at least never supported one). $60/week is a tiny sum compared to the cost of raising a child.

  10. Will@Welly 10

    The comments by Joyce and Williams are entirely predictable. Joyce is squealing like a wounded pig – “printing money, printing money”. Call it what is – qualitative easing – the Americans have been doing it for decades. No one has a problem with that there.
    As David said, this is a part of a list of packages to be announced over the year, not in one hit that National could counter with the stroke of a pen.
    I like the way it targets itself in years 2 and 3, and how Labour wants to see more pre-school groups in lower socio economic communities. Not just for the rich. Shame, a tad socialist.

  11. JustLikeTigerWoods 11

    Well, that policy went down like a lead balloon, huh.

    Taking money and throwing it at people who the public perceive as already having enough handouts is not going to win elections.

    This does nothing to improve the situation of those on low incomes. The focus needs to be on more higher paying jobs.

    • You_Fool 11.1

      have you been talking to Cunliffe about how to get people out of poverty? Because that is his reaction, at least to how to fix the problem. Strangely enough he has a plan for the high paying jobs as well, so I guess that means you will vote for him? Since the other lot don’t seem to have a plan at all?

      Also I didn’t realise that I already get handouts from the government, I will have to go talk to my accountant about all this “free” money I am missing out on…

      • JustLikeTigerWoods 11.1.1

        I’ll wait to see what his other policies are – he has been making some good noises – but THIS one is a-grade moronic.

        Did the ABC club set him up? Sure looks like it.

        • Colonial Viper 11.1.1.1

          Bill English used tax cuts to throw money at rich people.

          All Labour is doing is listening to the electorate and responding with needed support for young families. Its brilliant.

    • greywarbler 11.2

      JLTiger Woods
      You are clinging on to the coat tails of Mr T Woods are you? It sounds like you will always be hanging round closest to where the trickle down from the famous and wealthy are. And why not – that is where the jobs are these days.

      Being flunkeys to the wealthy and following the red carpet road between the lawyers, the accountants, the wedding arrangers, the service people, who are feeding off the magnetically attracting rich, who continue to soak up more. Or perhaps you have been able to get into dairy or some star achieving sector. Hope it doesn’t collapse on you from introduced biosecurity threats or sudden drops in the market. You are just too self-promoting and satisfied, dangerous if you are young. But perhaps you have managed to hold onto it, and you are now retired and the government is behind you with a cushion for your backside.

      What you understand about politics wouldn’t fill a golf trundler though. So don’t go all superior on us.

      • JustLikeTigerWoods 11.2.1

        Are you clinging on to a grey bird that warbles? What is in a name, eh. The Google thing may help you as far as my name goes.

        Could you clarify something for me. Is the $60 benefit calculated on the household income the year before, just before the baby is due, or when the baby is delivered and one partner takes time off, therefore reducing household income?

    • AmaKiwi 11.3

      The smart economy is one of Cunliffe’s next major policy speeches.

      He’ll rip the Nats to pieces for job destruction and show how lacking in vision they are to ignore how other nations become rich (and egalitarian).

      Cunliffe’s has described these strategies for years. He knows his sh*t.

      One issue at a time. He’s going to torture the Right slowly. Let the blood steadily ooze out of them for the next 6 months.

      • JustLikeTigerWoods 11.3.1

        It would be good if he could come up with some smart policy. It’s been very silly thus far.

        At least he’s not holding up dead fish, I suppose.

  12. Xtasy 12

    Yes, the whole “Best Start” policy is being twisted and manipulated by so many in the MS(p)M (Main Stream “propaganda” Media), which is mostly privately and corporate owned and controlled, living from advertising by businesses that have no other interests, to sell products and services, feed consumerism, make heaps of profits, and maintain the political status quo.

    All focus is on the “baby bonus”, the “baby bribe”, the “election bribe”, meaning the $ 60 payments that David Cunliffe and Labour announced would under their government be paid (per week) to new mums and dads from April 2016. There is virtually NO mention of the other, very important policy components, like extended paid maternity leave, more free ECE hours, better targeted and free health care, and what else was announced in Cunliffe’s SON speech. I must admit though, that the $ 150,000 or $ 145,000 income cap for the weekly payment is set too high. Either they should have targeted it more, and been more generous, to truly low income parents, or they should have simply made it a truly universal payment.

    And have any of you noticed, how since of recently, so many knowingly biased, government-friendly journalists, reporters, moderators and talk back hosts suddenly stress “I am independent”, while in the following sentences they swiftly go on and rubbish the “Best Start”, Labour and the Greens?

    They must be starting to have a bad conscience, and it shows. Even Paul Henry did in his first show “attempt” to look “balanced”, but some comments he made, they showed that he has a dim view of Labour’s and Cunliffe’s policies. He was spending more time with his preferred Prime Minister JK, and the body language showed it all.

    The first reporting on the TV networks and their evening news yesterday may not have been quite that bad, but today it is all on. Of course the National and ACT party allies like Jordan Williams from the ‘Taxpayers’ Union’, and certain business lobby group spokespersons will look critically at this, and the same applies to government ministers and MPs.

    But I see that the MSM are again behaving and reporting in similar ways as prior to the last elections. Most scary is how they succeed in spinning people into believing, that THEY (in their vast majority) will have to pay for the extra spending with “their taxes”, while most will not be paying extra taxes under Labour, only the high income earners. There is so much division after years of brainwashing people into a mentality – dominated by total commercialism and consumerism, it seems many do not even understand anymore, what a true sense and spirit of “unity” is in this country. I fear the public needs and deserves better information on this whole policy, and that Labour must find ways to explain it, so that all this misleading is stopped by the selectively reporting media.

    I hope that APN and Fairfax will get even less readership, once they bring in their paywalls.

    • Rob 12.1

      Look, if he is so determined to give 150K households more money, Why doesnt he just tax them less. Why take with one hand and give it back from another, its pretty controlling behaviour.

      • Xtasy 12.1.1

        In my earlier comments (under other topics) I raised some of my own concerns, as to how they decided to set the income level for entitlements to “Best Start” payments at that particular amount. That is where I have some concern about the policy, as it could have been better targeted (perhaps for incomes up to 75 or 80 k per annum). Alternatively it could as well have been decided to apply it universally, just to keep things simpler.

        When it comes to taxation, that will apply to all that go over certain thresholds, so making exceptions for tax payers with newborns, to offer them yet another tax credit, that seems to over complicate matters.

        It does seem there are also technical and administrative reasons for having decided to go ahead this way. There is always some give and take, and it is important to look at the whole policy set. The media get all preoccupied with the $ 60 per week payment, and mostly ignore what else Cunliffe announced.

        That shows once again, the selective reporting we get from the MSM, and how this leads to unbalanced informing – and hence a largely misinformed electorate, which is not at all serving true democracy.

        Such policies should be discussed and debated in open forums on television, radio and on-line, by a balance of participants (incl. experts), but hey, we cannot have that in NZ, as it “costs” too much, they tell us. Welcome to one of the worst informed wider public in the “developed” world.

  13. idlegus 13

    the stuff comments are up over 1000? that’s unusual, they normally shut them off before they get too unweildly, & this is only the beginning. those righties fingers are gonna tire themselves out with all that frantic typing,

  14. Chooky 14

    Re the Useless and Venal NACT Govt

    Bankster trader NACT politicians of New Zealand cream off what they can by selling State Assets and building multi billion dollar privatised toll motorways which will benefit them, their Trust funds and their ‘Chosen’ Bankster overseas mates. They are even proposing privatising evaluation and services to the mentally and physically disabled NZers to an Australian company (see Xtasy’s report on Open Mike)

    Solution:

    1.) All NACT proposed super motorways should be AXED!( we dont need them and they will be an environmental sore…more free public transport and rail is the way to go )

    2.) …the billions saved from super motorways should be used by the New Zealand Labour /Green (NZF/Mana) government to support the most vulnerable….. mentally and physically disabled and beneficiaries ( this is the Christian way! ….to look after the most vulnerable in society!..this is NZ’s ethical tradition … at least ostensibly)

    3.) the money saved from the unwanted super motorways costing billions ….can then also be spent on upgrading NZ State free education to a very high quality …..aiming at free university education, free polytech education, free apprenticeships, free internships for NEW ZEALANDERS FIRST! ( hear that Winston!…. no silly deals with desperate Banksters)

    ….lets look after New Zealanders instead of treating them like delinquents in their own country!!!!

    4.).there should be no young New Zealander or any New Zealander left untrained and without meaningful work….this is the job of the NEW ZEALAND government and not Key’s the ‘Chosen’ foreign Bankster private companies!!!

    Let us ALL take back New Zealand for New Zealanders!

  15. Will@Welly 15

    A big contrast in styles over at the Herald.
    David Cunliffe got dropped off by a mate, John Key turns up with a Press Agent and 5 members of the Diplomatic Protection Squad.
    A f**ken press interview, not a stroll through downtown Damascus.
    There was a bit of b.s. on TV 3 after Gower hounded Cunliffe about more details how everything was to be paid for, and how it would work. More like a desperate journo looking for a story – perhaps its his job that’s on the line.

    • Anne 15.1

      Another big contrast over at the Herald.

      Last week they spread Keys SON announcements over pages 2, 3 and 4…plus a banner head line along the top of the front page… plus (from memory) two opinion pieces lauding NAct’s latest step towards the privatisation of education – although they didn’t admit to it of course.

      What did Labour get? Page 8 with no accolades… plus a female giving the thumbs down to Labour’s early childhood package… no banner headline on the front page… editorial ignored Labour’s SON announcement and concentrated on Paula Bennett’s so-called initiatives instead – as if the policy amounted to nothing and wasn’t worth an editorial.

      Shame on the bastards!!! I think Labour should do a banner with a big NZ Herald front page full of crap and a large red headline above it saying DEMOCRACY UNDER ATTACK.

  16. captain hook 16

    what is really venal is National selling off the country’s assets and giving $500,000,000 to its mates in fees.
    You cant get much greedier than that.

  17. Philj 17

    Xox
    Supporting the needy is to be applauded. If the poor, and middle class don’t see that and vote they will continue to be dealt to by this heartless crony fake ‘government’. It’s just big business in drag.

  18. tricledrown 18

    Just like tiger woods you have lost the plot like your namesake why are you so worried if its such a bad policy.
    One of the worst things about targeted benfits is it creates unintended poverty traps like the very high abatement rates on people working partime while on benefits.they are paying more than the top rate of tax while being on the lowest incomes.
    Especially when their is mainly only partime work available.

    • JustLikeTigerWoods 18.1

      I am not “worried”.

      I think it’s a ridiculous policy. As do many people. Why? This is welfare for people who don’t need it. If the woman takes time off, thereby dropping an already wealthy household income below the 150K threshold, then she gets $60 p/w for at least the second half of the year.

      Stunning.

      This $60 will just get capitalised into the family home of the middle classes.

      • blue leopard (Get Lost GCSB Bill) 18.1.1

        The money that is an ‘extra’ for wealthier people will simply be spent on extras and thus go back into the community – as will the money given to the very poor – this is a win-win policy.

        • Rob 18.1.1.1

          Here is an idea Blue Leopard, just tax them less.

          I know this stunning idea dosn’t need an army of strategists and administrators to support it, nor does it require the services of a branding expert to come up with the brand and tag line.

          But if Labour cannot think of any other things to do than to give families bringing in 150K per annum another $60 per week, then they do not deserve to be in Govt.

        • JustLikeTigerWoods 18.1.1.2

          I think you’ll find it will go into house prices.

          Remember, it’s zero sum. You’re not gaining spend because you’re taking it off other people. You’re reducing their consumer spend, or their investment, which is another form of spend, namely the type that grows the pie.

          It is not win-win. It stupid. It’s expensive churn and welfare for the rich. He was onto something with no tax for low earners, but threw that for this?

          • geoff 18.1.1.2.1

            You are gaining because it will be coming off of wealthy people who undeservedly were gifted the money in the first place and who have been spending it on unproductive ego-boosting crap like holiday houses, boats and bmws.

            All that money that the rich drive into large material possessions that go unused is a gigantic waste of money, completely unproductive. Almost as wasteful as them using it to speculate on assets that were previously owned collectively by the Nation.

            You are completely ignorant of real economics.

            • Rob 18.1.1.2.1.1

              Geoff

              A family with one kid under 12mths old bringing in 149,999K per year will look at the extra $60 per week as 2 extra bottles of central otago Pinot. This is obviously the real economics that you are completely abreast of Geoff. For me , all I can see is a huge waste of taxpayers resource that could actually do some good, rather than just trying to buy votes in Central Auckland from all the trendy hip young things.

              Yes ” just like Tiger woods” , we all understand that the other people you are referring to in your zero sum argument are other families that now have the mis fortune of not having a child under 1, but will certainluy celebrate the fact that they will be getting taxed more to fund it, but you have evidently missed this blinder.

              • geoff

                Isn’t it fascinating how you focus on the small minority of families that are relatively well off who would benefit from this and completely forget about the large majority of less well-off folks who will benefit greatly from this policy.

                So let me get this right… you support this policy but you just don’t like the idea of wealthier families getting the benefit of it?

                • Rob

                  No I am actually focussing on how much this thing will cost, and what it means for the rest of the taxpayers that have to fund it. A lot of people are doing it tough Geoff, not just families with children under 1. Families that are bringing in 150K do not need Govt help, so why penalise the rest to fund it.

                  Its pretty predicatble that your arguments are based on who has their hands out and not who has to front up and pay for it. I dont think anyone is a kid hater because they dont think that paying money to high earning families is a good idea.

                  • Rob,

                    What makes you think that these people who are ‘doing it rough’ would pay for this policy with an increase in their taxes?

                    I haven’t heard Labour announce that tax rates at lower income levels are to be raised.

                  • geoff

                    Still focusing hard on that irrelevant minority I see. Not surprising though. It’s very predictable that your arguments completely neglect the economic conditions that led to the Left to promote policies like this.

                    What’s your opinion on privatisation, Rob? What do you think about low flat tax rates?

                    • Rob

                      Geoff I am focussing on this “irrelevant minority” as you term it, because Labour has now made it a focus and it is laughable.

                      I actually see nothing but words about the economic conditions from Labour and when they have a chance to promote a game changing policy, they present welfare packages for top earners.

                      I think the tax rate should be set to pay for the agreed requirements of the New Zealand. I dont think it should be hiked for stupid reasons like paying back high earners. Again if this is the best they come up with , then they dont deserve to be anywhere near Govt.

                      They should try again and at the very least ensure that the policy they present actually addresses the issues they go on about ad nauseum. I mean it is almost like Munchhausen by Proxy. They exists because the issue exists, but actually do nothing to address it, in fact inflame and propogate it.

                      To have a guy living in Herne Bay in a millionairs paradise, going on about the impoverished every 2 minutes, finally getting a chance to do something about it and he presents a welfare package for households earning $149,999 per annum. You could not make this shit up.

                    • geoff

                      Are you the Rob that posts articles on here?

                    • Rob

                      Geoff I am not the Rob who posts articles on here.

                      [lprent: That is r0b (with a zero instead of an ohh) ]

                    • Rob

                      Thanks LPrent

              • JustLikeTigerWoods

                But Geoff is implying extra money goes into “the community”. It doesn’t. The money gets spent by different people, after some needless administrative churn destroys some of the value. As a Wellington property owner, that churn benefits me. The country, not so much.

                I would favour a rising tax free threshold for all. We don’t need to be subsidising babies as we offer plenty of child subsidy already.

                • geoff

                  don’t worry your little head. When Labour heavily taxes the rich there’ll be plenty of money to go round.

                  Did you know… The highest tax rates in the USA during the 1960s were over 90%? And the economy was going like gangbusters!

                  Be good to see something like that here. Really ratchet back some of that wealth that the parasitic rich have stolen from the rest of the country.

                  • JustLikeTigerWoods

                    So, if the path to prosperity is simply to raise taxes on “the rich”, then why doesn’t every country make the top tax rate 100%?

                    Venezuela is learning the hard way, as is France.

                    Tax take often decreases when you raise top tax rates because the wealthy tend to provide capital. Capital takes flight.

                    Rather than focus on redistribution, how about *you* think about ways *you* can provide value for others and employ people in the process? That is the path to prosperity, not endless division.

                    • geoff

                      And you took the bait…

                      as I suspected you are a total waste of space, a traitor to your fellow NZers. Time for you to pack up your failed neo-lib happy meal and fuck off back to kiwiblog.

                    • Draco T Bastard

                      Tax take often decreases when you raise top tax rates because the wealthy tend to provide capital. Capital takes flight.

                      A) Great, we’re better off without them and B) doesn’t matter in the slightest as it’s always the workers who have paid for everything and the government can print money.

                    • JustLikeTigerWoods

                      Name calling is bullying behaviour. Geoff.

                      You’re avoiding my points and giving up the debate too easily. You could call people traitors, but emotive “arguments” won’t change the fact that capital and people are highly mobile.

                      I’ll give you an example to demonstrate how taxing people highly would make you worse off. Let’s say a NZ company invented a power crystal that produced the same energy as oil, but at half the cost and with no emissions. The profits of the company would be astronomical.

                      What are you going to do? Tax at 90%? You’ll get 90% of nothing when they move counties. You can yell traitor at the airport as much as you like, but you’ve just encouraged a policy that makes Australians much richer and you much poorer.

                      Incentives matter. Ignoring them does not make them go away.

                    • JustLikeTigerWoods

                      Good luck attracting doctors and other highly skilled immigrants, Draco. Good luck retaining those who are here now. Good luck retaining those you train and then leave once they hit your unfair tax rates.

                      Print as much as you like. The NZ currency will be near worthless.

                    • Colonial Viper

                      Interesting how the amoral corporatist right wing always end up first threatening then carrying out economic threats to nations.

                      Anyone who doesn’t understand how this system of undermining countries and citizens works, please get on YouTube and search for “confessions of an economic hitman.”

                      NZ is better off without narrow minded idiots who choose where they want to bring up a family on the basis of getting the lowest tax rate possible

                    • Colonial Viper

                      Print as much as you like. The NZ currency will be near worthless.

                      This also betrays your fundamental misunderstanding of why currency works and why NZ currency will always be valuable, and increasingly so.

                      Besides, a mild devaluation will help our farmers and our manufacturing exporters no end – another sign of your fundamental economic misunderstanding.

                    • greywarbler

                      DFTT THORQ (This Has-been One Received Quota).

                    • geoff

                      Let’s say a NZ company invented a power crystal that produced the same energy as oil, but at half the cost and with no emissions. The profits of the company would be astronomical.

                      Hahaha well instead of wasting your time here, how about you go away and work on that one, buddy.

                    • JustLikeTigerWoods

                      It’s not a threat, Viper, it’s an inevitable consequence.

                      Understand why you don’t send a high percentage of your income to Africa, and you’ll understand why others will be reluctant to pay 90%.

                    • JustLikeTigerWoods

                      No, Viper. It is you who show little understanding human nature and economics. You can pretend the country is a walled garden all you like, but it isn’t. If you make it so, you’re going to face heavily prohibitive trade barriers.

                      Your currency will be worthless.

                    • JustLikeTigerWoods

                      “Hahaha well instead of wasting your time here, how about you go away and work on that one, buddy.”

                      Sadly. Geoff, you continue to evade the argument.

                      Few, if anyone, will ever pay 90%. Capital and people are mobile. Tax them too much, and you’ll get less. Invoke capital controls and protectionism and your export revenues decline.

                      You can pretend the opposite is true all you like, but it doesn’t make it so. Maintain your fantasy, if you wish. But fantasy won’t bring about the positive change you seek.

                    • Draco T Bastard

                      Good luck attracting doctors and other highly skilled immigrants, Draco. Good luck retaining those who are here now. Good luck retaining those you train and then leave once they hit your unfair tax rates.

                      I’m pretty sure we’ll retain the ones that we want to retain – the ones that want to do the job rather than the psychopaths that only do it for money.

                      Print as much as you like. The NZ currency will be near worthless.

                      Oh, look, an export boost. Not that I agree with you. Once we’ve stopped the private banks from printing money with little to no limit I’m sure that the NZ$ will actually climb in value on the world market.

                      Maintain your fantasy, if you wish. But fantasy won’t bring about the positive change you seek.

                      The fantasy is yours in your belief that the present system works.

                    • MaxFletcher

                      Of there are those that want to do the job and are not driven by money alone. But money is still an important factor many people consider and given a doctor can get a working visa pretty much anywhere then NZ would have a hard time retaining a good doctor who loves his job and can get paid much more just over the Tasman.

                    • JustLikeTigerWoods

                      “I’m pretty sure we’ll retain the ones that we want to retain – the ones that want to do the job rather than the psychopaths that only do it for money.”

                      It’s clear you don’t understand people.

                      A doctor is not a “psychopath” because she wants to be paid well. Given the choice of doing the same caring work here, or Australia, but NZ taxes at 90%, or some other disproportional high relative rate, then more highly skilled people will choose Australia over New Zealand leaving you with a critical skills shortage.

                      “The fantasy is yours in your belief that the present system works.”

                      The present system works well enough. It could be better. The type of system you appear to propose doesn’t work. People don’t want it. Since you don’t understand people and their complex motivations, you’ll remain in your room, spouting invective, convincing no-one. Meanwhile, people like me run the world and enjoy prosperity, because we understand people and take them with us.

                      You take no one with you, which is why you are where you are.

                    • blue leopard (Get Lost GCSB Bill)

                      @ JLTW

                      “A doctor is not a “psychopath” because she wants to be paid well. Given the choice of doing the same caring work here, or Australia, but NZ taxes at 90%, or some other disproportional high relative rate, then more highly skilled people will choose Australia over New Zealand leaving you with a critical skills shortage. “

                      This is a strawman argument DTB did not say that people were pschopaths because they want to be paid well. DTB didn’t actually define a psychopath, rather DTB said that psychopaths [undefined label] who are only doing their jobs for money are well gotten rid of – I agree.

                    • McFlock

                      you had a reading comprehension fail, there:

                      that only do it for money.

                      does not equal

                      wants to be paid well.

                      Seems to be a recurrent issue you have

                    • JustLikeTigerWoods

                      “This is a strawman argument DTB did not say that people were pschopaths because they want to be paid well. DTB didn’t actually define a psychopath, rather DTB said that psychopaths [undefined label] who are only doing their jobs for money are well gotten rid of – I agree.”

                      Life must be so simple.

                      Meanwhile, in the real world, disproportionately high taxation will discourage many people who are not psychopaths, but would rather get paid more than a little. It will also see capital move. It will see companies base elsewhere.

                      This is the rational reaction of most people. The type of high performing people who agree with the ideology you espouse are likely few in number.

                    • geoff

                      National’s Research Unit employee’s must be getting paid per post on The Standard

                    • McFlock

                      lol

                      quantity over quality – just like national standards.

                    • blue leopard (Get Lost GCSB Bill)

                      Yes, life is a lot simpler when you don’t have your head up your arse – you should try it sometime Tiger.

                      “…disproportionately high taxation will discourage many people who are not psychopaths, but would rather get paid more than a little. It will also see capital move. It will see companies base elsewhere.

                      This is the rational reaction of most people. The type of high performing people who agree with the ideology you espouse are likely few in number.”

                      Yes, being paid more than a little is rather an issue at present for a very large percentage of our population – it is nice to see Labour attempting to address this.

                      I do not think that the reaction you state is rational. Do such reactions analyse what type of activities of capital are present and the different effects of these different type of activities? There is a huge problem with getting capital into productive activities that actually create livelihoods for people – those with large amounts of capital are tending to put that capital into ‘lower risk’ (erhem) higher return speculation -rather than things that actually help society. Speculation is hindering the entire world. It is great to see Labour attempting to curb this trend.

                      How do you define a “high performing” person Tiger?

                      Is it people who produce important goods and services for the rest of us – who do manual labour – build, grow food? Who look after our elderly? Hospital workers? Researchers? Inventors? Car assemblers? Teachers? Road workers? Or are they simply people who have a lot of capital due to their family wealth or those that get paid highly because they work in industries where all the money is flowing currently such as the banking industry and large corporations? What is a “high performing” person?

                    • geoff

                      One mention of the NRU and he’s gone like a fart in the wind.
                      Probably just coincidence.

                    • blue leopard (Get Lost GCSB Bill)

                      …yes and I was so interested to hear what his definition of ‘high performing people’ were too….spoil sport….

          • blue leopard (Get Lost GCSB Bill) 18.1.1.2.2

            Oh? So people are going to buy houses now with their extra $60 – wow! this argument just gets more hysterical as it goes on.

            What about the Capital Gains Tax being introduced?

            And your own argument – taking off money from some – and redistributing it to others; the only people having money taken off them in this policy are the ones in the most likely financial position to conduct ‘house price rising’ activities.

            Your arguments are weak and then you decided to refer to Labour’s policies as ‘expensive churn and welfare for the rich’ …Um – make up your mind – your preceding paragraph admits that some people are having money taken off them – let me spell it out for you: they are the rich people in this country

            Additionally, referring to Labour’s policies as ‘expensive churn and welfare for the rich’ after the policy the Nats just brought out – throwing money at creating a small bunch of highly paid bureaucrats and their red tape with the notion that doing so will lift education in this country – and noting no ‘loud’ stroppy comments from you over that one – is laughable.

            • Rob 18.1.1.2.2.1

              Any funding that keeps good teachers in the classroom as teachers is money well spent. The issue we hace currently is that the system is designed to protect the lowest performing teacher. Therefore any teacher worth their salt has to look at alternative career options (such as school admin and leadership roles) to earn more. Not all good teachers make good principals, as the roles are very different. However if a good teacher can remain in teaching and be well compensated for it then this has to be good for our children.

              • geoff

                The thing about good teachers is that they don’t do it for the money. They do it because they like educating kids. If money was their main concern then they wouldn’t be doing teaching. It’s only parasitic rightwing arseholes who are obsessed with much money they can make.

                • JustLikeTigerWoods

                  I have friends – Labour voting friends – who left the teaching profession because it didn’t pay well. They would like to still be teachers, but the pay is insufficient.

                  • geoff

                    Well they’re not going to come back just on the off chance they get picked (by who?) to be super teachers earning $10-20k more.

                    Teachers get paid higher than the average wage in NZ, they are relatively well paid for NZ. Your friends left for higher paying jobs because the cost of living in NZ is so high, a consequence of 30 years of rightwing economic and social policy. Do your friends a favour and vote Labour or Greens.

                    • Rob

                      They may not come back now, but they might not have left if there were other options open to them.

                    • geoff

                      @Rob

                      Yeah good, blame their inability to afford the rise in their cost of living on not having National’s elite teacher policy. That’s some seriously warped logic mate.

                    • JustLikeTigerWoods

                      I’d take the Denmark approach. Only take the top graduates and pay them very well. Performance would be measured regularly.

                      It’s a very important job.

                    • JustLikeTigerWoods

                      “Do your friends a favour and vote Labour or Greens.”

                      Bless. Why would I vote for economic muppetry? Giving the rich $60 a week? What a silly idea.

                    • geoff

                      So who are you going to vote for Tiger? Seeing as you still seem so genuinely concerned for the less well off.

                    • “Why would I vote for economic muppetry? Giving the rich $60 a week? What a silly idea.”

                      That’s the same ‘economic puppetry’ that currently sees very wealthy people getting hundreds of dollars a week? It’s called superannuation.

                      What is wrong with the principle of universalism, apart from some minor economic argument – which is itself debatable – that the ‘transaction costs’ of cycling tax revenue back to taxpayers is inefficient?

                      Universalism is a far healthier principle to run a social security system on than ‘targeting’ on the basis of income and then calling it ‘welfare’. I don’t see this policy as ‘middle-class welfare’ I see it as an extension of social security for all (to that extent, it’s disappointing that it isn’t entirely universal). As a society I believe we should support child-rearing, especially in those early years.

                      In a civilised society the goal should be to provide a base layer of services that provides sufficient dignity – within the context of the society – for all citizens (defined broadly to include residents) to live as healthy a life and one with as many opportunities to fulfil one’s potential as that society can provide to all.

                      It would be a civilised world if nation states competed with each other on the extensiveness of that ‘base layer’ of provision. That wouldn’t, of course, stop individuals from building upon that base to the extent that they chose to do so.

                      I have no problem at all with providing all public services to all as a matter of principle. I think it is quite moral and honourable.

                • Rob

                  Geoff, after this comment, who really is in a dream world?

                  • geoff

                    So you dont think people become teachers because they like educating kids, you think they do it for the money?

                    Yeah it must be me in dreamland….

              • felix

                “Any funding that keeps good teachers in the classroom as teachers is money well spent.”

                Indeed Rob. So what do you think of National’s policy of taking the best teachers out of the classroom and making them into middle-managers instead?

                • Rob

                  Well Felix, the idea of fostering greater middle management is not the outcome they are planning, however I thought you would be a great fan of more adminstration.

                  What I like is the idea of experienced and capable teachers formally mentoring new and developing teachers, especially in the areas of maths & science, which is where we are really struggling to hold on to good teachers and produce good results.

                  Speaking to my brother who is DP at a large decile 5 secondary school in Auckland, and certainly not a fan of this Govt, he felt that this is a good initiative, obviously devil is in the detail, but it is a fresh approach to a some long standing pain points.

                  • One Anonymous Knucklehead

                    the system is designed to protect the lowest performing teacher.

                    throwing money at issues doesn’t change anything, people are starting to understand this.

                    Neither of these statements has any basis in reality.

                    Further reading for ignorant wingnuts: the “overall framework for teacher performance management”, and the article “Some Evidence About Welfare” at Polity.

                    Google is your friend.

                  • felix

                    “I thought you would be a great fan of more adminstration.”

                    That’s because you’re a lazy reader.

              • blue leopard (Get Lost GCSB Bill)

                @ Rob 3.41pm

                How is throwing money toward creating super teachers and a whole new level of ‘middle management’ going to achieve ‘keeping good teachers in the classroom’?

                – Sounds more like good teachers are going to be being told how to teach by a small group of highly paid middlemen – orconversely good teachers may end up leaving the classroom to indulge in this fantasy that a ‘super teachers bureaucracy’ is somehow going to be a fix-all to problems that have very little to do with there being a lack of middlemen.

            • JustLikeTigerWoods 18.1.1.2.2.2

              No, their spending power increases. So what do they spend it on? The middle class tend to spend it on the mortgage. To spell that out for you, it means they can afford a bigger one.

              The proposed capital gains tax doesn’t apply to the family home.

              Taking money off “the rich” and then giving it back to them, after churn, as a baby bonus, is stupid.

              • blue leopard (Get Lost GCSB Bill)

                @ Just Like Tiger Woods,

                Someone ‘upgrading’ their family home is not what is causing house price rises – speculating on houses is. Capital gains tax is an attempt to discourage people from speculating on houses – not upgrading their accommodation.

                “Taking money off “the rich” and then giving it back to them, after churn, as a baby bonus, is stupid.

                This all depends on what your definition of rich is. It is not the people on household incomes of $150 000 a year who are creating the problems as outlined by movements such as Occupy Wall street – perhaps this is what you most dislike about this idea; that this policy lumps a lot of people ‘in the same basket’ – which is a pretty dodgy thing for those of you who want to keep dividing good New Zealanders against themselves in order to make way for the interests that solely benefit those holding mass wealth.

                No more ‘we are all in it together’ for the type of ideology you are arguing for, is there?

  19. Skinny 19

    This policy package is smart by Labour in my opinion, it certainly will maintain & increase the female vote. They trumped National on paid parental leave by increasing the number of weeks in the process. The call to implement by July 1 takes ownership of the increase, and has stopped National from taking the credit.

     I was pleasantly surprised that the meeting yesterday was short and sharp and we didn’t have to sit around half the day listening and then trying to digest too much information. 

    The more that National howl the better, 
    Kiwi’s don’t like sore losers and that is what it looks like. The message from this policy release was one of being ‘fair’ to all, 150k maybe a high threshold, however once labour release their amended tax policy you can expect those above a reasonably high income to be paying more taxes. Fair is the key word something that is foreign to Nact.  

  20. blue leopard (Get Lost GCSB Bill) 20

    This ‘Taxpayers Union’ Jordan William’s thing needs to be addressed – it seems to be a deception – Williams was highly active in the media opposing MMP when the MMP referendum was conducted at the last General election- [yet framed it that he “may” support another version of MMP style voting].

    People out there in the real world just get to hear that ‘The Taxpayers Union’ are condemning a Labour policy and that could well hold some sway in their minds – to me this is out-and-out deception – propaganda -and the whole point of this group.

    A highly related approach is that of introducing Prebble as an ‘ex-Labour MP’ – this is deceptive if his ‘ex-Act’ status wasn’t mentioned. Same goes for Hooton as a ‘political commentator’ – this is deceptively neutral with his credentials as an active spin doctor for National

    And ‘The NZ Institute’ – the old business round table??

    This is bullshit and how people get swayed into believing the nonsense they spout – not everyone is told what these people and groups agenda is likely to be – and therefore are more likely to absorb their misinformation more uncritically – I am really very concerned about this – its a shocker – out-and-out deception and needs to be addressed.

    I’m thinking some type of formal complaint – any suggestions [and information on that ‘Taxpayers Union’ would be most welcome

    • geoff 20.1

      “the tax payers union” sounds like astroturfing rightwing populism paid for no doubt through the National party network of wealthy donors.

      It’s going to be a cut-throat battle this year.

    • North 20.2

      “Puppy” Jordan Williams was just a little stooge for mad old Shirtcliffe in the anti-MMP campaign days. Now a stooge for the not so old but very mad Stephen Franks. He of lift in Moscow fame. Wee Jordan’s got nothing going for him except of course a seat in parliament at some point and the promise of a lifetime of trough guzzling. He and his like are the scum of the earth in the real picture.

  21. Tracey 21

    I love how all the “throwing money at poverty wont relieve poverty” brigade dont say what will.

    • Rob 21.1

      Well often throwing money at issues doesn’t change anything, people are starting to understand this.
      Here are some examples of when it doesnt work.

      Lotto winners often end up with very little.
      Expensive private school education does not gaurantee great results.
      large companies spending huge budgets on innovation often miss key trends , ie Kodak invented the digital camera, but could not deal with it in a value adding programme.
      Big shopping budgets can be spent on healthy meals or wasted on repetitive fast food meals.

      The list goes on and on. Just throwing money at it is often wasteful and lazy but gives people a sense that at least they have tried something , which is what is going on with this plan, isnt it.

      • JustLikeTigerWoods 21.1.1

        Yep

        The problem is some kids are going hungry sometimes because their parents are incapable of budgeting correctly. Those kids should be identified, and intervention should be direct.

        The answer is not to give some rich person $60 of their own money via government churn.

        • McFlock 21.1.1.1

          Actually, it’s probably just cheaper to give $3k over the course of a year to almost everyone. Takes the edge of the extreme poverty, makes life easier for those who are struggling, and you don’t need to pay huge amounts for assessors to go round to every household (half of whom might not need it).

        • geoff 21.1.1.2

          Nah the problem has always been ignorant right wing arseholes like yourself

          • JustLikeTigerWoods 21.1.1.2.1

            That’s nice.

            When you grow up, you may come to realise that most people want pretty much the same thing, but have slightly different views on how to get there.

            We’re much closer than we are apart.

      • McFlock 21.1.2

        But we’re talking about poverty – which, as a shortage of money, is indeed solved by the regular disbursal of even modest amounts of money. By definition.

        • JustLikeTigerWoods 21.1.2.1

          What happened to no tax on the first x dollars? That was actually a good, workable idea.

          • McFlock 21.1.2.1.1

            I agree with you on that one. but it only helps people who get x dollars in the first place.
            we’re talking about “alleviating poverty”, not simply “not kicking the poor”. Givning them “x plus tax difference” ensures everyone has at least x dollars.

        • JustLikeTigerWoods 21.1.2.2

          Yes, but that doesn’t explain why he wants to give rich parents $60 p/w? Wasn’t he able to do this policy because he scrapped the no tax on the first x policy?

          Why would he replace a good policy idea with a stupid one?

          • McFlock 21.1.2.2.1

            He wants to give the poor parents the $60. Maybe he’s just erring on the side of caution – unlike tories, who prefer many people suffer rather than one person live comfortably on the dole

            • JustLikeTigerWoods 21.1.2.2.1.1

              I don’t know who “Tories” in NZ are, but I don’t want many people to suffer. I certainly don’t want rich people being given $60 to keep their baby in designer nappies.

              I’m surprised anyone does.

              If Key had come up with this clanger, posters on here would surely be screaming blue murder. Is it some rule that if the Labour leader hands money to rich people by proposing some daft scheme, then you don’t get full socialist points unless you slavishly keep your tounge up a place even the Mayor of Auckland fears to go?

              • McFlock

                Hmmm.
                maybe you should look it up.

                Basically, your idea of a “clanger” of a policy is that some people at one end of the scale might not need the modest amount of money they will be given. A tory clanger is when people at the other end of the scale are refused assistance that they desperately need – that’s why commenters here “scream blue murder”.

      • KJT 21.1.3

        “Having more money doesn’t stop people from being poor”.

        Really?

        It worked for me…………..

  22. Penny Bright 22

    NZ Initiative (not NZ Institute) is what the NZ Business Roundtable has morphed into …..

    http://www.nbr.co.nz/article/roundtable-and-nz-institute-morph-nz-initiative-ck-115751

    Penny Bright

  23. Enough is Enough 23

    Although laudible, my issue is this is policy is a wee bit intellectually bankrupt and creates resentment rather than reconcilliation in this class war being raged by the right.

    It is a blunt tool to provide financial support to any member of society. The real issue in relation to the inequitable distibution of resources in our society is not dealt with under this policy.

    In a fair and just society there would be no need for this policy because every worker would receive fair pay for a fair day’s work.

    The key is how do we get to that position.

  24. tricledrown 24

    Knowledge is power these high finance weasels have to be kept an eye on.
    Their propaganda machine will working overtime this year.
    The new spokesman for nz initiative advocates for the porn industry because of inovation such as 3D.
    Wow what a nutjob they have to import this tosser via germany, UK right wing think tanks,Australian Rightwing think tank propaganda machine.Now he has been demoted to NZ.

  25. Steve James 25

    I am ok with this policy and would in fact make the payments more based on the amount of PAYE the parents have paid over say the previous two years, with a ceiling of course.

    What I will not be voting for is further payments that may encourage voluntary beneficiaries. Benefits should be short term help encouraging recipients back into paid employment, with or without children.

    Rob, I hope you read this, you make a lot of sense but I suspect one or two on this site are not understanding your meaning or are too set in their ways to accept reason.
    Keep it up.

    • blue leopard (Get Lost GCSB Bill) 25.1

      @ Steve James

      Do you have any concern over ‘involuntary beneficiaries’?

      I hope so – because then you will vote for a party that intends to create an high-value economy that is focussed on job creation and is aiming at removing the incentives to use capital in ways that destroy jobs and rise prices unreasonably and adding policies that makes the jobs that do still exist no longer require welfare supplements to cover living costs.

      And that party is not National.

      • Steve James 25.1.1

        blue leopard

        I have been a beneficiary; not voluntary, my wife died. I am eternally grateful to those who did the work and helped my young family out during a difficult time. Within a year I got organised and back to work. My remaining children will all graduate tertiary education paid for by them and me.

        The people who use the benefit system ‘voluntarily’ I have zero tolerance for. Those who genuinely need it; well I am happy to help for say up to five years, plenty of time to sort yourself out. I also believe benefits are somewhat low by todays standards.

        Bye the way, my daughter and friend were targeted by a paedophile couple on line; much publicised almost three years ago. It was with the help of the GCSB that these animals along with their overseas associates were caught. So when you go on about so called government spying remember my little girl and her friend could have had their lives ruined if not for the police and GCSB.

        • blue leopard (Get Lost GCSB Bill) 25.1.1.1

          I am sad for you that your wife died and happy for you that you and your children got through it and sound like are in good circumstances financially and otherwise now.

          Your comment does not, however, prove that people in different circumstances from your own, yet find themselves on an unemployment benefit, might struggle more than you did to find a way out of those circumstances.

          You supplied no information on your background, to your level of education or type of work you do – I consider these strong factors in how easily a person can lift themselves out of poor circumstances – it is clear that jobs are thin on the ground at present, it is clear that wages for some are extremely poor and according to Bill English 43% of the poorest households receive some form of income supplement [i.e. this includes people who are working as well as those without jobs and is a HUGE amount of households requiring assistance], it is clear that the level of debt that one has to agree to for education would deter those who haven’t earned a lot or come from poor backgrounds. It is also clear that opportunities for those in poor circumstances to lift themselves out of such are being taken away by people who don’t appear to realise that not everyone is as fortunate as themselves. This attitude serves noone apart from those who are extremely wealthy already [and I feel sure that neither you nor myself are in that category] and I really do not like the way that New Zealand is moving in this regard.

          I believe the type of policies that Mr Cunliffe indicated in his State of the Nation speech will provide far more likelihood that those in difficult circumstances will get out of those circumstances easier than anything that National have done in the last 6 years or have indicated that they intend to do if they get voted in again. These [Labour] policies include that of developing a ‘high value economy’: encouraging research and development and manufacturing here in this country – I.e. JOBS – instead of sending such off wholesale to other countries – along with the profits.

          As for the GCSB, it is great that they helped you and your family! – I feel confident that the reversal of anything I object to with regard to the GCSB bill would not hinder families such as your own from being helped in similar ways in the future.

          • Steve James 25.1.1.1.1

            Hey blue leopard

            Thank you for your kind thoughts, much appreciated.

            I will certainly take your comments on board as you rightfully pointed out my education did help when looking for work; having said that I work in an unrelated field. I understand it would be more difficult for the under educated; perhaps some form of teaching basic family planning might help them move up in the world. No easy answer I am sure.

            I get little time to visit The Standard but will check your posts when I can. As for some of the haters on this and other sites, I don’t know why they bother they are contributing nothing.

            Enjoy your weekend

            • blue leopard (Get Lost GCSB Bill) 25.1.1.1.1.1

              Cheers Steve James – Hope you have a good weekend too

        • Anne 25.1.1.2

          You’re a first class idiot Steve James.

          There’s one hell of a difference between the GCSB helping the police (not you) to solve a potential crime scene with an off-shore content… and government electronic spying on ordinary defenceless citizens.

          Glad you had a good experience with the police because I didn’t. Yes, I was targeted on and off for years by a group of people with off-shore ‘associations’ – albeit for different reasons and in a different way to your daughter – and the police never lifted a finger to catch the culprits. That was because there was a political element to the case so they swept it under the carpet and ran for cover. I have a word for a large section of the police force and it begins with w……s. I also have a policy: if the police ever required my assistance for some reason that I would not bother to give it to them.

          • Steve James 25.1.1.2.1

            Anne – Ignoring that first class idiot comment I have an acquaintance at Advanced Investigations (www.advancedinvestigations.co.nz) who may be able to assist you if that problem hasn’t gone away. Give them a call, they wont charge you for your first meeting. Even if they cannot proceed with your case their advice is priceless. Good luck

            • Anne 25.1.1.2.1.1

              @ Steve James

              My comment was a reference to the link you tried to make between the investigation into paedophile activity conducted by the police with the assistance of the GCSB – a legitimate and desirable combination in the battle against certain national and international crimes – and the wholesale spying on ordinary citizens for highly spurious purposes. I was not inferring you are a first class idiot in general terms.

              Thanks for the offer of assistance but the ‘problem’ was historical – 20 or so years ago. In the end I solved the mystery without the help of the police. It took several years and involved a great deal of ‘raking over old coals’ in my mind… a few valuable contacts… and some hitherto unknown historical revelations supplied by an unwitting news media – mainly the NZ Herald. The pieces of the jigsaw slowly came together and started to make sense. I never returned to the police with my discoveries despite the fact it unlocked, at least in part, a few well known historical and politically motivated mysteries (probably including the Colin Moyle saga of the mid to late 1970s) because of their earlier attitude towards me. A bit sad really but there you go…

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Seven reasons to be wary of waste-to-energy proposals
    Climate Explained is a collaboration between The Conversation, Stuff and the New Zealand Science Media Centre to answer your questions about climate change. If you have a question you’d like an expert to answer, please send it to climate.change@stuff.co.nz I was in Switzerland recently and discovered that they haven’t ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    42 mins ago
  • Reviewing the whitewash
    Back in 2015, then Ombudsman Beverley Wakem conducted a review of the OIA, Not a game of hide and seek. The "review" was a whitewash, which found no need for legislative change, and instead criticised the media and requesters - which destroyed Wakem's reputation, and undermined that of the Office ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    4 hours ago
  • You Gov MRP Poll Out
    So, You Gov's MRP poll - the weird one that tries to reflect what will happen at a constituency level and which pretty much nailed the hung parliament in 2017 - is not looking too good for Labour:
    UK #GE2019 MRP seat projection:CON: 339 (-20)LAB: 231 (+20)SNP: 41 (-2)LDEM: 15 ...
    4 hours ago
  • Climate Change: Accountability?
    We've known about climate change for over forty years now,and it has been a major political issue for twenty. And yet fossil fuel companies have kept polluting with impunity, while government have looked the other way and twiddled their thumbs and refused to do anything because "the economy", or just ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    4 hours ago
  • Delusional And Irrational: The Rise Of Paranoid Politics In New Zealand.
    Sheer Loopiness: Many of those expressing bemusement at the antics of these #turnardern effacers, were convinced that they were yet another expression of the National Party’s increasingly spiteful anti-government propaganda campaign. They marvelled at the oddness of the perpetrators’ mindset and questioned the common-sense of allowing the rest of New Zealand ...
    6 hours ago
  • Things to know about Whakaari/White Island
    Brad Scott, GNS Science VolcanologistThis post was originally published by GeoNet. Following the 9 December devastating eruption at Whakaari/White Island we have put together some information about the island. New Zealand’s most active volcano Whakaari/White Island is currently New Zealand’s most active volcano, it has been since an eruptive episode ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    24 hours ago
  • Status quo supports status quo
    The Justice Committee has reported back on its Inquiry into the 2017 General Election and 2016 Local Elections, with a host of recommendations about how to improve our electoral systems. Some of their recommendations are already incorporate din the Electoral Amendment Bill currently before Parliament, but there's also a recommendation ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 day ago
  • The Greens abandon NeoLiberalism
    Back in 2017, in order to make themselves "electable" in the eyes of rich people who oppose everything they stand for, the Greens signed up for NeoLiberalism, adopting a restrictive set of "Budget Responsibility Rules" which basicly prevented them from using government to make things better. Now, they're finally abandoning ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 day ago
  • Lying about a failed war
    Since invading in 2001, the US has consistently claimed that their war in Afghanistan has been going well, even when it continued year after year after year. Of course, they were lying, and thanks to the Washington Post and the US Freedom of Information Act, we get to see just ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 day ago
  • Artificial Intelligence and You
    How should we think about artificial intelligence and the implications that it has for our work and leisure? There are many articles on artificial intelligence and its potential impacts on jobs, and the ethics of applications. These are important topics, but I want to focus on some less discussed aspects, ...
    SciBlogsBy Robert Hickson
    1 day ago
  • Statistical manipulation to get publishable results
    I love data. It’s amazing the sort of “discoveries” I can make given a data set and computer statistical package. It’s just so easy to search for relationships and test their statistical significance. Maybe relationships which ...
    1 day ago
  • More lies on the Twitter (Dan Hodges edition)
    The other big story concerning Leeds Hospital is Boris Johnson's bizzare behaviour at Leeds Hospital, where he was confronted by a journalist and challenged about a four year old boy with suspected pneumonia who was left sleeping on the floor, rather than getting  abed like a sick kid would in ...
    1 day ago
  • LabourActivistPunchedMattHancock’sSPADGate
    So, for a brief period of history, it was alleged that a protester had punched Matt Hancock's SPAD (not a euphemism; special adviser) when Hancock visited Leeds Hospital.This was reported by the likes of Robert Peston and Laura Keunssberg, as well as the less credible Guido Fawkes.  It also quickly ...
    1 day ago
  • France’s anti-Zionism is anti-liberté
    by Daphna Whitmore Last week France passed a law that equates anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism. It is based on a definition of anti-Semitism that includes criticism of Israel such as: “Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    2 days ago
  • Another bus lockout
    Over the past year we've seen major bus problems in Hamilton and Wellington, as drivers have sought better wages and an end to the bullshit of split shifts, which basicly see them "married to the job". And now its Auckland's turn. When NZBus's drivers planned low-level strike action of not ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 days ago
  • Climate Change: Showing us how its done
    The government has been congratulating itself over the passage of the Zero Carbon Act, which sets out long-term emissions targets. But those targets are insufficient. Meanwhile, Denmark is showing us how its done:Denmark’s parliament adopted a new climate law on Friday, committing to reach 70% below its 1990 emissions in ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 days ago
  • Public sector dysfunction should not be allowed to undermine freedom of information
    Another day, another piece of legislation with a secrecy clause. This time its the innocuous-seeming Mental Health and Wellbeing Commission Bill, which (after establishing a new body and making it subject to the OIA in three different ways) includes the rapidly-becoming-standard clauses enabling it to request information from other public ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 days ago
  • “This is England, this knife of Sheffield steel…”
    The state of the United Kingdom is fractured, torn up, shredded. The Empire is gone, it died a long time ago. And yet, the country is still tracking with a lead in favour of the ones who play to the ingrained, class-bound division for political gain. It is a disgrace ...
    exhALANtBy exhalantblog
    4 days ago
  • CORSIA, coming soon to an airport near you
    On 27 September, Greta Thunberg addressed a crowd of 500,000 at the School Strike for Climate in Montreal, saying: “You are a nation that is allegedly a climate leader. And Sweden is also a nation that is allegedly a climate leader. And in both cases, it means absolutely nothing. Because ...
    SciBlogsBy Robert McLachlan
    4 days ago
  • Cloaking hate speech and fake news in the right to free expression.
    It should be obvious by now but let’s be clear: The same folk who regularly traffic in disinformation, misinformation and “fake news” are also those who most strongly claim that their freedom of expression rights are being violated when moves are made to curb hate speech (as opposed to protected ...
    KiwipoliticoBy Pablo
    4 days ago
  • The Physics (and Economics, and Politics) of Wheelchairs on Planes
    Michael Schulson When Shane Burcaw flies on an airplane, he brings along a customized gel cushion, a car seat, and about 10 pieces of memory foam. The whole arsenal costs around $1,000, but for Burcaw it’s a necessity. The 27-year-old author and speaker — who, alongside his fiancée, Hannah ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    4 days ago
  • To Advance Civil Rights, Oppose Transgender Extremism
    We are very pleased to publish this submission is from Lucinda Stoan. She is a social justice activist, mother, and educator, based in Washington State in the  US.   This detailed and comprehensive source-linked overview of trans issues and what is at stake will be useful for many people, especially in ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    5 days ago
  • Faafoi should be fired
    Newshub last night reported that Broadcasting Minister Kris Faafoi had apparently promised to help out a mate with an immigration issue. While its normal for people to approach MPs for assistance in this area, when you're a Minister, the rules are different: as the Cabinet Manual says, Ministers must "at ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • Adrian Orr – The Reserve Bank’s Revolutionary Governor?
    New Zealand's Underarm Banker: It bears recalling that the “independence” of the Reserve Bank Governor was for decades held up by neoliberal capitalists as the most compelling justification for passing the Reserve Bank Act. Interesting, is it not, how the ruling class’s support for the Bank’s independence lasted no longer than ...
    5 days ago
  • Driving Us Up The Poll.
    Rubbish In, Rubbish Out: Put all this together, and it’s difficult to avoid the conclusion that anyone who responds positively to a pollster’s request to “answer a few questions” is just ever-so-slightly weird. Desperately lonely? Some sort of psephological train-spotter? Political party member primed to skew the poll for or against ...
    5 days ago
  • Jordan Williams, Colin Craig podcast series announced
    “Free at last, Free at last, Thank God almighty we are free at last.” ― Martin Luther King Jr. A long and bitter court feud between former Conservative Party leader Colin Craig and Jordan Williams has been settled, with an apology and compensation from Williams. On Tuesday, Craig sent out ...
    The PaepaeBy Peter Aranyi
    6 days ago
  • Scientific integrity requires critical investigation – not blind acceptance
    Some people seem to want to close down any critical discussion of the current research into the relationship between water fluoride and child IQ. They appear to argue that claims made by researchers should not be open to critical review and that the claims be accepted without proper consideration ...
    6 days ago
  • Climate Change: The shameful reality
    The government has been congratulating itself over the passage of the Zero Carbon Act, which sets out long-term emissions targets. Meanwhile, Climate Action Tracker has the shameful reality: those targets are insufficient:While New Zealand is showing leadership by having passed the world’s second-ever Zero Carbon Act in November 2019, under ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • More secrecy
    The government introduced a Racing Industry Bill today. As an urban who horse racing as pointless-to-cruel, and gambling as a tax on stupidity and/or hope, this isn't normally a bill which would interest me in the slightest, beyond grumpiness at more government money for a dying industry. But there is ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • Unlikely online bully, Liam Hehir
    Check. Check. One, two, three, four. Is this thing ON? Hello readers, I logged in last night (yeah, it’s been a while) to mark THE END of the landmark legal case, Jordan Williams v Colin Craig, which (gulp) reached The Supreme Court, in which New Zealand’s most-defamed man was suing the politician he ...
    The PaepaeBy Peter Aranyi
    6 days ago
  • The Birth Of Israel: Wrong At The Right Time.
    Before The Birth: Israel’s most fervent supporters set their clocks ticking in Biblical times. They cite the kingdoms of David and Solomon as proof that, in the words of the Exodus movie’s theme-song: “This land is mine.” The majority of Israel’s backers, however, start their clocks in 1933 – the year Adolf ...
    6 days ago
  • Hard News: Public Address Word of the Year 2019: Korero phase
    In an unreliable, strange and confusing world, Public Address is proud to present a measure of comfort and stability by annually asking everyone what words or phrases sum up the year that's been – and then giving some of them consumer goods as prizes for being clever or simply lucky.Well, ...
    6 days ago
  • Generalist to specialist
    Both my parents are pretty handy – and they seem to have the right tools for most jobs in the garage and they know how to fix practically anything. A similar story could be told about their generation’s experience in the workforce – being a generalist was not unusual and ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    6 days ago
  • A “coincidence”
    When it was revealed that NZ First had tried to enrich itself from public office via the Provoncial Growth Fund, the Prime Minister assured us that everything was OK as Shane Jones, the Minister responsible for the fund, had recused himself. Except it seems that that recusal came very late ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    7 days ago
  • Member’s Day
    Today is a Member's Day, and probably the last one of the year. After the marathon of the End of Life Choice Act, most of the bills up for debate today are uncontentious. First up is the second reading of Chlöe Swarbrick's Election Access Fund Bill. This will be followed ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Worse than I thought
    The Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee has reported back on the government's odious and tyrannical control orders bill. As expected, the fraudulent select committee process has made no significant changes (partly because they couldn't agree, but mostly because it was a stitch-up from the start, with no intention of ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • The cannabis bill and the referendum
    Yesterday, the government released its draft Cannabis Legalisation and Control Bill, which will be put to a non-binding referendum at the next election. I'm not a drug policy expert, but Russell Brown is, and he thinks its pretty good. And pretty obviously, it will be a massive improvement on the ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Hard News: The Cannabis Legalisation and Control Bill: pretty good so far
    As you're probably aware, the draft bill outlining the proposed legal cannabis regime to be put to a referendum late next year was published yesterday, and has already attracted a flurry of comment. It's notable that a good deal of the comment is about proposals that aren't actually new.A minimum ...
    1 week ago
  • Climate Change: Alignment
    One of the big problems in New Zealand climate change policy is the government working at cross-purposes with itself. It wants to reduce fossil fuel use, but encourages oil and gas exploration. It wants to reduce transport emissions, but then builds enormous new roads. The problem could be avoided if ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • How climate change will affect food production and security
    Climate Explained is a collaboration between The Conversation, Stuff and the New Zealand Science Media Centre to answer your questions about climate change. If you have a question you’d like an expert to answer, please send it to climate.change@stuff.co.nz According to the United Nations, food shortages are a threat ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    1 week ago
  • More bad faith
    Last year, the government announced it was ending offshore oil exploration by no longer issuing new permits. The idea was that the industry would then die off as permits expired. Except almost immediately the government revealed its bad faith, by saying they would extend permits and alter conditions to keep ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Banning foreign money from our elections
    The government has said it will ban foreign donations to political parties and candidates, and will be introducing legislation to be passed under all-stages urgency this afternoon. While I agree with the goal, I don't see a particular case for urgency, unless the government is concerned about a flood of ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Reforming the Education Acts
    The government introduced the Education and Training Bill to Parliament yesterday. Its a massive bill, which replaces both existing Education Acts, as well as various other bits of legislation (including some which are still proceeding through the House). I'll leave the serious analysis to teachers and people who actually know ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Bite-sized learning
    Amelia SharmanThere’s no one-size-fits-all when it comes to micro-credentials, those bits of bite-sized learning that can help workers stay on top of technological change.  What’s a micro-credential? While definitions vary, micro-credentials can be understood as short courses that allow people to learn new skills or have an existing competency recognised. ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    1 week ago
  • “Not The Labour Party We Once Knew.”
    All Smiles Now: Claire Szabo is taking up her presidential role after serving as the CEO of Habitat For Humanity. Which is absolutely perfect! After KiwiBuild was so comprehensively mismanaged by Phil Twyford, the party has not only elected a new president from a thoroughly respectable not-for-profit, but one who ...
    1 week ago
  • Marxist versus liberal methodology on transgender ideology/identity politics
    While much of the NZ left has transitioned to postmodern and identity politics in relation to transgender ideology, there are some very good articles about that deploy Marxist methodology in relation to this subject.  The one below is from the British marxist group Counterfire and appeared on their site here ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    1 week ago
  • Book review: The Farm by Joanne Ramos
    by Daphna Whitmore At Golden Oaks, a luxurious country retreat in the Hudson Valley, pregnant women have the best care money can buy. From the organic food, personalised exercise programmes, private yoga instruction and daily massages Golden Oaks looks like a country lodge for the upper class. Set some time ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    1 week ago
  • Loosening the purse strings
    When Labour was running for election in 2017, it felt it needed to demonstrate "fiscal responsibility" and signed itself up to masochistic "budget responsibility rules". It was a fool's errand: the sorts of voters who demand fiscal responsibility are also the sorts of voters who believe that labour can never ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Climate Change: How to get there
    Writing in Stuff, Joel MacManus looks at what we need to do to meet the Zero Carbon Act's targets. The core of it:1. Convert 85 per cent of vehicles on the road to electric. 2. Eliminate fossil fuels from all industrial heating up to 300 degrees Celsius. 3. Double our ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • anti-vaxxers in a measles epidemic: so many ways to be untruthful
    “Anti-vaxers are a pro-death movement,” those comments from Dr Helen Petousis-Harris speaking about six more Measles related deaths in Samoa over the past twenty-four hours. “Anti-vaxers are a pro-death movement,” those comments from Dr Helen Petousis-Harris speaking about six more Measles related deaths in Samoa ...
    SciBlogsBy Alison Campbell
    1 week ago
  • Is Youth Vaping a Problem in New Zealand?
    Professors Janet Hoek and Richard Edwards, Emeritus Professor Phil Gendall, Jude Ball, Dr Judith McCool, Anaru Waa, Dr Becky Freeman Recent media reports have presented conflicting evidence on youth vaping in NZ. While some NZ school principals report concerns about increasing vaping on school grounds and confiscating vapes, ASH Year ...
    SciBlogsBy Public Health Expert
    1 week ago
  • In pursuit of “Freedom and Democracy”: Forever Wars in “America’s backyard”.
    “America the Beautiful!”, staunch defender of democracy, freedom and… a whole lot of despotic tyrants that play nice with what is called “the Washington Consensus.” America is indeed capable of immense good, but like any Nation, and most assuredly any aspirant to the mantle of Empire, great, immense evil. All ...
    exhALANtBy exhalantblog
    1 week ago
  • November ’19 – NZ blogs sitemeter ranking
    Image credit: The beginner’s guide to blogging I notice a few regulars no longer allow public access to the site counters. This may happen accidentally when the blog format is altered. If your blog is ...
    1 week ago
  • Whodunnit? Finding the mystery 1080 testing lab
    1080 is used to control pests in NZ. Its use is contested by a noisy few. A new report claims high levels of 1080 in rats washed up on a beach. Flora and Fauna of Aotearoa (F&F) won’t name the laboratory that did their testing. It has sparked a hunt ...
    SciBlogsBy Grant Jacobs
    1 week ago
  • Authoritarian Friends, Democratic Enemies.
    What Kind Of Empire? The thing for Kiwis to decide is what kind of empire they want to belong to. The kind that, while offering its own citizens democratic rights, demands absolute obedience from its “friends”? Or, the kind that, while authoritarian at home, takes a relaxed attitude to the ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Boris Johnson Goes Down
    It hasn't been a good week for the Conservatives, pollwise.  All major recent polls are showing their lead shrinking.Comparing each pollster's current (between 29/11 and 22/11) and previous most recent poll.Com Res - Conservative lead down 3 points.You Gov - Conservative lead down 1 point.Kantar - Conservative lead down 4 ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Interesting
    Within quick succession, Countdown maths wizard and twitterer Rachel Riley, alleged comedian David Baddiel and prominent lawyer Andrew Julius have all expressed very similar opinions / ideas:
    These #3billboards are going round London today, organised by ex-Labour people, horrified by what their party has become. Their principles haven’t changed, they’re ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Damn the Polls
    So, there have been a bunch of bad polls out for Labour, and even the Leftie's friend, Survation, have recently given the Conservatives a rip-snorting 11% lead.  You Gov's much vaunted MRP poll - which pretty much nailed the result in 2015 - is currently predicting a comfortable majority for ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Climate Change: Europe declares an emergency
    The European Parliament has voted overwhelmingly to declare a climate emergency:The European parliament has declared a global “climate and environmental emergency” as it urged all EU countries to commit to net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. The vote came as scientists warned that the world may have already crossed ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • A Bi-Partisan Commitment To X-ing “P”.
    Pure Fear: Worse than Heroin, this drug’s addictive power was terrifying. People under its influence didn’t drift off to Elysium. Nor did it persuade inadequate individuals that they could conquer the world. No, this drug – pure crystal methamphetamine, “P” for short – unlocked the gates of Hell itself. It ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Advice about measles: when ignorance is definitely not a virtue
    As the rate of measles infection, and of deaths, continues to climb in Samoa, antivaccination activists infectious disease proponents seem intent on doubling down on their claims about vaccination. (Check pretty much any news-media FB post about measles & you’ll see exactly what I mean.) Unfortunately, some of them have ...
    SciBlogsBy Alison Campbell
    2 weeks ago
  • Samoa’s devastating measles epidemic – why and how bad?
    Samoa are experiencing a devastating measles epidemic. It is possible that 2-3% of the population will ultimately be infected by the time it is over. Hopefully the mass immunisation campaign currently under way can mitigate some of this, for many it is too late. The first question many people ask ...
    SciBlogsBy Helen Petousis Harris
    2 weeks ago
  • “It’s basic rights we are defending”: the Meghan Murphy interview
    Meghan Murphy is a Canadian writer and journalist She runs the Feminist Current website which she founded in 2012.  She was a keynote speaker for the Feminism2020 conference in Wellington this month. When Massey University cancelled the original venue booking Feminism2020 was hosted in Parliament by MP David Seymour. Meghan ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    2 weeks ago
  • A week of protests in Colombia
    Text and photos by Gearóid Ó Loingsigh Colombia has lived through one week of protests against the economic measures taken by president Duque. What looked like a protest that would fizzle out after its first day on November 21st is still going strong. Part of the reason for the continuance ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    2 weeks ago
  • Anti-neutrinos–When you are your own opposite
    Around a million billion pass through you each second, almost all originating from our sun, but few of them are likely to interact with you enroute. I was reading in a physics magazine earlier in the week about the nature of neutrinos. These are extremely numerous elementary particles, but only ...
    SciBlogsBy Marcus Wilson
    2 weeks ago
  • Exoplanets, life, and the danger of a single study
    By Pallab Ghosh There’s value in covering new research advances, even when the underlying science is unsettled. But there are also risks. The recent announcement that scientists discovered water on the planet K2-18b, 110 light years away, prompted a media swoon. News stories, including a piece written by me, billed ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    2 weeks ago
  • The Intersex Continuum
    I wrote this review a couple of years ago when I was still in the process of getting my head around the politics of transgenderism, and specifically the claim that intersex conditions lend support to the notion that sex is ‘socially constructed’. Since writing this review I have come across ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    2 weeks ago
  • Leaving us with the bill
    Two weeks ago, Malaysian-owned oil company Tamarind declared it was insolvent and went into administration after a failed offshore drilling campaign. Tamarind apparently specialises in buying oil fields at the end of their life and trying to squeeze out the last few drops of pollution. But part of their scam ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • How much does flying contribute to climate change?
    Climate Explained is a collaboration between The Conversation, Stuff and the New Zealand Science Media Centre to answer your questions about climate change. If you have a question you’d like an expert to answer, please send it to climate.change@stuff.co.nz How much does our use of air travel contribute to the ...
    SciBlogsBy Shaun Hendy
    2 weeks ago
  • Climate Change: The task before us
    Two weeks ago, the Zero Carbon Act became law. Right this moment, the Climate Change Commisison will be working on its initial budgets for 2022-25 and 2026-2030, and the UN has just given them a very clear steer:Countries must make an unprecedented effort to cut their levels of greenhouse gases ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Among my favourite asteroids: (2309) Mr. Spock
    Minor planet/asteroid (2309) Mr. Spock is named not for the character in Star Trek, but for a cat that was itself imperturbable, logical, intelligent and had pointed ears In a preceding blog post I introduced one of my favourite asteroids, (2472) Bradman, and also mentioned (6581) Sobers amongst a few ...
    SciBlogsBy Duncan Steel
    2 weeks ago
  • Measles deaths and antivax misinformation
    Today the death toll from measles in Samoa rose to 32. All but four of the dead were less than 5 years old. Absolutely terrible, heartbreaking, news. That statistic alone should be enough to give the lie to the common claim by antivaccination activists plague enthusiasts that “measles is a ...
    SciBlogsBy Alison Campbell
    2 weeks ago
  • Colombia: the state murder of Dilan Cruz
    by Gearóid Ó Loingsigh It is late here in Bogotá, almost 11.30pm on Monday the 25th of November as I write this. The day began full of hope with yet more massive marches throughout the country, a mix of the International Day of Non-Violence Against Women and the National Strike. ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    2 weeks ago
  • Anti-fluoride propagandists appear not to read the articles they promote
    Anti-fluoride activists are rubbing their hands in glee over what they claim is “yet another study” showing fluoride harms the brains of children. But their promotion relies on IQ relationships which the paper’s authors acknowledge disappearing when outliers or other factors are considered. And they completely ignore other relationships ...
    2 weeks ago
  • The rise and collapse of classical political economy
    The feature below is the conclusion of A History of Economic Thought, whose author was a leading Marxist economist in Russia in the early 20th century, Isaac Ilyich Rubin.  The book arose from a course he ran at Moscow University following the Russian Revolution.  First published in Russian in 1929, ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    2 weeks ago

  • New Zealand’s National Statement to COP25
    E ngā mana, e ngā reo, e ngā iwi, e ngā rau rangatira mā. Tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou katoa. Señora Presidenta, Excellencies, Delegates. International action A common thread that runs through the Paris Agreement is the commitment we have made to each other to do what we can to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 hour ago
  • Strong economy, careful spending gives $12bn of surpluses
    The Government is forecast to run $12 billion worth of surpluses across the four years to 2023/24 as the economy continues to grow. The surpluses will help fund day-to-day capital requirements each year. These include fixing leaky hospitals, building new classrooms to cover population growth and take pressure off class ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 hours ago
  • Priorities for 2020 Wellbeing Budget outlined
    Budget 2020 will continue the Coalition Government’s focus on tackling the long-term challenges facing New Zealand while also investing to future-proof the economy. When the Government took office in 2017 it was left with crumbling infrastructure, severe underinvestment in public services, degraded rivers and lakes, a housing crisis and rising ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 hours ago
  • $12 billion in extra infrastructure investment
    The Government is lifting capital investment to the highest level in more than 20 years as it takes the next step to future-proof New Zealand. Finance Minister Grant Robertson has announced $12 billion of new investment, with $8 billion for specific capital projects and $4 billion to be added to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 hours ago
  • Minister welcomes data-rich coastline mapping tool
    The Minister responsible for the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Act 2011 (te Takutai Moana Act 2011), Andrew Little has welcomed the launch of an online geospatial tool that provides data-rich, dynamic coastline maps that will significantly boost research and evidence-gathering under the Act. Te Kete Kōrero a Te ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 hours ago
  • Chief Victims Advisor reappointed for a further two years
    The Chief Victims Advisor to Government Dr Kim McGregor, QSO, has been reappointed in her role for a further two years. Dr McGregor has held the role since it was established in November 2015. She provides independent advice to government on how to improve the criminal justice system for victims. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 hours ago
  • New Zealand tsunami monitoring and detection system to be established
    Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters and Civil Defence Minister Peeni Henare have today announced the deployment of a network of DART (Deep-ocean Assessment and Reporting of Tsunami) buoys. “New Zealand and the Pacific region are particularly vulnerable to natural disasters. It is vital we have adequate warning systems in place,” ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 hours ago
  • DART Buoys Announcement
    DART Buoys Announcement Aotea Wharf, 9.30am 11 December 2019   Acknowledgements Acknowledgements to Minister for Civil Defence Hon Peeni Henare also here today. White Island It is with regret that this event shadows the tragic natural disaster two days ago. The volcanic eruptions on White Island have claimed 5 lives, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 hours ago
  • Final steps for racing industry reform
    Racing Minister Winston Peters has welcomed the first reading of the Racing Industry Bill in parliament today. This is the second of two Bills that have been introduced this year to revitalise New Zealand’s racing industry. “Our domestic racing industry has been in serious decline.  The Government is committed to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Funding to promote New Zealand Sign Language initiatives
    Minister for Disability Issues, Carmel Sepuloni, is pleased to announce that $291,321 is to be awarded to national and local community initiatives to maintain and promote the use of New Zealand Sign Language (NZSL). “New Zealand is one of the few countries  in the world where Sign Language is an ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • How New Zealand defines and recognises veterans
    Minister for Veterans Ron Mark has announced today the Coalition Government’s initial response to work completed by the independent statutory body, the Veterans’ Advisory Board. “When Professor Ron Paterson completed his review of the Veterans’ Support Act in 2018, he made a number of recommendations, including one which I referred ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Government to fund lion’s share of Ohakea water scheme
    The Government will fund the bulk of the cost of a rural water supply for the Ohakea community affected by PFAS contamination, Environment Minister David Parker announced today at a meeting of local residents. This new water scheme will provide a reliable and clean source of drinking water to the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Prime Minister statement on White Island eruption
    I have had the opportunity to be briefed on the details of the volcanic eruption of Whakaari/White Island, off the coast of Whakatane in the Bay of Plenty.  The eruption happened at 2.11pm today.  It continues to be an evolving situation.  We know that there were a number of tourists ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Govt funds $100k for weather-hit communities
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and Minister of Civil Defence Peeni Henare have today confirmed initial Government support of $100,000 for communities affected by the severe weather that swept across the South Island and lower North Island over the weekend. The contribution will be made to Mayoral relief funds across the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Death of NZ High Commissioner to Cook Islands
    New Zealand's High Commissioner to the Cook Islands, Tessa Temata, died in Palmerston North over the weekend, Foreign Minister Winston Peters said today. Ms Temata, 52, had recently returned to New Zealand for medical treatment. "On behalf of the Government and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, we extend ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Wellington rail upgrade full steam ahead
    Transport Minister Phil Twyford today announced construction is underway on Wellington commuter rail upgrades which will mean more frequent services and fewer breakdowns. The upgrades include converting the Trentham to Upper Hutt single track section to a double track, with a new signalling system, upgraded stations and level crossings, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Defence Climate Change Implementation Plan released
    Minister of Defence Ron Mark and Minister for Climate Change James Shaw have announced the release of a Defence Climate Change Implementation Work Plan, titled Responding to the Climate Crisis: An Implementation Plan.  The plan sets out a series of recommendations based on the 2018 New Zealand Defence Assessment, The ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Govt releases funding to support South Canterbury
    A medium-scale adverse event has been declared for the South Canterbury district, which will see up to $50,000 in funding made available to support farming communities which have been significantly affected by recent heavy rain and flooding in the area, says Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor. “Two weeks of solid rain ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Speech at launch of Rethinking Plastics Report
    Thank you Professor Juliet Gerrard and your team for the comprehensive and extremely helpful report and recommendations. Thank you too to all the stakeholders and interested parties who have contributed ideas and thinking to it. “Making best practice, standard practice” is a great framework for change and the action plan ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Govt pledges next steps on plastic waste
    The Government will phase out more single-use plastics following the success of its single-use plastic bag ban earlier this year and the release today of a pivotal report for dealing with waste. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has welcomed the Rethinking Plastics in Aotearoa New Zealandreport, released by her Chief Science Advisor ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • International student enrolments grow in universities and the regions
    International education continues to thrive as the Government focuses on quality over quantity, Education Minister Chris Hipkins said. The tuition revenue from international education increased to $1.16 billion last year with the average tuition fee per student increasing by $960. The total number of international students enrolled in New Zealand ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Speech to Government Economics Network 2019 Conference
    I want to talk about one of the most pressing issues in our national life: the housing crisis and the poor performance of our cities. The argument I want to make to you is that generations of urban land use policy have lacked a decent grounding in economics. The consequences ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • DHB leadership renewed and strengthened
    Health Minister Dr David Clark says new appointments to DHBs represent a significant changing of the guard, with 13 new chairs including four Māori chairs. Today 76 appointments have been announced to complement elected board members, as well as eight elected members appointed as either chair or deputy chair.  Four ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Tabuteau to advance New Zealand’s trade and political interests with European partners
    Parliamentary Under-Secretary for Foreign Affairs, Fletcher Tabuteau, is travelling to Germany, Poland, Austria, and Spain next week to bolster New Zealand’s political and trade relationships in Europe. While in Spain, Mr Tabuteau will represent New Zealand at the 14th Asia-Europe (ASEM) Foreign Ministers’ Meeting in Madrid. “New Zealand strongly supports ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Statement from the Prime Minister on Kris Faafoi
    “I’ve spoken to Minister Faafoi, who has apologised for his poor handling of this issue,” Jacinda Ardern said. “I have confidence in Kris as a hardworking and effective Minister, but this should have been dealt with in a much clearer manner, and I’ve made my views on that very clear ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Tonga-New Zealand Joint Ministerial Forum
    Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters met with Tongan Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Pohiva Tu'i'onetoa in Wellington today. The pair signed a Statement of Partnership setting out joint priorities for cooperation out to 2023.  “We welcomed Prime Minister Tu'i'onetoa on his first visit to New Zealand as Prime Minister. Tonga ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Shooting in Kurow
    The Minister of Police Stuart Nash says his sympathies are with the family of a man who died after being shot by Police in Kurow. “Initial reports are that Police were called by a family member to help the man who was threatening to harm himself,” Mr Nash says. “However ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Government delivers funding boost for ethnic communities
    Ethnic communities will be able to plan and deliver more community initiatives thanks to an increase in Government funding, Minister for Ethnic Communities Hon Jenny Salesa said today. “Ensuring Aotearoa New Zealand is a place we can all be proud to call home has been a key priority of our ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Govt supports Southland farmers in sustainability
    Healthier waterways, better productivity and farmer wellbeing are front and centre in a new project involving more than 1000 Southland farmers and growers. Minister of Agriculture Damien O’Connor today announced that the Thriving Southland Change and Innovation Project is the first region-wide extension programme supported by the $229 million Sustainable ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Flood of support for Top of the South catchment
    Work to look after nature and restore freshwater quality in Te Hoiere/Pelorus River catchment is getting a significant boost, thanks to new Government funding support Minister for Conservation Eugenie Sage announced in Canvastown today. “Every New Zealander should be able to swim in their local river without getting sick, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Eight Queen’s Counsel appointed under new criterion
    Eight Queen’s Counsel have been appointed under a process that includes the new criterion of a commitment to improving access to justice, Attorney-General David Parker announced today. “The new criterion was included this year. It emphasises that excellence and leadership in the profession can be seen through a wider, community ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Major expansion for Wellington’s Onslow College
    Onslow College in Wellington will get 20 new classrooms for more than 400 students, Education Minister Chris Hipkins announced today. The much-needed investment will relieve growth pressure the school has been experiencing for some time. Seven existing classrooms which have deteriorated over time will also be replaced, bringing the total ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Talented young Kiwis awarded PM’s Scholarships to Asia and Latin America
    More than 250 young New Zealanders will add international experience to their education, thanks to the latest Prime Minister’s Scholarships for Asia (PMSA) and Latin America (PMSLA), Education Minister Chris Hipkins announced today. This round of scholarships supports 252 recent graduates or current students to undertake study, research or internships ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Government to improve competitiveness and transparency in the retail fuel market
    Consumers will benefit from a more competitive, transparent retail fuel market as a result of changes the Government will be making in response to the findings of the Commerce Commission’s study of the fuel sector. “We accept the Commission’s findings and, as the Prime Minister has said, we’re ready to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • More cancer medicines for more people
    Five new cancer medicines have now been funded this year, meaning thousands of people have more treatment options PHARMAC has today announced that it has approved two new medicines for funding – fulvestrant for breast cancer and olaparib for ovarian cancer. This follows earlier decisions on advanced lung cancer treatment alectinib, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Government acts to sort out electoral ‘coin toss’ problem
    The Minister of Local Government, Hon Nanaia Mahuta says the Government will consider making changes to local electoral legislation before the 2022 elections to fix the problems that have arisen where elections are settled by a coin toss.  The Minister says the recount process in the Murupara- Galatea ward at ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • NZ to Join IMO Convention to Reduce Ship Emissions
    New Zealand will sign up to new international maritime regulations to reduce ship emissions and lift air quality around ports and harbours, Associate Transport Minister Julie Anne Genter announced today. Subject to completion of the Parliamentary treaty examination process, New Zealand will sign up to Annex VI of MARPOL, an ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Bill to empower urban development projects
    New legislation to transform our urban areas and create sustainable, inclusive and thriving communities will tomorrow be introduced to Parliament, Urban Development Minister Phil Twyford said. “The Urban Development Bill gives Kāinga Ora-Homes and Communities the tools it needs to partner with councils, communities, mana whenua and private developers to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Early Learning Action Plan to kickstart long term change
    Today’s launch of He taonga te Tamaiti: Every child a taonga: The Early Learning Action Plan 2019-2029 provides the foundation for long-lasting changes to early learning, Education Minister Chris Hipkins says.   “Early learning will be one of the Government’s top education priorities going into 2020,” Chris Hipkins said.   ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Climate change lens on major Government decisions
    Major decisions made by the Government will now be considered under a climate change lens, Minister for Climate Change James Shaw announced today. “Cabinet routinely considers the effects of its decisions on human rights, the Treaty of Waitangi, rural communities, the disability community, and gender – now climate change will ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago