web analytics

Who’s sorry now?

Written By: - Date published: 9:46 am, September 23rd, 2008 - 41 comments
Categories: john key, slippery - Tags:

Anyone remember back in July Key accused Clark of misleading the house over his involvement in Tranzrail and asked for an apology? Just in case you don’t here’s what John Key said to TV3 said at the time:

“Can I assure her that neither I, nor my family trust, was an owner of shares in Tranz Rail at that time, and she has misled the House.”

Miss Clark made no comment, taking the back route out of Parliament. Through a spokesman she says she accepts Mr Key’s word. He now wants her to say sorry.

“Sorry would be nice, but I won’t hold my breath,” says Mr Key.

He’s got balls, I’ll give him that.

Hattip: Bill

41 comments on “Who’s sorry now? ”

  1. Jeeves 1

    What was “that time” in the context that he made the reply. It will seriosuly affect my view of him either way.

  2. coge 2

    Any chance of Dr Cullen making a full & frank disclosure of what his BNZ unit trust invests in exactly? Philip Morris perhaps?, Blackwater PMC?, Tranzrail?

  3. Jeeves, from the tv3 article “”Mr Key, as associate transport spokesperson, owning shares in Tranz Rail at the time, which he never disclosed, said publicly that shareholders were telling him they supported Toll’s offer for Tranz Rail over the Government’s,”

    …..

    “Can I assure her that neither I, nor my family trust, was an owner of shares in Tranz Rail at that time”

    of course, we now know he had owned the shares while making public statements.

  4. Tim Ellis 4

    Can we get on to discussing how to raise wages, whether we should break up ACC, and how to protect our environment now? Hide will miss the attention, but I suspect Kiwis will welcome coverage of issues that affect their lives instead of the latest gossip about who knew what when regarding some legal donations.

    I realise you guys write independently, but it is obvious many of you will be ignoring SP’s plea and will try to beat this up for the next six weeks.

    [lprent: That is the nature of a coop. It has its upsides and it has downsides. On the other hand to see the truely obsessional you just have to look at single author blog sites. I lost count after about 50 ‘posts’ in kiwiblog on NZF (a minor party and issue) within a space of two weeks. Most of them said exactly nothing but were just quotes and links to journalist articles. Most of the latter were just repeats of stuff that was already public. Now that is a truly obsessional behavior. Have a look at the word clouds that Bryon Clark did of some sites a few weeks ago to see what I mean.
    http://lossenelin.livejournal.com/109311.html
    It is an interesting technique, and I plan to have a closer look at it to monitor what the media are obsessing on.]

  5. coge. desperate. you can do better than that.

    captcha: ‘secretly Jeaves’. Jeeves’ real identity revealed?

  6. Bill 6

    Jeeves.
    Cullen released documents showing Key was an undisclosed shareholder during the buy back process. Key denied it saying the government ‘had the dates wrong’. You can hear it all for yourself here
    http://www.3news.co.nz/Video/Business/tabid/369/articleID/61684/cat/67/Default.aspx#video

    2002/2003 comes up towards the end.

  7. coge 7

    Steve, until evidence to the contrary is produced, questions will continue to be asked. Surely you would expect the same of every politician?

  8. Matthew Pilott 8

    coge, there is no reason to suspect Cullen has done anything wrong in using information to make a proofit or attenuate a loss, nor reason to suspect Cullen failed to declare interests relevant to his elected position.

    You can’t say the same for Key, can you?

    Well Tim, after hearing Key wax lyrical over Clark not revealing a conversation with Glenn because no one asked her, some of us are going to quite enjoy Key explain why the “no one asked me” defence is alright for him to use.

  9. NeillR 9

    Wait a minute – according to the 3News article, Labour knew about Key’s shareholding at the time:
    “Mr Key, as associate transport spokesperson, owning shares in Tranz Rail at the time, which he never disclosed,

    So what’s changed? The timelines aren’t any different to what they were then – the trust’s shares were already known and the dates were known then. The shares that he owned in his own name were during the timeline put forward months ago. I’ve seen some beatups, but this is almost as desperate as the “60 bodybags”.

    [lprent: Just fixed the moderation trap that you were getting caught in. ]

  10. IrishBill 10

    The difference is thay only knew about the 30,000 he had disclosed as belonging to his family trust. There were sill 70,000 he had failed to mention including 50,000 in his own name.

  11. Bill 11

    I’m still waiting for the right wing to beat up on HC for deceiving the NZ public and defending JK over his share holdings.

    She ‘knew’ he had shares. He denied it. She took him at his word and made no comment to the media/ NZ public.

    At least her deviousness is consistent. She acted in the same fashion towards Peters and Key….so, are the right wingers going to be equally consistent in their rationale of condemnation?

    Not holding my breath.

  12. Tim Ellis 12

    This is just another example of the biased foreign-owned right-wing media spinning National Party research as news. Oops. Hard to say that with a straight face now.

    Key’s form on TVNZ last night was pretty shabby. He was clearly rattled by the question. The issue itself is a stupid beat-up, but Key needs to realise that the Labour Party are determined to throw as much mud as they can between now and the election. They don’t do it to win more support on its own, but to rattle John Key and throw him off course.

    Key has to get a thicker skin on these things. They’re going to come at him again and again. It isn’t good enough to give unequivocal, semi-truthful responses. Nobody actually cares how many shares Key had in Tranzrail. He wasn’t involved in insider trading, and wasn’t required to disclose his interest. The same thing happened over the Ashcroft question with Garner. Helen Clark would never let herself be ambushed like that. It is just sloppy.

    Matthew, I think the press release John Key issued afterwards does give a very satisfactory explanation. Had he been on-form, then the press release is what he would have said straight away.

    People react in different ways when their integrity is called into question. Winston Peters’ reaction is to feign outrage, indignation, abuse the questioner, and generate confusion. John Key doesn’t seem to have developed a satisfactory response to ambushes on questions of his integrity yet. I don’t think Helen Clark had any particular expertise in this either, until after she’d gone through the ringer by being ambushed by John Campbell over Corngate.

    Key’s reputation among the media is that he’s straight up and gives direct, immediate answers. My view is that when he’s challenged in an ambush situation like this, he needs to say to the journalist: “Let’s sit down and talk this through. Where are you coming from? What do you want to know? You’re asking questions about my private affairs. If you want detail then I will have to check with my broker for all of the facts so that I’m not misleading you, and I’ll get back to you as soon as I can.”

    Barry Soper made an insightful comment on newstalk ZB this morning, and I’m surprised to be saying this because I very rarely hear him say anything deep or original. He said that Key’s instinct, honed after many years in his previous career, is to give instant, snap-responses and judgements to issues. That’s fine if you’re making a currency trade, but it doesn’t work when somebody is ambushing you with a smear campaign.

  13. Crank 13

    Sorry for the off topic but I wonder if anyone here can point me in the right direction.

    IrishBill: no need to apologise.

  14. RedLogix 14

    Crank,

    1. No don’t give it directly to the Minister. It’s kinda obvious and has to be declared.

    2. Picking up expenses is cool; it never National do it all the time and never declare them so you should be sweet with them.

    (Various major legal firms have incurred considerable expenses in administering various Trust funds for National. Seen those declared anywhere?)

    3. Using party trust is no longer acceptable according to the PC report. See p20. Of course you may want to make the gift retrospective back to 2005 when the practise WAS acceptable so as you are not caught out by the standard being applied in 2008.

  15. Bill 15

    Tim

    “Nobody actually cares how many shares Key had in Tranzrail. He wasn’t involved in insider trading, and wasn’t required to disclose his interest.”

    Your first claim is patently false; lots of people care about it. Your third point begs the question as to why Richard Prebble declared his conflict of interest at the same meeting where Key dug for information.

    “I think the press release John Key issued afterwards does give a very satisfactory explanation.”

    What!? The press release completely fails to mention the 50 000 shares he bought in his own name, held for a few weeks while he talked up prospects and sold for a handsome profit.

    But, Tim. What do you think of HC misleading the NZ public on this issue and allowing JK to hide behind her skirt tails of ‘no comment’ a couple of months back? Do you think we should have a rerun of the condemnation that was poured on HC and WP in the exact same scenario? If not, why not?

  16. Crank 16

    Thanks Redlogix. It makes this lobbying lark so much simpler now that we know we can straight out bribe ministers and the PM doesn’t mind.

  17. appleboy 17

    and I see Key had the audacity to use the “no one asked me” line in defending his lie – what a total hypercrit…exactly what he had a go over Helen on…he gets worse…

  18. r0b 18

    08Wire asks a pertinent question: Consistency or Partisanship – Which Will the Right Choose?.

    Tim has provided us with his answer: The issue itself is a stupid beat-up. Is it indeed. Just snip a bit from 08Wire:

    John Key has done all of the following:

    1. Sought, in his official capacity, details of secret meetings concerning a company in which he had a personal financial stake;

    2. Made a 126% profit over the course of 35 days trading in shares in TranzRail while asking official questions about it and privately meeting with it (even meeting with potential buyers / competitors) in his official capacity;

    3. Minimised a large loss in a share deal involving TranzRail after asking parliamentary questions about its financial health in his official capacity.

    4. Told repeated, public untruths about the extent and timing of his personal interest in the company.

  19. Bill 19

    appleboy.

    he ain’t going to get any better. I think it was on a post about the Herald write up that I commented the man comes across as an emotional cripple. I hold to that line. He can deal with the dynamics of inanimate objects (money in his case) but falls over when he has to relate to the living world of humanity.

    My perception was only reinforced when right wing comments on the ‘Hand in the till’ post seemed to claim he would not have acted dishonestly over his tranzrail shares because the money involved was quite small by his standards.

    But they miss the fact that the man has a single track emotional and intellectual train of thought. ( sorry. ) He wins/loses on financial transactions and gets the bulk of his emotional needs met by that and that alone. He might get more emotional satisfaction from participating in a run on the Kiwi dollar, but he gets it from any win/lose financial situation, be it 10c or a million bucks.

    I don’t believe the question is to whether NZ wants a money trader in charge of the country, but whether NZ wants an individual so desperately in need of psychiatric help in charge of the country.

    I don’t say that in a way of ‘having a go’. I’m being sincere.

  20. Jeeves 20

    I wonder if someone could do a timeline for me of what was brought and sold when, and what was said when, because I am kinda confused. Farrar did a similar thing for Peters. You guys should do it for this.

  21. randal 21

    yeh and I guess I should take up tapdancing as well. any other demands that you would like to add to the list while we are here?

  22. insider 22

    Key has issued a release saying no shares were owned in his name. They were all in the family trust’s name.

  23. r0b 23

    I wonder if someone could do a timeline for me

    The Herald has this one:
    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10533576&pnum=0

  24. Matthew Pilott 24

    Jeeves – try the front page of the Dom Post! Quite a few online articles detail it all.

    Tim – it’s not a silly beat up. Buying shares while asking for confidential information is not a beat up. Saying it is a beat up does not make it a beat-up. That goes for you, and John Key’s, and his piss-weak and pathetic attempt at a press release. Instead of explaining his actions, he has a wee cry and blames Labour. What kind of a leader would he make? Starting to get quite concerned. “no one asked me”… Well shit, incase you missed it, no one asked Clark about Glenn, quite a few people asked Key about his shares.

  25. gobsmacked 25

    “Key has issued a release saying no shares were owned in his name. They were all in the family trust’s name.”

    But yesterday he said he owned them. If he wants to claim the Trust is not him, he’s Winston-ing.

  26. lprent 26

    insider:

    Key has issued a release saying no shares were owned in his name. They were all in the family trust’s name.

    That isn’t good enough. That says he doesn’t ‘own’ them, but does he control the trust?

    To avoid allegations of a serious conflict of interest (from what I’ve heard so far). He’d really have to show that it was a blind trust – that he didn’t have any say in the purchasing or sales of the shares. Because of the lack of protection from ‘chinese walls’, he’d probably be best to show that he didn’t even know what specific shares were in the trust.

    The standard for the investigation should be in the same order as Winston and NZF. It doesn’t matter how small the amount is. It doesn’t matter who owns the asset. It simply matters that it doesn’t look good.

  27. insider 27

    I think the “asking for confidential informaiton” is a beat up. You don’t have to look at too many PQs to know they are regularly asking for information from meetings and reports.

    You would be seriously deluded if you thought anything remotely interesting would come out of such questions and anyone that did reveal confidential information would be rightly lambasted for disclosing it. Even CUllen says there is no issue here so why flog it?

    As for blaming others and having a cry, HC blamed the SFO for leaking information about the WP inquiry just two weeks ago, then blamed another govt agency when a very strong denial was made, and it was all done with no evidence. Last night she blamed the SFO for not seeking Crown Law advice on an issue there was no requirement for them to seek such advice. Cullen did seek advice but the Govt are not releasing it…

  28. insider 28

    lynn/gob

    I;ve got no view on this. It’s a point of information. but more the issue is that he has been attacked for having 50k shares in his own name, but he now appears to be denying that. I am just more confused now.

  29. NeillR 29

    Gobsmacked, do you have any reference for this new meme? I haven’t seen anywhere that he’s denied owning the shares in his own name.

    [until yesterday, he had never admitted owning the shares in his own name and even now he is trying to distance himself by blaming his broker. SP]

  30. Jeeves 30

    So having looked at the timeline, which is very useful, it still doesn’t seem clear to me that Key did have shares in tranzrail at the time he made the statement Steve referred to at 9.37am.

    When John Key made the statement “that shareholders were telling him they supported Toll’s offer for Tranz Rail over the Government’s” he couldn’t have had any shares personally, since (as I understand it) the government offer was made on 10 June. John Key had already sold his shares by then and the Key Family Trust sold its shares on June 13. I wonder, what day was the statement Helen Clark referred to actually made? If it was made on June 11, 12 or 13 then John Key lied. If not, then Steve is being very naughty in his 9.37 am post.

    I was going to say Steve would have lied, but I re-read his post he said “of course, we now know he had owned the shares while making public statements.” not of course the relevant public statement in respect of which he demanded an apology from the PM, but public statements generally.

    You can’t go around accusing someone of being clever with the truth and then use dirty tactics like that!

  31. Anita 31

    What the Fairfax summary linked to above doesn’t contain is when Key said what to whom. If someone had the spare time to trawl back through the media from July and the pecuniary interests registers there would be a really useful timeline of when Key said what how many lies, how many skirting-around-the-truths, how many times has he been caught out?

  32. gobsmacked 32

    NeillR

    Key has put out a statement today:

    http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA0809/S00467.htm

  33. Jeeves 33

    gobsmacked: that’s good enough for me! (though I am a tory)

  34. Bill 34

    So Key initially denied he had any shares (in the TV3 piece), saying that the government ‘had the dates wrong’.

    Now he says he did not personally own any shares and that “all the shares were owned by the trust and information on the share register that he had personally bought 50,00 shares was incorrect.”

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/4701953a6160.html

    How feasible is it for the share register to be so wrong?

    And on TV 1 he’s asked…”Did you personally buy 50 000 tranzrail shares in 2003 and sell them five weeks later..”

    Did he say “No. Not personally.”?. Nope. Why not? ‘Cause he did.

    And the press release from the Nats can be screamingly silent on the 50 000 shares, and he can say the register was wrong…I guess because he has to since he has been caught with his trousers well and truly down.

    Question is, how deep is he going to dig this hole he’s digging?

  35. johnny be good 35

    What on earth are the actual facts!??!

    The story has changed four times now, either he does not know what the hell he is talking about or he is digging himself a hole. And why?

  36. Bill 36

    johny be good

    He’s digging a hole because he has to avoid the fact he used his position to influence people and get info and that these two things in combination allowed him to buy 50 000 shares and make over 100% profit on them….cutting his losses on the other trust held shares that he had had for some time.

    simple

  37. Bill 37

    Here are the sums.

    Feb 2002. trust buys 30 000 shares for $108 000 ($3.60 each)

    Feb 2002. trust buys 20 000 shares for $72 000 ($3.60 each)

    July 2002 Elected in to parliament and digs for info on rail.

    May 2003. JK buys 50 000 shares for $22 500 (45 c each)

    Meets Rail America (potential buyers). Share price rises on the back of their interest.

    June 10 Then sells those 45c shares at $1 each

    June 11 Select committee where Roger Douglas declares his conflict of interest but JK does not and grills Government on rail.

    June 13 $3.60 trust shares sold.

    So on June 11, JK is told of the liabilities in the company and realises he will never get his $3.60 returned, so dumps them at a loss….mitigated somewhat by the profit on the 50 000 shares sold.

  38. June 11 Select committee where Roger Douglas declares his conflict of interest but JK does not and grills Government on rail.

    Um – I think you mean richard prebble…

  39. Bill 39

    Yeah, well all those wee Napoleons look the same to me. There was one not quite so short one, though can’t remember which one that was.

  40. Billy 40

    Bill,

    Be careful. ‘sod is very sensitive about his height.

  41. r0b 41

    As requested above, a more complete timeline is here:
    http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA0809/S00475.htm

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Tokelau Language Week reminds us to stay united and strong
    Staying strong in the face of challenges and being true to our heritage and languages are key to preserving our cultural identity and wellbeing, is the focus of the 2020 Tokelau Language Week. Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio, says this year’s theme, ‘Apoapo tau foe, i nā tāfea ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • NZ announces a third P-3 deployment in support of UN sanctions
    The Government has deployed a Royal New Zealand Air Force P-3K2 Orion (P-3) maritime patrol aircraft to support the implementation of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions imposing sanctions against North Korea, announced Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters and Minister of Defence Ron Mark. “New Zealand has long supported ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Pacific trade and development agreement a reality
    Pacific regional trade and development agreement PACER Plus will enter into force in 60 days now that the required eight countries have ratified it. Trade and Export Growth Minister David Parker welcomed the announcement that the Cook Islands is the eighth nation to ratify this landmark agreement. “The agreement represents ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Securing a pipeline of teachers
    The Government is changing its approach to teacher recruitment as COVID-19 travel restrictions continue, by boosting a range of initiatives to get more Kiwis into teaching. “When we came into Government, we were faced with a teacher supply crisis,” Education Minister Chris Hipkins said. “Over the past three years, we ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Border exceptions for a small number of international students with visas
    The Government has established a new category that will allow 250 international PhD and postgraduate students to enter New Zealand and continue their studies, in the latest set of border exceptions. “The health, safety and wellbeing of people in New Zealand remains the Government’s top priority. Tight border restrictions remain ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • First COVID-19 vaccine purchase agreement signed
    The Government has signed an agreement to purchase 1.5 million COVID-19 vaccines – enough for 750,000 people – from Pfizer and BioNTech, subject to the vaccine successfully completing all clinical trials and passing regulatory approvals in New Zealand, say Research, Science and Innovation Minister Megan Woods and Health Minister Chris Hipkins. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • International statement – End-to-end encryption and public safety
    We, the undersigned, support strong encryption, which plays a crucial role in protecting personal data, privacy, intellectual property, trade secrets and cyber security.  It also serves a vital purpose in repressive states to protect journalists, human rights defenders and other vulnerable people, as stated in the 2017 resolution of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Ministry of Defence Biodefence Assessment released
    The Ministry of Defence has today released a Defence Assessment examining Defence’s role across the spectrum of biological hazards and threats facing New Zealand. Biodefence: Preparing for a New Era of Biological Hazards and Threats looks at how the NZDF supports other agencies’ biodefence activities, and considers the context of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Approaches to Economic Challenges: Confronting Planetary Emergencies: OECD 9 October 2020
    New Approaches to Economic Challenges: Confronting Planetary Emergencies: OECD 9 October 2020 Hon David Parker’s response following Thomas Piketty and Esther Duflo. Good morning, good afternoon, and good evening, wherever in the world you might be. I first acknowledge the excellent thought provoking speeches of Thomas Piketty and Esther ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Kaipara Moana restoration takes next step
    A Memorandum of Understanding has been signed today at Waihāua Marae between the Crown, local iwi and councils to protect, restore and enhance the mauri of Kaipara Moana in Northland. Environment Minister David Parker signed the document on behalf of the Crown along with representatives from Ngā Maunga Whakahī, Ngāti ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Zealand and Uruguay unite on reducing livestock production emissions
    Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor and Uruguayan Minister of Livestock, Agriculture and Fisheries Carlos María Uriarte have welcomed the launch of a three-year project that will underpin sustainable livestock production in Uruguay, Argentina, and Costa Rica.  The project called ‘Innovation for pasture management’ is led by Uruguay’s National Institute of Agricultural ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • 3100 jobs created through marae upgrades
    Hundreds of marae throughout the country will be upgraded through investments from the Provincial Growth Fund’s refocused post COVID-19 funding to create jobs and put money into the pockets of local tradespeople and businesses, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones and Māori Development Minister Nanaia Mahuta have announced. “A total ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Health volunteers recognised in annual awards
    Health Minister Chris Hipkins has announced 9 teams and 14 individuals are the recipients of this year’s Minister of Health Volunteer Awards.  “The health volunteer awards celebrate and recognise the thousands of dedicated health sector volunteers who give many hours of their time to help other New Zealanders,” Mr Hipkins ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Community COVID-19 Fund supports Pacific recovery
    The Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio says a total of 264 groups and individuals have successfully applied for the Pacific Aotearoa Community COVID-19 Recovery Fund, that will support Pacific communities drive their own COVID-19 recovery strategies, initiatives, and actions. “I am keen to see this Fund support Pacific ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Community benefits from Māori apprenticeships
    Up to 50 Māori apprentices in Wellington will receive paid training to build houses for their local communities, thanks to a $2.75 million investment from the Māori Trades and Training Fund, announced Employment Minister Willie Jackson today. “This funding will enable Ngāti Toa Rangatira Incorporated to provide its Ngā Kaimahi ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Training fund supports Māori jobseekers
    Rapidly growing sectors will benefit from a $990,000 Māori Trades and Training Fund investment which will see Wellington jobseekers supported into work, announced Employment Minister Willie Jackson today. “This funding will enable Sapphire Consultants Ltd. to help up to 45 Māori jobseekers into paid training initiatives over two years through ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Ruakura Inland Port development vital infrastructure for Waikato
    The Government is investing $40 million to develop an inland port at Ruakura which will become a freight super-hub and a future business, research and residential development for the Waikato, Urban Development and Transport Minister Phil Twyford, and Māori Development Minister Nanaia Mahuta announced today. The funding has been has ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Appointments made to Defence Expert Review Group
    Defence Minister Ron Mark announced today the establishment of an Expert Review Group to review a number of aspects of the New Zealand Defence Force’s (NZDF) structure, information management and record-keeping processes.  The Expert Review Group’s work arises out of the first recommendation from the Report of the Government’s Inquiry ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • No active community cases of COVID-19
    There are no active community cases of COVID-19 remaining in the country after the last people from the recent outbreak have recovered from the virus, Health Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “This is a big milestone. New Zealanders have once again through their collective actions squashed the virus. The systems ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Clean energy upgrade for more public buildings
    More public buildings will be supported by the Government to upgrade to run on clean energy, the Minister for Climate Change James Shaw announced today. Minister Shaw announced that Lincoln and Auckland universities will receive support through the Clean-Powered Public Service Fund to replace fossil fuel boilers. Southern, Taranaki, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Schools back donations scheme for the second year
    More schools have opted in to the donations scheme for 2021, compared to 2020 when the scheme was introduced. “The families of more than 447,000 students will be better off next year, with 94% of eligible schools and kura opting into the scheme,” Education Minister Chris Hipkins said. “This is ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago