web analytics

You call that policy? This is policy

Written By: - Date published: 2:45 pm, June 23rd, 2008 - 88 comments
Categories: greens, national, slippery, workers' rights - Tags: ,

National has released a brochure, laying out all its policies. They take up two A4 pages of double-spaced bullet points. That’s incredibly lightweight. Contrast that with the policy files of another party outside government, the Greens.

National has 14 vague policies. The Greens have 51 policy area pages, each containing dozens of actionable policies.

There is no detail behind most of National’s policies. Their ‘Youth Guarantee’ policy page has 383 words, barely more than this post. The Greens’ policy pages contain over 100,000 words.

The summary page of the Greens’ industrial relations policy alone is longer than the summary of all of National’s policies. And, they have more than just a list of bullet points and slogans. One more click takes you to a comprehensive policy page, laying out 37 detailed, actionable policies. That’s only industrial relations; an area in which National has just one policy: the 90 Day No-Rights Bill, the only piece of legislation they have ready to enact if they win.

National policy is just being designed now, by a small clique excluding even the relevant spokespeople. Many policies have only come out as slips. In contrast, the Greens have an open policy development process culminating in ratification by delegated members and policy development is an ongoing process, not a last minute hash job.

We have a very clear, exhaustive, and honest statement of what the Greens hope to achieve. What National would do in government, apart from weaken workers’ rights, is anyone’s guess.

88 comments on “You call that policy? This is policy”

  1. Monty 1

    Patience lefties – when we are 20% to 26% points ahead there is no need to rush out comprehensive policy – we know you are desperate to start slaying National Policy regardless of merit, National have made it clear that they will wait unttil after the elction is announced before they wil release comprehensive policy.

    In the meantime we will soon have double Labour’s support in at least one poll, and although Helen is in denial, three polls over the weekend all supported each other.

    I also understand that in Auckland Labour’s soupport is now at an all time low – does this indicate that people understand the general if not specific policy direction of National and understand that they will take the country forward.

    So Advise the election date and we righties will then be in a position to start releasing policy. Until then, enjoy life in the vacuum – because come the Monday after the election, you guys will be screaming about reality.

  2. “The Greens’ policy pages contain over 100,000 words.” The Greens’ policy pages could have 1,000,000 words but would still be pointless when they can’t even get support for them from Labour let alone National.

    [in fact, the Greens have had a number of members’ bills passed with Labour’s support and been crucial in some policy areas. A slightly cartoonish understanding of politics could even argue that Labour moves forward by adopting Green policies (I would argue the presence of a respectable party to the Left with a sound policy platform allows Labour to explore it’s own leftward leanings from time to time) SP]

  3. Tane 3

    does this indicate that people understand the general if not specific policy direction of National and understand that they will take the country forward.

    If you’re to believe the polls then the Dom Post this morning makes interesting reading. Apparently the people saying they intend to vote for National are the ones least expecting National to make any significant changes.

    Essentially they’re voting for a nice smiling man who’ll keep Labour’s policy platfrom in place.

  4. T-rex 4

    Steve, this post should clearly have headed with a Notional logo.

    That section on economy is pathetic

    The fact that their broadband package, the only thing they’ve actually assigned so much as a number to (and are still hopelessly short in detail on) gets its own special blue box to show how (relatively) well developed and superduperspecial it is…

    Pretty much the only definitive statements are under youth justice and Law/Order. If that’s not a sad indictment of their philosophy I don’t know what is.

    Give police more power to storm and remove gang fortifications“???? Someone needs to spend a bit less time playing Call of Duty I think.

    Damn they suck.

  5. lprent 5

    Monty: Assuming you are right and the nats manage to stitch a coalition together, then I have 3 years of fun to look forward to.

    The Nat’s are sticking themselves in an incredibly vulnerable political position. They have raised unreasonable expectations in the public. It is hard to find two people that even agree on one thing that they think the Nat’s would do. However they each separately think that the Nat’s would help them even when the outcomes are incompatible.

    That means that to maintain the current state to election that the Nat’s will release ‘fuzzy’ policy – full of waffle and little detail (in fact like what they have released to date).

    So post-election it is just a matter of exploiting those lost expectations. Whisper campaigns. Denigration campaigns etc. We’ve had 5 years of an example of how to run a negative campaign and I’m going to love dishing it back.

    It may not be good for the country, but I think that having the Nat’s around for any length of time is likely to be worse… Just too incompetent.

    But I think that the voters are smarter than falling for this level of waffle.

  6. Monty 6

    I am sure the 55% of people voting for national based on current polling are voting for much more than a nice smiling man. For staarters they are also voting to get well rid of Helen Clark and her government which is so obviously past its useby date.

    I suggest they are voting to get rid of the nanny state, the interference in our lives.(By the way it seems we will hhave a referendum on anti-smacking – oh dear)

    Some will be voting against the Electoral Finance Act,

    Otheres will be voting against Michael Cullen and his arrogance.

    The list goes on = I understand that there is a significant part of the strong National support that is voting against Labour but in my view it is not the reason why National’s support is so strong in spite of no policy, what is important is that National will maintain this support all the way to the election.

    Policy for the Nats will come – but other than political junkies I suggest for many, specific policy may not be that important whereas getting well rid of labour is important. That will be hard to fight – especially as funding from donations must be drying up, Labour are getting hung by the EFA at every turn, and no one wants to back the donkey that in Labour in this election race.

  7. dave 7

    The first sentence of the National brochure says that these are some of the policies National has announced, not all of them.

    So why didn’t you mention that? Did you lie, or merely make an error

    [No, National has listed all its policies on the flyer. They’ve just injected the word ‘some’ to make it appear they have more. Ask yourself a) if there are more policies, why didn’t they include them b) what National policies have I heard announced that aren’t included? c) If you only had 14 vague policies to list, wouldn’t you try to hint that there are actually more? SP]

  8. QoT 8

    What, no “peace in our time”?

  9. T-rex 9

    Sigh.

    Don’t be a pedantic wank Dave, it’s National’s brochure, they’re clearly presenting it as their existing policy.

  10. Tane 10

    Interesting Monty, once again all you can cite is reasons to vote against Labour, not for National. That doesn’t strike me as the most solid platform on which to elect a government.

  11. Tane 11

    The first sentence of the National brochure says that these are some of the policies National has announced, not all of them.

    Tell us about the rest of them, Dave.

  12. It has been interesting watching the National party and its members this year. National party members have no say in policy. At best, they get to choose one local candidate who will then go on to the party list. National party members have no say over the list or its ranking. National party members have no say at all over who the party leader is.

    By contrast, the Green party member is expected to participate in all these things: party policy development and refinement, candidate selection by nomination locally and ranking on the list by preferential vote of all party members nationally. The male and female co-leaders of the party must be initially elected to the job by vote of all party members and they are re-confirmed in that role by vote of party delegates every year at the party AGM.

    It’s as though the National party doesn’t much like democracy at all, really and their members don’t appear to mind at all. They are happy with whatever the Leader they had no say in selecting says – even if he just makes it up as he goes along, as former leader Don Brash appeared to think would be just fine, in a recent Sunday Star Times interview.

    So here we are: a tiny clique at the top of a not-very democratic party composing policy on the fly that no one is being consulted about….and National party members seem to think that’s just fine. No transparency and little accountability. So much for open government from people who like to operate that way.

    What a lot of unthinking, negligent sheep they must all be. I’d never support a party like that, of ANY ideological stripe. Not in a million years.

    National’s policy list would look very much in place on Twitter.

  13. Matthew Pilott 13

    dave, truth be told, it’s because at any one stage, Key can’t know which incompetant backbencher may have let loose with another policy.

    It’s all of their policies thus far, but no one in National knows it.

    dave and monty – what do you think is the best thing about their “policies” – the lightweight bullet points, or the substantiative statements that reinforce the Labour policies they can’t touch?

    I like them equally.

  14. rjs131 14

    and maybe Lprent you can elaborate on how labour will manage a coalition which at this stage will need the greens and nzfirst. I am sure that the greens and nzfirst will have a lot in common say regarding law and order. How about defence or foreign affairs. Who woudl be minister of foreign affairs – Winston or Keith Locke?

  15. mike 15

    “If you’re to believe the polls”
    So Tane is in denial just like Helen, but what else can she say I guess better to bury head in sand.

    “For staarters they are also voting to get well rid of Helen Clark ”
    Monty -you sound like Matt McCarten.

  16. Monty 16

    Tane – Even the most optimistic person could not believe that 55% support is due to National Policy when they are holding off releasing policy. 55% cannot possibly be a solid platform – (I wish it was). I remember some months back the left blogs were saying Labours support was solid at around 40%. It seems to me that somehwere in the mid to late 20s is where support is solid for each party.

    But How the support is made up is not the question. How or can Labour claw back some of that support to even get competitive (without destroying the Greenies in the process is another challenge)

    And it is made harder because it usually is four to six times harder in business to get a new client as opposed to retaining an existing client. I am not sure politics are differnt in that respect. Nats support may soften a little – but the longer the massive lead in maintained the harder it is going to be to claw back some support. And what makes it worse, it that National will take the reins thanks to the support of about 50% of the population – including people who have never voted for National before and then they may become very comfortable with National. The horror stories that the left spread will come to nothing, and as the government, National will have much stronger resource to stay in government, in much the same way that previous governments certainly find it easier to win a second and even a thiird term than the opposition has of winning the government benches (forth term is another matter as you are more than aware)

    By the way I went onto the Labour Party wensite over the weekend and it seems all their policy dates back to 2005. When are Labour goinig to release fresh policy?

  17. Monty. Policy development is a constant process for most parties, it’s evolutionary, the past is not disgarded, it is built upon. National isn’t like that. It keeps on veering wildly from centre to right to who-knows-where, which is why it’s the only party with a policy vacuum (and when we say policy vacuum, we’re really talking a principles vacuum).

    Moreover, Labour is governing, you see it release policies daily.

  18. Yes Monty – Labour hasn’t released any prudent or commonsensical policy to help the dire circumstances New Zealand currently finds itself in. Good point Monty. Hi roger nome and tiger tea.

  19. Mr English 19

    Oops. We forgot to authorise it… I hope no one prints one out…

  20. Don’t worry Mr English as Robin cleared it with Batman so it’s all sweet bro.

  21. Steve Withers. I know what you mean, there’s definitely this belief in National that a leader should lead and the rest should follow.

    Talking with a couple of drunk National backbenchers one night brought that home when David Bennett said “[Key] he works us like dogs, as he should’.” and “‘John doesn’t really know what he wants to do if (when, hah!) he becomes Prime Minister and he certainly hasn’t told us!’

    At the core of the born-to-rule aspect of tory thought (and it underlies everything from tax cuts for the rich to less regulation to opposing Kiwisaver) is a belief that the strong should lead and those who aren’t should accept their fate (we know what that is called in its extreme case).

    We see this now in the Righties comments. They really think we should give up, roll over like little David Bennets, and not oppose National just because the polls are against us. They don’t understand that for the left it’s about fighting for what we think is just, not merely being the strongest. That fatal misunderstanding is why they think they can beat us once and for all but they never will.

  22. lprent 22

    rjs131: Beats me what coalition Helen would stitch together. She has surprised me every time. Last time I thought Progressive, Maori Party and Greens. Got Progressive, United Future, and NZ First. 1 out of 3 ain’t bad.

    But at least she has experience at both stitching them together and holding them together. The Nat’s haven’t – but they do have experience at making them implode. Helen has as well – Alliance in 2002.

  23. Vanilla Eis 23

    Sometimes I wonder if d4j is actually just one of those thousand Shakespeare monkeys, but somehow got loose and held onto his keyboard. One day, eventually, he will come up with something coherent.

  24. I do like Bananas and Vanilla Ice Cream in my cage.

  25. Matthew Pilott 25

    And it is made harder because it usually is four to six times harder in business to get a new client as opposed to retaining an existing client. I am not sure politics are differnt in that respect.

    They’re called swing voters – the clue is in the name.

  26. Skeptic 26

    Oh FFS. It’s a brochure highlighting major policy areas. It’s not an exhaustive list of all the policy documents and material, which are freely available on National’s website.

    There’s far more policy material on National’s website than there is on Labour’s. But Steve Pierson is too dishonest to observe that.

    Steve asks why National didn’t release all of its policy detail in the brochure. Well, buddy, it’s an A4 brochure, double-sided, designed to present an overview of key intiatives. Duh. Why wasn’t the pledge card in 2005 much larger, and much more detailed? Was it because it was taxpayer funded, and the Labour Party was concerned it didn’t want to present a more expensive taxpayer-funded document to the electorate?

    No, don’t think that was the reason.

  27. Monty 27

    And at the moment they seem to all have swung to National – (Long may they see the light and become baseline supporters). But the question remains what is Labour offering to try and get a few back. It will be hard to convince those swing voters to back Labour again – especially while Clark Cullen Jamderton are there.

    Do you not realise that the problem as well as the asset is Clark? Cullen is of course all problem and no asset.

    So Labour who also seem a little devoid of policy have no idea how to gain back the voters who are flirting with John Key. Leftards only seem capable of bagging the Nats and Especially John Key – that is not a policy. And every time you try it John Key just seems to get more popular – what is Labour’s Plan – or are things is such a mess (despite Clark’s Brave face and denials) that policy has not been formulated. Being in the seat of power gives Labour the opportunity to develop policy with the massive resources to hand – yet I fail to see even a vision from Labour except retain power at all costs. Key talks about a vision for a prosperous NZ – that seems to be enough at the present time for the majority of voters.

  28. Skeptic. I’ve been to National’s website, have you? There aren’t proper policy docs there. Hell, the policy page on the Youth Guarantee (including the much vaunted boot camps) is 383 words long.

    The biggest policy doc there is the Blue-Green Strategy and it doesn’t have actual policies in it. Plus, most of the Nat caucus rejects it as too lefty, tree-hugging.

  29. Skeptic 29

    Lynne this is again why you should stick to technical things, because your political history is faulty.

    “But at least she has experience at both stitching them together and holding them together. The Nat’s haven’t – but they do have experience at making them implode. Helen has as well – Alliance in 2002.”

    But Helen Clark wasn’t always successful at stitching together coalitions. She failed on her first attempt in 1996. 1999 was hardly a major effort–there was not a big bridge to overcome. Even less so in 2002. 2005, both Peter Dunne and Winston said they would negotiate first with the party with the most seats.

    National does have experience in stitching together coalitions. What do you think 1996 was? Don’t you remember how bitter Helen Clark was when Winston didn’t come through for her? She expected Winston to come to her party. He didn’t. He went to National, because at the time National had better negotiating skills. So too had Bolger stitched together coalitions to hold together a minority government between much of 1993 and 1996, before MMP, when United, Christian Coalition, and the Conservative Parties set up. Maybe you also forget that Bolger managed to get Jim Anderton not to vote down the National government between 1993 and 1996.

    Or you may have forgotten how when Jenny Shipley rolled Jim Bolger and then fired Winston Peters, she managed to hold together a coalition government that went to full term. That took considerable negotiating skills as well.

    Given that senior people in New Zealand First and now Peter Dunne are saying that it is National’s election to lose, and National’s current support base suggests it’s likely to govern alone it’s a big call to make to say that John Key, who’s spent his entire career stitching together deals, doesn’t have the negotiating skills to build a coalition when he needs it.

  30. ants 30

    SP – “They don?t understand that for the left it?s about fighting for what we think is just, not merely being the strongest.”

    Thats incorrect – for the majority of the left its about:

    “What party will ensure I get my WFF still?”
    “What party will ensure that I keep my public sector job?”
    “What party will ensure my student loan remains interest free?”

    For the majority of the right its about:

    “What party will ensure I get to keep more of my income?”

    You’re completely taking the piss if you believe people vote for a common good – 99% of voters, whether left or right leaning, vote selfishly.

  31. Monty. Lucky we’ve got people like you calling people Leftards. I want to see you out there on the hustings every day of the campaign calling anyone who wants better social service a ‘leftard’

    If you think Cullen is a liability you’ve never seen the work the man does. Does he have a great media image? No. But he does the actual real business of government, the stuff that matters, better than anyone.

  32. djp 32

    Broadcaster: “An A4 page of paper contains less information then the internet, news at 11”

  33. ants. Here’s a clue – life isn’t all about money for me or other leftwingers or most people. The fact that all your examples of both left and right wing thought are solely concerned with money shows the shallowness of your political understanding, and why you can’t understand a leftwinger’s worldview.

  34. Skeptic 34

    Try to be honest for once, Steve. That’s the summary document. There are also five keynote speeches on justice and law and order issues.

    Labour hasn’t released any law and order policy since 2005. But the youth offending section of Labour’s law and order policy in 2005 takes up, wait for it, a whopping FIVE HUNDRED AND FIFTY WORDS! And very little of it concerns new initiatives.

    But nice try at being dishonest again Steve.

  35. Speeches aren’t policy documents. Honestly, direct me to the policy document on the Youth Guarantee. I’m dying to see it.

    As for Labour’s policy, um, check the relevant ministries… you’re not comapring apples with apples when you’re looking at the policies of a party in govt with one that’s not, a party in government has the entire policy capacity of the civil service at it’s disposal and announces policy through the Ministers, not through the party – that’s why I compared with the Greens.

    And you don’t need to call me a liar to win the debate if you actually have evidence.

  36. lprent 36

    Skeptic: I’d have said that 1996 was more about nationals desperation to retain power than anything else. The deal that they gave NZF was generous, EXTREMELY generous. In fact one could look at it as being extremely stupid on the part of the Nat’s negotiating team.

    Helen didn’t care to follow in such a level of stupidity. After all anyone can put a stupidly generous deal together. In case you hadn’t noticed, Helen is both smart and pretty tight about what she gives away in deals.

    Now remind me Oh wise one – what was the result of that 1996 coalition agreement? I seem to remember that NZF fell apart inside the coalition. The maori rump that went with national got richly rewarded by the maori electorate. I wonder if there is a lesson in there for the maori party?

    But really – who in the current national caucus engaged in these deals? McCully perhaps? Anyway if the Nat’s wish to make stupid deals then they will do so. Personally it is what I’d expect.

    The 1993-1996 was just the usual horse trading by national to get around their own caucus. It wasn’t threatening to the government, as they always had an option of not putting the policy forward that they were getting resistance inside their own caucus.

    BTW: It is likely that I have been around politics longer than you. In all likelihood I probably have a better formal education in it as well. I used to collect degrees as a hobby, just like I collected programming skills as a hobby and turned it into a career.

  37. don't vote labour 37

    “By the way I went onto the Labour Party wensite over the weekend and it seems all their policy dates back to 2005. When are Labour goinig to release fresh policy?”

    Labour never releases fresh policy, all they do is recycle stuff from the bottom of the socialist rubbish bin.

  38. Scribe 38

    Steve,

    National has 14 vague policies.

    Where do you get the number 14 from? By my count, that pamphlet has 18 subheads, plus the little box on broadband. That seems to me like 19 “vague policies”, if that’s what we’re going to call them.

    The first lesson in criticism class is make sure your criticisms are factually correct.

    Keep plugging along, though. Something will turn the polls around eventually — or not.

    Captcha: bad selection (of number of policies?)

  39. Non 39

    Those are the Greens 2005 policies dickwad.

  40. T-rex 40

    Bye Non 🙂

  41. Luke C 41

    The brochure doesnt seem to have an authorization statement on it. Surely this must be counted as electoral advertising?

  42. Hey D4J shall we have another round?

  43. Steve: You are right, the Greens have helped Labour to be labeled the ‘Nanny State government’ with such successes as :

    -On 16 May, the Crimes (Substituted Section 59) Amendment Bill passes into law, ending the availability of the ‘reasonable force’ defence for the purposes of correction which allowed parents to legally beat their children.

    -11th June 2007 – Sue K – Government introduced new Food & Nutrition Guidelines in Schools.

    The Greens have also had wonderful successes in getting Labour to squander taxpayers money on their flaky hippy beliefs (homepathy, naturopathy etc):

    -The Greens secure $450K of funding in the 2007 Budget for a new Chief Advisor: Integrated Care, to work within the Ministry of Health. The Chief Advisor will be supported by a policy analyst to look at ways to integrate complementary healthcare and conventional medicine, particularly in the area of chronic condition management.

    -The Complementary Health Resource within the Health Ministry website, http://www.newhealth.govt.nz/maccah.htm, funded by a Green Budget initiative, is launched.

    (This website is now effectively dead and no DHB’s use SCAM (supplementary complementary alternative medicine) practitioners)

    http://www.greens.org.nz/about/achievements.htm

  44. T-rex 44

    Bryan:

    Re: Your first two points. I can’t believe you actually said that. F*ck you’re a gumby. Fancy the government intervening and “ending the availability of the ‘reasonable force’ defence for the purposes of correction which allowed parents to legally beat their children” (your words). God knows we need more children beaten, not less! And promoting good nutrition??? Who does this government think they are! Clearly we want more malnutrition, not less!

    On the last… maybe it is hippy medicine. But some of it has supporting empirical evidence, so hey, what’s the harm. Oh wait, I see the harm, as you say it’s the government SQUANDERING MONEY! All 450k of it.

    Quick Clinton, update wastewatch, Bryan has found another 0.00027c/week! Nail in the freakin coffin right there!

    I mean sure, like most waste it WOULD require cutting services that some people might value quite highly, but those are OTHER PEOPLE so who cares.

  45. Quoth the Raven 45

    You’re completely taking the piss if you believe people vote for a common good – 99% of voters, whether left or right leaning, vote selfishly.

    What utter sh*t. The difference between most left and right wing voters is that we on left vote for the common good. Those on the right vote for their back pocket (or so people who aren’t like them get sh*t) and even then they get it wrong.

  46. T-rex 46

    Raven – I think it’s also that people on the left are smart enough to realise that in the mid and long term actions that maximise the common good are generally the same as those that maximise the personal good.

    Ants – I imagine a significant number of the more left aligned on this site could personally discount your theory. I certainly can. Perhaps i vote selfishly and I’m just smart enough to be effectively selfish.

  47. T-Rex: Gumby ? You mean that cute little claymation guy with a penchant for mischief and mayhem ? Sounds exactly like me 🙂

    If you follow the link you will see these are all quotes from the Greens website, sorry I forgot to indicate that.

    Have a listen to Matthew Hooton and Laila Harre on Politics on Nine to Noon theorising that Labours 25% lag behind National in the polls is partially down to ordinary Kiwis being sick of told what to do by the Government. The latest example being the ditching of incandescent lamps.

    Left to it’s own devices Labour would never have been dumb enough to let Sue Bradfords ‘anti-smacking bill’ see the light of day. Helen Clark is a saavy operator and must have known how much of an insult it would be to most parents who would never smack these kids and how ineffectual it is in preventing the evil monsters who beat their kids to death. No doubt Labour needed the Greens to support some other initiative ( maybe the EFA ) and this was the Greens price.

    On SCAM (supplements complementary alternative medicines) this is $450k a year of pure waste: again no doubt some payoff from Labour to the flaky end of the Green Party. The poor bugger who gets the job of Chief Advisor will be in the unenviable position of trying to get doctors to adopt practises like homeopathy that any scientifically trained person finds ludicrous. I can see this dying a quiet death like the “Complementary Health Resource within the Health Ministry website” which hasn’t been updated since 2004.

    Earlier this year I had some email correspondence with a ‘senior policy advisor’ in the MInistry of Health. He confirmed that while there is no MOH restriction on SCAM use in DHB’s not a single one has adopted any of the practices discussed on the above mentioned section of the MOH website.

    I know $450k isn’t a lot to Wellington policy wonks but it would pay for 5 extra teachers or nurses on the frontline. INstead it is being squandered on the deluded belief system of some aging Green Party spinner hippy chick with an unresolved father issue ( Sue B or Sue K you choose).

  48. burt 48

    Quoth the Raven

    What utter sh*t. The difference between most left and right wing voters is that we on left vote for the common good. Those on the right vote for their back pocket (or so people who aren’t like them get sh*t) and even then they get it wrong.

    What utter sh*t. The difference between most right and left wing voters is that we on right vote for the common good. Those on the left vote for their back pocket (or so people who aren’t like them get sh*t) and even then they get it wrong.

    See two can play partisan myopia.

    For gods sake is that the best you can do? Don’t forget that when Labour are looking sad in the polls they pull out bribes like increases to WFF – you can’t convince me that people didn’t vote for that gift directly into their own back pockets. Oh let me guess, the 25% of families not eligible are all left wing and it was their gift to the poor disadvantaged right wing families, so they voted Labour in…. Yeah right!

  49. T-rex 49

    Bryan – It wasn’t that I thought you were misquoting, just that I couldn’t understand how you could represent achievements such as those as bad things. It’s really weird!!!

    Yeah, I think you do actually remind me of a little claymation dude. It’s not that you’re an asshole at all, you just only ever seem to think one layer deep!

    Why on earth would parents who would never smack their children be insulted by that bill??? SURELY they’d feel as though they were vindicated in the “don’t beat children” stance! As to those who do… whether it stops them or not is debatable, but it’ll certainly remove their defence when they do. And to stop them we have excellent initiatives like the “it’s not ok” ads. Or do you not like them either?

    Homeopathy – meh. I don’t have much time for it, but then I don’t expect the government to perfectly represent my views, and I know a LOT of people who think it’s valid. Why shouldn’t they have some of their views catered to, however stupid you and I may think they are?

  50. burt 50

    T-rex

    Children who are beaten by their parents probably prey for their parents to ‘only smack them’ – not they can’t even prey for that!

    I think you have nailed the point, parents who thrash their kids are not going to stop that because smacking is now illegal. One might also argue that parents who might ‘smack’ their children in public now can’t so what we will see is the removal of the ‘safety valve’ in public forcing that anger to be taken home where a beating is more likely.

    It’s a complex issue, I support the idea behind it but I think it’s all just weasel words at the end of the day. Some folk smack their children, some beat them senseless and some even beat them to death. Making the thin end of the wedge illegal will make no difference to the serious offenders, as we have seen. The killings haven’t stopped for now however the real test will be in a generation from now, will it have stopped then? Yes I agree “it’s not OK” was an excellent campaign, pity Trevor Mallard undermined a fair bit of that because he didn’t get fired – but I guess he’s a Labour MP and we know it’s just not on to fire them for doing stuff that’s illegal.

  51. T-rex 51

    I think you have nailed the point, parents who thrash their kids are not going to stop that because smacking is now illegal.

    I’m not sure about that. The law has taken away the shades of grey. There is now a clear stance of “physical force is NOT ok as a form of discipline”. It may well lead to a sea change. The worst of the worst will go on unimpeded, and will go to jail. But the ones who simply grew up with it and thought it was normal may behave differently. Certainly can’t hurt (if you’ll forgive the expression).

  52. burt 52

    T-rex

    I kind of agree with you, which is why I think it will take a generation to really see if it makes a difference. You are absolutely correct that if we smack our children we ‘normalise’ low level violence and then people like Trevor Mallard think nothing of punching other adults when they don’t have the intelligence to ‘fight’ with their words.

  53. National doesn’t work to thestandard.org’s timetable.

    They will release a more detailed account of their policies, closer to Election time, meantime they will just watch the poll numbers go up and up as Aunty Helen keeps talking her way into retirement.

  54. T-rex 54

    Wait and see hey. I just don’t think it makes sense to condemn a government for acting to protect those who can’t protect themselves.

    I’m not a fan of Mallard either. Wouldn’t be sorry to see him “reshuffled”. I can understand why he punched Henare, and aren’t really bothered by it, but generally he seems to be working with a pretty small and stroppy toolbox.

  55. Aunty Helen keeps talking her way into retirement.

    Is Helen your auntie? Shit boyo you didn’t get your brains from that side of the family that’s f’sure…

  56. T-rex 56

    I think it’s part of some desperate bid for credibility by association ‘Sod.

    Notice how seldom anyone refers to Uncle John? I guess his name just doesn’t carry the same weight.

  57. Tane 57

    T-Rex, brings this video to mind:

  58. T-rex 58

    Perceptive guy, Hone.

    Well. More perceptive than some.

    On a TOTALLY UNRELATED NOTE – Hi Brett.

  59. Eweugh! “Uncle John” sounds like something you’d pay a hooker to call you…

    But back on topic – I had a look at these so-called policies tonight and I’m amazed this tread has gone so long. I mean surely when a bullet point is given the title of “policy” it’s case closed? Or are do these chumps plan to govern by bullet point?

  60. burt 60

    Robinsod

    I took a look and I’m quite impressed. I like the 10% early repayment discount on student loans. Perhaps the Labour party could top that?

    Oh I know, no Tertiary fees and average after tax wage as a universal student allowance, no entry prerequisites and all students get a degree in Participation after 3 years.

    Surely it would encourage more people into study wouldn’t it? Get the building industry rocketing along building more Universities. More cash in the hands of more students will require more bars, car yards, Hospitals and drug/alcohol counselors. The inflation as a result of this spending would then be a lever to restrict essential wage inflation as measures need to be in place when govt spending personal spending is driving high inflation.

    However I must concede, National’s early repayment discount does none of that, it just encourages more rapid repayment of interest free loans.

  61. burt 61

    I also like the idea of National’s Youth Plan, has Labour clarified their position on raising the school leaving age to 18? It would be good if Labour could release their policy on this so I can compare at least the bullets with National’s.

    Remembering I’m not a National party voter, this brochure must have you guys wetting your pants?

  62. outofbed 62

    Policy ??
    What a National Government May Entail?
    http://election08.scoop.co.nz/what-a-national-government-may-entail/

    another good article by Gordon Campbell

  63. jbc 63

    Now, don’t take this as a defense of National’s lack of policy detail, but it seems that some of the arguments opposing are rather specious.

    From the Scoop article:

    [Nat’s policies] none have any costings. attached a rather essential ingredient if voters are to judge how affordable the ‘policies’ are, and the levels of debt that may be required to finance them

    Really? How many NZ voters are going to be spreadsheeting this stuff? How many would actually understand the workings of Treasury? Honestly.

    If voters aren’t smart enough to be trusted to judge the substance of a political advertisement [justification for EFB is that voters are swayed by advertising spend rather than message] then they’re hardly treasury wonks. If they are then they probably don’t need the numbers to make up their minds.

    I tend to agree with the present government’s cynical view of voters’ intelligence. Most are swayed by their emotions (a little to the left, a little to the right). They see cute animals on a TV advertisement and then switch telephone IDD providers based on this.

  64. T-rex 64

    Boy, I sure hope Notionals quasi-policies don’t cost any money. Especially those huge tax cuts they’re promising.

    Because it looks like 60% of NZ voters are busy quite liking the setup Labour has going. I wonder if that 60% include some of the 70% who tell pollsters to piss off. I’m picking yeah…

  65. burt 65

    jbc

    Now how much were interest free student loans going to cost when they were announced? Oh that’s right – we weren’t told were we, Treasury had some ideological burps and the information they provided was just crap.

    The silly buggers in Treasury said something about the interest free student loans and extensions to WFF causing inflation. Thankfully Dr Muppet Cullen was smarter than them and he told us that govt spending didn’t cause inflation like tax cuts did. Just as well, imagine how inflation would be looking now if govt spending caused inflation… Oh, hang on… we haven’t had tax cuts yet….

  66. Vanilla Eis 66

    jbc: I certainly won’t have the spreadsheet out, but it doesn’t take a huge amount of mental effort to realise that if National promises to spend, say, 1.5 billion dollars on a broadband network, then that $1.5 billion is going to have to come from somewhere.

    If National had the balls to do costings, anyone with 5 minutes to spare could easily tot up how much they were pledging, and then ask the next question that comes to mind: Where from?

  67. burt 67

    T-rex

    While we are on the subject of what people are thinking…. I wonder if that 60% is the same people in this survey.

    http://www.interest.co.nz/ratesblog/index.php/2008/06/21/were-worried/

    Now a record 62% of New Zealanders are expecting New Zealand to have bad times financially over the next 12 months. Only 16% are expecting good times.

    Can we assume from this that real Labour support is only 16%

  68. burt 68

    Vanilla Eis

    Did we ask the same questions when a few billion were thrown at Interest free loans and WFF. Oh no, because the govt had such massive surpluses from fiscal drag – but that was before thousands of tax payers started leaving the country wasn’t it. I suppose now that it’s not Labour planning to run rampant with the cheque book we had better stop and think because Labour are good and National are bad.

  69. T-rex 69

    burt – You can assume that if you like. I’m not astoundingly stupid, so I think I’ll assume something else, but you go knock yourself out.

    Hey, maybe it’s that in hard financial times people aren’t quite so keen to go it alone and the real value of a community becomes apparent.

  70. T-rex 70

    The National loans policy has no positive return for NZ.

    Labours interest free policy is only valid while the load holder is in NZ. If you go overseas you start paying interest. Even with a 10% discount on voluntary repayments you’d have to be stupid to pay it back while you were in NZ – oh yes, lets all rush to pay back our interest free loan when we could instead invest the money and collect interest on it.

    So the only people who will make and benefit from voluntary repayments are those leaving the country. Just the group we want to give money to right?

    Or have you got a different view Burt?

  71. andy 71

    burt

    How much has the interest free loans cost? And have the loans ballooned as The Nats predicted?

    Serious question!

    I have a student loan, I will pay it off 3 years earlier than prior to interest free. Then I get a 10% pay rise, as that is my SL deduction from wages.

    What I am trying to get to is that as a tax payer and consumer, does the interest free SL allow me to spend more (more GST) and save more (income tax on interest), allow me to get ahead buy a house etc.

    Lots of intangibles there, I also know people who were silly with loans under lockwood ‘free money’ smith and racked up huge debts, they had previously given up on paying it back, but for the first time they can see light at the end of the tunnel, so to speak. So they can know better participate as above.

    cheers

  72. Vanilla Eis 72

    burt: I honestly don’t know about WFF – did you demand to know how much it was going to cost? But yes, people were aware that there was a surplus and room for more spending. You’re alleging mismanagement by the government because now there isn’t a surplus for Key to run into the ground if he takes over? Unless I’m mistaken, there wasn’t one when Cullen took over either. I’m sure you see that as a good thing, and the creation of a surplus as bad, but I see it more as good financial management on Cullens part.

    As for the interest on student loans – unless I’m wrong, student loans are counted as an asset to the government (Much like mortgages go on a banks assets balance). Writing off interest on them simply means that aforementioned asset grows more slowly. Seeing as how thousands of students were fleeing the country and those remaining were barely able to cover the interest on their loans, I don’t necessarily think that was a bad thing. Because, y’know, there’s not much point in having a fantastic asset that grows (with compounding interest!) if you never get to realise any returns on it.

  73. How about this idea:

    We are all part of the Tumeke blogosphere ranking list. Every month or so Tim Selwyn compiles this list based on Technorati listings and some other parameters.

    While these ratings do not reflect quality but rather quantity judging by the fact that Farrar with his moronic sycophants consistently makes it to number one, there have been some very interesting changes this month on this list.

    For example John Key’s site went down 10 places from 33 to 43.
    Does this perhaps mean that people are getting tired of the same bland little “feel good” speeches John Key’s staff puts on it to keep the visitor enthralled by Slippery John and are they looking for more real information about Nationals politics than they are getting?

    If you believe like me that the NZH is just a National pusher so therefore it is likely that the polls are designed to have a positive outcome for National is it perhaps possible that the Tumeke blogosphere is more representative of the Political sentiments in this country?

    I am by the way proud to announce that I’m rubbing virtual shoulders with the man. My blog went 4 places up to 44. Not bad for an unknown Dutchy who arrived here a mere 2.8 years ago and started her blog 4 months ago. I already left Bill English behind me and hopefully I will surpass our Smiling Assassin next month.

    With some very nice compliments in my comments does this mean that people are hungry for real news in stead of the pre chewed mainstream crappy news? So that hopefully they can make up their own minds rather than follow the pollsters into the next election?
    And yes I place the ones critical of my site as well.

    Ooh yuck, I just saw the National brochure. Your typical empty sound bite sized talking points, just big enough to sound like something and say absolutely nothing but trust me they’ll go down a treat for the average kiwi sheeple nitwit.

  74. How nice for you tulip.

  75. burt 75

    T-rex

    Would you lend your own money interest free and expect it to be repaid if you offered no incentive?

  76. Vanilla Eis 76

    burt: It’s only interest free if you remain in New Zealand. While working in New Zealand, you are taxed an extra ten cents in the dollar over the repayment threshhold (which is something like $18k). This money is taken out by the IRD – just look at a tex-code declaration if you ever fill one out and see that students get their own tax codes and all. So yes, I would expect it to be repaid. Anyone heading overseas has interest applied to their loan, but would you consider that they have any incentive to repay it?

    Andy makes an excellent point: Paying interest on the loan is far less productive for businesses as it means that a large portion of our income is simply being given to the Government instead of being spent on goods and services. I’ve heard the horror stories about people who borrowed $40k, have so far repaid $50k, yet still have another $30k or so to go. There is something seriously flawed with that system. I thought you right-wing lot were all against the Government making a profit off it’s citizens?

    captcha: inland $1000. Creepy.

  77. Joker 77

    “they’ll go down a treat for the average kiwi sheeple nitwit”

    Maybe from the perspective of the average clog wearing, edam eating, surrender monkey.

  78. Vanilla Eis 78

    Gah, tax-code declaration. It’s the IR330. I’m sure you’ve seen one. Students don’t get a whole lot of choice in the matter – especially since the IRD administers your loan in the first place.

    Joker: I thought the French were the surrender monkeys?

  79. Joker 79

    They are but it is such a great phrase I just couldn’t resist using it. And the Dutch rolled over in ww2 as well.

  80. Pascal's bookie 80

    Joker,
    Yep, those tough manly Americans sure proved the French to be cowards in Iraq.

  81. Pascal's bookie 81

    Natch, here’s that link joker.

    http://www.exile.ru/print.php?ARTICLE_ID=7061&IBLOCK_ID=35

  82. slightlyrighty 82

    Wow.

    National policies on 2 A4 pages?

    Labour got their on a credit card last time didn’t they?

  83. T-rex 83

    “Would you lend your own money interest free and expect it to be repaid if you offered no incentive?”

    Well for starters, there are the compulsory repayments described above.

    Next, you should probably look into the successes of the micro-loan schemes in places like Bangladesh, India etc.

    So to answer your question – yes, depending on the nature of the loan.

    Surrender monkey is an awesome phrase

  84. Joker
    LOL

    I think Holland had about a 150 soldiers on bikes in WW II and antique guns, not exactly your stand up army against the German army.
    I think they held out for two days.

    Common you have to admit that most people only listen to sound bites.
    And not just in your beautiful and mostly gracious country but world wide.

  85. Joker 85

    Thanks for that Pascal’s bookie. My wife is French and she will appreciate the reference to counter my teasing.

  86. oops, Come on was the word I was looking for.

  87. Phil 87

    After the Michelen tyre debacle at the Indianapolis GP in 2005, the phrase (at least in motoring circles) was amended to “Cheese-eating tyre-shreding surrender monkeys”

    Cap; “cents forgery”
    doesn’t sound as cost effective as forging a nice shiny $100 note…

  88. gobsmacked 88

    Update: it doesn’t seem possible for National to actually have LESS policy, but somehow they’ve managed it.

    One of the few policies that have been announced … has now been dumped.

    http://stuff.co.nz/4596970a20475.html

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Prime Minister to visit Fiji and Australia
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern will visit two of New Zealand’s most important Pacific partners, Fiji and Australia, next week. The visit to Fiji will be the first by a New Zealand Prime Minister in four years and comes during the 50th anniversary of Fijian independence and diplomatic relations between our ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    14 hours ago
  • Next steps in Criminal Cases Review Commission announced
    Justice Minister Andrew Little and New Zealand First MP Darroch Ball, have today announced the appointment of the Chief Commissioner of the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), the location, and the membership of the Establishment Advisory Group. Colin Carruthers QC has been appointed Chief Commissioner of the CCRC for an ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    19 hours ago
  • Horticultural Ahuwhenua Trophy finalists announced
    Māori Development Minister Hon Nanaia Mahuta and Agriculture Minister Hon Damien O’Connor co-announced the first horticultural finalists for the Ahuwhenua Trophy celebrating excellence in the Māori agricultural sector.  The three finalists are Ngai Tukairangi Trust from Mt Maunganui, Otama Marere Trust from Tauranga, and Hineora Orchard Te Kaha 15B Ahuwhenua ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    19 hours ago
  • New support for students with dyslexia
    A new kete of resources to strengthen support for students with dyslexia will provide extra tools for the new Learning Support Coordinators (LSCs) as they start in schools, Associate Education Minister Tracey Martin announced today. The Minister launched the kete in Wellington this morning, at the first of three induction ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    19 hours ago
  • Rental reforms progress to select committee stage
    The Government continues to make progress on a fairer and more secure rental market for renters and landlords with the First Reading of the Residential Tenancies Amendment Bill and its referral to the Social Services and Community Select Committee.  “Now is the opportunity for landlords, tenants and others who want ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Papua New Guinea Prime Minister to visit New Zealand
    Papua New Guinea’s Prime Minister Hon James Marape will visit New Zealand from 21-25 February, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern announced today. “New Zealand and Papua New Guinea have a warm and friendly relationship. I look forward to welcoming Prime Minister Marape here and strengthening the relationship between our two countries,” ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Free school lunches served up to thousands
    Thousands of children have begun receiving a free lunch on every day of the school week, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said. The Government’s free and healthy school lunch programme is under way for 7,000 students at 31 schools in Hawke’s Bay / Tairāwhiti and Bay of Plenty / Waiariki, extending ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Social Wellbeing Agency replaces Social Investment Agency with new approach
    The Minister for Social Development Carmel Sepuloni today announced a new approach that continues to broaden the Government’s social sector focus from a narrow, investment approach to one centred on people and wellbeing. Minister Sepuloni said redefining the previous approach to social investment by combining science, data and lived experience ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Government to strengthen protections for whistleblowers
    The Government is strengthening the Protected Disclosures Act to provide better protection for whistle blowers, Minister of State Services Chris Hipkins said today. “The Protected Disclosures Act is meant to encourage people to speak up about serious wrongdoing in the workplace and protect them from losing their jobs or being ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • PM speech at Parliamentary Chinese New Year celebration 2020
    Nǐn hǎo (Hello in Mandarin). Xīn Nián Kuài Lè (Happy New Year in Mandarin) Néi Hóu (Hello in Cantonese). Sun Nin Fai Lok (Happy New Year in Cantonese) Tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou katoa. Thank you for your invitation to attend this celebration today. I would like to acknowledge ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • IPANZ Annual Address
    Kia ora. Ngā mihi nui ki a koutou katoa. Nau mai haere mai ki te Whare Pāremata. E ngā mana whenua ki tēnei rohe Taranaki Whānui, Te Upoko o Te Ika, Ngāti Toa Rangatira, Ngāti Raukawa – kei te mihi, kei te mihi, kei te mihi. E ngā mana, e ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • 2020 IPANZ Annual Address
    Kia ora. Ngā mihi nui ki a koutou katoa. Nau mai haere mai ki te Whare Pāremata. E ngā mana whenua ki tēnei rohe Taranaki Whānui, Te Upoko o Te Ika, Ngāti Toa Rangatira, Ngāti Raukawa – kei te mihi, kei te mihi, kei te mihi. E ngā mana, e ngā ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Tougher penalties for gun crime a step closer
    Tougher penalties for gun crime are a step closer with the passage of firearms reform legislation through another stage in Parliament. The Arms Legislation Bill has tonight passed its Second Reading. “The changes have one objective - to prevent firearms falling into the wrong hands,” said Police Minister Stuart Nash. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Arms Legislation Bill: Second Reading
    Introduction Mr Speaker We all know why we are here today. It has been a long journey. The journey did not actually begin on 15 March 2019. It began on 30 June 1997. Almost 23 years ago, Justice Sir Thomas Thorp told us what was wrong with our firearms legislation. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • New era for vocational education
    The Government’s work to put trades and vocational education back on the agenda took another major step forward today with the passing of the Education (Vocational Education and Training Reform) Amendment Bill, Education Minister Chris Hipkins said. “This is a watershed day for trades and vocational education. These law changes formalise ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Bill to Amend the Greater Christchurch Regeneration Act
    Speeding up the return of Christchurch regeneration activities to local leadership is behind the Greater Christchurch Regeneration Amendment Bill introduced to Parliament today by Minister Megan Woods. “As we approach nine years since the February 2011 earthquake in Canterbury, and with the transition to local leadership well underway, the time ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Milford Track to partly reopen after storm damage
    Hundreds of New Zealanders and international visitors will be able to get back out into nature with the Milford Track partially reopening next week, after extensive assessments and repairs, the Minister of Conservation Eugenie Sage announced today. The popular Great Walk has been closed since 3 February after an extreme ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Government drives low-emissions transport momentum
    Up to 110 new EV chargers nationwide in cities and regions 50 electric vehicles for ride-sharing The Government is helping deliver more infrastructure and options for low emissions transport through new projects, Energy and Resources Minister Dr Megan Woods says. Tauranga, Nelson, Levin, New Plymouth and Oamaru are just some ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Kiwis better off under Coalition Government
    New Zealanders are increasingly better off under this Government as wages rise and families have more disposable income, Finance Minister Grant Robertson says. Stats NZ reported today that average household disposable incomes after housing costs rose 4.9% in 2019. This was the highest rise in four years and came as ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Another step towards restoring rights for screen production workers
    All New Zealanders need to have their voices heard at work to ensure we have an inclusive and productive economy. Today we introduce a Bill to do this for workers in the New Zealand screen industry, Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Iain Lees-Galloway says. “The Screen Industry Workers Bill will ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Enhanced Taskforce Green for Southland and South Otago
    The Government has announced further help for the Southland and Otago regions to speed up recovery efforts from the floods.  “I’ve approved Enhanced Taskforce Green (ETFG), making $500,000 available to help with the clean-up in Fiordland, Southland, and the Clutha district in Otago,” Minister for Social Development Carmel Sepuloni said.  ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Employers and Industry take the lead to connect students to vocational education
    Following the announcement that more than 340 schools will be funded to run events promoting vocational education, the Government has announced it will fund a further 257 events to be run by employers and industry. “These industry-run events will allow more than 30,000 students to connect with more than 2,000 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Rental reforms a step closer with the introduction of the Residential Tenancies Amendment Bill
    Today the Government is making progress on a fairer and more secure rental market for renters and landlords with the introduction of the Residential Tenancies Amendment Bill in Parliament.  “This Bill includes a series of reforms to improve the wellbeing of the 609,700 households that live in rented homes, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Biosecurity Minister announces world first eradication of pea weevil
    A Government programme to wipe out pea weevil has achieved a world first, with Biosecurity Minister Damien O’Connor today announcing the successful eradication of the noxious pest from Wairarapa. This means the nearly four-year ban on pea plants and pea straw was lifted today. Commercial and home gardeners can again grow ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Temporary Accommodation Service activated for Southland flooding
    Southland residents hit by flooding caused by heavy rainfall can now access help finding temporary accommodation with the Government activating the Temporary Accommodation Service, Minister of Civil Defence Peeni Henare announced today. “The Temporary Accommodation Service (TAS) has been activated by the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment to help ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Bridges: Over-hyped and under-delivered
    “Is that it?” That’s Finance Minister Grant Robertson’s response to Simon Bridges’ much-hyped economic speech today. “Simon Bridges just gave the most over-hyped and under-delivered speech that I can remember during my time in politics,” Grant Robertson said. “It’s not surprising. Simon Bridges literally said on the radio this morning ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Police to trial eye in the sky in Christchurch
    A trial deployment of the Police Eagle helicopter in Christchurch will test whether the aircraft would make a significant difference to crime prevention and community safety. “The Bell 429 helicopter will be based in Christchurch for five weeks, from 17 February to 20 March,” said Police Minister Stuart Nash. “The ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Momentum of trade talks continues with visits to promote Pacific and Middle East links
    The Government has kept up the pace of its work to promote New Zealand’s trade interests and diversify our export markets, with visits to Fiji and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) by Trade and Export Growth Minister David Parker. Building momentum to bring the PACER Plus trade and development agreement ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Coalition Govt’s investment in Customs nets record drugs haul: 3 tonnes stopped at borders in 2019
    The Coalition Government’s investment in a strong border and disrupting transnational organised crime produced record results for stopping drugs in 2019, says Minister of Customs Jenny Salesa. The illegal drugs were seized at the New Zealand border by Customs, and overseas by Customs’ international border partners before the drugs could ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Separated scenic cycleway starts
    Transport Minister Phil Twyford today kicked off construction of a separated cycleway alongside Tamaki Drive. A two-way separated cycleway will be built along the northern side of Tamaki Drive, between the Quay Street Cycleway extension and Ngapipi Road. There will be a separate walking path alongside. Phil Twyford said giving ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Earthquake-Prone Building loan scheme: eligibility criteria announced
    Owner-occupiers of unit and apartments living in earthquake-prone buildings will have certainty about the financial support they’ll be eligible for with the release of criteria for an upcoming assistance scheme, Minister for Building and Construction Jenny Salesa says. The Residential Earthquake-Prone Building Financial Assistance Scheme will help unit owners facing ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Travel restrictions to remain in place as coronavirus precaution
    Temporary restrictions on travel from China will remain in place as a precautionary measure to protect against the spread of the COVID-19 coronavirus. The restrictions which prevent foreign nationals travelling from, or transiting through, mainland China from entering New Zealand have been extended for a further 8 days. This position ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Over $1 million to help Tairāwhiti youth into employment
    Employment Minister Willie Jackson announced today that Tairāwhiti rangatahi will benefit from an investment made by the Government’s He Poutama Rangatahi (HPR) scheme. The funding will go to the Tautua Village, Kauneke programme and the Matapuna Supported Employment Programme which will fund 120 rangatahi over two years. “Both programmes work ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • School attendance has to improve
    All parents and caregivers need to ensure that their children go to school unless they are sick, Associate Education Minister Tracey Martin said today. “The school attendance results for 2019 show, across the board, a drop in the number of students going to school regularly,” the Minister says. “Apart from ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Crown and Moriori sign a Deed of Settlement
    A Deed of Settlement agreeing redress for historical Treaty claims has been signed by the Crown and Moriori at Kōpinga Marae on Rēkohu (Chatham Islands) today, Minister for Treaty of Waitangi Negotiations Andrew Little has announced. Moriori have a tradition of peace that extends back over 600 years. This settlement ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Waikato Expressway driving towards completion
    Transport Minister Phil Twyford today with Māori King Tuheitia Pōtatau Te Wherowhero VII officially opened the country’s newest road, the $384 million Huntly section of the Waikato Expressway. The 15km four-lane highway with side and central safety barriers takes State Highway 1 east of Huntly town, across lowlands and streams ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • 3400 New Zealanders treated in first year of new hepatitis C treatment
    The rapid uptake of life-saving new hepatitis C medicine Maviret since it was funded by PHARMAC a year ago means the elimination of the deadly disease from this country is a realistic goal, Health Minister David Clark says. Hepatitis C is a blood-borne virus which attacks the liver, proving fatal ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Kaupapa Māori approach for homelessness
      Kaupapa Māori will underpin the Government’s new plan to deal with homelessness announced by the Prime Minister in Auckland this morning. “Māori are massively overrepresented among people experiencing homelessness, so, to achieve different outcomes for Māori, we have to do things very differently,” says the Minister of Māori Development ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government steps up action to prevent homelessness
    1000 new transitional housing places delivered by end of year to reduce demand for emergency motel accommodation. Introduce 25% of income payment, after 7 days, for those in emergency motel accommodation to bring in line with other forms of accommodation support. Over $70m extra to programmes that prevents those at ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Important step for new financial conduct regime
    Clear requirements for ensuring customers are treated fairly by banks, insurers and other financial service providers are included in new financial conduct legislation that passed its first reading today. “The recent reviews, by the Financial Markets Authority (FMA) and Reserve Bank of New Zealand, into the conduct of banks and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago