- Date published:
7:45 am, August 15th, 2019 - 220 comments
Categories: climate change, Environment, farming, food, housing, sustainability - Tags: gardening, land, MPI, resiliency, resiliency gardening
I’m very pleased to see the government moving to protect prime food growing land from development.
Environment Minister David Parker said the government would “prefer potatoes” to more subdivisions.
He and the Agriculture Minister today released a document for public consultation on the threats this highly productive farm land faces and how to protect it.
The document includes a draft National Policy Statement.
“In parts of New Zealand we’re losing too many of our productive soils to subdivision… we’ve got to get that balance better,” Mr Parker said.
“Every day, truckloads of brocolli and other winter greens leave from the Auckland region, not just to feed Auckland, but also to feed the South Island.
Given the encroaching climate emergency, and the now mainstream acceptance that there will be food shortages going forward, this is an important move by Labour. Fertile land is priceless.
Let’s join up some more dots. A big part of the ecological footprint of food in New Zealand is the domestic food miles. An economy based on transporting food from Auckland to Invercargill will have to change. We need more local food growing and seasonal eating, supported by improved rail and shipping networks for the foods that can’t easily be grown in a region (feijoa for Southland, oats for Auckland).
Urban land can also be highly productive. Many backyards are still suitable for vegetable growing. In some there is room for a fruit and nut orchard and some hens. The carbon footprint of lettuce or potatoes grown in our backyards is minuscule. People who don’t want to or can’t garden can provide a living to other people who want to garden and don’t have land. This is food production in resilient systems, that provide employment and support local economies. The Farmers Market is no longer on the other side of town, there’s one in every suburb.
All those Nimbys in Auckland with the big lawns and mature trees who are stopping housing infill are doing us a favour, because those landscapes can easily be converted to food production if/when we start getting crop failures internationally. We need to prepare rich folk to learn how to share, and there are social justice issues to resolve, but protection of that land is a good thing.
While we will continue to grow food in large farms, they’re not as resilient to extreme nature events as smaller farms and gardens growing polycultures. It takes one flood to destroy a farm crop of potatoes. An orchard flattened by gale winds or one summer’s bad drought, takes much longer to replace. Smaller farms and gardens can be more easily protected from weather and pest species.
Green urban spaces also have the benefit of protecting people. Cooler in summer, and more conducive to good mental health. Lots of wins here.
Finally, if we want more potatoes and less subdivisions, at some point we will have to talk about population and the carrying capacity of each watershed in New Zealand. The push to infill our cities, while understandable as a short term response to the housing crisis, is going to create another set of problems down the line. Sustainability and climate resiliency are intrinsically tied to how much food we can grow relative to the number of people who need to eat it. The global economy built on fossil fuels hides this fact.
There’s also an ethical imperative here, because in a climate change world if we don’t grow our own food we are expecting other, often poorer countries to do it for us and they may not be able to afford to do that.
A couple of further notes. I hope to see urban vegans all over this if they want to put their money where their mouth is in terms of climate change change. Importing industrial yet vulnerableplants crops from across the globe is a major climate mitigation fail. When I see vegans doing the mahi of getting New Zealand to grow beans and tree-crop nuts I’ll give the movement more respect. This isn’t an invitation to spam comments with vegan propaganda, but thoughtful, solution-based discussion is welcome.
The other is that it was hard to write this post without thinking about the juxtaposition of Labour protecting food growing land around Auckland at the same time as refusing to step in and protect the archeological site of some of the oldest food gardens in the country: Ihumātao. Māori have been pointing out that they’ve been trying to protect land for a very long time. Maybe the rest of us could learn something here. As long as we value profit over people and the environment we will get both these things wrong.
Proposed National Policy Statement for Highly Productive Land (MPI documents and submission forms)
The Right-wing farming community will be fully supportive of this, having forever decried the loss of good, productive farmland to housing and life-style block proliferation.
However, the demand by land owners for the right to sell to whomsoever they want to, as evidenced by the anguish presently about selling farms to forestry companies, shows the issue that might tip-up the plans.
The right wing farming community SHOULD (but probably won't) acknowledge that it should largely be up to individual property owners what happens to their land and not councils dictating what they should and shouldn't do.
are you ok with someone building a large and noisy factory next to your house?
He SHOULD (but probably won't) be.
I live next to a railway line across from a noisy factory. So in short I don't care.
I live not far from a railway and hear the Eagle Police chopper at 3 AM,… I kinda do care cos its usually them checking out burglars or traffic problems , which needs to be done… I want to go back to the bush before I get too old.
The bush doesn't do you any wrong.
Anyhow's,… every time I hear that train comin' or goin'… I get a little Johnny Cash about things…
Johnny Cash – Folsom Prison Blues – Live at San Quentin … – YouTube
Johnny Cash – San Quentin (Live from Prison) – YouTube
Physically as well as ideologically deaf, huh.
That explains a lot'. That's why you never listen to any other opinion.
in your world gosman, the right wing farming community will chase unlimited growth and in the end sell off to large farming corporates, who for a while will let those same right wing tenants stay as unpaid help. then those right wing squatters will be asked,, then told to leave. they will then moan, and blame those same councils for not doing anything to stop it..the remaining few in situ farmers(i.e. not based in ireland or singapore)will gather together under the fading umbrella of fed farmers, and be used as dupes by foresaid offshore farmers.dont believe me. look at far older farming communities and economies than ours.
The right wing farming community didn’t buy their land with the intention of flogging it off for housing. In general I imagine they will be supportive of efforts to preserve that land. There will always be exceptions.
Locally, the right-wing farming community are both vocal about the diminishment of available cropping land AND those who have utilised both current policy and political connections to get their A1 class soil land subdivided.
Despite the good intentions of this National Policy Statement, the implementation of such as statement is done by local governments and needs to be carefully monitored. Also it has to be in conjunction with exceptional, cohesive planning for residential, industrial, commercial development and transport otherwise it will be ineffective.
I would also love to see the National Policy Statement mechanism to bring in the need for regional and local authorities to consider climate change. Any planning – including the sequestering of fertile land – needs to be considered with this restriction in mind else the mechanisms of implementation might prove to be detrimental in the long run.
good point about climate change. Will you be making a submission?
I'd be happy to do another post, but I haven't read the documents, so if anyone wants to contribute bits or a whole post, let me know.
I've briefly spoken on the use of the National Policy Statement with Robert Guyton on TS, and he mentioned that there was work going on. It would require ALL regional and local authorities to adapt/design planning documents, and make decisions on resource consents that have climate change adaptation in mind. Any requirement for elected officials to be informed and effective would be minimised, as their local authorities have to meet the requirements. It would also stop any climate change washing that is presented by councils by actually making it a consideration of planning and resource consents, whereas now councils can hold up individual projects as PR and still conduct BAU in regards to the issues that matter.
Will have a look at the submissions – thanks for that – later. But am having a bit of a hiatus at the moment regarding consultation and submissions, and don't put as much time and effort in as I used to. Submission fatigue.
Good post. Good initiative.
"When I see vegans doing the mahi of getting New Zealand to grow beans and tree-crop nuts I’ll give the movement more respect."
Don't agree with that statement – vegans aren't the enemy – they are on the good side of history imo and one vegan doesn't speak for the many vegans out there.
We should probably stop talking about vegans as all being of a like mind for sure. My comment was about the current push for everyone to be vegan as a solution to climate change. People arguing that should be stepping up on how that can be achieved locally.
I don't agree – but small bickies really imo especially in the context of the post.
Try replacing the word vegan with the word Maori and see if the point of like-mindedness becomes clearer.
You probably need to specify which sentence, but also please keep on topic. Other conversations can be taken to Open Mike.
given 71% of farmed land on te planet is used to raise/fatten animals or to grow the food to feed those animals..
it is difficult to see how this can not be 'on topic'..
to ignore it while fretting about the use of productive farm land..
is setting a new benchmark in ignoring te pachyderm in te house..eh..?
trying to think of a name for greens/enviros/save-te-planet!-pple/who can't even get their shit together to stop eating animals + who recoil in horror @ any suggestion they shouldd stop chowing down on flesh – (y'know..!..seeing they are helping to fuck te planet..?) –
i came up with 'hand-flappers'..?
anyone got a better one..?
'cos more and more each day we need a name for these people..
'cos this phenomenon can no longer be just ignored..
the urgencies are too great..
Personally, since I actually read reports rather than the insane religious tracts that you do, I’m more concerned about :-
1. burning fossil fuels because of CO2 production
2. creating concrete because of CO2 production
3. deforestation, reducing CO2 sinks
4. increases in human populations driving increased resource usage
5. increases in human affluence levels driving increased resource usage
6. increases in air travel using kerosene because of injections of high atmosphere CO2
7. moralistic fuckwits of faith and ignorance who are obviously too stupid to prioritise what is important
Reducing food animal production and rice paddy production with their heavy methane production are further down on my list. They are short climate change cycles, are a matter of changing fashion, and very short-term issues.
Putting on my judgemental hat, you appear to be one of the nutters at number 7. Along with Trump.
wow..!..um..!..not really in the habit of reading 'insane religious tracts'..heh..!
i am just going on those 'reports' you place so much faith in..
y'know..!..all those things the mainstream media are saying..?..(c.f. guardian..?..daily..?..about how we have to stop eating so many animals..?
you just discount all those imperatives/'reports'..?)
let's take yr worries into account (seeing as you are refusing to see the pachyderm..(!)..eh..?
one thru three – fine with those (tho' none of them outweigh the pachyderm..eh….)
number 4) am puzzled you have bought into the population increase panic bullshit…
that is seen by most rational thinkers as a distraction from what needs to be really done..
6) air travel is the other big one people are goin to have to cease and desist on/
7) i see 'fuckwits of faith and ignorance' as those who pretend to 'care'/be green – but this is outweighed y their addictions to eating animal flesh..
so really..and hand-wringing they do whilst being in that deluded state..
is just so much hot air/bullshit..
and as such is to be studiously ignored..
and stopping eating animals is 'a matter of fashion'..?
are you listening to yrslf..?
i haven't eaten animal flesh for nearly 40 yrs..
and i have been arguing this case since then..
(one long fashion cycle..)
my arguments washing up against walls of ingrained leftwing ignorance/bloody mindedness – insult and scorn..
then..as now….as you so clearly just demonstrated..
i am arguing for the animals..and you call me 'a nutter'..?
of course..if i called you that – i wd probably be banned..eh..?
as well as being firmly on the wrong side of history – and part of the problem..
you also clearly have issues with abuse of power..eh..?
Did a brief scan of that self-pitying rubbish. Came out with 'I claim the absolute right to criticize others but find it dangerous when others criticize me in exactly same way.
So who made you the font of all wisdom if not a god? Or a mental illness?
Basically if you don't want to be judged like that by me – then argue your case to convince me and others. If you want to sit in judgement like a Salem magistrate over the your perception of the flaws of others – well then I am happy to judge you judge as harshly.
If you want to just be a sanctimonious nutbar, then you either put up with me replying to your inane comments in kind or you can just fuck off.
This site was set up for robust debate, not to provide a broadcasting soapbox for simpleton fools who can’t handle criticism of their ideas.
As far as I’m concerned your track record of appalling commenting behaviour adds nothing to this site and the discussions on it except to waste my resources. I intend to make sure you get a robust and very personal debate of your motivations and direct analysis until you learn to civilize yourself.
At that, I’m making a concession to allow you to use your voice here. Normally I’d suggest that you read the last section of the last paragraph of our about. But as we know from previous experience you aren’t particularly competent at attracting readers. Probably has something to do with how dumbarse many people find your ideas and behaviour.
hey..i'm an old guy…wanna race up mt eden..?
it could be billed as the unreconstructed-carnivore – vs. the vegan who annoys..
if you win i'll eat (fake)-meat – (a prospect i dread..)
if i win – you go vegan for a month..(you may find you like it..)
my 8 yr old (vegan)-dog who is super-fit/toned could also race..we could match him up against whatever carnivore-hound you like..(i should warn you he gets to run on a long west coast beach each/every day..he is up for it..)
as am i..)
Depending on who is doing the estimating, the difference between a human eating a red-meat and dairy heavy diet and a vegan diet is around 1 to 1.8 tonnes CO2eq per year.
That's equivalent to 3000 to 8000km of driving, or swapping out a little nana's shopping trolley for a big SUV for your daily drive. Or one longish flight. Or keeping a couple of small dogs (or large vegan ones), depending on who is doing the estimating.
where'd you get those estimates from Andre?
Googling phrases such as diet footprint and diet emissions and pet CO2 footprint.
ka pai. So global figures which means the NZ figures will probably be better.
Marginally better. Not enough to change the ballpark-y handwave-y big picture comparison.
So around the same saving as me driving low mileage pa in a well maintained and very fuel economic classic MX5 compared to my gas guzzling suv owning veggie neighbour?
I've gotten near 50mpg on trips to Auckland before. My next door drives a tank to the supermarket 2 minutes walk away.
Or around the emissions saving I got from changing all my compact fluorescent bulbs to LEDs, dropping my hot water thermostat to just over 60, and modifying my shower head to be ultra-low flow (assuming all my saved electricity resulted in less fossil fuels being burned at Huntly).
Done the led lamps at $12 a pop when they came out, had the hot water turned down under 60 since my babe was old enough to turn a tap 17 years ago, and my shower head is ultra low flow through needing a couple of nights with a glass clr.
Got to be worth a whopper, nay double whopper for dinner tonight.
Hope it's not much under 60. The risk of Legionnaire's growing in your hot water goes up really quickly as the set temp goes below 60.
Nowadays with decent LEDs regularly going on special under $2 each, it's time to require lurid labels on incandescent bulbs warning about how much money they waste. Like ciggie packs.
Labour should just ban the old bulbs… But not in election year this time, please.
Point taken about the hot water, but I wish I could get a 100w equivalent lamp for 2 bucks. On special they're about 9 dollars in pak n save.
A 100W incandescent puts out around 1400 lumens, evenly distributed around the full spherical direction. A 2buck 9W LED puts out around 800 lumens, well aimed into the hemisphere pointing away from the socket. For most of my fixtures it seems like pretty much the same amount of useful light.
Pak'n'Save always look bloody expensive for LED bulbs. Bunnings regularly have cheap ones. Mitre 10 occasionally. So far the cheapies from Bunnings have lasted over a year, so they've paid for themselves in savings even compared to the fluorescents I used to use.
I service my car but I'm not 'handy' so I seldom venture into places like Bunnings and the like, but I'll check them out next day off. Savings on savings is always good
Just look online. Right now they're selling 6packs for $9. They're calling them equivalent to 60W since they're 800lumens/10W, but in a lot of fixtures they'll be a lot better then a 60W incandescent since almost all the light is going directly out of the fixture, rather than half of it going back towards the the lampshade and then reflected (with losses).
Way back some fashion victim put downlighters through my house, so they may just do the trick. The ones I have now are better than the old fluro ones I had before, so when one eventually dies, whenever that is, I'll get me a pack in for back up at the weekend.
The largest element of my power usage is this site's server and associated gear like network routers and UPSes. Fortunately it doubles as my partner's apartment heater. Which is good in winter, but kind of a waste in summer. It is a pity that I can’t easily use a computers waste heat to power a aircond unit in the fetrid Auckland summer
Every time that I manage to get a lower power usage CPU, I really notice the drop in power costs. After I dropped off the 8 core 220W FX CPU down to more economical 65W Ryzen 7, there was a sustained drop in the power bill. Same when a threadripper with better idle was put in for those occasional 4k video editing jobs to replace the old 125W FX.
It's interesting how willingly we classify people according to the food preferences.
Just don't take my steamed veg's from me OK?
People can keep their stuffed grouse and fricasseed prawns whatever that is , – I'll stay with a massive plate of steamed veges topped with any number of simple sauces and grated cheese , preferably with nuts like almonds and cranberry's and a can of oily fish mixed in or on the side!
that cheese is from dairy? or is it chashew cheese? do Cashews grow in NZ? 🙂
'Food' ,… is the natural ' currency ' of the biological world,… be that of the hunter gatherers, or … the 'animal kingdom'.
Small wonder in every hunter gatherer / hort / agricultural society… food was the currency.
Koha,… in NZ ,.. often as not . Also the reason we have feasts during festivities.
Money , – being a unit of measure of labour over time,… only came when the old system of barter and trade,… grew too complex… and evil minded people saw it ( money ) as a way to wealth and power over others…
Which brings me to a point you have raised , Weka,… the rich wont share,
The best we can hope for is for them to be a parasitic land banker until such time as their lands will be sequestered from them… IF ,… the needs arise. Until then , as they always were,… the extremely wealthy in general will always be parasites.
Now,… it may come as a surprise ,… but 'potatoes' belong to the Solanum family… WHICH ,… is the same family as the Nightshades… eg: deadly nightshade. The same family as Eggplant, Tomatoes and Potatoes. All of which contain alkaloids that exacerbate arthritis.
Interesting , eh?
Sugar being the worst inflammatory.
Then Potatoes, then Tomatoes.
Here's the trick … Pineapple, Papaya … Black Grapes are the counters to that. And lastly but not least… Kumara,… if your want your carbs and a wealth of minerals and other nutrients… eat Kumara as a substitute. Not Potatoes. Far better for you.
As always , all things in moderation.
Enjoy those spuds, have those delicious tomatoes and take in that lycopene…
But the humble Kumara is far better for you.
Oh , and curry. If you want a ton of benefits, get used to putting a simple curry sauce in /on everything,… even melt a little peanut butter in with the curry and olive oil… goes great with steamed veges,… add some grated Edam cheese and your literally eating good health.
There are many other foodstuffs available,…
But hey ! … those Kumara's!
So many good things came from the Americas,… not just Potatoes and Toms!
thanks for those arthritis tips..
Though I like the odd spud myself, I really think a little rice growing wouldn't go amiss. You don't have to peel it so there's little or no waste, and it can be stored pretty easily, which makes it good rainy day stuff. Kumara doesn't prosper this far south unhappily, though it's looking like it may before too long.
Rice is basically Asian candy floss.
I can't find the link at the moment, but a few years ago there was a study done in terms of the glucose effect of rice on those who have eaten it for thousands of years (Asian) and those who are only recent (European)
What came out was that in Asian races, their blood glucose levels rose very slowly over time, as their bodies were better able to process the sugar and starch in rice for longer periods.
In Europeans, blood glucose rose very quickly, and dropped over a much longer period of time.
Fascinating to note that in Europeans, the hunger came back much faster than in Asians.
So effectively, rice is bad for Europeans as their physiology is not built to process rice as efficiently as Asians.
Experiencing extreme blood sugar spikes like that tires out the pancreas. I know there's more study to be done regarding pancreatic fatigue, but as a type 1 diabetic I used to notice myself the horrendous effect that rice has on BGLs.
I no longer eat rice, and have substituted for cauliflower rice.
There's rice and there's rice!
I like black, red, brown and wild varieties, organically-grown and bought through our food cooperative here in Riverton. I've seen rice growing on Waiheke Island and imagine there are parts of NZ already suitable for rice growing. I support the Masanobu Fukuoka way of rice growing; that is, without the mud and flooding, with seed sown into standing stubble and the rest of what he practiced, bless him!
Rice is nice.
It's common nowadays in Korea for rice to include a smattering of purple rice, or quinoa, or beans to make it more interesting. Once one masters the basics of doenjang jjigae, the stew-like relative of miso soup, the meat or fish fraction of the meal becomes more of a flavouring and less a staple, and an abundance and variety of banchan, vegetable side dishes, leaves plenty of scope for gourmandizing. One place in Gyeongju piled banchan literally three deep on the table, it was impressive, healthy, and in spite of its rural location it had hundreds queuing to get in.
… was delighted to find One Straw Revolution for sale at 20c at the local library a few years ago. Obviously amongst a group of donations that were unwanted that contained a wealth of organic gardening books. Whoever collected them must have been an interesting person. I thanked them, whoever they were, for this unexpected gift.
Yer – you gotta look at brown rice.
White rice is a crock like white sugar is.
All the goodness is stripped from it. Tasty though it may be… its candy floss.
Brown rice is the way to go ! And the grittier the better , as a rule of thumb
When I listened to the farmer rep on morning report this morning she appeared to be edging towards being paid by the Government not to sell land to the highest bidder. In a market economy cash is king and the farmers have spent the last 20 years telling us they barely break even. Expect the yearly bill to not sell!
lol, easy fix there, they can sell their land to people who want it to grow food on it.
An Easier fix is dont subsidize forestry companies and don't let fossil fuel burners offset there profits by planting trees. Also zone farm land nothing under class 4 to be blanket planted . Nothing under class2 to be subsidized.
Three things to think about – the need for forests to enable some limit in climate change and severity of seasons affecting growth of food, and the need to have land to grow food being ring-fenced, and then the methods by which food is grown should be healthy for people, and the land, and any animals involved.
We all have to walk and chew on a ploughman's lunch of cheese, celery and roast meat at the same time!
'We all have to walk and chew on a ploughman's lunch of cheese, celery and roast meat at the same time!
no we don't – two of those three are the most inefficient use of productive land..
and are a large part of our current problem..
how can you advocate for that..?
Though it's not true of contemporary intensive dairy, dairy products gave the Beaker Folk a significant competitive advantage. As with many farming practices it is a matter of using it in such a way as not to impact negatively on the animals, the neighbours, the environment, and the long term health of the soil.
and if you take those imperatives into account – clearly that is a very long way from what we are doing now..
Yeah – CAFOs are pretty much polluting concentration camps for animals. There's something intrinsically fascist about corporate farms that isn't obligate at the family farm level.
what's that zone classification system?
I'll try find when I have time but class one is the best soil contour and 4 is steep hard hill.
thanks, I'd be really interested to read about that (couldn't find it via google) and look at your solution suggestions in that context.
Turns out I had it back to front😬
Class 1 is high country class 9 is intensive cropping /finishing.
I cant work out how to link files.
Go to beef and lamb nz web site and search land classes .
Trees should have the poor soils, cows the best?
Probably crop the best.
Surely steep hungry erodable soil is what we should be retiring ..
Farming is at least 10000 years of culture and we need to protect the right to farm . It's a great way of living . (Thinking more sheep n beef than cold hard dairy)
cold hard dairy is a good phrase.
We will always need farmers. How we farm is what's being debated. NZ's biggest problem is our reliance on exports and farming being geared around that rather than producing food especially for locals.
Each of us can farm. When we do, all will be well.
But what is farming?
all will be well. Or gardening.
Farming as cropping and/or livestock? As distinct from gardening?
Older than that. Animal husbandry has been in effect since the neolithic revolution when animals were first domesticated, some 13,000 years bc, preceding farming of the first crops.
When we humans all, interact with our environment in a manner that doesn't diminish it or ourselves, especially with regards sustaining ourselves with food, we'll be "farming"; it's step up from foraging and requires the conscious management of edible resources.
Nomadic, pre-farming cultures both raised stock and had gardens. Farming is what happened when people settled in one place intergenerationally and stayed there (then outgrew the place and their descendants had to start colonising).
Robert, are you using the term farming to include food forests? Home and community gardens?
Weka makes the point. Exporting food has become the main thrust of farming, and growing it fast and lots of it if the price is right, not growing it well and in a manner that is in tune with the soil health and people's health. That farmers in general don't bother about, except those in organic farming.
We need to switch attention to producing good quality food and getting a good price for it – at the farmers end. There is a practice by supermarkets to contract for food and squeeze their suppliers who are then forced to use the methods required to produce to demand and on time and will be forced to use any means lawful to them. Organic food may be able to resist this, but the spots and bumps you get often, may still not be acceptable to supermarkets.
This morning radionz report on tests on processed food in supermarkets. This link from scoop.
Class 1 soils are the highest fertility, and used for cropping etc.
When I was doing submissions during the Unitary Plan, I looked at the Soil Classification maps being utilised at that time by Franklin District Council. They were compiled decades ago – around 1950, and were the go-to for that council for classifying land. However, despite being treated as the soil bible for classification of properties there was a considerable lack of detail in the zoning, due to low sample numbers and the boundaries of the classes could be up to 5km out of line.
I don't know if this has been updated, or undergoing any updates at present or whether current systems are still utilising those historic figures. Given the requirement for many resource and building consents to have geotechnical samples done, this information may be being utilised to update the previous maps. But I have no faith in the current systems to be that efficient with dealing with such accrued information.
market garderners are behind the move its not the dairy farmers there was artical q and a 2 years ago its soils around pukakoe and hawks bay something like only 5 percent nz soil is good for growing vegstables
"only 5 percent nz soil is good for growing vegstables"
Franklin is my district, and I can think of a few local market gardeners – who owned land – who have personall benefited from subdivisions. They are often those who are now berating the lack of arable soils. One particularly conflicted example, is one whose son is following in the family footsteps but who cannot find enough arable land for lease.
I see infill as the preferred solution to the housing shortage, so not a fan of building on horticultural land, which may have issues with pesticide residue etc in any case, but I do wonder if the problem is being overstated.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't NZ capable of producing far more food than the current population needs? Look at the UK with roughly the same land mass and 13x the population. Much smaller islands with double our population- Haiti, Cuba, Ireland etc.
I wonder how much dairy land could be converted to horticulture too?
Potatoes onions etc are already exported.
Fresh greens etc has a limited life and not really suitable for export. Except with frozen foods, and we are seeing plenty of stuff like that from China even in frozen food mixes that Watties and McCains sell. Others packs are completely from China
And in light of the fact we are omnivores yet better suited to a vegetable based diet.. makes you wonder. Interesting that the Plains Indians lived off Bison and supplemented their diets with wild vegetables and traded with more sedentary horticultural nations …
And the difference was instead of the market driven 'marbled fat' of domestic stock and the demand for that ,… those cultures avoided much of the coronary heart diseases we see in the West by living active lifestyles and living on lean meat.
I guess that the per acre/ profit is greater for meat based products than vegetable ones.
And therein lies the problem.
Lamb / mutton / hogget is fatty , but not in the same density as domestic beef… and lean wild meats must be cooked slowly because of the lack of fat content … which means the human body metabolises the former and the latter far more easily than domestic beef. Beef is very dense in its fat content. Clogs artery's so much easier. Onions and garlic are good to help move that, btw…
Now,… vegetable growing land use is far smaller than that used for beef…
Which makes one wonder… is it not more a matter of ' mindset ' in the domestic market… 'meat and 3 veges' mentality…
As for the export market… that's another thing entirely… but surely there's room for reeducation and change… at least here in NZ.
We currently export about 17x as much food as we consume ourselves. It has pretty low profit margins, but indirectly pays for most of our populations imports (outside of our remaining manufacturing and growing IP exporters who effectively pay for what they import).
The problem is that without those food exports paying for the imports, much of our existing economy won't work.
I think that what weka is talking about is replacing some of the food that we import. Potassium rich bananas from Equador or Brazil Nuts with their Selenium from Brazil for instance. Both will grow here in specific locations – as will many others.
Whereas the UK doesn't come close to fulfilling their own food consumption and hasn't since the 19th century. But does export way more manufacturing and services.
You made a pretty useless comparison between the UK and NZ – just totally irrelevant.
You'd want the bananas in Northland.
Maybe Gisborne and Nelson regions…?
Brazil nuts?… more suited to various climes in NZ. And that's a good case… in NZ we have Selenium poor soils. We have to add it in fertilser's. Our soils are Selenium poor and what little there is is leeched by heavy rainfall… in some cases has to be added to our foods… its that bad, thus a strong case for growing our own Brazil buts here.
Just a small handful… 3-5 every day can supply our Selenium needs… and as far as I can recall, isn’t destroyed by the heat process in cooking… so add em to the steam up or stir fry.., we can even replicate what Aussie does and package sliced Brazil nut produce for just that purpose…
The problem is this serves our domestic good health and that market… but doesnt really address the balance of payments of international trade… so we are hooked into that.
But with the smaller land mass needed for horticulture… surely we can think outside the square…
I'm thinking Brazil nuts can't be production/plantation-grown and have to be harvested from natural forests/jungles.
We should build trade agreements importing from lacalities that can produce for export and receive a return that enables a better standard of living. Fair Trade was started by a NZer wasn't it? They do this sort of thing already. Being able to rely for domestic basics from our own country would be the intelligent thing.
And then exporting what is wanted or what we can develop as a new or quality product. And then we buy in from the poorer areas and go for organic, natural and so it would be land and product not loaded with added chemicals that interfere with nature usually because of a blanket spray overall.
I think I've heard that, too – some particularly ecosystem-specific fertilisation process?
Ah: wikipedia says bees.
Olives and bananas should be doable, and other nuts too.
It is more like it is uneconomic to farm due to the fertilization by local animals.
This was interesting and discusses the issues with plantations.
I think that is right. We watched an Al Jazeera programme on Brazil Nut harvesting in Bolivia (no longer online but good Google skills might find it).
The nuts are harvested from the rainforest, and given the trip they make to market, only a small portion of those make it all the way. Makes the price of Brazil nuts at our end look very cheap.
We used to grow bananas in our backyard in Auckland.
Pretty much. It's easy enough to grow calories, but if we want all the nutrients that humans need to be healthy and reproduce themselves over generations, then counting wheat and corn crops globally isn't even close to good enough.
NZ has a good range of climates to grow diverse crops and animals. I think we will be fine, but agree the economics and our reliance on exports will be the big hurdle. From memory the Greens were talking about things like the knowledge economy and value added exports instead of commodities, but I haven't looked at it in a long time.
Or perhaps we can export something else or reprioritise what we import based on the added cost that is likely to occur as a greater demand on foreign currency if we have to import more food. That is how the market works.
Did you actually look at the numbers? only 48% of UK food is imported. That means they supply 6x our population locally, on top of exporting a great deal too.
Interesting that they export 8.4 billion NZD worth of whisky a year, which, as we know, is made from grain.
Hope that makes my comparison a bit more useful.
"Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't NZ capable of producing far more food than the current population needs? Look at the UK with roughly the same land mass and 13x the population. Much smaller islands with double our population- Haiti, Cuba, Ireland etc."
Things we need land for in an altered climate:
If we look at countries like the UK, they're not growing their own food, let alone all the other things, they're importing. Haiti is a country struggling with poverty. Cuba is a useful example because of how they transformed their food production when they lost their cheap oil supplies in the 90s but parts of their standard of living are well below what NZers would accept currently.
Afaik no-one has really done an analysis of what NZ's carrying capacity is, especially rohe by rohe. Whenever I ask about this people start guessing and many assume that we have heaps of land. I've not seen much work done on nutritional needs of humans (no, NZ cannot become vegan if it wants to keep a healthy population over generations) and how much land is needed to supply that here. Lots of the international figures are based on things like how many calories can be grown, that's not enough.
At the moment nearly all of our food is grown in a way that is dependent on fossil fuels and artificial inputs like fertiliser. When that ends, how we grow food will change, and that will mean looking at land use differently. An easy example is that we will need far, far lower stocking rates where animals are being farmed.
Yes, most dairy farms can and should be converted to other things. Part of that is going to required land restoration from the damage done to soils by industrial farming. So allow extra land for that. We also need to allow for crop loss.
I think all of that is totally doable in NZ. But I think the idea that we could for instance double our population and be fine is based on ignorance of the natural systems underpinning nature. The degree to which fossil fuels are propping up our lifestyles is something we're not yet looking at.
For the population we have now I'm going to guess we have spare land, thus we can grow food for other countries, but I think we should be viewing this as an aid issues, not a maximum profit issues. When people start starving in more obvious numbers, our economy should already be geared up for this. Food exports will need to not be contributers to climate change.
Just seen Glenn's comment, we can add nurseries to the list (native plants, trees, vegetables, fibre/materials)
I'm truly impressed by the amount of thought you've put into this. I tend to think Labour is appealing to sentiment given their track record, but you make a really good case for the land to be preserved as it is.
Cheers Warren. Lots of good work being done on this outside of the mainstream where people are getting on with pioneering how to grow sustainably and relocalise economies.
I read a lot of Peak Oil theory early on which changed how I saw what we needed to do.
.. Don't forget earth, stone and straw as building materials … they have a long, established history of use for building.
Well said Weka,
I grew up on a farm in Africa and farmed in Africa. I saw the ravages of drought and also what happened on natural grassland farms when they were over stocked. The rainfall went in cycles(a number of years) and during a cycle of high rainfall some farmers, and particulalry young/new/or inexperienced farmers increased their stocking rate….the number of stock units on the farm. When a dry cycle hit, most of them were caught with their pants down and suffered huge stock losses….many going bankrupt. Human greed and ignorance was the driver.
I see the world as one huge farm, stocked with many types of animals, of which Homo sapiens (the wise???) is by far the most numerous, if you convert weight to a standard "living unit"). I suspect that with the aide of fossil fuels and the bounty of nature that in many ways we have raped, we might have had our "good seasons". In the process we have destroyed forests, different types of swamps, kelp beds, sea grass paddocks, savannahs, peat boggs, plus, plus AND no doubt millions of hectares of SOIL destroyed permanently by towns, cities, roads and human infrustructure – destroyed that on which we THE WISE ones, are almost totally dependant, for our food production.
I refer to this distruction as Environment Degradation and one of it’s components and a very important one, is Climate Change. It is a fact that the alarmingly rapid rate of climate change is also very closely linked to Environment Degradation….and NOT just the burning of fossil fuels. Unless we “attack” both these issues with every means at our disposal, we will loose, and I am not trying to be an alarmist. I fear, as I hope you do or will do when you have them, for my children and my grand children!!!
New Zealand could be a world leader on this front, but it almost appears to me, that if it was not for school children standing up to fight for their futures, not too much would be happening in what used to be call Clean Green New Zealand. For a long time, we have not been that. We are green, but most certainly not clean. Dying lakes and stream due to dairy run-off and fertilizer leaching, soil damage due to bad dairy stock management on pastures during Winter, and the seemingly unchecked urban expansion…..the list goes on and on.
Surely, if the gun laws could be changed so fast, we do not have to wait for two years for electric vehicles to be subsidized? Fossil fuel users could be taxed immediately to subsidise a speedy transition to electric and hydrogen driven vehicles. If there have been so many obviously changes in climate over the past two years, how much more will there be in another two years? The change in climate is accelerating, not slowing down……because humanity and their leaders have not taken the problem seriously!! SURELY government can expedite this transition if it wanted to?
Reducing the use of fossil fuels dramatically is only part of the solution. A far more important aspect of this debate is environment degradation, and in many case total destruction. Humanity is rapidly destroying the very thing that has sustained us, and can help and is helping, in reducing CO2 in the atmosphere. What is happening in the Amazon as I write can only accelerate our demise…..and yes, it is caused by human greed – nothing else!!
Natural forest, savannahs, swamps, kelp forests, sea grass and perennial pastures to name but a few, store carbon and if preserved and restored, can help fight CO2 pollution. Our soils store carbon!! We are not restoring them, but are destroying them at an ever increasing rate.
I got very excited recently, when I heard that government was pushing for city accommodation to go up, only to want to cry, when in the same breath, I heard that urban spread was being pushed with farmland to be made available, for urban expansion. I asked myself…..have we gone made? We can go up very easily with minimal environmental impact, but once productive, environmentally friendly farmland is ripped up by developers, it is lost for ever!!!
Farmland feeds us and will continue to feed us, if we look after it properly. Inferior farmland can and should be returned to nature, to help fight Climate Change. As pointed out earlier it is also a carbon soak. Surely there are more than enough old houses in towns and cities that can and should be knocked down to make way for high density, high rise accommodation. If cities like Singapore and Hong Kong can be a thriving metropols with huge amounts of high density housing, then surely this can work in New Zealand as well. We need to stop the destruction of essential soils. All soils are precious and essensial!
Where and when is all this infill housing going to happen?
Soon as you apply to the bank for a refinance with your equity,… Australian banks, mind… but never mind,…. you can always pass on the costs to your minimum wage rentiers… cant you.
And practice your slumped shouldered Mr Burns routine while doing it.
the film guy james cameron has been doing some interesting work here in returning dairy farms to producing real food..
he bought a bunch of dairy farms in the wairarapa..and has been experimenting with different crops to see what works best..
and i understand he has been making his findings open-source..
Some of it here
One of the things the dirty intensive folk need to become aware of is that taking the organic road can give you a quality margin that makes for a better return, instead of being a Fonterra price taker.
Plant Nurseries are also being affected the same way. Their land is becoming too valuable to grow plants on and given a choice of working harder with wholesale plant material selling at stagnating prices, being squeezed by the chains or selling off the land for housing and retiring with a good wack in the bank…well theres no choice really.
Auckland was a plant hunters paradise but no longer. Shame really but I guess thats what they call progress.
In that case redirection would be the cure.
But all so often in NZ politics we have short sighted, short term planners who kick the problem down the road for future generations to deal with.
Pretty wanky , TBH…
Its the rip, shit and bust mentality that comes with a relatively new country. Every bastard out for their own for them and theirs.
Perhaps these rip , shit and buster were challenged and tactfully edged out of positions of influence… that is,… if we / you / me REALLY believe this society can go on for another 500 years…
Like North America has…
What say you?
Human Beings… need to learn and grow up a little, it seems…
You don't like knowing do you?
"a plant hunters' paradise"
That's the place I'm always searching for…
Yeah, they don't grow on trees.
By wiping the special zones in town planning areas and leaving it to the (housing) market when what we must have is the market gardeners, the neo lib no-regulation blitz has diminished our society's ability to sustain itself.
Just another similar move to the Scottish Highland Clearances – the powerful forced the local people out of their traditional hamlets, not caring about the effects on the locals and their network of reciprocal businesses and supply. The powerful wanted the land for something else so it was too bad for those living and working there and providing essentials to the area.
Indeed,… those who worked the land were either given the option of working the fishing fleets in dangerous, back breaking work on the bleak coasts or were sent abroad… thus the genocide that ensued with the elderly and young family's being relocated – often in the dead of a northern winter…,.. and thus was the mass emigration from the Highlands to the Americas, Australia and NZ.
The fishermen had to find places to live and often were forced to build very close to the shore line, in narrow valleys without much sun, and prone to being hit by waves at high tide and storms. So they are very admirable those who stayed and managed to rebuild their little communities with times for fun and music.
Land value rises is the major component of unaffordable housing in NZ and YOU seemingly want to make it even more expensive to get land. Bravo.
'' Bravo? Tango one nine,… this here's Whiskey , Papa come in ? ''
Hang about, … wasn't it National that put family's up in motels or was that just Pugnacious Paula overriding Beloved Bill?
Never mind, there's always room for a family to sleep in a van or a car ( more cozy) under a street lamp despite holding down two jobs per parent and still not being able to afford the rent…
'' Whats up with those dilapidated state houses, one nine? ''
'' You've managed to sell em off to the Aussies?''
'' Sure have '' .
'' Good score, one nine, … hell , – lets tell Tango that's its all in the bag '' .
''For sure Papa Gumba, … lets proceed with them tax havens before the OECD finds out and the IMF makes a report ''…
Replied to you on this matter previously without response, Gosman.
So I've reposted here so that you can ignore it again, but others can perhaps take something away from it:
In any case, we are expecting a lot if we want Central Government to sort out our food issues. Much better to act now, locally, and get you own small community readied. Start at home, spread out from there.
I think so, although I definitely see a role from government (central and local) in using legislation to protect land.
Yes but the problem is to get it politicized enough that it becomes a political force/ gains critical mass… and we all know us gardener types… we love to work the land but are quite silent when it comes to the unsavory aspects of driving political mindsets…
It really needs a forum all of its own…
The Rifle Assoc of NZ and many other groups have their political wings… what does the quiet home gardener have?… yet therein is a huge wealth of knowledge in both the older and younger generations… why has this not congealed into a movement?
From PHd hort scientists to climatologists to those wise old chook's who do their science by observation and empirical evidence and practical hands on experience…
Where is their voice to challenge the ' meat industry' duopoly with central govt concerns?
"why has this not congealed into a movement?"
People are too busy in their gardens. It's a good idea though. Imagine if gardeners were in charge of regional councils instead of farmers 😉
Aye… we'd have sensible town planning for a start !
Imagine if people had the ability to elect their local officials. Oh wait… they do.
Imagine if we had participatory democracy instead of the lower forms of majority rule democracy that is easily swayed by the special interests with the most power and money.
Bloody well said.
The extremely wealthy will always be parasites , mark my words.
Our job is to keep a check on them so they do not get out of hand, as parasites tend to do.
Why don't you try and remove these wealthy " parasites"? Countries like Venezuela have been very successful at doing that. They don't have as many weathy people any more.
Nonsense – they haven't culled them at all, which is why they're still there, fomenting mischief.
Oh yes ,… the American bogeyman of Venezuela ,… always the favourite of the American far right.
We just wont mention the Scandinavian's who put the Americans to shame with their generous welfare , high wages … and wait for it… the terror of the neo liberal far right… HIGH TAXES!!!
Oh yes,… we wont mention them to the Americanized far right … we are sensitive folks,… we don't want them to suffer from an apoplectic fit…
And BTW ,… what has Venezuela got to do with VEGETABLES ???
Ha! But let's not forget Maggie Barry…
my point destroyed in one fowl swoop.
Cheer up,… Maggies helping to keep them opposition , as Gosman didn't mention her… maybe salt based phosphates isn't the answer after all… and compost is…
And maybe Gosman knows this …
* NPo fertilizers. ( hope I got that right )
Create a saline soil, destroying beneficial bacterial / fungal life that creates a rich humus, and induce a plant to uptake vast amounts of water to counteract the salinity , and while promoting rapid growth because of that… diminishes the ability of the plant to uptake essentials minerals necessary for both the plant and healthy animal / human consumption.
This is modern plant growth technology.
In essence , … it means over several decades, .. depletion of the soils ability to support growth and vastly diminished ability to provide animal / human nutrient requirements.
Only natural humus and compost provides the optimum requirements for a healthy ecosystem and supportive animal / human sustenance.
In a nutshell using chemical fertilizers? ,… it means your vegetables are bigger but full of water,… not nutrients.
Natural guano too; attract birds to your place, invite them to make a deposit before they head off foraging elsewhere and the richness of your soil will increase markedly. I've mentioned our plan for a fish&chip-odour-generating machine before; the perfect way to add ocean-nutrients to your soil.
'' a fish&chip-odour-generating machine ''
Oh dear… 🙂
Still,… when you consider the massive amounts that birds contribute per annum with their bird poo… it isn't insignificant. And as the chap said on Weka's other great post ,… ''there’s no waste in nature''
Now I'm not a 'Greenie'. I was an avid gardener when I was a pre teen and brought up in the bush and later on when I had some land . I did a number of Hort papers and a Dip in Science / Technology.
I'm a simple kind of guy. I like simplicity.
I get more sense out of those who speak plainspeak than I ever observed by those with the Oxford / Cambridge accents…
And there aint nothing like getting ones hands dirty in a group situation thats beneficial to nature itself and all concerned ,- even to the extent of ones own country and other country's. I love seeing things being reveged . Its that old adage,… '' if in doubt ,… follow the hippies''.
And guys like Alan Savory.
I observe birds very closely. They land on something before they go to their nest. they check it is safe, then take a shit, then they go to the nest. To my mind there are nesting and resting trees: nesting trees are more dense in most circumstances.
You can direct bird guano by placing T structures (I just make em out of bamboo) where you'd like them to 'rest'. Above wintering garden beds, over land you plan to break in next season, besides swales that feed into the garden system…
Fertiliser in future will be guano (P), composts (N, K), rock dust/seaweed (minerals) and shellfish (lime aka calcium). It's that simple. Add in nitrogen fixing plants and deep mineralising plants you can chop and drop for mulch/biomass to feed soil.
Some of those N-fixers and chop and drop crops can be considered resting trees (and bird feed stations as they attract a high quantity of insects). Resting trees get free guano under them.
Watching Pukeko in the mangrove tops the other day. Ungainly!
That's right, WTB. I made tipi-style perches from "craddy" sticks; flower stalks of harakeke, to attract native birds to an area I was revegetating; I figured they'd bring their own seeds and fertiliser if I gave them somewhere safe to sit and …
I also tried feeding hens berries from coprosma and korokia and collecting the poop afterwards for spreading under gorse. Mixed results. I wonder if aviaries could be set up as processing plants for native berries and the results packaged and sent to denuded places for restoration purposes.
Been feeding chooks privet berries. They're there, why not. Another favorite of theirs is Tradescantia.
Maybe just set up an aviary in a denuded area. Feed the seed let the birds do the rest. Good idea btw!
nice sub thread here
Perhaps Tstructures as WtB describes could be set up on the margins of bush, forest and denuded, gorsey or scrubby areas. If they like to perch and poop then go to their nests they would need to be near nesting-type trees, and the seeds would bring a line of new growth that would be extending the treed area.
The shell needed for the contents of the mix for revitalising soil could come from this source in the South Island.
and encourage business to this active firm –
Havelock Shell Processors
Carries out crushing of mussel shell waste to produce material of various grades for a range of purposes:
And going further in thinking of shell – this is a very full account of NZ mussel farming in the Marlborough Sounds and its successes and its problems.
This from the Aquaculture magazine with a story about oyster farmers saving a small pod of whales, females and calves, and some new sustainable packaging. Good info for informed people.
(Sorry about getting off-track about food growing areas weka but I got interested and delved further, and like to pass on anything I find that is useful to the general thrust of healthy land and recycling, and news about what’s happening that is good and progressive.)
Lol Watch out for those seagulls.
What political wing does the home gardener have?
Why, The Garden Party, of course.
That sounds like a great non-political party behind the scenes to be in. It would take political action to ensure that people get every chance to garden in a convivial and happy way. Going up to the local community garden with your home-made lemonade, doing some weeding, playing guitars, potting up things for a certain time each week. Not even a labour of love, it would hardly seem like labour, with a party atmosphere.
I think that would be nice. Perhaps the kids and parents could drop in there after sport on Saturday morning, and have lunch there, keep up the connections, and water the shared patch of something novel that the kids are growing (marijuana? just to be a stirrer). Then they might cook it up with the help of a chef to make a nice finish to the trial, and all sit down and see how it can taste.
That would be good for a Garden Party activity I reckon.
And large helpings of steamed vegetables for all those attending free of charge. What does a few bottles of Olive oil and peanut butter cost ,- all cooked on a few barbeque's?
Think of it… the sharing of gardening ideas, in a festival atmosphere,.. where all generations can participate…from the things one can do with herbs to vegetable recipes to tree planting and ecology… the list is endless.
Bands could play ! Lolly scrambles for the kids ! Select wine tasting !
It would be a smash hit !
The Garden Party already exists, you just didn't know about it till now ("scuse pun). If you think you'd like to join, you have. If you'd like to contribute to the Party's manifesto, you are. If you'd like to represent the Party online, that's what you are doing now. If you'd like to contribute to the Party's coffers in a tangible way, get outside and garden. It's the most elegant of Parties. Been around for a while now. Our numbers are difficult to assess and we like it that way. Our influence though, is clear to those who know what to look for
Well that's a giant gesture , Robert, …
But here's something even 'gianter'…
Magnificent Giant Tree: Sequoia in a Snowstorm | National … – YouTube
But the biggest biomass was a type of fungus by volume , but by far the the biggest biomass by weight was a 'cloned ' forest of Aspens…
The Biggest Organism on Earth – YouTube
You have started me off on a how to get more people involved in voting enthusiastic piece. I have put it over on Open Mike 16 August. Perhaps you could have a look and say what you think about it and add or subtract from it as you feel.
I can't help thinking of Maggie Barry after reading that 🙂
Fertile land is not priceless. This is why many on the left can't grasp basic economics. Fertile land can be used for commercial agriculture which has a value attached. Therefore Fertile land has a price. If the return from growing crops or raising livestock is less than the return that the owner (remember this land is mostly privately owned) can get from converting it to something else like a lifestyle block or residential area then that is likely what will happen. The reason houses are so expensive in NZ is mainly because the supply of land for residential houses is so limited compared to the demand. If you restrict it further you will just drive up house prices even higher.
Sounds good if you lived / still live in the 1950's… but unfortunately , times have moved on and we have to look at practical measures in 2019.
And as for housing?
Who was it but the neo liberals who advocated the decimation of rural community's and the mad rush into the city's like what happened in 19th century England during the industrial revolution… and the earlier Highland Clearances ?
Different folks? ,… same strokes, idiot.
Or who was it other than your beloved and corrupted tax haven asswipe John Key that tried to sell off state houses to Australian private interests/- and left them to degrade and rot?… like the schools in Northland or the Hospitals in Auckland.
New Right Fight – Who are the New Right?
You truly are a moron.
please don't start with the pejoratives.
‘ mutter,… mutter,… mutter’…
You mean the same industrial revolution that lead to the greatest increase in living standards for the population ever?
Tell that to the people who lived in the East End and the Toffs who came looking there for a 'bit of rough , prostitution , gambling and dog / human pit fights'.
Read a little of William Booths accounts of the Salvation Army of conditions in the East End of London for your glorious ' greatest increase of living standards for the population ever '.
The Salvation Army.
To which my great grandparents were some of the originals in the Hawkes Bay, mate.
I could go on , and tell some good family story's,… but I'll leave the good works of the S. Army up to you to dig into and discover.
'Greatest increase in living standards for the population ' , … my arse it was.
For some, Gosman,… for some.
Claim take the credit for the industrial revolution will you? It wasn't the self-serving financial parasites who made it happen, they were just as happy to exploit the agricultural economy that preceded it, and the slave trade, the gin mills, all that crap. Face it, the Right contribute nothing more to society than you do to the Standard – relentessless, content-free carping.
Climate change doesn't care about the market, and I don't see any evidence that the market is responding well to climate change.
The post isn't about how to provide housing, it's about not letting the market destroy food growing land. If you have solutions to that I'm all ears.
Btw, we know that it's not as simple supply and demand eg rural land prices have been raised by overseas buyers with more capital and a favourable exchange rate.
The market cares about climate change and will adapt accordingly
The market does not care about anything; you are attributing a mind (and heart?) to the emergence of the market(s) from the activity and behaviour of many individual consumers. This is like saying that the brain feels pain (it doesn’t) because brain cells receive signals from their immediate and distant environment and each other (they do). How it will respond and adapt to CC in a way that increases our chances of survival is up for debate. Take it away.
End of the day, Gossy, you can't eat money!
Auckland Unitary Plan is locked.
Auckland Growth Alliance in full steam.
Looks like central totally out of synch with local.
Climate change is locked in too and will make monkeys out of pro-growth authorities and allies.
Any time they want to have coherent National Policy Statements with local government plans would be great.
This is just a poorly integrated mess.
Have you read the Statement or are basing that on what you know about the Unitary Plan?
Really poorly reconciled.
I think it's early days in terms of government or council making sensible determinations of land use in NZ, but of course we have to start somewhere. The unregulated woodcutting that deforested Japan 300 years ago was the perfection of Gosman's misguided market forces, but the regulatory regime that was imposed to end the erosion and famine it caused has been so successful that no-one wants to go back to it. This is from Jared Diamond's Collapse, a book that has a few apposite warnings for countries obliged to handle ecological matters.
Korea also has a kind of ecological consensus, whereby flat or valley land is reserved for crops and some animal raising, while slopes are used for orcharding or timber. Having been essentially deforested in the 1950s by the need for winter fuel, and obliged to forage wild greens for the Spring Hunger of the years that followed, Korea has yet to forget stories about the barley mountain – that part of the year when you've run out of rice and are obliged to eat barley and be glad if you have any.
Hunger has become a real issue in New Zealand – one need only ask the food banks. Our economy has divaricated, with the wealthy and professional classes essentially able to go on as before, while the working class and poor face increasing difficulties.
Only when the last tree has been cut down, the last fish caught, the last river poisoned, only then will muppets like Gosman realize that one cannot eat money. And by then it will be too late.
Perhaps Gosman will become grist to that hungry mill?
He sounds well fed.
Ambrose Bierce might have considered Gosman one of the "persons of little worth found cumbering the soil of a newly discovered country. They soon cease to cumber; they fertilize." ~The Devil’s Dictionary
Gosman's a classic cumberer, at least of left wing thinkers. I'm quite selective though, of what I put in my compost heap: if it's toxic or synthetic, I divert it to the refuse bin; we organic growers have our standards!
My compost heap is shamelessly omnivorous – like cadwallon (iron belly), the original excalibur, it will eat anything.
Thinking about compost and the breakdown of organic matter. I was thinking of crops being grown between lines of trees which would be planted on the grave of a natural burial. So the land isn't set aside and cannot be used, becoming a barren place of concrete and stone.
In a practical society which accepts nature and respects humans and needs tree shade from the hot summer, with spaced deciduous and non deciduous to ensure light all year, this would be intelligent practice to begin in the near future, once thinking councils can focus their minds.
I thought for a minute there you said Gosman's a classic cucumber.
I too was thinking the Labour announcement was a starting point (I decided to not read the MPI docs until after I had written the post 😉 ). Good to see the conversation happening and a recognition from central government that good growing is important. In these late stage neoliberal days, sometimes it seems like everything is a commodity even on the left.
We really don't know how fast AGW is going to hit us, though increasingly it seems much faster than was anticipated. If the governments and councils are used to planning land use they may be able to take sensible measures in a timely fashion, which won't happen if they're not prepared.
In the meantime a habit of converting lawns to more productive or even simply more biomass retentive culture would be the kind of thing that should be encouraged. We could do worse than invite suggestions from the likes of Mike Joy et al.
But the market is going to have to be tamed – better than half of NZers don't own their housing now, and going green under a toxic landlord isn't going to work.
Funny how it's all interrelated. Housing and food security being part of the same systems. I agree about councils/govt being prepared for changes, which means robust democracy is also part of the picture.
The good news for me is that we already have many resilient food growing practices in NZ adapted to our local climates and soils, include how to convert lawns fast. I'd love to see an emergence of strong gardening culture. So much good work has been done on this already, it's waiting to go mainstream.
Long term tenancies will solve some of the home gardener issue, as will collective ownerships models. Housing really is our biggest mess to sort out now, it flows out into so many other things.
Toxic landlords have houses that go green from damp, moss, algae etc!
And that's why the village green and the hedgerows of England…
Honestly we could bulldoze down half the crap that passes for NZ residential property's and the owners comfortable retirement plans on the backs of half a week and more of a labourers wages to pay for a moldy, run down shithouse,- such as the one I live in , whereby half the wiring doesn't work , where you will spend a $1000.00 on a leaky pump and a blocked shower, ( to which the grabastic landlord never hears about by a cowardly head tenant) a toilet that leaks, guttering so bad it caused the ceilings to spring a moldy leak in the ceiling and you have two buckets to catch the drips next to your bed… and it flooded up to a centimeter twice across the kitchen and living room carpet.
Twice ! , – poured in through the walls cos of illegal guttering and poor regulations.
That's the state of NZ housing at present.
I live there. But will soon be moving out after 4 years of the shit.
A two bedroomed sleep out.
But far better than the crap shit garbage I saw when I first began looking for a place to stay in Auckland. Some of them I wouldn't put a dog in there. But they loved packing the Asian students in , didn't they….
I hope you hear this Jacinda.
I hope you hear this real good.
And while this discussion takes place…
Which The Greens really should look in to if they truly cared about a Science based approach to policy. Unfortunately they only care about that when it suits them politically.
gawd, don't encourage him, he's gone all spammy.
I suggest that you don't know what The Greens think on this issue.
Soooo…. what does this mean?… that we advance GM type solutions?
I dunno about that….
hmm, should we be gearing up for a political fight over GE again? I've been seeing a fe of these arguments lately.
Yes. I think we need to have the updated debate. By declaring the issue over, we leave ourselves vulnerable to mockery and justifiable charges of head-in-the-sandness. I would welcome the new iteration of the debate.
In that case, I hope the Greens have this sorted within the party.
100 Out of work robust young fellas can do the job.
Whack em down with a straight bladed or curved bushman's hook.
Provide some work.
Why are we so soft?… they did it in the 1920's and 1930’s… whats changed?… its not as if they are going to be ball and chained to the job forever… same with Possums… why not a fur industry made from them?
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
it's just a bug, happens periodically and randomly to people.
No, this time it was triggered by a word in the comment.
ah, I see what you mean.
Was it, "asse*s" as in, we must asse*s our resources?
Ah, the Scunthorpe problem.
"The Scunthorpe problem is the unintentional blocking of websites, e-mails, forum posts or search results by a spam filter or search engine because their text contains a string of letters that appear to have an obscene or otherwise unacceptable meaning. Names, abbreviations, and technical terms are most often cited as being affected by the issue."
It was entirely intentional, Robert, and associated with the Christchurch massacre. With Weka back as Moderator, comments held up in Auto-Moderation will be checked more regularly and released if they are otherwise harmless. Apologies for the inconvenience.
There of course is the other scunthorpe problem.
The loss of jobs,and replacement with lower paying jobs to fulfill ideological whims.
The Bank of England's Andrew Haldane really knows how to promulgate his prose.
off the football pitch,it has not been all wins for Scunthorpe recently. Problems at the British Steel plant in the town have put at risk the jobs of 5,000workers and a further 20,000 in its supply chain.1Hopefully, a new buyer can be found and jobs in the town and beyond can be assured. This is the latest chapter in what has been a long and sometimes painful story for the UK steel industry recently. It has been a recurrent theme of my visits around the UK, including in Red car and Port Talbot. The loss of signature industries can leave lasting social and economic scars –jobs lost, families disrupted, communities decimated. I tis a pattern we see repeated across many industries in many advanced economies. It has been a key cause of the disaffection and disconnection felt by many and a potent polarising force in our politics, policies and societies.This polarisation is also a potent force shaping the fortunes of our economies, as I will go on to discuss.The travailso f the steel industry lead me neatly to the issue I want to discuss today–jobs and pay. In the UK recently, this has been good news/bad news story. The good news has been the new jobs created –the best jobs recovery in the UK since at least the Second World War. The bad news has been the subdued performance of payover much of that period –the weakest pay performance the UK has experienced since at least the Boer War.
You've planted your corn where the watermelons should grow , shading all of them out and your climbing beans are spreading rampant among the tomatoes and smothering them.
No choice but to dig them all up and start again.
Maggie may disagree but then again she isn't a gardener.
Panama Disease has hit the Americas for the first time. This deadly fungus has hit every continent bananas are grown and there is no cure.
Since the 1990s a fungus called Panama Disease has been spreading across Asia, Australia, Africa and the Middle East. Wherever it took hold, commercial growing ceasedThe consolation was that the Americas, the largest producer, had remained untouched.
And now the Fusarium type 4 (TR4) organism was detected across nearly 180 hectares in the northeastern province of La Guajira.
It is hoped that genetic modification and exploiting wild varieties may help find a solution"
This basically what you want for the home garden,… in actual fact commercial as well. Back in France in the 19th century they had a lot of horse poo… horse poo makes good dry mulch and compost, not so water logged as cattle poo but drier, almost like dry chicken poo but not so acidic.
Essentially you don't need to use horsey poo, but if you have a lot of compost, use that as a mulch. Buy in commercial compost if you must initially. Don't dig the soil because that damages soil structure and kills the earthworms, oxidizes humus and destroys the soil bacteria and fungi…therefore mimic nature, and simply successively apply compost / mulch on the top layers. Plant in that only.
Its the lazy mans way to garden,… without putting your back out.
Build your gardens with one inch by six inch planks… untreated.
They will last for years before you need replace them. Use the soil between rows to build up the beds. Provide netting to prevent Roberts delightful birds and their poo from knicking off with your seedlings. Do the usual watering. Maintain that compost heap. Use grass and hedge clippings ,- and if you can get it, – non treated sawdust shavings in successive layers.
It'll be so hot in a day you wont be able to hold your hand in it. That kills off the pathogenic bacteria and fungi. I used 40 gallon drums with both ends cut off. That encourages ' tiger worms' to devour the rest as the heap cools down and provides easy access. I had six of them running . Great additives in nutrients to the heap are those tiger worms.
In summer, the whole process can be over in a week or two,…winter?.. a little more time, please.
Throw the compost as mulch on your raised garden beds.
I did this in Cambridge for several years and we lacked for nothing regards vegetables. The richest tasting veges you / I have ever had. Took up an area behind my garage. No go area for my German Shepherd. Hard to convince her. But I did. Finally.
And that's all there is to it.
Raise those beds, throw on the mulch, and plant in that. DONT DIG.
French intensive gardening – Wikipedia
Everything You Need to Know About French Intensive Gardening
So there you go,… the internet is full of good advice on the subject.
"therefore mimic nature"
They dig. Aerate the soil. Should we emulate those wee mammals, even though they're "foreign"?
When I "manage" my herbaceous understorey, I use sound as my guide: if my hand-weeding sounds like a herbivore browsing, I'm happy.
Hang on , moles eat worms, but they are in fact aerating the soil like a gigantic worm, – but not turning the soil over for the humus to be oxidised and destroyed . Largely , they leave the bulk of it intact, and not exposing the humus. Ummm… I think I read the Amish also created large humus layers in their fields by not deep ploughing.
The Amish and a few other groups might bear a looking into for some of their techniques, just quietly as , come to think of it.
Nice article Weka, but not sure why you think vegans need to be any more accountable than anyone else.
I choose to be a plant-only eater and am aware of the indisputable benefits to environment, animal rights and health and will sometimes engage in pointing out hypocracy, I often hear on the subject of veganism from carnivores or 'veganophobes' – but not sure why I and other vegans have a greater duty to impress.
Agree about the accountability and vegans; why target them, or at least our straw-man vegans and the beliefs we think they have?
Kiaora you two, I thought it was reasonable clear but let me clarify. I was referring to the current phenomena of mostly urban vegans urging people to become vegan to save the planet from climate change. There are serious problems with this, including that for NZers this means importing a lot of food. I think the messaging globally is dangerous because it takes people down an industrial food path right at the time when we need to be transitioning to regenerative food growing systems.
So, if urban vegans in NZ are going to push this politically I think they have a responsibility to get their hands dirty and make sure that land in NZ gets prioritised for growing local vegan foods rather than importing them. By local I mean local to where one lives, because at the moment the biggest part of our food miles is domestic. Vegans in Otago need to be pushing for Otago grown crops as much as possible.
Of course other people have responsibility in this as well, but for people that want climate change change, I don't see most in NZ being averse to relocalising food. Vegans have a particular problem because the message is that don't ever eat animal products, and if that means importing instead of eating local meat or dairy or eggs, then do that. It's just wrong with regards to CC.
btw, 'eat less meat' is a different message than 'become a vegan'. At the moment those messages are being conflated. Which is kind of interesting because it may end up watering down the vegan movement ie people calling themselves vegan when they eat locally grown hens eggs. My own position is that for climate mitigation, local will generally be best. For people that want to eat local vegan, fantastic. But for people wanting to eat with the climate in mind, better to choose from what is real on the ground rather than ideology. That might be their neighbour's eggs and this is a better choice than soy imported from China or even from the other end of NZ.
the 'eat less' imperatives are only because flesh-addicts are horrified by 'eat none'…
(and i have never met anyone claiming to be a vegan – who eats eggs..
'cos if they do – they ain't…)
Thanks for your response, but it falls short of defending your different expectation on vegans. I fully support the main thrust of your article here, but I am indeed an advocate for veganism as a means to a range of ends – including reducing greenhouse gases and unsustainable land use.
Your position on this seems to be restricted by an idea that meat production is the only way to sustain our food supply – yet the evidence is that it is significantly less efficient than plant based food production. You are advocating here for change in the way we grow food, yet somehow you don't incorporate a change from our country's dependency on meat production.
Your ‘food miles’ concern applies equally to all types of food production, not just the food favoured by plant eaters.
"Your ‘food miles’ concern applies equally to all types of food production, not just the food favoured by plant eaters."
Exactly. So if someone wants to choose their food to mitigate CC, they can eat local. If local protein is in the form of eggs, meat or dairy but not plant foods, then it makes sense to choose the animal products. The message from the vegan movement is that this is wrong, and the person should be eating plant foods only, which means importing them. Which is not a good choice for climate mitigation.
"Your position on this seems to be restricted by an idea that meat production is the only way to sustain our food supply"
Not at all. If you follow my posts and comments you'll see that I'm proposing that our primary response should be to convert our food for NZers to regenerative agriculture, food forestry, local gardens (home, community, market), and should be polyculture. This would mean less animals than we have now and better integrated into ecological systems. I think we should be growing a range of legumes in NZ and integrating those into our diets as mainstream, but also producing free range eggs (actual free range).
If vegans are going to tell people to stop all animals products, then they need to step up majorly and support transition farming so vegans can eat local. I don't hear that, I just hear the message of don't eat animal products. I honestly don't get what is so controversial about that.
Most of NZ's animal farming is for export, and that's a different conversation.
"yet the evidence is that it is significantly less efficient than plant based food production."
I"d be really interested to see that evidence for NZ. The discussions I've seen have been based on global figures that are generalised across multiple countries and are reliant on large scale industrial cropping that is also highly damaging to the environment (local and global). NZ is different for a number of key reasons eg geographical distance from crop growing, the lack of use of CAFO.
'If vegans are going to tell people to stop all animals products, then they need to…'
Again, it is this line that I take issue with because it is so much in conjunction with the words all vegans have to endure – whether they actually tell people what to do or, as is more often the case, not. Being committed to a plant-based diet seems to be so offensive for many people, and I am curious why you are letting yourself be offended in this way when the rest of your article and the things you are saying is so reasonable.
Have you heard the silence of the silverbeet.
The Orch OR hypothesis, which is based in quantum physics, proposes that, when a sufficient mass of tubulin molecules has assembled into cytoskeletal microtubules (MTs) within neuronal cells of the brain, these structures become sites of quantum computation and of quantum state reduction (OR) events resulting in moments of protoconsciousness. Because plant cells also have large populations of MTs, and because plant MTs share properties with those of animal neuronal MTs, which putatively orchestrate OR events, plant MTs might also be sites of quantum reduction events and, hence, lead to momentary protoconsciousness. The extent to which the Orch OR hypothesis is applicable to plants is examined, and it is argued that, within the plant body, the most likely tissue where OR events could be located and promote protoconsciousness is to be found in the system of ray cells of tree trunks in which bundled MTs and actin filaments are prevalent. A single complete ray complex is estimated to contain about as many tubulin molecules as a single human cerebral neuron.
Cheers Poisson for pointing out the rich tapestry of life, and the same old 'but carrots have feelings too' yawn.
'If local protein is in the form of eggs, meat or dairy but not plant foods, then it makes sense to choose the animal products.
Yes, in such a hypothetically rare situation then this would be so, but you are not going to survive long on such a poor diet, and very soon you will begin traveling to other communities seeking greens and veges – necessity will extend the food miles for this poorly fed community until they locally grow and harvest the most critical foods for their survival – plants!
I'm not sure if you are trying to be smart or are just struggling to follow the points. If someone can eat eggs from their neighbour's hens then they should eat those rather than eating almonds imported from the US. That's if they want to eat with CC in mind.
If they don't want to eat any animal products, but still care about CC, and are advocating veganism for all people for CC reasons, then I believe there is an onus on them to promote local vegan food growing. Otherwise people are going to eat imported almonds and just create GHGs in other ways.
That was the point of my postscript in the post.
No-one is suggesting eating eggs and no plants, so please don’t do that.
so..vegans have to be perfect in their food-choices (no imported almonds..clearly..!..)
carnivores – not so much..eh..?
but the fact is that yr local meat has a larger environmental-footprint than imported fruit/vegetables..
and we could become a food-basket…
imagine all those inefficient dairy farms in the waikato – being returned to growing food to eat – not animals to eat..
Actually you did suggest that weka (see your quote I singled out), hence my response.
As both phillip and I have pointed out, there is no valid rationale for you to have a different expectation on vegans in the context of your article here.
We could grow all the almonds we need in NZ (and export them) if it wasn't for our obsession on growing and killing cows which dominates food production on our most productive land, and at a great cost to our environment.
I routinely write and talk about the need for everyone to help relocalise food production. I've been banging on about it for years. I chose to single out urban vegans promoting climate mitigation because I think they're causing a particular problem that needed naming. Hard to see how I could do that without naming them. I also don't see what the problem with naming them is, than some vegans are getting defensive for no good reason.
"We could grow all the almonds we need in NZ"
Yes, but we aren't. This is my point. If you want people to stop eating meat and eat NZ almonds instead, then tell them to relocalise food production. Otherwise they will just eat imported almonds.
"(and export them)"
I'll take from that that you aren't concerned about climate mitigation. Wish you had said that at the start, might have saved us all some trouble.
"if it wasn't for our obsession on growing and killing cows which dominates food production on our most productive land, and at a great cost to our environment"
Most, nearly all, or our dairy production is for profit. It''s not about growing food for locals. I also write and talk regularly about the need to stop industrial, export-driven dairying. The problem fundamentalist vegans have is that it's possible to raise and keep dairy cows humanely. The other problem is that drinking almond milk instead of cow's milk is rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.
18 months of consultation gets us to 2021.
What a load of working group wank this is.
Ag will be grown in office block type farms soon anyway. Growing in the ground is old school
White people, telling the tangata whenua what should be done with the land of Aotearoa since ages ago
I live on land zoned Horticultural A by my district council. It is protected for the food growing of future generations. It can not be subdivided unless the block is over 4 hectares. I totally support this. What I have never understood is why this protection has not nation-wide long before now. It seems that at last this is happening. Good on the present government team for this.
The subdividing over 4 hectares, what can that be broken down into?
Unfortunately it allows those with over 4 hectares to subdivide off blocks less than 4 hectares. eg a 5 hectare place could be subdivided , 1 hectare and 4 hectare.
I'm curious now what councils have any kind of protection in place.