Josie Pagani replies

Written By: - Date published: 2:20 pm, January 3rd, 2014 - 127 comments
Categories: blogs, labour - Tags: ,

lprent: Josie Pagani objected to mickysavage’s post objecting to her post at Pundit, and wanted me to publish this as a right of reply. That is something that doesn’t exist on this or any blog. After all there is always another site to put content up on. However the ongoing debate going on here at present about how the left and the labour movement should operate and communicate (from many different angles) makes it worth posting here.

This post will be fully moderated so stick to the topic. Comment in OpenMike if you think I may think your comment is going to be too far off-topic. I’ll discuss the errors of fact in this post in the first comment.

In the response to my post calling on progressive people to stand up to vilification and exclusion in sections of the left, many commenters on the Standard took the opportunity to vilify me and call for my exclusion.

David Cunliffe’s electorate chair, Greg Presland, posting under the pseudonym ‘Micky Savage’, wrote a post because I said comments at the Standard are an example of the intolerable abuse I’ve had enough of.

I’m tempted to point to the comments beneath that post as yet more proof. ‘Cringe-making airhead’ being one of the nicer things people say.

But I want to respond to some specific claims Mr Presland makes because, speaking as the Leader of the Labour Party’s senior electorate official, they presumably reflect the views of the Labour Party and therefore need to be examined carefully.

What Greg Presland tries to do is make everything a litmus test – he only has to find one or two statements that his baying readers may disagree with, and the proof of heresy is complete. This is the behaviour of an exclusive cult, not a broad-based political party which needs the support of half of New Zealanders to form a government.

He says I have “been vilified in the past in part” for my husband views. The sexism of this is breathtaking. Think about it: I’m not capable of developing my own thoughts, and can’t be judged on my own merits. He can’t contemplate a woman might not always agree with her partner. I am disappointed, to say the least, that women on The Standard haven’t called him and others on this bigotry.

Anyway, let me loyally be a good wife and point out he is wrong in his statement about my husband. He claims my husband wrote David Shearer’s comments about a ‘beneficiary on the roof.’ I know for a fact this is totally untrue. It was an allegation made by The Standard at the time, which John could not have responded to because you banned him from the Standard for life when he pointed out another false claim you made about him.

Not only did he not write the comments, but even if he had, politicians who give speeches take responsibility for their content. That’s why you vote for them, not for advisers.

He states I previously ‘though that John Tamihere would be a welcome addition as a Labour MP.

A year before JT made his thoughtless and misguided comments to a Roastbusters talkback caller, I said I was uncomfortable about a Labour party where working class Maori men weren’t welcome, even though that many would have conservative views I personally don’t like. This is actually a similar point to the one in my most recent post – that the left needs to be inclusive and stop vilifying.

One feature of the controversy about Willie and JT’s comments was that much of the discussion was aimed at their wider fitness as people – missing the opportunity to discuss the prevalence of misogynist and rape-enabling views across male society. The vilification of the individual undermined the politics of the substantive statement.

Yes it’s true, I opposed an in-work tax credit being extended to those not in work.

Well I pointed out that the announcement of this policy during the election campaign was greeted by low paid workers who thought we were taking the proverbial. That doesn’t mean I don’t support an increase in benefit levels. Using an in-tax work credit is the wrong tool.

How horrible does this observation make me? Helen Clark, Sir Michael Cullen, and the entire Cabinet of the previous government also believed WFF should not be extended to beneficiaries. Some time this year I am confident that David Cunliffe will announce a new policy in which – wait for it – WFF won’t be extended to beneficiaries.

In fact, just after I wrote the Herald column Greg Presland links to, I got a very nice comment about it from … David Cunliffe.

Greg says I opposed having a ‘proper proportion of women’ in parliament.

No I didn’t. I opposed a quota system and reserving seats only for women. I opposed that tactic not the value, and conflating the two is downright naughty.

But hang on a minute – it’s laughable to be lectured about sexism by someone who, a couple of sentences earlier stated I don’t have my own views, I am indivisible from my husband.

He says I supported casualisation on the waterfront.

No I didn’t. I said that casualisation is a fact of working life and we need to find ways to protect casualised workers. I am well aware this is a controversial statement, and that there is a solid body of opinion that says the only way to protect against casualisation is to join a union. This is an important debate and one the labour movement has to have. But Greg Presland distorts what I said.

He said I was probably the only Labour Party feminist that voted for Shane Jones.

How revealing is this statement – that those of us who supported an alternative contender in the leadership election are not welcome, that we don’t have a valid Labour voice, and that therefore, logically, we should be excluded.

So that puts the lie to David Cunliffe’s public claims during and after the contest that there would not be reprisals.

I reject the divisiveness and vilification that says you must be banished for voting the wrong way in a now-finished contest. It’s ugly. It’s self-defeating. Labour cannot win government by hunting heretics to demean and banish them.

Overall, Greg Presland’s outburst is summarised by his view that I represent a ‘right wing spin’ on Labour’s values.

I have written this elsewhere in self-defence, but let me repeat:

I believe in using progressive taxation and a strong interventionist state to achieve an equal and just community in which anyone, from any background, has opportunity and security. For example, I support state funding of free health care and free education. I believe in incomes that allow everyone to participate and belong to their community at all ages, both through wages and through fair provision for those in need. I believe the state has an obligation to ensure everyone has a safe and secure place to live. I believe that the interests of labour must not be made subservient to the interests of capital. I am a social liberal.

If you think that means I have noting in common with Labour, then others who have nothing to contribute to the Labour movement would also include Ed Milliband, Julia Gillard, Neil Kinnock…and Helen Clark and Jim Anderton. In fact, most of those leaders are to the right of me on several of those issues.

You accuse me of saying Labour values are unpopular and need to be jettisoned. Actually I believe the opposite. I think Labour values are popular – and therefore when Labour is unpopular it must be because it’s is not being faithful to its own principles. This is a much more nuanced analysis than you give me credit for.

No one has a monopoly on defining Labour values. I don’t claim mine are the only valid ones, but I strongly claim they are in the mainstream of the Labour and social democrat tradition in New Zealand and in like democracies.

Updated: Josie Pagani is on holiday at present. Her only contact with the world is a cellphone that she has to climb a hill to get on the net. Don’t demand replies because I will treat those as being off topic.

127 comments on “Josie Pagani replies ”

  1. lprent 1

    I have a few comments to make on facts in this post…

    • Talking about The Standard as if it is some kind of cohesive entity is daft. The site operates in all respects as a cooperative. Authors and commenters write in their own right and for themselves, this is made quite clear in the about.

      We write here in our personal capacities and the opinions that are expressed on the blog are individual unless expressly stated otherwise (see the policy). We do not write on behalf of any organization.

      Josie should read the about and policy so she gets a better idea about what this site does in reality rather than inventing her own myths about it.

    • One reason she should read them is because she’d find that site is interested in the broad labour movement, of which the Labour Party in NZ is just small part. She’d also find that the site was set up to foster “robust debate”, that while we discourage “pointless abuse” simple pointed abuse is not limited as it is part of robust debate, and that the authors on the site set the policies and rules governing the site.

      This is a point that she could have found out reading the responses on her own post. Frank Macskasy and Pete George (who got banned from here for trying to say how we should run our site) in particular. Our rule about people who’d like us to change is expressed in the About..

      No – you must….
      Have you read this page? We must do nothing. The posters post on the topics they want to (with a few limitations from the sysop). If you really absolutely want your ideas to be heard, then start a blog and start learning to write. You can probably find a more compatible blog on our blogroll. Or you can comment on the posts that our posters write and follow our rather lenient rules.

    • Similarly volunteering to work for a political party and/or a politician doesn’t mean that you are speaking for them – which is what Josie spent a large chunk of this post suggesting about mickysavage/Greg was doing for David Cunliffe. Complete bollocks and transparent politicking. It isn’t like Greg gets paid for working for David, or for that matter for writing on here.

      I spent a couple of decades doing volunteer work for the Mt Albert Labour party and Helen Clark. So by Josie’s foolish argument should everything I say reflects Helen’s viewpoint – hardly. Reality is that I disagreed with most of the ideas that Helen had over all of the time I have known her. However I also respect political competence whereever I find it and I’m prepared to spend effort supporting it if it is heading vaguely in a direction I can support.

      But respecting Josie’s incompetent politicking about a active volunteer isn’t particularly likely.

    • I (not some mythical being called The Standard) banned John Pagani from the site, not for his views, but because he said this about an author.

      Actually you’re a liar and a coward. Neither of us have ever said something that approximates I “don’t see any harm in casualisation because [I] imagine it being just like [my] contracting roles which give them flexibility [I] value and the focus of [my] politics is winning back Waitakere Man.”

      Eddie had never actually said anything of the sort. He’d been talking about a growing acceptance of casualisation by a number of people, like Gordon Campbell and Josie. However attacking personally authors on this site and trying to put words in their mouths is something that we ban anyone for. In John’s case he’d been ignoring moderators which was why he got a permanent ban because it was obviously pointless leaving him notes that he would ignore.

    Trying to tell someone else anywhere on the blogs how they should run their own site is simply complete bollocks. While it is probably preferable that sites should post their general moderation and privacy rules, it is pretty strictly a case of commenter beware. People writing comments on a site like Red Alert with no policy about privacy, or Whaleoil take a known risk (Cameron’s rules are below)

    1. The host is always right
    2. In the unlikely event the host is wrong then refer to rule number 1
    3. Stick to the topic
    4. Don’t tell lies about the host
    5. Whatever I feel like at any given moment.

    With the exception of a few tiresome busybodies like Pete George, the Mrs Grundy view of telling other people how they should run their parts of the net is something that has been debated on the net and amongst legislators in democracies for decades and resoundingly rejected. After all if these are the things that people are allowed to say to each other, then how can you prevent them saying it across a network without diminishing their freedom to speak?

  2. karol 2

    One point, before I digest the entire post.

    Josie, you claim this:

    He [micky/greg] says I have “been vilified in the past in part” for my husband views. The sexism of this is breathtaking. Think about it: I’m not capable of developing my own thoughts, and can’t be judged on my own merits. He can’t contemplate a woman might not always agree with her partner. I am disappointed, to say the least, that women on The Standard haven’t called him and others on this bigotry.

    I most certainly would have been critical, if that is actually what micky was saying/implying. But you have taken his comment out of context.

    But this is what micky actually wrote:

    She has been vilified in the past in part for her partner John Pagani’s rather bizarre campaign ideas. His beneficiary on a roof speech written for David Shearer was justifiably ridiculed for its ham fisted beneficiary bashing tone. And of course Josie should not be criticised for her partner’s actions.

    And I entirely agree with the last sentence.

    • weka 2.1

      Thanks karol, that one stood out for me too. I didn’t jump on micky at the time because he clearly thought that Pagani being criticised for her husband’s actions was wrong (which I agreed with). Which begs the question of whether Pagani didn’t bother to read micky’s post properly, or whether she has an agenda in misrepresenting what he said. Not the only example of that in her post either.

      • newsense 2.1.1

        Well it is interesting.

        I struggle to recall another ex- Labour candidate who got an article dedicated to them by Audrey Young in the same manner.

        I do recall time and time again she has chided the Left. It seemed odd that in an article by Martyn Bradbury on the Daily Blog behaving like Bradbury- a bombastic ex-Craccum editor and radio host- she decided to make it about The Standard.

        With Pete George as the main one giving her strident support on Pundit, this surely should give her pause.

        I’ve always found her writing vague and not to the point. I struggle to understand why she get so much air time. SHE has had a huge profile, but the question has to be what actual solutions has she advocated?

        http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10778301

        This article is an example:

        I met a truck driver in Marton. He owned his own truck and worked on contract for different companies. He told me he’d voted Labour all his life and so had his dad, who would turn in his grave if he knew his son wasn’t voting Labour in 2011.

        He looked troubled. “What am I meant to do? National’s there for the rich. Labour’s there for the poor. No one is there for people like me.”

        We lost because people like him weren’t voting for us. We were seen as looking backwards, not forwards. We didn’t sound aspirational, we sounded miserable. We were turning up on people’s doorsteps telling them their lives were gloomy. And anyone who has ever been poor knows the last thing you want is someone telling you your life is crap.

        The hardest week to door-knock was when we were telling people – who had just come home from a day’s work earning the minimum wage – that it was a great idea to extend their Working for Families tax credit to beneficiaries. “So what’s the point of working my guts out all week while someone sitting at home on the dole gets the same tax credit as me?”

        This is a clear example of what Danyl is talking about of repeating and re-inforcing the right’s stereotypes about Labour.

        IE- Labour is supporting bludgers, Labour is for poor people, not for hard-working kiwis, Labour is the party of no, Labour has become irrelevant in the ‘dynamic’ (read casualised and disempowered) environment, supporting the idea of turning the poor against the poorer, not against those whose policies have seen the median income in the country drop in real terms…

        http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10847238

        In this indepth profile of he career the main things it seems that she wants to say are about welfare reform and how the party shouldn’t resist allowing John Tamihere to rejoin.

        “He’s got to say stuff that neither Phil Goff nor Helen Clark would have said. We’re waiting for David Shearer to give us the Labour narrative. What does it mean to be a New Zealander in the future? Where’s he headed? What is the direction?

        “Take our values, our gut instincts and turn them into something that means something to people, that’s a Labour vision.

        What on earth does this mean? Apart from this vague statements we were kept waiting and waiting and waiting and never really heard a confident voice from the leader or his supporters, until he spoke about foreign affairs after he had given up the leadership.

        http://thestandard.org.nz/its-2014-and-we-have-a-job-to-do/

        If you had to chose betwen these two vision statements- one is viseral, specific and passionate about change, the other is vague and a touch defensive.

        That is in a nutshell why she gets criticism. No doubt she has done a lot of good work, but if we had to chose a champion to fight for our lives we would chose her, yet :

        She happily debates right-wing opponents such as Matthew Hooton, Deborah Coddington, David Farrar and Cameron Slater. There is no personal invective; they are often complimentary about her.

        If your opponents are not critical of you, you have to wonder why. We want to hear our opponents getting irritated and flustered by our successes and refusal to accept their framing and half-truths.

        • newsense 2.1.1.1

          * wouldn’t

        • Draco T Bastard 2.1.1.2

          I’ve always found her writing vague and not to the point. I struggle to understand why she get so much air time.

          Have you considered that it may be because she’s vague and not to the point?

      • Lanthanide 2.1.2

        Yes, this stuck out to me like a sore thumb, so much that I stopped reading the post. When someone makes such a basic and obvious error, I assume the rest of what they wrote is equally full of errors and don’t waste my time.

      • felix 2.1.3

        “Which begs the question of whether Pagani didn’t bother to read micky’s post properly, or whether she has an agenda in misrepresenting what he said.”

        Hmm, I think even a cursory skim of the rest of the mis-representative bullshit in her post ought to clear up that question.

    • Murray Olsen 2.2

      That was the first thing that stood out for me. Given the demonstrated inability to understand English of a not particularly high level, I struggled to take the rest of the post seriously.

  3. karol 3

    This:

    I believe in using progressive taxation and a strong interventionist state to achieve an equal and just community in which anyone, from any background, has opportunity and security. For example, I support state funding of free health care and free education. I believe in incomes that allow everyone to participate and belong to their community at all ages, both through wages and through fair provision for those in need. I believe the state has an obligation to ensure everyone has a safe and secure place to live. I believe that the interests of labour must not be made subservient to the interests of capital. I am a social liberal.

    Yes, such beliefs are that of a social democrat.

    • weka 3.1

      Beliefs are all well and good, but I would assume that many Labour supporters sees themselves broadly similarly. I’d like to see some specifics, especially clarification of this:

      “Yes it’s true, I opposed an in-work tax credit being extended to those not in work.

      Well I pointed out that the announcement of this policy during the election campaign was greeted by low paid workers who thought we were taking the proverbial. That doesn’t mean I don’t support an increase in benefit levels. Using an in-tax work credit is the wrong tool.

      How horrible does this observation make me? Helen Clark, Sir Michael Cullen, and the entire Cabinet of the previous government also believed WFF should not be extended to beneficiaries. Some time this year I am confident that David Cunliffe will announce a new policy in which – wait for it – WFF won’t be extended to beneficiaries.”

      Josie, what policies do you promote that would increase benefit levels? I’d like to hear some specifics. When would you support those policies being introduced?

    • greywarbler 3.2

      I like Josie’s solid statement of beliefs for the left in NZ. It’s good to read something definite out of the large amount of justification and accusation in the answer. Some of us read Josie and some of us have heard Josie on Jim Mora’s panel and I guess the discourse has been too equivocating for these serious times.

      It may be a handy continuing job Josie for you to be a commenter which will go on at one venue or another at the end of 2014 But people here are extremely anxious about NZ direction (downward) and there is little happening that shows positive, intelligent, precautionary movement here and not much in the world against more financial meltdowns, climate meltdowns, social welfare meltdowns, etc. We aren’t centred on being nice, though I think we try to be considerate of people when they are struggling with problems, and can also be kindly and friendly.

      I am interested in the David Shearer ‘beneficiary on a roof’ comment by David Shearer. Did Mr Pagani advise this was an appropriate comment indicating Mr Shearer’s attitudes to state beneficiaries? Here is what I have seen in this blog :

      From your content:
      He claims my husband wrote David Shearer’s comments about a ‘beneficiary on the roof.’ I know for a fact this is totally untrue. It was an allegation made by The Standard at the time, which John could not have responded to because you banned him from the Standard for life when he pointed out another false claim you made about him.

      And about this matter – quote from mickysavage (via Karol)
      She has been vilified in the past in part for her partner John Pagani’s rather bizarre campaign ideas. His beneficiary on a roof speech written for David Shearer was justifiably ridiculed for its ham fisted beneficiary bashing tone. And of course Josie should not be criticised for her partner’s actions.

  4. QoT 4

    But I want to respond to some specific claims Mr Presland makes because, speaking as the Leader of the Labour Party’s senior electorate official, they presumably reflect the views of the Labour Party and therefore need to be examined carefully.

    I’m saving this little nugget for the next time someone complains about people using pseudonyms online.

    Seriously, what is with some people and trying to silence fellow Labour Party members by threatening to use their personal affiliations against them?

  5. One Anonymous Knucklehead 5

    casualisation is a fact of working life

    Casualisation (or not) of work is an employment law issue, not a “fact of life”.

    To put it another way: casual workers are defined by law. So are their employers’ obligations.

    • The Stepper 5.1

      Not to nitpick, but (being an employment lawyer) I have to point out that ‘casual’ work is in fact not defined by law. That’s a large part of why ‘casual’ employment is so open to abuse. Strictly casual employees are permanent employees, but with variable hours of work and no guarantee of work. Accordingly they are due all rights of permanent employees – though granted this is often observed only in the breach.

      • karol 5.1.1

        I didn’t think casual employees had the right to things like sick leave?

        • The Stepper 5.1.1.1

          Hi Karol,

          Any employee is entitled to sick leave if they have completed six months continuous service with their employer. Alternatively an employee is entitled to sick leave if they have worked an average of 10 hours per week for six months (needing to have worked at least 1 hour in each week, or 40 hours in each month). The difficulty with casual employees is meeting those criteria, given the relative consistency of employment required.

      • One Anonymous Knucklehead 5.1.2

        Thanks The Stepper.

        Since casual employment is open to abuse, it follows that abusers Tories will pursue policies that increase the casualised workforce, but also, since casual work is by its very nature more flexible, it has benefits as well as pitfalls.

        Whatever improvements to the law the next government chooses, how can they be best enforced?

    • thechangeling 5.2

      That comment ticked me off too. Josie makes so many spurious claims and then also doesn’t back them up with anything substantial either. She just goes around in endless, meaningless circles speaking for the sake of speaking without getting close to any kind of resolution. Drives me nuts listening/reading from her.

  6. Tracey 6

    Josie

    If you are not banned from this site, and I dont know who is or isnt banned,why didnt you post this in the thread by mickey savage?

    Why would you think someone using the pseudonym mickey savage would be reflecting mr cunliffes views when clearly not posting in his capacity as electorate chair?

    Thanks in advance.

    [lprent: She isn’t banned (never has been). For that matter neither is John Pagani since the amnesty early last year. ]

    • xtasy 6.1

      Certain persons that were or are aspiring MPs, or even sitting MPs, appear to be considering themselves “above” the rest of us, hence they cannot bother jumping into the “boxing ring” to spar and discuss. So this more formal “request” to be heard shows exactly that.

      Do not “soil” my name and reputation, or else.

      But I say fair enough, for Josie being given her “space” here, and others being able to comment on it. I would agree with Tracey and others, that those that want to be heard, and that want to be taken serious by commenters, they should show a bit of courage and humility at the same time, to discuss matters here, and face the music, where it deserves to be played.

      How much damned silence was there from certain ones I asked to comment and respond, to stuff I presented on WINZ and welfare issues. It was hauntingly silent, whether it was David Shearer, Grant Robertson, David Cunliffe, Helen Kelly and certain other ones.

      So what am I to think of it all, what am I to think of Josie Pagani. What I read here again, what others, including Mickey Savage, have to say, only confirms to me, that I cannot and will not trust Josie.

      Best of luck to her, whatever.

  7. Ennui 7

    Congratulations to lprent for allowing the TS to give a right of reply to Josie. Well done, in the spirit of diversity of opinions, and right of reply I applaud it.

    Having said that Josie is very much too close to the centre for my tastes, however that does not discount all she has to say. For example try this I reject the divisiveness and vilification that says you must be banished for voting the wrong way in a now-finished contest. It’s ugly. It’s self-defeating. Labour cannot win government by hunting heretics to demean and banish them.

    I concur fully, try thinking about this principle with regard to the “debates” (or should I say witch hunts) on TS in the last few days.

    [lprent: It isn’t a “right of reply” – there is no such beast on this site or any other. It is however another viewpoint on the debate that has been emerging on TS over the last month or so about how people in the labour movement engage with each other. I don’t think that it is a particularly good or effective contribution myself (and I hope I made clear why in my comment). But it is a viewpoint worth discussing. ]

  8. Pete 8

    I am not sure why you are surprised. I read Red Alert and The Standard regularly (as well as some of the right wing blogs), and have noted that some of the opinion pieces and the comments contained a heavy thread of personal abuse.
    Personally, I find this very distasteful. I would far rather have a a robust exchange of views and leave the personality driven stuff out of it. If you read the comments then you will see that it is many of the regular contributors/commenters who engage in this stuff.
    I am strongly of the view that this ‘vilification’ of people is a turn off for many left of centre voters, and definitely for those in the middle. When Clare Curran had a go at Peter Leitch on Red Alert some time ago the response was a dramatic illustration of how people feel about denigration in general. I feel that the contributors of left and right wing blogs (but mainly left) frequently, just can’t help revealing their nasty side, and that this continual diet of attacks on people from all ‘sides’ creates an unfavourable impression of left wing politics. It definitely does not speak to values such as inclusion.
    My view is that it might be a coop but it is a bit rich to allow contributors free reign and then hide behind site policies. But then, it is their blog, so that is what you get.

    [lprent: You may very well feel that and even express it. However you cannot demand it nor expect it by the rules of this site. Indeed you will find that demanding how any site runs its affairs usually gets a sharp response from the people who make the effort of providing it to the lazy twerp like yourself making it.

    It was a choice that the original authors made. That decision to go for robust debate came directly from the cloying “niceness” and simple lack of depth that the political debate had on sites like Public Address. The original intent was to have no moderation at all and to let the community to develop naturally. That idealist concept died with some truly nasty right wing arseholes piling in on synchronised comment attacks in late 2007 and 2008 from Whaleoil and Kiwiblog doing post diversions.

    The only person who truly goes for full-blown nasty vilification and abuse on this site is me. Having dealt with similar dickheads for the last 30 years over many kinds of online forums, I have observed that the only way to make such fools aware of what they are doing to others is to do exactly the same back to them. Except do it nastier – a lot nastier. I’ve found that it causes anyone to pause and consider what they do on a site if they have to consider what awakening the site ogre is going to do to them.

    Have a look at my note to John Pagani banning him for an example. ]

    • Pete 8.1

      Actually, I don’t demand anything- that is the meaning of my last sentence when I more or less said that it is your blog. My point stands about personal vilification, but I am sure we have both got better things to do than continue a dialogue that will get you pissed off and me banned. I believe what I said and did not disparage anyone in saying it. It is not just your site I was referring to. I find some of the commenters on Whaleoil for example to be quite distasteful. But, there you go that is just how I see it.
      I am happy to leave it here.

    • As a blogger myself, I made it fairly clear to Pete George after Josie’s piece on The Pundit (http://pundit.co.nz/content/the-left-must-stand-up-to-abuse) that, in my ‘umble opinion, a blog is like someone’s lounge in their home – you’re a guest and you behave accordingly. If the rules state you must do ‘XYZ’ (or not do ‘XYZ’) on a blog that your choice is clear; observe the rules or contribute elsewhere. Or set up your own blog. There are enough pixels to go round for everyone.

      I gave Pete an example that, soon after the US invasion of Iraq and with no WMDs found; I posted a comment on the rightwing Free Republic website offering my views that this proved that the invasion was based on securing oil reserves and not in search of mythical WMDs.

      My post on Free Republic was non-confrontational and polite, since I was a ‘newbie’ on that blog.

      It was removed within ten minutes.

      Did I scream, wave my arms around, froth at the mouth and chuck an almighty spazz?

      Nah. I moved on.

      It’s their website. They can do what they like. (I just smiled at the contradiction of rightwingers who believe in freedom of expression – and then censored my post!! *snort!*)

      I’m glad that Lyn made it 100% crystal clear that no such beastie as a “right of reply” exists on any blog – anyone expecting such from me will be duly ignored.

      (PS: Apologies if this is off-topic by the way, Lyn.)

      • Sosoo 8.2.1

        That’s the very same view that right wingers use to shut down protests and debate.

        Good work, bro.

  9. Tracey 9

    Josie

    Do you fully support David Cunliffe as leader of the Labour Party?

    Can you clarify what it is about Mr Tamihere that leads you to describe him as working class or representative of anyone (including women) who fit your definition of working class?

    [lprent: Perhaps I should clarify. Josie is a on holiday at present. Her only contact with the world is a cellphone that she has to climb a hill to get on the net. I will add that to the post. ]

  10. chris73 10

    A well thought out piece and she raised some points in a way that someone on the right (me) would actually listen to which is something a lot of commentators and those on the left could take notes on

  11. Morrissey 11

    On December 31st I asked Josie Pagani on her Pundit blog to provide some evidence to support her outburst at Martyn Bradbury. This is what I wrote:

    You claim, without providing any evidence at all, that “Martyn Bradbury’s unreasonable aggression has produced a truckload of ugly incidents lately”. Could you back up that claim with specific examples please?
    http://pundit.co.nz/content/the-left-must-stand-up-to-abuse

    She has so far failed to come up with any evidence as requested. Perhaps she might like to post the evidence on this site. Although, seeing that she has not responded to any of the posts on this thread, I’m not expecting much from her.

    [lprent: Perhaps I should clarify. Josie is a on holiday at present. Her only contact with the world is a cellphone that she has to climb a hill to get on the net. I will add that to the post. ]

  12. Tracey 12

    Josie

    What does your notion of protection of casual labour look like in practice?

    What place do you see for unions in your vision for the workingclass of nz?

    When you submitted your post, as opposed to posting it like tge rest of us, did you intend to engage in a discussion of it or want to be “heard”?

    [lprent: Perhaps I should clarify. Josie is a on holiday at present. Her only contact with the world is a cellphone that she has to climb a hill to get on the net. I will add that to the post. ]

  13. Tracey 13

    Chris

    I am not surprised it appeals to you. Her foundation principles could also come from the mouths of national strategist. I suspect josie, like you, doesnt mind that the emperor has no clothes as long as it is the emperor from her team.

    It is of some interest that despite being on holiday she climbed a hill to get her view posted as its own thread and then will struggle to engage in discussion of it. She didnt post it in the thread she wants to respond to.

    The danger is it can come across as being about josie and not the nzers who she purports to want to help raise up. I am minded of ennuis link to an interview on national radio. Prod considine?

  14. Tracey 14

    Chris

    A well thought out piece and she raised some points in a way that someone on the right (me) would actually listen to which is something a lot of commentators and those on the left could take notes on”

    Except it is wasted on you because even when in surplus.. lower debt by some margin than today, economic growth, you didnt vote for labour because you didnt “trust helen clark”

    the fact that ms pagani appeals to you is possibly what is annoying some here about her. If she had posted this on kiwiblog it would probably be reasonably well received.

    my impression of many who visit here is they dont want a labour tgat is merely national lite. Thats what labour has been since 1984. It has not served the 50% of kiwis earning under 30k per year.

    • Tim 14.1

      I think C73 just HAS to be that guy we used to refer to as the ‘nodder’ in the days of 7’s Backbenchers (as opposed to Prime’s) Anxious to get in the pic whenever some Natzi came out with some outrageous BS ‘nodding’ in agreement.
      You can spot them oft times on Parliament TV doing the nod nod nod thing.
      Says a lot about the Neshnool party to my mind

  15. Descendant Of Sssmith 15

    “I believe in using progressive taxation and a strong interventionist state to achieve an equal and just community in which anyone, from any background, has opportunity and security. For example, I support state funding of free health care and free education. I believe in incomes that allow everyone to participate and belong to their community at all ages, both through wages and through fair provision for those in need. I believe the state has an obligation to ensure everyone has a safe and secure place to live. I believe that the interests of labour must not be made subservient to the interests of capital. I am a social liberal.”

    And what I don’t see is any Labour policy that supports a real increase in taxation in a progressive way, any commitment to roll back student loans, any willingness to increase benefit rates, any increase in state housing and a return to housing security (house for life), the removal of judgmental benefit policy that acts as though it’s charity, any sense at all of a 8 hour working day, 40 hour working week nor significantly increased union rights.

    My, and many others disillusionment with Labour comes from the absence of any real significant moves to any of those things.

    These were things that Labour was once proud of – condemned to the history books by the very party that introduced them.

    Extreme left growing up in the 70’s was communism not this sort of simple socialist egalitarian stuff.

    I’d ask you the same question (if you weren’t incommunicado) I asked Mike Smith over a year ago – do you actually believe in an 8 hour working day, 40 hour working week?” – you know that thing that is proudly held up as an achievement on the Labour Party website.

  16. Pascal's bookie 16

    But Greg Presland distorts what I said.

    He said I was probably the only Labour Party feminist that voted for Shane Jones.

    How revealing is this statementthat those of us who supported an alternative contender in the leadership election are not welcome, that we don’t have a valid Labour voice, and that therefore, logically, we should be excluded.

    emph mine. As a beginner’s class in logic, keeping your shit together, proof reading with a critical mind, and writing with a view to discuss vs flame bait.

  17. mickysavage 17

    Thanks for your response Josie.

    A few comments:

    1. I am not David Cunliffe’s LEC chair and have not been so for many years. I am obviously a supporter but do so in a completely voluntary basis.

    2. I also write under my own steam and do not take direction from anyone. To suggest that David somehow has a role in this is as disrespectful as suggesting that I implied that you are somehow responsible for John Pagani’s speech writing which I clearly distanced you from. I agree your views are your own and you should grant me the same courtesy.

    3. I am concerned at your continued use as a media spokesperson for the left because I and many others often disagree with your views and we are worried that progressive left ideas are not being enunciated in the media. Of the examples that I cited I gather the response from you is:

    (a) John Tamihere – you agree that you have supported him although not since the roast busters incident.
    (b) WFF – you agree you oppose it being extended to beneficiaries but cite the views of others in support.
    (c) Proportion of women in Parliament – I am pleased that we can agree on the principle but I was concerned that you had bought into the “man ban” spin and this had reinforced the right’s attack on the proposal.
    (d) Casualisation of Auckland Wharf’s workforce – I do agree that I was worried about my interpretation of your views and I did say that this was what I thought you were saying. You did say “[t]alking about the ports. ‘Casualisation’ scares us because it sounds like short hand for bad hours, low pay and no annual leave. It sounds like life in the early industrial revolution pre-unions. In some jobs it is. The only reason we have a 40 hr week and weekends is because unions fought for us. But I’ve spent my political life as a working mum, calling for more flexibility. And flexibility has to work both ways.” Apologies if I was wrong but I read this as support for casualisation of the workforce, at least of working hours.
    (e) Supporting Shane Jones – This is your prerogative. Although at one level I like Shane and admire his abilities I did not think that he would ever qualify for feminist support and I was surprised that you came out publicly to announce your decision.

    A couple of further comments:

    You accuse me of saying Labour values are unpopular and need to be jettisoned

    I am sure that I did not.

    Finally Danyl McLaughlan said what I was trying to say very well. He commented on pundit:

    Your ‘left-wing values’ don’t seem very left-wing at all, but rather a clumsy attempt to redefine the National Party’s values on, say, welfare as left-wing because you think they’re more palatable to the electorate and you think it would be easier for you personally to achieve your political ambitions by aping popular National Party rhetoric than articulating an alternative left-wing vision.

    Maybe I’m wrong and have misjudged you horribly! But that’s the impression a number of people also seem to have arrived at independently about you.

    I apologise if I hurt your feelings. But when you said that Martyn Bradbury and commenters on the Standard had engaged in “reprehensible abuse and aggression” I thought that the allegation needed to be responded to as there were a number of people feeling similarly insulted.

    As for criticism of your views I agree normally that they would not be warranted. But it is your rather unique role in commenting in the media essentially on behalf of lefty activists that means that a spirited debate about your views is warranted.

    • Anne 17.1

      Thanks for replying mickysavage. I’ve just read Josie Pagani’s response to your post and have been pacing the floor trying to calm down before leaping into the fray…

      Suffice to say Josie Pagani has indeed a lot to learn… not the least how to write a cogent and intelligent – and grammatically correct – letter.

      Example:

      David Cunliffe’s electorate chair, Greg Presland, posting under the pseudonym ‘Micky Savage’, wrote a post because I said comments at the Standard are an example of the intolerable abuse I’ve had enough of.

      Josie Pagani, apart from the fact he has not been the LEC Chairperson for at least eight years…
      anyone with a modicum of knowledge of the English language knows that you never end a sentence with a preposition.Here is how you write it:

      … wrote a post because I said comments at the Standard are an example of the intolerable abuse of which I have had enough.

      We’ll forget what’s wrong with rest of the sentence.

      Here endeth the grammar lesson.

      And what about the “abuse’ you claim to have experienced at the hands of mickysavage and a handful of commenters here? Let’s start with mickysavage. I re-read his post and there is not a hint of abuse. Criticism yes, but no abuse. Indeed anyone who knows mickysavage would tell you he is one of life’s gentleman. I have never read anything he has written anywhere that has contained the slightest hint of abusive language. And yet his detractors – including you it would seem – love to paint him as some sort of nasty, devious bastard. It is a compliment to him that his ability to be concise and coherent in his writings apparently has certain people feeling sufficiently threatened by him that they need to try and discredit him.

      He has no reason to apologise to you because he’s well within his rights to criticise anyone he perceives (correctly in this case) as being deserving of it, and it is up to you to take it on board and learn from the criticism.

      As for the “abuse” from commenters here… get yourself a thicker skin and shrug it off! If you put yourself out there in the public arena, then you have to expect that not everybody is going to like what you say – and say so!

      • Tim 17.1.1

        @Anne
        Uphill Shit Push!
        You’re correct about her unfounded claim of abuse at the hands of Mickey/
        I’m probably sailing bloody close to the wind – it’s just that Pagani – and her MSM media ‘friends’ to my mind represent EVERYTHING that’s wrong with the ‘broad church’ (ooo oooh – “I’m inclined to agree with you Mathew”)
        Despite the broad church – it’s ALL about Josie, and how dare any of us question her motives and sense of entitlement.
        It’s pretty bloody magnanimous of the site ‘owners’ to allow this utter flake a right of reply …. and YES …. probably even MORE magnanimous of them to allow a comment such as this!
        I’m not sure why we/Labour/ its principles/ etc even consider these people relevant any more to the extent that they’re given a rather lopsided and inequitable voice on the airwaves.

      • mickysavage 17.1.2

        Aw thanks Anne 😳

      • greywarbler 17.1.3

        That’s well put mickey. Seems to cover the points very clearly and courteously. What was needed as enough brouhaha to go already.

        BTW what branch of law do you specialise in?

      • karol 17.1.4

        Good comment, Anne.

        As for the “abuse” from commenters here… get yourself a thicker skin and shrug it off! If you put yourself out there in the public arena, then you have to expect that not everybody is going to like what you say – and say so!

        Indeed.

      • greywarbler 17.1.5

        That bit at the end Anne you have to expect that not everybody is going to like what you say – and say so! could have finished – And you could consider taking the reasoned criticism seriously and make changes.

        • karol 17.1.5.1

          Or at least think carefully about whether you need to make changes – sometimes people can get contradictory criticisms – in the end each person needs to reflecct and consider what needs changing and what doesn’t.

          Joise doesn’t actually seem to look very carefully at what the criticisms are, and gets them all wrong – not a good basis for making changes – the taking seriously and reflecting on the criticisms is important.

        • Anne 17.1.5.2

          @ greywarbler
          I wrote that just after having read Josie Pagani’s letter, and was pretty angry over the alleged abuse by mickysavage in particular. It wasn’t true. I guess I was in the mood to give her a bollocking. 🙁

          Maybe the last sentence was a bit unfair, but perhaps she will think twice about misrepresenting what people say in the future. It isn’t the first time it has happened by a long shot.

          • greywarbler 17.1.5.2.1

            Nah Anne. Wasn’t finding fault with anything you said. I was just thinking you could have made a stronger point and asked her to take our comments to heart. Something that may not happen I fear. Of course their point/s have to be understood first.

            Karol you seem to feel similarly.

            • Anne 17.1.5.2.1.1

              I think she might take some notice greywarbler. Time will tell. If she does I will be the first to give her a verbal bouquet…

    • karol 17.2

      micky, I think many of the individual crticisms of some things Josie has written, need to be seen in context: i.e. the context in which she produced them, and the kind of media coverage and poltical statements that were forefront at the time. She has tended to take individual criticisms out of such context – eg as you indicate with the quotas issue.

    • swordfish 17.3

      Josie Pagani (about Micky) “You accuse me of saying Labour values are unpopular and need to be jettisoned……..”

      Mickey (in reply) “I am sure that I did not.”

      Yep, I can’t see you making any such suggestion in your post, Mickey.

      Looks to me like Josie has just repeated a word-for-word criticism she made of Danyl (Pundit comments), lazily (and pointlessly) applying it to you too:

      On Pundit (Comment January 1 2014), she tells Danyl: “Danyl,…….You seem to be accusing me of saying Labour values are unpopular and need to be jettisoned. Actually I believe the exact opposite. I think Labour values are popular – and therefore when Labour is unpopular it must be because it’s is (sic) not being faithful to its own principles. This is a much more nuanced analysis than you give me credit for.”

      Give or take one or two extra words, this is (entirely verbatim) her criticism of you in the second-to-last paragraph of her Post above. She even includes the same “it’s is” mistake. (sic) !!!!!!

      Obviously, it’s a line she’s been working on and is keen to try out .http://www.pundit.co.nz/content/the-left-must-stand-up-to-abuse#comments

      • Anne 17.3.1

        Spot on swordfish.

        Some people are very good at coming up with fine sounding epistles. The problem arises when they don’t practice what they preach.

    • Saarbo 17.4

      “As for criticism of your views I agree normally that they would not be warranted. But it is your rather unique role in commenting in the media essentially on behalf of lefty activists that means that a spirited debate about your views is warranted.

      Yes, +1.

    • swordfish 17.5

      I appear to have a comment in moderation – a comment that suggests at least one of Pagani’s criticisms of Mickey is more than just a little bit disingenuous.

      [lprent: Read my comment at the top of the post. The post is under full moderation. This means that all comments made to it have to be released by a moderator. We commonly do this for guest posts from active politicians. For instance both Grant Robertson and David Cunliffe in the recent Labour party leadership debates. But also for some posts where we suspect that the content is going to cause excessive or concerted reactions. For instance the Blomfield guest post regarding the defamation case against Cameron Slater. ]

  18. Ad 18

    Couple of points.

    1. Greg Pesland is not the Chair of the New Lynn LEC. And he speaks, as one would expect, for himself. And he’s good at it.

    2. Stop conflating divisiveness for the contest of ideas. John Tamihere represented a set of ideas and is proud and unrepentant of it. When you step into the arena of ideas, expect that you could lose and that losing will hurt. Politics is not tiddlywinks pal.

    3. Re Shane Jones, why not do yourself a favour and admit that the best leadership candidate won? The great majority found your opinion to be wrong, so open your ears to why.

    4. With regard to your statement of beliefs, if you were half as clear as that in your columns or on National Radio you wouldn’t be in such constant hot water with the activist base here.

    5. The people that have a monopoly on defining Labour values are those who vote at the Labour Annual Conference and form remits to alter or support the Labour constitution, and the (now binding) Labour Policy Platform. As we did less than 3 months ago.
    Broader progressive values may well be contested, but Labour ones aren’t outside the AGM.

    6. Please improve your game – both on National Radio and here. Spell correctly. Get your facts correct. Write without cheap shots. Bring your best stuff to this game. You need to represent Labour better than you are.

  19. Tim 19

    God strewth … the temptation is almost too much! But just as I did with : “It’s 2014, and we have a job to do”, I’ll refrain from ANY comment and just watch the id, the egos and the super egos play themselves out.
    That divine right Josie has – having paid her dues , of course! – convinced her expertise provides her with an understanding of the real people is just too much for me to handle.
    Ew!
    And apolgies Lprent and others if the above is worthy of a ban – it probably is

  20. just saying 20

    Very clever of Josie to publish at a time she is not free to engage with those responding.

    • Lanthanide 20.2

      Apparently she sent this to Lynn several days ago and he’s posted it now. I presume at the time she sent it to him, she would have been available to reply to comments.

      So if you’re going to blame anyone, blame Lynn. On that point though, if he’d held off posting until after she got back from holiday, then it could potentially be weeks after Micky’s post.

      • just saying 20.2.1

        Was she on holiday when she sent it to you Lynn?

        • lprent 20.2.1.1

          Beats me. Seems kind of long for a phone. But I have a new laptop wityhan inadequete setup, a requirement to “not spend Lyns holiday buried in a computer” and being given a selection of ham, port and single malt scotch.

      • lprent 20.2.2

        Sort of. She sent it on the first. I sent back in the afternoon on the first after I got up with a hangover in the afternoon checking on the lack of links. She emailed back on the second. But I didn’t see that – either because of her phone and/or the hill or my trip to deepest southland. I saw her second email at lunch today after another late start and after talking to local bodies. Put up in a ham and port state after lunch. I am on holiday. She is on holiday. Why aren’t you?

  21. JK 21

    Thanks Mickey, Anne, Tim, JS, and others – as a relatively newcomer to The Standard I’ve been trying to think of a reply to Josie Pagani that wasn’t “abusive” or “nasty” or “poisonous” but I have often wondered WHY she is regarded by the mainstream media as a commentator for the left – so many things she says just don’t sound like the real left – so often she sounds like the Labour-lite from the old guards in the Labour caucus, that the Labour Party itself has tried to overcome with the change in leadership and its draft policy platform. I found Mickey’s comments quite reasonable and as Anne has put it “gentlemanly”. I hope she (Josie) gets an understanding from these comments about where she’s coming from, and where she might end up.

  22. Pascal's bookie 22

    Please improve your game – both on National Radio and here. Spell correctly. Get your facts correct. Write without cheap shots. Bring your best stuff to this game. You need to represent Labour better than you are.

    I’m gonna expand a bit on this from Ad, because fisking that damn post would be an even longer comment..

    A partisan* pundit’s job is to move the conversation towards their view, and away from their opponents. By doing that they shift the centre. A political party has to capture the centre when in opposition. It’s harder to do that when the pundits who are their supposed allies are calling them and their supporters ‘radicals’ or ‘loons’ or otherwise framing their own side as weird.

    This is basic, basic, stuff. If you are a left wing pundit, then every time the right wing pundits are agreeing with you about the ‘nasty left’ and saying ‘there there’ you are getting your butt kicked at your one fucking job.

    Over at Farrar’s blog, commenters get net upticks for, (for example), saying that Breivik was justified in doing what he did. Basic oppo research should have facts like that firmly lodged in your brain so that when a pundit starts going on the nasty left on the blogs, you don’t agree with them and martyr yourself, you stay something like:

    ‘Steady on, national party pollster David Farrar tolerates terrorist supporters on his blog; the Kiwiblog community approves of commenters who compare the Greens to nazis, and spout weird conspiracy theories about the education system being taken over by a cabal of marxists with a decades long plan to destroy the nuclear family. That’s what the National party’s base thinks of your average primary school teacher does in their day job. We on the left have our differences, but if you want to talk about nasty, I’ll go quote for quote for you”

    ..and have two or three quotes at hand. Quotes supporting Breivek that had net upticks showing “the clear support of rightwing commenters for this sort of talk”. Quotes attacking Key for being a traitor. Quotes about the maori party having desires for an apartheid state in NZ. Or that 95%+ of climate scientists world wide are all lying to get money and to set up New World Order.

    You don’t see right wing pundits discussing what goes in the KB or WO threads do you? Why do you think that is? It’s not rocket science. They don’t do it because they know what their bloody job is. And that’s to spin. Their side look good, and the other side look bad. That’s why shows have left and right guests. You are supposed to fight your damn corner in the left right battle.

    Don’t write columns talking about what the left, (by which you mean blog commenters and activists) ought to be saying. Most voters will never ever see these threads. All they know about them is what pundits say. So if all you say about them is negative, then what are they going to think about the left?

    In the media, you are the left. Don’t tell activists or blog commenters what we ought to be bloody saying to make your job easier. Your job, is making activists jobs easier. Our job is just being citizens. If you can’t convince us to vote for you, then you have no bloody show of changing swing voters minds

    You are not, (if you are a pundit), an academic analysing the left. You are the bloody left as far as the average punter sees things. So you should be attacking the right by highlighting the ways in which the right is out of step with the centre. One fucking job.
    .

    • karol 22.1

      uptick.

    • Lanthanide 22.2

      +100.

      PB, I think you should become a pundit for the left. I think you’d be very good at it – you’re one of the few commenters on TS who I *always* stop to read when I’m scrolling down the page.

    • QoT 22.3

      *thunderous applause*

    • just saying 22.4

      Brilliant.

      Could you CC that to Mike Williams too PB?

      Maybe after all these years they need an actual job description. Maybe point one could be “espouse left-wing ideas”. (course they may need a description of this as wel…)

      • QoT 22.4.1

        Your duties as a political commentator should include:

        a) espousing leftwing ideas [See Appendix 1: Leftwing Ideas and Appendix 2: Things which are NOT leftwing ideas]

        b) challenging rightwingers [See Appendix 3: How to Stop Saying You Agree With Matthew Hooton on Everything]

        c) understand that the “challenges” in point (b) do not include riding bikes with Cameron fucking Slater

    • Saarbo 22.5

      Perfect.

      Matthew Hooten (and a couple of others) do this well for the right, but frustratingly we don’t seem to have too many Lefties capable.

    • RedLogix 22.6

      Have to join the round of applause. PB doesn’t often say much, but when they do …

      It’s worth reflecting though that Josie may be doing the ‘left-wing pundit’ job she has been selected for – just fine thank you.

    • The Outrider 22.7

      Like a hot knife through butter. You get to the nub of the matter with some finesse and edge Pascal’s bookie.

    • One Anonymous Knucklehead 22.8

      Very well put PB. Like Lanthanide, I always stop to read what you have to say.

      • gobsmacked 22.8.1

        I’ll break a New Year’s resolution (already!) and interrupt a happily blog-free holiday, to add my support to Pascal Bookie’s excellent point.

        I don’t think there’s much else to say about Josie’s contributions, here or anywhere else in the media, except to restate the obvious: she just isn’t very good at this. I don’t *want* to disagree with – or criticise – a Labour supporter in the media, I don’t look for reasons to have a go, and I loathe bone-headed sexism. But nine times out of ten Josie makes me roll my eyes, when I’d really much rather applaud … if only she could say something worth applauding.

  23. Tanz 23

    progressive ideas, yikes.

  24. The Outrider 24

    It is worth noting that Mr. Key and his cronies are not and will not be the slightest bit interested in semantics when it comes to the GE dust up that is looming rapidly on the horizon. Steely resolve and a measure of unity would be very helpful in getting the correct result in November. I would far rather be raising a glass to toast a new government than licking bitter wounds and pondering on what could have been.

  25. Tanz 25

    moderaton. lol. what sin did I commit?

    [lprent: Moderated post. Interferes with holiday. Being social. Etc. Thanks. ]

  26. max 26

    Y’all don’t want to win this year do you?

  27. Tanz 27

    Key will be voted out, I hope. He is far left, anyway.

  28. For example, I support state funding of free health care and free education.

    Unbelievable that a mature adult aspiring to represent other adults could write a statement so irrational and delusional. If politicians Labour or Ntional or any party expect to win votes from thinking electors with this kind of infantile drivel they really deserve to go the way of the dodo.

    Health care and education supplied by the government is not “free”. It is funded by the taxpayer. Calling it “free” is something that would only come from someone who is (a) a slick talking used car salesman or (b) somebody who as an adult still believes in the tooth fairy.

    I think voters today are way past this kind of nonsense. Apparently Labour Party politicians are not.

    • One Anonymous Knucklehead 28.1

      They are free to those who receive them. Children, for example.

      Oh, and we already tried “private” healthcare and education. Medieval is the usual word.

    • greywarbler 28.2

      Redbaiter
      Your faux outrage on behalf of the sainted ‘taxpayer’, as opposed in your mind to the suckey beneficiaries and welfare recipients of all kinds, no longer holds water. Not since GST was introduced. Everybody now is a taxpayer, and those at the bottom end of the income strata pay a larger proportion of their small income than the more wealthy.

    • @ Redbaiter –

      Health care and education supplied by the government is not “free”.

      Hence why Josie said,

      For example, I support state funding of free health care and free education.

      Note the reference to state funding.

      As for suggesting that voters will not support “this drivel” – evidently you either weren’t around in the late 1980s or are suffering a Key-like brain fade/memory loss. At the time, the Rogergnomes in Labour attempted to implement a $50 per day, maximum ten days, charge for patients staying in hospitals.

      New Zealanders gave that policy the finger and ignored hospital invoices. People simply refused to pay, en masse.

      The policy was ditched shortly after.

      So despite New Zealanders generally buying into the Cult of Individualism (especially if it gives them the “inalienable” right to get pissed out of their brains at 5am in the morning and spew/urinate/defaecate in shop doorways), this was a step too far.

      Unlike creeping user-pays in education (school fees/donations, tertiary fees/debt, reduced early childhood education funding), Kiwis simply weren’t prepared to go down the route our American cuzzies have taken with their privatised healthcare system – which is an utter shambles by all accounts.

      Happy to have set you straight on this. 🙂

      • Redbaiter 28.3.1

        Frank, I could try and challenge your assumptions with mathematical arguments that prove socialised medicine and education systems cost more and are less effective, or I could use moral arguments that demonstrate that submitting to govt health care and education is anathema to anyone who values individuality and liberty.

        I know this. You might even know it. The trouble is the voters don’t know it and they never will while education and media are so firmly in the grip of progressives who view any argument that “gives ammunition to rednecks” as unworthy of an outing in the public sphere.

        Change won’t come and reason will not return to public debate until the left’s death grip on education and media is dislodged. It will be. Then we’ll be able to have a two sided public and real discussion on the matters you raise.

        Y’know, Cubans might not vote for Fidel Castro if one day they suddenly knew there was an alternative and better choice.

        • One Anonymous Knucklehead 28.3.1.1

          Yeah, when there’s so many real world examples to the contrary I’m not surprised “arguments” are all you can muster, but the reality check was never your strong point, was it?

        • Colonial Viper 28.3.1.2

          🙂 I’m glad you brought up Cuba. Using fully socialised medicine they spend 20 times less per capita on healthcare than the USA does, and get far better results in terms of health and life expectancy.

          No money gets wasted on supporting Big Pharma and private insurance shareholder profits, which is a bit sad for the capitalist privateers, however.

          • Redbaiter 28.3.1.2.1

            “and get far better results in terms of health and life expectancy.”

            Utter garbage.

            Not just completely dodgy stats but pro-Castro propaganda produced by govt depts that are just stooges for the regime.

            There’s a ton of real stuff out there telling the truth about the Cuban health system. What sort of idiot would believe and propagate figures put out by Castro’s govt stooges??? FFS.

  29. adam 29

    On casualisation of the work force, I wonder if Josie would be so fatalistic if we just skipped a step, and went back to the good old days on the wharf, were you put people in cages at the start of the day – then let the managers get to pick who they want to work that day. Or if she was a refugee in this country working for the job agencies – who some times pay there staff, and never really pay there tax properly, then leave them to struggle in the face of bills from acc and ird – would she be so fatalistic? I wonder if the protection we need from casualisation is for the police to politely never get involved in a labour dispute again. Don’t see why they should really – might make life as a cop, easer, if working stiffs could get there pay packets back to a more manageable level.

    Talking taxes, Josie does seem to be happy for the middle class to carry the tax burden whilst the top earners in society get richer. I mean – the people you say are to the right of you are indeed to the right of you – but do you get, that does not make you left by default? Indeed being on the left is a question of economics, and support of Women, Maori, Pacific, Disabled and the underclass. It does seem you get the later – on the former, you sound like a neo-liberal apologist.

    I’ve said it before, there are some people in labour who’s real home is national – and why? If you think the IKE era was a golden age, then national is the party for you – it is full of liberals – many of them classical.

  30. felix 30

    “Her only contact with the world is a cellphone that she has to climb a hill to get on the net.”

    I had always kinda assumed this was her normal state of affairs, although I am surprised to learn about the cellphone.

    • greywarbler 30.1

      Happy New Year felix. Were you at the top of a hill at 4.34 a.m. gazing down on a pristine world unencumbered by other humans?

      • felix 30.1.1

        Nah, in bed shivering with fever.

        • greywarbler 30.1.1.1

          Oh dear – still Christmas wasn’t much for weather and you didn’t miss much jollity probably. Were your eyes sore – if not chance to catch up on books and I hope you gathered in some looking-after- the-bedridden points.

  31. Tracey 31

    The number of folks asking about being in moderation really makes me wonder how many people read the whole comment to which they then respond?

    • enjoy every sandwich 31.1

      I think this is becase people have varying levels of reading speed, comprehension and attention span and interest and it becomes more obvious with long articles. I think a tldr(too long didnt read) at the top of a long article could be helpful

      • swordfish 31.1.1

        No. In terms of my 3 January 11:47 pm comment, it’s largely because I’m a bit of a dullard. Simple as that. Not as quick on the uptake as you might have hoped for.

        But, if I have one core philosophy, it’s precisely the same as yours, ees – I believe passionately that people should enjoy every sandwich. Not just 70% or 80% of them, EVERY SINGLE ONE ! * It’s what life’s all about, if only people would realise.

        * Lettuce and marmite ones in particular, mind.

        • enjoy every sandwich 31.1.1.1

          Well I’ve had the odd shitty sandwich, difficult to enjoy those ones. Even the good ones ones are tricky to enjoy under difficult circumstances.
          I guess ‘Enjoy every sandwich’ is catchier than ‘Try to enjoy every sandwich’.
          I do like sandwiches though.

  32. RedBaronCV 32

    I’m still not sure exactly what is bothering Josie. She says:
    “commenters on the Standard….vilify me and call for my exclusion.” which is obviously what concerns her.

    Dealing with the second bit first. What are we “excluding” her from – we have no power to remove her membership of a political party, intefere with her writing on the Pundit or remove her media output. There is a possibility that if she is seen as not ‘left wing enough’ then the media may pay others for more left wing commentary and there could be income loss. Still a right wing media might be more than happy to have commentary labeled “left wing” from someone who lands closer to the middle – if only because this feeds an image of division. The Herald could label whaleoil “left wing”, imagine that.

    Then there is the “vilify me”. Reading the above comments I cannot see that there has been any significant long term misinterpretation of her point of view as she expresses it.

    There is disagreement with some of her expressed views and opinions, as voiced, as to whether they are left enough (although no one person has the job of defining that).Most of us are to the left of some and the right of others.
    For instance, I could see a robust debate about the idea that “flexibility” for a workforce also requires it to be “casualised”. To me they are different concepts.

    So, is she bothered by income loss, or that her ideas/opinions, as expressed, are being questioned or debated against other left wing ideas? And that these ideas are possible vote losers, as opposed to the existing ideas which have been tested at the ballot box as definite losers.

  33. captain hook 33

    well Josie Pagani.
    Tell us all one good thing you have done then.

  34. rich the other 34

    Wake up Josie,
    The first point , the response to some of your opinions highlights the divisions in labour, a lack of tolerance unless you’re gay or knocking on the communist party’s door , no room for the middle of the road .
    Labour doesn’t want to recognise how pathetic and insignificant they have become , even the not so well off struggle to associate them selves with labour , just look at the last election result , the same fate awaits them later in the year.

    The obvious solution for you , join National and become relevant .
    National has plenty of proven ”near” leftish history and through the latest five year period of international economic turmoil have maintained social services and are on track for bright future .

    Josie,
    Take a little time , do a little research and then when you are convinced, join the party that caters for most NZers , NATIONAL.

  35. tricledrown 35

    Manipulative Hoodwinker
    Mathew Hooten
    Is all over you like a rash Mrs Pagani .
    We wouldn’t be complaining if it were not so
    Its election year and you need to show some spine.
    Come up with some spin that negates the Masterful Hoodwinking of Hooten.
    You can find some good spin to attack MS with half truths but fail to do your job on the Nactuf govt.

  36. trcey 36

    RTO

    50% of nzers who r on under 30k per yer hve no benefit from this government… which which letter hs gone from my keybord.

  37. THE big winners from six years of Labor government were white-collar, inner-city Greens, while the big losers were blue-collar traditional ALP voters and young mums in the outer suburbs, an analysis of job trends shows. Report author John Black – head of demographic profiling company Australian Development Strategies and a former Labor senator and national executive member – said yesterday it showed Labor had failed its much trumpeted promise to advance “working families”.

    http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/policy/labors-policies-hurt-working-families/story-fn59noo3-1226794662671#

    Who doesn’t know nowadays that the Labour movement has been transformed into the urban liberal/ watermelon movement? Apparently everyone knows other than the people who should, and who should be doing something about it.

  38. tricledrown 38

    Redbaiter
    So true,urbanization is the culprit.
    Community cooperation has dissapeared in urbanization so that has been replaced by individualism.
    Instead of cooperation we get competition.
    dog eat dog
    So how do we get people to be more cooperative in urban NZ

  39. Philj 39

    Xox
    Josie is not faring too well on TS. Can’t Jim Mora find some real left wing common tators? Or doesn’t he /RNZ know any? Or is he just tooo niiice…? Or clueless.

  40. One Anonymous Knucklehead 40

    The premise of Josie’s argument is that division – argument, differences of opinion, etc – is weakness.

    In fact it is strength. Democracy relies on debate, brings together competing values in compromise.
    The authoritarians are welcome to agreement. It’s more-or-less useless.

    Those who rail against “identity” politics might consider this.

  41. Sacha 41

    Photo of ex-candidate used to illustrate story about internal selection processes:
    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11183231

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Gravity wins, everybody loses
    This government should come with a whiplash warning. Did you hear the Prime Minister just go off about the Black Hole They Left Us? - how much was it, 20 billion? 200 billion? Or was it 2 gazillion billion? God he just gets so excited doing his we were going ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    4 hours ago
  • Gravity wins, everybody loses
    This government should come with a whiplash warning. Did you hear the Prime Minister just go off about the Black Hole They Left Us? - how much was it, 20 billion? 200 billion? Or was it 2 gazillion billion? God he just gets so excited doing his we were going ...
    More than a fieldingBy David Slack
    4 hours ago
  • Willis tells us before dawn about her travel plans and – early this afternoon – she reports on h...
    Buzz from the Beehive Finance Minister Nicola Willis – and press secretary Nick Venter, too, we may suppose – were up and about before sparrow’s fart. Her bags would have been packed and her passport checked. We report this on the strength of an email from Venter which landed in ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    5 hours ago
  • ROB MacCULLOCH: Grant Robertson’s new job sends an awful message to students about meritocracy in ...
      The appointment of Grant Robertson as Vice-Chancellor of Otago University has raised hackles – and questions – among academics.  Robertson’s credentials for the job is one issue.  The appointment process is another.  University of Auckland economics professor Rob MacCulloch has posted these three articles in the past few days ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    7 hours ago
  • Govt's Budget 'just like a household,' says Willis
    TL;DR: Flying in the face of comments from a ratings agency and a mountain of demand for a new long-term sovereign bond issued yesterday, Finance Minister Nicola Willis has again characterised the Government’s finances as too fragile to borrow in its own right to solve Aotearoa-NZ’s infrastructure deficits. She also ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    10 hours ago
  • Untold back-stories: the little things media don't tell us but which are nevertheless pertinent
    ..Thanks for reading Frankly Speaking ! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.In an article entitled "School donations continue to yield millions of dollars for wealthier schools" on RNZ's website on 19 February, Data journalist Farah Hancock reported on the fees ("donations") that (some) schools were ...
    Frankly SpeakingBy Frank Macskasy
    11 hours ago
  • Untold back-stories: the little things media don't tell us but which are nevertheless pertinent
    ..Thanks for reading Frankly Speaking ! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.In an article entitled "School donations continue to yield millions of dollars for wealthier schools" on RNZ's website on 19 February, Data journalist Farah Hancock reported on the fees ("donations") that (some) schools were ...
    Frankly SpeakingBy Frank Macskasy
    11 hours ago
  • Efeso Collins – Gone Too Soon.
    My wife’s breathing was heavy beside me as I woke this morning, still dark. Yesterday, and it’s awful news, came crashing into my head and I lay there quietly crying.Thinking of Efeso’s family and loved ones. Of so many people who knew him and were devastated by the shocking news. ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    13 hours ago
  • Efeso Collins spoke in Parliament only yesterday on bill which will regulate social workers (and vot...
    Buzz from the Beehive Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and other party leaders have been paying tribute to Green MP Fa’anānā Efeso Collins, who collapsed and died during a ChildFund charity run in central Auckland this morning, . The event, near Britomart, was to support local communities in the Pacific. Collins, ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    1 day ago
  • This is corrupt
    Earlier in the month, a panel of "independent" experts in Wellington produced recommendations for the future of housing in the city, and they were a bit shit, opposing intensification and protecting the property values of existing homeowners. Its since emerged that they engaged in some pretty motivated reasoning on the ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 day ago
  • Efeso Collins
    God, life can be cruel sometimes can’t it?If only everyone was like him. He was so very warm, so very generous, so very considerate, so very decent. Plenty of people have those qualities but I can think of hardly anyone I've met who had them as richly as he did.Let me ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    1 day ago
  • CHRIS TROTTER:  Is applying “tough love” to a “fragile” nation the right answer?
      The Question Christopher Luxon Needs To Ask –  And Answer:  How was it possible for a nation of barely three million citizens to create and maintain an infrastructure that functioned, schools and universities that turned out well-educated and enterprising citizens, a health system that kept its people healthy, and a ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    1 day ago
  • DON BRASH: Is an independent foreign policy really feasible?
    Don Brash writes – A week or so ago, Helen Clark and I argued that New Zealand would be nuts to abandon the independent foreign policy which has been a characteristic of New Zealand life for most of the last 40 years, a policy which has seen us ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    1 day ago
  • YVONNE VAN DONGEN: So proud
    Ratepayers might well ask why they are subsidising people who peddle the lie that it is possible to be born in the wrong body and people can change sex. The preponderance of events advertising as ‘queer’ is a gender ideology red flag. Yvonne Van Dongen writes –  It ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    1 day ago
  • S&P slams new Govt's council finance vacuum
    Wellington Water workers attempt to resolve a burst water main. Councils are facing continuing uncertainty over how to pay to repair and expand infrastructure. The Wellington Regional Council was one of those downgraded. File Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: Ratings agency Standard & Poor’s has downgraded the outlooks for ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 day ago
  • Grant Robertson Resigns.
    Yesterday the man that I admire most in NZ politics called time.Around the middle of yesterday news began to filter out. People were posting unconfirmed reports that Grant Robertson was taking a new role as Vice-Chancellor at Otago Uni. Within an hour it became clear that he was indeed retiring ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    2 days ago
  • Auckland’s City Rail Link will fail immediately… in the best possible way
    This post was originally published on Linked In by Nicolas Reid. It is republished here with permission. Here’s the thing: the City Rail Link is almost certainly going to be overcapacity from day one, with crowding on the trains at peak times. In the simple terms of popular transport ...
    Greater AucklandBy Greater Auckland
    2 days ago
  • You can’t always get what you want
    Grant Robertson is leaving Parliament for two new careers, having been frustrated and blocked from achieving some of his biggest political ambitions. So, he is returning to Dunedin, and, unusually for a former finance minister, with seemingly no ambitions to enter the business world. Instead, he will become Vice Chancellor ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    2 days ago
  • At a glance – Was Greenland really green in the past?
    On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
    2 days ago
  • Sharp-elbowed and loving it
    It doesn't seem to take a lot to persuade someone who feels they work their guts out that in fact no one is working as hard as me.It doesn't seem to take a lot to persuade someone who knows somebody taking the welfare system for a ride that they’re all ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    2 days ago
  • Sharp-elbowed and loving it
    It doesn't seem to take a lot to persuade someone who feels they work their guts out that in fact no one is working as hard as me.It doesn't seem to take a lot to persuade someone who knows somebody taking the welfare system for a ride that they’re all ...
    More than a fieldingBy David Slack
    2 days ago
  • Then why did she do it?
    Earlier in the month, Cancer Minister Casey Costello was caught lying to the media about whether or not she had requested advice on cutting tobacco excise tax to benefit the cancer industry. She repeated her lies in Parliament. But today, she stood up and pretended to apologise for "causing confusion" ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 days ago
  • Is Applying “Tough Love” To A “Fragile” Nation The Right Answer?
    The Question Christopher Luxon Needs To Ask –  And Answer: How was it possible for a nation of barely three million citizens to create and maintain an infrastructure that functioned, schools and universities that turned out well-educated and enterprising citizens, a health system that kept its people healthy, and a workforce ...
    2 days ago
  • The limits to realism.
    Realism is a school of thought in the field of international relations (IR). It provides a theoretical framework for analysing the behaviour of States in the world political system. Like other theories (which in the IR literature include idealism, liberalism, … Continue reading ...
    KiwipoliticoBy Pablo
    2 days ago
  • UNSOCIAL MEDIA – Following the Trolls
    From TODAY FM archives — Wilhelmina Shrimpton and Simon Morrow take a deep dive into trolling and cyberbullying. From the high profile to the general public, Kiwis across all walks of life are being targeted, and some are paying the ultimate price. So what drives us to troll, who is ...
    The PaepaeBy Peter Aranyi
    2 days ago
  • Govt prescribes stiff medicine for some beneficiaries while easing access to drugs containing pseudo...
    Buzz from the Beehive One of two new announcements on the government’s official website  – given plenty of publicity by the mainstream media over the past 24 hours – has been pitched as the first steps in a “reset” of the welfare system.  Stiff medicine for beneficiaries, in effect. The ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    2 days ago
  • We’re not as fragile or as lazy as Luxon says
    Luxon says his government is one that is “prepared to make those hard decisions”. File Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has adopted the language of Ruth Richardson before her 1991 ‘Mother of All Budgets’ in arguing for benefit sanctions to bolster the Government finances, which ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    2 days ago
  • Talking over the Silence.
    Please open the doorNothing is different, we've been here beforePacing these hallsTrying to talk over the silenceIf I was to describe what I do, or at least the way it sometimes feels, then talking over the silence wouldn’t be a bad way to do so.Not that there aren’t other voices ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    2 days ago
  • LINDSAY MITCHELL: National needs to go further
    Lindsay Mitchell writes – In today’s State of the Nation speech Christopher Luxon talked repeatedly about getting young people off welfare. It seems that National has devised a traffic light system which will use increasing levels of sanctions – welfare deductions – when beneficiaries fail to meet their ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    2 days ago
  • Gordon Campbell on National spreading panic about the economy
    It is a political strategy as old as time. Scare the public with tales of disaster and stampede them into supporting your ideological agenda because they believe There Is No Alternative. Yet, if the NZ economy truly is as “fragile” as PM Christopher Luxon says it is… Then how come ...
    3 days ago
  • The promise of passive house design
    This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Sarah Wesseler Imagine a home so efficient that it could be heated with a hair dryer. That’s the promise of a passive house, a design standard that’s becoming increasingly popular in the architecture community for its benefits to occupants and the climate. ...
    3 days ago
  • Deep in the Uncanny Valley of AI
    Hi,Before we get started, some very big fun Webworm news. I am launching a new journalism fund called Big Worm Farm!A really great thing that’s happened with Webworm over the last four years is that it’s grown. That’s great for a few reasons.Firstly — it means the work here gets ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    3 days ago
  • Introducing: Big Worm Farm
    Hi,I’m excited to tell you about Big Worm Farm.Put simply, the main aim of Big Worm Farm is to support investigative journalists from around the world to be able to devote dedicated time to research and report on a specific story, to be published on Webworm.The stories will capture the ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    3 days ago
  • Why Massey is broke
    The Tertiary Education Commission has named the two universities it says are at high risk financially. They are Massey and Victoria. The Commission appeared before Parliament’s Education Select Committee yesterday and offered a revealing and rare insight into the complex world of university economics. Its Briefing to the Incoming Minister ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    3 days ago
  • You keep Luxin' when you oughta be thruthin'
    Christopher Luxon’s campaign to win last year's election continued yesterday with a speech.Channelling possibly Bruce Willis in Die Hard, he was all, I'm not going to dress it up, I'm going to level with you guys: the state of the nation is fragile.The thing he’s maybe missing is that it ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    3 days ago
  • The PM spoke of the need for tough choices – and then opted to beat a retreat when gays and Gaza a...
    Buzz from the Beehive The PM’s State of the Nation speech – according to a Newshub headline – was a ‘buffet of buzzwords’ and full of ‘nonsense’. Fair to say, the quoted words were attributed to Opposition politicians, who were unlikely to say the speech was visionary and inspiring: PM ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    3 days ago
  • Keynesian Wisdom.
    When the facts change, I change my mind - what do you do, sir?John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946)This posting is exclusive to Bowalley Road. ...
    3 days ago
  • BRIAN EASTON: Puffing policy
    Public policy towards tobacco consumption remains politically sensitive. Brian Easton writes – In 1983, a young researcher was told by a medium-level Treasury official that Treasury policy was to abandon excise duties on tobacco. The senior Treasury economist that I consulted, famed for his commonsense, snorted ‘we ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    3 days ago
  • Is 2.8% per year population growth too much?
    TL;DR: The Government is reviewing migration settings that produced 2.8% population growth last year and is looking at a longer-term strategy of matching population growth to the ‘absorbtive capacity’ of Aotearoa-NZ’s infrastructure.Our population grew last year at its fastest rate since 1947, when large numbers of troops returning from World ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    3 days ago
  • Tough Choices & Tough Love.
    I've been trying to hurt youI've been holding you tightI've been learning to love youAm I doing it right?How are you still breathingWith my hands all over your heart?How do we start healingIf we can't keep out the dark?Yesterday the Prime Minister delivered his State of the Nation, for no ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    3 days ago
  • Will the 2024 RLTP be yet another debacle?
    A couple of years ago, Auckland Council and Auckland Transport found themselves in court over the 2021 Regional Land Transport Plan (RLTP). A non-profit alliance for transport decarbonisation, All Aboard Aotearoa, argued that among other factors, the RLTP was unlawful because it failed to give effect to the 2021 Government ...
    4 days ago
  • 2024 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #07
    A listing of 31 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, Feb 11, 2024 thru Sat, Feb 17, 2024. Story of the week Based on mission alignment, our Story of the Week is certainly Can we be inoculated against climate ...
    4 days ago
  • Immigration Issues.
    Help is comingI heard a whisperWhite caps turningThe breath of summerA distant drummingAnd liar birds callingEscape the anguish of our pastAnd prayOne of the major challenges of the the 21st century will be the mass migration of human beings around our globe.Some seeking economic opportunities, others fleeing repressive regimes, war ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    4 days ago
  • Trust us, we know what we’re doing
    The best trick the National Party ever pulled was to fabricate their reputation as the responsible ones.This would be the National Party that denied us the New Zealand Superannuation Scheme that—Brian Gaynor wrote back in 2007would be worth more than $240 billion today and would have transformed the New Zealand ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    5 days ago
  • The Left’s Timidity
    It is not just Karl Marx – even the most enthusiastic supporters of the market economy (not least Adam Smith) will concede that its normal operation inevitably leads to a concentration of wealth in relatively few hands. Some, at least, of these enthusiasts will accept that such a concentration is ...
    Bryan GouldBy Bryan Gould
    5 days ago
  • OLIVER HARTWICH: Absurd – NZ courts can now decide on climate change
    Oliver Hartwich writes – The World Justice Project ranks New Zealand 7th out of 142 countries on its ‘Rule of Law Index’, narrowly ahead of Australia’s 13th place. However, Australia still has hope – if only because of a recent decision by the Supreme Court of New Zealand. The ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    5 days ago
  • Still waiting on that turnaround
    Hello! Here comes the Saturday edition of More Than A Feilding, catching you up on the past week’s editions.Friday: Week in review, quiz style2. Shane Jones’ demeanour in mocking and deriding climate activists can be observed in what other realm of human behaviour?a. Gleeful little boys pulling wings off fliesb. ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    6 days ago
  • Can we be inoculated against climate misinformation? Yes – if we prebunk rather than debunk
    This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article written by Christian Turney, University of Technology Sydney and Sander van der Linden, University of Cambridge and first published on February 14, 2024. Adrien Demers/Shutterstock Last year, the world experienced the hottest day ...
    6 days ago
  • Mihi Forbes and the great Atlas conspiracy
    Graham Adams writes — Last week, Mihingarangi Forbes made an extraordinary claim while interviewing David Seymour on Mata Reports, a taxpayer-funded current affairs programme which, she says, looks at events through an “indigenous lens”. She asked him about Act’s links to the Atlas Network, which fosters connections between centre-right ...
    Point of OrderBy gadams1000
    6 days ago
  • Puffing Policy
    Public policy towards tobacco consumption remains politically sensitive. In 1983, a young researcher was told by a medium-level Treasury official that Treasury policy was to abandon excise duties on tobacco. The senior Treasury economist that I consulted, famed for his commonsense, snorted ‘we need the money’. He explained that no-excise-duty ...
    PunditBy Brian Easton
    6 days ago
  • Luxon is one of three prime ministers pressing for a ceasefire in Gaza – but the two-state solutio...
    Buzz from the Beehive Two days after hundreds of people rallied outside the New Zealand parliament and the US embassy in Wellington to protest against what they maintain is genocide in Gaza,  Prime Minister Chris Luxon joined with the Prime Ministers of Australia and Canada to express their  concerns that ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    6 days ago
  • All jellied up with possum grease
    1. Shane Jones, addressing the energy industry, called climate concern what?a. The only sane responseb. Undeniably valid c. Our last best hope d. A "religion" 2. Shane Jones’ demeanour in mocking and deriding climate activists can be observed in what other realm of human behaviour?a. Gleeful little boys pulling wings off fliesb. Gleeful ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    6 days ago
  • Equality comes to Greece
    The Greek Parliament has voted for marriage equality: Greece has become the first Christian Orthodox-majority country to legalise same-sex marriage. Same-sex couples will now also be legally allowed to adopt children after Thursday's 176-76 vote in parliament. Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis said the new law would "boldly abolish a ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • CHRIS TROTTER:  Iron in her soul.
      “Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.” – Friedrich Nietzsche   Chris Trotter writes – TELEVISION NEW ZEALAND is to be congratulated for inviting Chloe Swarbrick onto its Q+A current affairs show. The Green MP ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    6 days ago
  • The Hoon around the week to Feb 16
    Net emigration of New Zealanders overseas hit a record-high 47,000 in the 2023 year, which only partly offset net immigration of 173,000, which was dominated by arrivals from India, the Philippines and China with temporary work visas. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The five things that mattered in Aotearoa’s ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    6 days ago
  • Stop Whispering.
    There's nothing to sayAnd there's nothing to doStop whispering, start shoutingStop whispering, start shoutingYesterday our government surprised a few of us by standing up for something. It wasn’t for the benefit of people who own holiday homes and multiple investment properties. Neither were there any tobacco companies or fishing cartels ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    6 days ago
  • “I'm Not Keen on Whataboutism, But What About…”
    Hi,Not sure how your week is going, but I’ve had a pretty frustrating one. I’ve been trying to put my finger on it, and I think it’s perhaps distilled in this message I got on Twitter:What got me a bit riled up is that it was a response to the ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    6 days ago
  • Gordon Campbell on National passing bad policies under urgency
    If National really had faith in its welfare policies, it wouldn’t be ramming them through Parliament under urgency – a step that means the policies can’t be exposed to select committee debate, public submissions, expert commentary, media scrutiny and all the normal democratic processes that this coalition appears to hold ...
    6 days ago
  • Weekly Roundup 16-February-2024
    It’s Friday so once again here”s our roundup of some of the articles that caught our attention this week. This Week in Greater Auckland On Monday Matt looked at the Government’s war on Auckland. On Tuesday Matt covered the ongoing issues with the rail network. On Thursday Matt ...
    Greater AucklandBy Greater Auckland
    7 days ago
  • The Dawn Chorus for Friday, February 16
    The six things to note in my view at 6.30 am on Friday, February 16 in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy are: Read more ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    7 days ago
  • Iron In Her Soul.
    “Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.” – Friedrich NietzscheTELEVISION NEW ZEALAND is to be congratulated for inviting Chloe Swarbrick onto its Q+A current affairs show. The Green MP for Auckland Central is the odds-on ...
    7 days ago
  • Dig this
    Resources Minister Shane Jones yesterday told a breakfast hosted by Energy Resources Aotearoa precisely what they wanted to hear. “We campaigned to rehabilitate relegitimise and stand up for working families who derive their income,  derive their hope and derive purpose in regional New Zealand through a flourishing, growing, forward-leaning energy ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    7 days ago
  • Skeptical Science New Research for Week #7 2024
    Open access notables Physics-based early warning signal shows that AMOC is on tipping course, van Westen et al., Science Advances: Here, we show results of the first tipping event in the Community Earth System Model, including the large climate impacts of the collapse. Using these results, we develop a physics-based and ...
    7 days ago
  • A rejection of the rule of law
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Shrugging-Off The Atlas Network.
    Upholding The Status-Quo: The Left’s election defeat is not the work of the Atlas Network. It is not even the work of David Seymour and Act. It is the work of ordinary citizens who liked the Right’s stories better than they liked the Left’s. If the Right’s stories were made ...
    1 week ago
  • BARRIE SAUNDERS: Treaty Principles – all rather problematic
    Barrie Saunders writes – When ACT’s leader said they wanted legislation to state what the Treaty principles mean, my first thought was this will be controversial and divisive.  Clearly it is. The first reference to the principles of the Treaty were contained in the 1975 Act establishing the Treaty of ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    1 week ago
  • Luxon Rejects The “Rejection Election” At His Peril.
    Fitting Right In: National retailed a reactionary manifesto of right-wing, racially-charged policies to the electorate throughout 2023. No talk back then of ignoring the overwhelming political preferences of the voting public and making a strong stand on principle. If Luxon’s pollsters and focus-groups were telling him that the public was ...
    1 week ago
  • Valentine’s Day went unnoticed on the Beehive website – but it is not “baa, humbug” to celeb...
    Buzz from the Beehive None of our ministers – a quick check with the Beehive website suggests – found cause to mention, let along celebrate, Valentine’s Day. But two ministers – Agriculture Minister Todd McClay and Rural Communities Minister Mark Patterson – ensured that National Lamb Day did not pass ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    1 week ago
  • Are You A Leftist?
    Nothing To Lose But Our Chains: The emancipatory movement which the Left, understood correctly, has always been, cannot accommodate those who are only able to celebrate one group’s freedom by taking it from another. The expectation, always, among leftists, is that liberty enlarges us. That striking-off a person’s shackles not ...
    1 week ago
  • An unlawful directive
    An interesting question in the Parliamentary written questions feed today, from Jan Tinetti to the Minister of Education: Has she or her Office directed the Ministry of Education to not release Official Information Act material prior to the full twenty working days, if so, why? Given that ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • I’ve been doing this all wrong
    Here are six words that are not easy to say but god it can feel good when you finally say them:I’ve been doing this all wrongFive years ago today I said to myself:What if I'm doing this all wrong?Five years ago today I said to Karren: I think I’m going to ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    1 week ago
  • New study suggests the Atlantic overturning circulation AMOC “is on tipping course”
    This is a re-post from RealClimate by Stefan Rahmstorf A new paper was published in Science Advances today. Its title says what it is about: “Physics-based early warning signal shows that AMOC is on tipping course.” The study follows one by Danish colleagues which made headlines last July, likewise looking for early warning signals ...
    1 week ago
  • Drawn
    A ballot for five Member's Bills was held today, and the following bills were drawn: Parole (Mandatory Completion of Rehabilitative Programmes) Amendment Bill (Todd Stephenson) Goods and Services Tax (Removing GST From Food) Amendment Bill (Rawiri Waititi) Income Tax (ACC Payments) Amendment Bill (Hamish Campbell) ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Valentines from ACT.
    Some of us make a big deal out of Valentine’s Day. We’ll buy the flowers, eye watering though the price spike might be. Say the things we should be saying anyway, although diminished by being scheduled for delivery. Some of us will even write long free-form newsletters with declarations of ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    1 week ago
  • Tax cuts paid for by 13k more kids in poverty
    MSD advised the government that the indexation change it passed under urgency last night is likely to put around 7,000 extra children (and potentially up to 13,000) into poverty. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The Government has reverted indexation for main beneficiaries to price inflation from wage inflation under ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 week ago

  • Minister attending Australian data, digital meeting
    Minister for Digitising Government Judith Collins is in Sydney to attend the first Data and Digital Ministers’ Meeting of 2024.  “This is a great opportunity to connect with our Australian counterparts and identify how we can work together on digital transformation,” Ms Collins says.   “Both our nations are looking into ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 hours ago
  • Appointments to Antarctica New Zealand Board
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has appointed Leon Grice and Heather Simpson to serve on the Antarctica New Zealand board.  “Since taking office, the Coalition Government has become concerned about the direction of the Scott Base Redevelopment Project,” Mr Peters says.  “It is vital that Antarctica New Zealand has the right ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 hours ago
  • Strengthening the Single Economic Market
    Finance Minister Nicola Willis has met with Australian Treasurer Jim Chalmers to discuss the opportunities to lower business costs and increase the ease with which businesses and people can operate across the Tasman.     “I have met with Treasurer Chalmers and shared our new Government’s ambitious economic goals, our plans ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 hours ago
  • Government to address business payment practices
    The Government will repeal the Business Payment Practices Act 2023, Small Business and Manufacturing Minister Andrew Bayly announced today. “There is a major problem with large market players imposing long payment terms and routinely paying invoices late. “However, the Business Payment Practices Act is not an effective solution and would ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 hours ago
  • Greater focus on work will reduce child poverty
    Worsening child poverty rates support the Coalition Government’s focus on reducing the cost of living and getting people into work, Child Poverty Reduction Minister Louise Upston says. Figures released by Stats NZ today show child poverty rates have increased, with the rising cost of living, driven by inflation, making it ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    10 hours ago
  • NZ announces new support for Ukraine
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters and Defence Minister Judith Collins have marked two years since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine by announcing further support and sanctions, and extending our military assistance. “Russia launched its illegal, full-scale invasion of Ukraine, in blatant violation of international law, including the UN Charter,” Mr Peters says. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    10 hours ago
  • Finance Minister to meet Australian Treasurer
    Finance Minister Nicola Willis will travel to Australia today to meet her Australian counterpart, Treasurer Jim Chalmers.    “New Zealand and Australia have an incredibly strong trade and investment relationship. The Closer Economic Relations and Single Economic Market are powerful engines for growth on both sides of the Tasman.     “I will ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    12 hours ago
  • PM shocked and saddened at death of Efeso Collins
    “I am truly shocked and saddened at the news of Efeso Collins’ sudden death,” Prime Minister Christopher Luxon says. “Efeso was a good man, always friendly and kind, and a true champion and advocate for his Samoan and South Auckland communities. “Our thoughts and deepest sympathies go to his family, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Greater support for social workers
    The Coalition Government is enhancing the professionalism of the social work sector and supporting the vulnerable people who rely on them, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says.  The Social Workers Registration Legislation Amendment Bill passed its third reading in Parliament today. It amends the Social Workers Registration Legislation ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Government delivers greater freedom and choice for sick New Zealanders
    The coalition government is delivering on its commitment to making principled decisions by getting rid of red tape that doesn’t make sense and allowing sick New Zealanders greater freedom and choice to purchase effective cold and flu medicines. A bill amending the Misuse of Drugs Act 1975 is being introduced, and changes to the Medicines ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Government begins reset of welfare system
    The Coalition Government is taking early action to curb the surge in welfare dependency that occurred under the previous government by setting out its expectations around employment and the use of benefit sanctions, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. In 2017, 60,588 sanctions were applied to beneficiaries who ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • State of the Nation
    Ka nui te mihi kia koutou. Kia ora, good morning, talofa, malo e lelei, bula vinaka, da jia hao, namaste, sat sri akal, assalamu alaikum. Thank you for coming to my first State of the Nation as Prime Minister. Thank you for coming to a speech where I don’t just ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • West Coast tourism attractions officially open
    Regional Development Minister Shane Jones will attend the official opening of two highly anticipated tourism projects on the West Coast today – Pike29 Memorial Track, dedicated to the memory of the Pike River miners, and Pounamu Pathway. “The Pike29 Memorial Track is a way to remember and honour the men ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Independent ferry service advisory group in place
    Appointments to the Ministerial Advisory Group tasked with providing independent advice and assurance on the future of KiwiRail’s inter-island ferry service have been made, State Owned Enterprises Minister Paul Goldsmith says. “It’s important for New Zealand that KiwiRail is focused on ensuring safe, resilient, and reliable ferry services over the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Joint statement from the Prime Ministers of Australia, Canada, and New Zealand
    The Prime Ministers of Australia, Canada and New Zealand today issued the following statement on reports of Israel’s planned military operation in Rafah. We are gravely concerned by indications that Israel is planning a ground offensive into Rafah.   A military operation into Rafah would be catastrophic. About 1.5 million Palestinians ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Govt will deliver on expanded breast screening
    The coalition Government has made the first steps in delivering on its promise to  extend free breast screening to women aged 70-74, Health Minister Shane Reti says. “As part of the 100 day plan, the Government has now met with officials and discussed what is needed in order for the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government announces woolshed roadshows in support of sheep farmers
    The Government celebrates National Lamb Day (15 February 24) and congratulates sheep farmers on the high-quality products they continue to produce. Agriculture Minister McClay hosted bipartisan celebrations of National Lamb Day with industry representatives at Parliament this week to mark the anniversary of the first frozen lamb exports that left ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Speech: Address to the NZ Economics Forum
    It’s great to be back at the New Zealand Economics Forum. I would like to acknowledge everyone here today for your expertise and contribution, especially the Pro Vice-Chancellor, Head of the Waikato Management School, economists, students and experts alike. A year has passed since I was last before you, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government tackling high construction costs
    The Government is focused on reducing sky-high construction costs to make it more affordable to build a home, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says.  Stats NZ data shows the cost of building a house has increased by 41 per cent since 2019, making housing even more unaffordable for Kiwi ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Labour’s Three Waters legislation repealed
    The Coalition Government’s legislative plan to address longstanding issues with local water infrastructure and service delivery took an important step today, with the repeal of Labour’s divisive and unpopular Three Waters legislation, Local Government Minister Simeon Brown says. “Repealing this legislation is a necessary first step in implementing our Local ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Cost of living support for beneficiary households
    The Coalition Government is delivering on its commitment to ease the cost-of-living by increasing main benefit rates in line with inflation and ensuring the Minimum Family Tax Credit threshold remains aligned with this change, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. The Social Security (Benefits Adjustment) and Income Tax ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government announces agriculture delegations to better support Primary sector
    The coalition Government has announced ministerial delegations to support key areas across the Primary sector to deliver for New Zealand’s food and fibre sector, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay announced today. “I will be supported in my roles as Minister of Agriculture, Trade, Forestry and Hunting and Fishing, by three Associate ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Waikato MoU reinforces Govt’s commitment to increase NZ doctors
    The Government has taken an important step forward in addressing a critical shortage of New Zealand-trained doctors, with today’s signing of a Memorandum of Understanding for a third medical school, Minister of Health Dr Shane Reti has announced.  “Today’s signing by the Ministry of Health and the University of Waikato ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Speech – Lunar New Year 2024
    Annyeonghaseyo, greetings and welcome all. It is my pleasure as the Minister for Ethnic Communities to welcome you to the first Lunar New Year Event in Parliament. Thank you to our emcees for greeting us in the different languages that represent the many cultures that celebrate the Lunar New Year. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • More funding to Hawke’s Bay and Tairāwhiti
    Urgent work to clean-up cyclone-affected regions will continue, thanks to a $63 million boost from the Government for sediment and debris removal in Hawke’s Bay and Tairāwhiti.                                                                                                   The funding will help local councils continue urgent work removing and disposing of sediment and debris left from Cyclone Gabrielle.   “This additional ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Budget will be delivered on 30 May
    Plans to deliver tax relief to hard-working New Zealanders, rebuild business confidence and restore the Crown’s finances to order will be unveiled on 30 May, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. The plans will be announced in the Budget which is currently being developed by Ministers.  “The last government’s mismanagement of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government advances Local Water Done Well
    The Coalition Government is continuing work to restore council ownership and control of water assets by repealing Three Waters and appointing a Technical Advisory Group to provide expert advice on the implementation of Local Water Done Well, Local Government Minister Simeon Brown says. “The Government will pass a bill to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Minister congratulates NZQA Top Scholars
    Education Minister Erica Stanford congratulates the New Zealand Scholarship recipients from 2023 announced today.  “Receiving a New Zealand Scholarship is a fantastic achievement and is a testament to the hard work and dedication the recipients have put in throughout the year,” says Ms Stanford.  “New Zealand Scholarship tests not only ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New diplomatic appointments
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has today announced five new diplomatic appointments.  "Strong and effective diplomacy to protect and advance our interests in the world is needed now more than ever," Mr Peters says.  “We are delighted to appoint senior diplomats from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade to these ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Speech to the Committee for Auckland
    It is great to be here today at this event as Minister for Auckland and Minister ofTransport. Let me start by acknowledging each one of you and thanking the Committee forAuckland for hosting this event and inviting me to speak here today. The Committee for Auckland has been a symbol ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Getting Transport Back on Track in Auckland
    Transport Minister Simeon Brown has today confirmed his high-level transport priorities for Auckland, in the lead up to releasing the draft Government Policy Statement on Land Transport. “Our economic growth and productivity are underpinned by a transport network that enables people and freight to move around safely and efficiently. At ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Government to axe Auckland Regional Fuel Tax
    Transport Minister Simeon Brown has confirmed that the Auckland Regional Fuel Tax will end on 30 June 2024. “Today, I can confirm that the Government has agreed to remove the Auckland Regional Fuel Tax in line with our coalition commitments, and legislation will be introduced to parliament to repeal the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Minister Calls for Work to Tackle Kina Barrens
    Changes to fishing rules and a significant science programme are being undertaken to address kina barrens, says Minister for Oceans and Fisheries Shane Jones. “There has been tremendous interest from iwi, communities and recreational fishers who had raised concerns about such kina infestations being a major threat to Northland’s marine ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Government law and order crackdown begins
    The coalition Government is making good on its promise to restore law and order by removing government funding for Section 27 reports and abolishing the previous Labour Government’s prison reduction target, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith and Corrections Minister Mark Mitchell say.  “In recent years, the development of Section 27 reports ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Greater focus on getting people into work
    The coalition government will refocus employment efforts and the welfare system so that supporting people who can work into jobs is the number one priority, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. “Of concern in the labour market statistics released by Stats NZ today was the number of youth not ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • One year on, NZ appeals for release of Phillip Mehrtens
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has appealed to those holding New Zealand pilot Phillip Mehrtens in remote Papua, Indonesia, to release him immediately.  Phillip Mehrtens was taken hostage a year ago on 7 February in Paro, Papua, while providing vital air links and supplies to remote communities. “We strongly urge those holding ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Ministers reaffirm Pacific connections this week
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters and Health Minister and Minister for Pacific Peoples Dr Shane Reti are reaffirming the importance of New Zealand’s connections to the Pacific by visiting Tonga, Cook Islands and Samoa this week.  “New Zealand enjoys strong and long-standing relationships with our Pacific partners - especially in Polynesia, where we ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Rt Hon Christopher Luxon – Waitangi speech
    E ngā mana, e ngā reo, e ngā iwi, rau rangatira ma. Tēnā koutou katoa. He tino mihi ki te mana whenua o tēnei rohe.  Mihi mai, mihi mai, mihi mai. Te whare e tū nei, tēnā koe.                               He-wāhi whakahirahira tēnei mō Aotearoa. Ka huri nga whakaaro, ki nga mate. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Government awards primary sector scholarships to students
    Six university students studying agriculture and science have been awarded scholarships as part of the coalition Government’s efforts to boost on-the-ground support for farmers and growers. “The coalition Government is committed to improving support and operating conditions for farmers and growers,” Agriculture Minister Todd McClay says. “We’re backing a range ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2024-02-22T07:30:49+00:00