web analytics

National Parks, not National’s parks

Written By: - Date published: 9:31 am, March 15th, 2010 - 82 comments
Categories: Conservation, Environment, Mining - Tags: , ,

Forest and Bird has obtained information that Prime Minister John Key and Energy Minister Gerry Brownlee are looking to mine Paparoa National Park (the park of the famous Punakaiki blowholes), Great Barrier Island, and areas surrounding the Thames township.

[Forest and Bird] Spokesman Kevin Hackwell said the organisation had learned of three areas to be named in a delayed discussion document as areas the Government wanted to allow mining in.

Those included about 700ha in Te Ahumata plateau on Great Barrier Island, 396ha in Otahu Ecological Area, 3000ha in Eastern Paparoa National Park near Inangahua and 2500ha near Thames township.

That document has now been delayed four times. Originally it was due out in November.

I wonder if Key is so worried about the public reaction to mining our natural heritage, that he’s ordered Brownlee to delay the discussion document so Crosby/Textor can ready the PR campaign?

Though to be honest, I’m not sure that’ll be good enough this time Mr Key.

Kiwis don’t want pristine areas like Paparoa National Park destroyed. And the people of Thames don’t want their township put at risk because of Brownlee’s push to satisfy his mining mates.

Like Pascal’s bookie said on my last post on this topic, what Key and Brownlee have planned here goes further even than George W. Bush and Dick Cheney were willing to go. If an unfavourable comparison to Bush isn’t an indictment, I don’t know what is.

Kiwis won’t stand for it.

This could very well be the first popularity contest in three years that Key loses.

82 comments on “National Parks, not National’s parks ”

  1. tc 1

    This is where the real leopards spots become apparent……just a little more tip toeing around whilst we cobble together a charm affensive them WHAMMO, under urgency or maybe a sham consultation just to make the plebs feel valued like supershity.

    Well they can’t have a bok tour so mining seems a fantastic way to divide communities and make some dosh via shares into the bargain….win win !

    • Smokie 1.1

      The words “Save Manapouri” come to mind.

      • gitmo 1.1.1

        Manapouri is an excellent example of activism halting excessive exploitation of the natural resources and government allowing rational exploitation of the natural resources despite activism …… if that makes any sense ?

  2. But I thought that Key was capable of conducting mining in a protective and environmentally sensitive way? Doesn’t that win the argument if Smile and Wave says that it will be “sustainable” and “surgical”?

    I thought of another nickname for Key, “Side Show John”. That is what he does really well, walk and talk like a liberal progressive environmentalist and divert attention to himself while the trolls around him slowly but inevitably take New Zealand apart stitch by stitch.

  3. toad 3

    If Key and Brownlee think they are going to mine Great Barrier Island, they have obviously never been there and met the islanders.

    I suspect any attempts to bring mining equipment onto Great Barrier Island could meet a similar fate to the attempt by an Australian entrepreneur to introduce pokie machines to Norfolk Island back in the 1980s – they ended up at the bottom of the ocean outside the reef.

  4. Sookie 4

    Look at this quote from a meeting between Otago farmers and David Carter, from the Oddity:

    “High Country Accord chairman Jonathan Wallis said that while lessees were relieved the Government was addressing their concerns, voters sympathetic to conservation outnumbered farmers, and politicians might need to court their political support.

    Mr Carter agreed that was a challenge, but he believed most people had conservation sympathies but were rational and realised the need to balance economic necessity and conservation.

    A Government proposal to allow mining of conservation land was an example.

    There was the expected outrage from organisations such as the Green Party, but once details had been explained, most New Zealanders accepted it was a resource that should be looked at, he said.”

    They are relying on the apathy and sheer stupidity of the NZ public to get this through without a murmur. The crusading days of Save Manapouri and the original campaign to protect Paparoa NP from logging in the 1980’s are over. I wish this wasn’t true, but it is.

    • Red Rosa 4.1

      High country annual leases are slowly being moved above State House levels, to predictable howls of outrage.

      The abovementioned Wallis is leasing Minarets Station, carrying 20k+ stock units, for about $22k per year. Gross income would be in the range $1m – $1.5m annually.

      An annual rental of $100k odd was proposed last year, a not unreasonable sum, but this was reduced on appeal to the $22k.

      Somewhat surprisingly, given Carter is the Minister responsible, the Crown is appealing this.

      Needless to say, we have market rents on State houses, but non-market rents on high country stations………….

  5. Matthew Hooton on Radio New Zealand has tried to justify it on the basis that it is only a teensy weensy bit of land and most of the parkland will be left.

    If you can think of 7,000 hectares as being very little land I guess that you can say this.

    If they try and do this Great Barrier will be ungovernable and will probably cede from New Zealand. Coromandel will be close behind.

    Time for the greens to get a good candidate established in Thames.

    • Janice 5.1

      Matthew Hooton also said that all the protest against Manapouri was useless because the project went ahead anyway and now nobody minds. Talk about spin, from memory the protest was against raising the height of Manapouri not the project. This looks like one of the directions that the spin will take and we need to knock it down every time it puts its head up.

      • lprent 5.1.1

        …from memory the protest was against raising the height of Manapouri not the project

        That is correct.

        The nett effect of the Manapouri debate was that people did mind. I was barely a teenager and not all that interested. However I was rather appalled by the pig-headedness of the way the government pushed that level through despite a reasonably coherent set of arguments for a lower lake level. It fuelled my subsequent support for restricting the sovereign power of the government to ride roughshod over objections from the public.

        In effect the government and the affected businesses during that debate managed to energise the environmental movement in NZ. That in turn led to legislation like the Resource Management Act a generation later. Walking all over public opinion in the short term without carrying them with you (especially amongst activists) has some nasty effects for subsequent attempts to act the bully.

        For me, it is why the select committee process is so damn important, even if that idiot Brownlee doesn’t like it.

        Hooten is just being stupid spin-doctor when he says that the Manapouri debate didn’t have an effect.

      • toad 5.1.2

        Save Aramoana” might be a better analogy!

    • toad 5.2

      Catherine Delahunty moved back to the Coromandel about a year ago. Given her past credentials with Coromandel Watchdog, I can’t imagine a better candidate, mickey.

    • Jum 5.3

      excellent idea. This time they do need to stand a candidate in many electorates. Word should be going out now.

      • toad 5.3.1

        Now, if Labour could be persuaded to do a deal with the Greens in Coromandel – perhaps in return for the Greens not standing anyone in ÅŒhariu to give Charles Chauvel the inside running over Peter Dunhill.

  6. Bored 6

    A bunch of us fought to save the Canterbury riverbed birds during the late 70s early 80’s (we lost in due process: paradoxically we won when Dodgy Rogers user pays regime stopped the unholy alliance of Ministry of Waste and Destruction and Federated Farmers when they could no longer guarantee tax payer funding from Muldoon).

    The point about losing was you find out that:

    1. Small feathery things being alive are of little consequence to Joe Average who needs work and views the world as a resource to be exploited (and bugger any animal that is in the way).
    2. The power that corporate entities can bring to bear against groups of individuals who also have to earn wages is immense: it’s very dangerous to your employment prospects to be seen to be sticking your head above the parapet.
    3. You easily get marginalized politically and accused by the media of being a bunch of mad radical sandal wearing Luddites or similar (this is the problem the Greens have). Consequently your message is not taken seriously.

    What is able to be confidently stated is that if the environmental message is not getting through due to the above we can expect to see an escalation of activism. It will begin with property; I have no faith it will stop there.

  7. tsmithfield 7

    I think you’re all working yourself up into a lather a bit unnecessarily over this and the tax change debate that has been going on. Using leaked information as your source means you’re probably being drawn into the political game. The aim of the leak is likely to achieve this very effect and then have everyone breathing a sigh of relief when what actually comes out is nowhere near as severe.

    • Pascal's bookie 7.1

      Possibly, depends on the source of the leak though, which is unknown. Unless you have something to share?

    • lprent 7.2

      In the absence of information AND a strongly undemocratic government what do you expect. If this government acted responsibly then you’d find that people will wait for the official information.

      However we have a government that does not believe in following due process. That believes in pushing legislation through

      Without public consultation (ie put through everything under urgency without select committee)
      or
      Having sham ‘consultations’ with hand-picked minions (Anne Tolley in particular)
      or
      Allowing minimal time to prepare submissions for select committee
      or
      Just ignoring everything put to a select committee
      or
      Any combinations of the above.

      Moreover, they usually screw up the legislation. By the looks of this parliaments passed acts, the legislature and courts are going to be trying to close holes in their crap legislation for the next decade. In the meantime they’re destroying valuable institutions because they appear to be too stupid to listen.

      Just another National government…. You have to preempt them so you minimise how much they can screw up because they do all effective ‘consultations’ behind closed doors with their contributors – without getting public feedback. The only effective weapon is mobilise public opinion before they crap all over our country.

  8. Jum 8

    So if, eg the mining coy’s fortunes turned to custard, and we know how easy it is to hide money overseas (or in John Key’s financial hub) then the coy just goes into liquidation and NZers foot the bill and wear the humiliation of a lost nirvana.

  9. Zaphod Beeblebrox 9

    What does the Auckland Central local member say about mining Great Barrier? Wonder how much time she will be spending up there if they start minng 7000 Ha of her electorate?

    • sk 9.1

      Or DPF for that matter, who at the end of last year included photos from his fanstastic weekend on the Barrier.

  10. randal 10

    this is politics is it not?
    so who gains from opening up the national parks?
    all the national party supporters with a bulldozer perhaps?

  11. tc 11

    Yes Jum, and that’s just one of the many scenarios that fails to deliver the billions that Nat want everyone to believe will save us all from economic doom.

    Unless you can see a well run NZ owned mining company operating whatever they licence the jobs will be few as mechanisation in mining has removed alot of labour and the profits will flow offshore to their owners……that’s if we have a sizeable orebody, a very huge if.

    Works for Oz as they have Oz companies mining so profits to Oz shareholders (self managed super funds etc) and they have such levies as a gold tax on all production to clip the ticket for locals oh and they also mine in the desert not in tourist attractions.

    • Jum 11.1

      TC Has anyone actually mentioned in a countrywide way that Australia’s mining companies do the mining, not some foreign plunderer and explained in words of one syllable that this severely cuts into the profits NZ can expect from mining ventures.

  12. randal 12

    hey felix of course the national parks are open.
    but how long before they put a booking fee on compulsory bulldozer rides for the idiotes who cant go anywhere without the noise of some sort of engine going brrrm brrm brrrm inthe background.
    it seems like they are addicted to consuming oil and dont care what gets in the way of using gasoline to provide the cheap thrill of a throb between the legs.
    gouging and hacking at the same time just makes it so much better.

  13. Peter Johns 13

    We will be a poor nation soon relying on tourism. You lefties have no idea to get us out of the financial hole we are getting into. You can’t keep raising money without producing anything. Milk is not the ttal answer either. Saying the Greens are the answer says it all, people want jobs, however you lot are against job creation.

    • toad 13.1

      I can’t let that one go Peter. The Greens are the only party that has any coherent job creation policy.

      There are stuff all jobs in mining these days – this is not the 1930s with “hundreds of men down pit” (contracting nasty respiratory diseases).

    • Zaphod Beeblebrox 13.2

      Yeah but tourism doesn’t leave behind heavy metal poisons and toxic tailings dams to be maintained (probably by the state or the Auckland Council in the case of Great Barrier) for the next 50,000 years once the miners move on.

      In the case of NT and WA BHP only had a few dispossessed aboriginals to dump their crap on- not sure the Great Barrier residents will be so dis-organised. Last time I saw BHP, Rio and Western Mining were not NZ owned anyway so how is giving away to foreign miners going to help our situation anyway.

      The solutions surely lie in exploiting our unique assets not trying to become the Easter Islanders or Nauruans of the 21st century.

  14. Peter Johns 14

    Toad – greens job policy is to create jobs from taxes. Green jobs are not the answer either, they rely on subsidies, and who pays for this, the tax payer does. Not very sustainable is it. Also, the only reason alternatives are used bc of subsidies in lots of cases. In Spain for every Green Job produced 2.2 jobs were lost elsewhere. BTW Toad, Greens are irrelavant after the CRU emails and alchemy science that was uncovered.
    Mining creates jobs elsewhere such in the service sector. Companies like Skellerup would get to line rubber rollers that are required for conveyor systems. That is real job creation, no subsidies involved. Shopkeepers will sell more stuff etc. Taxes raised will also keep the benefits going – remember borrowing $240MPW is not suatainable either. After all you always moan about the increasing numbers of unemployed, but you are agains job creation if it does not suit your agenda.
    As for pollution 40 years ago the west started tidying up their act on heavy metals etc. There is no real pollution that is made now days that is not contained and treated properly. There are financial incentives to be good.
    I say dig, dig, dig in moderation, you guys are not happy about this but nothing this govt does is good anyway in your eyes, so bit like boy who calls wolf.

  15. toad 15

    Okay, not worth wasting my time debating with anyone who harps on about the CRU emails and “alchemy science” – I’ll just refer you to Michael Mann!. Listen carefully.

    • Peter Johns 15.1

      Listening to Mike Mann is like Hitler & Stalin saying they were not mass murderers. He is part of the core of the scandle. Mann is a A+ bullshit artist and to rely on his version of Junk Science is total fallicy. His data like Briffa, Jones et al is not worth a pinch of shit.

      [lprent: Yeah right. And you’re a all-knowing saint of science. Of course you don’t have any evidence, just a whole pile of out of context garbage that is completely meaningless just like any number of the idiot CCDs. FFS the only thing I’ve ever seen you dickheads ever criticise Mann for was for something written in the early 1990’s. It appears that you’ve never bothered dealing with any science since then. You are just pathetic. ]

      • Peter Johns 15.1.1

        What Mann wrote in 1998 MBH98 has been shown to be rather suspect. You just cannot accept people with the opposite view to yourself.

        BTW, I have a patent in chemistry involving palladium catalysts. This would have to have been mined but it helps in the control of skin disorders. That is central to this subject.

        Like I was saying before Mann is dis-credited big time but you and your flock of Emus still have your head in the sand over CRU etc. The world does not care about AGW anymore, the sheeple have seen through this in a great degree over the past few months. People are more concerned about jobs than AGW, a cyclic event anyway.

        [lprent: That was from research that was from the early 90’s. You know the timelags on the reports are rather long, typically about 5 years. What he wrote then hasn’t been ‘discredited’, it has been modified by having more accurate data. For some strange reason you work on a double standard… When talking on mining you say below…

        Years ago a lot of this stuff was put down the drain as laws said you could, but things have tightened in the past 30 years.

        The reason why was that they kept finding more and more bad effects from dumping this crud into the environment as more accurate data was accumulated. So the policy and law were changed.

        However in your usual moronic pig-headed style, you don’t apply exactly the same changes in understanding to the collection of more accurate data in a different area of science.

        Tell me, is this apparent level of stupidity due to heavy metal toxicity – or did it come naturally.. ]

    • TightyRighty 15.2

      got a transcript of that toad? so that we can check his sources, rather than just believing him in a little fireside chat.

  16. tc 16

    Dunno what planet PJ’s on but it aint this one. “There is no real pollution that is made now days that is not contained and treated properly…”
    gosh I must’ve missed the sudden transformation of Aresnic/Cyanide etc into easily treated by products casting aside their previous nasty properties….let’s hear it for arsenic and cyanide people, reformed at last.
    That’s as hilarious as sideshow John’s surgical mining claim….just a wafer thin hole misseur.

    • Peter Johns 16.1

      TC -a simple chemistry lesson for you. In a previous life I worked in haz waste treatment 10 years ago in East Tamaki.
      1. Cyanide – easily treated with hypochlorite/Janola to produce non hazardous by products like carbonates. I used to use cyanide in the lab and as long as you did not ingest it or add to acid you were fine. We added hypo to the CN- infected stuff to neutralise it. Tailings dams at mines treat the water to ery low levels of CN these days.
      2. Aresnic is from the ground already, it is easily treated with bases such as lime to give a solid product. This is allowed to be disposed at landfills like the ones in Redvale, north of Auckland. Very low leachability when treated properly. The lime used to come from BOC which was a waste stream from making acytelyne, so a nice way to recycle stuff. Years ago a lot of this stuff was put down the drain as laws said you could, but things have tightened in the past 30 years.
      Main waste streams for CN was metal processing and As was timber treatment plants. Shall we close these people down as well?

      • toad 16.1.1

        Okay, so you’re a chemistry whiz Peter. Problem is that most of this (apart from the rate of atmospheric oxidation of methane and nitrous oxide) is physics.

        Here’s a starter for 10: Do molecules with dipole moments such as those of gaseous carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide emit heat when bombarded by infra-red radiation?

      • Zaphod Beeblebrox 16.1.2

        I’ve seen cattle die from CN poisoning in the Vic Goldfields, though I agree it won’t be a long term issue (after twenty years). What will be are the other heavy metals. What about the tailings dam left behind? Where do you think you can dispose of that in a high rainfall area like Great Barrier? Do you think the miners will pay to take care of the groundwater sepage ad infinitum? Or do you expect the taxpayer to foot the bill?

        If not , how economic do you envisage all this would be? I’m guessing this is a poltical sop to make the govt look like it has some sort of plan- I’ve got my doubts as to how much you can make out of royalties. Its not like the Pilbarra where huge amounts of minerals are ready to be shovelled up and no-body lives there.

  17. tc 17

    Not doubting the chemistry but it’s all in a sludge in a massive tailings Dam so how’s that surgical mining looking now after you attach all that to the big open body of water to process it and then send it somewhere….after you’ve carted in all that product to treat it in the first place.

    I’ll ignore the fact these dams kill many native birds etc who can’t detect the chemicals and we’ll assume the cost of doing this still keeps the mine internationally competitive, oh and all the other chemicals can be treated easily.

    That’s why mining thrives in the desert….not much to bugger up that anyone cares about.

  18. WC 18

    It looks like Key’s approach will be to market New Zealand’s modified National Parks at a different tourist market: http://weeklycoitus.co.nz/?p=855

    Might work?

  19. tc 19

    Absolutely WC, you can’t move in outback WA for all the tourists clamouring for a picture of such wonders as the Superpit.

    • WC 19.1

      The only real worry is whether New Zealand has the ghost town infrastructure to cope with the influx of tourists wanting to see our magnificent holes in the ground. Everything else is ‘hysteria’.

  20. Pascal's bookie 20

    All very interesting stuff about the chemicals and wotnot. Very relevant for any discussion about digging a mine somewhere/anywhere.

    The point though, is that there are some lands that have intrinsic values such that we shouldn’t mine there. This is a widely accepted view. Even the boosters of this current madness say that they don’t intend to dig up the important bits.

    The way, the only way, to protect the intrinsic values of these bits of land is through legislation. That legislation though, by itself, can’t do it. Any piece of legislation can be repealed or watered down. The defence of all those lands rests on the integrity of the legislation protecting them.

    Any argument about under what conditions we might find it acceptable to mine the lands protected by the legislation designed to prevent mining, utterly and irrevocably breaches that integrity. Once it is granted that lands protected by the legislation can in fact sometimes be mined, then the legislation is worthless, and there is nothing to protect any of the lands.

    The best way to lose this argument is to keep discussing the conditions of sale.

    Reject the fucking premiss people.

    Every time.

  21. Bored 21

    The latest in the Herald .Jonkey thinks that there is \’too much hysteria\’ about mining in National parks ..the guys not just a pillock, he is an arrogant dipstick.

    • Pascal's bookie 21.1

      Shorter John Keyhole:

      The bloody media should just shut up. We haven’t worked our spin out yet. When we’ve worked out our spin, we’ll tell the media, and they can pass it on.

  22. tsmithfield 22

    Earlier I said: “I think you’re all working yourself up into a lather a bit unnecessarily over this and the tax change debate that has been going on. Using leaked information as your source means you’re probably being drawn into the political game. The aim of the leak is likely to achieve this very effect and then have everyone breathing a sigh of relief when what actually comes out is nowhere near as severe.”

    See, I told you so, judging by Key on the news tonight.. Everyone who has been getting hysterical has been played. What comes out in the wash is going to be a lot less severe, and the huge sigh of relief will make the revised proposals palatable to the masses. Probably what they wanted in the first place all along.

    • Pascal's bookie 22.1

      He didn’t deny it, or call it ridiculous, he just said the media was scaring people and they should shut up till the govt’s got it’s lines all ready.

      • Red Rosa 22.1.1

        Got it in one, PB. TV1 at 6 pm had JK say this, practically line for line!

        • Bored 22.1.1.1

          TS up yours big time, human induced species extinction comes back to bollock brained thinking by idiots like you. Dont you get it, its not about left or right, its about life. Whats not to get worked up about? Fool.

      • lprent 22.1.2

        In other words, spoiling the governments ‘surprise’ as they rush legislation through.

        Bearing in mind this governments appalling record of ‘consulting’ with the public, and the disinformation processes that preceded them (and the place the John Key plays in that strategy).. Then John Key has just confirmed that we should be worried.

        But this was all foretold to you earlier. I guess you’re not listening (just like this government)…

    • But TS this is becoming a pattern.

      It goes like this:

      1. PM/Minister floats really stupid weird idea.
      2. General uprising.
      3. PM/Minister backs off and denies that it is policy.

      The alternative goes like this:

      1. PM/Minister floats really stupid weird idea that is important to its financial backers.
      2. The population misses it because it was released just before Christmas or is missed by the MSM
      3. PM/Minister drives it through until the opposition manages to raise overwhelming dissent.

      So we have a government that will propose stupid stuff and then back off or raise stupid stuff supported by its backers and try to drive it through.

      Either way the policy development sucks. Lefties are being run ragged trying to persuade this mob that some of their ideas are, well, stupid, and other ideas that have the backing of their wealthy supporters are insane. We are winning some of the first battles but none of the second.

      Key is Sideshow John, designed to divert our attention from the inmates in charge of the asylum …

  23. tsmithfield 23

    Yeh, but they also suggested that they would be including less sensitive land in their focus, suggesting a move away from the more extreme position. Heck, if it was me, I would have started by proposing to open a mine at mount Cook as my opening gambit!!

    • Pascal's bookie 23.1

      He said they wouldn’t be looking at schedule 4 land did he?

      If not then it’s just the same old bullshit son. I’m not buying it.

  24. tsmithfield 24

    Bored “TS up yours big time, human induced species extinction comes back to bollock brained thinking by idiots like you. Dont you get it, its not about left or right, its about life. Whats not to get worked up about? Fool.”

    Well, you certainly seem worked up in an irrational sort of way. I don’t mind getting worked up either. However, I’d prefer to get worked up about what I knew to be facts rather than some leak that is most likely put out for PR purposes.

    • Pascal's bookie 24.1

      The fact is they are talking about mining what are now schedule 4 lands. If they do that, then being in s4 is no protection.

      So what protects a bit of NZ you’d like your grandkids to be able to enjoy?

      Nothing.

      That’s what.

  25. tsmithfield 25

    From what I heard on the news, there are already 82 consents for mining conservation (I believe schedule 4) land. The world hasn’t come to an end. If any such work is isolated, surgical, and remedied afterwards, then I don’t see such a big problem.

    • Pascal's bookie 25.1

      “you believe” huh.

      care to check? Or are you are you now unconcerned about the facts when pushing lines for pr purposes.

      And you didn’t answer the question.

      If being in s4 doesn’t protect our most valuable natural heritage areas from mining, then what does?

    • Pascal's bookie 25.2

      “If any such work is isolated, surgical, and remedied afterwards, then I don’t see such a big problem.”

      And just to demolish this nonsense, surgical keyhole mining of this description is actually allowed on s4 land. So we know that’s not what they’ve got in mind because they need to remove the land from s4 in order to do what they want.

    • Michael Foxglove 25.3

      Nice one ts. Love it when you right-wing jokers “believe” something to be true. Mining on schedule 4 land is prohibited, hence the current argument.

      You “believe” in capitalism as well?

  26. tsmithfield 26

    Pascal “care to check? Or are you are you now unconcerned about the facts when pushing lines for pr purposes.”

    Just going from what I remember seeing on TV. Didn’t want to be too emphatic about something I couldn’t verify.

    I am going to reserve my judgement until I see what comes out in the discussion document. I suspect it will be considerably watered down by then.

    I actually like the idea of companies who gain permits for doing this sort of stuff being required, as part of mitigation, to provide a similar sized area to the one they wish to mine and plant it out with the same type of trees etc as the land they will be using and provide it to the conservation department prior to starting the work. Then when the work is finished, they have to fill the excavated area back in, or contour it in a natural way if refilling is not possible. Then replant that area as well. Then net result is that the conservation estate eventually increases rather than decreases.

    For the record, I don’t support open-cast mining on s4 land, and I don’t think it will happen.

    • Michael Foxglove 26.1

      “Just going from what I remember seeing on TV.”

      Well, you’re wrong.

      Fool.

    • Pascal's bookie 26.2

      Fair enough.

      The way I see it though, once the principle is set that land can be removed from s4 simply because ‘we did a stocktake and found some stuff’, then there is nothing stopping open-cast mining on currently protected land.

      Once the integrity of s4 protection is breached, it’s breached. We are talking about around 14-16 % of our country. That leaves most of it available outside s4. So why the focus on that land other than to set the precedent? Can it really be that s4 land purle by coincidence has all the minerals? Or is it that it’s cheaper to mine there because it’s not privately held?

    • Zaphod Beeblebrox 26.3

      If it were going to happen it would have already happened by now. Too many problems. I’d be all for it if they showed they could do it responsibly and by NZ companies who care about this country (ie not Australians with appalling environmental records). But they haven’t and they won’t- which is really telling.

  27. tsmithfield 27

    Michael “Well, you’re wrong.

    Fool.”

    Sticks and stones. Says more about you than me.

  28. tsmithfield 28

    Pascal’s bookie: “The way I see it though, once the principle is set that land can be removed from s4 simply because ‘we did a stocktake and found some stuff’, then there is nothing stopping open-cast mining on currently protected land.”

    I really don’t think you need to worry. It would be politically untenable to seriously propose to allow open-cast mining in ecologically important areas. Thats why I think it is all just part of the political gamesmanship to open up this line of discussion. I stand to be proven wrong, but I think the reality will be much more mild than what people fear. National are probably trying to paint themselves as a party that listens to public opinion by proposing some radical, untenable ideas and then backing down when the protests mount.

    • Pascal's bookie 28.1

      What is politically tenable is a movable feast. The way it moves is through incremental changes. Once the integrity of s4 is breached, further breaches become more tenable.

      These lands are protected (according to the legislation) for their intrinsic value. That’s not their prettiness, or their value for tourism or any other extrinsic detail. They are protected as things in and of themselves. They are ends, not means. This whole discussion shifts that. That’s why it’s so dangerous. That’s the move that the political games you percieve are achieving.

      Once that bed gets shat, it can’t easily be unshat.

      On the poitical tactic angle, there is also an imporatan and necessary counter tactic. When the govt runs crap like this as distraction or whatever, the strength of the response to it determines (or at least influences) the govt’s end position. If there was no response, why would the govt fall back? The harder the response, the further they fall back.

      But like I’ve said, my personal position is that the land should have it’s intrinsic value protected. At the most, they should comply with s4 regulations. I don’t think locking up circa 15% of the countrty is an extrenme position. I think the extremists are those that say no land should have it’s extrinsic value protected by legislation with integrity.

  29. bobo 29

    Was the mining on Great Barrier just a diversion so they can say look we are not planning to mine there now then go for land they always wanted , spinning it as a compromise watered down deal.. A bit like the pretending to consider a land tax then bringing in the gst as the “lesser option”.

    • Pascal's bookie 29.1

      Doesn’t matter.

      What matters is the precedent set for removing land from s4. That precedent will then exist for Great Barrier, Central Otago, Tasman and everywhere else.

  30. tsmithfield 30

    bobo: “Was the mining on Great Barrier just a diversion so they can say look we are not planning to mine there now then go for land they always wanted , spinning it as a compromise watered down deal.. A bit like the pretending to consider a land tax then bringing in the gst as the “lesser option’.”

    I think so. Thats politics.

    • Pascal's bookie 30.1

      Maybe. On 3news they talked to locals who reported seeing people sniffing around though.

    • Bored 30.2

      TS, I think he is accurate, it says everything about you. Being a creepy bigotted troll is one thing, being a fool is another altogether. You do it so well.

  31. tsmithfield 31

    I’ll bet you a virtual beer that any thought of open cast mining of s4 land will be taken off the agenda.

  32. Jum 32

    TC Has anyone actually mentioned in a countrywide way that Australia’s mining companies do the mining, not some foreign plunderer and explained in words of one syllable that this severely cuts into the profits NZ can expect from mining ventures.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Govt backs business to vaccinate workforces
    Vaccination will be required for all workers at businesses where customers need to show COVID-19 Vaccination Certificates, such as hospitality and close-contact businesses. New law to introduce a clearer and simplified risk assessment process for employers to follow when deciding whether they can require vaccination for different types of work. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    18 hours ago
  • Winners of the 2021 Prime Minister’s Education Excellence Awards
    Frimley Primary School in Hawke’s Bay is the Supreme Award winner of the 2021 Prime Minister’s Education Excellence Awards, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and Education Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “The past year has been a real test for teachers, schools and local communities. But out of the challenge of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    19 hours ago
  • Government provides greater assurance to homeowners
    The Government has provided greater assurance for homeowners with the introduction of a new code of ethics for Licensed Building Practitioners (LBPs), Building and Construction Minister Poto Williams announced today.   The Code of Ethics, which comes into force in October 2022, sets behavioural standards for LBPs to give both ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    20 hours ago
  • Primary sector returns strengthen export-led recovery
    Farmers’ hard work in leading New Zealand’s export-led recovery from COVID-19 is being rewarded with high prices forecast for milk and very strong returns for meat, says Trade and Export Growth and Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor. Fonterra announced today a record predicted milk price of $7.90 to $8.90 for the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    20 hours ago
  • Supporting economic resilience in the Indo-Pacific – Speech to the Asia Forum
    (Check against delivery) Ladies and gentlemen, distinguished guests, kia ora koutou katoa Thank you Farib. It is a great pleasure to be invited to speak at this event. I want to acknowledge the on-going work of the Asia Forum. Over many years – decades, in fact – you have been ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    24 hours ago
  • RSI ‘state of the nation’ report published
    New Zealand’s FCR cited research ratio is twice the world average Investment in R&D is increasing Case studies underscore how a science based COVID-19 response helped save lives In 2019, Māori and Pacific people represented 5 per cent of PhD graduates. The latest research, science and innovation system report card ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    24 hours ago
  • Funding to translate science into real life solutions
    The Government is investing in ‘Te Tītoki Mataora’ the MedTech Research Translator, to deliver new medical tools - and meet both the demands of a global pandemic and of a growing and aging population. “COVID-19 has shown that we need to build a more resilient, productive, innovative and economically-sustainable health ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Tokelau champions language and culture
    COVID-19 continues to be a powerful reminder of the importance of language and culture to the wellbeing of our Pacific communities, said the Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio. “Our Tokelau community in Aotearoa has responded strongly to the challenges of the global pandemic by getting vaccinated and supporting ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Festival drug-checking services get a boost
    The Government is financially supporting drug-checking services to help keep young people safe at this summer’s large festivals and events, Health Minister Andrew Little says. “This is not about condoning drug use, but about keeping people safe,” Andrew Little said. “There is clear evidence that having drug-checking services at festivals ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Expanded vaccination order for health and disability, education and prison workers
    A newly-signed Order means most people working in three key sectors will very soon need to be vaccinated against COVID-19 for the sake of themselves, their workmates and their communities, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins has confirmed. The extended COVID-19 Public Health Response (Vaccinations) Amendment Order 2021 comes into effect ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • APEC finance ministers focus on inclusive, sustainable COVID recovery
    APEC finance ministers will continue to work together to respond to the effects of COVID-19 and ensure a sustainable and inclusive recovery while capitalising on the opportunity to build a more resilient future. The New Zealand Minister of Finance and Deputy Prime Minister Grant Robertson chaired the virtual APEC Finance ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Improvements to child and maternity facilities at Timaru Hospital on track
    Improvements to child and maternity facilities at Timaru Hospital are well underway, and the next stage of the project will begin next month. Health Minister Andrew Little visited Timaru Hospital today to view progress onsite. “The improvements are part of South Canterbury DHB’s four-year refurbishment project and will create a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Govt responds to independent review into WorkSafe
    The Government has clear expectations that WorkSafe must action the recommendations of the independent review into the regulator to improve its management of adventure activities following the tragedy at Whakaari White Island, Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Michael Wood says. The Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment (MBIE) today released the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Prevention funding to reduce tamariki in care
    A new iwi-led prevention programme will receive funding from Oranga Tamariki to help reduce the number of tamariki and rangatahi coming into state care, Children’s Minister Kelvin Davis has announced. Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu (Te Rūnanga) will receive $25.9m of Oranga Tamariki funding over three years to improve outcomes ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Transforming New Zealand’s mental health legislation
    Public consultation is now open for Aotearoa New Zealand to have a say on the repeal and replacement of the Mental Health (Compulsory Assessment and Treatment) Act 1992. “’He Ara Oranga, the report of the Government Inquiry into Mental Health and Addiction’ made it clear that we needed to replace ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • COVID-19 Protection Framework
    Kia ora koutou katoa Today I’m speaking directly to all New Zealanders to share a plan that will help us stay safe from COVID-19 into the future. A future where we want to continue to protect people’s lives, but also to live our lives – as safely as possible. Our ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Business boost to transition to new COVID framework
    We know that over the last twenty months the approach New Zealand has taken to COVID and Delta has saved lives and livelihoods. Along with one of the lowest mortality rates in the world, we have also had strong economic growth, low unemployment and one of the lower levels of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • COVID-19 funding boost to protect maōri communities
    Tēnā koutou katoa As you have heard from the Prime Minister, the new protection framework will support us to keep people safe especially our vulnerable communities and minimize the impact COVID-19 has on business and our day to day lives. If you want to protect yourself, your whanau and your ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • New COVID-19 Protection Framework delivers greater freedoms for vaccinated New Zealanders
    New COVID-19 Protection Framework provides pathway out of lockdown and ability for businesses and events to re-open to vaccinated New Zealanders Simpler framework to minimise cases and hospitalisations without use of widespread lockdowns Auckland to move into the new framework when 90 percent of eligible population in each of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • New fund to accelerate Māori vaccinations
    The Government has established a $120 million fund to accelerate Māori vaccination rates and support communities to prepare for the implementation of the new COVID-19 Protection Framework. The new Māori Communities COVID-19 Fund will directly fund Māori, Iwi, community organisations and providers to deliver local vaccination initiatives for whānau, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Government extends hardship assistance for low income workers
    Income limits for Hardship Support through the Ministry of Social Development have been temporarily lifted so more people can recieve assistance. “Cabinet has agreed to make it easier for low income workers to recieve assistance for items such as food and other emergency costs,” Carmel Sepuloni said. “We know the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • More support for learners with highest needs
    Students most in need of extra help in the classroom are the focus of a new review that gets under way today, Associate Education Minister Jan Tinetti says. About 50,000-80,000 children and young people are expected to benefit from a Ministry of Education review into Highest Need Learners that will ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Parts of Waikato to stay at Alert Level 3 for next six days
    The parts of Waikato that have been in Alert Level 3 will remain at that alert level till Wednesday, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “Based on the latest public health information, maintaining level 3 in those parts of the Waikato continues to be the most prudent course of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Hon Peeni Henare September 2021 Proactive Diary Release
    ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • NZ passes world-first climate reporting legislation
    New Zealand has become the first country in the world to pass a law that will ensure financial organisations disclose and ultimately act on climate-related risks and opportunities, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Dr David Clark and Climate Change Minister James Shaw today announced today. The Financial Sector (Climate-related Disclosures ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Prime Minister NZ UK FTA opening remarks
    Tēnā koutou katoa. Ngā mihi nui ki a koutou katoa. I am delighted to announce today that following a conversation with Prime Minister Johnson last night, New Zealand and the United Kingdom have Agreed in Principle a historic high-quality, comprehensive and inclusive free trade agreement. I’m joined today by the Minister ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • New Zealand secures historic free trade deal with the United Kingdom
    A boost of almost $1 billion to New Zealand GDP, unprecedented access for New Zealand exporters to the UK market UK to eliminate all tariffs on New Zealand exports, with over 97% being removed the day the FTA comes into force NZ exporters to save approx. $37.8 million per year ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Quarterly benefit numbers show more people in work
    Benefit figures released today show a year on year fall of 9,807 people receiving a Main Benefit in the September Quarter.  “The Government is working hard to tackle COVID-19 and it is clear our strong response to the initial outbreak has created a resilient labour market which is providing opportunities ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Health reforms bill introduced to Parliament
    Legislation central to fixing the health system has been introduced into Parliament by Health Minister Andrew Little. “Rebuilding the public health system is critical to laying the foundations for a better future for all New Zealanders,” Andrew Little said. “We need a system that works for everybody, no matter who ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • NCEA and NZ Scholarship Exams to proceed
    NCEA and New Zealand Scholarship exams will proceed, including in areas where Alert Level 3 has been in place, Education Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “The New Zealand Qualifications Authority, Ministry of Education and Ministry of Health have been working together to ensure exams can be managed in a safe ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Limited change to onsite learning – for senior secondary students – in Level 3 regions
    Onsite learning at schools in Level 3 regions will start from next week for senior secondary school students to prepare for end of year exams, Education Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “Secondary schools in these regions will start onsite learning for years 11 to 13 on Tuesday 26 October,” Chris ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Guaranteed MIQ spots for health workers
    The Government is changing the way managed isolation is co-ordinated for health workers, guaranteeing 300 spots a month for the health and disability sector. “Our world-class workforce is vital in rebuilding the health system and dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic,” Andrew Little said. “Whether it’s bringing doctors or nurses in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Govt helps to protect New Zealanders digital identities
    Making it easier for New Zealanders to safely prove who they are digitally and control who has access to that information is one step closer to becoming law, Minister for Digital Economy and Communications, Dr David Clark said. The Digital Identity Services Trust Framework Bill passed its first reading today ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Red tape cut to boost housing supply
    New building intensification rules will mean up to three homes of up to three storeys can be built on most sites without the need for a resource consent New rules will result in at least 48,200 and as many as 105,500 new homes built in next 5-8 years Bringing forward ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Nationwide business partnership grows conservation jobs
    Further Government support for New Zealand’s longest-standing sustainable business organisation will open up opportunities for dozens of workers impacted by COVID-19 to jump start a nature-based career, Conservation Minister Kiri Allan says. Partnering to Plant Aotearoa, led by the Sustainable Business Network (SBN), is a collaboration with iwi, hapū and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New Zealand increases climate aid contribution
    Government commits $1.3 billion over four years to support countries most vulnerable to the effects of climate change At least 50 percent of funding will go to the Pacific as it adapts to the impacts of climate change The increase means New Zealand now meets its fair share of global ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Super Māori turnout for Super Saturday
    Māori have put a superb effort into mobilising to get vaccinated over Super Saturday, with thousands rolling up their sleeves to protect themselves, their whānau and communities from COVID-19, Associate Health Minister Peeni Henare says. “It was absolutely outstanding that 21,702 Māori got vaccinated on this one day alone with 10,825 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Language assists Tagata Niue to thrive
    Despite the uncertain times we face with the challenges of COVID-19, our cultural knowledge, values and language remain constant, helping us progress towards goals in life, said  the Minister for Pacific Peoples Aupito William Sio. This year, the Niuean community in New Zealand decided on the theme, “Kia tupuolaola e ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New Zealand Ambassador to France announced
    Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta today announced the appointment of Caroline Bilkey as New Zealand’s next Ambassador to France and the OECD. “Aotearoa New Zealand and France have a shared history, and enjoy a strong, collaborative partnership. This includes a strong trade and economic relationship, a shared commitment to support ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Govt welcomes nurses’ pay settlement
    The Government is welcoming news that a new employment agreement for nurses working in public hospitals has been settled. “I am very pleased that the hard work of the Nurses Organisation and District Health Boards has led to a settlement that both can support,” Health Minister Andrew Little said today. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago