“So, we all know in our hearts that rodeo is wrong. But with Michael Laws speaking up for it, we now know it’s got to be even wrong-er than we originally thought…….”
Good morning Breakfast people some times I THINK that the stock market fall is engineered by the big players on the stock markert . Im always on the net and the amount of bad publicity on the stock market + the interest rate rise in the USA and wallar the big boy like Buffet could clean up 7% I could get someone to code a algorithm to examine theory Eco is assessing . I had thought of that before I changed my funds and while I wrote about that Phenomenon . But I m poor so can not afforded to take a risk . Please can all the people I Tautoko return the favour and make a small donation to help me fight for the rights of a Healthy Humane future FOR all my Whano
and my mokos If the sandflys are aloud to ride all over my reputation this action will put fat on the rungs of all my mokos ladders of life that is the big picture .
P.S some people are saying there is know ECO MAORI effect come on people you know I can easily test this theory of mine on a lot of subjects and I will time It right to have the maximum EFFECT I will not let that have a negative effect on the common people.
Here is my give a little page please help me .Ka kite ano Im off to work
Not sure how to express it but I’d put a stop to any and all dairy farming conversions in areas that can’t really handle it, like the MacKenzie Country for example plus all farms to fence of waterways and provide shade for animals, where feasible
I’d bring in a form of National service where two years service = one years tertiary training at an accredited institution and the National service can encompass working for DOC
I’d increase DOCs funding for pest eradication and look at reforming pest control boards
Make work scheme for SH1 where its made four lanes (where feasible), straightened and including making the bridges four lanes as well and all single lane state highway bridges to be widened
Really, I thought most of them were pretty left wing, maybe not the national service one but opening it up to DOC, forestry service or something similar makes it a bit more left
Left wing would be to create permanent jobs that DOC can rely on.
I don’t have a problem with bonding per se, but it needs to be tied to the thing one trained for and it needs to be good for the person receiving the training as well as the service.
Instead of national service, make it a carrot thing. If people want to work for DOC, make that a well funded experience that brings lots of benefits to the people involved.
“…for example plus all farms to fence of waterways and provide shade for animals, where feasible”
Fencing of waterways should be happening no matter where on the L/R spectrum. I think you are confusing neoliberalism running a plunder economy, and RW conservatism. I can’t see RW conservatism having a problem with fencing water ways. But the green left would say fencing waterways is not even the bare minimum that is needed.
Shade and/or shelter should be provided for animals and it can’t be then there shouldn’t be animals in that paddock. You’re suggestion leaves some room for greedy farmers to abuse animals i.e. profit is more important.
I see that you are going to have a Career change Matty Mclean your presents will be missed when this eventuates All the best to you on your new journey up your ladder of life Kia kaha Matty .Ka kite ano
Yes Bug Man Ruud Kleinpast this is my view on all our beautiful Piharenga /Insects but like anything to much of anything upset the Life balance . One season on the farm there were hundreds of millions of flys F that ka kite aon
You did it Rock Rumble radio my face is sore I was blowing to my son in law about my bug shoulder and said my offspring have inherited this. I laughed when he had the courage to say yea but you got short as legs like I started looking for shoes with a bit more heal on the only problem was I can’t afford them lol keep up the good work people I can see the cops have been spinning there lies again
Well you are going to see how there spinning lies get them on the hot coals of a NZ Court house Ana to kai Ka pai King Karlos A Maori with Great Mana Ka kite ano
I pumped out 2 days of lawns today so I don’t have to put up with the sandflys for another day + it’s less fuel but I’m stuffed.
I say that school should have all the same school uniform and that will bring the price down and there will be more secondhand uniform available good topic Hillary good show on TVNZ at 7 pm on 1
ECO MAORI had a sore face yesterday when I pllanted a bluff with one of the sandflys actor’s I told him I was going to work on Waitangi Day because the sandflys would be on holiday yea right. They even got a client to tx me to try and get me to reveal if I was going to work or not ECO ignored the tx. The sandflys were waiting around tauranga ready to start there intimidation game ECO snuffed that move up the sandflys would have been pissed. I foiled all there plays today to.I’m no longer going to go with these plays I’m going to shut them down straight away. They have a new option person I can tell by the way there moves have change. Ana to kai
Obama was the true smiling assassin … He engaged in constant war….. and honed the usa’s execution killing skills of lesser people in far away lands …..
Issuing Presidential death decrees …Using Predator Drones and ‘special forces’ … The presidents personal JSOC kill crews …. and privateer mercenaries from the likes of Black water.
But It gets worse ….Obama seemed to cross a line, … downwards … when as a result of his orders a innocent boy, Abdulrahman al-Awlaki, 16 years old and a usa citizen … was murdered without trial … death by drone.
Jeremy Scahills desperately sad movie documentary called “Dirty Wars” … details this and other war sickness… like compulsive repetitive lies from officials.
At this point we should note that Another Nobel Peace Prize Killer … Henry Kissenger … had established the right of the executive branch of the white house to murder with impunity ..
All done ‘legally’ as Wayne Mapp would say .. when a usa judge dismissed a case brought against Kissenger … by the now adult child of murder victim and former Chilean Army Commander Rene Schneider …who had been killed .. because he believed in the rule of law.
No justice was found in the usa legal system .. with a usa judge ruling their domestic laws … for things like murder …. did not apply to foreign policy … if your a white house wide boy.
Like criminal wide boys ….These uber VIPs had already declared themselves and any usa military invasion forces … above and off limits for any war crime prosecutions.
Anyway, one of my gripes against Obama …. was his gifting of a turn key killing machine to Trump…
and so it proved to be with Trump killing the 8 year old sister of the 16 year boy / her brother that Obama killed…. I think Trump killed their mum as well.
It seemed to me only a matter of time before this execution without trial … needing only the presidents order … would take place against usa citizens .. in their own ‘homeland’.
The next logical step in a frame work of blood lust military insanity.
But Somehow I had missed it … forgot it … or did not recognize it specifically for what it was at the time.
Bill Clinton had the guts to blaze this trail …. with scant credit or recognition.
Despite his humble discretion …. The documentary below shows u.s citizens,… mainly unarmed women and children… being murdered by the presidents special forces …. with extreme cruelty
Not in the beginning of the doco.. where incompetent gung-ho aggression from ATF agents and local law back-ups … starts the killing…
But in the deliberate savage assault following a siege ….where a shaped charge is dropped on usa women and children …. bombed and burned like they were in a Baghdad bunker…. Literally.
Machine guns and sniper fire .. is used to butcher others and prevent escape from burning to death ..
Its quite amazing the amount of freedoms a usa president and his personal legion has …
“Issuing Presidential death decrees …Using Predator Drones and ‘special forces’ …
The purchase and the program by the military of the USA to use drones had begun well before Obama became president. Nice of you to cherry pick incidents in war as if they only happen on one side. War is hell, do a bit of historical research.
Yes, but Obama ramped the whole drone program up several notches from Bush. It means less of your own boys/gals coming home in body bags, so electorally , all good.
Never mind about the collateral damage, thats “over there” amongst the unexceptional dispensible folk of the Unamerican primitive world
And it’s been ramped up to a whole new level under Dolt45. Where they’ve pretty stopped even pretending to care about how many civilians get caught up as “collateral damage”.
Each POTUS seems to set the scene for further normalisation of killing and carnage.Hopefully whereas “good guy” Obama sedated the peace movement, Trump’s odious character will reignite it.
But I’m not holding my breath
Surprised at your response.
Trump wouldnt LEAD a peace movement, but opposition to his ramped up militarism could surely revive the peace movement. That is if Americans can get over their exceptionalism
why, because i have absolutly no use for wishful thinking.
But hey, i am sure Russia today and yesterday had a ‘peacemovement’, so does North Korea, China etc etc etc, 🙂
seriously does this buffon really have to kill someone on fifth avenue for people to realise that he will not – under no circumstances – allow ‘dissent’?
He just called Democrats ‘treasonous’ for not clapping.
Its true that the democrats get away with their war crimes easier …
I can not recall anything in the news relating to Bill Clintons order …An order that had to be given …. For his Alpha team special forces to cross the Rubicon and use its war weapons…. in an operation of overkill against usa citizens on usa soil ….
Horrendously killing approximately 75 civilians… around half of which were women and children …. in ruthless military fashion.
We have a media… where we are all knowledgeable that Bill Clinton played the sax ……….. But uninformed of his behind the scene orders as commander in chief of the Waco massacre.
A clean up helped Bill clinton keep the blood from dead Waco children and women from staining him…. Some documents and other evidence were removed by white house staffers and given to the first lady … to forever disappear.
Bill Clinton is now in my eyes a murderous sex offender …..
The grim reality that the wealth creation built since the GFC in 2007/2008 is an illusion that can only survive on record low interest rates and insane Quantitate Easing is starting to sink in with the Dow Jones following up the 666 point loss on Friday with a horror 1175 point plunge today.
2018 GFC;
Caravans will cost three hundred rent cost from next year as homes are sold as ‘bank repo’s’ the party is over for the speculators.
Reality is nigh as “what goes up must come down”
Our ‘essential services (power/water) will climb as most of these former civic services have largely been “privatised” by the former national Government.
Solar panels and home wind turbines along with (roof collection self storage water tanks) alongside homes will dot the entire landscape as homeowners switch to providing their own power and water services.
The stock market recovered after an early plunge on Tuesday (Wednesday NZ Time) and was little changed in morning trading, raising hopes of a halt to a global sell-off in stock markets. The swings came one day after the steepest drop in 6 1/2 years.
CNN is reporting the Dow as “storming back”.
Please note, this comment is not a defence of financial systems or “Capitalism” (if you can, as Chomsky said, “show me some”, that is) or neoliberalism
A few years back it was fashionable among some Standardistas to predict the collapse of all fiat currencies by 2016. You don’t see too much of that anymore.
Meanwhile in Blenheim, covenants in housing divisions specify such things as minimum house size and style. They assert a minimum 145 sq m when the builder below is building kit set 104 sq m homes for $225,000.
The ‘developers’ obviously want a better look, or more profit from oversizing?
Some 15% of homes, I read, built since 2000 are smaller 1-2 bedroom units meaning that cost, size, builder and smaller building availability all conspire to deepen the housing crisis.
And further meanwhile in Blenheim, a town of 20,000, upwards of 60 people attend rental property open days hoping for a rental. Those who miss out may have to live for $1000 plus a week in emergency accommodation in motels, like this couple with child.
“Bigger boxes on the hillside
Bigger boxes made of ticky-tacky
Bigger boxes on the hillside
Bigger boxes all the same
There’s a brick one and a block one
Concrete and triple garaging
And though they are all bigger
They still look just the same!”
The 3 and 4 bedroom villas of the early 1900’s were often 100m2!
Huge international trend on tiny houses that are under 40m2.
One of the things that stopped many in Auckland buying was that banks would not lend under 40m2 apartments. So then only cashed up people (investors, new residents and those will cash or asset already could buy them).
Developers are there for profit so they are and have never been the answer to affordable housing.
It’s a right wing myth that more houses will stop the crisis because the houses being built are not designed for about 35% of the population that can’t afford to buy a house.
However the answer is not to throw out amenity controls, but more to reach a compromise of a practical and healthy dwelling that fulfils it’s role. In my mind size is the better sacrifice than windows and outdoor space. You don’t want to build cage houses either.
It also takes more energy to heat a larger house, so savings in grid energy use are being offset by the increase in size. We’re so fucking stupid. People treat energy use savings as a financial thing. It’s far more important as a climate change issue.
We need to guard against the push for apartments that are basically cells, but we should be incentivising people to build smaller houses at this point.
I’ve been watching these guys build the emergency accommodation units out the back of the old Kaitaia hotel…always a hive of activity.
I was also chatting to a guy staying in one of the rooms in the Hotel…and ex prisoner…. he was in the early stages of re integration and was struggling a bit with the strict rules he had to abide by. He could see that the rules were for his own good in the long term This is the strength of He Korowai Trust. They provide an holistic service, and like any whanau, there are rules and expectations of certain standards of behaviour.
They also have papakainga housing…also with strict no booze, drugs, violence rules.
Ricky Houghton does great work…should have been New Zealander of the Year.
I’m pretty sure that’s exactly what Labour have planned. It’s why they’ve been going on about pre-built housing for some time.
It makes sense. Build the house to high specification in a factory and then ship it to the desired location to assemble it.
Thing is, it’d be even better if they used such systems to build high-rise apartment buildings like this. Even more efficient then.
It’s a question of logistics. Making sure that the materials, the factories and the skilled people are available to do the building. That’s why it’s going to take a few years to get Labour’s Kiwibuild going. Those logistics simply aren’t in place due to the failure of the ‘free-market’.
Prefab also lowers the skill requirements onsite. If everything clips together, you don’t need so many people who are capable of working around the vagaries of an architect’s innovative ideas where shit doesn’t quite line up.
A decorator mate of mine had an entertaining story about how the builders and plasterers had a hell of a time trying to create a swooping curved wall that looked awesome on paper lol
True which just means that it’s only a matter of time before people aren’t required on site at all.
A decorator mate of mine had an entertaining story about how the builders and plasterers had a hell of a time trying to create a swooping curved wall that looked awesome on paper lol
And my nephew told me of how he was stopped from taking pictures of his own work which the architect then took pictures of and put into the architectural drawings as his own work.
Just watched the most amazing thing, true history in the making. Both boosters of the Spacex Falcon Heavy ( now I wonder why Elon Musk called it that! ) came back to the Canaveral launch pad and landed vertically. Straight out of Star Wars.
Absolutely amazing.
Yes he did and yes sending the car on the test flight was a better option than sending anything of worth. Still, something tells me there’s more than the car on board:
The longer the flight, he noted, the more the company would learn from the heavily instrumented rocket.
SpaceX is hoping for live shots of the car from on-board cameras, once the protective enclosure comes off and the car sails off fully exposed.
The car faces considerable speed bumps before settling into its intended orbit around the sun, an oval circle stretching from the orbit of Earth on one end to the orbit of Mars on the other.
I would be highly surprised if they didn’t have all sorts of measuring equipment on that car.
I s’pose if the aliens find it they’ll really be wondering how the fuck it got there and what kind of physics its propulsion system uses that they don’t understand.
There are direct links between the desire to get off this rock and our trashing of this rock. I’d prefer us to look after this planet instead of looking for an escape route. Especially as the looking for an escape route is taking part in trashing the planet.
Am happy to take our chances with a meteor. When we know how to look after this place, and learn how to leave without trashing things, I’ll probably change my mind.
No, it really isn’t. The science is in. What we need to do is stop burning fossil fuels now and keep on expanding. Space development ignores that and says we can keep doing what we want when we want and technology will save us. That’s a massive risk right now, not some eon in the future when an asteroid may or may not hit us.
Firstly, the window to stop burning coal has long passed. Now we really do need some tech to go alongside that.
Secondly, space exploration helps us know the extent of the problem, and new problems we hadn’t spotted before – so we know AGW is a problem, what about another CFC-style issue? What about weather monitoring?
Thirdly, asteroid issues are real. There’s no point solving AGW only to get zotzed by something we could have seen coming and maybe have done something about.
Fourthly, the message you take from space exploration is remarkably pessimistic. For many people, the more we know about the hostile environment around us makes us aware of just how precious and unique this planet is. Nobody wants to leave the ship for the lifeboat – but not having enough lifeboats is always a regretted decision.
“Firstly, the window to stop burning coal has long passed. Now we really do need some tech to go alongside that.”
Not sure what you mean by the windows to stop burning coal has passed. That window will never pass as long as we are burning coal (and gas and oil). The tech we need alongside stopping burning FF doesn’t need the space program. Our immediate problems are social and political not technical.
“Secondly, space exploration helps us know the extent of the problem, and new problems we hadn’t spotted before – so we know AGW is a problem, what about another CFC-style issue? What about weather monitoring?”
And that’s fine were space exploration not contributing to climate change now. Unknown problems we will face in the future doesn’t trump what we are doing and need to be doing instead now.
“Thirdly, asteroid issues are real. There’s no point solving AGW only to get zotzed by something we could have seen coming and maybe have done something about.”
Nevertheless, it’s madness to burn fossil fuels to do that. If I saw pro-space people being willing to power down, I’d be more supportive of resources going to space programs. But atm what I see is people saying hey tech will save us so lets keep burning some fossil fuels. Bill has written about this a lot, but there is plenty in the mainstream now too. CCS is not going to save us, and we are already in major overshoot.
“Fourthly, the message you take from space exploration is remarkably pessimistic. For many people, the more we know about the hostile environment around us makes us aware of just how precious and unique this planet is. Nobody wants to leave the ship for the lifeboat – but not having enough lifeboats is always a regretted decision.”
I don’t experience the environment as hostile and prefer world views that support humans as part of the environment. What I’m pointing to is that the paradigm that sees nature as hostile and we need high tech to survive it, is the paradigm that not only brought us CC but is resisting doing something about it. That many people believe in that paradigm doesn’t make it right or useful, and this is the core of it. Humans aren’t the most important thing here, not because we’re unimportant (we’re not), but because seeing ourselves as separate is the problem. We are *utterly dependent upon the environment within its own nature i.e.. functional living systems. Human tech can help us within that, but at the moment we are mostly living in denial of it.
Space is the hostile environment. The earth is a solitary oasis of life in a desolate, though beautiful, void. Anything remotely as habitable as earth will be unobtainably distant.
As for windows, we’re still looking at >2C. That will require new tech to deal with. Much of our tech comes directly from the space programmes of different nations, such as fuel cells. The trivial amount of carbon contributed by space exploration (compared to cars and construction) is well worth the effort.
Unknown problems in the future are what will bite us in the arse, so we’d better get to know them. We need to know the composition and orbits of NEO bodies now, so we will be able to do something about them in the future. So far we’re lucky that the notable ones in the last hundred years or so have landed in desolate areas.
1. Even if true (which itsn’t) we can do more than one thing at a time
2. See point one
The space program itself has numerous off-shoots which have beneficial to mankind and its R&D have contributed directly to civilian use rather than ‘stakeholders’ whomever they may be.
Not to mention the more we discover about who we are, why we are, where we are and when we are are pretty important things to know.
The purpose of spying is to prevent and/or shorten wars. Satellites are part of that process. If you have a substantive argument against that premise, rather than simply scoffing at it, let’s hear it, and let’s see you take account of The Better Angels Of Our Nature while you’re about it.
* Preventing famines/feeding the starving
Most famine is caused by war, and note that information about climate change, and associated droughts, has been driven in large part by NASA.
* Reducing inequality (name the type)
Information is power. Seeing photographs of Earth from space reminds everyone that we’re all in this together. Beyond that, inequality is a political choice. We could double the space program and still bring the GINI to a better value.
* Reducing financial debt burdon
What financial debt burden? On a planetary scale it’s a zero sum. Also a political choice.
NASA is 0.5% of the US budget. Military spending is more like 50%.
Water purification tech, early warning for shingles attacks, asthma treatment, vaccine development, cell behaviour, environmental health, climate monitoring, weather warnings, robotic prosthetics, disaster response, preventing bone loss in old age, treatment for strokes and cerebral palsy.
You really believe the purpose of spying is to prevent or shorten wars????
What a flippin idiotic thing to say.
CIA for the next nobel peace prize then.
I finally understand why you believe everything the spy agencies say.
“The space program itself has numerous off-shoots which have beneficial to mankind and its R&D have contributed directly to civilian use rather than ‘stakeholders’ whomever they may be.
Not to mention the more we discover about who we are, why we are, where we are and when we are are pretty important things to know.”
You’re second point is what is irrelevant rather than the space program. I’m not sure what you mean by “The power structures won’t be sharing that information with you, John….and that power structure are stakeholders in the space program…”
What is being withheld? The earth is flat? The earth is hollow? There are beings on Mars yet the phony Mar’s Rover is actually broadcasting from a set in Area 51?
Please tell me what is being held back by the power structures. You’re long on rhetoric but slim in actual ‘facts’
You’re not comprehending what I’ve clearly stated, John…
So I’ll give it one final attempt…
If the space program was halted permanently from this moment, there is nothing that would be lost from the available solutions list to remediate the worlds major issues…
We have the capability right at this precise same moment, what we lack is the environmental and collective will power to allow true remediation to proceed…
Irrelevant!
Get it?
Note: I’ve not referred to positives which have developed out of the space program. You can argue into the mirror…
They’re irrelevant to the remediations I’m referring to.. in the same way your responses have been…
If you’re still not able to understand, take a read through wekas comments a little higher up…perhaps they will help you out of the mud you’re stuck in…
You failed to provide any substantive rebuttal. so here’s a longer-form argument to chew on:
As expressed by Sun Tzu:
…There is no instance of a nation benefiting from prolonged warfare…
No shit Sun.
In the practical art of war, the best thing of all is to take the enemy’s country whole and intact; to shatter and destroy it is not so good. So, too, it is better to recapture an army entire than to destroy it, to capture a regiment, a detachment or a company entire than to destroy them.
“Best”, because fewer people die. In case you were wondering.
…to remain in ignorance of the enemy’s condition simply because one grudges the outlay of a hundred ounces of silver in honours and emoluments, is the height of inhumanity.
To send troops on (for example) a peacekeeping mission without knowledge of the warring factions isn’t just a stupid thing to do: it’s the height of inhumanity. Send your army deaf and blind into the field and see how long your command lasts.
Oh. So not only are the spies cotenders for innumerable peace prizes but philosophers as well.
The CIA trained and armed jihadists in Syria. Not noted for capturing anyone much alive or if they do not for long.
Libya whole and in good condition. Yeah right. Same with Syria. Their philosophy is more like Trump throwing his toys out of the cot. If you wont let us exploit your resources then we’ll make sure nobody gets them. What planet do you live on OAB? Spies make the world safer??? Spies have the good of humanity at heart?? This is a religous statement. Faith based and completely contradicted by reality. Somewhere further down this thread someone references Lee Camp. For the real take on the idiocy of spy agencies. Like real dumb fucks in a very Trump sort of way. Not sure they could even spell philosophy or humanity. Oh and Lee Camp is real funny tòo. https://leecamp.com/
If the space program was halted permanently from this moment, there is nothing that would be lost from the available solutions list to remediate the worlds major issues…
Except a tool to monitor whether what solutions we implement are actually working to the level we need.
The edit was going to say:
Your train wreck analogy just might have worked if we were talking one wreck. We’re not. Its many many many train wrecks to the point where sane people start to question the underlying system. Doing the same shit and expecting different resuts ring any bells?? Lie after lie after lie but still you say this time its the truth?? Hence the refrrence to religion. Your bible says spies work for peace so their lies aren’t lies. They can’t always be straight for our own good is it?? You fit the defunition of insanity stated above
“If the space program was halted permanently from this moment, there is nothing that would be lost from the available solutions list to remediate the worlds major issues…”
Except the ability to learn more and further our advancement in many areas of sciences and technology which may help us avert or restrain problems in the future
Speaking of what you affect to know about ‘reality’, I also referenced The Better Angels Of Our Nature, which presents evidence that we’re living in one of the least violent eras in human history. If true, that’s hardly surprising given the increased capabilities of communications technology.
Nothing you’ve ranted comes close to demonstrating that you even understand the argument, let alone a substantive rebuttal.
You reference an 800 page book. Maybe you can help me out with page numbers to support your assertion that spy agencies work for peace.
Also you show your euro centric (racial) bias. As a percentage of world population violence has decreased. This means European/USA experience of violence which isnt the same as American Indian experience or Maori or Syrian or Libian or Rwanda etc. Its all very easy when you belong to the priviledged group to bang on about how great things are.
Like Madeleine Allbrights belief that 10s of thousands of starved children or deaths from lack of medicine is an acceptable price. Whats your acceptable price OAB?
And last time I looked it was the spy agencies that lied about WMD.
For what it’s worth, there’s considerable evidence that the US knowledge of the Soviet reaction to Exercise Able Archer 83 helped pivot Reagan’s “evil empire” rhetoric into a de-escalation stance.
That knowledge came from US spies in the Soviet union.
Similarly, had warnings of military build-ups been heeded, maybe not so many Soviets would have died in WW2, and maybe the backlash against German civilians might not have been so visceral.
And then one could argue that the almost immediate ending of the US monopoly on nuclear weapons prevented their use in Korea – MacArthur was already pushing for it, and if there hadn’t been the threat of retaliation it might have been a tempting option in the see-sawing territorial possession.
Thats a long stretch back in time. How anout recently? The only one I can think of is Obama being told there was no credible evidence of Assad launching the Gouta chemical weapon attack but peobably didnt need a spy agency to tell him that.
Eight hundred pages? You must have an extended version. Even my hardback copy with additional material by Sun Pin and extensive notes by Ralph D. Sawyer only runs to three-hundred odd pages.
This is a pretty good version; it lays out the thirteen chapters clearly and only has a minimal amount of ‘chatter’, or commentary if you prefer.
I already quoted extensively from Chapter 13: The Use Of Spies, including Sun Tzu’s observation about ‘the height of inhumanity’. Chapter 2 goes into more details about the evils of war, so it’s worth reading that too – it’s only twenty paragraphs. But if you really want to get a firmer grasp on Taoist philosophy on such matters, read Lao Tzu side-by side with Sun Tzu.
Also, I already answered your question: send your peace keepers deaf and blind into the field and see how long your command lasts. Do you really not understand how that works?
Fair call on my Eurocentric bias – although I’m not sure it’s a valid criticism of Pinker (author of Better Angels…). The charge has certainly been levelled at him, with some fairly solid push-back.
Please note that I didn’t say “how great things are.” If the only way you can rebut my argument is to twist my words, why not just start waving your white flag right now?
Ok. So thanks for the link. Ive read the first chapter and you’re right theres a lot to chew over.
War is hell. Thats the first point.I consider myself lucky enough to have experienced the tail end of a war zone. Bosnia circa 1995. Lucky because I know first hand that war should be avoided if at all possible. War can also be addictive. I saw many ngo workers talk nostalgically about the days when they were taking fire.
Some anecdotes as relates to chapter one. Analysis of each participant. For some time I was based in the small village of Olovo. I spent an evening on the fringe of a group that contained a Russian officer. He was relaxed and comfortable in the company of the local population. The Russians arrived before the Americans. When American soldiers arrived in the valley they walked in single file in a large group of 6 or 7 with their guns in the air and the last man walking backwards. Very stressed and very nervous. No wonder they shoot civilians. And the bit about laws. When Americans break laws they are not held to account. How can anyone respect that? In Bosnia if you killed someone on the road like as notyoud get 5 years jail time. We all lived with that. Not Americans. I talked to one guy who was being smuggled out of the country because he had run someone over. As an aside NZ soldiers drove around the country side doing shows at schools and openly trying to engage with the locals. I guess that got lost somewhere in Afghanistan and we got Americanised and started shooting up the locals. On all counts except raw power in Chapter 1 the American military are inferior. If they have a philosophy it is that you gotta break a few eggs to make an omelette. Its the military version of fudamental Christianity where everyones going to heaven except theres the apocalypse first. Russian philosophy is way more exciting. It was a Russian who pretty much dealt the death blow to any credibility in believing in an all powerful god. All powerful but ignores suffering and injustice. This Russian pretty forcefully put his line in the sand. You (god) say that we can all go to heaven but there is a little bit of torture and rape and so forth which must go on first. Well he said if the cost is just one child tortured you can stick your heaven up your jacksy. Which is only right and proper because this is the original snake oul salesman. Next thing you know youre dealing with Allbrights 10s of thousands of Iraqi children only to find that thats srill not enough human sacrifice. More is needed!! Keep piling up the corpses.
So certainly no discipline in the American Military. Of course No one in their right mind would feel too good following Trump onto the battlefield. But really was Obama much better after he caved in to the bankers at the very moment when they thought the game was up. Talk about snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. What a glorious start for the commander in chief. So weve dealt with moral compass and leaders a little of course just my ramblings. As for Generals one of Trumps Junta was involved in the Falujah massacre. Its difficult at the moment to check which one. So for all these reasons and more I will never support the US military but mostly because they are above the law and are the play thing of an elite who are also above the law. So thanks for giving me more solid ground to base my convictions. Now and not just to make you see Red. Some kind words about Putin. Please offer back some links with solid proof of Putins corruption. There is a story about Putin that goes like this. When he came to power he gathered up all the oligarchs that had been trampling willie nilly all over Yeltsin and he said to them:
I’m going to let you all keep your illegal and ill-gotten gains but you have to obey the law and pay your taxes. And when they didn’t they got thrown in jail as promised and each one that ended up in jail was portrayed as some kind of hero or resistance fighter in the west. Personally I respect that and I think Suntzu would too. I also respect his hours long talks to all media. You want the people to come along with you its probably a good idea to talk to them. Maybe answer a few questions… So I guess in my book we’re gonna see if raw power trumps all the other attributes in chapter 1. The ultimate battle of materialism against all the intangibles. Have to say I’m quietly confident except as Putin accused Obama of Trump may just smash up the chess board…
More recently, how about all those meetings with Russians the trump team had? Certainly limited the friction between US and Russia. But maybe that doesn’t count, despite the FISA warrants and plea bargains.
Of course it counts. And heres a fascinating read on attempts to sway Obama away from his arming of the jihadists featuring one Michael Flynn as head of the DIA. Seems though that the whole house is now stacked with Russophobes with the appointment of Dunford as chairman of the Joint Chiefs.
So it doesnt say that? Then where did you get such an absurd idea from??
No, it doesn’t say that “their lies aren’t lies”.
In fact it says that “all warfare is based on deception”. In Chapter One. Perhaps if you actually read it (which really doesn’t take long – it’s a very short thesis) you might have some better ‘intelligence’ to base your attacks on.
You could just relax and call it cooperation. Probably the sky wouldnt fall in. But it would require removing Russia from your list of enemies I suppose. If collusion then according to Hersch in the article linked to above it was widespread through the pentagon at the time. Just that Flynn was the only one being open about it. This was written in 2016 so well before Trump was a thing. Cooperation or collusion? The difference is all in how Russia is viewed and at the time the demonisation of Russia hadn’t fully taken hold which is a necessary first step for charges of collusion
I didn’t realize there was an investigation into wether or not Russia was an enemy. That certainly is progress and the type of lateral thinking that I wouldn’t have credited them with
Although Russia is currently militarily occupying a NATO-oriented nation and they’re supporting opponents in proxy wars and confrontations, so the difference in the Russia-US case is largely semantic.
Either way, if there was FISA-relevant wrongdoing, then yay for the FSB for bringing the superpower-in-decline and the regional power into a more amicable relationship!
I beg to differ. If foreign were the key word then Jarrod would be in serious trouble over his dealing with and influence peddling for Israel. He’s not so enemy is the key word. You collude with enemies and cooperate with friends
No, the act says “foreign”.
Secondly, collusion is covert by definition.
Thirdly, what about Kushner and Israel? Maybe the Israelis gave him better advice on not making his emails public than the Ruccians did
It wasn’t emails. It was the taped phone call from Flynn. They have word for word what Flynn was requesting on behalf of Israel from Russia at the behest of Kushner.Enemy remains key. No one is going to press charges of colluding with the UK. Similarly in the USA for Israel.
Assuming Kush wasn’t on the phone, that’s called “hearsay”, but it could well be one of the things Flynn has for “cooperation” with the investigation.
The also need to demonstrate knowingly acting as an agent, and I bel;ieve that foreign agents can be declared (like a conflict of interest) so if JK didn’t do that, wait for the wheels of justice to inexorably roll forward… Trump pardons notwithstanding.
There are direct links between the desire to get off this rock and our trashing of this rock. I’d prefer us to look after this planet instead of looking for an escape route.
We’re not just looking for an escape route.
Especially as the looking for an escape route is taking part in trashing the planet.
Except that it isn’t. In fact, without the space program we probably wouldn’t know how much damage we’ve already done.
A list of ‘collateral benefits shared downwards’ can be found so easily it’s probably more fun to link to the “What Have the Romans Ever Done For Us?” sketch. See further up the page for some examples.
McFlock
I think your time epochs are getting mixed up. We should leave next century’s problems for them to deal with rather than presume we know the right thing to do now, and use up all the resources needed before whatever happens.
For interest and to allow imagination to be titillated I suggest watching Babylon 5.
But we need to know what we don’t know, otherwise it might sneak up on us. Besides, space exploration isn’t going to use up all the resources. Consumerism and phone “upgrades” will.
Climate change marches on because of our inability to reign in car use use. Of course, the people doing space development are also the ones that are more likely to develop a solution to climate change. Solar power was developed because of space development.
Watching those two boosters land together was a sci-fi moment in real life.
The future has arrived, we just saw it land at Cape Canaveral.
Anyway, curiosity and technology are traits innate to human culture and we are far to long gone on the technology ride to turn our backs on it now without a disaster.
Like it or not, if capitalism needs constant growth on a finite planet, then the solution to our growth conundrum lies in space, be it mining Asteroids (I’d rather have a sterile, lifeless hunk of space rock host the mining and ore refining operation and the steel mill be on a space station in orbit than have them all here on earth spewing toxic waster into the environment) or even – sci-fi time – colonising the inner planets or even going to Trappist-1 to take a look for life there.
Also, space based industry is literally outsourcing our carbon emissions!
No. I am saying you are not going to give 10 billion humans a western, middle class life style without going into space to get the resources to make it happen.
The alternative is most likely population overshoot, climate change, resource wars and probably nuclear catastrophe.
“Climate change marches on because of our inability to reign in car use use”
Not really. Magically change all car use to public transport and human generated climate change (and Peak Everything) continues via the growth economies. Car use is a big factor, but it’s not the driver.
“Of course, the people doing space development are also the ones that are more likely to develop a solution to climate change.”
We already have a solution to climate change, we just don’t have the will to do it. I don’t see space program people as being any more useful in resolving that. Probably the opposite, because they seem to think they can justify burning fossil fuels.
“Solar power was developed because of space development.”
Solar power was developed by evolution. What you mean is electricity generated by capturing solar energy, and we don’t actually need that to survive. If it were a choice between continuing emissions or giving up tech that came about via the space programs then we could still choose to stop emissions and we’d be ok.
I’m not saying the space development doesn’t do good or useful things. I’m saying it’s insane to be putting effort into that instead of preventing the worst of climate change.
“We already have a solution to climate change, we just don’t have the will to do it.”
Yeah – everybody knows (as the late great Leonard Cohen said) that the only solutions to CC that will be wholeheartedly embraced are those that either:
– leave existing profit streams intact, or
– provide opportunities for the owners of existing profit streams to readily replace or augment them with new ones
Kinda hard to think of ‘solutions’ that meet either condition really – except for some sort of privately-owned magic ‘tech’ (which is why that idea is so popular)
social tipping points are another. Or things we can’t conceive of yet. A major GFC would be a game changer for instance, and how we respond to that would determine how bad things have to get.
Magically change all car use to public transport and human generated climate change (and Peak Everything) continues via the growth economies.
It’s not ‘growth’ per se that drives increased fossil fuel use. It’s the demand for energy a lot of which is used to power transport:
Oil product demand growth stems mainly from the strong demand growth from the worldwide vehicle fleet, in particular in Asian countries.
Because of the strong development of their vehicle fleets, China and India continued to be the main source of growth accounting for half of the 2016 hike, while the OECD countries’ consumption increase accounted for close to one third of it.
Personal cars are a major part of the problem.
Magically change all car use to public transport and human generated climate change (and Peak Everything) continues via the growth economies.
Not necessarily.
We already have a solution to climate change, we just don’t have the will to do it.
True. Banning personal cars and burning of fossil fuels is not on the horizon.
I don’t see space program people as being any more useful in resolving that. Probably the opposite, because they seem to think they can justify burning fossil fuels.
They’re part of the people looking for the replacement of fossil fuels. A fairly big part in fact.
What you mean is electricity generated by capturing solar energy, and we don’t actually need that to survive. If it were a choice between continuing emissions or giving up tech that came about via the space programs then we could still choose to stop emissions and we’d be ok.
Well, a few of us would be but the majority of people would be wiped out pretty quick as a hell of a lot of stuff got taken away because we refused to use it because it came from the space program.
I’m saying it’s insane to be putting effort into that instead of preventing the worst of climate change.
Which just proves your ignorance about economics.
We can, and should, do both especially considering that the space program is likely to help doing that “preventing the worst of climate change”.
“It’s not ‘growth’ per se that drives increased fossil fuel use. It’s the demand for energy a lot of which is used to power transport:”
Reductionist thinking thinks climate change = carbon emissions, therefore reduce carbon emissions and everything will be alright (ish). We need systems thinking that sees the connections between growth, climate change, resource depletion, the take-make-waste economy, and the ignoring of natural systems particularly biological ones. Climate change can’t be solved without paradigm change. I’m pointing to the paradigms at play where.
“Personal cars are a major part of the problem.”
Obviously.
“They’re part of the people looking for the replacement of fossil fuels. A fairly big part in fact.”
Irrespective of whether we find a replacement or not, we have to power down. Powering up is antithetical to solving climate change. Paradigms and system thinking again.
“Well, a few of us would be but the majority of people would be wiped out pretty quick as a hell of a lot of stuff got taken away because we refused to use it because it came from the space program.”
again, obviously, if we gave it up in the blink of an eye. But if you read my comment in the context of the conversation with McFlock, you will see I am talking about something else, and making a different point.
“Which just proves your ignorance about economics.
We can, and should, do both especially considering that the space program is likely to help doing that “preventing the worst of climate change”.”
Asserting something doesn’t make it true. You believe in the space program and what sustainability expert David Holmgren calls techno-explosion with some components of techno-stability. I believe in the power down. I’ve been making a case for why the power down is necessary, you’ve just asserted that techno will save us, but you haven’t made the case.
Reductionist thinking thinks climate change = carbon emissions, therefore reduce carbon emissions and everything will be alright (ish).
Climate change is primarily driven by carbon emissions. There are other GHGs but they’re a small part of our emissions.
We need systems thinking that sees the connections between growth, climate change, resource depletion, the take-make-waste economy, and the ignoring of natural systems particularly biological ones. Climate change can’t be solved without paradigm change.
Which is all a load of bollocks. There is a connection between growth and resource depletion. Using more resources must inevitably result in resource depletion.
There isn’t necessarily a connection between growth and climate change. We could still have growth while having declining GHG emissions.
I’m pointing to the paradigms at play where.
You’re making assertions without any evidence or logic.
Irrespective of whether we find a replacement or not, we have to power down.
If we find a replacement then we obviously don’t need to power down. That’s basically what finding a replacement for fossil fuels and their emissions means.
Asserting something doesn’t make it true.
True. And you make lots of assertions that are downright wrong, that don’t even have a logical connection.
You believe in the space program and what sustainability expert David Holmgren calls techno-explosion with some components of techno-stability.
No I don’t.
I believe in reality.
I’ve been making a case for why the power down is necessary, you’ve just asserted that techno will save us, but you haven’t made the case.
No, you’ve been talking BS and I didn’t say that technology will save us. I said it has a role in doing so. A role in stopping the continued burning of fossil fuels and reducing other GHG emissions.
It will be politics that will save us but that requires that we all get involved and stop the politicians catering to the 1%.
weka says
“I’m not saying the space development doesn’t do good or useful things. I’m saying it’s insane to be putting effort into that instead of preventing the worst of climate change”
+1000 to that.
And the cost-benefit calculation of those good things we now have? The billions spent that have added to climate change, and still we are pouring money into the sky and space.
We are curious, clever children at heart; we have dilemmas that are very hard which we need to deal with hre and now on earth but space is so fascinating – look how I can pay table tennis with a drop of water in a weightless environment and look at all those flames when our space vehicle launches and how cleverly we do everything, except for mucking up, rare though, with a D or O ring. Very sad, most unfortunate. But it’s just amazing being able to control a vehicle on …(name your planet) from earth. Beats radio-controlled car racing on Sundays.
Sounds like HOP prices are increasing. AT also takes the lions share of Aucklander’s rates too. Rolling in cash but still can’t seem to run or build a world class service and no doubt complaining how they need more money.
It costs about $20 for 1 adult and 2 kids to go around 12km return and you have to catch 2 buses to reach your destination depending on where you are in Auckland, so generally takes nearly 1 hour when you can drive it for about $2 and it takes 10 minutes, so that’s part of the problem.
You also need to go through a huge paper rigmarole to get a child HOP so again totally thinking of their customers as usual (NOT).
Someone told me it was costing $70 per week to take public transport from Huapai in West Auckland to central Auckland, plus they had to get their elderly mother to get up at 6am and drive them to the station and pick them up. In the end they moved closer in, (another reason why the housing crisis will not abate as people can’t get back to their jobs if they move further out as limited and inconvenient transport options).
Not only that but the ancient buses that are generally empty of patrons (see above reason) amble along 25km under the speed limits on the open road, causing major delays and productivity loss for everybody else.
People might tolerate an expensive service if it was convenient, but often the AT service is both inconvenient and expensive.
AT also takes the lions share of Aucklander’s rates too.
[Citation Needed]
Rolling in cash but still can’t seem to run or build a world class service and no doubt complaining how they need more money.
Actually, they’re doing pretty well at getting public transport up to first class standards. The real problem was that the National government stood in the way and demanded more roads instead.
It costs about $20 for 1 adult and 2 kids to go around 12km return and you have to catch 2 buses to reach your destination depending on where you are in Auckland, so generally takes nearly 1 hour when you can drive it for about $2 and it takes 10 minutes, so that’s part of the problem.
Proof that you do not understand economics and the true costs of cars.
1. You actually have to buy the car
2. You have to maintain the car
3. You have to fuel it up
4. You have to pay insurance
5. That time you’re driving is a loss of time as you could be doing something far more productive
Now multiply all that by hundreds of thousands just in Auckland. And that’s just the driver.
Cars are expensive.
Our public transport could be and should be better but the reason why it’s so bad is due to decades of under-funding and lack of development so that car manufacturers and other services could make a profit and keep employment higher than it would be. Most of the gas stations would simply not exist. Same would apply to mechanics and panel beaters.
Getting rid of cars would free up huge numbers of capable people to do something else. Nurses, doctors, builders, teachers – the list goes on. All of which we need more than mechanics and service station attendants.
Cars are expensive.
Then there’s the 400+ people who die prematurely every year due to the pollution of the cars.
Cars are expensive.
Someone told me it was costing $70 per week to take public transport from Huapai in West Auckland to central Auckland, plus they had to get their elderly mother to get up at 6am and drive them to the station and pick them up. In the end they moved closer in, (another reason why the housing crisis will not abate as people can’t get back to their jobs if they move further out as limited and inconvenient transport options).
Better transport won’t actually make that any better. The only thing that will is high-rise apartments.
Not only that but the ancient buses that are generally empty of patrons (see above reason) amble along 25km under the speed limits on the open road, causing major delays and productivity loss for everybody else.
No, they amble along at their speed limit which is 90km/h on the motorway.
And those people in the cars are what’s causing the traffic jams and the productivity loss. They’re the ones taking up the roads and losing productivity by driving.
People might tolerate an expensive service if it was convenient, but often the AT service is both inconvenient and expensive.
One wonders why people drive then. It’s expensive and inconvenient.
Auckland’s annual public transport usage is continuing to soar with the latest figures showing a total of 81.2 million passenger trips in the past year – an increase of 8.1 per cent.
Mayor Len Brown says it’s especially pleasing to see rail patronage increasing by 22.6 per cent as Auckland prepares for the historic start of work on the City Rail Link (CRL).
Rail services totalled 15.1 million trips for the 12 months to November 2015.
Would be nice to have more recent figures but I couldn’t find them.
Auckland ratepayers pay more than 50% of the $1,324,000,000 operating spend of the 2017 – 2018 year for transport.
I’m not sure that figure includes the new transport levy or a proposed petrol tax or the new price increases for users. (I think not).
Source of that figure is the current rates levy!
If AT have all these extra journeys they are providing it’s not showing up in the costs to ratepayers or reducing the prices for transport. Maybe freebies on the Gold card!
As for thinking Auckland has world class transport, pleeeze, I’ve lived in the EU, Asia and Africa – NZ is one of the worst places for public transport and very expensive to the cost of wages – the only worst place for public transport, I’ve even been to, is Fiji.
In my view Aucklander’s are being ripped off and the COO structures are not working! More than 1 billion a year for AT shit service and their propaganda about how great they are!
The chairman of AT doesn’t even write his own preamble on the budget that’s signed off by him – that’s how disinterested and incompetent and what a shitty organisation they are.
….massive project underway to unlock the rail network… yawn somehow the Brits managed an underground in the 1863 and its still used by over 1 billion passengers a year… but hey in Auckland we are supposed to be excited by the prospect of EVENTUALLY and (probably not before a maned Mars landing) that the execs at AT and NZ transport will get something fit for purpose going.
Maybe if there were less excuses about why they can’t get it going, propaganda about how good they are and less about how much extra money they need it could be done. Having one track into Britomart or what ever the hell the dumbos did there, might be an inkling of the lack of size of the brains on our public transport system or the chairman apparently doesn’t write his own reports on his own budget he signs off.
Len Brown and Phil Goff faced similar uphill battles dealing with the road-addicted National administration, the Nats finally relented when they realised how many Aucklanders were pissed off by their BS.
PT is too much of a political football and needs a nationwide independent authority like AT to plan it properly.
The great thing about Trains & buses is that it gives one a captive audience – you can dictate where they travel to & from & how long it will take, then broadcast propaganda about Dear Leader, Civics, Te Reo, the horrors of Capitalism, etc etc.
Then I guess if you get 1000’s of people’s daily existence susceptible to the whims & demands of the Train & Bus Drivers Union you will have all kinds of power.
Good idea of selling to a captive audience, if they got Skycity on board with gambling on trains, the powers that be would make it happen. That’s the sad state of our elected officials. If it’s pointless or bad for society, it happens. If not, then just wait and wait and wait… and then some pathetic offering appears.
I note the replies to you savenz tend to the ideal – we shouldn’t have cars, or to educate you on the overall long-term cost of transport to you on an amortised basis, or how pleased you should feel knowing that rail is being built because it will be so much better then, when you need to travel now and your present cost is $x and it will take xtime.
Just listening or reading about how things are for people is good stuff that we need to hear to understand the present state of play. It is interesting and important that we know that change is happening…sometime soon. But today this is how it is for an ordinary person. Let’s not dismiss ourselves as ordinary persons with a life and a story and not beat people over the head with unrealised facts, future plans yet to emerge and serve.
Lovely article this morning in The Guardian on the necessity of both radical and reforming arms of the feminist movement to achieve success. In this case, the right for women to vote, on its 1918 centenary this year:
Despite having ministerial positions and largely outlining what they plan to achieve this term (20 policy goals) the latest poll has the Greens going downwards since the election.
And with nothing more up their sleeves, coupled with supporter disappointment of swallowing some dead rats along the way, there is a real chance they won’t make the 5% threshold come next election.
Meanwhile, despite securing a number of wins, New Zealand First is floundering and their support of the TPP could very well be the last nail in their coffin.
Therefore, if Labour want friends next election, Labour needs to consider giving the Greens a little win (like lifting the incomes of beneficiaries, whether through a Christmas bonus, core benefit increase or extended and larger energy payment) to appease their activist base.
Something which Labour should keep in mind, unless they think they can win the next election alone.
Firstly, polls this far out from an election are worse than useless, because they encourage idiots to make pointless declamations based on little more than tea leaves.
Secondly, Labour don’t need you to teach them how to suck eggs. Unlike the nats, they know how to work with partners. The wins the Greens and NZ1 will get over the next 2.5yrs won’t be “given” to them by Labour, those wins will be earned by the coalition partners in their own right.
Yes, it early days. However for the reasons I outlined above, I can’t see things improving for the Greens or NZF without them securing significant wins.
And as Labour has the majority vote, any wins the Greens or NZF obtain requires Labour’s blessing.
So political parties that achieve nothing over an electoral term will be punished in the election booths? A profound observation that has hitherto occurred to precisely nobody. /sarc
Lets look at the Greens. They won ministerial positions and have their 20 policy goals, yet instead of going up (which one would assume) they slipped downwards.
Therefore, if the Greens think that now they have their ministerial positions and 20 policy goals they can sleepwalk their way to the next election, they are going to get a shock.
Moreover, as popular as Davidson is with the party’s activist base, merely making her co leader won’t be enough. They need a significant policy win to appease the left within.
I can see the Greens easily following Labour’s path of leadership changes and party disunity.
“Lets look at the Greens”
Let’s not. I am going to hang out the washing, feeling mildly happy that we have a government that seems to be populated by normal people. I don’t expect too much from them, but it feels better than a government of vulgar, greedy, self-serving philistines.
“Let’s not. I am going to hang out the washing, feeling mildly happy that we have a government that seems to be populated by normal people.”
Yes, we changed the Government, but we still have the TPP. Rather weak employment reforms. An almost useless cannabis reform. A foreign investment ban with holes so large that our largest foreign investor is exempt. No date set for a living wage.
Well, given that you usually restrict yourself to stating the bleeding obvious in the most condescendingly insulting way possible, you shouldn’t be overy surprised.
But I’m sure that your effort today has made both NZ1 and the Greens finally realise that in order to win votes they’ll need to make some policy advances sometime in the next two years, rather than their previous intention to merely sit on their arses and do nothing.
Once again, your outstanding advice (offered for free, no less) has singlehandedly rescued the left and its electoral partners from oblivion 🙄
“But I’m sure that your effort today has made both NZ1 and the Greens finally realise that in order to win votes they’ll need to make some policy advances sometime in the next two years, rather than their previous intention to merely sit on their arses and do nothing.”
As far as NZF are concerned, their support of the TPP will be externally hard to overcome, hence it’s probably already all over for them.
There is no win big enough for them to come back from this.
And as for the Greens, apart from their 20 policy goals and new co leader, it seems that fluffing around making corny videos etc is all they plan to do. Hence, they need this nudge. As, evidently, their current actions show no signs of them being aware of this need.
Moreover, they need Labour’s blessing, and that won’t come willingly. Thus, this is part of the public pressure we require to put on them.
Your attempt to weaken it undermines it, so who’s side are you on?
How many times has NZ1 been predicted to die? One more announcement from you won’t make a difference.
It’s also really impressive the way you can convince yourself that your “nudge” is needed after you rule out their entire list of policy commitments.
Nobody needs anyone else’s “blessing”. That’s what you refuse to understand. Labour is not the overlord, throwing bones of policy achievement to the peasants. They are all equals.
The underlying strength of the coalition is respect, not power. As soon as you figure that one out, all your concerns will disappear into nothingness – which might be why it’s lost on you…
“National is on the cusp of Leadership change …. probably very undemocratic.”
A ballot of the National party caucus elects a new leader.
“There is no Green disunity. But there are bound to be factions in National.”
Not sure James Shaw has the same confidence as you do…
“Shaw said all candidates would be told it had to be a “clean campaign” although they would not have to sign a code of conduct, something Labour Party leadership contenders have done in the past.
Shaw said there was a risk of ructions in the party but a clean campaign would help prevent that.”
Yes, I’m sure so many people spontaneously offer you their opinions and voting intention that you could start your own political market research consultancy. /sarc
From what I can gather, it will be the death of them.
When I first heard the news, the first thing that came to mind is Winston must be planning on standing down as I don’t see them coming back from that and I think Winston knows it. Hence, I suspect he’s going to call it a day at the end of this term.
Maybe but currently NZFirst are below the threshold and i don’t see them improving (a lot of the farmers won’t forget) and the Greens are at 6% and seem to be shedding their principles quicker than you can say government pension
I expect the Greens to be back but only at around the number they have now and I don’t expect Winston to be back
You’d be sledging the Greens whatever they did – you’d like nothing better than for them to abandon their principles.
But it’s true that Labour’s PR shadow won’t win them anything from their base. They need a few successes – rivers are the obvious one.
TPP and immigration and foreign land sales will end NZF if they roll over for it. We’ll see as we leave the silly season whether they’ll make a go of it.
“You’d be sledging the Greens whatever they did – you’d like nothing better than for them to abandon their principles.”
I’m sledging them because they act like they have the moral high ground but the first sniff of power and they abandon their principles
“TPP and immigration and foreign land sales will end NZF if they roll over for it. We’ll see as we leave the silly season whether they’ll make a go of it.”
We don’t know they’ve abandoned their principles PR, they may be pursuing them by means other than media grandstanding. We’ll have some idea in the next few months.
“We don’t know they’ve abandoned their principles PR, they may be pursuing them by means other than media grandstanding. We’ll have some idea in the next few months.”
The problem is that all of us can make grand predictions but it generally takes months or years to see if it comes to pass
Yup – the far right idea of ‘fun’ – rivers that are toxic sumps, our government being sued under ISDS, unrestrained dairy development and jobs for sleazy assholes like those employed by CERA. As close to treason as makes no difference.
…an agreement has been reached between Labour, NZ First and the Greens individually that satisfies Green support for the protection of the Kermadec’s pristine waters, while assuring NZ First that iwi and commercial fishing rights will be taken into account.
Pretty sure you’ve had your face rubbed in this before.
My view of Greens is that they have somehow fallen into a trap of certain individual politicians following their pet projects or experiences while the identity of the Green Party flounders.
I’m not sure if dirty politics is at play and I think it would be super easy to have an undue influence and voting rights by members if a dirty organisation was inclined to wipe them out by becoming members on mass and voting in MP’s they know are polarising influences. Having newcomers being so high in the list and short on environmental credentials was very surprising.
I don’t think the new idea that social causes and niche transport (trains for the shore) being the Green focus is resonating with the loyal environmental followers that have voted for them since Jeanette days.
Oh c’mon lets be real here, whatever is happening inside the Greens is probably* not due to Dirty Politics
The MT clusterf**k was all down to MT, when the two traitors (Kennedy Graham and the other one) were removed their was jubilation all round, the Greens abandoning the Kermadecs and going with the waka jumping bill are all down to leadership of the Greens
*Obviously I don’t know for certain but if someone could organise the downfall of the Greens to this extent without anyone finding out it’d be a miracle, as an example its generally agreed that Steven Joyce was behind the leaking of Winstons details yet that couldn’t be kept secret
“its generally agreed that Steven Joyce was behind the leaking of Winstons details “.
Really? Pray tell. Just how big was your sample of people who “generally agree” and what party did they support?
Personally, and I have had a number of Labour supporters agree, that it was a Green-supporting Public Servant in the department who was unhappy that Winston had attacked that Turei woman and was trying to retaliate.
I originally thought it might have been Winston himself.
We’ll never find out of course. Winston has dropped all his claims after all.
No, you’re reaching. Some soft support might not have been keen on Metiria’s stand but rail for the Orcs is long overdue. It’s true though that environmental progress is called for – river revival springs to mind.
“I’m not sure if dirty politics is at play and I think it would be super easy to have an undue influence and voting rights by members if a dirty organisation was inclined to wipe them out by becoming members on mass and voting in MP’s they know are polarising influences.”
Or, most Green Party members support the current direction of the party and the MPs.
I think it would be obvious to long time members if there had been a mass influx of new members who skewed the organisation. If you look at the GP Charter and documents, it’s pretty hard to hijack it. I would guess it was designed that way.
“Having newcomers being so high in the list and short on environmental credentials was very surprising.”
Not really. It was intentional and the members knew that. The party is very sensible to be bringing new people up through the ranks.
Not sure what you mean by short on environmental credentials. Have you looked at Shaw’s bio? If you mean that only people with backgrounds in specific environmental work should be MPs, then again, that’s not what the party or the membership wants.
@ Weka “Or, most Green Party members support the current direction of the party and the MPs”
the problem is voting wise…. the Green voting public don’t seem convinced about the Green Party’s direction enough to vote for them.
I have no problem with Shaw as I think he wants the best for the party and the country and can work with others and is genuinely nice guy with a decent amount of experience in the wider world. A plus in parliament.
I get the sense that the “Green” mojo is gone for some reason, and that’s because too many new people in the party who have their own reasons for getting there and the messages are all over the place. Also if they start sneering at the middle class who vote for them while actually being middle class themselves trying to pretend to be poor, the message is not a genuine one. That’s also why the social messages just don’t come across well.
Wanting more development for Auckland for example and blaming older folks for the housing crisis, does not sit with the environmental message of sustainability in the traditional sense.
If you haven’t worked it out, the working poor and beneficiaries don’t seem to be interested in enough numbers to vote for the Green Party consistently or even vote at all.
My guess is that it’s the more well heeled who can afford to vote Green and travel to a river or beach and afford organic produce that are their most loyal followers and they are probably older too, because they lived through Rogernomics and saw the effects, and that’s what makes them stick to the Greens. They probably own houses too, having bought them 30 years ago.
But there was little in the last campaign that was aimed in that direction and the age and experiences of the Greens MP’s maybe no longer reflect their main voters.
My guess is that it’s the more well heeled who can afford to vote Green and travel to a river or beach and afford organic produce that are their most loyal followers and they are probably older too, because they lived through Rogernomics and saw the effects, and that’s what makes them stick to the Greens. They probably own houses too, having bought them 30 years ago.
in the graph #1 = the average – below #1 = less likely; above = more likely.
So, compared with the general population GP voters are
more likely to work part time;
more likely to be in a household where someone is a member of a union;
50% above and below line where household income is lower than average; way more likely to be students;
less likely to be male; less likely to own house or flat;
less likely to be over 56yrs;
less likely than average to be 18-29yrs, (but still that is more likely than being over 56yrs);
Nats are way more likely to have household income above average; labour and NZ first are way more likely to have lower than average household income (but way more are over 56yrs);
Green voters are split between a bit higher and a bit lower than average incomes – so somewhere in between Nats and Lab-NZF.
GP voters are way more likely than the other 3 parties to have a uni education.
NZF voters are way more likely to be male. Nat voters are least likely to have been to uni.
Don’t really agree. People will move to (or away) from the Greens based on what’s happening on the inside. Outside influences like media noise are less important imo
I think that the Greens are at the lower end of their natural polling level. They’re well placed to get advances on environmental concerns and some social policy. With two leaders complementing each other they’ll get under steam pretty soon.
As you say, Shaw is solid. But the next coleader will probably be inspirational as well.
I’m not sure about some of the internal ructions, probably blow-over from the divisions highlighted when two caucus members decided to quit. But I’m sure they’ve had ructions before, like most parties.
NZ1 have more difficulty, but again they’ll be plugging their own regional development issues.
Pretty much. The Greens have had this sorted for a while. Shaw is the suit who is building all those bridges within mainstream society that are needed for change. He’s also inspirational in areas that are important (e.g. the members. People like Ad who appear to have an anti-progressive agenda probably don’t bother to listen to Shaw on his own terms and so find mansplaining the Greens a useful strategy).
Davidson would bring in the connections with other important parts of society – Māori, women, low income people, NGOs working the coal face etc.
And beside them both are the rest of the MPs and the party structure. Davidson wasn’t out there on her own with the launch. Those people are building long term structures that will serve NZ and the Greens well irrespective of reckons about the vote at the next election.
Weka, I had a quick look at the Green Party website but could not find anything that stated what happens if there is only one nomination.
As far as I am aware, there is only one to date, Marama Davidson, and nominations close on Friday. If only one, does that person automatically get the position, or does the nomination still go out for votes for or against?
Thanks – just curious so don’t go to any trouble. And no doubt it will be covered in media etc if there is only one nomination on Friday.
It just occurred to me in view of the Greens’ other voting etc procedures.
EDIT – I can actually see a lot of sense in the Co-Leader being none of the Green MPs with Ministerial etc responsibilities (or any of the newies) so from that perspective, Davidson’s being the only nomination would make good sense (but not my call as a non-Green member but still supportive,)
“If only one, does that person automatically get the position, or does the nomination still go out for votes for or against?”
Every candidate for every position in the green Party runs against Re-open Nominations. To be successful in the case of a single candidate the candidate must receive 75% of the vote. That is, the candidate (or candidates) is rejected if Re-open Nominations receives more than 25%.
While I think Davidson is worthy of respect, I don’t share your views about how popular she will be for the public. I’d say her views would be ‘very challenging’ to the Green voter and similar to what happened with Metiria and potentially plummet the Green vote.
My pick is Sage, because she’s the one who stands for conservation and can woo back the old supporters.
But if there’s only 1 nomination, that’s also a bad sign of disorganisation within the Greens not having enough choice of candidates.
Well they should be choosing a leader that will ensure the survival of the Green Party and an increased vote, so I think that thinking about the public appeal of co leader should be an essential factor, especially when Greens have had some very rocky polls!
Maori have gone back to Labour and the amount of work it would take and the conflict that would bring to fight it out, especially being coalition partners is making a major tactical error… the same errors again and again including trying to get the youth vote by having younger MP’s is part of the problem.
Bernie Sanders and Corbyn are old and white but get the youth and black vote. Youth are not attracted by identity politics.
So you think that Davidson as co-leader won’t help the survival of the party and that people won’t vote because of her? Nice reckon but not seeing much rationale. Afaik, the GP vote dropped last year because of Ardern’s rise, and because of the mess with the two rogue MPs (and probably because of the sustained attack on the GP).
“Bernie Sanders and Corbyn are old and white but get the youth and black vote. Youth are not attracted by identity politics.”
Are either of them in government? Both of those men support solidarity politics. We are not the US or the UK and have a different political landscape and political system.
Labour and the Greens don’t have to fight it out. Labour can get the centrist and swing voters, including NZF, and the Greens can get back their previous voters from Labour. Both can pick up some of the non-vote. It’s not rocket science, and it moves the Overton Window left. What you are suggesting will move the Greens to a more centrist position and cement NZ in centrist, neoliberal hell.
“If they insist on a co-leader, of the three there is a clear winner: Julie Anne Genter.”
“Genter, like James Shaw is likeable. I have called her my favourite Green. She didn’t like it for fear that my support tainted her prospects within the cloistered world of the tree hugger and snail lover.”
Again, Julie Anne is respected for her transport ideas but I very much doubt she has popular appeal with New Zealander’s. Can anyone think of anything apart from transport that Julie Anne represents? I can’t.
I very much doubt she has popular appeal with New Zealander’s.
I think Julie-Anne Genter would be very popular with NZers for similar reasons to Jacinda Ardern. She is highly intelligent, outgoing and empathetic to a cross-section of NZers.
I have no quarrel with Marama Davidson, but Julie-Anne has more national (with a small ‘n’) political experience so maybe she should be given the co-leader mantle first and see how she goes.
How can tree huggers and snail lovers be considered “cloistered”? Surely their love for the natural world must come from being in the …natural world!
Cloistered? Pffffffft!!
The Greens take representation seriously – hence the male and female co-leadership. If they didn’t choose Marama they’d have a conspicuous lack of Maori representation, especially since she didn’t get a cabinet role. Personally I think she’s an asset, the party’s appeal would be so much narrower without her.
“They’re well placed to get advances on environmental concerns and some social policy”
Talk about stating the obvious.
Most know they are well placed to get advances on environmental concerns and some social policy, but still, they’ve gone downwards. Hence, it’s not going to be enough to appease the left within like me.
A pair of aviator shades and a chest resplendent – All Hail Grand Marshal Baby Fingers!.
(like Bastille day, really?)
President Trump’s vision of soldiers marching and tanks rolling down the boulevards of Washington is moving closer to reality in the Pentagon and White House, where officials say they have begun to plan a grand military parade later this year showcasing the might of America’s armed forces.
[…]
The inspiration for Trump’s push is last year’s Bastille Day celebration in Paris, which the president attended as a guest of French President Emmanuel Macron. Trump was awestruck by the tableau of uniformed French troops marching down Avenue des Champs-Elysees with military tanks, armored vehicles, gun trucks and carriers — complete with fighter jets flying over the Arc de Triomphe and painting the sky with streaks of blue, white and red smoke for the colors of the French flag.
Aboard Air Force One en route home from Paris last July, aides said Trump told them he was dazzled by the French display and said he wanted one at home.
FFS! Has the man no shame…
His endless greed is astounding.
Trump has reportedly said he hopes the display would run along Pennsylvania Avenue and pass by Trump International Hotel.
Viewing for the parade from the Hotel would of course be megabucks – but what a happy happenstance!
With such a weak Constitution, and having to rely on Congress to rein in a President who chooses to enrich himself at the expense of the public purse – isn’t it about time the US had a law about this sort of behaviour?
“Kiwis will have to pay GST on internet shopping purchases they make from overseas, Revenue Minister Stuart Nash has confirmed.” , ‘Absolutely the right thing to do” November 15 2017
Poor Stuart, he should listen more carefully to the nuances of Robertsons statements..
“Finance Minister Grant Robertson did not say whether the tax change was definitely a “happening thing” when asked later on Wednesday, indicating instead that it was still something that was being “investigated”, but agreed it had long been Labour policy.
My theory is that they are quietly honouring their statement that ‘no new taxes will be introduced before 2020’. The seeming postponement of the tourist tax is an example, possibly.
A very honourable thing to do (which was totally beyond the last government of course) even though they also said urgency is required in some areas.
If true, I’m not sure why they don’t just say it and put the accusations of u-turning to bed.
Bob Jones’ racism is too much for even the NBR this time. Says Maori wouldn’t exist without the British and they should be made to serve “us” (white people) on one day a year out of gratitude.
This attitude of course reflects the thoughts of Don Brash, we know that, but also the idea of Bill English’s that te reo Maori is “someone else’s language”.
Far from pretending to advocate for one New Zealand these destructive fossils are intent on division.
The anti Waka jumping brigades are status quo con artists.
Unless elected as an independent, the mps are voted for as a party by the public in one way or another.
Part of that should involve the mps striving to make their party structures and organisations as accountable as possible to what they were voted for ( which admittedly these days can be often rather vague but all the same ). This should be part of the mps’ job description to their constituencies, creating transparency within their parties working for the voting public so the constituencies get as much bang as their buck as possible for what was said they were voting for.
When these type of issues are blatantly betrayed by a party, then mps can resign, from their position and or the party. This is not the same as mps trying to set the agenda in internal power plays, as was the case with the recent spat of internal green party mps going into the election. No, it is due diligence after the fact, independent to what the party policy platform is and how it was formed.
Now that this doesn’t happen so much, is more about the conceit about the political process to start with than it is about the democratic principles about the ‘waka jumping bill’ to end with.
In my view, New Zealand society has just endured the most extremist & looting banana republic global communistic govt term in it’s history. This did not come about, nor exist, in a vacuum. Some realism about the place of the current coalition alternative govt is often missing, in being separate from complaints about things like the further directions and outcomes involved in the next step of free-trade’s global cartel monopolism in the guise of the TPP.
While elections are spectator sports, a significant component to what constitutes good governance in a public’s interest, often is not when it comes to the specifics of gears and lever operation. What the govt is doing, yes.
And what the govt was doing was saying they did not essentially feel good about the initial agreement. How a govt is doing this, is more a case of gears and lever operation, and that is to some level, related to the power wattage of the machinery it has the operation of to do so, and that is not the spectator sport part of the process. These two things may overlap in a continuum but they are not the same.
Fed. Farmers” “head of animal welfare” claims, unconvincingly: “Our role is to show leadership and to educate our members” The Panel, RNZ National, Wednesday 7 February 2018
Jim Mora, Penny Ashton, Patrick Morgan, Caitlin Cherry
First item after the 4 o’clock news is the vibe around this exciting new prime minister, and the excellent showing she made at Waitangi. “By any measure,” said host Jim Mora, “Jacinda Ardern’s trip north went well.” The panelists agree that Jacinda Ardern and her government are in for a lot more positive coverage in future, and the prospects for the Nasty Party seem dim. Then Penny Ashton comes up with one of the best lines of the year so far….
PENNY ASHTON: What is National going to do to counter her? I hear talk of Simon Bridges being in line for the leadership. I hope he does become leader, because he has all the charm of a school bully.
Mora does not greet this apposite and humorous quip with one of his trademark guffaws. Nor does he mutter his habitual, insincere “That’s very funny!” Instead he falls into an icy silence, as he does whenever someone makes a remark even slightly critical of the National Party.
After that awkward moment it was time to interview the first guest of the afternoon, billed as the “head of animal welfare” for Federated Farmers. His name is Chris Lewis and he apparently owns a farm “in the Waikato.” Mora insisted, at least three times, that Lewis is “one of the good farmers”. Maybe he is, but he didn’t seem to know much about the topic he was brought on to talk about: the suffering of dairy cows in the sun, with no trees to shelter under. Chris Lewis seemed to have no idea about anything. It was one of the most embarrassing performances in the history of The Panel—and that, as any long-time listener will attest, is very embarrassing indeed.
JIM MORA: Yeah, but are shelter belts being removed for the ease of installing centre-pivots?
CHRIS LEWIS: Ahhh, I don’t farm in Canterbury and I haven’t been there much lately. …. Our role is to show leadership and to educate our members….. But we need your listeners to tell us what are the best trees to plant…. [more confused blathering then, mercifully, he stops.]
….STUNNED SILENCE….
PENNY ASHTON: I would have thought he’d be the expert on such things. MORA: No, he’s— PENNY ASHTON: He’s the head of animal welfare for Federated Farmers. MORA: No, he’s looking for arboreal advice. PENNY ASHTON:[clearly unimpressed] Hmmmmmm….
Later, near the end of the program, Penny Ashton manages to run afoul of Jim Mora’s highly selective moral code again….
PENNY ASHTON: He’s a disgusting piece of human garbage, Piers Morgan. MORA: We don’t need to go into that….
New Zealand is again having to reconcile conflicting pressures from its military and its trade interests. Should we join Pillar Two of AUKUS and risk compromising our markets in China? For a century after New Zealand was founded in 1840, its external security arrangements and external economics arrangements were aligned. ...
The ‘50 Shades of Green’ farmers’ protest in 2019 was heavy on climate change denial, but five years on, scepticism and criticism about the idea that pine forests can save us is growing across the board. File photo: Lynn GrievesonTL;DR: Here’s the top six news items of note in climate ...
This morning the sky was bright.The birds, in their usual joyous bliss. Nature doesn’t seem to feel the heat of what might angst humans.Their calls are clear and beautiful.Just some random thoughts:MāoriPaul Goldsmith has announced his government will roll back the judiciary’s rulings on Māori Customary Marine Title, which recognises ...
In 2003, the Court of Appeal delivered its decision in Ngati Apa v Attorney-General, ruling that Māori customary title over the foreshore and seabed had not been universally extinguished, and that the Māori Land Court could determine claims and confirm title if the facts supported it. This kicked off the ...
Earlier this week at Parliament, Labour leader Chris Hipkins was applauded for saying that the response to the final report of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in Care had to be “bigger than politics.” True, but the fine words, apologies and “we hear you” messages will soon ring ...
TL;DR: In news breaking this morning:The Ministry of Education is cutting $2 billion from its school building programme so the National-ACT-NZ First Coalition Government has enough money to deliver tax cuts; The Government has quietly lowered its child poverty reduction targets to make them easier to achieve;Te Whatu Ora-Health NZ’s ...
Kia ora. These are some stories that caught our eye this week – as always, feel free to share yours in the comments. Our header image this week (via Eke Panuku) shows the planned upgrade for the Karanga Plaza Tidal Swimming Steps. The week in Greater Auckland On ...
1. What's not to love about the way the Harris campaign is turning things around?a. Nothingb. Love all of itc. God what a reliefd. Not that it will be by any means easye. All of the above 2. Documents released by the Ministry of Health show Associate Health Minister Casey ...
Trust in me in all you doHave the faith I have in youLove will see us through, if only you trust in meWhy don't you, you trust me?In a week that saw the release of the 3,000 page Abuse in Care report Christopher Luxon was being asked about Boot Camps. ...
TL;DR: The podcast above of the weekly ‘hoon’ webinar for paying subscribers last night features co-hosts and talking about the Royal Commission Inquiry into Abuse in Carereport released this week, and with:The Kākā’s climate correspondent on a UN push to not recognise carbon offset markets and ...
TL;DR: As of 6:00 am on Friday, July 26, the top six announcements, speeches, reports and research around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day are:Transport: Simeon Brown announced$802.9 million in funding for 18 new trains on the Wairarapa and Manawatū rail lines, which ...
The northern expressway extension from Warkworth to Whangarei is likely to require radical changes to legislation if it is going to be built within the foreseeable future. The Government’s powers to purchase land, the planning process and current restrictions on road tolling are all going to need to be changed ...
Text within this block will maintain its original spacing when publishedFirst they came for the doctors But I was confused by the numbers and costs So I didn't speak up Then they came for our police and nurses And I didn't think we could afford those costs anyway So I ...
Photo by Joshua J. Cotten on UnsplashWe’re back again after our mid-winter break. We’re still with the ‘new’ day of the week (Thursday rather than Friday) when we have our ‘hoon’ webinar with paying subscribers to The Kākā for an hour at 5 pm.Jump on this link on YouTube Livestream ...
Notes: This is a free article. Abuse in Care themes are mentioned. Video is at the bottom.BackgroundYesterday’s report into Abuse in Care revealed that at least 1 in 3 of all who went through state and faith based care were abused - often horrifically. At least, because not all survivors ...
Luxon speaks in Parliament yesterday about the Abuse in Care report. Photo: Hagen Hopkins/Getty ImagesTL;DR: The top six things I’ve noted around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy today are:PM Christopher Luxon said yesterday in tabling the Abuse in Carereport in Parliament he wanted to ‘do the ...
About a decade ago I worked with a bloke called Steve. He was the grizzled veteran coder, a few years older than me, who knew where the bodies were buried - code wise. Despite his best efforts to be approachable and friendly he could be kind of gruff, through to ...
Some of the recent announcements from the government have reminded us of posts we’ve written in the past. Here’s one from early 2020. There were plenty of reactions to the government’s infrastructure announcement a few weeks ago which saw them fund a bunch of big roading projects. One of ...
TL;DR: My pick of the top six links elsewhere around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day or so to 7:00 am on Thursday, July 25 are:News: Why Electric Kiwi is closing to new customers - and why it matters RNZ’s Susan EdmundsScoop: Government drops ...
Hi,I felt a small wet tongue snaking through one of the holes in my Crocs. It explored my big toe, darting down one side, then the other. “He’s looking for some toe cheese,” said the woman next to me, words that still haunt me to this day.Growing up in New ...
Yesterday I happily quoted the Prime Minister without fact-checking him and sure enough, it turns out his numbers were all to hell. It’s not four kg of Royal Commission report, it’s fourteen.My friend and one-time colleague-in-comms Hazel Phillips gently alerted me to my error almost as soon as I’d hit ...
TL;DR: As of 6:00 am on Thursday, July 25, the top six announcements, speeches, reports and research around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day were:The Abuse in Care Royal Commission of Inquirypublished its final report yesterday.PM Christopher Luxon and The Minister responsible for ...
The Official Information Act has always been a battle between requesters seeking information, and governments seeking to control it. Information is power, so Ministers and government agencies want to manage what is released and when, for their own convenience, and legality and democracy be damned. Their most recent tactic for ...
TL;DR: The top six things I’ve noted around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy today are:Transport and Energy Minister Simeon Brown is accelerating plans to spend at least $10 billion through Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) to extend State Highway One as a four-lane ‘Expressway’ from Warkworth to Whangarei ...
I live my life (woo-ooh-ooh)With no control in my destinyYea-yeah, yea-yeah (woo-ooh-ooh)I can bleed when I want to bleedSo come on, come on (woo-ooh-ooh)You can bleed when you want to bleedYea-yeah, come on (woo-ooh-ooh)Everybody bleed when they want to bleedCome on and bleedGovernments face tough challenges. Selling unpopular decisions to ...
Please note:To skip directly to the- parliamentary footage in the video, scroll to 1:21 To skip to audio please click on the headphone iconon the left hand side of the screenThis video / audio section is under development. ...
Given the crackdown on wasteful government spending, it behooves me to point to a high profile example of spending by the Luxon government that looks like a big, fat waste of time and money. I’m talking about the deployment of NZDF personnel to support the US-led coalition in the Red ...
TL;DR: My pick of the top six links elsewhere around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day or so to 7:40 am on Wednesday, July 24 are:Deep Dive: Chipping away at the housing crisis, including my comments RNZ/Newsroom’s The DetailNews: Government softens on asset sales, ...
As I reported about the city centre, Auckland’s rail network is also going through a difficult and disruptive period which is rapidly approaching a culmination, this will result in a significant upgrade to the whole network. Hallelujah. Also like the city centre this is an upgrade predicated on the City ...
Today, a 4 kilogram report will be delivered to Parliament. We know this is what the report of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in State and Faith-based Care weighs, because our Prime Minister told us so.Some reporter had blindsided him by asking a question about something done by ...
TL;DR: As of 7:00 am on Wednesday, July 24, the top six announcements, speeches, reports and research around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day are:Beehive:Transport Minister Simeon Brownannounced plans to use PPPs to fund, build and run a four-lane expressway between Auckland ...
NewstalkZB host Mike Hosking, who can usually be relied on to give Prime Minister Christopher Luxon an easy run, did not do so yesterday when he interviewed him about the HealthNZ deficit. Luxon is trying to use a deficit reported last year by HealthNZ as yet another example of the ...
Back in January a StatsNZ employee gave a speech at Rātana on behalf of tangata whenua in which he insulted and criticised the government. The speech clearly violated the principle of a neutral public service, and StatsNZ started an investigation. Part of that was getting an external consultant to examine ...
Renting for life: Shared ownership initiatives are unlikely to slow the slide in home ownership by much. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The top six things I’ve noted around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy today are:A Deloittereport for Westpac has projected Aotearoa’s home-ownership rate will ...
You're broken down and tiredOf living life on a merry go roundAnd you can't find the fighterBut I see it in you so we gonna walk it outAnd move mountainsWe gonna walk it outAnd move mountainsAnd I'll rise upI'll rise like the dayI'll rise upI'll rise unafraidI'll rise upAnd I'll ...
There’s been a change in Myers Park. Down the steps from St. Kevin’s Arcade, past the grassy slopes, the children’s playground, the benches and that goat statue, there has been a transformation. The underpass for Mayoral Drive has gone from a barren, grey, concrete tunnel, to a place that thrums ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections Global society may have finally slammed on the brakes for climate-warming pollution released by human fossil fuel combustion. According to the Carbon Monitor Project, the total global climate pollution released between February and May 2024 declined slightly from the amount released during the same ...
TL;DR: My pick of the top six links elsewhere around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day or so to 7:00 am on Tuesday, July 23 are:Deep Dive: Penlink: where tolling rhetoric meets reality BusinessDesk-$$$’sOliver LewisScoop:Te Pūkenga plans for regional polytechs leak out ...
TL;DR: As of 6:00 am on Tuesday, July 23, the top six announcements, speeches, reports and research around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day are:Health: Shane Reti announcedthe Board of Te Whatu Ora-Health New Zealand was being replaced with Commissioner Lester Levy ...
Health NZ warned the Government at the end of March that it was running over Budget. But the reasons it gave were very different to those offered by the Prime Minister yesterday. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon blamed the “botched merger” of the 20 District Health Boards (DHBs) to create Health ...
Long ReadKey Summary: Although National increased the health budget by $1.4 billion in May, they used an old funding model to project health system costs, and never bothered to update their pre-election numbers. They were told during the Health Select Committees earlier in the year their budget amount was deficient, ...
As a momentous, historic weekend in US politics unfolded, analysts and commentators grasped for precedents and comparisons to help explain the significance and power of the choice Joe Biden had made. The 46th president had swept the Democratic party’s primaries but just over 100 days from the election had chosen ...
TL;DR: I’m casting around for new ideas and ways of thinking about Aotearoa’s political economy to find a few solutions to our cascading and self-reinforcing housing, poverty and climate crises.Associate Professor runs an online masters degree in the economics of sustainability at Torrens University in Australia and is organising ...
The Finance and Expenditure Committee has reported back on National's Local Government (Water Services Preliminary Arrangements) Bill. The bill sets up water for privatisation, and was introduced under urgency, then rammed through select committee with no time even for local councils to make a proper submission. Naturally, national's select committee ...
Some years ago, I bought a book at Dunedin’s Regent Booksale for $1.50. As one does. Vandrad the Viking (1898), by J. Storer Clouston, is an obscure book these days – I cannot find a proper online review – but soon it was sitting on my shelf, gathering dust alongside ...
History is not on the side of the centre-left, when Democratic presidents fall behind in the polls and choose not to run for re-election. On both previous occasions in the past 75 years (Harry Truman in 1952, Lyndon Johnson in 1968) the Democrats proceeded to then lose the White House ...
This is a free articleCoverageThis morning, US President Joe Biden announced his withdrawal from the Presidential race. And that is genuinely newsworthy. Thanks for your service, President Biden, and all the best to you and yours.However, the media in New Zealand, particularly the 1News nightly bulletin, has been breathlessly covering ...
A homeless person’s camp beside a blocked-off slipped damage walkway in Freeman’s Bay: we are chasing our tail on our worsening and inter-related housing, poverty and climate crises. Photo: Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The top six things I’ve noted around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy ...
What has happened to it all?Crazy, some'd sayWhere is the life that I recognise?(Gone away)But I won't cry for yesterdayThere's an ordinary worldSomehow I have to findAnd as I try to make my wayTo the ordinary worldYesterday morning began as many others - what to write about today? I began ...
TL;DR: My pick of the top six links elsewhere around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day or so to 7:00 am on Monday, July 22 are:Today’s Must Read: Father and son live in a tent, and have done for four years, in a million ...
TL;DR: As of 7:00 am on Monday, July 22, the top six announcements, speeches, reports and research around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day are:US President Joe Biden announced via X this morning he would not stand for a second term.Multinational professional services firm ...
A listing of 32 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, July 14, 2024 thru Sat, July 20, 2024. Story of the week As reflected by preponderance of coverage, our Story of the Week is Project 2025. Until now traveling ...
This weekend, a friend pointed out someone who said they’d like to read my posts, but didn’t want to pay. And my first reaction was sympathy.I’ve already told folks that if they can’t comfortably subscribe, and would like to read, I’d be happy to offer free subscriptions. I don’t want ...
National: The Party of ‘Law and Order’ IntroductionThis weekend, the Government formally kicked off one of their flagship policy programs: a military style boot camp that New Zealand has experimented with over the past 50 years. Cartoon credit: Guy BodyIt’s very popular with the National Party’s Law and Orderimage, ...
Day one of the solo leg of my long journey home begins with my favourite sound: footfalls in an empty street. 5.00 am and it’s already light and already too warm, almost.If I can make the train that leaves Budapest later this hour I could be in Belgrade by nightfall; ...
Do you remember Y2K, the threat that hung over humanity in the closing days of the twentieth century? Horror scenarios of planes falling from the sky, electronic payments failing and ATMs refusing to dispense cash. As for your VCR following instructions and recording your favourite show - forget about it.All ...
Climate Change Minister Simon Watts being questioned by The Kākā’s Bernard Hickey.TL;DR: My top six things to note around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the week to July 20 were:1. A strategy that fails Zero Carbon Act & Paris targetsThe National-ACT-NZ First Coalition Government finally unveiled ...
Summary:As New Zealand loses at least 12 leaders in the public service space of health, climate, and pharmaceuticals, this month alone, directly in response to the Government’s policies and budget choices, what lies ahead may be darker than it appears. Tui examines some of those departures and draws a long ...
The Minister of Housing’s ambition is to reduce markedly the ratio of house prices to household incomes. If his strategy works it would transform the housing market, dramatically changing the prospects of housing as an investment.Leaving aside the Minister’s metaphor of ‘flooding the market’ I do not see how the ...
As previously noted, my historical fantasy piece, set in the fifth-century Mediterranean, was accepted for a Pirate Horror anthology, only for the anthology to later fall through. But in a good bit of news, it turned out that the story could indeed be re-marketed as sword and sorcery. As of ...
An employee of tobacco company Philip Morris International demonstrates a heated tobacco device. Photo: Getty ImagesTL;DR: The top six things I’ve noted around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy on Friday, July 19 are:At a time when the Coalition Government is cutting spending on health, infrastructure, education, housing ...
TL;DR: My pick of the top six links elsewhere around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day or so to 8:30 am on Friday, July 19 are:Scoop: NZ First Minister Casey Costello orders 50% cut to excise tax on heated tobacco products. The minister has ...
Kia ora, it’s time for another Friday roundup, in which we pull together some of the links and stories that caught our eye this week. Feel free to add more in the comments! Our header image this week shows a foggy day in Auckland town, captured by Patrick Reynolds. ...
TL;DR : Here’s the top six items climate news for Aotearoa this week, as selected by Bernard Hickey and The Kākā’s climate correspondent Cathrine Dyer. A discussion recorded yesterday is in the video above and the audio of that sent onto the podcast feed.The Government released its draft Emissions Reduction ...
Save some money, get rich and old, bring it back to Tobacco Road.Bring that dynamite and a crane, blow it up, start all over again.Roll up. Roll up. Or tailor made, if you prefer...Whether you’re selling ciggies, digging for gold, catching dolphins in your nets, or encouraging folks to flutter ...
Waiting In The Wings:For truly, if Trump is America’s un-assassinated Caesar, then J.D. Vance is America’s Octavian, the Republic’s youthful undertaker – and its first Emperor.DONALD TRUMP’S SELECTION of James D. Vance as his running-mate bodes ill for the American republic. A fervent supporter of Viktor Orban, the “illiberal” prime ...
TL;DR: As of 6:00 am on Friday, July 19, the top six announcements, speeches, reports and research around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day are:The PSAannounced the Employment Relations Authority (ERA) had ruled in the PSA’s favour in its case against the Ministry ...
TL;DR: The podcast above of the weekly ‘hoon’ webinar for paying subscribers last night features co-hosts and talking with:The Kākā’s climate correspondent talking about the National-ACT-NZ First Government’s release of its first Emissions Reduction Plan;University of Otago Foreign Relations Professor and special guest Dr Karin von ...
Open access notablesImproving global temperature datasets to better account for non-uniform warming, Calvert, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society:To better account for spatial non-uniform trends in warming, a new GITD [global instrumental temperature dataset] was created that used maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) to combine the land surface ...
A late change to charter school legislation will cheat educators out of fair pay and negotiating power proving charter schools are just a vehicle to make profit out of our education system. ...
In 2004 te iwi Māori rallied against the Crown’s attempt to confiscate our coastlines and moana with the Foreshore and Seabed Act. This led to the largest hīkoi of a generation and the birth of Te Pāti Māori. 20 years later, history is repeating itself. Today the government has announced ...
It has been five and a half years since the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in Care was established to investigate the abuse of children, young people, and vulnerable adults within state and faith-based institutions. Yesterday, the final report - Whanaketia through pain and trauma, from darkness to light ...
The Green Party is calling on the Government to take action off the back of the International Court of Justice ruling on Israel’s illegal occupation of Palestine. ...
On Friday the International Court of Justice reaffirmed what Palestinian’s have been telling us for decades: that the occupation and colonisation of Palestinian lands by Israel is illegal and must end immediately. They also called for reparations for Palestinian’s who have lived under Israeli occupation since it began in 1967. ...
Labour calls on the Government to act after the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled that Israel’s occupation of Palestinian Territories is illegal. ...
The 53.7 percent rise in benefit sanctions over the last year is more proof of this Government’s disdain for our communities most in need of support. ...
Aotearoa could be a country where every child grows up feeling safe, loved and with a sense of belonging in their whānau and community. But for some of our children, this is far from reality. Instead, they are trapped in a maze of intergenerational harm that they can’t escape on ...
Te Pāti Māori are calling for David Seymour to resign as Associate Health Minister in response to his call for Pharmac to ignore the Treaty of Waitangi. “This announcement is just another example of the government’s anti-Tiriti, anti-Māori agenda.” Said Co-leader and spokesperson for health, Debbie Ngarewa-Packer. “Seymour thinks it ...
The soaring price of renting is driving the rise of inflation in this country - with latest figures from Stats NZ showing rents are up 4.8 per cent on average while annual inflation is at 3.3 per cent. ...
National’s Emissions Reduction Plan will take New Zealand further from the economy we need to ensure the next generation has a stable climate and secure livelihoods. ...
Following consultation with named parties and thorough consideration of privacy interests, the Green Party is in a position to release the Executive Summary of the final report from the independent investigation into Darleen Tana. ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon should be asking serious questions of his Minister for Resources Shane Jones now it’s been revealed he misled the public about a dinner with mining companies that he didn’t declare and said wasn’t pre-arranged. ...
Te Pāti Māori have submitted to the Justice Select Committee against the Sentencing (Reinstating Three Strikes) Amendment Bill. The bill will further entrench racism in our justice system and fails to focus on rehabilitation. “Reinstating Three Strikes will empower a systematically racist system and exacerbate the overrepresentation of Māori in ...
The Transport and Infrastructure Committee is set to make a determination on the Residential Tenancies Amendment (RTA) Bill in the coming weeks. “This legislation will give landlords the power to kick our whānau out onto the street for no reason” said Housing spokesperson, Mariameno Kapa-Kingi. “Their solution to the housing ...
“National’s campaign was about tackling crime and the best they can do is a two-year long Ministerial Advisory Group,” Labour justice spokesperson Duncan Webb said. ...
“There are more examples of charter schools failing their students than there are success stories. The coalition Government is driving to dismantle our public school system and instead promote a privatised, competitive structure that puts profits before kids,” Jan Tinetti said. ...
“This government is choosing to deliberately mislead and withhold information, keeping our people in the dark about this government’s agenda and the future of our mokopuna,” said co-leader and spokesperson for Health, Debbie Ngarewa-Packer. The call comes after the demand from the Chief Ombudsman that Associate Minister of Health, Casey ...
“Today’s climate announcement by Simon Watts makes clear the National Government is simply paying lip service to meeting its climate change targets,” Megan Woods said. ...
National is choosing to make life harder for workers by taking away the rights our communities have fought hard for. Here's how they’re taking workers backwards. ...
Australia, Canada and New Zealand today issued the following statement on the need for an urgent ceasefire in Gaza and the risk of expanded conflict between Hizballah and Israel. The situation in Gaza is catastrophic. The human suffering is unacceptable. It cannot continue. We remain unequivocal in our condemnation of ...
Attorney-General Judith Collins today reminded all State and faith-based institutions of their legal obligation to preserve records relevant to the safety and wellbeing of those in its care. “The Abuse in Care Inquiry’s report has found cases where records of the most vulnerable people in State and faith‑based institutions were ...
Minister of Internal Affairs Brooke van Velden says the Government’s online safety website for children and young people has reached one million page views. “It is great to see so many young people and their families accessing the site Keep It Real Online to learn how to stay safe online, and manage ...
Tēnā tātou katoa, Ngā mihi te rangi, ngā mihi te whenua, ngā mihi ki a koutou, kia ora mai koutou. Thank you for the opportunity to be here and the invitation to speak at this 50th anniversary conference. I acknowledge all those who have gone before us and paved the ...
New Zealand’s payroll providers have successfully prepared to ensure 3.5 million individuals will, from Wednesday next week, be able to keep more of what they earn each pay, says Finance Minister Nicola Willis and Revenue Minister Simon Watts. “The Government's tax policy changes are legally effective from Wednesday. Delivering this tax ...
An experimental vineyard which will help futureproof the wine sector has been opened in Blenheim by Associate Regional Development Minister Mark Patterson. The covered vineyard, based at the New Zealand Wine Centre – Te Pokapū Wāina o Aotearoa, enables controlled environmental conditions. “The research that will be produced at the Experimental ...
The Coalition Government has confirmed the indicative regional breakdown of North Island Weather Event (NIWE) funding for state highway recovery projects funded through Budget 2024, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “Regions in the North Island suffered extensive and devastating damage from Cyclone Gabrielle and the 2023 Auckland Anniversary Floods, and ...
Indonesia’s Foreign Minister, Retno Marsudi, will visit New Zealand next week, Foreign Minister Winston Peters has announced. “Indonesia is important to New Zealand’s security and economic interests and is our closest South East Asian neighbour,” says Mr Peters, who is currently in Laos to engage with South East Asian partners. ...
He aha te kai a te rangatira? He kōrero, he kōrero, he kōrero. The government has reaffirmed its commitment to supporting the aspirations of Ngāti Maniapoto, Minister for Māori Development Tama Potaka says. “My thanks to Te Nehenehenui Trust – Ngāti Maniapoto for bringing their important kōrero to a ministerial ...
Transport Minister Simeon Brown has thanked outgoing Chair of the Civil Aviation Authority, Janice Fredric, for her service to the board.“I have received Ms Fredric’s resignation from the role of Chair of the Civil Aviation Authority,” Mr Brown says.“On behalf of the Government, I want to thank Ms Fredric for ...
The Government is proposing legislation to overturn a Court of Appeal decision and amend the Marine and Coastal Area Act in order to restore Parliament’s test for Customary Marine Title, Treaty Negotiations Minister Paul Goldsmith says. “Section 58 required an applicant group to prove they have exclusively used and occupied ...
Regulation Minister David Seymour says that opposition parties have united in bad faith, opposing what they claim are ‘dangerous changes’ to the Early Childhood Education sector, despite no changes even being proposed yet. “Issues with affordability and availability of early childhood education, and the complexity of its regulation, has led ...
After receiving more than 740 submissions in the first 20 days, Regulation Minister David Seymour is asking the Ministry for Regulation to extend engagement on the early childhood education regulation review by an extra two weeks. “The level of interest has been very high, and from the conversations I’ve been ...
The Coalition Government is investing $802.9 million into the Wairarapa and Manawatū rail lines as part of a funding agreement with the NZ Transport Agency (NZTA), KiwiRail, and the Greater Wellington and Horizons Regional Councils to deliver more reliable services for commuters in the lower North Island, Transport Minister Simeon ...
Local Government Minister Simeon Brown has announced his intention to appoint a Crown Manager to both Hawke’s Bay Regional and Wairoa District Councils to speed up the delivery of flood protection work in Wairoa."Recent severe weather events in Wairoa this year, combined with damage from Cyclone Gabrielle in 2023 have ...
Mr Speaker, this is a day that many New Zealanders who were abused in State care never thought would come. It’s the day that this Parliament accepts, with deep sorrow and regret, the Report of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in Care. At the heart of this report are the ...
For the first time, the Government is formally acknowledging some children and young people at Lake Alice Psychiatric Hospital experienced torture. The final report of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in State and Faith-based Care “Whanaketia – through pain and trauma, from darkness to light,” was tabled in Parliament ...
The Government has acknowledged the nearly 2,400 courageous survivors who shared their experiences during the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Historical Abuse in State and Faith-Based Care. The final report from the largest and most complex public inquiry ever held in New Zealand, the Royal Commission Inquiry “Whanaketia – through ...
With a week to go before hard-working New Zealanders see personal income tax relief for the first time in fourteen years, 513,000 people have used the Budget tax calculator to see how much they will benefit, says Finance Minister Nicola Willis. “Tax relief is long overdue. From next Wednesday, personal income ...
Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden says a bill that has passed its first reading will improve parental leave settings and give non-biological parents more flexibility as primary carer for their child. The Regulatory Systems Amendment Bill (No3), passed its first reading this morning. “It includes a change ...
Two Bills designed to improve regulation and make it easier to do business have passed their first reading in Parliament, says Economic Development Minister Melissa Lee. The Regulatory Systems (Economic Development) Amendment Bill and Regulatory Systems (Immigration and Workforce) Amendment Bill make key changes to legislation administered by the Ministry ...
New legislation paves the way for greater competition in sectors such as banking and electricity, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly says. “Competitive markets boost productivity, create employment opportunities and lift living standards. To support competition, we need good quality regulation but, unfortunately, a recent OECD report ranked New ...
Minister of Internal Affairs Brooke van Velden says lotteries for charitable purposes, such as those run by the Heart Foundation, Coastguard NZ, and local hospices, will soon be allowed to operate online permanently. “Under current laws, these fundraising lotteries are only allowed to operate online until October 2024, after which ...
The Coalition Government is accelerating work on the new four-lane expressway between Auckland and Whangārei as part of its Roads of National Significance programme, with an accelerated delivery model to deliver this project faster and more efficiently, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “For too long, the lack of resilient transport connections ...
Sir Don McKinnon will travel to Viet Nam this week as a Special Envoy of the Government, Foreign Minister Winston Peters has announced. “It is important that the Government give due recognition to the significant contributions that General Secretary Nguyen Phu Trong made to New Zealand-Viet Nam relations,” Mr ...
Minister of Internal Affairs Brooke van Velden says newly appointed Commissioner, Grant Illingworth KC, will help deliver the report for the first phase of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into COVID-19 Lessons, due on 28 November 2024. “I am pleased to announce that Mr Illingworth will commence his appointment as ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters travels to Laos this week to participate in a series of Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)-led Ministerial meetings in Vientiane. “ASEAN plays an important role in supporting a peaceful, stable and prosperous Indo-Pacific,” Mr Peters says. “This will be our third visit to ...
Construction of a new mental health facility at Te Nikau Grey Hospital in Greymouth is today one step closer, Mental Health Minister Matt Doocey says. “This $27 million facility shows this Government is delivering on its promise to boost mental health care and improve front line services,” Mr Doocey says. ...
New Zealand is committing nearly $50 million to a package supporting sustainable Pacific fisheries development over the next four years, Foreign Minister Winston Peters and Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones announced today. “This support consisting of a range of initiatives demonstrates New Zealand’s commitment to assisting our Pacific partners ...
Associate Education Minister David Seymour says proposed changes to the Education and Training Amendment Bill will ensure charter schools have more flexibility to negotiate employment agreements and are equipped with the right teaching resources. “Cabinet has agreed to progress an amendment which means unions will not be able to initiate ...
In response to serious concerns around oversight, overspend and a significant deterioration in financial outlook, the Board of Health New Zealand will be replaced with a Commissioner, Health Minister Dr Shane Reti announced today. “The previous government’s botched health reforms have created significant financial challenges at Health NZ that, without ...
Minister for Space and Science, Innovation and Technology Judith Collins will travel to Adelaide tomorrow for space and science engagements, including speaking at the Australian Space Forum. While there she will also have meetings and visits with a focus on space, biotechnology and innovation. “New Zealand has a thriving space ...
Climate Change Minister Simon Watts will travel to China on Saturday to attend the Ministerial on Climate Action meeting held in Wuhan. “Attending the Ministerial on Climate Action is an opportunity to advocate for New Zealand climate priorities and engage with our key partners on climate action,” Mr Watts says. ...
Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones is travelling to the Solomon Islands tomorrow for meetings with his counterparts from around the Pacific supporting collective management of the region’s fisheries. The 23rd Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Committee and the 5th Regional Fisheries Ministers’ Meeting in Honiara from 23 to 26 July ...
The Government today launched the Military Style Academy Pilot at Te Au rere a te Tonga Youth Justice residence in Palmerston North, an important part of the Government’s plan to crackdown on youth crime and getting youth offenders back on track, Minister for Children, Karen Chhour said today. “On the ...
The Government has welcomed news the NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) has begun work to replace nine priority bridges across the country to ensure our state highway network remains resilient, reliable, and efficient for road users, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says.“Increasing productivity and economic growth is a key priority for the ...
Acting Prime Minister David Seymour has been in contact throughout the evening with senior officials who have coordinated a whole of government response to the global IT outage and can provide an update. The Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet has designated the National Emergency Management Agency as the ...
New Zealand and Japan will continue to step up their shared engagement with the Pacific, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says. “New Zealand and Japan have a strong, shared interest in a free, open and stable Pacific Islands region,” Mr Peters says. “We are pleased to be finding more ways ...
New developments in the heart of North Island forestry country will reinvigorate their communities and boost economic development, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones visited Kaingaroa and Kawerau in Bay of Plenty today to open a landmark community centre in the former and a new connecting road in ...
President Adeang, fellow Ministers, honourable Diet Member Horii, Ambassadors, distinguished guests. Minasama, konnichiwa, and good afternoon, everyone. Distinguished guests, it’s a pleasure to be here with you today to talk about New Zealand’s foreign policy reset, the reasons for it, the values that underpin it, and how it ...
Opinion: The Canadian short story writer Alice Munro – winner of the Nobel Prize in Literature in 2013 – died in May at the age of 92. Her work was about “the damage people inflict on one another in the name of love”, Deborah Treisman wrote in the New Yorker. ...
This month marks two years since the most powerful telescope ever built sent its first pictures back to earth. From its lofty vantage point, beyond the moon in orbit around the sun, the James Webb Space Telescope was tuned to observe the first stars and galaxies being born soon after ...
Comment: After Climate Change Minister Simon Watts’ preview several weeks ago, I had some optimism about the Government’s emissions reduction plan. Now I’ve read the discussion document, that hope has been dashed. How can the Government propose a plan that wants to take New Zealand taxpayers’ hard-earned money, and spend ...
Christopher Luxon: hurdles The little man from National jumps hurdles in his sleep. He’s quite good at it in his dreams and even though the reality doesn’t quite match up you have to give him credit for getting up every morning and crashing into the very first hurdle of the ...
Comment: It was a good two hours into the conversation when Tyrone Marks raised the most basic of questions when I first spoke to him in 2017. “They didn’t explain the things they did to me. They never told me why. And they still haven’t. There’s no explanation for it. ...
Last summer when Matairangi burned, Ginny and Tom stood at the window of their lounge, watching kākā shoot skyward from the burning trees. From the distance, they looked to Ginny like pages torn from books and thrown into a bonfire. It was Tom, voice tight, who told her it was ...
Madeleine Chapman rounds out Death Week on The Spinoff with a final recommendation. You can read all of our Death Week coverage here. Nothing forces you to reflect on your life and relationships quite like proximity to death. For those whose nearest and dearest have died, there are reasonably obvious ...
Whitney Greene takes us through her life in television, including the TV character she’d like to plan a funeral for and her cow lung catastrophe on The Traitors NZ. “If the phone rings, I have to answer it,” Whitney Greene from The Traitors NZ warns as we begin our My ...
Maddie Ballard reviews the debut essay collection of Pōneke writer Flora Feltham.In ‘The Raw Material’, the longest essay in Flora Feltham’s dazzling debut collection, the author heads out for a run after hours of weaving and sees the world turn to textile. “Pounding along the Parade, I saw the ...
Andy Christiansen, one half of the experimental rock-pop duo TRiPS, shares the tunes inspiring the band’s perfect weekend and new release. “Good speakers, good food, good music, no distractions”: that’s all you need to enjoy the psychedelic stylings of TRiPS, a new band formed by Fly My Pretties’ Barnaby Weir ...
Celebrating our quadrennial opportunity to become experts in a bunch of sports we never normally watch.The games of the XXXIII Olympiad are upon us. Paris will host this year’s showcase of sporting and athletic prowess, which means some late-night and early-morning viewing for us in Aotearoa.But what sports ...
The photograph is striking and beautiful, but also disturbing – a reminder that my love for John was often entangled in shame.The Sunday Essay is made possible thanks to the support of Creative New Zealand.In the spring of 1980, in Dunedin, shortly before his death, someone took a photograph ...
Get to know Babushka, our latest Dog of the Month. This feature was offered as a reward during our What’s Eating Aotearoa PledgeMe campaign. Thank you to Babu’s humans, Jo and Isabel, for their support. Dog name: Babushka (Babu for short) Age: 2Breed: Border Collie X poodleIf rescued, ...
Pacific Media Watch A Lebanese photojournalist who was severely wounded during an Israeli air strike in south Lebanon carried the Olympic torch in Paris this week in honour of her peers who have been wounded and killed in the field — especially in Gaza and Lebanon. Christina Assi of Agence ...
The first report in a five-part web series focused on the 15th Triennial Conference of Pacific Women taking place in the Marshall Islands this week.SPECIAL REPORT:By Netani Rika in Majuro Women continue to fight for justice 70 years after the first nuclear tests by the United States caused ...
Christopher Luxon has joined with Australia and Canada's leaders in voicing support for US President Joe Biden's ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra The 2022 election brought the “teal wave” into parliament. The next election will test whether teals, who occupy what were Liberal seats, and other independents can maintain their momentum. Joining us on the Podcast ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ian Musgrave, Senior lecturer in Pharmacology, University of Adelaide Pixavri/Shutterstock A major Federal Court class action has been dismissed this week after Justice Michael Lee ruled there was not enough evidence to prove the weedkiller Roundup causes cancer. Plaintiff Kelvin ...
In The Week in Politics: politicians have to decide what to do about child abuse, Health NZ is booked in for major surgery and Darleen Tana returns. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Clare Corbould, Associate Professor, Contemporary Histories Research Group, Deakin University Mainstream media are surprisingly muted at the prospect of the world’s most powerful nation being led for the first time by a woman – specifically a woman of colour, Vice President Kamala ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Rebecca Bennett, PhD Student, Associate Research Fellow, Deakin University Last week, a drone delivery company called Wing (owned by Google’s parent company, Alphabet) started operating in Melbourne. Some 250,000 residents in parts of the city’s eastern suburbs can now order food from ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jonathan Foo, Lecturer, Physiotherapy, Monash University pikselstock/Shutterstock In the next 40 years in Australia, it’s predicted the number of Australians aged 65 and over will more than double, while the number of people aged 85 and over will more than triple. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Katrina Grant, Research Associate, Power Institute for Arts and Visual Culture, University of Sydney Jonas Åkerström’s 1790 work, Session of the Accademia dell’Arcadia on August 17 1788.Nationalmuseum/Cecilia Heisser Ever wondered whether you’d have a better chance at winning an Olympic gold ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Alexandra Jones, Program Lead, Food Governance, George Institute for Global Health wavebreakmedia/Shutterstock On Thursday, Australian and New Zealand food ministers at state, federal and national levels met to thrash out what’s next for health star ratings on packaged foods. Now, after ...
The Abuse in Care report found many Pacific survivors lost their connections to their culture and language, resulting in trauma that has been carried from generation to generation. ...
In the regulatory review, ECC intends to suggest that ERO focus on curriculum delivery reviews rather than the Ministry, because it’s not efficient or effective to have two agencies with radically different approaches climbing over each other. ...
Te Rūnanga Nui o Ngā Kura Kaupapa Māori invites the current government to work in partnership with them to develop a pathway forward, including the development of a parallel pathway and meaningful policy and strategy for Kura Kaupapa Māori ...
If you haven’t started watching yet, Tara Ward begs you to reconsider. This is an excerpt from our weekly pop culture newsletter Rec Room. Sign up here. In the world of New Zealand reality television, we have many gems in our crown. There’s the delicious second season of the Celebrity Treasure ...
A new poem by Fiona Kidman. The clothes of the dead I did not keep my mother’s furry red beret for long nor the stringy scarves that adorned the necks of my aunts, although I have kept tag ends of gold, the rings and trinkets they wore, the brooches no ...
The government’s announcement that it will re-open the foreshore and seabed controversy by changing the rules on recognising centuries-old Māori customary title for a third time goes against the rule of law and New Zealand values,” Mr Tipa says. ...
The only published and available best-selling indie book chart in New Zealand is the top 10 sales list recorded every week at Unity Books’ stores in High St, Auckland, and Willis St, Wellington.AUCKLAND1 Lioness by Emily Perkins (Bloomsbury, $25) Roarrrr! Perkins’ brilliant, award-winning, Marian-Keyes anointed, darkly funny, long ...
The 2004 Act vested ownership of the foreshore and seabed in the Crown, extinguishing any Māori claims to ownership and causing widespread outrage and protests among Māori communities. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Antje Deckert, Associate Professor (Criminology), Auckland University of Technology Getty Images Despite the connection between institutional harm and gang membership made clear in this week’s mammoth royal commission abuse-in care report, the government seems unlikely to soften its “get tough on ...
From Lewis Clareburt in the swimming to the start of the rowing – the first seven days of Paris 2024 promise to be big for New Zealand. There are few events that bring the country together quite like an Olympic Games. Nothing quite matches the excitement of getting up in ...
Groundbreaking local science just showed up in the most surprising of places: the season finale of The Kardashians. In the season five finale of The Kardashians last night, several members of the family gathered together in one of their signature empty, cream-coloured rooms to hear test results that had been ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Amin Saikal, Emeritus professor of Middle Eastern and Central Asian Studies, Australian National University The Middle East is on the brink of a possibly devastating regional war, with hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah reaching an extremely dangerous level. Washington has engaged in ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Laura Elizabeth Eades, Rheumatologist, Monash University Lupus is an inflammatory autoimmune illness, where the body’s immune system mistakenly attacks itself. Lupus can affect virtually any part of the body, although it most commonly affects the skin, joints and kidneys. The symptoms ...
A law firm that specialises in working with survivors of abuse in State care is disappointed that the Government fails to recognise that its boot camps can be directly compared to previous boot camps from the 1990s and 2000s. ...
Dying is a natural part of life, like updating your Wof or seeing your hairdresser, but without the word-of-mouth recs that help guarantee a good service. What if we changed that? Dying Reviews received by The Spinoff have had the names of organisations redacted while Hospice NZ collects further data. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jonti Horner, Professor (Astrophysics), University of Southern Queensland Mike Lewinski/Flickr, CC BY On any clear night, if you gaze skywards long enough, chances are you’ll see a meteor streaking through the sky. Some nights, however, are better than others. At ...
Despite having no bars or other designated spaces for lesbians, Auckland boasts a small but mighty lesbian museum. So how did it get here? The past 18 months has brought increasing hostility towards the queer community across Aotearoa. Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull’s anti-trans rally in Tamaki Makaurau last March led to a ...
Poneke Antifascist Coalition has invited Wellingtonians to stand in solidarity with the Kanak people at 12pm today outside the French Embassy in Wellington. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Peter Layton, Visiting Fellow, Strategic Studies, Griffith University Drones are the signature technology of the Ukraine war. A few miniature aircraft designs were used in the war’s early days, but an incredible array of drones have now evolved. There are different types, ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Mark Slee, Associate Professor, Clinical Academic Neurologist, Flinders University Francisco Gonzelez/Unsplash Migraine is many things, but one thing it’s not is “just a headache”. “Migraine” comes from the Greek word “hemicrania”, referring to the common experience of migraine being predominantly ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Lee White, Senior Lecturer and Horizon Fellow, School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Sydney Australia was slow to introduce minimum building standards for energy efficiency. The Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme (NatHERS) only came into force in 2003. Older homes ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Steven Sherwood, Professor of Atmospheric Sciences, Climate Change Research Centre, UNSW Sydney The past century of human-induced warming has increased rainfall variability over 75% of the Earth’s land area – particularly over Australia, Europe and eastern North America, new research shows. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Tony Heynen, Program Coordinator, Sustainable Energy, The University of Queensland A temporary stadium in the Champ-de-Mars, ParisEkaterina Pokrovsky/Shutterstock As Paris prepares to host the Olympic and Paralympic Games, the sustainability of the event is coming under scrutiny. The organisers have promoted ...
A night of karaoke and community in a pub that feels like a memory. You’d barely even notice it, unless you knew to look. Tucked away behind a liquor store on busy Constable Street is the capital’s last great pub. Newtown Sports Bar is an emblem of the pub culture ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ian Wright, Professor in Marine Geology, University of Canterbury Louise Corcoran/Getty Images The decline in the number of doctoral candidates at New Zealand universities is a worrying sign for the country’s effort to build a knowledge-based economy. Aotearoa New Zealand’s ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Laurie Berg, Associate Professor, University of Technology Sydney defotoberg/Shutterstock Migrant worker exploitation is entrenched in workplaces across Australia. Tragically, a deep fear of immigration consequences means most unlawful employer conduct goes unreported. On Wednesday, however, the government officially launched a ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Vaughan Cruickshank, Senior Lecturer in Health and Physical Education, University of Tasmania Paris is about to host its third summer Olympics. While we don’t yet know what the legacy of this year’s games will be, let’s take the opportunity to reflect on ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Hugh Breakey, Deputy Director, Institute for Ethics, Governance & Law, Griffith University In the wake of the assassination attempt on former US President Donald Trump, there were calls from bothsides of US politics, as well as internationally, to reduce the brutal, ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Keith Rathbone, Senior Lecturer, Modern European History and Sports History, Macquarie University Two high-profile assaults on Australians in Paris have raised concerns about security ahead of the Olympic Games. On Saturday evening, a young woman was allegedly sexually assaulted by a ...
Dying is inevitable and, so it seems, is it costing a lot, writes Stewart Sowman-Lund in today’s extract from The Bulletin. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here.The cost of dying ...
The government took Joyce Harris's first baby and sent her off to a girls' home. Half a century on - and out of oceans of hurt - it asked her to be a mother figure. ...
It’s the deadliest fictional town in the country, but which death has been the most bonkers? Alex Casey looks back at 10 seasons of The Brokenwood Mysteries to find out. Warning: The following ranking story contains famous New Zealand actors appearing to be dead (not alive). The Spinoff has been ...
Water cremation is the biggest thing to happen to the death industry in the last 100 years. Alex Casey meets the people trying to bring it to Aotearoa. Through a set of mirrored doors down the industrial end of Christchurch’s St Asaph Street, death is getting a new lease on ...
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A,DIV,A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Friday 26 July appeared first on Newsroom. ...
Rachel Stewart.
Rodeo is toast.
“So, we all know in our hearts that rodeo is wrong. But with Michael Laws speaking up for it, we now know it’s got to be even wrong-er than we originally thought…….”
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11988993
Hope so. Stewart is certainly right about Laws.
the Lhaws is an ass…
I’d always picked him as more of a whanker, but hey.
Good morning Breakfast people some times I THINK that the stock market fall is engineered by the big players on the stock markert . Im always on the net and the amount of bad publicity on the stock market + the interest rate rise in the USA and wallar the big boy like Buffet could clean up 7% I could get someone to code a algorithm to examine theory Eco is assessing . I had thought of that before I changed my funds and while I wrote about that Phenomenon . But I m poor so can not afforded to take a risk . Please can all the people I Tautoko return the favour and make a small donation to help me fight for the rights of a Healthy Humane future FOR all my Whano
and my mokos If the sandflys are aloud to ride all over my reputation this action will put fat on the rungs of all my mokos ladders of life that is the big picture .
P.S some people are saying there is know ECO MAORI effect come on people you know I can easily test this theory of mine on a lot of subjects and I will time It right to have the maximum EFFECT I will not let that have a negative effect on the common people.
Here is my give a little page please help me .Ka kite ano Im off to work
https://givealittle.co.nz/cause/helping-eco-maori-sue-the-nz-police
Ka pai
I’m sure a ton of commenters from the standard will support your claim against the police.
Good luck with that.
C’mon James thats not necessary
James changing his RWNJ attitude? Good luck with that.
Nothing wrong with being on the right but I don’t think its a good idea to tease eco maori
Im not. Its more a point that I doubt many people on here will put their hands in their pockets to help someone.
If some do just to prove me wrong – it wont be a bad thing.
Yeah but probably better to leave eco maori to do his thing rather than, unintentionally, rark him up
Being on the right and being a RWNJ aren’t necessarily the same thing 🙂
I’ve always considered myself more of a centrist 🙂
Lol, you keep telling yourself that PR. I’m happy for you to be a centrist once we’ve dragged the Overton Window back to where it should be.
On certain issues i’m quite to the left, its just those issues don’t get raised much 🙂
Go on then, what are they?
Not sure how to express it but I’d put a stop to any and all dairy farming conversions in areas that can’t really handle it, like the MacKenzie Country for example plus all farms to fence of waterways and provide shade for animals, where feasible
I’d bring in a form of National service where two years service = one years tertiary training at an accredited institution and the National service can encompass working for DOC
I’d increase DOCs funding for pest eradication and look at reforming pest control boards
Make work scheme for SH1 where its made four lanes (where feasible), straightened and including making the bridges four lanes as well and all single lane state highway bridges to be widened
For starters 🙂
Great suggestions.
Curb dairy conversions. Progressive.
Public interning for Doc. Progressive.
More funding to eradicate pests. Progressive.
Safety works on SH1. that’s Genters portfolio, so clearly progressive.
Pay no mind to Weka. Weka doesn’t determine what is or is not progressive.
We all do.
Suggest more. Reach across the House. We need it.
So no more dairy conversions at all? (everywhere is past capacity).
Apart from that, those aren’t really left wing positions PR. Not that I’m against them (mostly), but I’d like to see LW versions.
Really, I thought most of them were pretty left wing, maybe not the national service one but opening it up to DOC, forestry service or something similar makes it a bit more left
Left wing would be to create permanent jobs that DOC can rely on.
I don’t have a problem with bonding per se, but it needs to be tied to the thing one trained for and it needs to be good for the person receiving the training as well as the service.
Instead of national service, make it a carrot thing. If people want to work for DOC, make that a well funded experience that brings lots of benefits to the people involved.
“…for example plus all farms to fence of waterways and provide shade for animals, where feasible”
Fencing of waterways should be happening no matter where on the L/R spectrum. I think you are confusing neoliberalism running a plunder economy, and RW conservatism. I can’t see RW conservatism having a problem with fencing water ways. But the green left would say fencing waterways is not even the bare minimum that is needed.
Shade and/or shelter should be provided for animals and it can’t be then there shouldn’t be animals in that paddock. You’re suggestion leaves some room for greedy farmers to abuse animals i.e. profit is more important.
So we’ve establish I’m a RW conservative and not a neo-liberal tory…its a start 🙂
Pay Weka no mind.
Weka defines nothing.
You want to keep engaging, do it.
In Weka’s defence, progressive is not necessarily left. Don’t fudge.
I see that you are going to have a Career change Matty Mclean your presents will be missed when this eventuates All the best to you on your new journey up your ladder of life Kia kaha Matty .Ka kite ano
Yes Bug Man Ruud Kleinpast this is my view on all our beautiful Piharenga /Insects but like anything to much of anything upset the Life balance . One season on the farm there were hundreds of millions of flys F that ka kite aon
Good Rock Rumble people give us a sore face Ka pai
You did it Rock Rumble radio my face is sore I was blowing to my son in law about my bug shoulder and said my offspring have inherited this. I laughed when he had the courage to say yea but you got short as legs like I started looking for shoes with a bit more heal on the only problem was I can’t afford them lol keep up the good work people I can see the cops have been spinning there lies again
Well you are going to see how there spinning lies get them on the hot coals of a NZ Court house Ana to kai Ka pai King Karlos A Maori with Great Mana Ka kite ano
You can still donate you just have to hit the tab donate anyway on my give a little page
I pumped out 2 days of lawns today so I don’t have to put up with the sandflys for another day + it’s less fuel but I’m stuffed.
I say that school should have all the same school uniform and that will bring the price down and there will be more secondhand uniform available good topic Hillary good show on TVNZ at 7 pm on 1
And a interview Live With Lionel Richie Hillary & Jeremy what a scoop kai pai
Ka kite ano
ECO MAORI had a sore face yesterday when I pllanted a bluff with one of the sandflys actor’s I told him I was going to work on Waitangi Day because the sandflys would be on holiday yea right. They even got a client to tx me to try and get me to reveal if I was going to work or not ECO ignored the tx. The sandflys were waiting around tauranga ready to start there intimidation game ECO snuffed that move up the sandflys would have been pissed. I foiled all there plays today to.I’m no longer going to go with these plays I’m going to shut them down straight away. They have a new option person I can tell by the way there moves have change. Ana to kai
War Criminals
Obama was the true smiling assassin … He engaged in constant war….. and honed the usa’s execution killing skills of lesser people in far away lands …..
Issuing Presidential death decrees …Using Predator Drones and ‘special forces’ … The presidents personal JSOC kill crews …. and privateer mercenaries from the likes of Black water.
But It gets worse ….Obama seemed to cross a line, … downwards … when as a result of his orders a innocent boy, Abdulrahman al-Awlaki, 16 years old and a usa citizen … was murdered without trial … death by drone.
Jeremy Scahills desperately sad movie documentary called “Dirty Wars” … details this and other war sickness… like compulsive repetitive lies from officials.
At this point we should note that Another Nobel Peace Prize Killer … Henry Kissenger … had established the right of the executive branch of the white house to murder with impunity ..
All done ‘legally’ as Wayne Mapp would say .. when a usa judge dismissed a case brought against Kissenger … by the now adult child of murder victim and former Chilean Army Commander Rene Schneider …who had been killed .. because he believed in the rule of law.
No justice was found in the usa legal system .. with a usa judge ruling their domestic laws … for things like murder …. did not apply to foreign policy … if your a white house wide boy.
Like criminal wide boys ….These uber VIPs had already declared themselves and any usa military invasion forces … above and off limits for any war crime prosecutions.
Anyway, one of my gripes against Obama …. was his gifting of a turn key killing machine to Trump…
and so it proved to be with Trump killing the 8 year old sister of the 16 year boy / her brother that Obama killed…. I think Trump killed their mum as well.
It seemed to me only a matter of time before this execution without trial … needing only the presidents order … would take place against usa citizens .. in their own ‘homeland’.
The next logical step in a frame work of blood lust military insanity.
But Somehow I had missed it … forgot it … or did not recognize it specifically for what it was at the time.
Bill Clinton had the guts to blaze this trail …. with scant credit or recognition.
Despite his humble discretion …. The documentary below shows u.s citizens,… mainly unarmed women and children… being murdered by the presidents special forces …. with extreme cruelty
Not in the beginning of the doco.. where incompetent gung-ho aggression from ATF agents and local law back-ups … starts the killing…
But in the deliberate savage assault following a siege ….where a shaped charge is dropped on usa women and children …. bombed and burned like they were in a Baghdad bunker…. Literally.
Machine guns and sniper fire .. is used to butcher others and prevent escape from burning to death ..
Its quite amazing the amount of freedoms a usa president and his personal legion has …
exceptional dishonesty, cruelty and injustice.
“Issuing Presidential death decrees …Using Predator Drones and ‘special forces’ …
The purchase and the program by the military of the USA to use drones had begun well before Obama became president. Nice of you to cherry pick incidents in war as if they only happen on one side. War is hell, do a bit of historical research.
Yes, but Obama ramped the whole drone program up several notches from Bush. It means less of your own boys/gals coming home in body bags, so electorally , all good.
Never mind about the collateral damage, thats “over there” amongst the unexceptional dispensible folk of the Unamerican primitive world
And it’s been ramped up to a whole new level under Dolt45. Where they’ve pretty stopped even pretending to care about how many civilians get caught up as “collateral damage”.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-is-killing-record-numbers-of-civilians_us_59f9cc1be4b0412aab840c87
Each POTUS seems to set the scene for further normalisation of killing and carnage.Hopefully whereas “good guy” Obama sedated the peace movement, Trump’s odious character will reignite it.
But I’m not holding my breath
Yeah, right Tui.
There will be a ‘peacemovment’ under Trump.
thanks i needed a laugh.
Surprised at your response.
Trump wouldnt LEAD a peace movement, but opposition to his ramped up militarism could surely revive the peace movement. That is if Americans can get over their exceptionalism
why, because i have absolutly no use for wishful thinking.
But hey, i am sure Russia today and yesterday had a ‘peacemovement’, so does North Korea, China etc etc etc, 🙂
seriously does this buffon really have to kill someone on fifth avenue for people to realise that he will not – under no circumstances – allow ‘dissent’?
He just called Democrats ‘treasonous’ for not clapping.
Its true that the democrats get away with their war crimes easier …
I can not recall anything in the news relating to Bill Clintons order …An order that had to be given …. For his Alpha team special forces to cross the Rubicon and use its war weapons…. in an operation of overkill against usa citizens on usa soil ….
Horrendously killing approximately 75 civilians… around half of which were women and children …. in ruthless military fashion.
We have a media… where we are all knowledgeable that Bill Clinton played the sax ……….. But uninformed of his behind the scene orders as commander in chief of the Waco massacre.
A clean up helped Bill clinton keep the blood from dead Waco children and women from staining him…. Some documents and other evidence were removed by white house staffers and given to the first lady … to forever disappear.
Bill Clinton is now in my eyes a murderous sex offender …..
A flashed up Durte …. who can play the sax
https://theintercept.com/drone-papers/
Very disturbing, in depth study of the planning, targeting and execution of targets.
Is that you … Phil Ure?
https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/101212158/nz-share-market-in-for-an-ugly-day-after-global-rout
The grim reality that the wealth creation built since the GFC in 2007/2008 is an illusion that can only survive on record low interest rates and insane Quantitate Easing is starting to sink in with the Dow Jones following up the 666 point loss on Friday with a horror 1175 point plunge today.
2018 GFC;
Caravans will cost three hundred rent cost from next year as homes are sold as ‘bank repo’s’ the party is over for the speculators.
Reality is nigh as “what goes up must come down”
Our ‘essential services (power/water) will climb as most of these former civic services have largely been “privatised” by the former national Government.
Solar panels and home wind turbines along with (roof collection self storage water tanks) alongside homes will dot the entire landscape as homeowners switch to providing their own power and water services.
This is already happening in USA.
You’re a day out of date.
CNN is reporting the Dow as “storming back”.
Please note, this comment is not a defence of financial systems or “Capitalism” (if you can, as Chomsky said, “show me some”, that is) or neoliberalism
A few years back it was fashionable among some Standardistas to predict the collapse of all fiat currencies by 2016. You don’t see too much of that anymore.
Yep – dear old Travellereve sadly passed away a while back.
sorry to hear that.
An option for state houses and new builds? 4 days to build 2 bedroom eco home.
https://newatlas.com/kiss-house-flatpack-prefab-passivhaus/50106/#gallery
Meanwhile in Blenheim, covenants in housing divisions specify such things as minimum house size and style. They assert a minimum 145 sq m when the builder below is building kit set 104 sq m homes for $225,000.
The ‘developers’ obviously want a better look, or more profit from oversizing?
https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/property/100967443/little-hope-for-builder-as-readymade-homes-ruled-out-by-subdivision-covenants?cid=edm:stuff:marlboroughexpress&bid=586440584
Some 15% of homes, I read, built since 2000 are smaller 1-2 bedroom units meaning that cost, size, builder and smaller building availability all conspire to deepen the housing crisis.
And further meanwhile in Blenheim, a town of 20,000, upwards of 60 people attend rental property open days hoping for a rental. Those who miss out may have to live for $1000 plus a week in emergency accommodation in motels, like this couple with child.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/101073989/A-young-familys-hopeless-search-for-a-home-in-Marlborough
banks are in on that minimum size thing and the look thing too. Much easier to sell a carbon copy house in a mortgagee sail.
“Bigger boxes on the hillside
Bigger boxes made of ticky-tacky
Bigger boxes on the hillside
Bigger boxes all the same
There’s a brick one and a block one
Concrete and triple garaging
And though they are all bigger
They still look just the same!”
Apologies to Malvina Reynolds.
lol, I was thinking that too.
Yet the Levittown homes were around 70 square metres.
“Any fool can build homes—what counts is how many you can sell for how little.” William J. Levitt
Thinking has changed since. Now it’s keep the demand high along with the prices.
@ Mac 1, That is bizarre to demand 145m2!
The 3 and 4 bedroom villas of the early 1900’s were often 100m2!
Huge international trend on tiny houses that are under 40m2.
One of the things that stopped many in Auckland buying was that banks would not lend under 40m2 apartments. So then only cashed up people (investors, new residents and those will cash or asset already could buy them).
Developers are there for profit so they are and have never been the answer to affordable housing.
It’s a right wing myth that more houses will stop the crisis because the houses being built are not designed for about 35% of the population that can’t afford to buy a house.
However the answer is not to throw out amenity controls, but more to reach a compromise of a practical and healthy dwelling that fulfils it’s role. In my mind size is the better sacrifice than windows and outdoor space. You don’t want to build cage houses either.
It also takes more energy to heat a larger house, so savings in grid energy use are being offset by the increase in size. We’re so fucking stupid. People treat energy use savings as a financial thing. It’s far more important as a climate change issue.
We need to guard against the push for apartments that are basically cells, but we should be incentivising people to build smaller houses at this point.
Bear in mind that the size includes an attached garage, which old villas normally don’t have.
Meanwhile in Kaitaia….https://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/teahikaa/audio/2018630459/he-korowai-trust-s-mission-to-make-a-difference
I’ve been watching these guys build the emergency accommodation units out the back of the old Kaitaia hotel…always a hive of activity.
I was also chatting to a guy staying in one of the rooms in the Hotel…and ex prisoner…. he was in the early stages of re integration and was struggling a bit with the strict rules he had to abide by. He could see that the rules were for his own good in the long term This is the strength of He Korowai Trust. They provide an holistic service, and like any whanau, there are rules and expectations of certain standards of behaviour.
They also have papakainga housing…also with strict no booze, drugs, violence rules.
Ricky Houghton does great work…should have been New Zealander of the Year.
I’m pretty sure that’s exactly what Labour have planned. It’s why they’ve been going on about pre-built housing for some time.
It makes sense. Build the house to high specification in a factory and then ship it to the desired location to assemble it.
Thing is, it’d be even better if they used such systems to build high-rise apartment buildings like this. Even more efficient then.
It’s a question of logistics. Making sure that the materials, the factories and the skilled people are available to do the building. That’s why it’s going to take a few years to get Labour’s Kiwibuild going. Those logistics simply aren’t in place due to the failure of the ‘free-market’.
Prefab also lowers the skill requirements onsite. If everything clips together, you don’t need so many people who are capable of working around the vagaries of an architect’s innovative ideas where shit doesn’t quite line up.
A decorator mate of mine had an entertaining story about how the builders and plasterers had a hell of a time trying to create a swooping curved wall that looked awesome on paper lol
True which just means that it’s only a matter of time before people aren’t required on site at all.
And my nephew told me of how he was stopped from taking pictures of his own work which the architect then took pictures of and put into the architectural drawings as his own work.
Just watched the most amazing thing, true history in the making. Both boosters of the Spacex Falcon Heavy ( now I wonder why Elon Musk called it that! ) came back to the Canaveral launch pad and landed vertically. Straight out of Star Wars.
Absolutely amazing.
For the cost of space travel to come down, flyback boosters are are nessesity. Too bad the idea of the Space Shuttle having such a system was dropped.
Did Musk really just launch the Stig out to beyond Mars in a little red car?
On reflection, that might actually be a good use for a test launch where you don’t want to risk anything valuable…
Yes he did and yes sending the car on the test flight was a better option than sending anything of worth. Still, something tells me there’s more than the car on board:
I would be highly surprised if they didn’t have all sorts of measuring equipment on that car.
I s’pose if the aliens find it they’ll really be wondering how the fuck it got there and what kind of physics its propulsion system uses that they don’t understand.
This launch was a test and rather than compound any failure with the loss of expensive kit, the usual test payload is a block of concrete.
While the boys play with their toys, climate change marches on.
Actually, it’s pretty important for our longer term species survival that we get off this rock.
Sooner or later it’ll get hit by another massive impactor like the one that took out most of the dinosaurs.
There are direct links between the desire to get off this rock and our trashing of this rock. I’d prefer us to look after this planet instead of looking for an escape route. Especially as the looking for an escape route is taking part in trashing the planet.
Am happy to take our chances with a meteor. When we know how to look after this place, and learn how to leave without trashing things, I’ll probably change my mind.
You’re happy to take your chances.
Musk isn’t.
And the space program is integral to understanding just how we’re trashing this rock, and what we can do to un-trash it.
No, it really isn’t. The science is in. What we need to do is stop burning fossil fuels now and keep on expanding. Space development ignores that and says we can keep doing what we want when we want and technology will save us. That’s a massive risk right now, not some eon in the future when an asteroid may or may not hit us.
There’s a lot in that statement.
Firstly, the window to stop burning coal has long passed. Now we really do need some tech to go alongside that.
Secondly, space exploration helps us know the extent of the problem, and new problems we hadn’t spotted before – so we know AGW is a problem, what about another CFC-style issue? What about weather monitoring?
Thirdly, asteroid issues are real. There’s no point solving AGW only to get zotzed by something we could have seen coming and maybe have done something about.
Fourthly, the message you take from space exploration is remarkably pessimistic. For many people, the more we know about the hostile environment around us makes us aware of just how precious and unique this planet is. Nobody wants to leave the ship for the lifeboat – but not having enough lifeboats is always a regretted decision.
“Firstly, the window to stop burning coal has long passed. Now we really do need some tech to go alongside that.”
Not sure what you mean by the windows to stop burning coal has passed. That window will never pass as long as we are burning coal (and gas and oil). The tech we need alongside stopping burning FF doesn’t need the space program. Our immediate problems are social and political not technical.
“Secondly, space exploration helps us know the extent of the problem, and new problems we hadn’t spotted before – so we know AGW is a problem, what about another CFC-style issue? What about weather monitoring?”
And that’s fine were space exploration not contributing to climate change now. Unknown problems we will face in the future doesn’t trump what we are doing and need to be doing instead now.
“Thirdly, asteroid issues are real. There’s no point solving AGW only to get zotzed by something we could have seen coming and maybe have done something about.”
Nevertheless, it’s madness to burn fossil fuels to do that. If I saw pro-space people being willing to power down, I’d be more supportive of resources going to space programs. But atm what I see is people saying hey tech will save us so lets keep burning some fossil fuels. Bill has written about this a lot, but there is plenty in the mainstream now too. CCS is not going to save us, and we are already in major overshoot.
“Fourthly, the message you take from space exploration is remarkably pessimistic. For many people, the more we know about the hostile environment around us makes us aware of just how precious and unique this planet is. Nobody wants to leave the ship for the lifeboat – but not having enough lifeboats is always a regretted decision.”
I don’t experience the environment as hostile and prefer world views that support humans as part of the environment. What I’m pointing to is that the paradigm that sees nature as hostile and we need high tech to survive it, is the paradigm that not only brought us CC but is resisting doing something about it. That many people believe in that paradigm doesn’t make it right or useful, and this is the core of it. Humans aren’t the most important thing here, not because we’re unimportant (we’re not), but because seeing ourselves as separate is the problem. We are *utterly dependent upon the environment within its own nature i.e.. functional living systems. Human tech can help us within that, but at the moment we are mostly living in denial of it.
Space is the hostile environment. The earth is a solitary oasis of life in a desolate, though beautiful, void. Anything remotely as habitable as earth will be unobtainably distant.
As for windows, we’re still looking at >2C. That will require new tech to deal with. Much of our tech comes directly from the space programmes of different nations, such as fuel cells. The trivial amount of carbon contributed by space exploration (compared to cars and construction) is well worth the effort.
Unknown problems in the future are what will bite us in the arse, so we’d better get to know them. We need to know the composition and orbits of NEO bodies now, so we will be able to do something about them in the future. So far we’re lucky that the notable ones in the last hundred years or so have landed in desolate areas.
What’s the cradle to grave CC audit of the various space programs?
It it’s anything close to the millions of cars sold every year, I’ll be surprised.
Musk isn’t doing anything
He is neither the brains nor the funds behind his financially failing endevours…
The space program is irrelevant and is adding to environmental destruction…
Not that it will stop whomever is behind it…
Not that it will save or be the saviour of our species…
The rich who DTB wants to get rid off…he will have his wish…they will bw exiting this rock…once they’ve finished wrecking it…
You know nothing. What use are you.
So Musk is advertising his govt subsidised cars at govt expense.
Using the government developed internet as well, the rotter.
If the government really is subsidising both ventures, count that as two sensible things Trump hasn’t yet shut down.
“The space program is irrelevant ”
Wow. Care to elaborate what is so irrelevant about it?
It is irrelevant for the following reasons (not exhaustive)
1. It is not, and will not contribute to solving the serious issues being faced, right now…
2. Because the issues being faced have solutions which do not require the space program as part of an action plan, the space program is irrelevant…
Except to those who control it…and the ‘stakeholders’..
…
Note: Stakeholders list does not include 99.99% of the planets inhabitants, or the planet itself…
Space Program. Irrelevant!
In that case, NASA would be irrelevant to the AGW argument.
Pretty sure numpty here is a climate denier. It’s all “geo-engineering” and “weather tech”.
In response to your numbered list:
1. Even if true (which itsn’t) we can do more than one thing at a time
2. See point one
The space program itself has numerous off-shoots which have beneficial to mankind and its R&D have contributed directly to civilian use rather than ‘stakeholders’ whomever they may be.
Not to mention the more we discover about who we are, why we are, where we are and when we are are pretty important things to know.
How is point 1, not true IYO, John?
* Preventing wars/military industry
* Preventing famines/feeding the starving
* Reducing inequality (name the type)
* Reducing financial debt burdon
* etc etc
Who we are, why we are here….important things to know, I agree…
The power structures won’t be sharing that information with you, John….and that power structure are stakeholders in the space program…
See the degradation of education frameworks around the ‘western world’…..that’s what ‘you’ get to know….
Irrelevant!
* Preventing wars/military industry
The purpose of spying is to prevent and/or shorten wars. Satellites are part of that process. If you have a substantive argument against that premise, rather than simply scoffing at it, let’s hear it, and let’s see you take account of The Better Angels Of Our Nature while you’re about it.
* Preventing famines/feeding the starving
Most famine is caused by war, and note that information about climate change, and associated droughts, has been driven in large part by NASA.
* Reducing inequality (name the type)
Information is power. Seeing photographs of Earth from space reminds everyone that we’re all in this together. Beyond that, inequality is a political choice. We could double the space program and still bring the GINI to a better value.
* Reducing financial debt burdon
What financial debt burden? On a planetary scale it’s a zero sum. Also a political choice.
NASA is 0.5% of the US budget. Military spending is more like 50%.
Water purification tech, early warning for shingles attacks, asthma treatment, vaccine development, cell behaviour, environmental health, climate monitoring, weather warnings, robotic prosthetics, disaster response, preventing bone loss in old age, treatment for strokes and cerebral palsy.
Et cetera, et cetera.
You really believe the purpose of spying is to prevent or shorten wars????
What a flippin idiotic thing to say.
CIA for the next nobel peace prize then.
I finally understand why you believe everything the spy agencies say.
Because of the following which I already said:
“The space program itself has numerous off-shoots which have beneficial to mankind and its R&D have contributed directly to civilian use rather than ‘stakeholders’ whomever they may be.
Not to mention the more we discover about who we are, why we are, where we are and when we are are pretty important things to know.”
You’re second point is what is irrelevant rather than the space program. I’m not sure what you mean by “The power structures won’t be sharing that information with you, John….and that power structure are stakeholders in the space program…”
What is being withheld? The earth is flat? The earth is hollow? There are beings on Mars yet the phony Mar’s Rover is actually broadcasting from a set in Area 51?
Please tell me what is being held back by the power structures. You’re long on rhetoric but slim in actual ‘facts’
Just for you OneTwo….
http://www.ethicalatheist.com/docs/benefits_of_space_program.html
Try argue against these ‘irrelevant’ benefits and stay fashionable my binary friend.
You’re not comprehending what I’ve clearly stated, John…
So I’ll give it one final attempt…
If the space program was halted permanently from this moment, there is nothing that would be lost from the available solutions list to remediate the worlds major issues…
We have the capability right at this precise same moment, what we lack is the environmental and collective will power to allow true remediation to proceed…
Irrelevant!
Get it?
Note: I’ve not referred to positives which have developed out of the space program. You can argue into the mirror…
They’re irrelevant to the remediations I’m referring to.. in the same way your responses have been…
If you’re still not able to understand, take a read through wekas comments a little higher up…perhaps they will help you out of the mud you’re stuck in…
@Spikeyboy.
You failed to provide any substantive rebuttal. so here’s a longer-form argument to chew on:
As expressed by Sun Tzu:
No shit Sun.
“Best”, because fewer people die. In case you were wondering.
To send troops on (for example) a peacekeeping mission without knowledge of the warring factions isn’t just a stupid thing to do: it’s the height of inhumanity. Send your army deaf and blind into the field and see how long your command lasts.
Oh. So not only are the spies cotenders for innumerable peace prizes but philosophers as well.
The CIA trained and armed jihadists in Syria. Not noted for capturing anyone much alive or if they do not for long.
Libya whole and in good condition. Yeah right. Same with Syria. Their philosophy is more like Trump throwing his toys out of the cot. If you wont let us exploit your resources then we’ll make sure nobody gets them. What planet do you live on OAB? Spies make the world safer??? Spies have the good of humanity at heart?? This is a religous statement. Faith based and completely contradicted by reality. Somewhere further down this thread someone references Lee Camp. For the real take on the idiocy of spy agencies. Like real dumb fucks in a very Trump sort of way. Not sure they could even spell philosophy or humanity. Oh and Lee Camp is real funny tòo.
https://leecamp.com/
Except a tool to monitor whether what solutions we implement are actually working to the level we need.
@Spikeyboy.
Did I say anything at all about the ethics and character of people who become spies? Or what they have “at heart”? No, and no.
Did I express an opinion about whether the USA uses its ‘intelligence’ agencies sensibly? No.
Is anything I said a defence of US foreign policy? No.
Is the US the only country in the world whose leaders employ spies? No.
Your ‘argument’ is the equivalent to pointing at a trainwreck and concluding that public transport must be bad.
Still, at least you’re consistent.
You said that the purpose of spying is to prevent or shorten wars???
An incomprehensible statement given reality
The edit was going to say:
Your train wreck analogy just might have worked if we were talking one wreck. We’re not. Its many many many train wrecks to the point where sane people start to question the underlying system. Doing the same shit and expecting different resuts ring any bells?? Lie after lie after lie but still you say this time its the truth?? Hence the refrrence to religion. Your bible says spies work for peace so their lies aren’t lies. They can’t always be straight for our own good is it?? You fit the defunition of insanity stated above
“If the space program was halted permanently from this moment, there is nothing that would be lost from the available solutions list to remediate the worlds major issues…”
Except the ability to learn more and further our advancement in many areas of sciences and technology which may help us avert or restrain problems in the future
@Spikeyboy.
Speaking of what you affect to know about ‘reality’, I also referenced The Better Angels Of Our Nature, which presents evidence that we’re living in one of the least violent eras in human history. If true, that’s hardly surprising given the increased capabilities of communications technology.
Nothing you’ve ranted comes close to demonstrating that you even understand the argument, let alone a substantive rebuttal.
You reference an 800 page book. Maybe you can help me out with page numbers to support your assertion that spy agencies work for peace.
Also you show your euro centric (racial) bias. As a percentage of world population violence has decreased. This means European/USA experience of violence which isnt the same as American Indian experience or Maori or Syrian or Libian or Rwanda etc. Its all very easy when you belong to the priviledged group to bang on about how great things are.
Like Madeleine Allbrights belief that 10s of thousands of starved children or deaths from lack of medicine is an acceptable price. Whats your acceptable price OAB?
And last time I looked it was the spy agencies that lied about WMD.
Your bible says spies work for peace so their lies aren’t lies.
Does it? Where, ranty-boy?
What it actually says is that leaders should avoid wars if at all possible, and if they have no choice, advises them how to win fast and well.
In contrast, eg: Bush and Blair ignored what their spies told them, and are now regarded as war criminals.
So it doesnt say that? Then where did you get such an absurd idea from??
For what it’s worth, there’s considerable evidence that the US knowledge of the Soviet reaction to Exercise Able Archer 83 helped pivot Reagan’s “evil empire” rhetoric into a de-escalation stance.
That knowledge came from US spies in the Soviet union.
Similarly, had warnings of military build-ups been heeded, maybe not so many Soviets would have died in WW2, and maybe the backlash against German civilians might not have been so visceral.
And then one could argue that the almost immediate ending of the US monopoly on nuclear weapons prevented their use in Korea – MacArthur was already pushing for it, and if there hadn’t been the threat of retaliation it might have been a tempting option in the see-sawing territorial possession.
Thats a long stretch back in time. How anout recently? The only one I can think of is Obama being told there was no credible evidence of Assad launching the Gouta chemical weapon attack but peobably didnt need a spy agency to tell him that.
@Spikeyboy.
Eight hundred pages? You must have an extended version. Even my hardback copy with additional material by Sun Pin and extensive notes by Ralph D. Sawyer only runs to three-hundred odd pages.
This is a pretty good version; it lays out the thirteen chapters clearly and only has a minimal amount of ‘chatter’, or commentary if you prefer.
I already quoted extensively from Chapter 13: The Use Of Spies, including Sun Tzu’s observation about ‘the height of inhumanity’. Chapter 2 goes into more details about the evils of war, so it’s worth reading that too – it’s only twenty paragraphs. But if you really want to get a firmer grasp on Taoist philosophy on such matters, read Lao Tzu side-by side with Sun Tzu.
Also, I already answered your question: send your peace keepers deaf and blind into the field and see how long your command lasts. Do you really not understand how that works?
Fair call on my Eurocentric bias – although I’m not sure it’s a valid criticism of Pinker (author of Better Angels…). The charge has certainly been levelled at him, with some fairly solid push-back.
Please note that I didn’t say “how great things are.” If the only way you can rebut my argument is to twist my words, why not just start waving your white flag right now?
Ok. So thanks for the link. Ive read the first chapter and you’re right theres a lot to chew over.
War is hell. Thats the first point.I consider myself lucky enough to have experienced the tail end of a war zone. Bosnia circa 1995. Lucky because I know first hand that war should be avoided if at all possible. War can also be addictive. I saw many ngo workers talk nostalgically about the days when they were taking fire.
Some anecdotes as relates to chapter one. Analysis of each participant. For some time I was based in the small village of Olovo. I spent an evening on the fringe of a group that contained a Russian officer. He was relaxed and comfortable in the company of the local population. The Russians arrived before the Americans. When American soldiers arrived in the valley they walked in single file in a large group of 6 or 7 with their guns in the air and the last man walking backwards. Very stressed and very nervous. No wonder they shoot civilians. And the bit about laws. When Americans break laws they are not held to account. How can anyone respect that? In Bosnia if you killed someone on the road like as notyoud get 5 years jail time. We all lived with that. Not Americans. I talked to one guy who was being smuggled out of the country because he had run someone over. As an aside NZ soldiers drove around the country side doing shows at schools and openly trying to engage with the locals. I guess that got lost somewhere in Afghanistan and we got Americanised and started shooting up the locals. On all counts except raw power in Chapter 1 the American military are inferior. If they have a philosophy it is that you gotta break a few eggs to make an omelette. Its the military version of fudamental Christianity where everyones going to heaven except theres the apocalypse first. Russian philosophy is way more exciting. It was a Russian who pretty much dealt the death blow to any credibility in believing in an all powerful god. All powerful but ignores suffering and injustice. This Russian pretty forcefully put his line in the sand. You (god) say that we can all go to heaven but there is a little bit of torture and rape and so forth which must go on first. Well he said if the cost is just one child tortured you can stick your heaven up your jacksy. Which is only right and proper because this is the original snake oul salesman. Next thing you know youre dealing with Allbrights 10s of thousands of Iraqi children only to find that thats srill not enough human sacrifice. More is needed!! Keep piling up the corpses.
So certainly no discipline in the American Military. Of course No one in their right mind would feel too good following Trump onto the battlefield. But really was Obama much better after he caved in to the bankers at the very moment when they thought the game was up. Talk about snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. What a glorious start for the commander in chief. So weve dealt with moral compass and leaders a little of course just my ramblings. As for Generals one of Trumps Junta was involved in the Falujah massacre. Its difficult at the moment to check which one. So for all these reasons and more I will never support the US military but mostly because they are above the law and are the play thing of an elite who are also above the law. So thanks for giving me more solid ground to base my convictions. Now and not just to make you see Red. Some kind words about Putin. Please offer back some links with solid proof of Putins corruption. There is a story about Putin that goes like this. When he came to power he gathered up all the oligarchs that had been trampling willie nilly all over Yeltsin and he said to them:
I’m going to let you all keep your illegal and ill-gotten gains but you have to obey the law and pay your taxes. And when they didn’t they got thrown in jail as promised and each one that ended up in jail was portrayed as some kind of hero or resistance fighter in the west. Personally I respect that and I think Suntzu would too. I also respect his hours long talks to all media. You want the people to come along with you its probably a good idea to talk to them. Maybe answer a few questions… So I guess in my book we’re gonna see if raw power trumps all the other attributes in chapter 1. The ultimate battle of materialism against all the intangibles. Have to say I’m quietly confident except as Putin accused Obama of Trump may just smash up the chess board…
AA83 wasn’t that long ago.
More recently, how about all those meetings with Russians the trump team had? Certainly limited the friction between US and Russia. But maybe that doesn’t count, despite the FISA warrants and plea bargains.
Of course it counts. And heres a fascinating read on attempts to sway Obama away from his arming of the jihadists featuring one Michael Flynn as head of the DIA. Seems though that the whole house is now stacked with Russophobes with the appointment of Dunford as chairman of the Joint Chiefs.
https://www.lrb.co.uk/v38/n01/seymour-m-hersh/military-to-military
So it doesnt say that? Then where did you get such an absurd idea from??
No, it doesn’t say that “their lies aren’t lies”.
In fact it says that “all warfare is based on deception”. In Chapter One. Perhaps if you actually read it (which really doesn’t take long – it’s a very short thesis) you might have some better ‘intelligence’ to base your attacks on.
oh, ok, if russian collusion counts, then there’s your recent example of spies building peace rather than war.
You could just relax and call it cooperation. Probably the sky wouldnt fall in. But it would require removing Russia from your list of enemies I suppose. If collusion then according to Hersch in the article linked to above it was widespread through the pentagon at the time. Just that Flynn was the only one being open about it. This was written in 2016 so well before Trump was a thing. Cooperation or collusion? The difference is all in how Russia is viewed and at the time the demonisation of Russia hadn’t fully taken hold which is a necessary first step for charges of collusion
Aren’t the yanks lucky that an investigation is taking place to gather evidence resolving your questions one way or the other, then.
I didn’t realize there was an investigation into wether or not Russia was an enemy. That certainly is progress and the type of lateral thinking that I wouldn’t have credited them with
“Enemy” isn’t the key word – “foreign” is.
Although Russia is currently militarily occupying a NATO-oriented nation and they’re supporting opponents in proxy wars and confrontations, so the difference in the Russia-US case is largely semantic.
Either way, if there was FISA-relevant wrongdoing, then yay for the FSB for bringing the superpower-in-decline and the regional power into a more amicable relationship!
I beg to differ. If foreign were the key word then Jarrod would be in serious trouble over his dealing with and influence peddling for Israel. He’s not so enemy is the key word. You collude with enemies and cooperate with friends
No, the act says “foreign”.
Secondly, collusion is covert by definition.
Thirdly, what about Kushner and Israel? Maybe the Israelis gave him better advice on not making his emails public than the Ruccians did
It wasn’t emails. It was the taped phone call from Flynn. They have word for word what Flynn was requesting on behalf of Israel from Russia at the behest of Kushner.Enemy remains key. No one is going to press charges of colluding with the UK. Similarly in the USA for Israel.
Lolz I didn’t know that one.
Assuming Kush wasn’t on the phone, that’s called “hearsay”, but it could well be one of the things Flynn has for “cooperation” with the investigation.
The also need to demonstrate knowingly acting as an agent, and I bel;ieve that foreign agents can be declared (like a conflict of interest) so if JK didn’t do that, wait for the wheels of justice to inexorably roll forward… Trump pardons notwithstanding.
Yes. Time will tell I suppose. Anyhow, thanks for chatting…
We’re not just looking for an escape route.
Except that it isn’t. In fact, without the space program we probably wouldn’t know how much damage we’ve already done.
we’re not just looking for an escape route
Yes, Draco it’s clear you see yourself as somewhow ‘included’…but you’re not!
Those ‘rich’ you appreciate so much who are the key stakeholders in the ‘space program’, assured you personally….did they…
Escape route is exactly what they’re looking for…any collateral benefits would not be shared downwards…
Trickle down (space) economics…
A list of ‘collateral benefits shared downwards’ can be found so easily it’s probably more fun to link to the “What Have the Romans Ever Done For Us?” sketch. See further up the page for some examples.
McFlock
I think your time epochs are getting mixed up. We should leave next century’s problems for them to deal with rather than presume we know the right thing to do now, and use up all the resources needed before whatever happens.
For interest and to allow imagination to be titillated I suggest watching Babylon 5.
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tj4qfe9afs
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJmuHNDcXLQ
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDNkJu8xtwo
Good show.
But we need to know what we don’t know, otherwise it might sneak up on us. Besides, space exploration isn’t going to use up all the resources. Consumerism and phone “upgrades” will.
Climate change marches on because of our inability to reign in car use use. Of course, the people doing space development are also the ones that are more likely to develop a solution to climate change. Solar power was developed because of space development.
Watching those two boosters land together was a sci-fi moment in real life.
The future has arrived, we just saw it land at Cape Canaveral.
Anyway, curiosity and technology are traits innate to human culture and we are far to long gone on the technology ride to turn our backs on it now without a disaster.
Like it or not, if capitalism needs constant growth on a finite planet, then the solution to our growth conundrum lies in space, be it mining Asteroids (I’d rather have a sterile, lifeless hunk of space rock host the mining and ore refining operation and the steel mill be on a space station in orbit than have them all here on earth spewing toxic waster into the environment) or even – sci-fi time – colonising the inner planets or even going to Trappist-1 to take a look for life there.
Also, space based industry is literally outsourcing our carbon emissions!
Sanctuary
Do you mean that we need a space-connected disaster before we will stop pissing money and resources at the sky?
No. I am saying you are not going to give 10 billion humans a western, middle class life style without going into space to get the resources to make it happen.
The alternative is most likely population overshoot, climate change, resource wars and probably nuclear catastrophe.
“Climate change marches on because of our inability to reign in car use use”
Not really. Magically change all car use to public transport and human generated climate change (and Peak Everything) continues via the growth economies. Car use is a big factor, but it’s not the driver.
“Of course, the people doing space development are also the ones that are more likely to develop a solution to climate change.”
We already have a solution to climate change, we just don’t have the will to do it. I don’t see space program people as being any more useful in resolving that. Probably the opposite, because they seem to think they can justify burning fossil fuels.
“Solar power was developed because of space development.”
Solar power was developed by evolution. What you mean is electricity generated by capturing solar energy, and we don’t actually need that to survive. If it were a choice between continuing emissions or giving up tech that came about via the space programs then we could still choose to stop emissions and we’d be ok.
I’m not saying the space development doesn’t do good or useful things. I’m saying it’s insane to be putting effort into that instead of preventing the worst of climate change.
“We already have a solution to climate change, we just don’t have the will to do it.”
Yeah – everybody knows (as the late great Leonard Cohen said) that the only solutions to CC that will be wholeheartedly embraced are those that either:
– leave existing profit streams intact, or
– provide opportunities for the owners of existing profit streams to readily replace or augment them with new ones
Kinda hard to think of ‘solutions’ that meet either condition really – except for some sort of privately-owned magic ‘tech’ (which is why that idea is so popular)
social tipping points are another. Or things we can’t conceive of yet. A major GFC would be a game changer for instance, and how we respond to that would determine how bad things have to get.
Yes, really.
It’s not ‘growth’ per se that drives increased fossil fuel use. It’s the demand for energy a lot of which is used to power transport:
Personal cars are a major part of the problem.
Not necessarily.
True. Banning personal cars and burning of fossil fuels is not on the horizon.
They’re part of the people looking for the replacement of fossil fuels. A fairly big part in fact.
Well, a few of us would be but the majority of people would be wiped out pretty quick as a hell of a lot of stuff got taken away because we refused to use it because it came from the space program.
Which just proves your ignorance about economics.
We can, and should, do both especially considering that the space program is likely to help doing that “preventing the worst of climate change”.
“It’s not ‘growth’ per se that drives increased fossil fuel use. It’s the demand for energy a lot of which is used to power transport:”
Reductionist thinking thinks climate change = carbon emissions, therefore reduce carbon emissions and everything will be alright (ish). We need systems thinking that sees the connections between growth, climate change, resource depletion, the take-make-waste economy, and the ignoring of natural systems particularly biological ones. Climate change can’t be solved without paradigm change. I’m pointing to the paradigms at play where.
“Personal cars are a major part of the problem.”
Obviously.
“They’re part of the people looking for the replacement of fossil fuels. A fairly big part in fact.”
Irrespective of whether we find a replacement or not, we have to power down. Powering up is antithetical to solving climate change. Paradigms and system thinking again.
“Well, a few of us would be but the majority of people would be wiped out pretty quick as a hell of a lot of stuff got taken away because we refused to use it because it came from the space program.”
again, obviously, if we gave it up in the blink of an eye. But if you read my comment in the context of the conversation with McFlock, you will see I am talking about something else, and making a different point.
“Which just proves your ignorance about economics.
We can, and should, do both especially considering that the space program is likely to help doing that “preventing the worst of climate change”.”
Asserting something doesn’t make it true. You believe in the space program and what sustainability expert David Holmgren calls techno-explosion with some components of techno-stability. I believe in the power down. I’ve been making a case for why the power down is necessary, you’ve just asserted that techno will save us, but you haven’t made the case.
Climate change is primarily driven by carbon emissions. There are other GHGs but they’re a small part of our emissions.
Which is all a load of bollocks. There is a connection between growth and resource depletion. Using more resources must inevitably result in resource depletion.
There isn’t necessarily a connection between growth and climate change. We could still have growth while having declining GHG emissions.
You’re making assertions without any evidence or logic.
If we find a replacement then we obviously don’t need to power down. That’s basically what finding a replacement for fossil fuels and their emissions means.
True. And you make lots of assertions that are downright wrong, that don’t even have a logical connection.
No I don’t.
I believe in reality.
No, you’ve been talking BS and I didn’t say that technology will save us. I said it has a role in doing so. A role in stopping the continued burning of fossil fuels and reducing other GHG emissions.
It will be politics that will save us but that requires that we all get involved and stop the politicians catering to the 1%.
weka says
“I’m not saying the space development doesn’t do good or useful things. I’m saying it’s insane to be putting effort into that instead of preventing the worst of climate change”
+1000 to that.
And the cost-benefit calculation of those good things we now have? The billions spent that have added to climate change, and still we are pouring money into the sky and space.
We are curious, clever children at heart; we have dilemmas that are very hard which we need to deal with hre and now on earth but space is so fascinating – look how I can pay table tennis with a drop of water in a weightless environment and look at all those flames when our space vehicle launches and how cleverly we do everything, except for mucking up, rare though, with a D or O ring. Very sad, most unfortunate. But it’s just amazing being able to control a vehicle on …(name your planet) from earth. Beats radio-controlled car racing on Sundays.
Sounds like HOP prices are increasing. AT also takes the lions share of Aucklander’s rates too. Rolling in cash but still can’t seem to run or build a world class service and no doubt complaining how they need more money.
It costs about $20 for 1 adult and 2 kids to go around 12km return and you have to catch 2 buses to reach your destination depending on where you are in Auckland, so generally takes nearly 1 hour when you can drive it for about $2 and it takes 10 minutes, so that’s part of the problem.
You also need to go through a huge paper rigmarole to get a child HOP so again totally thinking of their customers as usual (NOT).
Someone told me it was costing $70 per week to take public transport from Huapai in West Auckland to central Auckland, plus they had to get their elderly mother to get up at 6am and drive them to the station and pick them up. In the end they moved closer in, (another reason why the housing crisis will not abate as people can’t get back to their jobs if they move further out as limited and inconvenient transport options).
Not only that but the ancient buses that are generally empty of patrons (see above reason) amble along 25km under the speed limits on the open road, causing major delays and productivity loss for everybody else.
People might tolerate an expensive service if it was convenient, but often the AT service is both inconvenient and expensive.
Yep. It’s called inflation.
[Citation Needed]
Actually, they’re doing pretty well at getting public transport up to first class standards. The real problem was that the National government stood in the way and demanded more roads instead.
Proof that you do not understand economics and the true costs of cars.
1. You actually have to buy the car
2. You have to maintain the car
3. You have to fuel it up
4. You have to pay insurance
5. That time you’re driving is a loss of time as you could be doing something far more productive
Now multiply all that by hundreds of thousands just in Auckland. And that’s just the driver.
Cars are expensive.
Our public transport could be and should be better but the reason why it’s so bad is due to decades of under-funding and lack of development so that car manufacturers and other services could make a profit and keep employment higher than it would be. Most of the gas stations would simply not exist. Same would apply to mechanics and panel beaters.
Getting rid of cars would free up huge numbers of capable people to do something else. Nurses, doctors, builders, teachers – the list goes on. All of which we need more than mechanics and service station attendants.
Cars are expensive.
Then there’s the 400+ people who die prematurely every year due to the pollution of the cars.
Cars are expensive.
Better transport won’t actually make that any better. The only thing that will is high-rise apartments.
No, they amble along at their speed limit which is 90km/h on the motorway.
And those people in the cars are what’s causing the traffic jams and the productivity loss. They’re the ones taking up the roads and losing productivity by driving.
One wonders why people drive then. It’s expensive and inconvenient.
Meanwhile, public transport is getting better and more and more people use it:
Would be nice to have more recent figures but I couldn’t find them.
The Greater Auckland site reports on them monthly.
Auckland ratepayers pay more than 50% of the $1,324,000,000 operating spend of the 2017 – 2018 year for transport.
I’m not sure that figure includes the new transport levy or a proposed petrol tax or the new price increases for users. (I think not).
Source of that figure is the current rates levy!
If AT have all these extra journeys they are providing it’s not showing up in the costs to ratepayers or reducing the prices for transport. Maybe freebies on the Gold card!
As for thinking Auckland has world class transport, pleeeze, I’ve lived in the EU, Asia and Africa – NZ is one of the worst places for public transport and very expensive to the cost of wages – the only worst place for public transport, I’ve even been to, is Fiji.
In my view Aucklander’s are being ripped off and the COO structures are not working! More than 1 billion a year for AT shit service and their propaganda about how great they are!
The chairman of AT doesn’t even write his own preamble on the budget that’s signed off by him – that’s how disinterested and incompetent and what a shitty organisation they are.
Just wait until March madness this year, all the public transport will be running at 100%+
BTW there is a massive project underway to unlock the rail network, but you probably haven’t heard of it as you’re doing an ostrich impression.
….massive project underway to unlock the rail network… yawn somehow the Brits managed an underground in the 1863 and its still used by over 1 billion passengers a year… but hey in Auckland we are supposed to be excited by the prospect of EVENTUALLY and (probably not before a maned Mars landing) that the execs at AT and NZ transport will get something fit for purpose going.
Maybe if there were less excuses about why they can’t get it going, propaganda about how good they are and less about how much extra money they need it could be done. Having one track into Britomart or what ever the hell the dumbos did there, might be an inkling of the lack of size of the brains on our public transport system or the chairman apparently doesn’t write his own reports on his own budget he signs off.
Dove Myer Robinson tried in the 70s but was stymied by the car lobby. https://www.greaterauckland.org.nz/2016/04/19/sir-dove-myer-robinson-on-his-rapid-transit-scheme-part-1/
Len Brown and Phil Goff faced similar uphill battles dealing with the road-addicted National administration, the Nats finally relented when they realised how many Aucklanders were pissed off by their BS.
PT is too much of a political football and needs a nationwide independent authority like AT to plan it properly.
Graph for Auckland Transport taking almost half of rates funding:
http://temp.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/Plans/LongTermPlan/VolumeOne/section_1341865502987.html
Most of which goes to road maintenance
The great thing about Trains & buses is that it gives one a captive audience – you can dictate where they travel to & from & how long it will take, then broadcast propaganda about Dear Leader, Civics, Te Reo, the horrors of Capitalism, etc etc.
Then I guess if you get 1000’s of people’s daily existence susceptible to the whims & demands of the Train & Bus Drivers Union you will have all kinds of power.
Good idea of selling to a captive audience, if they got Skycity on board with gambling on trains, the powers that be would make it happen. That’s the sad state of our elected officials. If it’s pointless or bad for society, it happens. If not, then just wait and wait and wait… and then some pathetic offering appears.
I note the replies to you savenz tend to the ideal – we shouldn’t have cars, or to educate you on the overall long-term cost of transport to you on an amortised basis, or how pleased you should feel knowing that rail is being built because it will be so much better then, when you need to travel now and your present cost is $x and it will take xtime.
Just listening or reading about how things are for people is good stuff that we need to hear to understand the present state of play. It is interesting and important that we know that change is happening…sometime soon. But today this is how it is for an ordinary person. Let’s not dismiss ourselves as ordinary persons with a life and a story and not beat people over the head with unrealised facts, future plans yet to emerge and serve.
Lee camp rips apart Former F B I Director Comey Tweets. Link to a video. 5 minute video.
https://leecamp.com/web-exclusive-former-f-b-director-comey-tweets-dumbest-thing-ever-reveals-lot/?mc_cid=74690f8973&mc_eid=524e48683c
Fair point.
Trump’s likely to get away with it, no matter the extent of his involvement in the collusion others have already admitted.
Lovely article this morning in The Guardian on the necessity of both radical and reforming arms of the feminist movement to achieve success. In this case, the right for women to vote, on its 1918 centenary this year:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/feb/06/feminism-women-vote-suffragette-democracy-protests-political-theatre
This approach doesn’t apply everywhere, but a centennary is a good point for reflection.
“A diet of dead rats would make the Greens sicken and die”
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/opinion/101208963/a-diet-of-dead-rats-would-make-the-greens-sicken-and-die
Despite having ministerial positions and largely outlining what they plan to achieve this term (20 policy goals) the latest poll has the Greens going downwards since the election.
And with nothing more up their sleeves, coupled with supporter disappointment of swallowing some dead rats along the way, there is a real chance they won’t make the 5% threshold come next election.
Meanwhile, despite securing a number of wins, New Zealand First is floundering and their support of the TPP could very well be the last nail in their coffin.
Therefore, if Labour want friends next election, Labour needs to consider giving the Greens a little win (like lifting the incomes of beneficiaries, whether through a Christmas bonus, core benefit increase or extended and larger energy payment) to appease their activist base.
Something which Labour should keep in mind, unless they think they can win the next election alone.
Firstly, polls this far out from an election are worse than useless, because they encourage idiots to make pointless declamations based on little more than tea leaves.
Secondly, Labour don’t need you to teach them how to suck eggs. Unlike the nats, they know how to work with partners. The wins the Greens and NZ1 will get over the next 2.5yrs won’t be “given” to them by Labour, those wins will be earned by the coalition partners in their own right.
Yes, it early days. However for the reasons I outlined above, I can’t see things improving for the Greens or NZF without them securing significant wins.
And as Labour has the majority vote, any wins the Greens or NZF obtain requires Labour’s blessing.
So political parties that achieve nothing over an electoral term will be punished in the election booths? A profound observation that has hitherto occurred to precisely nobody. /sarc
Lets look at the Greens. They won ministerial positions and have their 20 policy goals, yet instead of going up (which one would assume) they slipped downwards.
Therefore, if the Greens think that now they have their ministerial positions and 20 policy goals they can sleepwalk their way to the next election, they are going to get a shock.
Moreover, as popular as Davidson is with the party’s activist base, merely making her co leader won’t be enough. They need a significant policy win to appease the left within.
I can see the Greens easily following Labour’s path of leadership changes and party disunity.
“Lets look at the Greens”
Let’s not. I am going to hang out the washing, feeling mildly happy that we have a government that seems to be populated by normal people. I don’t expect too much from them, but it feels better than a government of vulgar, greedy, self-serving philistines.
“Let’s not. I am going to hang out the washing, feeling mildly happy that we have a government that seems to be populated by normal people.”
Yes, we changed the Government, but we still have the TPP. Rather weak employment reforms. An almost useless cannabis reform. A foreign investment ban with holes so large that our largest foreign investor is exempt. No date set for a living wage.
I can go on, but I think you can get the drift.
You can see whatever you want to see, that much is obvious.
What scares me is that I’m so often right.
Well, given that you usually restrict yourself to stating the bleeding obvious in the most condescendingly insulting way possible, you shouldn’t be overy surprised.
But I’m sure that your effort today has made both NZ1 and the Greens finally realise that in order to win votes they’ll need to make some policy advances sometime in the next two years, rather than their previous intention to merely sit on their arses and do nothing.
Once again, your outstanding advice (offered for free, no less) has singlehandedly rescued the left and its electoral partners from oblivion 🙄
“But I’m sure that your effort today has made both NZ1 and the Greens finally realise that in order to win votes they’ll need to make some policy advances sometime in the next two years, rather than their previous intention to merely sit on their arses and do nothing.”
As far as NZF are concerned, their support of the TPP will be externally hard to overcome, hence it’s probably already all over for them.
There is no win big enough for them to come back from this.
And as for the Greens, apart from their 20 policy goals and new co leader, it seems that fluffing around making corny videos etc is all they plan to do. Hence, they need this nudge. As, evidently, their current actions show no signs of them being aware of this need.
Moreover, they need Labour’s blessing, and that won’t come willingly. Thus, this is part of the public pressure we require to put on them.
Your attempt to weaken it undermines it, so who’s side are you on?
How many times has NZ1 been predicted to die? One more announcement from you won’t make a difference.
It’s also really impressive the way you can convince yourself that your “nudge” is needed after you rule out their entire list of policy commitments.
Nobody needs anyone else’s “blessing”. That’s what you refuse to understand. Labour is not the overlord, throwing bones of policy achievement to the peasants. They are all equals.
The underlying strength of the coalition is respect, not power. As soon as you figure that one out, all your concerns will disappear into nothingness – which might be why it’s lost on you…
As for stating the obvious, the response to Metiria coming out was blatantly obvious to foresee, yet the Greens failed to see it coming.
So when it comes to the obvious, those pulling the strings in the Greens seem to be a little blind.
Oh, they saw it. But it was the right thing to do.
“How many times has NZ1 been predicted to die?”
How many times has NZF supported the TPP? This is huge with widespread and long lasting ramifications, thus this time it’s different.
NZF has become TPP first. And that’s gone down like a cup of cold sick.
I didn’t rule out their entire list of policy commitments, I said apart from them.
“They are all equals.”
Not when it comes to voting on policy
“The underlying strength of the coalition is respect “
Respect didn’t get us decent cannabis reform, core benefit increases nor did it stop the TPP. Hence, the concerns remain.
Respect got them put up or argued against. Respect allowed disagreement.
Nice line about TPP first. Did you get it from farrar, or will we merely be seeing it there shortly?
“Oh, they saw it.”
No, they didn’t. As shown by their preparedness and how quick Metiria through in the towel. Despite having almost full party support.
like I say. see what you want to see.
National is on the cusp of Leadership change …. probably very undemocratic.
The Greens are electing a representative female co-leader, democratically.
There is no Green disunity. But there are bound to be factions in National.
Two years nine months, …… keep your breath to cool your porridge.
“National is on the cusp of Leadership change …. probably very undemocratic.”
A ballot of the National party caucus elects a new leader.
“There is no Green disunity. But there are bound to be factions in National.”
Not sure James Shaw has the same confidence as you do…
“Shaw said all candidates would be told it had to be a “clean campaign” although they would not have to sign a code of conduct, something Labour Party leadership contenders have done in the past.
Shaw said there was a risk of ructions in the party but a clean campaign would help prevent that.”
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11982510
By the way, every NZF supporter I’ve spoken to are totally gutted with Winston’s support of the TPP and will no longer vote for them.
Not to mention the disappointment surrounding their cannabis reform stance.
Yes, I’m sure so many people spontaneously offer you their opinions and voting intention that you could start your own political market research consultancy. /sarc
I’m a political junkie, hence talk politics with everyone I meet and associate with, even with the cold callers that knock on my door.
So I’ll add “guaranteed to give you their honest opinion”, too
They have no reason to lie.
Except why they knocked on your door in the first place.
Be they religious or capitalist, doorknockers are selling you something, so they have a reason to tell you what they think you want to hear.
I’m talking about discussion after they have pitched their sale, thus they have no need to tell me what I want to hear and often surprise me.
Yeah, right. 🙄
but mainly in the Koru lounge and your mates in business class…
Don’t frequent the Koru lounge that often anymore, but back in the day used to know the ladies working their rather well.
Yep, NZ First surprisingly a sell out on TPP. They might be gone. Bad decision.
From what I can gather, it will be the death of them.
When I first heard the news, the first thing that came to mind is Winston must be planning on standing down as I don’t see them coming back from that and I think Winston knows it. Hence, I suspect he’s going to call it a day at the end of this term.
“Unlike the nats, they know how to work with partners.”
Under MMP National and Labour have both “won” four times each so yes National do know how to work with parties and know how to win under MMP
No, “winning” isn’t “working with partners”.
National know how to work with sycophants and sellouts. They don’t know how to work with partners.
The problem is we won’t how true that is of Labour as well until the next election
Though that’s true, they’ll have their work cut out to mess up their partners as thoroughly as the Gnats messed up the Maori Party.
Maybe but currently NZFirst are below the threshold and i don’t see them improving (a lot of the farmers won’t forget) and the Greens are at 6% and seem to be shedding their principles quicker than you can say government pension
I expect the Greens to be back but only at around the number they have now and I don’t expect Winston to be back
You’d be sledging the Greens whatever they did – you’d like nothing better than for them to abandon their principles.
But it’s true that Labour’s PR shadow won’t win them anything from their base. They need a few successes – rivers are the obvious one.
TPP and immigration and foreign land sales will end NZF if they roll over for it. We’ll see as we leave the silly season whether they’ll make a go of it.
“You’d be sledging the Greens whatever they did – you’d like nothing better than for them to abandon their principles.”
I’m sledging them because they act like they have the moral high ground but the first sniff of power and they abandon their principles
“TPP and immigration and foreign land sales will end NZF if they roll over for it. We’ll see as we leave the silly season whether they’ll make a go of it.”
Sure will
We don’t know they’ve abandoned their principles PR, they may be pursuing them by means other than media grandstanding. We’ll have some idea in the next few months.
“We don’t know they’ve abandoned their principles PR, they may be pursuing them by means other than media grandstanding. We’ll have some idea in the next few months.”
The problem is that all of us can make grand predictions but it generally takes months or years to see if it comes to pass
Still fun though
Yup – the far right idea of ‘fun’ – rivers that are toxic sumps, our government being sued under ISDS, unrestrained dairy development and jobs for sleazy assholes like those employed by CERA. As close to treason as makes no difference.
“I’m sledging them because they act like they have the moral high ground but the first sniff of power and they abandon their principles”
really? What principles have they abandoned exactly?
Would have thought they would have rejected the waka jumping bill and the Kermadecs might have been worth fighting for
You need some new lies. Is Farrar getting lazy or something?
Pretty sure you’ve had your face rubbed in this before.
“while assuring NZ First that iwi and commercial fishing rights will be taken into account.”
Should read… while assuring NZ First political donors fishing rights will be taken into account.
🙂
“Would have thought they would have rejected the waka jumping bill and the Kermadecs might have been worth fighting for”
What are the *principles they have abandoned? Be specific.
They seem pretty good so far.
My view of Greens is that they have somehow fallen into a trap of certain individual politicians following their pet projects or experiences while the identity of the Green Party flounders.
I’m not sure if dirty politics is at play and I think it would be super easy to have an undue influence and voting rights by members if a dirty organisation was inclined to wipe them out by becoming members on mass and voting in MP’s they know are polarising influences. Having newcomers being so high in the list and short on environmental credentials was very surprising.
I don’t think the new idea that social causes and niche transport (trains for the shore) being the Green focus is resonating with the loyal environmental followers that have voted for them since Jeanette days.
Good points, savenz.
Oh c’mon lets be real here, whatever is happening inside the Greens is probably* not due to Dirty Politics
The MT clusterf**k was all down to MT, when the two traitors (Kennedy Graham and the other one) were removed their was jubilation all round, the Greens abandoning the Kermadecs and going with the waka jumping bill are all down to leadership of the Greens
*Obviously I don’t know for certain but if someone could organise the downfall of the Greens to this extent without anyone finding out it’d be a miracle, as an example its generally agreed that Steven Joyce was behind the leaking of Winstons details yet that couldn’t be kept secret
They have internal problems as well.
https://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/345887/greens-letter-reveals-damage-to-staff-morale
True that but again something that can’t be attributed to “Dirty Politics”
“its generally agreed that Steven Joyce was behind the leaking of Winstons details “.
Really? Pray tell. Just how big was your sample of people who “generally agree” and what party did they support?
Personally, and I have had a number of Labour supporters agree, that it was a Green-supporting Public Servant in the department who was unhappy that Winston had attacked that Turei woman and was trying to retaliate.
I originally thought it might have been Winston himself.
We’ll never find out of course. Winston has dropped all his claims after all.
No, you’re reaching. Some soft support might not have been keen on Metiria’s stand but rail for the Orcs is long overdue. It’s true though that environmental progress is called for – river revival springs to mind.
“I’m not sure if dirty politics is at play and I think it would be super easy to have an undue influence and voting rights by members if a dirty organisation was inclined to wipe them out by becoming members on mass and voting in MP’s they know are polarising influences.”
Or, most Green Party members support the current direction of the party and the MPs.
I think it would be obvious to long time members if there had been a mass influx of new members who skewed the organisation. If you look at the GP Charter and documents, it’s pretty hard to hijack it. I would guess it was designed that way.
“Having newcomers being so high in the list and short on environmental credentials was very surprising.”
Not really. It was intentional and the members knew that. The party is very sensible to be bringing new people up through the ranks.
Not sure what you mean by short on environmental credentials. Have you looked at Shaw’s bio? If you mean that only people with backgrounds in specific environmental work should be MPs, then again, that’s not what the party or the membership wants.
@ Weka “Or, most Green Party members support the current direction of the party and the MPs”
the problem is voting wise…. the Green voting public don’t seem convinced about the Green Party’s direction enough to vote for them.
I have no problem with Shaw as I think he wants the best for the party and the country and can work with others and is genuinely nice guy with a decent amount of experience in the wider world. A plus in parliament.
I get the sense that the “Green” mojo is gone for some reason, and that’s because too many new people in the party who have their own reasons for getting there and the messages are all over the place. Also if they start sneering at the middle class who vote for them while actually being middle class themselves trying to pretend to be poor, the message is not a genuine one. That’s also why the social messages just don’t come across well.
Wanting more development for Auckland for example and blaming older folks for the housing crisis, does not sit with the environmental message of sustainability in the traditional sense.
If you haven’t worked it out, the working poor and beneficiaries don’t seem to be interested in enough numbers to vote for the Green Party consistently or even vote at all.
My guess is that it’s the more well heeled who can afford to vote Green and travel to a river or beach and afford organic produce that are their most loyal followers and they are probably older too, because they lived through Rogernomics and saw the effects, and that’s what makes them stick to the Greens. They probably own houses too, having bought them 30 years ago.
But there was little in the last campaign that was aimed in that direction and the age and experiences of the Greens MP’s maybe no longer reflect their main voters.
My guess is that it’s the more well heeled who can afford to vote Green and travel to a river or beach and afford organic produce that are their most loyal followers and they are probably older too, because they lived through Rogernomics and saw the effects, and that’s what makes them stick to the Greens. They probably own houses too, having bought them 30 years ago.
Wrong.
here are the stats from the 2014 election:
And the important graphs here.
in the graph #1 = the average – below #1 = less likely; above = more likely.
So, compared with the general population GP voters are
more likely to work part time;
more likely to be in a household where someone is a member of a union;
50% above and below line where household income is lower than average; way more likely to be students;
less likely to be male;
less likely to own house or flat;
less likely to be over 56yrs;
less likely than average to be 18-29yrs, (but still that is more likely than being over 56yrs);
Nats are way more likely to have household income above average; labour and NZ first are way more likely to have lower than average household income (but way more are over 56yrs);
Green voters are split between a bit higher and a bit lower than average incomes – so somewhere in between Nats and Lab-NZF.
GP voters are way more likely than the other 3 parties to have a uni education.
NZF voters are way more likely to be male. Nat voters are least likely to have been to uni.
The Greens, as Mae West said, used to be snow white, but they drifted.
Shaw is as solid as Goff, and just as uninspiring.
They need some serious media airtime over two years to get towards 8% – and all of it has to be good.
Don’t really agree. People will move to (or away) from the Greens based on what’s happening on the inside. Outside influences like media noise are less important imo
“They need some serious media airtime…”
No, they need a significant policy win. Mere media airtime won’t cut it.
Announcing benefit increases did wonders for them last time, hence this the area that will appease the left within, thus where they must secure a win.
I think that the Greens are at the lower end of their natural polling level. They’re well placed to get advances on environmental concerns and some social policy. With two leaders complementing each other they’ll get under steam pretty soon.
As you say, Shaw is solid. But the next coleader will probably be inspirational as well.
I’m not sure about some of the internal ructions, probably blow-over from the divisions highlighted when two caucus members decided to quit. But I’m sure they’ve had ructions before, like most parties.
NZ1 have more difficulty, but again they’ll be plugging their own regional development issues.
Pretty much. The Greens have had this sorted for a while. Shaw is the suit who is building all those bridges within mainstream society that are needed for change. He’s also inspirational in areas that are important (e.g. the members. People like Ad who appear to have an anti-progressive agenda probably don’t bother to listen to Shaw on his own terms and so find mansplaining the Greens a useful strategy).
Davidson would bring in the connections with other important parts of society – Māori, women, low income people, NGOs working the coal face etc.
And beside them both are the rest of the MPs and the party structure. Davidson wasn’t out there on her own with the launch. Those people are building long term structures that will serve NZ and the Greens well irrespective of reckons about the vote at the next election.
Weka, I had a quick look at the Green Party website but could not find anything that stated what happens if there is only one nomination.
As far as I am aware, there is only one to date, Marama Davidson, and nominations close on Friday. If only one, does that person automatically get the position, or does the nomination still go out for votes for or against?
“If only one, does that person automatically get the position…”
I certainly hope so. Then they can put all this to bed and get on with the real work that requires doing.
Afaik if there is only one nomination then they become the co-leader, but I’m not the best person to ask. I’ll check with some Greenies on twitter.
Thanks – just curious so don’t go to any trouble. And no doubt it will be covered in media etc if there is only one nomination on Friday.
It just occurred to me in view of the Greens’ other voting etc procedures.
EDIT – I can actually see a lot of sense in the Co-Leader being none of the Green MPs with Ministerial etc responsibilities (or any of the newies) so from that perspective, Davidson’s being the only nomination would make good sense (but not my call as a non-Green member but still supportive,)
I was interested anyway, so went and asked and found out some stuff, commented here (afaik this applies to all elected positions),
https://thestandard.org.nz/daily-review-07-02-2018/#comment-1444613
I wouldn’t be unhappy as a member if MD was the only nomination (saves time and energy too), but I’m also good if others want to try out.
“If only one, does that person automatically get the position, or does the nomination still go out for votes for or against?”
Every candidate for every position in the green Party runs against Re-open Nominations. To be successful in the case of a single candidate the candidate must receive 75% of the vote. That is, the candidate (or candidates) is rejected if Re-open Nominations receives more than 25%.
Thanks solka. Excellent provisions IMHO, including as a protection etc for the sole candidate.
While I think Davidson is worthy of respect, I don’t share your views about how popular she will be for the public. I’d say her views would be ‘very challenging’ to the Green voter and similar to what happened with Metiria and potentially plummet the Green vote.
My pick is Sage, because she’s the one who stands for conservation and can woo back the old supporters.
But if there’s only 1 nomination, that’s also a bad sign of disorganisation within the Greens not having enough choice of candidates.
or they decided to conserve their current limited resources.
“I don’t share your views about how popular she will be for the public”
Not sure I said anything about popularity with the public.
Well they should be choosing a leader that will ensure the survival of the Green Party and an increased vote, so I think that thinking about the public appeal of co leader should be an essential factor, especially when Greens have had some very rocky polls!
Maori have gone back to Labour and the amount of work it would take and the conflict that would bring to fight it out, especially being coalition partners is making a major tactical error… the same errors again and again including trying to get the youth vote by having younger MP’s is part of the problem.
Bernie Sanders and Corbyn are old and white but get the youth and black vote. Youth are not attracted by identity politics.
So you think that Davidson as co-leader won’t help the survival of the party and that people won’t vote because of her? Nice reckon but not seeing much rationale. Afaik, the GP vote dropped last year because of Ardern’s rise, and because of the mess with the two rogue MPs (and probably because of the sustained attack on the GP).
“Bernie Sanders and Corbyn are old and white but get the youth and black vote. Youth are not attracted by identity politics.”
Are either of them in government? Both of those men support solidarity politics. We are not the US or the UK and have a different political landscape and political system.
Labour and the Greens don’t have to fight it out. Labour can get the centrist and swing voters, including NZF, and the Greens can get back their previous voters from Labour. Both can pick up some of the non-vote. It’s not rocket science, and it moves the Overton Window left. What you are suggesting will move the Greens to a more centrist position and cement NZ in centrist, neoliberal hell.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11989439
“If they insist on a co-leader, of the three there is a clear winner: Julie Anne Genter.”
“Genter, like James Shaw is likeable. I have called her my favourite Green. She didn’t like it for fear that my support tainted her prospects within the cloistered world of the tree hugger and snail lover.”
Again, Julie Anne is respected for her transport ideas but I very much doubt she has popular appeal with New Zealander’s. Can anyone think of anything apart from transport that Julie Anne represents? I can’t.
Women
well I think the co leader has to be a women so they all fall into that category.
I very much doubt she has popular appeal with New Zealander’s.
I think Julie-Anne Genter would be very popular with NZers for similar reasons to Jacinda Ardern. She is highly intelligent, outgoing and empathetic to a cross-section of NZers.
I have no quarrel with Marama Davidson, but Julie-Anne has more national (with a small ‘n’) political experience so maybe she should be given the co-leader mantle first and see how she goes.
How can tree huggers and snail lovers be considered “cloistered”? Surely their love for the natural world must come from being in the …natural world!
Cloistered? Pffffffft!!
“Genter, like James Shaw is white. I have called her my favourite Green.” – Hosko
Fixed it for ya’!
The Greens take representation seriously – hence the male and female co-leadership. If they didn’t choose Marama they’d have a conspicuous lack of Maori representation, especially since she didn’t get a cabinet role. Personally I think she’s an asset, the party’s appeal would be so much narrower without her.
“They’re well placed to get advances on environmental concerns and some social policy”
Talk about stating the obvious.
Most know they are well placed to get advances on environmental concerns and some social policy, but still, they’ve gone downwards. Hence, it’s not going to be enough to appease the left within like me.
A pair of aviator shades and a chest resplendent – All Hail Grand Marshal Baby Fingers!.
(like Bastille day, really?)
President Trump’s vision of soldiers marching and tanks rolling down the boulevards of Washington is moving closer to reality in the Pentagon and White House, where officials say they have begun to plan a grand military parade later this year showcasing the might of America’s armed forces.
[…]
The inspiration for Trump’s push is last year’s Bastille Day celebration in Paris, which the president attended as a guest of French President Emmanuel Macron. Trump was awestruck by the tableau of uniformed French troops marching down Avenue des Champs-Elysees with military tanks, armored vehicles, gun trucks and carriers — complete with fighter jets flying over the Arc de Triomphe and painting the sky with streaks of blue, white and red smoke for the colors of the French flag.
Aboard Air Force One en route home from Paris last July, aides said Trump told them he was dazzled by the French display and said he wanted one at home.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trumps-marching-orders-to-the-pentagon-plan-a-grand-military-parade/2018/02/06/9e19ca88-0b55-11e8-8b0d-891602206fb7_story.html?utm_term=.a4d1c3794764
They better make sure Kim Jong Orange’s parade is bigger and more tremendous than anything his baby twin Kim Jong Un can put together.
now we’re gonna have parade-offs between the two of ’em
Trump is organising himself a Parade ?
he loves ’em.
Read the link
I wonder how long it will be before he proclaims himself Emperor?
http://www.newhistorian.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Napoleon.jpg
As our former leader once said – ashpirations..
I think The Guggenheim’s golden crapper is highly appropriate:
https://www.vox.com/2018/1/25/16933970/trump-white-house-guggenheim-toilet-art
Purple-heartlessness!
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DVZMTjvV4AEdK1Q.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DVZPpcmX0AAzwoz.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DVZFsC4XkAAuA-P.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DVZGC5NVoAA-pOC.jpg
They forgot the medals for his personal Vietnam: avoiding STDs while rooting his way around New York.
http://money.cnn.com/2016/10/14/media/trump-stern-vietnam-stds/index.html
https://www.stuff.co.nz/world/americas/us-election-2016/85386821/it-was-my-personal-vietnam-trumps-proudest-moment-he-has-no-stds
As all the girls said – he was the biggest dick in town.
FFS! Has the man no shame…
His endless greed is astounding.
Trump has reportedly said he hopes the display would run along Pennsylvania Avenue and pass by Trump International Hotel.
Viewing for the parade from the Hotel would of course be megabucks – but what a happy happenstance!
With such a weak Constitution, and having to rely on Congress to rein in a President who chooses to enrich himself at the expense of the public purse – isn’t it about time the US had a law about this sort of behaviour?
Will there be massive photos of “himself” along the route?
Here’s that scary pile of plastic and rubbish washed out to sea by last week’s storm on the Coast…
https://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/349847/coasters-shift-thousands-of-plastic-bags
“Kiwis will have to pay GST on internet shopping purchases they make from overseas, Revenue Minister Stuart Nash has confirmed.” , ‘Absolutely the right thing to do” November 15 2017
https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/98894073/government-will-absolutely-ensure-gst-is-paid-on-internet-shopping-purchases
Then today we get this
“New legislation to expand GST to include all imports is off the table for this year, says Revenue Minister Stuart Nash.”
Nor is he willing to confirm legislation for next year, but rest assured we “will be watching Australia very closely”.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11989621
Poor Stuart, he should listen more carefully to the nuances of Robertsons statements..
“Finance Minister Grant Robertson did not say whether the tax change was definitely a “happening thing” when asked later on Wednesday, indicating instead that it was still something that was being “investigated”, but agreed it had long been Labour policy.
My theory is that they are quietly honouring their statement that ‘no new taxes will be introduced before 2020’. The seeming postponement of the tourist tax is an example, possibly.
A very honourable thing to do (which was totally beyond the last government of course) even though they also said urgency is required in some areas.
If true, I’m not sure why they don’t just say it and put the accusations of u-turning to bed.
Bob Jones’ racism is too much for even the NBR this time. Says Maori wouldn’t exist without the British and they should be made to serve “us” (white people) on one day a year out of gratitude.
This attitude of course reflects the thoughts of Don Brash, we know that, but also the idea of Bill English’s that te reo Maori is “someone else’s language”.
Far from pretending to advocate for one New Zealand these destructive fossils are intent on division.
http://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2018/02/column-calling-for-maori-servitude-for-a-day-pulled-after-outrage.html
The anti Waka jumping brigades are status quo con artists.
Unless elected as an independent, the mps are voted for as a party by the public in one way or another.
Part of that should involve the mps striving to make their party structures and organisations as accountable as possible to what they were voted for ( which admittedly these days can be often rather vague but all the same ). This should be part of the mps’ job description to their constituencies, creating transparency within their parties working for the voting public so the constituencies get as much bang as their buck as possible for what was said they were voting for.
When these type of issues are blatantly betrayed by a party, then mps can resign, from their position and or the party. This is not the same as mps trying to set the agenda in internal power plays, as was the case with the recent spat of internal green party mps going into the election. No, it is due diligence after the fact, independent to what the party policy platform is and how it was formed.
Now that this doesn’t happen so much, is more about the conceit about the political process to start with than it is about the democratic principles about the ‘waka jumping bill’ to end with.
In my view, New Zealand society has just endured the most extremist & looting banana republic global communistic govt term in it’s history. This did not come about, nor exist, in a vacuum. Some realism about the place of the current coalition alternative govt is often missing, in being separate from complaints about things like the further directions and outcomes involved in the next step of free-trade’s global cartel monopolism in the guise of the TPP.
While elections are spectator sports, a significant component to what constitutes good governance in a public’s interest, often is not when it comes to the specifics of gears and lever operation. What the govt is doing, yes.
And what the govt was doing was saying they did not essentially feel good about the initial agreement. How a govt is doing this, is more a case of gears and lever operation, and that is to some level, related to the power wattage of the machinery it has the operation of to do so, and that is not the spectator sport part of the process. These two things may overlap in a continuum but they are not the same.
Fed. Farmers” “head of animal welfare” claims, unconvincingly: “Our role is to show leadership and to educate our members”
The Panel, RNZ National, Wednesday 7 February 2018
Jim Mora, Penny Ashton, Patrick Morgan, Caitlin Cherry
First item after the 4 o’clock news is the vibe around this exciting new prime minister, and the excellent showing she made at Waitangi. “By any measure,” said host Jim Mora, “Jacinda Ardern’s trip north went well.” The panelists agree that Jacinda Ardern and her government are in for a lot more positive coverage in future, and the prospects for the Nasty Party seem dim. Then Penny Ashton comes up with one of the best lines of the year so far….
Mora does not greet this apposite and humorous quip with one of his trademark guffaws. Nor does he mutter his habitual, insincere “That’s very funny!” Instead he falls into an icy silence, as he does whenever someone makes a remark even slightly critical of the National Party.
After that awkward moment it was time to interview the first guest of the afternoon, billed as the “head of animal welfare” for Federated Farmers. His name is Chris Lewis and he apparently owns a farm “in the Waikato.” Mora insisted, at least three times, that Lewis is “one of the good farmers”. Maybe he is, but he didn’t seem to know much about the topic he was brought on to talk about: the suffering of dairy cows in the sun, with no trees to shelter under. Chris Lewis seemed to have no idea about anything. It was one of the most embarrassing performances in the history of The Panel—and that, as any long-time listener will attest, is very embarrassing indeed.
JIM MORA: Yeah, but are shelter belts being removed for the ease of installing centre-pivots?
CHRIS LEWIS: Ahhh, I don’t farm in Canterbury and I haven’t been there much lately. …. Our role is to show leadership and to educate our members….. But we need your listeners to tell us what are the best trees to plant…. [more confused blathering then, mercifully, he stops.]
….STUNNED SILENCE….
PENNY ASHTON: I would have thought he’d be the expert on such things.
MORA: No, he’s—
PENNY ASHTON: He’s the head of animal welfare for Federated Farmers.
MORA: No, he’s looking for arboreal advice.
PENNY ASHTON: [clearly unimpressed] Hmmmmmm….
Later, near the end of the program, Penny Ashton manages to run afoul of Jim Mora’s highly selective moral code again….
PENNY ASHTON: He’s a disgusting piece of human garbage, Piers Morgan.
MORA: We don’t need to go into that….
For more dodgy dairying philosophers, click here….
https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-17-12-2017/#comment-1427213
I like the sound of Peggy Ashton but it doesn’t look like she will be invited back again.
Kim Jong Trump – 5 times draft dodger.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/feb/06/donald-trump-military-parade-pentagon-bastille-day?utm_source=esp&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=GU+Today+main+NEW+H+categories&utm_term=263170&subid=15166303&CMP=EMCNEWEML6619I2
From the first link:
The move was instantly criticised, with one veterans’ group comparing the president to “a wannabe banana republic strongman”.
Since America under the stewardship of the Chump is descending into Banana Republic status, I guess such a parade is appropriate.
Cartoonists all around the world would have a field day.
Thanks for keeping the blog going The Chairman and McFlock.