“So, we all know in our hearts that rodeo is wrong. But with Michael Laws speaking up for it, we now know it’s got to be even wrong-er than we originally thought…….”
Good morning Breakfast people some times I THINK that the stock market fall is engineered by the big players on the stock markert . Im always on the net and the amount of bad publicity on the stock market + the interest rate rise in the USA and wallar the big boy like Buffet could clean up 7% I could get someone to code a algorithm to examine theory Eco is assessing . I had thought of that before I changed my funds and while I wrote about that Phenomenon . But I m poor so can not afforded to take a risk . Please can all the people I Tautoko return the favour and make a small donation to help me fight for the rights of a Healthy Humane future FOR all my Whano
and my mokos If the sandflys are aloud to ride all over my reputation this action will put fat on the rungs of all my mokos ladders of life that is the big picture .
P.S some people are saying there is know ECO MAORI effect come on people you know I can easily test this theory of mine on a lot of subjects and I will time It right to have the maximum EFFECT I will not let that have a negative effect on the common people.
Here is my give a little page please help me .Ka kite ano Im off to work
Not sure how to express it but I’d put a stop to any and all dairy farming conversions in areas that can’t really handle it, like the MacKenzie Country for example plus all farms to fence of waterways and provide shade for animals, where feasible
I’d bring in a form of National service where two years service = one years tertiary training at an accredited institution and the National service can encompass working for DOC
I’d increase DOCs funding for pest eradication and look at reforming pest control boards
Make work scheme for SH1 where its made four lanes (where feasible), straightened and including making the bridges four lanes as well and all single lane state highway bridges to be widened
Really, I thought most of them were pretty left wing, maybe not the national service one but opening it up to DOC, forestry service or something similar makes it a bit more left
Left wing would be to create permanent jobs that DOC can rely on.
I don’t have a problem with bonding per se, but it needs to be tied to the thing one trained for and it needs to be good for the person receiving the training as well as the service.
Instead of national service, make it a carrot thing. If people want to work for DOC, make that a well funded experience that brings lots of benefits to the people involved.
“…for example plus all farms to fence of waterways and provide shade for animals, where feasible”
Fencing of waterways should be happening no matter where on the L/R spectrum. I think you are confusing neoliberalism running a plunder economy, and RW conservatism. I can’t see RW conservatism having a problem with fencing water ways. But the green left would say fencing waterways is not even the bare minimum that is needed.
Shade and/or shelter should be provided for animals and it can’t be then there shouldn’t be animals in that paddock. You’re suggestion leaves some room for greedy farmers to abuse animals i.e. profit is more important.
I see that you are going to have a Career change Matty Mclean your presents will be missed when this eventuates All the best to you on your new journey up your ladder of life Kia kaha Matty .Ka kite ano
Yes Bug Man Ruud Kleinpast this is my view on all our beautiful Piharenga /Insects but like anything to much of anything upset the Life balance . One season on the farm there were hundreds of millions of flys F that ka kite aon
You did it Rock Rumble radio my face is sore I was blowing to my son in law about my bug shoulder and said my offspring have inherited this. I laughed when he had the courage to say yea but you got short as legs like I started looking for shoes with a bit more heal on the only problem was I can’t afford them lol keep up the good work people I can see the cops have been spinning there lies again
Well you are going to see how there spinning lies get them on the hot coals of a NZ Court house Ana to kai Ka pai King Karlos A Maori with Great Mana Ka kite ano
I pumped out 2 days of lawns today so I don’t have to put up with the sandflys for another day + it’s less fuel but I’m stuffed.
I say that school should have all the same school uniform and that will bring the price down and there will be more secondhand uniform available good topic Hillary good show on TVNZ at 7 pm on 1
ECO MAORI had a sore face yesterday when I pllanted a bluff with one of the sandflys actor’s I told him I was going to work on Waitangi Day because the sandflys would be on holiday yea right. They even got a client to tx me to try and get me to reveal if I was going to work or not ECO ignored the tx. The sandflys were waiting around tauranga ready to start there intimidation game ECO snuffed that move up the sandflys would have been pissed. I foiled all there plays today to.I’m no longer going to go with these plays I’m going to shut them down straight away. They have a new option person I can tell by the way there moves have change. Ana to kai
Obama was the true smiling assassin … He engaged in constant war….. and honed the usa’s execution killing skills of lesser people in far away lands …..
Issuing Presidential death decrees …Using Predator Drones and ‘special forces’ … The presidents personal JSOC kill crews …. and privateer mercenaries from the likes of Black water.
But It gets worse ….Obama seemed to cross a line, … downwards … when as a result of his orders a innocent boy, Abdulrahman al-Awlaki, 16 years old and a usa citizen … was murdered without trial … death by drone.
Jeremy Scahills desperately sad movie documentary called “Dirty Wars” … details this and other war sickness… like compulsive repetitive lies from officials.
At this point we should note that Another Nobel Peace Prize Killer … Henry Kissenger … had established the right of the executive branch of the white house to murder with impunity ..
All done ‘legally’ as Wayne Mapp would say .. when a usa judge dismissed a case brought against Kissenger … by the now adult child of murder victim and former Chilean Army Commander Rene Schneider …who had been killed .. because he believed in the rule of law.
No justice was found in the usa legal system .. with a usa judge ruling their domestic laws … for things like murder …. did not apply to foreign policy … if your a white house wide boy.
Like criminal wide boys ….These uber VIPs had already declared themselves and any usa military invasion forces … above and off limits for any war crime prosecutions.
Anyway, one of my gripes against Obama …. was his gifting of a turn key killing machine to Trump…
and so it proved to be with Trump killing the 8 year old sister of the 16 year boy / her brother that Obama killed…. I think Trump killed their mum as well.
It seemed to me only a matter of time before this execution without trial … needing only the presidents order … would take place against usa citizens .. in their own ‘homeland’.
The next logical step in a frame work of blood lust military insanity.
But Somehow I had missed it … forgot it … or did not recognize it specifically for what it was at the time.
Bill Clinton had the guts to blaze this trail …. with scant credit or recognition.
Despite his humble discretion …. The documentary below shows u.s citizens,… mainly unarmed women and children… being murdered by the presidents special forces …. with extreme cruelty
Not in the beginning of the doco.. where incompetent gung-ho aggression from ATF agents and local law back-ups … starts the killing…
But in the deliberate savage assault following a siege ….where a shaped charge is dropped on usa women and children …. bombed and burned like they were in a Baghdad bunker…. Literally.
Machine guns and sniper fire .. is used to butcher others and prevent escape from burning to death ..
Its quite amazing the amount of freedoms a usa president and his personal legion has …
“Issuing Presidential death decrees …Using Predator Drones and ‘special forces’ …
The purchase and the program by the military of the USA to use drones had begun well before Obama became president. Nice of you to cherry pick incidents in war as if they only happen on one side. War is hell, do a bit of historical research.
Yes, but Obama ramped the whole drone program up several notches from Bush. It means less of your own boys/gals coming home in body bags, so electorally , all good.
Never mind about the collateral damage, thats “over there” amongst the unexceptional dispensible folk of the Unamerican primitive world
And it’s been ramped up to a whole new level under Dolt45. Where they’ve pretty stopped even pretending to care about how many civilians get caught up as “collateral damage”.
Each POTUS seems to set the scene for further normalisation of killing and carnage.Hopefully whereas “good guy” Obama sedated the peace movement, Trump’s odious character will reignite it.
But I’m not holding my breath
Surprised at your response.
Trump wouldnt LEAD a peace movement, but opposition to his ramped up militarism could surely revive the peace movement. That is if Americans can get over their exceptionalism
why, because i have absolutly no use for wishful thinking.
But hey, i am sure Russia today and yesterday had a ‘peacemovement’, so does North Korea, China etc etc etc, 🙂
seriously does this buffon really have to kill someone on fifth avenue for people to realise that he will not – under no circumstances – allow ‘dissent’?
He just called Democrats ‘treasonous’ for not clapping.
Its true that the democrats get away with their war crimes easier …
I can not recall anything in the news relating to Bill Clintons order …An order that had to be given …. For his Alpha team special forces to cross the Rubicon and use its war weapons…. in an operation of overkill against usa citizens on usa soil ….
Horrendously killing approximately 75 civilians… around half of which were women and children …. in ruthless military fashion.
We have a media… where we are all knowledgeable that Bill Clinton played the sax ……….. But uninformed of his behind the scene orders as commander in chief of the Waco massacre.
A clean up helped Bill clinton keep the blood from dead Waco children and women from staining him…. Some documents and other evidence were removed by white house staffers and given to the first lady … to forever disappear.
Bill Clinton is now in my eyes a murderous sex offender …..
The grim reality that the wealth creation built since the GFC in 2007/2008 is an illusion that can only survive on record low interest rates and insane Quantitate Easing is starting to sink in with the Dow Jones following up the 666 point loss on Friday with a horror 1175 point plunge today.
2018 GFC;
Caravans will cost three hundred rent cost from next year as homes are sold as ‘bank repo’s’ the party is over for the speculators.
Reality is nigh as “what goes up must come down”
Our ‘essential services (power/water) will climb as most of these former civic services have largely been “privatised” by the former national Government.
Solar panels and home wind turbines along with (roof collection self storage water tanks) alongside homes will dot the entire landscape as homeowners switch to providing their own power and water services.
The stock market recovered after an early plunge on Tuesday (Wednesday NZ Time) and was little changed in morning trading, raising hopes of a halt to a global sell-off in stock markets. The swings came one day after the steepest drop in 6 1/2 years.
CNN is reporting the Dow as “storming back”.
Please note, this comment is not a defence of financial systems or “Capitalism” (if you can, as Chomsky said, “show me some”, that is) or neoliberalism
A few years back it was fashionable among some Standardistas to predict the collapse of all fiat currencies by 2016. You don’t see too much of that anymore.
Meanwhile in Blenheim, covenants in housing divisions specify such things as minimum house size and style. They assert a minimum 145 sq m when the builder below is building kit set 104 sq m homes for $225,000.
The ‘developers’ obviously want a better look, or more profit from oversizing?
Some 15% of homes, I read, built since 2000 are smaller 1-2 bedroom units meaning that cost, size, builder and smaller building availability all conspire to deepen the housing crisis.
And further meanwhile in Blenheim, a town of 20,000, upwards of 60 people attend rental property open days hoping for a rental. Those who miss out may have to live for $1000 plus a week in emergency accommodation in motels, like this couple with child.
“Bigger boxes on the hillside
Bigger boxes made of ticky-tacky
Bigger boxes on the hillside
Bigger boxes all the same
There’s a brick one and a block one
Concrete and triple garaging
And though they are all bigger
They still look just the same!”
The 3 and 4 bedroom villas of the early 1900’s were often 100m2!
Huge international trend on tiny houses that are under 40m2.
One of the things that stopped many in Auckland buying was that banks would not lend under 40m2 apartments. So then only cashed up people (investors, new residents and those will cash or asset already could buy them).
Developers are there for profit so they are and have never been the answer to affordable housing.
It’s a right wing myth that more houses will stop the crisis because the houses being built are not designed for about 35% of the population that can’t afford to buy a house.
However the answer is not to throw out amenity controls, but more to reach a compromise of a practical and healthy dwelling that fulfils it’s role. In my mind size is the better sacrifice than windows and outdoor space. You don’t want to build cage houses either.
It also takes more energy to heat a larger house, so savings in grid energy use are being offset by the increase in size. We’re so fucking stupid. People treat energy use savings as a financial thing. It’s far more important as a climate change issue.
We need to guard against the push for apartments that are basically cells, but we should be incentivising people to build smaller houses at this point.
I’ve been watching these guys build the emergency accommodation units out the back of the old Kaitaia hotel…always a hive of activity.
I was also chatting to a guy staying in one of the rooms in the Hotel…and ex prisoner…. he was in the early stages of re integration and was struggling a bit with the strict rules he had to abide by. He could see that the rules were for his own good in the long term This is the strength of He Korowai Trust. They provide an holistic service, and like any whanau, there are rules and expectations of certain standards of behaviour.
They also have papakainga housing…also with strict no booze, drugs, violence rules.
Ricky Houghton does great work…should have been New Zealander of the Year.
I’m pretty sure that’s exactly what Labour have planned. It’s why they’ve been going on about pre-built housing for some time.
It makes sense. Build the house to high specification in a factory and then ship it to the desired location to assemble it.
Thing is, it’d be even better if they used such systems to build high-rise apartment buildings like this. Even more efficient then.
It’s a question of logistics. Making sure that the materials, the factories and the skilled people are available to do the building. That’s why it’s going to take a few years to get Labour’s Kiwibuild going. Those logistics simply aren’t in place due to the failure of the ‘free-market’.
Prefab also lowers the skill requirements onsite. If everything clips together, you don’t need so many people who are capable of working around the vagaries of an architect’s innovative ideas where shit doesn’t quite line up.
A decorator mate of mine had an entertaining story about how the builders and plasterers had a hell of a time trying to create a swooping curved wall that looked awesome on paper lol
True which just means that it’s only a matter of time before people aren’t required on site at all.
A decorator mate of mine had an entertaining story about how the builders and plasterers had a hell of a time trying to create a swooping curved wall that looked awesome on paper lol
And my nephew told me of how he was stopped from taking pictures of his own work which the architect then took pictures of and put into the architectural drawings as his own work.
Just watched the most amazing thing, true history in the making. Both boosters of the Spacex Falcon Heavy ( now I wonder why Elon Musk called it that! ) came back to the Canaveral launch pad and landed vertically. Straight out of Star Wars.
Absolutely amazing.
Yes he did and yes sending the car on the test flight was a better option than sending anything of worth. Still, something tells me there’s more than the car on board:
The longer the flight, he noted, the more the company would learn from the heavily instrumented rocket.
SpaceX is hoping for live shots of the car from on-board cameras, once the protective enclosure comes off and the car sails off fully exposed.
The car faces considerable speed bumps before settling into its intended orbit around the sun, an oval circle stretching from the orbit of Earth on one end to the orbit of Mars on the other.
I would be highly surprised if they didn’t have all sorts of measuring equipment on that car.
I s’pose if the aliens find it they’ll really be wondering how the fuck it got there and what kind of physics its propulsion system uses that they don’t understand.
There are direct links between the desire to get off this rock and our trashing of this rock. I’d prefer us to look after this planet instead of looking for an escape route. Especially as the looking for an escape route is taking part in trashing the planet.
Am happy to take our chances with a meteor. When we know how to look after this place, and learn how to leave without trashing things, I’ll probably change my mind.
No, it really isn’t. The science is in. What we need to do is stop burning fossil fuels now and keep on expanding. Space development ignores that and says we can keep doing what we want when we want and technology will save us. That’s a massive risk right now, not some eon in the future when an asteroid may or may not hit us.
Firstly, the window to stop burning coal has long passed. Now we really do need some tech to go alongside that.
Secondly, space exploration helps us know the extent of the problem, and new problems we hadn’t spotted before – so we know AGW is a problem, what about another CFC-style issue? What about weather monitoring?
Thirdly, asteroid issues are real. There’s no point solving AGW only to get zotzed by something we could have seen coming and maybe have done something about.
Fourthly, the message you take from space exploration is remarkably pessimistic. For many people, the more we know about the hostile environment around us makes us aware of just how precious and unique this planet is. Nobody wants to leave the ship for the lifeboat – but not having enough lifeboats is always a regretted decision.
“Firstly, the window to stop burning coal has long passed. Now we really do need some tech to go alongside that.”
Not sure what you mean by the windows to stop burning coal has passed. That window will never pass as long as we are burning coal (and gas and oil). The tech we need alongside stopping burning FF doesn’t need the space program. Our immediate problems are social and political not technical.
“Secondly, space exploration helps us know the extent of the problem, and new problems we hadn’t spotted before – so we know AGW is a problem, what about another CFC-style issue? What about weather monitoring?”
And that’s fine were space exploration not contributing to climate change now. Unknown problems we will face in the future doesn’t trump what we are doing and need to be doing instead now.
“Thirdly, asteroid issues are real. There’s no point solving AGW only to get zotzed by something we could have seen coming and maybe have done something about.”
Nevertheless, it’s madness to burn fossil fuels to do that. If I saw pro-space people being willing to power down, I’d be more supportive of resources going to space programs. But atm what I see is people saying hey tech will save us so lets keep burning some fossil fuels. Bill has written about this a lot, but there is plenty in the mainstream now too. CCS is not going to save us, and we are already in major overshoot.
“Fourthly, the message you take from space exploration is remarkably pessimistic. For many people, the more we know about the hostile environment around us makes us aware of just how precious and unique this planet is. Nobody wants to leave the ship for the lifeboat – but not having enough lifeboats is always a regretted decision.”
I don’t experience the environment as hostile and prefer world views that support humans as part of the environment. What I’m pointing to is that the paradigm that sees nature as hostile and we need high tech to survive it, is the paradigm that not only brought us CC but is resisting doing something about it. That many people believe in that paradigm doesn’t make it right or useful, and this is the core of it. Humans aren’t the most important thing here, not because we’re unimportant (we’re not), but because seeing ourselves as separate is the problem. We are *utterly dependent upon the environment within its own nature i.e.. functional living systems. Human tech can help us within that, but at the moment we are mostly living in denial of it.
Space is the hostile environment. The earth is a solitary oasis of life in a desolate, though beautiful, void. Anything remotely as habitable as earth will be unobtainably distant.
As for windows, we’re still looking at >2C. That will require new tech to deal with. Much of our tech comes directly from the space programmes of different nations, such as fuel cells. The trivial amount of carbon contributed by space exploration (compared to cars and construction) is well worth the effort.
Unknown problems in the future are what will bite us in the arse, so we’d better get to know them. We need to know the composition and orbits of NEO bodies now, so we will be able to do something about them in the future. So far we’re lucky that the notable ones in the last hundred years or so have landed in desolate areas.
1. Even if true (which itsn’t) we can do more than one thing at a time
2. See point one
The space program itself has numerous off-shoots which have beneficial to mankind and its R&D have contributed directly to civilian use rather than ‘stakeholders’ whomever they may be.
Not to mention the more we discover about who we are, why we are, where we are and when we are are pretty important things to know.
The purpose of spying is to prevent and/or shorten wars. Satellites are part of that process. If you have a substantive argument against that premise, rather than simply scoffing at it, let’s hear it, and let’s see you take account of The Better Angels Of Our Nature while you’re about it.
* Preventing famines/feeding the starving
Most famine is caused by war, and note that information about climate change, and associated droughts, has been driven in large part by NASA.
* Reducing inequality (name the type)
Information is power. Seeing photographs of Earth from space reminds everyone that we’re all in this together. Beyond that, inequality is a political choice. We could double the space program and still bring the GINI to a better value.
* Reducing financial debt burdon
What financial debt burden? On a planetary scale it’s a zero sum. Also a political choice.
NASA is 0.5% of the US budget. Military spending is more like 50%.
Water purification tech, early warning for shingles attacks, asthma treatment, vaccine development, cell behaviour, environmental health, climate monitoring, weather warnings, robotic prosthetics, disaster response, preventing bone loss in old age, treatment for strokes and cerebral palsy.
You really believe the purpose of spying is to prevent or shorten wars????
What a flippin idiotic thing to say.
CIA for the next nobel peace prize then.
I finally understand why you believe everything the spy agencies say.
“The space program itself has numerous off-shoots which have beneficial to mankind and its R&D have contributed directly to civilian use rather than ‘stakeholders’ whomever they may be.
Not to mention the more we discover about who we are, why we are, where we are and when we are are pretty important things to know.”
You’re second point is what is irrelevant rather than the space program. I’m not sure what you mean by “The power structures won’t be sharing that information with you, John….and that power structure are stakeholders in the space program…”
What is being withheld? The earth is flat? The earth is hollow? There are beings on Mars yet the phony Mar’s Rover is actually broadcasting from a set in Area 51?
Please tell me what is being held back by the power structures. You’re long on rhetoric but slim in actual ‘facts’
You’re not comprehending what I’ve clearly stated, John…
So I’ll give it one final attempt…
If the space program was halted permanently from this moment, there is nothing that would be lost from the available solutions list to remediate the worlds major issues…
We have the capability right at this precise same moment, what we lack is the environmental and collective will power to allow true remediation to proceed…
Irrelevant!
Get it?
Note: I’ve not referred to positives which have developed out of the space program. You can argue into the mirror…
They’re irrelevant to the remediations I’m referring to.. in the same way your responses have been…
If you’re still not able to understand, take a read through wekas comments a little higher up…perhaps they will help you out of the mud you’re stuck in…
You failed to provide any substantive rebuttal. so here’s a longer-form argument to chew on:
As expressed by Sun Tzu:
…There is no instance of a nation benefiting from prolonged warfare…
No shit Sun.
In the practical art of war, the best thing of all is to take the enemy’s country whole and intact; to shatter and destroy it is not so good. So, too, it is better to recapture an army entire than to destroy it, to capture a regiment, a detachment or a company entire than to destroy them.
“Best”, because fewer people die. In case you were wondering.
…to remain in ignorance of the enemy’s condition simply because one grudges the outlay of a hundred ounces of silver in honours and emoluments, is the height of inhumanity.
To send troops on (for example) a peacekeeping mission without knowledge of the warring factions isn’t just a stupid thing to do: it’s the height of inhumanity. Send your army deaf and blind into the field and see how long your command lasts.
Oh. So not only are the spies cotenders for innumerable peace prizes but philosophers as well.
The CIA trained and armed jihadists in Syria. Not noted for capturing anyone much alive or if they do not for long.
Libya whole and in good condition. Yeah right. Same with Syria. Their philosophy is more like Trump throwing his toys out of the cot. If you wont let us exploit your resources then we’ll make sure nobody gets them. What planet do you live on OAB? Spies make the world safer??? Spies have the good of humanity at heart?? This is a religous statement. Faith based and completely contradicted by reality. Somewhere further down this thread someone references Lee Camp. For the real take on the idiocy of spy agencies. Like real dumb fucks in a very Trump sort of way. Not sure they could even spell philosophy or humanity. Oh and Lee Camp is real funny tòo. https://leecamp.com/
If the space program was halted permanently from this moment, there is nothing that would be lost from the available solutions list to remediate the worlds major issues…
Except a tool to monitor whether what solutions we implement are actually working to the level we need.
The edit was going to say:
Your train wreck analogy just might have worked if we were talking one wreck. We’re not. Its many many many train wrecks to the point where sane people start to question the underlying system. Doing the same shit and expecting different resuts ring any bells?? Lie after lie after lie but still you say this time its the truth?? Hence the refrrence to religion. Your bible says spies work for peace so their lies aren’t lies. They can’t always be straight for our own good is it?? You fit the defunition of insanity stated above
“If the space program was halted permanently from this moment, there is nothing that would be lost from the available solutions list to remediate the worlds major issues…”
Except the ability to learn more and further our advancement in many areas of sciences and technology which may help us avert or restrain problems in the future
Speaking of what you affect to know about ‘reality’, I also referenced The Better Angels Of Our Nature, which presents evidence that we’re living in one of the least violent eras in human history. If true, that’s hardly surprising given the increased capabilities of communications technology.
Nothing you’ve ranted comes close to demonstrating that you even understand the argument, let alone a substantive rebuttal.
You reference an 800 page book. Maybe you can help me out with page numbers to support your assertion that spy agencies work for peace.
Also you show your euro centric (racial) bias. As a percentage of world population violence has decreased. This means European/USA experience of violence which isnt the same as American Indian experience or Maori or Syrian or Libian or Rwanda etc. Its all very easy when you belong to the priviledged group to bang on about how great things are.
Like Madeleine Allbrights belief that 10s of thousands of starved children or deaths from lack of medicine is an acceptable price. Whats your acceptable price OAB?
And last time I looked it was the spy agencies that lied about WMD.
For what it’s worth, there’s considerable evidence that the US knowledge of the Soviet reaction to Exercise Able Archer 83 helped pivot Reagan’s “evil empire” rhetoric into a de-escalation stance.
That knowledge came from US spies in the Soviet union.
Similarly, had warnings of military build-ups been heeded, maybe not so many Soviets would have died in WW2, and maybe the backlash against German civilians might not have been so visceral.
And then one could argue that the almost immediate ending of the US monopoly on nuclear weapons prevented their use in Korea – MacArthur was already pushing for it, and if there hadn’t been the threat of retaliation it might have been a tempting option in the see-sawing territorial possession.
Thats a long stretch back in time. How anout recently? The only one I can think of is Obama being told there was no credible evidence of Assad launching the Gouta chemical weapon attack but peobably didnt need a spy agency to tell him that.
Eight hundred pages? You must have an extended version. Even my hardback copy with additional material by Sun Pin and extensive notes by Ralph D. Sawyer only runs to three-hundred odd pages.
This is a pretty good version; it lays out the thirteen chapters clearly and only has a minimal amount of ‘chatter’, or commentary if you prefer.
I already quoted extensively from Chapter 13: The Use Of Spies, including Sun Tzu’s observation about ‘the height of inhumanity’. Chapter 2 goes into more details about the evils of war, so it’s worth reading that too – it’s only twenty paragraphs. But if you really want to get a firmer grasp on Taoist philosophy on such matters, read Lao Tzu side-by side with Sun Tzu.
Also, I already answered your question: send your peace keepers deaf and blind into the field and see how long your command lasts. Do you really not understand how that works?
Fair call on my Eurocentric bias – although I’m not sure it’s a valid criticism of Pinker (author of Better Angels…). The charge has certainly been levelled at him, with some fairly solid push-back.
Please note that I didn’t say “how great things are.” If the only way you can rebut my argument is to twist my words, why not just start waving your white flag right now?
Ok. So thanks for the link. Ive read the first chapter and you’re right theres a lot to chew over.
War is hell. Thats the first point.I consider myself lucky enough to have experienced the tail end of a war zone. Bosnia circa 1995. Lucky because I know first hand that war should be avoided if at all possible. War can also be addictive. I saw many ngo workers talk nostalgically about the days when they were taking fire.
Some anecdotes as relates to chapter one. Analysis of each participant. For some time I was based in the small village of Olovo. I spent an evening on the fringe of a group that contained a Russian officer. He was relaxed and comfortable in the company of the local population. The Russians arrived before the Americans. When American soldiers arrived in the valley they walked in single file in a large group of 6 or 7 with their guns in the air and the last man walking backwards. Very stressed and very nervous. No wonder they shoot civilians. And the bit about laws. When Americans break laws they are not held to account. How can anyone respect that? In Bosnia if you killed someone on the road like as notyoud get 5 years jail time. We all lived with that. Not Americans. I talked to one guy who was being smuggled out of the country because he had run someone over. As an aside NZ soldiers drove around the country side doing shows at schools and openly trying to engage with the locals. I guess that got lost somewhere in Afghanistan and we got Americanised and started shooting up the locals. On all counts except raw power in Chapter 1 the American military are inferior. If they have a philosophy it is that you gotta break a few eggs to make an omelette. Its the military version of fudamental Christianity where everyones going to heaven except theres the apocalypse first. Russian philosophy is way more exciting. It was a Russian who pretty much dealt the death blow to any credibility in believing in an all powerful god. All powerful but ignores suffering and injustice. This Russian pretty forcefully put his line in the sand. You (god) say that we can all go to heaven but there is a little bit of torture and rape and so forth which must go on first. Well he said if the cost is just one child tortured you can stick your heaven up your jacksy. Which is only right and proper because this is the original snake oul salesman. Next thing you know youre dealing with Allbrights 10s of thousands of Iraqi children only to find that thats srill not enough human sacrifice. More is needed!! Keep piling up the corpses.
So certainly no discipline in the American Military. Of course No one in their right mind would feel too good following Trump onto the battlefield. But really was Obama much better after he caved in to the bankers at the very moment when they thought the game was up. Talk about snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. What a glorious start for the commander in chief. So weve dealt with moral compass and leaders a little of course just my ramblings. As for Generals one of Trumps Junta was involved in the Falujah massacre. Its difficult at the moment to check which one. So for all these reasons and more I will never support the US military but mostly because they are above the law and are the play thing of an elite who are also above the law. So thanks for giving me more solid ground to base my convictions. Now and not just to make you see Red. Some kind words about Putin. Please offer back some links with solid proof of Putins corruption. There is a story about Putin that goes like this. When he came to power he gathered up all the oligarchs that had been trampling willie nilly all over Yeltsin and he said to them:
I’m going to let you all keep your illegal and ill-gotten gains but you have to obey the law and pay your taxes. And when they didn’t they got thrown in jail as promised and each one that ended up in jail was portrayed as some kind of hero or resistance fighter in the west. Personally I respect that and I think Suntzu would too. I also respect his hours long talks to all media. You want the people to come along with you its probably a good idea to talk to them. Maybe answer a few questions… So I guess in my book we’re gonna see if raw power trumps all the other attributes in chapter 1. The ultimate battle of materialism against all the intangibles. Have to say I’m quietly confident except as Putin accused Obama of Trump may just smash up the chess board…
More recently, how about all those meetings with Russians the trump team had? Certainly limited the friction between US and Russia. But maybe that doesn’t count, despite the FISA warrants and plea bargains.
Of course it counts. And heres a fascinating read on attempts to sway Obama away from his arming of the jihadists featuring one Michael Flynn as head of the DIA. Seems though that the whole house is now stacked with Russophobes with the appointment of Dunford as chairman of the Joint Chiefs.
So it doesnt say that? Then where did you get such an absurd idea from??
No, it doesn’t say that “their lies aren’t lies”.
In fact it says that “all warfare is based on deception”. In Chapter One. Perhaps if you actually read it (which really doesn’t take long – it’s a very short thesis) you might have some better ‘intelligence’ to base your attacks on.
You could just relax and call it cooperation. Probably the sky wouldnt fall in. But it would require removing Russia from your list of enemies I suppose. If collusion then according to Hersch in the article linked to above it was widespread through the pentagon at the time. Just that Flynn was the only one being open about it. This was written in 2016 so well before Trump was a thing. Cooperation or collusion? The difference is all in how Russia is viewed and at the time the demonisation of Russia hadn’t fully taken hold which is a necessary first step for charges of collusion
I didn’t realize there was an investigation into wether or not Russia was an enemy. That certainly is progress and the type of lateral thinking that I wouldn’t have credited them with
Although Russia is currently militarily occupying a NATO-oriented nation and they’re supporting opponents in proxy wars and confrontations, so the difference in the Russia-US case is largely semantic.
Either way, if there was FISA-relevant wrongdoing, then yay for the FSB for bringing the superpower-in-decline and the regional power into a more amicable relationship!
I beg to differ. If foreign were the key word then Jarrod would be in serious trouble over his dealing with and influence peddling for Israel. He’s not so enemy is the key word. You collude with enemies and cooperate with friends
No, the act says “foreign”.
Secondly, collusion is covert by definition.
Thirdly, what about Kushner and Israel? Maybe the Israelis gave him better advice on not making his emails public than the Ruccians did
It wasn’t emails. It was the taped phone call from Flynn. They have word for word what Flynn was requesting on behalf of Israel from Russia at the behest of Kushner.Enemy remains key. No one is going to press charges of colluding with the UK. Similarly in the USA for Israel.
Assuming Kush wasn’t on the phone, that’s called “hearsay”, but it could well be one of the things Flynn has for “cooperation” with the investigation.
The also need to demonstrate knowingly acting as an agent, and I bel;ieve that foreign agents can be declared (like a conflict of interest) so if JK didn’t do that, wait for the wheels of justice to inexorably roll forward… Trump pardons notwithstanding.
There are direct links between the desire to get off this rock and our trashing of this rock. I’d prefer us to look after this planet instead of looking for an escape route.
We’re not just looking for an escape route.
Especially as the looking for an escape route is taking part in trashing the planet.
Except that it isn’t. In fact, without the space program we probably wouldn’t know how much damage we’ve already done.
A list of ‘collateral benefits shared downwards’ can be found so easily it’s probably more fun to link to the “What Have the Romans Ever Done For Us?” sketch. See further up the page for some examples.
McFlock
I think your time epochs are getting mixed up. We should leave next century’s problems for them to deal with rather than presume we know the right thing to do now, and use up all the resources needed before whatever happens.
For interest and to allow imagination to be titillated I suggest watching Babylon 5.
But we need to know what we don’t know, otherwise it might sneak up on us. Besides, space exploration isn’t going to use up all the resources. Consumerism and phone “upgrades” will.
Climate change marches on because of our inability to reign in car use use. Of course, the people doing space development are also the ones that are more likely to develop a solution to climate change. Solar power was developed because of space development.
Watching those two boosters land together was a sci-fi moment in real life.
The future has arrived, we just saw it land at Cape Canaveral.
Anyway, curiosity and technology are traits innate to human culture and we are far to long gone on the technology ride to turn our backs on it now without a disaster.
Like it or not, if capitalism needs constant growth on a finite planet, then the solution to our growth conundrum lies in space, be it mining Asteroids (I’d rather have a sterile, lifeless hunk of space rock host the mining and ore refining operation and the steel mill be on a space station in orbit than have them all here on earth spewing toxic waster into the environment) or even – sci-fi time – colonising the inner planets or even going to Trappist-1 to take a look for life there.
Also, space based industry is literally outsourcing our carbon emissions!
No. I am saying you are not going to give 10 billion humans a western, middle class life style without going into space to get the resources to make it happen.
The alternative is most likely population overshoot, climate change, resource wars and probably nuclear catastrophe.
“Climate change marches on because of our inability to reign in car use use”
Not really. Magically change all car use to public transport and human generated climate change (and Peak Everything) continues via the growth economies. Car use is a big factor, but it’s not the driver.
“Of course, the people doing space development are also the ones that are more likely to develop a solution to climate change.”
We already have a solution to climate change, we just don’t have the will to do it. I don’t see space program people as being any more useful in resolving that. Probably the opposite, because they seem to think they can justify burning fossil fuels.
“Solar power was developed because of space development.”
Solar power was developed by evolution. What you mean is electricity generated by capturing solar energy, and we don’t actually need that to survive. If it were a choice between continuing emissions or giving up tech that came about via the space programs then we could still choose to stop emissions and we’d be ok.
I’m not saying the space development doesn’t do good or useful things. I’m saying it’s insane to be putting effort into that instead of preventing the worst of climate change.
“We already have a solution to climate change, we just don’t have the will to do it.”
Yeah – everybody knows (as the late great Leonard Cohen said) that the only solutions to CC that will be wholeheartedly embraced are those that either:
– leave existing profit streams intact, or
– provide opportunities for the owners of existing profit streams to readily replace or augment them with new ones
Kinda hard to think of ‘solutions’ that meet either condition really – except for some sort of privately-owned magic ‘tech’ (which is why that idea is so popular)
social tipping points are another. Or things we can’t conceive of yet. A major GFC would be a game changer for instance, and how we respond to that would determine how bad things have to get.
Magically change all car use to public transport and human generated climate change (and Peak Everything) continues via the growth economies.
It’s not ‘growth’ per se that drives increased fossil fuel use. It’s the demand for energy a lot of which is used to power transport:
Oil product demand growth stems mainly from the strong demand growth from the worldwide vehicle fleet, in particular in Asian countries.
Because of the strong development of their vehicle fleets, China and India continued to be the main source of growth accounting for half of the 2016 hike, while the OECD countries’ consumption increase accounted for close to one third of it.
Personal cars are a major part of the problem.
Magically change all car use to public transport and human generated climate change (and Peak Everything) continues via the growth economies.
Not necessarily.
We already have a solution to climate change, we just don’t have the will to do it.
True. Banning personal cars and burning of fossil fuels is not on the horizon.
I don’t see space program people as being any more useful in resolving that. Probably the opposite, because they seem to think they can justify burning fossil fuels.
They’re part of the people looking for the replacement of fossil fuels. A fairly big part in fact.
What you mean is electricity generated by capturing solar energy, and we don’t actually need that to survive. If it were a choice between continuing emissions or giving up tech that came about via the space programs then we could still choose to stop emissions and we’d be ok.
Well, a few of us would be but the majority of people would be wiped out pretty quick as a hell of a lot of stuff got taken away because we refused to use it because it came from the space program.
I’m saying it’s insane to be putting effort into that instead of preventing the worst of climate change.
Which just proves your ignorance about economics.
We can, and should, do both especially considering that the space program is likely to help doing that “preventing the worst of climate change”.
“It’s not ‘growth’ per se that drives increased fossil fuel use. It’s the demand for energy a lot of which is used to power transport:”
Reductionist thinking thinks climate change = carbon emissions, therefore reduce carbon emissions and everything will be alright (ish). We need systems thinking that sees the connections between growth, climate change, resource depletion, the take-make-waste economy, and the ignoring of natural systems particularly biological ones. Climate change can’t be solved without paradigm change. I’m pointing to the paradigms at play where.
“Personal cars are a major part of the problem.”
Obviously.
“They’re part of the people looking for the replacement of fossil fuels. A fairly big part in fact.”
Irrespective of whether we find a replacement or not, we have to power down. Powering up is antithetical to solving climate change. Paradigms and system thinking again.
“Well, a few of us would be but the majority of people would be wiped out pretty quick as a hell of a lot of stuff got taken away because we refused to use it because it came from the space program.”
again, obviously, if we gave it up in the blink of an eye. But if you read my comment in the context of the conversation with McFlock, you will see I am talking about something else, and making a different point.
“Which just proves your ignorance about economics.
We can, and should, do both especially considering that the space program is likely to help doing that “preventing the worst of climate change”.”
Asserting something doesn’t make it true. You believe in the space program and what sustainability expert David Holmgren calls techno-explosion with some components of techno-stability. I believe in the power down. I’ve been making a case for why the power down is necessary, you’ve just asserted that techno will save us, but you haven’t made the case.
Reductionist thinking thinks climate change = carbon emissions, therefore reduce carbon emissions and everything will be alright (ish).
Climate change is primarily driven by carbon emissions. There are other GHGs but they’re a small part of our emissions.
We need systems thinking that sees the connections between growth, climate change, resource depletion, the take-make-waste economy, and the ignoring of natural systems particularly biological ones. Climate change can’t be solved without paradigm change.
Which is all a load of bollocks. There is a connection between growth and resource depletion. Using more resources must inevitably result in resource depletion.
There isn’t necessarily a connection between growth and climate change. We could still have growth while having declining GHG emissions.
I’m pointing to the paradigms at play where.
You’re making assertions without any evidence or logic.
Irrespective of whether we find a replacement or not, we have to power down.
If we find a replacement then we obviously don’t need to power down. That’s basically what finding a replacement for fossil fuels and their emissions means.
Asserting something doesn’t make it true.
True. And you make lots of assertions that are downright wrong, that don’t even have a logical connection.
You believe in the space program and what sustainability expert David Holmgren calls techno-explosion with some components of techno-stability.
No I don’t.
I believe in reality.
I’ve been making a case for why the power down is necessary, you’ve just asserted that techno will save us, but you haven’t made the case.
No, you’ve been talking BS and I didn’t say that technology will save us. I said it has a role in doing so. A role in stopping the continued burning of fossil fuels and reducing other GHG emissions.
It will be politics that will save us but that requires that we all get involved and stop the politicians catering to the 1%.
weka says
“I’m not saying the space development doesn’t do good or useful things. I’m saying it’s insane to be putting effort into that instead of preventing the worst of climate change”
+1000 to that.
And the cost-benefit calculation of those good things we now have? The billions spent that have added to climate change, and still we are pouring money into the sky and space.
We are curious, clever children at heart; we have dilemmas that are very hard which we need to deal with hre and now on earth but space is so fascinating – look how I can pay table tennis with a drop of water in a weightless environment and look at all those flames when our space vehicle launches and how cleverly we do everything, except for mucking up, rare though, with a D or O ring. Very sad, most unfortunate. But it’s just amazing being able to control a vehicle on …(name your planet) from earth. Beats radio-controlled car racing on Sundays.
Sounds like HOP prices are increasing. AT also takes the lions share of Aucklander’s rates too. Rolling in cash but still can’t seem to run or build a world class service and no doubt complaining how they need more money.
It costs about $20 for 1 adult and 2 kids to go around 12km return and you have to catch 2 buses to reach your destination depending on where you are in Auckland, so generally takes nearly 1 hour when you can drive it for about $2 and it takes 10 minutes, so that’s part of the problem.
You also need to go through a huge paper rigmarole to get a child HOP so again totally thinking of their customers as usual (NOT).
Someone told me it was costing $70 per week to take public transport from Huapai in West Auckland to central Auckland, plus they had to get their elderly mother to get up at 6am and drive them to the station and pick them up. In the end they moved closer in, (another reason why the housing crisis will not abate as people can’t get back to their jobs if they move further out as limited and inconvenient transport options).
Not only that but the ancient buses that are generally empty of patrons (see above reason) amble along 25km under the speed limits on the open road, causing major delays and productivity loss for everybody else.
People might tolerate an expensive service if it was convenient, but often the AT service is both inconvenient and expensive.
AT also takes the lions share of Aucklander’s rates too.
[Citation Needed]
Rolling in cash but still can’t seem to run or build a world class service and no doubt complaining how they need more money.
Actually, they’re doing pretty well at getting public transport up to first class standards. The real problem was that the National government stood in the way and demanded more roads instead.
It costs about $20 for 1 adult and 2 kids to go around 12km return and you have to catch 2 buses to reach your destination depending on where you are in Auckland, so generally takes nearly 1 hour when you can drive it for about $2 and it takes 10 minutes, so that’s part of the problem.
Proof that you do not understand economics and the true costs of cars.
1. You actually have to buy the car
2. You have to maintain the car
3. You have to fuel it up
4. You have to pay insurance
5. That time you’re driving is a loss of time as you could be doing something far more productive
Now multiply all that by hundreds of thousands just in Auckland. And that’s just the driver.
Cars are expensive.
Our public transport could be and should be better but the reason why it’s so bad is due to decades of under-funding and lack of development so that car manufacturers and other services could make a profit and keep employment higher than it would be. Most of the gas stations would simply not exist. Same would apply to mechanics and panel beaters.
Getting rid of cars would free up huge numbers of capable people to do something else. Nurses, doctors, builders, teachers – the list goes on. All of which we need more than mechanics and service station attendants.
Cars are expensive.
Then there’s the 400+ people who die prematurely every year due to the pollution of the cars.
Cars are expensive.
Someone told me it was costing $70 per week to take public transport from Huapai in West Auckland to central Auckland, plus they had to get their elderly mother to get up at 6am and drive them to the station and pick them up. In the end they moved closer in, (another reason why the housing crisis will not abate as people can’t get back to their jobs if they move further out as limited and inconvenient transport options).
Better transport won’t actually make that any better. The only thing that will is high-rise apartments.
Not only that but the ancient buses that are generally empty of patrons (see above reason) amble along 25km under the speed limits on the open road, causing major delays and productivity loss for everybody else.
No, they amble along at their speed limit which is 90km/h on the motorway.
And those people in the cars are what’s causing the traffic jams and the productivity loss. They’re the ones taking up the roads and losing productivity by driving.
People might tolerate an expensive service if it was convenient, but often the AT service is both inconvenient and expensive.
One wonders why people drive then. It’s expensive and inconvenient.
Auckland’s annual public transport usage is continuing to soar with the latest figures showing a total of 81.2 million passenger trips in the past year – an increase of 8.1 per cent.
Mayor Len Brown says it’s especially pleasing to see rail patronage increasing by 22.6 per cent as Auckland prepares for the historic start of work on the City Rail Link (CRL).
Rail services totalled 15.1 million trips for the 12 months to November 2015.
Would be nice to have more recent figures but I couldn’t find them.
Auckland ratepayers pay more than 50% of the $1,324,000,000 operating spend of the 2017 – 2018 year for transport.
I’m not sure that figure includes the new transport levy or a proposed petrol tax or the new price increases for users. (I think not).
Source of that figure is the current rates levy!
If AT have all these extra journeys they are providing it’s not showing up in the costs to ratepayers or reducing the prices for transport. Maybe freebies on the Gold card!
As for thinking Auckland has world class transport, pleeeze, I’ve lived in the EU, Asia and Africa – NZ is one of the worst places for public transport and very expensive to the cost of wages – the only worst place for public transport, I’ve even been to, is Fiji.
In my view Aucklander’s are being ripped off and the COO structures are not working! More than 1 billion a year for AT shit service and their propaganda about how great they are!
The chairman of AT doesn’t even write his own preamble on the budget that’s signed off by him – that’s how disinterested and incompetent and what a shitty organisation they are.
….massive project underway to unlock the rail network… yawn somehow the Brits managed an underground in the 1863 and its still used by over 1 billion passengers a year… but hey in Auckland we are supposed to be excited by the prospect of EVENTUALLY and (probably not before a maned Mars landing) that the execs at AT and NZ transport will get something fit for purpose going.
Maybe if there were less excuses about why they can’t get it going, propaganda about how good they are and less about how much extra money they need it could be done. Having one track into Britomart or what ever the hell the dumbos did there, might be an inkling of the lack of size of the brains on our public transport system or the chairman apparently doesn’t write his own reports on his own budget he signs off.
Len Brown and Phil Goff faced similar uphill battles dealing with the road-addicted National administration, the Nats finally relented when they realised how many Aucklanders were pissed off by their BS.
PT is too much of a political football and needs a nationwide independent authority like AT to plan it properly.
The great thing about Trains & buses is that it gives one a captive audience – you can dictate where they travel to & from & how long it will take, then broadcast propaganda about Dear Leader, Civics, Te Reo, the horrors of Capitalism, etc etc.
Then I guess if you get 1000’s of people’s daily existence susceptible to the whims & demands of the Train & Bus Drivers Union you will have all kinds of power.
Good idea of selling to a captive audience, if they got Skycity on board with gambling on trains, the powers that be would make it happen. That’s the sad state of our elected officials. If it’s pointless or bad for society, it happens. If not, then just wait and wait and wait… and then some pathetic offering appears.
I note the replies to you savenz tend to the ideal – we shouldn’t have cars, or to educate you on the overall long-term cost of transport to you on an amortised basis, or how pleased you should feel knowing that rail is being built because it will be so much better then, when you need to travel now and your present cost is $x and it will take xtime.
Just listening or reading about how things are for people is good stuff that we need to hear to understand the present state of play. It is interesting and important that we know that change is happening…sometime soon. But today this is how it is for an ordinary person. Let’s not dismiss ourselves as ordinary persons with a life and a story and not beat people over the head with unrealised facts, future plans yet to emerge and serve.
Lovely article this morning in The Guardian on the necessity of both radical and reforming arms of the feminist movement to achieve success. In this case, the right for women to vote, on its 1918 centenary this year:
Despite having ministerial positions and largely outlining what they plan to achieve this term (20 policy goals) the latest poll has the Greens going downwards since the election.
And with nothing more up their sleeves, coupled with supporter disappointment of swallowing some dead rats along the way, there is a real chance they won’t make the 5% threshold come next election.
Meanwhile, despite securing a number of wins, New Zealand First is floundering and their support of the TPP could very well be the last nail in their coffin.
Therefore, if Labour want friends next election, Labour needs to consider giving the Greens a little win (like lifting the incomes of beneficiaries, whether through a Christmas bonus, core benefit increase or extended and larger energy payment) to appease their activist base.
Something which Labour should keep in mind, unless they think they can win the next election alone.
Firstly, polls this far out from an election are worse than useless, because they encourage idiots to make pointless declamations based on little more than tea leaves.
Secondly, Labour don’t need you to teach them how to suck eggs. Unlike the nats, they know how to work with partners. The wins the Greens and NZ1 will get over the next 2.5yrs won’t be “given” to them by Labour, those wins will be earned by the coalition partners in their own right.
Yes, it early days. However for the reasons I outlined above, I can’t see things improving for the Greens or NZF without them securing significant wins.
And as Labour has the majority vote, any wins the Greens or NZF obtain requires Labour’s blessing.
So political parties that achieve nothing over an electoral term will be punished in the election booths? A profound observation that has hitherto occurred to precisely nobody. /sarc
Lets look at the Greens. They won ministerial positions and have their 20 policy goals, yet instead of going up (which one would assume) they slipped downwards.
Therefore, if the Greens think that now they have their ministerial positions and 20 policy goals they can sleepwalk their way to the next election, they are going to get a shock.
Moreover, as popular as Davidson is with the party’s activist base, merely making her co leader won’t be enough. They need a significant policy win to appease the left within.
I can see the Greens easily following Labour’s path of leadership changes and party disunity.
“Lets look at the Greens”
Let’s not. I am going to hang out the washing, feeling mildly happy that we have a government that seems to be populated by normal people. I don’t expect too much from them, but it feels better than a government of vulgar, greedy, self-serving philistines.
“Let’s not. I am going to hang out the washing, feeling mildly happy that we have a government that seems to be populated by normal people.”
Yes, we changed the Government, but we still have the TPP. Rather weak employment reforms. An almost useless cannabis reform. A foreign investment ban with holes so large that our largest foreign investor is exempt. No date set for a living wage.
Well, given that you usually restrict yourself to stating the bleeding obvious in the most condescendingly insulting way possible, you shouldn’t be overy surprised.
But I’m sure that your effort today has made both NZ1 and the Greens finally realise that in order to win votes they’ll need to make some policy advances sometime in the next two years, rather than their previous intention to merely sit on their arses and do nothing.
Once again, your outstanding advice (offered for free, no less) has singlehandedly rescued the left and its electoral partners from oblivion 🙄
“But I’m sure that your effort today has made both NZ1 and the Greens finally realise that in order to win votes they’ll need to make some policy advances sometime in the next two years, rather than their previous intention to merely sit on their arses and do nothing.”
As far as NZF are concerned, their support of the TPP will be externally hard to overcome, hence it’s probably already all over for them.
There is no win big enough for them to come back from this.
And as for the Greens, apart from their 20 policy goals and new co leader, it seems that fluffing around making corny videos etc is all they plan to do. Hence, they need this nudge. As, evidently, their current actions show no signs of them being aware of this need.
Moreover, they need Labour’s blessing, and that won’t come willingly. Thus, this is part of the public pressure we require to put on them.
Your attempt to weaken it undermines it, so who’s side are you on?
How many times has NZ1 been predicted to die? One more announcement from you won’t make a difference.
It’s also really impressive the way you can convince yourself that your “nudge” is needed after you rule out their entire list of policy commitments.
Nobody needs anyone else’s “blessing”. That’s what you refuse to understand. Labour is not the overlord, throwing bones of policy achievement to the peasants. They are all equals.
The underlying strength of the coalition is respect, not power. As soon as you figure that one out, all your concerns will disappear into nothingness – which might be why it’s lost on you…
“National is on the cusp of Leadership change …. probably very undemocratic.”
A ballot of the National party caucus elects a new leader.
“There is no Green disunity. But there are bound to be factions in National.”
Not sure James Shaw has the same confidence as you do…
“Shaw said all candidates would be told it had to be a “clean campaign” although they would not have to sign a code of conduct, something Labour Party leadership contenders have done in the past.
Shaw said there was a risk of ructions in the party but a clean campaign would help prevent that.”
Yes, I’m sure so many people spontaneously offer you their opinions and voting intention that you could start your own political market research consultancy. /sarc
From what I can gather, it will be the death of them.
When I first heard the news, the first thing that came to mind is Winston must be planning on standing down as I don’t see them coming back from that and I think Winston knows it. Hence, I suspect he’s going to call it a day at the end of this term.
Maybe but currently NZFirst are below the threshold and i don’t see them improving (a lot of the farmers won’t forget) and the Greens are at 6% and seem to be shedding their principles quicker than you can say government pension
I expect the Greens to be back but only at around the number they have now and I don’t expect Winston to be back
You’d be sledging the Greens whatever they did – you’d like nothing better than for them to abandon their principles.
But it’s true that Labour’s PR shadow won’t win them anything from their base. They need a few successes – rivers are the obvious one.
TPP and immigration and foreign land sales will end NZF if they roll over for it. We’ll see as we leave the silly season whether they’ll make a go of it.
“You’d be sledging the Greens whatever they did – you’d like nothing better than for them to abandon their principles.”
I’m sledging them because they act like they have the moral high ground but the first sniff of power and they abandon their principles
“TPP and immigration and foreign land sales will end NZF if they roll over for it. We’ll see as we leave the silly season whether they’ll make a go of it.”
We don’t know they’ve abandoned their principles PR, they may be pursuing them by means other than media grandstanding. We’ll have some idea in the next few months.
“We don’t know they’ve abandoned their principles PR, they may be pursuing them by means other than media grandstanding. We’ll have some idea in the next few months.”
The problem is that all of us can make grand predictions but it generally takes months or years to see if it comes to pass
Yup – the far right idea of ‘fun’ – rivers that are toxic sumps, our government being sued under ISDS, unrestrained dairy development and jobs for sleazy assholes like those employed by CERA. As close to treason as makes no difference.
…an agreement has been reached between Labour, NZ First and the Greens individually that satisfies Green support for the protection of the Kermadec’s pristine waters, while assuring NZ First that iwi and commercial fishing rights will be taken into account.
Pretty sure you’ve had your face rubbed in this before.
My view of Greens is that they have somehow fallen into a trap of certain individual politicians following their pet projects or experiences while the identity of the Green Party flounders.
I’m not sure if dirty politics is at play and I think it would be super easy to have an undue influence and voting rights by members if a dirty organisation was inclined to wipe them out by becoming members on mass and voting in MP’s they know are polarising influences. Having newcomers being so high in the list and short on environmental credentials was very surprising.
I don’t think the new idea that social causes and niche transport (trains for the shore) being the Green focus is resonating with the loyal environmental followers that have voted for them since Jeanette days.
Oh c’mon lets be real here, whatever is happening inside the Greens is probably* not due to Dirty Politics
The MT clusterf**k was all down to MT, when the two traitors (Kennedy Graham and the other one) were removed their was jubilation all round, the Greens abandoning the Kermadecs and going with the waka jumping bill are all down to leadership of the Greens
*Obviously I don’t know for certain but if someone could organise the downfall of the Greens to this extent without anyone finding out it’d be a miracle, as an example its generally agreed that Steven Joyce was behind the leaking of Winstons details yet that couldn’t be kept secret
“its generally agreed that Steven Joyce was behind the leaking of Winstons details “.
Really? Pray tell. Just how big was your sample of people who “generally agree” and what party did they support?
Personally, and I have had a number of Labour supporters agree, that it was a Green-supporting Public Servant in the department who was unhappy that Winston had attacked that Turei woman and was trying to retaliate.
I originally thought it might have been Winston himself.
We’ll never find out of course. Winston has dropped all his claims after all.
No, you’re reaching. Some soft support might not have been keen on Metiria’s stand but rail for the Orcs is long overdue. It’s true though that environmental progress is called for – river revival springs to mind.
“I’m not sure if dirty politics is at play and I think it would be super easy to have an undue influence and voting rights by members if a dirty organisation was inclined to wipe them out by becoming members on mass and voting in MP’s they know are polarising influences.”
Or, most Green Party members support the current direction of the party and the MPs.
I think it would be obvious to long time members if there had been a mass influx of new members who skewed the organisation. If you look at the GP Charter and documents, it’s pretty hard to hijack it. I would guess it was designed that way.
“Having newcomers being so high in the list and short on environmental credentials was very surprising.”
Not really. It was intentional and the members knew that. The party is very sensible to be bringing new people up through the ranks.
Not sure what you mean by short on environmental credentials. Have you looked at Shaw’s bio? If you mean that only people with backgrounds in specific environmental work should be MPs, then again, that’s not what the party or the membership wants.
@ Weka “Or, most Green Party members support the current direction of the party and the MPs”
the problem is voting wise…. the Green voting public don’t seem convinced about the Green Party’s direction enough to vote for them.
I have no problem with Shaw as I think he wants the best for the party and the country and can work with others and is genuinely nice guy with a decent amount of experience in the wider world. A plus in parliament.
I get the sense that the “Green” mojo is gone for some reason, and that’s because too many new people in the party who have their own reasons for getting there and the messages are all over the place. Also if they start sneering at the middle class who vote for them while actually being middle class themselves trying to pretend to be poor, the message is not a genuine one. That’s also why the social messages just don’t come across well.
Wanting more development for Auckland for example and blaming older folks for the housing crisis, does not sit with the environmental message of sustainability in the traditional sense.
If you haven’t worked it out, the working poor and beneficiaries don’t seem to be interested in enough numbers to vote for the Green Party consistently or even vote at all.
My guess is that it’s the more well heeled who can afford to vote Green and travel to a river or beach and afford organic produce that are their most loyal followers and they are probably older too, because they lived through Rogernomics and saw the effects, and that’s what makes them stick to the Greens. They probably own houses too, having bought them 30 years ago.
But there was little in the last campaign that was aimed in that direction and the age and experiences of the Greens MP’s maybe no longer reflect their main voters.
My guess is that it’s the more well heeled who can afford to vote Green and travel to a river or beach and afford organic produce that are their most loyal followers and they are probably older too, because they lived through Rogernomics and saw the effects, and that’s what makes them stick to the Greens. They probably own houses too, having bought them 30 years ago.
in the graph #1 = the average – below #1 = less likely; above = more likely.
So, compared with the general population GP voters are
more likely to work part time;
more likely to be in a household where someone is a member of a union;
50% above and below line where household income is lower than average; way more likely to be students;
less likely to be male; less likely to own house or flat;
less likely to be over 56yrs;
less likely than average to be 18-29yrs, (but still that is more likely than being over 56yrs);
Nats are way more likely to have household income above average; labour and NZ first are way more likely to have lower than average household income (but way more are over 56yrs);
Green voters are split between a bit higher and a bit lower than average incomes – so somewhere in between Nats and Lab-NZF.
GP voters are way more likely than the other 3 parties to have a uni education.
NZF voters are way more likely to be male. Nat voters are least likely to have been to uni.
Don’t really agree. People will move to (or away) from the Greens based on what’s happening on the inside. Outside influences like media noise are less important imo
I think that the Greens are at the lower end of their natural polling level. They’re well placed to get advances on environmental concerns and some social policy. With two leaders complementing each other they’ll get under steam pretty soon.
As you say, Shaw is solid. But the next coleader will probably be inspirational as well.
I’m not sure about some of the internal ructions, probably blow-over from the divisions highlighted when two caucus members decided to quit. But I’m sure they’ve had ructions before, like most parties.
NZ1 have more difficulty, but again they’ll be plugging their own regional development issues.
Pretty much. The Greens have had this sorted for a while. Shaw is the suit who is building all those bridges within mainstream society that are needed for change. He’s also inspirational in areas that are important (e.g. the members. People like Ad who appear to have an anti-progressive agenda probably don’t bother to listen to Shaw on his own terms and so find mansplaining the Greens a useful strategy).
Davidson would bring in the connections with other important parts of society – Māori, women, low income people, NGOs working the coal face etc.
And beside them both are the rest of the MPs and the party structure. Davidson wasn’t out there on her own with the launch. Those people are building long term structures that will serve NZ and the Greens well irrespective of reckons about the vote at the next election.
Weka, I had a quick look at the Green Party website but could not find anything that stated what happens if there is only one nomination.
As far as I am aware, there is only one to date, Marama Davidson, and nominations close on Friday. If only one, does that person automatically get the position, or does the nomination still go out for votes for or against?
Thanks – just curious so don’t go to any trouble. And no doubt it will be covered in media etc if there is only one nomination on Friday.
It just occurred to me in view of the Greens’ other voting etc procedures.
EDIT – I can actually see a lot of sense in the Co-Leader being none of the Green MPs with Ministerial etc responsibilities (or any of the newies) so from that perspective, Davidson’s being the only nomination would make good sense (but not my call as a non-Green member but still supportive,)
“If only one, does that person automatically get the position, or does the nomination still go out for votes for or against?”
Every candidate for every position in the green Party runs against Re-open Nominations. To be successful in the case of a single candidate the candidate must receive 75% of the vote. That is, the candidate (or candidates) is rejected if Re-open Nominations receives more than 25%.
While I think Davidson is worthy of respect, I don’t share your views about how popular she will be for the public. I’d say her views would be ‘very challenging’ to the Green voter and similar to what happened with Metiria and potentially plummet the Green vote.
My pick is Sage, because she’s the one who stands for conservation and can woo back the old supporters.
But if there’s only 1 nomination, that’s also a bad sign of disorganisation within the Greens not having enough choice of candidates.
Well they should be choosing a leader that will ensure the survival of the Green Party and an increased vote, so I think that thinking about the public appeal of co leader should be an essential factor, especially when Greens have had some very rocky polls!
Maori have gone back to Labour and the amount of work it would take and the conflict that would bring to fight it out, especially being coalition partners is making a major tactical error… the same errors again and again including trying to get the youth vote by having younger MP’s is part of the problem.
Bernie Sanders and Corbyn are old and white but get the youth and black vote. Youth are not attracted by identity politics.
So you think that Davidson as co-leader won’t help the survival of the party and that people won’t vote because of her? Nice reckon but not seeing much rationale. Afaik, the GP vote dropped last year because of Ardern’s rise, and because of the mess with the two rogue MPs (and probably because of the sustained attack on the GP).
“Bernie Sanders and Corbyn are old and white but get the youth and black vote. Youth are not attracted by identity politics.”
Are either of them in government? Both of those men support solidarity politics. We are not the US or the UK and have a different political landscape and political system.
Labour and the Greens don’t have to fight it out. Labour can get the centrist and swing voters, including NZF, and the Greens can get back their previous voters from Labour. Both can pick up some of the non-vote. It’s not rocket science, and it moves the Overton Window left. What you are suggesting will move the Greens to a more centrist position and cement NZ in centrist, neoliberal hell.
“If they insist on a co-leader, of the three there is a clear winner: Julie Anne Genter.”
“Genter, like James Shaw is likeable. I have called her my favourite Green. She didn’t like it for fear that my support tainted her prospects within the cloistered world of the tree hugger and snail lover.”
Again, Julie Anne is respected for her transport ideas but I very much doubt she has popular appeal with New Zealander’s. Can anyone think of anything apart from transport that Julie Anne represents? I can’t.
I very much doubt she has popular appeal with New Zealander’s.
I think Julie-Anne Genter would be very popular with NZers for similar reasons to Jacinda Ardern. She is highly intelligent, outgoing and empathetic to a cross-section of NZers.
I have no quarrel with Marama Davidson, but Julie-Anne has more national (with a small ‘n’) political experience so maybe she should be given the co-leader mantle first and see how she goes.
How can tree huggers and snail lovers be considered “cloistered”? Surely their love for the natural world must come from being in the …natural world!
Cloistered? Pffffffft!!
The Greens take representation seriously – hence the male and female co-leadership. If they didn’t choose Marama they’d have a conspicuous lack of Maori representation, especially since she didn’t get a cabinet role. Personally I think she’s an asset, the party’s appeal would be so much narrower without her.
“They’re well placed to get advances on environmental concerns and some social policy”
Talk about stating the obvious.
Most know they are well placed to get advances on environmental concerns and some social policy, but still, they’ve gone downwards. Hence, it’s not going to be enough to appease the left within like me.
A pair of aviator shades and a chest resplendent – All Hail Grand Marshal Baby Fingers!.
(like Bastille day, really?)
President Trump’s vision of soldiers marching and tanks rolling down the boulevards of Washington is moving closer to reality in the Pentagon and White House, where officials say they have begun to plan a grand military parade later this year showcasing the might of America’s armed forces.
[…]
The inspiration for Trump’s push is last year’s Bastille Day celebration in Paris, which the president attended as a guest of French President Emmanuel Macron. Trump was awestruck by the tableau of uniformed French troops marching down Avenue des Champs-Elysees with military tanks, armored vehicles, gun trucks and carriers — complete with fighter jets flying over the Arc de Triomphe and painting the sky with streaks of blue, white and red smoke for the colors of the French flag.
Aboard Air Force One en route home from Paris last July, aides said Trump told them he was dazzled by the French display and said he wanted one at home.
FFS! Has the man no shame…
His endless greed is astounding.
Trump has reportedly said he hopes the display would run along Pennsylvania Avenue and pass by Trump International Hotel.
Viewing for the parade from the Hotel would of course be megabucks – but what a happy happenstance!
With such a weak Constitution, and having to rely on Congress to rein in a President who chooses to enrich himself at the expense of the public purse – isn’t it about time the US had a law about this sort of behaviour?
“Kiwis will have to pay GST on internet shopping purchases they make from overseas, Revenue Minister Stuart Nash has confirmed.” , ‘Absolutely the right thing to do” November 15 2017
Poor Stuart, he should listen more carefully to the nuances of Robertsons statements..
“Finance Minister Grant Robertson did not say whether the tax change was definitely a “happening thing” when asked later on Wednesday, indicating instead that it was still something that was being “investigated”, but agreed it had long been Labour policy.
My theory is that they are quietly honouring their statement that ‘no new taxes will be introduced before 2020’. The seeming postponement of the tourist tax is an example, possibly.
A very honourable thing to do (which was totally beyond the last government of course) even though they also said urgency is required in some areas.
If true, I’m not sure why they don’t just say it and put the accusations of u-turning to bed.
Bob Jones’ racism is too much for even the NBR this time. Says Maori wouldn’t exist without the British and they should be made to serve “us” (white people) on one day a year out of gratitude.
This attitude of course reflects the thoughts of Don Brash, we know that, but also the idea of Bill English’s that te reo Maori is “someone else’s language”.
Far from pretending to advocate for one New Zealand these destructive fossils are intent on division.
The anti Waka jumping brigades are status quo con artists.
Unless elected as an independent, the mps are voted for as a party by the public in one way or another.
Part of that should involve the mps striving to make their party structures and organisations as accountable as possible to what they were voted for ( which admittedly these days can be often rather vague but all the same ). This should be part of the mps’ job description to their constituencies, creating transparency within their parties working for the voting public so the constituencies get as much bang as their buck as possible for what was said they were voting for.
When these type of issues are blatantly betrayed by a party, then mps can resign, from their position and or the party. This is not the same as mps trying to set the agenda in internal power plays, as was the case with the recent spat of internal green party mps going into the election. No, it is due diligence after the fact, independent to what the party policy platform is and how it was formed.
Now that this doesn’t happen so much, is more about the conceit about the political process to start with than it is about the democratic principles about the ‘waka jumping bill’ to end with.
In my view, New Zealand society has just endured the most extremist & looting banana republic global communistic govt term in it’s history. This did not come about, nor exist, in a vacuum. Some realism about the place of the current coalition alternative govt is often missing, in being separate from complaints about things like the further directions and outcomes involved in the next step of free-trade’s global cartel monopolism in the guise of the TPP.
While elections are spectator sports, a significant component to what constitutes good governance in a public’s interest, often is not when it comes to the specifics of gears and lever operation. What the govt is doing, yes.
And what the govt was doing was saying they did not essentially feel good about the initial agreement. How a govt is doing this, is more a case of gears and lever operation, and that is to some level, related to the power wattage of the machinery it has the operation of to do so, and that is not the spectator sport part of the process. These two things may overlap in a continuum but they are not the same.
Fed. Farmers” “head of animal welfare” claims, unconvincingly: “Our role is to show leadership and to educate our members” The Panel, RNZ National, Wednesday 7 February 2018
Jim Mora, Penny Ashton, Patrick Morgan, Caitlin Cherry
First item after the 4 o’clock news is the vibe around this exciting new prime minister, and the excellent showing she made at Waitangi. “By any measure,” said host Jim Mora, “Jacinda Ardern’s trip north went well.” The panelists agree that Jacinda Ardern and her government are in for a lot more positive coverage in future, and the prospects for the Nasty Party seem dim. Then Penny Ashton comes up with one of the best lines of the year so far….
PENNY ASHTON: What is National going to do to counter her? I hear talk of Simon Bridges being in line for the leadership. I hope he does become leader, because he has all the charm of a school bully.
Mora does not greet this apposite and humorous quip with one of his trademark guffaws. Nor does he mutter his habitual, insincere “That’s very funny!” Instead he falls into an icy silence, as he does whenever someone makes a remark even slightly critical of the National Party.
After that awkward moment it was time to interview the first guest of the afternoon, billed as the “head of animal welfare” for Federated Farmers. His name is Chris Lewis and he apparently owns a farm “in the Waikato.” Mora insisted, at least three times, that Lewis is “one of the good farmers”. Maybe he is, but he didn’t seem to know much about the topic he was brought on to talk about: the suffering of dairy cows in the sun, with no trees to shelter under. Chris Lewis seemed to have no idea about anything. It was one of the most embarrassing performances in the history of The Panel—and that, as any long-time listener will attest, is very embarrassing indeed.
JIM MORA: Yeah, but are shelter belts being removed for the ease of installing centre-pivots?
CHRIS LEWIS: Ahhh, I don’t farm in Canterbury and I haven’t been there much lately. …. Our role is to show leadership and to educate our members….. But we need your listeners to tell us what are the best trees to plant…. [more confused blathering then, mercifully, he stops.]
….STUNNED SILENCE….
PENNY ASHTON: I would have thought he’d be the expert on such things. MORA: No, he’s— PENNY ASHTON: He’s the head of animal welfare for Federated Farmers. MORA: No, he’s looking for arboreal advice. PENNY ASHTON:[clearly unimpressed] Hmmmmmm….
Later, near the end of the program, Penny Ashton manages to run afoul of Jim Mora’s highly selective moral code again….
PENNY ASHTON: He’s a disgusting piece of human garbage, Piers Morgan. MORA: We don’t need to go into that….
Eric Crampton writes – Grudges are bad. Better to move on. But it can be fun to keep a couple of really trivial ones, so you’re not tempted to have other ones. For example, because of the rootkit fiasco of 2005, no Sony products in our household. ...
A new report warns an estimated third of the adult population have unmet need for health care.Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāHere’s the six key things I learned about Aotaroa’s political economy this week around housing, climate and poverty:Politics - Three opinion polls confirmed support for PM Christopher Luxon ...
Today is May the fourth. Which was just a regular day when my mother took me to see the newly released Star Wars at the Odeon in Rotorua. The queue was right around the corner. Some years later this day became known as Star Wars Day, the date being a ...
Buzz from the Beehive Much more media attention is being paid to something Winston Peters said about former Australian Foreign Minister Bob Carr than to a speech he delivered to the New Zealand China Council. One word is missing from the speech: AUKUS. But AUKUS loomed large in his considerations ...
Is the economy in another long stagnation? If so, why?This is about the time that the Treasury will be locking up its economic forecasts to be published in the 2024 Budget Economic and Fiscal Update (BEFU) on budget day, 30 May. I am not privy to what they will be ...
The annual list of who's been bribing our politicians is out, and journalists will no doubt be poring over it to find the juiciest and dirtiest bribes. The government's fast-track invite list is likely to be a particular focus, and we already know of one company on the list which ...
In the weeks after the October 7 Hamas attacks on Southern Israel I wrote about the possible 2nd, 3rd and even 4th order effects of the conflict. These included new fronts being opened in the West Bank (with Hamas), Golan … Continue reading → ...
Peter Dunne writes – It is one of the oldest truisms that there is never a good time for MPs to get a pay rise. This week’s announcement of pay raises of around 2.8% backdated to last October could hardly have come at a worse time, with the ...
David Farrar writes – Newshub reports: Newshub can reveal a fresh allegation of intimidation against Green MP Julie-Anne Genter. Genter is subject to a disciplinary process for aggressively waving a book in the face of National Minister Matt Doocey in the House – but it’s not the first time ...
The Treasury has published a paper today on the global productivity slowdown and how it is playing out in New Zealand: The productivity slowdown: implications for the Treasury’s forecasts and projections. The Treasury Paper examines recent trends in productivity and the potential drivers of the slowdown. Productivity for the whole economy ...
Winston Peters’ comments about former Australian foreign minister look set to be an ongoing headache for both him and Luxon. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The podcast above of the weekly ‘hoon’ webinar for subscribers features co-hosts and , along with regular guests on Gaza and ...
These puppet strings don't pull themselvesYou're thinking thoughts from someone elseHow much time do you think you have?Are you prepared for what comes next?The debating chamber can be a trying place for an opposition MP. What with the person in charge, the speaker, typically being an MP from the governing ...
The land around Lyme Regis, where Meryl Streep once stood, in a hood, on the Cobb, is falling into the sea.MerylThe land around Lyme Regis, around the Cobb that made it rich, has always been falling slowly but surely into the sea. Read more ...
Buzz from the Beehive Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters was bound to win headlines when he set out his thinking about AUKUS in his speech to the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs. The headlines became bigger when – during an interview on RNZ’s Morning Report today – he criticised ...
The Post reports on how the government is refusing to release its advice on its corrupt Muldoonist fast-track law, instead using the "soon to be publicly available" refusal ground to hide it until after select committee submissions on the bill have closed. Fast-track Minister Chris Bishop's excuse? “It's not ...
As pressure on it grows, the livestock industry’s approach to the transition to Net Zero is increasingly being compared to that of fossil fuel interests. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / Getty ImagesTL;DR: Here’s the top five news items of note in climate news for Aotearoa-NZ this week, and a discussion above ...
The New Zealand Herald reports – Stats NZ has offered a voluntary redundancy scheme to all of its workers as a way to give staff some control over their “future” amidst widespread job losses in the public sector. In an update to staff this morning, seen by the Herald, Statistics New Zealand ...
On Werewolf/Scoop, I usually do two long form political columns a week. From now on, there will be an extra column each week about music and movies. But first, some late-breaking political events:The rise in unemployment numbers for the March quarter was bigger than expected – and especially sharp ...
David Farrar writes – The Herald reports: TVNZ says it is dealing with about 50 formal complaints over its coverage of the latest 1News-Verian political poll, with some viewers – as well as the Prime Minister and a former senior Labour MP – critical of the tone of the 6pm report. ...
Muriel Newman writes – When Meridian Energy was seeking resource consents for a West Coast hydro dam proposal in 2010, local Maori “strenuously” objected, claiming their mana was inextricably linked to ‘their’ river and could be damaged. After receiving a financial payment from the company, however, the Ngai Tahu ...
Alwyn Poole writes – “An SEP,’ he said, ‘is something that we can’t see, or don’t see, or our brain doesn’t let us see, because we think that it’s somebody else’s problem. That’s what SEP means. Somebody Else’s Problem. The brain just edits it out, it’s like a ...
Our trust in our political institutions is fast eroding, according to a Maxim Institute discussion paper, Shaky Foundations: Why our democracy needs trust. The paper – released today – raises concerns about declining trust in New Zealand’s political institutions and democratic processes, and the role that the overuse of Parliamentary urgency ...
This article was prepared for publication yesterday. More ministerial announcements have been posted on the government’s official website since it was written. We will report on these later today …. Buzz from the BeehiveThere we were, thinking the environment is in trouble, when along came Jones. Shane Jones. ...
New Zealand now has the fourth most depressed construction sector in the world behind China, Qatar and Hong Kong. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy at 8:46am on Thursday, May 2:The Lead: ...
Hi,I am just going to state something very obvious: American police are fucking crazy.That was a photo gracing the New York Times this morning, showing New York City police “entering Columbia University last night after receiving a request from the school.”Apparently in America, protesting the deaths of tens of thousands ...
Winston Peters’ much anticipated foreign policy speech last night was a work of two halves. Much of it was a standard “boilerplate” Foreign Ministry overview of the state of the world. There was some hardening up of rhetoric with talk of “benign” becoming “malign” and old truths giving way to ...
Graham Adams assesses the fallout of the Cass Review — The press release last Thursday from the UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls didn’t make the mainstream news in New Zealand but it really should have. The startling title of Reem Alsalem’s statement — “Implementation of ‘Cass ...
This open-for-business, under-new-management cliché-pockmarked government of Christopher Luxon is not the thing of beauty he imagines it to be. It is not the powerful expression of the will of the people that he asserts it to be. It is not a soaring eagle, it is a malodorous vulture. This newest poll should make ...
The latest labour market statistics, showing a rise in unemployment. There are now 134,000 unemployed - 14,000 more than when the National government took office. Which is I guess what happens when the Reserve Bank causes a recession in an effort to Keep Wages Low. The previous government saw a ...
Three opinion polls have been released in the last two days, all showing that the new government is failing to hold their popular support. The usual honeymoon experienced during the first year of a first term government is entirely absent. The political mood is still gloomy and discontented, mainly due ...
National's Finance Minister once met a poor person.A scornful interview with National's finance guru who knows next to nothing about economics or people.There might have been something a bit familiar if that was the headline I’d gone with today. It would of course have been in tribute to the article ...
Rob MacCulloch writes – Throughout the pandemic, the new Vice-Chancellor-of-Otago-University-on-$629,000 per annum-Can-you-believe-it-and-Former-Finance-Minister Grant Robertson repeated the mantra over and over that he saved “lives and livelihoods”.As we update how this claim is faring over the course of time, the facts are increasingly speaking differently. NZ ...
Chris Trotter writes – IT’S A COMMONPLACE of political speeches, especially those delivered in acknowledgement of electoral victory: “We’ll govern for all New Zealanders.” On the face of it, the pledge is a strange one. Why would any political leader govern in ways that advantaged the huge ...
Bryce Edwards writes – The list of former National Party Ministers being given plum and important roles got longer this week with the appointment of former Deputy Prime Minister Paula Bennett as the chair of Pharmac. The Christopher Luxon-led Government has now made key appointments to Bill ...
TL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy at 10:06am on Wednesday, May 1:The Lead: Business confidence fell across the board in April, falling in some areas to levels last seen during the lockdowns because of a collapse in ...
Over the past 36 hours, Christopher Luxon has been dong his best to portray the centre-right’s plummeting poll numbers as a mark of virtue. Allegedly, the negative verdicts are the result of hard economic times, and of a government bravely set out on a perilous rescue mission from which not ...
Auckland Transport have started rolling out new HOP card readers around the network and over the next three months, all of them on buses, at train stations and ferry wharves will be replaced. The change itself is not that remarkable, with the new readers looking similar to what is already ...
Completed reads for April: The Difference Engine, by William Gibson and Bruce Sterling Carnival of Saints, by George Herman The Snow Spider, by Jenny Nimmo Emlyn’s Moon, by Jenny Nimmo The Chestnut Soldier, by Jenny Nimmo Death Comes As the End, by Agatha Christie Lord of the Flies, by ...
On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
Have a story to share about St Paul’s, but today just picturesPopular novels written at this desk by a young man who managed to bootstrap himself out of father’s imprisonment and his own young life in a workhouse Read more ...
The list of former National Party Ministers being given plum and important roles got longer this week with the appointment of former Deputy Prime Minister Paula Bennett as the chair of Pharmac. The Christopher Luxon-led Government has now made key appointments to Bill English, Simon Bridges, Steven Joyce, Roger Sowry, ...
Newsroom has a story today about National's (fortunately failed) effort to disestablish the newly-created Inspector-General of Defence. The creation of this agency was the key recommendation of the Inquiry into Operation Burnham, and a vital means of restoring credibility and social licence to an agency which had been caught lying ...
Holding On To The Present:The moment a political movement arises that attacks the whole idea of social progress, and announces its intention to wind back the hands of History’s clock, then democracy, along with its unwritten rules, is in mortal danger.IT’S A COMMONPLACE of political speeches, especially those delivered in ...
Stuck In The Middle With You:As Christopher Luxon feels the hot breath of Act’s and NZ First’s extremists on the back of his neck and, as he reckons with the damage their policies are already inflicting upon a country he’s described as “fragile”, is there not some merit in reaching out ...
The unpopular coalition government is currently rushing to repeal section 7AA of the Oranga Tamariki Act. The clause is Oranga Tamariki's Treaty clause, and was inserted after its systematic stealing of Māori children became a public scandal and resulted in physical resistance to further abductions. The clause created clear obligations ...
Buzz from the Beehive The government’s official website – which Point of Order monitors daily – not for the first time has nothing much to say today about political happenings that are grabbing media headlines. It makes no mention of the latest 1News-Verian poll, for example. This shows National down ...
It Takes A Train To Cry:Surely, there is nothing lonelier in all this world than the long wail of a distant steam locomotive on a cold Winter’s night.AS A CHILD, I would lie awake in my grandfather’s house and listen to the traffic. The big wooden house was only a ...
Packing A Punch: The election of the present government, including in its ranks politicians dedicated to reasserting the rights of the legislature in shaping and determining the future of Māori and Pakeha in New Zealand, should have alerted the judiciary – including its anomalous appendage, the Waitangi Tribunal – that its ...
Dead Woman Walking: New Zealand’s media industry had been moving steadily towards disaster for all the years Melissa Lee had been National’s media and communications policy spokesperson, and yet, when the crisis finally broke, on her watch, she had nothing intelligent to offer. Christopher Luxon is a patient man - but he’s not ...
Chris Trotter writes – New Zealand politics is remarkably easy-going: dangerously so, one might even say. With the notable exception of John Key’s flat ruling-out of the NZ First Party in 2008, all parties capable of clearing MMP’s five-percent threshold, or winning one or more electorate seats, tend ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Polling shows that Wellington Mayor Tory Whanau has the lowest approval rating of any mayor in the country. Siting at -12 per cent, the proportion of constituents who disapprove of her performance outweighs those who give her the thumbs up. This negative rating is ...
Luxon will no doubt put a brave face on it, but there is no escaping the pressure this latest poll will put on him and the government. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on Aotearoa-NZ’s political ...
This is a re-post from The Climate Brink by Andrew Dessler In the wake of any unusual weather event, someone inevitably asks, “Did climate change cause this?” In the most literal sense, that answer is almost always no. Climate change is never the sole cause of hurricanes, heat waves, droughts, or ...
Something odd happened yesterday, and I’d love to know if there’s more to it. If there was something which preempted what happened, or if it was simply a throwaway line in response to a journalist.Yesterday David Seymour was asked at a press conference what the process would be if the ...
Hi,From time to time, I want to bring Webworm into the real world. We did it last year with the Jurassic Park event in New Zealand — which was a lot of fun!And so on Saturday May 11th, in Los Angeles, I am hosting a lil’ Webworm pop-up! I’ve been ...
Education Minister Erica Standford yesterday unveiled a fundamental reform of the way our school pupils are taught. She would not exactly say so, but she is all but dismantling the so-called “inquiry” “feel good” method of teaching, which has ruled in our classrooms since a major review of the New ...
Exactly where are we seriously going with this government and its policies? That is, apart from following what may as well be a Truss-Lite approach on the purported economic “plan“, and Victorian-era regression when it comes to social policy.Oh it’ll work this time of course, we’re basically assured, “the ...
Hey Uncle Dave, When the Poms joined the EEC, I wasn't one of those defeatists who said, Well, that’s it for the dairy job. And I was right, eh? The Chinese can’t get enough of our milk powder and eventually, the Poms came to their senses and backed up the ute ...
Polling shows that Wellington Mayor Tory Whanau has the lowest approval rating of any mayor in the country. Siting at -12 per cent, the proportion of constituents who disapprove of her performance outweighs those who give her the thumbs up. This negative rating is higher than for any other mayor ...
Buzz from the Beehive Pharmac has been given a financial transfusion and a new chair to oversee its spending in the pharmaceutical business. Associate Health Minister David Seymour described the funding for Pharmac as “its largest ever budget of $6.294 billion over four years, fixing a $1.774 billion fiscal cliff”. ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Many criticisms are being made of the Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill, including by this writer. But as with everything in politics, every story has two sides, and both deserve attention. It’s important to understand what the Government is trying to achieve and its ...
TL;DR: Here’s my top 10 ‘pick ‘n’ mix of links to news, analysis and opinion articles as of 10:10am on Monday, April 29:Scoop: The children's ward at Rotorua Hospital will be missing a third of its beds as winter hits because Te Whatu Ora halted an upgrade partway through to ...
span class=”dropcap”>As hideous as David Seymour can be, it is worth keeping in mind occasionally that there are even worse political figures (and regimes) out there. Iran for instance, is about to execute the country’s leading hip hop musician Toomaj Salehi, for writing and performing raps that “corrupt” the nation’s ...
Yesterday marked 10 years since the first electric train carried passengers in Auckland so it’s a good time to look back at it and the impact it has had. A brief history The first proposals for rail electrification in Auckland came in the 1920’s alongside the plans for earlier ...
Right now, in Aotearoa-NZ, our ‘animal spirits’ are darkening towards a winter of discontent, thanks at least partly to a chorus of negative comments and actions from the Government Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on ...
You make people evil to punish the paststuck inside a sequel with a rotating castThe following photos haven’t been generated with AI, or modified in any way. They are flesh and blood, human beings. On the left is Galatea Young, a young mum, and her daughter Fiadh who has Angelman ...
April has been a quiet month at A Phuulish Fellow. I have had an exceptionally good reading month, and a decently productive writing month – for original fiction, anyway – but not much has caught my eye that suggested a blog article. It has been vaguely frustrating, to be honest. ...
The Government is again adding to New Zealand’s growing unemployment, this time cutting jobs at the agencies responsible for urban development and growing much needed housing stock. ...
With Minister Karen Chhour indicating in the House today that she either doesn’t know or care about the frontline cuts she’s making to Oranga Tamariki, we risk seeing more and more of our children falling through the cracks. ...
The Labour Party is saddened to learn of the death of Sir Robert Martin, a globally renowned disability advocate who led the way for disability rights both in New Zealand and internationally. ...
Labour is calling for the Government to urgently rethink its coalition commitment to restart live animal exports, Labour animal welfare spokesperson Rachel Boyack said. ...
Today’s Financial Stability Report has once again highlighted that poverty and deep inequality are political choices - and this Government is choosing to make them worse. ...
The Green Party is calling on the Government to do more for our households in most need as unemployment rises and the cost of living crisis endures. ...
Unemployment is on the rise and it’s only going to get worse under this Government, Labour finance spokesperson Barbara Edmonds said. Stats NZ figures show the unemployment rate grew to 4.3 percent in the March quarter from 4 percent in the December quarter. “This is the second rise in unemployment ...
The New Zealand Labour Party welcomes the entering into force of the European Union and New Zealand free trade agreement. This agreement opens the door for a huge increase in trade opportunities with a market of 450 million people who are high value discerning consumers of New Zealand goods and ...
The National-led Government continues its fiscal jiggery pokery with its Pharmac announcement today, Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall says. “The government has increased Pharmac funding but conceded it will only make minimal increases in access to medicine”, said Ayesha Verrall “This is far from the bold promises made to fund ...
This afternoon’s interim Waitangi Tribunal report must be taken seriously as it affects our most vulnerable children, Labour children’s spokesperson Willow-Jean Prime. ...
Te Pāti Māori are demanding the New Zealand Government support an international independent investigation into mass graves that have been uncovered at two hospitals on the Gaza strip, following weeks of assault by Israeli troops. Among the 392 bodies that have been recovered, are children and elderly civilians. Many of ...
Our two-tiered system for veterans’ support is out of step with our closest partners, and all parties in Parliament should work together to fix it, Labour veterans’ affairs spokesperson Greg O’Connor said. ...
Stripping two Ministers of their portfolios just six months into the job shows Christopher Luxon’s management style is lacking, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said. ...
Tonight’s court decision to overturn the summons of the Children’s Minister has enabled the Crown to continue making decisions about Māori without evidence, says Te Pāti Māori spokesperson for Children, Mariameno Kapa-Kingi. “The judicial system has this evening told the nation that this government can do whatever they want when ...
It appears Nicola Willis is about to pull the rug out from under the feet of local communities still dealing with the aftermath of last year’s severe weather, and local councils relying on funding to build back from these disasters. ...
The Government is making short-sighted changes to the Resource Management Act (RMA) that will take away environmental protection in favour of short-term profits, Labour’s environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said today. ...
Labour welcomes the release of the report into the North Island weather events and looks forward to working with the Government to ensure that New Zealand is as prepared as it can be for the next natural disaster. ...
The Labour Party has called for the New Zealand Government to recognise Palestine, as a material step towards progressing the two-State solution needed to achieve a lasting peace in the region. ...
Some of our country’s most important work, stopping the sexual exploitation of children and violent extremism could go along with staff on the frontline at ports and airports. ...
The Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill will give projects such as new coal mines a ‘get out of jail free’ card to wreak havoc on the environment, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said today. ...
The government's decision to reintroduce Three Strikes is a destructive and ineffective piece of law-making that will only exacerbate an inherently biased and racist criminal justice system, said Te Pāti Māori Justice Spokesperson, Tākuta Ferris, today. During the time Three Strikes was in place in Aotearoa, Māori and Pasifika received ...
Cuts to frontline hospital staff are not only a broken election promise, it shows the reckless tax cuts have well and truly hit the frontline of the health system, says Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall. ...
The Green Party has joined the call for public submissions on the fast-track legislation to be extended after the Ombudsman forced the Government to release the list of organisations invited to apply just hours before submissions close. ...
New Zealand’s good work at reducing climate emissions for three years in a row will be undone by the National government’s lack of ambition and scrapping programmes that were making a difference, Labour Party climate spokesperson Megan Woods said today. ...
More essential jobs could be on the chopping block, this time Ministry of Education staff on the school lunches team are set to find out whether they're in line to lose their jobs. ...
Te Pāti Māori is disgusted at the confirmation that hundreds are set to lose their jobs at Oranga Tamariki, and the disestablishment of the Treaty Response Unit. “This act of absolute carelessness and out of touch decision making is committing tamariki to state abuse.” Said Te Pāti Māori Oranga Tamariki ...
The Government is trying to bring in a law that will allow Ministers to cut corners and kill off native species, Labour environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said. ...
Cancelling urgently needed new Cook Strait ferries and hiking the cost of public transport for many Kiwis so that National can announce the prospect of another tunnel for Wellington is not making good choices, Labour Transport Spokesperson Tangi Utikere said. ...
A laundry list of additional costs for Tāmaki Makarau Auckland shows the Minister for the city is not delivering for the people who live there, says Labour Auckland Issues spokesperson Shanan Halbert. ...
The Minister Responsible for RMA Reform, Chris Bishop today released his decision on four recommendations referred to him by the Western Bay of Plenty District Council, opening the door to housing growth in the area. The Council’s Plan Change 92 allows more homes to be built in existing and new ...
Thank you, John McKinnon and the New Zealand China Council for the invitation to speak to you today. Thank you too, all members of the China Council. Your effort has played an essential role in helping to build, shape, and grow a balanced and resilient relationship between our two ...
The Government is modernising insurance law to better protect Kiwis and provide security in the event of a disaster, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly announced today. “These reforms are long overdue. New Zealand’s insurance law is complicated and dated, some of which is more than 100 years old. ...
The coalition Government is refreshing its approach to supporting pay equity claims as time-limited funding for the Pay Equity Taskforce comes to an end, Public Service Minister Nicola Willis says. “Three years ago, the then-government introduced changes to the Equal Pay Act to support pay equity bargaining. The changes were ...
Structured literacy will change the way New Zealand children learn to read - improving achievement and setting students up for success, Education Minister Erica Stanford says. “Being able to read and write is a fundamental life skill that too many young people are missing out on. Recent data shows that ...
Trade Minister Todd McClay says Canada’s refusal to comply in full with a CPTPP trade dispute ruling in our favour over dairy trade is cynical and New Zealand has no intention of backing down. Mr McClay said he has asked for urgent legal advice in respect of our ‘next move’ ...
The rights of our children and young people will be enhanced by changes the coalition Government will make to strengthen oversight of the Oranga Tamariki system, including restoring a single Children’s Commissioner. “The Government is committed to delivering better public services that care for our most at-risk young people and ...
The Government is making it easier for minor changes to be made to a building consent so building a home is easier and more affordable, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says. “The coalition Government is focused on making it easier and cheaper to build homes so we can ...
New Zealand lost a true legend when internationally renowned disability advocate Sir Robert Martin (KNZM) passed away at his home in Whanganui last night, Disabilities Issues Minister Louise Upston says. “Our Government’s thoughts are with his wife Lynda, family and community, those he has worked with, the disability community in ...
Good evening – Before discussing the challenges and opportunities facing New Zealand’s foreign policy, we’d like to first acknowledge the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs. You have contributed to debates about New Zealand foreign policy over a long period of time, and we thank you for hosting us. ...
From today, passengers travelling internationally from Auckland Airport will be able to keep laptops and liquids in their carry-on bags for security screening thanks to new technology, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “Creating a more efficient and seamless travel experience is important for holidaymakers and businesses, enabling faster movement through ...
People with an interest in the health of Northland’s marine ecosystems are invited to a public meeting to discuss how to deal with kina barrens, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones will lead the discussion, which will take place on Friday, 10 May, at Awanui Hotel in ...
Kiwi exporters are $100 million better off today with the NZ EU FTA entering into force says Trade Minister Todd McClay. “This is all part of our plan to grow the economy. New Zealand's prosperity depends on international trade, making up 60 per cent of the country’s total economic activity. ...
There are heartening signs that the extractive sector is once again becoming an attractive prospect for investors and a source of economic prosperity for New Zealand, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. “The beginnings of a resurgence in extractive industries are apparent in media reports of the sector in the past ...
The return of the historic Ō-Rākau battle site to the descendants of those who fought there moved one step closer today with the first reading of Te Pire mō Ō-Rākau, Te Pae o Maumahara / The Ō-Rākau Remembrance Bill. The Bill will entrust the 9.7-hectare battle site, five kilometres west ...
Energy Minister Simeon Brown has announced 25 new high-speed EV charging hubs along key routes between major urban centres and outlined the Government’s plan to supercharge New Zealand’s EV infrastructure. The hubs will each have several chargers and be capable of charging at least four – and up to 10 ...
The coalition Government will not proceed with the previous Government’s plans to regulate residential property managers, Housing Minister Chris Bishop says. “I have written to the Chairperson of the Social Services and Community Committee to inform him that the Government does not intend to support the Residential Property Managers Bill ...
The Government has announced an independent review into the disability support system funded by the Ministry of Disabled People – Whaikaha. Disability Issues Minister Louise Upston says the review will look at what can be done to strengthen the long-term sustainability of Disability Support Services to provide disabled people and ...
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith has attended the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva and outlined the Government’s plan to restore law and order. “Speaking to the United Nations Human Rights Council provided us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while responding to issues and ...
The Government and Rotorua Lakes Council are committed to working closely together to end the use of contracted emergency housing motels in Rotorua. Associate Minister of Housing (Social Housing) Tama Potaka says the Government remains committed to ending the long-term use of contracted emergency housing motels in Rotorua by the ...
Trade Minister Todd McClay heads overseas today for high-level trade talks in the Gulf region, and a key OECD meeting in Paris. Mr McClay will travel to Riyadh to meet with counterparts from Saudi Arabia and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). “New Zealand’s goods and services exports to the Gulf region ...
Education Minister Erica Stanford has outlined six education priorities to deliver a world-leading education system that sets Kiwi kids up for future success. “I’m putting ambition, achievement and outcomes at the heart of our education system. I want every child to be inspired and engaged in their learning so they ...
The new NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) App is a secure ‘one stop shop’ to provide the services drivers need, Transport Minister Simeon Brown and Digitising Government Minister Judith Collins say. “The NZTA App will enable an easier way for Kiwis to pay for Vehicle Registration and Road User Charges (RUC). ...
Whānau with tamariki growing up in emergency housing motels will be prioritised for social housing starting this week, says Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka. “Giving these whānau a better opportunity to build healthy stable lives for themselves and future generations is an essential part of the Government’s goal of reducing ...
Racing Minister Winston Peters has paid tribute to an icon of the industry with the recent passing of Dave O’Sullivan (OBE). “Our sympathies are with the O’Sullivan family with the sad news of Dave O’Sullivan’s recent passing,” Mr Peters says. “His contribution to racing, initially as a jockey and then ...
Assalaamu alaikum, greetings to you all. Eid Mubarak, everyone! I want to extend my warmest wishes to you and everyone celebrating this joyous occasion. It is a pleasure to be here. I have enjoyed Eid celebrations at Parliament before, but this is my first time joining you as the Minister ...
Associate Health Minister David Seymour has announced Pharmac’s largest ever budget of $6.294 billion over four years, fixing a $1.774 billion fiscal cliff. “Access to medicines is a crucial part of many Kiwis’ lives. We’ve committed to a budget allocation of $1.774 billion over four years so Kiwis are ...
Hon Paula Bennett has been appointed as member and chair of the Pharmac board, Associate Health Minister David Seymour announced today. "Pharmac is a critical part of New Zealand's health system and plays a significant role in ensuring that Kiwis have the best possible access to medicines,” says Mr Seymour. ...
Hundreds of New Zealand families affected by Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) will benefit from a new Government focus on prevention and treatment, says Health Minister Dr Shane Reti. “We know FASD is a leading cause of preventable intellectual and neurodevelopmental disability in New Zealand,” Dr Reti says. “Every day, ...
Regional Development Minister Shane Jones today attended the official opening of Kaikohe’s new $14.7 million sports complex. “The completion of the Kaikohe Multi Sports Complex is a fantastic achievement for the Far North,” Mr Jones says. “This facility not only fulfils a long-held dream for local athletes, but also creates ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters’ engagements in Türkiye this week underlined the importance of diplomacy to meet growing global challenges. “Returning to the Gallipoli Peninsula to represent New Zealand at Anzac commemorations was a sombre reminder of the critical importance of diplomacy for de-escalating conflicts and easing tensions,” Mr Peters ...
Ambassador Millar, Burgemeester, Vandepitte, Excellencies, military representatives, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen – good morning and welcome to this sacred Anzac Day dawn service. It is an honour to be here on behalf of the Government and people of New Zealand at Buttes New British Cemetery, Polygon Wood – a deeply ...
Distinguished guests - It is an honour to return once again to this site which, as the resting place for so many of our war-dead, has become a sacred place for generations of New Zealanders. Our presence here and at the other special spaces of Gallipoli is made ...
Mai ia tawhiti pamamao, te moana nui a Kiwa, kua tae whakaiti mai matou, ki to koutou papa whenua. No koutou te tapuwae, no matou te tapuwae, kua honoa pumautia. Ko nga toa kua hinga nei, o te Waipounamu, o te Ika a Maui, he okioki tahi me o ...
Paul Goldsmith will take on responsibility for the Media and Communications portfolio, while Louise Upston will pick up the Disability Issues portfolio, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced today. “Our Government is relentlessly focused on getting New Zealand back on track. As issues change in prominence, I plan to adjust Ministerial ...
Recreational catch limits will be reduced in areas of Fiordland and the Chatham Islands to help keep those fisheries healthy and sustainable, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. The lower recreational daily catch limits for a range of finfish and shellfish species caught in the Fiordland Marine Area and ...
Energy Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed an important milestone in New Zealand’s hydrogen future, with the opening of the country’s first network of hydrogen refuelling stations in Wiri. “I want to congratulate the team at Hiringa Energy and its partners K one W one (K1W1), Mitsui & Co New Zealand ...
The coalition Government is delivering on its commitment to improve resource management laws and give greater certainty to consent applicants, with a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) expected to be introduced to Parliament next month. RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop has today outlined the first RMA Amendment ...
Overseas models for regulating the oil and gas sector, including their decommissioning regimes, are being carefully scrutinised as a potential template for New Zealand’s own sector, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. The Coalition Government is focused on rebuilding investor confidence in New Zealand’s energy sector as it looks to strengthen ...
Emergency Management and Recovery Minister Mark Mitchell has today released the Report of the Government Inquiry into the response to the North Island Severe Weather Events. “The report shows that New Zealand’s emergency management system is not fit-for-purpose and there are some significant gaps we need to address,” Mr Mitchell ...
We might be in Invercargill but all anyone can talk about is Gore. Specifically, Salford Street. That’s where three-year-old Lachlan Jones lived, south of the centre of town, between the A&P Showgrounds and the Mataura River. Roughly 1.2 km away from the single level home he lived in with his ...
MONDAY I lined up the latest round of civil servants from city hall against the wall, and signalled for the firing squad to drop their rifles. I stepped up onto a wooden crate to look at the office workers in the eye. But that didn’t feel right, so I found ...
Keen hiker and second-year MSc student Liam Hewson wears two hats when he’s in the great outdoors. “The scientist in me appreciates nature and goes, ‘Oh, there’s that thing and there’s another thing,’ but then the tramper and the outdoorsy person in me thinks, ‘Cool bush.’” Born and bred in ...
After a long and illustrious career as a goal kicker, Dan Carter’s favourite way to unwind is… kicking goals. Why can’t he get enough of it? And what it’s like to watch him do it for an hour straight? A semicircle of people wielding cameras and phones has formed in ...
Dame Susan Devoy takes us through her life in television, including late night ER debriefs, her proudest CTI moment and the show she watches in secret. Quite aside from her four world champion squash titles, Dame Susan Devoy will likely go down in history as one of the best Celebrity ...
Hera Lindsay Bird reveals the best places in Ōtepoti to score more for your apocalypse-prep book hoard.Sometimes I get the feeling I’ve been killed in a car crash, and this second half of my life is just the brain unspooling itself, like one of those episodes of a hospital ...
ThreeNow’s new murder mystery series takes us on a dark, damp journey into the Australian wilderness.This is an excerpt from our weekly pop culture newsletter Rec Room. Sign up here. High Country is ThreeNow’s new Australian eight-part crime drama, set in a remote part of the Victorian highlands. It tells ...
Introducing a new way to read The Spinoff every weekend. After nearly 10 years of being an online magazine, we’re finally embracing the weekend liftout. Despite our best efforts to convince you otherwise, writers and editors at The Spinoff don’t work weekend. It is through the sheer power of technology ...
Tip one: let yourself be nurtured by this big old man. Tip two: don’t ask him to adopt you. So, you’ve arrived at your first session with a new therapist. He tells you to make yourself comfortable and you opt for the tweed armchair, hoping it makes you look like ...
I didn’t know books could open you back up; that there were books that stayed with you, where reading was like a chemical event. I knew nothing.The Sunday Essay is made possible thanks to the support of Creative New Zealand.Not too long ago, I was listening to the American ...
Former Olympic swimmer James Magnussen has already started training for the Enhanced games, though says he won’t start taking performance enhancing substances until about nine months out from the competition. The Australian world champion was the first athlete to be announced by Enhanced, but he says the organisation has had ...
Everyone thinks he’s dead. Every day they expect his body to be washed up along the coast. Most likely up Karitane way, the way the tide’s running. But nobody’ll be too surprised if his body’s never found. Even in death he wouldn’t have wished for such attention. He would have ...
Council members voted 21 to 4 in favour of Ahluwalia returning to the Laucala campus following a much-awaited meeting in Vanuatu this week. It comes as USP and its two unions — the Association of the University of the South Pacific Staff (AUSPS) and the Administration and Support Staff Union ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Nicola Henry, Professor & Australian Research Council Future Fellow, Social and Global Studies Centre, RMIT University Shutterstock Following an emergency meeting of the National Cabinet this week, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has announced a raft of measures to tackle the problem ...
Analysis - A poll showing the opposition is more popular than the government raises questions, politicians go through their 'trial by pay rise' and a Green MP loses her cool in the debating chamber. ...
The entire stretch of Tokomaru Bay on the East Coast will be subject to a joint customary marine title for two hapū, and extending up to four miles out to sea. A High Court judge has found the two groups, who during the case settled a dispute over boundaries for ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By James Hall, Lecturer, Media & Cultural Studies, Edith Cowan University A longstanding feud between TikTok and Universal Music Group seems to have finally reached an end, with both parties signing a deal that will see Universal-backed music returned to the social media ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Siobhan O’Dean, Postdoctoral Research Associate, The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney After several highly publicised alleged murders of women in Australia, the Albanese government this week pledged more than A$925 million over five years ...
Political parties have now fully disclosed the donations they received last year - with National getting more than double the cash of any other party. ...
A Pacific regionalism expert has called out New Zealand's Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters for withholding information from the public on AUKUS military pact. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Richard de Grijs, Professor of Astrophysics, Macquarie University Bruno Scramgnon/Pexels All systems are “go” for tonight’s launch of China’s next step in a carefully planned lunar exploration program. Placed on top of a powerful Long March 5 rocket, the Chang’e 6 ...
National returned a massive donation the day after a Newsroom story linked the donors to a property being investigated for operating unlawfully as a migrant workers’ hostel. The party’s 2023 donation filings, released on Friday, show it returned a $200,000 donation from Buen Holdings on August 23. That was the ...
Pacific Media Watch New Zealand has slumped to an unprecedented 19th place in the annual Reporters Without Borders World Press Freedom Index survey released today on World Press Freedom Day — May 3. This was a drop of six places from 13th last year when it slipped out of its ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Joshua Black, Political Historian and Administrator Officer, Australian Historical Association, Australian National University Australia has had its fair share of public record-keeping controversies in recent years. Some have been mere farce, as in the case of two formerly government-owned filing cabinets (containing ...
Heavenly Culture, World Peace, Restoration of Light (HWPL), a United Nations-affiliated organization dedicated to fostering peace through civilian-led initiatives, has issued a statement in response to the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran. ...
A poem by Tessa Keenan, from AUP New Poets 10. Mātou These days we are a photograph; one of a farm strewn with cows that used to be bright harakeke or swamp. The kids point at it and say the sun sits behind a smudge (left by someone at Christmas); ...
The only published and available best-selling indie book chart in New Zealand is the top 10 sales list recorded every week at Unity Books’ stores in High St, Auckland, and Willis St, Wellington.AUCKLAND1 Small Things Like These by Claire Keegan (Faber & Faber, $25)The masterful Irish writer ...
Marriage and civil union statistics record the number of marriages and civil unions registered in New Zealand each year, and divorce statistics record the number of divorces granted in New Zealand each year. Key facts Marriages and civil unions In ...
Marriage and civil union statistics record the number of marriages and civil unions registered in New Zealand each year, and divorce statistics record the number of divorces granted in New Zealand each year. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Lennon Y.C. Chang, Associate Professor of Cyber Risk and Policy, Deakin University Taiwan stands out as a beacon of democracy, innovation and resilience in an increasingly autocratic region. But this is under growing threat. In recent years, China has used a variety ...
In this excerpt from her new memoir, Dame Susan Devoy remembers her turn as star contestant on the 2022 season of Celebrity Treasure Island. The most anxious time of every day was pre-elimination, when you knew this could be your final day on the show. I felt such contradictory emotions, ...
A week that began in triumph ended in an all-too-familiar disaster for the Green Party. Duncan Greive asks if there’s something in the mission that breaks its best and brightest. A long, strange week for the Green party began with a fantastic poll result. On one level this is hardly ...
By Lydia Lewis, RNZ Pacific journalist Vanuatu’s former prime minister and opposition MP Ishmael Kalsakau has stepped down — just two days after he confirmed he was the rightful opposition leader. Kalsakau, MP for Port Vila, confirmed to ABC’s Pacific Beat, and the Vanuatu Daily Post on Thursday that he ...
What’s to blame for the coalition’s choppy start? Six months in, and the mojo meter is in the doldrums. A new poll would put National out of power and sees its leader, Chris Luxon, sliding in popularity. How much is it about policy, how much coalition management and a perception ...
The striking report goes far beyond the proposed repeal of the Oranga Tamariki Act’s Treaty of Waitangi provision, and its impact should be felt far beyond the unique circumstances of the claim it addresses. Earlier this week, the Waitangi Tribunal released an interim report on the government’s proposed repeal of ...
The world has been experiencing a productivity slowdown, from which New Zealand has not been exempt. COVID-19 temporarily boosted labour productivity, but more recently, productivity has retreated. The overall trend since 2007 has been one of slow productivity ...
What’s more wasteful than spending $315k on syrup and machine maintenance? Trying to drum up a controversy about it.Cast your mind back to the pre-pandemic idylls of 2019. A “rat” was a disgusting rodent and not a self-administered plague test; the sixth Labour government was in power; and the ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kate Fitz-Gibbon, Professor of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Monash University, Monash University Ken stocker/Shutterstock In the wake of numerous killings of women allegedly by men’s violence in 2024, thousands of Australians have joined rallies across the country to demand action ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Henry Cutler, Professor and Director, Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University Oleg Ivanov IL/Shutterstock Waiting times for public hospital elective surgery have been in the news ahead of this year’s federal budget. That’s the type of non-emergency surgery ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Konstantine Panegyres, McKenzie Postdoctoral Fellow, Historical and Philosophical Studies, The University of Melbourne Amna Artist/Shutterstock One of the earliest descriptions of someone with cancer comes from the fourth century BC. Satyrus, tyrant of the city of Heracleia on the Black Sea, ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By John Rose, Professor of Sustainable Future Transport, University of Sydney LanaElcova/Shutterstock Electric vehicles are often seen as the panacea to cutting emissions – and air pollution – from transport. Is this view correct? Yes – but only once uptake accelerates. Despite the ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Giselle Natassia Woodley, Researcher and Phd Candidate, Edith Cowan University There is widespread agreement Australia needs to do better when it comes to gender-based violence. Anger and frustration at the numbers of women being killed saw national rallies over the weekend and ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By James Graham, Lecturer in Economics, University of Sydney Mark and Anna Photography/Shutterstock As home ownership moves further out of reach for many Australians, “rentvesting” is being touted as a lifesaver. Rentvesting is the practice of renting one property to live ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sukhmani Khorana, Associate Professor, Faculty of Arts, Design and Architecture, UNSW Sydney Netflix The new season of Heartbreak High is garnering mixed reviews. Critics are writing about the racy story lines, comparing it to other coming-of-age series about teenage relationships and ...
Bob Carr intends to launch legal action against Winston Peters and Julie Anne Genter is facing a second allegation of bullying. Both sucked the air out of an announcement on education, writes Anna Rawhiti-Connell in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in ...
In 1995, Sally Clark went out on her own in a bold and unorthodox attempt to join an illustrious group of equestrian riders conquering the world. In the days of glovebox road maps, brick cell phones, and the hit song How Bizarre, Clark refused to follow Sir Mark Todd, Blyth ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ben Beaglehole, Senior Lecturer, Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago niphon/Getty Images The number of people accessing medication for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in Aotearoa New Zealand increased significantly between 2006 and 2022. But the disorder is still under-diagnosed and ...
To celebrate the start of New Zealand music month, we look back at the best local tuneage that managed to weasel its way into Hollywood productions. There’s nothing quite like the thrilling zap of recognition when New Zealand weasels its way into a glamorous Hollywood production. Crack open a Tui ...
People trust other people more than institutions. So how can the media gain that trust through journalists without losing what’s important about the institution? Anna Rawhiti-Connell reflects on two years of curating the news for The Bulletin.Amonth ago, armed cops descended on my neighbourhood as calls to “lock your ...
A warning – suicide is discussed in this podcast New Zealand’s own long-running soap Shortland Street doesn’t hesitate to kill off its much-loved characters. But would TVNZ dare to kill off our favourite soap? That’s the fear as times get tough in television – even though it’s been pointed out ...
Essay: If the Crown harms children, how do you hold it accountable? Analysis by Aaron Smale in light of the Waitangi Tribunal court decision. The post The Crown versus Māori Children appeared first on Newsroom. ...
Opinion: PFAS – per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances – are a class of thousands of man-made chemicals used widely in everyday consumer items such as textiles, packaging, and cookware, popular for their water, grease and stain-repellent properties. However, the very properties that make PFAS so attractive to manufacturers are also what ...
NONFICTION 1 The Last Secret Agent by Pippa Latour & Jude Dobson (Allen & Unwin, $37.99)’ This is the hottest book in New Zealand, number one with a bullet in its first week, selling more than any overseas title, and demand is so huge that it’s already been reprinted. A ...
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A,DIV,A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Friday 3 May appeared first on Newsroom. ...
Rachel Stewart.
Rodeo is toast.
“So, we all know in our hearts that rodeo is wrong. But with Michael Laws speaking up for it, we now know it’s got to be even wrong-er than we originally thought…….”
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11988993
Hope so. Stewart is certainly right about Laws.
the Lhaws is an ass…
I’d always picked him as more of a whanker, but hey.
Good morning Breakfast people some times I THINK that the stock market fall is engineered by the big players on the stock markert . Im always on the net and the amount of bad publicity on the stock market + the interest rate rise in the USA and wallar the big boy like Buffet could clean up 7% I could get someone to code a algorithm to examine theory Eco is assessing . I had thought of that before I changed my funds and while I wrote about that Phenomenon . But I m poor so can not afforded to take a risk . Please can all the people I Tautoko return the favour and make a small donation to help me fight for the rights of a Healthy Humane future FOR all my Whano
and my mokos If the sandflys are aloud to ride all over my reputation this action will put fat on the rungs of all my mokos ladders of life that is the big picture .
P.S some people are saying there is know ECO MAORI effect come on people you know I can easily test this theory of mine on a lot of subjects and I will time It right to have the maximum EFFECT I will not let that have a negative effect on the common people.
Here is my give a little page please help me .Ka kite ano Im off to work
https://givealittle.co.nz/cause/helping-eco-maori-sue-the-nz-police
Ka pai
I’m sure a ton of commenters from the standard will support your claim against the police.
Good luck with that.
C’mon James thats not necessary
James changing his RWNJ attitude? Good luck with that.
Nothing wrong with being on the right but I don’t think its a good idea to tease eco maori
Im not. Its more a point that I doubt many people on here will put their hands in their pockets to help someone.
If some do just to prove me wrong – it wont be a bad thing.
Yeah but probably better to leave eco maori to do his thing rather than, unintentionally, rark him up
Being on the right and being a RWNJ aren’t necessarily the same thing 🙂
I’ve always considered myself more of a centrist 🙂
Lol, you keep telling yourself that PR. I’m happy for you to be a centrist once we’ve dragged the Overton Window back to where it should be.
On certain issues i’m quite to the left, its just those issues don’t get raised much 🙂
Go on then, what are they?
Not sure how to express it but I’d put a stop to any and all dairy farming conversions in areas that can’t really handle it, like the MacKenzie Country for example plus all farms to fence of waterways and provide shade for animals, where feasible
I’d bring in a form of National service where two years service = one years tertiary training at an accredited institution and the National service can encompass working for DOC
I’d increase DOCs funding for pest eradication and look at reforming pest control boards
Make work scheme for SH1 where its made four lanes (where feasible), straightened and including making the bridges four lanes as well and all single lane state highway bridges to be widened
For starters 🙂
Great suggestions.
Curb dairy conversions. Progressive.
Public interning for Doc. Progressive.
More funding to eradicate pests. Progressive.
Safety works on SH1. that’s Genters portfolio, so clearly progressive.
Pay no mind to Weka. Weka doesn’t determine what is or is not progressive.
We all do.
Suggest more. Reach across the House. We need it.
So no more dairy conversions at all? (everywhere is past capacity).
Apart from that, those aren’t really left wing positions PR. Not that I’m against them (mostly), but I’d like to see LW versions.
Really, I thought most of them were pretty left wing, maybe not the national service one but opening it up to DOC, forestry service or something similar makes it a bit more left
Left wing would be to create permanent jobs that DOC can rely on.
I don’t have a problem with bonding per se, but it needs to be tied to the thing one trained for and it needs to be good for the person receiving the training as well as the service.
Instead of national service, make it a carrot thing. If people want to work for DOC, make that a well funded experience that brings lots of benefits to the people involved.
“…for example plus all farms to fence of waterways and provide shade for animals, where feasible”
Fencing of waterways should be happening no matter where on the L/R spectrum. I think you are confusing neoliberalism running a plunder economy, and RW conservatism. I can’t see RW conservatism having a problem with fencing water ways. But the green left would say fencing waterways is not even the bare minimum that is needed.
Shade and/or shelter should be provided for animals and it can’t be then there shouldn’t be animals in that paddock. You’re suggestion leaves some room for greedy farmers to abuse animals i.e. profit is more important.
So we’ve establish I’m a RW conservative and not a neo-liberal tory…its a start 🙂
Pay Weka no mind.
Weka defines nothing.
You want to keep engaging, do it.
In Weka’s defence, progressive is not necessarily left. Don’t fudge.
I see that you are going to have a Career change Matty Mclean your presents will be missed when this eventuates All the best to you on your new journey up your ladder of life Kia kaha Matty .Ka kite ano
Yes Bug Man Ruud Kleinpast this is my view on all our beautiful Piharenga /Insects but like anything to much of anything upset the Life balance . One season on the farm there were hundreds of millions of flys F that ka kite aon
Good Rock Rumble people give us a sore face Ka pai
You did it Rock Rumble radio my face is sore I was blowing to my son in law about my bug shoulder and said my offspring have inherited this. I laughed when he had the courage to say yea but you got short as legs like I started looking for shoes with a bit more heal on the only problem was I can’t afford them lol keep up the good work people I can see the cops have been spinning there lies again
Well you are going to see how there spinning lies get them on the hot coals of a NZ Court house Ana to kai Ka pai King Karlos A Maori with Great Mana Ka kite ano
You can still donate you just have to hit the tab donate anyway on my give a little page
I pumped out 2 days of lawns today so I don’t have to put up with the sandflys for another day + it’s less fuel but I’m stuffed.
I say that school should have all the same school uniform and that will bring the price down and there will be more secondhand uniform available good topic Hillary good show on TVNZ at 7 pm on 1
And a interview Live With Lionel Richie Hillary & Jeremy what a scoop kai pai
Ka kite ano
ECO MAORI had a sore face yesterday when I pllanted a bluff with one of the sandflys actor’s I told him I was going to work on Waitangi Day because the sandflys would be on holiday yea right. They even got a client to tx me to try and get me to reveal if I was going to work or not ECO ignored the tx. The sandflys were waiting around tauranga ready to start there intimidation game ECO snuffed that move up the sandflys would have been pissed. I foiled all there plays today to.I’m no longer going to go with these plays I’m going to shut them down straight away. They have a new option person I can tell by the way there moves have change. Ana to kai
War Criminals
Obama was the true smiling assassin … He engaged in constant war….. and honed the usa’s execution killing skills of lesser people in far away lands …..
Issuing Presidential death decrees …Using Predator Drones and ‘special forces’ … The presidents personal JSOC kill crews …. and privateer mercenaries from the likes of Black water.
But It gets worse ….Obama seemed to cross a line, … downwards … when as a result of his orders a innocent boy, Abdulrahman al-Awlaki, 16 years old and a usa citizen … was murdered without trial … death by drone.
Jeremy Scahills desperately sad movie documentary called “Dirty Wars” … details this and other war sickness… like compulsive repetitive lies from officials.
At this point we should note that Another Nobel Peace Prize Killer … Henry Kissenger … had established the right of the executive branch of the white house to murder with impunity ..
All done ‘legally’ as Wayne Mapp would say .. when a usa judge dismissed a case brought against Kissenger … by the now adult child of murder victim and former Chilean Army Commander Rene Schneider …who had been killed .. because he believed in the rule of law.
No justice was found in the usa legal system .. with a usa judge ruling their domestic laws … for things like murder …. did not apply to foreign policy … if your a white house wide boy.
Like criminal wide boys ….These uber VIPs had already declared themselves and any usa military invasion forces … above and off limits for any war crime prosecutions.
Anyway, one of my gripes against Obama …. was his gifting of a turn key killing machine to Trump…
and so it proved to be with Trump killing the 8 year old sister of the 16 year boy / her brother that Obama killed…. I think Trump killed their mum as well.
It seemed to me only a matter of time before this execution without trial … needing only the presidents order … would take place against usa citizens .. in their own ‘homeland’.
The next logical step in a frame work of blood lust military insanity.
But Somehow I had missed it … forgot it … or did not recognize it specifically for what it was at the time.
Bill Clinton had the guts to blaze this trail …. with scant credit or recognition.
Despite his humble discretion …. The documentary below shows u.s citizens,… mainly unarmed women and children… being murdered by the presidents special forces …. with extreme cruelty
Not in the beginning of the doco.. where incompetent gung-ho aggression from ATF agents and local law back-ups … starts the killing…
But in the deliberate savage assault following a siege ….where a shaped charge is dropped on usa women and children …. bombed and burned like they were in a Baghdad bunker…. Literally.
Machine guns and sniper fire .. is used to butcher others and prevent escape from burning to death ..
Its quite amazing the amount of freedoms a usa president and his personal legion has …
exceptional dishonesty, cruelty and injustice.
“Issuing Presidential death decrees …Using Predator Drones and ‘special forces’ …
The purchase and the program by the military of the USA to use drones had begun well before Obama became president. Nice of you to cherry pick incidents in war as if they only happen on one side. War is hell, do a bit of historical research.
Yes, but Obama ramped the whole drone program up several notches from Bush. It means less of your own boys/gals coming home in body bags, so electorally , all good.
Never mind about the collateral damage, thats “over there” amongst the unexceptional dispensible folk of the Unamerican primitive world
And it’s been ramped up to a whole new level under Dolt45. Where they’ve pretty stopped even pretending to care about how many civilians get caught up as “collateral damage”.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-is-killing-record-numbers-of-civilians_us_59f9cc1be4b0412aab840c87
Each POTUS seems to set the scene for further normalisation of killing and carnage.Hopefully whereas “good guy” Obama sedated the peace movement, Trump’s odious character will reignite it.
But I’m not holding my breath
Yeah, right Tui.
There will be a ‘peacemovment’ under Trump.
thanks i needed a laugh.
Surprised at your response.
Trump wouldnt LEAD a peace movement, but opposition to his ramped up militarism could surely revive the peace movement. That is if Americans can get over their exceptionalism
why, because i have absolutly no use for wishful thinking.
But hey, i am sure Russia today and yesterday had a ‘peacemovement’, so does North Korea, China etc etc etc, 🙂
seriously does this buffon really have to kill someone on fifth avenue for people to realise that he will not – under no circumstances – allow ‘dissent’?
He just called Democrats ‘treasonous’ for not clapping.
Its true that the democrats get away with their war crimes easier …
I can not recall anything in the news relating to Bill Clintons order …An order that had to be given …. For his Alpha team special forces to cross the Rubicon and use its war weapons…. in an operation of overkill against usa citizens on usa soil ….
Horrendously killing approximately 75 civilians… around half of which were women and children …. in ruthless military fashion.
We have a media… where we are all knowledgeable that Bill Clinton played the sax ……….. But uninformed of his behind the scene orders as commander in chief of the Waco massacre.
A clean up helped Bill clinton keep the blood from dead Waco children and women from staining him…. Some documents and other evidence were removed by white house staffers and given to the first lady … to forever disappear.
Bill Clinton is now in my eyes a murderous sex offender …..
A flashed up Durte …. who can play the sax
https://theintercept.com/drone-papers/
Very disturbing, in depth study of the planning, targeting and execution of targets.
Is that you … Phil Ure?
https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/101212158/nz-share-market-in-for-an-ugly-day-after-global-rout
The grim reality that the wealth creation built since the GFC in 2007/2008 is an illusion that can only survive on record low interest rates and insane Quantitate Easing is starting to sink in with the Dow Jones following up the 666 point loss on Friday with a horror 1175 point plunge today.
2018 GFC;
Caravans will cost three hundred rent cost from next year as homes are sold as ‘bank repo’s’ the party is over for the speculators.
Reality is nigh as “what goes up must come down”
Our ‘essential services (power/water) will climb as most of these former civic services have largely been “privatised” by the former national Government.
Solar panels and home wind turbines along with (roof collection self storage water tanks) alongside homes will dot the entire landscape as homeowners switch to providing their own power and water services.
This is already happening in USA.
You’re a day out of date.
CNN is reporting the Dow as “storming back”.
Please note, this comment is not a defence of financial systems or “Capitalism” (if you can, as Chomsky said, “show me some”, that is) or neoliberalism
A few years back it was fashionable among some Standardistas to predict the collapse of all fiat currencies by 2016. You don’t see too much of that anymore.
Yep – dear old Travellereve sadly passed away a while back.
sorry to hear that.
An option for state houses and new builds? 4 days to build 2 bedroom eco home.
https://newatlas.com/kiss-house-flatpack-prefab-passivhaus/50106/#gallery
Meanwhile in Blenheim, covenants in housing divisions specify such things as minimum house size and style. They assert a minimum 145 sq m when the builder below is building kit set 104 sq m homes for $225,000.
The ‘developers’ obviously want a better look, or more profit from oversizing?
https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/property/100967443/little-hope-for-builder-as-readymade-homes-ruled-out-by-subdivision-covenants?cid=edm:stuff:marlboroughexpress&bid=586440584
Some 15% of homes, I read, built since 2000 are smaller 1-2 bedroom units meaning that cost, size, builder and smaller building availability all conspire to deepen the housing crisis.
And further meanwhile in Blenheim, a town of 20,000, upwards of 60 people attend rental property open days hoping for a rental. Those who miss out may have to live for $1000 plus a week in emergency accommodation in motels, like this couple with child.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/101073989/A-young-familys-hopeless-search-for-a-home-in-Marlborough
banks are in on that minimum size thing and the look thing too. Much easier to sell a carbon copy house in a mortgagee sail.
“Bigger boxes on the hillside
Bigger boxes made of ticky-tacky
Bigger boxes on the hillside
Bigger boxes all the same
There’s a brick one and a block one
Concrete and triple garaging
And though they are all bigger
They still look just the same!”
Apologies to Malvina Reynolds.
lol, I was thinking that too.
Yet the Levittown homes were around 70 square metres.
“Any fool can build homes—what counts is how many you can sell for how little.” William J. Levitt
Thinking has changed since. Now it’s keep the demand high along with the prices.
@ Mac 1, That is bizarre to demand 145m2!
The 3 and 4 bedroom villas of the early 1900’s were often 100m2!
Huge international trend on tiny houses that are under 40m2.
One of the things that stopped many in Auckland buying was that banks would not lend under 40m2 apartments. So then only cashed up people (investors, new residents and those will cash or asset already could buy them).
Developers are there for profit so they are and have never been the answer to affordable housing.
It’s a right wing myth that more houses will stop the crisis because the houses being built are not designed for about 35% of the population that can’t afford to buy a house.
However the answer is not to throw out amenity controls, but more to reach a compromise of a practical and healthy dwelling that fulfils it’s role. In my mind size is the better sacrifice than windows and outdoor space. You don’t want to build cage houses either.
It also takes more energy to heat a larger house, so savings in grid energy use are being offset by the increase in size. We’re so fucking stupid. People treat energy use savings as a financial thing. It’s far more important as a climate change issue.
We need to guard against the push for apartments that are basically cells, but we should be incentivising people to build smaller houses at this point.
Bear in mind that the size includes an attached garage, which old villas normally don’t have.
Meanwhile in Kaitaia….https://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/teahikaa/audio/2018630459/he-korowai-trust-s-mission-to-make-a-difference
I’ve been watching these guys build the emergency accommodation units out the back of the old Kaitaia hotel…always a hive of activity.
I was also chatting to a guy staying in one of the rooms in the Hotel…and ex prisoner…. he was in the early stages of re integration and was struggling a bit with the strict rules he had to abide by. He could see that the rules were for his own good in the long term This is the strength of He Korowai Trust. They provide an holistic service, and like any whanau, there are rules and expectations of certain standards of behaviour.
They also have papakainga housing…also with strict no booze, drugs, violence rules.
Ricky Houghton does great work…should have been New Zealander of the Year.
I’m pretty sure that’s exactly what Labour have planned. It’s why they’ve been going on about pre-built housing for some time.
It makes sense. Build the house to high specification in a factory and then ship it to the desired location to assemble it.
Thing is, it’d be even better if they used such systems to build high-rise apartment buildings like this. Even more efficient then.
It’s a question of logistics. Making sure that the materials, the factories and the skilled people are available to do the building. That’s why it’s going to take a few years to get Labour’s Kiwibuild going. Those logistics simply aren’t in place due to the failure of the ‘free-market’.
Prefab also lowers the skill requirements onsite. If everything clips together, you don’t need so many people who are capable of working around the vagaries of an architect’s innovative ideas where shit doesn’t quite line up.
A decorator mate of mine had an entertaining story about how the builders and plasterers had a hell of a time trying to create a swooping curved wall that looked awesome on paper lol
True which just means that it’s only a matter of time before people aren’t required on site at all.
And my nephew told me of how he was stopped from taking pictures of his own work which the architect then took pictures of and put into the architectural drawings as his own work.
Just watched the most amazing thing, true history in the making. Both boosters of the Spacex Falcon Heavy ( now I wonder why Elon Musk called it that! ) came back to the Canaveral launch pad and landed vertically. Straight out of Star Wars.
Absolutely amazing.
For the cost of space travel to come down, flyback boosters are are nessesity. Too bad the idea of the Space Shuttle having such a system was dropped.
Did Musk really just launch the Stig out to beyond Mars in a little red car?
On reflection, that might actually be a good use for a test launch where you don’t want to risk anything valuable…
Yes he did and yes sending the car on the test flight was a better option than sending anything of worth. Still, something tells me there’s more than the car on board:
I would be highly surprised if they didn’t have all sorts of measuring equipment on that car.
I s’pose if the aliens find it they’ll really be wondering how the fuck it got there and what kind of physics its propulsion system uses that they don’t understand.
This launch was a test and rather than compound any failure with the loss of expensive kit, the usual test payload is a block of concrete.
While the boys play with their toys, climate change marches on.
Actually, it’s pretty important for our longer term species survival that we get off this rock.
Sooner or later it’ll get hit by another massive impactor like the one that took out most of the dinosaurs.
There are direct links between the desire to get off this rock and our trashing of this rock. I’d prefer us to look after this planet instead of looking for an escape route. Especially as the looking for an escape route is taking part in trashing the planet.
Am happy to take our chances with a meteor. When we know how to look after this place, and learn how to leave without trashing things, I’ll probably change my mind.
You’re happy to take your chances.
Musk isn’t.
And the space program is integral to understanding just how we’re trashing this rock, and what we can do to un-trash it.
No, it really isn’t. The science is in. What we need to do is stop burning fossil fuels now and keep on expanding. Space development ignores that and says we can keep doing what we want when we want and technology will save us. That’s a massive risk right now, not some eon in the future when an asteroid may or may not hit us.
There’s a lot in that statement.
Firstly, the window to stop burning coal has long passed. Now we really do need some tech to go alongside that.
Secondly, space exploration helps us know the extent of the problem, and new problems we hadn’t spotted before – so we know AGW is a problem, what about another CFC-style issue? What about weather monitoring?
Thirdly, asteroid issues are real. There’s no point solving AGW only to get zotzed by something we could have seen coming and maybe have done something about.
Fourthly, the message you take from space exploration is remarkably pessimistic. For many people, the more we know about the hostile environment around us makes us aware of just how precious and unique this planet is. Nobody wants to leave the ship for the lifeboat – but not having enough lifeboats is always a regretted decision.
“Firstly, the window to stop burning coal has long passed. Now we really do need some tech to go alongside that.”
Not sure what you mean by the windows to stop burning coal has passed. That window will never pass as long as we are burning coal (and gas and oil). The tech we need alongside stopping burning FF doesn’t need the space program. Our immediate problems are social and political not technical.
“Secondly, space exploration helps us know the extent of the problem, and new problems we hadn’t spotted before – so we know AGW is a problem, what about another CFC-style issue? What about weather monitoring?”
And that’s fine were space exploration not contributing to climate change now. Unknown problems we will face in the future doesn’t trump what we are doing and need to be doing instead now.
“Thirdly, asteroid issues are real. There’s no point solving AGW only to get zotzed by something we could have seen coming and maybe have done something about.”
Nevertheless, it’s madness to burn fossil fuels to do that. If I saw pro-space people being willing to power down, I’d be more supportive of resources going to space programs. But atm what I see is people saying hey tech will save us so lets keep burning some fossil fuels. Bill has written about this a lot, but there is plenty in the mainstream now too. CCS is not going to save us, and we are already in major overshoot.
“Fourthly, the message you take from space exploration is remarkably pessimistic. For many people, the more we know about the hostile environment around us makes us aware of just how precious and unique this planet is. Nobody wants to leave the ship for the lifeboat – but not having enough lifeboats is always a regretted decision.”
I don’t experience the environment as hostile and prefer world views that support humans as part of the environment. What I’m pointing to is that the paradigm that sees nature as hostile and we need high tech to survive it, is the paradigm that not only brought us CC but is resisting doing something about it. That many people believe in that paradigm doesn’t make it right or useful, and this is the core of it. Humans aren’t the most important thing here, not because we’re unimportant (we’re not), but because seeing ourselves as separate is the problem. We are *utterly dependent upon the environment within its own nature i.e.. functional living systems. Human tech can help us within that, but at the moment we are mostly living in denial of it.
Space is the hostile environment. The earth is a solitary oasis of life in a desolate, though beautiful, void. Anything remotely as habitable as earth will be unobtainably distant.
As for windows, we’re still looking at >2C. That will require new tech to deal with. Much of our tech comes directly from the space programmes of different nations, such as fuel cells. The trivial amount of carbon contributed by space exploration (compared to cars and construction) is well worth the effort.
Unknown problems in the future are what will bite us in the arse, so we’d better get to know them. We need to know the composition and orbits of NEO bodies now, so we will be able to do something about them in the future. So far we’re lucky that the notable ones in the last hundred years or so have landed in desolate areas.
What’s the cradle to grave CC audit of the various space programs?
It it’s anything close to the millions of cars sold every year, I’ll be surprised.
Musk isn’t doing anything
He is neither the brains nor the funds behind his financially failing endevours…
The space program is irrelevant and is adding to environmental destruction…
Not that it will stop whomever is behind it…
Not that it will save or be the saviour of our species…
The rich who DTB wants to get rid off…he will have his wish…they will bw exiting this rock…once they’ve finished wrecking it…
You know nothing. What use are you.
So Musk is advertising his govt subsidised cars at govt expense.
Using the government developed internet as well, the rotter.
If the government really is subsidising both ventures, count that as two sensible things Trump hasn’t yet shut down.
“The space program is irrelevant ”
Wow. Care to elaborate what is so irrelevant about it?
It is irrelevant for the following reasons (not exhaustive)
1. It is not, and will not contribute to solving the serious issues being faced, right now…
2. Because the issues being faced have solutions which do not require the space program as part of an action plan, the space program is irrelevant…
Except to those who control it…and the ‘stakeholders’..
…
Note: Stakeholders list does not include 99.99% of the planets inhabitants, or the planet itself…
Space Program. Irrelevant!
In that case, NASA would be irrelevant to the AGW argument.
Pretty sure numpty here is a climate denier. It’s all “geo-engineering” and “weather tech”.
In response to your numbered list:
1. Even if true (which itsn’t) we can do more than one thing at a time
2. See point one
The space program itself has numerous off-shoots which have beneficial to mankind and its R&D have contributed directly to civilian use rather than ‘stakeholders’ whomever they may be.
Not to mention the more we discover about who we are, why we are, where we are and when we are are pretty important things to know.
How is point 1, not true IYO, John?
* Preventing wars/military industry
* Preventing famines/feeding the starving
* Reducing inequality (name the type)
* Reducing financial debt burdon
* etc etc
Who we are, why we are here….important things to know, I agree…
The power structures won’t be sharing that information with you, John….and that power structure are stakeholders in the space program…
See the degradation of education frameworks around the ‘western world’…..that’s what ‘you’ get to know….
Irrelevant!
* Preventing wars/military industry
The purpose of spying is to prevent and/or shorten wars. Satellites are part of that process. If you have a substantive argument against that premise, rather than simply scoffing at it, let’s hear it, and let’s see you take account of The Better Angels Of Our Nature while you’re about it.
* Preventing famines/feeding the starving
Most famine is caused by war, and note that information about climate change, and associated droughts, has been driven in large part by NASA.
* Reducing inequality (name the type)
Information is power. Seeing photographs of Earth from space reminds everyone that we’re all in this together. Beyond that, inequality is a political choice. We could double the space program and still bring the GINI to a better value.
* Reducing financial debt burdon
What financial debt burden? On a planetary scale it’s a zero sum. Also a political choice.
NASA is 0.5% of the US budget. Military spending is more like 50%.
Water purification tech, early warning for shingles attacks, asthma treatment, vaccine development, cell behaviour, environmental health, climate monitoring, weather warnings, robotic prosthetics, disaster response, preventing bone loss in old age, treatment for strokes and cerebral palsy.
Et cetera, et cetera.
You really believe the purpose of spying is to prevent or shorten wars????
What a flippin idiotic thing to say.
CIA for the next nobel peace prize then.
I finally understand why you believe everything the spy agencies say.
Because of the following which I already said:
“The space program itself has numerous off-shoots which have beneficial to mankind and its R&D have contributed directly to civilian use rather than ‘stakeholders’ whomever they may be.
Not to mention the more we discover about who we are, why we are, where we are and when we are are pretty important things to know.”
You’re second point is what is irrelevant rather than the space program. I’m not sure what you mean by “The power structures won’t be sharing that information with you, John….and that power structure are stakeholders in the space program…”
What is being withheld? The earth is flat? The earth is hollow? There are beings on Mars yet the phony Mar’s Rover is actually broadcasting from a set in Area 51?
Please tell me what is being held back by the power structures. You’re long on rhetoric but slim in actual ‘facts’
Just for you OneTwo….
http://www.ethicalatheist.com/docs/benefits_of_space_program.html
Try argue against these ‘irrelevant’ benefits and stay fashionable my binary friend.
You’re not comprehending what I’ve clearly stated, John…
So I’ll give it one final attempt…
If the space program was halted permanently from this moment, there is nothing that would be lost from the available solutions list to remediate the worlds major issues…
We have the capability right at this precise same moment, what we lack is the environmental and collective will power to allow true remediation to proceed…
Irrelevant!
Get it?
Note: I’ve not referred to positives which have developed out of the space program. You can argue into the mirror…
They’re irrelevant to the remediations I’m referring to.. in the same way your responses have been…
If you’re still not able to understand, take a read through wekas comments a little higher up…perhaps they will help you out of the mud you’re stuck in…
@Spikeyboy.
You failed to provide any substantive rebuttal. so here’s a longer-form argument to chew on:
As expressed by Sun Tzu:
No shit Sun.
“Best”, because fewer people die. In case you were wondering.
To send troops on (for example) a peacekeeping mission without knowledge of the warring factions isn’t just a stupid thing to do: it’s the height of inhumanity. Send your army deaf and blind into the field and see how long your command lasts.
Oh. So not only are the spies cotenders for innumerable peace prizes but philosophers as well.
The CIA trained and armed jihadists in Syria. Not noted for capturing anyone much alive or if they do not for long.
Libya whole and in good condition. Yeah right. Same with Syria. Their philosophy is more like Trump throwing his toys out of the cot. If you wont let us exploit your resources then we’ll make sure nobody gets them. What planet do you live on OAB? Spies make the world safer??? Spies have the good of humanity at heart?? This is a religous statement. Faith based and completely contradicted by reality. Somewhere further down this thread someone references Lee Camp. For the real take on the idiocy of spy agencies. Like real dumb fucks in a very Trump sort of way. Not sure they could even spell philosophy or humanity. Oh and Lee Camp is real funny tòo.
https://leecamp.com/
Except a tool to monitor whether what solutions we implement are actually working to the level we need.
@Spikeyboy.
Did I say anything at all about the ethics and character of people who become spies? Or what they have “at heart”? No, and no.
Did I express an opinion about whether the USA uses its ‘intelligence’ agencies sensibly? No.
Is anything I said a defence of US foreign policy? No.
Is the US the only country in the world whose leaders employ spies? No.
Your ‘argument’ is the equivalent to pointing at a trainwreck and concluding that public transport must be bad.
Still, at least you’re consistent.
You said that the purpose of spying is to prevent or shorten wars???
An incomprehensible statement given reality
The edit was going to say:
Your train wreck analogy just might have worked if we were talking one wreck. We’re not. Its many many many train wrecks to the point where sane people start to question the underlying system. Doing the same shit and expecting different resuts ring any bells?? Lie after lie after lie but still you say this time its the truth?? Hence the refrrence to religion. Your bible says spies work for peace so their lies aren’t lies. They can’t always be straight for our own good is it?? You fit the defunition of insanity stated above
“If the space program was halted permanently from this moment, there is nothing that would be lost from the available solutions list to remediate the worlds major issues…”
Except the ability to learn more and further our advancement in many areas of sciences and technology which may help us avert or restrain problems in the future
@Spikeyboy.
Speaking of what you affect to know about ‘reality’, I also referenced The Better Angels Of Our Nature, which presents evidence that we’re living in one of the least violent eras in human history. If true, that’s hardly surprising given the increased capabilities of communications technology.
Nothing you’ve ranted comes close to demonstrating that you even understand the argument, let alone a substantive rebuttal.
You reference an 800 page book. Maybe you can help me out with page numbers to support your assertion that spy agencies work for peace.
Also you show your euro centric (racial) bias. As a percentage of world population violence has decreased. This means European/USA experience of violence which isnt the same as American Indian experience or Maori or Syrian or Libian or Rwanda etc. Its all very easy when you belong to the priviledged group to bang on about how great things are.
Like Madeleine Allbrights belief that 10s of thousands of starved children or deaths from lack of medicine is an acceptable price. Whats your acceptable price OAB?
And last time I looked it was the spy agencies that lied about WMD.
Your bible says spies work for peace so their lies aren’t lies.
Does it? Where, ranty-boy?
What it actually says is that leaders should avoid wars if at all possible, and if they have no choice, advises them how to win fast and well.
In contrast, eg: Bush and Blair ignored what their spies told them, and are now regarded as war criminals.
So it doesnt say that? Then where did you get such an absurd idea from??
For what it’s worth, there’s considerable evidence that the US knowledge of the Soviet reaction to Exercise Able Archer 83 helped pivot Reagan’s “evil empire” rhetoric into a de-escalation stance.
That knowledge came from US spies in the Soviet union.
Similarly, had warnings of military build-ups been heeded, maybe not so many Soviets would have died in WW2, and maybe the backlash against German civilians might not have been so visceral.
And then one could argue that the almost immediate ending of the US monopoly on nuclear weapons prevented their use in Korea – MacArthur was already pushing for it, and if there hadn’t been the threat of retaliation it might have been a tempting option in the see-sawing territorial possession.
Thats a long stretch back in time. How anout recently? The only one I can think of is Obama being told there was no credible evidence of Assad launching the Gouta chemical weapon attack but peobably didnt need a spy agency to tell him that.
@Spikeyboy.
Eight hundred pages? You must have an extended version. Even my hardback copy with additional material by Sun Pin and extensive notes by Ralph D. Sawyer only runs to three-hundred odd pages.
This is a pretty good version; it lays out the thirteen chapters clearly and only has a minimal amount of ‘chatter’, or commentary if you prefer.
I already quoted extensively from Chapter 13: The Use Of Spies, including Sun Tzu’s observation about ‘the height of inhumanity’. Chapter 2 goes into more details about the evils of war, so it’s worth reading that too – it’s only twenty paragraphs. But if you really want to get a firmer grasp on Taoist philosophy on such matters, read Lao Tzu side-by side with Sun Tzu.
Also, I already answered your question: send your peace keepers deaf and blind into the field and see how long your command lasts. Do you really not understand how that works?
Fair call on my Eurocentric bias – although I’m not sure it’s a valid criticism of Pinker (author of Better Angels…). The charge has certainly been levelled at him, with some fairly solid push-back.
Please note that I didn’t say “how great things are.” If the only way you can rebut my argument is to twist my words, why not just start waving your white flag right now?
Ok. So thanks for the link. Ive read the first chapter and you’re right theres a lot to chew over.
War is hell. Thats the first point.I consider myself lucky enough to have experienced the tail end of a war zone. Bosnia circa 1995. Lucky because I know first hand that war should be avoided if at all possible. War can also be addictive. I saw many ngo workers talk nostalgically about the days when they were taking fire.
Some anecdotes as relates to chapter one. Analysis of each participant. For some time I was based in the small village of Olovo. I spent an evening on the fringe of a group that contained a Russian officer. He was relaxed and comfortable in the company of the local population. The Russians arrived before the Americans. When American soldiers arrived in the valley they walked in single file in a large group of 6 or 7 with their guns in the air and the last man walking backwards. Very stressed and very nervous. No wonder they shoot civilians. And the bit about laws. When Americans break laws they are not held to account. How can anyone respect that? In Bosnia if you killed someone on the road like as notyoud get 5 years jail time. We all lived with that. Not Americans. I talked to one guy who was being smuggled out of the country because he had run someone over. As an aside NZ soldiers drove around the country side doing shows at schools and openly trying to engage with the locals. I guess that got lost somewhere in Afghanistan and we got Americanised and started shooting up the locals. On all counts except raw power in Chapter 1 the American military are inferior. If they have a philosophy it is that you gotta break a few eggs to make an omelette. Its the military version of fudamental Christianity where everyones going to heaven except theres the apocalypse first. Russian philosophy is way more exciting. It was a Russian who pretty much dealt the death blow to any credibility in believing in an all powerful god. All powerful but ignores suffering and injustice. This Russian pretty forcefully put his line in the sand. You (god) say that we can all go to heaven but there is a little bit of torture and rape and so forth which must go on first. Well he said if the cost is just one child tortured you can stick your heaven up your jacksy. Which is only right and proper because this is the original snake oul salesman. Next thing you know youre dealing with Allbrights 10s of thousands of Iraqi children only to find that thats srill not enough human sacrifice. More is needed!! Keep piling up the corpses.
So certainly no discipline in the American Military. Of course No one in their right mind would feel too good following Trump onto the battlefield. But really was Obama much better after he caved in to the bankers at the very moment when they thought the game was up. Talk about snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. What a glorious start for the commander in chief. So weve dealt with moral compass and leaders a little of course just my ramblings. As for Generals one of Trumps Junta was involved in the Falujah massacre. Its difficult at the moment to check which one. So for all these reasons and more I will never support the US military but mostly because they are above the law and are the play thing of an elite who are also above the law. So thanks for giving me more solid ground to base my convictions. Now and not just to make you see Red. Some kind words about Putin. Please offer back some links with solid proof of Putins corruption. There is a story about Putin that goes like this. When he came to power he gathered up all the oligarchs that had been trampling willie nilly all over Yeltsin and he said to them:
I’m going to let you all keep your illegal and ill-gotten gains but you have to obey the law and pay your taxes. And when they didn’t they got thrown in jail as promised and each one that ended up in jail was portrayed as some kind of hero or resistance fighter in the west. Personally I respect that and I think Suntzu would too. I also respect his hours long talks to all media. You want the people to come along with you its probably a good idea to talk to them. Maybe answer a few questions… So I guess in my book we’re gonna see if raw power trumps all the other attributes in chapter 1. The ultimate battle of materialism against all the intangibles. Have to say I’m quietly confident except as Putin accused Obama of Trump may just smash up the chess board…
AA83 wasn’t that long ago.
More recently, how about all those meetings with Russians the trump team had? Certainly limited the friction between US and Russia. But maybe that doesn’t count, despite the FISA warrants and plea bargains.
Of course it counts. And heres a fascinating read on attempts to sway Obama away from his arming of the jihadists featuring one Michael Flynn as head of the DIA. Seems though that the whole house is now stacked with Russophobes with the appointment of Dunford as chairman of the Joint Chiefs.
https://www.lrb.co.uk/v38/n01/seymour-m-hersh/military-to-military
So it doesnt say that? Then where did you get such an absurd idea from??
No, it doesn’t say that “their lies aren’t lies”.
In fact it says that “all warfare is based on deception”. In Chapter One. Perhaps if you actually read it (which really doesn’t take long – it’s a very short thesis) you might have some better ‘intelligence’ to base your attacks on.
oh, ok, if russian collusion counts, then there’s your recent example of spies building peace rather than war.
You could just relax and call it cooperation. Probably the sky wouldnt fall in. But it would require removing Russia from your list of enemies I suppose. If collusion then according to Hersch in the article linked to above it was widespread through the pentagon at the time. Just that Flynn was the only one being open about it. This was written in 2016 so well before Trump was a thing. Cooperation or collusion? The difference is all in how Russia is viewed and at the time the demonisation of Russia hadn’t fully taken hold which is a necessary first step for charges of collusion
Aren’t the yanks lucky that an investigation is taking place to gather evidence resolving your questions one way or the other, then.
I didn’t realize there was an investigation into wether or not Russia was an enemy. That certainly is progress and the type of lateral thinking that I wouldn’t have credited them with
“Enemy” isn’t the key word – “foreign” is.
Although Russia is currently militarily occupying a NATO-oriented nation and they’re supporting opponents in proxy wars and confrontations, so the difference in the Russia-US case is largely semantic.
Either way, if there was FISA-relevant wrongdoing, then yay for the FSB for bringing the superpower-in-decline and the regional power into a more amicable relationship!
I beg to differ. If foreign were the key word then Jarrod would be in serious trouble over his dealing with and influence peddling for Israel. He’s not so enemy is the key word. You collude with enemies and cooperate with friends
No, the act says “foreign”.
Secondly, collusion is covert by definition.
Thirdly, what about Kushner and Israel? Maybe the Israelis gave him better advice on not making his emails public than the Ruccians did
It wasn’t emails. It was the taped phone call from Flynn. They have word for word what Flynn was requesting on behalf of Israel from Russia at the behest of Kushner.Enemy remains key. No one is going to press charges of colluding with the UK. Similarly in the USA for Israel.
Lolz I didn’t know that one.
Assuming Kush wasn’t on the phone, that’s called “hearsay”, but it could well be one of the things Flynn has for “cooperation” with the investigation.
The also need to demonstrate knowingly acting as an agent, and I bel;ieve that foreign agents can be declared (like a conflict of interest) so if JK didn’t do that, wait for the wheels of justice to inexorably roll forward… Trump pardons notwithstanding.
Yes. Time will tell I suppose. Anyhow, thanks for chatting…
We’re not just looking for an escape route.
Except that it isn’t. In fact, without the space program we probably wouldn’t know how much damage we’ve already done.
we’re not just looking for an escape route
Yes, Draco it’s clear you see yourself as somewhow ‘included’…but you’re not!
Those ‘rich’ you appreciate so much who are the key stakeholders in the ‘space program’, assured you personally….did they…
Escape route is exactly what they’re looking for…any collateral benefits would not be shared downwards…
Trickle down (space) economics…
A list of ‘collateral benefits shared downwards’ can be found so easily it’s probably more fun to link to the “What Have the Romans Ever Done For Us?” sketch. See further up the page for some examples.
McFlock
I think your time epochs are getting mixed up. We should leave next century’s problems for them to deal with rather than presume we know the right thing to do now, and use up all the resources needed before whatever happens.
For interest and to allow imagination to be titillated I suggest watching Babylon 5.
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tj4qfe9afs
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJmuHNDcXLQ
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDNkJu8xtwo
Good show.
But we need to know what we don’t know, otherwise it might sneak up on us. Besides, space exploration isn’t going to use up all the resources. Consumerism and phone “upgrades” will.
Climate change marches on because of our inability to reign in car use use. Of course, the people doing space development are also the ones that are more likely to develop a solution to climate change. Solar power was developed because of space development.
Watching those two boosters land together was a sci-fi moment in real life.
The future has arrived, we just saw it land at Cape Canaveral.
Anyway, curiosity and technology are traits innate to human culture and we are far to long gone on the technology ride to turn our backs on it now without a disaster.
Like it or not, if capitalism needs constant growth on a finite planet, then the solution to our growth conundrum lies in space, be it mining Asteroids (I’d rather have a sterile, lifeless hunk of space rock host the mining and ore refining operation and the steel mill be on a space station in orbit than have them all here on earth spewing toxic waster into the environment) or even – sci-fi time – colonising the inner planets or even going to Trappist-1 to take a look for life there.
Also, space based industry is literally outsourcing our carbon emissions!
Sanctuary
Do you mean that we need a space-connected disaster before we will stop pissing money and resources at the sky?
No. I am saying you are not going to give 10 billion humans a western, middle class life style without going into space to get the resources to make it happen.
The alternative is most likely population overshoot, climate change, resource wars and probably nuclear catastrophe.
“Climate change marches on because of our inability to reign in car use use”
Not really. Magically change all car use to public transport and human generated climate change (and Peak Everything) continues via the growth economies. Car use is a big factor, but it’s not the driver.
“Of course, the people doing space development are also the ones that are more likely to develop a solution to climate change.”
We already have a solution to climate change, we just don’t have the will to do it. I don’t see space program people as being any more useful in resolving that. Probably the opposite, because they seem to think they can justify burning fossil fuels.
“Solar power was developed because of space development.”
Solar power was developed by evolution. What you mean is electricity generated by capturing solar energy, and we don’t actually need that to survive. If it were a choice between continuing emissions or giving up tech that came about via the space programs then we could still choose to stop emissions and we’d be ok.
I’m not saying the space development doesn’t do good or useful things. I’m saying it’s insane to be putting effort into that instead of preventing the worst of climate change.
“We already have a solution to climate change, we just don’t have the will to do it.”
Yeah – everybody knows (as the late great Leonard Cohen said) that the only solutions to CC that will be wholeheartedly embraced are those that either:
– leave existing profit streams intact, or
– provide opportunities for the owners of existing profit streams to readily replace or augment them with new ones
Kinda hard to think of ‘solutions’ that meet either condition really – except for some sort of privately-owned magic ‘tech’ (which is why that idea is so popular)
social tipping points are another. Or things we can’t conceive of yet. A major GFC would be a game changer for instance, and how we respond to that would determine how bad things have to get.
Yes, really.
It’s not ‘growth’ per se that drives increased fossil fuel use. It’s the demand for energy a lot of which is used to power transport:
Personal cars are a major part of the problem.
Not necessarily.
True. Banning personal cars and burning of fossil fuels is not on the horizon.
They’re part of the people looking for the replacement of fossil fuels. A fairly big part in fact.
Well, a few of us would be but the majority of people would be wiped out pretty quick as a hell of a lot of stuff got taken away because we refused to use it because it came from the space program.
Which just proves your ignorance about economics.
We can, and should, do both especially considering that the space program is likely to help doing that “preventing the worst of climate change”.
“It’s not ‘growth’ per se that drives increased fossil fuel use. It’s the demand for energy a lot of which is used to power transport:”
Reductionist thinking thinks climate change = carbon emissions, therefore reduce carbon emissions and everything will be alright (ish). We need systems thinking that sees the connections between growth, climate change, resource depletion, the take-make-waste economy, and the ignoring of natural systems particularly biological ones. Climate change can’t be solved without paradigm change. I’m pointing to the paradigms at play where.
“Personal cars are a major part of the problem.”
Obviously.
“They’re part of the people looking for the replacement of fossil fuels. A fairly big part in fact.”
Irrespective of whether we find a replacement or not, we have to power down. Powering up is antithetical to solving climate change. Paradigms and system thinking again.
“Well, a few of us would be but the majority of people would be wiped out pretty quick as a hell of a lot of stuff got taken away because we refused to use it because it came from the space program.”
again, obviously, if we gave it up in the blink of an eye. But if you read my comment in the context of the conversation with McFlock, you will see I am talking about something else, and making a different point.
“Which just proves your ignorance about economics.
We can, and should, do both especially considering that the space program is likely to help doing that “preventing the worst of climate change”.”
Asserting something doesn’t make it true. You believe in the space program and what sustainability expert David Holmgren calls techno-explosion with some components of techno-stability. I believe in the power down. I’ve been making a case for why the power down is necessary, you’ve just asserted that techno will save us, but you haven’t made the case.
Climate change is primarily driven by carbon emissions. There are other GHGs but they’re a small part of our emissions.
Which is all a load of bollocks. There is a connection between growth and resource depletion. Using more resources must inevitably result in resource depletion.
There isn’t necessarily a connection between growth and climate change. We could still have growth while having declining GHG emissions.
You’re making assertions without any evidence or logic.
If we find a replacement then we obviously don’t need to power down. That’s basically what finding a replacement for fossil fuels and their emissions means.
True. And you make lots of assertions that are downright wrong, that don’t even have a logical connection.
No I don’t.
I believe in reality.
No, you’ve been talking BS and I didn’t say that technology will save us. I said it has a role in doing so. A role in stopping the continued burning of fossil fuels and reducing other GHG emissions.
It will be politics that will save us but that requires that we all get involved and stop the politicians catering to the 1%.
weka says
“I’m not saying the space development doesn’t do good or useful things. I’m saying it’s insane to be putting effort into that instead of preventing the worst of climate change”
+1000 to that.
And the cost-benefit calculation of those good things we now have? The billions spent that have added to climate change, and still we are pouring money into the sky and space.
We are curious, clever children at heart; we have dilemmas that are very hard which we need to deal with hre and now on earth but space is so fascinating – look how I can pay table tennis with a drop of water in a weightless environment and look at all those flames when our space vehicle launches and how cleverly we do everything, except for mucking up, rare though, with a D or O ring. Very sad, most unfortunate. But it’s just amazing being able to control a vehicle on …(name your planet) from earth. Beats radio-controlled car racing on Sundays.
Sounds like HOP prices are increasing. AT also takes the lions share of Aucklander’s rates too. Rolling in cash but still can’t seem to run or build a world class service and no doubt complaining how they need more money.
It costs about $20 for 1 adult and 2 kids to go around 12km return and you have to catch 2 buses to reach your destination depending on where you are in Auckland, so generally takes nearly 1 hour when you can drive it for about $2 and it takes 10 minutes, so that’s part of the problem.
You also need to go through a huge paper rigmarole to get a child HOP so again totally thinking of their customers as usual (NOT).
Someone told me it was costing $70 per week to take public transport from Huapai in West Auckland to central Auckland, plus they had to get their elderly mother to get up at 6am and drive them to the station and pick them up. In the end they moved closer in, (another reason why the housing crisis will not abate as people can’t get back to their jobs if they move further out as limited and inconvenient transport options).
Not only that but the ancient buses that are generally empty of patrons (see above reason) amble along 25km under the speed limits on the open road, causing major delays and productivity loss for everybody else.
People might tolerate an expensive service if it was convenient, but often the AT service is both inconvenient and expensive.
Yep. It’s called inflation.
[Citation Needed]
Actually, they’re doing pretty well at getting public transport up to first class standards. The real problem was that the National government stood in the way and demanded more roads instead.
Proof that you do not understand economics and the true costs of cars.
1. You actually have to buy the car
2. You have to maintain the car
3. You have to fuel it up
4. You have to pay insurance
5. That time you’re driving is a loss of time as you could be doing something far more productive
Now multiply all that by hundreds of thousands just in Auckland. And that’s just the driver.
Cars are expensive.
Our public transport could be and should be better but the reason why it’s so bad is due to decades of under-funding and lack of development so that car manufacturers and other services could make a profit and keep employment higher than it would be. Most of the gas stations would simply not exist. Same would apply to mechanics and panel beaters.
Getting rid of cars would free up huge numbers of capable people to do something else. Nurses, doctors, builders, teachers – the list goes on. All of which we need more than mechanics and service station attendants.
Cars are expensive.
Then there’s the 400+ people who die prematurely every year due to the pollution of the cars.
Cars are expensive.
Better transport won’t actually make that any better. The only thing that will is high-rise apartments.
No, they amble along at their speed limit which is 90km/h on the motorway.
And those people in the cars are what’s causing the traffic jams and the productivity loss. They’re the ones taking up the roads and losing productivity by driving.
One wonders why people drive then. It’s expensive and inconvenient.
Meanwhile, public transport is getting better and more and more people use it:
Would be nice to have more recent figures but I couldn’t find them.
The Greater Auckland site reports on them monthly.
Auckland ratepayers pay more than 50% of the $1,324,000,000 operating spend of the 2017 – 2018 year for transport.
I’m not sure that figure includes the new transport levy or a proposed petrol tax or the new price increases for users. (I think not).
Source of that figure is the current rates levy!
If AT have all these extra journeys they are providing it’s not showing up in the costs to ratepayers or reducing the prices for transport. Maybe freebies on the Gold card!
As for thinking Auckland has world class transport, pleeeze, I’ve lived in the EU, Asia and Africa – NZ is one of the worst places for public transport and very expensive to the cost of wages – the only worst place for public transport, I’ve even been to, is Fiji.
In my view Aucklander’s are being ripped off and the COO structures are not working! More than 1 billion a year for AT shit service and their propaganda about how great they are!
The chairman of AT doesn’t even write his own preamble on the budget that’s signed off by him – that’s how disinterested and incompetent and what a shitty organisation they are.
Just wait until March madness this year, all the public transport will be running at 100%+
BTW there is a massive project underway to unlock the rail network, but you probably haven’t heard of it as you’re doing an ostrich impression.
….massive project underway to unlock the rail network… yawn somehow the Brits managed an underground in the 1863 and its still used by over 1 billion passengers a year… but hey in Auckland we are supposed to be excited by the prospect of EVENTUALLY and (probably not before a maned Mars landing) that the execs at AT and NZ transport will get something fit for purpose going.
Maybe if there were less excuses about why they can’t get it going, propaganda about how good they are and less about how much extra money they need it could be done. Having one track into Britomart or what ever the hell the dumbos did there, might be an inkling of the lack of size of the brains on our public transport system or the chairman apparently doesn’t write his own reports on his own budget he signs off.
Dove Myer Robinson tried in the 70s but was stymied by the car lobby. https://www.greaterauckland.org.nz/2016/04/19/sir-dove-myer-robinson-on-his-rapid-transit-scheme-part-1/
Len Brown and Phil Goff faced similar uphill battles dealing with the road-addicted National administration, the Nats finally relented when they realised how many Aucklanders were pissed off by their BS.
PT is too much of a political football and needs a nationwide independent authority like AT to plan it properly.
Graph for Auckland Transport taking almost half of rates funding:
http://temp.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/Plans/LongTermPlan/VolumeOne/section_1341865502987.html
Most of which goes to road maintenance
The great thing about Trains & buses is that it gives one a captive audience – you can dictate where they travel to & from & how long it will take, then broadcast propaganda about Dear Leader, Civics, Te Reo, the horrors of Capitalism, etc etc.
Then I guess if you get 1000’s of people’s daily existence susceptible to the whims & demands of the Train & Bus Drivers Union you will have all kinds of power.
Good idea of selling to a captive audience, if they got Skycity on board with gambling on trains, the powers that be would make it happen. That’s the sad state of our elected officials. If it’s pointless or bad for society, it happens. If not, then just wait and wait and wait… and then some pathetic offering appears.
I note the replies to you savenz tend to the ideal – we shouldn’t have cars, or to educate you on the overall long-term cost of transport to you on an amortised basis, or how pleased you should feel knowing that rail is being built because it will be so much better then, when you need to travel now and your present cost is $x and it will take xtime.
Just listening or reading about how things are for people is good stuff that we need to hear to understand the present state of play. It is interesting and important that we know that change is happening…sometime soon. But today this is how it is for an ordinary person. Let’s not dismiss ourselves as ordinary persons with a life and a story and not beat people over the head with unrealised facts, future plans yet to emerge and serve.
Lee camp rips apart Former F B I Director Comey Tweets. Link to a video. 5 minute video.
https://leecamp.com/web-exclusive-former-f-b-director-comey-tweets-dumbest-thing-ever-reveals-lot/?mc_cid=74690f8973&mc_eid=524e48683c
Fair point.
Trump’s likely to get away with it, no matter the extent of his involvement in the collusion others have already admitted.
Lovely article this morning in The Guardian on the necessity of both radical and reforming arms of the feminist movement to achieve success. In this case, the right for women to vote, on its 1918 centenary this year:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/feb/06/feminism-women-vote-suffragette-democracy-protests-political-theatre
This approach doesn’t apply everywhere, but a centennary is a good point for reflection.
“A diet of dead rats would make the Greens sicken and die”
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/opinion/101208963/a-diet-of-dead-rats-would-make-the-greens-sicken-and-die
Despite having ministerial positions and largely outlining what they plan to achieve this term (20 policy goals) the latest poll has the Greens going downwards since the election.
And with nothing more up their sleeves, coupled with supporter disappointment of swallowing some dead rats along the way, there is a real chance they won’t make the 5% threshold come next election.
Meanwhile, despite securing a number of wins, New Zealand First is floundering and their support of the TPP could very well be the last nail in their coffin.
Therefore, if Labour want friends next election, Labour needs to consider giving the Greens a little win (like lifting the incomes of beneficiaries, whether through a Christmas bonus, core benefit increase or extended and larger energy payment) to appease their activist base.
Something which Labour should keep in mind, unless they think they can win the next election alone.
Firstly, polls this far out from an election are worse than useless, because they encourage idiots to make pointless declamations based on little more than tea leaves.
Secondly, Labour don’t need you to teach them how to suck eggs. Unlike the nats, they know how to work with partners. The wins the Greens and NZ1 will get over the next 2.5yrs won’t be “given” to them by Labour, those wins will be earned by the coalition partners in their own right.
Yes, it early days. However for the reasons I outlined above, I can’t see things improving for the Greens or NZF without them securing significant wins.
And as Labour has the majority vote, any wins the Greens or NZF obtain requires Labour’s blessing.
So political parties that achieve nothing over an electoral term will be punished in the election booths? A profound observation that has hitherto occurred to precisely nobody. /sarc
Lets look at the Greens. They won ministerial positions and have their 20 policy goals, yet instead of going up (which one would assume) they slipped downwards.
Therefore, if the Greens think that now they have their ministerial positions and 20 policy goals they can sleepwalk their way to the next election, they are going to get a shock.
Moreover, as popular as Davidson is with the party’s activist base, merely making her co leader won’t be enough. They need a significant policy win to appease the left within.
I can see the Greens easily following Labour’s path of leadership changes and party disunity.
“Lets look at the Greens”
Let’s not. I am going to hang out the washing, feeling mildly happy that we have a government that seems to be populated by normal people. I don’t expect too much from them, but it feels better than a government of vulgar, greedy, self-serving philistines.
“Let’s not. I am going to hang out the washing, feeling mildly happy that we have a government that seems to be populated by normal people.”
Yes, we changed the Government, but we still have the TPP. Rather weak employment reforms. An almost useless cannabis reform. A foreign investment ban with holes so large that our largest foreign investor is exempt. No date set for a living wage.
I can go on, but I think you can get the drift.
You can see whatever you want to see, that much is obvious.
What scares me is that I’m so often right.
Well, given that you usually restrict yourself to stating the bleeding obvious in the most condescendingly insulting way possible, you shouldn’t be overy surprised.
But I’m sure that your effort today has made both NZ1 and the Greens finally realise that in order to win votes they’ll need to make some policy advances sometime in the next two years, rather than their previous intention to merely sit on their arses and do nothing.
Once again, your outstanding advice (offered for free, no less) has singlehandedly rescued the left and its electoral partners from oblivion 🙄
“But I’m sure that your effort today has made both NZ1 and the Greens finally realise that in order to win votes they’ll need to make some policy advances sometime in the next two years, rather than their previous intention to merely sit on their arses and do nothing.”
As far as NZF are concerned, their support of the TPP will be externally hard to overcome, hence it’s probably already all over for them.
There is no win big enough for them to come back from this.
And as for the Greens, apart from their 20 policy goals and new co leader, it seems that fluffing around making corny videos etc is all they plan to do. Hence, they need this nudge. As, evidently, their current actions show no signs of them being aware of this need.
Moreover, they need Labour’s blessing, and that won’t come willingly. Thus, this is part of the public pressure we require to put on them.
Your attempt to weaken it undermines it, so who’s side are you on?
How many times has NZ1 been predicted to die? One more announcement from you won’t make a difference.
It’s also really impressive the way you can convince yourself that your “nudge” is needed after you rule out their entire list of policy commitments.
Nobody needs anyone else’s “blessing”. That’s what you refuse to understand. Labour is not the overlord, throwing bones of policy achievement to the peasants. They are all equals.
The underlying strength of the coalition is respect, not power. As soon as you figure that one out, all your concerns will disappear into nothingness – which might be why it’s lost on you…
As for stating the obvious, the response to Metiria coming out was blatantly obvious to foresee, yet the Greens failed to see it coming.
So when it comes to the obvious, those pulling the strings in the Greens seem to be a little blind.
Oh, they saw it. But it was the right thing to do.
“How many times has NZ1 been predicted to die?”
How many times has NZF supported the TPP? This is huge with widespread and long lasting ramifications, thus this time it’s different.
NZF has become TPP first. And that’s gone down like a cup of cold sick.
I didn’t rule out their entire list of policy commitments, I said apart from them.
“They are all equals.”
Not when it comes to voting on policy
“The underlying strength of the coalition is respect “
Respect didn’t get us decent cannabis reform, core benefit increases nor did it stop the TPP. Hence, the concerns remain.
Respect got them put up or argued against. Respect allowed disagreement.
Nice line about TPP first. Did you get it from farrar, or will we merely be seeing it there shortly?
“Oh, they saw it.”
No, they didn’t. As shown by their preparedness and how quick Metiria through in the towel. Despite having almost full party support.
like I say. see what you want to see.
National is on the cusp of Leadership change …. probably very undemocratic.
The Greens are electing a representative female co-leader, democratically.
There is no Green disunity. But there are bound to be factions in National.
Two years nine months, …… keep your breath to cool your porridge.
“National is on the cusp of Leadership change …. probably very undemocratic.”
A ballot of the National party caucus elects a new leader.
“There is no Green disunity. But there are bound to be factions in National.”
Not sure James Shaw has the same confidence as you do…
“Shaw said all candidates would be told it had to be a “clean campaign” although they would not have to sign a code of conduct, something Labour Party leadership contenders have done in the past.
Shaw said there was a risk of ructions in the party but a clean campaign would help prevent that.”
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11982510
By the way, every NZF supporter I’ve spoken to are totally gutted with Winston’s support of the TPP and will no longer vote for them.
Not to mention the disappointment surrounding their cannabis reform stance.
Yes, I’m sure so many people spontaneously offer you their opinions and voting intention that you could start your own political market research consultancy. /sarc
I’m a political junkie, hence talk politics with everyone I meet and associate with, even with the cold callers that knock on my door.
So I’ll add “guaranteed to give you their honest opinion”, too
They have no reason to lie.
Except why they knocked on your door in the first place.
Be they religious or capitalist, doorknockers are selling you something, so they have a reason to tell you what they think you want to hear.
I’m talking about discussion after they have pitched their sale, thus they have no need to tell me what I want to hear and often surprise me.
Yeah, right. 🙄
but mainly in the Koru lounge and your mates in business class…
Don’t frequent the Koru lounge that often anymore, but back in the day used to know the ladies working their rather well.
Yep, NZ First surprisingly a sell out on TPP. They might be gone. Bad decision.
From what I can gather, it will be the death of them.
When I first heard the news, the first thing that came to mind is Winston must be planning on standing down as I don’t see them coming back from that and I think Winston knows it. Hence, I suspect he’s going to call it a day at the end of this term.
“Unlike the nats, they know how to work with partners.”
Under MMP National and Labour have both “won” four times each so yes National do know how to work with parties and know how to win under MMP
No, “winning” isn’t “working with partners”.
National know how to work with sycophants and sellouts. They don’t know how to work with partners.
The problem is we won’t how true that is of Labour as well until the next election
Though that’s true, they’ll have their work cut out to mess up their partners as thoroughly as the Gnats messed up the Maori Party.
Maybe but currently NZFirst are below the threshold and i don’t see them improving (a lot of the farmers won’t forget) and the Greens are at 6% and seem to be shedding their principles quicker than you can say government pension
I expect the Greens to be back but only at around the number they have now and I don’t expect Winston to be back
You’d be sledging the Greens whatever they did – you’d like nothing better than for them to abandon their principles.
But it’s true that Labour’s PR shadow won’t win them anything from their base. They need a few successes – rivers are the obvious one.
TPP and immigration and foreign land sales will end NZF if they roll over for it. We’ll see as we leave the silly season whether they’ll make a go of it.
“You’d be sledging the Greens whatever they did – you’d like nothing better than for them to abandon their principles.”
I’m sledging them because they act like they have the moral high ground but the first sniff of power and they abandon their principles
“TPP and immigration and foreign land sales will end NZF if they roll over for it. We’ll see as we leave the silly season whether they’ll make a go of it.”
Sure will
We don’t know they’ve abandoned their principles PR, they may be pursuing them by means other than media grandstanding. We’ll have some idea in the next few months.
“We don’t know they’ve abandoned their principles PR, they may be pursuing them by means other than media grandstanding. We’ll have some idea in the next few months.”
The problem is that all of us can make grand predictions but it generally takes months or years to see if it comes to pass
Still fun though
Yup – the far right idea of ‘fun’ – rivers that are toxic sumps, our government being sued under ISDS, unrestrained dairy development and jobs for sleazy assholes like those employed by CERA. As close to treason as makes no difference.
“I’m sledging them because they act like they have the moral high ground but the first sniff of power and they abandon their principles”
really? What principles have they abandoned exactly?
Would have thought they would have rejected the waka jumping bill and the Kermadecs might have been worth fighting for
You need some new lies. Is Farrar getting lazy or something?
Pretty sure you’ve had your face rubbed in this before.
“while assuring NZ First that iwi and commercial fishing rights will be taken into account.”
Should read… while assuring NZ First political donors fishing rights will be taken into account.
🙂
“Would have thought they would have rejected the waka jumping bill and the Kermadecs might have been worth fighting for”
What are the *principles they have abandoned? Be specific.
They seem pretty good so far.
My view of Greens is that they have somehow fallen into a trap of certain individual politicians following their pet projects or experiences while the identity of the Green Party flounders.
I’m not sure if dirty politics is at play and I think it would be super easy to have an undue influence and voting rights by members if a dirty organisation was inclined to wipe them out by becoming members on mass and voting in MP’s they know are polarising influences. Having newcomers being so high in the list and short on environmental credentials was very surprising.
I don’t think the new idea that social causes and niche transport (trains for the shore) being the Green focus is resonating with the loyal environmental followers that have voted for them since Jeanette days.
Good points, savenz.
Oh c’mon lets be real here, whatever is happening inside the Greens is probably* not due to Dirty Politics
The MT clusterf**k was all down to MT, when the two traitors (Kennedy Graham and the other one) were removed their was jubilation all round, the Greens abandoning the Kermadecs and going with the waka jumping bill are all down to leadership of the Greens
*Obviously I don’t know for certain but if someone could organise the downfall of the Greens to this extent without anyone finding out it’d be a miracle, as an example its generally agreed that Steven Joyce was behind the leaking of Winstons details yet that couldn’t be kept secret
They have internal problems as well.
https://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/345887/greens-letter-reveals-damage-to-staff-morale
True that but again something that can’t be attributed to “Dirty Politics”
“its generally agreed that Steven Joyce was behind the leaking of Winstons details “.
Really? Pray tell. Just how big was your sample of people who “generally agree” and what party did they support?
Personally, and I have had a number of Labour supporters agree, that it was a Green-supporting Public Servant in the department who was unhappy that Winston had attacked that Turei woman and was trying to retaliate.
I originally thought it might have been Winston himself.
We’ll never find out of course. Winston has dropped all his claims after all.
No, you’re reaching. Some soft support might not have been keen on Metiria’s stand but rail for the Orcs is long overdue. It’s true though that environmental progress is called for – river revival springs to mind.
“I’m not sure if dirty politics is at play and I think it would be super easy to have an undue influence and voting rights by members if a dirty organisation was inclined to wipe them out by becoming members on mass and voting in MP’s they know are polarising influences.”
Or, most Green Party members support the current direction of the party and the MPs.
I think it would be obvious to long time members if there had been a mass influx of new members who skewed the organisation. If you look at the GP Charter and documents, it’s pretty hard to hijack it. I would guess it was designed that way.
“Having newcomers being so high in the list and short on environmental credentials was very surprising.”
Not really. It was intentional and the members knew that. The party is very sensible to be bringing new people up through the ranks.
Not sure what you mean by short on environmental credentials. Have you looked at Shaw’s bio? If you mean that only people with backgrounds in specific environmental work should be MPs, then again, that’s not what the party or the membership wants.
@ Weka “Or, most Green Party members support the current direction of the party and the MPs”
the problem is voting wise…. the Green voting public don’t seem convinced about the Green Party’s direction enough to vote for them.
I have no problem with Shaw as I think he wants the best for the party and the country and can work with others and is genuinely nice guy with a decent amount of experience in the wider world. A plus in parliament.
I get the sense that the “Green” mojo is gone for some reason, and that’s because too many new people in the party who have their own reasons for getting there and the messages are all over the place. Also if they start sneering at the middle class who vote for them while actually being middle class themselves trying to pretend to be poor, the message is not a genuine one. That’s also why the social messages just don’t come across well.
Wanting more development for Auckland for example and blaming older folks for the housing crisis, does not sit with the environmental message of sustainability in the traditional sense.
If you haven’t worked it out, the working poor and beneficiaries don’t seem to be interested in enough numbers to vote for the Green Party consistently or even vote at all.
My guess is that it’s the more well heeled who can afford to vote Green and travel to a river or beach and afford organic produce that are their most loyal followers and they are probably older too, because they lived through Rogernomics and saw the effects, and that’s what makes them stick to the Greens. They probably own houses too, having bought them 30 years ago.
But there was little in the last campaign that was aimed in that direction and the age and experiences of the Greens MP’s maybe no longer reflect their main voters.
My guess is that it’s the more well heeled who can afford to vote Green and travel to a river or beach and afford organic produce that are their most loyal followers and they are probably older too, because they lived through Rogernomics and saw the effects, and that’s what makes them stick to the Greens. They probably own houses too, having bought them 30 years ago.
Wrong.
here are the stats from the 2014 election:
And the important graphs here.
in the graph #1 = the average – below #1 = less likely; above = more likely.
So, compared with the general population GP voters are
more likely to work part time;
more likely to be in a household where someone is a member of a union;
50% above and below line where household income is lower than average; way more likely to be students;
less likely to be male;
less likely to own house or flat;
less likely to be over 56yrs;
less likely than average to be 18-29yrs, (but still that is more likely than being over 56yrs);
Nats are way more likely to have household income above average; labour and NZ first are way more likely to have lower than average household income (but way more are over 56yrs);
Green voters are split between a bit higher and a bit lower than average incomes – so somewhere in between Nats and Lab-NZF.
GP voters are way more likely than the other 3 parties to have a uni education.
NZF voters are way more likely to be male. Nat voters are least likely to have been to uni.
The Greens, as Mae West said, used to be snow white, but they drifted.
Shaw is as solid as Goff, and just as uninspiring.
They need some serious media airtime over two years to get towards 8% – and all of it has to be good.
Don’t really agree. People will move to (or away) from the Greens based on what’s happening on the inside. Outside influences like media noise are less important imo
“They need some serious media airtime…”
No, they need a significant policy win. Mere media airtime won’t cut it.
Announcing benefit increases did wonders for them last time, hence this the area that will appease the left within, thus where they must secure a win.
I think that the Greens are at the lower end of their natural polling level. They’re well placed to get advances on environmental concerns and some social policy. With two leaders complementing each other they’ll get under steam pretty soon.
As you say, Shaw is solid. But the next coleader will probably be inspirational as well.
I’m not sure about some of the internal ructions, probably blow-over from the divisions highlighted when two caucus members decided to quit. But I’m sure they’ve had ructions before, like most parties.
NZ1 have more difficulty, but again they’ll be plugging their own regional development issues.
Pretty much. The Greens have had this sorted for a while. Shaw is the suit who is building all those bridges within mainstream society that are needed for change. He’s also inspirational in areas that are important (e.g. the members. People like Ad who appear to have an anti-progressive agenda probably don’t bother to listen to Shaw on his own terms and so find mansplaining the Greens a useful strategy).
Davidson would bring in the connections with other important parts of society – Māori, women, low income people, NGOs working the coal face etc.
And beside them both are the rest of the MPs and the party structure. Davidson wasn’t out there on her own with the launch. Those people are building long term structures that will serve NZ and the Greens well irrespective of reckons about the vote at the next election.
Weka, I had a quick look at the Green Party website but could not find anything that stated what happens if there is only one nomination.
As far as I am aware, there is only one to date, Marama Davidson, and nominations close on Friday. If only one, does that person automatically get the position, or does the nomination still go out for votes for or against?
“If only one, does that person automatically get the position…”
I certainly hope so. Then they can put all this to bed and get on with the real work that requires doing.
Afaik if there is only one nomination then they become the co-leader, but I’m not the best person to ask. I’ll check with some Greenies on twitter.
Thanks – just curious so don’t go to any trouble. And no doubt it will be covered in media etc if there is only one nomination on Friday.
It just occurred to me in view of the Greens’ other voting etc procedures.
EDIT – I can actually see a lot of sense in the Co-Leader being none of the Green MPs with Ministerial etc responsibilities (or any of the newies) so from that perspective, Davidson’s being the only nomination would make good sense (but not my call as a non-Green member but still supportive,)
I was interested anyway, so went and asked and found out some stuff, commented here (afaik this applies to all elected positions),
https://thestandard.org.nz/daily-review-07-02-2018/#comment-1444613
I wouldn’t be unhappy as a member if MD was the only nomination (saves time and energy too), but I’m also good if others want to try out.
“If only one, does that person automatically get the position, or does the nomination still go out for votes for or against?”
Every candidate for every position in the green Party runs against Re-open Nominations. To be successful in the case of a single candidate the candidate must receive 75% of the vote. That is, the candidate (or candidates) is rejected if Re-open Nominations receives more than 25%.
Thanks solka. Excellent provisions IMHO, including as a protection etc for the sole candidate.
While I think Davidson is worthy of respect, I don’t share your views about how popular she will be for the public. I’d say her views would be ‘very challenging’ to the Green voter and similar to what happened with Metiria and potentially plummet the Green vote.
My pick is Sage, because she’s the one who stands for conservation and can woo back the old supporters.
But if there’s only 1 nomination, that’s also a bad sign of disorganisation within the Greens not having enough choice of candidates.
or they decided to conserve their current limited resources.
“I don’t share your views about how popular she will be for the public”
Not sure I said anything about popularity with the public.
Well they should be choosing a leader that will ensure the survival of the Green Party and an increased vote, so I think that thinking about the public appeal of co leader should be an essential factor, especially when Greens have had some very rocky polls!
Maori have gone back to Labour and the amount of work it would take and the conflict that would bring to fight it out, especially being coalition partners is making a major tactical error… the same errors again and again including trying to get the youth vote by having younger MP’s is part of the problem.
Bernie Sanders and Corbyn are old and white but get the youth and black vote. Youth are not attracted by identity politics.
So you think that Davidson as co-leader won’t help the survival of the party and that people won’t vote because of her? Nice reckon but not seeing much rationale. Afaik, the GP vote dropped last year because of Ardern’s rise, and because of the mess with the two rogue MPs (and probably because of the sustained attack on the GP).
“Bernie Sanders and Corbyn are old and white but get the youth and black vote. Youth are not attracted by identity politics.”
Are either of them in government? Both of those men support solidarity politics. We are not the US or the UK and have a different political landscape and political system.
Labour and the Greens don’t have to fight it out. Labour can get the centrist and swing voters, including NZF, and the Greens can get back their previous voters from Labour. Both can pick up some of the non-vote. It’s not rocket science, and it moves the Overton Window left. What you are suggesting will move the Greens to a more centrist position and cement NZ in centrist, neoliberal hell.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11989439
“If they insist on a co-leader, of the three there is a clear winner: Julie Anne Genter.”
“Genter, like James Shaw is likeable. I have called her my favourite Green. She didn’t like it for fear that my support tainted her prospects within the cloistered world of the tree hugger and snail lover.”
Again, Julie Anne is respected for her transport ideas but I very much doubt she has popular appeal with New Zealander’s. Can anyone think of anything apart from transport that Julie Anne represents? I can’t.
Women
well I think the co leader has to be a women so they all fall into that category.
I very much doubt she has popular appeal with New Zealander’s.
I think Julie-Anne Genter would be very popular with NZers for similar reasons to Jacinda Ardern. She is highly intelligent, outgoing and empathetic to a cross-section of NZers.
I have no quarrel with Marama Davidson, but Julie-Anne has more national (with a small ‘n’) political experience so maybe she should be given the co-leader mantle first and see how she goes.
How can tree huggers and snail lovers be considered “cloistered”? Surely their love for the natural world must come from being in the …natural world!
Cloistered? Pffffffft!!
“Genter, like James Shaw is white. I have called her my favourite Green.” – Hosko
Fixed it for ya’!
The Greens take representation seriously – hence the male and female co-leadership. If they didn’t choose Marama they’d have a conspicuous lack of Maori representation, especially since she didn’t get a cabinet role. Personally I think she’s an asset, the party’s appeal would be so much narrower without her.
“They’re well placed to get advances on environmental concerns and some social policy”
Talk about stating the obvious.
Most know they are well placed to get advances on environmental concerns and some social policy, but still, they’ve gone downwards. Hence, it’s not going to be enough to appease the left within like me.
A pair of aviator shades and a chest resplendent – All Hail Grand Marshal Baby Fingers!.
(like Bastille day, really?)
President Trump’s vision of soldiers marching and tanks rolling down the boulevards of Washington is moving closer to reality in the Pentagon and White House, where officials say they have begun to plan a grand military parade later this year showcasing the might of America’s armed forces.
[…]
The inspiration for Trump’s push is last year’s Bastille Day celebration in Paris, which the president attended as a guest of French President Emmanuel Macron. Trump was awestruck by the tableau of uniformed French troops marching down Avenue des Champs-Elysees with military tanks, armored vehicles, gun trucks and carriers — complete with fighter jets flying over the Arc de Triomphe and painting the sky with streaks of blue, white and red smoke for the colors of the French flag.
Aboard Air Force One en route home from Paris last July, aides said Trump told them he was dazzled by the French display and said he wanted one at home.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trumps-marching-orders-to-the-pentagon-plan-a-grand-military-parade/2018/02/06/9e19ca88-0b55-11e8-8b0d-891602206fb7_story.html?utm_term=.a4d1c3794764
They better make sure Kim Jong Orange’s parade is bigger and more tremendous than anything his baby twin Kim Jong Un can put together.
now we’re gonna have parade-offs between the two of ’em
Trump is organising himself a Parade ?
he loves ’em.
Read the link
I wonder how long it will be before he proclaims himself Emperor?
http://www.newhistorian.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Napoleon.jpg
As our former leader once said – ashpirations..
I think The Guggenheim’s golden crapper is highly appropriate:
https://www.vox.com/2018/1/25/16933970/trump-white-house-guggenheim-toilet-art
Purple-heartlessness!
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DVZMTjvV4AEdK1Q.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DVZPpcmX0AAzwoz.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DVZFsC4XkAAuA-P.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DVZGC5NVoAA-pOC.jpg
They forgot the medals for his personal Vietnam: avoiding STDs while rooting his way around New York.
http://money.cnn.com/2016/10/14/media/trump-stern-vietnam-stds/index.html
https://www.stuff.co.nz/world/americas/us-election-2016/85386821/it-was-my-personal-vietnam-trumps-proudest-moment-he-has-no-stds
As all the girls said – he was the biggest dick in town.
FFS! Has the man no shame…
His endless greed is astounding.
Trump has reportedly said he hopes the display would run along Pennsylvania Avenue and pass by Trump International Hotel.
Viewing for the parade from the Hotel would of course be megabucks – but what a happy happenstance!
With such a weak Constitution, and having to rely on Congress to rein in a President who chooses to enrich himself at the expense of the public purse – isn’t it about time the US had a law about this sort of behaviour?
Will there be massive photos of “himself” along the route?
Here’s that scary pile of plastic and rubbish washed out to sea by last week’s storm on the Coast…
https://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/349847/coasters-shift-thousands-of-plastic-bags
“Kiwis will have to pay GST on internet shopping purchases they make from overseas, Revenue Minister Stuart Nash has confirmed.” , ‘Absolutely the right thing to do” November 15 2017
https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/98894073/government-will-absolutely-ensure-gst-is-paid-on-internet-shopping-purchases
Then today we get this
“New legislation to expand GST to include all imports is off the table for this year, says Revenue Minister Stuart Nash.”
Nor is he willing to confirm legislation for next year, but rest assured we “will be watching Australia very closely”.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11989621
Poor Stuart, he should listen more carefully to the nuances of Robertsons statements..
“Finance Minister Grant Robertson did not say whether the tax change was definitely a “happening thing” when asked later on Wednesday, indicating instead that it was still something that was being “investigated”, but agreed it had long been Labour policy.
My theory is that they are quietly honouring their statement that ‘no new taxes will be introduced before 2020’. The seeming postponement of the tourist tax is an example, possibly.
A very honourable thing to do (which was totally beyond the last government of course) even though they also said urgency is required in some areas.
If true, I’m not sure why they don’t just say it and put the accusations of u-turning to bed.
Bob Jones’ racism is too much for even the NBR this time. Says Maori wouldn’t exist without the British and they should be made to serve “us” (white people) on one day a year out of gratitude.
This attitude of course reflects the thoughts of Don Brash, we know that, but also the idea of Bill English’s that te reo Maori is “someone else’s language”.
Far from pretending to advocate for one New Zealand these destructive fossils are intent on division.
http://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2018/02/column-calling-for-maori-servitude-for-a-day-pulled-after-outrage.html
The anti Waka jumping brigades are status quo con artists.
Unless elected as an independent, the mps are voted for as a party by the public in one way or another.
Part of that should involve the mps striving to make their party structures and organisations as accountable as possible to what they were voted for ( which admittedly these days can be often rather vague but all the same ). This should be part of the mps’ job description to their constituencies, creating transparency within their parties working for the voting public so the constituencies get as much bang as their buck as possible for what was said they were voting for.
When these type of issues are blatantly betrayed by a party, then mps can resign, from their position and or the party. This is not the same as mps trying to set the agenda in internal power plays, as was the case with the recent spat of internal green party mps going into the election. No, it is due diligence after the fact, independent to what the party policy platform is and how it was formed.
Now that this doesn’t happen so much, is more about the conceit about the political process to start with than it is about the democratic principles about the ‘waka jumping bill’ to end with.
In my view, New Zealand society has just endured the most extremist & looting banana republic global communistic govt term in it’s history. This did not come about, nor exist, in a vacuum. Some realism about the place of the current coalition alternative govt is often missing, in being separate from complaints about things like the further directions and outcomes involved in the next step of free-trade’s global cartel monopolism in the guise of the TPP.
While elections are spectator sports, a significant component to what constitutes good governance in a public’s interest, often is not when it comes to the specifics of gears and lever operation. What the govt is doing, yes.
And what the govt was doing was saying they did not essentially feel good about the initial agreement. How a govt is doing this, is more a case of gears and lever operation, and that is to some level, related to the power wattage of the machinery it has the operation of to do so, and that is not the spectator sport part of the process. These two things may overlap in a continuum but they are not the same.
Fed. Farmers” “head of animal welfare” claims, unconvincingly: “Our role is to show leadership and to educate our members”
The Panel, RNZ National, Wednesday 7 February 2018
Jim Mora, Penny Ashton, Patrick Morgan, Caitlin Cherry
First item after the 4 o’clock news is the vibe around this exciting new prime minister, and the excellent showing she made at Waitangi. “By any measure,” said host Jim Mora, “Jacinda Ardern’s trip north went well.” The panelists agree that Jacinda Ardern and her government are in for a lot more positive coverage in future, and the prospects for the Nasty Party seem dim. Then Penny Ashton comes up with one of the best lines of the year so far….
Mora does not greet this apposite and humorous quip with one of his trademark guffaws. Nor does he mutter his habitual, insincere “That’s very funny!” Instead he falls into an icy silence, as he does whenever someone makes a remark even slightly critical of the National Party.
After that awkward moment it was time to interview the first guest of the afternoon, billed as the “head of animal welfare” for Federated Farmers. His name is Chris Lewis and he apparently owns a farm “in the Waikato.” Mora insisted, at least three times, that Lewis is “one of the good farmers”. Maybe he is, but he didn’t seem to know much about the topic he was brought on to talk about: the suffering of dairy cows in the sun, with no trees to shelter under. Chris Lewis seemed to have no idea about anything. It was one of the most embarrassing performances in the history of The Panel—and that, as any long-time listener will attest, is very embarrassing indeed.
JIM MORA: Yeah, but are shelter belts being removed for the ease of installing centre-pivots?
CHRIS LEWIS: Ahhh, I don’t farm in Canterbury and I haven’t been there much lately. …. Our role is to show leadership and to educate our members….. But we need your listeners to tell us what are the best trees to plant…. [more confused blathering then, mercifully, he stops.]
….STUNNED SILENCE….
PENNY ASHTON: I would have thought he’d be the expert on such things.
MORA: No, he’s—
PENNY ASHTON: He’s the head of animal welfare for Federated Farmers.
MORA: No, he’s looking for arboreal advice.
PENNY ASHTON: [clearly unimpressed] Hmmmmmm….
Later, near the end of the program, Penny Ashton manages to run afoul of Jim Mora’s highly selective moral code again….
PENNY ASHTON: He’s a disgusting piece of human garbage, Piers Morgan.
MORA: We don’t need to go into that….
For more dodgy dairying philosophers, click here….
https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-17-12-2017/#comment-1427213
I like the sound of Peggy Ashton but it doesn’t look like she will be invited back again.
Kim Jong Trump – 5 times draft dodger.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/feb/06/donald-trump-military-parade-pentagon-bastille-day?utm_source=esp&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=GU+Today+main+NEW+H+categories&utm_term=263170&subid=15166303&CMP=EMCNEWEML6619I2
From the first link:
The move was instantly criticised, with one veterans’ group comparing the president to “a wannabe banana republic strongman”.
Since America under the stewardship of the Chump is descending into Banana Republic status, I guess such a parade is appropriate.
Cartoonists all around the world would have a field day.
Thanks for keeping the blog going The Chairman and McFlock.