That cats had been affected was published from somewhere in East many months ago, probably during our first lockdown. ….and it's not a reference I kept.
I wondered then about the myriad of homes where cats are well-cuddled pets.
I think the last nail is in RNZ coffin,Media watch going near total bias on trans genderism. Sorry no link,but i'm sure some are still reeling and others can find.
It was the 2nd to last story on Media Watch, but personally I felt it was a good article, I guess left for dead didn't like it because it was not anti trans. Given the atmosphere around us trans folk today I felt the item was fairly reasonable, again perhaps because for a change it wasn't overtly anti trans
Far from the truth,but it seems you happy to make it up as you go,ho hum.
Edited: if we stick to the facts,we should be able to move forward on what is a very simple matter,women’s rights.
Their you go again,and you wonder why men on this site don't comment.I have no problem with the trans community.That comment above from Joa about this site being anti-trans and the MSM being against said community is factually wrong,hence my two cents worth,but I will go back into my box.thanks!
I thought you just said the matter was about women's rights. I said it's about two sets of rights that are sometimes in conflict. What's the problem.
Trans people are out numbered and outgunned on TS. Joanne's comment is challenging, but it doesn't hurt for it to be here. You said her views about you are wrong, so it's all good I would have thought.
For all the help you have been,not.You just through me under the proverbial bus.And by the way have a read of Selina Todd (The people)the rise and fall of the working class 1910-2010,
Oh and too finish off,you were helping Joanna with her hypocrisy.Her being out numbered an all,they are a very small % of the pop, you know that would apply here @TS no.
their you go again,I never said that"women's rights are the only issue" show me where or retract.And maybe you are conflating middle class with working class,re another flame you started.This "Sorry,I have not idea what you mean"What do you mean to say,maybe copy and paste that bit you don't understand and I can only try and explain.
if we stick to the facts,we should be able to move forward on what is a very simple matter,women’s rights.
In the context of the thread this read to me like: Mediawatch did a terrible job by framing it as trans rights vs transphobia, and you were saying it should have been about women's rights instead.
Maybe what you really meant was that in addition to the issues for trans people, women's rights should be considered too.
Oh I see your problem,at that stage you hadn't listen to broadcast.which was about Trans rights,It should be clear I was countering that narrative.I see you are bussy,It would help if you didn't jump in half cocked,If I could share your gun analogy back up this thread "outgunned I think it was.
do you realise that I've written actual posts about the issue from a gender critical perspective?
I haven't listened to the Mediawatch piece, but it's clear that it took an anti-feminist approach. And my opinion is that it should be looking at the conflict of rights, not trans' rights or women's rights alone.
Yes,if only you had listen first before commenting. I know your got a lot on,so wadding in to defend Joanna,were she's is quite capable to do that herself,instead of making me out to be some sort of problem.
Too be clear,I've read what Joanne has said here over the last few week's,and mostly agree,but upending other peoples rights ie:biological women is wrong.
I appreciated listening to it. But the reality is (and this is why I comment so much on these issues on TS) is that there has been a virtual shut down in the media of GC voices.
You see for me this issue isn't. about people. Its about ideology. So Gender ideology is about how gender identity trumps biological sex. I don't believe that is true.
And for those of you who about to tell me sex is on a spectrum or there are more that two sexes, yah. Great. Iwill post a link for a scienctific competition, the prize money for which is $10,0000.00. If you can prove this is the case, you are going to win an awlful lot of money. Thing is no one has claimed the prize as of yet. Funny that.
I don't mind at all people identifying as the opposite sex. You are allowed to do that. But legislating for that, pushing your way into women's private spaces and sporting competitions. No Thank You.
Nor will I repeat back the phrase "trans women are real women'. I don't believe that to be the case……. And the science backs me up. I am also entitled to my GC views.
The mysogonists vile narrative by some trans gender activists against women e.g JK Rowling, Kathleen Stock is disgusting.
Re the media watch piece. the person with the Scottish accent said that in 30 years time their will be apologies from politicians who didn't support gender ideology. But I think it is just as likely that the 22,000 and counting de-transitioners who have irreverisble damage to their bodies will be asking and receiving the apology.
BTW congratulations to the Listener who are covering this issue in a balanced way
Is that said out of a sense of kindness and politeness do you think , or is it intended as a statement of fact. If that’s a statement of fact, I just can’t go along with it, and I couldn’t say it myself with any sincerity.Now I realise that’s because biological reality carries the most weight with me, the reason for that is, that the cultural baggage that makes up gender is so diverse and changeable, over time and culture.For another, gender might be the most important.Do we both have the right to feel the way we do?
I could say without feeling jarred by it, that "to all intents and purposes that person is a woman " ie, looks like one , behaves like one.Like Fa'afafine",in the manner of "
It's very unfair, but "passing "matters .Women are much more likely to welcome into their spaces someone who looks more like them, smaller, feminine, relatively hairless, feminine voice ,and of course, those transwomen who successfully "pass" have been using female spaces for a while now.
This feels like narcissistic rambling so I’ll stop now.
Well I will claim that $10,000 as a few weeks ago I directed you to a peer reviewed study on pregnancies in intersex individuals which you accepted as fact (and extrapolated into thinking it was a study of every intersex person in the world 🙄)
So, when can I expect my winnings?
Unless of course you're a liar…
After all, you are now saying the opposite of what you said at the time.
There's no shortage of men commenting on this site and my comment was not about this site being anti trans, it was about you bringing up this RNZ report and implying that it wasn't anti trans enough for you. You, Anker and others consistently say you have nothing against us trans folk yet in the last few weeks virtually every Open Mike has been taken over by your little group bemoaning the fact that I want my rights to be recognised as much as anyones. If you have issues with Gender ideology then fine, tell us and let it be, but no, that's not good enough you have to tell us day after day after day. I'm quite sure that if I stated my understanding of who I am in the same fashion I would very quickly be shown the door. It may be true that some people have been ill served by those who subscribe to the kind of gender ideology that gets talked about on here but you know what? Us Transpeople, particularly Transwomen don't get verbally abused, we get beaten up and murdered at a rate higher than any other group you would care to name. Not, I would say in absolute numbers but in terms of percentages. So if you, as you say, support Trans people then let us get on with our lives which are real, and often boring.
These discussions are being had now, Joanne, because of the legislation proposals and the impacts they may/and have had on women and girls.
It is not in any way intended to give you discomfort, or any other transgender people in the community.
However, the current gender ideology pushed by very aggressive activists (which I will not assume that you share) requires compliance from women and girls, in fact demands it. So, the discussion is occurring because those demands are taking place. And we are sharing information here, on TS, because the impacts on women's rights are not being actively investigated or discussed in many other places.
Just like anyone else, you are welcome to participate, or just scroll past. There is no intention to make you feel uncomfortable or require you to contribute unless you want to.
it's a tricky balance on TS, because there have been lots of problems with women being here historically so I am loathe to accept a line of telling women to not talk about their politics freely.
There is also the issue of legislative and social changes that affect women, and this is one of the better places to discuss that. That's a live issue, which is why we keep talking about it.
But I also see an obvious imbalance.
I'm quite sure that if I stated my understanding of who I am in the same fashion I would very quickly be shown the door.
Not sure I understand what you mean, would you mind clarifying?
I don't think that is correct Joanne, that virtually every Open Mike is "taken over". Open Mike is for everybody to share whatever they are concerned or interested. in. That's how it works.
My impression is that Open Mike has become dominated with info on Covid 19. I completely understand that even if I don't follow it.
Do you have a problem with women saying "I want my rights recognised as much as anyone's?"
I think gender identity is a relatively new term that has come out of gender ideology, postulated by Judith Butler and some others. I disagree with her theory and think biological realty trumps gender identity, not the other way around as many gender activists believe.
I am not sure about your assertion that trans women are murdered more than anyone (other than in South America
Sorry, last comment posted before I finished writing and for some reason, I can't edit it.
I think in South America more trans women are murdered per % but not in NZ. Interested to see if anyone has different stats on this.
Unfortunately rapes and assaults are often hard to quantify as often not reported to the police.
But women as a sex class are very vulnerable to sexual assault because they are smaller and not as physically strong and overwhelmingly the people who commit rape and violent assault are biological males
The latest UN figures show that 137 women across the world are killed every day by a partner or member of their own family – a total of 50,000 women a year murdered by people they know and should be able to trust.
In saying that, no one should be killed for what they are and on grounds of their sex or gender id. And yet, in the 2021 in the UK every third day on average a women gets killed. By partners, strangers in the parks and cops and everyone is meh.
Us Transpeople, particularly Transwomen don't get verbally abused, we get beaten up and murdered at a rate higher than any other group you would care to name. Not, I would say in absolute numbers but in terms of percentages.
Lots of women get murdered, it's true, but Joanne said %. Think about that.
It's not a competition.
When gender critical women minimalise the violence and abuse that trans women get directed at them, it's not too dissimilar when men minimalise violence against women.
But even in % no transwomen has been killed since 2018 in NZ while every other week a women is found dead, somewhere. Every year.
Women get beaten, kids get beaten every other month to death in NZ.
Most of that violence is from men. So again, we are asking women to make space for a group of people that is being victimised by men. Why are we – women – responsible for the safe keeping of Trans identified people from men, when no one is even pretending to care about safe keeping women and children. Why do we have to give up safe spaces to men who may victimise us? And why are pepole like Joanne so concerned to not talk about the real violence that women live daily and the reasons why women have created many of he safe spaces that trans want access to in the first place and often without any assistance from the state.
The fact that annoys me is that this distinction of the % gets thrown out all he time, because otherwise, many trans people would need to admit that they too live in countries were it is as safe for them as anyone else who are considered 'minorities', like NZ , or the UK, or Germany, and where their human rights are granted and people to try to their best ability to accommodate them.
But I think you are despite it not being your intention. How does it hurt women to acknowledge that trans women get abused as well?
But even in % no transwomen has been killed since 2018 in NZ while every other week a women is found dead, somewhere. Every year.
Women get beaten, kids get beaten every other month to death in NZ.
That's you making it a competition again.
I oppose self-ID in its current form, and I strongly believe in single sex spaces. But I don't see why the needs of trans women need to be negated as part of retaining women's rights.
Geniune apology Joanne. I missed understodd when you said bemoanig the fact that I want my rights. I thought you were referring to women, rather than yourself.
That's right,down played issues women have about current bill before the house,and even mis-represented the sporting issue,and as we now know those rules are about to be changed by the Olympic committee.
There is one, incredibly vocal, monied, government supported group that demands access to any and all spaces that Non Males have fougth for since the 1900, who pretty much show the attitude of the above poster to anything that is not total submission to that ideology. And as per the attitude of the lawmakers involved in the submissions hearings, it is already all decided. But then Non Males, are they even human, and why would we consider them human, and do they have rights if we can't even define who they are?
Fwiw, one could be mistaken and consider this a new mens rights activisim, as men are the primary benefector of these new rules and laws that are created. In the mean time, Non Males of all colors, creeds, and identifications are simply self selecting to resign, not compete, and not drink to much fluids lest they have to go to some public toilet that they rather not go too for all the obvious reasons.
Who will suffer the most if this legislation will be pushed through?
and yet trans women still exist and they are different from men.
If trans women want and need things to enable them to take part in society eg a gender recognition certificate in the UK, then how is this any different than wheelchair users needing ramps?
As Joanne says, the problem is with gender indentity ideology, which is pushing a sociopolitical agenda far beyond human rights issues. I don't think it helps women to deny that, or that there is in fact a conflict of rights (women want no self-ID, many trans people want self-ID). At some point we have to sort this out in ways that are good for women and trans women.
The conflict you speak of is there because we have a government who'd rather colonize women spaces and wholesale cancel women so to speak – then actually create something for the Trans community, and not just for the trans identified males btw. Goverment that demand to the point of threatening of prison and fines – that women give up their spaces, their awards, their sports, their meeting spaces to the point where a court ruled that trans women must be included in lesbian spaces even if they hold a date night.
That is not a conflict, that is colonisation. Taking over spaces, places and language that used to be used by a particular group of people to be themselves, speak of themselves and congregate.
The government could create these spaces. Men, Women, Unisex (Trans). It could, and we would not be having this discussion in the first place. But the government does not. So Transpeople – non binary people – and any other identification is now allowed to be where previously they could not be, and women will have to submit, or else deal with the fall out of job loss, loss of income, legal threats, questioning by the police, online harasment without recourse etc.
And yet, 'women' – aka 'non males ' exist. But then what are women, Weka? And are they even human.
the government is taking rights – hard won rights – away from Women, to give these rights over to men. And there are no other words for it. And the only one who has no longer rights, are women. The government has made Men the definer of women, and they will put this into law. Welcome back to the 1500.
Transwomen are Trans identified males and it should not be the duty of Women to accomodate these men into their spaces. Men should be taking care of their gender non conforming brethren. And government should be creating spaces for these men. Be they toilets, changing rooms, or shelters and refuges and prisons. As for housing and job discrimination, take that to the relevant courts and fix it there. And if they don't have the money to do so, bring back legal aid.
So We – women have to do nothing, as WE – women have not created this problem. Lesbians don't have to fix anything, as they did nothing. Mothers don't have to fix anything, as they did nothing.
It is a lazy government that has work to do, and that is to create spaces for trans people, non binary and other gender fluid people and leave Women for those who are women. It is government that on behalf of a few men is throwing away its female population wholesale into a ditch of 'can't be defined, gets called body with vagina, and gets beat up by trans identified male in boxing matches for funsies'.
It is a lazy government that has work to do, and that is to create spaces for trans people, non binary and other gender fluid people and leave Women for those who are women. It is government that on behalf of a few men is throwing away its female population wholesale into a ditch of 'can't be defined, gets called body with vagina, and gets beat up by trans identified male in boxing matches for funsies'.
A lot of my fury is for the politicians that have created this mess.
All of my fury is for them, as without them this would not be an issue mostly. And my question is, why. What is in for the political/media/academic class that pushes this shit on mainly working class and poor class women, as the nice and polite middle class and upper class women will only ever use a public toilet at their fancy eatery or the koru club in the airport.
The ones that will have to compete for a space in the loo at the mall are the shop girls that have to use the public loos there, or the school girls that suddenly end up in unisex toilets with boys galore while they try to change a tampon or a sanitary pad.
A pox on the house of everyone of the lawmakers that pushes that shit on us and our kids.
They already have the same rights you and I have. Those that pass already use female spaces without incidents – at least i have not heard of any issues. They have the same rights as all men and women, gay, hetero, bi, have in this country. This is not about rights, and frankly i don't think it ever was. If women don't have rights, then trans women don't have rights, and trans men being trans identified women also don't have rights.
I don't have an issue with the Identification of Transwomen / Transmen, i have an issue with Self ID that needs to be followed up by nothing, but grants access to US in spaces were we like to be on our own to everyone anytime without exception. Make it easier for adults to transition, put their paper work in order (born bio male, gender F or vis versa), grant them access to the law and courts if their 'rights' are not given. All that can happen without remotely doing what they propose now. And above all, stop pretending that Women and Transwomen and Men and Transmen are the same. They aren't. And that fault, is with government. These proposed chances are so drastic that i find it hard to believe that that was the best they could come up with to accommodate an actual trans population of less then a percent or two, into the women spaces of half of this worlds population.
Why are the government all over the industrial world – which funnily is enough the 'world' were women have the most rights, highest earning power and best life conditions and most rights – insisting in telling us that Trans identified men are women, and that no women, you can not be upset about this or else we give you big big trouble. So why are governments and here in NZ too, telling women to shut up and submit to Men in their spaces and just take that loss of actual rights on the chin and suck it up.
'sex' M , Gender F or vis versa. There you have it. It should also clear that up if they have an accident and need medical care. That can be printed on Driver lisences, and any other legal document.
(for purpose of identifying trans as to their 'dead' personality, that should be kept in cases of the sexual offenders register or similar. i.e. Alonsus Alonsus, also known as Brigitte Brigitte).
Job applications, the one that i got was, My birth name is xxx, but i go by yyy. That was good enough for me, and besides i was hiring a baker and this transperson came recommended. In the same sense as you and I would identify as women, and men would identify as men. Why do we have to bake a special cake for these people? This is a serious question.
My point is that these people are someone before they transition, and there should be a reference to that person.
And last but least, why do we need to erase several thousand years of womenhood, language, and customs, to accommodate gender non conform males.
They have exactly the same rights as we all have. They have the same human rights. Heck, we are discriminating against women daily, we kill women daily, we abuse them daily, we don't hire them, we don't promote them, we rather hire and promote a Trans identified male to a board then a women. WE call this 'equity'.
What if the trans woman doesn't want their employer to know they are trans?
They have exactly the same rights as we all have. They have the same human rights. Heck, we are discriminating against women daily, we kill women daily, we abuse them daily, we don't hire them, we don't promote them, we rather hire and promote a Trans identified male to a board then a women. WE call this 'equity'.
Oh, so women's rights don't get respected, let's disrespect trans rights too.
"What if the trans woman doesn't want their employer to know they are trans?"
That's a question worth a whole post, I think, weka.
I've been turning it over in my mind, having been through the eighties when declaring your sexuality required a lot of courage from friends, so I can understand how this may be a dilemma.
At present, I think that there has to be societal acceptance of however people want to identify, but to 'hide' those identities by passing, is also not going to help for individuals in the long run.
Accurate records of birth, and gender identity are necessary for statistics and the delivery of health, justice and support systems, so I don't support the replacement of biological sex with gender identity. I do support some form of official documentation that records gender identity for those that wish it. The gender reassignment surgery is one status that should allow people into their gender identified single sex space, particularly as they are no longer male or female bodied. It is the self-id access that is of particular concern.
Is it harmful to transpeople to not identify them as the biological sex they identify as? I can only think, No.
I believe it is more harmful to require them to have to hide themselves amongst others in order for them to feel accepted.
In addition, the removal of boundaries in regards to single-sex spaces, both physical and other, requires much more discussion. Trans rights do matter, but we do need to understand what rights they actually want, and need to be able to live their lives fully. At present, the demand is sophistry, Transwomen are Women, so they become a de-facto protected category, while removing that protected category by that inclusion.
Yes trans people do have the same rights as we all do. Difficulties can arise with people living as another sex when it comes to presenting a birth certificate where the birth sex does not align with the lived in gender. Transpeople have the ability to change their birth certificates now ie without the proposed amendment. .
Some must believe it is unfair to either have to live life as a woman or to do the hormonal or surgical transition or get the certifications around this, hence the amendments proposed.
These amendments enable a person to aver that they are male or female etc. with no formal proof required that this is so. I thought at first, that looking at the Maori roll which has a similar provision that this 'averring' in the trans context was fair.
I no longer do. The reason is that Maori, if pressed, if this ever came to pass, are actually able to provide proof by way of whakapapa, certificates, genealogy even DNA. With no requirement to even live as a woman let alone embark on any transition this proof ipso facto is not attainable by a trans person.
Rather than forcing people to not believe the evidence of their eyes why was work not done around examining the existing ways to change birth certificates, examine them for unexpected/unfair difficulties but to expect evidence of a transition or active transitioning?
The longer this goes on and the more I see the evidence of malice, threats of violence against bio women the more I see it may be/is just more of oppression that men/patriarchy have traditionally dealt against women.
In other words my male bullshit meter is clanging like it does/did when sexist jokes were about and we 'did not have a sense of humour', the country was not 'ready' to enact equal pay, the rubbish about male overwhelming sexuality that means male cannot control it and so rape…….women wearing clothing that 'invites' rape etc etc. Many of the memes promulgated by trans women and their supporters are incredibly misogynistic, openly violent and crude like male bullshit often is.
If someone could answer me why the existing provision could not have been amended ……I gather it was around the legal costs around statutory declarations..at least that was said.
I personally think bio women have been 'snowed' by the mighty powerful US based corporations and males of all sorts and stripes…..by the trans community with the catchy rights based argument and by hetero men who probably thing we are 'over-reacting, again…..perhaps even being 'hysterical'.
Not holding my breath that any good will come from the submissions before the select Committee.
We have unsafe spaces in the public sphere to look forward to, women prisoners being raped by males in women's prisons (UK) , by born males trying to insert themselves through human rights legislation into sensitive female spaces such as Rape Crisis Centres (Canada)
Rape Crisis Centre Edinbourough is run by an entire male who lied about his GRC in the first place to get a similar job previously. They then pontificated about 'rape and orgasms' (literally 14 century it was thought that if a women got pregnant by rape its because she had an orgasm'), and that bigotted rape victims need to be re-educated to their bigottry before they could get help. In the US they now hand out condoms to men in female prisons, and abortions to the women who end up pregnant. I read somewhere that some 3000+ males are looking to relocate to womens prisons in California alone. You can't get cancer care in the US unless you pay, but the state will pay for fake tits and a neo vag for a bloke, go figure.
This whole Self ID is an affront to women everywhere, it is sexual abuse made legal, it is putting women back on the urinary leash, and it is taking women out – no pun intended, one by one out of Universities, jobs, and generally public life.
And all of that here in NZ courtesy to the Green and the Labour Party, and one can't actually make this shit up. For the right we are 'helpmeets' at best, for the 'left' we are something that can't even be defined.
Weka, I think those are really good questions. It seems like some activists want transwomen, in particular, to be treated as if they are biological women.
I want to preserve biological women as a sex class and be referred to as women, not mensturaters, chest feeders, birthing parent etc.
I want female only spaces and sporting competitions for biological women only.
I am unsure why transwomen want the opposite…..i.e. to have their gender identity treated as the same as biological women, when it just isn't. Its not possible. Just one of those things.
But if trans people want help with being treated with respect, getting jobs etc no problem.
I tend to take people as I find them, no matter who they are.
Here an update from the female prisons in the UK, they are now apparently reviewing the rule to allow trans identified males into womens prison, they are even building a rather large annex to house trans identified people and youth offenders.
Some activists propose that housing male inmates who identify as transgender in separate units is a compromise that would take the safety and dignity of both the female population and the transgender-identifying population into account.
This push led to the creation of the first transgender unit in the UK. The dedicated transgender wing is in HMP Downview, a closed category women’s prison in England that houses 300 women and has a juvenile unit."
Transgender-identifying inmates have rejected the push for separate units like the one at HMP Downview (pictured), telling a researcher they wanted “to be treated in the same manner of people of the same gender as them” including “wanting to be searched more, to share a cell and shower at the same time as other people in custody.” Courtesy: @HMPDownview / Twitter
However, transgender-identifying inmates are overwhelmingly against separate units like the one available at HMP Downview, Dr Matt Maycock, a Dundee University-based researcher who has worked for SPS, found. Dr Maycock interviewed 13 transgender-identifying individuals incarcerated in Scottish prisons, and determined that the majority wanted “to be treated in the same manner of people of the same gender as them” including “wanting to be searched more, to share a cell and shower at the same time as other people in custody something that is in contrast to what would be seen as undesirable to their fellow people in custody.” The research was published in the Prison Service Journal. Continue reading Transgender Policy That Led to Male Sex Offenders in Women’s Jails Set to be Reviewed | Women Are Human. Read more at: https://www.womenarehuman.com/transgender-policy-that-led-to-male-sex-offenders-in-womens-jails-set-to-be-reviewed/
Maybe it is really only the access to women they want, and the right to behave in these places and around women and with women as they like. Maybe they really just want others to validate their existance every day as a women and if they don't get their fix then they get to complain about a hate crime.
And i find it very telling that a court in England knows that women are going to be harmed by these men, yet, they will put the wellbeing of men – violent men who have and will abuse women – before the wellbeing of the incarcerated women.
“to be treated in the same manner of people of the same gender as them” including “wanting to be searched more, to share a cell and shower at the same time as other people in custody something that is in contrast to what would be seen as undesirable to their fellow people in custody.”
I find it interesting that the vast majority of people know this is a bad idea, know exactly what this (or can at least imagine) will lead to yet I wouldn't be surprised if it happened lest someone in a government position be labelled a transphobe
That once again woman are the lest of peoples considerations
this is already happening. Both for ideology and because people are afraid to speak against that ideology (and that fear is reasonable given that people lose their jobs, careers, friends, SM accounts)
So in Rolleston we have, I think two trans women and they aren't segregated however all but one of Rollestons units are voluntary segregation so no real issues there
Last time I was in Chch Womens there were two trans women and one was in directed segs, a little more solid but similar to this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lb6OpRfyLFo
so imagine you're a women in prison and this person is in your wing.
The other was your more traditional Fa'afafine type, she was in the wing with the women but had seperate shower times and you couldn't have her anywhere near mens prison
Oh yes……women again making the accommodations trying to seek the best of a bad job, not accepting but trying to mitigate the inevitable.
It would be interesting to do a femo-linguistic exercise on the words/sayings in this issue.
I first came across it when the catch-cry was 'no debate'.
This immediately struck me as profoundly anti democratic. Why? If something is as good as it is made out to be it will stand up the scrutiny of good hearted people.
No debate (ie no democracy) was behind the case that went to the High Court so that SUFW could be stopped from holding meetings in Council premises. This was disguised by calling it 'hate speech' and was rightly called out by the Judges.
Then in Wellington, some/a City councillors could not see that protesting against people who were legally discussing things in Council premises could be seen as a conflict of interest.
My view is they should be impartial as far as the use of local govt premises are concerned….I see now of course why one was doing it. It also explains why my intuition about this particular person being self- rather than community-driven has turned out to be true right back from 2017 I have had the shivers running up my spine, they are our local councillor.
The words 'no debate' also falls into male/female roles since time immemorial,
no debate about bearing children until your insides fell out through multiple prolapses
no debate about not being able to work when married,
no debate about whose name went on to a certificate of title for a home, no debate just accepting what a male boss wanted to pay you,
no debate about not being able to raise one's own money (always with a male guarantor)
and, most overwhelmingly,
no debate when a man is about to sexually assault or rape you.
As well, like the covid anti vaxx movement, the trans movement here in NZ has some memes, 'players' and ways that are not NZ…..we have imported them.
@puckish Rogue. My distaste for the views of Jordan Peterson came about well before the current trans issues……at the time when Lauren Southern, Stefan Molyneux, Katie Hopkins and Tommy Robinson seemed to be thought worthy of respect and listened to.
Blazer, I do not want to spend time unpicking anything Peterson says through a feminist lens. It is a waste of my time that I would rather spend reading or listening to the views of people who can recognise patriarchy when they see it and not be apologists for it.
He had had a tough time health wise lately and it does not seem to have marked a sea change in his views, which often happens when confronting death in the face.
I know one should be exposing oneself to all views. Take it from me when the above were in the news, including Peterson, I spent hours and hours researching them to see their views so I could be fair in my appraisal of them.
At the end I felt much as I do now when trying to assess the reasons for anti vax sentiments by reading their views and going down the rabbit hole. It gives me a feeling of being besmirched/mental nausea.
I think it is important Jordan P gets to put his views across.
he does have some points (men with skills, most homeless men. Homicide victims so I do write him off.
Blazer nothing i factual as such, but presenting info that favours his case. Like I said he has a perspective he is entitled too
but he does appear to gloss over sex assaults and also that women earn less overall.
most men I come across are really decent. But they have been brought up to be self focused and self need driven. Women more empathetic.
men seem to be able to watch porn or visit prostitutes (not all men) which to me shows a lack of empathy and an ability to objectify those human beings.
Reply to Blazer and Joe 90. I am aware women watch porn. Although not porn as such the movie 50 shades of grey seemed to be aimed at women (I never saw it) as somehow an exciting new way of spicing up your sex life.
I also accept what you say Joe 90 about extreme religious groups, although there is a difference between women being dominated in their lives by husbands and males they encounter and the sex industry.
I find the idea of porn destestable, but I understand that the stuff available on the internet is heavily dominated by men abusing and dominating women. ……..Also I belive there a very few women who visit male prostitutes.
I think its good to discuss these things as its not black and white.
As you may have noticed from discussion on recent threads – the two sexes are different, have quite different sexual strategies and engage with sex in different modes.
The extraordinary sales success of 50 Shades – driven almost entirely by female buyers – cannot be so lightly dismissed as you have. You can rightly criticise it on any number of literary and accuracy grounds, but as a fantasy it clearly worked for huge numbers of women all over the world.
It's always been my view that both sexes equally consume pornography but in different forms. Males typically, but not always, align their interest visually, while women through narrative. 50 Shades was nothing new – it was really just a romance novel with an extra dose of spice added on. And women have been avid consumers of these for generations.
The big difference really is that the one form of imaginative arousal is socially deprecated while the other goes unremarked on.
Reply to Red Logic,….."It has always been my view that both sexes equally consume pornography"…..That's an extraordinary claim, how do you justify it?
Huge sales of 50 Shades of Grey I think means that it is commericially successful. Why this is, we can't be 100% sure.
I have never read it or seen the movie. However I have read (feminists) critiques of it. The relationship between the two protaginists seems deeply problematic. It appears it is about an older man who stalks a younger women and enoourages/grooms her into S and M relationship. The control by the male isn't just into the context of the B and D sex. He apparently stalks her. This is not a healthy template for relationships.
I also wonder about the damage for women who portray such scenes in movies. I note none of the big stars, such as Jennifer Anistan, Charleze Theron etc don't take on these roles. they don't have too. Melanie Griffiths daughter who was in 50 Shades of Grey was a virtual unknown it was her break out role. So yeah I do wonder what it does to these actress playing such parts. Afterall Holywood is full of exploitation of women.
Todays paper suggests that ever since the Government has abandoned the elimination strategy, they are adrift as to what to do. I don't believe that this started with the drop of the elimination strategy. We have no planning, financial or with immigration, housing, poverty, law and order etc. None is actually in real terms improving, all blamed on covid of cause.
I think that is should be mandated that everybody has a chance to get fully vaccinated until the 15 December. After that, we are back to "normal" and people have to take responsibility over their own health. I mean a year surely is enough notice. The only logistical work needed is border control in and out the country. Plane, ship, hang glider whatever is used. Resources need to be allocated to those areas and the health system freed up by allocation resourcing by rate of incidence. For example: 100% are 50 beds, Covid incidence is 10 % so 5 beds are allocated unless more are available due to not being used by i.e. accidents, heart attack's, etc. Sounds like rationing but this is done right now anyways.
If the virus is to be "contained" rather than eliminated, the only choice is to manage all surrounding support systems. In the end you cannot hold someone's hand forever because it starts to look like milking the system.
If the patient is unvaccinated or refuses to say, then they should be:
Offered a tele consult in the first instance to manage their medical problems remotely.
If a face-to-face consultation is considered clinically necessary, then the practice needs to arrange for the patient to be seen face-to-face by a clinician. This clinician may or may not be the patient’s regular GP.
The patient should be treated as a ‘red’ stream patient according to practice procedures and appropriate precautions taken including:
separation in the waiting room, or waiting outside the practice (e.g., in the carpark).
the use of appropriate PPE by clinical staff interacting with the patient.
The upshot of this will be that many, if not most, of us who are unvaccinated will not seek medical attention at all. (Who wants to be treated like unclean plague carriers, especially when the vaccinated can also carry and transmit the virus? )
So we will not go to our GP for the usual health issues and those health issues will not be dealt to and could very well develop into the kinds of co- morbidities that are listed for those who the Covid kills.
Result!
I have not been able to access what advice is being given hospital based doctors, but I imagine it will be pretty much the same.
All those kindhearted lefties lurking on TS who have been demanding that the unvaccinated are refused medical treatment and can expect nothing more than an area set aside in the carpark can celebrate.
Their fantasies have come to fruition.
PS. What happened to "herd immunity"? What % vaccinated before we get there?
What about those who have had Covid and recovered and now have natural immunity? Why are they not a category on the Pass?
Conclusions This study demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity. Individuals who were both previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 and given a single dose of the vaccine gained additional protection against the Delta variant.
Why would anyone play Russian Roulette trying to acquire a natural immunity by getting Covid? It might not work – you might die instead or get Long Covid.
I really would like to know. Why would anyone do this to themselves unless they were about ready to leave the world anyway. And there are easier ways now seeing it is now 7/11/21.
Wanting to acquire an immunity from catching covid that might mean you would die, or catch long covid does not seem to me to be capable of a rationale explanation.
I don't have a problem with GPs taking precautions, but that statement smacks of values judgements.
Seeing people by phone/video makes sense anyway, but this one is fucked up,
If a face-to-face consultation is considered clinically necessary, then the practice needs to arrange for the patient to be seen face-to-face by a clinician. This clinician may or may not be the patient’s regular GP.
That's just punitive shit.
And I completely agree that the end result will be vulnerable people not getting medical care (and then ending up in A and E).
Right now in Auckland I haven't been able to have a face to face GP consultation for 3 months ; all done by tele consult. My quarterly oncology appointment has been postponed twice now and arranged (hopefully this time) for mid – December. By then it will have been a 6 month gap.
My husband obtained an urgent dental appointment but had to have a Covid test as close as possible to the date of consult.
So we've been living this way for months ; both double vaxed and hoping for booster shots in March.
I have close friends in Hamilton who seem to have been in Level three forever. When one of the young adults experienced shortness of breath and heart palpitations after their first Pfizer injection I most strenuously advised going to the doctor…preferably the one he had been enrolled with since before birth. I was shocked when I was told that they will only see patients who are getting the Pfizer product.
I'm not sure if you are aware McFlock, but an awful lot of young folk are aware of the possible heart issues but feel they have no choice…what with jobs and all that. And pressure from all sides to do the decent thing. And being told that the vaccine is safe and effective and any side effects and mild and transitory and even full blown myocarditis will also be mild and transitory. And of course if you can't get to see a doctor or go to the hospital and even the ambos write it off as stress…your report to CARM will be dismissed anyway.
So what's the point?
We should be able to speak about the very real adverse effects of the Pfizer product… but we can't can we?
Go on…call me a misinformation peddling anti-vaxxer…
WTF has work got to do with it? It's an online form. Heck, you could do it yourself if they were cool with it.
Even if CARM don't think it's linked, they log it. It's not usually about the individual, it's about the patterns of reports they get. But to establish a pattern, they need reports.
Big pharma doesn't need to cover anything up with folk like you around.
Don't understand this…..if he had had his first injection then he was getting the Pfizer product. The sheet that everyone is given says what to do and where to go if there are side effects. Not sure that they advised for heart things going to their own Dr or going to A & E.
If a face-to-face consultation is considered clinically necessary, then the practice needs to arrange for the patient to be seen face-to-face by a clinician. This clinician may or may not be the patient’s regular GP.
That's just punitive shit.
This is normal practice already in a in some areas – I sort of wondered why they mentioned it at all. It's really frustrating for people with chronic illnesses, and has been for a long time.
I guess it might be to do with the some sort of rotation among the doctors?
I have to book 3 days ahead if I want to see a GP of my choice. I didn't get that from the statement, I took it to mean that they would be at the back of the queue. I could be wrong about that, but their tone is really that of someone who highly disapproves and wants the person to know it.
What is the problem here? Even in normal times with group practices and urgency your own Dr may not be available they may have a locum or because of urgency it might be better to see another in the practice. I have even been advised to go straight to the hospital or to an after hours clinic that has lab & xray facilities. These words continue what has been normal practice in my Dr's practice. It says they are to be seen by another clinician. This could be another Dr or the hospital, or a clinic.
Surely a person who wanted to see a Dr could take advantage of the options under Manage my Health for repeats of prescriptions, Zoom/telehealth consultation, carpark consultation (I had one last year in lockdown).
Since Covid last year my Dr has operated a screening process in his rooms with anyone who answers 'yes' to questions such as cold symptoms being required to remain outside in the corridor, masked until the appointment time The nurse will see you and then if necessary the Dr will come out masked to triage me, it was sinus and to take me through to his actual rooms.
I do not see the problem with being referred another Doctor. This may be one who has premises better suited to consults with possibly infectious patients.
I have just checked with partner who goes to a different practice they have operated a changed system since Covid came last year with more info being provided at phone up stage to work out the best ways of being seen. He then went to a closed door, had a nurse assessment/verbal questionnaire and then went to the waiting room where there were 3 other people at 2m spaces.
Sister has had a couple of carpark consults in Gore since Covid last year but to be fair the Dr also used to do carpark consults, if needed, with my mother when she was frail (she died in 2010) .
Have other people's Drs practices not been operating with changed procedures since last year?
If you have a GP who is older, overweight, is immunocompromised, Maori, diabetic etc etc, any of or all of the above, it is only right they protect themselves by not seeing people with Covid and those unvacinated will present more risk to them.
Surely by not going to the Dr by availing yourself of the options that are there you are just 'cutting your nose off to spite your face', as my Dad, bless him, used to say.
Many of us had telehealth, carpark consults last year. We did not feel either clean or dirty by accepting these practices but accepting of the fact that everyone is trying to keep others safe. .
I really do not understand the problem here when these processes have been par for the course for many medical practices for over 18 months now.
As I said below I had a carpark consult when no-one was vaccinated. I accepted this, I had covid-like symptoms and also the fact that my Dr looked a little space age-y when he came out. Now they feel that they can moderate this process as many are vaccinated.
I think the medical staff are under such intense pressure it must be very scary for them and also infuriating that they will have to treat people with covid who have refused the jab. I am not saying this is right or wrong but human.
I would hate to be in their postiion and I would feel resentment towards every patient who didn't do absolutely everything they could not to endanger me and my family. But maybe medical staff are people than I am.
Its great your practice worked out red/greeen streams for their patients Patricia. But maybe that isn't want is formost in GPs mind at the moment.
I visited my wonderful GP last week, to get as much stuff checked as possible before Covid hits. She told me that had done all their jabs for now and were now trying to work out how they were going to look after their patients who got sick with Covid in the Community. I doubt they prioritized how can we make sure the unvacinated don't feel bad about their choice.
People have a right not to be vacinated, but their are consequences. If it is that important to people not to be vacinated then, thats what goes with it.
Yep, you may as well clear out the smokers, overweight, drivers who caused accidents from the hospital wards too… just so the vaccinated can get a clean run 🙄
I don't believe that unvaccinated people should be denied health care, and it's reprehensible politically to promote that idea. But, there's a difference between smokers' personal choices and needing health services, and unvaccinated people. Smoking isn't contagious.
i put '' around the word for a reason. And for what its worth, my sister life time issues can be directly attributed to having spend her life in cars full of smoke, waiting for her parents to leave the smoky bar / restaurant, and generally be surrounded by smokers all her life. I would even go so far that the smoking of my parents contributed to the smoking of my siblings and I (with me being the only one to have kicked the habit). So yes, it is 'contagious' but not in the sense of a virus. Rather a social contagion, and a physical softening as clearly all my siblings and i were second hand smokes a day after we were born thus leading to addiction later in life.
contagion: the spreading of a harmful idea or practice.
contagion: the communication of disease from one person or organism to another by close contact.
sure, but your parents' smoking didn't lead to 200 people being infected. Contagious has an actual medical meaning that differentiates it from the kind of issues that you are talking about, and it's why we have lock downs for covid but not smoking.
Ok Please don't take this seriously. I am posting it for light relief. One of my favourite comedians, Jack Dee on triaging health care for the NHS. (pre covid).
There is no intention or practice of denying health care to people who are unvaccinated……all along in the info about the vaccine passport it has been clear to state that access to food or health care is not restricted.
Some practices have been operating differently this since last year.
No, read what I wrote. We haven't got unlimited resources and hence it has to be apportioned. It always has before but no one ever seem to have asked the hard questions. I wonder why.
Smokers, overweight and drunk drivers are a different category then a transferable virus. The first lot is doing the harm to themselves and also others in some cases by administering a drug/food to their body. The people who get infected are getting the disease via a transferable virus that is not visible to the naked eye and is a living thing looking for a host. BIG DIFFERENCE.
If an option exists to limit the outfall of this or any disease, an obligation on the citizen/resident to protect all people within their family, district, city, country that is within their means is not an unreasonable request. If a person feels that their right is to deny this, all good and fine. But please don't ask the same community to fork out endlessly for treatment whilst their family can't get access to an ICU or hospital bed for any treatment that is urgent.
This has to be a managed risk rather than have a runaway health issue. I mean this is not the first time a pandemic has happened. Vaccination was then and is now a way to limit casualties. One has to wonder whether reason and logic has gone out the window.
No, not at all. What I am saying is that everybody has a right to protection and as a nation we have to look at the sum of things rather than personal issues in cases like that. We are talking about a disease that does not differentiate between races, religion, age or income. It is an obligation on every person to do their best not to abscond from their responsibility within the community. I have a sister who is adamant to not vaccinate, that's ok with me. But she has to take precautions not to get ill. And this means limited contacts, family need to distance and wear mask to protect HER. Do you think that is a good outcome for anyone?
And are all unvaccinated do the same and follow their own protection protocol? There is an issue here and it can cost lives.
It is an obligation on every person to do their best not to abscond from their responsibility within the community.
Yup – that's why I vaccinated – more from a sense of duty than conviction. (It helped that I had something of a choice here in WA and could go with the AZ vaccine.)
But stepping from this position to compulsion erases the individual's agency and incurs a social and political cost – that may or may not be worth paying.
….family need to distance and wear mask to protect HER.
No, no, no!!!
[deleted]
22.10.21…the day New Zealand officially lost the plot…Science died, and those who have chosen not to risk the known side effects from the Pfizer product because of existing health conditions (which will not be recognized by doctors because the Word has already come down from On High that only those with an allergy to Pfizer product ingredients (specifically PEGs) will be allowed an exemption) will be called 'fucking filth anti vaxxers' who should be forced to wait in the carpark for medical attention.
Should we even risk seeking it.
As for 'absconding from their responsibility within the community' tell that to the people who rushed to get the Pfizer product and are now suffering the consequences… and are not allowed to speak publicly about it.
Those of us who have chosen to decline the Pfizer product on health grounds are of course going to practice good infection control and support our immune systems with good nutrition.
[if you want to make claims about a public figure in a heated debate, then you have to link. I’m now past asking for this (and it’s not just you). Feel free to repost once you have link so we know what you are talking about – weka]
Yes, you have the choice. Also to wait for other vaccines. But you have to also live with the consequences and not complain about lack of treatment places, overwhelmed health systems, resources being diverted for wage subsidies, border control etc. to keep NZ ticking over for all.
Being vaccinated does not mean that you are immune or cannot pass the virus on, but it does mean that if you are infected, the symptoms become manageable to the majority and can be treated at home. No need to end up in ICU.
We need to get out of this mental prison of being preoccupied by stealth with one issue only. Why do you think so many people flaunt borders etc. getting unruly, aggression is on the rise.
This would lead me back to my initial posting. Enough said.
but this dystopian world were we are going to will produce this exact outcome. When everything is in a shortage they will start triaging, and guess who will not be provided a service or a reduced service.
And we already do that. Women with physical ailments after giving birth are not receiving the same care by ACC then someone who breaks a leg while mountain biking down a hill – sober, drunk or high for that matter.
And so as long as society is ok with doing that – to the groups is can get away with it i.e. Women, children, oldies, infirm, chronically ill etc, they have no issues putting us on waiting lists, medicating our ailments rather then finding what is wrong and curing that etc.
So this is just good banter among good citizens proposing whom they would exclude from healthcare, and obviously it will never be the good citizens themselves cause 'good citizen'.
Women with physical ailments after giving birth are not receiving the same care
Yeah this one definitely irks me. There's a whole history everything around sexual health, childbirth and post natal care falling into a chasms opened up by competing ideologies and ideas in tension with each other.
We are merely defective men, and if men don't suffer from something, no one does. See how that is fixed now, and cheap too. No investments and pay out needed. It's just Non Males.
I'll limit myself to saying that this non-woman got into very deep shit here for insisting some years back that men and women were indeed different and this had many important implications.
My perspective here is not at all sophisticated – merely informed by this simple idea that I find so obvious I feel stupid for typing it out.
Sabine, I am originally from a country where we have not had any rationing of health services and women have 1 year paid parental leave. I am one of those who would like to have a solid system in place that is not from an anglo saxon origin where you show a stiff upper lip until you die.
Not in my world. But we need to take realities into consideration. NZ has a small tax base and a government that has not shown any vision or idea how to get out of this. Meanwhile we drown in debt and the kids will get the bill for that (not to mention the environmental issues).It will not be easy, no one in their right mind would assume this. But we have to find a way because right now, with the talk about freedom etc. everybody is loosing theirs. In case it isn't obvious.
We lost our freedoms last year march on the eve of Lockdown L4. Since then nothing has changed. And despite that, we got us the Americas Cup, some Amazon Give a way for no return and the Wiggles, and gave our underpaid and over worked nurses a run around for a decent and deserved pay raise. We have priorities for our spending, and sadly we spend it on frivolous stuff rather then invest it in our healthcare.
And now we are going to sleep in the bed we made.
And i will not be blaming the people who don't want to be pfizered for the national shortage of trained staff for our ICU beds, and ICU beds. We always knew it was going to be bad when it gets here.
Not just a threat but a consequence. Smaller family gatherings and police call outs to businesses if entry to a shop is not permitted and a heated verbal exchange or an assault occurs.
The deliberately unvaccinated are a threat to the passively unvaccinated. The unvaccinated are not a homogeneous group of steely-eyed ideologues who have made a firm decision to not get vaccinated. Some will be merely misinformed, indifferent, out of the loop or have other stuff going on in their lives. We need to try and get to these people and get them vaccinated for their own sake. As usual Peterson heads up to such a level of abstraction that he's dumb as a rock.
To respond to the question one has to accept the premise that in fact the vaccinated feel threatened by the unvaccinated.
I am far from convinced the vaccinated do feel threatened other than the exhibiting innate good sense for fear of infection.
Many in the US are wary on a personal level of the unvaccinated as they sometimes do not follow other public health advice such masking and physical distancing.
There are very few public figure people in my life that my intuition clangs about
I mentioned one, a Wellington City Councillor above, you have mentioned Jordan Petterson and please nobody mention Gerard Wall former Porirua MP and arch anti abortionist…….ooops!
long covid is estimated at between 10% and 40% of people who are infected. I'm guessing you haven't factored in that.
2% of health care workers in the UK have long covid. Kids get long covid. People who had mild covid are getting decline in kidney function months later.
It's a novel virus, there is a still a lot we don't know about it.
We literally know nothing about it. And it would be very nice if our officials could actually admit that. And frankly, that is one of the reason people refuse the jabs. We know actually nothing much at all about this virus, we are always three steps behind, and then the bugger mutates into a different version.
And thus, maybe saying that this jab is the best preventative medication we have would be more honest rather then sell it as a vaccine. And frankly, it might have also taken a bit the edge of the 'anti vac' movement, as obviously it ain't a vaccine.
thanks, that was interesting. Have you come across any research or analysis on people with autoimmune conditions or PVFS having a flare after being vaccinated?
No. The only thing that comes to mind is that in my current workplace of about 40 people that I interact with regularly – 6 had an unhappy reaction to their vaccination that I know of.
But I've no idea if there is any correlation between this and a vulnerability to long covid.
it was a tangent (whether people with chronic illness are at risk of flare or relapse from vaccination). Looks like they are in somewhat low numbers, anecdotally and from what I can tell this isn't being researched very well.
An anecdotal story of one person, my sister, who has fibromyalgia rheumatica, still on prednisone and has had no problems or flares with either of her Covid vaccinations. She is also allergic to penicillin so getting Covid with the often follow-up lung etc infections would be very hard to treat.
that doesn't really help much sorry. Most people are ok, some aren't, it's the ones that aren't that are being missed and afaik the research on this isn't being done (or at least not well or in a timely manner).
thanks, it's not looking good. Some of those people will have simple disability and still be able to work/have a life. Others will have their life destroyed by it.
The report concludes that, without substantial changes in resource consumption, "the most probable result will be a rather sudden and uncontrollable decline in both population and industrial capacity". Although its methods and premises were heavily challenged on its publication, subsequent work to validate its forecasts continue to confirm that insufficient changes have been made since 1972 to significantly alter their nature.
It has been reevaluated by KPMG sustainability analysist and found to be accurate:
Technological advances have meant simply that we go farther and deeper to extract fossil fuels, and despite some efficiencies, consumption and emissions have only increased. The MIT authors, she points out, predicted as much.
“They said that even if we innovate ourselves out of resource scarcity, we would probably see an increase in pollution from those adaptations unless we also limit our continued search for growth,” she said.
Her assessment, Beyond Growth, is a call, not for 'degrowth' but 'agrowth':
Under an agrowth strategy, a decline or increase in GDP/profits are both acceptable outcomes. Growth, and certainly progress, might still happen, but it’s no longer the goal.
Obviously the only metric of any import is wealth. /s
With an agrowth agenda, profit is no longer the only goal, so then we could use the productive capacity of the earth to feed and house those who need it rather than continuing to concentrate wealth in the global north.
Pretty sure that approach would be popular with the 6b people you refer to.
Whether it's dressed up as 'agrowth' or 'degrowth' strikes me a semantic gymnastics. In essence it still comes down to the following:
Advocates of degrowth propose to address this paradox through a process they call “shrink and share,” proposing not only to limit total global consumption but also to redistribute it equitably. A more equitable distribution of a smaller pie would presumably allow those remaining in deep agrarian poverty to make the leap to modern living standards and fertility rates.
Such a scheme might be possible theoretically but as a practical matter would appear to be unlikely, requiring some combination of voluntary austerity and redistribution at a global scale or, lacking that, some form of global government that would mandate limits on personal consumption and would forcibly redistribute wealth from richer precincts of the global economy to poorer ones.
Even if such a scenario were plausible, it is not clear that it would actually degrow the economy. Global per-capita income today is about $10,000–$15,000, depending on the accounting method.32 Even with perfect redistribution of wealth, this level of income would probably be insufficient to achieve something approximating modern living standards globally. Actually degrowing the economy significantly from present levels would probably leave large populations stranded in deep agrarian poverty. And to provide a first-world perspective, such a perfect redistribution would require — for global GDP to be maintained at its current level — High Income countries (World Bank designated) to reduce their present GDP by between about 60 percent to 70 percent, again depending on the accounting method.33 This surely qualifies as exceptional austerity, voluntary or otherwise.
There is also the small matter of whether such a scheme could actually sustain itself economically or ecologically. It is not clear that such a scheme could work without large-scale collectivization, as it is not clear that the incentives necessary to keep producers producing, savers saving, and investors investing in new or replacement capital voluntarily could be sustained.
Again it's worth asking – if you argue to impose this massive re-distribution and hard ceiling on human development indefinitely into the future – exactly how to you imagine to achieve this? For literally the whole of future of the human race however long this might be?
We live in capitalism. Its power seems inescapable. So did the divine right of kings. Any human power can be resisted and changed by human beings. Resistance and change often begin in art, and very often in our art, the art of words.
Nowhere have I suggested capitalism is an ideal, inescapable reality. And I've repeatedly said that it's not obvious that any of the economic systems we've tried so far will work well in the post-growth world we're heading into.
As I've said a few times – from a political economy pov we're in uncharted waters. If I had to guess the coming evolution will conserve the proven elements of conservatism, capitalism and socialism – but leverage a wholly new social and ethical universalism.
The fixation on wealth and global quality of life as zero-sum are from a capitalist, false scarcity point of view. Also, from your provided link:
7.
Getting to a zero-growth steady state economy with declining calls on natural capital will require, then, sustaining — or better yet, accelerating — two trends that capitalism has proven better able to advance than any alternative economic arrangement to date: lifting large agrarian populations out of poverty, and improving resource productivity through technological change.
Both the USSR and China achieved lifting large agrarian populations out of poverty, so by any reasonable analysis some variation of socialism, not capitalism, has proven better. Capitalism has largely got us to where we are now, and still stands in the way of immediate action on a majority of the crises the world is facing. It is important to remember markets and their mechanisms don't only exist under capitalism.
Again it's worth asking – if you argue to impose this massive re-distribution and hard ceiling on human development indefinitely into the future – exactly how to you imagine to achieve this? For literally the whole of future of the human race however long this might be?
Large-scale wealth redistribution is an unachievable utopia – we know why.
Limiting consumption to reflect the resource ceiling of spaceship Earth is an unachievable utopia – we know why.
1.5-Degree Lifestyles:Towards A Fair Consumption Space for All
[PDF; 2021]
If applied, the recommendations from the 1.5-Degree Lifestyles report will bring us back to a status of good ancestry. Some of the policy proposals herewith may be perceived as too far-reaching and intruding on privacy and the rights of the individual. But we are in a precarious situation. Carbon emissions must be brought to net zero in less than a few decades. This means we have to explore all possible means at our disposal and design the future we want to truly emerge from the current planetary emergency. The 1.5-Degree Lifestyles report is a bold attempt to do just that.
Yes I am rather and I've spoken to this earlier. But at the same time China will build more coal fired power stations will be built and for the next 15 odd years their CO2 trajectory will continue to rise. Due to their climate and geographic realities – renewables really is not an option for China, nor many other locations:
What realistic chance to meet the 1.5 degree global warming target?
We’re Heading Straight for a Demi-Armageddon
What happens when we do something—but not enough—to stop climate change? In a prelude to the conference, the UN added up the most recent pledges of parties to the 2015 Paris Agreement. If all 192 keep their promises, the synthesis found, the planet would still be on track to warm 2.7 degrees Celsius, or 4.9 degrees Fahrenheit, by the end of the century. This is nearly twice the 1.5-degree-Celsius (2.7 Fahrenheit) goal agreed to in principle in Paris. But it is also not nearly the jump predicted in the hottest scenario envisioned in the latest report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change—4.4 degrees Celsius, or 8 degrees Fahrenheit.
In many ways I'm seeing CC as one of a number of important but not necessarily the most urgent issues facing humanity. Right now we're faced with some very urgent challenges around authoritarianism, covid disruptions to global systems and increasing social polarisation to name a few that leap to mind.
Longer term CC is on a list of quite a few catastrophe's that could kick us in the arse.
Part of the problem is the embedded psychological flaw that we put a far greater weight on negative events or the possibility of loss, than we do the positive. There are good evolutionary reasons for this – all the good years mean little if everyone starves during the one year of famine, or that rustle in the bushes turn out to be a predator. Yet when faced with complex technical problems our collective risk management is very prone to leaping to wrong conclusions.
But all other things being equal (which they probably won't be) I'd suggest by 2050 we should have CC under control. I'd rate the odds at over 70% – if and only if there is a global consensus on fast tracking advanced next gen nuclear. Absent that the odds drop – my main concern being the increasing economic and social impacts of de-globalisation, the disruption of trade, the return of famine, mass migrations and internecine strife. That would be the perfect storm that would cripple our ability to act on climate change directly and adapt to it's inevitable impact.
In short a bumpy ride, but we can choose to avoid the worst pot-holes.
But all other things being equal (which they probably won't be) I'd suggest by 2050 we should have CC under control. I'd rate the odds at over 70% – if and only if there is a global consensus on fast tracking advanced next gen nuclear.
Them's good odds, "all other things being equal" and "if and only if there is a global consensus on fast tracking advanced next gen nuclear." But, as you observe, the devil is in the "pot holes", and our easy ride is ending.
Nevertheless filled with optimism that I'll see out my days in relative comfort – so lucky to be born when and where I was.
“COP26 must be the COP for children,” said UNICEF Executive Director Henrietta Fore. “Climate change is one of the greatest threats facing this generation, with 1 billion children at extremely high risk. Yet, while the outlook is dire, world leaders at COP26 have a significant, time-sensitive opportunity to redirect the terrible path we are on. They can do so by committing to strengthening the resilience of services that children depend upon, and by cutting emissions faster and deeper. The futures of billions of children depend on it.”
I was thinking of the overdevelopped world's insistence that people stop growing food for themselves and their neighbours and grow cash crops for the global economy instead.
Yet at the same time we live in a world that produces roughly 25% more food than we can consume. The problem is clearly one of distribution rather than production.
The boiler-plate left wing response is to blame capitalism for everything – yet the root cause is poverty something that capitalism has done a remarkable job in reducing. In 1800 almost all of humanity lived in extreme poverty – now after 200 years of capitalism life expectancies have doubled, population growth is slowing and less than 10% of people live in poverty. Indeed the more capitalist a nation is, the more likely it's people are to suffer obesity than starvation. We need a better explanation.
The answers that on the ground are a good deal more pragmatic and less ideological than we'd like. Things like decent transport, reliable electricity, functioning economies, and rule of law governance. Boring stuff – but transformative.
So is the answer for so many African countries, where malnutrition is rife to become 'Capitalist'…..or just more Capitalist than they are at present?
I always thought their access to beneficial capital was something out of their control.
One would think that 25,000 people dying every day from something that does not need a vaccine ,but could be solved by benevolent intervention would be a big priority.
Nah – all I'm saying is that if we want to eradicate poverty and hunger (and on current trends we're well on the way to achieving this by the end of this century if not sooner) then smashing capitalism is not the most obvious starting point.
I'll put this thought out there – the left might do better if it could formulate a constructive model of socialism that was capable of footing it on equal terms with both the energy and innovation of capitalism, and the stability and continuity of conservatism.
Lot's of attempts have been made at this – and I'd argue it's well overdue we firmly relegated Marx and his fellow travellers to a big fat footnote of history and started thinking about a holistic political economy better adapted to the post-growth world we're heading into. The timing feels good on this.
But the wealth of those capitalist countries is derived to a large part from their capture and control of the resources/labour of other smaller less powerful countries.
Yup there is a great deal that can and should be done to enforce greater transparency and trust to global financial systems. That linked article is absolutely on the nail with this – there is every reason to build more fairness into global trade systems at the institutional level.
Yet arguably the reason why poorer countries are too often the losers in this game is because they have weak governments – prone to corrupt kleptocratic elites, weak institutions and geopolitical considerations that put them on the backfoot in any negotiation.
So while I'm absolutely in favour of more global multi-lateral action as the article suggests – top down action has it's limits unless also met with the kind of on the ground, human development basics like clean safe water, reliable electricity, education and basic medical care. Only then does a nation have the chance to build the kind of middle class that has sufficient political clout to hold it’s elites to account.
'Yet arguably the reason why poorer countries are too often the losers in this game is because they have weak governments – prone to corrupt kleptocratic elites, weak institutions and geopolitical considerations that put them on the backfoot in any negotiation.'
'Arguably is right!
Tokenism by the worlds economic powers,whose corporations actively seek out resources and labour exploitation for their own shareholders profit ,definately doesn't help alleviate poverty.
The 2plus trillion dollars the U.S 'spent' on Afghanistan ,largely went into the pockets of their own multi nationals and look at the outcome-a giant leap backwards .
Millionaire western politicians doing the bidding of billionaire donors.
I posted to this in more detail elsewhere but in essence I see capitalism (with a little 'c') as little more than a set of economic tools coupled with one important social idea. (It's when it tips into the neo-liberal's singular insistence that markets can be the only measure of value that it becomes an ideology.)
In brief the economic tools were things like fractional reserve lending (that greatly expanded money supply), double entry book-keeping (that formalised business accounts) and the rules of contract law. This isn't exhaustive but gives a sense of what I mean – think of them as commercial technologies that enabled modern business to exist.
The other big idea was that of private property. It's so important that Marx was intuitively drawn to attack it – even if he was proven utterly wrong on this. Private property creates both incentives and the continuity to let economies grow.
And in the 1600's when capitalism was being invented – grow they needed to do – because while the historic record speaks to the events and lives of a tiny minority of the elites, the vast majority of people lived lives of extreme poverty none of us moderns would tolerate for more than a few days, weeks at most.
What we can immediately recognise is that while remarkably successful at enabling human production and development – none of these tools or ideas innately spoke to the subsequent problem of distribution. And this is where the socialist impulse has played a vital moderating role. As you say socialism is everywhere.
The other days I spoke to a vision of a world in which say 9b humans lived fully upper middle class lives by say the end of this century. (This is not so crazy – if my grandfather who was born in 1870 was shown a video of my daily life in 2021 he would be astonished beyond all belief.) It's my sense that getting there is going to require the harnessing of human innovation, a just distribution and stable social structures – each of these drawing on all three of our existing economic modes.
But to achieve this merger we need one more radical transformative idea.
You appear to give Capitalism alot of credit I don't believe it deserves.
The core premise is…who creates and gets first use of created capital.
Its impossible to deny that it is only a small,select elite(born to rule) who have structured society on the cornerstone of compounding interest on debt.
You allude to 'neo-liberalism' as a replacement/excuse for pure Capitalism.
This standard of modern day living you are enamoured with, relies on infinite growth and material acquisition as a worthy goal for aspiration.
We know that ,today a tiny % of the worlds population control 90% of the worlds wealth.
We also know that to enforce any ideology dominant military power is required.
Free markets,laissez faire capitalism and all the propaganda associated with them(trickle down etc)are an illusion.
That bastion of freedom,democracy and supposedly Capitalism that you admire-the U.S.A empire is maintained by domination of financial markets and military might.
This is not a sustainable regime.
As an aside your belief that freedom from hunger will be alleviated before the end of this century,is not very comforting…its 2021,so @25,000 deaths a day times 365 days x 78 years is a hell of alot of…'collateral damage.
You appear to give Capitalism alot of credit I don’t believe it deserves.
Only if you ignore everything else I’ve written to this on this theme.
relies on infinite growth and material acquisition as a worthy goal for aspiration.
Nowhere is there a rule that says capitalism relies on infinite growth. That's a strawman argument. It's fair to say it's well adapted to growth, but then we can point to Japan which has experienced at least two decades of post-growth see that capitalism has adapted to this as well.
You allude to 'neo-liberalism' as a replacement/excuse for pure Capitalism.
Neo-liberalism is what happens when you go too far with capitalism. There is a close parallel with what happens when you take socialism too far and it degenerates into communism. Or you take good ideas around social justice and it becomes the cult of woke. Or sane ideas around ethnic identity and pervert them into racial supremacy.
Getting a sense of where the boundaries lie is important.
Capitalism does not seem to have a hard set of 'rules' regardless.
Its merits are a debate that can never be resolved.
', how quickly a zero-growth economy is achieved, and calls on natural capital globally peak and then decline, depends upon three closely related phenomena: how rapidly global population stabilizes, how rapidly incomes among the global poor rise, and the rate at which resource-sparing technological change occurs.'
Breakthrough Institute are an interesting group and I've read a fair bit of their material in the past year or two. The article you reference is a good one and underlines my assertion that the left really needs to get over not only Marx, but Malthus as well. Oddly enough I was idly contemplating a post along those just those lines but hesitated at how to present it without pointlessly enraging some people here.
I get it – nowhere have I presented our history as anything like ideal. The US have – like all superpowers – behaved quite ruthlessly at various times. In a world where nation states are still the top social order and lacking any global authority to constrain them – one will usually dominate.
What we get to hope for is the least tyrannical one. And of all the realistic alternatives the post WW2 period might have offered – the US was probably the best bet.
Good question – the timeline I have in mind is that capitalism slowly emerged out of the Renaissance era (alongside a similar flourishing in the science domain) in the 15th and 16th centuries.
But it took another few hundred years until roughly the 1840's when the first round of globalisation really took off that we started to see the industrial revolution have it's huge impact on our daily lives. And even by 1900 most people were still very poor indeed, it's only the post-WW2 period that has seen modernity really spread out across the majority of humanity.
I accept this is a very low resolution presentation – and there is lots of opportunity to parse the precedents and details – but for the purposes of this conversation it's what I have in mind when I say 'capitalism'.
While you did post a hypocritical partisan load of bile I don't for one minute condone some of the responses to your post but it could be said you asked for it.
[TheStandard: A moderator moved this comment to Open Mike as being off topic or irrelevant in the post it was made in. Be more careful in future.]
do you want the day off? Because while I appreciated the political point you are trying to make there, yours was the only abusive response so it’s hard to not be thinking you are still flaming.
Full credit to the leaders of both Maori and Pacifica. This region has some of the poorest and most marginalised people in the country, so for it to reach nearly 90% ahead of many other regions means that the effort of so many in the region has been magnificent:
Counties Manukau DHB has 192 first doses to go to hit 90 percent. Sitting at 80 percent fully vaccinated. Auckland DHB 95 percent first dose, 87 percent fully vaccinated. Waitematā is 92 percent first dose, 83 percent fully vaccinated.
Fair enough, just think this passport system is doomed to fail , they are already causing unintended consequences like a couple of events my youngster would have been in involved being canceled due to volunteers not willing to police the gates checking them , and just uncertainty on how it's going to operate.
The traffic light system is only designed to work with passports. Without the passport thing you are stuck with the levels we have now. That doesn't balance out the conflicting rights.
We expect Joe n Jill publican to police underage drinking in their premises, no different to vaccination status. It'll really be the police who do the policing though, quiet walk through by the force and check a few certificates / passports. Publican will probably wear it just like they do for underage.
Talking to a neighbouring publican about this and he's not worried about it, he sees it as an opportunity to get rid of his barflies, says there's a very strong correlation.
I'm not concerned about pubs ,they can hire an orc or 2 to police the doors!!
It's my kids event that's been canned(I'm sure it wont be the only on in nz) because the organizers dont want to put the lions club who run the gate to face possible abuse from antis.
I am not really concerned about protecting the unvaccinated, they have made their choice. Rather it is protecting everybody else from their selfishness both in terms of spreading covid and tying up hospital beds that concerns me. Yes policing the passports will be problematic but i can't see a better way forward.
People don't like being told what to do, especially by a Government led by Jacinda Ardern. The government should have come out at the outset and said "Don't get vaccinated."
All the contrarians would have rushed to get vaccinated. Then the government could have announced, "Just kidding, get jabbed."
It's a good joke, and yes, there are some contrarians that are that stupid.
But (serious hat on) our divisions on vaccination are nowhere near those of some other countries. Every single MP is vaccinated (first dose or second). Across the country there are (e.g.) mayors who are anti-Ardern on many other issues, but encouraging their communities to get vaccinated. From Hone to Hosking, it's consistent across the range of political opinion.
People ranting like Coutts and Gunn make for juicy headlines, but it doesn't alter arithmetic. The antis are a tiny minority.
This late spring afternoon I unwrapped the carefully folded and labelled bean seeds my friend gave me weeks ago. She teases me. Seven white shiny seeds pressed into moist dark soil. Evenly spaced with three tall bamboo stakes in the tub to climb on.
There's a little Beruit vibe around these parts. Retired, terrified handy dog and her elderly scared witless heading dog friend say can you lot fuck off with your stinking fireworks.
It's hard times try to make a livingYou wake up every morning in the unforgivingOut there somewhere in the cityThere's people living lives without mercy or pityI feel good, yeah I'm feeling fineI feel better then I have for the longest timeI think these pills have been good for meI ...
In 1974, the US Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. Nixon, finding that the President was not a King, but was subject to the law and was required to turn over the evidence of his wrongdoing to the courts. It was a landmark decision for the rule ...
Every day now just seems to bring in more fresh meat for the grinder.In their relentlessly ideological drive to cut back on the “excessive bloat” (as they see it) of the previous Labour-led government, on the mountains of evidence accumulated in such a short period of time do not ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Megan Valére SosouMarket gardening site of the Itchèléré de Itagui agricultural cooperative in Dassa-Zoumè (Image credit: Megan Valère Sossou) For the residents of Dassa-Zoumè, a city in the West African country of Benin, choosing between drinking water and having enough ...
Buzz from the Beehive Melissa Lee – as may be discerned from the screenshot above – has not been demoted for doing something seriously wrong as Minister of ...
Morning in London Mother hugs beloved daughter outside the converted shoe factory in which she is living.Afternoon in London Travelling writer takes himself and his wrist down to A&E, just to be sure. Read more ...
Mike Grimshaw writes – The recent announcement of the University Advisory Group, chaired by Sir Peter Gluckman, makes very clear where the Government’s focus and priorities lie. The remit of the Advisory Group is that Group members will consider challenges and opportunities for improvement in the university sector including: ...
Eric Crampton writes – The Reserve Bank of New Zealand desperately wants to find reasons to have workstreams in climate change. It makes little sense. They’ve run another stress test on the banks looking to see if they could find a prudential regulation case. They couldn’t. They ...
Rob MacCullough writes – Pundits from the left and the right are arguing that National’s Fast Track Bill that is designed to speed up infrastructure decisions could end up becoming mired in a cesspool of corruption. Political commentator ...
Looking at the headlines this morning it’s hard to feel anything other than pessimistic about the future of humanity.Note that I’m not speaking about the future of mankind, but the survival of our humanity. The values that we believe in seem to be ebbing away, by the day.Perhaps every generation ...
Swabbing mixed breed baby chicks to test for avian influenzaUh oh. Bird flu – often deadly to humans – is not only being transmitted from infected birds to dairy cows, but is now travelling between dairy cows. As of last Friday, Bloomberg News reports, there were 32 American dairy herds ...
On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
What is it with the mining industry? Its not enough for them to pillage the earth - they apparently can't even be bothered getting resource consent to do so: The proponent behind a major mine near the Clutha River had already been undertaking activity in the area without a ...
Photo # 1 I am a huge fan of Singapore’s approach to housing, as described here two years ago by copying and pasting from The ConversationWhat Singapore has that Australia does not is a public housing developer, the Housing Development Board, which puts new dwellings on public and reclaimed land, ...
Buzz from the Beehive Reactions to news of the government’s readiness to make urgent changes to “the resource management system” through a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) suggest a balanced approach is being taken. The Taxpayers’ Union says the proposed changes don’t go far enough. Greenpeace says ...
I’m starting to wonder if Anna Burns-Francis might be the best political interviewer we’ve got. That might sound unlikely to you, it came as a bit of a surprise to me.Jack Tame can be excellent, but has some pretty average days. I like Rebecca Wright on Newshub, she asks good ...
Chris Trotter writes – Willie Jackson is said to be planning a “media summit” to discuss “the state of the media and how to protect Fourth Estate Journalism”. Not only does the Editor of The Daily Blog, Martyn Bradbury, think this is a good idea, but he has also ...
Graeme Edgeler writes – This morning [April 21], the Wellington High Court is hearing a judicial review brought by Hon. Karen Chhour, the Minister for Children, against a decision of the Waitangi Tribunal. This is unusual, judicial reviews are much more likely to brought against ministers, rather than ...
Both of Parliament’s watchdogs have now ripped into the Government’s Fast-track Approvals Bill. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāMy pick of the six newsey things to know from Aotearoa’s political economy and beyond on the morning of Tuesday, April 23 are:The Lead: The Auditor General,John Ryan, has joined the ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Sarah SpengemanPeople wait to board an electric bus in Pune, India. (Image credit: courtesy of ITDP) Public transportation riders in Pune, India, love the city’s new electric buses so much they will actually skip an older diesel bus that ...
The infrastructure industry yesterday issued a “hurry up” message to the Government, telling it to get cracking on developing a pipeline of infrastructure projects.The hiatus around the change of Government has seen some major projects cancelled and others delayed, and there is uncertainty about what will happen with the new ...
Hi,Over the weekend I revisited a podcast I really adore, Dead Eyes. It’s about a guy who got fired from Band of Brothers over two decades ago because Tom Hanks said he had “dead eyes”.If you don’t recall — 2001’s Band of Brothers was part of the emerging trend of ...
Buzz from the Beehive The 180 or so recipients of letters from the Government telling them how to submit infrastructure projects for “fast track” consideration includes some whose project applications previously have been rejected by the courts. News media were quick to feature these in their reports after RMA Reform Minister Chris ...
It would not be a desirable way to start your holiday by breaking your back, your head, or your wrist, but on our first hour in Singapore I gave it a try.We were chatting, last week, before we started a meeting of Hazel’s Enviro Trust, about the things that can ...
Calling all journalists, academics, planners, lawyers, political activists, environmentalists, and other members of the public who believe that the relationships between vested interests and politicians need to be scrutinised. We need to work together to make sure that the new Fast-Track Approvals Bill – currently being pushed through by the ...
Feel worried. Shane Jones and a couple of his Cabinet colleagues are about to be granted the power to override any and all objections to projects like dams, mines, roads etc even if: said projects will harm biodiversity, increase global warming and cause other environmental harms, and even if ...
Bryce Edwards writes- The ability of the private sector to quickly establish major new projects making use of the urban and natural environment is to be supercharged by the new National-led Government. Yesterday it introduced to Parliament one of its most significant reforms, the Fast Track Approvals Bill. ...
Michael Bassett writes – If you think there is a move afoot by the radical Maori fringe of New Zealand society to create a parallel system of government to the one that we elect at our triennial elections, you aren’t wrong. Over the last few days we have ...
Without a corresponding drop in interest rates, it’s doubtful any changes to the CCCFA will unleash a massive rush of home buyers. Photo: Lynn GrievesonTL;DR: The six things that stood out to me in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, poverty and climate on Monday, April 22 included:The Government making a ...
Sunday was a lazy day. I started watching Jack Tame on Q&A, the interviews are usually good for something to write about. Saying the things that the politicians won’t, but are quite possibly thinking. Things that are true and need to be extracted from between the lines.As you might know ...
In our Weekly Roundup last week we covered news from Auckland Transport that the WX1 Western Express is going to get an upgrade next year with double decker electric buses. As part of the announcement, AT also said “Since we introduced the WX1 Western Express last November we have seen ...
TL;DR: The six key events to watch in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the week to April 29 include:PM Christopher Luxon is scheduled to hold a post-Cabinet news conference at 4 pm today. Stats NZ releases its statutory report on Census 2023 tomorrow.Finance Minister Nicola Willis delivers a pre-Budget speech at ...
A listing of 29 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, April 14, 2024 thru Sat, April 20, 2024. Story of the week Our story of the week hinges on these words from the abstract of a fresh academic ...
The ability of the private sector to quickly establish major new projects making use of the urban and natural environment is to be supercharged by the new National-led Government. Yesterday it introduced to Parliament one of its most significant reforms, the Fast Track Approvals Bill. The Government says this will ...
This is a column to say thank you. So many of have been in touch since Mum died to say so many kind and thoughtful things. You’re wonderful, all of you. You’ve asked how we’re doing, how Dad’s doing. A little more realisation each day, of the irretrievable finality of ...
Identifying the engine type in your car is crucial for various reasons, including maintenance, repairs, and performance upgrades. Knowing the specific engine model allows you to access detailed technical information, locate compatible parts, and make informed decisions about modifications. This comprehensive guide will provide you with a step-by-step approach to ...
Introduction: The allure of racing is undeniable. The thrill of speed, the roar of engines, and the exhilaration of competition all contribute to the allure of this adrenaline-driven sport. For those who yearn to experience the pinnacle of racing, becoming a race car driver is the ultimate dream. However, the ...
Introduction Automobiles have become ubiquitous in modern society, serving as a primary mode of transportation and a symbol of economic growth and personal mobility. With countless vehicles traversing roads and highways worldwide, it begs the question: how many cars are there in the world? Determining the precise number is a ...
Maintaining a safe and reliable vehicle requires regular inspections. Whether it’s a routine maintenance checkup or a safety inspection, knowing how long the process will take can help you plan your day accordingly. This article delves into the factors that influence the duration of a car inspection and provides an ...
Mazda Motor Corporation, commonly known as Mazda, is a Japanese multinational automaker headquartered in Fuchu, Aki District, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan. The company was founded in 1920 as the Toyo Cork Kogyo Co., Ltd., and began producing vehicles in 1931. Mazda is primarily known for its production of passenger cars, but ...
Your car battery is an essential component that provides power to start your engine, operate your electrical systems, and store energy. Over time, batteries can weaken and lose their ability to hold a charge, which can lead to starting problems, power failures, and other issues. Replacing your battery before it ...
In most states, you cannot register a car without a valid driver’s license. However, there are a few exceptions to this rule. Exceptions to the RuleIf you are under 18 years old: In some states, you can register a car in your name even if you do not ...
Mazda, a Japanese automotive manufacturer with a rich history of innovation and engineering excellence, has emerged as a formidable player in the global car market. Known for its reputation of producing high-quality, fuel-efficient, and driver-oriented vehicles, Mazda has consistently garnered praise from industry experts and consumers alike. In this article, ...
Struts are an essential part of a car’s suspension system. They are responsible for supporting the weight of the car and damping the oscillations of the springs. Struts are typically made of steel or aluminum and are filled with hydraulic fluid. How Do Struts Work? Struts work by transferring the ...
Car registration is a mandatory process that all vehicle owners must complete annually. This process involves registering your car with the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) and paying an associated fee. The registration process ensures that your vehicle is properly licensed and insured, and helps law enforcement and other authorities ...
Zoom is a video conferencing service that allows you to share your screen, webcam, and audio with other participants. In addition to sharing your own audio, you can also share the audio from your computer with other participants. This can be useful for playing music, sharing presentations with audio, or ...
Building your own computer can be a rewarding and cost-effective way to get a high-performance machine tailored to your specific needs. However, it also requires careful planning and execution, and one of the most important factors to consider is the time it will take. The exact time it takes to ...
Sleep mode is a power-saving state that allows your computer to quickly resume operation without having to boot up from scratch. This can be useful if you need to step away from your computer for a short period of time but don’t want to shut it down completely. There are ...
Introduction Computer-Assisted Translation (CAT) has revolutionized the field of translation by harnessing the power of technology to assist human translators in their work. This innovative approach combines specialized software with human expertise to improve the efficiency, accuracy, and consistency of translations. In this comprehensive article, we will delve into the ...
In today’s digital age, mobile devices have become an indispensable part of our daily lives. Among the vast array of portable computing options available, iPads and tablet computers stand out as two prominent contenders. While both offer similar functionalities, there are subtle yet significant differences between these two devices. This ...
A computer is an electronic device that can be programmed to carry out a set of instructions. The basic components of a computer are the processor, memory, storage, input devices, and output devices. The Processor The processor, also known as the central processing unit (CPU), is the brain of the ...
Voice Memos is a convenient app on your iPhone that allows you to quickly record and store audio snippets. These recordings can be useful for a variety of purposes, such as taking notes, capturing ideas, or recording interviews. While you can listen to your voice memos on your iPhone, you ...
Laptop screens are essential for interacting with our devices and accessing information. However, when lines appear on the screen, it can be frustrating and disrupt productivity. Understanding the underlying causes of these lines is crucial for finding effective solutions. Types of Screen Lines Horizontal lines: Also known as scan ...
Right-clicking is a common and essential computer operation that allows users to access additional options and settings. While most desktop computers have dedicated right-click buttons on their mice, laptops often do not have these buttons due to space limitations. This article will provide a comprehensive guide on how to right-click ...
Powering up and shutting down your ASUS laptop is an essential task for any laptop user. Locating the power button can sometimes be a hassle, especially if you’re new to ASUS laptops. This article will provide a comprehensive guide on where to find the power button on different ASUS laptop ...
Dell laptops are renowned for their reliability, performance, and versatility. Whether you’re a student, a professional, or just someone who needs a reliable computing device, a Dell laptop can meet your needs. However, if you’re new to Dell laptops, you may be wondering how to get started. In this comprehensive ...
Two-thirds of the country think that “New Zealand’s economy is rigged to advantage the rich and powerful”. They also believe that “New Zealand needs a strong leader to take the country back from the rich and powerful”. These are just two of a handful of stunning new survey results released ...
In today’s digital world, screenshots have become an indispensable tool for communication and documentation. Whether you need to capture an important email, preserve a website page, or share an error message, screenshots allow you to quickly and easily preserve digital information. If you’re an Asus laptop user, there are several ...
A factory reset restores your Gateway laptop to its original factory settings, erasing all data, apps, and personalizations. This can be necessary to resolve software issues, remove viruses, or prepare your laptop for sale or transfer. Here’s a step-by-step guide on how to factory reset your Gateway laptop: Method 1: ...
“You talking about me?”The neoliberal denigration of the past was nowhere more unrelenting than in its depiction of the public service. The Post Office and the Railways were held up as being both irremediably inefficient and scandalously over-manned. Playwright Roger Hall’s “Glide Time” caricatures were presented as accurate depictions of ...
Roger Partridge writes – When the Coalition Government took office last October, it inherited a country on a precipice. With persistent inflation, decades of insipid productivity growth and crises in healthcare, education, housing and law and order, it is no exaggeration to suggest New Zealand’s first-world status was ...
Rob MacCulloch writes – In 2022, the Curriculum Centre at the Ministry of Education employed 308 staff, according to an Official Information Request. Earlier this week it was announced 202 of those staff were being cut. When you look up “The New Zealand Curriculum” on the Ministry of ...
Chris Bishop’s bill has stirred up a hornets nest of opposition. Photo: Lynn Grieveson for The KākāTL;DR: The six things that stood out to me in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, poverty and climate from the last day included:A crescendo of opposition to the Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill is ...
Monday left me brokenTuesday, I was through with hopingWednesday, my empty arms were openThursday, waiting for love, waiting for loveThe end of another week that left many of us asking WTF? What on earth has NZ gotten itself into and how on earth could people have voluntarily signed up for ...
Hello! Here comes the Saturday edition of More Than A Feilding, catching you up on the past week’s editions.State of humanity, 20242024, it feels, keeps presenting us with ever more challenges, ever more dismay.Do you give up yet? It seems to ask.No? How about this? Or this?How about this?Full story Share ...
Determining the hardest sport in the world is a subjective matter, as the difficulty level can vary depending on individual abilities, physical attributes, and experience. However, based on various factors including physical demands, technical skills, mental fortitude, and overall accomplishment, here is an exploration of some of the most challenging ...
The allure of sport transcends age, culture, and geographical boundaries. It captivates hearts, ignites passions, and provides unparalleled entertainment. Behind the spectacle, however, lies a fascinating world of financial investment and expenditure. Among the vast array of competitive pursuits, one question looms large: which sport carries the hefty title of ...
Introduction Pickleball, a rapidly growing paddle sport, has captured the hearts and imaginations of millions around the world. Its blend of tennis, badminton, and table tennis elements has made it a favorite among players of all ages and skill levels. As the sport’s popularity continues to surge, the question on ...
Abstract: Soccer, the global phenomenon captivating millions worldwide, has a rich history that spans centuries. Its origins trace back to ancient civilizations, but the modern version we know and love emerged through a complex interplay of cultural influences and innovations. This article delves into the fascinating journey of soccer’s evolution, ...
Our two-tiered system for veterans’ support is out of step with our closest partners, and all parties in Parliament should work together to fix it, Labour veterans’ affairs spokesperson Greg O’Connor said. ...
Stripping two Ministers of their portfolios just six months into the job shows Christopher Luxon’s management style is lacking, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said. ...
It appears Nicola Willis is about to pull the rug out from under the feet of local communities still dealing with the aftermath of last year’s severe weather, and local councils relying on funding to build back from these disasters. ...
The Government is making short-sighted changes to the Resource Management Act (RMA) that will take away environmental protection in favour of short-term profits, Labour’s environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said today. ...
Labour welcomes the release of the report into the North Island weather events and looks forward to working with the Government to ensure that New Zealand is as prepared as it can be for the next natural disaster. ...
The Labour Party has called for the New Zealand Government to recognise Palestine, as a material step towards progressing the two-State solution needed to achieve a lasting peace in the region. ...
Some of our country’s most important work, stopping the sexual exploitation of children and violent extremism could go along with staff on the frontline at ports and airports. ...
The Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill will give projects such as new coal mines a ‘get out of jail free’ card to wreak havoc on the environment, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said today. ...
Cuts to frontline hospital staff are not only a broken election promise, it shows the reckless tax cuts have well and truly hit the frontline of the health system, says Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall. ...
The Green Party has joined the call for public submissions on the fast-track legislation to be extended after the Ombudsman forced the Government to release the list of organisations invited to apply just hours before submissions close. ...
New Zealand’s good work at reducing climate emissions for three years in a row will be undone by the National government’s lack of ambition and scrapping programmes that were making a difference, Labour Party climate spokesperson Megan Woods said today. ...
More essential jobs could be on the chopping block, this time Ministry of Education staff on the school lunches team are set to find out whether they're in line to lose their jobs. ...
The Government is trying to bring in a law that will allow Ministers to cut corners and kill off native species, Labour environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said. ...
Cancelling urgently needed new Cook Strait ferries and hiking the cost of public transport for many Kiwis so that National can announce the prospect of another tunnel for Wellington is not making good choices, Labour Transport Spokesperson Tangi Utikere said. ...
A laundry list of additional costs for Tāmaki Makarau Auckland shows the Minister for the city is not delivering for the people who live there, says Labour Auckland Issues spokesperson Shanan Halbert. ...
The Green Party has today launched a step-by-step guide to help New Zealanders make their voice heard on the Government’s democracy dodging and anti-environment fast track legislation. ...
The National Government’s proposed changes to the Residential Tenancies Act will mean tenants can be turfed from their homes by landlords with little notice, Labour housing spokesperson Kieran McAnulty said. ...
Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson is calling on all parties to support a common-sense change that’s great for the planet and great for consumers after her member’s bill was drawn from the ballot today. ...
A significant milestone has been reached in the fight to strike an anti-Pasifika and unfair law from the country’s books after Teanau Tuiono’s members’ bill passed its first reading. ...
New Zealand has today missed the opportunity to uphold the right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment, says James Shaw after his member’s bill was voted down in its first reading. ...
Today’s advice from the Climate Change Commission paints a sobering reality of the challenge we face in combating climate change, especially in light of recent Government policy announcements. ...
Minister for Disability Issues Penny Simmonds appears to have delayed a report back to Cabinet on the progress New Zealand is making against international obligations for disabled New Zealanders. ...
The Government’s newly announced review of methane emissions reduction targets hints at its desire to delay Aotearoa New Zealand’s urgent transition to a climate safe future, the Green Party said. ...
The Government must commit to the Maitai School building project for students with high and complex needs, to ensure disabled students from the top of the South Island have somewhere to learn. ...
Paul Goldsmith will take on responsibility for the Media and Communications portfolio, while Louise Upston will pick up the Disability Issues portfolio, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced today. “Our Government is relentlessly focused on getting New Zealand back on track. As issues change in prominence, I plan to adjust Ministerial ...
Recreational catch limits will be reduced in areas of Fiordland and the Chatham Islands to help keep those fisheries healthy and sustainable, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. The lower recreational daily catch limits for a range of finfish and shellfish species caught in the Fiordland Marine Area and ...
Energy Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed an important milestone in New Zealand’s hydrogen future, with the opening of the country’s first network of hydrogen refuelling stations in Wiri. “I want to congratulate the team at Hiringa Energy and its partners K one W one (K1W1), Mitsui & Co New Zealand ...
The coalition Government is delivering on its commitment to improve resource management laws and give greater certainty to consent applicants, with a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) expected to be introduced to Parliament next month. RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop has today outlined the first RMA Amendment ...
Overseas models for regulating the oil and gas sector, including their decommissioning regimes, are being carefully scrutinised as a potential template for New Zealand’s own sector, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. The Coalition Government is focused on rebuilding investor confidence in New Zealand’s energy sector as it looks to strengthen ...
Emergency Management and Recovery Minister Mark Mitchell has today released the Report of the Government Inquiry into the response to the North Island Severe Weather Events. “The report shows that New Zealand’s emergency management system is not fit-for-purpose and there are some significant gaps we need to address,” Mr Mitchell ...
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith is today travelling to Europe where he’ll update the United Nations Human Rights Council on the Government’s work to restore law and order. “Attending the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva provides us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while ...
Associate Agriculture Minister, Mark Patterson, formally reopened the world’s largest wool processing facility today in Awatoto, Napier, following a $50 million rebuild and refurbishment project. “The reopening of this facility will significantly lift the economic opportunities available to New Zealand’s wool sector, which already accounts for 20 per cent of ...
Hon Andrew Bayly, Minister for Small Business and Manufacturing At the Southland Otago Regional Engineering Collective (SOREC) Summit, 18 April, Dunedin Ngā mihi nui, Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Ko Whanganui aho Good Afternoon and thank you for inviting me to open your summit today. I am delighted ...
The Government is delivering on its commitment to bring back the Three Strikes legislation, Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee announced today. “Our Government is committed to restoring law and order and enforcing appropriate consequences on criminals. We are making it clear that repeat serious violent or sexual offending is not ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters has today announced four new diplomatic appointments for New Zealand’s overseas missions. “Our diplomats have a vital role in maintaining and protecting New Zealand’s interests around the world,” Mr Peters says. “I am pleased to announce the appointment of these senior diplomats from the ...
New Zealand is contributing NZ$7 million to support communities affected by severe food insecurity and other urgent humanitarian needs in Ethiopia and Somalia, Foreign Minister Rt Hon Winston Peters announced today. “Over 21 million people are in need of humanitarian assistance across Ethiopia, with a further 6.9 million people ...
Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Paul Goldsmith is congratulating Mataaho Collective for winning the Golden Lion for best participant in the main exhibition at the Venice Biennale. "Congratulations to the Mataaho Collective for winning one of the world's most prestigious art prizes at the Venice Biennale. “It is good ...
The Government is reforming financial services to improve access to home loans and other lending, and strengthen customer protections, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly and Housing Minister Chris Bishop announced today. “Our coalition Government is committed to rebuilding the economy and making life simpler by cutting red tape. We are ...
“China remains a strong commercial opportunity for Kiwi exporters as Chinese businesses and consumers continue to value our high-quality safe produce,” Trade and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay says. Mr McClay has returned to New Zealand following visits to Beijing, Harbin and Shanghai where he met ministers, governors and mayors and engaged in trade and agricultural events with the New ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has completed a successful trip to Singapore, Thailand and the Philippines, deepening relationships and capitalising on opportunities. Mr Luxon was accompanied by a business delegation and says the choice of countries represents the priority the New Zealand Government places on South East Asia, and our relationships in ...
New Zealand is demonstrating its commitment to reducing global greenhouse emissions, and supporting clean energy transition in South East Asia, through a contribution of NZ$41 million (US$25 million) in climate finance to the Asian Development Bank (ADB)-led Energy Transition Mechanism (ETM). Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Climate Change Minister Simon Watts announced ...
The Government is today releasing a list of organisations who received letters about the Fast-track applications process, says RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop. “Recently Ministers and agencies have received a series of OIA requests for a list of organisations to whom I wrote with information on applying to have a ...
Attorney-General Judith Collins today announced the appointment of Wellington Barrister David Jonathan Boldt as a Judge of the High Court, and the Honourable Justice Matthew Palmer as a Judge of the Court of Appeal. Justice Boldt graduated with an LLB from Victoria University of Wellington in 1990, and also holds ...
Education Minister Erica Stanford will lead the New Zealand delegation at the 2024 International Summit on the Teaching Profession (ISTP) held in Singapore. The delegation includes representatives from the Post Primary Teachers’ Association (PPTA) Te Wehengarua and the New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI) Te Riu Roa. The summit is co-hosted ...
A stopbank upgrade project in Tairawhiti partly funded by the Government has increased flood resilience for around 7000ha of residential and horticultural land so far, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones today attended a dawn service in Gisborne to mark the end of the first stage of the ...
Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters will represent the Government at Anzac Day commemorations on the Gallipoli Peninsula next week and engage with senior representatives of the Turkish government in Istanbul. “The Gallipoli campaign is a defining event in our history. It will be a privilege to share the occasion ...
Science, Innovation and Technology and Defence Minister Judith Collins will next week attend the OECD Science and Technology Ministerial conference in Paris and Anzac Day commemorations in Belgium. “Science, innovation and technology have a major role to play in rebuilding our economy and achieving better health, environmental and social outcomes ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon held a bilateral meeting today with the President of the Philippines, Ferdinand Marcos Jr. The Prime Minister was accompanied by MP Paulo Garcia, the first Filipino to be elected to a legislature outside the Philippines. During today’s meeting, Prime Minister Luxon and President Marcos Jr discussed opportunities to ...
The Government has announced that $20 million in funding will be made available to Westport to fund much needed flood protection around the town. This measure will significantly improve the resilience of the community, says Local Government Minister Simeon Brown. “The Westport community has already been allocated almost $3 million ...
The Government is proud to support the first ever Repco Supercars Championship event in Taupō as up to 70,000 motorsport fans attend the Taupō International Motorsport Park this weekend, says Economic Development Minister Melissa Lee. “Anticipation for the ITM Taupō Super400 is huge, with tickets and accommodation selling out weeks ...
Local Government Minister Simeon Brown has announced an increase to the Rates Rebate Scheme, putting money back into the pockets of low-income homeowners. “The coalition Government is committed to bringing down the cost of living for New Zealanders. That includes targeted support for those Kiwis who are doing things tough, such ...
The Coalition Government is investing in a project to boost survival rates of New Zealand mussels and grow the industry, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones has announced. “This project seeks to increase the resilience of our mussels and significantly boost the sector’s productivity,” Mr Jones says. “The project - ...
Benefit figures released today underscore the importance of the Government’s plan to rebuild the economy and have 50,000 fewer people on Jobseeker Support, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. “Benefit numbers are still significantly higher than when National was last in government, when there was about 70,000 fewer ...
The Government’s commitment to doubling New Zealand’s renewable energy capacity is backed by new data showing that clean energy has helped the country reach its lowest annual gross emissions since 1999, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. New Zealand’s latest Greenhouse Gas Inventory (1990-2022) published today, shows gross emissions fell ...
The Government is bringing the earthquake-prone building review forward, with work to start immediately, and extending the deadline for remediations by four years, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says. “Our Government is focused on rebuilding the economy. A key part of our plan is to cut red tape that ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and his Thai counterpart, Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin, have today agreed that New Zealand and the Kingdom of Thailand will upgrade the bilateral relationship to a Strategic Partnership by 2026. “New Zealand and Thailand have a lot to offer each other. We have a strong mutual desire to build ...
RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop and Transport Minister Simeon Brown have today announced the Coalition Government’s intention to extend port coastal permits for a further 20 years, providing port operators with certainty to continue their operations. “The introduction of the Resource Management Act in 1991 required ports to obtain coastal ...
Today’s announcement that inflation is down to 4 per cent is encouraging news for Kiwis, but there is more work to be done - underlining the importance of the Government’s plan to get the economy back on track, acting Finance Minister Chris Bishop says. “Inflation is now at 4 per ...
Refreshed health guidance released today will help parents and schools make informed decisions about whether their child needs to be in school, addressing one of the key issues affecting school attendance, says Associate Education Minister David Seymour. In recent years, consistently across all school terms, short-term illness or medical reasons ...
Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones is streamlining high-level oceans management while maintaining a focus on supporting the sector’s role in the export-led recovery of the economy. “I am working to realise the untapped potential of our fishing and aquaculture sector. To achieve that we need to be smarter with ...
Associate Agriculture Minister Mark Patterson is speaking at the International Wool Textile Organisation Congress in Adelaide, promoting New Zealand wool, and outlining the coalition Government’s support for the revitalisation the sector. "New Zealand’s wool exports reached $400 million in the year to 30 June 2023, and the coalition Government ...
The Government is making legislative changes to make it easier for new early learning services to be established, and for existing services to operate, Associate Education Minister David Seymour says. The changes involve repealing the network approval provisions that apply when someone wants to establish a new early learning service, ...
Changes to the Resource Management Act will align consenting for coal mining to other forms of mining to reduce barriers that are holding back economic development, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. “The inconsistent treatment of coal mining compared with other extractive activities is burdensome red tape that fails to acknowledge ...
Trade, Agriculture and Forestry Minister Todd McClay has concluded productive discussions with ministerial counterparts in Beijing today, in support of the New Zealand-China trade and economic relationship. “My meeting with Commerce Minister Wang Wentao reaffirmed the complementary nature of the bilateral trade relationship, with our Free Trade Agreement at its ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Magdalena M.E. Bunbury, Postdoctoral Researcher, James Cook University Burial with a horse at the Rákóczifalva site, Hungary (8th century AD).Sándor Hegedűs, Hungarian National Museum, CC BY How do we understand past societies? For centuries, our main sources of information have been ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kathryn Willis, Postdoctoral Researcher, CSIRO Xavier Boulenger/Shutterstock In the two decades to 2019, global plastic production doubled. By 2040, plastic manufacturing and processing could consume as much as 20% of global oil production and use up 15% of the annual carbon ...
With our collective remembrance, and steadfast belief in our common humanity, we strengthen our hope and resolve to do what we can to foster dialogue and understanding, and to heal divisions in our pursuit of peace. ...
Principal reasons for the opposition is the loss of the public’s democratic right to have “a fair say” and the vital need for a government free from corruption, said Casey Cravens of Dunedin, president of the New Zealand Federation of Freshwater ...
Never mind the scoreboard – in the 2000 Bledisloe Cup decider, the real trans-Tasman battle was won before kickoff.First published in 2016. The dawn of the new millennium was a dark time for the All Blacks. Their final game pre-Y2K was a 22-18 loss to South Africa in the ...
I’m on the wrong side of 40, I never pursued creative work and now my job is killing my soul. Help! Want Hera’s help? Email your problem to helpme@thespinoff.co.nzDear Hera,May I start with the least original conversation opener you’re likely to hear around the motu at the moment, particularly in Wellington: ...
“Never again - No AUKUS” was the message of the wreath laid at this morning’s national ANZAC Day commemorative service at Pukeahu National War Memorial Park this morning by the Stop AUKUS group. ...
Until this month, Auckland swimmer Hazel Ouwehand had never met a qualifying time in an Olympic event for a New Zealand team, even as a junior. Now she’s very likely off to the Paris Olympics after swimming well under the qualifying standard in the 100m butterfly twice – both in ...
While Anzac Day has experienced a resurgence in recent years, our other day of remembrance has slowly faded from view.The Sunday Essay is made possible thanks to the support of Creative New Zealand. Original illustrations by Hope McConnell.First published in 2022.The high school’s head girl and ...
Australian and New Zealand volunteers fought together in the Waikato War, yet still its place in the Anzac tradition is unacknowledged by our defence forces or Returned Services Association.First published in 2018.When I was a boy cub I attended Anzac Day services in the South Auckland suburb of ...
A poem by Wellington writer Tayi Tibble.Hoki Mai She kisses him goodbye with her eyes still wet and alight from their last swim in the Awatere river. At the train station celebration, she leads the Kapa Haka but her voice keeps breaking under and over itself like waves. ...
A poem from Bill Manhire’s 2017 book of verse Some Things to Place in a Coffin.My World War I Poem Inside each trench, the sound of prayer. Inside each prayer, the sound of digging. Image courtesy of Auckland War Memorial Museum. ...
There are three books I have wolfed down in one sitting over the last two years. Colleen Maria Lenihan’s gorgeous and sad debut Kōhine, Noelle McCarthy’s memoir Grand about becoming her mother and then unbecoming her, and now Hine Toa, a staunch yet gentle self-portrait by living legend Ngāhuia te ...
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A[quiz],DIV[quiz],A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Thursday 25 April appeared first on Newsroom. ...
Asia Pacific Report Students and activist staff at Australia’s University of Sydney (USyd) have set up a Gaza solidarity encampment in support of Palestinians and similar student-led protests in the United States. The camp was pitched as mass graves, crippled hospitals, thousands of civilian deaths and the near-total destruction of ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By James B. Dorey, Lecturer in Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong Australian teddy bear bees are cute and fluffy, but get a look at that massive (unbarbed) stinger! James Dorey Photography Most of us have been stung by a bee and we ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jen Roberts, Senior Lecturer, School of Humanities and Social Inquiry, University of Wollongong Aussie~mobs/FlickrVictor Farr, a private in the 1st Infantry Battalion, was among the first to land at Anzac Cove just before dawn on April 25 1915. Victor Farr ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Gregory Moore, Senior Research Associate, School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, The University of Melbourne Gregory Moore I had the good fortune to care for the sugar gum at The University of Melbourne’s Burnley Gardens in Victoria where I worked for ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By John Hawkins, Senior Lecturer, Canberra School of Politics, Economics and Society, University of Canberra BagzhanSadvakassov/Upsplash, CC BY-SA Australia’s inflation rate has fallen for the fifth successive quarter, and it’s now less than half of what it was back in late 2022. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Rachel Ong ViforJ, ARC Future Fellow & Professor of Economics, Curtin University Just when we think the price of rentals could not get any worse, this week’s Rental Affordability Snapshot by Anglicare has revealed low-income Australians are facing a housing crisis like ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Meighen McCrae, Associate Professor of Strategic & Defence Studies, Australian National University American and Australian stretcher bearers working together near the front line during the Battle of Hamel in 1918.Australian War Memorial While the AUKUS alliance is new, the Australian-American partnership ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Tracey Holmes, Professorial Fellow in Sport, University of Canberra When the news broke last weekend that 23 Chinese swimmers had tested positive to a banned drug in early 2021 and were allowed to compete at the Tokyo Olympic Games six months later ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Cally Jetta, Senior Lecturer and Academic Lead; College for First Nations, University of Southern Queensland Australian War MemorialAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander readers are advised this article contains names and images of deceased people, as well as sensitive historical information ...
RNZ News Melissa Lee has been ousted from New Zealand’s coalition cabinet and stripped of the Media portfolio, and Penny Simmonds has lost the Disability Issues portfolio in a reshuffle. Climate Change and Revenue Minister Simon Watts will take Lee’s spot in cabinet. Simmonds was a minister outside of cabinet. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By David Lindenmayer, Professor, Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University laurello/Shutterstock Some reports and popular books, such as Bill Gammage’s Biggest Estate on Earth, have argued that extensive areas of Australia’s forests were kept open through frequent burning by ...
Analysis - Christopher Luxon framing the demotion of two ministers as the portfolios getting "too complex" is a charitable way of saying they weren't up to the job. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra With Jim Chalmers’s third budget on May 14, Australians will be looking for some more cost-of-living relief – beyond the tax cuts – although they have been warned extra measures will be modest. As ...
Analysis: Melissa Lee has lost the media portfolio and her spot in Cabinet after multiple failed attempts to find solutions for a media industry in crisis. On Wednesday, the Prime Minister announced Lee would be losing her spot in Cabinet along with her media and communications ministerial portfolio. The job ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Simon Wilmot, Senior Lecturer, Film, Deakin University Among the many Australian who served during the second world war, there is a small group of people whose stories remain largely untold. These are the Muslim men and women who, while small in number, ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kelly Saunders, PhD Candidate, University of Canberra There has been much analysis and praise of Justice Michael Lee’s recent judgement in Bruce Lehrmann’s defamation case against Channel Ten. Many people were openly relieved to read Lee’s “forensic” and “nuanced” application of law ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kathy Gibbs, Program Director for the Bachelor of Education, Griffith University zEdward_Indy/Shutterstock Around one in 20 people has attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It’s one of the most common neurodevelopmental disorders in childhood and often continues into adulthood. ADHD is diagnosed ...
The Fairer Future coalition of anti-poverty groups say Whaikaha must be properly funded going forward, and that to argue that poor financial management of the new Ministry is a red herring by the Prime Minister. ...
The Taxpayers’ Union is today congratulating Hon. Paul Goldsmith on his appointment as Minister for Media and Communications and urges him to rule out state intervention in the private media sector. ...
Asia Pacific Report The West Papuan resistance OPM leader has condemned Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and US President Joe Biden, accusing their countries of “six decades of treachery” over Papuan independence. The open letter was released today by OPM chairman Jeffrey P Bomanak on the eve of ANZAC Day ...
Welcome to The Spinoff Books Confessional, in which we get to know the reading habits and quirks of New Zealanders at large. This week: writer and one of Time Magazine’s 100 most influential people of 2024, Lauren Groff.The book I wish I’d writtenIf I wish I’d written a ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By David Fechner, Research Fellow, Social Marketing, Griffith University mavo/Shutterstock Imagine having dinner at a restaurant. The menu offers plant-based meat alternatives made mostly from vegetables, mushrooms, legumes and wheat that mimic meat in taste, texture and smell. Despite being given that ...
“Three Strikes is a dead-end policy proposed by a dead-end government. The Three Strikes law ignores the causes of crime, instead just brutalising people already crushed by the cost of living.” ...
By Don Wiseman, RNZ Pacific senior journalist An Australian-born judge in Kiribati could well face deportation later this week after a tribunal ruling that he should be removed from his post. The tribunal’s report has just been tabled in the Kiribati Parliament and is due to be debated by MPs ...
With its clear mandate for police use, political nuances, and nuanced public trust, Denmark's insights provide valuable considerations for Australia and New Zealand. ...
Books editor Claire Mabey reviews poet Louise Wallace’s debut novel. A famous poet once said to me that he’s always suspicious when a poet publishes a novel. I never really understood why but maybe it’s something to do with cheating on your first form. Louise Wallace is a poet. She’s ...
For a few months at the turn of the millennium, TrueBliss burned bright as the biggest pop stars in the country. Alex Casey chats to two superfans who still hold the flame. During a humble backyard wedding in Nelson, 1999, one of the cordially invited guests had to excuse themselves ...
How will the recent wave of job cuts impact ethnic diversity in the media? In November last year, I was working a very busy day in the newsroom of a large online news site, interviewing whānau about their concerns over the imminent closure of one of the few puna reo ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ruth Knight, Researcher, Queensland University of Technology Have you ever felt sick at work? Perhaps you had food poisoning or the flu. Your belly hurt, or you felt tired, making it hard to concentrate and be productive. How likely would you be ...
Despite heavy criticism and an ongoing select committee process, the Police Minister says the Government will forge ahead with a ban on gang patches. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sam Whiting, Lecturer – Creative Industries, University of South Australia Shutterstock Everyone has a favourite band, or a favourite composer, or a favourite song. There is some music which speaks to you, deeply; and other music which might be the current ...
A new survey says ‘outlook not great’ for those charged with building infrastructure, while RMA changes delight farmers and depress environmentalists, writes Anna Rawhiti-Connell in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here. First RMA changes announced ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Olli Hellmann, Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Waikato Getty Images When New Zealanders commemorate Anzac Day on April 25, it’s not only to honour the soldiers who lost their lives in World War I and subsequent conflicts, but also ...
A leaked document shows the Canterbury/Waitaha arm of health agency Te Whatu Ora is scurrying to save $13.3 million by July. The “financial sustainability target”, which was “allocated” to Waitaha, is consistent with what’s happening in other districts, says Sarah Dalton, executive director of the Association of Salaried Medical Specialists. ...
A look at the state of the previous government’s affordable housing scheme, and what could come next.Remind me: What’s KiwiBuild again?First announced in 2012, KiwiBuild was a flagship policy of the Labour Party heading into both its 2014 and 2017 election campaigns. With Jacinda Ardern as prime minister, ...
Labour in opposition will be shocked to learn which party had six years in power but squandered any chance to make real change. Grant Robertson’s valedictory speech was a predictably entertaining trip down memory lane. The acid-tongued incoming Otago University chancellor administered a sick burn to the coalition government. He ...
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry is seen some as its ‘silicon shield’ against invasion – but how will overseas expansion affect that protection? The post The state of Taiwan’s silicon shield appeared first on Newsroom. ...
There’s relief for building owners bending under the weight of earthquake strengthening rules – and costs – that came into force seven years ago. Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk has announced a scheduled 2027 review of the earthquake-prone building regulations will now start this year. Owners will also get ...
Opinion: It has been announced that nine percent of roles at Oranga Tamariki will be disestablished, presumably to help fund the tax cuts promised by the coalition Government. I am reminded of the graphics used to illustrate pandemic events, where five thousand people are standing in a field and then ...
After more than two sleepless days, running through savage terrain, Greig Hamilton didn’t know if he was going to finish one of the most gruelling psychological assaults in sport. He was metres away from the finish line, a yellow gate made famous in a Netflix documentary; a race he’d dreamed ...
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A[quiz],DIV[quiz],A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Wednesday 24 April appeared first on Newsroom. ...
The following interview with former Green Party MP Sue Kedgley came about because she features in the new memoir Hine Toa by activist Ngāhuia te Awekōtuku; the two knew each other at the University of Auckland in the early 70s, when they were both took on leadership roles in the ...
I read in todays NZ Herald that a zoo in Denver has detected a number of their animals have contracted covid.Hyenas,Lions,Tigers.
Wonder what the wider implications could be with this revelation.
We have a huge number of domestic cats here in NZ.
Can sheep/cows catch covid?
This reference would suggest not.
https://modernfarmer.com/2020/09/which-farm-animals-can-catch-covid-19/
That cats had been affected was published from somewhere in East many months ago, probably during our first lockdown. ….and it's not a reference I kept.
I wondered then about the myriad of homes where cats are well-cuddled pets.
I will respond in full later.I am just getting my sewing machine out…I'm making masks for…cats.
I was threading elastic through homemade masks while watching Q&A.
1. Where did you get your cat mask patterns from?
2. Are you thinking of using cat animals prints for your masks?
I would have thought human prints would be appropriate.
Just use a Covid print, it will cover both.
Please send video of your first attempt at fitting.
Lol, I can't wait to see it.
I just googled, hoping to find some funny memes. Don't look (fuck people are weird).
When you say Don't look, people will look.
When you say Don't look, people will look.
sorry. It wasn't that bad, but the photos of cat masks with eyeholes cut into them was just too much
It's a very serious matter Robert….in fact it may become a….catastrophe!
👍🏼 😹
Pity Al most likely can’t be persuaded to post here, so have decided it’s not worth my suggesting it to him.
I miss the robust, precise style of his better arguments, when he could be bothered to make one.
Don’t think he’d survive being moderated here.
Al is alot of things,but stupid it is not one of them.
He would get destroyed by this lot!
Tru dat.
And he’d still think he won.
☘🐧💪🏼
I think the last nail is in RNZ coffin,Media watch going near total bias on trans genderism. Sorry no link,but i'm sure some are still reeling and others can find.
I would be interested to hear more left for dead.
did have a quick look on RNZ but couldn’t see anything
It was the 2nd to last story on Media Watch, but personally I felt it was a good article, I guess left for dead didn't like it because it was not anti trans. Given the atmosphere around us trans folk today I felt the item was fairly reasonable, again perhaps because for a change it wasn't overtly anti trans
please fix your username on next comment (there’s a bug with where the cursor goes)
Far from the truth,but it seems you happy to make it up as you go,ho hum.
Edited: if we stick to the facts,we should be able to move forward on what is a very simple matter,women’s rights.
women's rights and trans people's rights, and how to resolve any conflicts.
Their you go again,and you wonder why men on this site don't comment.I have no problem with the trans community.That comment above from Joa about this site being anti-trans and the MSM being against said community is factually wrong,hence my two cents worth,but I will go back into my box.thanks!
I thought you just said the matter was about women's rights. I said it's about two sets of rights that are sometimes in conflict. What's the problem.
Trans people are out numbered and outgunned on TS. Joanne's comment is challenging, but it doesn't hurt for it to be here. You said her views about you are wrong, so it's all good I would have thought.
For all the help you have been,not.You just through me under the proverbial bus.And by the way have a read of Selina Todd (The people)the rise and fall of the working class 1910-2010,
Oh and too finish off,you were helping Joanna with her hypocrisy.Her being out numbered an all,they are a very small % of the pop, you know that would apply here @TS no.
I was talking about TS.
Sorry, I have not idea what you mean. I didn't throw you under a bus, I disagreed that women's rights are the only issue.
their you go again,I never said that"women's rights are the only issue" show me where or retract.And maybe you are conflating middle class with working class,re another flame you started.This "Sorry,I have not idea what you mean"What do you mean to say,maybe copy and paste that bit you don't understand and I can only try and explain.
You said upthread,
In the context of the thread this read to me like: Mediawatch did a terrible job by framing it as trans rights vs transphobia, and you were saying it should have been about women's rights instead.
Maybe what you really meant was that in addition to the issues for trans people, women's rights should be considered too.
Please clarify.
Oh I see your problem,at that stage you hadn't listen to broadcast.which was about Trans rights,It should be clear I was countering that narrative.I see you are bussy,It would help if you didn't jump in half cocked,If I could share your gun analogy back up this thread "outgunned I think it was.
do you realise that I've written actual posts about the issue from a gender critical perspective?
I haven't listened to the Mediawatch piece, but it's clear that it took an anti-feminist approach. And my opinion is that it should be looking at the conflict of rights, not trans' rights or women's rights alone.
Agreed.
Yes,if only you had listen first before commenting. I know your got a lot on,so wadding in to defend Joanna,were she's is quite capable to do that herself,instead of making me out to be some sort of problem.
Too be clear,I've read what Joanne has said here over the last few week's,and mostly agree,but upending other peoples rights ie:biological women is wrong.
I appreciated listening to it. But the reality is (and this is why I comment so much on these issues on TS) is that there has been a virtual shut down in the media of GC voices.
You see for me this issue isn't. about people. Its about ideology. So Gender ideology is about how gender identity trumps biological sex. I don't believe that is true.
And for those of you who about to tell me sex is on a spectrum or there are more that two sexes, yah. Great. Iwill post a link for a scienctific competition, the prize money for which is $10,0000.00. If you can prove this is the case, you are going to win an awlful lot of money. Thing is no one has claimed the prize as of yet. Funny that.
I don't mind at all people identifying as the opposite sex. You are allowed to do that. But legislating for that, pushing your way into women's private spaces and sporting competitions. No Thank You.
Nor will I repeat back the phrase "trans women are real women'. I don't believe that to be the case……. And the science backs me up. I am also entitled to my GC views.
The mysogonists vile narrative by some trans gender activists against women e.g JK Rowling, Kathleen Stock is disgusting.
Re the media watch piece. the person with the Scottish accent said that in 30 years time their will be apologies from politicians who didn't support gender ideology. But I think it is just as likely that the 22,000 and counting de-transitioners who have irreverisble damage to their bodies will be asking and receiving the apology.
BTW congratulations to the Listener who are covering this issue in a balanced way
Thanks Anker, totally agree.
"Transwomen are real women "
Is that said out of a sense of kindness and politeness do you think , or is it intended as a statement of fact. If that’s a statement of fact, I just can’t go along with it, and I couldn’t say it myself with any sincerity.Now I realise that’s because biological reality carries the most weight with me, the reason for that is, that the cultural baggage that makes up gender is so diverse and changeable, over time and culture.For another, gender might be the most important.Do we both have the right to feel the way we do?
I could say without feeling jarred by it, that "to all intents and purposes that person is a woman " ie, looks like one , behaves like one.Like Fa'afafine",in the manner of "
It's very unfair, but "passing "matters .Women are much more likely to welcome into their spaces someone who looks more like them, smaller, feminine, relatively hairless, feminine voice ,and of course, those transwomen who successfully "pass" have been using female spaces for a while now.
This feels like narcissistic rambling so I’ll stop now.
"to all intents and purposes that person is a woman"
"to all intents and purposes that person is a transwomen".
intents and purposes – what is a women?
and if you can't define it, can you discriminate against it?
Well I will claim that $10,000 as a few weeks ago I directed you to a peer reviewed study on pregnancies in intersex individuals which you accepted as fact (and extrapolated into thinking it was a study of every intersex person in the world 🙄)
So, when can I expect my winnings?
Unless of course you're a liar…
After all, you are now saying the opposite of what you said at the time.
So, where's my money?
There's no shortage of men commenting on this site and my comment was not about this site being anti trans, it was about you bringing up this RNZ report and implying that it wasn't anti trans enough for you. You, Anker and others consistently say you have nothing against us trans folk yet in the last few weeks virtually every Open Mike has been taken over by your little group bemoaning the fact that I want my rights to be recognised as much as anyones. If you have issues with Gender ideology then fine, tell us and let it be, but no, that's not good enough you have to tell us day after day after day. I'm quite sure that if I stated my understanding of who I am in the same fashion I would very quickly be shown the door. It may be true that some people have been ill served by those who subscribe to the kind of gender ideology that gets talked about on here but you know what? Us Transpeople, particularly Transwomen don't get verbally abused, we get beaten up and murdered at a rate higher than any other group you would care to name. Not, I would say in absolute numbers but in terms of percentages. So if you, as you say, support Trans people then let us get on with our lives which are real, and often boring.
These discussions are being had now, Joanne, because of the legislation proposals and the impacts they may/and have had on women and girls.
It is not in any way intended to give you discomfort, or any other transgender people in the community.
However, the current gender ideology pushed by very aggressive activists (which I will not assume that you share) requires compliance from women and girls, in fact demands it. So, the discussion is occurring because those demands are taking place. And we are sharing information here, on TS, because the impacts on women's rights are not being actively investigated or discussed in many other places.
Just like anyone else, you are welcome to participate, or just scroll past. There is no intention to make you feel uncomfortable or require you to contribute unless you want to.
it's a tricky balance on TS, because there have been lots of problems with women being here historically so I am loathe to accept a line of telling women to not talk about their politics freely.
There is also the issue of legislative and social changes that affect women, and this is one of the better places to discuss that. That's a live issue, which is why we keep talking about it.
But I also see an obvious imbalance.
Not sure I understand what you mean, would you mind clarifying?
There are a number of men here like myself who have stopped commenting on this topic because no point.
And yet here you are again…using a comment to say you are not commenting.
So, what is your insight?
Like me Soltka, I usually just skim read, trans people have my support.
I don't think that is correct Joanne, that virtually every Open Mike is "taken over". Open Mike is for everybody to share whatever they are concerned or interested. in. That's how it works.
My impression is that Open Mike has become dominated with info on Covid 19. I completely understand that even if I don't follow it.
Do you have a problem with women saying "I want my rights recognised as much as anyone's?"
I think gender identity is a relatively new term that has come out of gender ideology, postulated by Judith Butler and some others. I disagree with her theory and think biological realty trumps gender identity, not the other way around as many gender activists believe.
I am not sure about your assertion that trans women are murdered more than anyone (other than in South America
Sorry, last comment posted before I finished writing and for some reason, I can't edit it.
I think in South America more trans women are murdered per % but not in NZ. Interested to see if anyone has different stats on this.
Unfortunately rapes and assaults are often hard to quantify as often not reported to the police.
But women as a sex class are very vulnerable to sexual assault because they are smaller and not as physically strong and overwhelmingly the people who commit rape and violent assault are biological males
the last transwomen in NZ to be murdered was in 2018.
per the trans rememberance day 350 transpeople were killed in 2020, and so far in 2021 some 49 were killed
https://pflag.org/blog/transgender-day-remembrance-2021
women however are dying like flies
In saying that, no one should be killed for what they are and on grounds of their sex or gender id. And yet, in the 2021 in the UK every third day on average a women gets killed. By partners, strangers in the parks and cops and everyone is meh.
Here's what Joanne said,
Lots of women get murdered, it's true, but Joanne said %. Think about that.
It's not a competition.
When gender critical women minimalise the violence and abuse that trans women get directed at them, it's not too dissimilar when men minimalise violence against women.
I am not trying to diminish the death of anyone.
But even in % no transwomen has been killed since 2018 in NZ while every other week a women is found dead, somewhere. Every year.
Women get beaten, kids get beaten every other month to death in NZ.
Most of that violence is from men. So again, we are asking women to make space for a group of people that is being victimised by men. Why are we – women – responsible for the safe keeping of Trans identified people from men, when no one is even pretending to care about safe keeping women and children. Why do we have to give up safe spaces to men who may victimise us? And why are pepole like Joanne so concerned to not talk about the real violence that women live daily and the reasons why women have created many of he safe spaces that trans want access to in the first place and often without any assistance from the state.
The fact that annoys me is that this distinction of the % gets thrown out all he time, because otherwise, many trans people would need to admit that they too live in countries were it is as safe for them as anyone else who are considered 'minorities', like NZ , or the UK, or Germany, and where their human rights are granted and people to try to their best ability to accommodate them.
But I think you are despite it not being your intention. How does it hurt women to acknowledge that trans women get abused as well?
That's you making it a competition again.
I oppose self-ID in its current form, and I strongly believe in single sex spaces. But I don't see why the needs of trans women need to be negated as part of retaining women's rights.
This is hopeless,were have I implied it wasn't anti-trans enough.You have mis-understand or are being a troll.which is it ?
Geniune apology Joanne. I missed understodd when you said bemoanig the fact that I want my rights. I thought you were referring to women, rather than yourself.
'and you wonder why men on this site don't comment'
Well thats not quite accurate
https://www.rnz.co.nz/national/programmes/mediawatch/audio/2018819466/avoiding-the-mistakes-of-the-past-in-trans-rights-coverage
I haven't listened yet. They apparently missed that the issue is about the conflict of rights.
That's right,down played issues women have about current bill before the house,and even mis-represented the sporting issue,and as we now know those rules are about to be changed by the Olympic committee.
There is no 'conflict of rights'.
There is one, incredibly vocal, monied, government supported group that demands access to any and all spaces that Non Males have fougth for since the 1900, who pretty much show the attitude of the above poster to anything that is not total submission to that ideology. And as per the attitude of the lawmakers involved in the submissions hearings, it is already all decided. But then Non Males, are they even human, and why would we consider them human, and do they have rights if we can't even define who they are?
Fwiw, one could be mistaken and consider this a new mens rights activisim, as men are the primary benefector of these new rules and laws that are created. In the mean time, Non Males of all colors, creeds, and identifications are simply self selecting to resign, not compete, and not drink to much fluids lest they have to go to some public toilet that they rather not go too for all the obvious reasons.
Who will suffer the most if this legislation will be pushed through?
and yet trans women still exist and they are different from men.
If trans women want and need things to enable them to take part in society eg a gender recognition certificate in the UK, then how is this any different than wheelchair users needing ramps?
As Joanne says, the problem is with gender indentity ideology, which is pushing a sociopolitical agenda far beyond human rights issues. I don't think it helps women to deny that, or that there is in fact a conflict of rights (women want no self-ID, many trans people want self-ID). At some point we have to sort this out in ways that are good for women and trans women.
The conflict you speak of is there because we have a government who'd rather colonize women spaces and wholesale cancel women so to speak – then actually create something for the Trans community, and not just for the trans identified males btw. Goverment that demand to the point of threatening of prison and fines – that women give up their spaces, their awards, their sports, their meeting spaces to the point where a court ruled that trans women must be included in lesbian spaces even if they hold a date night.
That is not a conflict, that is colonisation. Taking over spaces, places and language that used to be used by a particular group of people to be themselves, speak of themselves and congregate.
The government could create these spaces. Men, Women, Unisex (Trans). It could, and we would not be having this discussion in the first place. But the government does not. So Transpeople – non binary people – and any other identification is now allowed to be where previously they could not be, and women will have to submit, or else deal with the fall out of job loss, loss of income, legal threats, questioning by the police, online harasment without recourse etc.
And yet, 'women' – aka 'non males ' exist. But then what are women, Weka? And are they even human.
the government is taking rights – hard won rights – away from Women, to give these rights over to men. And there are no other words for it. And the only one who has no longer rights, are women. The government has made Men the definer of women, and they will put this into law. Welcome back to the 1500.
Transwomen are Trans identified males and it should not be the duty of Women to accomodate these men into their spaces. Men should be taking care of their gender non conforming brethren. And government should be creating spaces for these men. Be they toilets, changing rooms, or shelters and refuges and prisons. As for housing and job discrimination, take that to the relevant courts and fix it there. And if they don't have the money to do so, bring back legal aid.
So We – women have to do nothing, as WE – women have not created this problem. Lesbians don't have to fix anything, as they did nothing. Mothers don't have to fix anything, as they did nothing.
It is a lazy government that has work to do, and that is to create spaces for trans people, non binary and other gender fluid people and leave Women for those who are women. It is government that on behalf of a few men is throwing away its female population wholesale into a ditch of 'can't be defined, gets called body with vagina, and gets beat up by trans identified male in boxing matches for funsies'.
A lot of my fury is for the politicians that have created this mess.
All of my fury is for them, as without them this would not be an issue mostly. And my question is, why. What is in for the political/media/academic class that pushes this shit on mainly working class and poor class women, as the nice and polite middle class and upper class women will only ever use a public toilet at their fancy eatery or the koru club in the airport.
The ones that will have to compete for a space in the loo at the mall are the shop girls that have to use the public loos there, or the school girls that suddenly end up in unisex toilets with boys galore while they try to change a tampon or a sanitary pad.
A pox on the house of everyone of the lawmakers that pushes that shit on us and our kids.
I don't quite see it that way. I think the politcians have either been taken in by the ideology or are too scared to speak up.
I agree with this view Anker.
Agreed
yeah, I know all that Sabine. And you know that I know that, so maybe consider you are missing what I am saying.
If self-ID doesn't go ahead, do trans people have rights to take part in society like everyone else? What are the issues that are stopping them?
They already have the same rights you and I have. Those that pass already use female spaces without incidents – at least i have not heard of any issues. They have the same rights as all men and women, gay, hetero, bi, have in this country. This is not about rights, and frankly i don't think it ever was. If women don't have rights, then trans women don't have rights, and trans men being trans identified women also don't have rights.
I don't have an issue with the Identification of Transwomen / Transmen, i have an issue with Self ID that needs to be followed up by nothing, but grants access to US in spaces were we like to be on our own to everyone anytime without exception. Make it easier for adults to transition, put their paper work in order (born bio male, gender F or vis versa), grant them access to the law and courts if their 'rights' are not given. All that can happen without remotely doing what they propose now. And above all, stop pretending that Women and Transwomen and Men and Transmen are the same. They aren't. And that fault, is with government. These proposed chances are so drastic that i find it hard to believe that that was the best they could come up with to accommodate an actual trans population of less then a percent or two, into the women spaces of half of this worlds population.
Why are the government all over the industrial world – which funnily is enough the 'world' were women have the most rights, highest earning power and best life conditions and most rights – insisting in telling us that Trans identified men are women, and that no women, you can not be upset about this or else we give you big big trouble. So why are governments and here in NZ too, telling women to shut up and submit to Men in their spaces and just take that loss of actual rights on the chin and suck it up.
explain to me what the needs are of a trans woman in regards to what it says on their birth certificate, in terms of job applications.
Birth Certificate
'sex' M , Gender F or vis versa. There you have it. It should also clear that up if they have an accident and need medical care. That can be printed on Driver lisences, and any other legal document.
(for purpose of identifying trans as to their 'dead' personality, that should be kept in cases of the sexual offenders register or similar. i.e. Alonsus Alonsus, also known as Brigitte Brigitte).
Job applications, the one that i got was, My birth name is xxx, but i go by yyy. That was good enough for me, and besides i was hiring a baker and this transperson came recommended. In the same sense as you and I would identify as women, and men would identify as men. Why do we have to bake a special cake for these people? This is a serious question.
My point is that these people are someone before they transition, and there should be a reference to that person.
And last but least, why do we need to erase several thousand years of womenhood, language, and customs, to accommodate gender non conform males.
They have exactly the same rights as we all have. They have the same human rights. Heck, we are discriminating against women daily, we kill women daily, we abuse them daily, we don't hire them, we don't promote them, we rather hire and promote a Trans identified male to a board then a women. WE call this 'equity'.
Sabine, "'sex' M , Gender F or vis versa."
What if the trans woman doesn't want their employer to know they are trans?
Oh, so women's rights don't get respected, let's disrespect trans rights too.
"What if the trans woman doesn't want their employer to know they are trans?"
That's a question worth a whole post, I think, weka.
I've been turning it over in my mind, having been through the eighties when declaring your sexuality required a lot of courage from friends, so I can understand how this may be a dilemma.
At present, I think that there has to be societal acceptance of however people want to identify, but to 'hide' those identities by passing, is also not going to help for individuals in the long run.
Accurate records of birth, and gender identity are necessary for statistics and the delivery of health, justice and support systems, so I don't support the replacement of biological sex with gender identity. I do support some form of official documentation that records gender identity for those that wish it. The gender reassignment surgery is one status that should allow people into their gender identified single sex space, particularly as they are no longer male or female bodied. It is the self-id access that is of particular concern.
Is it harmful to transpeople to not identify them as the biological sex they identify as? I can only think, No.
I believe it is more harmful to require them to have to hide themselves amongst others in order for them to feel accepted.
In addition, the removal of boundaries in regards to single-sex spaces, both physical and other, requires much more discussion. Trans rights do matter, but we do need to understand what rights they actually want, and need to be able to live their lives fully. At present, the demand is sophistry, Transwomen are Women, so they become a de-facto protected category, while removing that protected category by that inclusion.
I assume that part of the reason is that it alleviates gender dysphoria to an extent.
Don't want to think about the AGP side of it.
Yes trans people do have the same rights as we all do. Difficulties can arise with people living as another sex when it comes to presenting a birth certificate where the birth sex does not align with the lived in gender. Transpeople have the ability to change their birth certificates now ie without the proposed amendment. .
Some must believe it is unfair to either have to live life as a woman or to do the hormonal or surgical transition or get the certifications around this, hence the amendments proposed.
These amendments enable a person to aver that they are male or female etc. with no formal proof required that this is so. I thought at first, that looking at the Maori roll which has a similar provision that this 'averring' in the trans context was fair.
I no longer do. The reason is that Maori, if pressed, if this ever came to pass, are actually able to provide proof by way of whakapapa, certificates, genealogy even DNA. With no requirement to even live as a woman let alone embark on any transition this proof ipso facto is not attainable by a trans person.
Rather than forcing people to not believe the evidence of their eyes why was work not done around examining the existing ways to change birth certificates, examine them for unexpected/unfair difficulties but to expect evidence of a transition or active transitioning?
The longer this goes on and the more I see the evidence of malice, threats of violence against bio women the more I see it may be/is just more of oppression that men/patriarchy have traditionally dealt against women.
In other words my male bullshit meter is clanging like it does/did when sexist jokes were about and we 'did not have a sense of humour', the country was not 'ready' to enact equal pay, the rubbish about male overwhelming sexuality that means male cannot control it and so rape…….women wearing clothing that 'invites' rape etc etc. Many of the memes promulgated by trans women and their supporters are incredibly misogynistic, openly violent and crude like male bullshit often is.
If someone could answer me why the existing provision could not have been amended ……I gather it was around the legal costs around statutory declarations..at least that was said.
I personally think bio women have been 'snowed' by the mighty powerful US based corporations and males of all sorts and stripes…..by the trans community with the catchy rights based argument and by hetero men who probably thing we are 'over-reacting, again…..perhaps even being 'hysterical'.
Not holding my breath that any good will come from the submissions before the select Committee.
We have unsafe spaces in the public sphere to look forward to, women prisoners being raped by males in women's prisons (UK) , by born males trying to insert themselves through human rights legislation into sensitive female spaces such as Rape Crisis Centres (Canada)
Rape Crisis Centre Edinbourough is run by an entire male who lied about his GRC in the first place to get a similar job previously. They then pontificated about 'rape and orgasms' (literally 14 century it was thought that if a women got pregnant by rape its because she had an orgasm'), and that bigotted rape victims need to be re-educated to their bigottry before they could get help. In the US they now hand out condoms to men in female prisons, and abortions to the women who end up pregnant. I read somewhere that some 3000+ males are looking to relocate to womens prisons in California alone. You can't get cancer care in the US unless you pay, but the state will pay for fake tits and a neo vag for a bloke, go figure.
This whole Self ID is an affront to women everywhere, it is sexual abuse made legal, it is putting women back on the urinary leash, and it is taking women out – no pun intended, one by one out of Universities, jobs, and generally public life.
And all of that here in NZ courtesy to the Green and the Labour Party, and one can't actually make this shit up. For the right we are 'helpmeets' at best, for the 'left' we are something that can't even be defined.
Women, politically homeless since ages ago.
Weka, I think those are really good questions. It seems like some activists want transwomen, in particular, to be treated as if they are biological women.
I want to preserve biological women as a sex class and be referred to as women, not mensturaters, chest feeders, birthing parent etc.
I want female only spaces and sporting competitions for biological women only.
I am unsure why transwomen want the opposite…..i.e. to have their gender identity treated as the same as biological women, when it just isn't. Its not possible. Just one of those things.
But if trans people want help with being treated with respect, getting jobs etc no problem.
I tend to take people as I find them, no matter who they are.
' It seems like some activists want transwomen, in particular, to be treated as if they are biological women.'
Isn't this the case though?
How else does Laurel Hubbard get to compete in womens events.
Sounds entirely reasonable to me
Here an update from the female prisons in the UK, they are now apparently reviewing the rule to allow trans identified males into womens prison, they are even building a rather large annex to house trans identified people and youth offenders.
Now this is the bit that i thought is telling
Maybe it is really only the access to women they want, and the right to behave in these places and around women and with women as they like. Maybe they really just want others to validate their existance every day as a women and if they don't get their fix then they get to complain about a hate crime.
And i find it very telling that a court in England knows that women are going to be harmed by these men, yet, they will put the wellbeing of men – violent men who have and will abuse women – before the wellbeing of the incarcerated women.
“to be treated in the same manner of people of the same gender as them” including “wanting to be searched more, to share a cell and shower at the same time as other people in custody something that is in contrast to what would be seen as undesirable to their fellow people in custody.”
I find it interesting that the vast majority of people know this is a bad idea, know exactly what this (or can at least imagine) will lead to yet I wouldn't be surprised if it happened lest someone in a government position be labelled a transphobe
That once again woman are the lest of peoples considerations
this is already happening. Both for ideology and because people are afraid to speak against that ideology (and that fear is reasonable given that people lose their jobs, careers, friends, SM accounts)
Sure is.
So in Rolleston we have, I think two trans women and they aren't segregated however all but one of Rollestons units are voluntary segregation so no real issues there
Last time I was in Chch Womens there were two trans women and one was in directed segs, a little more solid but similar to this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lb6OpRfyLFo
so imagine you're a women in prison and this person is in your wing.
The other was your more traditional Fa'afafine type, she was in the wing with the women but had seperate shower times and you couldn't have her anywhere near mens prison
And why is it women who have to figure this out and provide places.?
Because men simply don't.
100% Sabine and Fransceca.
Oh yes……women again making the accommodations trying to seek the best of a bad job, not accepting but trying to mitigate the inevitable.
It would be interesting to do a femo-linguistic exercise on the words/sayings in this issue.
I first came across it when the catch-cry was 'no debate'.
This immediately struck me as profoundly anti democratic. Why? If something is as good as it is made out to be it will stand up the scrutiny of good hearted people.
No debate (ie no democracy) was behind the case that went to the High Court so that SUFW could be stopped from holding meetings in Council premises. This was disguised by calling it 'hate speech' and was rightly called out by the Judges.
Then in Wellington, some/a City councillors could not see that protesting against people who were legally discussing things in Council premises could be seen as a conflict of interest.
My view is they should be impartial as far as the use of local govt premises are concerned….I see now of course why one was doing it. It also explains why my intuition about this particular person being self- rather than community-driven has turned out to be true right back from 2017 I have had the shivers running up my spine, they are our local councillor.
The words 'no debate' also falls into male/female roles since time immemorial,
no debate about bearing children until your insides fell out through multiple prolapses
no debate about not being able to work when married,
no debate about whose name went on to a certificate of title for a home, no debate just accepting what a male boss wanted to pay you,
no debate about not being able to raise one's own money (always with a male guarantor)
and, most overwhelmingly,
no debate when a man is about to sexually assault or rape you.
As well, like the covid anti vaxx movement, the trans movement here in NZ has some memes, 'players' and ways that are not NZ…..we have imported them.
Agree Shanreagh
yes to all of it.
I don't want to upset anyone but our learned Jordan Peterson has this to add.
https://youtu.be/JB9sfe_mQ1I
Jordan Peterson is a twit, not a learned anything and on feminism he is back in the dark ages.
Just my completely unbiased view though, he makes the hairs on my neck stand up and a shiver run down my spine.
Anything in that particular clip that you found him being non factual about?
It would be very shallow to label him a 'twit' on the basis that your opinion does not align with his,would it not?
Jordans a good man and makes good points. However he was unfairly targeted as a transphobe and so had the twitter/social media mob come after him
@puckish Rogue. My distaste for the views of Jordan Peterson came about well before the current trans issues……at the time when Lauren Southern, Stefan Molyneux, Katie Hopkins and Tommy Robinson seemed to be thought worthy of respect and listened to.
Blazer, I do not want to spend time unpicking anything Peterson says through a feminist lens. It is a waste of my time that I would rather spend reading or listening to the views of people who can recognise patriarchy when they see it and not be apologists for it.
He had had a tough time health wise lately and it does not seem to have marked a sea change in his views, which often happens when confronting death in the face.
I know one should be exposing oneself to all views. Take it from me when the above were in the news, including Peterson, I spent hours and hours researching them to see their views so I could be fair in my appraisal of them.
At the end I felt much as I do now when trying to assess the reasons for anti vax sentiments by reading their views and going down the rabbit hole. It gives me a feeling of being besmirched/mental nausea.
https://www.vox.com/conversations/2018/6/6/17409144/jordan-peterson-12-rules-for-life-feminism-philosophy
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/18/style/jordan-peterson-12-rules-for-life.html
Blazer nothing i factual as such, but presenting info that favours his case. Like I said he has a perspective he is entitled too
but he does appear to gloss over sex assaults and also that women earn less overall.
most men I come across are really decent. But they have been brought up to be self focused and self need driven. Women more empathetic.
men seem to be able to watch porn or visit prostitutes (not all men) which to me shows a lack of empathy and an ability to objectify those human beings.
Your statement that 'men seem to be able to watch porn or visit prostitutes' is hard to validate.
A quick search may surprise you, as to just how many women watch porn.
Regardless there are always differing viewpoints.
The lamest allegation imo….is the labelling of people whose views you disagree with as being…apologists.
Thread
https://twitter.com/_Bryana_Joy/status/1456661231322927104
[…]
https://twitter.com/_Bryana_Joy/status/1456663053240573957
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1456663048513523715.html
Reply to Blazer and Joe 90. I am aware women watch porn. Although not porn as such the movie 50 shades of grey seemed to be aimed at women (I never saw it) as somehow an exciting new way of spicing up your sex life.
I also accept what you say Joe 90 about extreme religious groups, although there is a difference between women being dominated in their lives by husbands and males they encounter and the sex industry.
I find the idea of porn destestable, but I understand that the stuff available on the internet is heavily dominated by men abusing and dominating women. ……..Also I belive there a very few women who visit male prostitutes.
I think its good to discuss these things as its not black and white.
@Anker
As you may have noticed from discussion on recent threads – the two sexes are different, have quite different sexual strategies and engage with sex in different modes.
The extraordinary sales success of 50 Shades – driven almost entirely by female buyers – cannot be so lightly dismissed as you have. You can rightly criticise it on any number of literary and accuracy grounds, but as a fantasy it clearly worked for huge numbers of women all over the world.
It's always been my view that both sexes equally consume pornography but in different forms. Males typically, but not always, align their interest visually, while women through narrative. 50 Shades was nothing new – it was really just a romance novel with an extra dose of spice added on. And women have been avid consumers of these for generations.
The big difference really is that the one form of imaginative arousal is socially deprecated while the other goes unremarked on.
If you go to the RNZ web page,go to Sunday morning then Media Watch and have a listen. My linking skills are not renown.
The last third of that program,there about's.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/national/programmes/mediawatch/audio/2018819466/avoiding-the-mistakes-of-the-past-in-trans-rights-coverage
Reply to Red Logic,….."It has always been my view that both sexes equally consume pornography"…..That's an extraordinary claim, how do you justify it?
Huge sales of 50 Shades of Grey I think means that it is commericially successful. Why this is, we can't be 100% sure.
I have never read it or seen the movie. However I have read (feminists) critiques of it. The relationship between the two protaginists seems deeply problematic. It appears it is about an older man who stalks a younger women and enoourages/grooms her into S and M relationship. The control by the male isn't just into the context of the B and D sex. He apparently stalks her. This is not a healthy template for relationships.
I also wonder about the damage for women who portray such scenes in movies. I note none of the big stars, such as Jennifer Anistan, Charleze Theron etc don't take on these roles. they don't have too. Melanie Griffiths daughter who was in 50 Shades of Grey was a virtual unknown it was her break out role. So yeah I do wonder what it does to these actress playing such parts. Afterall Holywood is full of exploitation of women.
I think you rather missed my point. But I'll leave it there.
no problem
RNZ have far bigger problems than their alleged bias(?) on "trans genderism"……their class bias just for starters…..
Too right,a damn shame of a once fine broadcaster.
Todays paper suggests that ever since the Government has abandoned the elimination strategy, they are adrift as to what to do. I don't believe that this started with the drop of the elimination strategy. We have no planning, financial or with immigration, housing, poverty, law and order etc. None is actually in real terms improving, all blamed on covid of cause.
I think that is should be mandated that everybody has a chance to get fully vaccinated until the 15 December. After that, we are back to "normal" and people have to take responsibility over their own health. I mean a year surely is enough notice. The only logistical work needed is border control in and out the country. Plane, ship, hang glider whatever is used. Resources need to be allocated to those areas and the health system freed up by allocation resourcing by rate of incidence. For example: 100% are 50 beds, Covid incidence is 10 % so 5 beds are allocated unless more are available due to not being used by i.e. accidents, heart attack's, etc. Sounds like rationing but this is done right now anyways.
If the virus is to be "contained" rather than eliminated, the only choice is to manage all surrounding support systems. In the end you cannot hold someone's hand forever because it starts to look like milking the system.
This is a question put by a well known clinical psychologist-Jordan Peterson-'what threat do the unvaccinated present to the…vaccinated'?
One way is for the unvaccinated to overwhelm the health system, so the vaccinated have more trouble getting care they need.
Yes that is the conclusion I came to as well.
Not sure it is a very compelling message to the reluctant though.
Why? Selfish much…
"Compelling message to the reluctant."
Consider this…your family member/child has no help for a condition because the unvaccinated have overwhelmed the health system.
So do you think presenting that scenario to the unvaccinated would encourage them to get vaxxed?
Hi Blazer. Just a thought. The parent could be the unvaccinated party?
When people take a stance for whatever reason, they are willing to risk themselves, yet will go to extraordinary lengths to protect their children.
…the unvaccinated to overwhelm the health system, so the vaccinated have more trouble getting care they need.
At the general practice level this is sorted already….with the Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners setting out the protocols for keeping the filthy, unworthy unvaxxed away from the clean, deserving vaccinated.
If the patient is unvaccinated or refuses to say, then they should be:
The upshot of this will be that many, if not most, of us who are unvaccinated will not seek medical attention at all. (Who wants to be treated like unclean plague carriers, especially when the vaccinated can also carry and transmit the virus? )
So we will not go to our GP for the usual health issues and those health issues will not be dealt to and could very well develop into the kinds of co- morbidities that are listed for those who the Covid kills.
Result!
I have not been able to access what advice is being given hospital based doctors, but I imagine it will be pretty much the same.
All those kindhearted lefties lurking on TS who have been demanding that the unvaccinated are refused medical treatment and can expect nothing more than an area set aside in the carpark can celebrate.
Their fantasies have come to fruition.
PS. What happened to "herd immunity"? What % vaccinated before we get there?
What about those who have had Covid and recovered and now have natural immunity? Why are they not a category on the Pass?
Afaik, there is no herd immunity for covid at this time. And natural immunity from previous infection apparently wanes over time.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415v1#disqus_thread
Conclusions This study demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity. Individuals who were both previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 and given a single dose of the vaccine gained additional protection against the Delta variant.
yes, but natural immunity and vaccination both wane over time.
Maybe I missed your point. You said,
Because the government believes that public health is best served by a vaccination programme that reaches 90%+?
Additionally, the numbers of people in NZ who have had covid is still quite small.
But sure, they're not going to do that because then less people would vaccinate.
When evaluating the relevance and reliability of scientific studies, there are some key considerations:
Number of participants
Length of study
Has it been peer reviewed?
Does it form part of meta analysis? Or it a single study and results to be viewed with caution until other similar studies are released?
I have seen this study before and until the warning on the top of the first page has been resolved then it should be treated with caution.
"This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice."
It has not been referred either.
Doh 'refereed' …not 'referred'.
Why would anyone play Russian Roulette trying to acquire a natural immunity by getting Covid? It might not work – you might die instead or get Long Covid.
is that a rhetorical question or would you really like to know?
I really would like to know. Why would anyone do this to themselves unless they were about ready to leave the world anyway. And there are easier ways now seeing it is now 7/11/21.
Wanting to acquire an immunity from catching covid that might mean you would die, or catch long covid does not seem to me to be capable of a rationale explanation.
BUT over to you.
I don't have a problem with GPs taking precautions, but that statement smacks of values judgements.
Seeing people by phone/video makes sense anyway, but this one is fucked up,
That's just punitive shit.
And I completely agree that the end result will be vulnerable people not getting medical care (and then ending up in A and E).
Two New Zealands. Let's see how that works out.
Right now in Auckland I haven't been able to have a face to face GP consultation for 3 months ; all done by tele consult. My quarterly oncology appointment has been postponed twice now and arranged (hopefully this time) for mid – December. By then it will have been a 6 month gap.
My husband obtained an urgent dental appointment but had to have a Covid test as close as possible to the date of consult.
So we've been living this way for months ; both double vaxed and hoping for booster shots in March.
I have close friends in Hamilton who seem to have been in Level three forever. When one of the young adults experienced shortness of breath and heart palpitations after their first Pfizer injection I most strenuously advised going to the doctor…preferably the one he had been enrolled with since before birth. I was shocked when I was told that they will only see patients who are getting the Pfizer product.
I trust you also encouraged them to report the adverse event? It's useless if not used.
Of course I did. And of course they didn't.
I'm not sure if you are aware McFlock, but an awful lot of young folk are aware of the possible heart issues but feel they have no choice…what with jobs and all that. And pressure from all sides to do the decent thing. And being told that the vaccine is safe and effective and any side effects and mild and transitory and even full blown myocarditis will also be mild and transitory. And of course if you can't get to see a doctor or go to the hospital and even the ambos write it off as stress…your report to CARM will be dismissed anyway.
So what's the point?
We should be able to speak about the very real adverse effects of the Pfizer product… but we can't can we?
Go on…call me a misinformation peddling anti-vaxxer…
WTF has work got to do with it? It's an online form. Heck, you could do it yourself if they were cool with it.
Even if CARM don't think it's linked, they log it. It's not usually about the individual, it's about the patterns of reports they get. But to establish a pattern, they need reports.
Big pharma doesn't need to cover anything up with folk like you around.
Don't understand this…..if he had had his first injection then he was getting the Pfizer product. The sheet that everyone is given says what to do and where to go if there are side effects. Not sure that they advised for heart things going to their own Dr or going to A & E.
This is normal practice already in a in some areas – I sort of wondered why they mentioned it at all. It's really frustrating for people with chronic illnesses, and has been for a long time.
I guess it might be to do with the some sort of rotation among the doctors?
I have to book 3 days ahead if I want to see a GP of my choice. I didn't get that from the statement, I took it to mean that they would be at the back of the queue. I could be wrong about that, but their tone is really that of someone who highly disapproves and wants the person to know it.
What is the problem here? Even in normal times with group practices and urgency your own Dr may not be available they may have a locum or because of urgency it might be better to see another in the practice. I have even been advised to go straight to the hospital or to an after hours clinic that has lab & xray facilities. These words continue what has been normal practice in my Dr's practice. It says they are to be seen by another clinician. This could be another Dr or the hospital, or a clinic.
Surely a person who wanted to see a Dr could take advantage of the options under Manage my Health for repeats of prescriptions, Zoom/telehealth consultation, carpark consultation (I had one last year in lockdown).
Since Covid last year my Dr has operated a screening process in his rooms with anyone who answers 'yes' to questions such as cold symptoms being required to remain outside in the corridor, masked until the appointment time The nurse will see you and then if necessary the Dr will come out masked to triage me, it was sinus and to take me through to his actual rooms.
I do not see the problem with being referred another Doctor. This may be one who has premises better suited to consults with possibly infectious patients.
I have just checked with partner who goes to a different practice they have operated a changed system since Covid came last year with more info being provided at phone up stage to work out the best ways of being seen. He then went to a closed door, had a nurse assessment/verbal questionnaire and then went to the waiting room where there were 3 other people at 2m spaces.
Sister has had a couple of carpark consults in Gore since Covid last year but to be fair the Dr also used to do carpark consults, if needed, with my mother when she was frail (she died in 2010) .
Have other people's Drs practices not been operating with changed procedures since last year?
on this one I have to disagree with you Weka.
If you have a GP who is older, overweight, is immunocompromised, Maori, diabetic etc etc, any of or all of the above, it is only right they protect themselves by not seeing people with Covid and those unvacinated will present more risk to them.
they should say that then, if that's the reason.
Surely by not going to the Dr by availing yourself of the options that are there you are just 'cutting your nose off to spite your face', as my Dad, bless him, used to say.
Many of us had telehealth, carpark consults last year. We did not feel either clean or dirty by accepting these practices but accepting of the fact that everyone is trying to keep others safe. .
I really do not understand the problem here when these processes have been par for the course for many medical practices for over 18 months now.
As I said below I had a carpark consult when no-one was vaccinated. I accepted this, I had covid-like symptoms and also the fact that my Dr looked a little space age-y when he came out. Now they feel that they can moderate this process as many are vaccinated.
The red and green streams at our Dr's practice are for feverish likely covid and no symptoms at all. Not vaccinated or unvaccinated.
I think the medical staff are under such intense pressure it must be very scary for them and also infuriating that they will have to treat people with covid who have refused the jab. I am not saying this is right or wrong but human.
I would hate to be in their postiion and I would feel resentment towards every patient who didn't do absolutely everything they could not to endanger me and my family. But maybe medical staff are people than I am.
Its great your practice worked out red/greeen streams for their patients Patricia. But maybe that isn't want is formost in GPs mind at the moment.
I visited my wonderful GP last week, to get as much stuff checked as possible before Covid hits. She told me that had done all their jabs for now and were now trying to work out how they were going to look after their patients who got sick with Covid in the Community. I doubt they prioritized how can we make sure the unvacinated don't feel bad about their choice.
People have a right not to be vacinated, but their are consequences. If it is that important to people not to be vacinated then, thats what goes with it.
Yep, you may as well clear out the smokers, overweight, drivers who caused accidents from the hospital wards too… just so the vaccinated can get a clean run 🙄
I don't believe that unvaccinated people should be denied health care, and it's reprehensible politically to promote that idea. But, there's a difference between smokers' personal choices and needing health services, and unvaccinated people. Smoking isn't contagious.
it is 'contagious', we call it second hand smoking.
that's not contagious, it's sharing toxins. Contagious is when you end up with 200+ cases a day, some of whom will get a permanent disability.
i put '' around the word for a reason. And for what its worth, my sister life time issues can be directly attributed to having spend her life in cars full of smoke, waiting for her parents to leave the smoky bar / restaurant, and generally be surrounded by smokers all her life. I would even go so far that the smoking of my parents contributed to the smoking of my siblings and I (with me being the only one to have kicked the habit). So yes, it is 'contagious' but not in the sense of a virus. Rather a social contagion, and a physical softening as clearly all my siblings and i were second hand smokes a day after we were born thus leading to addiction later in life.
contagion: the spreading of a harmful idea or practice.
contagion: the communication of disease from one person or organism to another by close contact.
both are valid word choices.
sure, but your parents' smoking didn't lead to 200 people being infected. Contagious has an actual medical meaning that differentiates it from the kind of issues that you are talking about, and it's why we have lock downs for covid but not smoking.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drhkVKlHWZI
Ok Please don't take this seriously. I am posting it for light relief. One of my favourite comedians, Jack Dee on triaging health care for the NHS. (pre covid).
There is no intention or practice of denying health care to people who are unvaccinated……all along in the info about the vaccine passport it has been clear to state that access to food or health care is not restricted.
Some practices have been operating differently this since last year.
No, read what I wrote. We haven't got unlimited resources and hence it has to be apportioned. It always has before but no one ever seem to have asked the hard questions. I wonder why.
Smokers, overweight and drunk drivers are a different category then a transferable virus. The first lot is doing the harm to themselves and also others in some cases by administering a drug/food to their body. The people who get infected are getting the disease via a transferable virus that is not visible to the naked eye and is a living thing looking for a host. BIG DIFFERENCE.
If an option exists to limit the outfall of this or any disease, an obligation on the citizen/resident to protect all people within their family, district, city, country that is within their means is not an unreasonable request. If a person feels that their right is to deny this, all good and fine. But please don't ask the same community to fork out endlessly for treatment whilst their family can't get access to an ICU or hospital bed for any treatment that is urgent.
This has to be a managed risk rather than have a runaway health issue. I mean this is not the first time a pandemic has happened. Vaccination was then and is now a way to limit casualties. One has to wonder whether reason and logic has gone out the window.
You are pre-supposing in that argument that only the unvaccinated transmit the virus.
No, not at all. What I am saying is that everybody has a right to protection and as a nation we have to look at the sum of things rather than personal issues in cases like that. We are talking about a disease that does not differentiate between races, religion, age or income. It is an obligation on every person to do their best not to abscond from their responsibility within the community. I have a sister who is adamant to not vaccinate, that's ok with me. But she has to take precautions not to get ill. And this means limited contacts, family need to distance and wear mask to protect HER. Do you think that is a good outcome for anyone?
And are all unvaccinated do the same and follow their own protection protocol? There is an issue here and it can cost lives.
It is an obligation on every person to do their best not to abscond from their responsibility within the community.
Yup – that's why I vaccinated – more from a sense of duty than conviction. (It helped that I had something of a choice here in WA and could go with the AZ vaccine.)
But stepping from this position to compulsion erases the individual's agency and incurs a social and political cost – that may or may not be worth paying.
It is an obligation on every person to do their best not to abscond from their responsibility within the community.
And those of us who, after much careful consideration, have decided not to risk the Pfizer product are what…?
Sociopaths?
….family need to distance and wear mask to protect HER.
No, no, no!!!
[deleted]
22.10.21…the day New Zealand officially lost the plot…Science died, and those who have chosen not to risk the known side effects from the Pfizer product because of existing health conditions (which will not be recognized by doctors because the Word has already come down from On High that only those with an allergy to Pfizer product ingredients (specifically PEGs) will be allowed an exemption) will be called 'fucking filth anti vaxxers' who should be forced to wait in the carpark for medical attention.
Should we even risk seeking it.
As for 'absconding from their responsibility within the community' tell that to the people who rushed to get the Pfizer product and are now suffering the consequences… and are not allowed to speak publicly about it.
Those of us who have chosen to decline the Pfizer product on health grounds are of course going to practice good infection control and support our immune systems with good nutrition.
[if you want to make claims about a public figure in a heated debate, then you have to link. I’m now past asking for this (and it’s not just you). Feel free to repost once you have link so we know what you are talking about – weka]
mod note.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/454049/watch-live-govt-reveals-its-covid-19-protection-framework
(-5.00)
.https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-22-10-2021/#comment-1826556
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdMSRolWCyQ&t=61s
(about .40)
thanks 👍
That bloody interview. At the 40s mark, that's spin. Telling people that they're safe once double vaxxed, all she had to do was say safer.
does -5.00 mean five minutes from the end of the video?
Yes, you have the choice. Also to wait for other vaccines. But you have to also live with the consequences and not complain about lack of treatment places, overwhelmed health systems, resources being diverted for wage subsidies, border control etc. to keep NZ ticking over for all.
Being vaccinated does not mean that you are immune or cannot pass the virus on, but it does mean that if you are infected, the symptoms become manageable to the majority and can be treated at home. No need to end up in ICU.
We need to get out of this mental prison of being preoccupied by stealth with one issue only. Why do you think so many people flaunt borders etc. getting unruly, aggression is on the rise.
This would lead me back to my initial posting. Enough said.
Agree and nicely put F Waka
No liver transplants for anyone who ever drank an alcoholic beverage.
No ACC for anyone who broke their body skiing or mountain biking.
No helicopter service for anyone who is responsible for their own accidents.
I can only shake my head because these are just emotional responses.
Of course they are.
but this dystopian world were we are going to will produce this exact outcome. When everything is in a shortage they will start triaging, and guess who will not be provided a service or a reduced service.
And we already do that. Women with physical ailments after giving birth are not receiving the same care by ACC then someone who breaks a leg while mountain biking down a hill – sober, drunk or high for that matter.
And so as long as society is ok with doing that – to the groups is can get away with it i.e. Women, children, oldies, infirm, chronically ill etc, they have no issues putting us on waiting lists, medicating our ailments rather then finding what is wrong and curing that etc.
So this is just good banter among good citizens proposing whom they would exclude from healthcare, and obviously it will never be the good citizens themselves cause 'good citizen'.
Women with physical ailments after giving birth are not receiving the same care
Yeah this one definitely irks me. There's a whole history everything around sexual health, childbirth and post natal care falling into a chasms opened up by competing ideologies and ideas in tension with each other.
We are merely defective men, and if men don't suffer from something, no one does. See how that is fixed now, and cheap too. No investments and pay out needed. It's just Non Males.
I'll limit myself to saying that this non-woman got into very deep shit here for insisting some years back that men and women were indeed different and this had many important implications.
My perspective here is not at all sophisticated – merely informed by this simple idea that I find so obvious I feel stupid for typing it out.
Sabine, I am originally from a country where we have not had any rationing of health services and women have 1 year paid parental leave. I am one of those who would like to have a solid system in place that is not from an anglo saxon origin where you show a stiff upper lip until you die.
Not in my world. But we need to take realities into consideration. NZ has a small tax base and a government that has not shown any vision or idea how to get out of this. Meanwhile we drown in debt and the kids will get the bill for that (not to mention the environmental issues).It will not be easy, no one in their right mind would assume this. But we have to find a way because right now, with the talk about freedom etc. everybody is loosing theirs. In case it isn't obvious.
We lost our freedoms last year march on the eve of Lockdown L4. Since then nothing has changed. And despite that, we got us the Americas Cup, some Amazon Give a way for no return and the Wiggles, and gave our underpaid and over worked nurses a run around for a decent and deserved pay raise. We have priorities for our spending, and sadly we spend it on frivolous stuff rather then invest it in our healthcare.
And now we are going to sleep in the bed we made.
And i will not be blaming the people who don't want to be pfizered for the national shortage of trained staff for our ICU beds, and ICU beds. We always knew it was going to be bad when it gets here.
Sabine….I assume you are anti vax then?
Not just a threat but a consequence. Smaller family gatherings and police call outs to businesses if entry to a shop is not permitted and a heated verbal exchange or an assault occurs.
The deliberately unvaccinated are a threat to the passively unvaccinated. The unvaccinated are not a homogeneous group of steely-eyed ideologues who have made a firm decision to not get vaccinated. Some will be merely misinformed, indifferent, out of the loop or have other stuff going on in their lives. We need to try and get to these people and get them vaccinated for their own sake. As usual Peterson heads up to such a level of abstraction that he's dumb as a rock.
Well Jordan Peterson, words fail me.
Could you link to the background to this please?
To respond to the question one has to accept the premise that in fact the vaccinated feel threatened by the unvaccinated.
I am far from convinced the vaccinated do feel threatened other than the exhibiting innate good sense for fear of infection.
Many in the US are wary on a personal level of the unvaccinated as they sometimes do not follow other public health advice such masking and physical distancing.
There are very few public figure people in my life that my intuition clangs about
I mentioned one, a Wellington City Councillor above, you have mentioned Jordan Petterson and please nobody mention Gerard Wall former Porirua MP and arch anti abortionist…….ooops!
https://youtu.be/mbxN6OcBT5I
long covid is estimated at between 10% and 40% of people who are infected. I'm guessing you haven't factored in that.
2% of health care workers in the UK have long covid. Kids get long covid. People who had mild covid are getting decline in kidney function months later.
It's a novel virus, there is a still a lot we don't know about it.
We literally know nothing about it. And it would be very nice if our officials could actually admit that. And frankly, that is one of the reason people refuse the jabs. We know actually nothing much at all about this virus, we are always three steps behind, and then the bugger mutates into a different version.
And thus, maybe saying that this jab is the best preventative medication we have would be more honest rather then sell it as a vaccine. And frankly, it might have also taken a bit the edge of the 'anti vac' movement, as obviously it ain't a vaccine.
You may find this dip into the causes of long covid interesting:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnPvw20iH80
Not definitive, but some solid indications as to why people are reacting so very differently.
thanks, that was interesting. Have you come across any research or analysis on people with autoimmune conditions or PVFS having a flare after being vaccinated?
No. The only thing that comes to mind is that in my current workplace of about 40 people that I interact with regularly – 6 had an unhappy reaction to their vaccination that I know of.
But I've no idea if there is any correlation between this and a vulnerability to long covid.
it was a tangent (whether people with chronic illness are at risk of flare or relapse from vaccination). Looks like they are in somewhat low numbers, anecdotally and from what I can tell this isn't being researched very well.
An anecdotal story of one person, my sister, who has fibromyalgia rheumatica, still on prednisone and has had no problems or flares with either of her Covid vaccinations. She is also allergic to penicillin so getting Covid with the often follow-up lung etc infections would be very hard to treat.
that doesn't really help much sorry. Most people are ok, some aren't, it's the ones that aren't that are being missed and afaik the research on this isn't being done (or at least not well or in a timely manner).
Weka …the guardian reports today that (from a big study) 37 per cent have ended up with long covid, including some pretty scary symptoms.
Sorry on my phone and can't link but someone will do this I'm sure.
thanks, it's not looking good. Some of those people will have simple disability and still be able to work/have a life. Others will have their life destroyed by it.
Probably the same study, reported on RNZ
https://www.rnz.co.nz/national/programmes/sunday/audio/2018819491/long-covid-issues-continuing-to-mount
The Limits to Growth is an MIT study from 1972:
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/jul/25/gaya-herrington-mit-study-the-limits-to-growth
It has been reevaluated by KPMG sustainability analysist and found to be accurate:
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/jul/25/gaya-herrington-mit-study-the-limits-to-growth
Her assessment, Beyond Growth, is a call, not for 'degrowth' but 'agrowth':
Nice one. I don't trust KPMG, but good to see The Limits of Growth being taken seriously.
Growth, and certainly progress, might still happen, but it’s no longer the goal.
Now explain that to the roughly 6b people in the world who are nowhere near as wealthy as you are.
Obviously the only metric of any import is wealth. /s
With an agrowth agenda, profit is no longer the only goal, so then we could use the productive capacity of the earth to feed and house those who need it rather than continuing to concentrate wealth in the global north.
Pretty sure that approach would be popular with the 6b people you refer to.
Whether it's dressed up as 'agrowth' or 'degrowth' strikes me a semantic gymnastics. In essence it still comes down to the following:
https://thebreakthrough.org/journal/issue-6/does-capitalism-require-endless-growth
Section 5
Again it's worth asking – if you argue to impose this massive re-distribution and hard ceiling on human development indefinitely into the future – exactly how to you imagine to achieve this? For literally the whole of future of the human race however long this might be?
High income countries can reduce their GDP easily.
All they need to do is stymie the property market.
I'm sure I read it makes up about 42% of GDP in either Auck or NZ.
An unproductive class of unearned income.
― Ursula K. Le Guin
Nowhere have I suggested capitalism is an ideal, inescapable reality. And I've repeatedly said that it's not obvious that any of the economic systems we've tried so far will work well in the post-growth world we're heading into.
As I've said a few times – from a political economy pov we're in uncharted waters. If I had to guess the coming evolution will conserve the proven elements of conservatism, capitalism and socialism – but leverage a wholly new social and ethical universalism.
The fixation on wealth and global quality of life as zero-sum are from a capitalist, false scarcity point of view. Also, from your provided link:
Both the USSR and China achieved lifting large agrarian populations out of poverty, so by any reasonable analysis some variation of socialism, not capitalism, has proven better. Capitalism has largely got us to where we are now, and still stands in the way of immediate action on a majority of the crises the world is facing. It is important to remember markets and their mechanisms don't only exist under capitalism.
Large-scale wealth redistribution is an unachievable utopia – we know why.
Limiting consumption to reflect the resource ceiling of spaceship Earth is an unachievable utopia – we know why.
Tick tock.
1.5-Degree Lifestyles: Towards A Fair Consumption Space for All
[PDF; 2021]
If applied, the recommendations from the 1.5-Degree Lifestyles report will bring us back to a status of good ancestry. Some of the policy proposals herewith may be perceived as too far-reaching and intruding on privacy and the rights of the individual. But we are in a precarious situation. Carbon emissions must be brought to net zero in less than a few decades. This means we have to explore all possible means at our disposal and design the future we want to truly emerge from the current planetary emergency. The 1.5-Degree Lifestyles report is a bold attempt to do just that.
This means we have to explore all possible means at our disposal
Oh good:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94ZA6ddXk4c
You must be stoked
But what chance to meet the 1.5 degree global warming target?
Yes I am rather and I've spoken to this earlier. But at the same time China will build more coal fired power stations will be built and for the next 15 odd years their CO2 trajectory will continue to rise. Due to their climate and geographic realities – renewables really is not an option for China, nor many other locations:
Yet the good news is that contrary to the hype – in the developed world CO2 emissions per unit of GDP have been declining for some time now.
What realistic chance to meet the 1.5 degree global warming target?
I've put up a number of references that address your question.
However if you prefer to wallow in unproductive catastrophism count me out.
What’s your best reckon for a +1.5 degree future – a 50% chance? More? Less?
It’s your choice to characterise my lack of optimism as “unproductive catastrophism” – I’ll refrain from my usual response. https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-22-07-2021/#comment-1805387
In many ways I'm seeing CC as one of a number of important but not necessarily the most urgent issues facing humanity. Right now we're faced with some very urgent challenges around authoritarianism, covid disruptions to global systems and increasing social polarisation to name a few that leap to mind.
Longer term CC is on a list of quite a few catastrophe's that could kick us in the arse.
Part of the problem is the embedded psychological flaw that we put a far greater weight on negative events or the possibility of loss, than we do the positive. There are good evolutionary reasons for this – all the good years mean little if everyone starves during the one year of famine, or that rustle in the bushes turn out to be a predator. Yet when faced with complex technical problems our collective risk management is very prone to leaping to wrong conclusions.
But all other things being equal (which they probably won't be) I'd suggest by 2050 we should have CC under control. I'd rate the odds at over 70% – if and only if there is a global consensus on fast tracking advanced next gen nuclear. Absent that the odds drop – my main concern being the increasing economic and social impacts of de-globalisation, the disruption of trade, the return of famine, mass migrations and internecine strife. That would be the perfect storm that would cripple our ability to act on climate change directly and adapt to it's inevitable impact.
In short a bumpy ride, but we can choose to avoid the worst pot-holes.
Them's good odds, "all other things being equal" and "if and only if there is a global consensus on fast tracking advanced next gen nuclear." But, as you observe, the devil is in the "pot holes", and our easy ride is ending.
Nevertheless filled with optimism that I'll see out my days in relative comfort – so lucky to be born when and where I was.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/international/pacific-news/454843/growing-numbers-of-children-forced-to-flee-by-climate-change-report
You’ve got to accentuate the positive …
Apparantly 25,000 people die of starvation everyday….there appears to be a 'cure' …it's called FOOD.
Losing 25,000 to Hunger Every Day | United Nations
Probably had co-morbidities…
neoliberal capitalism is a co-morbidity.
More likely lack of a functioning government, and corruption, .
I was thinking of the overdevelopped world's insistence that people stop growing food for themselves and their neighbours and grow cash crops for the global economy instead.
+1 Extractive economies – many left over from the colonial era.
Dead…right Robert…they identified malnutrition as the…prevelant..one.
https://www.bread.org/what-causes-hunger
Yet at the same time we live in a world that produces roughly 25% more food than we can consume. The problem is clearly one of distribution rather than production.
The boiler-plate left wing response is to blame capitalism for everything – yet the root cause is poverty something that capitalism has done a remarkable job in reducing. In 1800 almost all of humanity lived in extreme poverty – now after 200 years of capitalism life expectancies have doubled, population growth is slowing and less than 10% of people live in poverty. Indeed the more capitalist a nation is, the more likely it's people are to suffer obesity than starvation. We need a better explanation.
The answers that on the ground are a good deal more pragmatic and less ideological than we'd like. Things like decent transport, reliable electricity, functioning economies, and rule of law governance. Boring stuff – but transformative.
'The problem is clearly one of distribution rather than production.'
affordability not relevant?
Yes affordability is absolutely relevant – and largely bundled up in the items I mentioned in my last para.
So is the answer for so many African countries, where malnutrition is rife to become 'Capitalist'…..or just more Capitalist than they are at present?
I always thought their access to beneficial capital was something out of their control.
One would think that 25,000 people dying every day from something that does not need a vaccine ,but could be solved by benevolent intervention would be a big priority.
A fine 'so what you're saying' moment there.
Nah – all I'm saying is that if we want to eradicate poverty and hunger (and on current trends we're well on the way to achieving this by the end of this century if not sooner) then smashing capitalism is not the most obvious starting point.
I'll put this thought out there – the left might do better if it could formulate a constructive model of socialism that was capable of footing it on equal terms with both the energy and innovation of capitalism, and the stability and continuity of conservatism.
Lot's of attempts have been made at this – and I'd argue it's well overdue we firmly relegated Marx and his fellow travellers to a big fat footnote of history and started thinking about a holistic political economy better adapted to the post-growth world we're heading into. The timing feels good on this.
I am very interested in your definition of Capitalism,and expressly where it exists in meaningful form.
Everywhere I look I see varying degrees of…Socialism.
But the wealth of those capitalist countries is derived to a large part from their capture and control of the resources/labour of other smaller less powerful countries.
https://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2017/jan/14/aid-in-reverse-how-poor-countries-develop-rich-countries
Yup there is a great deal that can and should be done to enforce greater transparency and trust to global financial systems. That linked article is absolutely on the nail with this – there is every reason to build more fairness into global trade systems at the institutional level.
Yet arguably the reason why poorer countries are too often the losers in this game is because they have weak governments – prone to corrupt kleptocratic elites, weak institutions and geopolitical considerations that put them on the backfoot in any negotiation.
So while I'm absolutely in favour of more global multi-lateral action as the article suggests – top down action has it's limits unless also met with the kind of on the ground, human development basics like clean safe water, reliable electricity, education and basic medical care. Only then does a nation have the chance to build the kind of middle class that has sufficient political clout to hold it’s elites to account.
'Yet arguably the reason why poorer countries are too often the losers in this game is because they have weak governments – prone to corrupt kleptocratic elites, weak institutions and geopolitical considerations that put them on the backfoot in any negotiation.'
'Arguably is right!
Tokenism by the worlds economic powers,whose corporations actively seek out resources and labour exploitation for their own shareholders profit ,definately doesn't help alleviate poverty.
The 2plus trillion dollars the U.S 'spent' on Afghanistan ,largely went into the pockets of their own multi nationals and look at the outcome-a giant leap backwards .
Millionaire western politicians doing the bidding of billionaire donors.
I posted to this in more detail elsewhere but in essence I see capitalism (with a little 'c') as little more than a set of economic tools coupled with one important social idea. (It's when it tips into the neo-liberal's singular insistence that markets can be the only measure of value that it becomes an ideology.)
In brief the economic tools were things like fractional reserve lending (that greatly expanded money supply), double entry book-keeping (that formalised business accounts) and the rules of contract law. This isn't exhaustive but gives a sense of what I mean – think of them as commercial technologies that enabled modern business to exist.
The other big idea was that of private property. It's so important that Marx was intuitively drawn to attack it – even if he was proven utterly wrong on this. Private property creates both incentives and the continuity to let economies grow.
And in the 1600's when capitalism was being invented – grow they needed to do – because while the historic record speaks to the events and lives of a tiny minority of the elites, the vast majority of people lived lives of extreme poverty none of us moderns would tolerate for more than a few days, weeks at most.
What we can immediately recognise is that while remarkably successful at enabling human production and development – none of these tools or ideas innately spoke to the subsequent problem of distribution. And this is where the socialist impulse has played a vital moderating role. As you say socialism is everywhere.
The other days I spoke to a vision of a world in which say 9b humans lived fully upper middle class lives by say the end of this century. (This is not so crazy – if my grandfather who was born in 1870 was shown a video of my daily life in 2021 he would be astonished beyond all belief.) It's my sense that getting there is going to require the harnessing of human innovation, a just distribution and stable social structures – each of these drawing on all three of our existing economic modes.
But to achieve this merger we need one more radical transformative idea.
Thank you.
You appear to give Capitalism alot of credit I don't believe it deserves.
The core premise is…who creates and gets first use of created capital.
Its impossible to deny that it is only a small,select elite(born to rule) who have structured society on the cornerstone of compounding interest on debt.
You allude to 'neo-liberalism' as a replacement/excuse for pure Capitalism.
This standard of modern day living you are enamoured with, relies on infinite growth and material acquisition as a worthy goal for aspiration.
We know that ,today a tiny % of the worlds population control 90% of the worlds wealth.
We also know that to enforce any ideology dominant military power is required.
Free markets,laissez faire capitalism and all the propaganda associated with them(trickle down etc)are an illusion.
That bastion of freedom,democracy and supposedly Capitalism that you admire-the U.S.A empire is maintained by domination of financial markets and military might.
This is not a sustainable regime.
As an aside your belief that freedom from hunger will be alleviated before the end of this century,is not very comforting…its 2021,so @25,000 deaths a day times 365 days x 78 years is a hell of alot of…'collateral damage.
You appear to give Capitalism alot of credit I don’t believe it deserves.
Only if you ignore everything else I’ve written to this on this theme.
relies on infinite growth and material acquisition as a worthy goal for aspiration.
Nowhere is there a rule that says capitalism relies on infinite growth. That's a strawman argument. It's fair to say it's well adapted to growth, but then we can point to Japan which has experienced at least two decades of post-growth see that capitalism has adapted to this as well.
You allude to 'neo-liberalism' as a replacement/excuse for pure Capitalism.
Neo-liberalism is what happens when you go too far with capitalism. There is a close parallel with what happens when you take socialism too far and it degenerates into communism. Or you take good ideas around social justice and it becomes the cult of woke. Or sane ideas around ethnic identity and pervert them into racial supremacy.
Getting a sense of where the boundaries lie is important.
Capitalism does not seem to have a hard set of 'rules' regardless.
Its merits are a debate that can never be resolved.
', how quickly a zero-growth economy is achieved, and calls on natural capital globally peak and then decline, depends upon three closely related phenomena: how rapidly global population stabilizes, how rapidly incomes among the global poor rise, and the rate at which resource-sparing technological change occurs.'
Does Capitalism Require Endless Growth? | The Breakthrough Institute
Breakthrough Institute are an interesting group and I've read a fair bit of their material in the past year or two. The article you reference is a good one and underlines my assertion that the left really needs to get over not only Marx, but Malthus as well. Oddly enough I was idly contemplating a post along those just those lines but hesitated at how to present it without pointlessly enraging some people here.
@RL-I just wish the 'right' would get over their 2 options re geo politics-
1-we will bomb you back to the…Stone Age.
2-we will make your economy…scream.
All done in the best possible…taste…naturellement.
I get it – nowhere have I presented our history as anything like ideal. The US have – like all superpowers – behaved quite ruthlessly at various times. In a world where nation states are still the top social order and lacking any global authority to constrain them – one will usually dominate.
What we get to hope for is the least tyrannical one. And of all the realistic alternatives the post WW2 period might have offered – the US was probably the best bet.
Red , you must be aware , in Latin America for instance that any govt that has attempted these things tends to get very promptly regime changed
"… In 1800 almost all of humanity lived in extreme poverty – now after 200 years of capitalism life expectancies have doubled…"
Since when was capitalism only introduced 200 years ago!? The timing sounds much more like the industrial revolution doesn't it?
Good question – the timeline I have in mind is that capitalism slowly emerged out of the Renaissance era (alongside a similar flourishing in the science domain) in the 15th and 16th centuries.
But it took another few hundred years until roughly the 1840's when the first round of globalisation really took off that we started to see the industrial revolution have it's huge impact on our daily lives. And even by 1900 most people were still very poor indeed, it's only the post-WW2 period that has seen modernity really spread out across the majority of humanity.
I accept this is a very low resolution presentation – and there is lots of opportunity to parse the precedents and details – but for the purposes of this conversation it's what I have in mind when I say 'capitalism'.
We can't feed poor people for free, they might feel entitled……NZGovt/WINZ.
While you did post a hypocritical partisan load of bile I don't for one minute condone some of the responses to your post but it could be said you asked for it.
[TheStandard: A moderator moved this comment to Open Mike as being off topic or irrelevant in the post it was made in. Be more careful in future.]
do you want the day off? Because while I appreciated the political point you are trying to make there, yours was the only abusive response so it’s hard to not be thinking you are still flaming.
No problem Weka – I'll leave it.
Congratulations to Counties Manukau!
Full credit to the leaders of both Maori and Pacifica. This region has some of the poorest and most marginalised people in the country, so for it to reach nearly 90% ahead of many other regions means that the effort of so many in the region has been magnificent:
@rarahsobson
Counties Manukau DHB has 192 first doses to go to hit 90 percent. Sitting at 80 percent fully vaccinated. Auckland DHB 95 percent first dose, 87 percent fully vaccinated. Waitematā is 92 percent first dose, 83 percent fully vaccinated.
+100
Time to let them free then, instead of punishing them, as they've got to 90% , just move to a system of no entry to low vaccine areas .
they need 90% double not single.
Fair enough, just think this passport system is doomed to fail , they are already causing unintended consequences like a couple of events my youngster would have been in involved being canceled due to volunteers not willing to police the gates checking them , and just uncertainty on how it's going to operate.
Have you got a better idea? Now else can you balance rights to refuse medical treatment with rights to public safety?
Broad brush is the only way
Red light the the low % vaccinated areas, ie nortland ,westcoast.
Passports are going to be un applicable as an internal method,
Ok for air travel though.
Un policable!!! Fucking auto correct
The traffic light system is only designed to work with passports. Without the passport thing you are stuck with the levels we have now. That doesn't balance out the conflicting rights.
You cant expect Joe n Jill public to police passports.
The unvaccinated will have to protect them selves.
We expect Joe n Jill publican to police underage drinking in their premises, no different to vaccination status. It'll really be the police who do the policing though, quiet walk through by the force and check a few certificates / passports. Publican will probably wear it just like they do for underage.
Talking to a neighbouring publican about this and he's not worried about it, he sees it as an opportunity to get rid of his barflies, says there's a very strong correlation.
I'm not concerned about pubs ,they can hire an orc or 2 to police the doors!!
It's my kids event that's been canned(I'm sure it wont be the only on in nz) because the organizers dont want to put the lions club who run the gate to face possible abuse from antis.
I am not really concerned about protecting the unvaccinated, they have made their choice. Rather it is protecting everybody else from their selfishness both in terms of spreading covid and tying up hospital beds that concerns me. Yes policing the passports will be problematic but i can't see a better way forward.
Great effort.
People don't like being told what to do, especially by a Government led by Jacinda Ardern. The government should have come out at the outset and said "Don't get vaccinated."
All the contrarians would have rushed to get vaccinated. Then the government could have announced, "Just kidding, get jabbed."
It's a good joke, and yes, there are some contrarians that are that stupid.
But (serious hat on) our divisions on vaccination are nowhere near those of some other countries. Every single MP is vaccinated (first dose or second). Across the country there are (e.g.) mayors who are anti-Ardern on many other issues, but encouraging their communities to get vaccinated. From Hone to Hosking, it's consistent across the range of political opinion.
People ranting like Coutts and Gunn make for juicy headlines, but it doesn't alter arithmetic. The antis are a tiny minority.
This late spring afternoon I unwrapped the carefully folded and labelled bean seeds my friend gave me weeks ago. She teases me. Seven white shiny seeds pressed into moist dark soil. Evenly spaced with three tall bamboo stakes in the tub to climb on.
Hope you have better luck than me.
I planted some baked beans a number of weeks ago and still….nothing.
I think you take them out of the tin first Blazer and why waste a tin doing that? I'd just eat them if I were you.
Grafton Gully might give you some of theirs….I still have some borlotti beans to plant.
There's a little Beruit vibe around these parts. Retired, terrified handy dog and her elderly scared witless heading dog friend say can you lot fuck off with your stinking fireworks.