Richard Heinberg: The Final Doubling

Written By: - Date published: 7:37 am, December 16th, 2022 - 80 comments
Categories: climate change, economy, energy, Mining, nature, sustainability - Tags: , , ,

 

This post by Richard Heinberg first appeared on November 21, 2022 at the Post Carbon Institute.

______________________________________________________

This essay is dedicated to the memory of Herman Daly, the father of ecological economics, who began writing about the absurdity of perpetual economic growth in the 1970s; Herman died on October 28 at age 84.

Politicians and economists talk glowingly about growth. They want our cities and GDP to grow. Jobs, profits, companies, and industries all should grow; if they don’t, there’s something wrong, and we must identify the problem and fix it. Yet few discuss doubling time, even though it’s an essential concept for understanding growth.

Doubling time helps us grasp the physical meaning of growth—which otherwise appears as an innocuous-looking number denoting the annual rate of change. At 1 percent annual growth, any given quantity doubles in about 70 years; at 2 percent growth, in 35 years; at 7 percent, in 10 years, and so on. Just divide 70 by the annual growth rate and you’ll get a good sense of doubling time. (Why 70? It’s approximately the natural logarithm of 2. But you don’t need to know higher math to do useful doubling-time calculations.)

Here’s why failure to think in terms of doubling time gets us into trouble. Most economists seem to believe that a 2 to 3 percent annual rate of growth for economies is healthy and normal. But that implies a doubling time of roughly 25 years. When an economy grows, it uses more physical materials—everything from trees to titanium. Indeed, the global economy has doubled in size in the last quarter-century, and so has total worldwide extraction of materials. Since 1997 we have used over half the non-renewable resources extracted since the origin of humans.

As the economy grows, it also puts out more waste. In the last 25 years, the amount of solid waste produced globally has soared from roughly 3 million tons per day to about 6 million tons per day.

chart

Global materials extraction and usage, 1900 to 2015. Source: Arnulf Grubler, Technological and Societal Changes and Their Impacts on Resource Production and Use.

NOTE: higher res version here: https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0959378017313031-gr2_lrg.jpg.

Further, if the economy keeps growing at the recent rate, in the next 25 years we will approximately double the amount of energy and materials we use. And by 50 years from today our energy and materials usage will have doubled again, and will therefore be four times current levels. In a hundred years, we will be using 16 times as much. If this same 2 to 3 percent rate of growth were to persist for a century beyond that, by the year 2222 we’d be using about 250 times the amount of physical resources we do now, and we’d be generating about 250 times as much waste.

Population growth can also be described in terms of doublings. Global human population has doubled three times in the past 200 years, surging from 1 billion in 1820 to 2 billion in 1927, to 4 billion in 1974, to 8 billion today. Its highest rate of growth was in the 1960s, at over 2 percent per year; that rate is now down to 1.1 percent. If growth continues at the current rate, we’ll have about 18 billion people on Earth by the end of this century.

All of this would be fine if we lived on a planet that was itself expanding, doubling its available quantities of minerals, forests, fisheries, and soil every quarter-century, and doubling its ability to absorb industrial wastes. But we don’t. It is essentially the same beautiful but finite planet that was spinning through space long before the origin of humans.

Young people might think of 25 years as a long time. But, given the centuries it takes to regrow a mature forest, or the millennia it takes to produce a few inches of topsoil, or the tens of millions of years it took nature to produce fossil fuels, 25 years is a comparative eyeblink. And in that eyeblink, humanity’s already huge impact on Earth’s finely balanced ecosystems doubles.

Since resources are finite, the doubling of humanity’s rates of extracting them can’t go on forever. Economists try to get around this problem by hypothesizing that economic growth can eventually be decoupled from greater usage of resources. Somehow, according to the hypothesis, GDP (essentially a measure of the amount of money flowing through the economy) will continue to climb, but we’ll spend our additional money on intangible goods instead of products made from physical stuff. So far, however, the evidence shows that decoupling hasn’t occurred in the past and is unlikely to happen in the future. Even cryptocurrencies, seemingly the most ephemeral of goods, turn out to have a huge material footprint.

As long as we continue to pursue growth, we are on track to attempt more doublings of resource extraction and waste dumping. But, at some point, we will come up short. When that final doubling fails, a host of expectations will be dashed. Investment funds will go broke, debt defaults will skyrocket, businesses will declare bankruptcy, jobs will disappear, and politicians will grow hoarse blaming one another for failure to keep the economy expanding. In the worst-case scenario, billions of people could starve and nations could go to war over whatever resources are left.

Nobody wants that to happen. So, of course, it would help to know when the last doubling will begin, so we can adjust our expectations accordingly. Do we have a century or two to think about all of this? Or has the final, ill-fated doubling already started?

Forecasting the Start of the Final Doubling—It’s Hard!

One of the problems with exponential acceleration of consumption is that the warning signs of impending resource scarcity tend to appear very close to the time of actual scarcity. During the final doubling, humanity will be using resources at the highest rates in history—so it will likely seem to most people that everything is going swimmingly, just when the entire human enterprise is being swept toward a waterfall.

Trying to figure out exactly when we’ll go over the falls is hard also because resource estimates are squishy. Take a single mineral resource—copper ore. The US Geological Survey estimates global copper reserves at 870 million metric tons, while annual copper demand is 28 million tons. So, dividing the first number by the second, it’s clear that we have 31 years’ worth of copper left at current rates of extraction. But nobody expects the global rate of copper mining to stay the same for the next 31 years. If the rate of extraction were to grow at 2.5 percent per year, then current reserves would be gone in a mere 22 years.

But that’s a simplistic analysis. Lower grades of copper ore, which are not currently regarded as commercially viable, are plentiful; with added effort and expense those resources could be extracted and processed. Further, there is surely more copper left to be discovered. A key bit of evidence in this regard is the fact that copper reserves have grown in some years, rather than diminishing. (On the other hand, the World Economic Forum has pointed out that the average cost of producing copper has risen by over 300 percent in recent years, while average copper ore grade has dropped by 30 percent.)

What if we were to recycle all the copper we use? Well, we should certainly try. But, disregarding any practical impediments, there’s the harsh reality that, as long as usage rates are growing, we’ll still need new sources of the metal, and the rate at which we’re depleting reserves will increase.

If all else fails, there are other metals that can serve as substitutes for copper. However, those other metals are also subject to depletion, and some of them won’t work as well as copper for specific applications.

Altogether, the situation is complicated enough that a reliable date for “peak copper,” or for when copper shortages will cause serious economic pain, is hard to estimate. This uncertainty, generalized to apply to all natural resources, leads some resource optimists to erroneously conclude that humanity will never face resource scarcity.

Here’s the thing though: if extraction is growing at 3 percent annually for a given resource, any underestimate won’t be off by very many years. That’s due to the power of exponentially growing extraction. For example, let’s say an analyst underestimates unobtanium reserves by half. In other words, there’s twice as much unobtanium in the ground as the analyst predicted. The date of the last bit of unobtanium extraction will only be 25 years later than what was forecast. Underestimating the abundance of a resource by three-quarters implies a run-out date that’s only 50 years too soon.

We’re In It

Resource depletion isn’t the only limit to the continued growth of the human enterprise. Climate change is another threat capable of stopping civilization in its tracks.

Our planet is warming as a result of greenhouse gas emissions—pollutants produced mainly by our energy system. Fossil fuels, the basis of that system, are cheap sources of densely stored energy that have revolutionized society. It’s because of fossil fuels that industrial economies have grown so fast in recent decades. In addition to causing climate change, fossil fuels are also subject to depletion: oilfields and coalmines are typically exhausted in a matter of decades. So, virtually nobody expects that societies will still be powering themselves with coal, oil, or natural gas a century from now; indeed, some experts anticipate fuel supply problems within years.

The main solution to climate change is for society to switch energy sources—to abandon fossil fuels as quickly as possible and replace them with solar and wind power. However, these alternative energy sources require infrastructure (panels, turbines, batteries, expanded grids, and new electrically powered machinery such as electric cars and trucks) that must be constructed using minerals and metals, many of which are rare. Some resource experts doubt that there are sufficient minerals to build an alternative energy system on a scale big enough to replace our current fossil-fueled energy system. Simon Michaux of the Finnish Geological Survey declares flatly that, “Global reserves are not large enough to supply enough metals to build the renewable non-fossil fuels industrial system.” Even if Michaux’s resource estimates are too pessimistic, it is still probably unrealistic to imagine that a renewables-based energy system will be capable of doubling in size even once, much less every 25 years forever more.

So, if another doubling of the global economy is impossible, that means the last doubling is already under way, and perhaps even nearing its conclusion.

It is better to anticipate the final doubling too soon rather than too late, because it will take time to shift expectations away from continuous growth. We’ll have to rethink finance and government planning, rewrite contracts, and perhaps even challenge some of the basic precepts of capitalism. Such a shift might easily require 25 years. Therefore, we should begin—or already should have begun—preparing for the end of growth at the start of the final doubling, at a time when it still appears to many people that energy and resources are abundant.

Re-localize, reduce, repair, and reuse. Build resilience. Become more independent of the monetary economy in any neighborly ways you can.

______________________________________________________

Moderation note: if you want to argue against the propositions here (and please do), then please present your evidence up front as you comment. This enables robust debate. Looking at you in particular Gosman.

80 comments on “Richard Heinberg: The Final Doubling ”

  1. pat 1

    No more needs to be said.

    • weka 1.1

      One of the best things I've ever read explaining this (in terms of clarity and making it accessible to a range of people's understandings about the economy and the planet).

  2. RedLogix 2

    Population growth can also be described in terms of doublings. Global human population has doubled three times in the past 200 years, surging from 1 billion in 1820 to 2 billion in 1927, to 4 billion in 1974, to 8 billion today. Its highest rate of growth was in the 1960s, at over 2 percent per year; that rate is now down to 1.1 percent. If growth continues at the current rate, we’ll have about 18 billion people on Earth by the end of this century.

    The following two references suggest a much lower number of around 10 billion.

    One of the big lessons from the demographic history of countries is that population explosions are temporary. For many countries, the demographic transition has already ended, and as the global fertility rate has now halved we know that the world as a whole is approaching the end of rapid population growth.

    https://ourworldindata.org/future-population-growth#global-population-growth

    https://www.populationpyramid.net/world/2100/

    • SPC 2.1

      A lot of unknowns – such as the impact of COVID on lifespan.

      1950 to 2021 births

      Asian 57-67M per annum.

      Africa 11-45M per annum.

      Rest 24-21M per annum.

      Any change in the African mortality rate (improved health and longevity) would have an increasing impact.

      It's little wonder the African Union is to become an add on to the G20.

      One wonders as to the carbon impact of the urbanisation in that continent.

    • lprent 2.2

      It is essentially a idiotic argument that Richard Heinberg is making, based completely on exponential growth without looking at economic behaviour, the causes of innovation, what triggers recycling and reuse, and what causes populations to start and stop growing.

      As RL implies arguing on the basis of 18 billion population at the end of the century is completely ridiculous.

      Within my lifetime the rate of population growth worldwide has slowed from a double replacement of >2 children per child rearing adult to below the replacement rate (at 1.1 once you factor in accidents before progenation, fertility rates, and people who simply don't have children). The only reason that we still have a rising world population at present is because of those population replacement rates in the 1960s and 1970s. There is still a population bulge running through of children of the 60s having more limited number of children, and their children having fewer again.

      Essentially all areas apart from Africa are currently not replacing their existing populations once you factor that 50s-70s age bulge in almost every part of the world. Africa itself had lower than expected population growths compared to the other regions of the world through most of the last part of the 20th century. That is likely due to a combination of endemic HIV/AIDs and other diseases, post-colonial warfare, and that as the only major equatorial landmass that it has had continuous extreme climate change since the temperature drops at the end of the Holocene hotspot ~5000 years ago.

      Africa is now showing signs of a braking fertility, just as the rest of the world is showing signs of joining it in extreme climatic change events.

      Reusable resources like copper being used in a economic system get changed usage according to their effort to be extracted. Sure, when we have a rising population the pool of available reusable copper gets increased by mining and refining. As easily accessible resources are used up (and remember that in the neolithic, copper 'mines' were places where raw almost pure copper was able to be picked up at the surface by hand), the effort to extract new mineral resources increases. When that happens, the already mined copper not in use becomes used more.

      Not to mention that higher costs have an immediate effect of causing innovation in how to use less. Instead of using solid drawn wires for power, smaller stranded wires are used. Old electronic boards within my lifetime used to use wire strands. Now they use trace impurities.

      Plus the falling populations that we already have in the developed nations now means that there is a lot of currently in-use copper going to be available for scavenging. That is why most of the recycled copper makes it way from developed countries to ones who are building their infrastructure up.

      Then consider where copper is currently being used in a rising population world. Currently something like 40% of the worlds copper going into new manufacture is recycled copper. And when we have a falling population there is less need to create new power generation, distribution and transmission or to expand transport systems. That is around 65+% of all copper usage at present. When the infrastructure equalises out across the world, then that 65% will drop to maintenance and upgrade levels and demand falls drastically.

      Population growth is the driver for all new material additions for recyclable resources. To ignore it, as Heinberg has done in this silly exponential growth thought experiment, is to ignore that exponential growth over any longer time periods is something that simply doesn't exist. Similarly, over the last three centuries, minerals have repeatably promoted as being a constraint on population growth. It simply hasn't happened.

      You can easily find projections of copper running out since the 18th century and throughout the whole 20th century. On a fully recyclable material? They really are nuts. I can't think of a faster way than rising extraction costs to cause innovation and lower consumption patterns. In fact I can't think of any minerals

      Virtually every growth system follows S curves of some form when new resources open up – in the human case from societal innovation that resulted in scientific innovation. The constraint at the top of a S curve shows as soon as a resource constraint is found. You can't see a single one over the last 3 centuries. Currently the only effective constraint displaying for population is that people aren't wanting to have spare kids when they don't drop dead so often.

      Sure this doesn't happen with non-recyclable minerals like fossil hydrocarbon or fossil radioactives. Eventually having to tap the supply for new sources all of the time will eventually cause the extraction cost to rise high enough to cause constraint or a change in usage.

      But there are a lot of reasons to not use non-recyclable minerals anyway – the waste byproducts are where the real cost shows up. Especially since these waste products cause issues that are visible at geological time scales.You can’t clean them up in human lifetimes. You have to plan on fixing them up over thousands of years.

      Climate change from burning fossil fuels is ridiculously expensive to deal with.

      Cleaning up nuclear waste sites like Sellafield (and thousands of others scattered world wide) was the 'solved' problem of Edward Teller in 1956. That simply hasn't effectively 'solved' anywhere in the intervening decades. The Finns are the first to have what looks like a properly designed geological disposal site actually working. But no-one knows if it will be any better than the sites and trials that have failed in miserably the past. It will also take decades of sceptical analysis of that and other new geological storage systems to decide if they get around the major problem known about nuclear electricity systems.

      But what is clear is that if full nuclear disposal was an accounted project cost at the start of almost any nuclear power project, then nuclear power was the most expensive possible electricity supply option. Since most current new technology nuclear power projects also seem to be very light on how to clean up their waste properly, I think that they should be treated as prototypes unsuitable for wide release only. We shouldn't believe any modern day Edward Teller. Their track record for responsible engineering absolutely sucks.

      • RedLogix 2.2.1

        Agree on almost all points.

        I responded to the nuclear power question elsewhere.

        And very recently a new author – albeit he is 90 yrs old – has popped up in the pro-nuclear space who I'm finding challenging and thought provoking.

        • lprent 2.2.1.1

          Yeah, Jack whatever his name simply doesn't understand the issue of how to deal with containment over time. He is a idiot focused on the short-term and obsessed by power generation rather than making the environment reasonably safe from nuclear waste de-containment over the next 500 years..

          Think of it like this. If he and every nuclear engineer that I have ever read on containment on waste issues was alive as an engineer in the court of James 1st of England – they'd be confident that

          1. That the Stuart monarchy would endure (Charles 1 got beheaded in 1649).
          2. Modern building practices were safe (London largely burnt down in the Great fire of 1666).
          3. That the Thames would regularly freeze because was regularly (it last froze over in 1814 at the end of the northern hemisphere little ice age – when the gulf stream shifted back)
          4. That no-one could fly. It was a fantasy.
          5. etc

          This is essentially the position of nuclear engineers now when looking at containment. As someone who spends a lot of time reading history, and trained in thinking in geological timescales – that just reeks of stupidity. Both geology and reading history teach you that the everything changes.

          It isn't a case of if containment of nuclear waste will get breached – it is a case of when it will. It is also a case of limiting how much damage gets caused when it does.

          Nuclear engineers have a track record of never bothering to think about that any more than Edward Teller did back in 1956.

          • RedLogix 2.2.1.1.1

            I was hoping to continue this discussion on the other Open Mike thread. It might be regarded as 'irrelevant' here.

    • pat 2.3

      It would pay to read what is written inits entirety.

      18 billion at the current growth rate…however if we are already in overshoot this is the final doubling and that total will not be reached because reasons explained.

      "So, if another doubling of the global economy is impossible, that means the last doubling is already under way, and perhaps even nearing its conclusion."

      As to materials and energy Simon Michaux has outlined the same issues.

      https://www.reddit.com/r/collapse/comments/vja57q/nate_hagens_interviews_scientist_studying_mineral/

      • RedLogix 2.3.1

        The reason why population is projected to peak at around 10b (and I personally think it may well come in under this) is because industrialisation and urbanisation has dramatically cut fertility everywhere. Not because of famine or mass death.

        As for the resources and materials constraint – as Lynn points out – this is an old prediction that has repeatedly failed to deliver. What happens is that as soon as market signals suggest we are reaching a resource constraint, we shift to an alternative. Either a more efficient implementation, recycling or a new technology.

        Here for example are three decent alternatives to copper in electrical applications.

        • pat 2.3.1.1

          The reasons for population growth decline are many including resource constraint…and there are tipping points. All well canvases by Donella Meadows in her work on systems.

          The 'old prediction that has failed to deliver' has been delayed by the type of substitution you promote…that substitution is evidence of resource constraint and only delays events…eventually all substitutes meet the same problems…i.e aluminium as a conductor , the constraint will not be the bauxite but the energy/processes that are increasingly constraining all activity at the required level.

          Rationing has to date been achieved by price….Id suggest we have entered the era where rationing will be achieved by more direct and difficult decisions….and that will only buy a little time…..if we are lucky.

          • RedLogix 2.3.1.1.1

            The reasons for population growth decline are many including resource constraint…and there are tipping points.

            I do not understand this – fertility rates peaked in 1968 (even Heinberg acknowledges this) and have been declining ever since. Are you say this is because of resource constraints?

            How would that work when in the pre-Industrial era where resources were far more constrained and everyone was dirt poor – they always had far more children?

            • pat 2.3.1.1.1.1

              Im saying that fertility rates are influenced by many factors….including resource constraint.

              The degree of influence of individual factors will vary with both location and time.

              Pre industrially the constraints were of capability not of reserves….and larger families were a feature (and still are in some locations) until relatively recently, certainly post industrial revolution.

  3. Maurice 3

    So is the cure LESS people or less stuff used per person?

    OR do we just continue to take stuff away from many more people so that the few can live the high life?

    • weka 3.1

      living within our means. Steady state economies with or without degrowth. Doughnut economics. Being real about physical reality and developing economics based on that. There are a lot of people doing work on this, from the edge and within the mainstream. It's not in politics or the MSM much yet.

  4. Gosman 4

    Resources generally do not disappear when used they merely change form. The question then becomes whether we expend effort and energy to extract the resource from the by-product or we use more readily accessible forms of the resource. We are only restricted by technology and energy and in relation to energy we have far more than we can hope to use.

    • weka 4.1

      Resources do disappear. If you chop down a forest, it is gone. It takes decades to replace it and old growth forest takes much longer. If the timber from the forest is made into something short lived and single use eg paper, then it too all intents and purposes disappears both as part of an ecological loop, or as something humans can use over time. eg it is burned or sent to degrade in a landfill.

      Even if humans choose to "to extract the resource from the by-product", eg to recycle the paper, that process itself takes energy and produces waste, as well as generally producing a product of a lesser order.

      We are only restricted by technology and energy and in relation to energy we have far more than we can hope to use.

      This is only true as an abstract. In reality, energy is lost all the time and the materials we rely on (forests, precious metals, sand, whatever) don't obey the rules you are trying to lay down. We are limited by the physicality of the universe and by the paucity of our imaginations and our unwillingness to work within the container of nature. That limitation isn't a bad thing if one uses sustainable design principles, in fact that kind of design is more inline with what you are talking about because it uses the energy loops and flows inherent in nature. But unlike your philosophy it doesn't ignore the meaning of the material world.

    • KJT 4.2

      One of the requirements for right wing views, is to ignore concepts such as entropy.

      • Gosman 4.2.1

        Entropy only matters in a closed system. The Earth is not a closed system when it comes to energy. We don't have to worry about running out for billions of years.

        • pat 4.2.1.1

          Unfortunately you make a fundamental error…we are indeed a closed system.

          All that free energy has to be converted, either biologically or technologically….both are limited.

        • Robert Guyton 4.2.1.2

          I'm with Gosman on this. There's energy pouring in on us, yes? no?

          • KJT 4.2.1.2.1

            Which, if we captured more than a small fraction, the earth would be a fireball.

            Venus is an example of capturing too much energy.

            However the resources required to use that energy, will run out eons before the energy does.

    • lprent 4.3

      For most mineral resources, they don't go away. They are there and available to recycle within whatever civilisation is around. The reason that we've been mining so much in the last 5 centuries is because humans managed to figure out techniques to increase their population.

      The mining took off to service the expanded population because recycling doesn't cope with expanded populations. When you look at periods when populations are static or falling (the aftermath centuries of the black death across eurasia being a good example), you find mines being abandoned.

      You can see the same change in pace for mining in the past whenever there is population increase in an area. Mining starts or resumes on recyclable mineral mining sites.

      The exceptions are in consumed minerals like salt and tars. Even during times of human diebacks you can see those mining activities continuing.

      So population changes are always the main operand for recyclical mineral mining activity

      • pat 4.3.1

        I suggest you listen to the interview with Simon Michaux…you cant recycle something that hasnt been created and recycling itself is a finite process…you expend both energy and capability /capacity and also lose quality …it is not an ad infinitum process.

        • Robert Guyton 4.3.1.1

          Isn't the universe recycling constantly, the materials created at the point of big-bang?

          Are you suggesting that new materials are being added, daily?

        • lprent 4.3.1.2

          you cant recycle something that hasnt been created

          Not created – you mean possibly mean 'mined' or 'extracted'. There are very few places where elements are actually created out of various types of particles. Slightly more places where minerals are formed.

          However if you read my comments. Mining by humans has a direct relationshop with human population growth. If you had a

          and recycling itself is a finite process…

          You really need to be kind of careful specifying your frameworks especially when you're assert something to someone interested in earth sciences, physics, chemistry, or cosmology.

          As Robert points out, everything material is recycled already.

          The continents push material into the upper mantle and spew it out of non-basaltic volcanoes. The core routes heavy elements up from the lower mantle in magma geysers. The core itself mixes itself into lower mantle as it discards radioactive heat.

          We are orbiting a generation III star. Almost everything in it has been recycled at least a couple of times in gas clouds, exploded stars and their nebulas. Most everything will tend to agglomerate under gravity and most likely be recycled somewhere. There are some interesting interactions even with black holes which don't look that persistent over very long time frames.

          …you expend both energy and capability /capacity and also lose quality …it is not an ad infinitum process.

          What you are probably trying to articulate and describe is largely a economic framework in the present day. Recycling is not a particularly loss creating process if you have sufficient energy. Because after all mining itself is just another recycling process.

          At an atomic level, atoms aren't known for their ability to be lost as a element outside of inside of sun (where they make different elements) or a neutron star (seas of smaller particles) or a black hole (who knows) – or whenre they are an unstable isotope within a given time frame.

          You can grab almost any element and with energy and knowledge of physical and chemical properties – extract pure elements out of the most mixed up messes. This is after all how we extract them now.

          We are long past the days when our neolithic ancestors could pick up on the earth surface nearly pure veins of copper or gold or silver out of rock.

          For centuries we extract have extracted copper and every other element at very low purity rates out of rubbish rock or sediments.

          These days copper is mined from ores with a concentration of copper of less than 1%.

          If you look back say 180 years ago, we only mined copper directly out of veins of rock – probably typically around 5% concentration of the rock extracted at a much lower expenditure of energy.

          An electronics graveyard has a copper concentration that is way way more than 1%. After one of our current waste disposal areas has compacted a bit and bled off organics – they will probably wind up with copper concentrations approaching 0.1%. Not a large step.

          Copper is about 0.09 ppm in seawater. If we got a concentrated source of energy, (fusion, renewable/battery) of a break though in ionic filtering it wouldn't surprise me if we could recycle copper out of seawater in 180 years. It isn't that hard. Cuttlefish have copper based blood where the copper is filtered out of seawater. In fact we can do this now quite easily with current technologies. But…

          It'd be more currently expensive in energy terms for humans to do it than the way the cuttle fish do it. But what we do now to extract copper is way harder and more expensive in energy that the way it was done 180 years ago.

          And that leads back to economics. Now perhaps you can have a look at the need for certain minerals in economic terms and then look at costs to extract and refine it. This is a classic problem of break evens. So if we need Yttrium or Copper for something, the the price will go up. As it does, then innovation will get funded to make it economic or to find an alternative.

          With copper, we can use aluminium for almost all cases that we need it for. In electricity or electricity, the common aluminium alloys are less ductile and requires more heat handling. But that is just a cost in the BOM. You can guarantee that the price for dealing with that will drop like a stone if the cost of extracting 'fresh' copper rises. You can also guarantee that there will be a rush of copper out of existing installations and its replacement by

          The same applies to every other element or mineral. Possibly except for the radioactive ones or where we're getting cheap chemical energy from. Those would require energy inputs to store potential energy. There isn't really a point – it is almost invariably simpler to directly use the energy directly stored more efficiently.

          So if you want to make the stupid assertion

          …it is not an ad infinitum process.

          You are dead wrong – unless you want to specify a very long time period – as in billions of years. You’re not even really right is it was looking at human timescales. Most of the time now we already know how to extract anything at almost any concentration from multiple sources. It just becomes a matter of making it worth doing so. Moreover we also usually know ways to work around needing a particular mineral – also at a cost.

          But hey, if you’re justy trying to say that you’re cheap, kind of lazy and conservative. Well yep that does show up in your attitudes and understanding of the universe and world you live in.

          • RedLogix 4.3.1.2.1

            Yes again this lines up closely with my understanding as well. The only point I would like to underline is that recycling most resources is indeed a simple matter of energy economics.

            Setting aside your objection to nuclear energy that we have debated elsewhere, this is one of the critical benefits that would flow from clean, abundant and cheap electricity – the opportunity to effectively recycle virtually any resource we needed.

          • pat 4.3.1.2.2

            All that is wonderful…some if may even be correct but you miss the fundamental point of doubling….all the recycling in the world dosnt create 2 tonnes of (e.g) copper when you start with 1 tonne….and there are loses in the recycling process, even for copper.

            Michaux's case is there are insufficient minerals (subsequently materials) available to replace the energy fossil fuels currently provide….consequently we will have (considerably) less energy available….and recycling requires energy, along with all the competing uses

            NZ produces approx 0.5% of the worlds aluminium and expends 13% of its electricity generation to do so.

            • lprent 4.3.1.2.2.1

              I think that you're completely missing the point.

              What we are are mining at present is teeny fraction of the accessible and economic atoms of every material. Also the teeny fraction of the available energy. What you're presupposing is that the means for using either is restricted to something like 19th or 20th century means.

              Given enough energy or enough knowledge it is easy to extract fresh resources to top up the massive stockpile of used atoms of every type that we already have.

              Given even moderate amounts of surplus energy it is always cheaper to recycle than it is to mine at the current concentrations of raw ore being mined.

              The only reason that we don't currently do more on recycling is that it'd be pointless when the existing stockpile of minerals is already in use. We have an expanding population and an expanding infrastructure.

              The only reason that we had to mine over the last 300 years is and has been the breakneck increase in human populations. Plus a steady rise of affluence amongst some parts of it over the last millennium. This was the breathless and rather idiotic view in 2011.

              First, the figures. It took all of human history up to 1804 for the world's population to reach 1 billion. But the next billion came only 100 years later, in 1927. And after that, the rate of growth accelerated, 3 billion in 1959, 4 billion 1974, 5 billion 1987, 6 billion 1999, and now 7 billion [in 2011]. We're adding a billion population every 12 years.

              If you ever care to look at the demographics stats, then that is clearly not going to be a factor in future. We're going to add about just 2.5 billion to the existing 8 billion over the next 80 years up to 2100. We won't be adding a billion every decade as we have been doing through most of my life.

              The world's population continues to grow, but the pace of growth is slowing down • The world's population is projected to reach 8 billion on 15 November 2022. 8.5 billion in 2030, 9.7 billion in 2050 and 10.4 billion in 2100.

              When I was born in 1959 when the world population was estimated at about 3 billion. That means that we have nearly tripled the world population while I have been alive. We have way more than tripled the worlds infrastructure.

              We've been mining because that that was the only way to add the new resources to simultaneously provide the same things to new generations that our parents had in 1959 AND raise the level of resources at the same time for all living generations.

              95% of the materials for roads, rail, airports, housing, comms lines, factories, stores, cars, trains, aircraft etc now present were not in a useable form in 1959. It has all been mined or extracted since then. Recycling has always gone on. It just wasn't sufficient to keep up with demand.

              But that is slowly going to peter out as the rate of population growth decreases again and again. Sure there will be continued demand due to rising affluence and there will be mining to support that. But even that will fade out. Given sufficient energy it is always cheaper to recycle the concentrations of materials in unused infrastructure that it is mine.

              That is why China as a country going through a massive infrastructure upgrade takes much of the infrastructural waste from the US and the EU to recycle. This isn't a new trend. Japan was doing that when I was born.

              The only question in my mind over past decades was if we'd have the surplus energy to really start to recycle. That has been answered over the past decade. Renewables can easily supply the energy – you only have to look at South Austraila (surplus solar) or the North sea to see that.

              There are still questions about the energy storage, buffering, and grid transport. But most of those are in the engineering refinement stage rather than the "is it possible" stage.

              NZ produces approx 0.5% of the worlds aluminium and expends 13% of its electricity generation to do so.

              A meaningless way to express it because there is no comparable base of comparison. That is the David Farrar technique of how to lie meaninglessly with unrelated statistics. It is how you produce a slogan for the lazy and mindless to understand.

              The more useful basal way of expressing it with population at its base…

              NZ produces enough aluminium for 0.005 * 8 billion = 40 million people. It expends the electrical power for 0.13 * 5.1 million = 663,000 people to do it. That makes it look a whole lot different eh?

              It is still a bullshit stat. It just happens to be more rational than your silly slogan

  5. Ad 5

    What is remarkable is how successful developed and major developing economies are in energy efficiency, and how fast.

    The Top 10 Most Energy Efficient Countries | Quick Electricity

    In order of appearance: France, UK, Germany and Netherlands tied, Italy, Spain, Japan, Taiwan, China, and the USA are the most efficient economies in energy use.

    This is of course not the same as the countries leading the way in energy transition, which are the Usual Suspects from Scandinavia.

    These countries are leading the energy transition race | World Economic Forum (weforum.org)

    In 2022 the global economy used energy 2% more efficiently than it did in 2021, a rate of improvement almost four times that of the last two years, and almost double the rate of the past five years.

    Poverty is rapidly decreasing across the world, with more than a billion fewer people living below the International Poverty Line of $2.15 per day than in 1990.

    It is really, really tiring listening to Heinberg doing yet more Malthusian bullshit and he needs to stop, and it would be great if this bullshit weren't repeated here.

  6. Mike the Lefty 6

    Whenever a politician starts talking about growth it is usually one from ACT or National.

    And the growth they are talking about is their own bank balance.

    That's all they ever care about, despite what they might claim otherwise.

    • pat 6.1

      That is a patently false statement….all political parties lionise 'growth' even the Greens.

      Unfortunately growth is considered the measure of success…and not without reason….our entire system of being currently depends upon it.

      • Incognito 6.1.1

        Hmmm …

        Tangata whenua and tangata Tiriti seek to mitigate climate harms by prioritising a cultural shift that addresses the root causes of climate change. This will be achieved by focusing on Te Tiriti o Waitangi-based solutions, energy sufficiency, efficiency and democratisation, supporting sustainable modes of transport, rapidly phasing out fossil fuels, agricultural diversification to plant-based, climate-safe and resilient models, and economic transformation that avoids growth. [emphasis added]

        https://www.greens.org.nz/climate_change_policy

        • weka 6.1.1.1

          snap. Nice one, that one hadn't sunk in before now.

        • pat 6.1.1.2

          Hmmm indeed..

          • Government should actively support sustainable industries and collaborate with the private sector to increase productivity and wages, fund research and development, reduce environmental damage, and grow the value of exports.
          • 5. Utilise government-owned companies and strengthen collaboration with the private sector in order to capitalise on the growing international market for clean and sustainable technology and knowledge-intensive innovation, and build local capacity to participate and lead internationally.
          • Support and develop the New Zealand Green Investment Fund to help accelerate investment in the clean-technology sector in Aotearoa New Zealand.
          • Support regional development and encourage new industries that contribute to a resilient and sustainable regional economy, such as renewable energy generation, energy efficiency design, environmentally sustainable agriculture, and waste management.
          • c) Government's nation-wide perspective and responsibility towards communities throughout Aotearoa New Zealand: its ability to build capacity in the regions and promote hubs of specialist economic activity in collaboration with local government.

          https://assets.nationbuilder.com/beachheroes/pages/9646/attachments/original/1596420974/policy-Greens_Economic.pdf?1596420974

          • Incognito 6.1.1.2.1

            More hmmm …

            1.13. Ensuring regions facing growth pressures are supported to manage this in ways that promote sustainability and cohesion.

            The Green Party will promote a broader and more balanced approach to fiscal policy in line with both the overall principles of this Policy, and the recognition that unlimited material growth is impossible.
            The purpose of fiscal policy should be to ensure ongoing wellbeing for all and the health of our environment.

            10.3. Implement a fiscal strategy which:

            a) Incorporates the need to transition to a circular economy which does not rely on unlimited growth

            Doesn’t look like they are lionising ‘growth’, does it?

            • pat 6.1.1.2.1.1

              investment = growth …econ101

              • Incognito

                differentiation = growth …biol101

                differentiation = growth …psych101

                • pat

                  You forgot time….time is a bugger eh

                  • Incognito

                    Missing the point, several points, in fact.

                    Anywho, time is factored in all those growth processes, in fact it is a necessary factor. As with economic growth. And they all require investment of resources and some transformative step(s) (HT to Gosman).

                    Think like a Greenie, for a minute and think of the 4 pillars of the Green Party, none of which fits your econ101 label well.

                    • pat

                      Unfortunately Incognito the 4 pillars fit econ 101 all too well which if you are honest you will recognise.

                      As said to weka it is not a criticism, rather a statement of fact.

                      The problem for all politcal parties (and their voters) is a viable (acceptable?) pathway from here to there.

                      Sadly I see none….hence your labelling me as a fatalist.

                    • weka []

                      Unfortunately Incognito the 4 pillars fit econ 101 all too well which if you are honest you will recognise.

                      I don’t see how. Econ 101 is fundamentally incompatible with both “This world is finite, therefore unlimited material growth is impossible” and “Ecological sustainability is paramount”.

                      The Greens have a set of principles, and they engage in policy making. They are willing to compromise on policy but not principles. The charter doesn’t say ‘hey, let’s do sustainability within neocapitalism and ignore nature’. That’s parliament saying that.

                    • Incognito []

                      Nope, it is your interpretation, which doesn’t make it a fact, but your PoV through your chosen monocular lens of econ101 and all that comprises.

                      I don’t need to label, just making an observation that the shoe fits rather nicely and you wear it well.

                      The problem is that many commenters, even here on TS, appear to misunderstand the Green way of thinking (and acting) – it is not quite cookie-cutter mainstream politics and can be confusing for those who are less receptive to nuance. They mischaracterise and misrepresent Green policies by ‘green-splaining’ them through their own reductionist and often binary lens. This inevitably leads to twisting and contorting and thus to wrong conclusions accusing Greens of flawed logic, contradictions, and falsehoods. It almost never seems to occur to such people that they may be in fact incorrect in many of their assumptions and interpretations. This is a fact but since I’m addressing you, it’s a criticism too.

                      Not all growth is unsustainable …green101

                    • pat

                      if you accept that the world is finite then the very act of compromise is contrary to their principles.

                      Again it is not a criticism (or perhaps it is) but the fact remains…if you believe that growth is unsustainable, then you cannot (or should not) promote a misnomer, sustainable growth.

                      but I understand the logic for doing so, even if I see the falsehood.

                    • weka []

                      Pat, by your argument, no political party who has the vision, ethics, and policies to make the necessary changes would ever be in parliament because they would have to compromise their core principles to do so. This would go some way to explaining why you believe that the necessary change won’t happen.

                      It’s like saying that climate activists have compromised their principles by driving a car, and therefore aren’t committed to climate change.

                      Meanwhile, the Greens can have the core principles in their Charter, and still work within the pragmatics of the system. Some people believe this means they have sold out, they don’t believe in the charter and are instead pro-growth and that they won’t lead on degrowth or steady state because of that compromise. But as Incognito is saying, such views come from not understanding how the GP works.

                      They are playing the long game. If they want to influence mainstream politics they have to work within mainstream structures, and they are the ones who change the mainstream by holding to their principles at the same time. This is how change happens.

                    • pat

                      lol…whatever gets you through the day

                    • Incognito []

                      As you were …

                    • pat

                      @ weka

                      its like saying…exactly like…that if we wish to solve the problems created by growth we have to implement actions that nobody wants.

                      That may be a controversial statement but it dosnt necessarily make it incorrect.

                      Al Bartlett had a great list of the things we all considered ‘goods’ that potentially worked against the collective best interest…it is an enlightening list

                    • Incognito []

                      Bartlett was a physicist and defined growth in a strictly physical quantitative way, as you do too and many an economist. When the Green Party writes “grow the value of exports”, for example, this doesn’t necessarily mean increase the volume but the quality. A so-called knowledge economy can have a light carbon footprint and still be better off than one that specialises (!) in producing and exporting bulk quantities of primary products. It takes imagination and courage to envision a different way of doing things and it only takes a little of negativity and resistance to keep on the garden path.

                      As long as you don’t want to consider this possibility, we’re doomed to talk past each other. As you were.

                    • weka []

                      its like saying…exactly like…that if we wish to solve the problems created by growth we have to implement actions that nobody wants.

                      This is a political and philosophical positioning of yours, it’s not a fact.

                      For instance, there are increasing numbers of people who support alternative economic models, degrowth, steady state, doughnut and so on.

                      There are also many people working on Transition networks, or regenag or any number of transition techs.

                      Maybe it’s you that doesn’t want the actions that are necessary.

                      Nevertheless, the Greens are in parliament and they still have their core principles which address the problems of overpopulation, overconsumption, and the current economic model of perpetual growth.

                    • pat

                      And as long as you decline to accept that there is a relationship between the quantity of people and the consumption of resources and erosion of other (no matter the 'value') then you will continue to delude yourself that there are solutions that dont require less

                      As you are

                    • Incognito []

                      More people need to consume more to meet the basic life necessities – never declined this, so it is a strawman. Beyond that, it becomes a debate about what is justified over-consumption and what is sustainable. Arguably, even without any increase in the number of people on the planet our collective way of living is unsustainable. If you cannot accept this then any talk about future predictions or models is moot beyond the pale.

                    • pat

                      Strawmen are not the problem

                      We are victims of our own success.

                      "Arguably, even without any increase in the number of people on the planet our collective way of living is unsustainable."

                      The evidence shows that to be the case…and yet all our current systems (detrimental as they are) are necessary to maintain that.

                      If you believe you have solved the moral dilemma presented by the 'overcrowded lifeboat' dont be shy and enlighten the world…there may be a Nobel prize in it for you.

                    • Incognito []

                      I tried walking on water to rescue the strawmen in the Titanic hoping for a major reward that would make me feel special great, but alas … it was but a figment of your imagination. Those are like an iceberg.

                    • pat

                      Maybe it is me ….but you yourself wrote "Meanwhile, the Greens can have the core principles in their Charter, and still work within the pragmatics of the system. Some people believe this means they have sold out, they don’t believe in the charter and are instead pro-growth and that they won’t lead on degrowth or steady state because of that compromise"

                      Now the Greens in NZ attract around 10% support from those that vote, and by your statement 'some' of the Greens think thats a sell out position but ipso facto the majority do not, or party policy would reflect that…so if its 'my' philosophy it is a philosophy supported by the overwhelming majority of voters…and that is a fact.

                    • weka []

                      Now the Greens in NZ attract around 10% support from those that vote, and by your statement ‘some’ of the Greens think thats a sell out position but ipso facto the majority do not, or party policy would reflect that…so if its ‘my’ philosophy it is a philosophy supported by the overwhelming majority of voters…and that is a fact.

                      Your statement that some of the Greens think the GP being pragmatic and staying in parliament is a sell out is a reflection of your own purity politics, doesn’t really have much bearing on the GP’s principles or being willing to compromise on policy.

                      Your philosophy isn’t supported by the overwhelming majority of voters. People vote for a wide range of reasons and most people won’t even know what your philosophy is.

                      You believe that no-one wants to make the necessary change. I can easily point to individuals and whole movements that demonstrate this is simply not true. I write whole posts about this. The vast majority of NZ voters don’t know what the alternatives are or at least don’t see them as possible. The argument here is about why, and people saying ‘we can’t change’ or ‘no-one wants to change’ is part of the problem.

                      Research shows most people in NZ want more action on climate. There are obviously forces working against that, but that’s a different thing from saying no-one is willing to change. Lots of people are waiting for change and wanting it to happen.

                    • Incognito []

                      In your opinion.

                    • Robert Guyton

                      pat wrote:

                      "if you believe that growth is unsustainable, then you cannot (or should not) promote a misnomer, sustainable growth."

                      Forests grow…sustainably.

                      The biosphere seemed, until humans emerged, to be growing sustainably.

                      Growth, moderated/governed/regulated by natural death and decay, is sustainable (not infinitely, perhaps, but long-term enough to need a fair stack of fire-fighter's calendars to cover).

                    • weka []

                      and that is the antithesis of the global economy’s obsession with perpetual growth. I wish we could just get to the conversation about how we can think like a forest in order to meet human needs, instead of chopping all the trees down.

                    • Robert Guyton

                      Weka wrote:

                      "I wish we could just get to the conversation about how we can think like a forest in order to meet human needs, instead of chopping all the trees down."

                      Same. I have ideas about this. Goethe had ideas about this. Thinking like a forest is doable. Trying to do so, using the frameworks we use to build our towns and cities, transport ourselves around etc. will hamper the needed dialogue. We first have to unravel the tangled skein of habit, expectation, faith and desire we have woven for ourselves. That's harder, few can do it. Meeting our needs in a "forest-friendly" way is doable. We just need to take advice 🙂

      • weka 6.1.2

        The Greens will shift to degrowth or steady state narratives when it becomes politically possible to do so. I would guess TPM will too.

        From the GP charter,

        Ecological Wisdom

        The basis of ecological wisdom is that human beings are part of the natural world. This world is finite, therefore unlimited material growth is impossible. Ecological sustainability is paramount.

        Social Responsibility

        Unlimited material growth is impossible. Therefore the key to social responsibility is the just distribution of social and natural resources, both locally and globally.

        https://www.greens.org.nz/charter

        Point being, it's hardwired into the charter for a reason, and many in the Greens would make the change now if it were possible.

        • pat 6.1.2.1

          Yes some would shift to degrowth now if as you say it were politically viable…but the fact remains the party policy retains a growth agenda (albeit with a sustainable rider)…it is not a criticism, merely a statement of fact.

          • weka 6.1.2.1.1

            That's different from lionising. They're a mainstream political party. They have to work within a parliament and government that runs a neoliberal economy. It's pragmatics.

        • Robert Guyton 6.1.2.2

          "fact" ?

          You can identify and verify "fact"?

          You the man!

        • Robert Guyton 6.1.2.3

          "This world is finite"

          Is it?

          How so??

          • weka 6.1.2.3.1

            the bit in the post about the planet not expanding along with humans extracting resources is probably as good a response as any.

      • Mike the Lefty 6.1.3

        It isn’t a patently false statement at all.
        How often do you hear National or ACT talking about “managing” resources the way the Greens or (sometimes) Labour do?
        Almost never.
        They exist on the premise that everyone should want more and more of everything and one should never be satisfied with what one has.
        Our planet cannot sustain the “more…more” philosophy much longer but National and ACT are blind and deaf to this.

    • Robert Guyton 6.2

      Correct!

      It's all about story.

      Guard yourself against story-tellers who's stories are truncated.

  7. SPC 7

    Has anyone got a counter to concern about the need to bury somewhat toxic windmill turbines and solar panels after their use?

    The Oz coal industry shills are onto the issue as a way to place pressure on their new government.

    https://www.indystar.com/story/news/environment/2021/03/23/how-to-keep-solar-panels-and-wind-turbines-out-landfills/6875966002/

    • RedLogix 7.1

      Given this plant is by it's very nature exposed to the weather, or worse the ocean, the expected life can be reasonably expected to be in the range of 10 to 25 years. And that is being generous.

      The article you link to looks reasonable to me. The correct answer is recycling, but ideally this has to be incorporated into the design right from the outset in order to be efficient. As far as I am aware, none of our current SWB designs take this into account, nor are there any published lifecycle plans around disposal.

      I was talking with a project engineer a month or two back (in a very different context) bemoaning how difficult it was to scale up the pilot plant he was working on. Issues, problems and waste streams that are easily dealt with at small scale, quickly become monsters as you go big.

  8. I'm amazed that this Malthusian nonsense has raised its head once more. A forecast of the global human population reaching 18 billion this century?

    I had similar arguments on Kiwiblog in 2008 where I quoted another book published in 1974, not long after The Population Bomb and at the same time as a number of doom-mongering tomes. The book was called The Next Ten Thousand Years and it was written by a guy who specialised in popularising science and technology. His name was Adrian Berry and he freely admitted that trying to predict how humanity would develop over such an enormous span of time was very speculative. But he thought it would be fun and interesting if he could ground it in known science as far as possible.

    Before he pushed forward in time though he felt he had to give a brief background as to the development of science and technology to date and focusing on the philosophies behind it. He also felt he had to deal with the various predictions of doom that were then in vogue, including Mr Erlich and friends (of the Earth). With regard to the population explosion predictions this is a little of what he wrote:

    The developed world has virtually reached demographic stability, and some of the undeveloped nations are moving towards it. It appears that high and potentially disastrous growth-rates occur when parents expect that most of their children are going to die. Yet the parents are often too pessimistic, and it chances that all of their children survive. But it is too late; they have already allowed for the possibility of the deaths of their children by having several more. An enormously high birth-rate results.
    Now introduce modern medicine to a developing country. Within a few years there is a change. Parents no longer fear the deaths of all their children, and no longer feel that they must insure against this possibility by having great numbers of them. A decline in the death-rate is soon followed by a decline in the birth-rate. Marriages are delayed, the growth-rate slackens, and population stability is gradually achieved. This is exactly what has happened in the developed countries, and it is beginning to happen in the rest of the world. There is a peak year of very high birth-rate; the medical technology improves, and births decline…

    … If any rich nation adopted the Ehrlich-Paddock policies, which happily they show no signs of doing, the result would surely be the very explosion of population that these men fear. Birth-rates are kept down, not only by medicines and birth-control devices, but also by improved agriculture, clean streets, good schools and efficient hospitals. Fear and insecurity mean a high birth-rate. Confidence in the future means a low one…

    … Most demographers are convinced that during the next century, [global] population will stabilise at about 10 billion…

    A set of rational, logically connected arguments grounded in a degree of understanding of human nature that Erlich and company never came close to grasping. Moreover, arguments and predictions that turned out to be right. Not bad for one page from a relatively obscure author with probably no more than a humble Bachelors degree to his name, if that. Something to remember the next time somebody tries to browbeat one into not speaking up against experts with superior qualifications and knowledge.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Bernard's mid-winter pick 'n' mix for Tuesday, June 25
    Confidence about future job availability collapsed after Budget 2024 to lows last seen during the the Global Financial Crisis of 2008/09. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: Employee confidence in more jobs being available in a year’s time collapsed in the first two weeks of June after the Budget, falling ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    4 hours ago
  • “I Don't Care”
    Walking through the rooms in my headI came across your image,You looked at me with that sweet smile and saidSomething they won't let me repeatWe hurt the ones we love the mostIts a subtle form of complimentAfter you’ve watched Christopher Luxon for a while you think to yourself - that ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    4 hours ago
  • Gordon Campbell on cancer drugs, and the Great Ferries Cancellation Disaster of ’23
    The decision taken last December to cancel the contract for the two purpose-built Cook Strait ferries – without having a Plan B in mind, let alone in place – has been a calamity that’s going to haunt New Zealand for decades to come, long after the Luxon government has been ...
    WerewolfBy lyndon
    4 hours ago
  • June-24 AT Board Meeting
    Today the Auckland Transport board meets again,so I’ve taken a look through the items on their public agenda to see what’s interesting. Musical Chairs The first item of note is another change to the make-up of the AT Board. The legislation that established Auckland Transport allows for Waka Kotahi to ...
    6 hours ago
  • Colonial oppression in Kanaky
    How does France deal with opponents of its colonisation of the Pacific? Arrest them and deport them to France to face prosecution in a foreign court: A group of pro-independence leaders charged with allegedly organising protests that turned into violent unrest in New Caledonia last month was indicted on ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    21 hours ago
  • Media Link: Post-pandemic economics and the rise of national populism” on “A View from Afar.”
    On this edition of AVFA Selwyn Manning and I discuss post-pandemic economics and the rise of national populism. It seems that a post-pandemic turn to more nationalist economic policies may have encouraged the rise of populists who use xenophobia and … Continue reading ...
    KiwipoliticoBy Pablo
    21 hours ago
  • Climate Change: National’s vice-signalling
    Two weeks ago the climate denier government announced they would be giving farmers what they want and removing agriculture from the ETS. On Friday they introduced the bill for it to the House. Due to past efforts and backdowns, the Climate Change Response Act has a lot of inactive clauses ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    23 hours ago
  • The Left’s Joyous Cherub: Keith Locke, 1944 – 2024.
    The Struggle Continues: Keith Locke belonged to a generation that still believed in a world that could be, through struggle, relieved of its chains. That struggle constituted the core of a life lived with purpose, courage and determination. MANY NEW ZEALANDERS would, no doubt, have been surprised to discover that Keith Locke was ...
    23 hours ago
  • The Night Before Yule: A Reprint
    A couple of my stories – A Breath Through Silver, and The Last Libation – have previously earned themselves reprints. Well, I am pleased to report that the nice people at Heroic Fantasy Quarterly (https://www.heroicfantasyquarterly.com/) have included my narrative horror-poem, The Night Before Yule, in their newly-compiled Best Of anthology. ...
    24 hours ago
  • Bernard’s mid-winter pick ‘n’ mix for Monday, June 24
    TL;DR: Responding to the grounding of the Aratere over the weekend, the Government has signalled it will buy new replacement ferries, but only enough to replace existing freight capacity.That would effectively limit Aotearoa-NZ’s ability to handle any growth in population or the need to reduce emissions by shifting freight from ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 day ago
  • Greater Auckland 2.0 – we need your help!
    Hi, we’re Greater Auckland. We’ve been a part of the landscape for over 15 years now. Over that time, we’ve provided informed commentary, evidence-based analysis, and inspiring visions for the future of Tāmaki Makaurau. You might know us from such hits as: The Congestion-Free Network 2013 (and its 2017 ...
    Greater AucklandBy Greater Auckland
    1 day ago
  • Distractions and Inaction.
    Fancy, a fast carA bag full of lootI can nearly guaranteeYou'll end up with the bootThe Prime Minister arrived home, perhaps a bit surprised, maybe even secretly a little pleased at the diversion, to find the country falling apart. Things going more badly that even his c-list, self back-slapping, trip ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    1 day ago
  • KiwiRail aground while Government obfuscates
    The problems at KiwiRail go further and deeper than the maintenance issue, which caused the inter-island ferry Aratere to run aground on Saturday. The company is also the subject of a damning report published last week about the way it runs its rail operations from the Transport Accident Investigation Commission. ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    1 day ago
  • 2024 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #25
    A listing of 32 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, June 16, 2024 thru Sat, June 22, 2024. Stories we promoted this week, by publication date: Before June 16 ‘Unprecedented mass coral bleaching’ expected in 2024, says expert, ...
    2 days ago
  • The Realm Of The Possible.
    The People’s House: What would it be like to live in a country where a single sermon could prick the conscience of the comfortable? Where a journalist could rouse a whole city to action? Where the government could be made to respond to the people’s concerns? Where real change was possible? And ...
    2 days ago
  • Public Service Day
    Good morn or evening friendsHere's your friendly announcerI have serious news to pass on to everybodyWhat I'm about to sayCould mean the world's disasterCould change your joy and laughter to tears and painIt's thatLove's in need of love todayDon't delaySend yours in right awayHate's goin' 'roundBreaking many heartsStop it pleaseBefore ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    2 days ago
  • When is a road of National significance not a road of National significance?
    I loved everything about my first Cook Strait ferry crossing: a day parked in the car in howling Wellington wind and driving Wellington rain, waiting to hear if they were going to sail or not; watching the huge black ministerial limousines come and go; listening to the adventures of Chicken ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    2 days ago
  • Fact Brief – Was the Medieval Warm Period a global event?
    Skeptical Science is partnering with Gigafact to produce fact briefs — bite-sized fact checks of trending claims. This fact brief was written by John Mason in collaboration with members from the Gigafact team. You can submit claims you think need checking via the tipline. Was the Medieval Warm Period a global ...
    3 days ago
  • Aotearoa Runs Aground
    Your face has fallen sad nowFor you know the time is nighWhen I must remove your wingsAnd you, you must try to flyCome sail your ships around meAnd burn your bridges downWe make a little history, babyEvery time you come aroundWhen I went to bed last night I thought the ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    3 days ago
  • Wagon keeps movin'
    Hello! Here comes the Saturday edition of More Than A Feilding, catching you up on the past somewhat interrupted week. Still on the move!Share Read more ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    3 days ago
  • Mainstreaming Māori
    Mainstreaming need not be inherently anti-Māori. It will be if it is done badly because it will be anti-those-in need, and proportionally more of them are Māori.That the Coalition Government says it will deliver public services on the basis of need rather than, say, race deserves consideration, even though many ...
    PunditBy Brian Easton
    4 days ago
  • National says “fuck you”
    The Justice Committee has reported back on the government's racist bill to eliminate Māori representation in local government. The report duly notes the Waitangi Tribunal's finding that the bill breaches te Tiriti, and the bill's inconsistency with our international human rights obligations - and then proceeds to ignore both. Instead, ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    4 days ago
  • Christopher Luxon is – Big in Japan
    This week our Prime Minister Christopher Luxon… mmm, let’s take a moment to consider just how good that sounds. Hope you weren’t eating.Anyway that guy. Better? That bloke from the telly, he said - what I would say to you is… I’m big in Japan. My kind of people, hard ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    4 days ago
  • Weekly Roundup 21-June-2024
    Tis the winter solstice! The shortest day and longest night of the year. The good news: we’re on our way back to summertime. Here’s another roundup of stories to brighten up your Friday. Our header image is from CRL and shows Waihorotiu Station lit up for Matariki 2024 The ...
    Greater AucklandBy Greater Auckland
    4 days ago
  • Bernard’s mid-winter pick ‘n’ mix for Friday, June 21
    Our economic momentum remains anaemic, and it’s possible the tiny increase in GDP was a ‘dead cat bounce’. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: Per-capita GDP has fallen 4.3% from its peak over the last 21 months, which is more than it it fell in the Global Financial Crisis recession ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    4 days ago
  • The Futility of Punishment
    Hi,I was in Texas recently and couldn’t stop thinking about how in some parts of America they really like to kill their prisoners. As a society we tend to agree murder is wrong, but somewhere along the way Texas figured it’s fine if it’s after 6pm and the killing is ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    4 days ago
  • The new Beehive approach to the environment
    A persistent theme has been weaving between the Committee rooms at Parliament all this so-called “Scrutiny” week as MPs have probed Ministers and agencies about their work and plans. The question has been simply what the environmental price might be if the country begins to accelerate its infrastructure building to ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    4 days ago
  • Skeptical Science New Research for Week #25 2024
    Open access notables Climate Change Is Leading to a Convergence of Global Climate Distribution, Li et al., Geophysical Research Letters: The impact of changes in global temperatures and precipitation on climate distribution remains unclear. Taking the annual global average temperatures and precipitation as the origin, this study determined the climate distribution with the ...
    5 days ago
  • You take nicer pictures when you’re not drunk
    Readers keeping count will know it's more than five years since I gave up booze. Some of you get worried on my behalf when I recount a possibly testing moment. Anxious readers: today I got well tested.All the way across France I've been enquiring in my very polite and well-meaning but ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    5 days ago
  • Cancer
    Turn awayIf you could, get me a drinkOf water 'cause my lips are chapped and fadedCall my Aunt MarieHelp her gather all my thingsAnd bury me in all my favourite coloursMy sisters and my brothers, stillI will not kiss you'Cause the hardest part of this is leaving youI remember the ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    5 days ago
  • Gordon Campbell on why we shouldn’t buy new planes for the PM
    Its not often that one has to agree with Judith Collins, but yes, it would indeed cost “hundreds of millions of dollars” (at least) to buy replacement aircraft to fly the Prime Minister on his overseas missions of diplomacy and trade. And yes, the public might well regard that spending ...
    WerewolfBy lyndon
    5 days ago
  • The Stadium Debate – What About the Transport Options?
    A few weeks ago, Auckland Council took another step in the long-running stadium saga, narrowing its shortlist down to two options for which they will now seek feasibility studies. The recommendation to move forward with a feasibility study was carried twenty to one by the council’s Governing Body for the ...
    5 days ago
  • Bernard’s mid-winter pick ‘n’ mix for Thursday, June 20
    Social Development Minister Louise Upston has defended the Government’s decision to save money by dumping a programme which tops up the pay of disabled workers. Photo: Lynn GrievesonTL;DR: It has emerged the National-ACT-NZ First Government decided to cut wages for disabled workers from the minimum wage to $2 an hour ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    5 days ago
  • Where the power really resides in Wellington
    The new Chief Executive of the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (DPMC) yesterday gave a Select Committee a brutally frank outline of the department’s role as the agency right at the centre of power in Wellington. Ben King, formerly a deputy Chief Executive at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    5 days ago
  • Climate Adam: Why we're still losing the fight against Methane
    This video includes conclusions of the creator climate scientist Dr. Adam Levy. It is presented to our readers as an informed perspective. Please see video description for references (if any). Carbon dioxide is the main culprit behind climate change. But in second place is methane: a greenhouse gas stronger than CO2, ...
    6 days ago
  • Climate Change: More ETS failure
    A few weeks ago, I blogged about the (then) upcoming ETS auction, raising the prospect of it failing, leaving the government with a messy budget hole. The auction was today, and indeed, it failed. In fact, it was such a failure that no-one even bothered to bid. Its easy to ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • The Return of Jacinda.
    Oh, take me, take me, take meTo the dreamer's ballI'll be right on time and I'll dress so fineYou're gonna love me when you see meI won't have to worryTake me, take mePromise not to wake me'Til it's morningIt's all been trueEarly morning yesterday, well before dawn, doom-scrolling.Not intentionally, that’s ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    6 days ago
  • How good is the interim NW busway?
    This is a guest post by Pshem Kowalczyk, a long-time follower of the blog. With great fanfare, just over six months ago (on 12 November 2023), AT launched its interim busway for the NorthWest region, with the new WX express service at the heart of the changes. I live ...
    Greater AucklandBy Guest Post
    6 days ago
  • Consumer confidence collapses after Budget, in contrast with rest of world
    The first widespread survey of consumers and voters since the Budget on May 30 shows a collapse in confidence. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The belt-tightening and tax-cutting Budget delivered on May 30 has not delivered the boost to confidence in the economy the National-ACT-NZ First Government might have ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    6 days ago
  • The end for the Air Force 757s
    The Air Force 757 that broke down with the Prime Minister on board in Port Moresby on Sunday is considered so unreliable that it carries a substantial stock of spare parts when it travels overseas. And the plane also carries an Air Force maintenance team on board ready to make ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    6 days ago
  • At a glance – Was 1934 the hottest year on record?
    On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
    7 days ago
  • It's not New Zealand they've never heard of, it's him
    Sometimes you’ll just be so dog-tired, you can only keep yourself awake with a short stab of self-inflicted pain.A quick bite of the lip, for instance.Maybe a slight bite on the tongue or a dig of the nails.But what if you’re needing something a bit more painful?The solution is as ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    7 days ago
  • Some “scrutiny” II
    Last month I blogged about the Ministry of Justice's Open Government Partnership commitment to strengthen scrutiny of Official Information Act exemption clauses in legislation", and how their existing efforts did not give much reason for confidence. As part of that, I mentioned that I had asked the Ministry for its ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    7 days ago
  • Gordon Campbell on why the Biden “peace plan” for Gaza is doomed
    After months and months of blocking every attempt by the UN and everyone else to achieve a Gaza ceasefire, US President Joe Biden is now marketing his own three-stage “peace plan” to end the conflict. Like every other contribution by the US since October 7, the Biden initiative is hobbled ...
    WerewolfBy lyndon
    1 week ago
  • Raised crossings: hearing the voice of vulnerable pedestrians
    This is a guest post by Vivian Naylor, who is the Barrier Free Advisor and Educator at CCS Disability Action, Northern Region, the largest disability support and advocacy organisation in Aotearoa New Zealand. She also advises on AT’s Public Transport and Capital Projects Accessibility Groups. Vivian has been advocating and ...
    Greater AucklandBy Guest Post
    1 week ago
  • Leaving on a Jet Plane
    So kiss me and smile for meTell me that you'll wait for meHold me like you'll never let me go'Cause I'm leavin' on a jet planeDon't know when I'll be back againOh babe, I hate to go“The true measure of any society can be found in how it treats its ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    1 week ago
  • Bernard's mid-winter pick 'n' mix for Tuesday, June 18
    The election promises of ‘better economic management’ are now ringing hollow, as NZ appears to be falling into a deeper recession, while other economies are turning the corner. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The economy and the housing market are slumping back into a deep recession this winter, contrasting ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 week ago
  • Scrutiny week off to rocky start
    Parliament’s new “Scrutiny” process, which is supposed to allow Select Committees to interrogate Ministers and officials in much more depth, has got off to a rocky start. Yesterday was the first day of “Scrutiny Week” which is supposed to see the Government grilled on how it spends taxpayers’ money and ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    1 week ago
  • The choice could not be more stark’: How Trump and Biden compare on climate change
    This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Barbara Grady Illustration by Samantha Harrington. Photo credits: Justin Lane-Pool/Getty Images, Win McNamee/Getty Images, European Space Agency. In an empty wind-swept field in Richmond, California, next to the county landfill, a company called RavenSr has plotted out land and won ...
    1 week ago
  • Differentiating between democracy and republic
    Although NZ readers may not be that interested in the subject and in lieu of US Fathers Day missives (not celebrated in NZ), I thought I would lay out some brief thoughts on a political subject being debated in the … Continue reading ...
    KiwipoliticoBy Pablo
    1 week ago
  • Bernard's mid-winter pick 'n' mix for Monday, June 17
    TL;DR: Chris Bishop talks up the use of value capture, congestion charging, PPPs, water meters, tolling and rebating GST on building materials to councils to ramp up infrastructure investment in the absence of the Government simply borrowing more to provide the capital.Meanwhile, Christopher Luxon wants to double the number of ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 week ago
  • You do have the power to change things
    When I was invited to come aboard and help with Greater Auckland a few months ago (thanks to Patrick!), it was suggested it might be a good idea to write some sort of autobiographical post by way of an introduction. This post isn’t quite that – although I’m sure I’lll ...
    Greater AucklandBy Connor Sharp
    1 week ago
  • Turning Away – Who Cares If We Don't?
    On the turning awayFrom the pale and downtroddenAnd the words they say which we won't understandDon't accept that, what's happeningIs just a case of other's sufferingOr you'll find that you're joining inThe turning awayToday’s guest kōrero is from Author Catherine Lea. So without further ado, over to Catherine…I’m so honoured ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    1 week ago
  • Dissecting Tickled
    Hi,Tickled was one of the craziest things that ever happened to me (and I feel like a lot of crazy things have happened to me).So ahead of the Webworm popup and Tickled screening in New Zealand on July 13, I thought I’d write about how we made that film and ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    1 week ago
  • New Zealand Webworm Popup + Tickled!
    Hi,I’m doing a Webworm merch popup followed by a Tickled screening in Auckland, New Zealand on July 13th — and I’d love you to come. I got the urge to do this while writing this Webworm piece breaking down how we made Tickled, and talking to all the people who ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    1 week ago
  • What China wants from NZ business
    One simple statistic said it all: China Premier Li Qiang asked Fonterra CEO Miles Hurrell what percentage of the company’s overall sales were made in China. “Thirty per cent,” said Hurrell. In other words, New Zealand’s largest company is more or less dependent on the Chinese market. But Hurrell is ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    1 week ago
  • Review: The Worm Ouroboros, by E.R. Eddison (1922)
    One occasionally runs into the question of what J.R.R. Tolkien would have thought of George R.R. Martin. For years, I had a go-to online answer: we could use a stand-in. Tolkien’s thoughts on E.R. Eddison – that he appreciated the invented world, but thought the invented names were silly, and ...
    1 week ago
  • 2024 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #24
    A listing of 35 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, June 9, 2024 thru Sat, June 15, 2024. Story of the week A glance at this week's inventory of what experts tell us is extreme weather mayhem juiced by ...
    1 week ago
  • Sunday Morning Chat
    After a busy week it’s a good day to relax. Clear blues skies here in Tamaki Makaurau, very peaceful but for my dogs sleeping heavily. In the absence of a full newsletter I thought I’d send out a brief update and share a couple of posts that popped up in ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    1 week ago
  • The Book of Henry
    Now in the land of Angus beef and the mighty ABsWhere the steaks were juicy and the rivers did run foulIt would often be said,This meal is terrible,andNo, for real this is legit the worst thing I've ever eatenBut this was an thing said only to others at the table,not ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    1 week ago
  • Fact Brief – Is ocean acidification from human activities enough to impact marine ecosystems?
    Skeptical Science is partnering with Gigafact to produce fact briefs — bite-sized fact checks of trending claims. This fact brief was written by Sue Bin Park in collaboration with members from the Skeptical Science team. You can submit claims you think need checking via the tipline. Is ocean acidification from human ...
    1 week ago
  • Happiness is a Warm Gun
    She's not a girl who misses muchDo do do do do do, oh yeahShe's well-acquainted with the touch of the velvet handLike a lizard on a window paneI wouldn’t associate ACT with warmth, other than a certain fabled, notoriously hot, destination where surely they’re heading and many would like them ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    1 week ago
  • Still doing a good 20
    Hello! Here comes the Saturday edition of More Than A Feilding, catching you up on the past somewhat interrupted week. Still on the move!Share Read more ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    1 week ago
  • Coalition of the Unwilling?
    What does Budget 2024 tell us about the current government? Muddle on?Coalition governments are not new. About 50 percent of the time since the first MMP election, there has been a minority government, usually with allied parties holding ministerial portfolios outside cabinets. For 10 percent of the time there was ...
    PunditBy Brian Easton
    2 weeks ago
  • Of red flags and warning signs in comments on social media
    Somewhat surprisingly for what is regarded as a network of professionals, climate science misinformation is getting shared on LinkedIn, joining other channels where this is happening. Several of our recent posts published on LinkedIn have attracted the ire of various commenters who apparently are in denial about human-caused climate change. Based ...
    2 weeks ago
  • All good, still
    1. On what subject is Paul Henry even remotely worth giving the time of day?a. The state of our nationb. The state of the ACT partyc. How to freak out potential buyers of your gin palace by baking the remains of your deceased parent into its fittings2. Now that New ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    2 weeks ago
  • The looting is the point
    Last time National was in power, they looted the state, privatising public assets and signing hugely wasteful public-private partnership (PPP) contracts which saw foreign consortiums provide substandard infrastructure while gouging us for profits. You only have to look at the ongoing fiasco of Transmission Gully to see how it was ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • The Illusion of Power: How Local Government Bureaucrats Overawe Democratically-Elected Councillors..
    The Democratic Façade Of Local Government: Our district and city councillors are democratically elected to govern their communities on one very strict condition – that they never, ever, under any circumstances, attempt to do so.A DISINTEGRATION OF LOYALTIES on the Wellington City Council has left Mayor Tory Whanau without a ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Lowlights & Bright Spots
    I can feel the lowlights coming over meI can feel the lowlights, from the state I’m inI can see the light now even thought it’s dimA little glow on the horizonAnother week of lowlights from our government, with the odd bright spot and a glow on the horizon. The light ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    2 weeks ago
  • Weekly Roundup 14-June-2024
    Another week, another roundup of things that caught our eye on our favourite topics of transport, housing and how to make cities a little bit greater. This Week in Greater Auckland On Monday, Connor wrote about Kāinga Ora’s role as an urban development agency Tuesday’s guest post by ...
    Greater AucklandBy Greater Auckland
    2 weeks ago
  • The Hoon around the week to June 14
    Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The podcast above of the weekly ‘hoon’ webinar for paying subscribers features co-hosts and talking with:The Kākā’s climate correspondent about the National-ACT-NZ First Government’s moves this week to take farming out of the ETS and encourage more mining and oil and ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    2 weeks ago
  • Climate policy axed in broad daylight, while taxpayer liabilities grow in the dark
    In 2019, Shane Jones addressed the “50 Shades of Green” protest at Parliament: Now he is part of a government giving those farmers a pass on becoming part of the ETS, as well as threatening to lock in offshore oil exploration and mining for decades. Photo: Lynn GrievesonTL;DR: Here’s the ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    2 weeks ago
  • Rage Bait!
    Hi,Today’s newsletter is all about how easy it is to get sucked into “rage bait” online, and how easy it is to get played.But first I wanted to share something that elicited the exact opposite of rage in me — something that made me feel incredibly proud, whilst also making ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    2 weeks ago
  • Bernard's Dawn Chorus and pick 'n' mix for Friday, June 14
    Seymour said lower speed limits “drained the joy from life as people were forced to follow rules they knew made no sense.” File Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: My six things to note in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Friday, June 14 were:The National/ACT/NZ First ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    2 weeks ago
  • Friendly but frank talks with China Premier
    It sounded like the best word to describe yesterday’s talks between Chinese Premier Li Qiang and his heavyweight delegation of Ministers and officials and Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and New Zealand Ministers and officials was “frank.” But it was the kind of frankness that friends can indulge in. It ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    2 weeks ago

  • Government introduces Three Strikes Bill
    The Government has introduced a Bill today to restore the Three Strikes sentencing law, Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee says. “New Zealanders are rightly concerned about violent crime. We are delivering on our commitment to introduce a revised Three Strikes law as one of our key law and order priorities.  ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 hour ago
  • New support for agricultural emissions reduction
    The Government and the Bank of New Zealand (BNZ) are together committing an additional $8 million towards AgriZeroNZ to boost New Zealand’s efforts to reduce agricultural emissions. Agriculture Minister Todd McClay says the strength of the New Zealand economy relies on effective and affordable emission reduction solutions for New Zealand’s ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 hours ago
  • Transformative investment in cancer treatments and more new medicines
    The coalition Government is delivering up to 26 cancer treatments as part of an overall package of up to 54 more new medicines, Health Minister Dr Shane Reti and Associate Health Minister David Seymour announced today. “Pharmac estimates that around 175,000 people will benefit from the additional treatments in just ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    23 hours ago
  • More support for drought-affected communities
    The coalition Government is providing more financial support to drought-stricken farmers and growers in many parts of the country to help with essential living costs. “Rural Assistance Payments have been made available in 38 districts affected by dry conditions to help eligible farmers and growers whose income has taken a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Job seekers to report on progress after six months from today
    A new requirement for people on Jobseeker Support benefits to meet with MSD after six months to assess how their job search is going gets underway today. About 20,000 Jobseeker beneficiaries with full-time work obligations are expected to attend MSD’s new ‘Work check-in’ seminars over the next 12 months, Social ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • New cops means more Police on the beat
    The decision to deploy more Police on the beat in Auckland CBD has been welcomed by Police Minister Mark Mitchell and Associate Police Minister Casey Costello. Starting from 1 July, an additional 21 police officers will be redeployed in Auckland City, bringing the total number of beat police in the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Government takes action to address youth crime
    The Government is introducing a new declaration for young offenders to ensure they face tougher consequences and are better supported to turn their lives around, Children’s Minister Karen Chhour announced today. The establishment of a Young Serious Offender declaration delivers on a coalition Government commitment and supports the Government’s target ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Reserve Bank chair reappointed
    Professor Neil Quigley has been reappointed as Chair of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Board for a further term of two years, until 30 June 2026.  “Professor Quigley has played a key role in establishing the new Board after the commencement of the new RBNZ Act on 1 July ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • School attendance increases
    School attendance data released today shows an increase in the number of students regularly attending school to 61.7 per cent in term one. This compares to 59.5 per cent in term one last year and 53.6 per cent in term four. “It is encouraging to see more children getting to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Record investment in public transport services
    The Government has announced a record 41 per cent increase in indicative funding for public transport services and operations, and confirmed the rollout of the National Ticketing Solution (NTS) that will enable contactless debit and credit card payments starting this year in Auckland, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says.“This Government is ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • GDP data shows need to strengthen and grow the economy
    GDP figures for the March quarter reinforce the importance of restoring fiscal discipline to public spending and driving more economic growth, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says.  Data released today by Stats NZ shows GDP has risen 0.2 per cent for the quarter to March.   “While today’s data is technically in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Women continue to make up over 50 per cent on public sector boards
    Women’s representation on public sector boards and committees has reached 50 per cent or above for the fourth consecutive year, with women holding 53.9 per cent of public sector board roles, Acting Minister for Women Louise Upston says. “This is a fantastic achievement, but the work is not done. To ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Government supporting Māori business success
    The Coalition Government is supporting Māori to boost development and the Māori economy through investment in projects that benefit the regions, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones and Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka say. “As the Regional Development Minister, I am focused on supporting Māori to succeed. The Provincial Growth Fund ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Better solutions for earthquake-prone buildings
    Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk has announced that the review into better managing the risks of earthquake-prone buildings has commenced. “The terms of reference published today demonstrate the Government’s commitment to ensuring we get the balance right between public safety and costs to building owners,” Mr Penk says.  “The Government ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Prime Minister wraps up visit to Japan
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has just finished a successful three-day visit to Japan, where he strengthened political relationships and boosted business links. Mr Luxon’s visit culminated in a bilateral meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Kishida Fumio followed by a state dinner. “It was important for me to meet Prime Minister Kishida in person ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Major business deals signed on PM’s Japan trip
    Significant business deals have been closed during the visit of Prime Minister Christopher Luxon to Japan this week, including in the areas of space, renewable energy and investment.  “Commercial deals like this demonstrate that we don’t just export high-quality agricultural products to Japan, but also our world-class technology, expertise, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Strategic Security speech, Tokyo
    Minasan, konnichiwa, kia ora and good afternoon everyone. Thank you for the invitation to speak to you today and thank you to our friends at the Institute for International Socio-Economic Studies and NEC for making this event possible today.  It gives me great pleasure to be here today, speaking with ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • National Infrastructure Pipeline worth over $120 billion
    The National Infrastructure Pipeline, which provides a national view of current or planned infrastructure projects, from roads, to water infrastructure, to schools, and more, has climbed above $120 billion, Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop says. “Our Government is investing a record amount in modern infrastructure that Kiwis can rely on as ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Making it easier to build infrastructure
    The Government is modernising the Public Works Act to make it easier to build infrastructure, Minister for Land Information Chris Penk announced today. An independent panel will undertake an eight-week review of the Act and advise on common sense changes to enable large scale public works to be built faster and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • NZ enhances North Korea sanctions monitoring
    New Zealand will enhance its defence contributions to monitoring violations of sanctions against North Korea, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced today.  The enhancement will see the New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF) increase its contributions to North Korea sanctions monitoring, operating out of Japan. “This increase reflects the importance New Zealand ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Speech to Safeguard National Health and Safety Conference
    Good afternoon everyone. It’s great to be with you all today before we wrap up Day One of the annual Safeguard National Health and Safety Conference. Thank you to the organisers and sponsors of this conference, for the chance to talk to you about the upcoming health and safety consultation. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Ōtaki to north of Levin alliance agreements signed
    Transport Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed an important milestone for the Ōtaki to north of Levin Road of National Significance (RoNS), following the NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) signing interim alliance agreements with two design and construction teams who will develop and ultimately build the new expressway.“The Government’s priority for transport ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Improvements to stopping Digital Child Exploitation
    The Department of Internal Affairs [Department] is making a significant upgrade to their Digital Child Exploitation Filtering System, which blocks access to websites known to host child sexual abuse material, says Minister of Internal Affairs Brooke van Velden.  “The Department will incorporate the up-to-date lists of websites hosting child sexual ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New vaccine research aims to combat prevalent bovine disease
    A vaccine to prevent an infectious disease that costs New Zealand cattle farmers more than $190 million each year could radically improve the health of our cows and boost on-farm productivity, Associate Agriculture Minister Andrew Hoggard says. The Ministry for Primary Industries is backing a project that aims to develop ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Making it easier to build granny flats
    The Government has today announced that it is making it easier for people to build granny flats, Acting Prime Minister Winston Peters and RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop say. “Making it easier to build granny flats will make it more affordable for families to live the way that suits them ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • High Court Judge appointed
    Attorney-General Judith Collins today announced the appointment of Auckland King’s Counsel Gregory Peter Blanchard as a High Court Judge. Justice Blanchard attended the University of Auckland from 1991 to 1995, graduating with an LLB (Honours) and Bachelor of Arts (English). He was a solicitor with the firm that is now Dentons ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Health workforce numbers rise
    Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says new data released today shows encouraging growth in the health workforce, with a continued increase in the numbers of doctors, nurses and midwives joining Health New Zealand. “Frontline healthcare workers are the beating heart of the healthcare system. Increasing and retaining our health workforce ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Government to overhaul firearms laws
    Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee has today announced a comprehensive programme to reform New Zealand's outdated and complicated firearms laws. “The Arms Act has been in place for over 40 years. It has been amended several times – in a piecemeal, and sometimes rushed way. This has resulted in outdated ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Government delivers landmark specialist schools investment
    The coalition Government is delivering record levels of targeted investment in specialist schools so children with additional needs can thrive. As part of Budget 24, $89 million has been ringfenced to redevelop specialist facilities and increase satellite classrooms for students with high needs. This includes: $63 million in depreciation funding ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Major health and safety consultation begins
    A substantial consultation on work health and safety will begin today with a roadshow across the regions over the coming months, says Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden.  This the first step to deliver on the commitment to reforming health and safety law and regulations, set out in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Growing the potential of New Zealand’s forestry sector in partnership
    Forestry Minister Todd McClay, today announced the start of the Government’s plan to restore certainty and confidence in the forestry and wood processing sector. “This government will drive investment to unlock the industry’s economic potential for growth,” Mr McClay says. “Forestry’s success is critical to rebuilding New Zealand’s economy, boosting ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Government cancels forestry ETS annual service charges for 2023-24
    Annual service charges in the forestry Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) will be cancelled for 2023/24, Forestry Minister Todd McClay says. “The sector has told me the costs imposed on forestry owners by the previous government were excessive and unreasonable and I agree,” Mr McClay says. “They have said that there ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Speech to the LGNZ Infrastructure Symposium
    Introduction Thank you for having me here today and welcome to Wellington, the home of the Hurricanes, the next Super Rugby champions. Infrastructure – the challenge This government has inherited a series of big challenges in infrastructure. I don’t need to tell an audience as smart as this one that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Government boosts Agriculture and food trade with China
    Trade and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay and Food Safety Minister Andrew Hoggard welcomed outcomes to boost agricultural and food trade between New Zealand and China. A number of documents were signed today at Government House that will improve the business environment between New Zealand and China, and help reduce barriers, including on infant formula ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • NZ and China launch Services Trade Negotiations
    Trade Minister Todd McClay, and China’s Commerce Minister Wang Wentao, today announced the official launch of Negotiations on Services Trade between the two countries.  “The Government is focused on opening doors for services exporters to grow the New Zealand’s economy,” Mr McClay says.  As part of the 2022 New Zealand-China Free Trade Agreement Upgrade ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Prime Minister Luxon meets with Premier Li
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon met with Chinese Premier Li Qiang at Government House in Wellington today.  “I was pleased to welcome Premier Li to Wellington for his first official visit, which marks 10 years since New Zealand and China established a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership,” Mr Luxon says. “The Premier and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Government and business tackling gender pay gap
    The coalition Government is taking action to reduce the gender pay gap in New Zealand through the development of a voluntary calculation tool. “Gender pay gaps have impacted women for decades, which is why we need to continue to drive change in New Zealand,” Acting Minister for Women Louise Upston ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Funding Boost for Rural Support Trusts
    The coalition Government is boosting funding for Rural Support Trusts to provide more help to farmers and growers under pressure, Rural Communities Minister Mark Patterson announced today. “A strong and thriving agricultural sector is crucial to the New Zealand economy and one of the ways to support it is to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Latest data shows size of public service decreasing
    Spending on contractors and consultants continues to fall and the size of the Public Service workforce has started to decrease after years of growth, according to the latest data released today by the Public Service Commission. Workforce data for the quarter from 31 December 23 to 31 March 24 shows ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Speech to the Law Association
    Thank you to the Law Association for inviting me to speak this morning. As a former president under its previous name — the Auckland District Law Society — I take particular satisfaction in seeing this organisation, and its members, in such good heart. As Attorney-General, I am grateful for these ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2024-06-25T02:03:41+00:00