Would Labour reach out a formal partnership hand to the Greens if Labour win outright? Surely not?
"so that he can continue his anti homosexual crusade." to describe two Instagram posts that don't directly single out only homosexuals and that do want people in those groups to live a life more aligned with Folau's quite recent take on Christianity.....
Only does it, if its resourced and "policed".
It'd be zero in town on a section. Odd that this TWG makes the distinction. I don't understand the driver.
'The Tax Working Group (TWG) has come up with a common-sense set of tests, and has suggested no-one would have to pay tax on the section their family home was built on if their section was smaller than 4500 square metres. ' Why should my rural scrub block ...
I reckon Nats stayed in due to their celebrity head, and Labour's fortunes changed dramatically once they found one. Many Kiwi voter's priorities are ??able and sad.
off topic but surely there's no notable regulation around swim between the flags?!
Do you mean evidence like actual data collected from multiple govt and non govt agencies, compiled and analysed?
I'd suggest a fair chunk of particularly MBIE and also MPI as a start.
From RNZ - " Today Checkpoint was contacted by a person close to Metiria Turei during the time she was on the DPB. The person (who Checkpoint has agreed not to name) strongly alleged that Metiria Turei had received significant support from her daughter's ...
Planned accident to generate a few extra clicks their way.
... and that's practiced where in Aotearoa?
"Ardern is personable and popular, that is an achievement in itself" - not really. John Key was notable for this and what did he achieve?
National - "stay in goverment", despite changing / doing nothing significantly different from the previous labour govt.
Old boys club.
Better still, just stop propping up farming so much and use that money to help / target those small "groups" that really needed. Nothing worse than corporate welfare.
That'll be because the science is settled.
At least one of the messengers mentioned does shoot himself. "Arbitrary and selective reactionary taxation is the epitome of policy naivety. One would have hoped John Key wouldn’t take us back into that black hole." Sugar tax anyone?
One, six and seven.
‘Hegemonic harmony within a caucus and subservient submittal to your leader’s ideas is not realistic. It’s perhaps even a bit creepy.” Sums up Nats.
......except the 191 didn't exist to be used elsewhere.
It probably matters what you do once in the house surely? ... and to all the sympathy for Mr Hager, he did knowingly receive stolen information, and used it, and cleaned up with the expectation that the police would be around at some point. All this ...
It'll be an interesting test of Chris Trotter's theory that the discipline required was to stay out of the media.
No they bloody don't!
... wouldn't the policy be the same?
I believe, and have for a long time, that its poor/blinkered middle management not broadband performance that holds essentially keyboard operators to the big centres.... and I've been very lucky.
Yip. Disgusting. pointless and weird.
I certainly agree that 'The left didn’t present an image of a unified, stable government, and the right coasted on their record.' and maybe you're right, it would have been the same without all the useless sound and fury from Hager's book release, but for ...
That's about right. It's not about being National Light, or Left wing, it needs to be along the lines of here's our specific and believable goals and here's the basics of the mechanism[s] we think will get NZ there. Leave "the other team" to their shambles...