web analytics

Tax is violence

Written By: - Date published: 1:24 pm, April 5th, 2018 - 56 comments
Categories: david seymour, parody, social media lolz, tax - Tags: ,

Can we please now save David Seymour from his violent oppression and relieve him of his tax-funded salary? Should probably liberate him from the evil clutches of that red couch too.

56 comments on “Tax is violence ”

  1. James 1

    This guy ….. hell even I can’t defend him sometimes.

  2. lprent 2

    Bugger the sofa. I haven’t seen it, but my partner recoiled when she saw a promo for dancing with the stars in which he was wearing some kind of stripper uniform…..

    • weka 2.1

      I have seen that promo and tried to wipe it from my brain.

      • cleangreen 2.1.1

        I am one of the chosen few as I have never seen it; — I am saved – – my mind is clear with no visions of David Seymour dancing.

    • james 2.2

      Ive seen the online (still) adverts – I can only assume a video would be considerably worse.

  3. Matthew Whitehead 3

    I find it very interesting that none of his ACToid friends who are currently crowing on social media about tax being violence are saying similar things about inflation, which is what tax prevents, and has an effect much like a flat tax on basically everything you own. I shall ignore them as inconsistent idiots until such time as I hear “inflation is violence!”

    It’s also rather amusing to hear them trying to claim that some violence is justified in defense of funding the defence force.

    The thing I don’t like is that it’s leading to a bunch of equally wrong rhetoric from our side about how we need tax to pay for things, which is fundamentally backwards. New Zealand dollars are government issued, which means they must be spent by the government first, (otherwise how does anyone get any?) before they can be paid back as tax. The point of tax bills is to control inflation (by ensuring the supply of official money is appropriate to the size of the productive economy) and to create the initial demand for fiat money by demanding it back as tax. (fiat money, ie. official government-backed currency that can’t be exchanged for a commodity, like say, gold)

    The government never needs to tax to spend money, but it might find it the most advisable idea to offset its spending with equivalent tax takes if it thinks the economy is in neither boom nor bust mode, or if it thinks existing tax and spending settings are compensating for whichever of the two it’s in right now.

    • weka 3.1

      Violence is justified when it’s for the things the libertarians like 😆

      Re what tax is for, you should so do a post on that (I had no idea).

    • Draco T Bastard 3.2

      New Zealand dollars are government issued

      This is the usual misleading BS. Approximately 97% of the money in circulation has been issued by the private banks.

      High you describe it is how it should but not how it is.

      • Matthew Whitehead 3.2.1

        That’s not money, that’s credit. Unless you’re spending cash it’s most likely credit that you’re circulating- but tax deductions from your bank, for instance, will be paid in NZ dollars, or reconciled after the fact in terms of reserves vs digital transactions.

        • Draco T Bastard 3.2.1.1

          That’s not money, that’s credit.

          And is used as money thus making it, for all intents and purposes, money.

          Either way, it shouldn’t exist at all.

          • Matthew Whitehead 3.2.1.1.1

            Well, if you insist, sure, it’s money. Regardless, that just means the government takes into account what banks are doing with their lending when making their own decisions about whether to increase or decrease the net money supply.

            I think your proposal to move to full-reserve banking would have a lot of side-effects you’re not considering. For a start, it would give National much more ability to screw up the economy when it’s in government by directing the Reserve Bank not to create more money. On top of that, if we’re still letting commercial banks operate, they’ll start charging fees for everything they currently do, including the cashless economy, (which won’t be so much cashless as banks moving huge amounts of cash reserves between each other, or at least ledgers of it against what the Reserve Bank will be holding for them) deposit and withdrawal fees, etc… and the only way to avoid that would be to socialize all the costs through subsidy or having the government run the damn thing, so it’s not the simple bullet it sounds like, especially when the only thing the government can’t directly do is actually force the banks to lend to people, it can just set the incentives to do so, and pass some non-discrimination laws.

            There are some proponents of this idea, including some famous ones, but there’s a real risk that poorly managed it would drive a lot of currently open and observable financial activities underground or just make them more difficult and costly, making life difficult for ordinary people. It would give you unprecedented government control of the economy, though.

        • alwyn 3.2.1.2

          That really doesn’t make any sense.
          When you pay your tax the money will go out of your account at your bank and goes into a Government account at their bank.
          If you happen to bank with Westpac it is the same bank.
          It doesn’t get converted into anything along the way. There really isn’t anything special about those Government accounts.

          • Matthew Whitehead 3.2.1.2.1

            That’s sort of like saying that there’s nothing special about Lorde in terms of access to her songs, Alwyn, lol.

            The government accounts are absolutely different in nature, because unlike you or me, the government can absolutely pass laws, give directives to the reserve bank, etc… to top up the numbers in their accounts whenever they’re willing to accept the consequences of doing so.

            The banks can do so only to the degree that they think they’ll:
            a) make more money or credit in repayments on average by lending to a certain type of applicant than they’ll lose.
            b) not risk having too little reserve cash to pay out to people drawing on their credit with the bank in terms of their accounts, etc… Their nightmare is always risking a run on the bank.

            The government has its own version of (a), where they have to worry about the productive benefit to the country of their spending vs the consequences in either increased taxation, increased debt, or increased inflation. You’ll notice though that unlike with banks, it’s not an easily quantified equation: political parties will disagree vehemently about what does and does not belong in a well-crafted BCR, and will frequently approve spending with fractional BCRs for political reasons anyway. You’d never catch a bank giving a loan with an expected fractional or even return. Government spending is qualitatively different in terms of how it’s conceived than credit, because it will be granted under completely different criteria.

            A country has to be in a really difficult situation to get into its equivalent of (b) when it can still issue its own currency, (so for countries in the Eurozone, for instance, they largely DO operate like people typically think they do, and have to balance budgets regarding tax vs spending and deficits vs surpluses like a household, because currency is only issued or recalled for the interests of Europe as a whole, not individual member countries) but it can’t meaningfully declare any useful new fiat reserves, which is usually because it’s mismanaged things so badly that it’s caused hyperinflation, or people have otherwise lost faith in the value of their fiat currency despite having it soft-backed by the labour of an entire country.

        • mikesh 3.2.1.3

          The banks create money and then lend it out.

    • Andre 3.3

      “New Zealand dollars are government issued, which means they must be spent by the government first, (otherwise how does anyone get any?) before they can be paid back as tax.”

      There’s some sort of disconnect between that idea and the idea that most money is created out of thin air by banks when creating loans (as espoused by Bryan Gould).

      I’d be interested in your thoughts on how to reconcile the two ideas, or why Gould is wrong.

      • Matthew Whitehead 3.3.1

        Gould is talking about credit, not money. Technically money is only cash or other officially authorised government currency in economic terms.

        Credit complicates setting the right amount for government spending or tax a bit, because you have to take account of what banks are doing with regards to lending in terms of deciding whether the total currency supply (money + credit) is the right size for the productive economy, so the government may need to run a surplus (ie. reduce the amount of money in the economy) even though the economy is technically in a minor recession because it feels banks are lending too much. If we ignore credit, a recession would generally mean deficit spending is advisable, and a bubble would mean surpluses are advisable.

        • alwyn 3.3.1.1

          “Technically money is only cash or other officially authorised government currency in economic terms.:”
          I would like to see a reference from any Economist who would describe money in those terms. Do you have a reference to anyone who does?

          Even the narrowest of definitions of money, M1, used by Economics, includes a great deal more than the cash you are talking about. You might like your definition but it isn’t the one in normal use. If you try and use your version you are not talking about money as the term is used in the world.
          Have a look at this. It is a very simple explanation of money
          https://open.lib.umn.edu/principleseconomics/chapter/24-1-what-is-money/

          • Incognito 3.3.1.1.1

            What is ‘Money’
            Money is an officially-issued legal tender typically consisting of notes and coins. Money is the circulating medium of exchange as defined by a government. Money is often synonymous with cash and includes various instruments such as checks. Each country has its own money that is used for exchange within that country.

            https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/money.asp

            I have zero economics expertise so feel free to dispel but please keep it seemly 😉

          • Matthew Whitehead 3.3.1.1.2

            It really depends who you’re asking how the term is used. I’m talking MMT so I’m using the terms they typically do- where money is used only to refer to government-backed currency of any type, and credit is used to refer to notional guarantees of payments in money on request.

            There are varying degrees of liquidity and even the US Federal reserve terms of M1 and M2 aren’t the only other way of defining them, so it’s useful to define them as you go in my experience. I think I was relatively clear on query that I was talking about government-issued currency primarily, not that the addition of credit (or anything of intermediate liquidity) fundamentally changes the theory, it just makes the government’s job of judging the state of the economy more complex.

        • mikesh 3.3.1.2

          As I understand it the government finances its expenditure by selling government bonds to the Reserve Bank. It is then up to the RB to decide what to do with those bonds – whether to hold on to them or sell them to the banks or into the money markets. If it hangs on to them it effectively increases the money supply. If it sells them it avoids increasing the money supply. The Reserve Bank’s decision will depend on how it views inflationary pressures within the community.

          • Matthew Whitehead 3.3.1.2.1

            I was talking chicken-and-egg terms, not precise legal facts of how money is issued now we’ve set up a taxation and spending cycle- my point is more that we actually know what came first between government spending and tax, and the answer is spending, at least in terms of fiat currency. Some governments will have taxed before that in non-sovereign currencies such as precious metals, when they would have had to tax (or mine!) them before they could spend.

            In terms of the precise details of how it works now, yes, the reserve bank does it, as a delegated agent of the NZ government under the Reserve Bank Act, but again, that is still fundamentally a government decision on how money is created and spent, it’s just that the government has delegated its authority under the law. The government can at any time it likes repeal the act and issue currency directly if it wishes, or set other directives for it through order in council. The reserve bank has some independence in how it reaches its mandates, but they are still fundamentally set by government. The real point here is that the government cannot run out of money. It can only be unwilling to accept possible inflationary pressures of additional spending. The idea that we have to tax before we can spend creates the idea of the government running out of money- this only happens in legislatures that have become dysfunctional, like in the USA.

            • mikesh 3.3.1.2.1.1

              The trading banks also create money. Such creation is their own decision, not the government’s, though the Reserve Bank endeavours to set upper limits on how much they can create, by imposing capital requirements or a reserve ratio, or by setting interest rates.

    • alwyn 3.4

      “similar things about inflation, which is what tax prevents”.
      Would you care to provide a justification for this claim and an explanation of the mechanism involved?
      I’m sure it would be very interesting, if only it worked.

      • Matthew Whitehead 3.4.1

        So, let’s say you have yourself a fiat money system, where there are no taxes, instead people pay money to the government only for services rendered, fines, etc… and they’re not significantly larger than ours are today in New Zealand. (We’ll ignore how this was pulled off without taxes in the first place, maybe they had them but lifted them all as a radical social experiment, or maybe it’s just a hypothetical to illustrate a point 😉 ) You would experience massive inflation if the government printed money to continue spending as much as it does right now, as people realize that there’s simply more money around than there was last year and therefore in relative terms it’s worth less, and that inflation will hit the poor worst, because their costs will go up, they have no wealth to cushion them, and their income is likely to stay the same, because it’s not like their employers can afford more, and any attempt from the government to subsidize them will just make the problem worse.

        Rich people also suffer the same problem where their savings will be worth less, but it matters a bit less because their pre-existing wealth still has the same productive value it always did. However, if the inflation continues year on year, their willingness to sell for fiat money will likely go away, because they can never trust that its value won’t continue to inflate away over time, and will instead revert to barter. (and that’s even worse, because barter has a lot of disadvantages compared to currency, and people make a lot less efficient business decisions under it) In this regard, inflation is a lot like a very regressive tax in its overall effects, except it functions by increasing prices (which effectively means it’s also taxing any savings as well as income, but not investment- another reason why it has a very regressive effect when compared to just taxing people instead) rather than as a gross decrease in the money supply.

        The whole point of having the reserve bank is to have experts who look at the economy very closely and say “ah, we need about this amount of money, or that amount of credit, and here are the policies we think will get it right,” so that we’re not putting too much currency into the economy like in our hypothetical, or too little because we’re insisting on seeing a government budget like a household one. (like what happened in the Great Depression)

      • Tricledrown 3.4.2

        Alwhinger go back in preparation democratic times you and hologram would be peasants without a voice but your anti tax system would be in place.
        Taking money out of the economy lowers inflation. Spending that money on building more houses will lower housing demand.
        Spending that tax on improving productivity and efficiency reduces inflation.
        Alwhinger you know nothing about economics other than to follow your Dogma of being an uneducated cult minion.

        • Richard McGrath 3.4.2.1

          By “taking money out of the system” you effectively lower people’s wages. So by raising the minimum wage but also raising taxes at the same time people are no better off. They are effectively being told to hand over their pay increase because the politicians know better than they do what it should be spent on. A better way to reduce inflation is for the government to stop printing money that has no precious metal deposits to back it up.

    • UncookedSelachimorpha 3.5

      “The point of tax bills is to control inflation (by ensuring the supply of official money is appropriate to the size of the productive economy) and to create the initial demand for fiat money by demanding it back as tax. (fiat money, ie. official government-backed currency that can’t be exchanged for a commodity, like say, gold)”

      Agree. One other important function of tax is it can be used to counter inequality, that otherwise is inevitable in a capitalist system.

  4. adam 4

    The ‘so called’ libertarian right – I say ‘so called ‘ because if you love freedom, how can you support an economic system which at it’s core is based on exploitation of labour.

    They act in a manner to raise these contradictions and piece of theater to keep themselves relevant. They are at the dog end of history, so theater is all they got left. Rational argument is lost on them, as is any discussion of economics, which they won’t discuss because they know they can’t defend capitalism and it’s excesses here at the beginning of the 21 century.

    • Richard McGrath 4.1

      Unfortunately Adam, we all have to work – or someone is forced to work on our behalf – or we starve. So we all live under the ‘tyranny of hunger’. Having to choose between working or starving is not a breach of anyone’s freedom. Entering into voluntary agreement with an employer for a wage under the division of labour (where people find employment in work they’re good at doing) is not a breach of freedom, and is a damn sight easier than isolationism and self-sufficiency.

  5. koreropono 5

    That is rich coming from a creature who participates and promotes violence on a daily basis. Seymore’s type of violence is even more destructive because of its insidious nature. It grieves me greatly that my tax dollars goes toward paying this parasite. Perhaps tax is violence if it gives that creep funded air time.

  6. Delia 6

    David Seymour could always be self employed and stop relying on the taxpayer for his salary…but being honest, he would still be relying on people who pay tax to pay his invoices. He is confuzzled. Not sure what country would suit his outlook on life.

  7. Pete 7

    I’m looking for Seymour’s contribution about the fiasco in Christchurch with the re-repairing of buildings. You know, the episode about costs of $100,000,000 or so.

    He’s quick to jump on things which involves spending of our money.

    He’s so quick to jump on every little thing to get attention for himself you’d have thought he’d be into this boots and all.

    What? It didn’t happen under Labour’s watch so he’s not interested? What? It happened when he was part of the government so he’s not interested? What? He’s more interested in being on pop tv dancing?

  8. Ad 8

    Good to see The Spinoff focussing on corporate tax. Doesn’t happen enough.

    They are as much a part of the bind between society and country and government as the millions of individual taxpayers are.

    Also the list included the highlight of SKyCIty paying over 50% in its effective tax rate. Good to see the reality of paying society back for a regulated vice.

  9. Macro 9

    Isn’t it Seymour’s crowd that want to throw everyone who commits a misdemeanour into jail? Rather ironic isn’t it, that on the one hand he wants to commit this sort of violence against people, and on the other (in order to perpetrate this physical violence) he has to fund it through taxes.

    • alwyn 9.1

      They actually have a great deal more forward looking ideas than does the current Government. Labour didn’t like the policy when it was announced but Angry Andy didn’t like anything.
      Former Labour Party President and the current Boss of the Howard League was in favour though. He, of course, knew something about the matter.
      https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/89802594/ACT-to-reward-prisoners-with-reduced-sentences-for-learning-to-read-in-prison
      Labour currently seem to want to release people from Prison but don’t seem at all interested in rehabilitation. They still seem to be going to build a new prison of course.

      • Macro 9.1.1

        BS – who was the Party that introduced the 3 strikes?

      • Incognito 9.1.2

        Labour currently seem to want to release people from Prison but don’t seem at all interested in rehabilitation.

        Do you have a citation for that, particularly the second part?

    • Richard McGrath 9.2

      Get your facts right. If you’re referring to the three strikes law, it refers to recidivist offenders committing serious crimes and being locked away for the benefit of the law-abiding rest of us. Libertarians believe running a justice system is a valid function of government. No-one ever said it had to be funded through taxation – there is nothing stopping funding via voluntary contribution and ‘user-pays’, i.e. fines that actually cover costs. Also by decriminalising peaceful substance use, and not arresting/jailing people for self-medicating.

  10. Violence? violence?… did Seeless /Rimmer support Operation Burnham?

    And does anybody remember this little tyke who never got the chance to grow up and live a normal life because John Key sanctioned and gave permission for a punitive SAS raid on an Afghani village full of civilians?

    https://thedailyblog.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Screen-Shot-2018-03-15-at-10.25.52-AM-1.png

    Go fuck yourselves.

    You want to talk fucking violence ?

    Then get off your sanctimonious high horses and drop John Key , Jerry Mateparae, Lieutenant General Tim Keating , Bill English and Wayne Mapp right where they belong – in the shit.

    And petition for them to be brought before the International Criminal Court on War Criminal charges.

    Wikipedia
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Criminal_Court

    And as for the fuckwit Rimmer- the guys an idiotic joke and a mere distraction.

    Forget the bugger. He doesn’t even rate.

    • Ed 10.1

      For a party with o.5% they get a lot more than that percentage of the media’s attention.
      Funny that, they advocate policies the corporates dream about.

      • WILD KATIPO 10.1.1

        Only because the guys a freak and has the same hype and media stardust as interviewing Kyle Chapman or any other fucked up neo Nazi fuckwit.

        Congratulations !

        We have Hollywood / Bollywood, Houston ! – Hollywood / Bollywood in New Zealand.

        And as for the real news?

        Fuck that shit ! – it dont sell papers or viewing ratings !

        And the Oligarchs cant make a dollar of of it. Too fucking honest .

        Cant have that sort of shit going on!

  11. Incognito 11

    I thought anything goes with Libertarians (or is that Libertines? I can never tell the difference) as long as it is between consenting adults (cue: Jamie Whyte). So, if tax = violence it is all o.k. because all taxpayers have consented to paying taxes as part of their social contract. People who are not happy with the contract and want to break it should accept the consequences of this; you cannot have it both ways.

    • Richard McGrath 11.1

      Seymour objected to the Orwellian ‘tax is love’ slogan. Tax is violence, it’s not voluntary, and it’s arbitrary – it can be ratcheted up to whatever level the politicians want, right up to 100% and beyond. The “social contract” is a statist myth which aims to keep workers enslaved to their political masters. Capitalism depends on social interaction and free exchange for mutual benefit, but it doesn’t lock people into unchosen obligations to strangers with whom they may share few or little values in common.

  12. Gosman 12

    What part of this is somehow illogical or inconsistent with reason?

    He is being up front about his political philosophy and how it relates to taxation and government spending.

    • McFlock 12.1

      According to his political “philosophy” he’s choosing to live off the proceeds of 4 million-odd robberies every year. What a tosser.

  13. Tricledrown 13

    Goose man you must be his altered, he was always a slave to his Cultist Dogma.
    I met him while he was at uni when he was ontinually partying and pissing up logic or Facts did not enter his mind as he knew then there is good money to be made being a mouth piece for a failed ideology which has less than 2,000 supporters.
    Fringe lunatic police science 101Gooseman.

    • Tricledrown 13.1

      My spell check has gone rogue as I am using a new phone.

    • Richard McGrath 13.2

      I note you didn’t offer any argument against Seymour’s points, just an ad hominem attack on Gosman. Surely you can do better than that.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Project protects jobs and nature
    A Waitomo-based Jobs for Nature project will keep up to ten people employed in the village as the tourism sector recovers post Covid-19 Conservation Minister Kiri Allan says. “This $500,000 project will save ten local jobs by deploying workers from Discover Waitomo into nature-based jobs. They will be undertaking local ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 hours ago
  • Minister of Foreign Affairs makes three diplomatic appointments
    Foreign Affairs Minister Hon Nanaia Mahuta today announced three diplomatic appointments: Alana Hudson as Ambassador to Poland John Riley as Consul-General to Hong Kong Stephen Wong as Consul-General to Shanghai   Poland “New Zealand’s relationship with Poland is built on enduring personal, economic and historical connections. Poland is also an important ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 hours ago
  • Major redevelopment of Wainuiomata High School underway
    Work begins today at Wainuiomata High School to ensure buildings and teaching spaces are fit for purpose, Education Minister Chris Hipkins says. The Minister joined principal Janette Melrose and board chair Lynda Koia to kick off demolition for the project, which is worth close to $40 million, as the site ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    9 hours ago
  • New expert group appointed to advise Government on Oranga Tamariki
    A skilled and experienced group of people have been named as the newly established Oranga Tamariki Ministerial Advisory Board by Children’s Minister Kelvin Davis today. The Board will provide independent advice and assurance to the Minister for Children across three key areas of Oranga Tamariki: relationships with families, whānau, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    13 hours ago
  • COVID-19 vaccine slated for possible approval next week
    The green light for New Zealand’s first COVID-19 vaccine could be granted in just over a week, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said today. “We’re making swift progress towards vaccinating New Zealanders against the virus, but we’re also absolutely committed to ensuring the vaccines are safe and effective,” Jacinda Ardern said. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • New ACC Board members announced.
    The Minister for ACC is pleased to announce the appointment of three new members to join the Board of ACC on 1 February 2021. “All three bring diverse skills and experience to provide strong governance oversight to lead the direction of ACC” said Hon Carmel Sepuloni. Bella Takiari-Brame from Hamilton ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Economic boost for Southland marae
    The Government is investing $9 million to upgrade a significant community facility in Invercargill, creating economic stimulus and jobs, Infrastructure Minister Grant Robertson and Te Tai Tonga MP Rino Tirikatene have announced.  The grant for Waihƍpai RĆ«naka Inc to make improvements to Murihiku Marae comes from the $3 billion set ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Celebrating the Entry Into Force of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons
    [Opening comments, welcome and thank you to Auckland University etc] It is a great pleasure to be here this afternoon to celebrate such an historic occasion - the entry into force of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. This is a moment many feared would never come, but ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Supporting disabled people to stay connected
    The Government is providing $3 million in one-off seed funding to help disabled people around New Zealand stay connected and access support in their communities, Minister for Disability Issues, Carmel Sepuloni announced today. The funding will allow disability service providers to develop digital and community-based solutions over the next two ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Voluntary saliva testing offered to quarantine workers from Monday
    Border workers in quarantine facilities will be offered voluntary daily COVID-19 saliva tests in addition to their regular weekly testing, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said today. This additional option will be rolled out at the Jet Park Quarantine facility in Auckland starting on Monday 25 January, and then to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Next steps in firearms buy-back
    The next steps in the Government’s ambitious firearms reform programme to include a three-month buy-back have been announced by Police Minister Poto Williams today.  “The last buy-back and amnesty was unprecedented for New Zealand and was successful in collecting 60,297 firearms, modifying a further 5,630 firearms, and collecting 299,837 prohibited ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Jobs for Nature projects target iconic ecosystems
    Upscaling work already underway to restore two iconic ecosystems will deliver jobs and a lasting legacy, Conservation Minister Kiri Allan says.  “The Jobs for Nature programme provides $1.25 billion over four years to offer employment opportunities for people whose livelihoods have been impacted by the COVID-19 recession. “Two new projects ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • New Public Housing Plan announced
    The Government has released its Public Housing Plan 2021-2024 which outlines the intention of where 8,000 additional public and transitional housing places announced in Budget 2020, will go. “The Government is committed to continuing its public house build programme at pace and scale. The extra 8,000 homes – 6000 public ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Prime Minister congratulates President Joe Biden on his inauguration
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has congratulated President Joe Biden on his inauguration as the 46th President of the United States of America. “I look forward to building a close relationship with President Biden and working with him on issues that matter to both our countries,” Jacinda Ardern said. “New Zealand ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Jobs for Nature funding will create training and employment opportunities
    A major investment to tackle wilding pines in Mt Richmond will create jobs and help protect the area’s unique ecosystems, Biosecurity Minister Damien O’Connor says. The Mt Richmond Forest Park has unique ecosystems developed on mineral-rich geology, including taonga plant species found nowhere else in the country. “These special plant ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Pre-departure testing extended to all passengers to New Zealand
    To further protect New Zealand from COVID-19, the Government is extending pre-departure testing to all passengers to New Zealand except from Australia, Antarctica and most Pacific Islands, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “The change will come into force for all flights arriving in New Zealand after 11:59pm (NZT) on Monday ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Bay Cadets learn skills to protect environment
    Bay Conservation Cadets launched with first intake Supported with $3.5 million grant Part of $1.245b Jobs for Nature programme to accelerate recover from Covid Cadets will learn skills to protect and enhance environment Environment Minister David Parker today welcomed the first intake of cadets at the launch of the Bay ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Cook Islanders to resume travel to New Zealand
    The Prime Minister of New Zealand Jacinda Ardern and the Prime Minister of the Cook Islands Mark Brown have announced passengers from the Cook Islands can resume quarantine-free travel into New Zealand from 21 January, enabling access to essential services such as health. “Following confirmation of the Cook Islands’ COVID ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Supporting communities and landowners to grow employment opportunities
    Jobs for Nature funding is being made available to conservation groups and landowners to employ staff and contractors in a move aimed at boosting local biodiversity-focused projects, Conservation Minister Kiritapu Allan has announced. It is estimated some 400-plus jobs will be created with employment opportunities in ecology, restoration, trapping, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Border exception for some returning international tertiary students
    The Government has approved an exception class for 1000 international tertiary students, degree level and above, who began their study in New Zealand but were caught offshore when border restrictions began. The exception will allow students to return to New Zealand in stages from April 2021. “Our top priority continues ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Tiwai deal gives time for managed transition
    Today’s deal between Meridian and Rio Tinto for the Tiwai smelter to remain open another four years provides time for a managed transition for Southland. “The deal provides welcome certainty to the Southland community by protecting jobs and incomes as the region plans for the future. The Government is committed ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New member for APEC Business Advisory Council
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has appointed Anna Curzon to the APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC). The leader of each APEC economy appoints three private sector representatives to ABAC. ABAC provides advice to leaders annually on business priorities. “ABAC helps ensure that APEC’s work programme is informed by business community perspectives ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Govt’s careful economic management recognised
    The Government’s prudent fiscal management and strong policy programme in the face of the COVID-19 global pandemic have been acknowledged by the credit rating agency Fitch. Fitch has today affirmed New Zealand’s local currency rating at AA+ with a stable outlook and foreign currency rating at AA with a positive ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Additional actions to keep COVID-19 out of NZ
    The Government is putting in place a suite of additional actions to protect New Zealand from COVID-19, including new emerging variants, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “Given the high rates of infection in many countries and evidence of the global spread of more transmissible variants, it’s clear that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • 19 projects will clean up and protect waterways
    $36 million of Government funding alongside councils and others for 19 projects Investment will clean up and protect waterways and create local jobs Boots on the ground expected in Q2 of 2021 Funding part of the Jobs for Nature policy package A package of 19 projects will help clean up ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • New Zealand Government acknowledges 175th anniversary of Battle of Ruapekapeka
    The commemoration of the 175th anniversary of the Battle of Ruapekapeka represents an opportunity for all New Zealanders to reflect on the role these conflicts have had in creating our modern nation, says Associate Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Kiri Allan. “The Battle at Te Ruapekapeka Pā, which took ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago