web analytics

The bigots beneath

Written By: - Date published: 9:38 am, September 17th, 2009 - 39 comments
Categories: maori party, Maori seats, national, racism - Tags:

Last night, Sandra Goudie, the big-mouth of the National Party caucus, said the words out loud that the Nats usually keep in their heads. During the debate on the Supercity, one of the Labour MPs was talking about the success of Maori seats in the Bay of Plenty and how other councillors didn’t object. Goudie yelled out: ‘the others earned their seats’

Get it? The Nats think that Maori seats are frauds, and those who win them are undeserving of their office. You can’t deny there’s a streak of racism underlying that view. These are the same Nats that the Maori Party is working with. They don’t respect the Maori Party MPs. They don’t think there’s any mana in winning their seats. They think they are frauds. No wonder they keep exploiting them.

Hey, Maori Party MPs, time to wake up.

You think you’re going to get an increase in benefits in return for giving up your principles on climate change? Get real. They’re going to screw you like they did on the Maori seats.

You think you’re going to get a good deal on the Foreshore and Seabed? Just wait. They’ll screw you on that too.

If you keep bowing down and sacrificing your eloquently stated principles to save your relationship with the Nats, you’ll just confirm in their minds that you’re not worthy of respect.

39 comments on “The bigots beneath ”

  1. T 1

    A bit patronising methinks. The Maori Party doesn’t need the left telling them their business any more than the ACT party needs it. The Maori Party aren’t a left wing party that has gone astray and needs to be brought back into line – they don’t fit into the left/right spectrum. They’ll do whatever they think suits them, as they should and their independence ought to be respected. They can be criticised just as ACT and National can be criticised, but this paternalistic tone is unhelpful.

    • snoozer 1.1

      I don’t see this as patronising. I see it as an expression of what many of us on the Left feel. Here’s a party with Leftwing values (hell, they used to vote with the Greens more than anyone else) who are allowing themselves to be screwed over again and again.

      The thing the Right doesn’t get is that most on the Left actually welcomed the Maori Party. We’re not afraid of plurality and having an independent Maori voice alongside the other Leftwing voices was nothing to be afraid of. Indeed, it was the Right who called the Maori Party a racist party.

      We’re just sad to see them betraying their principles for this fantasy that National will ever do the right thing for them.

      PS. Anyone who thinks that a party doesn’t fit on the left-right spectrum is deluding themselves.

    • roger nome 1.2

      Mr T – if you did a little research, you’d realise that the Maori Party’s constituency is overwhelmingly left of centre. So i disagree – if they are to represent their constituency, the Maori Party needs to act as a left-leaning anchor in this Government.

      • Rob A 1.2.1

        So why did the overwhelmingly left of centre electorates vote for a party knowing there was a very good chance they would go into coalition with the Nats?

        I guess the proof of the pudding will be the next election but your arguement seems extremely arrogant to me.

        • Lew 1.2.1.1

          So why did the overwhelmingly left of centre electorates vote for a party knowing there was a very good chance they would go into coalition with the Nats?

          And more to the point, why did that constituency ratify the party’s intention to go into government with the Nats in a series of hui after the election?

          They were prepared to give it a chance.

          L

          • roger nome 1.2.1.1.1

            Lew – probably because they decided they could have more influence inside of government than outside. That doesn’t mean they prefered National over Labour, they didn’t have the option of going with Labour.

          • snoozer 1.2.1.1.2

            lew. 10 mates of Pita’s at a couple of hastely called hui counts as endorsement?

            You’re right though, the Maori Party was prepared to give it a chance. Can’t they see now that it’s not working?

            • Lew 1.2.1.1.2.1

              snoozer, if you think that’s what the post-election hui tour was, then you either slept through it or simply don’t know a thing about it.

              L

        • roger nome 1.2.1.2

          Rob Aiden?

          Because the Maori party was obviously going to go with Labour if they had a choice, but they didn’t. They couldn’t have formed a government with Labour, so you point is moot.

          Why do you think my argument is arrogant? I merely argued based on the facts/statistics.

  2. felix 2

    You can’t deny there’s not a streak of racism underlying that view.

    Don’t mean to be picky but perhaps someone could fix this up as this thread is going to be confusing enough for some as it is.

  3. Tim Ellis 3

    It is very patronising of you Marty to lambast the Maori Party for going into government with National to seek benefits for Maori when Labour excluded Maori from the table.

    Your anti Maori Party tirade is typical of the patronising attitude of the Labour Party. Rather than look at why the Labour Party lost the Maori seats in the first place (they neglected Maori voters), Labour then tries to dictate to the Maori Party how their MPs should vote and whom they should support, after having rejected them from influence from 2005-2008 in favour of that nasty bigot Winston Peters.

    • Tigger 3.1

      Tim – were Maori excluded from the table or the Maori Party? One is not the other and to think so is utterly patronising.

      And at least Labour treated the MP like an adversary and not a lapdog who appears to jump every time the chain is yanked.

    • Maynard J 3.2

      “It is very patronising of you Marty to lambast the Maori Party for going into government with National to seek benefits for Maori when Labour excluded Maori from the table.”

      Labour did not exclude the Maori party – if anything it was a fairly mutual dislike between Turia and Clark that meant there was no chance of them working together. To be honest, Tim, this is fairly uncontroversial and well known. Why am I having to tell you this? It is almost enough to make me think you are distorting history to make a point that could not be made otherwise.

      Did you not realise that Turia refused to work with Labour after the 2005 election, or are you just lying?

      “Your anti Maori Party tirade is typical of the patronising attitude of the Labour Party.”

      What has this got to do you the Labour Party? Your arrogant demeanour and lies/distortions are typical of the National party, I guess, but that does not mean there is any link between the two.

      “Rather than look at why the Labour Party lost the Maori seats in the first place (they neglected Maori voters), Labour then tries to dictate to the Maori Party how their MPs should vote and whom they should support,”

      How are Labour doing this? How can one party dictate what another does, when there is no formal or even informal agreement between them? That strikes me as a dishonest assessment, Tim. If Labour are doing this via press releases and blogs, for example, is that not the role of the opposition – pointing out where parties are not meeting the needs or desires of their constituents. What is wrong with them being held to account? Surely that is more important than your petty and flawed theory of hypocrisy.

      “after having rejected them from influence from 2005-2008 in favour of that nasty bigot Winston Peters”

      Again, Labour did not reject them, and had no other choice but to work with Winston. Your comment would make equal sense if you said Labour rejected ACT, or National – none of those parties were an option.

  4. roger nome 4

    T E –

    I think the point is that the Maori Party seems to have forgotten that their constituency is primarily centre left (the statistics show this), and its constant right-leaning backflips are not representitive of its constituency. What’s so hard to understand about that?

  5. Lew 5

    The māori party need to give National a fair chance to make good, or fail to make good, on their agreements and indications. Lord knows they’ve given successive Labour governments exhaustive opportunities to do so. Withdrawing on the presumption that National will screw them would be a sign of bad faith and would cede ground to National, who would then be able to say (unfalsifiably) that things would have been different if the process had been allowed to continue.

    Besides, what advantage is there in pulling out now? It’s not as if National’s policy will be any better without them. The māori party have made their bed. Now they lie in it. If the experiment fails, it fails; but the only thing which will guarantee failure is aborting it prematurely.

    L

    • Lew 5.1

      Quoting myself:

      Lord knows they’ve given successive Labour governments exhaustive opportunities to do so.

      ‘They’ here refers to Māori political movements in general, not the māori party, which obviously didn’t. Sorry about that.

      L

    • roger nome 5.2

      Lew:

      Is it part of their agreement with National that they suppport every single proposal that National puts forward? I don’t think so.

      • Lew 5.2.1

        Nome, agreed again. But they need to demonstrate good faith and cooperativeness in order to expect the same from National. They have – if National don’t, they will have clear grounds to cut loose. If they hadn’t demonstrated such good faith and cooperativeness, National would have a pretext upon which to deny them the policy and symbolic gains they seek.

        L

        • Draco T Bastard 5.2.1.1

          Just a feeling but I think you’re deluding yourself. National doesn’t play fair.

        • Lew 5.2.1.2

          No reason for others to allow themselves to be dragged down to their level.

          L

          • Draco T Bastard 5.2.1.2.1

            I’m more pointing to the fact that they shouldn’t have signed up with National in the first place. They’ll get to swallow a few dead rats and then break off the agreement because National didn’t keep to their word. To be more precise, National will keep to it’s word but it’ll be a very narrow definition that isn’t what the MP thought they were signing up to. The spin will be that National did everything right and the MP broke their word.

            • Lew 5.2.1.2.1.1

              DTB,

              This is based on a value judgement, a Manichean view of the National party as baby-eating baddies. I don’t accept, and the māori party evidently doesn’t accept that view either.

              Getting screwed was a risk they were prepared to take, which you (in their position) would not. In my view it was a fair risk, given the intransigence of Labour in passing the Foreshore and Seabed Act.

              If you find yourself in such a position, I urge you to take all (and only) the risks you are willing to take.

              L

    • snoozer 5.3

      “The māori party need to give National a fair chance to make good, or fail to make good, on their agreements and indications”

      You don’t think we’ve passed this point by now, Lew?

      And frankly your assertion that Labour hasn’t done anything for Moari is grossly ahistorical and insulting – not only to Labour but to our intelligence. Look at the metrics. Maori quality of life has improved vastly thanks to the poverty reduction, full employment, and higher wages policies of Labour governments.

      What’s your bloody National party ever done?

      • Lew 5.3.1

        snoozer,

        You don’t think we’ve passed this point by now, Lew?

        Absolutely not. It’s not even a year into a three-year agreement. I expect them to stick out at least half the term, and would prefer that they stick out the whole thing. The more opportunities they give the Nats to honour their agreement, the more intransigent the Nats are if they fail to do so.

        And frankly your assertion that Labour hasn’t done anything for Moari is grossly ahistorical and insulting

        I made no such assertion – only that tangata whenua have been extremely patient with and loyal to Labour governments, and remain broadly loyal to Labour even in spite of its own massive intransigence with the FSA.

        What’s your bloody National party ever done?

        Whose bloody National party? Not mine.

        L

  6. ben 6

    Hey Marty, can you do one of your charts which tells us exactly what Nats think but don’t say? Use three decimal points of precision for extra effect.

    • Maynard J 6.1

      Why, when someone comes out and says it?

      He could do a chart on your increasing resemblance to a tool though, there would be a nice upwards tending curve in it and they are always pleasing on the eye.

    • lprent 6.2

      Hey fuckwit (aka ben) – why not be a negative dickhead who is more characterized by carping than doing anything… It is all I ever see you do…

      I can’t remember you make a comment that actually gives anyone anything to talk over.. Just as series of meaningless spin lines

      • luva 6.2.1

        Name calling

        Charming as always

        • lprent 6.2.1.1

          Yeah my multi-named critic (I was impressed when I realised how many there had been). That is part of my role on this site to promote debate. One of the ways of doing it is to be nastier than the trolls so others don’t have to be.

          Mind you – that was a mild warning..

  7. roger nome 7

    Lew:

    Agreed – the Maori Party has to draw a line in the sand somewhere re its coflicting obligations to its constituency and National.

    You may argue that they’ve found the correct ballance, but its looking more and more to me, that their abandoning their constituency for the baubles of office. They’re acting far too much like sell-out elites, and not the representitives of the people that they’re supposed to be. They will pay for this at the next election just as NZ first did in 1999 if they’re not careful.

    • Lew 7.1

      Nome, I don’t think they have found the correct balance, but I think they are trying to find it. I agree that they’re somewhat at sea – especially with the ETS decision. But it’s early days yet. Māori electors are patient, prepared to accept tactical losses for strategic gains, and not prone to making snap decisions. They won’t abandon waka yet, and I don’t believe they want the party to do so either.

      L

  8. The MP is surely cast against type, in cinematic parlance. Why are people so interested in what the MP gets up to? Well it is the raw edge of politics where theory meets practice. This is not a rehearsal. Their co-operation with an anti worker government appears so likely to be counter productive for many of its own supporters that it is uncomfortable to observe. It will not do to say it is their mistake to make, because the ‘mistake’ of granting further largesse to Nact affects pakeha and other immigrant workers too, not to forget the whenua.

    I would recommend the Kiwi Politico archives where this issue has been chipped away at over many months in a format with more space than the necessarily ‘shoot from the hip’ Standard posts.

    • Lew 8.1

      Yes, a grand experiment. But also a critical swing constituency with a growth outlook over the long term (browning, etc.) without whom either major party will have a hard time governing in the future.

      And the economic left are pissed that their clients have decided to set up shop nearby with a competing product. There’s a lot of unhealthy schadenfreude.

      L

  9. gobsmacked 9

    Next test: Maurice Whilliamson and Wanganui.

    What will the Maori Party do if the Minister for Land Information overturns the decision of the Geographic Board today?

    Whose mana matters more, local MP Chester Borrows or local MP Tariana Turia?

    Will there be a U turn on the H?

    Watch this space …

    • gobsmacked 9.1

      And if anybody thinks this issue is no big deal to Turia …

      http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/2874203/Wanganui-spelling-change-right-thing-to-do

      It’s Tariana versus Talkback (i.e. National’s Orewa base). Only one can win.

    • Lew 9.2

      gobsmacked: A good question, but the target of your ire is incorrect; Borrows supports the change.

      Still, it’ll be an interesting case. It would be an enormous statement for Williamson to decline the change, and I don’t believe he will. But we’ll see.

      L

      • gobsmacked 9.2.1

        My apologies to Chester Borrows (although it’s not ire, more like mockery).

        Michael Laws is giving a press conference this afternoon. This is the classic talkback issue (i.e. heat not light) as that piece I linked to demonstrates – 75 comments in a matter of minutes is Kiwiblog on steroids.

        Key will have to use all his aw-shucks charm on this one.

  10. Murray M 10

    The name change will be an absolute bloody disaster. Think of the expense this will impose on gang members having to change thier patches. I guess WINZ will be inundated with requests for emergency grants, and the dopey bastards will probably pay.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • What’s Labour achieved so far?
    Quite a bit! This Government was elected to take on the toughest issues facing Aotearoa – and that’s what we’re doing. Since the start of the pandemic, protecting lives and livelihoods has been a priority, but we’ve also made progress on long-term challenges, to deliver a future the next generation ...
    6 days ago
  • Tackling the big issues in 2022
    This year, keeping Kiwis safe from COVID will remain a key priority of the Government – but we’re also pushing ahead on some of New Zealand’s biggest long-term challenges. In 2022, we’re working to get more Kiwis into homes, reduce emissions, lift children out of poverty, and ensure people get ...
    1 week ago
  • Happy new year, Aotearoa!
    Welcome to 2022! As we look ahead to another year of progress on the big issues facing our country, we’re taking a look back at the year that’s been and everything the team of five million achieved together in 2021. ...
    3 weeks ago

  • Quarterly benefit numbers show highest number of exits into work
    The Government’s strong focus on supporting more people into work is reflected in benefit figures released today which show a year-on-year fall of around 21,300 people receiving a main benefit in the December 2021 quarter, Minister for Social Development and Employment Carmel Sepuloni said. “Our response to COVID has helped ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 hour ago
  • Northland to move to Orange, NZ prepared for Omicron 
    Northland to move to Orange Rest of New Zealand stays at Orange in preparedness for Omicron All of New Zealand to move into Red in the event of Omicron community outbreak – no use of lockdowns Govt planning well advanced – new case management, close contact definition and testing rules ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 hours ago
  • RNZAF C-130 Hercules flight departs for Tonga as Navy vessels draw nearer to Tongatapu
    A Royal New Zealand Air Force C-130 Hercules has departed Base Auckland Whenuapai for Tonga carrying aid supplies, as the New Zealand aid effort ramps up, Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta and Defence Minister Peeni Henare said today. “The aircraft is carrying humanitarian aid and disaster relief supplies, including water ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 hours ago
  • New Zealand prepared to send support to Tonga
    New Zealand is ready to assist Tonga in its recovery from Saturday night’s undersea eruption and tsunami, Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta and Defence Minister Peeni Henare said today. “Following the successful surveillance and reconnaissance flight of a New Zealand P-3K2 Orion on Monday, imagery and details have been sent ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Aotearoa New Zealand stands ready to assist people of Tonga
    The thoughts of New Zealanders are with the people of Tonga following yesterday’s undersea volcanic eruption and subsequent tsunami waves, Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta says. “Damage assessments are under way and New Zealand has formally offered to provide assistance to Tonga,” said Nanaia Mahuta. New Zealand has made an ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Record high of new homes consented continues
    In the year ended November 2021, 48,522 new homes were consented, up 26 per cent from the November 2020 year. In November 2021, 4,688 new dwellings were consented. Auckland’s new homes consented numbers rose 25 per cent in the last year. Annual figures for the last nine months show more ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Report trumpets scope for ice cream exports
    Latest research into our premium ice cream industry suggests exporters could find new buyers in valuable overseas markets as consumers increasingly look for tip top quality in food. Economic Development Minister Stuart Nash has released a new report for the Food and Beverage Information Project. The project is run by ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Honouring the legacy of legendary kaumātua Muriwai Ihakara
    Associate Minister for Arts, Culture, and Heritage Kiri Allan expressed her great sadness and deepest condolences at the passing of esteemed kaumātua, Muriwai Ihakara. “Muriwai’s passing is not only a loss for the wider creative sector but for all of Aotearoa New Zealand. The country has lost a much beloved ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Have your say on proposed changes to make drinking water safer
    Associate Minister for the Environment Kiri Allan is urging all New Zealanders to give feedback on proposed changes aimed at making drinking water safer. “The current regulations are not fit for purpose and don’t offer enough protection, particularly for those whose water comes from smaller supplies,” Kiri Allan said. “This ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Planting the seeds for rewarding careers
    A boost in funding for a number of Jobs for Nature initiatives across Canterbury will provide sustainable employment opportunities for more than 70 people, Conservation Minister Kiri Allan says. “The six projects are diverse, ranging from establishing coastline trapping in Kaikōura, to setting up a native plant nursery, restoration planting ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Zealand congratulates Tonga's new Prime Minister on appointment
    Minister of Foreign Affairs Nanaia Mahuta today congratulated Hon Hu'akavameiliku Siaosi Sovaleni on being appointed Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Tonga. “Aotearoa New Zealand and Tonga have an enduring bond and the Kingdom is one of our closest neighbours in the Pacific. We look forward to working with Prime ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • High-tech investment extends drought forecasting for farmers and growers
    The Government is investing in the development of a new forecasting tool that makes full use of innovative climate modelling to help farmers and growers prepare for dry conditions, Agriculture Minister Damien O'Connor said.  The new approach, which will cost $200,000 and is being jointly funded through the Ministry for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Support for fire-hit Waiharara community
    The government will contribute $20,000 towards a Mayoral Relief Fund to support those most affected by the fires in Waiharara in the Far North, Minister for Emergency Management Kiri Allan says. “I have spoken to Far North Mayor John Carter about the effect the fires continue to have, on residents ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Manawatū’s ‘oases of nature’ receive conservation boost
    The Government is throwing its support behind projects aimed at restoring a cluster of eco-islands and habitats in the Manawatū which were once home to kiwi and whio. “The projects, which stretch from the Ruahine Ranges to the Horowhenua coastline, will build on conservation efforts already underway and contribute ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Zealand to continue Solomon Islands support
    A New Zealand Defence Force and Police deployment to help restore peace and stability to Solomon Islands is being scaled down and extended. The initial deployment followed a request for support from Solomon Islands Government after riots and looting in capital Honiara late last month. They joined personnel from Australia, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago