What vote will deliver the change we need…?

Written By: - Date published: 8:19 am, September 17th, 2017 - 149 comments
Categories: election 2017, greens - Tags: , , ,

This post by Invercargill Green Party campaign manager Dave Kennedy is republished with permission from localbodies-bsprout.blogspot.co.nz

This has probably been the most dramatic election campaign that I have experienced in almost 40 years of voting. As with most elections, the media focusses on the drama rather than the substance and there is very little real analysis of the policies and what would really be in the best interests of our country.

After nine years in power National has created an opportunist, boom and bust economy that has served property investors, banks, corporate interests and intensive dairying well. At the same time we have seen damaging under-investments in social welfare, housing, education and health. The lowest income quintile of New Zealanders have suffered most and we now have the highest percentage in the developed world of homelessness and the worst statistics for child health and welfare. Our environment has suffered hugely and we have one of the weakest responses in the world to climate change.

To hold on to power National has resorted to wild scaremongering as it has seen its comfortable lead melt away with the warm positivity of the Jacinda effect. The claim that there is a $11.5 billion hole in Labour’s proposals and that cabbages will cost $18 each is the equivalent of Muldoon’s dancing cossacks. Sadly such blatant lies can be effective when the initial headline gets the most attention and the rebuttal or retraction generally becomes minor news.

The constant attack on Labour’s tax plans has also created a perception of uncertainty and yet the media has not looked in any depth at National’s campaign promises and the cost benefit analysis behind them. One of their most expensive policies is the $10.5 billion promised for even more roads when the whole country is screaming out for improved public transport systems and a greater investment in rail.

Voters need to understand that the National Government is a reactionary, populist and largely neoliberal one that rarely uses evidence to support major decisions or has a future focus. Its attempts to deal with the housing crisis is the most obvious indicator of its ineffectiveness. It knew in 2008 that there were issues around housing supply and affordability and yet chose to protect the interest of property investors above ordinary New Zealanders. That decision ultimately caused us to have the most expensive housing in the world and ignored the fact that having decent housing actually underpins the general health and wellbeing of our communities. It is also false economics as our health system struggles to meet the growing numbers of patients suffering from respiratory illnesses and Rheumatic Fever, directly attributable to poor housing.

While National is now throwing some money at areas of need, we need to question why they didn’t act earlier and why the amounts involved are still very minimal compared to what is actually needed (and a fraction of what they are prepared to spend on roads). When the likes of mental health needs a huge investment to turn around our shocking youth suicide statistics it appears to be more important to cater for those who want to drive their cars (National supporters clearly have a strong aversion to slumming it on buses). Earlier this year Metiria Turei suggested that there should be a unit within Treasury to independently cost party promises each election, but it was National that was most reluctant to support this. Only Labour and the Greens have sought independent analysis of their policy costings.

When the current Deputy Prime Minister suggested that some people should have fewer human rights it was a clear indication that the current judgemental and punitive approach that is being used to manage social welfare support won’t change if National is re-elected. Bill English has already written off our struggling young people in favour of continuing to rely on cheap migrant labour. Compassion is a word that may be used by National MPs at times but its true meaning is beyond their understanding. A good deal of the legislation passed under this Government breaches the human rights declarations we have committed to, and this isn’t likely to change in the future.

So who to vote for?

The Labour Party and the Green Party are the only two parties who have publicly committed to changing the government and declared an interest in forming a coalition afterwards. It is also important that voters think carefully about the sort of values and governance that they would like to have emanating from the beehive. Surely the corruption and conflicts of interest that have been the hallmark of the National led Government needs to end. Report after report and numerous court decisions have questioned government decisions and internationally our past reputation as a clean green, honest paradise is rapidly eroding.

Labour has built some real momentum after Jacinda took on the leadership. She has proven to be knowledgeable, empathetic, quick witted and personable and has won the popular vote from the leadership debates so far. Behind Jacinda are team of current and potential MPs who would be easily more competent and principled than National’s line up. However Labour is still a mainstream party that has over 80% of its donors as secret and neoliberal, corporate concerns may still have an influence on decisions over ordinary New Zealanders. When Jacinda was elected leader and Labour rose in the polls a flurry of donations came in, many would be wanting to buy influence if the party became the government. The Green Party has been open about all major donors.

While Labour has adopted a number of Green like policies in relation to addressing our polluted rivers, climate change and addressing poverty, many still don’t go far enough. In a Newshub debate between Labour’s Carmel Sepuloni and the current Social Development Minister Anne Tolley, Sepuloni refused to count out the use of sanctions for beneficiaries and commentators were concerned about the softness of Labour’s policy in this area.

The Green Party are the obvious coalition partner for Labour and will add real value for supporting true progressive change. The Green’s comprehensive policies on climate change, protecting our freshwater systems and dealing with poverty would strengthen and compliment Labour’s policies if a good many are adopted. The Green Party’s history of getting greater transparency in parliament and government will also be of value (we only have access to MPs expense claims because of the Greens). The Green Party would be a useful conscience for a Labour led government that still has the remnants of its neoliberal past lurking in its back benches. The greater the Green vote, the greater chance Green policies and transparent decision making will feature.

TOP is unlikely to pass the 5% threshold so is a wasted vote, Winston is a populist and almost Trump like in his approach to politics and he has spent most of his recent campaigning on his own personal issues. Act and United Future are also nonentities and barely exist as functional parties.

The Green Party is not a minor party as the media have often suggested after it dropped in recent polls. For the last six years the Greens have sat above 10% and, before the arrival of Jacinda, one poll gave the party 15% (only 9 points behind Labour at the time). For the last few years the party has managed to raise more money than Labour and built a sizeable membership. The Green Party also has an impressive candidate list with many highly competent and principled candidates who would be great in government.

A party vote for the Green Party is not a wasted vote. It is a vote to change the government, it is a vote for our rivers, for our climate and for our struggling families. The Green’s policies on most issues from health to education, to sustainable business and our precious environment are also evidence based and comprehensive. It is also a vote for an able coalition partner for Labour to ensure the real change we need actually happens.

Party Vote Green!

149 comments on “What vote will deliver the change we need…?”

  1. Matt 1

    I will be doing just that. I heard James on the radio the other day saying that if you have ever voted green have a think about why you did and consider if the party has really changed. There are some wonderful young candidates on the greens list. The New Zealand Parliament will be all the better for having them as a part of it. We all need to do what we can to ensure that they are there.

  2. … ” It knew in 2008 that there were issues around housing supply and affordability and yet chose to protect the interest of property investors above ordinary New Zealanders ”

    … ” It is also false economics as our health system struggles to meet the growing numbers of patients suffering from respiratory illnesses and Rheumatic Fever, directly attributable to poor housing ” …

    ……………………………………………….

    Remember THIS New Zealanders ??? ,… and the promises this con man sold to New Zealanders back then and tugged the heart strings ( like a ponytail ) about poverty and poor housing ? ,….

    Aroha of McGehan Close flees NZ | Stuff.co.nz
    http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/10468960/Aroha-of-McGehan-Close-flees-NZ

    Well – where is he now ?… just sold his mansion for another 4-5 cool million profit to a buyer purported to be from China… knowing there was a good chance if Labour and the Greens get in they will be clamping down on foreigners buying houses and not living here…

    • Ross 2.1

      Reminds me of this little parable:

      It’s a slow day in a little Greek village. The rain is beating down and the streets are deserted. Times are tough, everybody is in debt, and everybody lives on credit.

      On this particular day a rich German tourist is driving through the village, stops at the local hotel and lays a €100 note on the desk, telling the hotel owner he wants to inspect the rooms upstairs in order to pick one to spend the night. The owner gives him some keys and, as soon as the visitor has walked upstairs, the hotelier grabs the €100 note and runs next door to pay his debt to the butcher.  The butcher takes the €100 note and runs down the street to repay his debt to the pig farmer. The pig farmer takes the €100 note and heads off to pay his bill at the supplier of feed and fuel. The guy at the Farmers’ Co-op takes the €100 note and runs to pay his drinks bill at the taverna. The publican slips the money along to the local prostitute drinking at the bar, who has also been facing hard times and has had to offer him “services” on credit. The hooker then rushes to the hotel and pays off her room bill to the hotel owner with the €100 note. The hotel proprietor then places the €100 note back on the counter so the rich traveler will not suspect anything. At that moment the traveller comes down the stairs, picks up the €100 note, states that the rooms are not satisfactory, pockets the money, and leaves town.

      No one produced anything. No one earned anything. However, the whole village is now out of debt and looking to the future with a lot more optimism. And that, folks, is how National has run the country for the last 9 years.

      • WILD KATIPO 2.1.1

        Mhmmm ,… but the problem is ,… the rich prick hoarded his cash , didn’t pay his tax , ensured the butcher and the pig farmer and the publican all worked for a minimum wage so they couldn’t pay the hotelier ( although there was an offer by a politician to put them up there but they would have to pay the money back which they couldn’t ) and all of them including their family’s had to live and sleep in their cars.

        I’d say that folks , … is more like the way National has run this country for the last 9 years , ….

        • Ross 2.1.1.1

          Yeah of course those who avoid tax are a key part of the problem – in the story and in the real world. 🙂

      • Ross 2.1.2

        Although this probably illustrates the differences between the Left and Right fairly succintly:

        A management consultant was on holiday in Greece. He travelled to a small fishing village and watched one afternoon as a small fishing boat docked at the quayside. Seeing the high quality of the fish, the consultant asked the fisherman how long he had spent out at sea that day.

        “A few hours.” answered the fisherman.

        “Then, why didn’t you stay out all day and catch more?” asked the consultant.
        The fisherman told him that his small catch was enough to feed him and his family.

        The business guru asked, “So what do you do the rest of the time?”

        “Well”, he replied, “I sleep late, make love to my wife, play with my kids and have an afternoon’s nap in my hammock which overlooks the sea. In the evenings, I go into town to see my friends, have a couple of beers, shoot some pool, and sing a few songs….. I have a full and happy life.”

        The consultant ventured, “I have an MBA and work for a top management consultancy – I think, in fact I know I can help you…… You should start by fishing much longer every day and recruit some help. You can then sell the additional fish you catch and with the extra revenue, you can buy a bigger boat. A larger boat will allow you to catch more and expand your business to two or three boats until you have the largest fleet on the island. Instead of selling your fish at harbour, you can negotiate directly with the major fish distributors and perhaps open your own plant. You can then leave this village and move your entire operation to the mainland and build a huge company.

        “How long would that take?” asked the fisherman.

        “Done right, no more than ten years.” replied the consultant.

        “And then what?” asked the fisherman.

        “After that? You could acquire other companies, grow a massive organisation and finally float or sell your company and make millions of dollars!”

        “Millions? Wow? And after that?” queried the fisherman.

        “After that you’ll be able to retire, move to a small island, sleep late, make love to your wife, play with your grandkids and have an afternoon’s nap in a hammock overlooking the sea. In the evenings, you could shoot the breeze with friends, drink a few beers, sing some songs and have a full and happy life.”

        • Pat 2.1.2.1

          lol…thats about the size of it

        • WILD KATIPO 2.1.2.2

          Or apply for a tax payed for bail out when he gets too big to fail along with all his other banking and investment mates.

          Then the fisherman will be back to a small fishing boat “ sleeping late, making love to his wife, playing with his kids and having an afternoon’s nap in his hammock which overlooks the sea. In the evenings, he goes into town to see his friends, have a couple of beers, shoot some pool, and sings a few songs….. and says he has a full and happy life.”

  3. Roy 3

    Excellent post!

    Labour, for reasons of their own, have decided to chase the so-called ‘middle’ as part of their strategy. Great – we need people to be on board.

    The Greens represent the bolder, fairer way. Ask they include the so-called fringes as well, like the poor and the environmental.

    A coalition would be the best of both – solid green and social policy, inclusion and action, made palatable to the middle by the stability and mana of Labour.

    • Carolyn_nth 3.1

      I do think the future for left politics is via the integration of Labour and Green movement values. Of course, putting this into political practice will not happen overnight, and will need we the people, to keep working together, on the ground, on the blogs, showing politicians the way forward.

      A Labour-Green government would be a beginning: but needs a strong GP presence, for the reasons stated above.

  4. Anne 4

    I’m going to tread on some toes here but it can’t be helped.

    As a strong supporter of a Lab/Green coalition govt., I have just seen James Shaw throw an almighty spanner in the works on Q&A this morning. He was asked for his priorities and he mentioned three. Concerns around the environment and poverty were two of them (of course) but guess what the other one was… and from memory he mentioned it first. Introduce a CGT tax.

    OK, the Greens have had a policy of introducing a CGT tax – excluding family home etc. – since 1999. Fair enough. Why couldn’t he have left it there? We all know there is going to be one sometime in the near future even if it ends up being called by another name. So, couldn’t he have kept his mouth shut? The letters CGT are the adult equivalent of the old “bogey man” threat used to keep children away from strange men. Joe and Mary Bloggs go into a paroxysm of irrational fear at the mere mention of them.

    All he has succeeded in doing is give Bill English, Steven Joyce and co. a very large axe with which to attack both Labour and the Greens in the final week of the election. They will be producing new ads for both public and social media as we speak. Their bovver boys will be filling social media and the news outlets with fear and prejudice – a 2017 version of “Democracy under Attack”. And there is now a much greater chance it will once again work.

    Foolish, foolish, foolish of James.

    • weka 4.1

      treading on toes is fine 🙂 but it helps to put up a link so that other people can see what you are referring to.

      • weka 4.1.1

        This one I think https://www.tvnz.co.nz/shows/q-and-a/clips/james-shaw

        Just having a watch now.

        • Anne 4.1.1.1

          Sorry, I didn’t expect it to be online so soon.

          Here is the panel response:

          https://www.tvnz.co.nz/shows/q-and-a/clips/q-a-panel

          I can’t stand Claire Robinson at the best of times and she used the opportunity to attack both Labour and the Greens. Fran O’sullivan was not much better.

          • weka 4.1.1.1.1

            All good. I haven’t watched the other ones yet, just Shaw. Will have a look at the panel in a moment.

          • Karen 4.1.1.1.2

            O’Sullivan and Robinson are both rightwing, so not a particularly balanced panel.

            I am sure some in the MSM will try and make the most of this because they are always looking for signs of conflict between the Greens and Labour and the Nats will try and do some more scaremongering. I don’t think your average voter out there will be concerned about this, however.

            Climate change is one of the Green Party’s big issues and always has been. I think it is reasonable for James to say the CGT is something they will argue strongly for because he has to shore up the GP base and it is a point of difference.

            • red-blooded 4.1.1.1.2.1

              I also thought Shaw should have played that a lot smarter. He’d just heard Ardern say she would act on the advice of the tax working group by preparing and passing legislation in the first term, but that it wouldn’t come into effect until after the next election and that this was a way for NZers to have the final say about whether they approved of the changes. That’s a perfectly reasonable position and, as she pointed out, it would at most delay the implementation of any CGT by a few months. He knows how much Labour’s been under attack about this and he’s seen her make a difficult decision and have to explain it under pressure again and again. Why the hell would he choose to put Labour under pressure about this and open up possible lines of attack that have only just been closed down at this point? As Robinson said, if she was advising the Nats, she’d have them drawing up a new set of attack ads then and there. All it does is give them the chance to attack a possible Lab-Green coalition and actually it makes it harder for Labour to justify the position of preferring the Greens as coalition partners. That’s not smart politics.

              • Frida

                Yeah I just couldn’t believe this move by him. Dumb dumb dumb. Did he just hand the election to the right? Drops head on table in despair

    • Pat 4.2

      although inclined to agree re the Nats seizing upon it as an attack line (though they would likely do so anyway) the Greens are merely doing that which Labour has done, which is to highlight points of difference (or degree) between the two parties in order to boost their own support…and in the case of the Greens it could be said to be critical.
      in the grand scheme of things and at this late stage i doubt it will have an impact on the election outcome.

    • Carolyn_nth 4.3

      This is a tricky one. I haven’t seen Q&A, but the responses from Labour supporters on Twitter has been along the lines that once again Ardern will be hammered by the media, asking for a response to Shaw’s statements on CGT – after Labour had seemed to lay that to rest and were moving on.

      From another angle, some on the left felt Ardern was wrong to cave to media pressure to rule out CGT.

      Also, I do think Shaw it is correct to point out that no policies of any party will be enacted as published at the moment, but that they will be subject to negotiation with support partners.

      The MSM have tended to treat the election as a FPP one, where it is a straight choice between Labour and National – so anything Labour states as policy will be a done deal in government.

      But, it seems to me Shaw is trying to point out the GP is a separate party, with some significant policy differences from Labour, and that they aren’t there just to support the decisions of Labour.

      But it is a tricky area where Labour and the GP are trying to show they are potential partners in government, while also demonstrating they are different in some areas of policy – AND there is a big problem with the MSM that treat the election as largely a 2 horse race, and ignore all the negotiations that still need to happen once a government is formed.

      • weka 4.3.1

        Snap. Hopefully at the next election it will be a given that parties are in an MMP environment and the govt will be a coalition.

      • Anne 4.3.2

        I agree totally with your comments Carolyn_nth but unfortunately all the “Joe and Mary Bloggses” out there are uninformed about the mechanisms of coalition governments and make no effort to get themselves informed. That makes it so easy for the Right to spread lies, innuendo and generally manipulate the voters by way of introducing fear and prejudice. The aim is to allay those fears etc. which Jacinda had largely achieved in doing by kicking the can down the road for a few extra months.

        I hope I’m wrong and it won’t work this time.

        • Carolyn_nth 4.3.2.1

          I hope you are wrong, too.

          The other thing is, Labour people saying/implying Shaw should shut up about CGT makes it look like Labour is dictating to the GP the policies they should support.

          If the GP rolled over and accepted that, it would potentially restrict what the GP could say about the CGT after the election – or it would make a Lab-GP government look like they were mis-leading people during the election, only to put CGT back on the negotiating table after the election.

          IMO, it’s not just about wining an election, but how you win it, and the way a coalition party proceeds once in government.

          • weka 4.3.2.1.1

            Yep. That’s what this week is going to be about IMO. The Greens standing their ground and saying the relationship will be different this time and some of it will be on our terms. Much is dependent upon the number of MPs they get, but I support them standing their ground on the chance that they may end up with real influence.

          • Anne 4.3.2.1.2

            Labour people saying/implying Shaw should shut up about CGT makes it look like Labour is dictating to the GP the policies they should support.

            That perhaps was an unfortunate way for me to put it. I wasn’t meaning to suggest that Labour tell the Greens what they can or can’t say. It just seems to me to be a politically unwise move by James Shaw given the attacks of recent weeks and the now imminent election.

            • weka 4.3.2.1.2.1

              Do you mean that Shaw should be protecting Labour? That’s fraught with difficulty, both in terms of how that would compromise the Greens, but also Shaw won’t know what Labour strategy is, he’s not part of that process, trying to make himself part of that is risky.

              • Anne

                Do you mean that Shaw should be protecting Labour?

                No. I mean the time has been reached when both need to “protect” the image of a new Labour/Green coalition govt.

                • red-blooded

                  Let’s remember that if Labour doesn’t get to form the government, the Greens will have no input at all. Plus, because Labour have been under so much pressure about this and have had to alter their position, there’s no way that they can agree to forwarding any CGT within the first term now. It’s not a viable negotiating position for the Greens and even it it was it sure as hell wouldn’t a smart thing to signal to the public straight after the interview with Ardern that was so focused on this issue.

                  • weka

                    “there’s no way that they can agree to forwarding any CGT within the first term now”

                    If that’s true then Labour can say so during the coalition negotiations. The Greens may be happy to have some say in the tax working group proposal and how a CGT is designed for a second term.

                  • Pat

                    think it fair to say that Shaw knows that and it is merely positioning to (attempt to) ensure a Green presence in the next Parliament…and any voter with half a clue will understand that…..so that rules out the 40% or less who support National i guess.

                    • Clumsy positioning that gives ammo to the enemy and destabilizes the potential for a change of government imo

                    • Pat

                      @Marty….a little bit, but obviously Shaw still concerned about poll numbers (he’s a politician after all) but it does of course generate headlines like this…
                      https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2017/09/16/48330/election2017live-6days

                      however Id expect labour to be able to kick this to touch without too much trouble

                    • weka

                      It’s *only a problem if Labour don’t know how to position themselves in the context of the MoU and a progressive coalition. In some ways this lets them off the hook. The Greens are the ones that want to push the CGT etc.

                      It would have been a really bad move by the Greens if they didn’t signal their CGT position clearly before the election.

                    • Well i think the people who vote Green already know it. Chucking it into that interview context is poor politics because it does nothing apart from make it harder and it’s fucken hard enough already thanks James.

                    • Pat

                      current voters for the Greens may know it, but some who moved to Labour may be tempted back with such a position…as stated, the Greens want to be in the next Parliament (even ahead of the next government)

                    • weka

                      I think it’s about votes (the Greens need voters from Labour, let’s not pussy foot around that one anymore).

                      But also credibility in government. It’s not core Green voters that are going to be an issue post-election, it’s the MSM and electorate in general. Hence the need for the Greens to be very clear and up front about what they will be after post-election.

                      If the Greens hasn’t signalled this this week and then next week were pushing hard on this in the negotiations and then a L/G govt comes out later and says oh we’re doing a CGT after all, then Labour, the Greens and the L/G govt would get hammered (and rightly so).

                      Edited to add, the core issue here seems to be whether the Greens should be protecting Labour. I think Labour set the tone for that after Metiria’s speech, but it’s not a bad thing for the two parties to be independent at this point and having to stand on their own two feet.

                    • Yep it is about cannibalizing the left vote. Or trying to get labour voters to change to Green. It sorta makes it less honorable for me because of that.

                  • Anne

                    That is my argument too red blooded.

                    Doesn’t stop one understanding the basis for Shaw’s CGT statement. The Greens have had a long term policy to introduce a CGT tax. I agree with them. But to re-introduce the subject in the way Shaw did was a very risky thing to do one week out from an election.

                    • James

                      Why? They asked his parties priorities- he gave them.

                      If you don’t like them – don’t vote for them. It’s pretty simple really.

                      Or would you prefer he lie ?

                    • Muttonbird

                      I think it’s ok Anne. The drive for urgency on CGT has now been passed to the Green Party. JA is now able to present to the privileged white elite that she is cautious and will seek their approval before doing anything to fix NZ while the Greens are able to continue the message that the current tax regime is broken.

                    • lurgee

                      I think it’s ok Anne. The drive for urgency on CGT has now been passed to the Green Party. JA is now able to present to the privileged white elite that she is cautious and will seek their approval before doing anything to fix NZ while the Greens are able to continue the message that the current tax regime is broken.

                      So which do we get, post election? Caution or radicalism?

                      You realise this sort of mixed messaging is exactly the sort of thing that National will exploit? “Vote Labour, get the Green’s Capital Gains Tax!”

                      FWIW, I’m in favour of a CGT, including on the family home. If I sell my home for twice the value I bought it, that income should be taxed.

                    • Muttonbird

                      Lurgee, you are one of the few right wingers who do agree with taxing capital income so congrats for that at least.

                      The CGT policy remains and JA’s desire for urgency marry with the Greens statement today. They are on the same page as far as I can see. The ageing, selfish, white elite however punctured their colostomy bags at the thought a future PM might make a decision without their explicit say-so and a delay until 2021 it is.

                      There is no mixed message. Labour as the bigger party will keep their word to NZ and place certainty over urgency (NZ loses from this of course) and the Greens are passed the mantle for urgency. They both work together well in the next term and the required CGT is voted in in 2020.

                    • lurgee

                      Lurgee, you are one of the few right wingers who do agree with taxing capital income so congrats for that at least.

                      I amn’t a rightwinger. Other than that, carry on.

                • weka

                  “No. I mean the time has been reached when both need to “protect” the image of a new Labour/Green coalition govt.”

                  He just made it really clear that the new coalition will be a partnership not the Greens being subsumed into Labour. Very important for a progressive govt. Honestly I can’t see how this harms the coalition unless you believe that the Greens should be protecting Labour from their own policies. It’s ok for them to have different stances on this, and it’s critical that the Greens present their own position. If you can think of a way that Shaw could have done that on CGT that was different, I’d be interested to hear it.

          • The Chairman 4.3.2.1.3

            The Greens should have been wise enough to foresee the potential damage re-announcing this (a CGT) would cause at this stage of the game. There should be no need for Labour to have to tell them this.

            Moreover, they should have been wise enough to know that the damage may prevent them and Labour forming the next Government, hence no opportunity for them to push forward their CGT.

            Of all the issues the Greens could have used to highlight their point of difference, this was clearly the wrong one.

            It wouldn’t restrict what they could say about it after the election. And they could still negotiate on it. The only restriction would be the introduction of the policy. And that’s only if they want to ensure Labour honor their public commitment.

            • lurgee 4.3.2.1.3.1

              The Greens haven’t really shown themselves to be very tactically astute, though.

              Even Bill English hasn’t managed to shed support at the rate they’ve achieved.

              • Bill English didn’t have Stephen Joyce and his media contacts to put him in the court of public opinion to help smear and spread rumour’s and red herrings about him either ….

                Don’t worry , Hosking and Gower will be getting theirs when Labour and the Greens become the govt after Sep 23rd.

                And then there’s a little matter of UTU for those who have been wrecking our democracy for the last 9 years…

                Utu – Haka – YouTube
                you tube▶ 0:40

        • weka 4.3.2.2

          This is where it’s so important to base one’s politics in values.

          Good old Fran Sullivan said on the panel that National is the capitalistic party and that Labour could be wedging that against being a new era where we need to broaden tax out beyond company and personal income tax. This is the dilemma that Labour still have, neo-liberal light or heading towards social democracy. IMO when they pick a side it will get easier for them and they won’t have to worry about the lies that the right tries to spread because their message and policies and values will be crystal clear. Bear in mind that the Greens have been through this shit as well and found a way out of it.

          • Ad 4.3.2.2.1

            I would believe Labour wanted to shift the entire keel of the economy if, instead of saying where else they wanted to increase taxes, they stated how much lower income, GST, and company tax would be.

            They haven’t. There is no apparent strategy for tax.

            So I do t believe them.

            • weka 4.3.2.2.1.1

              As opposed to the Greens, who are saying exactly that (where taxes will increase, where they will decrease, how they will change over time).

      • Karen 4.3.3

        I agree with all of this except we obviously look at different people on twitter!

        I haven’t seen any Labour people criticising Shaw at all.

        • Carolyn_nth 4.3.3.1

          I was being a bit vague using the term “Labour supporter”. I was going from memory of earlier tweets to refer to the arguments against Shaw mentioning CGT.

          I scrolled back through my twitter. the main tweet actually came from an MSM person, Tim Watkin. He’s currently a producer at RNZ. I do think he is probably centre or on the centre-left of politics, and could favour Labour.

          His tweet (with some of the replies below it):

          Shaw wants Ardern to do a CGT in 1st term. Labour slaps head, knowing it will spend next day denying it again. National rubs hands #NZQandA

          Actually, he’s just contradicted an earlier post he published on Pundit about the parties’ policies on taxes.

          In that post he’s arguing for parties to be transparent on things like Tax policies, and also arguing that it’s not just an FPP election, but an MMP one that will require some post-election negotiations.

        • red-blooded 4.3.3.2

          I’m a Labour supporter. I’m not tweeting, but I am criticising. I think he made a foolish decision to raise this in this morning’s interview.

        • cleangreen 4.3.3.3

          Karen,

          I’m Labour and hoping like hell James Shaw’s CGT ‘bottom line’ statement doesn’t hurt either the greens or Labour.

          I reckon James should now come out, and say ‘that his CGT tax bottom line will be that it is part of a ‘stategy’ not that it has to be implimented in the first term.’

          That will clarify it clearly as Jacinda has already had to do.

          Even when Corrin Dann asked the consumate politican Winston about whether his NZ First Party would make a CGT tax ‘a bottom line’ he said no.

          James must clarify the voter now as Jacinda did.

          Then we can alll breathe a bit easier.

          letsdothis @ilovejacinda

          • weka 4.3.3.3.1

            Shaw never said it was a bottom line. He said it’s a priority policy for the Greens. I don’t think he even said that it had to be done this term, although I can see why that implication was taken.

            If you want a bottom line, look at climate change and the carbon tax.

            • Patricia 4.3.3.3.1.1

              Did he also say that the Greens were determined to ensure the family home would be free from CGT ? How many times has Jacinda told us that on every medium ?

    • weka 4.4

      “OK, the Greens have had a policy of introducing a CGT tax – excluding family home etc. – since 1999. Fair enough. Why couldn’t he have left it there? We all know there is going to be one sometime in the near future even if it ends up being called by another name. So, couldn’t he have kept his mouth shut? The letters CGT are the adult equivalent of the old “bogey man” threat used to keep children away from strange men. Joe and Mary Bloggs go into a paroxysm of irrational fear at the mere mention of them.”

      Because the Greens want change not power. It’s critical that NZ talks about the housing crisis in ways that include a CGT otherwise we will keep tinkering around the edges.

      The reason it’s a bogeyman is because National went hard on this at the last election as a way of attacking Cunliffe, so those things got conflated in a way – Labour’s weakness at that time and the CGT. The Greens don’t have that, they can talk about a CGT as part of their housing policy and it’s a strength.

      This is also the Greens fronting up and saying that if they get the numbers they’re going to be a strong coalition partner (this isn’t news). They want a partnership with Labour and that means taking them seriously. These are the issues they’re campaigning on, they have every right to do so. If you think that the Greens shouldn’t be talking about CGT because Labour are shy of it and it goes against Labour policy, then why is it ok for Labour to make definitive statements about tax that contradict Green policy?

      In this sense the Greens are continuing the long mahi of chipping away at FPP thinking in NZ. Both parties should be campaigning on their policies and values, but that should be happening in the over context of the next government being a coalition. Shaw just reminded everyone of that.

      • red-blooded 4.4.1

        “The Greens want change not power” is a nice tagline, but the fact is if they don’t make it into government they won’t have the chance to effect any change. They will only make it into government in cooperation with Labour. Shaw’s comments this morning put that in jeopardy.

        In general, I admire Shaw. I’ve always seen him as smart, articulate and principled. Today I saw him make a clumsy mistake and I’m calling him on it. There were plenty of things Shaw could have highlighted as issues up for debate between coalition partners. He chose the one issue that has the greatest potential to keep damaging the chances of any such coalition. It was ill-judged.

        • cleangreen 4.4.1.1

          Yep I agree Red Blooded fully here.

        • Carolyn_nth 4.4.1.2

          “The Greens want change not power” is a nice tagline, but the fact is if they don’t make it into government they won’t have the chance to effect any change. >

          Except that the GP has already influenced some changes in the narrative, without being in government. They have led the way on Climate Change, poverty, etc – and now, close to the election, the Labour Party are adopting some of the GP policies.

          The GP introduced many in the wider public to the arguments for significant climate change and anti-poverty policies. Other parties have picked up on them.

          There’s an inter-relationship between wider narratives, grass roots pressure, and the power of political parties to implement change – it’s not all top down, and most often governments pick up on policies when there’s public pressure for change – especially when it’s changes supproted by left wing people.

      • cleangreen 4.4.2

        Fair Comment Weka, Just that during the panel debate after they were mumbling that National may capitalise on that issue of CGT, – but hope you are right and the panel is wrong.

        They are such slimy politicians with their blinding scaremongering.

    • Bill 4.5

      All Shaw said was that the Green Party’s policies would hit the negotiating table. NZ Labour don’t view some of those policies in a favourable light? Really!?

      Maybe the idea some people have is that only those policies hedged around by agreement be part of any negotiation? Wouldn’t be much of a negotiation in that case though.

      And the whole point of developing policies and costings and campaigning to seek election on a given policy mix would be made utterly redundant.

      I mean, seriously, what’s the idea here? That a party campaigns on a policy with the clear understanding that it’s not campaigning on said policy and said policy is going to hit the dust-bin the second votes are tallied?

      It’s an odd idea if that’s what the idea is.

      • Union city greens 4.5.1

        I agree. It’s green part policy and they’re pushing it as part of their agenda. It’s not a secret it’s going to be part of post election bargaining, and like others, it’s going to be accepted or rejected as part of an agreement.

        It’s no more damaging to labour than act or nz1st pushing their policies in front of national.

        Hate to write it, but ‘fake news’.

        • Antoine 4.5.1.1

          > It’s not a secret it’s going to be part of post election bargaining

          Apparently it won’t be,

          “Jacinda Ardern says Labour will not consider negotiating with Greens over capital gains tax” – (https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/96925332/on-the-campaign-trail-sunday)

          • Bill 4.5.1.1.1

            Well that’s just stupid talk (or a stupid way of reporting stuff).

            Of course they’ll consider it. That happens by dint of the Greens just bringing it up. NZ Labour might impress on The Greens that they won’t alter their position or whatever. And even if that’s the end of the matter, a CGT has been a part of negotiations.

            • weka 4.5.1.1.1.1

              It’s also one sentence in passing from a single MSM outlet. I’d be more interested to see the context. It’s not going to surprise me if that’s what Ardern is doing but I’d like to see how she says it.

              • Bill

                Oops. Guess I was messing about with editing as you were submitting.

                Yup. Context and precise wording… If they’d reported Ardern as saying she wouldn’t renegotiate NZ Labour’s stated position, then that would at least have made sense. (ie, she’d have been signalling intransigence on the CGT front – which is a perfectly legitimate negotiating position to take.)

          • marty mars 4.5.1.1.2

            Yep sounds adamant – own, unnecessary, goal for the greens. For what? ffs.

            • Bill 4.5.1.1.2.1

              Marty. Where you getting this notion that any party to post elections negotiations has the power to decide what another party’s negotiating line or agenda will be?

              ffs. Imagine a boss gets wind a union’s going to put the case for a pay rise on the table and announces there will be no negotiation on a pay rise. You think the union then pulls that from their negotiations?

              • I am just over macho politics and I thought Shaw was better than that. Seriously why even do that.
                Deleted

                • Bill

                  So the “macho politics” is when a party says its campaign policies will be put forward at negotiations?

                  And a party attempting to have another party remove items from its negotiating stance before bargaining has even begun isn’t “macho politics”?

                  And simply stating the bleeding obvious (that your policy platform constitutes your negotiating positions) is “arrogant” and “stupid shit”?

                  edit – obviously a reply to your ‘unredacted’ original comment.

                  • No, doing it on tv a week from the election is macho politics especially when the purpose is to take votes from your potential partner.

                    • red-blooded

                      And especially when he has just heard the other party say there’s no way this would be implemented in the first term, and especially when he knows it a push-button issue for the Nats, who’re just going to keep on pushing that button now.

                    • Carolyn_nth

                      Seriously guys?! There are differences in Labour and Greens’ policies. Expect each party to try to maximise their votes.

                      when the purpose is to take votes from your potential partner.

                      And it’s not like Labour hasn’t announced several policies that are a repeat of GP ones close to the election – likely to be a shot at trying to win over some potential GP voters? leaving the GP with which significant policies to highlight?

                      doing it on tv a week from the election is macho politics

                      And how does this differ from Labour publicly announcing they wouldn’t implement CGT in their first term a week or so before the election – as though they wouldn’t need to negotiate it with coalition partners – when it has long been clear that CGT is a GP policy? And then expect potential coalition partners to roll over and accept that?

                    • See this is the problem imo. Bill asked and I said what I thought – then it becomes labour did or do it too. I know they do. Imo it was a mistake for the Greens to do the same.

                      But whatever, I’m still voting for them even though I’m disappointed in them

    • I agree Anne – time and place and as that interview showed just ammo for the attackers. I haven’t been impressed by some of the advice the Greens have listened to over recent times. Silly politics imo.

      • Carolyn_nth 4.6.1

        Well, I guess we all have our own views on this.

        I haven’t been keen on some of the advice the Labour Party seem to have got during the campaign eg distancing themselves from Turei, which was the turning point, after which the MSM treated Turei as fair game for attack; and the ruling out of inheritance tax or CGT in the first term.

        • marty mars 4.6.1.1

          Yep – Metiria made her choices and so did Jacinda. I’m okay with that because at that stage of the game I cannot see what else she could have done AND built the momentum that has built. We’ll never know I spose but no way do I agree that bringing tax up again a week out for ANY reason was a good idea. It was a bad idea imo.

            • Bill 4.6.1.1.1.1

              The RNZ blurb reproduced in that tweet is pretty damned mis-leading insofar as it suggests a coalition deal depends on a CGT being introduced in the first term.

              Greens target capital gains tax as a priority
              The Greens would want a capital gains tax introduced in the first term, if they went into coalition with Labour, leader James Shaw says

              Meanwhile, Shaw was quite clear it isn’t a pre-condition to any coalition, but simply one of however many policies that will be put forward for negotiation as per the process that forges any prospective coalition.

              • Carolyn_nth

                Yes. it and every other report quotes Shaw as saying:

                “There are a couple of things that I think we would like to push them on. One is a capital gains tax excluding the family home because we do have a real sense of urgency about the housing crisis.”

                Newshub also has a somewhat misleading headline, but reports:

                The Green Party wants a capital gains tax in the next term of Government and will put that on the table in coalition negotiations with Labour, leader James Shaw says.

                He told TVNZ’s Q&A programme that was one of a number of key items the party wanted when he received Labour leader Jacinda Ardern’s first call if she had the opportunity to form a Government after next weekend’s election.

                “In the same way that every coalition involves policies from both partners we’ve got to negotiate what a coalition agreement would look like but there are a couple of things that I think we would like to push them on – one is the area of a capital gains tax excluding the family home,” he said.

                “Because we do have a real sense of urgency around the housing crisis.”

                And Newsroom reports:

                With less than a week to go until the election, Greens leader James Shaw has reopened the capital gains tax debate by saying he would argue in any coalition negotiations with Labour for a capital gains tax in their first term.

                In an interview with Corin Dann on TVNZ’s Q+A, Shaw said the Greens would push Labour to enact a capital gains tax in its first term, although he said it would not be a condition for support.

                But, I would expect the right leaning MSM journos to keep pushing the anti-tax lines. If we want real change, there needs to be a change to the dominant narrative, and this means constantly challenging the retro MSM lines.

              • red-blooded

                But he DID say he would want it introduced in the first term, Bill. Note that RNZ have used the same wording as you did (above) – “priority”. There’s nothing misleading about this report.

            • marty mars 4.6.1.1.1.2

              Well i like i dont agree with him all the time too.

    • Ross 4.7

      I disagree with you, Anne, re Shaw’s comments. A CGT will likely be here in the future but not in the next three years. I would say the vast majority of Green voters expect to see a CGT. They will get their wish but not immediately.

    • SpaceMonkey 4.8

      Anne… I watched the same interview but I didn’t think it a spanner in anything. Given Labour’s position, I read it as the Greens will do their best, as part of any coalition negotiation, to ensure an analysis of a workable CGT is included in the Tax Working Group terms of reference.

    • tracey 4.9

      Had you thought Greens might be giving Labour a way out if elected? Also Labour still has the 5 year bright line extension on the table?

    • patricia bremner 4.10

      Anne Jacinda has ruled out debating CGT tax with the Greens. “It will be our agenda not theirs” Nip and tuck!!

    • I don’t understand why people commenting here are so influenced by right wing commentators. Of course we need a capital gains tax, it was Jacinda who weakened. As even Corin explained later on the 6pm news, James’ statement will actually bring in support from all those who understand the importance of a CGT. The Greens are needed to stop Labour from softening too much and bowing to capitalist interests. Good on James for taking the principled approach. We need more of that!

      All this worrying about what Joyce and Bill may say…I would have thought more people want opposition parties to stand strong and stand up for their policies.

      Don’t let Crosby Textor define this election!

      • lprent 4.11.1

        The Greens are needed to stop Labour from softening too much and bowing to capitalist interests.

        It was the primary reason about why I voted Green this election. I simply don’t trust the wide range of people as a group in the Labour caucus enough to make decisions for the longer term. They have way too much of a tendency to do particular things because they are expedient. That was what was required in the 5th Labour government. It isn’t what is required now because the predictable problems that they didn’t address have kept getting worse under National’s bovine stupidity and timidity in dealing with anything that might actually require fixing.

        Labour need to have a bit of a whip. Probably from both sides because I think that the Greens and NZ First really under estimate how much common ground that they have.

        The reality is that Labour probably need to have a party either side of them who are .

      • weka 4.11.2

        “Don’t let Crosby Textor define this election!”

        This.

        Thanks for the post Dave!!

      • gsays 4.11.3

        Well said Dave.
        I think the nats attacking on the cgt front,will only help the other parties.

        So far, the negative tax mongering approach hasn’t served the Tories well.
        Zoology clearly isn’t about running election campaigns.

  5. Incognito 5

    Very good post! Nice balance, clear & bold message, and honest. No need to say more …

  6. Ant 6

    My vote is in : Green (Party) and Labour (Electorate).

    • red-blooded 6.1

      And so’s mine – two ticks for Labour. The electorate vote doesn’t mean a thing really, unless you’re in an electorate like Epsom or one of the Māori seats that might bring in a party that wouldn’t make the 5% threshold. Splitting your vote might make you feel like you’re supporting both parties, but it’s an illusion.

      I think there are some good people in the Greens and I want them to have a role in government, but there’s no chance of that without a Labour led government and while the Greens are still my preferred coalition partners, I could still support a Labour led government even if it ended up working with NZF. It wouldn’t be my first choice, but it would still be better than what we’ve got.

      • Andre 6.1.1

        Vote-splitting still makes sense in an electorate like New Lynn, where the National vote is higher than Labour, but lower than Labour plus Greens. Garcia is such a social troglodyte I’d be seriously ashamed to have him as my MP. Without vote splitting, it might even be possible that the left vote would be split enough to let the Nat candidate win in enough electorates to actually give the Nats an overhang.

        • red-blooded 6.1.1.1

          On current polling (RNZ poll of polls) Garcia will make it in. He’s number 50 on Nat’s list, and on 41.9% they would get 50 seats. They only way to get rid of him is to lower their percentage of the vote. You don’t manage that by vote splitting.

          Do it if it makes you feel better, but don’t kid yourself that it has any other meaning.

          • Andre 6.1.1.1.1

            There’s a bunch of Nats lower down the list that have a good chance to win their seats, which means the Nats would probably need more than that 42% to get Garcia in. Erica Stanford #65 East Coast Bays, Chris Penk #64 Helensville, Denise Lee #63 Maungakiekie, David Elliott 55 Napier, etc.

            So ensuring that Garcia does not win New Lynn has a good chance of keeping him out of Parliament. Whereas two ticks to the Greens has no chance of winning the electorate for Leilani Tamu and might just let Garcia into Parliament by the back door.

            • red-blooded 6.1.1.1.1.1

              So give your two ticks to Labour, then…

              • Andre

                Nice try.

                But the Greens are significantly closer aligned to my views and priorities, and I’m very confident they’ll get over 5%. So my vote’s already gone to the Greens and Deborah Russell.

      • Incognito 6.1.2

        I don’t see vote splitting as an illusion or futile unless it delivers a ‘winner’. It is my personal expression of whom I consider a good candidate, for the electorate, but more importantly in general terms. All people matter, not just the ones who get the majority electorate vote IMO.

        • red-blooded 6.1.2.1

          “I don’t see vote splitting as an illusion or futile unless it delivers a ‘winner’. ”

          Huh? Surely when we vote, we’re hoping to deliver a winner? (And a winning party.)

          “All people matter, not just the ones who get the majority electorate vote IMO.”

          OK… I think you’ll find I was discussing the fact that it’s the party vote that matters most. The electorate vote makes a difference in some cases, but in terms of who forms the government (the topic of discussion), it’s by no means the most important decision.

  7. Some good comments here regarding tax :

    Why are you so afraid of tax? | Stuff.co.nz
    https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/opinion-analysis/…/shamubeel-eaqub-tax-is-love

    • Carolyn_nth 7.1

      Yes. Just read that, and it concludes:

      Taxes may not be on the agenda for the vote on September 23, because there is not much in any of the major parties’ policies. But we should not start from a basic misunderstanding about taxes.

      We are not a highly taxed nation. We pay tax to pool our resources for services we all want and to redistribute to make our country better off. How much tax we want to pay is directly linked to what kind of New Zealand we want. There is no magic way of having lower taxes, better public services and a fairer New Zealand.

  8. Ad 8

    If they lose this election, it will be because of tax, and Labour will have no-one but themselves to blame.

    I hope they win.

    But if they do its because they did other things better.

    • Antoine 8.1

      Mixture of tax and Turei, rather

      • WILD KATIPO 8.1.1

        Who are you again ?… you forgot to mention a non existent 11.7 billion dollar hole,… kind of like the non existent $100,000.00 bottle of wine that never existed…

        Or am I reminiscing about the Dirty Politics of the National party senior ministers again…

        Oh ,… and btw ….

        Just WHERE is Jason Ede?

        Or little Toddles?

        • Antoine 8.1.1.1

          > you forgot to mention a non existent 11.7 billion dollar hole

          Well, if they win the election then that might be a big part of why they won, for sure.

          A.

          • WILD KATIPO 8.1.1.1.1

            What ,… you mean like winning an election through lying to the public ?… mhmmm… would have to agree. Real National form. Not so long ago they called it Dirty Politics.

            Remember ?… like when John Key used the SIS to smear Phil Goff and their media mate John Armstrong fabricated the non existent $ 100 ,000 .00 bottle of wine?

            Funny how they wheel the geriatric Armstrong out on the eve of an election to further smear and discredit the opposition . But Hey !… that’s impartial journalism ,- National style , – isn’t it …

            Good old Dildo Stephen Joyce to the rescue again , huh ?

            Cant beat those media tax payer funded bail outs and threats of funding cuts to move those mountains , eh Antoine ? …

      • Ad 8.1.2

        Turei was a gift from several weeks ago.

        Tax was something Labour had nine fucking years to plan for and still got spectacularly wrong and is still costing them into this last week.

        • weka 8.1.2.1

          Do you know when/why Ardern shifted from the previous Labour position (no tax reform until after a tax review and in the second term)?

        • red-blooded 8.1.2.2

          That’s a spectacular overstatement.

          Tax is something Kiwis have been conditioned into seeing as akin to theft. Labour has fought on this issue 3 times and had it soundly rejected 3 times. This time, they brought a more nuanced argument to the table, saying that something has to change and that they’re open to advice. Yes, that’s been presented as muddled or hiding their true intentions, and yes, they’ve had to do a lot of ruling in and out. Yes, they’ve changed position on implementation (first term or after the next election). Yes, it’s been a stick to beat them with. But it was always going to be a point of attack if they had any sort of agenda about making tax changes. It was always going to be the thing they had to explain and justify and allay fears about. It probably could have been handled better, but no matter how clear and fair and transparent it all was, it was always going to be one of the Nat’s targets and something for the media to latch onto and worry about. The lies about increased personal tax show the level of spin and bullshit that were always going to be attached to any proposal about tax.

          • Antoine 8.1.2.2.1

            > It probably could have been handled better

            For me the problem was that Labour came across as wanting to tax for the sake of taxing, rather than as an unfortunate necessity in order to get money to fund social spending

            A.

            • Carolyn_nth 8.1.2.2.1.1

              that’s the doing of the MSM. And framing it as “unfortunate” is not helpful. As Shamubeel Eaqub says:

              We are not a highly taxed nation. We pay tax to pool our resources for services we all want and to redistribute to make our country better off. How much tax we want to pay is directly linked to what kind of New Zealand we want.

              Too many people have been sucking up the right wing self-interest spin of the last decade or more. And too many of the property owners have been fed with the false idea that their property-based wealth has increased painlessly over the last 9 years – so they don’t want to stop the false wealth feeling.

              It hasn’t been a painless 9 years for those on low incomes.

            • Psycho Milt 8.1.2.2.1.2

              …Labour came across as wanting to tax for the sake of taxing…

              In the version presented by their political opponents, yes. Which is hardly surprising, and surely something a person of even average intelligence could see through.

              • Andre

                “something a person of even average intelligence could see through” isn’t a particularly useful criterion in this case, since by definition half the population is below average intelligence.

                • True, which is of course why political parties do it – but I don’t get the impression Antoine is from that half of the population.

                  • Antoine

                    I don’t really believe in intelligence as a quantifiable thing anyway

                    • In Vino

                      It takes a certain degree of intelligence to doubt its own quantifiability…

                    • Antoine

                      What I meant is that I don’t agree with this division of the population into smart people, average people and dumb people, I just don’t think it sums up what’s really going on.

                    • Antoine …
                      17 September 2017 at 2:04 pm

                      ” … I don’t really believe in intelligence as a quantifiable thing anyway ” …

                      Then we have an accord then , Antoine ,… as there are many examples of smart arsed rich pricks progeny inheriting wealth , education and social position to stand them in good stead to go on to even greater aspirations than the south Auckland family struggling on minimum wages living out of a car or garage …..

                      Much like the spoilt brats of certain Asian family’s in which their govt dictates 1 child per family being teleported to New Zealand to study ,… and while their at it ,… place their name on the title of the new home they just purchased to be used as a family cash cow once their progeny returns to the country of their birth…

                      Funny how ‘free trade’ deals work,… how one party can rape the shit out of one country and f@ck up their economy with gay abandon while the other signatories to the same free trade deal cannot buy land/ houses in reciprocal kind….

              • Antoine

                >> Labour came across as wanting to tax for the sake of taxing…
                > In the version presented by their political opponents, yes. Which is hardly surprising, and surely something a person of even average intelligence could see through.

                I still buy into it to some extent. Look at Labour’s messaging around the water taxes and the CGT. Needing more money to provide services, is far from being front and centre.

                A.

                • red-blooded

                  Bullshit. The message about the water levy is entirely focused on cleaning up our waterways (both through encouraging conservation of water and through building funds to attack practical issues on a regional basis). The discussion around CGT has always been about fairness, yes, but it’s also been about improving provision of services without putting up income tax or GST (both of which weigh heavily on the less well-off).

            • WILD KATIPO 8.1.2.2.1.3

              Antoine :

              … ” For me the problem was that Labour came across as wanting to tax for the sake of taxing, rather than as an unfortunate necessity in order to get money to fund social spending ” …

              Yep ,- keep up the far right neo liberal mantra on taxation, Antoine,… steady as she goes , but unfortunately for you ,… there are those far more economically and politically aware than your simplistic , self serving agendas out there …

              Why are you so afraid of tax? | Stuff.co.nz
              https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/opinion-analysis/…/why-are-you-so-afraid-of-tax

              Oh and BTW ,…

              Its time for you to read this and realize the games up .

              New Right Fight – Who are the New Right?
              http://www.newrightfight.co.nz/pageA.html

        • Pat 8.1.2.3

          “Tax was something Labour had nine fucking years to plan for and still got spectacularly wrong and is still costing them into this last week.”

          element of truth and it may end up costing them , however….

          Lets talk about tax policy

  9. Craig H 9

    My biggest issue with CGT is that some people don’t understand it, and believe that the rate will be 100%…

  10. nzsage 10

    This article could not be more wrong.

    Yes we need the Greens to be there and they will get their +5% needed but the #1 priority for the left is to have a Labour party with a large majority and therefore mandate to govern.

    That can only happen if progressives party vote Labour.

  11. BM 11

    No change if you vote Labour, you can really start to see Helen Clarks influence shining through.

    Jacinda Ardern tells Q+A the Five Eyes spy network has “benefited New Zealand” and she won’t change it if put in government

    • adam 11.1

      That should make you happy BM.

      • Muttonbird 11.1.1

        There’s a certain amount of conservatism, caution, and risk management creeping into Labour’s talk in the dying days of this campaign.

        It’s very much a don’t scare the horses approach. Particularly, like BM, horses bound for the glue-factory.

      • BM 11.1.2

        I’m a bit meh about the whole 5 eyes thing, not a big issue for me.

        I do know that it’s a huge issue for many on the left though, a real vote decider.

        Having read that I can’t see Labour pulling out of the TPPA either.

        • WILD KATIPO 11.1.2.1

          … ” I’m a bit meh about the whole 5 eyes thing, not a big issue for me / I do know that it’s a huge issue for many on the left though, a real vote decider. ” …

          …………………………………..

          Apparently its a concern for both those on the left AND the RIGHT.

          And then there was the small matter of Tim Grosser and John Key using the SIS / GSCB to gain advantage for the top job for Grosser on the World Trade Organisation to aid in ramming through the TTPA a few years back… jettisoned of course when it was apparent Obama and the Democrats were going to lose the elections …

          Who cares about the #SnowdenNZ revelations? | The National …
          https://www.nbr.co.nz/opinion/who-cares-about-snowdennz-revelations

          You seem to have a very insular head in the sand attitude towards government corruption , BM, … I can only be thankful that others in a position to speak out do not ….

  12. David Mac 12

    Of course stand alone political parties have policy clash. I didn’t see a fat faux pas from James. Two people having a great life together is all about the art of compromise, successful coalitions, more so.

    The Greens are unlikely to have enough pull to have a very extensive wish-list. The immediate implementation of a CGT is unlikely to make the Gotta Haves. I’m confident the Greens will happily live with the Labour stance: ‘Lets look hard at it for 2020, get a mandate.’ Most people with a basic interest in politics will get this….Jacinda and her crew will be boss. Those with no interest in politics didn’t see the interview, they don’t care….. We’re flat out getting 20 minutes of their time next Saturday.

    While saying nothing about who he’ll run with, Winston has said plenty about what he wants to get done, his bottom limes. I think it’s strategy, 6 of his bottom lines sacrificial lambs. Hoover up any votes a call for a Maori Seat referendum may generate and lose little when giving it up to coalition partners around the negotiating table. The coalition partners can then claim, ‘It’s something we demanded from NZ First’.

    Today, opening up the Whangarei Port and infrastructure is near the top of Winston’s list. Come next Sunday, if he and Shane stumble, I’m expecting NZ First policy to morph into “What Port?”

    I think James is awake to the Old Silver Foxs’ cunning and is having a bit too. The Greens have bigger fish to fry than the implementation of a CGT.

    • Antoine 12.1

      God alone knows what Winston really wants

      A.

      • cleangreen 12.1.1

        Antoine; in answer to; ‘God alone knows what Winston really wants’

        Winston wants to save this couuntry from a corporate financial takeover as what happend to Greece simple as that, he cares about us all.

        I spoketo him last Tuesday in Gisborne – as he said this to over 200 strong at a public meeting.

        The media and National have tried to destroy him for countless years, that’s why I have deep admiration of him, as he is still there trying to save our couintry.

        He will not go with National, TPPA or any other so called ‘free trade’ agreement if it has any controls on our own sovergenty.

        He will ammend the financial system that is throttlig us all with borrowing everything from foriegn banks money to support our economy and infrustructure that is a fools paridise.

        We are paying overseas banks 5 billion interest only a year now.

        He wants our own financail institutions to benefit not forien banks!!!!

        He will save our nationwide rail, airports and seaports from privatisation or control and this is essential that all essential services are kept undern kiwi control. ‘NZ First’ means that exactlly.

        Thats what he wants.

        • red-blooded 12.1.1.1

          Winston is a political opportunist and he plays and bullies the media shamelessly. No-one’s been “trying to destroy him” – that’s all part of the narrative he uses to paint himself as an underdog, battling the forces of the mainstream on behalf of… who, exactly? What, exactly? How much did he “amend the financial system” when he was the Treasurer in Bolger’s National government?

          Vote for Winston if it’s going to keep you from voting for the Nats, but if you want meaningful change, vote Labour or Green.

        • Antoine 12.1.1.2

          @cleangreen

          In my view you are getting sucked in by Winston’s BS

          He knows what you want to hear, but that doesn’t mean he believes it

          A.

      • WILD KATIPO 12.1.2

        Antoine 12.1
        17 September 2017 at 2:52 pm

        … ” God alone knows what Winston really wants ” …

        But at least we know what you and others like you want , Antoine,…

        New Right Fight – Who are the New Right?
        http://www.newrightfight.co.nz/pageA.html

  13. Rosemary McDonald 13

    I’m a bit confused at the hullabaloo over Shaw’s statement today re Capital Gains Tax (but not on the family home).

    This is not new, and he stated this quite clearly a couple of weeks ago in the RNZ ‘quick fire questions with Campbell…with cake!!”.

    http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/checkpoint/audio/201857551/quick-fire-questions-with-minor-party-leaders

    CGT at about 3.10

    Most peculiar answer was from Marama Fox….no CGT on first, second or third homes because the second and third homes are bought so the oldies can survive without relying on Super.

    If folk have not already realised that the Maori Party has spent too long lying down with the dogs then that particular statement should just about peel the last blinding skin from their eyes.

    The Greens will secure seats at this election…kudos to them for being up front on this contentious issue…rare for a political party at election time.

    Said my piece…back to your strategy debate! 🙂

    • weka 13.1

      As Shaw pointed out, the Greens have had a CGT policy since 1999 😉

      • Rosemary McDonald 13.1.1

        Yep…but folk have very short memories.

        Having said that, some parties are over quick to tweak their policies as conditions (time of the month, year, tide, wind direction…..) change. Small wonder that folk find consistency a tad unnerving.

        Me…must be fast sinking into my dotage as I find constancy comforting.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Measles: the quackery that is homeopathic “vaccination”
    A few days ago, a friend sent me a link to a health-related FB page that had published a post from a homeopathist, offering homeopathic “vaccination”¹ against measles (using something called a “Morbillinum nosode” at a “potency” of 200C, which I’ll explain shortly). I followed the link, left a comment ...
    SciBlogsBy Alison Campbell
    1 hour ago
  • Colombia: 20th anniversary of La Gabarra massacre
    by Gearóid Ó Loingsigh This year marks the 20th anniversary of the La Gabarra massacre. The community organised an event to remember the most well-known of the horrendous heart-breaking events that befell the communities of this area of the municipality of Tibú: the massacre carried out on August 21st 1999. ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    2 hours ago
  • A prediction
    There was another police chase in Christchurch this morning, resulting in a crash which killed one person and injured five more. Because someone died, the chase is being investigated by the Independent Police Conduct Authority. And based on previous reports by the IPCA, we know how it will go: the ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 hours ago
  • Climate Change: The Zero Carbon Bill
    Just a month ago we saw the biggest protest in a generation as people marched to demand stronger action on climate change. A core demand of the protesters was to strengthen the Zero Carbon Bill's target to net-zero by 2040. So what is the government's response? Judging by the ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    8 hours ago
  • Zombie ants, updated
    Back in 2010, I wrote about the strange tale of the zombie ants, which do the bidding of their fungal overlords. (They’re not an isolated example; a range of parasites change their hosts’ behaviour. See here and here for example – though as you’ll find, the toxoplasmosis story may be ...
    SciBlogsBy Alison Campbell
    10 hours ago
  • Paying For Our Pakeha “Guilt” And “Privilege”.
    Shouldn't That Be: "Wrong White Crowd"? Rather than apportion guilt, would it not have been wiser for the makers of Land Of The Long White Cloud to accept that the Pakeha of 2019 are not – and never will be – “Europeans”? Just as contemporary Maori are not – and ...
    11 hours ago
  • A Bodyguard of Truths.
    One, Two, Many Truths: With the collapse of “actually existing socialism” in 1991, the universities of the West found themselves saddled with a new mission. With their ideological competitors now soundly defeated they were no longer required to demonstrate the superiority of capitalist values. Their job now was to cement ...
    12 hours ago
  • A call to unionists
    by the Council of Disobedient Women   We call on the Council of Trade Unions to show some fortitude and take a stand with your sisters. Unionists know that there is a material world, otherwise workers could simply identify out of poverty. They could declare themselves Well Paid. Why stop ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    1 day ago
  • Sophistry and bullshit
    I spent some time reading the Regulatory Impact Statement and Bill of Rights Act advice for the government's odious control order scheme today. I am not impressed with either of them. Starting with the RIS, it is built on some pretty questionable assumptions. For example:Unless individuals have been convicted of ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 day ago
  • I’m so fly, I’m #NoFly!
    #NoFly: Walking the talk on climate change, by Shaun Hendy. BWB Texts, 2019. Reviewed by Robert McLachlan In June 2018, Swede Maja Rosén founded We stay on the ground with a pledge not to fly in 2019, and a goal of persuading 100,000 other Swedes to join her. In August, ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    1 day ago
  • Punishing the young
    We all know that NZ First is a party of and for old people who hate the young. But they've topped their previous pedophobia with a proposal that all young people be forced to do 100 hours community work:NZ First wants all young people to do 100 hours of community ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 day ago
  • Journalism, clickbait, & ideas of classical beauty – but not science
    A couple days ago the NZ Herald published a story with the headline, “Science says Bella Hadid is world’s most beautiful woman“, and followed up with the ridiculous statement that Supermodel Bella Hadid has been declared as the world’s most beautiful woman following a scientific study into what constitutes as ...
    SciBlogsBy Alison Campbell
    1 day ago
  • Is Simon’s Smile Sustainable?
    A Sustainable Proposition: With as much as 18 percent of the electorate declaring itself “undecided” about who to vote for, there is obviously plenty of space for a party like former Green Party member, Vernon Tava's, about-to-be-launched "Sustainable NZ Party" to move into. The most hospitable political territory for such ...
    1 day ago
  • What the actual Hell?
    Keir Starmer has hinted that Labour might vote in favour of the Johnson government's shoddy deal, with the proviso that a second referendum is attached:Speaking to BBC One’s The Andrew Marr Show, he said: “We will see what that looks like but it makes sense to say that by whatever ...
    2 days ago
  • Hard News: Dealer’s Choice, an oral history from Planet 1994
    In 1994, I was the editor for an issue of Planet magazine focused on cannabis, its culture and the prospects for the end of its prohibition. Part of that issue was an interview with 'Ringo', an experienced cannabis dealer.I recently posted my essay from that issue, and I figured it ...
    3 days ago
  • The invasion of women’s sports by men: some facts
    Dr Helen Waite, sports sociologist and former elite athlete, on the invasion of women’s sport by men and the anti-scientific and misogynist ideology used to rationalise it.   ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    3 days ago
  • Remainers starting to sound like fascists
    As Brexit comes to a grisly conclusion (perhaps) people on all sides are saying intemperate and uwise things.  Some, like the Daly Mail, have been doing it for years.People as normally level headed as Jon Lansman are calling for automatic deselection of MPs who vote against a (likely) Labour three ...
    3 days ago
  • Labour MPs supporting Johnson’s turd-sandwich deal?
    I find this unbelievable:
    I've got one source saying more Labour MPs than expected are mulling whether to vote for the deal - including names who were not on the letter to Juncker and Tusk— Emilio Casalicchio (@e_casalicchio) 17 October 2019 I've compiled a list of possible reasons why Labour ...
    4 days ago
  • Why do we need control orders again?
    On Wednesday, the government was loudly telling us that it needed to legislate to allow it to impose "control orders" - effectively a parole regime, but imposed without charge, prosecution, conviction or real evidence - on suspected terrorists because they couldn't be prosecuted for their supposed crimes. Today, it turns ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    4 days ago
  • Bullshitting the Minister
    On Monday, the Hit and Run inquiry heard from NZDF's former director of special operations, who claimed that the defence Minister knew everything about the Operation Burnham raid. Today, the inquiry heard from that (former) Minister - and it turns out that he didn't know nearly as much as NZDF ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    4 days ago
  • Speaker: Extinction Rebellion is not a cult (but ecstasy for the people)
    Yoga gurus and cult leaders – I’ve seen a few. Two weeks ago, I unknowingly joined an alleged new-age cult at the Kāpiti coast, together with a giant kraken and some neatly dressed pensioners who would make any book club proud.They were among the two hundred people of all ages ...
    4 days ago
  • We need to bring the police under control
    The last decade has seen a trend of increasing weapons availability to police. Assault rifles. Tasers on every hip. Guns in cars. And following the march 15 massacre, pistols on every hip, all over the country. At the same time, its also seen an increase in the abuse of force: ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    4 days ago
  • If you can’t measure it, does it exist?
    In the last couple of weeks, I’ve been busy preparing for our summer paper on Science Communication. Looking for something amusing about ‘risk’ in science, I came across this neat xkcd.com cartoon about why so many people come knocking on my door (or phoning me, or emailing me) desperately wanting ...
    SciBlogsBy Marcus Wilson
    4 days ago
  • Swinson’s swithering
    Jo Swinson is doing even worse at this Being Sensible lark that I'd thought.  I've just become aware of the following utterance
    .@KayBurley presses Lib Dem leader @joswinson on whether she would agree to a #Brexit deal 'no matter how bad a deal it is' as long as it had ...
    5 days ago
  • Women’s rights, trans ideology and Gramsci’s morbid symptoms
    by John Edmundson The International Socialist Organisation (ISO) have recently reposted a February article, by Romany Tasker-Poland, explaining ISO’s position in the “trans rights” debate.  It is available on their website and on their Facebook Page.  The article sets out to explain why “socialists support trans rights”.  It reads more ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    5 days ago
  • We need to take guns off police
    Today's IPCA report of police criminality: a police officer unalwfully tasered a fleeing suspect who posed no threat to anyone:The police watchdog has found an officer unlawfully tasered an Auckland man who broke his ankle jumping off a balcony to escape arrest. [...] To avoid arrest, the man jumped over ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • “Bringing kindness back”
    "Auckland City Mission: 10% of Kiwis experiencing food insecurity", RNZ, 16 October 2019:About half a million people are experiencing food insecurity, according to new research from the Auckland City Mission. Food insecurity, or food poverty, is defined as not having enough appropriate food. The City Mission said over the last ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • Press Release: “Fake News” from Auckland City Council CCOs Board Chairs re pay and performance b...
    Media Statement for Immediate Release 16th October 2019 “Fake News” from Auckland City Council CCOs Board Chairs re pay and performance bonuses for top managers Despite comments from Auckland City Council CCOs Board Chairs re pay and performance bonuses for top managers—Herald Newspaper Tuesday Oct 15th–there is very little evidence ...
    Closing the GapBy Tracey Sharp
    5 days ago
  • Ever-So-Slightly Bonkers: Simon Bridges Plays To His Base.
    Would You Buy A Used Propaganda Video From This Man? Bridges and the National Party’s strategists have discovered that the ideas and attitudes considered acceptable by today’s editors and journalists are no longer enforceable. The rise and rise of the Internet and the social media platforms it spawned means that ...
    5 days ago
  • Asking for food
    There is plenty of evidence of the way the business mentality has permeated every level of society since the recrudescence of market liberalism 35 years ago. You only need to think of how citizens in need of help from their government, their state, their country, are now routinely described as ...
    Opposable ThumbBy Unknown
    5 days ago
  • Forty years of change in the jobs Kiwi do and the places they call home
    John MacCormick Over the last 40 years, New Zealanders – and people in other countries – have experienced big changes in the jobs they do and where they live and work. These changes include: a decline in manufacturing jobs an increase in jobs in ‘information-intensive’ industries (which are better paid ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    5 days ago
  • Protecting Fresh Waterways in Aotearoa/NZ: The Strong Public Health Case
    Nick Wilson, Leah Grout, Mereana Wilson, Anja Mizdrak, Phil Shoemack, Michael Baker Protecting waterways has the benefits of: (1) protecting water from hazardous microbes; (2) minimising cancer risk and other problems from nitrates in water; (3) avoiding algal blooms that are hazardous to health; (4) protecting mahinga kai uses (cultural ...
    SciBlogsBy Public Health Expert
    6 days ago
  • Massey University triggered to rebrand
    by The Council of Disobedient Women In a press release today Massey University announced it has decided to rebrand and reorientate after struggling to be a University for grown-ups. For some time the University has wanted to be a safe play space for wee-woke-misogynists who have been really badly triggered ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    6 days ago
  • Swinson backing calls for a second referendum (again)
    After a brief dalliance with 'hard Revoke' it looks like the Lib Dems are changing ground on on Brexit, with leader Jo Swinson reverting to calling for a second referendum on Johnson's deal.The party has tabled an amendment to the Queen’s speech requesting that any deal brought back from Brussels ...
    6 days ago
  • An odious bill
    The government has decided that someone has done Something Bad. But despite their belief, there seems to be no evidence that they have actually broken the law. So the government's solution is to pass a retrospective law allowing them to be punished anyway, on a lower standard of proof. If ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • National is now the party of climate arson
    So, Judith Collins has done a Facebook rant about climate change, peddling the same shit National has been shovelling for the past twenty years: the impacts are overstated, there's no need to do anything about it, and its too hard anyway (oh, and its so unfair that people who peddle ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • The environmental footprint of electric versus fossil car
    Climate Explained is a collaboration between The Conversation, Stuff and the New Zealand Science Media Centre to answer your questions about climate change. If you have a question you’d like an expert to answer, please send it to climate.change@stuff.co.nz There is a lot of discussion on the benefits of ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    6 days ago
  • “Manifest” by Andrew Bird – A Song For The Times.
    I came across this song quite by accident. If it isn't one of Greta Thunberg's favourites - it should be.Video courtesy of YouTube.This post is exclusive to Bowalley Road. ...
    6 days ago
  • Passing the buck
    Last month, NZDF's shoddy coverup of what it knew about civilian casualties in Operation Burnham began to fall apart, with the revelation that a report on the matter, which NZDF claimed not to have, had been sitting in an NZDF safe for the past nine years. Yesterday, the man responsible ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • India a major player in Earth observation satellites
    While many imagine that countries like the USA and Europe dominate space activities, in fact India is now a major player on this stage. It launches satellites for its own purposes and also commercially, and has constellations orbiting our planet and returning data of vital importance to that nation in ...
    SciBlogsBy Duncan Steel
    1 week ago
  • The rot at the top (2).
    Thanks to a report from the Acting Inspector General of Intelligence and Security following a complaint by Nicky Hager, we have come to find out that the SIS illegally spied on Mr. Hager on behalf of the NZDF after publication of Hager’s 2011 book, Other People’s Wars. The NZDF justified ...
    KiwipoliticoBy Pablo
    1 week ago
  • Common misconceptions about “Global Warming”
    COMMON MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING MYTH 1: Global temperatures are rising at a rapid, unprecedented rate. FACT: The HadCRUT3 surface temperature index, produced by the Hadley Centre of the UK Met Office and the Climate Research Unit of the University of East Anglia, shows warming to 1878, cooling to 1911, ...
    An average kiwiBy admin@averagekiwi.com
    1 week ago
  • A climate of tyranny
    For the past week, Extinction Rebellion has been peacefully protesting in London to demand action on climate change. The British government's response? Ban their protests:Police have banned Extinction Rebellion protests from continuing anywhere in London, as they moved in almost without warning to clear protesters who remained at the movement’s ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Collins crushes climate
    An essay by Judith Collins MP reported on Carbon News yesterday seems to show an alarming shift in attitude within the National Party. Collins argues against the Zero Carbon Bill, the Paris Agreement, and downplays the magnitude of climate impacts. The Paris Agreement was adopted in December 2015 and ratified ...
    SciBlogsBy Robert McLachlan
    1 week ago
  • More disappointment
    When they were running for election, Labour promised to overhaul the Employment Relations Act and introduce fair pay agreements to set basic pay and conditions on an industry level, preventing bad employers from undercutting good ones. They followed this up by establishing a working group, which reported back in January ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • What do these mother-child studies really say about fluoridation?
    A list of indicators of bad science – many of these are found in articles promoted by anti-fluoride activists. Anti-fluoride activists have been pouring money into a scaremongering campaign warning pregnant women not to drink fluoridated water. They claim fluoride will lower the IQ of their future child. Fluoride ...
    1 week ago
  • Losing Labour’s Mills-Tone.
    Nothing Left To Say: Labour's pollster, Stephen Mills, remains swaddled-up in the comforting myths of the 1980s. As if the experience of Roger Douglas’s genuinely radical post-Muldoon policy agenda was literally a once-in-a-lifetime thing – as much as the party could possibly absorb for at least the next 50 years.MEMO ...
    1 week ago
  • Speaker: Disability and the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Historical Abuse
    The Royal Commission on abuse in care is very significant for the disability community. For many decades last century, thousands of disabled children, and adults who managed to survive, were locked away from families and communities. This was not for anything they had done, but for the perceived threat their ...
    1 week ago
  • Spain is not a democracy
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • UK Conservatives hate democracy
    With an unfair voting system, uneven electorates and an un-elected upper house, the UK's "democracy" is barely worthy of the name. But now the government wants to make it worse:The government has been accused of suppressing voters’ rights with the potential disenfranchisement of tens of thousands of people after plans ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • What is wrong with our building industry?
    Back in the 90's and early 2000's, the building industry was building leaky homes which should never have been granted consent. Now it turns out they've been building dodgy office blocks as well:New imaging technology has revealed hundreds of major buildings nationwide have defective or missing concrete or reinforcing steel. ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Local bodies
    Local body election results were released over the weekend, to joy or despair depending on where you live. In Auckland, Phil Goff trounced John Tamihere, who is muttering darkly about running for Parliament again (but which party would want him?) Wellington is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of Weta Workshop, except ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • A future of government
      How could government evolve over the next decades? Reports of democracy’s imminent demise are greatly exaggerated.  However, satisfaction with political systems in many countries is low, so there is much to do for governments of all political stripes to improve relevance and trust. Digital technologies are seen as one ...
    SciBlogsBy Robert Hickson
    1 week ago
  • Speaker: Catalonia, interrupted
    Two years have now gone by since the Friday afternoon when my university-student son and I headed out of our Barcelona flat to a nearby primary school, designated as a polling station for the vote that was to be held the following Sunday: the referendum on Catalonia’s independence from Spain ...
    1 week ago
  • Sage Decisions Unwisely Over-Ruled.
    Overruled: The joint decision of Finance Minister, Grant Robertson (Labour) and his Associate Minister, David Parker (Labour) arguably the two most powerful ministers in Jacinda Ardern’s government, to grant OceanaGold the consents which Land Information Minister, Eugenie Sage (Greens) had earlier denied them, offers bitter proof of how hard fighting ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Government may ban voting in effort to get more people to do it
    More than double the number of people who will vote in this year’s local body elections have tried marijuana or urinated somewhere they shouldn’t have. As local elections look set for the lowest turnout in decades, with many regions falling well short of 40%, the Government is exploring a number ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    2 weeks ago
  • Woman: Deleted.
    A Statement on Abortion Law Reform by the Council of Disobedient Women   On the eve of bringing an end to antiquated, anti-women abortion laws Green MP Jan Logie intends to write women out of the Bill. With a stroke of the pen, the woke are aiming for total erasure ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    2 weeks ago
  • The Hollowest of Men Ride Again… SURPRISE!
    Musings continue apace about “the experienced businessman!” soon to be taking up a National Party MP position. Or to be more accurate, being parachuted into a seat to shut down their former MP Jamie-Lee Ross, who despite his own shortcomings shed at least some more light on the inner workings ...
    exhALANtBy exhalantblog
    2 weeks ago
  • Barbaric
    The Ugandan government wants to murder gay people:Uganda has announced plans to impose the death penalty on homosexuals. The bill, colloquially known as “Kill the Gays” in Uganda, was nullified five years ago on a technicality, but the government said on Thursday it plans to resurrect it within weeks. The ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Is this study legit? 5 questions to ask when reading news stories of medical research
    Hassan Vally, La Trobe University Who doesn’t want to know if drinking that second or third cup of coffee a day will improve your memory, or if sleeping too much increases your risk of a heart attack? We’re invested in staying healthy and many of us are interested in reading ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    2 weeks ago
  • Fighting Monsters.
    Freedom Of Speech? The Säuberung (cleansing by fire) was the work of the German Student Union which, on 10 May 1933, under the watchful eye of the Nazi Reichminister for Propaganda, Joseph Goebbels, consigned 25,000 books to the flames in a ritual exorcism of “un-German thought”. According to the logic of the ...
    2 weeks ago
  • The next wave of kaupapa Māori politics: its constitutional, it must be.
      “There can be no such thing as kaupapa Māori political parties or politics in Aotearoa” (Willie Jackson, Labour Party (2017). Māori TV, General/List Election Special) I begin with that claim because at the time, I was confounded at first that it fell out of Willie Jackson’s mouth, and then ...
    EllipsisterBy Ellipsister
    2 weeks ago
  • Night lights of NZ from orbit
    New Zealand has prided itself for decades with regard to its lack of pollution, and all will be aware that the ‘100% Pure New Zealand‘ meme is under threat through land, water and air pollution of various causes. There is another type of contamination that the country also faces: light ...
    SciBlogsBy Duncan Steel
    2 weeks ago
  • Reporters deliver uplifting news to fleeing Japanese residents: they won’t miss any rugby
    New Zealand’s media is doing its part in Japan, reassuring those in the path of the storm that they won’t miss any rugby while away from their flooded homes. New Zealand sports reporters stationed in Japan for the Rugby World Cup have had the rare and heartwarming opportunity to inform ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    2 weeks ago
  • Government in contentious discussions about whether to put surplus on red or black
    Regional Development Minister Shane Jones is the only Cabinet member in favour of putting it all on green. As Finance Minister Grant Robertson finds himself with an enormous $7.5 billion surplus, the Government has begun intense, at times contentious conversations about whether to put the money on red or black at ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    2 weeks ago
  • Jordanian teachers’ successful strike has lessons for here
    by Susanne Kemp At the start of September close to 100,000 school teachers went on strike in Jordan.  They demanded a 50% pay rise.  A pay rise actually agreed to by the regime back in 2014. In early October, however, in the face of government repression and threats, the teachers’ ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    2 weeks ago
  • Why some people still think climate change isn’t real
    Climate Explained is a collaboration between The Conversation, Stuff and the New Zealand Science Media Centre to answer your questions about climate change. If you have a question you’d like an expert to answer, please send it to climate.change@stuff.co.nz Why do people still think climate change isn’t real? David ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    2 weeks ago
  • The SIS unlawfully spied on Nicky Hager
    Back in 2011, journalist Nicky Hager published Other People's Wars, an expose on NZDF's activities over the previous decade of the "war on terror". NZDF didn't like this, and especially didn't like the fact that it was base don leaks from their own. So, they had the SIS investigate him ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • October 2019 – Newsletter
    https://mailchi.mp/7d9133add053/closing-the-gap-october-2019-newsletter ...
    Closing the GapBy Tracey Sharp
    2 weeks ago
  • And they wonder why we think they’re environmental vandals…
    The Zero Carbon Bill is due back from select committee in two weeks, and will likely pass its final stages in November. So naturally, farmers are planning a hate-march against it. But they're not just demanding lower methane targets so they can keep on destroying the planet; they're also demanding ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Climate Change: Paying the price in California
    Last year, California burned. This year, to stop it happening again (or rather, to stop themselves from being found liable if it happens again), Pacific Gas and Electric is cutting power to half the state for a week:Schools are closed. Traffic lights down. Tunnels dark. Businesses unopened. Hospitals running on ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Let’s Hear It For Up-Close-And-Personal, Hard-Copy Democracy!
    The Best Way: Missing from the on-line voting debate is any reference to the voting system that produces turn-out figures ranging from 77 to 93 percent of registered voters. The voting system used to collect and count the votes cast in our parliamentary elections. The system that involves citizens making ...
    2 weeks ago
  • 10/10: World Day Against the Death Penalty
    Today, October 10, is the world day against the death penalty. Out of 195 UN member states, 84 still permit capital punishment. Today is the day we work to change that. This year's theme is children. Having a parent sentenced to death or executed causes long-term trauma and stigmatization which ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Talking Freer Lives: a Marxist gender-critical perspective from Australia
    Among the great new bunch of political friends we have been making recently is the excellent Australian-based Marxist gender-critical site, Freer Lives.  So we asked the comrade who set up that blog to write something for Redline on the blog, himself, his analysis of the rise of gender politics and ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    2 weeks ago
  • Government spin accepted by union leadership
    by Don Franks  The Auckland City Mission is struggling with a 40 percent increase in demand for food parcels this year. A total of 23,020 were needed by June. Last month Missioner Chris Farrelly told the Herald the “cupboards are bare” and without an emergency food drive, he can’t see ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    2 weeks ago

  • Corrections Amendment Bill passes third reading
    A Bill to improve prison security and ensure the fair, safe, and humane treatment of people in prison while upholding public safety has passed its third reading. Corrections Minister Kelvin Davis says the Corrections Amendment Bill makes a number of changes to ensure the Corrections Act 2004 is fit for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 hours ago
  • Ngāi Tahu CEO appointed to NZ-China Council
    Minister for Māori Development, Nanaia Mahuta, has selected Arihia Bennett MNZM, Chief Executive Officer of Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu, as the Te Puni Kōkiri appointed representative on the New Zealand-China Council. The New Zealand-China Council (the Council) was established in 2012 as a New Zealand led and funded organisation ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 hours ago
  • Southern Response claims move to EQC
    Responsibility for processing the small number of Southern Response claims still to be settled will be transferred to EQC by the end of the year. “As claim numbers reduce, it no longer makes sense for the Crown to have two organisations processing the remaining Canterbury claims,” Grant Robertson says. “Since ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    8 hours ago
  • Bowel screening starts in Whanganui
    Health Minister David Clark is encouraging Whanganui residents to take up the opportunity for free bowel screening, which can detect cancer early when it’s easier to treat.   Over the next two years 12,000 Whanganui locals, aged 60 to 74 will be invited to participate in the National Bowel Screening ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    10 hours ago
  • Pacific Peoples Minister to attend Our Ocean Conference in Norway
    Minister for Pacific Peoples Aupito William Sio, heads to Oslo today to represent New Zealand at the sixth Our Ocean Conference, which is being hosted by the Norwegian Government from the 23-24 October. “The Our Ocean Conference mobilises real action on issues like marine plastic pollution and the impacts of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Government announces 27 percent increase in Trades Academy places
    Two secondary-school initiatives are being expanded as part of the Government’s plan to see more young New Zealanders take up a trade to help close the skills gap.   This includes the largest single increase in Trades Academy places in recent years. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and Education Minister Chris ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Speech to the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs, Pacific Futures Conference: Connection...
    Session 4: Pacific Connectivity – Youth, Media and New Opportunities   Kia ora tatou katoa and Warm Pacific greetings to one and all. Representatives of Tainui, the local people of the land, or manawhenua – the indigenous peoples of this area – have welcomed you this morning in accordance with ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Methane reducing cattle feed one step closer
    The Government today announced its support for a project that could substantially reduce agricultural greenhouse gas emissions from cattle. The announcement was made as part of Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern’s and Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor’s visit to Nelson’s Cawthron Aquaculture Park. The Cawthron Institute will receive $100,000 from the Government’s ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Bill to refresh superannuation system passes first reading
    Social Development Minister Carmel Sepuloni has welcomed the first reading of the New Zealand Superannuation and Veteran’s Pension Legislation Amendment Bill. “Every New Zealander has a stake in New Zealand Superannuation and Veteran’s Pension,” says Carmel Sepuloni. “They are our most common form of social assistance – nearly 800,000 New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Government announces next steps in fight against measles
    Babies in Auckland aged six months and over can receive a free vaccination and children will all have access to vaccines, Associate Minister of Health Julie Anne Genter announced today at Papatoetoe High School.   The move comes as part of Government efforts to step up the fight against measles. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Speech to the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs, Pacific Futures: Connections, Identity...
    ***Check against delivery*** Good morning. It is a pleasure to be here, and to have the honour of opening this important conference on behalf of the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs. Let us take the opportunity to acknowledge all the people who have helped make today possible, including our special ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Police trial new response to high risk events
    Police Minister Stuart Nash says the safety of frontline officers and members of the public will be the focus of a new trial of specialist Police response teams in three of our largest urban centres. Police have this morning released details of an initiative to be trialled in Counties Manukau, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • New awards celebrate fisheries sustainability
    The Minister of Fisheries is calling for entries for a new public award to celebrate innovation in our seafood sector. “I have established the Seafood Sustainability Awards to recognise and celebrate those throughout industry, tangata whenua and communities who demonstrate outstanding dedication and innovation towards the sustainability of New Zealand’s ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • More progress for women and we can do more
    Minister for Women Julie Anne Genter welcomes leaders in the private sector taking action on closing their gender pay gaps to ensure a fairer workplace for all New Zealanders. Ms Genter today launched a new report, Addressing the gender pay gap and driving women’s representation in senior leadership, from the Champions for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Proposals to curb environmental damage help our coasts and the oceans
    Government Ministers today welcomed the release of a marine environment report highlighting the four key issues affecting our oceans, estuaries and coastlines.  The release underlines the importance of government proposals to combat climate pollution, ensure clean freshwater, protect biodiversity, make land use more sustainable, and reduce waste and plastic.    Environment ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • New mental health facility for Waikato
    The Government has approved funding for a new acute mental health facility for Waikato which will provide better care and support to people with mental health and addiction issues. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and Health Minister Dr David Clark announced the $100 million project to replace the aging Henry Rongomau ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • 500 new te reo Māori champions in our classrooms
    The Government is making progress on its goal to integrate te reo Māori into education by 2025, with over 500 teachers and support staff already graduating from Te Ahu o te Reo Māori,  Associate Education Minister Kelvin Davis announced today. Kelvin Davis made the announcement at an awards ceremony in Waikanae today, for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Minister James Shaw welcomes 2018 Census first release
    Statistics Minister James Shaw has welcomed the first release of 2018 Census data. The first release of data today, 23 September, includes key data on population, regional growth, the number of homes and the size of different ethnic groups in New Zealand. Data from the 2018 Census will support the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Driving transparency, ethics and accountability in government use of algorithms
    Minister for Statistics James Shaw today announced a public consultation on a proposed algorithm charter for government agencies. The charter has been developed by the Government Chief Data Steward in response to growing calls for more transparency in government use of data. Computer algorithms – procedures or formulas for solving ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • New Zealand and the Netherlands working together on climate change
    Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor, Climate Change Minister James Shaw and visiting Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte co-hosted a business roundtable in Auckland this morning focused on working together to address climate change.  “The Netherlands is an important partner for New Zealand. We share a strong agricultural history. Sustainable agribusiness and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Protecting fairness for workers and businesses
    The Government is taking action to build an inclusive economy where more of us receive our fair share at work and businesses can compete on great products and services, not undercutting wages and conditions, Immigration and Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Iain Lees-Galloway says. Two consultations launched today seek feedback ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Indigenous Freshwater Fish Bill Passes
    The future for New Zealand’s threatened indigenous freshwater fish looks brighter with the passing of the Conservation (Indigenous Freshwater Fish) Amendment Bill in Parliament today said Minister of Conservation, Eugenie Sage. “Until now, our freshwater fish legislation has been 20 years out of date. We have lacked effective tools to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Kiwis to take part in world’s biggest earthquake drill
    At 1.30pm tomorrow, hundreds of thousands of Kiwis will join about 65 million people around the globe in ShakeOut, the world’s biggest earthquake drill. The annual drill is to remind people of the right action to take during an earthquake which is to Drop, Cover, Hold, and to practise their ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Rising wages and low inflation supporting Kiwis
    Kiwis are benefiting from higher wage growth and low inflation under the Coalition Government. Stats NZ data out today shows the rise in the cost of living remains low, as annual Consumers Price Index (CPI) inflation fell to 1.5% in September from 1.7% in June. “The low inflation comes as ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • NZ economy strong amid global headwinds
    New Zealand’s economic strength and resilience has been recognised in a major update on the state of the global economy. The IMF’s latest World Economic Outlook released overnight shows a reduced global growth forecast over the next two years as issues like the US-China trade war and Brexit take hold. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Keeping New Zealanders safer with better counter-terrorism laws
    Justice Minister Andrew Little has today introduced a new Bill to prevent terrorism and support the de-radicalisation of New Zealanders returning from overseas. The Terrorism Suppression (Control Orders) Bill gives the New Zealand Police the ability to apply to the High Court to impose control orders on New Zealanders who ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Improved succession and dispute resolution core of Ture Whenua changes
    A Bill that proposes targeted changes to simplify the processes for Māori land owners when engaging with the Māori Land Court has had its First Reading today. “The approach taken by the Government is to ensure that the protection of Māori land remains a priority as we seek to improve ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Speech to CTU Biennial Conference
    Let me first thank all the new unionists and members in the room. There is nothing more important to improving people’s working lives than people making the decision to care, to get on board and help, to take up the reins and get involved. Congratulations to you. You bring the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Minister ensures continued Whenuapai flight operations
    Minister of Defence Ron Mark has signed a certificate exempting the activity of engine testing at Whenuapai Airbase from the Resource Management Act 1991. The Act gives the Minister of Defence the power to exempt activities for the purposes of national security.  The certificate will mean the recent Environment Court ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • NZ joins Coalition of Finance Ministers for Climate Action
    Finance Minister Grant Robertson has announced New Zealand will join the Coalition of Finance Ministers for Climate Action while attending APEC meetings in Chile. The objective of the 39 member Coalition is to share information and promote action to tackle climate change. It was formed in April this year, in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Feedback Sought – Section 71 – Lyttelton Parking
    Feedback sought– Lyttelton commercial zone parking  The Associate Minister for Greater Christchurch Regeneration, Poto Williams, is seeking feedback on a proposal to remove on-site car parking requirements for new developments in the Lyttelton commercial zone.  The proposal, by Christchurch City Council, asks that powers under section 71 of the Greater ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Feedback Sought – Section 71 – Hagley Oval
    Hon Minister Poto Williams Associate Minister for Greater Christchurch Regeneration   MEDIA STATEMENT       Tuesday 15 October 2019 Feedback sought – Hagley Oval The Associate Minister for Greater Christchurch Regeneration, Poto Williams, is seeking feedback on a proposal about Hagley Oval. The proposal was developed by Regenerate Christchurch ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • CTU speech – DPM
    Ladies and gentlemen, NZCTU President Richard Wagstaff, members of respective unions – thank you for the invitation to speak to you today. This might be preaching to the choir, but the importance of trade unions in New Zealand’s historical arch is difficult to understate. And it is my belief that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Police Association Annual Conference
    "Let’s start by acknowledging that it has been a huge year. " Police Association Annual Conference James Cook Grand Chancellor Hotel Wellington Nau mai, haere mai. Tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou, ka nui te mihi, ki a koutou katoa. President of the Police Association, Chris Cahill; Members of the Association and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New Zealand announces a further P-3 deployment in support of UN sanctions
    Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters and Minister of Defence Ron Mark have announced the New Zealand Government’s decision to again deploy a Royal New Zealand Air Force P-3K2 (P-3) maritime patrol aircraft to support the implementation of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions imposing sanctions against North Korea. New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New Zealand deeply concerned at developments in north-east Syria
    Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters says New Zealand continues to have serious concerns for peace and stability in north-east Syria. “Recent reports that hundreds of ISIS-affiliated families have fled from a camp are deeply concerning from a humanitarian and security perspective”, Mr Peters says. “While we acknowledge Turkey’s domestic security ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government on high alert for stink bugs
    Biosecurity Minister Damien O’Connor is warning travelling Kiwis to be vigilant as the high-season for the crop-eating brown marmorated stink bug (BMSB) is under way. “We’re on high alert to stop BMSB arriving in NZ. The high season runs until April 30 and we’ve strengthened our measures to stop stink ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Better protections for students in halls of residence
    The Government is moving swiftly to change the law to improve the welfare and pastoral care of students living in university halls of residence and other tertiary hostels. Cabinet has agreed to several changes, including creating a new mandatory Code of Practice that sets out the duty of pastoral care ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New trapping guide for community and expert trappers alike
    The Minister for Conservation Eugenie Sage has launched a new comprehensive trapping guide for community trappers to help them protect our native birds, plants and other wildlife, at Zealandia in Wellington today. ‘A practical guide to trapping’, has been developed by the Department of Conservation (DOC), and was launched during ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Widening Access to Contraceptives Welcomed
    Associate Health Minister Julie Anne Genter welcomes PHARMAC’s move to improve access to long-acting reversible contraception (LARCs). PHARMAC has today announced it will fund the full cost of Mirena and Jaydess for anyone seeking long term contraception, lifting previous restrictions on access to Mirena. “I welcome women having greater choices ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago