Open mike 17/10/2024

Written By: - Date published: 6:00 am, October 17th, 2024 - 6 comments
Categories: open mike - Tags:


Open mike is your post.

For announcements, general discussion, whatever you choose.

The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).

Step up to the mike …

6 comments on “Open mike 17/10/2024 ”

  1. dv 1

    NATZ

    We have a plan

    We are working really hard to shambolise the country.

    Next on the plan is Wellington.

    We are on track.

    • Matiri 1.1

      Newsroom on takeover bid for Wellington. Good analysis from Jonathan Milne.

      https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/10/16/govt-hostile-takeover-bid-for-wellington-city/

      • gsays 1.1.1

        The longer these clowns are in control, the more decisions they make, the saying:

        They know the cost of everything and the value of nothing. Rings true

        Luxon, Reti and Levy could not articulate the many and varied benefits of the Dunedin hospital. A once in many generations opportunity and they want to scrooge it.

        Willis and the ferry debacle, taking a 2-3 yr balance sheet view of a 30year infrastructure project.

      • Bearded Git 1.1.2

        From Milne's article:

        "Tory Whanau told me the council now has about $2.8 billion of its assets left uninsured – it hasn’t been able to sustain the rising premiums. “Should the worst happen in our city, like an earthquake, we have very little to access in terms of rebuilding our city. Hence, the sale of the airport.”

        Nobody is quoting figures on this insurance cost. People bandy around figures like $2.8 billion, but what is the cost per annum of the premiums?

        I would have thought that the cost of these premiums would not be be significant in comparison with the many other costs faced by the WCC, especially for infrastructure and 3-waters.

        If this is true, then this is not the real reason that the airport shares were proposed to be sold.

  2. Chris Clark 2

    What's the bet Luxon will fold on this, eventually?

  3. PsyclingLeft.Always 3

    Kiwibank says it needs a more level banking playing field – as well as a potential cash injection – to really make a difference in the New Zealand banking market.

    Quelle surprise

    The main four Australian banks all told the committee they felt that was unnecessary.

    KiwiSaver provider Simplicity said it would be interested in investing in Kiwibank if that were made possible.

    First Union said the solution was not to open it up to private investment, but instead to have it fully publicly owned and well capitalised.

    As part of a submission made with other domestic banks, Kiwibank said there needed to be changes to bank capital requirements.

    It said the big four Australian banks had much easier access to cheaper capital options as well as the backing of their parent banks, and the cost of banking regulation was disproportionately borne by the smaller players.

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/business/531026/how-do-you-solve-a-problem-like-kiwibank

    The definite anti-competetive nature of our Australian owned banks..sucks. We need our own bank. Way past time for it to be a level playing field !

Leave a Comment