web analytics

Adequate gun control and (almost) complete party support.

Written By: - Date published: 8:43 am, March 22nd, 2019 - 128 comments
Categories: act, david seymour, jacinda ardern, national, Politics, Simon Bridges, winston peters - Tags: , , ,

Now that I’ve had time to look look through what has been implemented and what is proposed to happen with changes to gun laws and to think about the impacts. Like others, I’m almost satisfied.

Since that so seldom happens that I suspect a gotcha, I’m now going to keep debugging until I am sure that it is actually as good as it looks.

I can (reluctantly) live with .22 rimfire semi-automatics on farms and limited capacity shotguns. While these weapons can easily kill people, it is a whole lot harder to use them to kill people in batch lots. There should be enough time for the people being shot at to drag down a arsehole shooter if they get misused.

The ammunition available for these weapons will need to be clearly defined. The current 0.22 long at range isn’t a sure thing killer, but the loads of the 0.22 calibre weapons need to be tightly constrained. I really don’t want to see a faster velocity low calibre rounds becoming common. The legislation and regulation needs to account for innovation.

Similarly, I think that there is no need for buckshot shotgun loads in NZ or anything like it. For birds and rabbits it simply isn’t required, and it turns a shotgun into a great area weapon for indoctrinated dickheads.

A semi-automatic shotgun firing buckshot giving a  close quarters pattern as its shown on this image is a lethal weapon, commonly used in the military in urban warfare situations. 

There was a reason that the Christchurch mosque killer had shotguns in his car. Adding all non-birdshot shotgun loads to the list of class E requirements will remove its ready availability for such crazed fools.

Clearly the gun controls mechanisms will need to be beefed up. However putting the major effort into the the very limited numbers of class E license holders will make the job of arms control officers a whole lot easier to cover.

I’m pretty surprised at the level of political support. And in particular with both NZ First and National coming out with strong support. Here is National’s parliamentary leader Simon Bridges

Simon Bridges in Epson announcing support for government’s gun law reforms. Click through to Stuff article and video.

Now I know that most people are going to be surprised that I finally have a reason to laud Simon Bridges (I know I am). But I just have to on this occasion. Both he and the public responses of National to the announcements yesterday were excellent.

They’re fully supporting the thrust of the proposed changes going forward into the future. As National seem to have made a career in politics of being stupid over my lifetime, I’m sure it won’t last. But I’m going to enjoy it while it does. 

In parliament, only the minnow party of Act appears to be in opposition to the changes. I suppose that, at this point, one can’t read too much significance into Simon Bridges choosing to make his announcements in support from in the Epsom electorate – the Act survival lifeline. But I find it of political interest.

Finally, I’d have to say that the government coalition led by Jacinda Ardern and Winston Peters have done their customary good initial job. It is what I expect of them (which is high praise from me).

It looks like the way forward on gun controls is clear and I expect to be poring over the detail looking for problems in a few weeks.

The massacres in Christchurch were horrific and  a result of blase attitude to weapons control by successive governments and opposition parties over decades was just dumb. This program moving forward looks good. 

But being a person steeped in debugging programs, this all makes me deeply suspicious. I’m looking for when (and not if) the gotcha is going to crawl out into the light.

128 comments on “Adequate gun control and (almost) complete party support. ”

  1. greywarshark 1

    Right let’s pass the sort of gun law we need. In this we apparently can take most leaves of our book from copying the Australian action. But we are warned about equivocating by the dreaded Lobbyists for their particular obsession, and getting tied up in knots.

    New Zealand Politics
    22 March 2019
    ‘Military-style semi-automatic weapons ban: Gun lobby will fight changes warns reform advocate’

    Just as we can learn from Australian experience of the past, we can keep in mind that practically all our problems are just reruns of those of the past, cyclical.
    Hence the Gordian knot learning:

    Gordian knot, knot that gave its name to a proverbial term for a problem solvable only by bold action. In 333 bc, Alexander the Great, on his march through Anatolia, reached Gordium, the capital of Phrygia. …

    The phrase “cutting the Gordian knot” has thus come to denote a bold solution to a complicated problem.</blockquote)

    So in our smart, civilised society, we think, let us look back to the ancients grappling with the same basics in a different time. Alexander the Great is still remembered. NZ the Great Country will be known for taking a giant step forward if we come down hard and provide the funds to ensure the regulation is carried out strictly.

    The fact that Australia has already done it won't make a difference. We can be a tipping point in gun control after this. Bernie Sanders is quoting our stance to
    illustrate what the USA needs to do. We can win, and do good. Let's do it.

    'World reacts to New Zealand's new gun laws after Christchurch terror attacks'
    US Senator Bernie Sanders has applauded Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern for announcing tougher gun laws in New Zealand.
    “This is what real action to stop gun violence looks like,” he posted on Twitter. “We must follow New Zealand’s lead, take on the NRA and ban the sale and distribution of assault weapons in the United States.”

  2. Nick 2

    Thank you for the write up Lprent. Good information. So good to see politicians do the right thing at pace.

  3. Grant Insley 3

    It’s been my experience that any more than one shot when hunting only results in damage to the meat. Bird shooting is different in some ways. I’ve never yet seen a group of animals, flock of birds or whatever sit quietly and let anyone fire more than 5 shots at them. They quickly depart. Then you reload. We used to carry spare clips for this purpose. Having more than 5 shots loaded makes you a lazy hunter.

    • greywarshark 3.1

      What have other shooters got to say to Grant I’s opinions and experience? This is a rare example of factual stuff about results. It is good to hear some anecdotes if they are on the level.

  4. fustercluck 4

    You guys are looking in the wrong places for solutions, I believe.

    The UK has even more restrictive gun laws and yet gun violence is rising there. Stabbings increased so they banned knives but stabbings are still increasing.

    Terrorists have adapted to gun restrictions using rental trucks or IEDs to accomplish similar casualty rates to mass shootings.

    3d printing, in both metal and plastic, is advancing rapidly.

    Firearms have recently been found in illicit drug shipments into NZ.

    The most violent cities in the USA have the most restrictive gun control laws. Over 90% of the mass shootings in the USA happen in so-called gun-free zones.

    Restricting a technology to try to restrict the abuse of that technology is not a very effective way to deal with the causal, i.e., the human factor.

    NZ now faces a much more difficult discussion about free speech, freedom on the internet, and political freedom. Removing firearms of whatever type from the possession of law-abiding citizens that were never going to be a part of the problem at hand will not deal with these larger problems.

    We need to be very cautious here. We must carefully protect the rights of those that we disagree with vehemently or we will all face living in a country that has lost the fruits of the Enlightenment, the hard-fought gains of our ancestors, that is to say, the right to live as free men and women.

    • lprent 4.1

      I think that you aren’t thinking, more playing with simple minded slogans.

      The issue isn’t that nutters are out there and can use whatever weapons are available. We know that. Hell everyone knows that.

      The reason why the semi-automatic weapons are the focus at present is because they allow killing or severely injure large numbers of people to be accessible to technical simpletons.

      You don’t have to learn to make sophisticated bombs, or fly aircraft to spray a clip out of a semi-automatic. You don’t require brains – as is pretty self-evident from the people who use them.

      Cars, trucks, knives, and even bolt-action weapons are not designed as mass death weapons and are not that capable at being adapted to it.

      • fustercluck 4.1.1

        I am sad to see that my attempt to participate in the discussion here from a different perspective than most was dismissed as “simple-minded”. The facts that I asserted are simply that, facts.

        A truck requires no special training and is arguably easier to use than a firearm.

        The 2016 truck attack in Nice killed over 80 innocents.

        Knives are ubiquitous.

        The 2014 attack in Kunming involved zero firearms and resulted in the death of 31 innocents.

        An IED using a 9kg gas cylinder requires very little training and (horribly) ample instructions are available on the internet to permit any wingnut to build one.

        Home-made IEDs killed 23 in Manchester and wounded over 100 more.

        Arguably, the Christchurch shooter had to jump through more hoops than any of the attackers listed above in order to carry out his plan.

        The University of Texas tower shooter used a bolt action rifle to kill 11 and wound over 30, some at a range of over 500 meters. The ammunition used in pretty much any hunting rifle is far more deadly and has much greater range than the .223/5.56 ammunition used in an AR15. Certainly, a bolt action rifle requires different tactics than an AR15, but it is every bit as capable of inflicting mass casualties.

        My point is that removing certain guns from the law-abiding does not deal with the underlying issues that result in mass fatality attacks. Forcing a mass killer to choose alternative methods does not deal with the question of why they have come to that motivation nor does it prevent them from undertaking a very effective plan using something other than a firearm.

        You may dismiss the above as simple-minded, but I challenge you to do so when facing the families of those killed in Nice, Manchester, Kunming, etc.

        [lprent: Read the policy and consider what is involved in robust debate. I used exactly the same tone to you, that of contempt for stupidity, that you used to everyone else. The only difference was that I was explicit as I was uncertain if you were intelligent enough to interpret anything more subtle.

        If you don’t like receiving it, then I suggest you don’t use that particular debating tactic. It causes flame wars and I’m likely to shove the consequences straight down whining throat. I have a low toleration for fuckwits doing antique online tactics that I’ve observed for the last 4 decades. ]

        • Dennis Frank

          “The University of Texas tower shooter used a bolt action rifle to kill 11 and wound over 30”: the rebel architect was immortalised in The Ballad of Charles Whitman by Kinky Friedman.

          [Verse 1]
          He was sitting up there for more than an hour
          Way up there on the Texas tower
          Shooting from the twenty-seventh floor
          He didn’t choke or slash or slit them
          Not our Charles Joseph Whitman
          He won’t be an architect no more

          Didn’t show up on vinyl till ’72, but “I wrote “The Ballad of Charles Whitman” shortly afterward. I’m sure the people who didn’t like it thought I was mocking a tragedy or something, but they didn’t listen to the song. It explores the mind of Charles Whitman and what makes these things happen. The question is, Why? Why would somebody do that? He was a straight-A student, an Eagle Scout, a Marine—just a good all-around, all-American asshole. I doubt if his neighbors thought he was evil. That’s usually how it is”.

          • greywarshark

            Thanks Dennis F
            …these things happen. The question is, Why? Why would somebody do that? He was a straight-A student, an Eagle Scout, a Marine—just a good all-around, all-American asshole. I doubt if his neighbors thought he was evil. That’s usually how it is”

            So – was he a materialist and didn’t have a soul? Was he a conformist and went through all the routines, did the things society had set up, and then thought WTF? Did he get to the end of all his certification of being great and wonder ‘What is this all for. I’m finished, but what next and I even don’t like anybody or anything around me’?

            • Dennis Frank

              I got a lot of flack from a few commentators when I tried to encourage a focus on learning about his psyche & motivation. Citing the need for evidence-based public policy escalated it into abuse. Puzzling why some leftists seek to deny our need to learn from experience.

              So I cited Kinky’s rationale in wry observation of his similar interest in the psychological angle 53 years ago. I doubt the media reported much if anything on that shooter’s motive, or even family background, to explain his apparent alienation & descent into ultraviolence. As I’ve mentioned, the profession of psychology carefully refrains from exhibiting any professional competence on these issues, so as to create the impression in the public mind that they verge on useless. So it’s hard to blame the media for their focus on sensationalism instead of elucidation.

              • WeTheBleeple

                Dennis. I was not discouraging learning. I had an issue with your direct propogation of the terrorists materials, and your consideration he had a point…

                It was tone deaf and terrible timing. Especially in the light of the wishes of our PM not to do it. It came across as entitled pompous and arrogant. And very ignorant.

                Stop stirring and misrepresenting me and the situation. I got mad, and you know I’m not a hotbed of mental health, but you kept at it, snide shitty comments and here you are still going…

                You are using all of this to pick on the aspie ptsd guy, refusing to answer to what you actually did, and constantly acting like a victim for being sworn at.

                If you can’t handle swearing you are out of touch with most of the population and you don’t care anyway you just use it to play victim.

                Stop judging, lying, picking, digging at and needling me in your underhanded shitty way.

                You prick.

                • solkta

                  I used to think Franky was a try-hard who was too stupid and or lazy to get any real knowledge of the topics he prattles on about. Now i think that he is a shit stirring little prick.

                • gsays

                  @WtB Mate, I value your contribution here on TS.

                  I have noticed folks, who are usually quite magnanimous, being quite aggresive.
                  All good, bearing in mind that we are grieving etc.

                  What caused me to comment was in your second paragraph, you cite the PMs wishes.

                  In your last line, you ignored our leaders more important instruction of kindness.

              • lprent

                I’d just ask – what would be the point (outside of pure gossip)?

                Presumably the point of such a profile would need to be translated into policy changes at some point to be useful to society as a whole.

                One of the problems is that to do a psychological analysis on a single society wide basis, from where any individual is drawn, and then to try to remove the causes of their behaviour would have to be described as a forlorn hope. This would be almost everyone’s experience just of families, let alone acquaintances or friends or even enemies. Frigging hard to see where most personalities, even those that we know well, derive much of their behaviour from except as poorly formed metaphors.

                Then to try to do it in a society that is in a large part made up of people born in from other societies subject to different policies and societies (like this individual) seems ridiculous to me. And then there are the generational shifts.

                Just thinking about any correlations spinning off the infinite levels of different traits.

                For instance this guy appears to have spent a lot of time playing online games in his youth. I hate to think of a tens of thousands of hours that I have done with them ever since starting to play Duke Nukem with other via modem in 1991. I did several thousand hours playing Doom in groups in 1993-5. Or online forums. I’ve been doing them since 1980. I have over 20 thousand comments over the last decade just in this one.

                How much does that both of us have done these things lead to a probability of occurrence of the same behaviour in the other? I’d say pretty minimal based on the people I know who have also done the both of these activities.

                You can see the same things in just about everything from kids from abusive families to those raised in the lap of luxury. Those who are short compared to those who are tall.

                Outside of physical developmental damage, any correlations tend to be well below any useful margins of error.

                So what would be the point? The only one I can think of would be to do the kind of profiling that police already do (and frequently misuse). And my opinion of those is that it usually causes more damage than it handles.

                • Dennis Frank

                  The point is formulation of public policy. I’m a sceptic about the utility of the hate-speech law, as I’ve mentioned, due to the lack of usage. Now that the cops have launched prosecutions in the wake of the massacre, any court decision that identifies it on the basis of evidence will establish case law.

                  If/when that happens, media will know how to recognise it. Nobody reproduced any definition for it that was attached to the legislation during the canadian visit furore, did they? That created the impression in my mind that no definition was used by the designers and drafters of the legislation. Small wonder the media don’t act in the way parliament expected them to, eh?

                  People think mass shooters are wacko. That’s traditional. Courts often decide otherwise. It would be helpful to all if the warning signs are recognisable. That requires consensus on what those warning signs actually are – right across the political spectrum.

                  • McFlock

                    Warning signs are only recognisable if displayed, and are fundamentally different to motivations.

                    Our fucker and the Norwegian fucker concealed any warning “signs” from anyone who would do anything about it. Finding commonalities after the fact won’t help prevent the next fucker, because fuckers know to keep their plans quiet. There are very few spreekilling fuckers about whom everyone says “oh shit, totally knew he was going to do that, he told everyone when where and how he was going to do it, and he totally did it”.

                    All we can do is keep weeding out the hate so as few people as possible grow up to be fuckers.

                    • Dennis Frank

                      Warning signs tend to be produced by motivations. The inquiry into why the govt agencies created to detect these threats didn’t detect him will presumably inform us more about what warning signs they look for, whether they hadn’t been instructed to look for the right signs, whether he exhibited warning signs, etc.

                      While not attempting to jump the gun on that, I think it is a good idea for us to consider it from a personal perspective – and a social perspective. After all, personal and social threat detection have been critical to human survival throughout our evolutionary trajectory. No way can we avoid the necessity.

                    • McFlock

                      Any competent person can avoid raising the biggest red flags. And all they need to do is raise about as many flags, warnings, side-glances, or concerns as anyone else.

                      We can help detection by lowering the backround level of hate, but detection of someone thinking about cmmitting an atrocity is the final hail mary effort you make as a backstop to things that actually work: controlling people’s access to offensive weapons, and protecting probable targets without turning the area into a prison.

                      And we don’t actually need to know some of these methods. We shouldn’t. Because knowledge enables evasion. If everyone knows that anyone who googles “mein kampf” gets their full history processed through a threat assessment, the serious ones will just buy the book secondhand, or groups will distribute samizdat copies.

                      Basically, I reckon the most we should see is an inquiry the recommends the SIS and GCSB have a management shake up and probably their heads fired. Other than that, knowing the details of what they look for will just make those aspects easier to hide.

                    • Exkiwiforces

                      From what I’m hearing and a chap by the of Jim also mentioned yesterday I think?

                      That ……… name was reported to the local firearms officer/ office at Dunedin police station and the same people also raise the issue of the conduct of the Bruce Range in Sth Dunedin over Safety, the live fire practices/ serials and possibly breaches of illegal mod’s to weapons as well.

                      From what I read/ heard from sources so far there is a lot of very pissed off people down in Dunedin, from coppers, Ex and current service personnel, hunters and Service Rifle Tgt shooters. At the soppy, lazy or just plain incompetence from the local firearms office/ officer and the head of Dunedin Policing. Then also we have people in CHCH raising issues of the white supremacy muppets attending certain firearms/ militia events in ever increasing numbers.

                      Some of my copper mates are now starting to ask why the top head shed of NZ Police is in CHCH and not Wally his deputy??

                      I think Bushy knows more than what he is saying to the media and Janadals is doing a bloody outstanding job atm, if the cops are trying hide something? Then she needs hold a Royal Commission at arm’s length before it does damage to the Government and to her moral ethical standards that she has set of the last week.

                    • McFlock

                      Yeah, but as this sort of points out, anything he did didn’t separate him from folks who didn’t commit any massacres.

                      BTW, “sth Dunedin” floods every time we get a decent rain, and it’s right next to the harbour. This club was in the arse end of the dunners city limits 🙂

              • greywarshark

                I guess you will let that pass. I said the other day about being a statesman and you certainly argue things out well. enough to be one. And the art of breathing your nose is a handy one.

                Handling psyches is an interesting thing, you can’t know someone as well as you think if you don’t know something of their background and tendencies. It might explain why you don’t listen to the sensitives at times of sensitivity!

                I think back to the Kansas affair. Breakfast at Tiffany’s guy. Waiting for it to come to me. He did a closely researched study on two shooters who seemed to randomly select a farming family to shoot. Got them lying down with their heads on pillows beforehand. Weirdly considerate.
                I’ll look up google. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_Cold_Blood
                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truman_Capote : author.

                • Dennis Frank

                  Re sensitivity, I have my own. I can empathise with the sensitivity of others no problem. Whether that then becomes a suitable topic for blog discussion is driven by the extent of reciprocity. Seeing things from one’s own point of view is fundamental to human nature, so when folks get into dramatising their personal navel-gazing I switch to something more interesting. Just like everyone else.

                • WeTheBleeple

                  “when folks get into dramatising their personal navel-gazing I switch to something more interesting”

                  See, I might have a bit of insight, but you are not open to conversation, you are still scoring points aka playing games.

                  This is not Statesman like take off the rosy spectacles GWS. I have every right to reply to his little digs. it’s not you who’s the implied target.

                  I also don’t appreciate how it all got dumped, out of context, at the top of open mike, but I did read the context of how that came to be, so such is life. I then got piled on. Dennis gloats. You blow smoke up his ass.

                  Just stop being petty please Dennis.

                  • greywarshark

                    I just like to see us sticking to the bigger picture as much as possible WtB.

                    And all the time i am on this blog I am thinking ‘These are people who imply they care about what sort of society we live in, how treat each other, and how the present society we have can be improved so it’s fit for purpose in the fast-developing distant future. We are supposed to be intelligent, educated, aware environmentally, but also socially. I fear that we will all split into groups that have to defend themselves from other groups and that there will be little room for concerted human effort because so many people are so bloody self-centred and lack kindness and empathy. That means they will also be impractical as people getting on with each other and keeping to agreements that are enhancing rather than limiting will be necessary. The ill-tempered, sneering, mean and self-centred approach emerges from many on this blog, which does not bode well. Also a sentimental attachment to a soft approach and reluctance to engage in debate against some favoured person will result in limiting the width of ideas and debate; consensus is often managed in a way that dampens thought and expression.

                    • WeTheBleeple

                      “because so many people are so bloody self-centred and lack kindness and empathy”

                      That’s what I’m seeing in the constant needle (Frank) – jab (me) – victim (Frank) – pile on (you, others) – victim (me) – needle (frank) – pattern.

                      And it’s getting tedious.

                      I don’t know what the rest of what you were saying is about, and didn’t ask for a psychoanalysis.

                • Molly

                  I was given that book many years ago by a friend.

                  Interesting read. One of the perpetrators had noticeable learning difficulties, and followed the lead of the other. He also had some recognisable physical features that many years later make me wonder if he had Foetal Alcohol Syndrome. I’ll have to dig the book up after our renovations, and read it again. People with this impairment have very little or no impulse control, have impaired decision making, and are easily led or manipulated. IIRC, he was reported as saying that he didn’t think he would shoot anyone until after he had done it.

                  The issue regarding mental impairment was clearly outlined in the book.

          • SHG

            Whitman wasn’t evil, he was ill, and he knew it.

        • greywarshark

          You fail to sharpen your mind cluster-fluster. Trying to solve a number of similar problems by widening the scope of one remedial action is not likely to be satisfactory. Concentrating on a range of weapons that are particularly egregious and preventing availability of certain clip-on additions to allowed guns is the first priority.

          The new laws won’t stop gun tragedies. But it is a good step, and will help if proper controls are introduced, maintained by regulation that is rigidly carried out. There should be no ‘capturing’ of government officials in this area of control. In fact it might be good to ensure that staff turns over every ten years or so.

          And your point of looking at why people resort to hurting and killing as a way of ‘serving their country’ and ‘solving problems’ is a good one. All the male energy that goes into violence and projected self-deprecation could be used
          in something that they could be proud of and which would be honoured by the community.

          There could be teams of guys that would be on call to help out with whatever needs doing, a sort of Ready Team, that would either be working or working out to keep fit between tasks. They would be permanent members of their Team, which would have different ranks according to the experience and quality of their personnel. They could all also do short block courses at Technical College between call-out times.

          They could be a bit like the now nation-wide Students Army like the one that started in Christchurch after the earthquakes. People would cheer the guys, and girls, in the Ready Team when they came to town or country to help out with the big, difficult jobs and highly regard them. They could be helping shift logs at Tolaga Bay at the moment. There are going to be so many environmental problems, that something would be occurring all the time.

          It would give regular pay at a good rate, which would improve with experience, length of service, quality of skills, and there would be travel around different parts of the country. There would be team spirit, it would in the end be equivalent to getting in the All Blacks when one of the workers got into the A team.

          It is a practical idea and worth going for Cluster. If you are looking for positive change, why don’t you take this up and start lobbying for this change instead of thinking about guns. Guns are to test your shooting skills, or for scaring, injuring or killing people. So go for the positive, go hunting with your mind, like gun users who give up shooting with guns and take up a camera to shoot images of the wonderful animals. Take your ideas to wonderful pollies and leaders whose batteries are still fully charged and who could shine some light on the dark corners of sad society, at present going bad for lack of sunlight. Just trying would be a worthy activity leading to appreciation and two-way respect. and succeeding would be a great service to the nation and prove you to be strong in mind and body, the sort of well-balanced individual that is so needed now and into our ever more difficult future.

          • fustercluck

            Why do you people have to preface any comments with an insult?

            [lprent: Read the policy, stop whining and grow up. Just do the debate like an adult without attempting to make yourself an artificial victim. ]

            • greywarshark

              I start off with an uncomplimentary feeling about your comment.

              Then I put effort in to an extensive comment on an idea that you could use to build something that would lift you or other men up from the present state of sadness and dissatisfaction many of them are in.

              But you are too tender to even try to think to lift yourself and your cohort up and be real men. Not much hope for you and the rest of us while there is such a soggy bunch of aggrieved males with no spirit to raise themselves. Your first thought is to reject anything that someone outside the group suggests, unless said with gentleness, paying proper respect. Poor you, poor the rest of us.

            • OnceWasTim

              Read the Policy, Stop whining and grow up
              Or ‘you person’ go start you’re own fucking blog

              Jesus H!
              But thanks for reminding me why I gave up tutoring (apart from the diminishing appreciation and support of the academic staff in favour of the bean counters)

            • WeTheBleeple

              Hey Fuster

              Change ‘you people’ to ‘some people’ and you’ll likely only piss off the some people doing what you think it is they’re doing.

              Opening statements like yours are provocative, not specific.

        • Gabby

          Thanks, I shall dismiss it as simpleminded fluffyduck.

      • Bewildered 4.1.2

        LPrent devils adocate arguement on this is bad policy made on the hoof and emotion

        How many people have been murdered by guns in nz, very few, murder rate has been dropping since gun ownership including automatics have been increasing Mass shootings in nz are a outlier Should we be making policy on the hoof based on outlier especially when statistics that are meaningful correlate that guns are not the issue here The Au arguement also is weak, yes there has been no massacres since port Arthur but there where very few before port Arthur suggesting nothing si statistically significant Finally current gun laws did not prevent the massacre and where broken and not enforced why do we think more regulation will help Murder is against the law, drugs are against the law, murderers and criminals don’t tend to care about laws, prohibition solves very little One other interesting point, people may be surprised to know that the US only ranks 56th in the world in mass public shootings Norway Switzland Russia have 45pc higher rates of mass public shootings ( source Crime prevention research Center, crime search.org), so again are guns really the issue

        • Bewildered

          Note above should read 56th per capitia in regard to US ranking with respect to public mass shootings

        • lprent

          How many people have been murdered by guns in nz, very few, murder rate has been dropping since gun ownership including automatics have been increasing ….

          And that is a prime example of the moron’s correlation dribbled by a anti-punctuation bewildered idiot.. Lets just assume the dribbler actually has the stat right – which is unlikely since dribbler was unable to provide a link in support of his lie. But I guess if you looked at it as being a percentage of our burgeoning population – it is possible.

          Here are just a few other alternative explanations – some are probably valid causations, some are not. But they are all valid correlations.

          • We have had increased immigration over the last 20 years, so gun deaths have been falling. The dilution of the deathly kiwi gun kulture.
          • The number of people in younger age groups relative to the rest of the population has been falling – so gun deaths have been falling – fewer kids suiciding by gun
          • Farmers have been getting better prices for dairy products (the farmer murder/suicide hypothesis)
          • As the internet grows, gun deaths have been falling.
          • As the use of MMOG grows, gun deaths have been falling.
          • As Judith Collins gets closer to the hot seat, gun deaths have been falling. I won’t comment on that one…
    • Dennis Frank 4.2

      Good point re 3D printing. There was a tv news story I saw not long ago proving that the tech had successfully produced a semi-auto gun. To a non-gun-nut like me it looked just like an AK47 or similar and apparently worked just as well.

      Our legislation will have to be designed to cope with this new tech too. Your other point re UK trend despite the law is worthy of examination. I’d like to know why the trend is happening.

      Supply & demand could explain it. The law is a constraint on animal spirits (techno-jargon of economists). Excessive immigration escalates hostilities regardless of the constraint. You can actually accelerate a vehicle when the handbrake is on.

      • Paul Campbell 4.2.1

        I run a makerspace in NZ, at least once a year I get some teenage boy (and yes they’ve always been boys) who asks about printing guns … I get to explain that our gun laws apply equally to making guns as they do to owning guns, and that a 3D printed gun made from the low temp thermoplastics we use for 3D printing is more than likely to blow up in their faces … yes we encourage you to use our free 3D printers, but NO you may not print an (illegal) gun

        • Dennis Frank

          Assuming that you are right, and the current law suffices to stop such 3D gun-printing here, that’s reassuring. No evidence that it has happened here does suggest the copycat thing is not kicking in.

          If the one I saw on the news is made via more sophisticated chemistry, to withstand the effect of heat generated by usage, then an enterprising gun-shop owner may try to find a loophole in the law that allows manufacture here.

          • Andre

            I’ve used 3-D printing professionally. The material properties you get are absolute crap for anything but the most sophisticated printers. A 3-D printed gun from a hobby printer through to a middle-level professional printer is going to be as much a hazard to the user as to anyone else.

            Yes, it’s also possible to 3-D print metal parts (research what Rocket Lab is doing). But that kind of printer is worth around half a mil as I understand it. Is anyone going to put that kind of investment at risk to produce highly illegal parts? Particularly when it’s going to remain much easier to just smuggle some guns?

            The point of banning the guns isn’t that it realistically expects to remove all the banned guns at once. Even though it will get rid of most of them. When all that’s left are the illegal ones, it becomes much riskier for anyone to own one, it’s risky to let anyone else become aware you have one, and it becomes much easier for the police to confiscate them as soon as they become aware of them.

            • woodart

              very good post andre, should re required reading for all of the ‘:what about 3d printing’ know it alls.

        • BM

          Shows how little you know.

    • mauī 4.3

      I like your last paragraphs. I’ve recently watched a bit of Stefan Molyneux for the first time, he makes the point that shutting down people’s views/debate has the effect of driving it underground. That could be even more dangerous for a society.

      There’s also a chance that getting tough on hate groups won’t make the slightest difference. This individual could have chosen to wear an “extreme right” ideology to carry out a heinous act. It might not be so much about the ideology, but about a sick character who uses whatever they can to justify their heinous actions.

      • fustercluck 4.3.1

        And underground is where extremism can turn to mass murder. If we do not protect the right of the truly offensive to speak freely we will see more and more of these murderous eruptions. Allowing free speech for all, not just those we agree with, is the single best way to protect ourselves, i.e., it is far more effective than gun control, knife control, etc. When we force others to hide their thoughts and feelings, we will encounter them in other forms soon enough.

        • greywarshark

          Self control goes hand in hand with gun control. Expecting people who have no self control, no real self respect or respect for others, to behave themselves responsibly is futile. Gun control is necessary for us others who do attempt self control. We need a society where trust prevails, otherwise we never know what mad and bad thing may happen. It is the may that ‘kills’ society, enjoyable and friendly society that is.

          • WeTheBleeple

            I was wondering if, with the ‘internet of things’, all 3D printers might be perpetually online and then they are monitored for:

            Known pre-existing code for weaponry. Weaponry.

            And new designs might run through a digital filter to log their components and origin should that design prove to be nefarious. (a transformer!). This might also solve issues of copyright.

            Dunno. Just thoughts on it.

        • Bastables

          Bullshit, even Hitler complained about how his speech was taken away. Fascists do not take freedom of speech seriously, they use it to gain power and commit genocide.

          The Wiemar republic stated they had the most free society…

      • lprent 4.3.2

        The problem is that there are many ways to shut down debate. My problem as a moderator is that one of the most common ways of doing it is for individuals commenting to try do an artificial imbalance of behaviour online.

        Do as I say, not do as I do.

        Personally that is the basis of my operational response to critical new commentators who clearly haven’t observed the site for any length of time. I reflect their style back to them in an accentuated form and see how they cope with it.

        Always enlightening 😈

      • Bastables 4.3.3

        Stefan Molyneux is part of the alt right. He propagates the white replacement theory, argues the fall of Rome is due to immigration and therefore immigration into Europe will destroy “European” culture., that there was no native american genocide. He was also very involved in the alt right/gamer gates redicoulus attacks on women including surreal critiques on Star wars, Ghost busters and Wonder Woman being secret feminist assaults on masculinity.

        He’s a crypto white supremacist and a misogynist, that has actually propagated the hateful ideas of immigrants will destroy “western culture” (aka the white race). That you’re using him as a defence for allowing hate speech as “view’s and debate” is telling.

        Let’s listen to the fascists on why their ideas of how terrible minorities should be acceptable eh?

        • Stuart Munro.

          I agree. I don’t think Molyneux has improved on Gibbons’ explanations for the decline of Rome, and I don’t welcome his stimulus of the nutjob fringe.

          The anarchic alt-right has reached the point of presenting a real danger to societies that tolerate it. He or any other agent provocateur should be given cause to reflect on the consequences of inciting ethnic violence, which may include legal liability.

          I’d contrast him with Peterson, who has a fair amount of unobjectionable material out there, and whose opinions are somewhat informed by research. I don’t think I’d bother to see him, but his book isn’t just a collection of vagrant prejudices loitering without means of support – though he would do well not to appear to tacitly endorse some kinds of fans, like the ‘proud Islamophobe’ in the recently circulated photo.

        • mauī

          Ok, thanks. I haven’t seen a lot of his content, in the thing I watched he seemed to have a reasonable argument and appeared balanced when it came to free speech.

          But.. I’ve just looked up his take on native americans and that is really off. He does actually think that the european race is superior, and looks to be finding excuses for what happened to the indians. What a fuckwit. You’re right, looks like a white supremacist.

      • Jess NZ 4.3.4

        Anyone wanting to debate on free speech vs hate speech re: threat to society should first at least read what the UN has already discussed decades ago and concluded – then see if you have anything new and better to say. Molyneux does not, and is clearly biased.

        ‘During its eighty-first session, to be held from 6 to 31 August 2012, the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination will hold a day of thematic discussion on racist hate speech in the context of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination.

        ‘According to article 4, States parties are required to penalize racist hate speech, including dissemination of ideas based on racial superiority or hatred, incitement to racial hatred, acts of racially motivated violence and incitement to such acts.’

        And much more at.


    • Dukeofurl 4.4

      US cities generally dont have highly restrictive gun laws any more after US Supreme court rulings in the last decade.

      Remember that old requirement that gun owners in Chicago register their firearms with the city and obtain a permit? Well, that’s gone too.

      Then you have to consider the ‘City of Chicago’ is only 2.7 mill people in an urban area of almost 10 mill people with dozens of municipalities which runs into 3 states.
      In 30 min or so you can drive from ‘City of Chicago’ to ‘City of East Chicago’ which is in neighboring Indiana not in Illinois. Different state laws would apply, or in half a day, drive from Chicago to very lax Missouri.
      Guns dont recognise borders/ municipal boundaries in the US, The most violent places are not the very large cities but small towns in the South, but the figures most often used are deliberately only count areas of 100K population or more ( “Cities”)

      • greywarshark 4.4.1

        What is the approved level of killings to enable a human settled area to call itself a ‘safe’ city, town or state?

  5. ianmac 5

    Being a cynic I expect Bridges sighed in relief because he would know that the 20 Select Committee points of reform 2017, which Bennett whittled down to 7 of the easier ones, will mean that National doesn’t have to do the hard yards.

    • Chris 5.1

      And Collins is just smart enough to know where the popular support is. Why didn’t she do anything when she was minister?


      • ianmac 5.1.1

        No doubt a finger in the air will indicate which way the wind is blowing. Be very easy therefore to make the “right” call. Brave? Nah!

        • Chris

          Collins would’ve asked herself “it’s difficult but I need to find something to say about all of this that will resonate with the masses yet is consistent with my reputation as having a tough and abrasive personality. I know, I’ll say I told the NRA to bugger off! Perfect”.

      • Siobhan 5.1.2

        You give her too much credit for ‘smarts’.

        She’s just, as good as admitted, that her previous lackluster attempts at gun ownership reform were clearly in line (or possibly at the behest of) with previous NRA lobbying.

        They have no shame. Unfortunately that’s how their voters seem to like them.

        • Chris

          I think the likes of Collins, Bennett et al, are *just smart enough to see where the popular support is*, but yes, I agree that an inability to look beyond popular support suggests the bar is pretty low.

  6. Puckish Rogue 6

    Personally speaking bringing in new laws and rules and still managing to get, mostly, universal support means you’ve probably got it about right so hopefully we can now all agree that all we need now is just minor, and I do mean minor, tinkering

    • It is ,… a milestone.

      A good milestone,… even Judith is happy with it… like as you say… just a few more tying up of loose ends. It is a good result so far. Ironing out any rough edges is all that’s needed in the pragmatic sense. Re-implementing a register system is needed.

    • Kevin 6.2

      I think the universal support was pretty much forced upon them PR. The political hit for opposing the Governments actions over gun laws would have been crippling for National and would have been the final nail in Bridges leadership coffin.

      • Puckish Rogue 6.2.1

        The rules did need to change and this seems a fairly decent balance so good on them, and everyone else of course

    • lprent 6.3

      Yeah. I was surprised.

      You can see from my post yesterday, that I really hadn’t thought through the implications. What they wound up with was pretty much what Redlogix was advocating.

      Less than what I was advocating. Probably I’m a bit more worried about upcoming technologies.

      For instance the increased densities in batteries start making devices like coilguns far more likely to go into wide usage. If I can get a battery on the back of my bike capable of (mostly) pushing my 120kgs + 7kg of computer up a 85m hill every work day – then pushing a multiple 2mm ferro slither out at very high velocities out of a man portable weapon isn’t that far away.

      But for the existing projectile weapons, this isn’t a bad solution.

    • ianmac 6.4

      PR “means you’ve probably got it about right”
      How come it was wrong in 2017 but right in 2019?

  7. patricia bremner 7

    There are things we have to be thankful for after the tragedy of loss.
    A clear sighted Prime Minister who has led with grace.
    A parliament which has moved swiftly to remove military grade weapons.
    A public who have shown grief and generosity in equal measure, every other ethnic community pulling together and sharing.
    A Muslim Community who have shown huge dignity and trust.
    A good foundation for moving forward, and a balm on the pain.
    We are ever changed, and will open our Marae Halls Churches and places of worship (with few exceptions.) We must open our hearts and homes, and grow in memory.
    Prime Minister Ardern is correct. He has failed in his message of hate.He of no name.
    The Nation will remember the fifty and support their families.

  8. Grumpy 8

    Like you, I have spent a lifetime around guns. I have worked as a professional deer hunter and pest controller and been heavily involved in the control of all types of pests.
    I agree totally with everything you say. These firearms have no place in New Zealand and are not useful in any form of wild animal control (except perhaps in the rapidly shrinking business of mass culling of deer and suchlike – which can be properly managed by DoC).
    Of more concern to me is the “type” of shooter around now. Predominantly younger and obsessed with wearing camo clothing these guys live for killing things. No longer a couple of ducks for the table but wholesale slaughter and just dump the carcasses.
    We see this attitude everywhere and it will not end well.
    The old hunting culture of New zealand still exists and could flourish with the removal of E-Cat and MSSA firearms and the attendant attitudes of many of their owners.

    • marty mars 8.1

      + 1 good comment

      • Grumpy 8.1.1

        In my old age, I have been invited out for a hunt with some of the younger generation. All armed with the latest point and spray automatics and donned head to foot in the latest pattern camo gear. I am now very choosy who I go out with.
        My father and uncles would have given them a good boot up the posterior. Hunting is a culture which involves providing food for the family and respect for the prey. That is missing these days.

        • marty mars

          Yep all my rellies hunt and I know a few hunters here – most older – I’ve mainly hunted pig in the day so bit different.

          It is a whole different type of hunter out there – less the hunter more just the killer imo.

          • WeTheBleeple

            Ah, living in the bush catching dinner with a tomahawk. Some of us were feral wayback 😀

            I absolutely agree with Grumpy. Unless it’s pest control, hunting is to fill the freezer and feed the whanau.

        • greywarshark

          I suggest grumpy that films and television has a big part to play here. Strong-jawed men striding into the fray, able to handle the opposition and preserve the life and resources of those behind, that’s the excuse behind the gun craze and the use of it as a means to settle a man’s mind when he gets riled about something. Or the man in wartime, so ennobling and so held back by incompetent officers, just go in and blaze away. Problem solved. The man who is looked up to and obeyed, whose skills and resilience are great gets glorified on film.

          So many films are about conflict and strength and enjoying having a go at the despicable enemy that just want to harass, injure, kill you and take what is yours? So put on the camo gear, and see if you can get some of the special night-hunting headgear and be a real man away from pesky rules, do your own thing, that’s the game. I think that would be what passes for thought in many young shooters’ minds.

          I read about Australian senator – or Queensland or something – Fraser Anning. He used the gun to clear aborigines off the properties he wanted. Now he is wealthy and believes in keeping what he has and preventing anyone trying to get some of it back. And is against people of colour as being undesirable; he would know all about that! Having is nine-tenths of the law. And if you use guns to get it, apparently once you have got it, whatever, you are home and hosed as they used to say.

        • left_forward

          Excellent Grump – I was espousing yesterday the school of thought that there is no moral legitimacy in killing animals (other than culling to protect flora, fauna, and food production), but the old hunting lore that you talk about here is acceptable when combined with the above exceptions.

          Unfortunately, this new hunter attitude also includes people who release young pigs and goats into natural bush areas to replenish hunting stocks, just as our colonial ancestors used released rabbits, possums, stoats and ferrets further back in time – all still doing significant damage to our fauna and flora.

          These people are often associated with one section of the anti-1080 lobby who are more interested in protecting ‘their’ hunting stocks and dogs than they are the natural environment.

          The whole issue of hunting culture and behaviour is all tied up with the gun issue – do we really want or need to concede our gun laws to protect such irresponsible attitudes?

          Thanks for your contribution.

    • RedLogix 8.2

      As a lifelong tramper I’ve shared a hut with hunters many times. Apart from the odd slightly anti-social and quirky ones, and one idiot who insisted it was ok to have a loaded gun inside … I’ve enjoyed the company of most, and learned a thing or two from them. The experienced ones know the bush so intimately, in a way trampers often never quite connect with.

      It’s not the guns I’ve a big problem with, it’s the irresponsible culture around them. Like you I’ve seen the culture shift from the highly skilled bushmen from the NZFS, through to a new group of camo-wearing fools who’ve learned all the wrong things, from all the wrong people.

      And these MSSA’s have done nothing but enable this unhealthy culture.

    • lprent 8.3

      Yeah. I’ve always viewed weapons as tools, not entertainment devices.

      I’ve invariably used weapons always as part of whatever I was working on – as a soldier or as part of work on farms or on a rifle range we were grazing or working with soldiers. Never been hunting except for pest clearance on farms.

      I suspect that a lot of kids (and as I get older the idea of what I think is a kid seems to get older as well) these days get their ideas about weapons from playing computer games.

      They have no conception of messiness that happens in real life at all kinds of levels when they get used inappropriately. Like this dickhead in Christchurch, they expect to rush in, spend a few minutes shooting appropriately play-acting targets and then running away from the consequences. Just damn dangerous to be around.

      I grew up around people who went off to WW2, Korea, Vietnam – including the range instructors and my grand-parents generation. It was somewhat chastising.

      • greywarshark 8.3.1

        The men forming hate groups want excitement. Having something to focus on gives them solidarity. And it is part of human behaviour. Countries that have internal problems will go to war, knowing that when facing outwards the citizens will concentrate on the external problem. Margaret Thatcher and the Falklands War is said to be an example.

        If those whitey identity groups haven’t ruined their brains with alcohol or some other disabling drug, they could form a bunch of do-or-die toads and learn how to defuse mines etc. They could front up to that enemy in a very sneaky way and give them a send off so that the people could farm, walk there again. Excitement, high pay, team spirit and self-pride. The Defence Force should do it and satistfy everyone provide they are kept under control. See they don’t go on night raids to neighbouring villages and rape young females or males; people who are either amoral, starved of sex, or both might do this.

        They would have regular trips home. They would be feted and probably given Nobel Peace prizes. Why not give them a chance to suck it and see what real danger and heroism is like, or return to it if they have been in a war. After war’s all-encompassing demands are over, some find civilian life lacks something. Some mine-sweepers would become much admired.

  9. Puckish Rogue 9

    Also let’s hope there’s an overhaul of how the police run firearms licensing

  10. Dennis Frank 10

    I heard a comment on Nine to Noon reinforcing yesterdays suggestion that there will be a longer-term program of gun reform by the coalition after the legislation scheduled for April 10 comes into effect. That suggests serious intent to do a thorough job. I also heard the Police Association rep (Cahill) say he’d seen his face on a blog with a target super-imposed.

    Media reportage has been to promote the pending legislation as a changing of the gun law but refer to the announcement by the G-G not as such. It suggests general ignorance of the fact that an order-in-council does change the law! The relevant govt website describes an order-in-council as a Legislative Instrument. Legislative Instruments are laws made by the Governor-General, Ministers of the Crown, and certain other bodies under powers conferred by an Act of Parliament.

  11. Jeremy 11

    I don’t think ACT is opposing reform, just that NZers should be able to have their say on the changes.

    I know we have had numerous previous reviews of the gun laws, but I believe NZers should still be able to have their say on this legislation. The Order in Council has removed the threat of additional sales i.e. held the status quo in place – it doesn’t reduce the threat of further attacks like the amnesty and surrender does till the amended legislation is passed, but the threat of further attacks can never be eliminated with the plethora of weapons available it can only be reduced slightly, and you can bet the spy agencies are working overtime to ensure a further attack doesn’t happen in the meantime.

    What the Government has basically decided to do is run roughshod over particapatory democracy to expedite a slight reduction in the risk of a further attack in the few months it would have taken to have proper engagement and consulation with the public over this major law reform. You can bet that if the public consultation was allowed to happen there would be a lot more and very different responses than to previous proposals when it was a niche issue. By not being allowed to have our say the terrorist via our politicians has robbed us of a little bit of our freedom and democracy.

    Because this is a major reform, and while I’m sure many commenters won’t agree, arguments for inalienable gun rights are often termed with respect to multi-generational ability to stockpile weapons against future autocratic and despotic regimes. It’s not an argument I agree with, but the way in which this legislation is going to be rammed through ensures that people with these beliefs won’t get to make their case, from within this group are the kind of gun nuts we’re all worried about and this is likely to incense them more than they would be already with the changes – exactly one of the outcomes the terrorist enumerated.

    I know that many people here are in favour of what is being prosed and view it as common sense, but not everyone is society shares those views. We need to maintain our democracy and freedom and engage in debate, because that is the only way that when the shoe is other the other foot, and something you strongly oppose is being proposed as common sense that you will also get your say and it won’t be rammed through under urgency.

    A further consideration is the wisdom of retrospectively criminalising behaviour, our government has done this twice now in a week and it should be worrying to all NZers.

    • Ed1 11.1

      The proposals in 2017 did go through a select committee process, and it has been indicated that further legislation will also have such a process, albeit possibly quite short. I cannot believe that submissions will be much different from those in 2017; I believe the statements about “Attack on Democracy” are somewhat over-egged.

      From what I understand, the recommendations of the 2017 select committee were not put to a vote of parliament – was that “maintaining our democracy”? One possible way forward would be to make the vote on any legislation a conscience vote, although not all parties may agree to that. Far from their being too little discussion, some may feel that with all the reports since the Thorpe Report, the example of Australia, and the need for change demonstrated by the Christchurch shooting, it is time for considered but timely action.

      • Jeremy 11.1.1

        Hi Ed,

        There is a difference between riding roughshod over the limited participatory parts of our democracy and an “Attack on Democracy”, I believe that further changes will allow for submissions but this initial change is going to be put through under urgency and is the only part I was referring to.

        Where you said, “some may feel that with all the reports since the Thorpe Report, the example of Australia, and the need for change demonstrated by the Christchurch shooting, it is time for considered but timely action.” that is exactly my point – some may feel that very strongly, and I’m sure many do, but that does’t justify making the changes they strongly prefer under urgency when considering the limited benefits of doing so compared to the cost and risks.

        • McFlock

          The cost is trivial. The risk of urgency becoming habit-forming in this govt is not much of a risk compared to the fact that we now know that we have active nazis in NZ and (until a day or two ago) massive loopholes in controlling tools of mass murder. As we’ve discovered, that’s a lethal risk.

    • greywarshark 11.2

      Blah blah. Delay. Blah blah. Side issues get talked up and the discussion expands to contain these further matters. Blah blah. Stats of all sorts come forward with confusing graphs. Blah blah. Suggest some change Blah blah. Get sidetracked by the next large crisis. Blah blah. Something gets passed by parliament under urgency so as to appear to have dealt with the problem in a considered, formal manner…blah blah.

      • Jeremy 11.2.1

        So I’m guessing you have no actual constructive response to the serious points I’ve laid out above?

        No one is getting sidetracked before legislation is passed, it’s the most important bill on every parties agenda and it will be till it’s passed, the points I’ve raised go to the lack on wisdom in doing so in the manner proposed.

        • lprent

          Grey did.

          But these serious points that grey raised. I noticed that you aren’t dealing with them at all?

          • Jeremy

            I don’t see how he engaged in a debate other than to say, effectively, don’t raise any objections because that might delay things.

            I believe I did deal with that point in my response when I said “No one is getting sidetracked before legislation is passed, it’s the most important bill on every parties agenda and it will be till it’s passed” and it would remain the most important piece of legislation on every parties agenda until it was passed – whether it was passed under urgency or under a fast tracked select committee process. To imagine the public would let it be otherwise is, in my opinion, fanciful.

            I believe that would remove any concerns about the process and we would still end up at the same place, and we wouldn’t be letting this scumbag rob a little bit more of our participatory democracy from us.

            • greywarshark

              Cripes Jeremy. You are fanciful. You are just growing towards middle age apparently, but have not yet had time to stop and review all the political changes that have happened since you were born.

              it’s the most important bill on every parties agenda and it will be till it’s passed” and it would remain the most important piece of legislation on every parties agenda until it was passed – whether it was passed under urgency or under a fast tracked select committee process To imagine the public would let it be otherwise is, in my opinion, fanciful.

              Do you only take an interest in politics when it refers to something that affects you? If you were interested in society and your country, which most of your age group aren’t (this is from observation across a wide range of societal groups) you would have seen numerous examples of
              government ignoring ‘the most important piece of legislation’ to the country, which change FTTT.

              (Warning – Spoiler: reading may be incredibly boring. Rant starts here.)
              As politics involves all our society’s concerns there are numbers of pieces of legislation that were most important to be passed, that haven’t.
              For instance those helping to solve the problems of – people even families having to sleep in cars, having to pack into homes with the likelihood of spreading diseases, the unaffordable homes even to rent, the lack of homes for rent, those with low incomes and lack of time to parent have lack of food for children – from toddlers to secondary school students, the budget advisers struggling to help people who on the minimum grid of livability don’t get enough income,
              and – deep breath –

              the sale of NZ to foreign buyers to give the impression that we have an economy, the inability to enable jobs to be available to do things that need to be done because business interests have successfully tied government hands from taking cost-efficient steps for the unemployed, the organising of statistics taking so that it doesn’t give a clear picture of NZs employment situation for NZ consumption but uses methods that are compatible with the OECD’s recommendations, the joining up to trade treaties with egregious clauses that call for contra proforentum clauses (we being so small beside the bigger nations with bigger pockets and more brains – we exported many of value to us and turn to flexible overseas ones.)
              Also health, tourism, roads and rail, and on and on.

              • Jeremy

                You underestimate me methinks, I’ve been interested in politics since I was a teen and have studied the history of politics back to how our tribal ancestors governed before the dawn of agriculture.

                You seem to be intimating that you are old and grey and therefore your experience outweighs any younger person’s experiences, research and ability to reason but there are plenty of old, dim and uniformed people in society.

                The problems you mention above are serious but are in a different stratosphere of urgency compared the massive holes this act of terrorism has so clearly demonstrated in our gun laws. The question to my mind is exactly how urgent should the revision be put through, should they be passed under urgency with all the negatives that entails, or should we take a few months in order to have participatory democracy and hopefully a better law. I don’t believe any of the arguments presented thus far have provided any good rationale for passing this under urgency – rather than an expedited select committee process, especially when the cost / risk reward factors are accurately considered.

                • McFlock

                  Oh, if we’re expertise-measuring, I’ve got an hons degree in politics.

                  Law changes aren’t immutable, and in this case it’s better to err on the side of public safety and relax it later if the need is legitimate.

                  • Jeremy

                    That argument could be made to make everything illegal and then only legalise things that have a “legitimate need”.

                    Doesn’t sound like a country I’d like to live in.

                    You didn’t perhaps get that degree from the University of Waikato did you?

                    • McFlock

                      Firstly, it could only be made to make things illegal that are demonstrable hazards to everyone and with no obvious need from the start.

                      What else would be on that list?
                      Tobacco (already being phased out)
                      alcohol (already tried and prohibition caused more harm than good)
                      cars/trucks (off the list because of obvious need, but risks mitigated by regulation)
                      Lions and tigers as household pets.

                      Feel free to add more.

                      what was with the Waikato reference?

        • KJT

          The majority are pretty much in favour of Rambo being reined in.

          As we obviously, have been all along.

          That is democracy.

          Risking the safety of everyone, because a small interest group may swing the vote your way, or to help party funding, is not!

          I see the tactic from the anti gun control advacates is to try and delay until the sensible majority forget about it.

          Note; the concerns of farmers and others who use guns as tools for their job gave been addressed.

          For once, politicians have worked in everyone’s best interest. I am happy to give credit where it is due, and say, good on them.

          • Jeremy

            “I see the tactic from the anti gun control advacates is to try and delay until the sensible majority forget about it.”

            I presume that is directed at me?

            I’m not an anti-gun control advocate. Never had a firearms licence, in fact I can only remember shooting a single round of ammunition during a visit to the Police Armoury.

            “Risking the safety of everyone, because a small interest group may swing the vote your way, or to help party funding, is not!”

            I couldn’t agree more, thats why we probably shouldn’t push legislation through under urgency to ensure we have extreme gun nuts white-anting around to the maximum extent possible.

    • Peter 11.3

      I haven’t seen why Act won’t support the moves. Surprised that Seymour hasn’t used the opportunity to show how principled and reasoned they are.

      • lprent 11.3.1

        He may have problems getting them out via the media.

        However I’m sure that an Act supporter would have linked to them if they’d been written.

    • left_forward 11.4

      In 2017, a cross party, parliamentary select committee thoroughly and carefully researched the impact and risks inherent in our deregulated gun laws, heard detailed and extensive submissions in an open process. After a whole year of work and debate, recommendations were finally made only to be unilaterally turned over by a National Minister under pressure from a gun lobby working behind close doors to successfully undermine our constitutional democratic process.

      An then there was 15 March 2019.

      Is this the process that you are calling for to maintain our democracy, freedom and debate?

      • Jeremy 11.4.1

        Your argument above is an argument against seeming corruption, not against NZers having their input into a select committee process. It’s an argument against having any select committee process, or a call for total reform of how our government works. A wholly separate debate.

        Surely you can see that after 15/03 that things will be different? I.e. the select committee would attract many more and diverse views – and amended views, in wake of the attack and that none of the political parties would be stupid enough to “play politics” with this issue.

        • left_forward

          Corruption of the democratic process is one part of the point and how sad that we look back at it now and see that if the recommendations had all been implemented they may well have prevented last Friday’s events (although we may never have known).

          The other part is that the consultation has already been done – it is just a year and a bit on – lets just get on with what should have been done then. The collective view of the public and parliament is very supportive of this change – there is little doubt other than in the mind of National Rifle Association of America.

          While the risk remains on high alert for copycat behaviour, it makes sense to act right now. As you point out, the lesson of having few controls on access to these weapons has been well and truly learnt.

          Parliament are our elected representatives – they are empowered to act on our behalf. This is indeed democracy.

          • lprent

            While the risk remains on high alert for copycat behaviour, it makes sense to act right now. As you point out the lesson of having few controls on access to these weapons has been well and truly learnt.

            The current changes to the regulations only really stop new sales and give cause for police to easily arrest class A holder of certain weapons. They don’t clean up the mass of now-illegal weapons already out there.

            That requires budget and process. Both require approval from parliament.

            A rapid start to that is what will reduce the copycats and to the formations of any potential illegal resistance to the changes mandated by parliament. You can see why opponents of the legislation would like more time.

    • lprent 11.5

      but I believe NZers should still be able to have their say on this legislation.

      I think that the problem is that most of us have been through these periods of ‘consultation’ on this topic before.

      I know that I have ever since I was living in Dunedin during the Aromoana shootings.

      From what I have seen, in this particular topic, consultation essentially just provides room for un-elected self-interested lobby groups to pervert the process of consultation by screwing with the government of the day. They appear to outweigh all other people contributing to the debate.

      I’d go with more ‘consultation’ on this topic if and only if the recommendations of the select committee doing it are implemented without change. Unlike the last time.

      Alternatively we could pretty much go with the 2017 recommendations – which largely appear to be what is being put in place.

      • Jeremy 11.5.1

        Fair enough, I was 11 when Aromoana happened so I don’t have any experience with that tragedy, but I have to believe that this time is different, the sheer scale, horror and audacity of the attack will see that the majority of NZers have a keen and very active interest in legislation being passed within a few months under a fast tracked select committee and there is no doubt the overwhelming number of submissions will be for a ban of MSSAs, et al.

        We would get to the same place but NZers would have been directly involved.

        • lprent

          We would get to the same place but NZers would have been directly involved.

          I’m not sure that we would get to get to the same place. It didn’t happen the last three times that the longer public submission process you are describing was followed on this topic.

          For a started, most NZers simply won’t be involved except as being potential future unarmed victims of another dickhead.

          In this issue (and many others) only the most self-interested parties will make submissions and usually the ones most vocal about it are that very small minority of people who own guns. But their views have previously been quite strongly represented throughout previous reviews of the legislation and regulation.

          Even there, when in the course of those reviews the majority of the representations and subsequent recommendations produced were simply ignored in the interests of an even smaller group of well heeled noisy interests making private representations to ministers.

          I’d say that the process you are interested in promoting simply doesn’t work that well on this topic based on the results.

          One of the reasons that we have a representative democracy rather than a direct issue voting one is simply that most people don’t get that concerned about much outside of their own direct interests. They don’t present to select committees. Hell – they even avoid pollsters.

          So we have a composite process. The select committee system provides a way for specialized self-interested bodies and individuals to make their self-interested representations in public rather than more dangerously in private.

          Being an MP inevitably invokes the self-interest of getting re-elected by a large and usually diverse set of people. That leads to the main effect that you always get when you are around MPs and they know you even slightly – they keep asking you what you think. They and their staff always watch all media (including specialist sites like this) for opinions being formed.

          Then almost regardless of the issue (apart from a few things that are reserved to the crown) our parliamentarians sit in judgement. That is why parliament is the highest court in the land.

          In this case it is clear that our parliamentarians are getting some rather direct feedback from those that they represent. Otherwise there wouldn’t have been anything like the unanimity that I described in the post – the normal state of politicians is like what you see from commentators here – they all disagree with everyone else.

          Now I know that there are those who disagree with me on theoretical (I carefully didn’t say religious) grounds. But I still haven’t seen a more effective system for getting a useful balance – despite and possibly because of all its flaws. So in this rare moment of parliamentary agreement, we can do with a short technical select committee process looking less at the rights or wrong of gun control, and more about how to do it effectively.

          • Jeremy

            Thank you for taking the time to write out that in depth response.

            We are making a fundamental change to what many consider one of our most important rights/privileges and I’ll never be able to get on board with the idea that is should be done is a rushed manner and without allowing the direct involvement of the public in that proposed piece of legislation, as you say “I still haven’t seen a more effective system for getting a useful balance – despite and possibly because of all its flaws.” You’ve pointed out above that MPs are likely getting a lot of direct feedback, well good, they know where things are heading so let people have their say in response to one of the worst days in our history, a day that would have informed their opinions so vividly and will draw responses from those not usually engaged in the political process. As you point out, Parliament has the final say they can still push through whatever they like through if they so desire after the select committee if they believe those submissions are not representatives of the wider population, and face any consequences at the ballot box. Why go out of our way to antagonise gun nuts and reduce input from the public for such limited benefit? The arguments that opening this up to the select committee process would change the final result is one I’m highly spectical of given what happened last week.

            Previous parties have presented their views, yes, but they might well have changed in light of the 15/03 and others that have never presented on the issue before would like to have their say I’m sure, it’s only fair and right that people get to express their views under a normal expedited process, and the argument that politicians might do the wrong thing if we allow this isn’t sufficient in my opinion.

            • lprent

              It isn’t a right. That is a bit of mis-interpreted bullshit from the US constitution. And frankly most of the US gun nuts (as distinguished from the more rational gun-owners aren’t fit to be in a militia.

              But it never has been a right or even a privilege here. It has always been something that people earned by being deemed ok enough by our local milita (ie the police) and the crown to possess. That was because they were deemed to be not stupid enough to be either a homicidal dickhead or an accident waiting to happen.

              Moreover historically that didn’t include semi-automatic or automatic weapons. Nor for that matter; grenades, tanks, artillery, warships, warplanes, claymore mines, or innumerable other offensive devices. Or for that matter cruise missiles.

              We already know what the gun-nuts will say – it is kind of pointless listening to them yet again. They are like a record stuck in a groove repeating some legal crap from the other side of the world. You can read their comments in the proceedings from 2017. And they were outright wrong when they assured everyone else that the regime could prevent this kind of gratuitous bulk murder. So they clearly aren’t trustworthy sources.

              I know what the more moderate gun-users are going to say and so does everyone else. They have been doing so in all of those meetings in the past, and if you read the comments here you’ll find a lot of them saying it again. Essentially why does anyone need a semi-auto to shoot? You mostly use them for entertainment (including duck-hunting).

              It is also the same at my work – a deeply weapon oriented workplace. I haven’t yet talked to my gunsmith father-out-law or my gun-owner father – but I’d imagine exactly the same conversation. The gun laws are letting dickheads get weapons that they are dangerous with.

              As for everyone else – the vast majority, they are just appalled that a dimwitted dickhead gun-nut was able to get weapons that killed or injured more about a 100 people, and who was only stopped by accident from continuing.

              Screw the gun-nuts. If they want to get upset, I sure that the old (like me) and current soldiers will be able to educate them. We’d happily demonstrate what real firepower will do.

      • left_forward 11.5.2

        Yesterday Dennis F argued that it was reasonable for Minister Bennett to favour the wishes of a behind-the-scenes-lobby over the select committee recommendations (although he / she went on to claim that what he / she thought was reasonable and what he /she supported were different things).

        I largely agree with you lprent – if a Minister wishes to overturn a select committee recommendation then IMO, they have a democratic duty to disclose a clear rationale along with any lobby groups who may have influenced them, their arguments, and whether they have made any donations to the party.

        Dennis the Menace will say that I am being delusional, partisan and bigoted in holding this opinion. I fail to understand him / her – but I am interested in how an alternate case can be legitimately made.

    • Dukeofurl 11.6

      Since the election there has been debate over some changes with submissions , the 2016 select committee had a debate with submissions.

      There is plenty of debate …. which is just being used to now to stop action

    • Jess NZ 11.7

      I disagree, because most of us know f*ck all about guns, and SOME of the ones who know the most are the ones who will protest the loudest and gain backing from the NRA (who did their best to interfere with Oz at the time).

      We all didn’t get a chance to debate when Bennett rejected most of the expert recommendations paid for by our taxes.

      It can’t be democratic when there isn’t understanding. I’m more than happy to leave it to the recent expert review and our elected reps, elected through the democratic process to represent us.

  12. Ed1 12

    The decisions have been well received, but it was not clear early on that this was just the first part of the process, that a number of issues have still to be decided / agreed. For example, I have not seen anything about retaining the use of semi-automatic weapons by police or defence forces – saying we will rid our country of these weapons could be taken as meaning that that our military will be similarly limited; I suspect that was not intended.

    I support a registration system for every firearm, and for that registration to be linked to an individual’s firearms license. I was impressed with a radio interview, I think with Alpers, where he told of police attending a domestic dispute call being able to be told as they travelled whether there were firearms at the property they were going to, , and having the authority to remove those firearms and ammunition if they felt that necessary. The system used for motor vehicles is a reasonable comparison. Presumably it is possible to give a unique identifier to each firearm. Sales of firearms should be reported promptly as for motor vehicles, with penalties for non-compliance, or selling to a person not licenses for a particular class of weapon.

    Purchase of ammunition should be limited to holders of firearms license holders only, and if the license includes details of firearms held under that license it becomes in effect a “prescription” for the types of ammunition that can be sold. Just as for a prescription, details can be required to be automatically sent to a central body who are then able to analyse usage (over-prescribing is identified in this way).

    I am wary of large concentrations of firearms in one place – one suggestion was that some firearms only be able to be stored at an approved gun club facility – would that just make the gun club ab attractive target to thieves / terrorists?

    • RedLogix 12.1

      would that just make the gun club ab attractive target to thieves / terrorists?

      That’s a reasonable point, and I had pondered it a bit. Yes it is a risk, but then in a relatively small country like NZ such a raid would be immediately obvious (assuming appropriate alarms and monitoring) and if the cops really want to find you … they damn well do.

      I think this would cover most likely scenarios.

      • Jeremy 12.1.1

        The police currently resolve less than 20% of burglaries.

        Do you believe they don’t “really want” to find the other 80%?

        • Gabby

          They don’t really ‘have the time’ jermy.

        • McFlock

          A police force is only as good as its budget.

          But twenty MSSA’s being stolen? They’d make the time.

          • Jeremy

            I worked for the Police for a while. I don’t share your faith in them.

            • McFlock

              Luckily it’s cynicism rather than faith that gives me that impression

              • I have been to the Police a number of times on serious matters and they are basically not interested ?

              • Pierre

                Having trouble following the cultural contortions emanating from the left in New Zealand at the moment – collectively deciding the best response to fascism is to *arm the police* and *disarm the working class*? Did nobody think to raise the serious political considerations of that?

                • McFlock

                  The working class has always been disarmed. A few years ago we saw what happens in “semiauto vs LAV”. It ended badly for the guy who shot the cop.

                  And I reckon you’ll find that most people (left or right) don’t want to see armed police everywhere, anyway.

  13. A 13

    I like it 😀


    She told the Sydney Morning Herald and The Age that these lobbyists typically directed massive amounts of material that appeared to be sourced directly from the National Rifle Association to her office and those of other MPs.

    “They talked about how we were trying to take away their Second Amendment rights to own guns. We don’t have a right to bear arms. To own a gun in New Zealand is absolutely a privilege and not a right,” she said.

    I’m guessing she will be the next NZ politician commented on by John Oliver

    • Puckish Rogue 13.1

      Well tv programs do prefer having sexy, attractive women on screen but I just hope they ignore her personal magnetism and focus on her considerable intellect

    • ScottGN 13.2

      I watched this morning’s piece with Garner and Faafoi online. Collins never actually told anyone to bugger off as far as I could tell, It was Garner who suggested that’s what she might like to say to the NRA and she readily agreed.
      Her main mission this morning though was to try and re-write the story around National’s pathetic response to the recommendations from the 2017 taskforce. She tried to claim that National and Paula Bennett was prevented from implementing all the recommendations because of the impending parliamentary hiatus due to the election that year, after which they lapsed as the new government was sworn in.

  14. woodart 14

    think that gun clubs around the country should be doing some serious soul searching and some serious vetting of their members. I have had experience of a couple of gun clubs and a good percentage of their members seemed to have a large amount of hate in their systems. definitley made me feel uneasy, and were the last people that should be allowed access to firearms. worked with a couple of regular gun club shooters who exhibited serious pyscopath tendencies. all very matey with the local plod and saw themselves as law abiding, and were always itching to take up arms to put down imagined civilian insurrection……

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • The Picnic Period: A sign of our Covid times
    Auckland. For a long been it’s been known to Maori as Tamaki Makaurau, a place of ‘many lovers’. In the past fortnight, though, Auckland has shaken out the rug and grabbed a drink to become Tamaki Pikiniki, a place of many picnics. The humble picnic is now, in many ways, a ...
    PunditBy Tim Watkin
    9 hours ago
  • Are Covid vaccines becoming less effective?
    A critical debate about Covid-19 vaccines is when does protection wane, by how much, why, and what does this mean for controlling the pandemic and the impacts of infections. Depending on the studies or headlines you read it can be confusing. Some report declining vaccine effectiveness, and others don’t. Some ...
    SciBlogsBy Robert Hickson
    9 hours ago
  • NZ Politics Daily: 19 October 2021
    Today’s NZPD testimonial from Dr Oliver Hartwich, Executive Director, The New Zealand Initiative “There is a dearth of quality journalism in New Zealand, and so I am grateful to NZ Politics Daily for sifting through our media to discover the gems of reporting and opinion editorials. It is a valuable contribution to ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    10 hours ago
  • The Entrust election
    Auckland is holding elections for EnTrust, its local electricity trust. Entrust is important - it owns electricity and gas-supplier Vector, and so the decisions it makes around energy infrastructure could make a significant difference to greenhouse gas emissions. But the elections have traditionally been ignored, so its run by CitRats ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 day ago
  • Argentina returns the favour
    In the early 2000s, Argentinian victims of the Dirty War, denied justice due to a local amnesty, sought justice in Spanish courts, who obligingly convicted agents of that country's dictatorship of crimes against humanity under Spain's "universal jurisdiction" law. But Argentina wasn't the only country with a repressive dictatorship which ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 day ago
  • Climate Change: A good move, but not enough
    The government has announced that it will quadruple climate aid to developing nations, from $300 million to $1.3 billion over four years. This is good: "climate finance" - aid to developing nations to decarbonise and offset the damage caused by rich-country emissions - is going to be a flashpoint at ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 day ago
  • Too Much Say, Not Enough Do.
    When The Green Party Co-Leader Speaks, Does He Make Any Sound? James Shaw must know that neither New Zealanders, nor the rest of humanity, will ever take the urgent and transformative action that Science now deems necessary to stave-off climate catastrophe.POOR JAMES SHAW: He’s the man this government sends out ...
    1 day ago
  • Gordon Campbell on the perils of declaring premature victory
    Sure enough, Saturday’s Vaxathon was a barrel of fun and a throwback not merely to the Telethons of the past. It also revived memories of those distant days of early 2020, when we were all carefully wiping down our groceries, not touching our faces, washing our hands for 20 seconds ...
    1 day ago
  • NZ Politics Daily: 18 October 2021
    Today’s NZPD testimonial from Kim Gillespie, Editor NZME Newspapers Lower North Island & Communities “I find the daily email great for giving me an overview of each morning’s big issues across the media landscape, and really appreciate the huge amount of work that must go in to compiling it each day.” Anyone ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    1 day ago
  • Bryce Edwards: Political Roundup – Celebrating and critiquing 25 years of MMP
    Over the last week, MMP has been in the spotlight, given that it’s now been 25 years since the first general election was held under this proportional representation system. This has produced some important commentary and storytelling about the introduction of MMP and about the various pros and cons of ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    1 day ago
  • COVID-19 in Aotearoa: what does public health do now?
    Dr Belinda Loring, Dr Ruth Cunningham, Dr Polly Atatoa Carr* Public health activities have collectively made an incredible contribution to minimising the impact of COVID-19 in Aotearoa. But the work for public health is not over. As the situation in Auckland heralds a transition point in our approach to the ...
    SciBlogsBy Public Health Expert
    1 day ago
  • 2021 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #42
    Listing of articles linked to on the Skeptical Science Facebook Page during the past week: Sun, October 10, 2021 through Sat, October 16, 2021 The following articles sparked above average interest during the week: ‘This is a story that needs to be told’: BBC film tackles Climategate scandal, Why trust science?, ...
    2 days ago
  • Is injection technique contributing to the risk of post vaccine myocarditis?
    Recent misleading media headlines about vaccines being administered incorrectly in the absence of evidence do little to help public confidence in vaccines. Spoiler alert, vaccines are not being administered incorrectly. The topic of this blog is based on what could be an important scientific question – is one of the ...
    SciBlogsBy Helen Petousis Harris
    2 days ago
  • A Māori health expert reports from the Super Saturday frontlines
    Rawiri Jansen, National Hauora Coalition I write this as I charge my car, getting ready to head home at the end of a pretty good Super Saturday. It started with coffee and checking the news feeds as any good day should. Between 9 and 10 am as I drove to ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    2 days ago
  • Weddings and Leopards
    Could it be that the Herald is beginning to twig that an unremitting hostility to the government does not go down well with all its readers? The evidence for that is that, in today’s issue, two contributors (Bill Ralston and Steven Joyce) who usually enjoy sticking the knife in, take ...
    Bryan GouldBy Bryan Gould
    2 days ago
  • The Chronicles of Kregsmal and Krunch: Volume I
    As noted previously, my weekly DND campaign with Annalax and Gertrude has been put on ice. I expect it to return eventually, but for now it is very much on hiatus. The remainder of the group have decided to run an entirely new campaign in the meantime. This ...
    3 days ago
  • Super Saturday recap: Patrick Gower doesn’t know what he’s supposed to do
    It was Aotearoa’s first national day of action in over ten years, the first since 2010, when Prime Minister John Key tried to inspire us to clean up our nation’s berms. It didn’t work. Today, New Zealand’s berms are worse than ever. But history is not destiny, and other cliches. ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    3 days ago
  • COVID-19 Worried about getting your vaccine or want a simple explanation?
    Worried about getting your vaccine? Let me tell you a secret. No-one likes getting a vaccine. People do it because they know they’re better off to. Let me tell you another secret, a weird one: the vaccine doesn’t really “do” anything. Confusing? Let me explain… Vaccines are a face at ...
    SciBlogsBy Grant Jacobs
    3 days ago
  • Delta puts workers’ power under the spotlight
    by Don Franks Foremost fighting the Delta virus are workers, especially in health, distribution, service and education sectors. Unionised members of these groups are centrally represented by the New Zealand Council of trade unions ( NZCTU). Political journalist Richard Harman recently noted:“Businesses are caught in a legal tangle if they ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    3 days ago
  • Faster transitions to clean energy are also cheaper
    This is a re-post from the Citizens' Climate Lobby blog Several clean energy technologies like solar panels have become consistently cheaper year after year as the industries have benefited from learning, experience and economies of scale. Falling solar costs are described by “Swanson’s Law,” much like Moore’s Law described the rapid and consistent ...
    4 days ago
  • Abstraction and Reality in Economics
    Sometimes high theory loses the human point of the exercise.One of the joys of teaching is you learn from your students. When fifty-odd years ago, I was at the University of Sussex, a student doing our first-year economics course, Jim, came to me, saying he was pulling out because it ...
    PunditBy Brian Easton
    4 days ago
  • What Happened to the Team?
    Last year, in the early stages of the pandemic, the Prime Minister’s “team of five million” performed well; team discipline was maintained and we all worked well together. This year, however, has been a different story; team discipline has weakened, and many people have on numerous occasions behaved badly and ...
    Bryan GouldBy Bryan Gould
    4 days ago
  • Climate Change: Another legal victory
    Across the world climate change activists have been going to court, seeking to make their governments act to protect future generations. And hot on the heels of victories in the Netherlands and Germany, there's been another one in France: A French court has ordered the government to make up ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    4 days ago
  • Invasion Of The (Covid) Body Snatchers.
    It's Here! They're Here! We're Here! Help! It’s as if we’re all living through a Covid version of Invasion of the Body Snatchers. What has become of Jacinda? Where have they taken her closest Cabinet colleagues? The people on the stage of the Beehive Theatrette look the same, but they ...
    4 days ago
  • NZ Politics Daily: 15 October 2021
    Today’s NZPD testimonial from Associate Professor Grant Duncan, Massey University, Auckland “The NZ Politics Daily email is very helpful in giving me a quick overview of current events and opinion. It allows me to pick out important or informative columns that I may otherwise have missed. I recommend NZ Politics Daily to anyone ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    4 days ago
  • Missing From The Anti-Covid Action.
    The Invisible Man: Where has the NZ Council of Trade Unions been during the Covid-19 Pandemic? Why hasn’t its current president, Richard Wagstaff (above) become a household name during the pandemic? Up there with Ashley Bloomfield, Michael Baker, Shaun Hendy and Siouxsie Wiles? WHERE HAVE THE UNIONS BEEN during the Covid-19 ...
    5 days ago
  • “Go West, Young Virus”
    The Auckland Coronavirus Outbreak potters along, not helped by the perception that the Government is disturbingly enthusiastic about “managing the virus” or loosening the border. Health Minister Andrew Little said today he envisages 90% vaccination rates (which we don’t have) eventually leading to 5,000 cases in Auckland a week… ...
    5 days ago
  • Skeptical Science New Research for Week #41, 2021
    How to fill a glass and thereby drink— from a fire hose So far this year, New Research has published listings for 3,291 papers concerning climate change from one aspect or another. Each edition includes two dozen or so articles describing freshly and directly observed effects of global waming. These ...
    5 days ago
  • Climate Change: UKanians supports cuts
    The Guardian reports a study on emissions reduction policy from the UK, which found that UKanians overwhelmingly support stronger action than their government: The UK public backs a carbon tax on polluting industries, higher levies on flying and grants for heat pumps in order to tackle the climate crisis, ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • Media Link: “A View from Afar” on PRC-Taiwan tensions.
    In this week’s podcast Selwyn Manning and I discuss the upsurge in tensions between the PRC and Taiwan and what are the backgrounds to and implications of them. You can check the conversation out here. ...
    KiwipoliticoBy Pablo
    5 days ago
  • Labour’s 2023 election manifesto
    This morning Health Minister Andrew Little effectively unveiled Labour's 2023 election manifesto: 5,000 cases a week in Auckland alone: Thousands of people will be infected with Covid-19 every week even with vaccination levels at 90 per cent, and hospitals face being overwhelmed once restrictions are eased and borders opened, ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • Don't Blame James.
    Emissions Impossible! So, don’t be too hard on poor James Shaw. His pathetic little To-Do list is, indeed, totally inadequate to the crisis. But, you know what? He’ll be lucky to get half of the items ticked-off. There’s just too many entrenched interests – not the least of whom are ...
    5 days ago
  • The “Pulpit of Strewth”
    Barry Soper is one half of one of one of those right-wing husband-and-wife duos in which the Herald seems to specialise. In today’s issue, he has a piece that doesn’t quite reach the heights (or depths) of a Hoskings-style anti-government hostility, but which does provide an interesting example of the ...
    Bryan GouldBy Bryan Gould
    5 days ago
  • Gordon Campbell on the epic fails of Kris Faafoi
    Ever since Winston Peters first breathed life into this government in 2018, its own branding has been all about social justice and how we all need to be “kind” to each other. Somehow, Kris Faafoi must have missed the memo. His performance in the immigration portfolio (in particular) has neither ...
    5 days ago
  • NZ Politics Daily: 14 October 2021
    Today’s NZPD testimonial from Mike Treen, Advocate, Unite Union “Please continue your incredible work compiling these news digests. As someone operating in the fields of advocacy for workers and the broader social justice areas it is invaluable to be able to check what is happening in the media relating to the issues I have to deal ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    5 days ago
  • Overconfident Idiots: Why Incompetence Breeds Certainty
    This is a re-post from the Thinking is Power website maintained by Melanie Trecek-King where she regularly writes about many aspects of critical thinking in an effort to provide accessible and engaging critical thinking information to the general public. Please see this overview to find links to other reposts from Thinking is Power. ...
    6 days ago
  • Climate Change: Abandoning ambition
    When Labour was first elected to power in 2017, they promised us "[an] ambitious plan to take real action on climate change". Four years and a lot of foot-dragging later, they've finally released that plan. And its not what was promised. Where to begin? Firstly, they've taken the Climate Change ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • Many e-cigarette vaping liquids contain toxic chemicals: new Australian research
    Alexander Larcombe, Telethon Kids Institute   From October 1, it’s been illegal to buy e-liquids containing nicotine without a prescription from a doctor everywhere in Australia, except South Australia. But vaping with nicotine-free e-liquids is not illegal in Australia (though in some jurisdictions the e-cigarette devices themselves are illegal). Vaping ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    6 days ago
  • Young adults worldwide have blunt message for governments: ‘We don’t trust you.’
    This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Karin Kirk Elizabeth Marks describes herself as “a psychologist who works on difficult problems.” Her past research aimed at helping people cope with challenging health conditions, apt training, it appears, for taking on climate change issues. A few years ago, she altered ...
    6 days ago
  • Making ‘Second Age’ Hobbits Work: Amazon Series Speculation
    Time for a good old-fashioned fandom furore. The Tolkien fandom hasn’t had a proper one of those since the Great Nudity Scandal of October 2020… so it clearly must be time to pontificate from on-high about a television series we still know vanishingly little about. This time the subject ...
    6 days ago
  • NZ Politics Daily: 13 October 2021
    Today’s NZPD testimonial from Dr Lara Greaves, Political scientist, University of Auckland: “I love the NZ Politics Daily emails as they help me to keep on top of current events. It’s incredibly easy to skim through and follow the links. I really appreciate these as it means that I am exposed to a ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    6 days ago
  • The Data and Statistics Bill and the OIA
    The government introduced a new Data and Statistics Bill today to modernise and replace the 45-year old Statistics Act. Part of the Bill re-enacts the existing confidentiality regime (with one exception), which while a secrecy clause isn't an especially controversial one. Another part is aimed at removing "outdated" (inconvenient) limits ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Graham Adams: The debate over the $55 million media fund erupts again
    RNZ’s Mediawatch and a video clip viewed 42,000 times keep the topic of the Public Interest Journalism Fund fizzing. Graham Adams reports.   A week ago, the NZ Taxpayers’ Union posted a short video clip of the exchange in Parliament between Jacinda Ardern and Judith Collins in which the National ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    1 week ago
  • Multiple sclerosis: the link with earlier infection just got stronger – new study
    Scott Montgomery, UCL For most of the time since the first description of multiple sclerosis (MS) in 1868, the causes of this disabling disease have remained uncertain. Genes have been identified as important, which is why having other family members with MS is associated with a greater risk of developing ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    1 week ago
  • Hit hard by the pandemic, researchers expect its impacts to linger for years
    Sora Park, University of Canberra; Jennie Scarvell, University of Canberra, and Linda Botterill, University of Canberra   The impacts of COVID-19 on Australian university researchers are likely to have consequences for research productivity and quality for many years to come. According to an online survey of academics at the University ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    1 week ago
  • Covid and free speech
    by Don Franks Some commentators have likened the struggle against Covid 19 to the world war experience. To those of us not alive in those times, that comparison can only be academic. What the anti virus battle reminds me of much more is an industrial strike. In my twenties and ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    1 week ago
  • “Angry Blowhards”
    In today’s Herald, their excellent columnist, Simon Wilson, takes to task those “shouty” people whom he further describes as “angry blowhards”. They are those whose prime reaction to the pandemic is anger – an anger they seamlessly (and perhaps unwittingly) transfer from the virus to the government. The basis for ...
    Bryan GouldBy Bryan Gould
    1 week ago
  • Looking Forward To 2022.
    Future Tense? Okay, so that’s where we are in 2022. Living in a New Zealand where all the usual rules of politics once again apply. And, guess what? Jacinda’s government, once again, isn’t doing very well – not very well at all.LET’S PLAY A GAME. Let’s pretend we’re half-way through ...
    1 week ago
  • Gordon Campbell on Covid mandates, and the Covid pill
    The cliché about “living with Covid” will not mean life as we’ve known it, Jim. Vaccination is fast becoming a condition of employment, and also a requirement to participate in aspects of social life, such as travel, attending bars, cafes, and concerts etc. These protective measures enjoy a high level ...
    1 week ago
  • NZ Politics Daily: 12 October 2021
    Today’s NZPD testimonial from Prof Alan Bollard, Professor of Practice at the School of Government, Victoria University of Wellington; Chair of the Infrastructure Commission: “NZ Politics Daily” provides a great public service – a quick and unbiased way to check policy announcements and analysis every morning.” Anyone can sign up to NZPD ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    1 week ago
  • Legal Beagle: A submission on the COVID-19 Public Health Response Amendment Bill (No 2)
    I have made a submission on the COVID-19 Public Health Response Amendment Bill (No 2).In preparing it, I looked at the Hansard for the first reading debate, and got name-dropped as someone likely to make a submission. So, of course I did. I focus on a small bit of the ...
    1 week ago
  • Hard News: More tales from the Medicinal Cannabis Scheme
    You may have read last week that two years after the publication of regulations for medicinal cannabis – and three years after the enabling legislation – two local products from a local manufacturer have finally met the minimum quality standards for prescription. You may also be interested to know that ...
    1 week ago
  • Climate Change: Real action requires government
    Over the weekend someone pointed me at a journal article on "The Poverty of Theory: Public Problems, Instrument Choice, and the Climate Emergency". Its a US law journal article, so is a) very long; and b) half footnotes (different disciplines have different norms), but the core idea is that the ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Climate Change: Not doing our bit
    Last month the US and EU announced they would push an agreement to cut methane emissions by 30% (from 2020 levels) by 2030 at the upcoming climate change conference in Glasgow. The good news is that New Zealand is looking at joining it. The bad news is that that won't ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Delta’s Week Of Doom.
    Classic Shot: Are the Prime Minister’s formidable communication skills equal to the task of getting her government’s anti-Covid campaign back on track?IF JACINDA ARDERN thought last week was bad, the week ahead promises to be even worse. Sixty community cases of Covid-19, one of the highest daily totals so far ...
    1 week ago
  • Urgent measures needed to allow the safe re-opening of Auckland schools
    Dr Rachel Webb, Dr Jin Russell, Dr Pip Anderson, Dr Emma Best, Dr Alison Leversha and Dr Subha Rajanaidu* In this blog we describe the range of urgent measures that are needed to facilitate a safe return to schools in Auckland and other regions of the country where there is ...
    SciBlogsBy Public Health Expert
    1 week ago
  • Children live online more than ever – we need better definitions of ‘good’ and ‘bad’ scree...
    Kathryn MacCallum, University of Canterbury and Cheryl Brown, University of Canterbury   The pandemic has fundamentally altered every part of our lives, not least the time we spend on digital devices. For young people in particular, the blurred line between recreational and educational screen time presents new challenges we are ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    1 week ago
  • Putting Aotearoa on the map: New Zealand has changed its name before, why not again?
    Claire Breen, University of Waikato; Alexander Gillespie, University of Waikato; Robert Joseph, University of Waikato, and Valmaine Toki, University of Waikato   Our names are a critical part of our identity. They are a personal and social anchor tying us to our families, our culture, our history and place in ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    1 week ago
  • Speaker: Yes, of course festival organisers will follow the law on vaccination
    On Tuesday 5 October the New Zealand Government announced that proof of COVID-19 vaccination would be a requirement to attend large events this summer.It took a few days for event owners to absorb the information and understand the implications. By the end of the working week, most of the big ...
    1 week ago
  • NZ Politics Daily: 11 October 2021
    Today’s NZPD testimonial from Jim Hubbard, Cartoonist “NZ Politics daily is a go to for cartoonists, or should be.  Political reporting enmasse like this gives cartoonists and political junkies a smorgasbord to get their teeth into. Essential and I daresay vital reading for those who care about the future of NZ.” Anyone can sign ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    1 week ago
  • 2021 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #41
    Listing of articles linked to on the Skeptical Science Facebook Page during the past week: Sun, October 3, 2021 through Sat, October 9, 2021 The following articles sparked above average interest during the week: VFX Artist Reveals how Many Solar Panels are Needed to Power the ENTIRE World, Will you fall ...
    1 week ago
  • The Night of Parmenides: accepted
    A bit of good news on the writing front. My 3900-word short story, The Night of Parmenides, has been accepted by SpecFicNZ for their upcoming Aftermath anthology, to be published in early 2022. This is my first published short story to be explicitly set in my home-town of ...
    1 week ago
  • The Virus, the Politician, and the gang member
    . . . . . References Newshub Nation: Gang leader Harry Tam denies Winston Peters’ claims he helped infected woman breach COVID boundary, sparking Northland lockdown Te Ao News: ‘Apologise!’ Mob leader slams Peters’ Covid, Northland allegations Stuff media: Covid-19 – Search for contact of Northland case ‘extraordinarily frustrating’ CNBC: ...
    Frankly SpeakingBy Frank Macskasy
    1 week ago
  • Rapid kits, responses, and openings: watch motivations, or catch something worse with Covid…
    Last week was probably a high point for many armchair “experts”, fresh from their high after some deep inhaling of the various musings and fumings, of an actually very smug, and very insualted John “Things all work for me…” Key, former Prime Minister and FOREX trader, had blitzed the ...
    exhALANtBy exhalantblog
    1 week ago
  • Bollocks
    It would appear we have an unwelcome presence in town.Positive wastewater results had been detected in Hamilton and Palmerston North on October 6 and 7. There are 26 cases in hospital, seven of these are in ICU or high dependency units (HDU).One of the people in hospital is in Palmerston ...
    1 week ago
  • World-leading?
    So, the Herald has found someone, as we can see from today’s issue, who is able to explain why we should not claim to have been “world-leading” in our response to the covid epidemic. It seems that we have been kidding ourselves when we celebrated our low total number of ...
    Bryan GouldBy Bryan Gould
    1 week ago
  • Why Is Labour So Frightened Of “Mr Stick”?
    Force Multiplier: Why are Ardern and her ministers so loathe to put a bit of stick about? The “emergency” legislation eventually enacted to authorise the measures needed to combat the Covid-19 pandemic failed to confer upon the New Zealand Government the unequivocal authority that subsequent events showed to be so ...
    1 week ago
  • The Need for an Updated Strategic Approach to Covid-19 Control in Aotearoa NZ
    Prof Nick Wilson, Dr Jennifer Summers, Prof Michael Baker* The NZ Government appears to have drifted into an unclear strategic approach to Covid-19 control. In this blog we outline one potential way forward: a regional strategic approach that considers “regional suppression” and “regional elimination”. To maximise the success of this ...
    SciBlogsBy Public Health Expert
    2 weeks ago
  • Mairon: The Actual Source for the Blasted Name
    Long-time Tolkien geeks – or those bemused enough to run across a certain internet phenomenon – might know that ‘Sauron’ is not actually the real name of the Lord of the Ring. ‘Sauron’ is just an abusive Elvish nickname, meaning ‘the Abhorred.’ Sauron’s actual name, at least originally, ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Forced Re-entry
    The elimination of Covid strategy is not so much defeated but changing circumstances means that policy has to evolve. Our elimination stance was never sustainable or at least it would not be until the rest of the world also eliminated Covid-19. Elimination of the virus was a strategy we adopted ...
    PunditBy Brian Easton
    2 weeks ago
  • Repeal this unjust law
    Yesterday the Supreme Court ruled on National's unjust "three strikes" law, and found that the sentence it required was (in the case in question) so disproportionate as to "shock the conscience" and violate the Bill of Rights Act ban on disproportionately severe treatment or punishment: The Supreme Court has ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Climate Change: Preparing for the flood
    The Christchurch City Council has published new "coastal hazards" data, indicating which places are under threat from sea-level rise. And its not good news: Parts of Christchurch and Banks Peninsula are likely to become unhabitable [sic] as the city council figures out how to adapt to sea level ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • The Virus, Not The Government
    I wonder if Mike Hosking ever reads the paper in which he appears so regularly? If he does, he might have noticed a report in today’s Herald about the problem that could face churches in Auckland if a vaccine passport becomes mandatory for those wishing to attend church services. The ...
    Bryan GouldBy Bryan Gould
    2 weeks ago
  • NZ Politics Daily: 8 October 2021
    Today’s NZPD testimonial from Bill Ralston, Media consultant and columnist: “NZ Politics Daily provides an invaluable service for journalists, politicians, businesspeople, decision makers and the public at large by providing an easily accessible, exhaustive, link to every significant political story in the country’s media that day. It’s a gem of a service ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    2 weeks ago
  • Open letter to Michael Barnett, Julie White, et al
    . . Congratulations,  Mr Barnett, Ms White, and your business colleagues. It appears that we will end up having to “live” (ie, get sick, end up in hospital, perhaps in ICU, intubated on ventilators, and possibly dying as our lungs fail) with covid19. But at least businesses will open up. ...
    Frankly SpeakingBy Frank Macskasy
    2 weeks ago

  • Red tape cut to boost housing supply
    New building intensification rules will mean up to three homes of up to three storeys can be built on most sites without the need for a resource consent New rules will result in at least 48,200 and as many as 105,500 new homes built in next 5-8 years Bringing forward ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 hours ago
  • Nationwide business partnership grows conservation jobs
    Further Government support for New Zealand’s longest-standing sustainable business organisation will open up opportunities for dozens of workers impacted by COVID-19 to jump start a nature-based career, Conservation Minister Kiri Allan says. Partnering to Plant Aotearoa, led by the Sustainable Business Network (SBN), is a collaboration with iwi, hapū and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • New Zealand increases climate aid contribution
    Government commits $1.3 billion over four years to support countries most vulnerable to the effects of climate change At least 50 percent of funding will go to the Pacific as it adapts to the impacts of climate change The increase means New Zealand now meets its fair share of global ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Super Māori turnout for Super Saturday
    Māori have put a superb effort into mobilising to get vaccinated over Super Saturday, with thousands rolling up their sleeves to protect themselves, their whānau and communities from COVID-19, Associate Health Minister Peeni Henare says. “It was absolutely outstanding that 21,702 Māori got vaccinated on this one day alone with 10,825 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Language assists Tagata Niue to thrive
    Despite the uncertain times we face with the challenges of COVID-19, our cultural knowledge, values and language remain constant, helping us progress towards goals in life, said  the Minister for Pacific Peoples Aupito William Sio. This year, the Niuean community in New Zealand decided on the theme, “Kia tupuolaola e ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • New Zealand Ambassador to France announced
    Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta today announced the appointment of Caroline Bilkey as New Zealand’s next Ambassador to France and the OECD. “Aotearoa New Zealand and France have a shared history, and enjoy a strong, collaborative partnership. This includes a strong trade and economic relationship, a shared commitment to support ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Govt welcomes nurses’ pay settlement
    The Government is welcoming news that a new employment agreement for nurses working in public hospitals has been settled. “I am very pleased that the hard work of the Nurses Organisation and District Health Boards has led to a settlement that both can support,” Health Minister Andrew Little said today. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Judge of the High Court appointed
    Māori Land Court Judge Layne Harvey has been appointed a Judge of the High Court, Attorney‑General David Parker announced today. Justice Harvey graduated with an LLB from the University of Auckland in 1992 and commenced employment as a law clerk with Simpson Grierson in Auckland that same year. In 1997 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Kiwis to have their say on plan to reduce waste
    New Zealanders are invited to have their say on proposals for a new waste strategy and options for new waste legislation. “Reducing waste is one of the issues all New Zealanders – especially younger Kiwis - care deeply about,” Environment Minister David Parker said today “New Zealand is one of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Next steps in action plan for indigenous rights kicks off
    Minister for Māori Development Willie Jackson has today meet with more than 30 national Māori organisations in an online hui, kicking off the process to develop a plan for New Zealand to implement the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (the Declaration). The previous National Government signed ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Iwi-led housing solutions build homes for the future
    Whai Kāinga, Whai Oranga will open on 20 October, to receive applications for investment through Te Tūāpapa Kura Kāinga – Ministry of Housing and Urban Development and Te Puni Kōkiri The $730m fund combines investment from Budget 2021 ($380m) and the Māori Infrastructure Fund ($350m) - the largest investment seen ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • E whakarite ana Te Kāwanatanga i ngā tūāpapa mō twhakamaumahara ki Te Petihana Reo Māori ka t...
    I te rā nei, i pānuihia e te Minita mō Manatū Taonga, ko Carmel Sepuloni, rāua ko te Minita Whanaketanga Māori, ko Willie Jackson, ā tērā tau, ka whakanuia rawatia te 50 o ngā tau mai i te whakatakotoranga o te petihana mō te Reo Māori me te huanga mai ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • E whakarite ana Te Kāwanatanga i ngā tūāpapa mō tewhakamaumahara ki Te Petihana Reo Māori ka t...
    I te rā nei, i pānuihia e te Minita mō Manatū Taonga, ko Carmel Sepuloni, rāua ko te Minita Whanaketanga Māori, ko Willie Jackson, ā tērā tau, ka whakanuia rawatia te 50 o ngā tau mai i te whakatakotoranga o te petihana mō te Reo Māori me te huanga mai ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Government green lights rapid antigen testing
    Some of the country’s largest businesses have put in an order for 300,000 approved rapid antigen tests for their workforce, after working at pace with the Government on a new scheme unveiled by Associate Minister of Health and Research, Science and Innovation Ayesha Verrall. A coalition of around 25 businesses ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Government lays foundations as Māori Language Petition commemorations take shape for 2022
    Taiaha hā! Taiaha hā! - Te kairangi o te reo hoki mai ki taku tikanga, ki taku taumata, ki taku reo, ki taku ao. He reo whai tikanga, he reo whai mana, he reo whai tangata koe. Ki te whāngaihia te reo Māori he ao tēnā, ki te kore he ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Major contract awarded to power NZ Battery investigation
    A consortium of specialist firms has been awarded a major contract to advance the New Zealand Battery Project’s feasibility investigation into a pumped hydro storage scheme at Lake Onslow, the Minister of Energy and Resources Megan Woods has announced. “This contract represents a major milestone as it begins the targeted ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Additional Funding for Foodbanks and Social Agencies
    The Government has approved $13.55m from the Covid Response and Recovery Fund to support foodbanks and social sector agencies, Minister for Social Development Carmel Sepuloni has announced. “Foodbanks and social agencies across Auckland are doing a great job supporting their communities and the Government is today providing them with more ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Generating a new generation of guardians
    The Government is supporting a Whakatōhea-led project undertaking landscape scale restoration in forests and around vulnerable rivers within the Eastern Bay of Plenty, Minister of Conservation Kiri Allan says. “The Whakatōhea Tiaki Taiao project will employ four people to undertake pest and weed control, ecosystem restoration and monitoring over three ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Parts of Waikato, Northland staying at Alert Level 3
    The parts of Waikato that have been in Alert Level 3 and Northland will remain in Alert Level 3 for a few more days, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said today. Auckland remains at Alert Level 3, Step 1. “Based on the latest public health information, ministers have decided that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • New courthouses for Tauranga and Whanganui
    The Government is moving ahead with new courthouses in Tauranga and Whanganui, which the Justice Minister says provide an opportunity to redesign court facilities that help put victims at the heart of the justice system. “These courthouses are part of the 10-year infrastructure investment plan to restore and modernise Ministry ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Speech on the launch of the consultation on the development of the Emissions Reduction Plan
    Tēnā koutou katoa. Ngā mihi o te ata. Earlier this month Save the Children wrote to me with their most up to date analysis on the impact of climate change. What they said was that children born in Aotearoa today will experience up to five times as many heatwaves and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Opportunity to shape NZ’s first Emissions Reduction Plan
    The Government is inviting New Zealanders to inform the country’s first Emissions Reduction Plan with the release of a consultation document containing a range of policy ideas to decrease the country’s emissions, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and Climate Change Minister James Shaw announced today. The Emissions Reduction Plan will set ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Convention on Biological Diversity COP 15, Virtual High-Level Segment
    Kia ora koutou katoa. I want to thank China for hosting this critically important Conference of the Parties. We are all here for the same reason. Biodiversity loss, and the ongoing degradation of nature, are accelerating at an unprecedented rate. These losses are causing irreparable harm to our planet’s ability ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Government books show resilient and strong economy
    The end of year audited Crown accounts released today show the Government’s health led approach to the COVID-19 pandemic has protected New Zealand’s economy. “On almost every indicator the accounts show that the New Zealand economy has performed better than forecast, even as recently as the Budget in May. It ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • ​​​​​​​Health system is ready for assisted-dying law
    The health system is ready for the implementation of the End of Life Choice Act when it takes effect next month, making assisted dying legal in New Zealand, Health Minister Andrew Little said today. The law received 65.1 per cent support in a public referendum held alongside last year’s general ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Taking a lead in threat to curious kea
    Reducing lead poisoning of kea, the world’s only alpine parrot and one-time New Zealand bird of the year winner, is the goal of a two year project being backed by the Government’s Jobs for Nature programme, Minister of Conservation Kiri Allan says.  “Lead poisoning is a serious threat to this ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government provides certainty to working holiday and seasonal visa holders and employers for summer
    The Government will extend Working Holiday visas and Supplementary Seasonal Employment (SSE) work visas for six months to provide more certainty to employers and visa holders over the coming summer period, Immigration Minister Kris Faafoi has announced. “This offers employers and visa holders the certainty they’ve been asking for going ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Lower card fees good for businesses, consumers
    The Bill to help lower the cost of the fees retailers get charged for offering contactless and debit payment options is another step closer to becoming law, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Dr David Clark said today. “COVID-19 has changed the way we spend our money, with online and contactless ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Mandatory vaccination for two workforces
    High-risk workers in the health and disability sector to be fully vaccinated by 1 December, 2021, and to receive their first dose by 30 October School and early learning staff and support people who have contact with children and students to be fully vaccinated by 1 January, 2022, and to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Fund allows more Pacific community led vaccinations
    The Government has made $1.1 million available through ‘The Prepare Pacific Community Vaccination Fund’ to directly support Pacific community-led initiatives towards increasing vaccinations, said Associate Minister of Health, Aupito William Sio. “The best way to protect our communities from COVID-19 is through vaccination. “We need to explore every avenue to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Small business at heart of economic recovery across APEC region
    The Minister for Small Business says support for small and medium enterprises will remain ongoing as the Asia-Pacific region moves through response and recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. Stuart Nash today chaired a virtual summit from Wellington for the APEC Small and Medium Enterprises Ministerial Meeting (SMEMM). “APEC Ministers responsible ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Restrictions on abortion medication lifted for health practitioners
    Abortion services can now be provided in primary care, meaning people can access this care from someone like their trusted GP and in a familiar setting, Associate Minister of Health Dr Ayesha Verrall announced today. “By lifting some restrictions on the funded medications used for early medical abortions, more health ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Record day for Māori vaccinations
    More than 10,000 vaccinations were administered to Māori yesterday, the highest number in the vaccine campaign so far, Associate Minister of Health (Maori Health) Peeni Henare announced. There were 10,145 doses administered across the motu yesterday this is almost equivalent to the population of Hāwera. The doses are made up ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Statement on Joint Cooperation in Agriculture between Ireland and New Zealand
    8 October 2021 - Dublin, Ireland Agriculture plays an important role in the economic, social, environmental, and cultural wellbeing of Ireland and New Zealand. We are focused on increasing the productivity, inclusivity, and resilience of our respective primary sectors. As agri-food exporting nations, we also share a commitment to a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Northland to move to Alert Level 3 tonight
    Northland will move to Alert Level 3 restrictions from 11:59pm tonight following recent information on the risk presented by the positive case initially tested in Whangarei earlier this week and confirmed in Auckland yesterday, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said. The person is now in an Auckland Managed Isolation Quarantine ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Prime Minister's Christmas Card Competition
    It’s that time of year again! If you’d like to help design the Prime Minister’s official Christmas card, here’s how to take part: Draw, paint, sketch or craft an image you’d like to see on the front of this year’s Christmas card. It can be anything you want – a traditional ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Speech : Pacific Public Sector Fono – Friday 8th October 2021
    Greetings and Acknowledgements and Warm Pacific Greetings to one and all. It’s a privilege to be able to join with you this afternoon and share some remarks on how important you are to our communities throughout Aotearoa, and across the Pacific region. COVID-19 has been described as a one in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Pacific Public Sector Fono – Friday 8th October 2021
    Greetings and Acknowledgements and Warm Pacific Greetings to one and all. It’s a privilege to be able to join with you this afternoon and share some remarks on how important you are to our communities throughout Aotearoa, and across the Pacific region. COVID-19 has been described as a one in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Ruapehu social housing pilot, providing value for generations to come
    Housing Minister Hon Dr Megan Woods today announced the development of six social housing units funded by the Government’s Covid response infrastructure fund, to help work toward resolving Ruapehu's lack of social housing. “The Crown’s investment of $2.1 million in this project will provide value to the community for generations ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Children’s Commissioner Appointed
    Social Development and Employment Minister Carmel Sepuloni has announced  Judge Frances Eivers’ appointment as the new Children’s Commissioner. Judge Eivers, who is currently a District Court Judge in Manukau, will take up the role on 1 November 2021. She has been appointed for two years. The Children’s Commissioner is an ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago