"they lie by omission by using income tax, not total tax." But did you read the article? It specifically does address both income tax and total (net) taxes, inclusive of GST. "What this means is that for approximately half of all households future tax ...
For someone who 'may not be an expert' you've pretty much hit the nail on the head in my view. "a tax cut on the first 20,000 is likely fairer" I like the idea of a tax free threshold, but the calculation of where to set that threshold is complicated by ...
This is a real problem, but it seems to be more to do with households than supermarkets. Households: "New Zealand households throw away 157,389 tonnes of food a year. That is equivalent to 271 jumbo jets of food that has to go somewhere to rot, instead of ...
Boris should have gone on the stage. He really is very funny, and would have made an excellent stand up comedian.
Ah, I see what you did there. You have combined a series of claims into one alleged assertion that I never made. So let me deconstruct. "there are surviving children of late term abortions" Guilty as charged. There is ample sources for this. Here's two, ...
"I wasn't asking for a study that combined those two data sets. " Sorry, I thought you were. So here goes: On why women choose late term abortions: "Abortions performed due to maternal and/or fetal indicators are a small percentage of the abortions done ...
Late term abortions are indeed very rare. As is the rate of survival. I'm not sure either fact is relevant to this discussion, however. "with no links to support your alarming assertions." Can you provide an example of one of my 'alarming assertions'.
I'm not sure what it is about the statement you think is incorrect. The Bill sought to ensure the same level of care is applied to a baby surviving an attempted abortion as to any other baby born. The Bill also sought to prescribe sanctions against doctors...
I'm not aware of any study that combines those 2 data sets (why the abortion took place and what the babies prognosis was) in cases specifically of 'born alive abortion survivors'. But I'm not sure either consideration is relevant in this case. 1. Once a ...
"there is no way the Democrats were calling for the killing of live babies. " This from CBS about the 2019 bill: "The legislation -- which fell seven votes short of the 60 it needed to move forward -- would have required doctors to provide care to infants ...
That's a leap. She's speaking (from 2019 I think?) about the protection of born alive abortion survivors protection. When she talks about 'the murder of babies', she is literally talking about new-born babies, born alive as the result of failed abortions. ...
I see your point about Kamahl Santamaria. I had actually read that comment by Martyn Bradbury to be a criticism of TVNZ's recruitment process rather than a defence of Kamahl Santamaria. My bad. "as it immediately makes me (and possibly others) wonder what ...
Yes that's it.
Yes it's bizarre, and all very unfortunate. But so was TV1's breathless leading of this on their 6pm news as if they'd uncovered who really shot JFK. Martyn Bradbury wrote this piece that is both humorous and on point.
Is this the new face of tolerance?
Brilliant response. Thank you, you've made my day (and a very wet day it is)!
Hold on to your hats...the Australians are coming after Hairy Maclary! Hairy Maclary author Lynley Dodd responds to academic's claim book is outdated, lacks diversity | Newshub
Recent Comments