web analytics

Tumbleweeds from National on the Tax Working Group

Written By: - Date published: 12:37 pm, December 21st, 2017 - 40 comments
Categories: capital gains, national, tax - Tags: , , , , ,

[getty src=”602983205″ width=”511″ height=”339″]

A month ago Labour announced that Sir Michael Cullen would chair the tax working group and the National Party was cock-a-hoop! Steven Joyce said: “Sir Michael is many things but a politically independent voice on taxation policy he is not,”

Judith Collins had fun with it too, in her regular spot on Newshub she dubbed the working group a “load of bollocks” and described Cullen as a skilled political operator, but not a tax expert nor non-partisan.

But now it seems they may have fallen into the classic trap for young players in opposition politics – getting all gleeful about something that looks like a great ‘gotcha’ before the full picture emerges.

Because yesterday the government announced the full list of tax working group members. They are:

  • Professor Craig Elliffe, University of Auckland
  • Joanne Hodge, former tax partner at Bell Gully
  • Kirk Hope, Chief Executive of Business New Zealand
  • Nick Malarao, senior partner at Meredith Connell
  • Geof Nightingale, partner at PwC New Zealand
  • Robin Oliver, former Deputy Commissioner at Inland Revenue
  • Hinerangi Raumati, Chair of Parininihi ki Waitotara Inc
  • Michelle Redington, Head of Group Taxation and Insurance at Air New Zealand
  • [Bill] Rosenberg, Economist and Director of Policy at the CTU
  • Marjan Van Den Belt, Assistant Vice Chancellor (Sustainability) at Victoria University of Wellington

Interesting that there was no quote from the opposition in that piece. And looking at Scoop, and the National Party website, I can see nothing but tumbleweeds on this issue coming up to a full day after the announcement.

Have their finance and revenue spokespeople swanned off for an early Christmas already?

Surely they would have something to say about the appointment of noted pinko Kirk Hope from that great bastion of socialism Business New Zealand amongst others!

Or is this actually a fairly balanced looking group of incredibly well-qualified folks?

You can criticise the tax working group from the left for not challenging the status quo enough and for being compromised by the government already ruling out too many potentially useful tools. But, looking at that line-up, you can’t easily criticise it from the right for being a bunch of shills that will just go along with a Capital Gains Tax.

Better luck next time blue team!

40 comments on “Tumbleweeds from National on the Tax Working Group ”

  1. red-blooded 1

    Heh heh…😄

  2. You can criticise the tax working group from the left for not challenging the status quo enough and for being compromised by the government already ruling out too many potentially useful tools.

    Yep, that’s about all we can do. They’re findings will be BAU and Labour and NZ1st will stick to them. National will support them as well.

    We can hope that the Greens don’t and that we’ll see a rise in their support because of that.

  3. cleangreen 3

    As a blue collar worker I have no idea whonthe others onthee tax working group are execpt for Sir Michael Cullen who was so gracious to us in 2015-2007 when in Napier and he graciously allowed us as a local transpot group to meet him four times at his home in Napier as we asked him as Finance minister to buy back our rail asset and he being very smart knew just how much “the value of rail in New Zealand” was before labour entered Government in October 2017 and found this report;


    An Ernst and Young report for the NZ Transport Agency in 2016 — The Value of Rail in New Zealand — put that value at $1.5 billion. The report was not made public until recently.

    Sir michael Cullen is a very clever, assute asset to our country and I welcome his chairmanship of this Tax working group.

    Good luck Sir Michael and take care of our country and its people’s future.

    • indiana 3.1

      You make it sound like he hold the final decision…I thought he was just the chairperson. All I’m expecting him to do is make sure the meetings keep to schedule.

  4. cleangreen 4


  5. Tanz 5

    And how many people voted for Cullen exactly? Oh yes, no one. Shows the daftness of MMP, how undemocratic it is. And so much for the next generation stepping up, instead it’s just the old team. Roll on 2020, this is a rort.

    • opium 5.1

      Yes dear.

    • One Anonymous Bloke 5.2

      I just want to make sure you don’t miss the fact that David Farrar says National has lost support since the election, Tanzy.

      How many votes did Wayne Mapp get for his position at the Law Commission, Tanzy?

      • Thinkerrr 5.2.1

        IMHO National are playing a dangerous game, but from their performance over the past 9 years maybe its the only game in town.

        They’re simply knocking everything the government comes up with. Doing that will only succeed if everything the government does turns to custard.

        If it does, then National gets the moral high ground. If not, it will get a reputation like the old 1950s British unionists, of knocking everything, good or bad. The supposed $11b shortfall is an example of an own goal and National cant afford too many.

        But the odds are not on Nationals side. Even if everything this new government tries has an 80% chance of falure, there is only about a 25% chance it will all go wrong after only 5 new initiatives.

        But it seems to me they spent most of their 9 years in government blaming Clark’s government for their own neglect of the bottom 90% until that wouldnt wash any longer. This particular incarnation of National seems to me like a dinosaur whose tail is being eaten but the message hasnt reached its head yet.

      • srylands 5.2.2

        What I am detecting is people thinking that maybe the government is not going to do anything too radical at all. The fiscal thing is still a worry. But on the fundamentals, it is not changing anything. And it may even tackle some problems with refreshed energy, e.g water, housing, mental health.

        So I’m feeling good. 😁

        • Tracey

          What do you mean the “fiscal thing”? Are you referring tot he zero budget? Like the ones run by English and key in 2014 and 2015, or do you mean something else?

    • Grey Area 5.3


    • And how many people voted for Cullen exactly? Oh yes, no one.

      Cullen isn’t part of the government. He’s chair of a working group that the government has initiated as one of it’s promises.

      You complaining about it is showing your political bias and stupidity. Or were you also complaining about National’s working groups that were chaired by other people outside of government?

      • Tanz 5.4.1

        More people voted for National over Labour, the majority don’t want all the taxes that are coming, this is a rort. Luckily in three years time or less, it will be corrected.

        • Incognito

          National did not and does not have a majority. No party has ever held a majority under MMP in New Zealand. Your denial of reality does not pay you any credit; please stop embarrassing yourself.

          In the 2014 Election only 16,689 (0.69%) people voted for ACT and yet we got lumped with Charter Schools when clearly the majority did not want them.

        • fender

          So basically you won’t stop this crap until Lab. NZF and Greens form one party. Is that the only way you may see that they have a majority? Stop acting like a simpleton, no new taxes have been announced. Don’t you understand the difference between a working group and new legislation?

        • Draco T Bastard

          The majority didn’t vote for National.

          • Incognito

            I think we can keep saying this till the cows come home but it will simply be ignored as sophistry as long as the National Party elite makes claims stating the opposite.

    • srylands 5.5

      You sound sound a bit crazy. Michael Cullen being appointed to a working group is not a function of MMP.

      I don’t have major issues with the working group. I would have preferred more tax experts. But hopefully this weakness will be attenuated by the Secretariat that supports the group.

    • Tracey 5.6

      You must have hated the Job Summit in 2009. Promised in lieu of policy in the 2008 election. promised to solve job losses in the GFC. Just ended by being a talk fest with a cycle way that was still not completed in 9 years. Full of people that no one voted for that one.

  6. UncookedSelachimorpha 6

    Actually I think the make up of the tax working group is not great, as outlined in my comment yesterday .

    I think 60% of them represent the interests of the richest 1% – who pay as little tax as possible and want to keep it that way.

    Unfortunately Labour seems to have muddled “being rich and chasing money” with “knowing something of benefit for the economy and society” here.

    • +111

      We’re going to have to do it again once we have a Green government but I’m sure this one will take a step or two in the right direction.

      Wonder if this working group could ask why businesses have tax deductions and why people or actually work and have expenses from that work don’t.

      • indiana 6.1.1

        Because we have fair tax system as it is.

        • Draco T Bastard

          No we don’t.

          If we had a fair tax system then rich people wouldn’t be able to avoid paying $7 billion per year in taxes.

          • Ed

            And trillions in tax havens.

          • srylands

            Perhaps I need to get a better accountant. He prepares my personal and company tax returns. And every year I need to pay about $75000 in tax. Huh. He never told me about this option of “avoiding” tax.

            • dv

              It is good to see you showing social responsibility and not looking to ‘avoid’ tax.

              • srylands

                I’m not showing social responsibility. My accountant will do everything legally possible to minimise my tax bill. That is not “avoiding” tax. It is simply applying the tax codes as designed.

                • solkta

                  That is called “Tax Avoidance”

                  “The arrangement of one’s financial affairs to minimize tax liability within the law.”

                  You are thinking of “Tax Evasion”

                  “The illegal non-payment or underpayment of tax.”


                • I’m not showing social responsibility.

                  Which is a sociopathic action.

                • dv

                  I’m not showing social responsibility

                  OH well glad we got that cleared up.

                  Sort of sounds like the beneficiaries that screw as much as they can legally from the govt!!

                  • UncookedSelachimorpha

                    But remember we hate those bludging beneficiaries – but srylands and co are hard working kiwi battlers

              • Stuart Munro

                $75000 is a magic number – the sum typically paid by those with tax minimization options.

            • UncookedSelachimorpha

              Before embarking on any actual avoidance (legal or otherwise) the system already allows wealthy people to pay far less tax.

              The increase in the value of your business – which for many business owners is their largest source of wealth gain – is entirely tax free. Untaxed capital gains are not available to poorer people, and capital gains are the #1 source of new wealth for the already wealthy. Go figure.

        • UncookedSelachimorpha

          Yeah….in the sense that Trump has just made the US tax system even “fairer”…

    • Tracey 6.2

      I agree. But having backed away from income tax it is something of a damp squib.

      But certainly telling that there is no representation of vulnerable tax paying groups or the majority of taxpayers.

      “Business” as usual.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Government's response to preliminary referendums' results
    Minister of Justice Andrew Little has acknowledged the provisional results of the two referendums voted on in the 2020 General Election. New Zealanders were asked whether they supported the proposed Cannabis Legalisation and Control Bill, and whether they supported the End of Life Choice Act 2019 coming into force. On ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • New testing requirements for international maritime crew arriving in NZ
    The Government is moving to provide further protection against the chance of COVID-19 entering New Zealand through the maritime border.  “Yesterday I instructed officials to consult with the maritime sector around tightening of the requirements for international maritime crew entering the country,” Health Minister Chris Hipkins said.  “Ultimately, this will ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Fast-tracked Northland water project will accelerate economic recovery
    The Government has welcomed the decision to approve a new water storage reservoir in Northland, the first of a number of infrastructure projects earmarked for a speedy consenting process that aims to accelerate New Zealand’s economic recovery from Covid-19.  The Matawii Water Storage Reservoir will provide drinking water for Kaikohe, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Tokelau Language Week reminds us to stay united and strong
    Staying strong in the face of challenges and being true to our heritage and languages are key to preserving our cultural identity and wellbeing, is the focus of the 2020 Tokelau Language Week. Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio, says this year’s theme, ‘Apoapo tau foe, i nā tāfea ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • NZ announces a third P-3 deployment in support of UN sanctions
    The Government has deployed a Royal New Zealand Air Force P-3K2 Orion (P-3) maritime patrol aircraft to support the implementation of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions imposing sanctions against North Korea, announced Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters and Minister of Defence Ron Mark. “New Zealand has long supported ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Pacific trade and development agreement a reality
    Pacific regional trade and development agreement PACER Plus will enter into force in 60 days now that the required eight countries have ratified it. Trade and Export Growth Minister David Parker welcomed the announcement that the Cook Islands is the eighth nation to ratify this landmark agreement. “The agreement represents ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Securing a pipeline of teachers
    The Government is changing its approach to teacher recruitment as COVID-19 travel restrictions continue, by boosting a range of initiatives to get more Kiwis into teaching. “When we came into Government, we were faced with a teacher supply crisis,” Education Minister Chris Hipkins said. “Over the past three years, we ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Border exceptions for a small number of international students with visas
    The Government has established a new category that will allow 250 international PhD and postgraduate students to enter New Zealand and continue their studies, in the latest set of border exceptions. “The health, safety and wellbeing of people in New Zealand remains the Government’s top priority. Tight border restrictions remain ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • First COVID-19 vaccine purchase agreement signed
    The Government has signed an agreement to purchase 1.5 million COVID-19 vaccines – enough for 750,000 people – from Pfizer and BioNTech, subject to the vaccine successfully completing all clinical trials and passing regulatory approvals in New Zealand, say Research, Science and Innovation Minister Megan Woods and Health Minister Chris Hipkins. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • International statement – End-to-end encryption and public safety
    We, the undersigned, support strong encryption, which plays a crucial role in protecting personal data, privacy, intellectual property, trade secrets and cyber security.  It also serves a vital purpose in repressive states to protect journalists, human rights defenders and other vulnerable people, as stated in the 2017 resolution of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Ministry of Defence Biodefence Assessment released
    The Ministry of Defence has today released a Defence Assessment examining Defence’s role across the spectrum of biological hazards and threats facing New Zealand. Biodefence: Preparing for a New Era of Biological Hazards and Threats looks at how the NZDF supports other agencies’ biodefence activities, and considers the context of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago