Tumbleweeds from National on the Tax Working Group

40 comments on “Tumbleweeds from National on the Tax Working Group ”

• Comments are now closed

1. red-blooded 1

   21 December 2017 at 1:15 pm

   Heh heh…😄
2. Draco T Bastard 2

   21 December 2017 at 1:24 pm

   You can criticise the tax working group from the left for not challenging the status quo enough and for being compromised by the government already ruling out too many potentially useful tools.

   Yep, that’s about all we can do. They’re findings will be BAU and Labour and NZ1st will stick to them. National will support them as well.

   We can hope that the Greens don’t and that we’ll see a rise in their support because of that.
3. cleangreen 3

   21 December 2017 at 1:52 pm

   As a blue collar worker I have no idea whonthe others onthee tax working group are execpt for Sir Michael Cullen who was so gracious to us in 2015-2007 when in Napier and he graciously allowed us as a local transpot group to meet him four times at his home in Napier as we asked him as Finance minister to buy back our rail asset and he being very smart knew just how much “the value of rail in New Zealand” was before labour entered Government in October 2017 and found this report;

   http://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2017/11/trains-save-nz-1-5-billion-a-year-report.html

   An Ernst and Young report for the NZ Transport Agency in 2016 — The Value of Rail in New Zealand — put that value at $1.5 billion. The report was not made public until recently.

   Sir michael Cullen is a very clever, assute asset to our country and I welcome his chairmanship of this Tax working group.

   Good luck Sir Michael and take care of our country and its people’s future.
   • indiana 3.1

     21 December 2017 at 3:37 pm

     You make it sound like he hold the final decision…I thought he was just the chairperson. All I’m expecting him to do is make sure the meetings keep to schedule.
     • One Anonymous Bloke 3.1.1

       21 December 2017 at 3:52 pm

       The sweet taste of bitter Tory tears 😆
4. cleangreen 4

   21 December 2017 at 1:55 pm

   test
5. Tanz 5

   21 December 2017 at 5:05 pm

   And how many people voted for Cullen exactly? Oh yes, no one. Shows the daftness of MMP, how undemocratic it is. And so much for the next generation stepping up, instead it’s just the old team. Roll on 2020, this is a rort.
   • opium 5.1

     21 December 2017 at 5:11 pm

     Yes dear.
   • One Anonymous Bloke 5.2

     21 December 2017 at 5:31 pm

     I just want to make sure you don’t miss the fact that David Farrar says National has lost support since the election, Tanzy.

     How many votes did Wayne Mapp get for his position at the Law Commission, Tanzy?
     • Thinkerrr 5.2.1

       21 December 2017 at 10:31 pm

       IMHO National are playing a dangerous game, but from their performance over the past 9 years maybe its the only game in town.

       They’re simply knocking everything the government comes up with. Doing that will only succeed if everything the government does turns to custard.

       If it does, then National gets the moral high ground. If not, it will get a reputation like the old 1950s British unionists, of knocking everything, good or bad. The supposed $11b shortfall is an example of an own goal and National cant afford too many.

       But the odds are not on Nationals side. Even if everything this new government tries has an 80% chance of falure, there is only about a 25% chance it will all go wrong after only 5 new initiatives.

       But it seems to me they spent most of their 9 years in government blaming Clark’s government for their own neglect of the bottom 90% until that wouldnt wash any longer. This particular incarnation of National seems to me like a dinosaur whose tail is being eaten but the message hasnt reached its head yet.
     • srylands 5.2.2

       22 December 2017 at 7:56 am

       What I am detecting is people thinking that maybe the government is not going to do anything too radical at all. The fiscal thing is still a worry. But on the fundamentals, it is not changing anything. And it may even tackle some problems with refreshed energy, e.g water, housing, mental health.

       So I’m feeling good. 😁
       • Tracey 5.2.2.1

         22 December 2017 at 10:24 am

         What do you mean the “fiscal thing”? Are you referring tot he zero budget? Like the ones run by English and key in 2014 and 2015, or do you mean something else?
   • Grey Area 5.3

     21 December 2017 at 6:19 pm

     Zzzzzz….
   • Draco T Bastard 5.4

     21 December 2017 at 7:06 pm

     And how many people voted for Cullen exactly? Oh yes, no one.

     Cullen isn’t part of the government. He’s chair of a working group that the government has initiated as one of it’s promises.

     You complaining about it is showing your political bias and stupidity. Or were you also complaining about National’s working groups that were chaired by other people outside of government?
     • Tanz 5.4.1

       23 December 2017 at 10:59 pm

       More people voted for National over Labour, the majority don’t want all the taxes that are coming, this is a rort. Luckily in three years time or less, it will be corrected.
       • Incognito 5.4.1.1

         23 December 2017 at 11:11 pm

         National did not and does not have a majority. No party has ever held a majority under MMP in New Zealand. Your denial of reality does not pay you any credit; please stop embarrassing yourself.

         In the 2014 Election only 16,689 (0.69%) people voted for ACT and yet we got lumped with Charter Schools when clearly the majority did not want them.
       • fender 5.4.1.2

         23 December 2017 at 11:18 pm

         So basically you won’t stop this crap until Lab. NZF and Greens form one party. Is that the only way you may see that they have a majority? Stop acting like a simpleton, no new taxes have been announced. Don’t you understand the difference between a working group and new legislation?
       • Draco T Bastard 5.4.1.3

         23 December 2017 at 11:35 pm

         The majority didn’t vote for National.
         • Incognito 5.4.1.3.1

           24 December 2017 at 12:19 am

           I think we can keep saying this till the cows come home but it will simply be ignored as sophistry as long as the National Party elite makes claims stating the opposite.
           • Draco T Bastard 5.4.1.3.1.1

             24 December 2017 at 1:26 am

             True but we need to keep pointing out their lies. pointing out that they are lies. If we don’t then people start to believe because they’re not being held to account.
             • Incognito …

               24 December 2017 at 12:17 pm

               I wish it were so simple but there’s some thought & research that suggests that pointing out (their) lies does not achieve any of the kind and, in fact, might entrench fixed & rigid opinions & beliefs and thus worsen polar opposites. I have commented on this before, with links: https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-07022015/#comment-964856
   • srylands 5.5

     22 December 2017 at 7:42 am

     You sound sound a bit crazy. Michael Cullen being appointed to a working group is not a function of MMP.

     I don’t have major issues with the working group. I would have preferred more tax experts. But hopefully this weakness will be attenuated by the Secretariat that supports the group.
     • Tracey 5.5.1

       22 December 2017 at 10:20 am

       60% being tax experts not enough for ya?

       Very few representatives of the majority of taxpayers.
   • Tracey 5.6

     22 December 2017 at 10:18 am

     You must have hated the Job Summit in 2009. Promised in lieu of policy in the 2008 election. promised to solve job losses in the GFC. Just ended by being a talk fest with a cycle way that was still not completed in 9 years. Full of people that no one voted for that one.
6. UncookedSelachimorpha 6

   21 December 2017 at 6:23 pm

   Actually I think the make up of the tax working group is not great, as outlined in my comment yesterday .

   I think 60% of them represent the interests of the richest 1% – who pay as little tax as possible and want to keep it that way.

   Unfortunately Labour seems to have muddled “being rich and chasing money” with “knowing something of benefit for the economy and society” here.
   • Draco T Bastard 6.1

     21 December 2017 at 7:31 pm

     +111

     We’re going to have to do it again once we have a Green government but I’m sure this one will take a step or two in the right direction.

     Wonder if this working group could ask why businesses have tax deductions and why people or actually work and have expenses from that work don’t.
     • indiana 6.1.1

       21 December 2017 at 9:57 pm

       Because we have fair tax system as it is.
       • Draco T Bastard 6.1.1.1

         21 December 2017 at 10:15 pm

         No we don’t.

         If we had a fair tax system then rich people wouldn’t be able to avoid paying $7 billion per year in taxes.
         • Ed 6.1.1.1.1

           21 December 2017 at 10:16 pm

           And trillions in tax havens.
         • srylands 6.1.1.1.2

           22 December 2017 at 7:48 am

           Perhaps I need to get a better accountant. He prepares my personal and company tax returns. And every year I need to pay about $75000 in tax. Huh. He never told me about this option of “avoiding” tax.
           • dv 6.1.1.1.2.1

             22 December 2017 at 7:55 am

             It is good to see you showing social responsibility and not looking to ‘avoid’ tax.
             • srylands …

               22 December 2017 at 8:01 am

               I’m not showing social responsibility. My accountant will do everything legally possible to minimise my tax bill. That is not “avoiding” tax. It is simply applying the tax codes as designed.
               • solkta …

                 22 December 2017 at 8:08 am

                 That is called “Tax Avoidance”

                 “The arrangement of one’s financial affairs to minimize tax liability within the law.”

                 You are thinking of “Tax Evasion”

                 “The illegal non-payment or underpayment of tax.”

                 oxford
               • Draco T Bastard …

                 24 December 2017 at 1:27 am

                 I’m not showing social responsibility.

                 Which is a sociopathic action.
               • dv …

                 24 December 2017 at 8:57 am

                 I’m not showing social responsibility

                 OH well glad we got that cleared up.

                 Sort of sounds like the beneficiaries that screw as much as they can legally from the govt!!
                 • UncookedSelachimorpha …

                   24 December 2017 at 9:26 am

                   But remember we hate those bludging beneficiaries – but srylands and co are hard working kiwi battlers
             • Stuart Munro …

               22 December 2017 at 10:14 pm

               $75000 is a magic number – the sum typically paid by those with tax minimization options.
           • UncookedSelachimorpha 6.1.1.1.2.2

             22 December 2017 at 10:42 am

             Before embarking on any actual avoidance (legal or otherwise) the system already allows wealthy people to pay far less tax.

             The increase in the value of your business – which for many business owners is their largest source of wealth gain – is entirely tax free. Untaxed capital gains are not available to poorer people, and capital gains are the #1 source of new wealth for the already wealthy. Go figure.
       • UncookedSelachimorpha 6.1.1.2

         22 December 2017 at 12:54 am

         Yeah….in the sense that Trump has just made the US tax system even “fairer”…
   • Tracey 6.2

     22 December 2017 at 10:22 am

     I agree. But having backed away from income tax it is something of a damp squib.

     But certainly telling that there is no representation of vulnerable tax paying groups or the majority of taxpayers.

     “Business” as usual.

• Comments are now closed

• Log in
• Donate
• Contribute post

• Articles RSS