Will Labour go it alone?

Written By: - Date published: 7:42 am, October 21st, 2020 - 99 comments
Categories: act, greens, labour, maori party, national - Tags:

I have no idea if she is right or not.  But Tova O’Brien has suggested that a Labour Green joined at the hip coalition is not going to happen.

There has been a fair bit of commentary suggesting that the election result was bad for the left.  This is surprising given that the only available rational conclusion is that it was a blood bath for the right.

Labour polling at levels never seen under MMP and not seen since Micky Savage’s time is an outstanding result.  And the Greens created history of their own.  They were the first support party to increase their share of the vote in a subsequent election.

The commentators are not picking up what happened at the grass roots of our democracy.  I have spoken to many, many people over the past few months.  Overwhelmingly their response was that Jacinda and the Government had handled Covid exceptionally well, National was a mess, and they were going to vote for who they could trust to do the job.

Why did the Greens do so well?  I am pretty sure there were more than a few Labour voters thinking they needed to make sure the Government was as progressive as possible and made sure that the Green Party can have a significant effect on party policy.

Both parties have had to draw heavily on their respective lists.  I said this a week ago:

And last minute Green – Labour party votes could see some very deserving people elected to Parliament.

For Labour Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board Chair and all round good person Lemauga Lydia Sosene is 54 on Labour’s list and has a good chance of being in the next Parliament although there are electorate MPs below her on the list who should win their electorate and it will be tight.  Mangere deserves two MPs.  Epsom has though the ACT gerrymander had two MPs for the past 15 years.  Mangere deserves to be treated the same even if more legitimate and democratic methods are used.

For the Greens at number 11 on their list Steve Abel is tantalisingly close.  His history with Greenpeace and fighting climate change is formidable.  His lifetime of activism and his deep understanding of the issues would be invaluable for the next Government. This Parliament needs Steve to be there.

Sosene and Abel are the next MPs into Parliament, just on the wrong side of the current vote count.  I hope they both make it, soon.

Should Labour go into coalition with the Greens?

In brutal terms there is no need to.  Previous coalitions were to make sure that the dominant party had a majority in Parliament to ensure supply and a buffer in case of emergency.  Labour has a healthy buffer.

It is a function of people seeking public office but there is a great interest in occupying Ministerial positions.  I am actually a fan of the Micky Savage way of doing things, from each according to their ability and to each according to their need.  Put all Parliamentarians on the same salary and invite those that are keen to do extra work.  Unfortunately it does not work this way.

So a joined at the hip coalition does not seem likely.

However there is the potential of a confidence and supply arrangement and there are some talented members of the Green caucus who should be offered Ministerial positions outside Cabinet.  As examples James Shaw’s work on the Zero Carbon bill last term was invaluable and Julie Anne Genter has a significant contribution to make to the areas of transport and sustainability.

As for the Maori Party I believe that it is important for a respectful relationship to be developed.  The Maori Party is the latest of a number of parties set up with a Maori focus dating back to Mana Motuhake in the late 1970s.  I have a lot of time for many of its policies.  The Maori Party in my view would fit better in a Labour coalition than in a National led coalition.

Further evidence of the swing to the left is the Greens winning Auckland Central and the Maori Party winning Waiariki.  That a majority were willing to endorse Chloe Swarbrick and Rawiri Waititi shows how far they have come.

Further details of the new Government’s make up will appear this week.  But given the utter domination of Parliament by the centre left and left, the fact that National’s caucus has been reduced to a Christian Farmer rump, and the ACT party has more than a hint of being full of crazies, this will be an interesting Parliament.

Finally here is the Labour Party policy platform.  Read it carefully.  It is this Parliament’s coalition agreement against which at the end of the term Labour’s performance will be measured.

99 comments on “Will Labour go it alone? ”

  • Comments are now closed

  1. Roy Cartland 1
    21 October 2020 at 8:35 am

    The idea that Labour somehow owes any concessions to its new-found 'swing' voters is utterly ridiculous. If people wanted National policies they should have, and would have, voted National. The fact that the Nats were a disaster is irrelevant.

    Labour needs to deliver on its rhetoric as well as its promises rather than sell us out under platitudes like 'together' and 'all NZers'. Again.

    • froggleblocks 1.1
      21 October 2020 at 8:52 am

      The idea that Labour should just ignore the people that gave it an outright majority is utterly ridiculous.

      • I Feel Love 1.1.1
        21 October 2020 at 9:02 am

        Well, no, Labour has a set of policies, which they are obliged to deliver.

        Your argument would be like me voting ACT, and then demanding they have a bunch of socialist type policies, just because I (a socialist type), voted for them.

        • froggleblocks 1.1.1.1
          21 October 2020 at 9:45 am

          No, that's not my argument at all.

          Roy said those voters should be ignored. I said they shouldn't be.

          • Gabby 1.1.1.1.1
            21 October 2020 at 12:01 pm

            No he didn't. He said they shouldn't be mollycoddled. They wouldn't want that anyway.

            • Robert Guyton 1.1.1.1.1.1
              21 October 2020 at 12:06 pm

              That Labour should "make concessions".

              It's all speculation, isn't it; double-guessing the intentions of voters.

              Labour can do as she pleases, so long as the next election delivers them into Government again. That might require a successful and willing Green Party.

              • roy cartland …
                21 October 2020 at 12:43 pm

                Yes it is speculation. But there is an audible buzz in the msm that Labour ought to be somehow accommodating the wishes of those who swung from National. Not 'rewarding' them with policies the media insists they would prefer is not the same as ignoring them. They swung for a reason, and Labour can happily assume it's because they specifically didn't want Nat policy.

                • froggleblocks …
                  21 October 2020 at 2:03 pm

                  Not having a formal coalition with the Greens is how the accommodate them.

                • greywarshark …
                  21 October 2020 at 2:55 pm

                  They swung for a reason, and Labour can happily assume it's because they specifically didn't want Nat policy.

                  What policy do they want or is it a case of what they don't want? Have they any good wishes for NZ at all those swinging Nats – like chimpanzees from tree to tree?

                  National swings like the pendulum do,
                  Trendies on bicycles two by two,
                  Wellington night life, Auckland tower of babel,
                  The latest style and the latest marvel.

                  Think of the tune to England Swings.

                  • Roy Cartland …
                    21 October 2020 at 3:07 pm

                    Who cares what they want, or rather what the media and business lobby says they want. They voted Labour. And that's what they get.

                    Climate change action, better wages/welfare, inequality reduction, housing, proper health service and education and improvement for Māori/treaty. You know, the ole Labour party 'values'.

                    You don't water down because you got more votes, surely?

      • Incognito 1.1.2
        21 October 2020 at 9:07 am

        Right, Labour should put more lipstick on the neo-liberal pig and become a pinko shade of National because that’s the mini-mandate that a few National voters allegedly gave them because they were disillusioned with their shambolic ‘team’?

        If anything, Labour has a mandate to implement what they campaigned on and not implement what they ruled out. It really is that simple.

        • froggleblocks 1.1.2.1
          21 October 2020 at 9:44 am

          Yes. Which means not having a formal coalition with the Greens.

          • Incognito 1.1.2.1.1
            21 October 2020 at 9:34 pm

            Because Labour and Green Party policies are diametrically opposed and there’s no common ground and no common goals? That might explain the friction & tension since 2017 between the two parties.

        • Nic the NZer 1.1.2.2
          21 October 2020 at 9:47 am

          They have you there because I didn't see them campaign on anything in particular, though we can rule out a wealth tax (probably).

          • greywarshark 1.1.2.2.1
            21 October 2020 at 12:17 pm

            NictNZer Yes that is a major point I think – they kept their options open in general, only ensuring that they didn't scare the horses.

          • Incognito 1.1.2.2.2
            21 October 2020 at 9:45 pm

            Labour did hide it well that they were going to continue the rebuilding of the economy as outlined in Budget-2020 and even their campaign slogan “Let’s keep moving” was a fuzzy smokescreen. They were so late with posting their Election Manifesto I’m surprised they even bothered this time.

            https://www.labour.org.nz/news-labour_2020_manifesto

            Our Manifesto To Keep New Zealand Moving

            I understand that all former National voters, particularly the farmers, read it and went “yeah, nah, I’m going to vote for the pretty communist to keep those green communists out of Government”. You see, there’s a big difference between a pretty and a green communist.

      • RosieLee 1.1.3
        21 October 2020 at 6:10 pm

        Labour has the outright majority full stop – they are not obliged to consider any arrangements. Doesn't mean they are ignoring anyone.

      • ken 1.1.4
        21 October 2020 at 6:56 pm

        If people didn't want a Labour Government, why did they vote Labour?

        Here's a tip – next time there's an election, be true unto thy self, and vote for the party you want to govern.

    • Treetop 1.2
      21 October 2020 at 1:36 pm

      For me it is not about who wants what, it is about who has earnt the privilege to govern.

      When it comes to ministerial positions if prior to entering parliament you have a lot of skill in an area I would not want to see this wasted sitting on the back bench. Those previous cabinet ministers who performed well need to be retained in cabinet regardless of a change in a portfolio.

  2. Treetop 2
    21 October 2020 at 8:48 am

    Labour has a mandate to govern alone, the voters exercised their democratic right and the result is a Labour victory.

    As for all the other parties in parliament if they want a stronger voice they will need to legislate for this. Good policy by other parties will not be ignored by a Labour government. Both recent referenda were from the Green and Act Party and were agreed on by Labour and NZF.

    NZF is no longer there because the voters chose this.

  3. froggleblocks 3
    21 October 2020 at 8:50 am

    There has been a fair bit of commentary suggesting that the election result was bad for the left. This is surprising given that the only available rational conclusion is that it was a blood bath for the right.

    Because Labour, at best, is a center-left party.

    It's not a case of left or right, it's left, right and center.

    • Enough is Enough 3.1
      21 October 2020 at 11:34 am

      I agree.

      This is bad for the left because Labour will now be able to continue on their Business as Usual way, as they have since 1984. The Greens ability to really make transformational change is extremely limited.

      I hope I am wrong but I can't really see Labour doing anything which is likely to upset big business, or the centrist rural voters who flocked to Labour.

  4. Stuart Munro 4
    21 October 2020 at 8:55 am

    Conservation can be a bit of a poisoned chalice in terms of popularity – it wouldn't surprise me if Eugenie Sage was allowed to retain it.

    • Devo 4.1
      21 October 2020 at 1:10 pm

      Especially if mining exploration permits can be granted against your wishes by the Labour ministers

  5. Ad 5
    21 October 2020 at 9:01 am

    It'll be pretty much same as last time, with the NZF posts going to the Labour 2017 intake.

    Nice and tidy.

  6. bwaghorn 6
    21 October 2020 at 9:51 am

    Yip they should but maybe only one full ministers spot , that would be Sage in conservation, let them take the heat for that culling etc shes proved upto it .

    Then some associate spots . The more the greens are in the more they will realise blind ideology dont cut it and they will become more ready for when they will most likely have some rwal power next election.

  7. Adrian 7
    21 October 2020 at 10:28 am

    The reason that the Greens may/will miss out is that with 65+/- Labour MPs to keep happy the last thing Jacinda needs is another partys MPs to cater too.

    • Tricledrown 7.1
      21 October 2020 at 10:48 am

      Of course Adrian the right would love this division on the left.

      But in reality our 3 year election cycle needs a pragmatic approach imagine if National ditched ACT.

      The next election will require a coalition of some sort, to cut off your potential coalition partner's would be stupid.

      • froggleblocks 7.1.1
        21 October 2020 at 2:07 pm

        The next election will require a coalition of some sort, to cut off your potential coalition partner's would be stupid.

        What are the Greens going to do, pack a sad and refuse to form a coalition with Labour, allowing National to form a government instead?

        The Greens, in refusing to deal with National, have no leverage. If in 2023 they're faced with the choices of "go into coalition with Labour" or "let National form a government", do you really think they'd let National win?

        • Robert Guyton 7.1.1.1
          21 October 2020 at 2:10 pm

          The Greens have choices other than coalition with Labour; some of those options have been described already, others are hovering in the wings, waiting to be realised and explored; even Opposition is a choice The Greens could take, to the concern of Labour, should the Greens then use the position to :ginger-up", undermine, whatever, Labour. The Greens are certainly not without options. In 2023, their options could be greatly enhanced by circumstance. If they were in a kingmaker position, they’d have more leverage than you could shake a stick at!

          • Enough is Enough 7.1.1.1.1
            21 October 2020 at 3:05 pm

            The Greens only have options, if those options are offered to them by Labour.

            Labour could form a government the day that the specials come out without even picking up the phone to Marama and James.

            So their choices are only those which Labour decides are their choices.

          • Psycho Milt 7.1.1.1.2
            21 October 2020 at 4:58 pm

            The Greens have choices other than coalition with Labour…

            I keep seeing people on Twitter seemingly unable to grasp this I-would-have-thought-obvious fact. Underestimating the Greens seems to be chronic among their opponents.

          • froggleblocks 7.1.1.1.3
            21 October 2020 at 5:03 pm

            The Greens have choices other than coalition with Labour

            I'm explicitly talking about the outcome of the 2023 election here.

            If the Greens are upset in 2023 about how they were treated in 2020, their choices may be to get over it and form a coalition with Labour, or let National form a government.

            I think they will get over whatever put their nose out of joint and form a coalition with Labour.

            Ergo, Labour can treat them pretty badly in 2020, because the Greens still won't have any leverage in 2023.

            • Drowsy M. Kram 7.1.1.1.3.1
              21 October 2020 at 5:14 pm

              If 'Labour' does "treat them [the Green party MPs] pretty badly in 2020", then it's possible that some will be upset; "nose out of joint" and all that.

              On the other hand, based on the recent history of generally good relations (cooperation even) between the Green and Labour party MPs, it's possible that both parties will continue to engage in a friendly and respectful manner. Given the current leadership of each party, the dominance of the Labour party in the new parliament doesn't preclude pretty good 'treatment', IMHO.

              Is there some evidence that ‘Labour‘ intends to treat the Greens “pretty badly“, or is this simply speculation – wishful thinking even?

              • froggleblocks …
                21 October 2020 at 6:37 pm

                My definition of "treat badly" is "give them much less than what Green leaders, MPs and party members really wanted and are happy with".

                Marama Davidson said on election night she wanted to be a cabinet minister. If they end up with 0 ministerial posts at all, and just a 'consultation agreement', that's the sort of thing that leaders, MPs and party members might consider to be "treated pretty badly".

                • Drowsy M. Kram …
                  21 October 2020 at 10:40 pm

                  "Marama Davidson said on election night she wanted to be a cabinet minister."

                  froggleblocks, you've claimed repeatedly that on election night Davidson said "she wanted to be a cabinet minister", and that "she wanted to be a minster [sic] inside cabinet."

                  I've tried to track down Davidson's actual words, but a Google search yielded nothing. Where can I listen to or read what Davidson said? I’d really like to hear/read what Davison said, in her own words – that would help me to make up my own mind about what Davidson wants.

                  If they end up with 0 ministerial posts at all, and just a ‘consultation agreement’, that’s the sort of thing that leaders, MPs and party members might consider to be “treated pretty badly”.

                  I guess we’ll just have to wait and see what happens. Honestly, it seems to me that some here would prefer there to be a bit more argy-bargy between Labour and the Greens than is currently evident. Indeed, certain MSM outlets seem to want the same – I guess conflict sells.

              • Robert Guyton …
                21 October 2020 at 7:11 pm

                " it's possible that both parties will continue to engage in a friendly and respectful manner"

                I'm with Drowsy. Only the cynical expect Jacinda to bitch-slap the Greens.

                I am not expecting such an outcome.

          • observer 7.1.1.1.4
            21 October 2020 at 5:28 pm

            I agree they have several options, but I don't agree that "opposition is a choice".

            They clearly stated their position pre-election: to support Labour on conf & sup. Presumably they have read Labour's policies before making that commitment. "Accept" doesn't mean "like".

            They have to keep their word now. Later on, if Labour renege on promises during the term, or respond to "events" in an unacceptable way, then the Greens could withdraw support. They would be justified in doing that.

            But not justified now.

            • solkta 7.1.1.1.4.1
              21 October 2020 at 7:20 pm

              I don't recall the statements being that specific. I did hear that voting Green was a vote for a Labour led government, and that is what there would be with the Greens in opposition.

    • Treetop 7.2
      21 October 2020 at 10:49 am

      I to thought the PM has enough on her plate with managing her own MPs.

      The Deputy PM needs to be selected carefully. As well the position down from Deputy PM.

      Who would you choose for Deputy PM?

      • anker 7.2.1
        21 October 2020 at 11:08 am

        It has to be Kelvin D. The Deputy Leader. End of.

        • Treetop 7.2.1.1
          21 October 2020 at 11:34 am

          I want Davis just below the deputy leader as he is not Wellington based. I want Hipkins as deputy leader. I want to see Davis take education.

          Deputy PM did not sound right when I wrote it.

          • anker 7.2.1.1.1
            21 October 2020 at 12:00 pm

            Hipkins has proved he is excellent.

            Interesting idea Davis for education. Will Hipkins stay with health? I thought Ayesha Verrall might get a quick promotion and even wondered if they'd bring Clark in as Associate Min of Health for his knowledge of the portfolio.

            Deputy PM needs to be Maori.

            Excuse me if this is ignorant, but they don't have much to do unless the PM is out of the country (Not gonna happen for a while) or indisposed.

            I am not sure why people don't want Davis? I thought he was o.k

            • Treetop 7.2.1.1.1.1
              21 October 2020 at 12:35 pm

              There is going to be a big restructure in education not seen since tomorrows schools in 1989. I want to see a strong Maori voice in education and Davis has been a school principal. Hipkins is my pick for health minister and Verrall for associate health.

              • froggleblocks …
                21 October 2020 at 5:06 pm

                & Peeni Henare for associate health, specifically for the Maori Health Authority that's proposed as part of the DHB restructure.

          • Gabby 7.2.1.1.2
            21 October 2020 at 12:05 pm

            Kelv has clearly made a pitch for Arts and Culture.

            • Treetop 7.2.1.1.2.1
              21 October 2020 at 12:41 pm

              He can do Arts and Culture as well as education.

              Right now school boundaries are being discussed to be redrawn to attract diversity of culture in Auckland schools.

  8. Paul 8
    21 October 2020 at 11:01 am

    The Green Party also did well because people like me that normally tick red twice wanted to see them over the line so that, if needed, they could with Labour defeat the right. Do I care now that they are not needed – yes because I am not entirely sure that this or any Labour government will do the 'lefty' things that I think need doing.

  9. Pierre 9
    21 October 2020 at 11:30 am

    I am pretty sure there were more than a few Labour voters thinking they needed to make sure the Government was as progressive as possible and made sure that the Green Party can have a significant effect on party policy.

    This is a curious paragraph. It suggests there are Labour voters who want a government of the left – a Labour government. But (by hedging support for the Greens) they think Labour needs to be held accountable by a coalition partner? Do these hypothetical voters believe that Labour can't actually be relied upon to carry through social advances without the influence of a friendly party in the form of the Greens? If there are concerns that a Labour government won't be progressive enough, that should be a matter for the internal democratic structures of the Labour Party, not a tactical decision on election day.

    And, speaking of internal democracy, in this context the decision to form a government is not up to parliamentary calculations. There is already a majority, so any potential alliance would be based on a common political project. Of course internal discussion is by necessity invisible from outside, but… is there discussion around this?

    • Pierre 9.1
      21 October 2020 at 11:50 am

      Just want to point out that Paul up there in comment number 8 shows exactly the sort of problem I was referring to.

    • Gabby 9.2
      21 October 2020 at 12:07 pm

      Labour may be less likely to disintegrate if forced left by external factors rather than internal strife.

      • PIerre 9.2.1
        22 October 2020 at 11:14 am

        If all Labour members were loyal to the party and its constitution, we could simply substitute 'internal strife' for 'a healthy democratic culture'.

        A British MP who I admire a lot used to talk about how under some circumstances it was necessary to extend political struggle inside the party. At least in the British Labour Party there are MPs who openly lobby on behalf of the corporate monopolies, they are friends of the oligarchs. So, if the class enemy exists inside your party, you should be prepared to fight them within the party. It is sometimes better to confront the contradiction than to hold your tongue in the name of unity.

        I'm not saying it's the same in New Zealand, it's not; only OP suggested that there were contradictions, and these have come to the fore as part of the question of forming a government. My point is that these should have been dealt with before reaching this stage.

    • Devo 9.3
      21 October 2020 at 1:19 pm

      I think that the Author may have been making the same mistake that those on the right have been doing in trying to attribute voters as solely belonging to a singular party.

      The swing voters that decided this election weren't National voters wanting to shut the Greens out. They are like the same people that voted for Clark three times, and then Key three times, etc. They simply trusted the Labour party (Jacinda if you want to get specific) more than National to lead us right now and hence gave their votes to the Labour party

      Likewise, "Labour" voters who gave their vote to the Greens are probably from the same group that voted Green in 2011 and 2014 when they would pull in 11% on election night, and then voted Labour during the 2017 campaign when the wheels fell off the Green party and Jacindamania was sweeping those on the left. They likely voted for the Greens this time because they liked what they were offering policy wise and wanted the next government to implement those policies

    • Phillip ure 9.4
      21 October 2020 at 1:28 pm

      Um..!…it has been more than a few decades since labour has been a 'left' party….neoliberalism is the mast they cling to…lange wasn't 'left'…clark wasn't 'left'…the last three yrs have been neoliberal-incrementalism writ large..(but we are told this is the fault of peters/nz first…yeah right..!)….the greens have/were to be the spine of any left revival/return to roots from labour..

      • PIerre 9.4.1
        22 October 2020 at 10:43 am

        There is always the argument that Labour (in New Zealand and Britain) is the political wing of the labour movmement, the mass party of the working class. So long as that relationship is there, the party has the potential to express the demands of the working class (the left). If some 'natural' Labour voters would rather vote Green, that shows somewhere along the way there should have been a discussion inside Labour, well before election day.

  10. anker 10
    21 October 2020 at 12:01 pm

    Hipkins has proved he is excellent.

    Interesting idea Davis for education. Will Hipkins stay with health? I thought Ayesha Verrall might get a quick promotion and even wondered if they'd bring Clark in as Associate Min of Health for his knowledge of the portfolio.

    Deputy PM needs to be Maori.

    Excuse me if this is ignorant, but they don't have much to do unless the PM is out of the country (Not gonna happen for a while) or indisposed.

    I am not sure why people don't want Davis? I thought he was o.k

    • Gabby 10.1
      21 October 2020 at 5:28 pm

      He's an ok parrot, when he remembers to stick to the two lines he's been coached to recite. He doesn't appear to be able to form coherent thoughts independently.

  11. anker 11
    21 October 2020 at 12:03 pm

    Pierre, I think people try to use their vote strategically, depending on what they want to see happen/the govt to do.

    • Pierre 11.1
      22 October 2020 at 11:26 am

      Yes, and if the strategic preference of Labour voters is they want a Labour government, but they want it held in check by the Greens – that's fine, although we should question what that strategic choice actually means for the Labour Party.

  12. Eco maori 12
    21 October 2020 at 12:39 pm

    If I was Labour I would have A Coalition with the Green Party why its quite logical. With all the new environmental policies needed to mitigate Human Caused Climate Change the Greens would take the lead with the policys and the negative effects to come next Election.

    Ka kite Ano.

    • greywarshark 12.1
      21 October 2020 at 2:06 pm

      That will be considered by the Greens. One reason why they might want to just commit to supporting Labour on supply and confidence – I think that's the term.

      If they go into coalition they may as you say get blamed for the Green effects on various aggrieved parties, and also they might have to swallow some policy that Labour wants and they hate.

      And I don't think that Labour has said sorry for opening our front door to the scavengers of the world, or has that slipped my memory?

      And – what Robert G says. https://thestandard.org.nz/will-labour-go-it-alone/#comment-1761361

  13. Uncle Scrim 13
    21 October 2020 at 1:26 pm

    not seen since Micky Savage’s time

    … a small correction – not since Peter Fraser’s time. Labour got 51.3% in 1946, six years after Savage’s death.

  14. NZJester 14
    21 October 2020 at 2:57 pm

    Labour does need to look to the future and going it alone could possibly backfire at a future election. Not having NZ First there will help a lot with getting some policies in place formally being blocked by NZF. Most of the support National lost went to their puppet party not to Labour. Most of the people Lanour would have drawn from National would be the type who just go with who is popular and don't give a darn about policy. They have no elegance to any party, just to saying they are part of the popular crowd.

    • Enough is Enough 14.1
      21 October 2020 at 3:08 pm

      Labour looking to the future…

      Who will the Greens go with in 2023 if they hold the balance of power?

      That's all Labour will be asking themselves and the answer is 100% clear.

      • greywarshark 14.1.1
        21 October 2020 at 3:14 pm

        "What do we want! Positive Action."

        "When do we want it….? NOW."

      • Robert Guyton 14.1.2
        21 October 2020 at 3:19 pm

        They ought also to ask themselves, "What price will they ask?" Along with, “How much will we be willing to pay?”
        🙂

  15. observer 15
    21 October 2020 at 3:46 pm

    It's really very straightforward. The policies of the government are what matters. And those policies will be as "left" or "centrist" as Ardern wants them to be. No more, no less.

    This will be the case if … James Shaw is Deputy PM, or a Minister in Cabinet, or a Minister outside Cabinet, or supporting on confidence and supply, or on the cross benches, or part of the opposition. Or Speaker, for that matter.

    The roles/portfolios of Green MPs will not make the government more or less progressive. (It might make the Ministers more or less talented, e.g. if Genter is replaced by a mediocre Labour MP, but that's a different issue).

    Presumably Ardern will offer the Greens something, so they can support the policies she wants. Whether they take it or not is a strategic decision for the Greens themselves (with legit pro's and cons, long term). And that's all it is.

    • weka 15.1
      21 October 2020 at 3:50 pm

      I agree with the general point, but, I think having Shaw with Climate, or MD with welfare (as examples) *would in fact make Labour more progressive, by default. That's one value for Labour of at least a C/S, they can tell voters it was the Greens.

      • froggleblocks 15.1.1
        21 October 2020 at 5:10 pm

        That's one value for Labour of at least a C/S, they can tell voters it was the Greens.

        Yeah but no-one forced Ardern to give the Greens any power at all, so that's not especially credible, particularly as Labour get last say in any policy they put forwards, and if it came to it, Ardern can sack them as ministers too.

  16. Ffloyd 16
    21 October 2020 at 6:16 pm

    Why not Meghan Woods for DPM?

    • bwaghorn 16.1
      21 October 2020 at 7:37 pm

      They would rather have a Maori even if hes a tongue tied dipstick who thinks a dodgy poem attacking a wounded foe is the a good idea.

      • greywarshark 16.1.1
        21 October 2020 at 7:54 pm

        Can you write a poem bwaghorn? They can be very expressive, dodgy or not.

        This from a Scottish site. https://sceptical.scot/2019/11/five-poems-for-a-general-election-in-hard-times/

        They sent out a dove: it wobbled home
        wings slicked in a rainbow of oil,
        a sprig of tinsel snagged in its beak.
        a yard of fishing-line binding its feet
        Simon Armitage

      • PaddyOT 16.1.2
        22 October 2020 at 1:09 am

        Come on Waghorn… TS commentators have lampooned Judith and the Natz relentlessly!

        The poem was far more intellectual than many pernicious projectiles aimed at Natz' personalities and tactics. The foe who had been so dirty and insulting were defeated resoundingly and so Davis just threw as good back at ’em,rubbing it in.

        Far better speech than the white hypocrite's, dirtier than a farmer's ditch, wearing the blingy golden, emperor's new clothes that cost more than manys weekly income.

        Kelvin Davis was actually playing off his comic speech from 2019 where he introduced the blue taniwha and 9 long years of darkness. In effect he was adding a chapter on election night.

        2019 speech- an in house Labour parody that also jabbed at Hemi, Winiata and Maui Jonesy.

        "One by one people came forward committing themselves to making the world of light a better place for people to live. "
        …….
        " They have 365 days (give or take) to devise a plan to defeat the hideous taniwha heading their way…
        But, ladies and gentlemen, this, this is where the story stops for now. A cliff-hanger of sorts…..

        Because the second chapter is still being written… "

        https://www.labour.org.nz/conf2019-kelvin-davis-speech

        Putting Kelvin Davis' poetic endeavour in perspective, "dipstick" is the deputy leader at the 2004 Natz conference, Brownlee who asked attendees to think of a "c" word to describe Prime Minister Helen Clark and the Labour government.

        Gerry's was funny eh for a public speech, the Natz all laughed ?

        So now having a speech impediment, being Māori and scripting a metaphoric poem makes a poor deputy? Jeepers.

  17. Jackel 17
    21 October 2020 at 6:43 pm

    It's not a matter of is it palatable to the left, right or centre, it's a matter of does it work or is it just another waste of resources. If the Ardern government are successful at removing child poverty they would win support from every political quarter just as they have with their covid response.

    • solkta 17.1
      21 October 2020 at 6:49 pm

      The thing is though, "child poverty" is just a euphemism for "poverty", and you must know that National no want to get rid of that eh.

      • Jackel 17.1.1
        21 October 2020 at 6:55 pm

        In my mind a child living in poverty is something completely different to poverty in general.

        • solkta 17.1.1.1
          21 October 2020 at 6:56 pm

          Like love and marriage, they go together like a horse and carriage.

          • greywarshark 17.1.1.1.1
            21 October 2020 at 7:47 pm

            I suggest that the authorities and most of the citizens have become so hardened about hardship, that hearing about adults difficulties and sufferings just slides away from consciousness. To talk about children being in poverty does have some affect, small though it be as the Child Poverty Action Group would tell you after years of presenting facts, argument and protest.

        • In Vino 17.1.1.2
          21 October 2020 at 7:08 pm

          I am inclined to think that the whole expression is nonsensical. How on Earth does anyone bring a child out of poverty whilst leaving the rest of that family in poverty?

          It is a nice-sounding phrase to throw about, that is all.

          • Anne 17.1.1.2.1
            21 October 2020 at 7:28 pm

            yes

          • Jackel 17.1.1.2.2
            21 October 2020 at 7:41 pm

            My main point wasn't about child poverty, it was do what works and people will support you. Of course poverty and child poverty are related but that doesn't mean we can't treat them separately.

            • solkta 17.1.1.2.2.1
              21 October 2020 at 8:18 pm

              Oh yes, we could just move all the kiddies into state care, that's a good idea that would work. Oh wait..

          • Gareth Wilson 17.1.1.2.3
            21 October 2020 at 9:42 pm

            How on Earth does anyone bring a child out of poverty whilst leaving the rest of that family in poverty?

            Wasn't there a novel about that?

        • UncookedSelachimorpha 17.1.1.3
          22 October 2020 at 9:28 am

          " In my mind a child living in poverty is something completely different to poverty in general. "

          …until you start to think about how you get rid of one without getting rid of the other.

          • Jackel 17.1.1.3.1
            22 October 2020 at 6:58 pm

            Appropriations specifically for children should not be being used for other purposes.

  18. WeTheBleeple 18
    21 October 2020 at 9:22 pm

    I reckon Collin's drove her own voters into the arms of Labour with her wealth tax fear-mongering. This was not organised but a fear based knee jerk reaction as planned, but voters moved in the wrong direction.

    ​​​​​​​Which is freaking hilarious.

  19. Infused 19
    21 October 2020 at 11:36 pm

    Labour handles a crisis well and thats where it ends. Labour is naked this time around for their failures to be seen by all.

    Of course the greens are not getting in. Why would they.

    Key needed the buffer when he did it. Labour do not

    • Drowsy M. Kram 19.1
      22 October 2020 at 5:08 am

      "Of course the greens are not getting in. Why would they."

      Reckon arrangements the Greens & Labour will have for the next 3 years will be similar to their cooperative arrangements over the last 3 years – just speculation, of course.

      Some predicting a 'cold shoulder outcome' will be the same folks who would have preferred a different outcome from the 2017 post-election talks – 'We was robbed!'

      “I bet the electorate, at the first possible chance, (not just Nat supporters either) will punish all three parties harshly.” “I bet they will pay a very high price, in a very short time…”

      I suppose you could make the case that NZ1st paid a very high price – not so sure about punish the two left-leaning parties though.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Taking action on Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder
    Hundreds of New Zealand families affected by Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) will benefit from a new Government focus on prevention and treatment, says Health Minister Dr Shane Reti. “We know FASD is a leading cause of preventable intellectual and neurodevelopmental disability in New Zealand,” Dr Reti says.  “Every day, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    11 hours ago

  • New sports complex opens in Kaikohe
    Regional Development Minister Shane Jones today attended the official opening of Kaikohe’s new $14.7 million sports complex. “The completion of the Kaikohe Multi Sports Complex is a fantastic achievement for the Far North,” Mr Jones says. “This facility not only fulfils a long-held dream for local athletes, but also creates ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    13 hours ago

  • Diplomacy needed more than ever
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters’ engagements in Türkiye this week underlined the importance of diplomacy to meet growing global challenges.    “Returning to the Gallipoli Peninsula to represent New Zealand at Anzac commemorations was a sombre reminder of the critical importance of diplomacy for de-escalating conflicts and easing tensions,” Mr Peters ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    16 hours ago

  • Anzac Commemorative Address, Buttes New British Cemetery Belgium
    Ambassador Millar, Burgemeester, Vandepitte, Excellencies, military representatives, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen – good morning and welcome to this sacred Anzac Day dawn service.  It is an honour to be here on behalf of the Government and people of New Zealand at Buttes New British Cemetery, Polygon Wood – a deeply ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago

  • Anzac Commemorative Address – NZ National Service, Chunuk Bair
    Distinguished guests -   It is an honour to return once again to this site which, as the resting place for so many of our war-dead, has become a sacred place for generations of New Zealanders.   Our presence here and at the other special spaces of Gallipoli is made ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Anzac Commemorative Address – Dawn Service, Gallipoli, Türkiye
    Mai ia tawhiti pamamao, te moana nui a Kiwa, kua tae whakaiti mai matou, ki to koutou papa whenua. No koutou te tapuwae, no matou te tapuwae, kua honoa pumautia.   Ko nga toa kua hinga nei, o te Waipounamu, o te Ika a Maui, he okioki tahi me o ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • PM announces changes to portfolios
    Paul Goldsmith will take on responsibility for the Media and Communications portfolio, while Louise Upston will pick up the Disability Issues portfolio, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced today. “Our Government is relentlessly focused on getting New Zealand back on track. As issues change in prominence, I plan to adjust Ministerial ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • New catch limits for unique fishery areas
    Recreational catch limits will be reduced in areas of Fiordland and the Chatham Islands to help keep those fisheries healthy and sustainable, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. The lower recreational daily catch limits for a range of finfish and shellfish species caught in the Fiordland Marine Area and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • Minister welcomes hydrogen milestone
    Energy Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed an important milestone in New Zealand’s hydrogen future, with the opening of the country’s first network of hydrogen refuelling stations in Wiri. “I want to congratulate the team at Hiringa Energy and its partners K one W one (K1W1), Mitsui & Co New Zealand ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • Urgent changes to system through first RMA Amendment Bill
    The coalition Government is delivering on its commitment to improve resource management laws and give greater certainty to consent applicants, with a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) expected to be introduced to Parliament next month. RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop has today outlined the first RMA Amendment ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • Overseas decommissioning models considered
    Overseas models for regulating the oil and gas sector, including their decommissioning regimes, are being carefully scrutinised as a potential template for New Zealand’s own sector, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. The Coalition Government is focused on rebuilding investor confidence in New Zealand’s energy sector as it looks to strengthen ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • Release of North Island Severe Weather Event Inquiry
    Emergency Management and Recovery Minister Mark Mitchell has today released the Report of the Government Inquiry into the response to the North Island Severe Weather Events. “The report shows that New Zealand’s emergency management system is not fit-for-purpose and there are some significant gaps we need to address,” Mr Mitchell ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • Justice Minister to attend Human Rights Council
    Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith is today travelling to Europe where he’ll update the United Nations Human Rights Council on the Government’s work to restore law and order.  “Attending the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva provides us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • Patterson reopens world’s largest wool scouring facility
    Associate Agriculture Minister, Mark Patterson, formally reopened the world’s largest wool processing facility today in Awatoto, Napier, following a $50 million rebuild and refurbishment project. “The reopening of this facility will significantly lift the economic opportunities available to New Zealand’s wool sector, which already accounts for 20 per cent of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • Speech to the Southland Otago Regional Engineering Collective Summit, 18 April 2024
    Hon Andrew Bayly, Minister for Small Business and Manufacturing  At the Southland Otago Regional Engineering Collective (SOREC) Summit, 18 April, Dunedin    Ngā mihi nui, Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Ko Whanganui aho    Good Afternoon and thank you for inviting me to open your summit today.    I am delighted ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • Government to introduce revised Three Strikes law
    The Government is delivering on its commitment to bring back the Three Strikes legislation, Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee announced today. “Our Government is committed to restoring law and order and enforcing appropriate consequences on criminals. We are making it clear that repeat serious violent or sexual offending is not ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • New diplomatic appointments
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has today announced four new diplomatic appointments for New Zealand’s overseas missions.   “Our diplomats have a vital role in maintaining and protecting New Zealand’s interests around the world,” Mr Peters says.    “I am pleased to announce the appointment of these senior diplomats from the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • Humanitarian support for Ethiopia and Somalia
    New Zealand is contributing NZ$7 million to support communities affected by severe food insecurity and other urgent humanitarian needs in Ethiopia and Somalia, Foreign Minister Rt Hon Winston Peters announced today.   “Over 21 million people are in need of humanitarian assistance across Ethiopia, with a further 6.9 million people ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • Arts Minister congratulates Mataaho Collective
    Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Paul Goldsmith is congratulating Mataaho Collective for winning the Golden Lion for best participant in the main exhibition at the Venice Biennale. "Congratulations to the Mataaho Collective for winning one of the world's most prestigious art prizes at the Venice Biennale.  “It is good ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Supporting better financial outcomes for Kiwis
    The Government is reforming financial services to improve access to home loans and other lending, and strengthen customer protections, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly and Housing Minister Chris Bishop announced today. “Our coalition Government is committed to rebuilding the economy and making life simpler by cutting red tape. We are ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago

  • Trade relationship with China remains strong
    “China remains a strong commercial opportunity for Kiwi exporters as Chinese businesses and consumers continue to value our high-quality safe produce,” Trade and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay says.   Mr McClay has returned to New Zealand following visits to Beijing, Harbin and Shanghai where he met ministers, governors and mayors and engaged in trade and agricultural events with the New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago

  • PM’s South East Asia mission does the business
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has completed a successful trip to Singapore, Thailand and the Philippines, deepening relationships and capitalising on opportunities. Mr Luxon was accompanied by a business delegation and says the choice of countries represents the priority the New Zealand Government places on South East Asia, and our relationships in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • $41m to support clean energy in South East Asia
    New Zealand is demonstrating its commitment to reducing global greenhouse emissions, and supporting clean energy transition in South East Asia, through a contribution of NZ$41 million (US$25 million) in climate finance to the Asian Development Bank (ADB)-led Energy Transition Mechanism (ETM). Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Climate Change Minister Simon Watts announced ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Minister releases Fast-track stakeholder list
    The Government is today releasing a list of organisations who received letters about the Fast-track applications process, says RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop. “Recently Ministers and agencies have received a series of OIA requests for a list of organisations to whom I wrote with information on applying to have a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Judicial appointments announced
    Attorney-General Judith Collins today announced the appointment of Wellington Barrister David Jonathan Boldt as a Judge of the High Court, and the Honourable Justice Matthew Palmer as a Judge of the Court of Appeal. Justice Boldt graduated with an LLB from Victoria University of Wellington in 1990, and also holds ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Education Minister heads to major teaching summit in Singapore
    Education Minister Erica Stanford will lead the New Zealand delegation at the 2024 International Summit on the Teaching Profession (ISTP) held in Singapore. The delegation includes representatives from the Post Primary Teachers’ Association (PPTA) Te Wehengarua and the New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI) Te Riu Roa.  The summit is co-hosted ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Value of stopbank project proven during cyclone
    A stopbank upgrade project in Tairawhiti partly funded by the Government has increased flood resilience for around 7000ha of residential and horticultural land so far, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones today attended a dawn service in Gisborne to mark the end of the first stage of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Anzac commemorations, Türkiye relationship focus of visit
    Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters will represent the Government at Anzac Day commemorations on the Gallipoli Peninsula next week and engage with senior representatives of the Turkish government in Istanbul.    “The Gallipoli campaign is a defining event in our history. It will be a privilege to share the occasion ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Minister to Europe for OECD meeting, Anzac Day
    Science, Innovation and Technology and Defence Minister Judith Collins will next week attend the OECD Science and Technology Ministerial conference in Paris and Anzac Day commemorations in Belgium. “Science, innovation and technology have a major role to play in rebuilding our economy and achieving better health, environmental and social outcomes ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Comprehensive Partnership the goal for NZ and the Philippines
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon held a bilateral meeting today with the President of the Philippines, Ferdinand Marcos Jr.  The Prime Minister was accompanied by MP Paulo Garcia, the first Filipino to be elected to a legislature outside the Philippines. During today’s meeting, Prime Minister Luxon and President Marcos Jr discussed opportunities to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Government commits $20m to Westport flood protection
    The Government has announced that $20 million in funding will be made available to Westport to fund much needed flood protection around the town. This measure will significantly improve the resilience of the community, says Local Government Minister Simeon Brown. “The Westport community has already been allocated almost $3 million ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Taupō takes pole position
    The Government is proud to support the first ever Repco Supercars Championship event in Taupō as up to 70,000 motorsport fans attend the Taupō International Motorsport Park this weekend, says Economic Development Minister Melissa Lee. “Anticipation for the ITM Taupō Super400 is huge, with tickets and accommodation selling out weeks ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Cost of living support for low-income homeowners
    Local Government Minister Simeon Brown has announced an increase to the Rates Rebate Scheme, putting money back into the pockets of low-income homeowners.  “The coalition Government is committed to bringing down the cost of living for New Zealanders. That includes targeted support for those Kiwis who are doing things tough, such ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Government backing mussel spat project
    The Coalition Government is investing in a project to boost survival rates of New Zealand mussels and grow the industry, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones has announced. “This project seeks to increase the resilience of our mussels and significantly boost the sector’s productivity,” Mr Jones says. “The project - ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Government focused on getting people into work
    Benefit figures released today underscore the importance of the Government’s plan to rebuild the economy and have 50,000 fewer people on Jobseeker Support, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. “Benefit numbers are still significantly higher than when National was last in government, when there was about 70,000 fewer ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Clean energy key driver to reducing emissions
    The Government’s commitment to doubling New Zealand’s renewable energy capacity is backed by new data showing that clean energy has helped the country reach its lowest annual gross emissions since 1999, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. New Zealand’s latest Greenhouse Gas Inventory (1990-2022) published today, shows gross emissions fell ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Earthquake-prone buildings review brought forward
    The Government is bringing the earthquake-prone building review forward, with work to start immediately, and extending the deadline for remediations by four years, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says. “Our Government is focused on rebuilding the economy. A key part of our plan is to cut red tape that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Thailand and NZ to agree to Strategic Partnership
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and his Thai counterpart, Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin, have today agreed that New Zealand and the Kingdom of Thailand will upgrade the bilateral relationship to a Strategic Partnership by 2026. “New Zealand and Thailand have a lot to offer each other. We have a strong mutual desire to build ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Government consults on extending coastal permits for ports
    RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop and Transport Minister Simeon Brown have today announced the Coalition Government’s intention to extend port coastal permits for a further 20 years, providing port operators with certainty to continue their operations. “The introduction of the Resource Management Act in 1991 required ports to obtain coastal ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Inflation coming down, but more work to do
    Today’s announcement that inflation is down to 4 per cent is encouraging news for Kiwis, but there is more work to be done - underlining the importance of the Government’s plan to get the economy back on track, acting Finance Minister Chris Bishop says. “Inflation is now at 4 per ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2024-04-27T10:20:08+00:00