Yet another thing the PM is “not responsible” for

26 comments on “Yet another thing the PM is “not responsible” for ”

• Comments are now closed

1. One Tāne Huna 1

   1 November 2012 at 9:22 am

   Since yesterday the Herald piece linked above has changed substantially, to downplay Key’s denial.

   They just keep on polishing that turd.

   There was a similar occurrence on the Herald’s story quoting the attack on Justice Young.
2. brybry 2

   1 November 2012 at 9:57 am

   “google the first sentence”

   Other, better internet search engines work too. So rather than ‘google’, you can just ‘search’.
   • Professor Longhair 2.1

     1 November 2012 at 11:11 am

     “Other, better internet search engines work too. So rather than ‘google’, you can just ‘search’”.

     What internet search engines work as well as Google?
     • McFlock 2.1.1

       1 November 2012 at 12:47 pm

       bing?
       lol 
       • Professor Longhair 2.1.1.1

         1 November 2012 at 12:53 pm

         It’s a case of LOL, all right. Hopefully it won’t be too long until Bing joins Vista and the rest of its Microsoft stablemates in the dustbing [geddit?] of history.
     • brybry 2.1.2

       1 November 2012 at 11:36 pm

       Try DuckDuckGo – heaps of great features, and they don’t track you! Or IXQuick.
3. Shane Gallagher 3

   1 November 2012 at 10:09 am

   He IS responsible under international law:

   Principle III
   Principle III states, “The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law acted as Head of State or responsible government official does not relieve him from responsibility under international law.”

   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_principles
   • McFlock 3.1

     1 November 2012 at 4:23 pm

     no, key’s defense isn’t that he isn’t legally respnsible due to his position, but that he sent SAS troops back to Afghanistan to coordinate logistics. If they exceeded his order by, oh, taking part in combat, then they are acting illegally.
        
     But note that he failed to mention disciplining the soldiers for disobeying his orders. So I’d suggest that implies tacit approval, for which he IS culpable. Not to mention the entire “command structure top-down is responsible for maintaining discipline” thing…
     • blue leopard 3.1.1

       1 November 2012 at 5:02 pm

       “But note that he failed to mention disciplining the soldiers for disobeying his orders. So I’d suggest that implies tacit approval, for which he IS culpable. Not to mention the entire “command structure top-down is responsible for maintaining discipline” thing…”

       I wouldn’t simply suggest this implied tacit approval; the message came over loud and clear that that is exactly what he was doing.

       Dear NZ, “I give you license to do wtf you want; its an open slather free for all now, thems the new rulez”

       Entirely irresponsible
4. shorts 4

   1 November 2012 at 11:06 am

   this doesn’t add to the discussion, sorry, but Key really is a cock… what a sad little man
5. AmaKiwi 5

   1 November 2012 at 12:23 pm

   Why isn’t Shearer capitalizing in this?

   “PM admits he is totally irresponsible. He says he’s not responsible for the SAS, Dotcom fiasco, criminal leaks of confidential data, rising joblessness, Exodus to Australia, CHC debacle, etc. Everything else that goes wrong he is not responsible for because he can’t recall it.”

   I read great criticisms in The Standard but the best criticisms in the press are from Peters and Norman.

   How many missed opportunities!
   • Professor Longhair 5.1

     1 November 2012 at 12:45 pm

     “Why isn’t Shearer capitalizing in this?”

     The problem for Labour on this issue is that it was the Labour government of Helen Clark that was browbeaten into sending troops to Afghanistan. Labour bears as much culpability as National does for the crimes (whether of commission or omission) committed by our troops.
     • One Tāne Huna 5.1.1

       1 November 2012 at 2:07 pm

       The fifth Labour government committed the NZSAS to Afghanistan from 2001 to 2005. The decision to redeploy them was taken in 2009.
     • Molly 5.1.2

       1 November 2012 at 4:49 pm

       Helen Clark sent the RF troops in to rebuild and they had good relationship and success with the locals because of it (and no loss of life in active combat).

       John Key committed our troops to active combat alongside the US who have a reputation for arrogance and misconduct. No surprise at the increase in fatalities there.

       He also takes great delight in informing media of names and locations of our SAS troops, putting both them and their fellow soldiers at risk.

       To have such an ignorant and compliant PM who regards our troops as negotiation tools is a tragedy.

       To compound that by having a PM who did not attend the funerals of those killed as a result of this policy adds insult to injury.
6. AmaKiwi 6

   1 November 2012 at 2:46 pm

   Is the man at the top responsible or not?

   Key is denying he is responsible for anything that goes wrong. According to my dictionary, that is the definition of “irresponsible.”

   The Opposition front bench is not pressing that point.
7. blue leopard 7

   1 November 2012 at 3:02 pm

   Glad to read this article.

   I couldn’t believe the statements made.

   The statements Mr Key spoke with regard to this issue are so clearly worded as to ensure he is at no point accountable for any ensuing information disclosures, or anything that the lawyer and spin doctor he got the wording off is palpable.

   What is the point of having a PM who doesn’t want to take responsibility for anything???

   Unclear why go he doesn’t go and live in his idea of paradise and leave us all alone; he could probably afford to buy or rent a small island and set up a golfing circuit.

   I wish he would.
8. tracey 8

   1 November 2012 at 3:11 pm

   I also heard key on the fraud on the court by the police. He said IF the judiciary were right then the police might have to review but there wld be no enquiry. In otherwords the executive branch has just given the judicial branch the finger in favour of the police…
9. Fortran 9

   1 November 2012 at 3:23 pm

   I hope that Key is wrong and we do have SAS troops there going for the men that killed our troops.
   • fatty 9.1

     1 November 2012 at 4:57 pm

     yeah…those cheeky Afgans have the audacity to fight back when foreign troops invade their country.
     There’s no excuse for killing troops in a war, eh Fortran!
10. tracey 10

    1 November 2012 at 3:25 pm

    Good lord fortran, state sponsored revenge… How very civilised.
11. Steve Wrathall 11

    1 November 2012 at 3:48 pm

    Soldiers go to stage an attack? Outrageous!
    • Colonial Viper 11.1

      1 November 2012 at 4:03 pm

      PM lies about sending troops back to fight? Outrageous!
    • Rob A 11.2

      4 November 2012 at 1:57 pm

      Exactly. Since when were the SAS masters in logistics?
12. blue leopard 12

    1 November 2012 at 4:46 pm

    “Nice” distractions Fortran & Steve Wrathall
13. blue leopard 13

    1 November 2012 at 4:54 pm

    Disco Break

    Dear Mr Key, this song is dedicated to you

    Oh my love
    You’re so good
    Treating me so cruel
    There you go
    With your fancy lies
    Leavin me lookin
    Like a dumbstruck fool
    With all your

    Jive talkin
    Youre telling me lies, yeah
    Jive talkin
    You wear a disguise
    Jive talkin
    So misunderstood, yeah
    Jive talkin
    You just ain’t no good

    Love talkin
    Is all very fine, yeah
    Jive talkin
    Just isn’t a crime
    And if there’s somebody
    You’ll love till you die
    Then all that jive talkin
    Just gets in your eye

    From the NZ population who are enamoured with you.
    xxxxx

    Thanks The Bee Gees
14. tracey 14

    1 November 2012 at 5:10 pm

    Encore!

• Comments are now closed

• Log in
• Donate
• Contribute post

• Articles RSS