The Karam defamation case should be a warning to bloggers and other forum hosts, and anyone who uses social media who thinks they can make unprovable and potentially defamatory comments with impunity.
In her ruling, released yesterday, the judge identified about 50 defamatory statements published on Facebook and on a private website by Mr Parker and Mr Purkiss — members of the Justice for Robin Bain group — to which there was no defence.
Mr Karam said the men had made “an all-out assault on me [in] an attempt to show that I’m shonky”.
He and Fairfax NZ had earlier agreed to settle defamation claims, on a confidential basis, arising from articles on stuff.co.nz that drew attention to the websites that contained the defamatory comments by Mr Parker and Mr Purkiss.
People commenting anonymously may think they are immune from defamation but that could be put to the test legally.
And bloggers who allow open slather comments should note that Fairfax NZ has been also held responsible in this case and have settled privately. I frequently see potentially defamatory comments made on a number of blogs.
Most people being attacked online don’t take defamation action and the attackers probably think they are safe from being held to account.
Parker and Purkiss probably thought they were untouchable and could make unsubstantiated claims with impunity. They may have thought they could exploit the power of free speech.
They may have believed their own hype and thought that believing something was sufficient justification for attacking someone’s integrity. This seems have continued “in choosing to use the defence of truth at the trial”.
Perhaps hose who think they are safe attacking and defaming online should have a good look at this case.
[karol: I don’t know why you chose to make this warning on The Standard, Pete. But The Standard Policy is very strong on not allowing comments that are a legal risk. Also, anonymous comments are not allowed.]
Hey George, are you trying to warn off those people who are questioning the ethics of Peter Dunne, Minister for Legal Highs, not disclosing that the person paid for advocating on behalf of the scum who run the Legal High business is his pride and joy, my son James?
Actually i thought the comments were beginning to resemble commenters on WO and kiwiblog.
I dont agree with many things Pete posts but apart from ownering twice if he was being stupid or naive, I have tried not to stoop.
I do want to point out tinfoilhat that it is not just left commenters either. Srylands repeatedly accuses me of being drunk and others on the right get very abusive.
Yes I agree that there are many on the right that are just as bad.
And I’ve been guilty of some bad behaviour myself, i think we’d all be much better behaved towards each other if we met face to face rather than on the internet which does tend to lend itself to bullying and other bad behaviour at times.
This particular issue was particularly pertinent to Kiwiblog because there were extensive Bain /Karam discussions there with a lot of abuse and accusations and probably defamation. That’s why I posted there first and again on today’s General Debate. No reactionary abuse there and there’s been some sensible discussion on it.
After the usual few have calmed down addressing the issue rather than attacking the messenger seems to be taking over here. It’s an important issue for all who comment in social media.
One comment on KB from Nostalgia:
Trade Me have also settled. TM was the nest of this and ignored advice that they were indeed a publisher in the first instance and responsible for third party posts in the second.
Parker now claims that he only had a small membership, that’s irrelevant and in this case his ‘followers’ posted the defamatory material on this blog and else where.
KS is running a good model for a blog to ensure it remains legal – others claim not to have the ‘resources’ to monitor their own boards well, that won’t stand up now, nor should it have in the past.
The Herald report skims the surface of the Judgement, but you are right about things being ‘proveable’ and the test is not that “I read it somewhere, or in a paper,” it’s a satisfactory conclusion reached on facts, not repeated mantras or false assertions.
On this board the history is different. Over here the history is of you clogging up threads with passive aggressive bullshit, and of you making weird arguments about what oppositions ought to able to talk about.
Yes, PG does have a habit of talking baloney and leading a discussion around in circles but that’s not a good enough excuse to attack someone without reading what they’re saying first. In this case it was a reasonable point.
The irony there Tracey is that PG commented on the wrong blog. As Karol pointed out, ts authors are already aware of what the legal situation is, and have been very clear on that. If PG wasn’t implying that this case has implications for ts, then he needs to learn how to communicate better.
I doubt there is a single commenter here who has had the policy explained to him more often than Pete, often in great detail and with enormous patience.
It’s the passive-aggressive thing that Pete does, Tracey. The cumulative body of work.
I’m quite sure that if you had commented first on this we would have had, when taken in the context of your previous comments, and also as a comment that stands alone a reasoned comment that doesn’t put in the judgments that Pete does.
Let’s not pretend that this is anything other than the fact that PG creates a whole bunch of distruption, and then decides that he has a right to continue doing so. And then he plays disingenuous.
It’s obvious here that I didn’t ‘create’ any disruption, rather there’s a few very familiar pseudonyms who chose to disrupt something that should be of interest to anyone using social media.
Typical ignore the issue and attack the messenger. It’s something that’s obviously supported here. And then trying to blame me for it is a common part of the game.
But nothing actually goes into defamation because the owners/moderators look for and remove that type of shit. It was well worth posting but now you’re getting into your usual BS.
I’m not using a pseudonym, Pete, and I’m happy to agree with others that your contributions at The Standard are frequently disruptive and come across as very disingenuous. This is a case in point – you’ve high-handedly warned “[t]hose who think they are safe attacking and defaming online” when you have a lot of history of making rather nasty insinuations about others. This is an example:
Of course, everything you write is carefully vague, or couched as questions. So you ‘get away’ with basically stating in that post that the entire story about Mojo Mathers’ trip to Masterton was deliberately leaked by the Greens to the Herald in order to ‘sting’ the Taxpayers’ Union and smear the government. The whole conspiracy’s laid out there, including your snide comments about Green supporters expressing their contempt for the TU on Twitter.
It’s just as vicious and personal as anything which I’ve ever seen posted at The Standard, but as far as I can tell you think it doesn’t count as long as you can wring your hands and pretend to be distressed by the muckiness of politics.
You’re right – his pattern of commenting shows he’s just a stirrer, and he plays until he gets caught out not having researched the thing he’s talking about, has his own previous comments with a 180 deg different ‘opinion’ quoted back at him, or is proven comprehensively wrong. Then he just refuses to engage at all.
I understand Tracey’s frustration with people who are sick of PG, but jeez – any look back at his commenting will show he does have a pattern of passive aggressive pontificating and then running.
I don’t think you would have couched your comment in such a way as to start a flame war, Tracey.
Once Fairfax settled it was obvious where the case was going. The remaining defendants were mad to continue it; I suspect a retraction and apology even at that late stage might have brought out some of Mr. Karam’s undoubted generosity.
and if a blogger or commenter defames someone who can afford to sue them. this is an important aspect pete cos bringing defamation proceedings is very expensive and most awards are below 50k.
Some comments there already that recognise the potential implications. And I’ll post again there in today’s General debate (it doesn’t start until 8 am).
Odd but perhaps not surprising that some here have taken this as a threat or somehow attacking The Standard. I think anyone commenting online should be aware of the risks.
Interesting responses to felix, he is one person who on at least two suggested people give you a chance at politicheck and has often taking people to task for suggesting someone else, anyone else, shouldn’t post here.
IMO Felix is one of the worst offenders at this site Tracey, just because he says he’s of the left doesn’t mean his bullying and defamation shouldn’t be called out.
wasn’t saying he should be immune to anything. show me where I said he ought to be? no one is immune from responses to their comments. Just cos you are on the right doesn’t mean you only have to comment on the behaviour of those on the left here. Yet you do so discriminate.
I’m not aware we’ve ever met. You’ve made claims that I think are a way off the mark. Either you don’t know me very well or you deliberately make shit up.
Another irony is passive aggressive accusations. Yes Tracey, I agree, there’s different felixes.
mickey accused me of leading a green attack on cunliffe yesterday. its all through the looking glass these past few days on here. I apologise for calling you as one on the right.
Couldnt agree more Tinfoilhat Felix is just an abusive ranting idiot, he may have said he would give Pete a chance but everytime Pete posts you can guarantee Felix is right behind with his crap along with that idiot OAB never any facts or reasoned and balanced arguements just swearing and throwing their toys out of the cot, it disruptive and boring for those that dont comment often but read often
” I agree, there’s different felixes.” from my comment that “he is one person who on at least two suggested people give you a chance at politicheck and has often taking people to task for suggesting someone else, anyone else, shouldn’t post here”
Has been one of the worst there but seems to have toned down, they’ve made an effort to do that. Wanting to be seen as a more serious site.
It was mentioned briefly there this morning there but wasn’t picked up on. I wanted to see if there was a post on it, they cover a of of relevant things but haven’t been pro-Karam what is not said and posted on can say as quite a bit sometimes. There’s plenty of time yet. You could do it if you wanted to see it there.
It doesn’t seem to have been mentioned at The Daily Blog either, it’s a lottery whether comments are allowed through there. Nor on other blogs. It would have been mentioned at Kiwiblog and here regardless of what I did. More general topics covered at the two more moderate political blogs.
The truth is an absolute defence against libel, Petty George, you bland, banal, biased, passive-aggressive incompetent dishonest waste of oxygen.
Anyone employing you as a fact checker needs their head examined. Your continued employment in the role can only lead to the ridicule and contempt that attaches to you rubbing off on your employer and co-workers.
[karol: the “truth” still needs to be tested in court. The moderators here are very strong on not allowing potentially defamatory comments, where there is no public evidecne available as to whether the accusations are true or not. I’d suggest commenters don’t leep rising to the provocation – it leads to a flame war that, among other things, gets boring for other readers.]
Karol, I think this is something all blogs and participants in social media should be aware of. I know what The Standard policies are.
[karol: your intitial comment did come across as a veiled attack on posters and commenters on The Standard. The anonymity of bloggers had nothing at all to do with the Karam case you cited. It was a provocative statement to post here as starkly as you did. It’s bound to wind people up.]
There’s commenters here who take all sorts of things as ‘veiled attacks’. Most of that is imagined or invented, often that seems to be an excuse for them to attack.
Irony abounds.
[karol: The TS policy states clearly that anonymity and legal risks are not allowed. Your comment pontificated as if people here did not know that. I jumped on it quickly hoping to prevent the predictable retaliations and flame war.]
Lolz OAB, my tech ‘savvy-ness’ has just increased this morning by 100%, my self taught computer use has the odd small gap in the teaching side of things…
Don’t fret Pete, as long as you don’t make demands on our politicians whether Left or Right to do something about climate change.
I don’t recall any Right Winger being called a Goebbels by the lprent for demanding that climate change become an election issue so you should be alright.
Am very interested in defamation myself and am considering taking an action. However the expected award is probably 10,000 to 30,000, with only scaled costs (about a third of the costs of a decent lawyer). So, like many who believe they have been defamed and their business and reputation hurt, I am in a position where taking the action will cost me, and I don’t have the money.
I am glad that karam stood up but I know he could afford to. us ordinary folks sometimes have to accept the appalling malice of others,a nd the damage it causes… until they do it to someone who can fight back.
I understand the need to weed out the vexacious litigants. Ms P Bright and many of her group would come into this category. BUT having a panel or a single judge (not able to hear the actual case) read the initial pracey, view supporting evidence, and decide if a prima facie case exists would be a start.
However, if you have a home and any equity, that’s where the attachment order comes in. When you sell your house, the LA group/crown get their money back.
It was a great comment because it encapsulated the issue i have with pete – his sanctimonious, holier than thou persona is not backed up with reality – I find that irritating.
I’m glad you read it – I may, although i’m not worried personally as I’m usually nice to people 🙂 at least to people i think might not be able to take it. Kia kaha.
I read it cos I have a legal background and at the moment a genuine personal interest in defamation law. I don’t expect most people to wade through a 60+ page judgment.
Nothing to see here folks,there’s been the odd comment recently about the corrupting influence big Pharma could have on our medical ‘profession’ with news that staff employed by the DHB’s had reported $170,000 worth of ‘gifts from the drug manufacturers in a year,
Buried in the ‘Economics’ pages of today’s Herald Online version is a little story which states that one of these giant companies,(incidently the worlds biggest enabler of the manufacture of the drug P with its factory in China cranking 24/7 pumping out the main precursor substance used in the manufacture of the illegal drug), GlaxoSmithKline is under investigation in a number of countries for you guessed it ‘Corruption’,
China, Poland, Iraq, Jordan, and Lebanon are all apparently investigating the drug maker and in Poland the company is being investigated for allegedly ‘bribing’ doctors to prescribe the companies drugs,
There is no corruption in New Zealand tho right???, or is that simply because we refuse to look with private medical practice having no legal requirement to report all ‘gifts’ it receives from the drug manufacturers…
While the mud flies at Key and Collins concerning the Oravida dinner, etc, I received a note from a friend in China which puts an important perspective:
‘ I’m aware there has been a lot of publicity about the trade with China, especially in the areas of dairy and meat products. One thing that could investigated a bit closer is: who owns the dairy and cattle farms who are sending so much produce to China? I think you will find they are owned by Chinese business-people. Also, at least one of the largest meat-works in NZ is owned by Chinese interests. So – the trade figures look good but where are the profits going? Don’t get me wrong – this is not anti-Chinese. We love the people here. Voters need to be made aware of the full picture, though. Why does NZ allow the sale of key assets? Australia doesn’t allow it; nor do many of our other major trading partners. When Key visited China and made such a big fuss about the show put on for him, he clearly lacked any knowledge of Chinese culture. What the Chinese Government was saying was: this is what we can do for you; what are you going to do for us? Being described as a good friend of China should also raise some concerns. In business here, if you are a good friend, you are expected to lower your price to the extent you are barely making a profit. I don’t think Key understands the cost of being a good friend. “
He’s going to get a bit of a shock next year when the invitations are no longer forthcoming and he figures out that it was “THE PM OF NZ” that played golf with the President, and had tea with the Queen, and sang the national anthem with the All Blacks.
gotta happen though that, like using lippie makes your lips stop producing their own lip protection, he will lose the ability to assess his environment, completely contrary to his stated aim.
Pete George is a Troll who us threatening Standinastas. He is doing the dirty work of Legal High drug pushers, Chen Palmer and the Dunnes, Pere et fils.
”My Daddy was a bank robber but He never hurt no-body”, the tables appear to have turned, in what appears to be a ‘bank robbery’ the Reserve Bank recently raised the Official Cash Rate which in turn had the Trading Banks cranking up their interest rates,
Basing it’s decision on the ‘expected’ rate of inflation the Reserve Bank is said to be again raising the OCR in April and again in June/July, with every .25 rise in the Official Rate translating to an extra 20 bucks on interest paid for every $100,000 of debt,
Spurred on by the cheer-leading Trading Banks in what looks like a major exercise in profit gouging the Reserve Bank is said to be expected to raise the OCR again despite inflation being lower than expectations for the year coming in at an annual rate of 1.5%,
Given that the ‘expectation’,(from the Trading Banks),is that the rises in the OCR in April and June/July will again be .25 basis points each time this will result in an increase in interest payments weekly of $60 a week for every $100,000 of debt owed in the first 6 months of this year alone by individuals and business effectively kneecapping an economy nowhere near the 3% of inflation where the Reserve Bank could be expected to act,
Consumer information from the Consumer Price Index shows across the board from big ticket items, to clothing and food, prices are stable or falling, the exceptions being the 2.9% rise in retail electricity costs(again), and, a 10% rise in Government Taxation of tobacco products,(which makes all those lives ‘saved’,(snigger),by the upward trajectory in tobacco taxation,(when you consider the role this taxation has in inflation and the Reserve Bank’s response to this), an extremely costly exercise for everyone with an iota of debt,
The only winners in this little equation of raising interest rates off of the back of incorrect data, the Trading Banks who get a ‘free’ jump in profits and the Reserve Bank Governor’s ego who gets to be the ‘enabler’ of the trading banks ‘profit gouge’ and kill off any growth in the economy befor it occurs…
slylands will be along presently to tell you that you are
a. wrong
b. paying extra is a good thing, or the fault of those who bought houses
c. it’s not as bad as 2008 (which English banged on about yesterday to blame Labour and ignore the GFC and gouging financial institutions)
he may or may not discuss how landlords with mortgages will raise rentals.
last month the cost of poultry, meat, fruit and vegetables rose.
Ah it all depends on how and what you eat Tracey, poultry and meat are off my menu, as is butter and cheese,
i can get 3 meals out of a $7 Wharehou fillet, and,buying the fruit and vege at the weekend market has allowed me an extra ten(at least)in my pocket at the end of the week while the volume of fruit and vege has risen by at least 50%…
Depends how you look at fish Tracey, ,my $7 fillet turned into two hunks big enough to make two separate meals,(in tinfoil steamed in the juices along with a bed of finely chopped onion and a cap of sliced tomato, an optional squeeze of lemon juice or a dab of honey right in the middle of it to get the mind singing),
Plus a decent enough amount left for a bowl of raw fish saturated with lemon juice which along with the onions and tomatoes soaking in the coconut cream is a good meal,(tonight’s tea),
i can understand the ‘meat-eaters’ comparison tho, i used to ‘judge’ the price of fish against how much fish i could buy measured against how much beef or pork i could get for the same amount of coin,
Sure by volume you get more Pork and Beef for the bucks, but then, the ‘jam tart’ gets a load more bad fats for the sake of being economical…
If you can get a good price on shallots, I find they work better with fish than onions due the milder, almost sweet flavour.
That’s it, I’m going to stop at the fish markets on my way home tonight.
Plus a decent enough amount left for a bowl of raw fish saturated with lemon juice which along with the onions and tomatoes soaking in the coconut cream is a good meal,(tonight’s tea),
I do something similar, soy sauce, cubed hard tofu, chopped onions, finely chopped sweet peppers – leave to marinate for at least 30 mins.
Get a baking dish and place a couple of fish fillets (where the flesh will still hold together), tip the marinade on top of it, spinkle a few breadcrumbs and bake.
Serve with whatever seasonal veges you have on hand.
Hmm, chives have a much sharper flavour than shalotts.
I am lucky enough to have handed down from my grandmother a variety of multiplying leeks that are in size, somewhere between chives and spring onions, and are stronger in flavour than chives.
Fantastic for all sort of dishes, though I find them just a little too strong for scrambled eggs so I tend to go with parsley or garlic chives.
Ode to Money (and John Key)
hat tip owed to Lorde, of course.
Last night she received another award. And prizemoney. She said she doesn need the money as much as others and asked for the prizemoney to be divided amongst the nominees. In sport you constantly hear the refrain “who would turn down a money to break a contract”. In the business world you constantly hear about how |everyone” would do the same (low ethic) thing in that position.
I’ve got many diamonds in the flesh
I cut my teeth on dollar dealing in the trade rooms
And I’m proud of my addresses,
Parnell and Hawaii, livin off dodgy dealins
Cos every speech is like I’m funny, safety’s loose, dyin in the workrooms
Blood stains, wages down, trashin’ all the unions,
We don’t care, we’re driving BMW’s on main streets.
But I just love Cristal, Maybach, diamonds on my timepiece.
Jet planes, islands, bodyguards on a gold leash.
I don’t care, I’m not caught up in your need for welfare.
And I wanna be royal (royals).
I can buy that strain of blood’
That kind of luxe is just for us.
I crave a celebrity sized buzz.
Cos I became your ruler (ruler),
You can call me Lord Key
And stoolies I’ll rule, I’ll rule, I’ll rule, I’ll rule.
Yea, I’m living that fantasy.
[Verse 2]
My friends and I—we’ve cracked the code.
We count our millions at the donor parties.
And everyone who knows us knows that we’re fine with this,
We do anything for money.
Cos every speech is like I’m funny, safety’s loose, dyin in the workrooms
Blood stains, wages down, trashin’ all the unions,
We don’t care, we’re driving BMW’s on main streets.
But I just love Cristal, Maybach, diamonds on your timepiece.
Jet planes, islands, bodyguards on a gold leash.
I don’t care, I’m not caught up in your need for welfare.
And I wanna be royal (royals).
I can buy that strain of blood’
That kind of luxe is just for us.
I crave a celebrity siezed buzz.
Cos I became your ruler (ruler),
You can call me Lord Key
And stoolies I’ll rule, I’ll rule, I’ll rule, I’ll rule.
Yea, I’m living that fantasy.
Ooh ooh oh
I’m bigger than I ever dreamed,
And I’m in love with being Lord.
Ooh ooh oh
Life is great without a care
I’m not caught up in your need for welfare.
And I wanna be royal (royals).
I can buy that strain of blood’
That kind of luxe is just for us.
I crave a celebrity siezed buzz.
Cos I became your ruler (ruler),
You can call me Lord Key
And stoolies I’ll rule, I’ll rule, I’ll rule, I’ll rule.
Yea, I’m living that fantasy.
This needs to be set to music with the backing video of Key wining and dining and living it up with the Royals.
Brought here by Key in election year to epitomise the principal of a glittering born to rule elite, that Key seeks to stamp on the consciousness of this country.
I miss Phil too. Seems even Bad does. I think it is the healthy diet turning Bad into a nice guy, we may have to call him Sweet12 soon. He just needs to drop the fish, too much mercury or it will be Mad12!
Ffffing Mad is an epithet often attached to me round here,(i think there is some documentation in the box under the sink that somewhat supports this allegation, although of the 3 ‘doctors involved there appears to be an inability to reach a consensus)
Mad/bad12 as a handle might have been confusing for those logging on to the Standard in the morning,(especially me, its hard enough coping with being a million different people from one day to the next without having to ascertain my ‘mental’ state every morning, so best stick to bad),
Miss Phill, nah not a bit,(that might provoke his return), in relation to Phill V PG, well yeah Phill was way more fun,(my idea of fun tho having to be tempered against expectations of being caned),
i have it in my mind that i will have to greet Phill’s BS with either ignorance or 🙄 to avoid having myself ‘going down in flames’ upon his return, but, probably wont be able to resist…
Heh, Heh, Heh, certainly ‘counted’ in that little ‘contest of ideas’, Phill only brought one to the debate, idea that is, it encapsulated my impression of the sum total of His intellect and as far as ideas go simply added a No…
Final electoral boundaries are due to be announced today. I am interested in the result as my home is about 50 metres away from the edge of the draft New Lynn electorate boundary and if it moves towards me then John Key may become my local MP …
Due to golfing and drinking considerations this office no longer takes appointments, however Mr Key is always happy to speak with his constituents, hear their concerns, and help where he can. To arrange a meeting, please approach either Antione’s Restaurant or The Northern Club with a minimum of $5000 in cash.
My Mum and Dad aren’t to happy about to electoral boundaries too, they live in a part of Hei Hei that could be a tory seat by tonight and they have in touch with Mike Mora (He and merry bunch are trying to stop the change) to stay in a Labour held electoral seat where their 2 votes will count.
“We’ve had droughts before but the last decade has seen, in my opinion a lot more droughts and coming more frequently and closer together so the impact is huge now….”
Normally speaking anyway, this farm is self sufficient in its milking platform which is 250 cows, that is we make enough feed on farm usually to support stock to supply through dry periods such as this, as long as they are not extensive so long as it is a normal dry summer….
Now we are buying in Palm Kernal…..
Palm kernal prices are over $300 dollars so it is expensive.” Brent Erceg Dairy Farmer, Mata
“Three droughts in four years is not something we would expect the usual is perhaps one maybe two so to have three in four years has placed a huge strain on the Northland economy….
This is our third drought in four years so it’s huge this time and its a little bit later than usual…. Julie Jonker Northland Rural Support co-ordinator
“The speed that it has dried off and the speed that it has disappeared has been the worrying thing for us but in the last three weeks the grass growth has just stopped…
It is not just the farmers who are going to get hammered here it is all of the rural people…..” Bob Campbell Dairy Farmer, Waiharara
Rain is still on track to spread across the country this weekend, bringing much-needed relief to the parched North Island and parts of the South Island heading the same way.
The remnants of Cyclone Sandra and a weather system in the Tasman Sea would move across the New Zealand from late tomorrow, bringing wet weather until Monday, the MetService said.
Severe weather warnings were in place for Westland, Nelson and Buller.
Farmers are experiencing widespread drought from an extended dry spell, with the entire North Island declared a drought zone and parts of the South Island getting drier by the day.
The announcement was made on a Manawatu sheep and beef farm by Primary Industries Minister Nathan Guy this morning.
Northland, Auckland, Waikato, Bay of Plenty and Hawkes Bay have already been declared to be in drought…..
“ACT OF GOD”
Federated Farmers president Bruce Wills said he could not recall a time when the entire North Island had been in drought….
“These are people that are suffering through no fault of their own, through an act of God. We have real concerns about the emotional stress and difficulties that many families are coping with and that’s the predominant benefit that comes from a drought declaration.”
Yup, he will be voting for the climate change deniers again… and asking all of us to subsidise his union members because he thinks his invisible friend in the sky is responsible.
PS I know Act of God is an insurance/legal term, but he is still deliberately framing his comment this way. ie climate change denier and farmers don’t choose where to farm, what to farm, or to stay farming.
“Yup, he will be voting for the climate change deniers again… and asking all of us to subsidise his union members because he thinks his invisible friend in the sky is responsible.” Tracey
Officially only ACT and the Conservatives deny the reality of human induced climate change
“Another week and no drought declaration yet it is the second driest year on record in Waikato, and my has it revealed some peoples true colours! Default settings with graziers contracts are being ignored, and cooperatives are pretending there is no drought.” James Houghton Federated Farmers Waikato provincial president
I don’t think Bruce Wills and the Feds are climate change deniers, and so are unlikely to vote for ACT or the Conservatives. Like the “cooperatives”, (Fonterra?) the Fed and Wills are ignorers.
In this area there is a lot more electoral choice.
In fact there is a whole vipers nest of climate change ignorers, right across the political spectrum it’s a much bigger field with lots to choose from.
“You know what really strikes me about climate change in the election? It’s the absence. It is as if climate change is nearly completely absent from the campaign. When climate change does pop up, it’s portrayed in simplistic soundbites.”
Meanwhile back in the jungle, it appears that the recent trip to China by Slippery the Prime Minister to sort out ‘trust’ issues over the Fonterror false positive whey scare worked so damn well that Fonterror’s whey products are still banned from that country,
Quoted on RadioNZ National news this afternoon the PM claims that there is no ban in place the Fonterror whey products are ”just not allowed into China as the Chinese await a New Zealand Government report on the original ‘contamination”,
i have the impression that inside the mind of our Prime Minister is a cracked CD firmly stuck on BULLSHIT which forces Him to find novel definitions for everything…
Heard about the Oravida expansion into gold mining in NZ on Radio Active this morning, on the regular Thursday morning slot with Redbird, Alistair Thompson and Grant Robertson. Just when you thought it couldn’t get any worse……….!
Thompson’s view was that APN and Fairfax haven’t covered the Collins/Oravida saga consistently due to the lack of investigative journalism and that there is much more to uncover. He did suggest however that the story may have reached a tipping point and the MSM would have to start paying more attention. He also suggested that despite Key’s complicity in the saga that it’s possible that her position as Minister may be untenable……
“People commenting anonymously may think they are immune from defamation but that could be put to the test legally.”
Leaving aside the fatuousness of how that comment has been phrased, it’s point is actually wrong. The people that got sued were the people that published the defamation, not that people that made comments ie the website owners and Fairfax. It’s an important distinction.
this is why people need to read the decision before posting it. the decision has all anyone need know. the media will have relied on a press release. I read the decision before coming here to post about it.
its this part of petes posting that bothers me about his new position at politicheck. editor has a skill set and it is disrespectful to those who have these skills and experience to say you can just become one. like slater and the truth.
Haven’t had time to look at the decision. Were commenters mentioned at all? I’m curious at what level FB was accountable. Was FB approached to remove comments?
Agreed about PG/politicheck. That he won’t take feedback about this or his behaviour also is a concern.
+1 and what does it say about politicheck that such a partisan wannabe polly can get such a gig.
PG is part of that CT architected media landscape with a probable mandate to produce as much inconsequential waffle as his copy/paste allows across blogland.
“The people that got sued were the people that published the defamation, not that people that made comments ie the website owners and Fairfax. It’s an important distinction.”
Purkiss was judged against for making comments only.
[3] The second defendant, Victor Purkiss, was a contributor to the Facebook page, Counterspin and other sites. Mr Karam has sued him only in respect of comments that he himself posted.
[232] Although Mr Purkiss was responsible for some egregious remarks, I treat him as less culpable than Mr Parker for two reasons. He is liable only for his own posts and is therefore responsible for much less of the defamatory content than Mr Parker.
Although I understand Mr Purkiss was also an administrator, along with Kevin James. One of Kevin’s statements was found to be defamatory but he didn’t get sued.
[2] The first defendant, Kent Parker, was an administrator of the Facebook page “Justice for Robin Bain” and creator of the Counterspin website. Mr Karam has sued Mr Parker in respect of comments that Mr Parker himself posted on these sites and also as the publisher of comments posted by third parties. Mr Parker denied being the publisher of statements by third parties, relying on the defence of innocent dissemination under s 21 of the Defamation Act 1992.
No, one was sued as a publisher the other as an author. I should add, that some of the defamatory statements were written by named people, and they were not sued.
In my decision in Wishart v Murray & Ors I traced the history of US, UK and
Australian decisions that considered publication via Facebook I concluded that the status of publisher in an internet context depended upon editorial control rather than actual knowledge of the existence of defamatory material. A Facebook page is to be regarded as similar to a noticeboard.
[13]I concluded in Wishart that those who host Facebook pages or similar sites
are to be regarded as publishers of postings made by others in two circumstances.
The first is if they know of the defamatory material and do not remove it within a
reasonable time in circumstances that give rise to an inference that they are taking
responsibility for it. The second is where they do not know of the defamatory
statement but ought, in the circumstances, to know that material being posted is
likely to be defamatory.”
Bagelo v Smith seems to traverse the kind of “cut and thrust” commenting that people make here, WO and KB, to name only a few. Courtenay does, imo, send a warning to people who post, namely, that they are not protected from the law of defamation. I suspect she is saying between the lines, that because people are not being sued on a daily basis doesn’t mean they are not defaming people. For example a comment by Kevin James was found to be defamatory, with parker being held responsible as publisher, but James himself was not sued.
part of the reason for this is that people sue the ones with money (hence fairfax or trademe get sued) and I hope, for karam’s sake, the settlements with them covered his legal costs, permitting him to sue the other two on principle. Without knowing anything about either defendant, I wonder if either can afford to pay out? One made no appearance and the other defended himself.
“Baglow v Smith which distinguished internet fora and blogs from other forms of publication.
This distinction was made on the basis that the context of an ongoing debate would reduce the sting of the defamatory comments as sharp and witty replies are seen merely as part of the ‘parry and thrust’ of the debaters.
[29]
However, there is no principled basis on which internet fora and blogs
should attract a different test for what constitutes a defamatory statement.
There may well be a degree of casualness associated with contributions to online conversations
. In this regard they might be likened to talkback radio. However, the capacity for harm
resulting from the permanent nature of posts means that those posting statements
should not be relieved of the usual constraints imposed at law.”
Her honour usefully goes three each alleged defamatory statement and explains why they are or are not defamatory. Not all were found to be defamatory. It makes useful reading to help understand the distinction.
“No, one was sued as a publisher the other as an author.”
Parker “sued Mr Parker in respect of comments that Mr Parker himself posted on these sites and also as the publisher”:
[2] The first defendant, Kent Parker, was an administrator of the Facebook page “Justice for Robin Bain” and creator of the Counterspin website. Mr Karam has sued Mr Parker in respect of comments that Mr Parker himself posted on these sites and also as the publisher of comments posted by third parties.
Purkiss “only in respect of comments”:
[3] The second defendant, Victor Purkiss, was a contributor to the Facebook page, Counterspin and other sites. Mr Karam has sued him only in respect of comments that he himself posted.
I’ve read parts of it since mid-morning-ish but as I’ve already said I need time over Easter to read it properly. Someone I know advised they had a copy before 7 but I didn’t have the time nor need to get one off them then, I knew it would become available soon enough. I’ve also seen useful comments on it, including from lawyers. And I’m sure there’ll be a lot more to be added to the discussion.
but you felt you could post warningss based on something you hadnt read.
i didnt see your comment about needing time to read it over easter, so i reread your opening post
you dont have to wait for lawyer friends, you can google seach judicial decisions online nz, put in karam and bingo.
a new tool for your fax checking armoury.
i thought you wanted to make change, but posting before reading the crucial favts, when they are available to you, not linking to that document and purporting to give advice on it, isnt really what you are trying to achieve are you?
I haven’t read the full file. However, my understanding is that the “cut and thrust” that happens on the Standard is not defamation.
This is what Karam is stated as being unhappy with at the beginning of the case file:
Mr Karam claims that many of the comments defamed him by conveying, among other things, that he lacked integrity, was dishonest, was motivated to support Mr Bain by the prospect of financial gain and had defrauded the Legal Services Agency (LSA).
I think the discussion here has been confusing ad hominems and general personal abuse of the “you’re a dickhead” kind (basically an opinion), with defamation (something far more specific and stated as fact without any evidence supporting it). A certain amount of abuse is accepted on TS as part of the “robust debate”. Defamation is deleted as soon as, because the trustees of the site regard themselves as being the ones who would be taken to court over it.
So something more general stating someone lacked integrity would be allowed. But something like that quoted above (allegations that Karam “had defrauded the Legal Services Agency”), is getting far more specific and could be supported or not by evidence – without evidence, it could be judged as defamation.
On TS, it’s more usually “pointlesss” abuse that gets moderated, especially if it looks like tr0lling or a deliberate thread derail. But other abuse is often left unmoderated.
In Karam’s case, the complaint was that there had been a concerted attempt to damage his reputation over time. So the general “cut and thrust” on blogs where people abuse each other, probably wouldn’t count.
the comment must lower the persons reputation in the eyes of an ordinary person. that is a very nutshell version of one of the main tests.
hence calling a politician a liar is hard to prove as defamation because politicians are frequently described in surveys and polls and by the public as untrustworthy.
it is wrong to think only public figures or people known to the public can be defamed.
Agreed. Good eg about politicians. I was just thinking why MPs don’t usually pursue defamation – eg Cunliffe could claim Gower had defamed him in repeatedly stating that Cunliffe had attempted a leadership coup. Generally, there is a fair amount of leeway.
it is wrong to think only public figures or people known to the public can be defamed.
I didn’t say that. I said, it’s more likely. But context is very important, I think.
But, if a non-entity felt they had their work reputation defamed, they’d be more likely to take out a complaint.
i think, with respect, you might be confusing being able to sue for defamation and being defamed. most people simply cant afford to sue to redress the damage done to them or their business. public figures tend to have easier access to funds or pro bono lawyers.
i agree entirely, context of a statement is crucial.
i hope you get time to read the decision, and the wishart ruling. i think you will enjoy the analysis of the statements.
at my first law firm patricia courtenayhad just been appointed a partner. an incredibly earnest and intelligent lawyer who cut her teeth on insurance law. i always enjoy reading her decisions even if i dont agree with every point.
Oh, I imagine if it was some smear against a business person they would want to sue for defamation, whether or not they could afford it.
But I was thinking most non-entities don’t have widespread enough reputation to be damaged. And if something was said/publicised about such people, it would mean little to most of the public – unless it was something extremely sensational,
Most people in the public eye don’t sue people for every single public smear or criticism. Someone with a lot of social capital would probably have the power to refute the allegations without having to take it to court.
I note (in the NZ Herald article) in awarding costs for damages to reputation, the judge took into account Karam’s previous good reputation in various realms of activity – ones that would give him a fair amount of standing in certain sections of the community/public sphere:
In awarding costs (yet to be decided) and damages, the judge said Mr Karam had enjoyed a “positive and significant reputation” before becoming involved in the Bain case, with success in sport and business.
She accepted his evidence of the great distress the comments had caused him and Mr Reed’s description of the defamation as a “full-scale assault on Mr Karam’s reputation”.
PS, I’ll read the judgement another day. I’m still recovering from being battered by an extremely strong and wet gale this morning – a total drenching, after a drive though some pretty treacherous conditions.
What a disaster. Govt debt is 60 billion under Key. And now English wants to claim a surplus!
How corrupt is that, its the false belief that cutting taxes would increase govt revenue, that
ideological nonsense of the right, that has cause this disastrous fiscal mess.
yup, the debt that is defended by saying “it would have been higher under labour”… hard to prove or disprove that, which is not the same as it being true.
Means nothing, if the purpose of the dinner was to impress upon a Chinese border official that Oravida is a very important company that owns its own Minister of Corruption Justice, why on Earth would they need to be overt about it? Her presence would be enough.
Just as John Key promotes Oravida when they pay him to model for them, just as Dan Carter promotes that shampoo by walking past a camera with his hand on his head: nothing need be said.
a private dinnerwith friends, but the advisor says it was short cos people there didnt speak the same language. so collins is friends with people who she doesnt understand and dont understand her?
the advisor doesnt say that border control issues werent discussed…
so to summarise collins private dinner with friends included an employee and at least one person she couldnt speak with due to language differences.
Quite! I ask because the dinner was either private, or official, but surely not both. Does Margaret Malcolm accompany Judith Collins to all private dinner engagements? What about the movies?
Heather Simpson attended quite a few things with Helen Clark – people often develop close friendships with the people they rely on. Yes, it does look bad, but not so bad it couldn’t be perfectly innocent. Way too much confirmation bias here.
National 48.5% (+5.5%)
Labour 28.5% (-3.5%)
Greens 11.5% (-1.5%)
NZFirst 5.5% (no change)
Conservatives 2% (-0.5)
Maori Party 1% (-0.5)
Mana 1% (+.5)
Internet Party 1% (+0.5)
Act 0.5% (no change)
Other 0.5%
Keep up the Orivida attack, it’s such a winning strategy.
Idiots.
The only thing that surprises me is that there is 1% and 2% of people dumb enough to say Internet party and conservative party respectively although perhaps like the 0.5% saying ACT they are just taking the piss out of Roy Morgan.
Oh there’s no doubt that Labour’s in tatters and that the hope they had in Cunliffe was seriously misplaced. I think the Greens will do quite well at this election as people who can’t stand the Nats see them as a better option than labour.
What will be interesting is to see who the Nats try and stitch up a deal with as Winston first is a bit like one of those vampires that you can’t seem to kill even with a stake through the heart.
It will also be interesting to see whether the Nats really have jumped 5% in two weeks – apparently at Lab/Greens’ expense – whether the increase in Mana and the IP’s support continues, or whether the whole poll is a bit of an outlier.
I’d doubt this has much to do with the Collins/Oravida scandal and Labour’s pursuit of it. I’d hazard a guess that this poll is a reflection of voters dislike for disagreements between Labour and the Greens over whether or not to outline potential coalition arrangements in the lead up to campaigning.
No I think it’s voters expressing their displeasure at public disagreement between Labour and the Greens over campaign strategy. For what it’s worth my preferred outcome for the General Election is a Coalition Government comprised of Labour and the Greens plus maybe Mana. But I think the Greens tactic of trying to shoehorn Labour into that position before the election was a mistake and this poll, I think, bears that out. By the way BM have you seen today’s ODT editorial? The one that calls on Key to sack Collins? It’s saying something, don’t you think when one of the conservative daily broadsheets calls for a Cabinet Minister’s sacking?
How could I forget McFlock, I got about as close to them as possible while they were here in Queenstown and to be honest, like everybody else (it seems), my anti-monarchist sentiments melted away like ice in the Sahara. She’s that bloody lovely.
Likewise, that story only broke on 9 April and the poll started on 31 March so I don’t think the Labour/Green thing has yet impacted on any published polls.
Also, I doubt any newspaper editorial counts for anything. Sadly, people don’t read them, except for political tragics like all of us here.
Maybe some effect but certainly not all of it.
Polling was carried out from March 31 to April 14, presumably with most calls completed in the first week – seehttp://www.roymorgan.com/findings/5549-new-zealand-voting-intention-april-17-2014-201404170455 (The second week is usually spent doing call backs if they use the same methodology that other polling companies use.)
The royal tour started on 7 April and the cute Plunket thing wasn’t until 9 April – see http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/prince-william-kate-middletons-itinerary-3206058
Put it this way, I think that by now, David Shearer, despite all his faults, would be regarded as the incoming PM and John Key seen as a two-termer. Labour made a terrible mistake going for David Cunliffe.
Hamish (above) – because he was focussing on the median voter and also came across as an “ordinary kiwi bloke” but one with a social conscience and a background in working for the most disadvantaged people in the world, at personal risk to himself.
Hey Matthew I am brimming with ideas about who should be the next National Party leader and I really want to share them with the right wing. Judith Collins has to be your next leader. No ifs no buts she will lead National to a fifth term. After her I think you should go with either Kanwaljit Bakshi or Paul Goldsmith. Both of these candidates would be excellent leaders and would respect National’s traditions.
And by the way I would get rid of John Key as soon as possible. He is obviously a closet socialist and I expect that he will start the socialisation of the means of production any time now …
I know you jest but he does run a left wing, progressive government. That is why he is popular.
And I hope Judith Collins is the next leader. However it is looking increasingly likely that National will get a third and fourth term. So the next New Zealand Prime Minister may not currently be a member of Parliament.
Micky, please ignore these people.They are not interested in debating with you.
They merely want to waste your energy on nonsense and they enjoy making provocative comments to get a reaction.
Paul, some of us really don’t have better things to do with our time and are quite aware of what the motives are of the people we are engaging with. Call it doing it for shits and giggles if you like.
silence means assent to those types and they never shut up plus i can’t stand reading their bullshit cascades where 2 or 3 of them comment to each other – no, much better to slam dunk them (just about) every time and I appreciate those who enjoy doing that and take the time to. If it becomes excessive – just scroll on by.
Ignore him. You have better things to do with your time.
His job is to spin for right wing interests. His job is a create a narrative or meme ; by discussing it with hIm, you amplify it. The MSM will repeat his words and publicise his views anyway.
He is not interested in genuine debate. As a paid opinion maker for the right, he is only here to divert, distract and disrupt.
I don’t support speeding but i’d like to see an increase in the limit in certain areas (SH1 between Oamaru and Christchurch in particular) + an increase in overtaking lanes
@DTB+100…the slower you go the more fuel you conserve….i once drove in the snow/ice between Chch and Arthurs Pass and back again on one tank and one chain ….a lot of the time it was at a crawl no faster than a horse …5-10 k/hr ….but i passed about 40 vehicles that had skidded off the ice road and I got home
….the lesson i learned was that it is possible to go a very very long way on very little fuel if you drive very very slowly…..no faster than a trotting/walking horse and coach…..so there is hope yet…..when the fuel crisis bites we wont have to jump on a horse or donkey as our ancestors did ….just learn to drive very very slowly…like Granny or Grandad….safer too…and better for your health
The only nonsense around here…is your…posts. I stand by my comment that most NZ roads are not good enough to warrant a speed limit of 120km/hr. Cars are safer, yes, but our roads are not.
@ Weepu’s Beard …. i still think what you say is nonsense ..why go 120km/hr?….no point…if you want to be a racing car driver join a racing club and get on the track …or join a rally car club…or go and live in Germany
……i have seen plenty of people drive past me at 120km/hr only to have me catch up at the next major intersection or lights….. and really speeding does not save much time in NZ, the distances for speed are too short
( btw i used drive my Peugeot at 120 km/hr on occasion on the motorway until i suspected cops were watching for me and my partner got on to me about fuel waste….
@ Weepu’s Beard ..re “most NZ roads are not good enough to warrant a speed limit of 120km/hr. Cars are safer, yes, but our roads are not”….
Our young German visitors from Berlin after travelling around NZ for six months think our New Zealand roads are very good and there is no need to speed here
….They say that in Germany ( with a population of 80 million) there is a movement to put in place speed restrictions because of Co2 emissions.
They do not like using the autobahns because they are too fast/ dangerous and not relaxing ….and the difference in time ( saving about 15 minutes) if you go 160km/hr as opposed to 120 km/hr is not worth the effort
They say Germany has a very good public transport rail system and this is the way New Zealand should go…put the motorway money into cheap affordable Public Transport.
Labour and the Left should invest in Public Transport and axe the hugely expensive motorways which no one wants except NACT property developers and their mates who would like to privatise the roads for tolls and further marginalise and exclude the ordinary NZer from free travel
The money should be put into State education , Public Health hospitals , reduced Retirement age to 65, cleaning up the rivers and lakes , Research and Development, support for technology startups and entrepreneurial business development
Shows the Righties are getting very concerned about the issue of motorways under a Cunliffe led coalition government imo
I wish they’d keep to one speed tolerance level and not do these special holiday period deals. I tend to continue to work (part time) through holiday persiods, and forget when traveling to and from work that there’s been a change of approach.
Was Kelston previously part of the Waitakere electorate, and what will the changes mean for Kelston?
I see our electorate of Ohariu has taken on Wadestown as had been suggested. Come on down from those swanky hills Pinot Noir socialists and vote Dunne out!
(PS, saw your reply on yesterdays Open Mike re the you- know -who commenters. Thats an understandable view you have – I just don’t think those who you are replying to are big on logic and evidence. Cognitive dissonance seems to be more their thing. Agree that clarification may be helpful for the silent readers)
There was a good article about politicians not being from the electorate that they represent a few days ago on the Guardian. Paula Bennett is one of those parachuted politicians – going to where the grass is greener, where they’re more likely to be voted in.
Was Kelston previously part of the Waitakere electorate, and what will the changes mean for Kelston?
The new Kelston electorate has parts from New Lynn (Where I was previously), Waitakere and a part of Te Atatu – if I’m reading the map right.
And I really don’t know what that’s going to mean. I have a feeling that it’s probably going to be good for the people here especially if we get a left MP. I’d prefer Greens or Mana or even Alliance but we’ll probably get Labour.
I have a bit of a soft spot for West Akld from the days when I used to visit my friends out west who were of Dalmatian descent. I never forget their their amazing hospitality. I got the feeling that people were more on the level in the West and it didn’t feel like the natural home of Blue to me – I hope it turns shades of red, green and red/black on 20th September, enough to kick out that faux westie, as Tracey points out, comes from Taupo anyway.
I’m in Kelston, too. It goes as far as Sunnyvale, near Henderson, and out onto the North Western – anyone living on the causeway is in Kelston. And includes part of Titirangi.
I’m still in New Lynn … just. Mind you John Key is going to find out that campaigning in the Waitakere Ranges is not a pleasant experience. Too many of the talented educated people there have far too much concern for the environment.
Yes – note the difference between the NSW situation, where the Premier has resigned because he misled the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption.
NSW has an Independent Commission Against Corruption – New Zealand does not.
High time we did – because – in my considered opinion, New Zealand is rotten with corruption, and our ‘perceived status’ as the ‘least corrupt country in the world’ is nothing more than a sick joke.
Please be reminded that on the watch of Minister of Justice Judith Collins – New Zealand STILL has not yet ratified the UN Convention Against Corruption.
Has she even read it?
It would appear that she has not.
Have these mysterious ‘Cabinet officials’ who purportedly give advice on corrupt ‘conflicts of interest’- read it?
It would appear that they have not.
Here – read it for yourselves – and ask how can it be possible for the ‘least corrupt country in the world’ to have not yet ratified the UN Convention Against Corruption?
What’s going on with Labour and welfare fraud? Last month in an interview:
Gordon Campbell: Does Labour oppose the government’s new welfare fraud policy whereby the partners of welfare fraudsters will be criminally liable for the fraud, and for the repayment of the entire amount – and not simply for the amount from which they might have indirectly benefitted. If re-elected will Labour retain this provision or scrap it ?
David Cunliffe: Scrap it.
Today:
Hon Chester Borrows @ChesterBorrows
Welfare fraud bill passed 102 votes to 17. Thanks to my Parliamentary colleagues for such broad support for these fair, sensible reforms.
Greens, Maori Party (2 votes) and Mana voted against it.
Would Labour scrap legislation they’ve just voted for?
We’ve got ten minutes. I haven’t asked about your welfare policy, so I’ll make it specific. We all oppose fraud. Does Labour oppose the government’s new welfare fraud policy whereby the partners of welfare fraudsters will be criminally liable for the fraud, and for the repayment of the entire amount – and not simply for the amount from which they might have indirectly benefitted. If re-elected will Labour retain this provision or scrap it ?
OK. Sue Moroney explains in her speech, why Labour decided to support the Bill. It has to do with submissions to the select committee by many women who felt they were unfairly being left to carry the penalty for relationship fraud. As I understand it, the women’s complaint was, when a woman fraudulently claimed she was a single parent/woman, the partner was complicit in the fraud, and should be penalised as well as the woman.
Sue Moroney’s speech is here in a video. She also slams National’s beneficiary bashing, especially in a time of high unemployment. She also says tax fraud should be dealt with harshly.
Sue Moroney said if the bill was about fairness then it would be talking about dealing with tax fraud on the same basis. The bill was part of the “relentless beating up” of beneficiaries, but Labour would support it because it had some good points.
Well, vote for it and own then, even if there are bigger priorities.
Saying you’ll scrap it once in power, at the same time as supporting it in the House, just makes Labour MPs look like prevaricating prats.
What it really shows is that the right is still firmly in control of caucus. There are other remedies for the scenario outlined in submissions.
Yes. I don’t agree with Labour on this, and am happy to see that Mana and the Greems didn’t support it.
Saying you’ll scrap it once in power, at the same time as supporting it in the House, just makes Labour MPs look like prevaricating prats.
Although, Moroney indicated Labour had changed their minds upon hearing some select committee submissions. So they weren’t sayign scrap it while simultaneoulsy supporting it.
Labour was stating the two positions simultaneously. Gordon Campbell’s interview with Cunliffe was published on the very day Labour voted for the Bill’s second reading (March 18).
Although, Cunliffe was interviewed on March 10 for that Werewolf article – says so at the beginning of the article. He does seem to be saying something different from what Moroney and Jacinda Ardern said later in debating the Bill and supporting it. Their consistent line was that they wanted to see tax fraud treated as strongly as beneficiary fraud. They were concerned about the low level of evidence needed to find someone guilty of relationship fraud and were supporting an amendment to change that – don’t know if the amendment passed.
Labour could still scrap that particular part of the amendment later on, I guess.
I do think Labour could come out more strongly generally in supporting social security, and turning totally away from the punitive beneficiary bashing policies of National. I would have preferred Labour not to support the Bill.
Yep, I said published, rather than when the interview was conducted.
An eight day lag time. Submissions on the Bill were due last October 10, so the concerns were aired well before Cunliffe’s interview.
I agree with your point about social security, but notwithstanding the issues in this particular legislation, its handling feeds into a bigger perception that the party doesn’t know where it stands.
Well. I think the Labour Caucus is pretty consistent in its main lines – including on how they debated the Welfare Fraud Bill. They put primary focus on employment and jobs, and benefits as a back up to that. They also made a big repeated line about there should be as harsh a penalty for tax evasion as for benefit fraud.
They talk about beneficiary bashing in the context of rising unemployment. So, while they pay lip service to challenging bennie bashing, they want to be seen of the party of employment, jobs, and “fairness” for taxpayers.
Sue Moroney seems to be talking sympathy pandering claptrap.
@DavidCunliffeMP
Welfare fraud, $23 million = National obsession. Tax dodging, $6 BILLION = National doing nothing.
@ChesterBorrows
@DavidCunliffeMP Welfare fraud budget flat after 40% up under Lab, tax fraud budget up 40% under Nats. Actions speak louder than words mate.
I haven’t seen Labour try and substantiate their claims that National are doing nothing on tax fraud (and I asked them).
Borrows’ office provided:
The figures on tax fraud use the “Management of Debt and Outstanding Returns (M57)” appropriation, which I was advised was the best measure of spending on combating tax fraud. The figures given were a 2008/09 budget of $89 million, and a 2013/14 budget of $125 million – a 40% percentage change.
The Vote Revenue budgets are on the Treasury website – obviously the 2013/14 figure is appropriated not actual.
I checked the Treasury website and what is claimed stacks up.
Labour are opposing and complaining a lot but they don’t seem to be doing their homework and backing up their claims, hence whenever they release new policy it’s automatically viewed with skepticism. In contrast Greens seem to have a functional and competent research unit and they communicate far more effectively.
I think there may be differences between how the figures are calculated. Deborah Russell talks about tax evasion as a “fraud” – ie people avoiding taxes through doing things that look legal. So they may not show up the Treasury calculations.
The problem is Labour don’t give many details. Cunliffe talked about tax dodging and they published graphics showing $6 billion of dodging, but I haven’t seen them elaborate.
Yes. Also The Greens have published a lot of info on tax evasion and how National has been lax on it… but I’ve had a long day. I don’t have time or inclination right now for further research. PG’s research seems to have been pretty limited. – tweets hardly amount to indepth research.
No quantifying of “put the most effort into to” at all. And it sounds dubious. For example from budgets:
Management of Debt and Outstanding Returns (M57)
Taking follow-up action where returns are outstanding and where payments are overdue, including providing people with assistance on the actions they need to take to meet their obligations.
2012/13 Estimated Actual $116,874,000
2013/14 Budget $124,896,000
They spend five times as much on Management of Debt and Outstanding Returns as they recover on benefit fraud, which is about five times what they spend on it.
But MacLennan seems to be correct on one thing:
“The total amount of unpaid tax not yet detected is unknown.”
You seem to just be looking for some quick to find stuff that will discredit Labour, and aren’t doing any indepth research into National’s claims. But…. that’d take a lot more time and reading than I want to do right now …. I need some down time.
Pete, tell me, what is the definition of benefit fraud being used? Of those numbers, how many were the intentional, I have no right to this so I am going to tell a pack of lies to get it, kind vs my boyfriend has moved in, but isn’t really contributing to the household yet so I won’t notify WINZ yet?
I’d like to know how much of it is just overpayments by WINZ being erroneously classified as fraud to make the numbers look worse in order to justify another kicking.
Yet New Zealand is ‘perceived’ to be ‘the least corrupt country in the world’ (along with Denmark, according to Transparency International’s 2013 ‘Corruption Perception Index’.
The Otago Daily Times publishes a 100 year old ‘from our files’ column, and I did enjoy today’s, a well argued missive about the pressing need for a servants’ union. Especially in the wake of the visit from the royal family, which among many other businesses in the UK, enforce zero hours contracts on domestic staff.
And in a similar announcement today the National Library and Auckland Council have launched a huge new resource – 82 years of New Zealand Herald has been digitised including letters and announcements and advertisements. It’ll be a fantastic resource for progressive bloggers. Any articles with a “Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose” flavour you’ll find something suitably pithy in here to suit.
For a taster here’s Michael Joseph Savage on Labour Policy in 1938 – adequate wages, recognition that productivity gains should go to workers, health service, social welfare and pensions policy. http://bit.ly/1ismYcR
Nigel Evans used to be in Parliament. While there he helped cut legal aid. As a result, people who are charged by the government but found innocent can’t recover costs. Mr Evans is now looking at a (UKP) 130,000 legal bill (plus VAT) after defending successfully against an allegation of sexual assault.
Thing is, he’s actually surprised by this:
He said he was stunned to learn he would have to pay his legal fees even if he was acquitted – plus value added tax.
One wonders if he read the bill before voting on it.
On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
TL;DR: In today’s ‘six-stack’ of substacks at 6.06pm on Tuesday, March 19:Kāinga Ora’s dry rot The Spinoff DailyBill McKibben on ‘Climate Superfunds’ making Big Oil pay for climate damage The Crucial YearsPreston Mui on returning to 1980s-style productivity growth NoahpinionAndy Boenau on NIMBYs needing unusual bedfellows Urbanism SpeakeasyNed Resnikoff's case ...
Negative yesterday, negative today. Negative all year, according to one departing reader telling me I’ve grown strident and predictable. Fair enough. If it’s any help, every time I go to write about a certain topic that begins with C and ends with arrrrs, I do brace myself and ask: Again? Are ...
Bryce Edwards writes – It’s been a tumultuous time in politics in recent months, as the new National-led Government has driven through its “First 100 Day programme”. During this period there’s been a handful of opinion polls, which overall just show a minimal amount of flux in public support ...
Inspirational: The Family of Man is a glorious hymn to human equality, but, more than that, it is a clarion call to human freedom. Because equality, unleavened by liberty, is a broken piano, an unstrung harp; upon which the songs of fraternity will never be played.“Somebody must have been telling lies about ...
Tax Lawyer Barbara Edmonds vs Emperor Justinian I- Nolo Contendere: False historical explanations of pivotal events are very far from being inconsequential.WHEN BARBARA EDMONDS made reference to the Roman Empire, my ears pricked up. It is, lamentably, very rare to hear a politician admit to any kind of familiarity ...
It’s been a tumultuous time in politics in recent months, as the new National-led Government has driven through its “First 100 Day programme”. During this period there’s been a handful of opinion polls, which overall just show a minimal amount of flux in public support for the various parties in ...
Buzz from the Beehive Housing Minister Chris Bishop delivered news – packed with the ingredients to enflame political passions – worthy of supplanting Winston Peters in headline writers’ priorities. He popped up at the post-Cabinet press conference to promise a crackdown on unruly and antisocial state housing tenants. His ...
Ele Ludemann writes – The Reserve Bank is advertising for a Diversity, Equity and Inclusion advisor. The Bank has one mandate – to keep inflation between one and three percent. It has failed in that and is only slowly getting inflation back down to the upper limit. Will it ...
Last week former National Party leader Simon Bridges was appointed by the Government as the new chair of the New Zealand Transport Agency Waka Kotahi (NZTA). You can read about the appointment in Thomas Coughlan’s article, Simon Bridges to become chair of NZ Transport Agency Waka KotahiThe fact that a ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Last week former National Party leader Simon Bridges was appointed by the Government as the new chair of the New Zealand Transport Agency Waka Kotahi (NZTA). You can read about the appointment in Thomas Coughlan’s article, Simon Bridges to become chair of NZ Transport Agency ...
TL;DR: My top 10 news and analysis links this morning include:Today’s must-read: Gavin Jacobson talks to Thomas Piketty 10 years on from Capital in the 21st CenturyThe SalvoLocal scoop: Green MP’s business being investigated over migrant exploitation claims StuffSteve KilgallonLocal deep-dive: The commercial contractors making money from School ...
It’s a home - but Kāinga Ora tenants accused of “abusing the privilege” may lose it. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The Government announced a crackdown on Kāinga Ora tenants who were unruly and/or behind on their rent, with Housing Minister Chris Bishop saying a place in a state ...
This is a guest post by Connor Sharp of Surface Light Rail Light rail in Auckland: A way forward sooner than you think With the coup de grâce of Auckland Light Rail (ALR) earlier this year, and the shift of the government’s priorities to roads, roads, and more roads, it ...
Note: As a paid-up Webworm member, I’ve recorded this Webworm as a mini-podcast for you as well. Some of you said you liked this option - so I aim to provide it when I get a chance to record! Read more ...
TL;DR: In my ‘six-stack’ of substacks at 6.06pm on Monday, March 18:IKEA is accused of planting big forests in New Zealand to green-wash; REDD-MonitorA City for People takes a well-deserved victory lap over Wellington’s pro-YIMBY District Plan votes; A City for PeopleSteven Anastasiou takes a close look at the sticky ...
Buzz from the Beehive Here’s hoping for a lively post-cabinet press conference when the PM and – perhaps – some of his ministers tell us what was discussed at their meeting today. Until then, Point of Order has precious little Beehive news to report after its latest monitoring of the ...
David Farrar writes – We now have almost all 2023 data in, which has allowed me to update my annual table of how labour went against its promises. This is basically their final report card. The promiseThe result Build 100,000 affordable homes over 10 ...
I’m a bit worried that I’ve started a previous newsletter with the words “just when you think they couldn’t get any worse…” Seems lately that I could begin pretty much every issue with that opening. Such is the nature of our coalition government that they seem to be outdoing each ...
Geoffrey Miller writes – Timing is everything. And from China’s perspective, this week’s visit by its foreign minister to New Zealand could be coming at just the right moment. The visit by Wang Yi to Wellington will be his first since 2017. Anniversaries are important to Beijing. ...
Depictions of Islam in Western popular culture have rarely been positive, even before 9/11. Five years on from the mosque shootings, this is one of the cultural headwinds that the Muslim community has to battle against. Whatever messages of tolerance and inclusion are offered in daylight, much of our culture ...
Last week Transport Minster Simeon Brown and Mayor Wayne Brown opened the new Auckland Rail Operations Centre. The new train control centre will see teams from KiwiRail, Auckland Transport and Auckland One Rail working more closely together to improve train services across the city. The Auckland Rail Operations Centre in ...
Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: Retiring former Labour Finance Minister Grant Robertson said in an exit interview with Q+A yesterday the Government can and should sustain more debt to invest in infrastructure for future generations. Elsewhere in the news in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy at 6:36am: Read more ...
Timing is everything. And from China’s perspective, this week’s visit by its foreign minister to New Zealand could be coming at just the right moment. The visit by Wang Yi to Wellington will be his first since 2017. Anniversaries are important to Beijing. It is more than just a happy ...
TL;DR: The key events to watch in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the week to March 18 include:China’s Foreign Minister visiting Wellington today;A post-cabinet news conference this afternoon; the resumption of Parliament on Tuesday for two weeks before Easter;retiring former Labour Finance Minister Grant Robertson gives his valedictory speech in Parliament; ...
New Zealand First Leader Winston Peters’s state-of-the-nation speech on Sunday was really a state-of-Winston-First speech. He barely mentioned any of the Government’s key policies and could not even wholly endorse its signature income tax cuts. Instead, he rehearsed all of his complaints about the Ardern Government, including an extraordinary claim ...
A listing of 35 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, March 10, 2024 thru Sat, March 16, 2024. Story of the week This week we'll give you a little glimpse into how we collect links to share and ...
A listing of 35 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, March 10, 2024 thru Sat, March 16, 2024. Story of the week This week we'll give you a little glimpse into how we collect links to share and ...
“I’ve been internalising a really complicated situation in my head.”When they kept telling us we should wait until we get to know him, were they taking the piss? Was it a case of, if you think this is bad, wait till you get to know the real Christopher, after the ...
Happy fourth anniversary, Pandemic That Upended Bloody Everything. I have been observing it by enjoying my second bout of COVID. It’s 5.30 on Sunday morning and only now are lights turning back on for me.Allow me to copy and paste what I told reader Sara yesterday:Depleted, fogged and crappy. Resting, ...
Happy fourth anniversary, Pandemic That Upended Bloody Everything. I have been observing it by enjoying my second bout of COVID. It’s 5.30 on Sunday morning and only now are lights turning back on for me.Allow me to copy and paste what I told reader Sara yesterday:Depleted, fogged and crappy. Resting, ...
Happy fourth anniversary, Pandemic That Upended Bloody Everything. I have been observing it by enjoying my second bout of COVID. It’s 5.30 on Sunday morning and only now are lights turning back on for me.Allow me to copy and paste what I told reader Sara yesterday:Depleted, fogged and crappy. Resting, ...
.“$10 and a target that bleeds” - Bleeding Targets for Under $10!.Thanks for reading Frankly Speaking ! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.This government appears hell-bent on either scrapping life-saving legislation or reintroducing things that - frustrated critics insist - will be dangerous and likely ...
“It hardly strikes me as fair to criticise a government for doing exactly what it said it was going to do. For actually keeping its promises.”THUNDER WAS PLAYING TAG with lightning flashes amongst the distant peaks. Its rolling cadences interrupted by the here-I-come-here-I-go Doppler effect of the occasional passing car. ...
Subversive & Disruptive Technologies: Just as happened with that other great regulator of the masses, the Medieval Church, the advent of a new and hard-to-control technology – the Internet – is weakening the ties that bind. Then, and now, those who enjoy a monopoly on the dissemination of lies, cannot and will ...
Been Here Before: To find the precedents for what this Coalition Government is proposing, it is necessary to return to the “glory days” of Muldoonism.THE COALITION GOVERNMENT has celebrated its first 100 days in office by checking-off the last of its listed commitments. It remains, however, an angry government. It ...
Bob Edlin writes – And what is the world watching today…? The email newsletter from Associated Press which landed in our mailbox early this morning advised: In the news today: The father of a school shooter has been found guilty of involuntary manslaughter; prosecutors in Trump’s hush-money case ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Is another Green MP on their way out? And are the Greens severely tarnished by another integrity scandal? For the second time in three months, the Green Party has secretly suspended an MP over integrity issues. Mystery is surrounding the party’s decision to ...
For the last few years, the Green Party has been the party that has managed to avoid the plague of multiple scandals that have beleaguered other political parties. It appears that their luck has run out with a second scandal which, unfortunately for them, coincided with Golraz Ghahraman, the focus ...
TL;DR: The six newsey things that stood out to me as of 6:46am on Saturday, March 16.Andy Foster has accidentally allowed a Labour/Green amendment to cut road user chargers for plug-in hybrid vehicles, which the Government might accept; NZ HeraldThomas CoughlanSimeon Brown has rejected a plea from Westport ...
What seemed a booming success a couple of years ago has collapsed into fraud convictions.I looked at the crash of FTX (short for ‘Futures Exchange’) in November 2022 to see whether it would impact on the financial system as a whole. Fortunately there was barely a ripple, probably because it ...
Anybody following the situation in Ukraine and Russia would probably have been amused by a recent Tweet on X NATO seems to be putting in an awful lot of effort to influence what is, at least according to them, a sham election in an autocracy.When do the Ukrainians go to ...
TL;DR:Shaun Baker on Wynyard Quarter's transformation. Magdalene Taylor on the problem with smart phones. How private equity are now all over reinsurance. Dylan Cleaver on rugby and CTE. Emily Atkin on ‘Big Meat’ looking like ‘Big Oil’.Bernard’s six-stack of substacks at 6pm on March 15Photo by Jeppe Hove Jensen ...
Buzz from the Beehive Finance Minister Nicola Willis had plenty to say when addressing the Auckland Business Chamber on the economic growth that (she tells us) is flagging more than we thought. But the government intends to put new life into it: We want our country to be a ...
The Transport and Infrastructure Committee has reported back on the Road User Charges (Light Electric RUC Vehicles) Amendment Bill, basicly rubberstamping it. While there was widespread support among submitters for the principle that EV and PHEV drivers should pay their fair share for the roads, they also overwhelmingly disagreed with ...
Peter Dunne writes – This week’s government bailout – the fifth in the last eighteen months – of the financially troubled Ruapehu Alpine Lifts company would have pleased many in the central North Island ski industry. The government’s stated rationale for the $7 million funding was that it ...
See if you can spot the difference. An Iranian born female MP from a progressive party is accused of serial shoplifting. Her name is leaked to the media, which goes into a pack frenzy even before the Police launch an … Continue reading → ...
Ele Ludemann writes – The government is omitting general Treaty references from legislation : The growth of Treaty of Waitangi clauses in legislation caused so much worry that a special oversight group was set up by the last Government in a bid to get greater coherence in the public service on Treaty ...
What was that judge thinking?Peter Williams writes – That Golriz Ghahraman and District Court Judge Maria Pecotic were once lawyer colleagues is incontrovertible. There is published evidence that they took at least one case to the Court of Appeal together. There was a report on ...
TL;DR: My top 10 news and analysis links this morning include:Today’s must-read:Climate Scorpion – the sting is in the tail. Introducing planetary solvency. A paper via the University of Exeter’s Institute and Faculty of Actuaries.Local scoop:Kāinga Ora starts pulling out of its Auckland projects and selling land RNZ ...
Wellington’s massively upzoned District Plan adds the opportunity for tens of thousands of new homes not just in the central city (such as these Webb St new builds) but also close to the CBD and public transport links. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: Wellington gave itself the chance of ...
It’s Friday and we’re halfway through March Madness. Here’s some of the things that caught our attention this week. This Week in Greater Auckland On Monday Matt asked how we can get better event trains and an option for grade separating Morningside Dr. On Tuesday Matt looked into ...
Something you might not know about me is that I’m quite a stubborn person. No, really. I don’t much care for criticism I think’s unfair or that I disagree with. Few of us do I suppose.Back when I was a drinker I’d sometimes respond defensively, even angrily. There are things ...
Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The five things that mattered in Aotearoa’s political economy that we wrote and spoke about via The Kākā and elsewhere for paying subscribers in the last week included:PM Christopher Luxon said the reversal of interest deductibility for landlords was done to help renters, who ...
It was not so much the Labour Party but really the Chris Hipkins party yesterday at Labour’s caucus retreat in Martinborough. The former Prime Minister was more or less consistent on wealth tax, which he was at best equivocal about, and social insurance, which he was not willing to revisit. ...
Buzz from the BeehiveThe text reproduced above appears on a page which records all the media statements and speeches posted on the government’s official website by Melissa Lee as Minister of Media and Communications and/or by Jenny Marcroft, her Parliamentary Under-secretary. It can be quickly analysed ...
For forty years, Robert Muldoon has been a dirty word in our politics. His style of government was so repulsive and authoritarian that the backlash to it helped set and entrench our constitutional norms. His pig-headedness over forcing through Think Big eventually gave us the RMA, with its participation and ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Is the new government reducing tax on rental properties to benefit landlords or to cut the cost of rents? That’s the big question this week, after Associate Finance Minister David Seymour announced on Sunday that the Government would be reversing the Labour Government’s removal ...
Saudi Arabia is rarely far from the international spotlight. The war in Gaza has brought new scrutiny to Saudi plans to normalise relations with Israel, while the fifth anniversary of the controversial killing of Jamal Khashoggi was marked shortly before the war began on October 7. And as the home ...
Questions need to be asked on both sides of the worldPeter Williams writes – The NRL Judiciary hands down an eight week suspension to Sydney Roosters forward Spencer Leniu , an Auckland-born Samoan, after he calls Ezra Mam, Sydney-orn but of Aboriginal and Torres Strait ...
Ele Ludemann writes – Contrary to what many headlines and news stories are saying, residential landlords are not getting a tax break. The government is simply restoring to them the tax deductibility of interest they had until the previous government removed it. There is no logical reason ...
I can't remember when it was goodMoments of happiness in bloomMaybe I just misunderstoodAll of the love we left behindWatching our flashbacks intertwineMemories I will never findIn spite of whatever you becomeForget that reckless thing turned onI think our lives have just begunI think our lives have just begunDoes anyone ...
Michael Bassett writes – At first reading, a front-page story in the New Zealand Herald on 13 March was bizarre. A group of severely intellectually limited teenagers, with little understanding of the law, have been pleading to the Justice Select Committee not to pass a bill dealing with ram ...
How much political capital is Christopher Luxon willing to burn through in order to deliver his $2.9 billion gift to landlords? Evidently, Luxon is: (a) unable to cost the policy accurately. As Anna Burns-Francis pointed out to him on Breakfast TV, the original ”rock solid” $2.1 billion cost he was ...
TL;DR: My top 10 news and analysis links this morning include:Today’s must-read:Jonathon Porritt calling bullshit in his own blog post on mainstream climate science as ‘The New Denialism’.Local scoop:The Wellington City Council’s list of proposed changes to the IHP recommendations to be debated later today was leaked this ...
TL;DR:Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said yesterday tenants should be grateful for the reinstatement of interest deductibility because landlords would pass on their lower tax costs in the form of lower rents. That would be true if landlords were regulated monopolies such as Transpower or Auckland Airport1, but they’re not, ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Tom Toro Tom Toro is a cartoonist and author. He has published over 200 cartoons in The New Yorker since 2010. His cartoons appear in Playboy, the Paris Review, the New York Times, American Bystander, and elsewhere. Related: What 10 EV lovers ...
The business section of the NZ Herald is full of opinion. Among the more opinionated of all is the ex-Minister of Transport, ex-Minister of Railways, ex MP for Auckland Central (1975-93, Labour), Wellington Central (1996-99, ACT, then list-2005), ex-leader of the ACT Party, uncle to actor Antonia, the veritable granddaddy ...
Hi,Just quickly — I’m blown away by the stories you’ve shared with me over the last week since I put out the ‘Gary’ podcast, where I told you about the time my friend’s flatmate killed the neighbour.And you keep telling me stories — in the comments section, and in my ...
The first season of Rings of Power was not awful. It was thoroughly underwhelming, yes, and left a lingering sense of disappointment, but it was more expensive mediocrity than catastrophe. I wrote at length about the series as it came out (see the Review section of the blog, and go ...
Buzz from the Beehive Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden told Auckland Business Chamber members they were the first audience to hear her priorities as a minister in a government committed to cutting red tape and regulations. She brandished her liberalising credentials, saying Flexible labour markets are the ...
Chris Trotter writes – TO UNDERSTAND WHY NEWSHUB FAILED, it is necessary to understand how TVNZ changed. Up until 1989, the state broadcaster had been funded by a broadcasting licence fee, collected from every citizen in possession of a television set, supplemented by a relatively modest (compared ...
Bob Edlin writes – The Māori Party has been busy issuing a mix of warnings and threats as its expresses its opposition to interest deductibility for landlords and the plans of seabed miners. It remains to be seen whether they follow the example of indigenous litigants in Australia, ...
The Government has accepted Labour’s change to the Road User Charge (RUC) discount for hybrid vehicles, meaning there will still be some incentive for people to buy greener vehicles. ...
Kicking the most vulnerable people out of state housing and pushing them towards homelessness will result in a proliferation of poverty and trauma across our most vulnerable communities. ...
Te Pāti Māori co-leader and MP for Waiariki, Rawiri Waititi has penned a letter asking MPs to support his members bill to remove GST from all food. The bill is expected to go through its first reading in parliament this Wednesday. “I’m calling on all political parties to support my ...
This year is about getting real with Kiwis and discussing the tough issues, as the National Government exacerbates inequality and divides New Zealand, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said ...
The Government adding Significant Natural Areas (SNAs) to its already roaring environmental policy bonfire is an assault on the future of wildlife that makes Aotearoa unique. ...
After 12 years of fighting to protect our moana we are finding ourselves back at square one and back at court. Today, the Environmental Protection Agency is sitting in Hawera to reconsider an application from Trans-Tasman Resources to dig up 50 million tonnes of the seabed in South Taranaki. This ...
Minister Shane Jones’ decision to step away from a seabed mining project is evidence of the murky waters surrounding the Government’s fast-track legislation. ...
The growth of Treaty of Waitangi clauses in legislation caused so much worry that a special oversight group was set up by the last government in a bid to get greater coherence in the publicservice on Treaty matters. When ministers first considered the need for tighter oversight in 2021, there ...
The growth of Treaty of Waitangi clauses in legislation caused so much worry that a special oversight group was set up by the last government in a bid to get greater coherence in the publicservice on Treaty matters. When ministers first considered the need for tighter oversight in 2021, there ...
The Coalition Government’s miscalculation saga continues as it has forgotten an eyewatering $90 million gap in its interest deductibility cost figures, say Labour Finance spokesperson Barbara Edmonds and Revenue Spokesperson Deborah Russell. ...
He Pou a Rangi Climate Change Commission has today released advice that says if the Government doesn’t act now New Zealand is at risk of not meeting its climate goals. ...
The Coalition Government has today confirmed it is abandoning first home buyers who are struggling to get ahead, says Labour Finance spokesperson Barbara Edmonds. ...
The New Zealand public voted for a change in direction at the 2023 general election and that is exactly what this coalition government has been delivering in its first 100 days. There was an immediate focus on the economy, easing the cost of living, cracking down on law and order ...
The Government has left the health system as an afterthought, announcing half-baked targets at the last minute of their 100-day plan, says Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall. ...
Kiwis are still waiting for their promised cost of living support after 100 days of a National Government that is taking us backwards, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said today. ...
The National Government has spent its first 100 days stopping, cutting and reversing. They have scrapped stuff for stuff for the sake of it, without putting up any solutions of their own – and it’s hardworking New Zealanders who will pay for it. ...
100 days of National taking NZ backwardsThe National Government has spent its first 100 days stopping, cutting and reversing. They have scrapped stuff for stuff for the sake of it, without putting up any solutions of their own – and it’s hardworking New Zealanders who will pay for it. ...
The Government must commit to funding free and healthy school lunches, as thousands of people sign the petition to keep them, education spokesperson Jan Tinetti says. ...
If the Government was serious about moving families into public housing, they would build more houses so there is actually somewhere for people to go. ...
The free and healthy school lunches programme feeds our kids, helps them to learn, and saves families money – but it is at risk under this Government, education spokesperson Jan Tinetti said. ...
The Government’s proposed changes to Firearms Prohibition Orders (FPO) add almost nothing new and are merely an attempt to distract from its plans to loosen gun laws, police spokesperson Ginny Andersen and justice spokesperson Dr Duncan Webb said. ...
The great Victorian era English politician Lord Macauley stood in the British House of Parliament and said, "The gallery in which the reporters sit has become a fourth estate of the realm".He understood and outlined even way back then, the significant role and influence media have in a democracy. ...
"The Government is moving quickly to realise an additional $46 million in tariff savings in the EU market this season for Kiwi exporters,” Minister for Trade and Agriculture, Todd McClay says. Parliament is set, this week, to complete the final legislative processes required to bring the New Zealand – European ...
New Zealand’s social workers are qualified, experienced, and more representative of the communities they serve, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. “I want to acknowledge and applaud New Zealand’s social workers for the hard work they do, providing invaluable support for our most vulnerable. “To coincide with World ...
Cabinet has agreed to a reduced road user charge (RUC) rate for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs), Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. Owners of PHEVs will be eligible for a reduced rate of $38 per 1,000km once all light electric vehicles (EVs) move into the RUC system from 1 April. ...
Minister of Agriculture and Trade, Todd McClay, says that today’s opening of Riverland Foods manufacturing plant in Christchurch is a great example of how trade access to overseas markets creates jobs in New Zealand. Speaking at the official opening of this state-of-the-art pet food factory the Minister noted that exports ...
Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters met with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Wellington today. “It was a pleasure to host Foreign Minister Wang Yi during his first official visit to New Zealand since 2017. Our discussions were wide-ranging and enabled engagement on many facets of New Zealand’s relationship with China, including trade, ...
Kāinga Ora – Homes & Communities has been instructed to end the Sustaining Tenancies Framework and take stronger measures against persistent antisocial behaviour by tenants, says Housing Minister Chris Bishop. “Earlier today Finance Minister Nicola Willis and I sent an interim Letter of Expectations to the Board of Kāinga Ora. ...
Tēna koutou katoa. Greetings everyone. Thank you to the Auckland Chamber of Commerce and the Honourable Simon Bridges for hosting this address today. I acknowledge the business leaders in this room, the leaders and governors, the employers, the entrepreneurs, the investors, and the wealth creators. The coalition Government shares your ...
Minister Winston Peters completed the final leg of his visit to South and South East Asia in Singapore today, where he focused on enhancing one of New Zealand’s indispensable strategic partnerships. “Singapore is our most important defence partner in South East Asia, our fourth-largest trading partner and a ...
Minister of Internal Affairs and Workplace Relations and Safety, Hon. Brooke van Velden, will travel to the Republic of Korea to represent New Zealand at the Third Summit for Democracy on 18 March. The summit, hosted by the Republic of Korea, was first convened by the United States in 2021, ...
ICNZ Speech 7 March 2024, Auckland Acknowledgements and opening Mōrena, ngā mihi nui. Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Nor Whanganui aho. Good morning, it’s a privilege to be here to open the ICNZ annual conference, thank you to Mark for the Mihi Whakatau My thanks to Tim Grafton for inviting me ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Lead Coordination Minister Judith Collins have expressed their deepest sympathy on the five-year anniversary of the Christchurch terror attacks. “March 15, 2019, was a day when families, communities and the country came together both in sorrow and solidarity,” Mr Luxon says. “Today we pay our respects to the 51 shuhada ...
Speech for Financial Advice NZ Conference 5 March 2024 Acknowledgements and opening Morena, Nga Mihi Nui. Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Nor Whanganui aho. Thanks Nate for your Mihi Whakatau Good morning. It’s a pleasure to formally open your conference this morning. What a lovely day in Wellington, What a great ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters held discussions in Jakarta today about the future of relations between New Zealand and South East Asia’s most populous country. “We are in Jakarta so early in our new government’s term to reflect the huge importance we place on our relationship with Indonesia and South ...
Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters has announced that the Foreign Minister of China, Wang Yi, will visit New Zealand next week. “We look forward to re-engaging with Foreign Minister Wang Yi and discussing the full breadth of the bilateral relationship, which is one of New Zealand’s ...
Transport Minister Simeon Brown has today opened the new Auckland Rail Operations Centre, which will bring together KiwiRail, Auckland Transport, and Auckland One Rail to improve service reliability for Aucklanders. “The recent train disruptions in Auckland have highlighted how important it is KiwiRail and Auckland’s rail agencies work together to ...
The Government is proud to support the 10th edition of Crankworx Rotorua as the Crankworx World Tour returns to Rotorua from 16-24 March 2024, says Minister for Economic Development Melissa Lee. “Over the past 10 years as Crankworx Rotorua has grown, so too have the economic and social benefits that ...
Legislation implementing coalition Government tax commitments and addressing long-standing tax anomalies will be progressed in Parliament next week, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. The legislation is contained in an Amendment Paper to the Taxation (Annual Rates for 2023–24, Multinational Tax, and Remedial Matters) Bill issued today. “The Amendment Paper represents ...
Associate Environment Minister Andrew Hoggard has today announced that the Government has agreed to suspend the requirement for councils to comply with the Significant Natural Areas (SNA) provisions of the National Policy Statement for Indigenous Biodiversity for three years, while it replaces the Resource Management Act (RMA).“As it stands, SNAs ...
Agriculture Minister Todd McClay has classified the drought conditions in the Marlborough, Tasman, and Nelson districts as a medium-scale adverse event, acknowledging the challenging conditions facing farmers and growers in the district. “Parts of Marlborough, Tasman, and Nelson districts are in the grip of an intense dry spell. I know ...
The Government is helping farmers eradicate the significant impact of facial eczema (FE) in pastoral animals, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay announced. “A $20 million partnership jointly funded by Beef + Lamb NZ, the Government, and the primary sector will save farmers an estimated NZD$332 million per year, and aims to ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters has completed a successful visit to India, saying it was an important step in taking the relationship between the two countries to the next level. “We have laid a strong foundation for the Coalition Government’s priority of enhancing New Zealand-India relations to generate significant future benefit for both countries,” says Mr Peters, ...
Cabinet has agreed to provide $7 million to ensure the 2024 ski season can go ahead on the Whakapapa ski field in the central North Island but has told the operator Ruapehu Alpine Lifts it is the last financial support it will receive from taxpayers. Cabinet also agreed to provide ...
Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says the launch of a new mobile breast screening unit in Counties Manukau reinforces the coalition Government’s commitment to drive better cancer services for all New Zealanders. Speaking at the launch of the new mobile clinic, Dr Reti says it’s a great example of taking ...
Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says the launch of a new mobile breast screening unit in Counties Manukau reinforces the coalition Government’s commitment to drive better cancer services for all New Zealanders. Speaking at the launch of the new mobile clinic, Dr Reti says it’s a great example of taking ...
Unlocking economic growth and land for housing are critical elements of the Government’s plan for our transport network, and planned upgrades to State Highway 29 (SH29) near Tauriko will deliver strongly on those priorities, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “The SH29 upgrades near Tauriko will improve safety at the intersections ...
Unlocking economic growth and land for housing are critical elements of the Government’s plan for our transport network, and planned upgrades to State Highway 29 (SH29) near Tauriko will deliver strongly on those priorities, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “The SH29 upgrades near Tauriko will improve safety at the intersections ...
Lower fruit and vegetable prices are welcome news for New Zealanders who have been doing it tough at the supermarket, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. Stats NZ reported today the price of fruit and vegetables has dropped 9.3 percent in the 12 months to February 2024. “Lower fruit and vege ...
Tēnā koutou katoa and greetings to you all. Chair, I am honoured to address the sixty-eighth session of the Commission on the Status of Women. I acknowledge the many crises impacting the rights of women and girls. Heightened global tensions, war, climate related and humanitarian disasters, and price inflation all ...
Tēnā koutou katoa and greetings to you all. Chair, I am honoured to address the 68th session of the Commission on the Status of Women. I acknowledge the many crises impacting the rights of women and girls. Heightened global tensions, war, climate related and humanitarian disasters, and price inflation all ...
The coalition Government is supporting farmers to enhance land management practices by investing $3.3 million in locally led catchment groups, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay announced. “Farmers and growers deliver significant prosperity for New Zealand and it’s vital their ongoing efforts to improve land management practices and water quality are supported,” ...
Good evening everyone and thank you for that lovely introduction. Thank you also to the Honourable Simon Bridges for the invitation to address your members. Since being sworn in, this coalition Government has hit the ground running with our 100-day plan, delivering the changes that New Zealanders expect of us. ...
Recommendations from the Climate Change Commission for New Zealand on the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) auction and unit limit settings for the next five years have been tabled in Parliament, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. “The Commission provides advice on the ETS annually. This is the third time the ...
The coalition Government is beginning its fight to lower building costs and reduce red tape by exempting minor building work from paying the building levy, says Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk. “Currently, any building project worth $20,444 including GST or more is subject to the building levy which is ...
Proposed changes to tax legislation to prevent the over-taxation of low-earning trusts are welcome, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. The changes have been recommended by Parliament’s Finance and Expenditure Committee following consideration of submissions on the Taxation (Annual Rates for 2023–24, Multinational Tax, and Remedial Matters) Bill. “One of the ...
Assalaamu alaikum. السَّلَام عليكم In light of the holy month of Ramadan, I want to extend my warmest wishes to our Muslim community in New Zealand. Ramadan is a time for spiritual reflection, renewed devotion, perseverance, generosity, and forgiveness. It’s a time to strengthen our bonds and appreciate the diversity ...
Former Transport Minister and CEO of the Auckland Business Chamber Hon Simon Bridges has been appointed as the new Board Chair of the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) for a three-year term, Transport Minister Simeon Brown announced today. “Simon brings extensive experience and knowledge in transport policy and governance to the role. He will ...
Good morning all, it is a pleasure to be here as Minister of Science, Innovation and Technology. It is fantastic to see how connected and collaborative the life science and biotechnology industry is here in New Zealand. I would like to thank BioTechNZ and NZTech for the invitation to address ...
Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says he is looking forward to the day when three key water projects in Northland are up and running, unlocking the full potential of land in the region. Mr Jones attended a community event at the site of the Otawere reservoir near Kerikeri on Friday. ...
Associate Finance Minister David Seymour has today announced that the Government has agreed to restore deductibility for mortgage interest on residential investment properties. “Help is on the way for landlords and renters alike. The Government’s restoration of interest deductibility will ease pressure on rents and simplify the tax code,” says ...
Sport and Recreation Minister Chris Bishop will travel to Switzerland today to attend an Executive Committee meeting and Symposium of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). Mr Bishop will then travel on to London where he will attend a series of meetings in his capacity as Infrastructure Minister. “New Zealanders believe ...
Pacific Media Watch Earthwise hosts Lois and Martin Griffiths. Earthwise presenters Lois and Martin Griffiths on Plains FM 96.9 community radio talk to Dr David Robie, a New Zealand author, independent journalist and media educator with a passion for the Asia-Pacific region. David talks about the struggle to raise awareness ...
Pacific Media Watch Ismail al-Ghoul, an Al Jazeera Arabic correspondent who was held for 12 hours at Gaza’s al-Shifa hospital, says Israeli forces rounded up Palestinian journalists at the facility and made them kneel on the ground for hours, while naked and blindfolded. “The occupation forces handcuffed and blindfolded us ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Tony Wood, Program Director, Energy, Grattan Institute chinasong, Shutterstock Electricity customers in four Australian states can breathe a sigh of relief. After two years in a row of 20% price increases, power prices have finally stabilised. In many places they’re ...
Chumbawamba have reportedly issued the deputy PM a cease-and-desist notice after he used their song 'Tubthumping' before his state of the nation speech. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Deborah Lupton, SHARP Professor, Vitalities Lab, Centre for Social Research in Health and Social Policy Centre, and the ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society, UNSW Sydney kitzcorner/Shutterstock The assertion from Queensland’s chief health officer John Gerrard that ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Peter Martin, Visiting Fellow, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University Shutterstock Why are musicians so keen to get played on the radio? It can’t be because of the money. In Australia they are paid at rates so low they ...
"Farmers make a point not to tell our urban cousins how to live, yet Chlöe from central Auckland is hell-bent on having her say about farmers," says ACT Rural Communities spokesman Mark Cameron. “On her first day in the House as Green ...
Analysis by Dr Bryce Edwards – Democracy Project (https://democracyproject.nz)Political scientist, Dr Bryce Edwards. It’s been a tumultuous time in politics in recent months, as the new National-led Government has driven through its “First 100 Day programme”. During this period there’s been a handful of opinion polls, which overall just ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Tim Curran, Associate Professor of Ecology, Lincoln University, New Zealand Getty Images/Gerald Corsi In the latest move to reform environmental laws in New Zealand, the coalition government has introduced a bill to fast-track consenting processes for projects deemed to ...
Uber has argued it does not have as much control over drivers as the unions suggest, and wants a judgment ruling that drivers are employees and not contractors set aside and sent back to the Employment Court. The 2022 ruling followed a three-week hearing in which four drivers sought to ...
What can and can’t be purchased by disabled people or their carers has been slashed in an effort by the Ministry of Disabled People Whaikaha to save money. The purchasing guidelines, a set of rules that sets out what can be purchased using the various streams of Government disability funding, ...
The Treasury has published today a new Analytical Note by Tod Wright and Hien Nguyen, Fiscal incidence in New Zealand: The effects of taxes and benefits on household incomes in tax year 2018/19 . Analyses of the distributional impact of taxation and government ...
The Treasury has published today a new Analytical Note by Cory Davis, Boston Hart and Benjamin Stubbing, Household cost-of-living impacts from the Emissions Trading Scheme and using transfers to mitigate regressive outcomes . This Analytical Note ...
A coalition of public transport and climate organisations, united as ‘Transport for All’, is actively opposing the government’s transport proposals. The draft Government Policy Statement (GPS) includes plans for higher fares for public transport, ...
Greater Wellington is inviting feedback on proposed changes to its Revenue and Financing Policy. The Revenue and Financing Policy covers the Council’s various sources of funding, and how the cost of services is shared across the region. This includes ...
Labour has conceded it could have done more to deal with disruptive state housing tenants while in government but says the current coalition is going too far. ...
The band has asked their record label to issue a cease and desist to stop the NZ First leader using their 1997 hit to support his ‘misguided political views’. “I get knocked down, but I get up again,” blared through the speakers on Sunday as Winston Peters took the stage ...
By Lydia Lewis, RNZ Pacific journalist Food rationing is underway in remote areas in Papua New Guinea’s Highlands following torrential rain and flash flooding. More than 20 people have been reported dead in Chimbu Province. In nearby Enga Province, the centre of last month’s massacre, a 15-year-old boy has been ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Andrew Hughes, Lecturer, Research School of Management, Australian National University After months of debate and intrigue, the AFL’s 19th and newest team, the Tasmania Devils, finally launched its jumper, logo and colours in Devonport this week. The Devils will wear green, ...
Brannavan Gnanalingam reviews the debut novel by Saraid de Silva.One of the most baffling things for children who move to a new country is what their parents’ (or grandparents’) lives were like prior to moving – for kids in particular, they’re too busy trying to fit in in their ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Stephen Gaunson, Associate Professor in Cinema Studies, RMIT University Narelle Portanier/Binge “If you don’t know who your mob are, you don’t know who you are,” Detective Andrea “Andie” Whitford (played by Leah Purcell) is told early into the new crime ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Elise Klein, Associate professor, Australian National University It’s commonly accepted that women do the vast majority of caregiving in Australian society. But less appreciated is that Indigenous women do larger amounts of unpaid care than any other group. Working with the Aboriginal ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Adrian Beaumont, Election Analyst (Psephologist) at The Conversation; and Honorary Associate, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne Joe Biden and Donald Trump have both secured their parties’ nominations for the November 5 United States general election by winning a ...
Comment: There has been a striking contrast in trans-Tasman interest about Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi’s visit to New Zealand and Australia. While the Australian press has been full of articles about the visit – including his curious decision to meet with former prime minister and China booster Paul Keating ...
After years of pressuring banks and other institutions to stop investing in fossil fuels, climate campaigners are making some progress. So how does divestment work?For years, climate activists have been pushing banks and other big institutions to divest from fossil fuels. New research from climate advocacy group 350 Aotearoa ...
For Boba, Ethan and Ashley, K-pop is a place to belong, a way to express themselves, and a bridge to connect with others. The three young Polynesians are part of a K-pop fan community in Tāmaki Makaurau. It’s one of many that have sprung up worldwide as K-pop has gone ...
For Boba, Ethan and Ashley, K-pop is a place to belong, a way to express themselves, and a bridge to connect with others. This one-off documentary presents three intimate portraits of young Polynesians who are pulled into a Korean cultural phenomenon. K-POLYS is directed by Litia Tuiburelevu, Produced by Hex ...
There’s ample evidence demonstrating free school lunch programmes provide wide benefits across schools, households and communities according to public health researchers. ACT Minister David Seymour wants to reduce the spending on Aotearoa New Zealand’s ...
By Wata Shaw in Suva Fiji is facing an exodus of Fijians as many are leaving for overseas seeking employment and education and others are migrating, says Opposition MP Viliame Naupoto. Speaking in Parliament, he said: “His Excellency’s speech (Ratu Wiliame Katonivere) comes after a little over one year of ...
The Taxpayers’ Union is welcoming comments from Christopher Luxon this morning recommitting to ‘no new taxes’ as part of Budget 2024. “Mr Luxon’s refusal at the Post-Cabinet press conference yesterday to repeat the ‘no new taxes’ promise ...
SAFE is urgently calling on the Environment Committee to reject the Government’s Fast-Track Approvals Bill, and is urging New Zealanders to rally behind the call. The proposed Bill, currently under consideration with the Environment select committee, ...
Teammates who spend all their time picking fights with spectators are only helpful for the other team, writes Madeleine Chapman. Anyone who has ever played a team sport competitively, particularly as a child and particularly, for some reason, basketball, will know that there’s a lot of politics involved. While there ...
The long-running Wellington music festival is too focused on the Jim Beam-ness and not enough on the Homegrown-ness.There is something about Homegrown that’s difficult to place. A barely perceptible-ness. Like feeling a ghost is watching you from the corner of the room but when you look, there’s nothing there. ...
The latest Ipsos New Zealand Issues Monitor reveals that fewer New Zealanders believe crime / law and order is one of the top issues facing our country. In 2018, Ipsos New Zealand started tracking the key issues facing New Zealand. In this wave ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kate Griffiths, Deputy Program Director, Budgets and Government, Grattan Institute Australia’s political donations rules are woefully inadequate, but donations reform is finally on the agenda. The federal government has signalled its interest in reform and will soon begin briefing MPs on its ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Mark Patrick Taylor, Chief Environmental Scientist, EPA Victoria; Honorary Professor, School of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University Naiyana Somchitkaeo/Shutterstock A recent study published in the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine has linked microplastics with risk to human health. The study ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Albert Van Dijk, Professor, Water and Landscape Dynamics, Fenner School of Environment & Society, Australian National University Global climate records were shattered in 2023, from air and sea temperatures to sea-level rise and sea-ice extent. Scores of countries recorded their hottest year ...
As part of our series exploring how New Zealanders live and our relationship with money, a teacher explains why he and his partner are in frugal mode – and how they’re making it work. Gender: Male Age: 35Ethnicity: Pākehā Role: I am an intermediate school teacher and my partner is ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sarah Bendall, Senior Lecturer, Institute for Humanities and Social Sciences, Australian Catholic University Binge Mary & George, the new British television drama series, depicts the real-life story of Mary Villiers and her son George, and their social climbing at the ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jason Nassios, Associate Professor, Centre of Policy Studies, Victoria University This article is part of The Conversation’s series examining the housing crisis. Read the other articles in the series here. Australian state and federal governments spend money in many ways to ...
The finance minister is denying that there’s a $5.6b shortfall in paying for the government’s campaign promises, including tax cuts. At his post-cabinet press conference yesterday, the PM refused to rule out new taxes to pay for the cuts, writes Anna Rawhiti-Connell in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s ...
Kāinga Ora tenants abused by their neighbours are doubting the government's crackdown on disruptive tenants will make a difference on their behaviour. ...
Kāinga Ora is New Zealand’s biggest residential landlord, housing more than 180,000 vulnerable people in more than 67,000 properties. Yesterday the government announced a crackdown on its tenants who fall behind on rent. One longtime Kāinga Ora tenant shares her experience.For 18 years I lived in a 1960s standalone ...
Why does this myth persist, and what’s the real reason our skin is suffering?It’s one of the biggest international grievances New Zealanders hold, up there with the sinking of the Rainbow Warrior and 1981’s underarm incident. We’re quick to tell international travellers that the world’s pollution led to the ...
Opinion: In a move that has shocked road safety advocates across the country, the new Minister of Transport, Simeon Brown, is poised to abandon the previous government’s speed limit reduction policy, particularly around schools. Even more alarmingly, he wants school speed limits to be variable rather than full-time, arguing ...
Auckland Council is opposing a fast-track development backed by Sir John Kirwan and Spark NZ, because it doesn’t meet stringent new climate adaptation requirements The post Surf-data centre faces new 3.8C climate warming rules appeared first on Newsroom. ...
When the Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act was introduced in 2009 it was firmly targeted at gangs and drugs. The legislation means police no longer need a conviction to seize assets that criminals can’t prove were paid for legitimately, as long as their alleged offences are punishable by more than a ...
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A[quiz],DIV[quiz],A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Tuesday 19 March appeared first on Newsroom. ...
Bob’s relationship with certain members of Lincoln’s academic staff continued to deteriorate in the 1990s. Others supported him publicly, though articles such as Roland Clark’s 1993 piece in Growing Today cannot have pleased the university management. Clark wrote that Bob was selling onions from the Biological Husbandry Unit to a ...
SailGP’s races feature in-your-face action, with agile, hydro-foiling catamarans tacking and jibing for the title over several days. However, public comments ahead of the global series’ return to New Zealand have left this past year’s controversy in the shadows, as a key appointment attracts criticism from dolphin advocates. A year ...
Opinion: We are fast approaching a fundamental change in prisons. As the number of people on custodial remand looks set to overtake the number of sentenced prisoners, the main function of prisons in New Zealand may become incarcerating un-sentenced people who may not be guilty of offending. We have already ...
A huge seven months lies in store for the White Ferns, beginning this week with the visit of England and culminating with the T20 World Cup in Bangladesh in September and October. Starting on Tuesday in Dunedin, the world ranked No. 2 visitors will play five T20s and three ODIs, ...
The letters, which were published last week, were addressed to Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P) Chairperson Megawati Sukarnoputri, National Democrat Party (NasDem) Chairperson Surya Paloh, National Awakening Party (PKB) Chairperson Muhaimin Iskandar, Justice and Prosperity Party (PKS) President Ahmad Syaikhu and United Development Party (PPP) Chairperson Muhammad Mardiono. In ...
Evicting more people from state housing is ignorant to the consequences of poverty, the Greens say, but the Housing Minister says it's a privilege that can be taken away if abused. ...
Evicting more people from state housing is ignorant to the consequences of poverty, the Greens say, but the Housing Minister says it's a privilege that can be taken away if abused. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Emerald L King, Lecturer in Humanities, University of Tasmania IMDB Between Netflix’s 2023 live-action version of One Piece, and its latest take on Avatar: The Last Airbender, fans are once again asking: why are live-action anime adaptations so tricky to ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Emerald L King, Lecturer in Humanities, University of Tasmania IMDB Between Netflix’s 2023 live-action version of One Piece, and its latest take on Avatar: The Last Airbender, fans are once again asking: why are live-action anime adaptations so tricky to ...
The government says it still intends to deliver tax cuts by July, but will not lock them in until they have got them past their coalition partners. ...
The Karam defamation case should be a warning to bloggers and other forum hosts, and anyone who uses social media who thinks they can make unprovable and potentially defamatory comments with impunity.
From Karam awarded $535,000 over defamation:
People commenting anonymously may think they are immune from defamation but that could be put to the test legally.
And bloggers who allow open slather comments should note that Fairfax NZ has been also held responsible in this case and have settled privately. I frequently see potentially defamatory comments made on a number of blogs.
Most people being attacked online don’t take defamation action and the attackers probably think they are safe from being held to account.
Parker and Purkiss probably thought they were untouchable and could make unsubstantiated claims with impunity. They may have thought they could exploit the power of free speech.
They may have believed their own hype and thought that believing something was sufficient justification for attacking someone’s integrity. This seems have continued “in choosing to use the defence of truth at the trial”.
Perhaps hose who think they are safe attacking and defaming online should have a good look at this case.
[karol: I don’t know why you chose to make this warning on The Standard, Pete. But The Standard Policy is very strong on not allowing comments that are a legal risk. Also, anonymous comments are not allowed.]
Hey George, are you trying to warn off those people who are questioning the ethics of Peter Dunne, Minister for Legal Highs, not disclosing that the person paid for advocating on behalf of the scum who run the Legal High business is his pride and joy, my son James?
Are you?
I came to post on the finding and found pete had already. what was my ulterior motive?
I am no apologist for pete but the pouncing has become more volumous and less specific to any relevant point recently?
Agreed Tracey the blogs getting more and more like an old boys club to beat up on anyone that they don’t agree with.
Pathetic really.
Actually i thought the comments were beginning to resemble commenters on WO and kiwiblog.
I dont agree with many things Pete posts but apart from ownering twice if he was being stupid or naive, I have tried not to stoop.
I do want to point out tinfoilhat that it is not just left commenters either. Srylands repeatedly accuses me of being drunk and others on the right get very abusive.
Yes I agree that there are many on the right that are just as bad.
And I’ve been guilty of some bad behaviour myself, i think we’d all be much better behaved towards each other if we met face to face rather than on the internet which does tend to lend itself to bullying and other bad behaviour at times.
This particular issue was particularly pertinent to Kiwiblog because there were extensive Bain /Karam discussions there with a lot of abuse and accusations and probably defamation. That’s why I posted there first and again on today’s General Debate. No reactionary abuse there and there’s been some sensible discussion on it.
After the usual few have calmed down addressing the issue rather than attacking the messenger seems to be taking over here. It’s an important issue for all who comment in social media.
One comment on KB from Nostalgia:
So what Pete?
On this board the history is different. Over here the history is of you clogging up threads with passive aggressive bullshit, and of you making weird arguments about what oppositions ought to able to talk about.
Yes, PG does have a habit of talking baloney and leading a discussion around in circles but that’s not a good enough excuse to attack someone without reading what they’re saying first. In this case it was a reasonable point.
The irony there Tracey is that PG commented on the wrong blog. As Karol pointed out, ts authors are already aware of what the legal situation is, and have been very clear on that. If PG wasn’t implying that this case has implications for ts, then he needs to learn how to communicate better.
i suspect he hasnt read the ploicy carefully or reaquainted himself with it. something many here are probably guilty of.
i am working on some stuff and not ignoring your other questions.
I doubt there is a single commenter here who has had the policy explained to him more often than Pete, often in great detail and with enormous patience.
He really has no excuse.
this is my point about his new role. he doesnt seem to read the right stuff before posting, like the actual court decision.
It’s the passive-aggressive thing that Pete does, Tracey. The cumulative body of work.
I’m quite sure that if you had commented first on this we would have had, when taken in the context of your previous comments, and also as a comment that stands alone a reasoned comment that doesn’t put in the judgments that Pete does.
+1 miravox.
Let’s not pretend that this is anything other than the fact that PG creates a whole bunch of distruption, and then decides that he has a right to continue doing so. And then he plays disingenuous.
It’s obvious here that I didn’t ‘create’ any disruption, rather there’s a few very familiar pseudonyms who chose to disrupt something that should be of interest to anyone using social media.
Typical ignore the issue and attack the messenger. It’s something that’s obviously supported here. And then trying to blame me for it is a common part of the game.
That’s right, it’s everyone else’s fault, nothing to do with your ongoing and historical behaviour.
Remind me again why you got banned last time, and what you were doing leading up to that ban?
Check it out. I was suggesting that some of the behaviour here was not a good look, and I was being attacked and abused for doing that. Same old.
Ah, now Pete the Martyr.
But nothing actually goes into defamation because the owners/moderators look for and remove that type of shit. It was well worth posting but now you’re getting into your usual BS.
Now now, pete was only warning folks here of an issue that they were already aware of. He’s a very helpful chap that way.
when did you post your commentary at whaleoil… the publisher there isprobably pretty susceptible
weka
Absolutely.
I’m not using a pseudonym, Pete, and I’m happy to agree with others that your contributions at The Standard are frequently disruptive and come across as very disingenuous. This is a case in point – you’ve high-handedly warned “[t]hose who think they are safe attacking and defaming online” when you have a lot of history of making rather nasty insinuations about others. This is an example:
http://yournz.org/2014/03/03/mathers-story-seems-odd/
Of course, everything you write is carefully vague, or couched as questions. So you ‘get away’ with basically stating in that post that the entire story about Mojo Mathers’ trip to Masterton was deliberately leaked by the Greens to the Herald in order to ‘sting’ the Taxpayers’ Union and smear the government. The whole conspiracy’s laid out there, including your snide comments about Green supporters expressing their contempt for the TU on Twitter.
It’s just as vicious and personal as anything which I’ve ever seen posted at The Standard, but as far as I can tell you think it doesn’t count as long as you can wring your hands and pretend to be distressed by the muckiness of politics.
“And then he plays disingenuous.”
You’re right – his pattern of commenting shows he’s just a stirrer, and he plays until he gets caught out not having researched the thing he’s talking about, has his own previous comments with a 180 deg different ‘opinion’ quoted back at him, or is proven comprehensively wrong. Then he just refuses to engage at all.
I understand Tracey’s frustration with people who are sick of PG, but jeez – any look back at his commenting will show he does have a pattern of passive aggressive pontificating and then running.
You know what he really doesn’t like? Following through to the logical conclusion of his statements.
It’s frequently awful and he has pretty much never thought it through himself.
I don’t think you would have couched your comment in such a way as to start a flame war, Tracey.
Once Fairfax settled it was obvious where the case was going. The remaining defendants were mad to continue it; I suspect a retraction and apology even at that late stage might have brought out some of Mr. Karam’s undoubted generosity.
agreed. Karam said exactly that. A retraction and apology in 2009 would have been enough.
What we do know George is no-one will be attacking your integrity round here right???,
That’s because of despite there being an exhaustive and ongoing search by everyone here we have yet to find it…
As greywarbler pointed out yesterday. It’s often better not to rise to the provocation, and feed the tit for tats.
But we are all anonymous aren’t we karol.
Aren’t we?
oh, except PG Tips and a few other loons
anonymity shouldnt be a shield from unlawful behaviour, which includes defaming people.
of course, just checking on whether the standard thinks we are anonymous or not …
Pseudonymous. It doesn’t think 😉
an anonymous pseudonymite perhaps?
“anonymous pseudonymite” sounds like something banned in Leviticus
snap 😆
understood
“anonymity shouldnt be a shield from unlawful behaviour, which includes defaming people.”
And it’s not. Pete’s comment is ridiculous in its suggestion. Commenting has nothing to do with it. It’s who does the publishing that is at issue.
karol
am appreciating your thoughtful comments on this thread, and responses within pete’s and other’s own posts.
and if a blogger or commenter defames someone who can afford to sue them. this is an important aspect pete cos bringing defamation proceedings is very expensive and most awards are below 50k.
Have you posted this on WhaleOil and KiwiBlog as well? Haven’t got time to look myself.
At Kiwiblog over an hour before here:
http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2014/04/general_debate_16_april_2014.html/comment-page-1#comment-1307574
Some comments there already that recognise the potential implications. And I’ll post again there in today’s General debate (it doesn’t start until 8 am).
Also (attracting immediate interest): http://yournz.org/2014/04/17/karam-defamation-case-a-warning-to-blogs/
Odd but perhaps not surprising that some here have taken this as a threat or somehow attacking The Standard. I think anyone commenting online should be aware of the risks.
It’s cowardly to make veiled threats and then deny them.
Cowardly but not at all surprising.
You would know.
Yep I’ve dealt with bullies before. Passive-aggressive dishonest cowardly ones like you are the worst.
Very funny Mr Brave.
🙄
Interesting responses to felix, he is one person who on at least two suggested people give you a chance at politicheck and has often taking people to task for suggesting someone else, anyone else, shouldn’t post here.
IMO Felix is one of the worst offenders at this site Tracey, just because he says he’s of the left doesn’t mean his bullying and defamation shouldn’t be called out.
wasn’t saying he should be immune to anything. show me where I said he ought to be? no one is immune from responses to their comments. Just cos you are on the right doesn’t mean you only have to comment on the behaviour of those on the left here. Yet you do so discriminate.
*shrug
Maybe you don’t know Pete like I know Pete.
You think you know or you say you know?
I’m not aware we’ve ever met. You’ve made claims that I think are a way off the mark. Either you don’t know me very well or you deliberately make shit up.
Another irony is passive aggressive accusations. Yes Tracey, I agree, there’s different felixes.
Not sure why you think i’m on the right Tracey unless you take the rather odd view of DtB that he Green party is centre right. 🙂
mickey accused me of leading a green attack on cunliffe yesterday. its all through the looking glass these past few days on here. I apologise for calling you as one on the right.
Couldnt agree more Tinfoilhat Felix is just an abusive ranting idiot, he may have said he would give Pete a chance but everytime Pete posts you can guarantee Felix is right behind with his crap along with that idiot OAB never any facts or reasoned and balanced arguements just swearing and throwing their toys out of the cot, it disruptive and boring for those that dont comment often but read often
“You think you know or you say you know?
I’m not aware we’ve ever met. “
You’re really not much good at interpreting teh english, Pete. Bit concerning, considering you’re the Factmaster General.
I’ve never said that the Green Party is centre right. I’ve said that about the Labour Party.
@ Mainlander “Couldn’t agree more Tinfoilhat Felix is just an abusive ranting idiot.”
Brighter, more enlightened and more compelling than you’ll ever be, my thoroughly pointless Tory chum.
If you think there are different felixes, Pete, why not just say so?
Instead you pretend Tracey said it. Why?
I don’t know how you got
” I agree, there’s different felixes.” from my comment that “he is one person who on at least two suggested people give you a chance at politicheck and has often taking people to task for suggesting someone else, anyone else, shouldn’t post here”
whaleoil commenters are probably most in need of the warning Pete.
So not on WhaleOil?
Probably the worst offending blog there is.
Has been one of the worst there but seems to have toned down, they’ve made an effort to do that. Wanting to be seen as a more serious site.
It was mentioned briefly there this morning there but wasn’t picked up on. I wanted to see if there was a post on it, they cover a of of relevant things but haven’t been pro-Karam what is not said and posted on can say as quite a bit sometimes. There’s plenty of time yet. You could do it if you wanted to see it there.
It doesn’t seem to have been mentioned at The Daily Blog either, it’s a lottery whether comments are allowed through there. Nor on other blogs. It would have been mentioned at Kiwiblog and here regardless of what I did. More general topics covered at the two more moderate political blogs.
Pete George can fuck off and take his veiled threats with him.
Pretty much this ^^
Pretty much this also
The truth is an absolute defence against libel, Petty George, you bland, banal, biased, passive-aggressive incompetent dishonest waste of oxygen.
Anyone employing you as a fact checker needs their head examined. Your continued employment in the role can only lead to the ridicule and contempt that attaches to you rubbing off on your employer and co-workers.
[karol: the “truth” still needs to be tested in court. The moderators here are very strong on not allowing potentially defamatory comments, where there is no public evidecne available as to whether the accusations are true or not. I’d suggest commenters don’t leep rising to the provocation – it leads to a flame war that, among other things, gets boring for other readers.]
Karol, I think this is something all blogs and participants in social media should be aware of. I know what The Standard policies are.
[karol: your intitial comment did come across as a veiled attack on posters and commenters on The Standard. The anonymity of bloggers had nothing at all to do with the Karam case you cited. It was a provocative statement to post here as starkly as you did. It’s bound to wind people up.]
…I think…
[citation needed]
I know what The Standard policies are … after being banned for breaching them. Fact.
“did come across as a veiled attack”
There’s commenters here who take all sorts of things as ‘veiled attacks’. Most of that is imagined or invented, often that seems to be an excuse for them to attack.
Irony abounds.
[karol: The TS policy states clearly that anonymity and legal risks are not allowed. Your comment pontificated as if people here did not know that. I jumped on it quickly hoping to prevent the predictable retaliations and flame war.]
@Karol, and one could hardly blame you.
I’ll confine myself to rolleyes from here on in.
OAB, how do we produce them again, my short term memory loss seems to have become permanent…
Put a colon at either end of “roll” 🙂
,roll, Tah OAB,(doesn’t want to work for me tho)..
colon not comma bad 😉
:rolleyes:
🙄
:rolleyes:
It ain’t working for me.
Anyway, I would roll my eyes if I could. We’ve gone from Mornings with Phil to Mornings with Pete!
lets try again………..
🙄
?
Lolz Rosie, i am just about ready to join the ‘bring back Phill campaign’…
Lolz Tracey, i ‘think’ i tried colon first but here goes again, ‘rolleyes’ ‘roll’ … :rolleyes:
Just the word “roll” with a colon at each end. You can do it! 😀
Edit: follow the link in my comment above for the whole list 😉
🙄 one last try…YES, i feel like a computer genius, Google this morning is definitely my friend,
Its roll with : befor the roll and : after the roll,(with no spacing)…
Yay!
Lolz OAB, my tech ‘savvy-ness’ has just increased this morning by 100%, my self taught computer use has the odd small gap in the teaching side of things…
took me 3 edits to get mine right!
Don’t fret Pete, as long as you don’t make demands on our politicians whether Left or Right to do something about climate change.
I don’t recall any Right Winger being called a Goebbels by the lprent for demanding that climate change become an election issue so you should be alright.
anyone who wants to read the decision, it is here.
https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/pdf/jdo/58/alfresco/service/api/node/content/workspace/SpacesStore/d2156730-d467-4a54-b8fe-b5d95dce9e3e/d2156730-d467-4a54-b8fe-b5d95dce9e3e.pdf
Am very interested in defamation myself and am considering taking an action. However the expected award is probably 10,000 to 30,000, with only scaled costs (about a third of the costs of a decent lawyer). So, like many who believe they have been defamed and their business and reputation hurt, I am in a position where taking the action will cost me, and I don’t have the money.
I am glad that karam stood up but I know he could afford to. us ordinary folks sometimes have to accept the appalling malice of others,a nd the damage it causes… until they do it to someone who can fight back.
And that really is why we need to have better legal aid.
I understand the need to weed out the vexacious litigants. Ms P Bright and many of her group would come into this category. BUT having a panel or a single judge (not able to hear the actual case) read the initial pracey, view supporting evidence, and decide if a prima facie case exists would be a start.
However, if you have a home and any equity, that’s where the attachment order comes in. When you sell your house, the LA group/crown get their money back.
PG: “Perhaps hose who think they are safe attacking and defaming online should have a good look at this case.””
A timely warning for the likes of WhaleOil and Kiwiblog who overindulge in such practices.
Yes, as has been pointed out this morning at Kiwiblog:
Here’s a PDF of the judgement.
when did you read the judgment?
lol – nice one Tracey
its just that having read it i was going to post the link in my post here. i was surprised pete hadnt.
It was a great comment because it encapsulated the issue i have with pete – his sanctimonious, holier than thou persona is not backed up with reality – I find that irritating.
I’m glad you read it – I may, although i’m not worried personally as I’m usually nice to people 🙂 at least to people i think might not be able to take it. Kia kaha.
I hear you marty.
I read it cos I have a legal background and at the moment a genuine personal interest in defamation law. I don’t expect most people to wade through a 60+ page judgment.
your kia kaha and plus 1.
Nothing to see here folks,there’s been the odd comment recently about the corrupting influence big Pharma could have on our medical ‘profession’ with news that staff employed by the DHB’s had reported $170,000 worth of ‘gifts from the drug manufacturers in a year,
Buried in the ‘Economics’ pages of today’s Herald Online version is a little story which states that one of these giant companies,(incidently the worlds biggest enabler of the manufacture of the drug P with its factory in China cranking 24/7 pumping out the main precursor substance used in the manufacture of the illegal drug), GlaxoSmithKline is under investigation in a number of countries for you guessed it ‘Corruption’,
China, Poland, Iraq, Jordan, and Lebanon are all apparently investigating the drug maker and in Poland the company is being investigated for allegedly ‘bribing’ doctors to prescribe the companies drugs,
There is no corruption in New Zealand tho right???, or is that simply because we refuse to look with private medical practice having no legal requirement to report all ‘gifts’ it receives from the drug manufacturers…
they will settle it so as to avoid being found guilty of anything….
While the mud flies at Key and Collins concerning the Oravida dinner, etc, I received a note from a friend in China which puts an important perspective:
‘ I’m aware there has been a lot of publicity about the trade with China, especially in the areas of dairy and meat products. One thing that could investigated a bit closer is: who owns the dairy and cattle farms who are sending so much produce to China? I think you will find they are owned by Chinese business-people. Also, at least one of the largest meat-works in NZ is owned by Chinese interests. So – the trade figures look good but where are the profits going? Don’t get me wrong – this is not anti-Chinese. We love the people here. Voters need to be made aware of the full picture, though. Why does NZ allow the sale of key assets? Australia doesn’t allow it; nor do many of our other major trading partners. When Key visited China and made such a big fuss about the show put on for him, he clearly lacked any knowledge of Chinese culture. What the Chinese Government was saying was: this is what we can do for you; what are you going to do for us? Being described as a good friend of China should also raise some concerns. In business here, if you are a good friend, you are expected to lower your price to the extent you are barely making a profit. I don’t think Key understands the cost of being a good friend. “
key only cares that they made HIM feel special.
He’s going to get a bit of a shock next year when the invitations are no longer forthcoming and he figures out that it was “THE PM OF NZ” that played golf with the President, and had tea with the Queen, and sang the national anthem with the All Blacks.
Plus 1
Interesting observation by your friend there Dan1.
Look at this looney …. all wired and dataed up to 700 gadgets …..
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/9950896/Personal-informatics-trends-tracked
what a laugh that is
gotta happen though that, like using lippie makes your lips stop producing their own lip protection, he will lose the ability to assess his environment, completely contrary to his stated aim.
foolish methinks, foolish
Pete George is a Troll who us threatening Standinastas. He is doing the dirty work of Legal High drug pushers, Chen Palmer and the Dunnes, Pere et fils.
Ban him, after telling him to go fuck himself.
”My Daddy was a bank robber but He never hurt no-body”, the tables appear to have turned, in what appears to be a ‘bank robbery’ the Reserve Bank recently raised the Official Cash Rate which in turn had the Trading Banks cranking up their interest rates,
Basing it’s decision on the ‘expected’ rate of inflation the Reserve Bank is said to be again raising the OCR in April and again in June/July, with every .25 rise in the Official Rate translating to an extra 20 bucks on interest paid for every $100,000 of debt,
Spurred on by the cheer-leading Trading Banks in what looks like a major exercise in profit gouging the Reserve Bank is said to be expected to raise the OCR again despite inflation being lower than expectations for the year coming in at an annual rate of 1.5%,
Given that the ‘expectation’,(from the Trading Banks),is that the rises in the OCR in April and June/July will again be .25 basis points each time this will result in an increase in interest payments weekly of $60 a week for every $100,000 of debt owed in the first 6 months of this year alone by individuals and business effectively kneecapping an economy nowhere near the 3% of inflation where the Reserve Bank could be expected to act,
Consumer information from the Consumer Price Index shows across the board from big ticket items, to clothing and food, prices are stable or falling, the exceptions being the 2.9% rise in retail electricity costs(again), and, a 10% rise in Government Taxation of tobacco products,(which makes all those lives ‘saved’,(snigger),by the upward trajectory in tobacco taxation,(when you consider the role this taxation has in inflation and the Reserve Bank’s response to this), an extremely costly exercise for everyone with an iota of debt,
The only winners in this little equation of raising interest rates off of the back of incorrect data, the Trading Banks who get a ‘free’ jump in profits and the Reserve Bank Governor’s ego who gets to be the ‘enabler’ of the trading banks ‘profit gouge’ and kill off any growth in the economy befor it occurs…
slylands will be along presently to tell you that you are
a. wrong
b. paying extra is a good thing, or the fault of those who bought houses
c. it’s not as bad as 2008 (which English banged on about yesterday to blame Labour and ignore the GFC and gouging financial institutions)
he may or may not discuss how landlords with mortgages will raise rentals.
last month the cost of poultry, meat, fruit and vegetables rose.
Ah it all depends on how and what you eat Tracey, poultry and meat are off my menu, as is butter and cheese,
i can get 3 meals out of a $7 Wharehou fillet, and,buying the fruit and vege at the weekend market has allowed me an extra ten(at least)in my pocket at the end of the week while the volume of fruit and vege has risen by at least 50%…
seafood not caught yourself in auckland… simple fish is v expensive. im glad you are finding ways. milk and cheese and nuts and bread went down.
before christmas coke was being sold at countdown . 8 1.5 ltr for $15. crazy shit
Depends how you look at fish Tracey, ,my $7 fillet turned into two hunks big enough to make two separate meals,(in tinfoil steamed in the juices along with a bed of finely chopped onion and a cap of sliced tomato, an optional squeeze of lemon juice or a dab of honey right in the middle of it to get the mind singing),
Plus a decent enough amount left for a bowl of raw fish saturated with lemon juice which along with the onions and tomatoes soaking in the coconut cream is a good meal,(tonight’s tea),
i can understand the ‘meat-eaters’ comparison tho, i used to ‘judge’ the price of fish against how much fish i could buy measured against how much beef or pork i could get for the same amount of coin,
Sure by volume you get more Pork and Beef for the bucks, but then, the ‘jam tart’ gets a load more bad fats for the sake of being economical…
Mmm, sounds delish.
If you can get a good price on shallots, I find they work better with fish than onions due the milder, almost sweet flavour.
That’s it, I’m going to stop at the fish markets on my way home tonight.
I do something similar, soy sauce, cubed hard tofu, chopped onions, finely chopped sweet peppers – leave to marinate for at least 30 mins.
Get a baking dish and place a couple of fish fillets (where the flesh will still hold together), tip the marinade on top of it, spinkle a few breadcrumbs and bake.
Serve with whatever seasonal veges you have on hand.
or grow chives
Hmm, chives have a much sharper flavour than shalotts.
I am lucky enough to have handed down from my grandmother a variety of multiplying leeks that are in size, somewhere between chives and spring onions, and are stronger in flavour than chives.
Fantastic for all sort of dishes, though I find them just a little too strong for scrambled eggs so I tend to go with parsley or garlic chives.
use fewer of them 😉
joking aside my chives last for month sand months and nothing seems to kill them… take up less space than shallots too
Ode to Money (and John Key)
hat tip owed to Lorde, of course.
Last night she received another award. And prizemoney. She said she doesn need the money as much as others and asked for the prizemoney to be divided amongst the nominees. In sport you constantly hear the refrain “who would turn down a money to break a contract”. In the business world you constantly hear about how |everyone” would do the same (low ethic) thing in that position.
Well done Lorde.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/music/9950870/Lorde-wins-Taite-award-for-Pure-Heroine
I’ve got many diamonds in the flesh
I cut my teeth on dollar dealing in the trade rooms
And I’m proud of my addresses,
Parnell and Hawaii, livin off dodgy dealins
Cos every speech is like I’m funny, safety’s loose, dyin in the workrooms
Blood stains, wages down, trashin’ all the unions,
We don’t care, we’re driving BMW’s on main streets.
But I just love Cristal, Maybach, diamonds on my timepiece.
Jet planes, islands, bodyguards on a gold leash.
I don’t care, I’m not caught up in your need for welfare.
And I wanna be royal (royals).
I can buy that strain of blood’
That kind of luxe is just for us.
I crave a celebrity sized buzz.
Cos I became your ruler (ruler),
You can call me Lord Key
And stoolies I’ll rule, I’ll rule, I’ll rule, I’ll rule.
Yea, I’m living that fantasy.
[Verse 2]
My friends and I—we’ve cracked the code.
We count our millions at the donor parties.
And everyone who knows us knows that we’re fine with this,
We do anything for money.
Cos every speech is like I’m funny, safety’s loose, dyin in the workrooms
Blood stains, wages down, trashin’ all the unions,
We don’t care, we’re driving BMW’s on main streets.
But I just love Cristal, Maybach, diamonds on your timepiece.
Jet planes, islands, bodyguards on a gold leash.
I don’t care, I’m not caught up in your need for welfare.
And I wanna be royal (royals).
I can buy that strain of blood’
That kind of luxe is just for us.
I crave a celebrity siezed buzz.
Cos I became your ruler (ruler),
You can call me Lord Key
And stoolies I’ll rule, I’ll rule, I’ll rule, I’ll rule.
Yea, I’m living that fantasy.
Ooh ooh oh
I’m bigger than I ever dreamed,
And I’m in love with being Lord.
Ooh ooh oh
Life is great without a care
I’m not caught up in your need for welfare.
And I wanna be royal (royals).
I can buy that strain of blood’
That kind of luxe is just for us.
I crave a celebrity siezed buzz.
Cos I became your ruler (ruler),
You can call me Lord Key
And stoolies I’ll rule, I’ll rule, I’ll rule, I’ll rule.
Yea, I’m living that fantasy.
This needs to be set to music with the backing video of Key wining and dining and living it up with the Royals.
Brought here by Key in election year to epitomise the principal of a glittering born to rule elite, that Key seeks to stamp on the consciousness of this country.
Yup, and don’t forget his hollywood friends… he does like to celebrity it up
Speaking of Odes
Where is our Philip Ure?!…..come in Philip Ure and your Vegan Sausage(s)….we miss you ( that is everyone except bad12 and he does not count)
…we miss you odes and witticisms…stop sulkiing!
Agreed Chooky, I know many don’t like Phillip’s writing style but having met him once in person I can say he is a lovely guy and I miss his musings.
I miss Phil too. Seems even Bad does. I think it is the healthy diet turning Bad into a nice guy, we may have to call him Sweet12 soon. He just needs to drop the fish, too much mercury or it will be Mad12!
Ffffing Mad is an epithet often attached to me round here,(i think there is some documentation in the box under the sink that somewhat supports this allegation, although of the 3 ‘doctors involved there appears to be an inability to reach a consensus)
Mad/bad12 as a handle might have been confusing for those logging on to the Standard in the morning,(especially me, its hard enough coping with being a million different people from one day to the next without having to ascertain my ‘mental’ state every morning, so best stick to bad),
Miss Phill, nah not a bit,(that might provoke his return), in relation to Phill V PG, well yeah Phill was way more fun,(my idea of fun tho having to be tempered against expectations of being caned),
i have it in my mind that i will have to greet Phill’s BS with either ignorance or 🙄 to avoid having myself ‘going down in flames’ upon his return, but, probably wont be able to resist…
Heh, Heh, Heh, certainly ‘counted’ in that little ‘contest of ideas’, Phill only brought one to the debate, idea that is, it encapsulated my impression of the sum total of His intellect and as far as ideas go simply added a No…
Final electoral boundaries are due to be announced today. I am interested in the result as my home is about 50 metres away from the edge of the draft New Lynn electorate boundary and if it moves towards me then John Key may become my local MP …
You can make appointments with his office and see who actually turns up.
Due to golfing and drinking considerations this office no longer takes appointments, however Mr Key is always happy to speak with his constituents, hear their concerns, and help where he can. To arrange a meeting, please approach either Antione’s Restaurant or The Northern Club with a minimum of $5000 in cash.
mr key is unavailable today, unless thats you Wills?
Lucky you!
could be worse, you could be in the 3 legged pig with lipstick electorates of Oahariu and Epsom
My Mum and Dad aren’t to happy about to electoral boundaries too, they live in a part of Hei Hei that could be a tory seat by tonight and they have in touch with Mike Mora (He and merry bunch are trying to stop the change) to stay in a Labour held electoral seat where their 2 votes will count.
The drought has broken, (this time).
Drought: ‘The impact is huge’
Drought: Rain still on track for weekend
“through an act of God. ”
Yup, he will be voting for the climate change deniers again… and asking all of us to subsidise his union members because he thinks his invisible friend in the sky is responsible.
PS I know Act of God is an insurance/legal term, but he is still deliberately framing his comment this way. ie climate change denier and farmers don’t choose where to farm, what to farm, or to stay farming.
Officially only ACT and the Conservatives deny the reality of human induced climate change
DROUGHT GREAT TIME TO SHOW SOME COMPASSION
I don’t think Bruce Wills and the Feds are climate change deniers, and so are unlikely to vote for ACT or the Conservatives. Like the “cooperatives”, (Fonterra?) the Fed and Wills are ignorers.
In this area there is a lot more electoral choice.
In fact there is a whole vipers nest of climate change ignorers, right across the political spectrum it’s a much bigger field with lots to choose from.
The snakes that ate the elephant in the room
you dont think a chunk of acts low polling is farmers?
nationals actions and inactions speak volumes on their attitude to climate implications and the environment.
john key reminds me of slampacker from the stark novel by ben elton… buying his way to a new home on the moon once hes shat all over earth.
Meanwhile back in the jungle, it appears that the recent trip to China by Slippery the Prime Minister to sort out ‘trust’ issues over the Fonterror false positive whey scare worked so damn well that Fonterror’s whey products are still banned from that country,
Quoted on RadioNZ National news this afternoon the PM claims that there is no ban in place the Fonterror whey products are ”just not allowed into China as the Chinese await a New Zealand Government report on the original ‘contamination”,
i have the impression that inside the mind of our Prime Minister is a cracked CD firmly stuck on BULLSHIT which forces Him to find novel definitions for everything…
not banned but not allowed in…
jeshus!!
oh my 🙂
http://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/auckland/news/nbbus/266137544-oravida-expanding-into-gold-mining-
Conflicts anyone? No ,no?
nothing to see here
Heard about the Oravida expansion into gold mining in NZ on Radio Active this morning, on the regular Thursday morning slot with Redbird, Alistair Thompson and Grant Robertson. Just when you thought it couldn’t get any worse……….!
Thompson’s view was that APN and Fairfax haven’t covered the Collins/Oravida saga consistently due to the lack of investigative journalism and that there is much more to uncover. He did suggest however that the story may have reached a tipping point and the MSM would have to start paying more attention. He also suggested that despite Key’s complicity in the saga that it’s possible that her position as Minister may be untenable……
Sorry, no link to that interview.
Thanks Rosie for that info. Much appreciated.
judith can hear the jug boiling from her office
“People commenting anonymously may think they are immune from defamation but that could be put to the test legally.”
Leaving aside the fatuousness of how that comment has been phrased, it’s point is actually wrong. The people that got sued were the people that published the defamation, not that people that made comments ie the website owners and Fairfax. It’s an important distinction.
this is why people need to read the decision before posting it. the decision has all anyone need know. the media will have relied on a press release. I read the decision before coming here to post about it.
its this part of petes posting that bothers me about his new position at politicheck. editor has a skill set and it is disrespectful to those who have these skills and experience to say you can just become one. like slater and the truth.
Haven’t had time to look at the decision. Were commenters mentioned at all? I’m curious at what level FB was accountable. Was FB approached to remove comments?
Agreed about PG/politicheck. That he won’t take feedback about this or his behaviour also is a concern.
+1 and what does it say about politicheck that such a partisan wannabe polly can get such a gig.
PG is part of that CT architected media landscape with a probable mandate to produce as much inconsequential waffle as his copy/paste allows across blogland.
“The people that got sued were the people that published the defamation, not that people that made comments ie the website owners and Fairfax. It’s an important distinction.”
Purkiss was judged against for making comments only.
Although I understand Mr Purkiss was also an administrator, along with Kevin James. One of Kevin’s statements was found to be defamatory but he didn’t get sued.
Parker for both commenting and publishing.
No, one was sued as a publisher the other as an author. I should add, that some of the defamatory statements were written by named people, and they were not sued.
Below she succinctly outlines the status of publisher for the purposes of the law (and her decision) and refers to Wishart, (which can be found here http://www.buddlefindlay.com/static/Wishart_v_Murray.pdf (46 pages))
In my decision in Wishart v Murray & Ors I traced the history of US, UK and
Australian decisions that considered publication via Facebook I concluded that the status of publisher in an internet context depended upon editorial control rather than actual knowledge of the existence of defamatory material. A Facebook page is to be regarded as similar to a noticeboard.
[13]I concluded in Wishart that those who host Facebook pages or similar sites
are to be regarded as publishers of postings made by others in two circumstances.
The first is if they know of the defamatory material and do not remove it within a
reasonable time in circumstances that give rise to an inference that they are taking
responsibility for it. The second is where they do not know of the defamatory
statement but ought, in the circumstances, to know that material being posted is
likely to be defamatory.”
Bagelo v Smith seems to traverse the kind of “cut and thrust” commenting that people make here, WO and KB, to name only a few. Courtenay does, imo, send a warning to people who post, namely, that they are not protected from the law of defamation. I suspect she is saying between the lines, that because people are not being sued on a daily basis doesn’t mean they are not defaming people. For example a comment by Kevin James was found to be defamatory, with parker being held responsible as publisher, but James himself was not sued.
part of the reason for this is that people sue the ones with money (hence fairfax or trademe get sued) and I hope, for karam’s sake, the settlements with them covered his legal costs, permitting him to sue the other two on principle. Without knowing anything about either defendant, I wonder if either can afford to pay out? One made no appearance and the other defended himself.
“Baglow v Smith which distinguished internet fora and blogs from other forms of publication.
This distinction was made on the basis that the context of an ongoing debate would reduce the sting of the defamatory comments as sharp and witty replies are seen merely as part of the ‘parry and thrust’ of the debaters.
[29]
However, there is no principled basis on which internet fora and blogs
should attract a different test for what constitutes a defamatory statement.
There may well be a degree of casualness associated with contributions to online conversations
. In this regard they might be likened to talkback radio. However, the capacity for harm
resulting from the permanent nature of posts means that those posting statements
should not be relieved of the usual constraints imposed at law.”
Her honour usefully goes three each alleged defamatory statement and explains why they are or are not defamatory. Not all were found to be defamatory. It makes useful reading to help understand the distinction.
“No, one was sued as a publisher the other as an author.”
Parker “sued Mr Parker in respect of comments that Mr Parker himself posted on these sites and also as the publisher”:
Purkiss “only in respect of comments”:
yes, Pete, I know that. Thanks for fact checking me.
when did you read the decision pete
I’ve read parts of it since mid-morning-ish but as I’ve already said I need time over Easter to read it properly. Someone I know advised they had a copy before 7 but I didn’t have the time nor need to get one off them then, I knew it would become available soon enough. I’ve also seen useful comments on it, including from lawyers. And I’m sure there’ll be a lot more to be added to the discussion.
Blogs are for initiating discussion aren’t they?
🙄
but you felt you could post warningss based on something you hadnt read.
i didnt see your comment about needing time to read it over easter, so i reread your opening post
you dont have to wait for lawyer friends, you can google seach judicial decisions online nz, put in karam and bingo.
a new tool for your fax checking armoury.
i thought you wanted to make change, but posting before reading the crucial favts, when they are available to you, not linking to that document and purporting to give advice on it, isnt really what you are trying to achieve are you?
I haven’t read the full file. However, my understanding is that the “cut and thrust” that happens on the Standard is not defamation.
This is what Karam is stated as being unhappy with at the beginning of the case file:
I think the discussion here has been confusing ad hominems and general personal abuse of the “you’re a dickhead” kind (basically an opinion), with defamation (something far more specific and stated as fact without any evidence supporting it). A certain amount of abuse is accepted on TS as part of the “robust debate”. Defamation is deleted as soon as, because the trustees of the site regard themselves as being the ones who would be taken to court over it.
So something more general stating someone lacked integrity would be allowed. But something like that quoted above (allegations that Karam “had defrauded the Legal Services Agency”), is getting far more specific and could be supported or not by evidence – without evidence, it could be judged as defamation.
On TS, it’s more usually “pointlesss” abuse that gets moderated, especially if it looks like tr0lling or a deliberate thread derail. But other abuse is often left unmoderated.
Defamation in the US also takes into account a person’s public reputation, and whether that has been damaged. A well known person is more likely to be able to prove defamation than a non-entity. ie they need to show their reputation has been publicly damaged.
In Karam’s case, the complaint was that there had been a concerted attempt to damage his reputation over time. So the general “cut and thrust” on blogs where people abuse each other, probably wouldn’t count.
the comment must lower the persons reputation in the eyes of an ordinary person. that is a very nutshell version of one of the main tests.
hence calling a politician a liar is hard to prove as defamation because politicians are frequently described in surveys and polls and by the public as untrustworthy.
it is wrong to think only public figures or people known to the public can be defamed.
Agreed. Good eg about politicians. I was just thinking why MPs don’t usually pursue defamation – eg Cunliffe could claim Gower had defamed him in repeatedly stating that Cunliffe had attempted a leadership coup. Generally, there is a fair amount of leeway.
it is wrong to think only public figures or people known to the public can be defamed.
I didn’t say that. I said, it’s more likely. But context is very important, I think.
But, if a non-entity felt they had their work reputation defamed, they’d be more likely to take out a complaint.
i think, with respect, you might be confusing being able to sue for defamation and being defamed. most people simply cant afford to sue to redress the damage done to them or their business. public figures tend to have easier access to funds or pro bono lawyers.
i agree entirely, context of a statement is crucial.
i hope you get time to read the decision, and the wishart ruling. i think you will enjoy the analysis of the statements.
at my first law firm patricia courtenayhad just been appointed a partner. an incredibly earnest and intelligent lawyer who cut her teeth on insurance law. i always enjoy reading her decisions even if i dont agree with every point.
Oh, I imagine if it was some smear against a business person they would want to sue for defamation, whether or not they could afford it.
But I was thinking most non-entities don’t have widespread enough reputation to be damaged. And if something was said/publicised about such people, it would mean little to most of the public – unless it was something extremely sensational,
Most people in the public eye don’t sue people for every single public smear or criticism. Someone with a lot of social capital would probably have the power to refute the allegations without having to take it to court.
I note (in the NZ Herald article) in awarding costs for damages to reputation, the judge took into account Karam’s previous good reputation in various realms of activity – ones that would give him a fair amount of standing in certain sections of the community/public sphere:
PS, I’ll read the judgement another day. I’m still recovering from being battered by an extremely strong and wet gale this morning – a total drenching, after a drive though some pretty treacherous conditions.
The flowerbeds and duckponds of Auckland’s Domain look innocently picturesque – but they tell a strange story about imperialism and war: http://readingthemaps.blogspot.co.nz/2014/04/gardening-and-imperialism.html
Karol/Lyn
Has The Standard been contacted by Chen Palmer in the past 36 hours?
What a disaster. Govt debt is 60 billion under Key. And now English wants to claim a surplus!
How corrupt is that, its the false belief that cutting taxes would increase govt revenue, that
ideological nonsense of the right, that has cause this disastrous fiscal mess.
yup, the debt that is defended by saying “it would have been higher under labour”… hard to prove or disprove that, which is not the same as it being true.
Can’t have a surplus until the borrowings are paid back. Probably need to have that written into Law.
Just a helpful hint for the Standardistas.
When reading Pete George, I find it best to think of him as a backwater tram conductor who aspires to one day be like Stephen Franks.
Then you’ll just chortle and ignore him.
Where is Lynne….been quiet for afew days/
Rushing to get a build finished before easter. Work sometimes gets in the way of blogging
Something that might bring a smile to you lefties:
http://imperatorfish.com/2014/04/15/a-statement-from-david-cunliffe/
and just to let you know its not that bad:
http://imperatorfish.com/2014/04/02/chin-up/
-David Bennett MP, NZ National Party.
And all the Natz are living up to that promise!!
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/9951066/Adviser-steps-forward-in-defence-of-Collins
Well there we go
😆
Means nothing, if the purpose of the dinner was to impress upon a Chinese border official that Oravida is a very important company that owns its own Minister of
CorruptionJustice, why on Earth would they need to be overt about it? Her presence would be enough.Just as John Key promotes Oravida when they pay him to model for them, just as Dan Carter promotes that shampoo by walking past a camera with his hand on his head: nothing need be said.
a private dinnerwith friends, but the advisor says it was short cos people there didnt speak the same language. so collins is friends with people who she doesnt understand and dont understand her?
the advisor doesnt say that border control issues werent discussed…
so to summarise collins private dinner with friends included an employee and at least one person she couldnt speak with due to language differences.
What was her adviser doing at a private dinner with close personal friends, and their close personal friends?
having dinner ?
Quite! I ask because the dinner was either private, or official, but surely not both. Does Margaret Malcolm accompany Judith Collins to all private dinner engagements? What about the movies?
Heather Simpson attended quite a few things with Helen Clark – people often develop close friendships with the people they rely on. Yes, it does look bad, but not so bad it couldn’t be perfectly innocent. Way too much confirmation bias here.
Not looking good chaps
Latest Roy Morgan
National 48.5% (+5.5%)
Labour 28.5% (-3.5%)
Greens 11.5% (-1.5%)
NZFirst 5.5% (no change)
Conservatives 2% (-0.5)
Maori Party 1% (-0.5)
Mana 1% (+.5)
Internet Party 1% (+0.5)
Act 0.5% (no change)
Other 0.5%
Keep up the Orivida attack, it’s such a winning strategy.
Idiots.
Meh I don’t think much has really changed.
The only thing that surprises me is that there is 1% and 2% of people dumb enough to say Internet party and conservative party respectively although perhaps like the 0.5% saying ACT they are just taking the piss out of Roy Morgan.
Labour dropping significantly into the 20% zone ain’t good.
I’m predicting it to go quite a bit lower.
Oh there’s no doubt that Labour’s in tatters and that the hope they had in Cunliffe was seriously misplaced. I think the Greens will do quite well at this election as people who can’t stand the Nats see them as a better option than labour.
What will be interesting is to see who the Nats try and stitch up a deal with as Winston first is a bit like one of those vampires that you can’t seem to kill even with a stake through the heart.
It will also be interesting to see whether the Nats really have jumped 5% in two weeks – apparently at Lab/Greens’ expense – whether the increase in Mana and the IP’s support continues, or whether the whole poll is a bit of an outlier.
A Royal blip, I’d say.
In relation to National’s support it looks like they’re just back to where they were in late Feb/early March (48 & 48.5).
Just had a look at Roy Morgan specifically. In 2012 National averaged 45.5% in all RM polls, 44.4% in 2013 and so far this year it’s 46.3%.
They will be comfortable where they’re at.
What did they average in 2011?
Ha, now that has made my day.
But but but the trend is looking upwards according to Mickey Comical ali savage so its nothing to worry about
[Snip – free speech is wasted on some people. BTW I only said that I hopelessly partisan – MS]
Hey now cut that out, he says Cunliffe doesn’t want just yes men in his team so that proves hes no fanboi 🙂
http://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-14112011/#comment-400632 (self admitted partisan hack)\
[And? I agree I said that I was hopelessly partisan. I have never described myself in the other term you used – MS]
I’d doubt this has much to do with the Collins/Oravida scandal and Labour’s pursuit of it. I’d hazard a guess that this poll is a reflection of voters dislike for disagreements between Labour and the Greens over whether or not to outline potential coalition arrangements in the lead up to campaigning.
So you think Labour dropped because they won’t commit to the greens and this is voters punishing them for not making that obvious choice?
No I think it’s voters expressing their displeasure at public disagreement between Labour and the Greens over campaign strategy. For what it’s worth my preferred outcome for the General Election is a Coalition Government comprised of Labour and the Greens plus maybe Mana. But I think the Greens tactic of trying to shoehorn Labour into that position before the election was a mistake and this poll, I think, bears that out. By the way BM have you seen today’s ODT editorial? The one that calls on Key to sack Collins? It’s saying something, don’t you think when one of the conservative daily broadsheets calls for a Cabinet Minister’s sacking?
don’t forget the royal visit 🙂
How could I forget McFlock, I got about as close to them as possible while they were here in Queenstown and to be honest, like everybody else (it seems), my anti-monarchist sentiments melted away like ice in the Sahara. She’s that bloody lovely.
A similar tactic is used to sell sports cars to midlife-crisis males 🙂
Likewise, that story only broke on 9 April and the poll started on 31 March so I don’t think the Labour/Green thing has yet impacted on any published polls.
Also, I doubt any newspaper editorial counts for anything. Sadly, people don’t read them, except for political tragics like all of us here.
Presuming it is valid, and RM does bounce around, it seems that the Royal Tour has had the desired effect …
Roy Morgan call cellphones and therefore doesn’t have that anti-Labour / pro-National “landline bias” we hear so much about.
So Matthew do you think the royal tour has had an effect? Anne’s cartoon (linked below) sums things up!
Maybe some effect but certainly not all of it.
Polling was carried out from March 31 to April 14, presumably with most calls completed in the first week – seehttp://www.roymorgan.com/findings/5549-new-zealand-voting-intention-april-17-2014-201404170455 (The second week is usually spent doing call backs if they use the same methodology that other polling companies use.)
The royal tour started on 7 April and the cute Plunket thing wasn’t until 9 April – see http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/prince-william-kate-middletons-itinerary-3206058
Yep,Cunliffe dorky comment about not getting enough face time with the royals no doubt contributed to the poor poll result.
No, that happened after most of the polling was completed.
So it was just Cunliffes natural drag factor?
You’ve been around a while, how would you rate Cunnliffe, Bob Jones said he’s never heard a politician talk so much shit, would you agree?
Put it this way, I think that by now, David Shearer, despite all his faults, would be regarded as the incoming PM and John Key seen as a two-termer. Labour made a terrible mistake going for David Cunliffe.
🙄
Why do you think David Shearer would have beaten John Key?
He doesn’t, he thinks if Shearer was still there then National would definitely be in next term. As it is, Labour could lead the next government.
Please ignore, Micky.
Hamish (above) – because he was focussing on the median voter and also came across as an “ordinary kiwi bloke” but one with a social conscience and a background in working for the most disadvantaged people in the world, at personal risk to himself.
But he stammered in front of the cameras. Don’t you think that John Key would have easily beaten him in a debate?
Hamish, please ignore the bait.
You have better things to do with your time.
Yes, but the expectations would have been so low, the MSM would have called it a “draw”.
Plus, you have to consider that Cunliffe will also be a disaster in the debates, but the MSM expectations for him are much higher.
How does the MSM’s take on it come into it?
Hey Matthew I am brimming with ideas about who should be the next National Party leader and I really want to share them with the right wing. Judith Collins has to be your next leader. No ifs no buts she will lead National to a fifth term. After her I think you should go with either Kanwaljit Bakshi or Paul Goldsmith. Both of these candidates would be excellent leaders and would respect National’s traditions.
And by the way I would get rid of John Key as soon as possible. He is obviously a closet socialist and I expect that he will start the socialisation of the means of production any time now …
I know you jest but he does run a left wing, progressive government. That is why he is popular.
And I hope Judith Collins is the next leader. However it is looking increasingly likely that National will get a third and fourth term. So the next New Zealand Prime Minister may not currently be a member of Parliament.
Key runs a progressive left wing government? If that is where he occupies the political spectrum the world is doomed …
Micky, please ignore these people.They are not interested in debating with you.
They merely want to waste your energy on nonsense and they enjoy making provocative comments to get a reaction.
Paul, some of us really don’t have better things to do with our time and are quite aware of what the motives are of the people we are engaging with. Call it doing it for shits and giggles if you like.
It makes for very dull reading on this blog and it gives those people a sense of importance.
In your opinion.
Anyway…
Have you considered writing a guest post for TS?
Paul, what is your end game with this campaign of non-engagement?
How do you imagine the blog will be better to read if it is just wall-to-wall right wing propaganda?
Or do you suffer from the delusion that these people will stop posting if they don’t get a response?
silence means assent to those types and they never shut up plus i can’t stand reading their bullshit cascades where 2 or 3 of them comment to each other – no, much better to slam dunk them (just about) every time and I appreciate those who enjoy doing that and take the time to. If it becomes excessive – just scroll on by.
Yes and in today’s world Labour voters are too busy making ends meet to shoot the breeze of an afternoon with a pollster.
The Royal Effect
Edit: Oh #^*% – off Matthew. You’re like a school kid with a lollypop sometimes.
Ignore him. You have better things to do with your time.
His job is to spin for right wing interests. His job is a create a narrative or meme ; by discussing it with hIm, you amplify it. The MSM will repeat his words and publicise his views anyway.
He is not interested in genuine debate. As a paid opinion maker for the right, he is only here to divert, distract and disrupt.
😉
And just to piss off the drivers:
It seems that less and less people are supporting speeding.
I don’t support speeding but i’d like to see an increase in the limit in certain areas (SH1 between Oamaru and Christchurch in particular) + an increase in overtaking lanes
Agree, I’d like to see the speed limit raised to 120kph in certain areas.
100kph speed limit in modern vehicles is just ridiculous.
you passed your drivers test??
Why’s that?
i shudder to think of you or puckish behind the wheel of a car, at any speed let alone 120.
watching people on the roads today was an advertisement for public transport.
BM is a bus driver
Please ignore these people.
i know paul, you have sagely advised me before…
Actually, anything above 80km/h is ridiculous as it exponentially increases fuel consumption.
We really should be developing transport that runs on our own poo.
bm and puckish would have an endless free supply
@DTB+100…the slower you go the more fuel you conserve….i once drove in the snow/ice between Chch and Arthurs Pass and back again on one tank and one chain ….a lot of the time it was at a crawl no faster than a horse …5-10 k/hr ….but i passed about 40 vehicles that had skidded off the ice road and I got home
….the lesson i learned was that it is possible to go a very very long way on very little fuel if you drive very very slowly…..no faster than a trotting/walking horse and coach…..so there is hope yet…..when the fuel crisis bites we wont have to jump on a horse or donkey as our ancestors did ….just learn to drive very very slowly…like Granny or Grandad….safer too…and better for your health
It’s the roads that are the problem. They are for the most part not modern.
nonsense…the problem is in people’s heads…like yours
The only nonsense around here…is your…posts. I stand by my comment that most NZ roads are not good enough to warrant a speed limit of 120km/hr. Cars are safer, yes, but our roads are not.
You’re probably right about that. The big problem though is that speeds over 80km/h aren’t rational as it uses up more resources.
Yes I think I know you. Do you drive a smoky Mazda Familia with “No Fracking” stickers on the rear bumper?
Trying to guess who I am is against site policy.
Please ignore him. You have better things to do with your time.
@ Weepu’s Beard …. i still think what you say is nonsense ..why go 120km/hr?….no point…if you want to be a racing car driver join a racing club and get on the track …or join a rally car club…or go and live in Germany
……i have seen plenty of people drive past me at 120km/hr only to have me catch up at the next major intersection or lights….. and really speeding does not save much time in NZ, the distances for speed are too short
( btw i used drive my Peugeot at 120 km/hr on occasion on the motorway until i suspected cops were watching for me and my partner got on to me about fuel waste….
Speed Kills even on the autobahns
http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2013/may/13/speed-limits-reduce-number-road-deaths
@ Weepu’s Beard ..re “most NZ roads are not good enough to warrant a speed limit of 120km/hr. Cars are safer, yes, but our roads are not”….
Our young German visitors from Berlin after travelling around NZ for six months think our New Zealand roads are very good and there is no need to speed here
….They say that in Germany ( with a population of 80 million) there is a movement to put in place speed restrictions because of Co2 emissions.
They do not like using the autobahns because they are too fast/ dangerous and not relaxing ….and the difference in time ( saving about 15 minutes) if you go 160km/hr as opposed to 120 km/hr is not worth the effort
They say Germany has a very good public transport rail system and this is the way New Zealand should go…put the motorway money into cheap affordable Public Transport.
Hopefully over the next 30 years we can invest in better roads so we can have higher speed limits. A motorway from Wellington to Auckland for a start.
Labour and the Left should invest in Public Transport and axe the hugely expensive motorways which no one wants except NACT property developers and their mates who would like to privatise the roads for tolls and further marginalise and exclude the ordinary NZer from free travel
The money should be put into State education , Public Health hospitals , reduced Retirement age to 65, cleaning up the rivers and lakes , Research and Development, support for technology startups and entrepreneurial business development
Shows the Righties are getting very concerned about the issue of motorways under a Cunliffe led coalition government imo
you can use your genesis dividends and start building them yourself
I wish they’d keep to one speed tolerance level and not do these special holiday period deals. I tend to continue to work (part time) through holiday persiods, and forget when traveling to and from work that there’s been a change of approach.
Very quiet out there today. Down to running two webservers, something that usually only happens in the middle of the night after the backups are done.
Easter break early eh?
our rightwingers all get extra days around public holidays 😉
Nah, we are put off by the return of Pete George.
Probably power problems, ours was off for 7 hours on the North Shore!
Internet was down in West Auckland for the entire morning and into the afternoon. Came back on around 14:00
Urggh.
It was a freaking nightmare on the motorway this morning – rain, gales, and early holiday traffic heading for the hills.
possibly related to the panic-buying queues in the supermarket this evening.
Apparently one day without supermarkets is a cause for stocking up.
New electorate boundaries out. I’ve shifted in to Kelston as expected.
Thanks Drax.
Was Kelston previously part of the Waitakere electorate, and what will the changes mean for Kelston?
I see our electorate of Ohariu has taken on Wadestown as had been suggested. Come on down from those swanky hills Pinot Noir socialists and vote Dunne out!
(PS, saw your reply on yesterdays Open Mike re the you- know -who commenters. Thats an understandable view you have – I just don’t think those who you are replying to are big on logic and evidence. Cognitive dissonance seems to be more their thing. Agree that clarification may be helpful for the silent readers)
fascinating how quickly bennett abandoned the west
There was a good article about politicians not being from the electorate that they represent a few days ago on the Guardian. Paula Bennett is one of those parachuted politicians – going to where the grass is greener, where they’re more likely to be voted in.
bennett is from taupo and schooled there but a “westie”
bridges is from auckland and educated there but describes himself as a “tauranga boy”
knowing how it will be heard by their electorates
The new Kelston electorate has parts from New Lynn (Where I was previously), Waitakere and a part of Te Atatu – if I’m reading the map right.
And I really don’t know what that’s going to mean. I have a feeling that it’s probably going to be good for the people here especially if we get a left MP. I’d prefer Greens or Mana or even Alliance but we’ll probably get Labour.
Ta Drax. All the best for a Left win for Kelston.
I have a bit of a soft spot for West Akld from the days when I used to visit my friends out west who were of Dalmatian descent. I never forget their their amazing hospitality. I got the feeling that people were more on the level in the West and it didn’t feel like the natural home of Blue to me – I hope it turns shades of red, green and red/black on 20th September, enough to kick out that faux westie, as Tracey points out, comes from Taupo anyway.
If its Carmel Sepuloni then you should be right. She’s impressive in every way.
I’m in Kelston, too. It goes as far as Sunnyvale, near Henderson, and out onto the North Western – anyone living on the causeway is in Kelston. And includes part of Titirangi.
I was previously in New Lynn.
I’m still in New Lynn … just. Mind you John Key is going to find out that campaigning in the Waitakere Ranges is not a pleasant experience. Too many of the talented educated people there have far too much concern for the environment.
what makes you think he will go there at all?
He would be well advised to steer clear!
Did he ever visit the existing Helensville electorate?
Lols. Seen this?
http://www.greenpeace.org/new-zealand/en/take-action/Take-action-online/sack-simon-bridges/?utm_source=scoop&utm_medium=banner&utm_term=sacksimon&utm_campaign=sacksimon
Sorry about the massively long link. Haven’t mastered writing over a link yet. Have only just mastered rolly eyes, today!
Anyway, no harm in trying eh? Over 17,300 signatures already.
thanks rosie
i started my letter by asking the pm if he can confirm that mr bridges reads documents before he signs them off.
Excellent Tracey 😀
ttp://www.nbr.co.nz/article/opposition-damages-public-morality-oravida-claims-dc-154962
(My comment – yet to be published)
Yes – note the difference between the NSW situation, where the Premier has resigned because he misled the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption.
NSW has an Independent Commission Against Corruption – New Zealand does not.
High time we did – because – in my considered opinion, New Zealand is rotten with corruption, and our ‘perceived status’ as the ‘least corrupt country in the world’ is nothing more than a sick joke.
http://cpi.transparency.org/cpi2013/results/
Please be reminded that on the watch of Minister of Justice Judith Collins – New Zealand STILL has not yet ratified the UN Convention Against Corruption.
Has she even read it?
It would appear that she has not.
Have these mysterious ‘Cabinet officials’ who purportedly give advice on corrupt ‘conflicts of interest’- read it?
It would appear that they have not.
Here – read it for yourselves – and ask how can it be possible for the ‘least corrupt country in the world’ to have not yet ratified the UN Convention Against Corruption?
http://www.unodc.org/documents/treaties/UNCAC/Publications/Convention/08-50026_E.pdf
What a CROCK.
Penny Bright
+100 Penny
What’s going on with Labour and welfare fraud? Last month in an interview:
Today:
Would Labour scrap legislation they’ve just voted for?
Labour Pains
Your fact-checking still needs work.
Isn’t that the same thing that PG quoted?
Yeah, multi-tasking not working.
Sorry PG.
OK. Sue Moroney explains in her speech, why Labour decided to support the Bill. It has to do with submissions to the select committee by many women who felt they were unfairly being left to carry the penalty for relationship fraud. As I understand it, the women’s complaint was, when a woman fraudulently claimed she was a single parent/woman, the partner was complicit in the fraud, and should be penalised as well as the woman.
Sue Moroney’s speech is here in a video. She also slams National’s beneficiary bashing, especially in a time of high unemployment. She also says tax fraud should be dealt with harshly.
Well, vote for it and own then, even if there are bigger priorities.
Saying you’ll scrap it once in power, at the same time as supporting it in the House, just makes Labour MPs look like prevaricating prats.
What it really shows is that the right is still firmly in control of caucus. There are other remedies for the scenario outlined in submissions.
Yes. I don’t agree with Labour on this, and am happy to see that Mana and the Greems didn’t support it.
Saying you’ll scrap it once in power, at the same time as supporting it in the House, just makes Labour MPs look like prevaricating prats.
Although, Moroney indicated Labour had changed their minds upon hearing some select committee submissions. So they weren’t sayign scrap it while simultaneoulsy supporting it.
Labour was stating the two positions simultaneously. Gordon Campbell’s interview with Cunliffe was published on the very day Labour voted for the Bill’s second reading (March 18).
Although, Cunliffe was interviewed on March 10 for that Werewolf article – says so at the beginning of the article. He does seem to be saying something different from what Moroney and Jacinda Ardern said later in debating the Bill and supporting it. Their consistent line was that they wanted to see tax fraud treated as strongly as beneficiary fraud. They were concerned about the low level of evidence needed to find someone guilty of relationship fraud and were supporting an amendment to change that – don’t know if the amendment passed.
Labour could still scrap that particular part of the amendment later on, I guess.
I do think Labour could come out more strongly generally in supporting social security, and turning totally away from the punitive beneficiary bashing policies of National. I would have preferred Labour not to support the Bill.
Yep, I said published, rather than when the interview was conducted.
An eight day lag time. Submissions on the Bill were due last October 10, so the concerns were aired well before Cunliffe’s interview.
I agree with your point about social security, but notwithstanding the issues in this particular legislation, its handling feeds into a bigger perception that the party doesn’t know where it stands.
Well. I think the Labour Caucus is pretty consistent in its main lines – including on how they debated the Welfare Fraud Bill. They put primary focus on employment and jobs, and benefits as a back up to that. They also made a big repeated line about there should be as harsh a penalty for tax evasion as for benefit fraud.
They talk about beneficiary bashing in the context of rising unemployment. So, while they pay lip service to challenging bennie bashing, they want to be seen of the party of employment, jobs, and “fairness” for taxpayers.
Sue Moroney seems to be talking sympathy pandering claptrap.
I haven’t seen Labour try and substantiate their claims that National are doing nothing on tax fraud (and I asked them).
Borrows’ office provided:
I checked the Treasury website and what is claimed stacks up.
Labour are opposing and complaining a lot but they don’t seem to be doing their homework and backing up their claims, hence whenever they release new policy it’s automatically viewed with skepticism. In contrast Greens seem to have a functional and competent research unit and they communicate far more effectively.
I think there may be differences between how the figures are calculated. Deborah Russell talks about tax evasion as a “fraud” – ie people avoiding taxes through doing things that look legal. So they may not show up the Treasury calculations.
The problem is Labour don’t give many details. Cunliffe talked about tax dodging and they published graphics showing $6 billion of dodging, but I haven’t seen them elaborate.
http://yournz.org/2014/04/04/labours-fraudulent-claim/
Have you heard of this thing I like to call Google?
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&objectid=10871292
Labour’s numbers are probably based on the research of Victoria University lecturer Dr Lisa Marriott.
Yes. Also The Greens have published a lot of info on tax evasion and how National has been lax on it… but I’ve had a long day. I don’t have time or inclination right now for further research. PG’s research seems to have been pretty limited. – tweets hardly amount to indepth research.
That is vague and lacks a lot of details.
No quantifying of “put the most effort into to” at all. And it sounds dubious. For example from budgets:
They spend five times as much on Management of Debt and Outstanding Returns as they recover on benefit fraud, which is about five times what they spend on it.
But MacLennan seems to be correct on one thing:
“The total amount of unpaid tax not yet detected is unknown.”
Try some more Googling.
Well, of course, any newspaper report is going to be fairly general. So, instead you could try looking for some actual research papers by the likes of Lisa Marriott.
Do you think someone doing scholarly research in such an area is not going to have detailed stats to back their arguments?
Treasuries stats are part of the problem. They are not looking so much at tax avoidance.
Russell Norman has also pointed to stuff like the tax working group, and cuts at IRD, etc.
You seem to just be looking for some quick to find stuff that will discredit Labour, and aren’t doing any indepth research into National’s claims. But…. that’d take a lot more time and reading than I want to do right now …. I need some down time.
Try some more Googling.
Pete George YOU are the one claiming Labour is being fraudulent, how about YOU back up your own claims?!
Unbelievable.
Pete, tell me, what is the definition of benefit fraud being used? Of those numbers, how many were the intentional, I have no right to this so I am going to tell a pack of lies to get it, kind vs my boyfriend has moved in, but isn’t really contributing to the household yet so I won’t notify WINZ yet?
I’d like to know how much of it is just overpayments by WINZ being erroneously classified as fraud to make the numbers look worse in order to justify another kicking.
Poor Pete. The fuckwit factchecker can’t tell the difference between a Bill and a provision in that Bill.
“If re-elected will Labour retain this provision or scrap it ?
David Cunliffe: Scrap it.”
EVIDENCE that New Zealand has yet to ratify the UN Convention Against Corruption:
https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/treaties/CAC/signatories.html
Yet New Zealand is ‘perceived’ to be ‘the least corrupt country in the world’ (along with Denmark, according to Transparency International’s 2013 ‘Corruption Perception Index’.
http://cpi.transparency.org/cpi2013/results/
If New Zealand was genuinely the ‘least corrupt country’ – shouldn’t we be the MOST transparent?
If New Zealand was genuinely the ‘least corrupt’ and most ‘transparent’ – then arguably – shouldn’t we be the least financially secretive?
So – how then is New Zealand ranked the 48th most secretive out of 82 nations, in the 2013 Tax Justice Network ‘Financial Secrecy Index’?
http://www.financialsecrecyindex.com/introduction/fsi-2013-results
File (again) under ‘You Couldn’t Make This Sh*t Up’?
Want to see a ONE page ACTION PLAN which would establish a genuine, meaningful framework for transparency and accountability in New Zealand?
Try this:
http://www.pennybright4mayor.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/ANTI-CORRUPTION-WHITE-COLLAR-CRIME-CORPORATE-WELFARE-ACTION-PLAN-Ak-Mayoral-campaign-19-July-2013-2.pdf
‘Where the people lead – the politicians will follow …..?”
Kind regards,
Penny Bright
So did the GCSB hack into the Roy Morgan website to change the latest findings?
Maybe it was the SIS?
http://www.roymorgan.com/morganpoll/new-zealand/voting-intention-summary
Must be because David Cunliffe didn’t get enough face time with Prince Willy?
28% = bummer…..
It must be a rogue poll surely. National’s polling puts Labour at 26%
http://www.elections.org.nz/voting-system/mmp-voting-system/mmp-seat-allocation-calculator?asPercentage=1&partyName_0=ACT+New+Zealand&partyVote_0=0.5&electorateSeats_0=1&partyName_1=Alliance&partyVote_1=0&electorateSeats_1=0&partyName_2=Aotearoa+Legalise+Cannabis+Party&partyVote_2=0&electorateSeats_2=0&partyName_3=Conservative+Party&partyVote_3=2&electorateSeats_3=0&partyName_4=Democrats+for+Social+Credit&partyVote_4=0&electorateSeats_4=0&partyName_5=Green+Party&partyVote_5=11.5&electorateSeats_5=0&partyName_6=Labour+Party&partyVote_6=28.5&electorateSeats_6=0&partyName_7=Libertarianz&partyVote_7=0&electorateSeats_7=0&partyName_8=Mana&partyVote_8=1&electorateSeats_8=1&partyName_9=M%C4%81ori+Party&partyVote_9=1&electorateSeats_9=2&partyName_10=National+Party&partyVote_10=48.5&electorateSeats_10=0&partyName_11=New+Zealand+First+Party&partyVote_11=5.5&electorateSeats_11=0&partyName_12=United+Future&partyVote_12=0&electorateSeats_12=1&partyName_opt_0=Internet&partyVote_opt_0=1&electorateSeats_opt_0=0&partyName_opt_1=Other+Party&partyVote_opt_1=0.5&electorateSeats_opt_1=0&partyName_opt_2=Other+Party&partyVote_opt_2=0&electorateSeats_opt_2=0&partyCount=13&optPartyCount=3&action=Calculate+parliamentary+seats
The Otago Daily Times publishes a 100 year old ‘from our files’ column, and I did enjoy today’s, a well argued missive about the pressing need for a servants’ union. Especially in the wake of the visit from the royal family, which among many other businesses in the UK, enforce zero hours contracts on domestic staff.
http://www.odt.co.nz/opinion/100-years-ago/299228/servants-union-needed
And in a similar announcement today the National Library and Auckland Council have launched a huge new resource – 82 years of New Zealand Herald has been digitised including letters and announcements and advertisements. It’ll be a fantastic resource for progressive bloggers. Any articles with a “Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose” flavour you’ll find something suitably pithy in here to suit.
For a taster here’s Michael Joseph Savage on Labour Policy in 1938 – adequate wages, recognition that productivity gains should go to workers, health service, social welfare and pensions policy.
http://bit.ly/1ismYcR
UK Tory MP who helped kill Legal Aid is wiped out by defending himself
Thing is, he’s actually surprised by this:
One wonders if he read the bill before voting on it.
Disciples of Ayn Rand only care about 1 person.
Anyone following Laudafinem on the Blomfield stuff ?
Haka law passed
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11240050
Seems like a very good thing 🙂
Protects existing common use of Kamate while providing recognition to Ngati Toa.
Granny Herald hasn’t even managed to find anything to maori bash about it which itself is cause for minor celebration O_O