Is there a journalist reckless enough to direct a question to Hamish Rutherford, who lurks at Luxon's side in pressers, rather than to Luxon himself? As in "Can I ask Hamish a question? I'd prefer to talk to the ventriloquist, not his dummy”.
Not a nice time be laid off with a mortgage that you've been paying down for a while.
BNZ, and I presume all the others removed the re-draw facility from their existing mortgage agreements this week. So you've got to make a new application to borrow funds to tide you over the initial unemployment until you find a new job.
I'm not convinced about the appropriateness of voucher systems in the NZ setting, although we already have a quasi voucher system (with scholarships etc). NZ has "a much smaller market for – and culture of – private schooling than many other OECD countries" (Research-Note-The-State-of-Schooling.pdf), however that same research (from 2020) found that "state schools are underperforming compared with state-integrated and private schools", and that has to change.
That research doesn't even address the question, let alone challenge it. Since vouchers are a state level choice about how to run the entire education system then the effectiveness of that choice needs to address the performance of the whole education system in comparison to public funding. Examples of successful students, teachers or institutions do not make that point, regardless of how successful examples they may be.
We should also keep in mind that there is a survival bias to successful examples. The schools which fail and are subsequently closed due to their failure or absorbed into the public system are not around to study (and there are numerous examples of this style even in NZ, where we already saw the evidence of these schools undermining student testing at a national level).
I think that Finland does not allow any form of private schools but expects that every state school is of the highest standard and funds it accordingly.
They also as a society value education and understand the benefits to everyone in the society so, as expounded in 'Viking Economics', people are happy to pay higher taxes to get the mutual benefits of an educated work force.
What is happening here? We are cutting services, encouraging a two tier system of health and education, not ensuring enough quality graduates for our needs, allowing to go overseas many of those graduates we do produce because of the lack of employment.
We are cutting taxes and impoverishing our country by doing so, developing an unfair society and we will pay the cost of all that.
You should disconnect the taxation issue from the funding of education. Its a choice to undervalue education and to systematically reduce the salary of teachers over time and that choice is not constrained by the amount of taxation collected by the government. The actual restriction the government faces is in the number of educators who will work in the public education system and the ability to train them to and have them perform well in their teaching.
This is a relevant point with Lars P Syll being a member of the MMT group of economists (you could find posts on his blog describing this fact). It over complicates things to link these together when its much more clear that this National led govt really doesn't value public education very highly as a profession.
There are private schools, although not very many. Apparently about 3% or pupils go to private schools. They teach the State Curriculum and are financed by the state,
An acquaintance, whose son lives there has told me that this is a reasonable review of the system. I don't have personal knowledge.
If the public education and health systems were of a high enough standard you wouldn't need to ban private schools and health insurance, they just wouldn't exist.
"That research doesn't even address the question, let alone challenge it. "
The comment you made was "Where voucher schooling has been used the consistent conclusion is that it does not work as advertised."
The Fordham research shows that voucher schooling can and does work, and points out the nuances.
"We should also keep in mind that there is a survival bias to successful examples."
And we should also point out that there in education (as with other disciplines) there is strong ideological bias that is often directed against alternatives to education.
First I will just point out that nobody is proposing alternatives to education which appear to be, no education.
Now otherwise you have again failed to contend the important question regarding vouchers (which are a change to the school system as a whole), which is do they make the overall school system better, improve performance overall, etc… The question is not can some schools succeed in their mission when they are paid in vouchers.
Now you can very well claim that the structure of public education is mostly driven by ideology all you want (I guess with the unstated implication that its not objectively well structured due to that), but the onus is still on research to demonstrate that the voucher alternative is actually better overall. The evidence is on the contrary that institutional competition for funding has and does damage the primary purpose of these institutions and most frequently undermines the standards of assessment well before it improves performance in those standards.
"Now otherwise you have again failed to contend the important question regarding vouchers (which are a change to the school system as a whole), which is do they make the overall school system better, improve performance overall, etc…"
That's not the question you posed. You said "Where voucher schooling has been used the consistent conclusion is that it does not work as advertised."
"…which are a change to the school system as a whole…"
Vouchers are not a change to the school system as a whole. They are a means for allocating financial resources.
"do they make the overall school system better, improve performance overall, etc… "
I don't know. Fordham's research says they do, but there are exceptions and nuances.
"The evidence is on the contrary that institutional competition for funding has and does damage the primary purpose of these institutions and most frequently undermines the standards of assessment well before it improves performance in those standards."
What evidence? How do you define the 'primary purpose'?
That is the question I posed. You may well not have understood that when you replied, but that is the question. And yes, vouchers are a change to the overall school system. You could very well set a voucher school in NZ today which would of course have zero chance of accepting voucher pupils, because the voucher system needs a systematic legislative change to even exist.
Finally, you seem to be search for just what is the primary purpose of education institutions? That would be to provide education, at least to their students.
"That would be to provide education, at least to their students."
I would suggest that any definition should include some kind of qualitative ambition. Anyway…
"And yes, vouchers are a change to the overall school system."
We'll have to agree to disagree. We have vouchers of sorts operating in the education system already, and we have choice in the system already. Vouchers are merely a mechanism to simply funding of those choices and any others the government may wish to introduce.
Your saying these existing funding mechanisms, which you are referring to as effectively vouchers, are not implemented via govt legislation and budgeting? I mean what are you even disagreeing with here. NZ's education system is overwhelmingly public even as far as it contains private schools which are still quite largely publicly funded.
"Your saying these existing funding mechanisms, which you are referring to as effectively vouchers, are not implemented via govt legislation and budgeting?"
No, I'm not saying that.
"NZ's education system is overwhelmingly public even as far as it contains private schools which are still quite largely publicly funded."
They are publicly funded as state schools are. I'm not sure what your point is.
Good so we seem to agree then that implementing a voucher system is a change to the overall school system. This is very clearly quite important to my claim, that if we are going to change the school system then one of the government goals should be to improve overall that system.
I mean if the govt wanted they could instead set up a bunch of new charter schools and then fund those over and above the level of public schools and if they were not incompetent in doing that they might very well succeed in creating some relatively successful new charter schools. But the justification of the public interest of such a policy appears to be does that improve the overall performance of NZs school system.
That is the supposed promise of voucher funding, that incentives are setup to make the delivery of education more 'efficient' and incentivized than the public sector (where efficient in this context supposedly means quite unrealistically having better teaching outcomes). But if that incentive structure undermines the overall education system performance its quite clearly not justified as an education policy.
"Good so we seem to agree then that implementing a voucher system is a change to the overall school system. "
Please don’t misrepresent me. I repeat, voucher systems are not a change to the overall school system. Voucher systems are simply a funding mechanism to facilitate choice, choice that is already in place in many cases.
Awesome. In that case it seems we already in NZ have the worlds most comprehensive voucher school system in place, no further school system reform necessary. School choice delivered.
You have convinced me of this. Apparently legislation of the school system is not needed to implement this, so I willed it into existence in my own thinking based on what you told me.
Did the 2020 research state the reasons why the underperforming happened, and therefore help understand what would be needed to achieve parity in performance?
For some reason my link to the reasearch broke – here it is Research Note: The State of Schooling | The New Zealand Initiative (nzinitiative.org.nz)– download the PDF from there. The answer to your question is that the report examines outcomes, not reasons for the outcomes, however section 3 does look at "which socioeconomic factors predict school authority attendance".
The full report concludes with this:
"Putting educational ideology aside, this report shows the absence of evidence for which schools are succeeding and which are falling behind. For too long, families have had to rely on prejudiced anecdotal evidence, and misleading league tables and decile ratings to decide the ‘right’ school for their child. More needs to be done and more can be done, but we must first use the right tools. Without the right information and tools, New Zealand will remain blind to serious educational problems and the successes that should be celebrated."
NZ Initiative… rw thinktank. Why do you believe their views on a voucher system are worth espousing on a lw opinion site?
A solution in search of a problem, seems to me. Greater resource targetting to low decile schools is a better answer, surely, than a 'free-market' approach. The aim should be to provide equitable education to all NZ children.
For examples of failed 2-tier education systems, you have only to look to UK (academies/charter schools run for profit, with expensive business management that sucks resource from the students and from the public sector); or to Oz (where private fee-paying schools are paid significantly more by the government than state schools).
If you have winner and loser Schools then you have winner and loser children, through no fault of their own.
Finland's system works because it aims for a high standard for their entire education system. Something ours also aspires to, but gets knee capped periodically by Governments wedded to dogma, rather than informed research.
New Zealand's has suffered from too much knee jerk simplistic bombastic "solutions'" by, mostly right wing, rote learning, cannon fodder for industry ideology. A two tier Education system.
They want to have a basic system for the "bottom feeders" and an elite system for their own children. Ironically they want other tax payers to subsidise a higher standard education for their children, with all the advantages of smaller class sizes, subject ranges, skilled Teachers and personalised Teaching they oppose funding in State Schools.
"If you have winner and loser Schools then you have winner and loser children, through no fault of their own."
It doesn't have to be that way. There is plenty of research that shows competition can improved educational outcomes, but certainly there have to be controls.
"New Zealand's has suffered from too much knee jerk simplistic bombastic "solutions'" by, mostly right wing, rote learning, cannon fodder for industry ideology."
My experience is that it has come from right and left. My children were exposed to educational philosophies such as the Numeracy Project (Un(ac)countable: Why millions on maths returned little | The New Zealand Initiative (nzinitiative.org.nz)) that was trialed under a National government but rolled out under a Labour administration. They were also unfortunate victims of the 'whole of language' experiment, which began as a system introduced in the 1970's to complement phonics, but somehow saw phonics based teaching relegated to such an extent that literacy rates fell alarmingly. My severely dyslexic child in particular suffered from this absurd ideological movement, which occurred under governments of left and right.
I am not an educationalist, but I am close enough to the outcomes of the education system to be deeply concerned about the quality of education in this country, and what it means for the future of NZ.
"socioeconomic factors predict school authority attendance". What is a 'school authority attendance'?
This does not seem to help, if it is about attendance figures, as the question concerned overall academic underperformance.
Attendance rates no doubt is a factor but what else?
Your final paragraph says in essence that the NZInitiative don't know, but criticise what information and argument based on that information is already published.
The very first paragraph of the link defines it for you:
"This research note takes a closer look at school effectiveness across state, state-integrated, and private schools, otherwise defined as school authority (or type) using the Initiative's school performance tool."
"Your final paragraph says in essence that the NZInitiative don't know, but criticise what information and argument based on that information is already published."
The research examined school effectiveness; it makes no claims about 'why' because that isn't its purpose.
"Like the governments before it, the current Labour-led administration and its Ministry of Education have shown themselves keen to jump on fashionable bandwagons. Anything that sounds kind, caring, inclusive and modern is in. Anything appearing old-fashioned, rigorous or demanding is out. In this way, over time, NZ’s education system has been hollowed out. There is no canon of knowledge enshrined in the curriculum. There is a lack of rigorous assessment. New teaching approaches are thrown at the system without proper monitoring or evaluation. The result is that the successive tiers of education play catch-up, catch up. Secondary schools are teaching what primary schools should have. And tertiary institutions spend an incredible amount of effort making up for the deficits of secondary schooling. NZ once prided itself in having a world-class education system. It has now become a country in education free fall."
I am expected to treat what is little more than rhetoric as being worthy of the title of research? The use of exaggeration and generalisation is evident.
" Anything that sounds kind, caring, inclusive and modern is in. Anything appearing old-fashioned, rigorous or demanding is out."
The conclusions from whatever research was conducted are no more than political press releases and contaminate the research to the point of having to doubt their reliability and freedom from bias.
The conclusions are drawn from the research. And that research is far from being an outlier. It's generally accepted that NZ's education system has been in decline for decades.
Traveller, you wrote early on, "I am not an educationalist, but I am close enough to the outcomes of the education system to be deeply concerned about the quality of education in this country, and what it means for the future of NZ."
I was a teacher and professionally worked with those concerns and for those outcomes.
One thing I taught as an English and History teacher were the dangers of such errors as hyperbole, exaggeration, false and rash generalisations. You have not yet acknowledged that danger in what you are quoting. If you can't see it, then your conclusions are as faulted.
"One thing I taught as an English and History teacher were the dangers of such errors as hyperbole, exaggeration, false and rash generalisations. You have not yet acknowledged that danger in what you are quoting. If you can't see it, then your conclusions are as faulted."
Have you read the actual research paper? What is your assessment of the actual data and conclusions reached?
These are the conclusions."Anything that sounds kind, caring, inclusive and modern is in. Anything appearing old-fashioned, rigorous or demanding is out."
"These are the conclusions."Anything that sounds kind, caring, inclusive and modern is in. Anything appearing old-fashioned, rigorous or demanding is out.""
That's commentary. Have you read the actual research paper and it’s conclusions and recommendations?
There are two threads to this conversation. One is about the decline in the education system, the other about vouchers. My comment you quoted is from the former.
Traveller. now that has been sorted. My error- it is commentary and obviously now the NZInitiative's generalisation is their reaction to their reading of the research. What was the response of the authors of the research to that summation of their work, I wonder.
It didn't help your argument, by the way, to be quoting the NZInitiative's reaction to support your original arguments. Distractive at best.
Re this COC Govt. once Winston has to hand over his Deputy PM possie to Atlas Dave he could well turn on them. Not suggesting it would involve principles!
Pre the last election he had a letter prepared for the Governor General withdrawing support for PM Ardern, which he never sent in the end, but he is certainly capable of being the worm that turned…again.
"If you have looked hard at the manner of things, if you have surveyed the troubles of our time, and cannot discover a way forward, do not despair. Do better. Grieve: mount an altar to the sensuous feelings of loss that swim through you. In the stinging fumes that redden the eyes, you might partly recover a clear vision of where to go. You might come to see that forward movement is no longer possible in these moments, and that the way to go was never forward anyway – but awk-ward: into the blackness of catacombs, into the shadows of sanctuary, into the riven cracks signed with the pen of the trickster, into the heat of compost, into the position of a prostrated man who knows that when the storm roars the thing to do is to be still. In that stillness, entire worlds churn."
The Newshub shutdown is fake panic. It’s TINA, when it’s really what the very right wing US owners wish to do, which is erode our democracy and make us more pliant.
The disaster of the media and a National government of whatever kind this is is real, but this is opportunism. There will be no more Dame Jacinda’s doing the correct thing supported by the country’s media. We will have opposition for its own sake and the further rise to prominence of the extreme.
I agree. This situation suits NAct very well. Pretty much no competition any more. TVNZ journalists/reporters will know if they run stories which do not present the govt. in a good light they are likely to be dumped on by this govt., which has demonstrated they have no ethical standards. It's happened before under the Muldoon administration.
Probably the reason Melissa Lee has been sitting on her a***e doing nothing. She's been told not to.
Hi Anne. IMHO, doing nothing is entirely the correct response. Newshub is a private company that has failed. Other private media formats are rising up and taking their place. It's simply the circle of life. and while unfortunate for those personally affected, no amount of corporate welfare should be put in their direction.
Day 2 of Tickle v Giggle in Australia. Do women have the right to single sex spaces?
Evolutionary biologist Colin Wright is giving evidence for Giggle today. Presumably because it's now necessary to establish what biological sex is. Tickle is arguing that they are female because of having a gender recognition certificate, and therefore should be treated as a woman (and allowed in women's only spaces).
Wright will be presenting evidence that there are two sexes in humans, and that humans cannot change sex.
correction to the above. Tickle has been able to legally change his birth certificate to female, in Queensland. Queensland has no gender recognition certificate process.
The key piece of legislation in this case is the Sex Discrimination Act 1984, initially set up because of women's rights and so that Australia would comply with being a signatory to CEDAW
"What it means to "live as a woman" in one pithy tweet. Roxy Tickle's evidence that he is a woman hinges on his repeated and ongoing intrusion on women only spaces, where by definition he is not permitted, because he's a man not a woman. Then he turns up in court and says that the very fact that he intrudes on women's spaces is evidence that he's entitled to be there. Trans logic is circular logic"
I would have thought the logic adopted by trans people…..on its literal and plain meaning.
We have discussed ad nauseam the most egregious examples of this logic namely that some mechanism exists to change one's biologic sex from male to female.
From this cherished held to heart belief from TRAs come
1 the ability for a man ro say he is a woman and enter and race against women in sports or sports teams despite research showing that a male passing through male puberty maintains strength, muscle and other sports advantages no matter how they dress currently.
2 the notion that as a man says he is a women he is able to enter into women's toilets and changing rooms. NB this need for men is tied to a conditon known as AGP Autogynephilia is defined as a male's propensity to be sexually aroused by the thought of himself as a female.
3 the idea that a man should be held in a prison designated as one for women only. Some womens prisons now hold prisoners who have raped women.
The list of these leaps in logic is endless leading to the shorthand 'trans logic' and I am sure you actually know this.
I suspect this is part of the reason for Tabletennis’ comment about it being ‘creepy’ as well meaning people have explained over and again how male sexuality, in the form adopted by the trans community has an impact on women.
My fundamental belief about trans is that it is at heart misogynistic. Men may believe, even support, the notion that whatever other men want to do in the way of sexuality is ‘ok by them’
Well, I surprised you are comfortable conflating all trans people with a certain style of logic – are they not individuals, with individualistic views of the world? It's just like saying "women's logic" isn't it?
I thought you'd be all over that sort of broad-brush misrepresentation.
Thanks for the sarcasm and the deliberate, I suspect, bearing mind how long this issue has been discussed here, misreading of my remarks.
What I was explaining is the current set of beliefs adopted as part of the trans arguments.
'Logic' is some times used as a simile for belief.
It is common to group people into say 'cohorts' to look at them and their beliefs as a group. This does not mean that as being part of this group they lose their identity. Of course not. They may still vote Labour, or Democrat, support certain sports teams etc.
What we are saying is that here is a group of people who have decided to believe things that are ? possibly? lacking in logic. Prime among these beliefs is that by dressing as a woman a man becomes a woman.
For me it has a smidgen of similarity to the battle between proponents of trans- and con- substantiation.
The overriding belief is that a man can turn into a woman by adopting dress or womanface or by just saying they are a woman.
My belief is this belief or 'trans logic' can be seen through a lens of misogyny, ie inherent male beliefs. Others explain it through the lens of psychiatric makeup ie as a paraphilia/psychiatric illness. These all help people to understand why someone would say they are some thing they are not or belive some thing that is a biological impossibility.
Looking at children we can see the influence of social contagion and still, that some may do all they can to ensure their child does not present when grown up, as gay. It is tragic that any parent would do this to a child.
Shanreagh, Something that I have noticed as I have aged… There have always been men who get quite wound up with women who don’t know their place. As they get older they become rather peculiar, and have funny ideas about women/girls. Unfortunately I’ve had to deal with the consequences within my own extended family. For some reason Robert cannot comprehend that women themselves should have a say in their own issues, without the input from a man, or transwomen.
No Robert, I’m referring to those funny little men, especially older men, who are very controlling of women and girls. For some reason they get wound up by the idea that women and girls are able to decide and do things without the consent of men. Anyone would think that a woman must get their opinions from that woman’s male owner.
Presumably they have a gender hierarchy, at the top Men, then transwomen (a man who believes that he is a women), then much further down the list it is women.
In saying that, in my extended family a number several are gay/lesbian. I have noticed how a young nephew and his boyfriend, as well as some of his friends, have disturbing views of girls, particularly lesbians. Disgusting is a term that comes to mind, but as they are gay/bisexual/non binary, they believe that they can say whatever they like about women and girls.
Anyway, for the life of me, I can’t fathom why you seem to be so invested with this issue. If woman are concerned about transwomen in women’s spaces, then it’s a discussion for women to have.
It’s kinda obvious to me, and maybe others, that you as a man, have an issue with women discussing this, especially if they have the audacity to disobey you, and hold and express views that contradict yours.
Robert, the reason why I comment on this issue is because so many men (including men who identify as a woman) are telling women what to do. And heaven forbid, should a woman, or group of women, decide that they want to have a say in women’s issues, men shut them down.
In my opinion Robert, I get the impression, that you are one of those men who who gets a little wound up, if woman do their own thing, without your approval.
I appreciate that you may disagree with this, but it is the impression that I get from your comments around this topic.
"…'trans logic' can be seen through a lens of misogyny, ie inherent male beliefs."
Which of course doesn't mean that 'misogyny' is an essential part of being male.
What are 'male beliefs'?
And David you say “If woman are concerned about transwomen in women’s spaces, then it’s a discussion for women to have.”
Women (and girls) are the ones directly affected but it’s not just women that are concerned. Men have Mothers, Wives, Daughters, Girlfriends, etc so many men are also concerned.
As a cohort, as a group. The overwhelming prime belief is that a person can trans into a being that they are not, by the mere expression of the belief.
So if a man says 'I am a woman therefore I am a woman or if 'I shop in womens clothing stores therefore I am a woman,…..etc
My belief that I am a princess does not mean I am a princess.
The belief that, say Roxy Tickle has, that he is a woman does not mean that he is a woman
I certainly prefer 'facts', but beliefs are powerful – such are the mysteries of the human mind, and imho our species still has much to learn, time and circumstances permitting.
Biological sex in humans has been immutable throughout history.
If, at some time in humanity's future, that was no longer the case, who might be opposed to people changing their sex, and why?
The devil is in the 'anomaly'
not quite sure what you mean there. Biological sex in humans is the way that we reproduce. It is inherently binary: we have the people that have the physiology that produces eggs and the ones that have the physiology that produces sperm.
Are you suggesting that in the future we might reproduce differently from that?
It’s not possible for humans to change sex, and I don’t see a potential mechanism by which that might be possible in the future. Afaik, sex is hardwired in soon after conception, and leads to two different pathways of development (egg/sperm people) that includes chromosomes, differences in physical body shape and size which then feeds into differences in strength and capacity. Short of imagining a magic wand, how would it be possible to change all that (barring intervention at conception, which precludes any notion of informed consent)?
"Facts of all kinds have been regularly 'upstaged' by human beliefs, not to mention by new knowledge, since time immemorial."
Yes. When a new concept or theory is proposed that answers more questions than it creates. Usually accompanied by good evidence pertaining to this change. This is not the case regarding human sex.
"Biological sex in humans has been immutable throughout history.
If, at some time in humanity's future, that was no longer the case, who might be opposed to people changing their sex, and why?"
Biological sex in humans is binary and immutable.
Historical truth, contemporary truth, and future truth.
Your last question is the stuff of SF fan-fiction, not the basis for legislative and policy changes, nor for significant iatrogenic harmful medical interventions.
However, I would answer it will be those who understand biology, psychology, ethics and safeguarding.
Sex is determined by a mechanism originating before conception. The sex of the zygote is determined by the chromosome carried by the fertilizing sperm. In humans its called either an X or Y chromosome with the egg providing an X chromosome. The resulting genome is usually either XX (female) or XY (male).
"Biological sex in humans has been immutable throughout history.
If, at some time in humanity's future, that was no longer the case, who might be opposed to people changing their sex, and why?"
It should be possible to entertain such a question, for the purpose of testing one's beliefs; that's what Ursula le Guin does with her "impossible sci-fi stories" and we like Ursula here, don't we 🙂
I especially liked the last line,
"who might be opposed to people changing their sex, and why?"
I’d take this more seriously if I saw any attempt by you to challenge your own beliefs. Did you miss the three explanations of what biological sex is and why it can’t be changed?
If you want to do an abstract thought experiment and reference Le Guin, you’d need to give some kind of explanation for how it’s relevant to this conversation today. But of course you won’t, because explaining is losing and it’s only other people, not yourself, that bother sharing their ideas and clarifying.
take your pick. Any belief you hold in this conversation today, expressed or not, tell us what it is and how you challenge that belief. You talk about others needing to be challenged but I don’t see you applying that principle to yourself.
the problem here is that you appear to be both arguing that trans people are being disappeared and arguing in a conversation about the necessity of centring biological sex in law, policy and culture. Did you mean to erase women’s culture, or was that accidental.
I can’t tell if RG doesn’t care about women’s sex based rights, doesn’t understand them, or is simply arguing abstract whatevers for the sake of his own thought experiment agenda, but you I have more expectation of.
If a woman cannot call a man a man without permission from that man, there are no women’s rights.
Nic – Drowsy has, I believe, posed a question that requires a suspension of belief, in order to uncover base motivations in those taking part in the thought experiment. Hunkering down and declaring that the proposal is impossible is a not-unexpected response. It's a thought exercise, designed to stretch thinking and reveal calcification of thought (I reckon). I find it interesting, in a way similar to reading science fiction 🙂
again, this would only have credibility if you demonstrated any kind of self reflection about your own beliefs. You think expressing biological sex matters hinders the thought experiment, but I see it as enhancing it. I can both do an imaginative exercise about fantasy of humans changing sex and hold an understanding of material reality. You on the other hand appear to want to ignore biological sex/material reality in favour of fantasy, how very binary of you.
You also utterly fail to take any account of why material reality matters. Transcendence of/denial of material reality is the patriarchal wet dream. It’s the core of male dominated religions that kill nature and hate women, as well as being core to trans activism where it has transhumanism as an end goal. It’s also why we have climate change and the ecological crisis. That the loss of women’s rights is happening at the same time isn’t a coincidence.
If you want to do an abstract thought experiment and reference Le Guin, you’d need to give some kind of explanation for how it’s relevant to this conversation today. But of course you won’t, because explaining is losing and it’s only other people, not yourself, that bother sharing their ideas and clarifying.
And you have yet again failed to answer. You don’t have to of course, and that leaves people free to come to their own conclusions.
I can’t tell if RG doesn’t care about women’s sex based rights, doesn’t understand them, or is simply arguing abstract whatevers for the sake of his own thought experiment agenda…
I don't know either, weka, but I suspect – Lord save us from men (and women) with agendas.
If you want to do an abstract thought experiment and reference Le Guin, you’d need to give some kind of explanation for how it’s relevant to this conversation today. But of course you won’t, because explaining is losing and it’s only other people, not yourself, that bother sharing their ideas and clarifying.
And you have yet again failed to answer. You don’t have to of course, and that leaves people free to come to their own conclusions.
take your pick. Any belief you hold in this conversation today, expressed or not, tell us what it is and how you challenge that belief. You talk about others needing to be challenged but I don’t see you applying that principle to yourself.
and in the absence of you saying what it is, I will continue to make my own conclusions based on what you have been doing on TS on this topic for some time.
The context for my three points was that I expect more from Drowsy. I have zero expectations of you now.
Just wondering, weka, how many "Robert Guyton to weka" comments have been posted on TS over the years. My guess would be hundreds, at least. Despite that high level of interaction, you claim that I don't answer your questions. On the face of it, that would seem unlikely. If there were no "Robert Guyton to weka" comments, a person might wonder if I was refusing to engage with you, but that's clearly not the case. Is it possible, do you think, that you haven't been recognising that I am responding to you in an open, honest way, but that you aren't perceiving it thus?
my comment was specifically about this topic. Other topics I see you sharing your thinking.
you appear to be conflating ‘replying to a comment’ with ‘answering a question’ or ‘clarifying one’s point’
it’s not just me, you do this with a range of people.
it’s possible and likely you are not being intentionally dishonest. However telling me that basically I’m the one with the misperception again demonstrates an unwillingness to examine your own beliefs despite using rhetoric to challenge others.
in the past day I have pointed out multiple times where you are avoiding clarifying or answering directly. In the face of that you mostly have continues to avoid clarifying or answering directly. 🤷♀️
it’s like you want to play but only on your terms. This is why, I think, David makes the points he does. I think he is wrong in the characterisation, but I can see why he gets that impression, and you never do anything to show that you are not what he says.
I have zero expectations of you [Robert Guyton] now.
That's disappointing. To quote the wisdom of GoT:
A good act does not wash out the bad, nor a bad act the good. Each should have its own reward.
– King Stannis Baratheon [“I am your King!”]
I expect more from Drowsy.
What “more” do you expect, I wonder.
We all have views on this (and that), what's good (and bad), and one's own views are invariably the best (or so it seems to me), but I could never "have zero expectations" of either weka or Robert.
on this particular topic, it’s RG’s behaviour I am pointing to. Who knows what his actual views are, he almost never says. We are left to guess, and then he objects. It’s such a long standing pattern of behaviour, I’m surprised I have to even explain it. But unlike RG, I think explaining is winning, for us all.
as an example, from today, I laid out three potential explanations for RG’s behaviour/position. RG played some word games with that and eventually said it was none of them. What he didn’t so was say what he actually thinks. This is how he often/usually engages on this topic. All the time. He had the opportunity to clarify and he chose not too.
Funny little men, who are so desperate to control women, that they indulge in circular logic that just goes around in circles and goes nowhere.
Transwomen could always organise their own spaces, but for some reason they seem to be determined to take over women’s* spaces, & tell them what to do.
* Women in this case meaning actual real women. Not men who believe that they are women.
David made a valid point about TW organising their own spaces.
You framed that as a claim and asked him to expand on that, specifically on toilets and changing rooms.
I pointed out that there has been widespread discussion on that.
You attempt a derail.
My conclusion is that you have no intention of educating yourself and will continue with your sophistry (although tbf, a chunk of wha you do doesn't even meet the bar of sophistry).
Engaging with Robert reminds me of the parable of the donkey & the tiger..
As a kiwi bloke who is on the wrong side of 50 I have learned many things.
In this case, shall I say women’s issues.
When a woman (real/actual women, not transgender women) is in need to hear a man’s opinion or view on women’s issues, she will then advise you (the man, or transgender person) what your options/views will be. Your response will be, yes dear you are right, as usual.
Following this little piece of advice will allow you to enjoy the rest of your day.
I asked David to explain his claim, as it seemed to me he was quite wrong in making it.
You suggested I do my own research.
I chose rather, to ask David; I still can't see the error in that. Perhaps, weka, you could explain why directing a question about a claim made by an individual, to that individual, is insufficient?
David wrote;
""Transwomen could always organise their own spaces…"
I don't think that's a reasonable claim. I hope David will respond and respond in a way that's more useful than this drivel 11 April 2024 at 3:00 pm
Sure they could live as a women meaning dress as a women etc. Living/dressing does not alter biology though.
The leap in logic occurs when the wish to live/dress then is magicked by some alchemy to say they are a woman. This cannot happen any more than me dressing as a princess will make me a princess or dressing in a green suit will make me into Kermit the frog.
To take the princess analogy further having dressed as a princess I make it my life's work to insist that all that I meet treat me as a princess. First I insist, ie compelled in speech to call call me 'Your Highness', I may change my surname to reflect a long obscure set of Germano-Spanish Portugese royalty that I say are my ancestors. I then force people to curtsy to me. I may change my name my Deed Poll to Princess Susannah. I then insist on getting some sort of payment from the Govt.
All the way along kind people are helping me to check out that I am seeing the world correctly, to get help, to offer help. They may try to stop me gatecrashing events where real royalty is. Because I am so fixed in my ideas I may be arrrested if I breach protocols/boundaries around real Royalty as I am a threat, as imposters always are, to real Royalty.
To live as a woman does not involve compelling people to act as if you are a woman ie being part of your delusions. It does not involve going into womens safe spaces or into womens sports teams or even into womens prisons.
Aside from seeing drag performers, I worked with one man who dressed as a woman and he never expected that we belived he was a woman and he always used the mens toilets at work. A gentle soul we all treated him with kindness/caring. He did not change his name to a female one. He was good at his job, he just like dressing as a woman.
Funny little men, who are so desperate to control women, that they indulge in circular logic that just goes around in circles and goes nowhere.
as David says or the violent, foul men of the type that Weka has pictures. often caught on camera masturbating in front of women in toilets, of raping women in prisons.
As I said above the whole concept now is one of misogyny, adopting womanface. Many are fetishists or autogynephiliacs. Many would benefit from counselling and care.
What we as a society do not need to do is to pander to their delusions by making woman the props to support deluded men.
So Robert if a man dresses as a woman then presumably there is no onus on society to go along with the belief that this dressing/living has somehow made him a woman?
Then while dressed as a woman surely a man would have no expectation of going into women's safe spaces or to play in women's sports.
He remains a man just dressed a little differently so he uses the male toilets and continue to play in men's sport.
Presumably you will agree with this as I have confined to to just dressing as a woman.
The examples of the trans logic we are facing is
1 when a person feels that dressing means morphing into a woman,
2 that dressing entitles a man to go into women's toilets
3 that dressing entitles a man to play in women's sports.
So Shaneagh if you go to a party as a pirate, you could just as easily go to a party as a woman. You could spend your time living as a homeless person, even though you owned a home. If there is such a thing as trans logic, there will also be lesbian logic. Is there?
It may have been the topic of your conversation, Shanreagh, but it wasn't mine. I asked only about just 2 things. I'm disinterested in the other points raised by others here and have made no comments about them, consequently I don't feel compelled to answer questions on them.That you (and others) think I hold certain views about them is a mistake that compounds every time one of you claims this or that about my position.
I don't understand what you mean by "trans logic".
Robert Guyton 9.1.1.1.1.1
10 April 2024 at 2:39 pm
It is this I am trying to explain. Perhaps it would be clearer if you accepted I have (tried) to answer this, thanked me and then moved on to your different questions.
Thank you, Shanreagh, for trying. You've given me examples of what you believe are manifestations of "trans logic", but that's not what I'm asking for. I'm trying to understand how anyone can describe/define the way a group of people think by calling it, "X-logic". For example, can we justifiably use the term, "lesbian logic", or "Asian logic". Do you think, "trans logic" means the logic employed by trans people? Would you also say, "Asian logic" when describing the way Asians view the world?
"What’s meant here is TRA logic. It’s an ideological belief set and political movement that uses circular logic.
it’s a mistake to see TRA = trans or vice versa."
seems to be, at last, addressing my original question:
"What is "trans logic"?
Dozens of responses later and I'm still in the dark, but perhaps what you have said will cast some light: are you meaning that the phrase, "trans logic" is not a valid one, and that TRA logic is?
‘trans logic’ is vague. What Joyce was talking about is the ideology. Which obviously is not something that all trans people subscribe to. It’s better to think about TRA logic, or gender identity ideology logic. Circular reasoning is not uncommon there.
It covers all the things that Gender Critical people have been saying for several years including:
Acknowledgment of the lack of evidence for the benefits of cross-sex hormones, the need for caution and the importance of data collection and follow-up. NHS England must now follow the recommendation for a review of cross-sex hormones and include them in a broader research programme.
The recommendation for provision of specialised NHS services for detransitioners and those who regret their medical transition. This is an urgent requirement.
Insufficient research on social transition, inconclusive evidence of any benefits but clear risk of creating persistence of an identity that would in all likelihood have resolved by itself. Governments should use this information to end the practice of social transition in schools carried out by untrained adults. The impact on other children of adults pretending a child has changed their sex is outside the terms of reference for this report, but it is something the government must address.
Recognition that no formal science-based training in psychotherapy, psychology or psychiatry teaches or advocates ‘conversion therapy.’ Normal “exploration of complex psychosocial challenges and/or mental health problems an adolescent may be experiencing is essential to provide diagnosis, clinical support and appropriate intervention”, and it is harmful to equate this approach to ‘conversion therapy.’
Visubversa
"The long awaited Cass Review final report is out."
And now see what the Te Whatu Ora is going to do with this information…Their long awaited report on the use, safety and effectiveness, of puberty blockers has still not seen the light of day.
1. Parents interviewed by Cass were looking for depathologisation of trans children, and decentralisation of supporting services away from a single UK centre, and into mainstream medicine, as seen in other countries.
Instead, the report focusses on unpicking why children are trans, as if it's a mental health problem, not on providing the best medical support for trans kids and their families.
2. The review panel was 'naive', having no one experienced with the trans research community in the UK or internationally involved in the report output. Cass herself has no experience of trans people in her social circle. This is like reviewing Maori health initiatives without anyone Maori being part of debate, vs only being interviewed.
3. As an outcome of this, the Cass report is unbalanced in naming 'trans ideology' as a bias, without a corresponding recognition of the significant anti-trans bias pushed over the past 5 years in the UK.
4. No trans treatment processes from outside the UK were evaluated for effectiveness as potential alternative models to to GID service. Once again, the Cass framed trans kids as a 'mental health problem' issue, completely erasing the identity of trans kids and their families.
Instead, the report focusses on unpicking why children are trans, as if it's a mental health problem, not on providing the best medical support for trans kids and their families.
I'd like to know if that's really true. I haven't read the report, but everything I have since in the last day, including interviews with Hilary Cass, shows that there are issues with large numbers of children with concurrent mental health issues, abuse histories and undiagnosed autism. All things that GIDS was ignoring in favour of affirmation only.
I used to think that transness wasn't a pathology, and I think that could be true, but needing hormones and surgery suggests to me that it is. And what is gender dysphoria if it's not a mental health issue? I think that the need to transition via extreme body modification is something that is largely culturally imposed. If we lived in societies that valued gender non-conformity, then the whole born in the wrong body bullshit wouldn't exist like it does.
I move we scrap official limits on the acceptable number of politicians clubbed to death, too.
Pricks.
An official limit on the acceptable number of sea lion deaths in commercial fishing nets is no longer necessary, Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says.
Despite the number of sea lion pups inexplicably plunging by almost a third last year, Jones has scrapped the Fishing Related Mortality Limit (FRML), which sets the maximum number of sea lion deaths each year before a squid trawl fishery in the Southern Ocean has to close.
Joe-IMHO very few of the things this government is doing are vote winners.
Standardistas need to compile a list of these stupid/crazy/crap policies to roll out at the next election and say "do you really want to continue with this lot in charge?"
@Joe "An official limit on the acceptable number of sea lion deaths in commercial fishing nets is no longer necessary, Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says."
I believe the only reason Shane Jones became an MP again, so he can abuse use his position to give any conservationist, NGO, conservation volunteer, animal lover, etc the middle finger.
Yet there is no kai to be found on a dead planet.
This government doesn't seem to include the costs, to the tax payer, associated with all the hours put into legislation and laws such that we do not have a society where some people have all the rights and others non.
Under "Selected Video" you will see a date that is currently playing, or you can select a date from the filtering dialogue box on the right hand side.
The site no longer allows you to choose a particular question form a list of questions. On the right there is a scrolling list of speakers. You will need to scroll down to the name of the person asking the first question, or the particular question you are interested in, click on the name and the video will begin.
I'm finding it very clunky, but it does work. Hope that helps.
South Korea and Australia should enhance their cooperation to secure submarine cables, which carry more than 95 percent of global data traffic. As tensions in the Indo-Pacific intensify, these vital connections face risks from cyber ...
The Parliament Bill Committee has reported back on the Parliament Bill. As usual, they recommend no substantive changes, all decisions having been made in advance and in secret before the bill was introduced - but there are some minor tweaks around oversight of the new parliamentary security powers, which will ...
When the F-47 enters service, at a date to be disclosed, it will be a new factor in US air warfare. A decision to proceed with development, deferred since July, was unexpectedly announced on 21 ...
All my best memoriesCome back clearly to meSome can even make me cry.Just like beforeIt's yesterday once more.Songwriters: Richard Lynn Carpenter / John BettisYesterday, Winston Peters gave a State of the Nation speech in which he declared War on the Woke, described peaceful protesters as fascists, said he’d take our ...
Regardless of our opinions about the politicians involved, I believe that every rational person should welcome the reestablishment of contacts between the USA and the Russian Federation. While this is only the beginning and there are no guarantees of success, it does create the opportunity to address issues ...
Once upon a time, the United States saw the contest between democracy and authoritarianism as a singularly defining issue. It was this outlook, forged in the crucible of World War II, that created such strong ...
A pre-Covid protest about medical staffing shortages outside the Beehive. Since then the situation has only worsened, with 30% of doctors trained here now migrating within a decade. File Photo: Lynn GrievesonMōrena. Long stories shortest: The news this morning is dominated by the crises cascading through our health system after ...
Bargaining between the PSA and Oranga Tamariki over the collective agreement is intensifying – with more strike action likely, while the Employment Relations Authority has ordered facilitation. More than 850 laboratory staff are walking off their jobs in a week of rolling strike action. Union coverage CTU: Confidence in ...
Foreign Minister Penny Wong in 2024 said that ‘we’re in a state of permanent contest in the Pacific—that’s the reality.’ China’s arrogance hurts it in the South Pacific. Mark that as a strong Australian card ...
Here’s my selection1 of scoops, breaking news, news, analyses, deep-dives, features, interviews, Op-Eds, editorials and cartoons from around Aotearoa’s political economy on housing, climate and poverty from RNZ, 1News, The Post-$2, The Press−$, Newsroom/$3, NZ Herald/$, Stuff, BusinessDesk/$, Politik-$, NBR-$, Reuters, FT/$, WSJ/$, Bloomberg/$, New York Times/$, Washington Post/$, Wired/$, ...
In the past week, Israel has reverted to slaughtering civilians, starving children and welshing on the terms of the peace deal negotiated earlier this year. The IDF’s current offensive seems to be intended to render Gaza unlivable, preparatory (perhaps) to re-occupation by Israeli settlers. The short term demands for the ...
A listing of 31 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, March 16, 2025 thru Sat, March 22, 2025. This week's roundup is again published by category and sorted by number of articles included in each. We are still interested ...
In recent months, I have garnered copious amusement playing Martin, chess.com’s infamously terrible Chess AI. Alas, it is not how it once was, when he would cheerfully ignore freely offered material. Martin has grown better since I first stumbled upon him. I still remain frustrated at his capture-happy determination to ...
Every time that I see ya,A lightning bolt fills the room,The underbelly of Paris,She sings her favourite tune,She'll drink you under the table,She'll show you a trick or two,But every time that I left her,I missed the things she would doSongwriters: Kelly JonesThis morning, I posted - Are you excited ...
Long stories shortest this week in our political economy:Standard & Poor’s judged the Government’s council finance reforms a failure. Professional investors showed the Government they want it to borrow more, not less. GDP bounced out of recession by more than forecast in the December quarter, but data for the ...
Each day at 4:30 my brother calls in at the rest home to see Dad. My visits can be months apart. Five minutes after you've left, he’ll have forgotten you were there, but every time, his face lights up and it’s a warm happy visit.Tim takes care of almost everything ...
On the 19th of March, ACT announced they would be running candidates in this year’s local government elections. Accompanying that call for “common-sense kiwis” was an anti-woke essay typifying the views they expect their candidates to hold. I have included that part of their mailer, Free Press, in its entirety. ...
Even when the darkest clouds are in the skyYou mustn't sigh and you mustn't crySpread a little happiness as you go byPlease tryWhat's the use of worrying and feeling blue?When days are long keep on smiling throughSpread a little happiness 'til dreams come trueSongwriters: Vivian Ellis / Clifford Grey / ...
Here’s my selection1 of scoops, breaking news, news, analyses, deep-dives, features, interviews, Op-Eds, editorials and cartoons from around Aotearoa’s political economy on housing, climate and poverty from RNZ, 1News, The Post-$2, The Press−$, Newsroom/$3, NZ Herald/$, Stuff, BusinessDesk/$, Politik-$, NBR-$, Reuters, FT/$, WSJ/$, Bloomberg/$, New York Times/$, Washington Post/$, Wired/$, ...
ACT up the game on division politicsEmmerson’s take on David Seymour’s claim Jesus would have supported ACTACT’s announcement it is moving into local politics is a logical next step for a party that is waging its battle on picking up the aggrieved.It’s a numbers game, and as long as the ...
1. What will be the slogan of the next butter ad campaign?a. You’re worth itb.Once it hits $20, we can do something about the riversc. I can’t believe it’s the price of butter d. None of the above Read more ...
It is said that economists know the price of everything and the value of nothing. That may be an exaggeration but an even better response is to point out economists do know the difference. They did not at first. Classical economics thought that the price of something reflected the objective ...
Political fighting in Taiwan is delaying some of an increase in defence spending and creating an appearance of lack of national resolve that can only damage the island’s relationship with the Trump administration. The main ...
The unclassified version of the 2024 Independent Intelligence Review (IIR) was released today. It’s a welcome and worthy sequel to its 2017 predecessor, with an ambitious set of recommendations for enhancements to Australia’s national intelligence ...
Yesterday outgoing Ombudsman Peter Boshier published a report, Reflections on the Official Information Act, on his way out the door. The report repeated his favoured mantra that the Act was "fundamentally sound", all problems were issues of culture, and that no legislative change was needed (and especially no changes to ...
The United States government is considering replacing USAID with a new agency, the US Agency for International Humanitarian Assistance (USIHA), according to documents published by POLITICO. Under the proposed design, the agency will fail its ...
Hi,Journalism was never the original plan. Back in the 90s, there was no career advisor in Bethlehem, New Zealand — just a computer that would ask you 50 questions before spitting out career options. Yes, I am in this photo. No, I was not good at basketball.The top three careers ...
Mōrena. Long stories shortest: Professional investors who are paid a lot of money to be careful about lending to the New Zealand Government think it is wonderful place to put their money. Yet the Government itself is so afraid of borrowing more that it is happy to kill its own ...
As space becomes more contested, Australia should play a key role with its partners in the Combined Space Operations (CSpO) initiative to safeguard the space domain. Australia, Britain, Canada and the United States signed the ...
Ooh you're a cool catComing on strong with all the chit chatOoh you're alrightHanging out and stealing all the limelightOoh messing with the beat of my heart yeah!Songwriters: Freddie Mercury / John Deacon.It would be a tad ironic; I can see it now. “Yeah, I didn’t unsubscribe when he said ...
The PSA are calling the Prime Minister a hypocrite for committing to increase defence spending while hundreds of more civilian New Zealand Defence Force jobs are set to be cut as part of a major restructure. The number of companies being investigated for people trafficking in New Zealand has skyrocketed ...
Another Friday, hope everyone’s enjoyed their week as we head toward the autumn equinox. Here’s another roundup of stories that caught our eye on the subject of cities and what makes them even better. This week in Greater Auckland On Monday, Connor took a look at how Auckland ...
The podcast above of the weekly ‘Hoon’ webinar for paying subscribers on Thursday night features co-hosts & talking with special guest author Michael Wolff, who has just published his fourth book about Donald Trump: ‘All or Nothing’.Here’s Peter’s writeup of the interview.The Kākā by Bernard Hickey Hoon: Trumpism ...
Wolff, who describes Trump as truly a ‘one of a kind’, at a book launch in Spain. Photo: GettyImagesIt may be a bumpy ride for the world but the era of Donald J. Trump will die with him if we can wait him out says the author of four best-sellers ...
Australia needs to radically reorganise its reserves system to create a latent military force that is much larger, better trained and equipped and deployable within days—not decades. Our current reserve system is not fit for ...
Here’s my selection1 of scoops, breaking news, news, analyses, deep-dives, features, interviews, Op-Eds, editorials and cartoons from around Aotearoa’s political economy on housing, climate and poverty from RNZ, 1News, The Post-$2, The Press−$, Newsroom/$3, NZ Herald/$, Stuff, BusinessDesk/$, Politik-$, NBR-$, Reuters, FT/$, WSJ/$, Bloomberg/$, New York Times/$, Washington Post/$, Wired/$, ...
I have argued before that one ought to be careful in retrospectively allocating texts into genres. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein (1818) only looks like science-fiction because a science-fiction genre subsequently developed. Without H.G. Wells, would Frankenstein be considered science-fiction? No, it probably wouldn’t. Viewed in the context of its time, Frankenstein ...
Elbridge Colby’s senate confirmation hearing in early March holds more important implications for US partners than most observers in Canberra, Wellington or Suva realise. As President Donald Trump’s nominee for under secretary of defence for ...
China’s defence budget is rising heftily yet again. The 2025 rise will be 7.2 percent, the same as in 2024, the government said on 5 March. But the allocation, officially US$245 billion, is just the ...
Concern is growing about wide-ranging local repercussions of the new Setting of Speed Limits rule, rewritten in 2024 by former transport minister Simeon Brown. In particular, there’s growing fears about what this means for children in particular. A key paradox of the new rule is that NZTA-controlled roads have the ...
Speilmeister:Christopher Luxon’s prime-ministerial pitches notwithstanding, are institutions with billions of dollars at their disposal really going to invest them in a country so obviously in a deep funk?HAVING WOOED THE WORLD’s investors, what, if anything, has New Zealand won? Did Christopher Luxon’s guests board their private jets fizzing with enthusiasm for ...
Christchurch City Council is one of 18 councils and three council-controlled organisations (CCOs) downgraded by ratings agency S&P. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāMōrena. Long stories shortest:Standard & Poor’s has cut the credit ratings of 18 councils, blaming the new Government’s abrupt reversal of 3 Waters, cuts to capital ...
Figures released by Statistics New Zealand today showed that the economy grew by 0.7% ending the very deep recession seen over the past year, said NZCTU Te Kauae Kaimahi Economist Craig Renney. “Even though GDP grew in the three months to December, our economy is still 1.1% smaller than it ...
What is going on with the price of butter?, RNZ, 19 march 2025: If you have bought butter recently you might have noticed something - it is a lot more expensive. Stats NZ said last week that the price of butter was up 60 percent in February compared to ...
I agree with Will Leben, who wrote in The Strategist about his mistakes, that an important element of being a commentator is being accountable and taking responsibility for things you got wrong. In that spirit, ...
You’d beDrunk by noon, no one would knowJust like the pandemicWithout the sourdoughIf I were there, I’d find a wayTo get treated for hysteriaEvery dayLyrics Riki Lindhome.A varied selection today in Nick’s Kōrero:Thou shalt have no other gods - with Christopher Luxon.Doctors should be seen and not heard - with ...
Two recent foreign challenges suggest that Australia needs urgently to increase its level of defence self-reliance and to ensure that the increased funding that this would require is available. First, the circumnavigation of our continent ...
Here’s my selection1 of scoops, breaking news, news, analyses, deep-dives, features, interviews, Op-Eds, editorials and cartoons from around Aotearoa’s political economy on housing, climate and poverty from RNZ, 1News, The Post-$2, The Press−$, Newsroom/$3, NZ Herald/$, Stuff, BusinessDesk/$, Politik-$, NBR-$, Reuters, FT/$, WSJ/$, Bloomberg/$, New York Times/$, The Atlantic-$, The ...
According to RNZ’s embedded reporter, the importance of Winston Peters’ talks in Washington this week “cannot be overstated.” Right. “Exceptionally important.” said the maestro himself. This epic importance doesn’t seem to have culminated in anything more than us expressing our “concern” to the Americans about a series of issues that ...
Up until a few weeks ago, I had never heard of "Climate Fresk" and at a guess, this will also be the case for many of you. I stumbled upon it in the self-service training catalog for employees at the company I work at in Germany where it was announced ...
Japan and Australia talk of ‘collective deterrence,’ but they don’t seem to have specific objectives. The relationship needs a clearer direction. The two countries should identify how they complement each other. Each country has two ...
The NZCTU strongly supports the OPC’s decision to issue a code of practice for biometric processing. Our view is that the draft code currently being consulted on is stronger and will be more effective than the exposure code released in early 2024. We are pleased that some of the revisions ...
Australia’s export-oriented industries, particularly agriculture, need to diversify their markets, with a focus on Southeast Asia. This could strengthen economic security and resilience while deepening regional relationships. The Trump administration’s decision to impose tariffs on ...
Minister Shane Jones is introducing fastrack ‘reforms’ to the our fishing industry that will ensure the big players squeeze out the small fishers and entrench an already bankrupt quota system.Our fisheries are under severe stress: the recent decision by theHigh Court ruling that the ...
In what has become regular news, the quarterly ETS auction has failed, with nobody even bothering to bid. The immediate reason is that the carbon price has fallen to around $60, below the auction minimum of $68. And the cause of that is a government which has basically given up ...
US President Donald Trump’s tariff threats have dominated headlines in India in recent weeks. Earlier this month, Trump announced that his reciprocal tariffs—matching other countries’ tariffs on American goods—will go into effect on 2 April, ...
Hi,Back in June of 2021, James Gardner-Hopkins — a former partner at law firm Russell McVeagh — was found guilty of misconduct over sexually inappropriate behaviour with interns.The events all related to law students working as summer interns at Russell McVeagh:As well as intimate touching with a student at his ...
Climate sceptic MP Mark Cameron has slammed National for being ‘out of touch’ by sticking to our climate commitments. Photo: Lynn GrievesonMōrena. Long stories shortest:ACT’s renowned climate sceptic MP Mark Cameron has accused National of being 'out of touch' with farmers by sticking with New Zealand’s Paris accord pledges ...
Now I've heard there was a secret chordThat David played, and it pleased the LordBut you don't really care for music, do you?It goes like this, the fourth, the fifthThe minor falls, the major liftsThe baffled king composing HallelujahSongwriter: Leonard CohenI always thought the lyrics of that great song by ...
People are getting carried away with the virtues of small warship crews. We need to remember the great vice of having few people to run a ship: they’ll quickly tire. Yes, the navy is struggling ...
Mōrena. Here’s my selection1 of scoops, breaking news, news, analyses, deep-dives, features, interviews, Op-Eds, editorials and cartoons from around Aotearoa’s political economy on housing, climate and poverty from RNZ, 1News, The Post-$2, The Press−$, Newsroom/$3, NZ Herald/$, Stuff, BusinessDesk/$, Politik-$, NBR-$, Reuters, FT/$, WSJ/$, Bloomberg/$, New York Times/$, The Atlantic-$, ...
US President Donald Trump’s hostile regime has finally forced Europe to wake up. With US officials calling into question the transatlantic alliance, Germany’s incoming chancellor, Friedrich Merz, recently persuaded lawmakers to revise the country’s debt ...
We need to establish clearer political boundaries around national security to avoid politicising ongoing security issues and to better manage secondary effects. The Australian Federal Police (AFP) revealed on 10 March that the Dural caravan ...
The NZCTU Te Kauae Kaimahi have reiterated their call for Government to protect workers by banning engineered stone in a submission on MBIE’s silica dust consultation. “If Brooke van Velden is genuine when she calls for an evidence-based approach to this issue, then she must support a full ban on ...
The Labour Inspectorate could soon be knocking on the door of hundreds of businesses nation-wide, as it launches a major crackdown on those not abiding by the law. NorthTec staff are on edge as Northland’s leading polytechnic proposes to stop 11 programmes across primary industries, forestry, and construction. Union coverage ...
It’s one thing for military personnel to hone skills with first-person view (FPV) drones in racing competitions. It’s quite another for them to transition to the complexities of the battlefield. Drone racing has become a ...
Seymour says there will be no other exemptions granted to schools wanting to opt out of the Compass contract. Photo: Lynn GrievesonLong stories shortest:David Seymour has denied a request from a Christchurch school and any other schools to be exempted from the Compass school lunch programme, saying the contract ...
Russian President Boris Yeltsin, U.S. President Bill Clinton, Ukrainian President Leonid Kuchma, and British Prime Minister John Major signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty in ...
Edit: The original story said “Palette Cleanser” in both the story, and the headline. I am never, ever going to live this down. Chain me up, throw me into the pit.Hi,With the world burning — literally and figuratively — I felt like Webworm needed a little palate cleanser at the ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Sarah Wesseler(Image credit: Antonio Huerta) Growing up in suburban Ohio, I was used to seeing farmland and woods disappear to make room for new subdivisions, strip malls, and big box stores. I didn’t usually welcome the changes, but I assumed others ...
Myanmar was a key global site for criminal activity well before the 2021 military coup. Today, illicit industry, especially heroin and methamphetamine production, still defines much of the economy. Nowhere, not even the leafiest districts ...
What've I gotta do to make you love me?What've I gotta do to make you care?What do I do when lightning strikes me?And I wake up and find that you're not thereWhat've I gotta do to make you want me?Mmm hmm, what've I gotta do to be heard?What do I ...
Hundreds more Palestinians have died in recent days as Israel’s assault on Gaza continues and humanitarian aid, including food and medicine, is blocked. ...
National is looking to cut hundreds of jobs at New Zealand’s Defence Force, while at the same time it talks up plans to increase focus and spending in Defence. ...
It’s been revealed that the Government is secretly trying to bring back a ‘one-size fits all’ standardised test – a decision that has shocked school principals. ...
The Green Party is calling for the compassionate release of Dean Wickliffe, a 77-year-old kaumātua on hunger strike at the Spring Hill Corrections Facility, after visiting him at the prison. ...
The Green Party is calling on Government MPs to support Chlöe Swarbrick’s Member’s Bill to sanction Israel for its unlawful presence and illegal actions in Palestine, following another day of appalling violence against civilians in Gaza. ...
The Green Party stands in support of volunteer firefighters petitioning the Government to step up and change legislation to provide volunteers the same ACC coverage and benefits as their paid counterparts. ...
At 2.30am local time, Israel launched a treacherous attack on Gaza killing more than 300 defenceless civilians while they slept. Many of them were children. This followed a more than 2 week-long blockade by Israel on the entry of all goods and aid into Gaza. Israel deliberately targeted densely populated ...
Living Strong, Aging Well There is much discussion around the health of our older New Zealanders and how we can age well. In reality, the delivery of health services accounts for only a relatively small percentage of health outcomes as we age. Significantly, dry warm housing, nutrition, exercise, social connection, ...
Shane Jones’ display on Q&A showed how out of touch he and this Government are with our communities and how in sync they are with companies with little concern for people and planet. ...
Labour does not support the private ownership of core infrastructure like schools, hospitals and prisons, which will only see worse outcomes for Kiwis. ...
The Green Party is disappointed the Government voted down Hūhana Lyndon’s member’s Bill, which would have prevented further alienation of Māori land through the Public Works Act. ...
The Labour Party will support Chloe Swarbrick’s member’s bill which would allow sanctions against Israel for its illegal occupation of the Palestinian Territories. ...
The Government’s new procurement rules are a blatant attack on workers and the environment, showing once again that National’s priorities are completely out of touch with everyday Kiwis. ...
With Labour and Te Pāti Māori’s official support, Opposition parties are officially aligned to progress Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick’s Member’s Bill to sanction Israel for its unlawful presence in Palestine. ...
Te Pāti Māori extends our deepest aroha to the 500 plus Whānau Ora workers who have been advised today that the govt will be dismantling their contracts. For twenty years , Whānau Ora has been helping families, delivering life-changing support through a kaupapa Māori approach. It has built trust where ...
Labour welcomes Simeon Brown’s move to reinstate a board at Health New Zealand, bringing the destructive and secretive tenure of commissioner Lester Levy to an end. ...
This morning’s announcement by the Health Minister regarding a major overhaul of the public health sector levels yet another blow to the country’s essential services. ...
New Zealand First has introduced a Member’s Bill that will ensure employment decisions in the public service are based on merit and not on forced woke ‘Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion’ targets. “This Bill would put an end to the woke left-wing social engineering and diversity targets in the public sector. ...
Police have referred 20 offenders to Destiny Church-affiliated programmes Man Up and Legacy as ‘wellness providers’ in the last year, raising concerns that those seeking help are being recruited into a harmful organisation. ...
Te Pāti Māori welcomes the resignation of Richard Prebble from the Waitangi Tribunal. His appointment in October 2024 was a disgrace- another example of this government undermining Te Tiriti o Waitangi by appointing a former ACT leader who has spent his career attacking Māori rights. “Regardless of the reason for ...
“Finally our story can be heard, and the Crown now acknowledges the injustices that were inflicted on Ngāti Hāua,” says Chair of Ngāti Hāua Iwi Trust, Graham ‘Tinker’ Bell. “Those injustices include being pushed out of Heretaunga (Hutt ...
The challenge now is to get the best possible outcome from the split Act model. We will be working closely with the Government over the course of this year to that end. We simply must have a more nuanced outcome from this process than from the Fast-track ...
The Free Speech Union has made two submissions advocating for more speech, not less, on the Media Reform Proposals and the Regulatory Systems (Occupational Regulation) Amendment Bill, says Jonathan Ayling, Chief Executive of the Free Speech Union. “Our ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Eric Windholz, Associate Professor, Faculty of Law, Monash University Last week, the Novak Djokovic-led Professional Tennis Players Association (PTPA) announced it was suing the sport’s governing bodies – the men’s (ATP) and women’s (WTA) tours, the International Tennis Federation (ITF) and the ...
The Children's Minister says Oranga Tamariki's breaching of confidential information of children and families could not be allowed to continue under this government's watch. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By William Alexander Donald, Professor of Chemistry, UNSW Sydney Irene Miller/Shutterstock Silicosis is an incurable but entirely preventable lung disease. It has only one cause: breathing in too much silica dust. This is a risk in several industries, including tunnelling, stone masonry ...
By Patrick Decloitre, RNZ Pacific correspondent French Pacific desk Southern Cross, a French-hosted regional military exercise, is moving to Wallis and Futuna Islands this year. The exercise, which includes participating regional armed and law enforcement forces from Australia, Fiji, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea and Tonga every two years, is ...
“The Government has rightly decided to scrap Councils’ focus on social and cultural ‘wellbeings’ and get them back to getting the basics right first, and it’s time Dunedin Council followed suit.” ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Christina McCabe, PhD Candidate in Interdisciplinary Ecology, University of Canterbury Shutterstock/S Watson When we think about flood management, higher stop banks, stronger levees and concrete barriers usually come to mind. But what if the best solution – for people and nature ...
Report by Dr David Robie – Café Pacific. – Like a relentless ocean, wave after wave of pro-Palestinian pro-human rights protesters disrupted New Zealand deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters’ state of the nation speech at the Christchurch Town Hall yesterday. A clarion call to Trumpism and Australia’s One Nation ...
Pacific Media Watch Paris-based global media freedom watchdog Reporters Without Borders (RSF) has recalled that 20 journalists were killed during the six-year Philippines presidency of Rodrigo Duterte, a regime marked by fierce repression of the press. Former president Duterte was arrested earlier this week as part of an International Criminal ...
"The councillors were given tickets because they are councillors, at the very same time they're considering the future of the stadium. It's beyond belief that anyone is defending this." ...
SPECIAL REPORT:By Saige England in Christchurch Like a relentless ocean, wave after wave of pro-Palestinian pro-human rights protesters disrupted New Zealand deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters’ state of the nation speech at the Christchurch Town Hall yesterday. A clarion call to Trumpism and Australia’s One Nation Party, the speech ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Adrian Beaumont, Election Analyst (Psephologist) at The Conversation; and Honorary Associate, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne A national Morgan poll, conducted March 10–16 from a sample of 2,097, gave Labor a 54.5–45.5 lead by headline respondent preferences, a ...
Julie Hill reviews the Meta exposé written by the New Zealander who used to work there. Sarah Wynn-Williams begins to get a sense that she isn’t in for a normal life when, at 13, she is munched by a shark. The Christchurch teenager is at the beach, on holiday with ...
The proposal to remove the living wage requirement from public sector procurement rules turns back the clock on a progressive step towards valuing essential workers, argues Lyndy McIntyre.On April 1, workers on the minimum wage will get their annual pay rise, with their hourly rate moving from $23.15 to ...
Lyric Waiwiri-Smith recalls a serene week eating raw fish and swimming in Samoa.In June 2023, I travelled from Tāmaki Makaurau to Samoa with my (now) ex-boyfriend’s family (love (most of) you guys). We spent a beautiful nearly two weeks with sand stuck to our skin and salt water dripping ...
The Labour Party’s Tangi Utikere is Palmerston North’s biggest champion and an MP on the come-up. There’s an ancient adage familiar to Palmerstonians (as in, people from Palmerston North), uttered by a British explorer after a voyage through the land of the long white cloud: “if you wish to kill ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Olivia Fisher, Senior Research Fellow, Applied Implementation Science, Charles Darwin University Seven million Australians live in rural and remote areas and many struggle to access the same quality of health care as those in metropolitan areas. More than 18,000 Australians have no ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kate Holland, Principal Research Scientist, Water Security, CSIRO A dry farm dam in Montacute, Adelaide Hills, March 2025. Ilan Sagi. The Adelaide Hills are experiencing severe water shortages. The root cause? A prolonged dry period and not enough water tankers to ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Erin O’Brien, Associate Professor, School of Government and International Relations, Griffith University Getty Images When the United States starts a trade war with your country, how do you fight back? For individuals, one option is to wage a personal trade war ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By John Hawkins, Senior Lecturer, Canberra School of Politics, Economics and Society, University of Canberra Treasurer Jim Chalmers will bring down the federal budget on Tuesday. It’s likely most of the major spending initiatives have already been announced. An extra A$8.5 billion in ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Alexis Weaver, Associate Lecturer in Music Technology, University of Sydney Shutterstock With artificial intelligence programs that can now generate entire songs on demand, you’d be forgiven for thinking AI might eventually lead to the decline of human-made music. But AI can ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Justin Bergman, International Affairs Editor Both Labor and the Coalition are considering an increase to defence spending ahead of the federal election. Defence spending is currently at about 2% of gross domestic product (GDP), or around A$56 billion per year. The Coalition ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Janeen Baxter, Director, ARC Life Course Centre and ARC Kathleen Fitzpatrick Laureate Fellow, The University of Queensland Australia has a gender problem. Despite social, economic and political reform aimed at improving opportunities for women, gender gaps are increasing and Australia is falling ...
Based on the 2023 and 2024 Budget Summary of Initiatives, CPAG refers to estimates of the cost of restoring school lunches to their 2024 standard, between $107-115 extra a year. ...
In a speech that channelled Trump-style rhetoric but stuck to old Peters themes, the NZ First leader mixed nationalism, culture war grievances and economic blame, writes Catherine McGregor in today’s extract from The Bulletin. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here.An ‘outright litany’ of grievances Winston ...
The government is spending $2.7 billion on tertiary courses this year, but there are early signs it will not be enough to cover all the enrolments. ...
If you want to understand where this coalition Government is coming from, with its disdain for impoverished families and hungry children, Freddy the Frog, Te Tiriti, democratic conventions and other Kiwi decencies, George Monbiot’s The Invisible Doctrine: The Secret History of Neoliberalism is illuminating.The book is short and vividly written, ...
https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/350240619/anatomy-political-misfire-how-pms-accommodation-supplement-saga-unfolded
Huge amt of time by civil servants to sort this out.
Gota wonder how much that cost ….
How sad for Mr Luxon. He was entitled after all.
Interesting to read the lines prepared by staff and the way he can't deviate or ad lib.
Is there a journalist reckless enough to direct a question to Hamish Rutherford, who lurks at Luxon's side in pressers, rather than to Luxon himself? As in "Can I ask Hamish a question? I'd prefer to talk to the ventriloquist, not his dummy”.
Yr heart has to go out to all the media people whose lives are being messed up today..
They will have mortgages…and the like..
It's just ghastly…
Not a nice time be laid off with a mortgage that you've been paying down for a while.
BNZ, and I presume all the others removed the re-draw facility from their existing mortgage agreements this week. So you've got to make a new application to borrow funds to tide you over the initial unemployment until you find a new job.
Fun times.
Where voucher schooling has been used the consistent conclusion is that it does not work as advertised.
https://larspsyll.wordpress.com/2024/04/07/the-swedish-for-profit-free-school-disaster-2/
Seymour was an advocate for voucher schools I think.
There is quite a body of research that would disagree.
The impact of voucher programs: A deep dive into the research (fordhaminstitute.org)
I'm not convinced about the appropriateness of voucher systems in the NZ setting, although we already have a quasi voucher system (with scholarships etc). NZ has "a much smaller market for – and culture of – private schooling than many other OECD countries" (Research-Note-The-State-of-Schooling.pdf), however that same research (from 2020) found that "state schools are underperforming compared with state-integrated and private schools", and that has to change.
That research doesn't even address the question, let alone challenge it. Since vouchers are a state level choice about how to run the entire education system then the effectiveness of that choice needs to address the performance of the whole education system in comparison to public funding. Examples of successful students, teachers or institutions do not make that point, regardless of how successful examples they may be.
We should also keep in mind that there is a survival bias to successful examples. The schools which fail and are subsequently closed due to their failure or absorbed into the public system are not around to study (and there are numerous examples of this style even in NZ, where we already saw the evidence of these schools undermining student testing at a national level).
I think that Finland does not allow any form of private schools but expects that every state school is of the highest standard and funds it accordingly.
They also as a society value education and understand the benefits to everyone in the society so, as expounded in 'Viking Economics', people are happy to pay higher taxes to get the mutual benefits of an educated work force.
What is happening here? We are cutting services, encouraging a two tier system of health and education, not ensuring enough quality graduates for our needs, allowing to go overseas many of those graduates we do produce because of the lack of employment.
We are cutting taxes and impoverishing our country by doing so, developing an unfair society and we will pay the cost of all that.
You should disconnect the taxation issue from the funding of education. Its a choice to undervalue education and to systematically reduce the salary of teachers over time and that choice is not constrained by the amount of taxation collected by the government. The actual restriction the government faces is in the number of educators who will work in the public education system and the ability to train them to and have them perform well in their teaching.
This is a relevant point with Lars P Syll being a member of the MMT group of economists (you could find posts on his blog describing this fact). It over complicates things to link these together when its much more clear that this National led govt really doesn't value public education very highly as a profession.
That isn't actually true. They do exist.
There are private schools, although not very many. Apparently about 3% or pupils go to private schools. They teach the State Curriculum and are financed by the state,
An acquaintance, whose son lives there has told me that this is a reasonable review of the system. I don't have personal knowledge.
https://eurydice.eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-education-systems/finland/organisation-private-education
Yip ban private schools and health insurance,
If the public education and health systems were of a high enough standard you wouldn't need to ban private schools and health insurance, they just wouldn't exist.
Private education is not prohibited in Finland (aacrao.org)
"That research doesn't even address the question, let alone challenge it. "
The comment you made was "Where voucher schooling has been used the consistent conclusion is that it does not work as advertised."
The Fordham research shows that voucher schooling can and does work, and points out the nuances.
"We should also keep in mind that there is a survival bias to successful examples."
And we should also point out that there in education (as with other disciplines) there is strong ideological bias that is often directed against alternatives to education.
First I will just point out that nobody is proposing alternatives to education which appear to be, no education.
Now otherwise you have again failed to contend the important question regarding vouchers (which are a change to the school system as a whole), which is do they make the overall school system better, improve performance overall, etc… The question is not can some schools succeed in their mission when they are paid in vouchers.
Now you can very well claim that the structure of public education is mostly driven by ideology all you want (I guess with the unstated implication that its not objectively well structured due to that), but the onus is still on research to demonstrate that the voucher alternative is actually better overall. The evidence is on the contrary that institutional competition for funding has and does damage the primary purpose of these institutions and most frequently undermines the standards of assessment well before it improves performance in those standards.
"Now otherwise you have again failed to contend the important question regarding vouchers (which are a change to the school system as a whole), which is do they make the overall school system better, improve performance overall, etc…"
That's not the question you posed. You said "Where voucher schooling has been used the consistent conclusion is that it does not work as advertised."
"…which are a change to the school system as a whole…"
Vouchers are not a change to the school system as a whole. They are a means for allocating financial resources.
"do they make the overall school system better, improve performance overall, etc… "
I don't know. Fordham's research says they do, but there are exceptions and nuances.
"The evidence is on the contrary that institutional competition for funding has and does damage the primary purpose of these institutions and most frequently undermines the standards of assessment well before it improves performance in those standards."
What evidence? How do you define the 'primary purpose'?
I could point to work that suggests that competition between institutions is indeed healthy for those institutions and for student outcomes, including Does Competition Work in Education? | Center for Excellence in Education (cee.org) and The Education Competition Index: Quantifying competitive pressure in America’s 125 largest school districts (fordhaminstitute.org). But no doubt you could point to studies that present a different picture because this is not settled. But to suggest that competition damages 'the primary purpose of these institutions' is in my view an unsustainable claim.
That is the question I posed. You may well not have understood that when you replied, but that is the question. And yes, vouchers are a change to the overall school system. You could very well set a voucher school in NZ today which would of course have zero chance of accepting voucher pupils, because the voucher system needs a systematic legislative change to even exist.
Finally, you seem to be search for just what is the primary purpose of education institutions? That would be to provide education, at least to their students.
"That would be to provide education, at least to their students."
I would suggest that any definition should include some kind of qualitative ambition. Anyway…
"And yes, vouchers are a change to the overall school system."
We'll have to agree to disagree. We have vouchers of sorts operating in the education system already, and we have choice in the system already. Vouchers are merely a mechanism to simply funding of those choices and any others the government may wish to introduce.
Your saying these existing funding mechanisms, which you are referring to as effectively vouchers, are not implemented via govt legislation and budgeting? I mean what are you even disagreeing with here. NZ's education system is overwhelmingly public even as far as it contains private schools which are still quite largely publicly funded.
"Your saying these existing funding mechanisms, which you are referring to as effectively vouchers, are not implemented via govt legislation and budgeting?"
No, I'm not saying that.
"NZ's education system is overwhelmingly public even as far as it contains private schools which are still quite largely publicly funded."
They are publicly funded as state schools are. I'm not sure what your point is.
Good so we seem to agree then that implementing a voucher system is a change to the overall school system. This is very clearly quite important to my claim, that if we are going to change the school system then one of the government goals should be to improve overall that system.
I mean if the govt wanted they could instead set up a bunch of new charter schools and then fund those over and above the level of public schools and if they were not incompetent in doing that they might very well succeed in creating some relatively successful new charter schools. But the justification of the public interest of such a policy appears to be does that improve the overall performance of NZs school system.
That is the supposed promise of voucher funding, that incentives are setup to make the delivery of education more 'efficient' and incentivized than the public sector (where efficient in this context supposedly means quite unrealistically having better teaching outcomes). But if that incentive structure undermines the overall education system performance its quite clearly not justified as an education policy.
"Good so we seem to agree then that implementing a voucher system is a change to the overall school system. "
Please don’t misrepresent me. I repeat, voucher systems are not a change to the overall school system. Voucher systems are simply a funding mechanism to facilitate choice, choice that is already in place in many cases.
Awesome. In that case it seems we already in NZ have the worlds most comprehensive voucher school system in place, no further school system reform necessary. School choice delivered.
What gives you the idea we have ‘the world’s most comprehensive voucher school system in place’?
You have convinced me of this. Apparently legislation of the school system is not needed to implement this, so I willed it into existence in my own thinking based on what you told me.
Did the 2020 research state the reasons why the underperforming happened, and therefore help understand what would be needed to achieve parity in performance?
For some reason my link to the reasearch broke – here it is Research Note: The State of Schooling | The New Zealand Initiative (nzinitiative.org.nz)– download the PDF from there. The answer to your question is that the report examines outcomes, not reasons for the outcomes, however section 3 does look at "which socioeconomic factors predict school authority attendance".
The full report concludes with this:
"Putting educational ideology aside, this report shows the absence of evidence for which schools are succeeding and which are falling behind. For too long, families have had to rely on prejudiced anecdotal evidence, and misleading league tables and decile ratings to decide the ‘right’ school for their child. More needs to be done and more can be done, but we must first use the right tools. Without the right information and tools, New Zealand will remain blind to serious educational problems and the successes that should be celebrated."
NZ Initiative… rw thinktank. Why do you believe their views on a voucher system are worth espousing on a lw opinion site?
A solution in search of a problem, seems to me. Greater resource targetting to low decile schools is a better answer, surely, than a 'free-market' approach. The aim should be to provide equitable education to all NZ children.
For examples of failed 2-tier education systems, you have only to look to UK (academies/charter schools run for profit, with expensive business management that sucks resource from the students and from the public sector); or to Oz (where private fee-paying schools are paid significantly more by the government than state schools).
The link about voucher systems was not from NZI. The voucher link is from my comment at https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-10-04-2024/#comment-1995786, and is https://fordhaminstitute.org/national/commentary/impact-voucher-programs-deep-dive-research
If you have winner and loser Schools then you have winner and loser children, through no fault of their own.
Finland's system works because it aims for a high standard for their entire education system. Something ours also aspires to, but gets knee capped periodically by Governments wedded to dogma, rather than informed research.
New Zealand's has suffered from too much knee jerk simplistic bombastic "solutions'" by, mostly right wing, rote learning, cannon fodder for industry ideology. A two tier Education system.
They want to have a basic system for the "bottom feeders" and an elite system for their own children. Ironically they want other tax payers to subsidise a higher standard education for their children, with all the advantages of smaller class sizes, subject ranges, skilled Teachers and personalised Teaching they oppose funding in State Schools.
"If you have winner and loser Schools then you have winner and loser children, through no fault of their own."
It doesn't have to be that way. There is plenty of research that shows competition can improved educational outcomes, but certainly there have to be controls.
"New Zealand's has suffered from too much knee jerk simplistic bombastic "solutions'" by, mostly right wing, rote learning, cannon fodder for industry ideology."
My experience is that it has come from right and left. My children were exposed to educational philosophies such as the Numeracy Project (Un(ac)countable: Why millions on maths returned little | The New Zealand Initiative (nzinitiative.org.nz)) that was trialed under a National government but rolled out under a Labour administration. They were also unfortunate victims of the 'whole of language' experiment, which began as a system introduced in the 1970's to complement phonics, but somehow saw phonics based teaching relegated to such an extent that literacy rates fell alarmingly. My severely dyslexic child in particular suffered from this absurd ideological movement, which occurred under governments of left and right.
I am not an educationalist, but I am close enough to the outcomes of the education system to be deeply concerned about the quality of education in this country, and what it means for the future of NZ.
"socioeconomic factors predict school authority attendance". What is a 'school authority attendance'?
This does not seem to help, if it is about attendance figures, as the question concerned overall academic underperformance.
Attendance rates no doubt is a factor but what else?
Your final paragraph says in essence that the NZInitiative don't know, but criticise what information and argument based on that information is already published.
"What is a 'school authority attendance'?"
The very first paragraph of the link defines it for you:
"This research note takes a closer look at school effectiveness across state, state-integrated, and private schools, otherwise defined as school authority (or type) using the Initiative's school performance tool."
Research Note: The State of Schooling | The New Zealand Initiative (nzinitiative.org.nz)
"Your final paragraph says in essence that the NZInitiative don't know, but criticise what information and argument based on that information is already published."
The research examined school effectiveness; it makes no claims about 'why' because that isn't its purpose.
If you want to understand why NZ's educational system has been in such decline, that is a far more detailed conversation. However, this piece gives some clues (System in freefall: why NZ children face education tragedy | The New Zealand Initiative (nzinitiative.org.nz)), including this:
"Like the governments before it, the current Labour-led administration and its Ministry of Education have shown themselves keen to jump on fashionable bandwagons. Anything that sounds kind, caring, inclusive and modern is in. Anything appearing old-fashioned, rigorous or demanding is out. In this way, over time, NZ’s education system has been hollowed out. There is no canon of knowledge enshrined in the curriculum. There is a lack of rigorous assessment. New teaching approaches are thrown at the system without proper monitoring or evaluation. The result is that the successive tiers of education play catch-up, catch up. Secondary schools are teaching what primary schools should have. And tertiary institutions spend an incredible amount of effort making up for the deficits of secondary schooling. NZ once prided itself in having a world-class education system. It has now become a country in education free fall."
I am expected to treat what is little more than rhetoric as being worthy of the title of research? The use of exaggeration and generalisation is evident.
" Anything that sounds kind, caring, inclusive and modern is in. Anything appearing old-fashioned, rigorous or demanding is out."
"… kind, caring, inclusive and modern…"
The Business Roundtable to a T.
The research note is in the PDF that you can download from the URL.
The conclusions from whatever research was conducted are no more than political press releases and contaminate the research to the point of having to doubt their reliability and freedom from bias.
The conclusions are drawn from the research. And that research is far from being an outlier. It's generally accepted that NZ's education system has been in decline for decades.
Traveller, you wrote early on, "I am not an educationalist, but I am close enough to the outcomes of the education system to be deeply concerned about the quality of education in this country, and what it means for the future of NZ."
I was a teacher and professionally worked with those concerns and for those outcomes.
One thing I taught as an English and History teacher were the dangers of such errors as hyperbole, exaggeration, false and rash generalisations. You have not yet acknowledged that danger in what you are quoting. If you can't see it, then your conclusions are as faulted.
"One thing I taught as an English and History teacher were the dangers of such errors as hyperbole, exaggeration, false and rash generalisations. You have not yet acknowledged that danger in what you are quoting. If you can't see it, then your conclusions are as faulted."
Have you read the actual research paper? What is your assessment of the actual data and conclusions reached?
"The conclusions are drawn from the research."
These are the conclusions."Anything that sounds kind, caring, inclusive and modern is in. Anything appearing old-fashioned, rigorous or demanding is out."
What does that say about the research?
But we've been here before………
"These are the conclusions."Anything that sounds kind, caring, inclusive and modern is in. Anything appearing old-fashioned, rigorous or demanding is out.""
That's commentary. Have you read the actual research paper and it’s conclusions and recommendations?
Traveller wrote:
"The research examined school effectiveness; it makes no claims about 'why' because that isn't its purpose."
Then why are you promoting vouchers?
Did the Business Roundtable suggest them?
You've quoted them extensively in your comments.
There are two threads to this conversation. One is about the decline in the education system, the other about vouchers. My comment you quoted is from the former.
Traveller. now that has been sorted. My error- it is commentary and obviously now the NZInitiative's generalisation is their reaction to their reading of the research. What was the response of the authors of the research to that summation of their work, I wonder.
It didn't help your argument, by the way, to be quoting the NZInitiative's reaction to support your original arguments. Distractive at best.
Is the original research sound in your opinion?
I wish you well on your travels.
"Is the original research sound in your opinion?"
Yes. And it's supported by other work including
Now_I_dont_know_my_ABC_final-1.pdf (theeducationhub.org.nz)
Ed-Hub_Long-literacy-report_v2.pdf (theeducationhub.org.nz)
"I wish you well on your travels."
And you!
The guardian website has the roundup of late nite u s. comedians…(always a recommended watch..)
And Jon stewart does an effective dissection of gaza/america's relationship with israel..
(And he has the first funny God/gender-wars joke I have heard…)
Re this COC Govt. once Winston has to hand over his Deputy PM possie to Atlas Dave he could well turn on them. Not suggesting it would involve principles!
Pre the last election he had a letter prepared for the Governor General withdrawing support for PM Ardern, which he never sent in the end, but he is certainly capable of being the worm that turned…again.
"If you have looked hard at the manner of things, if you have surveyed the troubles of our time, and cannot discover a way forward, do not despair. Do better. Grieve: mount an altar to the sensuous feelings of loss that swim through you. In the stinging fumes that redden the eyes, you might partly recover a clear vision of where to go. You might come to see that forward movement is no longer possible in these moments, and that the way to go was never forward anyway – but awk-ward: into the blackness of catacombs, into the shadows of sanctuary, into the riven cracks signed with the pen of the trickster, into the heat of compost, into the position of a prostrated man who knows that when the storm roars the thing to do is to be still. In that stillness, entire worlds churn."
~ Bayo Akomolafe
There’s no Fair Go in Luxon’s New Zealand.
The Newshub shutdown is fake panic. It’s TINA, when it’s really what the very right wing US owners wish to do, which is erode our democracy and make us more pliant.
The disaster of the media and a National government of whatever kind this is is real, but this is opportunism. There will be no more Dame Jacinda’s doing the correct thing supported by the country’s media. We will have opposition for its own sake and the further rise to prominence of the extreme.
What is your evidence that "the very right wing US owners wish to … erode our democracy and make us more pliant"?
It's a life crisis for 250 people and their families and subcontractors.
I agree. This situation suits NAct very well. Pretty much no competition any more. TVNZ journalists/reporters will know if they run stories which do not present the govt. in a good light they are likely to be dumped on by this govt., which has demonstrated they have no ethical standards. It's happened before under the Muldoon administration.
Probably the reason Melissa Lee has been sitting on her a***e doing nothing. She's been told not to.
Hi Anne. IMHO, doing nothing is entirely the correct response. Newshub is a private company that has failed. Other private media formats are rising up and taking their place. It's simply the circle of life. and while unfortunate for those personally affected, no amount of corporate welfare should be put in their direction.
Day 2 of Tickle v Giggle in Australia. Do women have the right to single sex spaces?
Evolutionary biologist Colin Wright is giving evidence for Giggle today. Presumably because it's now necessary to establish what biological sex is. Tickle is arguing that they are female because of having a gender recognition certificate, and therefore should be treated as a woman (and allowed in women's only spaces).
Wright will be presenting evidence that there are two sexes in humans, and that humans cannot change sex.
https://twitter.com/tribunaltweets2/status/1777841201007472750
correction to the above. Tickle has been able to legally change his birth certificate to female, in Queensland. Queensland has no gender recognition certificate process.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgender_rights_in_Australia
The key piece of legislation in this case is the Sex Discrimination Act 1984, initially set up because of women's rights and so that Australia would comply with being a signatory to CEDAW
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_on_the_Elimination_of_All_Forms_of_Discrimination_Against_Women
The SDA was amended in 2013 to include gender identity and sexual orientation.
https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2004A02868/latest/text
https://twitter.com/hjoycegender/status/1777596165191586127
Helen Joyce (Director of Advocacy Sex Maters UK)
"What it means to "live as a woman" in one pithy tweet. Roxy Tickle's evidence that he is a woman hinges on his repeated and ongoing intrusion on women only spaces, where by definition he is not permitted, because he's a man not a woman. Then he turns up in court and says that the very fact that he intrudes on women's spaces is evidence that he's entitled to be there. Trans logic is circular logic"
" Trans logic is circular logic"
Is that like saying all Māori are animists?
Trans logic. What is "trans logic"?
Dear Robert
I do appreciate all your attention you give me, but it is getting a bit too creepy.
So, in case this needs a translation for you: back off.
Attention?
I don't understand what you mean by "trans logic".
I would have thought the logic adopted by trans people…..on its literal and plain meaning.
We have discussed ad nauseam the most egregious examples of this logic namely that some mechanism exists to change one's biologic sex from male to female.
From this cherished held to heart belief from TRAs come
1 the ability for a man ro say he is a woman and enter and race against women in sports or sports teams despite research showing that a male passing through male puberty maintains strength, muscle and other sports advantages no matter how they dress currently.
2 the notion that as a man says he is a women he is able to enter into women's toilets and changing rooms. NB this need for men is tied to a conditon known as AGP Autogynephilia is defined as a male's propensity to be sexually aroused by the thought of himself as a female.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22005209/#:~:text=Autogynephilia%20is%20defined%20as%20a,of%20himself%20as%20a%20female.
3 the idea that a man should be held in a prison designated as one for women only. Some womens prisons now hold prisoners who have raped women.
The list of these leaps in logic is endless leading to the shorthand 'trans logic' and I am sure you actually know this.
I suspect this is part of the reason for Tabletennis’ comment about it being ‘creepy’ as well meaning people have explained over and again how male sexuality, in the form adopted by the trans community has an impact on women.
My fundamental belief about trans is that it is at heart misogynistic. Men may believe, even support, the notion that whatever other men want to do in the way of sexuality is ‘ok by them’
Well, I surprised you are comfortable conflating all trans people with a certain style of logic – are they not individuals, with individualistic views of the world? It's just like saying "women's logic" isn't it?
I thought you'd be all over that sort of broad-brush misrepresentation.
Thanks for the sarcasm and the deliberate, I suspect, bearing mind how long this issue has been discussed here, misreading of my remarks.
What I was explaining is the current set of beliefs adopted as part of the trans arguments.
'Logic' is some times used as a simile for belief.
It is common to group people into say 'cohorts' to look at them and their beliefs as a group. This does not mean that as being part of this group they lose their identity. Of course not. They may still vote Labour, or Democrat, support certain sports teams etc.
What we are saying is that here is a group of people who have decided to believe things that are ? possibly? lacking in logic. Prime among these beliefs is that by dressing as a woman a man becomes a woman.
For me it has a smidgen of similarity to the battle between proponents of trans- and con- substantiation.
The overriding belief is that a man can turn into a woman by adopting dress or womanface or by just saying they are a woman.
My belief is this belief or 'trans logic' can be seen through a lens of misogyny, ie inherent male beliefs. Others explain it through the lens of psychiatric makeup ie as a paraphilia/psychiatric illness. These all help people to understand why someone would say they are some thing they are not or belive some thing that is a biological impossibility.
Looking at children we can see the influence of social contagion and still, that some may do all they can to ensure their child does not present when grown up, as gay. It is tragic that any parent would do this to a child.
Again as David says below
Shanreagh, Something that I have noticed as I have aged… There have always been men who get quite wound up with women who don’t know their place. As they get older they become rather peculiar, and have funny ideas about women/girls. Unfortunately I’ve had to deal with the consequences within my own extended family. For some reason Robert cannot comprehend that women themselves should have a say in their own issues, without the input from a man, or transwomen.
David – are you the person who calls trans people "funny little men"?
No Robert, I’m referring to those funny little men, especially older men, who are very controlling of women and girls. For some reason they get wound up by the idea that women and girls are able to decide and do things without the consent of men. Anyone would think that a woman must get their opinions from that woman’s male owner.
Presumably they have a gender hierarchy, at the top Men, then transwomen (a man who believes that he is a women), then much further down the list it is women.
In saying that, in my extended family a number several are gay/lesbian. I have noticed how a young nephew and his boyfriend, as well as some of his friends, have disturbing views of girls, particularly lesbians. Disgusting is a term that comes to mind, but as they are gay/bisexual/non binary, they believe that they can say whatever they like about women and girls.
Anyway, for the life of me, I can’t fathom why you seem to be so invested with this issue. If woman are concerned about transwomen in women’s spaces, then it’s a discussion for women to have.
It’s kinda obvious to me, and maybe others, that you as a man, have an issue with women discussing this, especially if they have the audacity to disobey you, and hold and express views that contradict yours.
David writes:
"If woman are concerned about transwomen in women’s spaces, then it’s a discussion for women to have."
which begs the question, "Why does David comment so regularly on this issue?
Robert, the reason why I comment on this issue is because so many men (including men who identify as a woman) are telling women what to do. And heaven forbid, should a woman, or group of women, decide that they want to have a say in women’s issues, men shut them down.
In my opinion Robert, I get the impression, that you are one of those men who who gets a little wound up, if woman do their own thing, without your approval.
I appreciate that you may disagree with this, but it is the impression that I get from your comments around this topic.
"…'trans logic' can be seen through a lens of misogyny, ie inherent male beliefs."
Which of course doesn't mean that 'misogyny' is an essential part of being male.
What are 'male beliefs'?
And David you say “If woman are concerned about transwomen in women’s spaces, then it’s a discussion for women to have.”
Women (and girls) are the ones directly affected but it’s not just women that are concerned. Men have Mothers, Wives, Daughters, Girlfriends, etc so many men are also concerned.
Shanreagh said;
"I would have thought the logic adopted by trans people…" and I have to ask if you believe all trans people think the same.
If you don't think that, and I hope you don't, you'll perhaps review your statement.
As a cohort, as a group. The overwhelming prime belief is that a person can trans into a being that they are not, by the mere expression of the belief.
So if a man says 'I am a woman therefore I am a woman or if 'I shop in womens clothing stores therefore I am a woman,…..etc
My belief that I am a princess does not mean I am a princess.
The belief that, say Roxy Tickle has, that he is a woman does not mean that he is a woman
Biological facts cannot be upstaged by beliefs.
I suspect you know this.
With apologies to Hughes Mearns:
Facts of all kinds have been regularly 'upstaged' by human beliefs, not to mention by new knowledge, since time immemorial.
https://undsci.berkeley.edu/understanding-science-101/how-science-works/even-theories-change/
I certainly prefer 'facts', but beliefs are powerful – such are the mysteries of the human mind, and imho our species still has much to learn, time and circumstances permitting.
Biological sex in humans has been immutable throughout history.
If, at some time in humanity's future, that was no longer the case, who might be opposed to people changing their sex, and why?
The devil is in the 'anomaly'
not quite sure what you mean there. Biological sex in humans is the way that we reproduce. It is inherently binary: we have the people that have the physiology that produces eggs and the ones that have the physiology that produces sperm.
Are you suggesting that in the future we might reproduce differently from that?
It’s not possible for humans to change sex, and I don’t see a potential mechanism by which that might be possible in the future. Afaik, sex is hardwired in soon after conception, and leads to two different pathways of development (egg/sperm people) that includes chromosomes, differences in physical body shape and size which then feeds into differences in strength and capacity. Short of imagining a magic wand, how would it be possible to change all that (barring intervention at conception, which precludes any notion of informed consent)?
@Drowsy M. Kram
"Facts of all kinds have been regularly 'upstaged' by human beliefs, not to mention by new knowledge, since time immemorial."
Yes. When a new concept or theory is proposed that answers more questions than it creates. Usually accompanied by good evidence pertaining to this change. This is not the case regarding human sex.
"Biological sex in humans has been immutable throughout history.
If, at some time in humanity's future, that was no longer the case, who might be opposed to people changing their sex, and why?"
Biological sex in humans is binary and immutable.
Historical truth, contemporary truth, and future truth.
Your last question is the stuff of SF fan-fiction, not the basis for legislative and policy changes, nor for significant iatrogenic harmful medical interventions.
However, I would answer it will be those who understand biology, psychology, ethics and safeguarding.
Sex is determined by a mechanism originating before conception. The sex of the zygote is determined by the chromosome carried by the fertilizing sperm. In humans its called either an X or Y chromosome with the egg providing an X chromosome. The resulting genome is usually either XX (female) or XY (male).
Drowsy M.Kram posed an interesting question:
"Biological sex in humans has been immutable throughout history.
If, at some time in humanity's future, that was no longer the case, who might be opposed to people changing their sex, and why?"
It should be possible to entertain such a question, for the purpose of testing one's beliefs; that's what Ursula le Guin does with her "impossible sci-fi stories" and we like Ursula here, don't we 🙂
I especially liked the last line,
"who might be opposed to people changing their sex, and why?"
I’d take this more seriously if I saw any attempt by you to challenge your own beliefs. Did you miss the three explanations of what biological sex is and why it can’t be changed?
If you want to do an abstract thought experiment and reference Le Guin, you’d need to give some kind of explanation for how it’s relevant to this conversation today. But of course you won’t, because explaining is losing and it’s only other people, not yourself, that bother sharing their ideas and clarifying.
Politics as science fiction Robert?
weka – which of my beliefs are you referring to; ones I've stated, or those claimed by others on my behalf?
A quoted example would suffice, please and thank you.
take your pick. Any belief you hold in this conversation today, expressed or not, tell us what it is and how you challenge that belief. You talk about others needing to be challenged but I don’t see you applying that principle to yourself.
@RG (10:14 am)
Yes, Le Guin is a great favourite of mind/mine – so imaginative, and what would Homo sapiens be without the gift of imagination.
Embracing uncertainty can open up new possibilities – "the future’s not ours to see" – mind you, I don’t fancy the idea of thought police!
the problem here is that you appear to be both arguing that trans people are being disappeared and arguing in a conversation about the necessity of centring biological sex in law, policy and culture. Did you mean to erase women’s culture, or was that accidental.
I can’t tell if RG doesn’t care about women’s sex based rights, doesn’t understand them, or is simply arguing abstract whatevers for the sake of his own thought experiment agenda, but you I have more expectation of.
If a woman cannot call a man a man without permission from that man, there are no women’s rights.
Nic – Drowsy has, I believe, posed a question that requires a suspension of belief, in order to uncover base motivations in those taking part in the thought experiment. Hunkering down and declaring that the proposal is impossible is a not-unexpected response. It's a thought exercise, designed to stretch thinking and reveal calcification of thought (I reckon). I find it interesting, in a way similar to reading science fiction 🙂
again, this would only have credibility if you demonstrated any kind of self reflection about your own beliefs. You think expressing biological sex matters hinders the thought experiment, but I see it as enhancing it. I can both do an imaginative exercise about fantasy of humans changing sex and hold an understanding of material reality. You on the other hand appear to want to ignore biological sex/material reality in favour of fantasy, how very binary of you.
You also utterly fail to take any account of why material reality matters. Transcendence of/denial of material reality is the patriarchal wet dream. It’s the core of male dominated religions that kill nature and hate women, as well as being core to trans activism where it has transhumanism as an end goal. It’s also why we have climate change and the ecological crisis. That the loss of women’s rights is happening at the same time isn’t a coincidence.
So weka, you won't or can't provide one single quote to back your assertion?
Come on.
You wrote:
"Any belief you hold in this conversation today"
Okay.
"Drowsy M.Kram posed an interesting question".
What I actually said,
And you have yet again failed to answer. You don’t have to of course, and that leaves people free to come to their own conclusions.
I don't know either, weka, but I suspect – Lord save us from men (and women) with agendas.
Well, Drowsy, you could ask.
Why would anyone bother doing that when you so consistently fail to share or clarify your thinking, or answer direct questions?
No need to ask for myself, Robert.
I could ask on behalf of others, if that would be helpful
Go on then, give it a whirl!
Wot?
weka[]
11 April 2024 at 11:19 am
What I actually said,
And you have yet again failed to answer. You don’t have to of course, and that leaves people free to come to their own conclusions.
weka[]
11 April 2024 at 10:59 am
take your pick. Any belief you hold in this conversation today, expressed or not, tell us what it is and how you challenge that belief. You talk about others needing to be challenged but I don’t see you applying that principle to yourself.
possibly the wrong quote, but if can’t see what I was meaning, or go back and figure it out yourself, I’m not doing the work for you.
You selectively quote to support your own point or position and make it harder to follow the other person’s argument. It’s dishonest.
Ok Robert, here goes.
It appears that you have been given three options/characterisations to choose from, none of which seem particularly appealing (to me):
I suspect it's none of the above, although it might be the third one – who knows what agendas lie in the hearts of men (and women.)
Thanks, Drowsy, I appreciate your courage in joining the fray. If you're happy, I'll quote and add my responses in italics.
"It appears that you have been given three options/characterisations to choose from, none of which seem particularly appealing:"
It certainly does appear that way. Yes, I have been "given"(unasked) those options. Again, yes, they aren't particularly appealing.
I suspect it's none of the above, but who knows."
You are quite right in your suspicion that, " it's none of the above ".
As to who knows, well, I know 🙂
The claim is often made, that I don't answer questions posed to me.
and in the absence of you saying what it is, I will continue to make my own conclusions based on what you have been doing on TS on this topic for some time.
The context for my three points was that I expect more from Drowsy. I have zero expectations of you now.
"possibly the wrong quote," she says, breezily…
Certainly the wrong quote and to me, it matters.
weka!
" It’s dishonest."
Are you accusing me of dishonesty?
yes
That's unkind. I'd like a second (mod) opinion, please.
it’s got nothing to do with me being a mod, and I’m not moderating you (if I was, it would be in bold), it’s my personal opinion.
Just wondering, weka, how many "Robert Guyton to weka" comments have been posted on TS over the years. My guess would be hundreds, at least. Despite that high level of interaction, you claim that I don't answer your questions. On the face of it, that would seem unlikely. If there were no "Robert Guyton to weka" comments, a person might wonder if I was refusing to engage with you, but that's clearly not the case. Is it possible, do you think, that you haven't been recognising that I am responding to you in an open, honest way, but that you aren't perceiving it thus?
it’s like you want to play but only on your terms. This is why, I think, David makes the points he does. I think he is wrong in the characterisation, but I can see why he gets that impression, and you never do anything to show that you are not what he says.
That's disappointing. To quote the wisdom of GoT:
What “more” do you expect, I wonder.
We all have views on this (and that), what's good (and bad), and one's own views are invariably the best (or so it seems to me), but I could never "have zero expectations" of either weka or Robert.
on this particular topic, it’s RG’s behaviour I am pointing to. Who knows what his actual views are, he almost never says. We are left to guess, and then he objects. It’s such a long standing pattern of behaviour, I’m surprised I have to even explain it. But unlike RG, I think explaining is winning, for us all.
as an example, from today, I laid out three potential explanations for RG’s behaviour/position. RG played some word games with that and eventually said it was none of them. What he didn’t so was say what he actually thinks. This is how he often/usually engages on this topic. All the time. He had the opportunity to clarify and he chose not too.
It’s fairly obvious Robert.
Funny little men, who are so desperate to control women, that they indulge in circular logic that just goes around in circles and goes nowhere.
Transwomen could always organise their own spaces, but for some reason they seem to be determined to take over women’s* spaces, & tell them what to do.
* Women in this case meaning actual real women. Not men who believe that they are women.
David; that's just ditzy!
Have you anything constructive to say on the issue?
David wrote:
"Transwomen could always organise their own spaces…"
Please expand on this claim, David. Perhaps with regard public toilets. Or changing rooms at public swimming pools.
Cheers!
Plenty of discussion out there about third and NB spaces if you care to educate yourself.
Are you covering for David?
David made a valid point about TW organising their own spaces.
You framed that as a claim and asked him to expand on that, specifically on toilets and changing rooms.
I pointed out that there has been widespread discussion on that.
You attempt a derail.
My conclusion is that you have no intention of educating yourself and will continue with your sophistry (although tbf, a chunk of wha you do doesn't even meet the bar of sophistry).
I addressed my request to David, in response to a claim he made.
Still waiting for his response, though not holding my breath.
You may conclude whatever you wish. I'm hanging out for David's reply.
😂
Engaging with Robert reminds me of the parable of the donkey & the tiger..
As a kiwi bloke who is on the wrong side of 50 I have learned many things.
In this case, shall I say women’s issues.
When a woman (real/actual women, not transgender women) is in need to hear a man’s opinion or view on women’s issues, she will then advise you (the man, or transgender person) what your options/views will be. Your response will be, yes dear you are right, as usual.
Following this little piece of advice will allow you to enjoy the rest of your day.
I asked David to explain his claim, as it seemed to me he was quite wrong in making it.
You suggested I do my own research.
I chose rather, to ask David; I still can't see the error in that. Perhaps, weka, you could explain why directing a question about a claim made by an individual, to that individual, is insufficient?
David wrote;
""Transwomen could always organise their own spaces…"
I don't think that's a reasonable claim. I hope David will respond and respond in a way that's more useful than this drivel 11 April 2024 at 3:00 pm
Robert, I find little point in replying to you, as you either don’t understand, or deliberately misunderstand what others are saying.
As for “drivel” you’re just reinforcing my thoughts regarding your attitude around this issue.
If you want to believe weird stuff, that’s up to you.
"Is that like saying all Māori are animists?"
No.
It seems very much like that, claiming that one group of people have one “logic", which is what you are supporting.
It's just not the case., is it.
"It seems very much like that," – but it's not.
The reasoning behind "Transwomen are women" is an example of circular logic.
I don't think RG knows what circular logic is.
A home-owner could live as a homeless person, simply by getting out on the street and living rough.
But that doesn't mean s/he is a homeless person. Is that your point?
My point is, they live as a homeless person. just a someone might live as a woman.
Sure they could live as a women meaning dress as a women etc. Living/dressing does not alter biology though.
The leap in logic occurs when the wish to live/dress then is magicked by some alchemy to say they are a woman. This cannot happen any more than me dressing as a princess will make me a princess or dressing in a green suit will make me into Kermit the frog.
To take the princess analogy further having dressed as a princess I make it my life's work to insist that all that I meet treat me as a princess. First I insist, ie compelled in speech to call call me 'Your Highness', I may change my surname to reflect a long obscure set of Germano-Spanish Portugese royalty that I say are my ancestors. I then force people to curtsy to me. I may change my name my Deed Poll to Princess Susannah. I then insist on getting some sort of payment from the Govt.
All the way along kind people are helping me to check out that I am seeing the world correctly, to get help, to offer help. They may try to stop me gatecrashing events where real royalty is. Because I am so fixed in my ideas I may be arrrested if I breach protocols/boundaries around real Royalty as I am a threat, as imposters always are, to real Royalty.
To live as a woman does not involve compelling people to act as if you are a woman ie being part of your delusions. It does not involve going into womens safe spaces or into womens sports teams or even into womens prisons.
Aside from seeing drag performers, I worked with one man who dressed as a woman and he never expected that we belived he was a woman and he always used the mens toilets at work. A gentle soul we all treated him with kindness/caring. He did not change his name to a female one. He was good at his job, he just like dressing as a woman.
as David says or the violent, foul men of the type that Weka has pictures. often caught on camera masturbating in front of women in toilets, of raping women in prisons.
As I said above the whole concept now is one of misogyny, adopting womanface. Many are fetishists or autogynephiliacs. Many would benefit from counselling and care.
What we as a society do not need to do is to pander to their delusions by making woman the props to support deluded men.
I suspect you may know this though.
"Sure they could live as a women meaning dress as a women…"
along with other womanish behaviours… live as a woman.
Yes, that's correct and what I was saying.
"Living/dressing does not alter biology though."
I didn't say it does. You folk read that in, as you do.
Doesn't make them homeless as they have a home, just as it doesn't make them a woman.
And you reckon David was being ditzy!
Edit; “Trans logic. What is “trans logic”?
Trans Woman is a woman = Trans logic.
Got it in one gsays.
That is the prime illogical belief.
I genuinely believe you folk have messed-up thinking and I mean that most kindly.
Doesn't matter how you mean it.
Point out the error in calling it circular logic:
"It", Molly?
Calling what "circular logic?
"…messed up thinking…"
You are the one that wants us to share your belief that someone with a home is homeless.
"You are the one that wants us to share your belief that someone with a home is homeless."
That's not what I said, gsays, I wrote:
"My point is, they live as a homeless person. just a someone might live as a woman."
as as as as as as
Can you see the difference?
@Robert Guyton
"It"? – that which you mean kindly.
"Calling what "circular logic?"
Going around in circles a bit yourself here, so linking to my reply to get you back on the straight and narrow:
https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-10-04-2024/#comment-1995893
gsays; do you believe all trans people believe/claim that "Trans Woman is a woman"?
Or are you painting all trans people with the same brush, in the same way someone might say, "All women…blah, blah, blah"?
If you don't mean that, then you might look at your statement,
Trans Woman is a woman = Trans logic." with fresh eyes.
Shanreagh has replied to you at 9.1.1.2.1.1
The answers to your many questions are there.
They have missed it, just as you have.
So Robert if a man dresses as a woman then presumably there is no onus on society to go along with the belief that this dressing/living has somehow made him a woman?
Then while dressed as a woman surely a man would have no expectation of going into women's safe spaces or to play in women's sports.
He remains a man just dressed a little differently so he uses the male toilets and continue to play in men's sport.
Presumably you will agree with this as I have confined to to just dressing as a woman.
The examples of the trans logic we are facing is
1 when a person feels that dressing means morphing into a woman,
2 that dressing entitles a man to go into women's toilets
3 that dressing entitles a man to play in women's sports.
So Shaneagh if you go to a party as a pirate, you could just as easily go to a party as a woman. You could spend your time living as a homeless person, even though you owned a home. If there is such a thing as trans logic, there will also be lesbian logic. Is there?
Robert
Are you able to address these? After all this is the topic of the conversation.
It may have been the topic of your conversation, Shanreagh, but it wasn't mine. I asked only about just 2 things. I'm disinterested in the other points raised by others here and have made no comments about them, consequently I don't feel compelled to answer questions on them.That you (and others) think I hold certain views about them is a mistake that compounds every time one of you claims this or that about my position.
Robert Guyton 9.1.1.1.1.1
10 April 2024 at 2:39 pm
It is this I am trying to explain. Perhaps it would be clearer if you accepted I have (tried) to answer this, thanked me and then moved on to your different questions.
Thank you, Shanreagh, for trying. You've given me examples of what you believe are manifestations of "trans logic", but that's not what I'm asking for. I'm trying to understand how anyone can describe/define the way a group of people think by calling it, "X-logic". For example, can we justifiably use the term, "lesbian logic", or "Asian logic". Do you think, "trans logic" means the logic employed by trans people? Would you also say, "Asian logic" when describing the way Asians view the world?
What’s meant here is TRA logic. It’s an ideological belief set and political movement that uses circular logic.
it’s a mistake to see TRA = trans or vice versa.
weka – your comment @
11 April 2024 at 12:26 pm
"What’s meant here is TRA logic. It’s an ideological belief set and political movement that uses circular logic.
it’s a mistake to see TRA = trans or vice versa."
seems to be, at last, addressing my original question:
"What is "trans logic"?
Dozens of responses later and I'm still in the dark, but perhaps what you have said will cast some light: are you meaning that the phrase, "trans logic" is not a valid one, and that TRA logic is?
‘trans logic’ is vague. What Joyce was talking about is the ideology. Which obviously is not something that all trans people subscribe to. It’s better to think about TRA logic, or gender identity ideology logic. Circular reasoning is not uncommon there.
The long awaited Cass Review final report is out.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2024/apr/09/cass-review-nhs-children-gender-dysphoria
It covers all the things that Gender Critical people have been saying for several years including:
Visubversa
"The long awaited Cass Review final report is out."
And now see what the Te Whatu Ora is going to do with this information…Their long awaited report on the use, safety and effectiveness, of puberty blockers has still not seen the light of day.
And to balance the Cass report, a critique from those raising trans children in the UK.
Points from the critique:
1. Parents interviewed by Cass were looking for depathologisation of trans children, and decentralisation of supporting services away from a single UK centre, and into mainstream medicine, as seen in other countries.
Instead, the report focusses on unpicking why children are trans, as if it's a mental health problem, not on providing the best medical support for trans kids and their families.
2. The review panel was 'naive', having no one experienced with the trans research community in the UK or internationally involved in the report output. Cass herself has no experience of trans people in her social circle. This is like reviewing Maori health initiatives without anyone Maori being part of debate, vs only being interviewed.
3. As an outcome of this, the Cass report is unbalanced in naming 'trans ideology' as a bias, without a corresponding recognition of the significant anti-trans bias pushed over the past 5 years in the UK.
4. No trans treatment processes from outside the UK were evaluated for effectiveness as potential alternative models to to GID service. Once again, the Cass framed trans kids as a 'mental health problem' issue, completely erasing the identity of trans kids and their families.
I'd like to know if that's really true. I haven't read the report, but everything I have since in the last day, including interviews with Hilary Cass, shows that there are issues with large numbers of children with concurrent mental health issues, abuse histories and undiagnosed autism. All things that GIDS was ignoring in favour of affirmation only.
I used to think that transness wasn't a pathology, and I think that could be true, but needing hormones and surgery suggests to me that it is. And what is gender dysphoria if it's not a mental health issue? I think that the need to transition via extreme body modification is something that is largely culturally imposed. If we lived in societies that valued gender non-conformity, then the whole born in the wrong body bullshit wouldn't exist like it does.
I move we scrap official limits on the acceptable number of politicians clubbed to death, too.
Pricks.
An official limit on the acceptable number of sea lion deaths in commercial fishing nets is no longer necessary, Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says.
Despite the number of sea lion pups inexplicably plunging by almost a third last year, Jones has scrapped the Fishing Related Mortality Limit (FRML), which sets the maximum number of sea lion deaths each year before a squid trawl fishery in the Southern Ocean has to close.
The New Zealand sea lion, or rāpoka, is the world’s rarest and with a population of just 10,000 features on an international “red list” of endangered species.
Last year, an annual count was so low it triggered a government review of squid fishing in their foraging grounds, around the remote subantarctic Auckland Islands.
https://www.thepost.co.nz/nz-news/350240291/death-limit-endangered-new-zealand-sea-lions-scrapped
Joe-IMHO very few of the things this government is doing are vote winners.
Standardistas need to compile a list of these stupid/crazy/crap policies to roll out at the next election and say "do you really want to continue with this lot in charge?"
You mean like selling our land to foreigners?
@Joe
"An official limit on the acceptable number of sea lion deaths in commercial fishing nets is no longer necessary, Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says."
I believe the only reason Shane Jones became an MP again, so he can
abuseuse his position to give any conservationist, NGO, conservation volunteer, animal lover, etc the middle finger.Yet there is no kai to be found on a dead planet.
This government doesn't seem to include the costs, to the tax payer, associated with all the hours put into legislation and laws such that we do not have a society where some people have all the rights and others non.
"Teanau Tuiono's Restoring Citizenship Removed By Citizenship (Western Samoa) Act 1982 Bill, which would correct one of the great historical crimes of the Muldoon era. National will likely vote that down too, out of racism. "
ACT are supporting the bill!
http://norightturn.blogspot.com/2024/04/members-day.html
Question Time on Demand today seems stuck on 28 March. Anyone else get it?
It is stuck. Can't understand why that might be.
Most likely one of Nicola's 'wasteful spending' cut backs…….
Or a reduction of transparency?
The Parliament website has changed it's format, and you're probabaly looking at a cached version.
Go to home page – New Zealand Parliament (www.parliament.nz).
Click 'Watch'.
Select 'On Demand' from the top banner bar.
Under "Selected Video" you will see a date that is currently playing, or you can select a date from the filtering dialogue box on the right hand side.
The site no longer allows you to choose a particular question form a list of questions. On the right there is a scrolling list of speakers. You will need to scroll down to the name of the person asking the first question, or the particular question you are interested in, click on the name and the video will begin.
I'm finding it very clunky, but it does work. Hope that helps.
Thanks Traveller. It is downright difficult to manage. Clunky? Yep.