If we had ‘rule of the majority’ in New Zealand, Parliament would be subservient to the people.
If we had ‘rule of the majority’ in Parliament, Government would be subservient to Parliament.
If we had ‘rule of the majority’ in Government, Government would be subservient to the Caucus.
If we had ‘rule of the majority’ in politics, the Caucus would be subservient to the party.
But in New Zealand, currently, we have it the other way round
In politics, the majority in the party, is subservient to the minority in Caucus.
In government, the majority in the Caucus are subservient to the minority in Cabinet.
In Parliament, the majority in Parliament are subservient to the minority in Government.
And the majority of the people are subservient to the minority in Parliament.
(Some have described this situation as being an elected dictatorship).
Looked at it this way, our so called representative system of government, really doesn’t allow much majority rule at all. And what it does allow, is slowly being eroded away. This lends to a tiny minority of very wealthy, but completely unrepresentative lobbyists a lot of power to pressure, and manipulate, and persuade that tiny minority that rule us, to their bidding, not ours. And this lobbying which is all done behind closed doors by wealthy lobbyists who enjoy special access to our parliamentarians, possessing the swipe cards and necessary security passes to the Beehive, is often against the majority will
But why is this relevant to the latest debate going on inside the Green Party?
Good Guys Finish last
Jeanette Fitzsimons expresses disappointment that the Green Party Caucus has been given power to over rule the party*
Fitzsimons was more disappointed about a rule change to the way MPs were bound by the decisions of the wider party, but wouldn’t elaborate further on that change as it was not yet public.
It wasn’t clear exactly what that rule change was. Asked if she was disappointed in the caucus decision to support Waka Jumping, Fitzsimons said “I’m more disappointed in the fact the party rules were changed to mean that [we] can now do that legitimately any time [we] want to, I think that is much more serious.”
My parentheses J.
Fitzsimons’ use of words is telling. Which is why I have put parentheses around them.
When Fitzsimons says ‘we’, what she means is, ‘they’ (meaning the caucus). But doesn’t want to say it.
The choice of worlds represents that Fitzsimons is trying to inhabit her customary role in the party of peace maker between political divisions inside and outside the party. This is a role that Fitzsimons has played throughout her political career. She is clearly not comfortable with confrontation, and will back down in the face of it. (As she did with Clark over the ETS, when she gave the ETS her backing in spite of her own reservations and despite deep opposition against the ETS in the Greens.)
The choice of the word ‘we’ indicates that Fitzsimons is attempting to bridge the division, between the membership and the Caucus giving the impression, ‘we’ are all one, in handing the Caucus the power to rule over the membership.
In line with her self appointed role of peacemaker, Fitzsimons indicates that she has become resigned to the new state of affairs.
Though Fitzsimons thinks that this new power, this new ability of the caucus to legitimately do ‘that’ any time they want to, is “much more serious”.
In line with her self appointed role of peacemaker, Fitzsimons indicates that she has become resigned to the new state of affairs.
Green Party co-founder and former leader Jeanette Fitzsimons still wants the party to pull their support for the Waka Jumping bill – but says she has hit a “brick wall”….
….“It would be great if [a motion was passed] but I think we have tried everything we can try and we have been met by a brick wall. I think we have to move on.”
“I’m disappointed in that decision that was made but I’m not going to dwell on it for the rest of my life,” Fitzsimons said.
Fitzsimons said there were tensions to be worked through at the conference, but she was proud of the work the party had done so far in Government.
*(That battle has been won and lost inside the Labour Party, a long time ago. And was never fought inside New Zealand First. Because NZ First has always been run as a fiefdom from its inception).
I’m really glad that we have the rule of law rather than simple majority rule. Had we had the latter then Maori Treaty rights would not have been recognized but rather the document would have been ripped up long ago. Had this happened NZ most probably descended into the kind of violence we saw in places like Northern Ireland in the 70s.
As far as Jeannette and the Greens is concerned you invent your point:
When Fitzsimons says ‘we’, what she means is, ‘they’ (meaning the caucus). But doesn’t want to say it.
What evidence do you have for putting words in her mouth? How do you know this when the changes to party processes have not been made public?
In identity politics someone may have different identities in different political contexts. The royal “we” has long been employed by leftists when they self-identify as part of the whole. In this instance I believe she is using it to refer to her inclusion as a member, therefore caucus members are implicitly included in that whole.
Referring to parliamentarians as “they” kicks in when the common-interest frame doesn’t apply: when the common interests of caucus members differ from the common interests of party members who aren’t in caucus! There’s a tension at this interface. Members will inevitably feel that when MPs operate independently as a group, their accountability to the party as a whole comes into question.
I’m intrigued by Jenny’s statement that “the Green Party Caucus has been given power to over rule the party”. I’d like to see some evidence that it’s true (rather than merely a personal interpretation). Having just returned from representing my local branch as a delegate at the conference, I encountered no such evidence.
The review was not complete at the time of writing, but its likely that it will give MPs a little bit more freedom to act without consulting members on every decision.
I’m the kind of person who would object to lying if circumstances were appropriate, but no such applied at conference. Depends what you are referring to. Often what one person thinks is a lie, another sees as spin or (mis)interpretation.
It was a very tightly-organised event, carefully designed to cater for lowest-common-denominator democracy only. That’s good when you want efficient production of consensus as output. It’s frustrating for folks like me who also want to steer the gathering in a particular direction at times, when vital points are not being considered.
I’ve spent most of my life being in a minority & not liking the result! But no, the organisers cleverly designed their process to avoid polarisation.
Yeah, talk-fest has been normal for the Greens & still happens somewhat (summer policy conferences) but is better-facilitated towards constructive outputs & efficient time-management now.
RNZ: “Former MPs Jeanette Fitzsimons and Sue Bradford had hoped the caucus might be persuaded this weekend to pull its support from the waka jumping bill.”
Hard to believe either Jeanette or Sue would be that naive, eh? If true, though, it does indicate an unwillingness to consider the other side of the coin. And in politics, reluctance to weigh the merits of both sides of an issue are likely to make you seem incompetent. Retirement is therefore sensible, and lobbying from retirement only a good idea when you operate on a sound basis.
Audrey Young: “Labour insisted on having an insurance policy – a clause in both agreements requiring the Greens and New Zealand First to act in good faith to allow the other’s agreements to be complied with.”
Obviously this ought to have been acknowledged at the press conference (instead of tossing a dead rat at the media on behalf of the leftists in the party). So we got weeks of hoo-ha in which journos claimed the coalition agreements did not bind the Greens. Either they can’t read, or Audrey is wrong. Which?
The advice given to the Greens from the Cabinet Office states good faith is a political statement around how the Greens endeavour to work with the Government. It commits them to work through areas of concern in good faith, but does not bind them to support everything set out in the Labour/New Zealand First coalition agreement.
Looks like you are correct in your diagnosis. She could also be framing her (mis)interpretation to reflect a similar view adopted by the Green caucus. This is just another perception/reality thing. Even lawyers don’t agree on what the law means half the time.
Also, our caucus isn’t necessarily being disingenuous. Choosing to take Cabinet Office advice as more precise than the vagueness implied by your description of it serves the purpose of making the government operate on a consensus basis. I side with our caucus on this.
While I agree lawyers don’t agree on what the law means half the time, this is rather clear cut.
Acting in good faith doesn’t mean one is obligated to approve of everything in negotiation. If it did, they wouldn’t have to act in good faith as everything would have already been agreed upon by agreeing to act in good faith.
All I’m saying is that they are interpreting it as more binding than you are so as to show they are team players rather than separatists. Naturally some leftists got enraged by the spectre of collaboration: those to whom separatism has become a way of life. An addiction. Other leftists are proving they understand that the left can only be successful nowadays via consensus.
They may well be interpreting it as more binding, but they weren’t bound by it as they claimed.
Albeit this Green lot don’t have much fight, I understand they are required to make compromises from time to time. But they don’t have to lie about it.
Audrey is not wrong. There is an expectation (perfectly reasonable) that all parties in a coalition will work together to achieve the key points of their respective policy objectives. To do otherwise would quickly destroy a government.
From what I can see that is what happens with the current government. Each of the parties has got something that is important to them and they expect their partners to support that, not frustrate it, even if it is not something they would specifically want.
Outside of those agreed things, no doubt it is all negotiable, though presumably they all have to be sufficiently ok with it. After all, any one of the parties can prevent something happening. For instance repealing three strikes was abl to be stopped by NZ First. That is they said they would not vote for it.
While there is an expectation that all parties in a coalition will work together to achieve the key points of their respective policy objectives, good faith doesn’t mean they have to comply with all those key points as Audrey implied.
Sounds dodgy to me , as its the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet.
Good faith in a context of industrial relations – which is very familiar to a lot of labour people- means NO absolute no nos as far as to finding an agreement.
ie an employer saying they are opposed to a collective bargaining agreement ‘on principal’ is definitely not in good faith.
Greens not budging on waka jumping in principle is definitely NOT in good faith
Hi Solkta. You are right it is an assumption. But I think it is a reasonable assumption, mainly because it makes proper sense, (and meaning), of the sentence.
“I’m more disappointed in the fact the party rules were changed to mean that we can now do that legitimately any time we want to, I think that is much more serious.”
Jeanette is talking about something she doesn’t like, and not supported by her, that lets ‘they’, meaning the caucus, do things the Party, don’t support, but uses the word “We”, meaning the caucus. I can’t think of anyone else Jeanette might be thinking of, who can now over rule the party in parliament. She also says that she thinks that this is “much more serious”. (Than letting the caucus sack dissenting MPs)
No, it is very clear to me that the “we” refers to the Party but Jeanette is not happy about the rule change. The fact that she disagrees does not make her suddenly not part of the party.
that lets ‘they’, meaning the caucus,
Where is the “they” in the sentence you quote? If she had meant “they” as in the caucus she would have said “they”. Jeanette is extremely articulate and is always careful to say what she means.
“The fact that she disagrees does not make her suddenly not part of the party.”
solkta
I would certainly hope not.
Solkta, I think that as I tried to explain before, in my opinion, with her choice of words, Jeanette was trying to straddle the difference between the Caucus and the Party.
Jeanette also expressed resignation that these changes were inevitable.
I was of the opinion that instead of being resigned to these changes and trying to cover over the difference opened up by them, Jeanette should have openly challenged them.
I would have hoped that openly challenging the rule changes, (not yet public), that she disagrees with, would not have entailed her leaving her party.
If it had, things are much worse than I thought.
Personally I hope that I am wrong about all this, and the Green Party Caucus will not be become distant from their membership, and/or isolated and contained in parliament.
Though they now will have a harder time of it, I hope the Green Party Caucus will still strenuously lobby the other MPs in the Government for the legislative changes their members want. And that despite the efforts to constrain them, that the Green Party MPs will be able to get some more wins for the environment and especially the climate on the board.
You keep seeing this as a caucus versus party issue when it is really a party versus party issue. Some members, like Jeanette, think the Party should never compromise on policy while others, the majority, think that some level of compromise is acceptable to achieve wider goals.
yes Jenny we need the greens to back NZ First to get ourb regional rail going again after 20 years of neglect.
See this as the reasons.
We hope this new agency ‘EMA’ Shane Jones yesterday announced to plan our ‘inferstucture’ – recommends regional rail to take trucks off the roads that are now the most danerous roads in the developed world now.
One truck wears the road surface 9600 times faster than one car does according to a US study from engineers, according to a US gov’t GAO study.
Vehicle Weight and Road Damage
admin December 2, 2009 @vabike 22 comments
Heavy trucks obviously cause more road damage than cars, but how much more? According to a GAO study, Excessive Truck Weight: An Expensive Burden We Can No Longer Afford, road damage from one 18-wheeler is equivalent to 9600 cars (p.23 of study, p.36 of PDF).
The study assumed a fully loaded tractor-trailer at 80,000 pounds, and a typical passenger car at 4,000 pounds. That’s 20 times difference in weight, but the wear and tear caused by the truck is exponentially greater.
Food for thought: a bicycle and rider at 200 pounds is the same 20 times less heavy than a 4000 pound passenger car. Similarly, the wear and tear caused by that bike and rider would be exponentially less than a passenger car’s.
Virginia has already figured out that it’s cheaper to move trucks off our highways and onto trains, than to support those trucks on our roads. Let’s also think about getting motorists out of their cars. Wide shoulders, wide outer lanes and bike lanes, and off-road paths and trails for bicyclists may seem like extra expense, but they’re cheaper than supporting the car trips they can eliminate.
More serious in the respect that it had to happen?
Because the number of plants in the Greens has grown to the point where they need to give more power to the top? Because there are too many bloos and joos in middle ranks? Plenty of wisdom in the Greens, it will take more than dirty politics to stop them from rising.
Jeanette Fitzsimons of course, is not the only ex-Green MP to warn against these changes.
We should really listen when someone like Sue Bradford, who has successfully achieved getting more bills passed from a minority position, than any other MP in our democracy’s history, also warns against these constraints on party and parliamentary democracy.
From Wikipedia:
Bradford has successfully pushed through three member’s bills: removing the defence of “reasonable force” when corporally punishing or smacking children; letting mothers in jail keep their babies for longer; and making the adult minimum wage apply to 16- and 17-year-olds. It is considered an achievement for a backbench MP to pass a single member’s bill, let alone three.
It can be strongly argued that if the MPs from other parliamentary parties had been under the hammer of their executives and the possibility of being dismissed from parliament, if they strayed from the party line, that all of Bradford’s bills would have died in committee.
On the contrary. Labour backed the Bill while National gave their MPs a conscience vote. If there had been any crossing of the floor it could only have been Labour MPs to oppose it.
“Labour backed the Bill while National gave their MPs a conscience vote.”
Solkta
The reason Labour backed minority Green Party MP Sue Bradford’s Bills, is because she and other Green MPs were free to aggressively lobby and win over, Labour (and National Party) MPs without repercussions to these MPs.
Would Sue Bradford have been able to win these Labour Government MPs, (and even some National MPs), to support these Green Party Bills’ if they knew their Party leaders could sack them for supporting a Private Member Bill of a minor non-government party?
This new law will make the Green Party’s job of getting the MPs of the other Partes in parliament to support or take up their policies that much harder.
Your concern and framing of it in the context of democracy is appropriate & I share it. Newsroom: “Some of the party’s well-known rifts were no doubt aired in these closed sessions.” Not sufficiently, that’s for sure.
Always on the watch for traces of closet-stalinism, I would agree with any member who felt that the agenda was designed to minimise the possibility of members criticising party decision-making in our closed sessions. OTOH I’d also agree with anyone who saw that design as a sophisticated way of inducing a focus on common ground and how to progress via learning better ways of framing issues. Encouraging to see conference organisers deploying diversionary tactics so cleverly. Perhaps Exec & caucus will realise the same expertise can be applied to the media.
“I would agree with any member who felt that the agenda was designed to minimise the possibility of members criticising party decision-making in our closed sessions”
Silencing dissent within the ranks will only lead to more resentment.
My take is that they had too tight a timeframe to allow for venting. The formal AGM structure & business took up half the conference. The rah-rah team-building slots for MPs took up a couple of hours, scattered throughout the schedule to avoid overkill. Did we really need them? Yes & no. Humans get too negative on criticism easily, so reminder of our historic policy achievements in the current govt is a good strategy to balance that tendency.
The necessity for the Greens caucus to do rapid decision-making that requires divergence from GP policy in order to progress our government on the basis of a three-party consensus provoked whatever rule change has happened: support for the waka-jumping bill to the next stage of parliamentary process.
Herald: ” The sweetener for the Greens has been a commitment by the cabinet to compensate for that dead rat by an extension of the Bill of Rights Act – it will give courts the statutory authority to declare a law inconsistent with the Bill of Rights Act (authority which is disputed at present) and when they do, Parliament will be required to review that law. One can only hope that once the courts’ new powers are conferred that the first law to be declared inconsistent with the Bill or Rights Act will be the party-hopping bill.” https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12108919
The journo’s hope seems based on the assumption of poor legal drafting. Winston’s a lawyer, so why would anyone expect him to fall into that trap?? But yes, the option provided by the govt is a good sensible check on party dominance. Democracy was designed for power-sharing, so a balance of powers in governance is necessary.
I’m still waiting to see if amendments to Winston’s bill have emerged in the select committee process to balance the rights of party and electors against the right of an MP to dissent and then jump the waka. We need an integral design satisfying the common interests of all.
If MPs are allowed to fly free when they have sucked up to a Party and its supporters long enough to get elected, nothing is certain except that more bad time wasting acrimonious and self-centred attempts will be made to ram through legislation with doubtful importance compared to the big, becoming unsolvable problems that hang in the closet like disintegrating smelly corpses.
There needs to be time given for bills or deemed legislation to remedy bad social problems that show up and should be dealt with quickly, even by following a procedure agreed on, monitored for benefit and suitability as a pilot scheme.
Having MPs flying round madly on their own trajectories like those flying click beetles near a light, is not of benefit to our human rights.
Have a look at Australia where they have often had trouble with Independents and take note of the latest insect that has crawled through a hole in the wall there. He has gopt into government through them having imperfect legislation allowing a band glued together by negative feelings towards others as Pauline Hanson’s One Party is, then the guy went independent, then joined another small party the Australia Party. He indicates how dangerous and degrading of government independents can be; so narrow minded they are toxic. He is preaching the White Australia Policy return.
Fraser Anning: How only 19 people voting for him secured Senate gig https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/…/f8d8aaa83f0c2bcab53626455a3698d6
5 days ago – In his offensive and dangerous maiden speech, Senator Fraser … took a pit-stop as an independent, and then joined Katter’s Australian Party.
“(As she did with Clark over the ETS, when she gave the ETS her backing in spite of her own reservations and despite deep opposition against the ETS in the Greens.)”
I understood it was the ETS or nothing. NZF would have been happy with nothing at the time.
In Parliament, the majority in Parliament are subservient to the minority in Government.
You’re heading in the right direction but this is wrong: It’s the majority in parliament that makes up the government.
And the majority of the people are subservient to the minority in Parliament.
That’s how Representative Democracy was designed. The rich were concerned that the majority would vote to make them poor.
Of course, we can’t afford the rich so we do need to legislate them out of existence.
Asked if she was disappointed in the caucus decision to support Waka Jumping, Fitzsimons said “I’m more disappointed in the fact the party rules were changed to mean that [we] can now do that legitimately any time [we] want to, I think that is much more serious.”
Fitzsimons is misrepresenting what has happened and what it allows.
… in handing the Caucus the power to rule over the membership.
The caucus hasn’t been given power to over-rule the membership.
I thought carefully before including the line; “….Parliament are subservient to the minority in Government.”
In a narrow sense, Yes of course you are right: “It’s the majority in parliament that makes up the government.”
But if the government lose that majority on some issue during their term; under Standing Orders the Government can invoke a right of Financial Veto. Effectively over ruling Parliament.
The past National Government used Financial Veto to over rule the majority of Parliament to oppose extending paid parental leave to 26 weeks.
Finance Minister Bill English on Thursday vetoed proposed changes to extend paid parental leave after the bill passed its second reading with 61 votes to 60 a fortnight ago.
Labour, the Greens, the Maori Party, NZ First and United Future all supported the bill while National and ACT were opposed.
The third reading is expected to take place later this month but there will be no vote now that English has lodged a certificate of financial veto.
P.S. As to your other point, that, “Fitzsimons, is misrepresenting what has happened and what it allows”
As the details are being withheld, I suppose time will tell whether you, or jeanette are right. As Jeanette was probably privy to this information, my guess is that her estimation would be more accurate than yours.
The Herald Editorial yesterday makes some very pertinent points about the Waka Jumping Bill:
Every supporter of the New Zealand First Party ought to be embarrassed by the “waka jumping” bill. No respectable political party in a democracy needs a law to keep its elected legislators loyal to it.
Labour and the Greens are real political parties. That is, they are organisations of like-minded people who can channel their values and views into a coherent political programme to put to a public vote. They choose their candidates for Parliament through internal votes that produce competent and usually reliable MPs.
New Zealand First is different, as it has effectively declared with this bill. It cannot rely on its MPs to remain loyal to the party that put them in Parliament and needs a law that will allow its caucus to expel a member from Parliament who will not go along with something the party intends to do.
Labour and National have both had MPs who “crossed the floor” on rare occasions and though it can bring down governments, neither has felt the need of a law to prevent it. They are parties in the Westminster tradition which values the ultimate right of elected representatives to act on their personal sense of what is right and what is in the nation’s interests.
Just as the Herald Editorial says; No self respecting party sure of its vision (which feed into its candidate selection process) need worry about Waka Jumping.
I also think it is a mature position for any political party to hold to accept that sometimes the minority may be right.
In relation to the case of Alamein Kopu, which is always brought up as a reason for the need for a Waka Jumping Bill.
What that snafu revealed to me, was a weakness in the Alliance candidate selection process, resulting from a lack of a united cohesive political vision inside the Alliance. A weakness that expressed itself in their selection process.
It was this lack of a united cohesive vision that led to the Greens Alliance split, and ultimately to the split between the membership and the leadership over New Zealand troop deployment to Afghanistan, (the final dispute that finished them off).
You can’t take the analogy too far but I think that there is a resemblance between New Zealand First and the Alliance, in that both were formed as reactive offshoots to the perceived betrayal of their respective birthing parties, (National >> NZFirst, Labour >> Alliance), One from the Left and the other from the Right.
Both parties encompassed differing political streams under one roof. And both parties were led by stubbourn charismatic leaders who brook no insubordination to their top down style of leadership in each of their respective parties. (Peters more successfully so than Anderton).
Though the party recently celebrated 25 years of existence it remains a one-man band.
It has not developed a body of principles and people larger than allegiance to its founder. It remains difficult to imagine the party existing without Winston Peters.
Just as the Alliance didn’t survive the departure of their leader (Albeit under likely very different circumstances)
A party such as this is not good for democracy or stability of government. Allegiance to a person rather than a party is shallow, as we have seen in NZ First over the years. Peters has fallen out with a number of his MPs and his need for this legislation suggests his latest caucus is no more reliable.
A few days ago we learned they have all been obliged to sign an agreement to pay the party $300,000 if they resign from its caucus or are expelled and do not leave Parliament within three days. It is an abject disgrace that Peters can require that of those he brings into Parliament with him but it is their business, it is less of a public concern.
Legislation to impose the same sort of rule on all MPs, minus the fine, is of most serious public concern. It offends our deepest political principles. We elect people to Parliament, not stooges.
Labour and the Greens ought to be embarrassed too that they are obliged to support their governing partner on this bill. Green Party members, to their credit, have made their distaste for it very clear before and during their annual conference at the weekend.
It may seem so, but the decision was made by caucus and the Executive didn’t provide delegates at conference with the opportunity to either endorse or reject it, so the numbers supporting the government never got counted!
The thing has been discussed at every level of the Party for eight months now. The only voting members on both the Exec and Policy Committee are the Province reps. Delegates can take control of an AGM if they are of a mind to. Remits can also be prepared in advance. If the majority of members were opposed it could not have happened.
It seems that members (and ex-MPs), opposition to the Waka Jumping Bill, was not discussed at the conference. Leading Jeanette Fitzsimmons to air her misgivings to the media in a break during the conference.
….But Fitzsimons, who co-led the Green Party from 1995 to 2009, said the Greens’ support for the Electoral (Integrity) Amendment Bill was a low point. “It’s wrong it denies MPs’ basic freedom of speech, freedom of association, freedom of thought. It’s contrary to the Bill of Rights and it’s contrary to our policy.”
Efforts to prevent the caucus from voting with Labour and New Zealand First had “hit a brick wall”, Fizsimons said.
Despite that, the bill was not discussed at the meeting……
Amusing to see the editor of the Herald putting NZ first while criticising NZ First: “They are elected on the brands of political parties but their first allegiance should be to New Zealand.” Bullshit, of course. It’s what the Herald always provides.
In our representative democracy, the first allegiance of MPs has long been to parties, and the second allegiance to those who elected them. To prove the Herald claim valid, the evidence of an allegiance requirement to the nation would have to be produced. Citations from any employment contract that current legislation applies to them or party rules would suffice.
“In our representative democracy, the first allegiance of MPs has long been to parties, and the second allegiance to those who elected them.”
Dennis Frank
Hi Dennis, I disagree.
God save the rebels!
Dennis, I would like to ask you to consider the consequences of letting party leaderships impose an undemocratic sectarian straight jacket, on our elected MPs.
In my opinion our MPs have an allegiance to the people and the welfare of the nation above sectarian allegiances.
We should guard the right of our elected leaders to obey their conscience.
Let me ask you this Dennis; If a democratically elected MP, feels their leaders or their government are betraying the people who elected them, and then is moved to act on their conscience by crossing the floor or abstaining on some government bill or action they disagree with, that they then should be removed from parliament?
Are you happy to give this power to party executives without any democratic checks and balances from their grass roots party members or the voters?
Wouldn’t you agree that this is undemocratic?
Do you think that Jim Anderton should have been undemocratically thrown out of Parliament when he disagreed with the Lange/Douglas administration over their undemocratic imposition of neoliberalism on the country?
Do you think that Mike Minogue and Marilyn Waring should have undemocratically thrown out of parliament when they disagreed with the Muldoon administration over nuclear ship visits?
It can be strongly argued that these rebels were more in touch with the democratic will of the people and their party grass roots than their party leaders.
Hi Jenny, perhaps you haven’t noticed my earlier comments on this where I endorsed the principled position that you, JF & KL have taken. I’ve just been trying to established a balanced view in support of our current government.
Excessive focus on one side of the issue defeats the consensus process which is essential to successful governance.
So although MPs must have freedom of speech and conscience, and must retain the right to jump the waka when necessary, parliamentary rules and party constitutions must preserve democracy by including the electoral contract to balance their duties and responsibilities. Trust in democracy is vital. Denying it is a fatal design flaw. My concern is to ensure that the select committee produces an integral design instead of a zero-sum design which favours one side and discriminates against the other. Let’s be inclusive!
Jenny, the flaw I see in your analysis is that the status quo allows parliamentarians to betray their electors. Trust is a vital part of parliamentary democracy. We ought to have electoral law that enforces accountability for such betrayal. Winston’s design is inadequate and the select committee process ought to improve it. However this has been raised numerous times already in this forum in recent years so I regret having to reinforce the need for balance!
Dennis, the flaw I see in your analysis is that the Waka Jumping Bill allows political parties to betray their their members, the nation, and the electors. And to silence any MP who objects on pain of dismissal.
One of the more surprising matters included in the Labour-NZ First coalition agreement is their joint commitment to pass a ‘Waka Jumping’ Bill”. Such legislation effectively requires any MP who leaves her or his party, whether willingly or not, to also leave Parliament…..
…..Such a law seeks to freeze representation as apportioned at the last election, by saying that the reason an MP may have for wanting to leave (or the reason why an MP is forced to leave) his or her party is irrelevant and so the MP also must leave Parliament.
Consequently, where you have a genuine, irreconcilable clash of ideology within a party, there is no way to resolve that split neatly by separating the party into new, clearly distinct political organisations – unless one or the other disaffected groups is prepared to walk out of Parliament altogether.
……If the MP has done something really bad, then fair enough. But note that this approach puts an awful lot of power into the hands of a party leader (assuming that she or he still has the backing of her or his party). And where there is power, then there is the temptation to use that power in ways bad as well as good……
……If the MP has done something really bad, then fair enough. But note that this approach puts an awful lot of power into the hands of a party leader (assuming that she or he still has the backing of her or his party). And where there is power, then there is the temptation to use that power in ways bad as well as good.
In his new book Capitalism vs. Freedom, economist Rob Larson further develops a “left” idea of freedom. But in doing so, he departs from the usual way of framing the “positive-negative liberty” debate. Often, the left says something like “Free market economies may provide ‘negative’ liberty, but they do not provide ‘positive’ liberty.” Larson says that they do neither. In fact, he says, capitalism both restricts people’s ability to act and acts upon them against their will.
Capitalism isn’t about freedom for everyone. It’s about freedom for the capitalists to negatively affect everyone else.
Capitalism, started, for example, when instead of say mining ore, paper wealth was created instead of actually mining more ore. The price of the existed mined ore went up as the interest in digging for it was depressed, see you could own gold without actually holding it. It was at its core Green, since the planet did not get polluted as much. It’s politics that force new mines, etc upon us, to grow wealth. What we need is less talk about capitalism, more talk about abusing it, since at its core capitalism stops every duck mining, farming inefficiently.
When you can’t burn anymore oil, you’ve essentially found all the gold there is, capitalism stalls as everyone knows the paper wealth has no clothes. Why have we moved into fake news, coz simple, the reality is capitalism has hit the planetary limit, it’s all bollocks now. Less some with a clue, no interest in current value, no call on future wealth, systemically detached, create new avenues, green ways to allot wealth that has no connection to limits. oh I know, the virtual economy, which currently is in the pre economic historical stage, ruled by warlocks and mystics. oh the joys of the pre history.
When you can’t burn anymore oil, you’ve essentially found all the gold there is, capitalism stalls as everyone knows the paper wealth has no clothes. Why have we moved into fake news, coz simple, the reality is capitalism has hit the planetary limit, it’s all bollocks now. Less some with a clue, no interest in current value, no call on future wealth, systemically detached, create new avenues, green ways to allot wealth that has no connection to limits. oh I know, the virtual economy, which currently is in the pre economic historical stage, ruled by warlocks and mystics. oh the joys of the pre history.
Your data is your soul,Google is God now, theocracy of the cloud.
Ironically, the concentration of capital means that one of the great fears about socialism—that decisions about what to sell would be made by small, unelected groups of bureaucrats, rather than determined by competition—is increasingly coming true under capitalism. As Larson writes, “rather than the ‘planned economy’ of socialism that haunts Hayek’s dreams, it is corporate monopoly and oligopoly, and their industrial organizations, that are the main source of today’s central planning.” Instead of the government determining which speech will be heard, and which product features will be offered, the decisions are made by Mark Zuckerberg and “Jack,” who nobody ever voted for.
Consumer NZ estimates that for every $3.56 bottle of milk (an average retail price at present), about $1.19 would go to the farmer, $1.91 to the processor and retailer and 46c to GST.
What interests me about the above statistic is that a lot more of the price of milk is going to the processor and retailer than the farmer. You can understand the farmers costs a lot more, they have to pay rates, mortgages and the price of land is increasing, as is the cost of vets, labour, feed, cost of the animals to produce, etc.
But the majority is going not to the farmer but the processor, retailer and GST
When so many in the grocery business are getting on the rich list with just one store you have to wonder why the neoliberal obsession with the price the farmers are paying versus the middle men, (processor and retailer) who seem to be creaming off the profits but often escape scrutiny as why their costs are so high!
I think there are plenty of cows that’ll turn tricks. There’s a whole opposition in parliament that can attest to that
Treat them with a bit of respect and they’ll at least happily produce enough for the daily cup of chai.
I’m in New Caledonia at the moment. There’s French and NZ milk on the supermarket shelves. The French milk is 75% of the price of NZ milk. Go figure! At least there’s a choice.
It would be interesting to work out the milk processing charge, separate from the milk retailer charge and also who is the processor (is that Fonterra?).
Saw an article about horticulture and they were saying that the supermarket used to pay for the cartage and a whole lot of other costs but have gradually forced all the costs back on the producer as well as being very picky and telling the producer what they want them to produce.
The commerce commission did not do a very good job investigating supermarkets because they seem to be the one that has managed to get control over the food chain well over the small amount of work they do as middle men.
They have also found that fruit and veg has about 30% less nutrition that a generation ago possibly co inciting with the rise of supermarkets, exported food instead of local production and their obsession with shelf life and profits.
But the majority is going not to the farmer but the processor, retailer and GST
Who also have to pay rates, mortgages and other expenses.
How much is going to pay interest from both the farmer and the processor?
That’s the big question and why the banks are slowly being seen as the major drain on the economy (Why we can’t afford the rich, and a few other things I’ve read).
Let’s make a bet. 112 refugee children are taken in by NZ, housed, and their extensive mental health taken care of before disabled are funded properly and basic needs are met.
Mr Bridges says that the leak came not from his side but from the Government which was trying to distract the public.
The dumbest thing was that he was unable to nominate from what the government was trying to distract attention.
The Leader of the Opposition is unable to say what the government might have got wrong enough to want to misdirect voters!
No wonder he has flagged away winning in 2020. He’s like the Wallabies after their 25 point walloping, hands on knees after his exhausting tour of the provinces, his front row collapsing, unable to retain his own ball (singular) even on his own throw in, and kicking possession away for his opposition to run back at him, fumbling, bumbling, and unlike the Wallabies now blaming the opposition.
I bet he will soon be blaming Referee Mallard and the touch judges. The ball boys might even be suspect, someone will have spiked the drinks, and they were bullied even before the game started, the media asked questions, the crowd stayed away and it wasn’t a level playing field……..
On Morning Report this morning, Bridges came close to blaming Mallard for the enquiry. He also seemed to not understand that the enquiry that he insisted on, would cost a heap of money which could be seen as hypocritical given his complaints of money being spent on other Government enquiries.
In short he was more over the place in this morning’s interview. Not so cocky.
They will walk back from the enquiry for sure. Brownlee who is leader of the house for the Nats was harumping about the ‘eternally sacred private communications between Mps and constituents’ , which for me meant they wont allow access to emails, but they might allow access to ‘network traffic’ or some other way to obstruct finding a culprit. Much like Dunne did for his ‘leaking’
I think they have found’ leakers from cabinet’ before and thats a main reason why some ‘successful’ Mps have ‘retired early’.
lol how can nearly half the voting public follow and then vote for this idiot.
And his recent statement that dealing with the dumping of tyres would be just another tax by the Greens. Just proves that his party does not give a shit about paptuanuku.
A new movement called Organise Aotearoa, to the left of the Greens, has sprung up to soak up some of those who might be less comfortable with the compromises.
Well if it was to happen, and as Dennis Frank just stated it won’t, having two parties offer pretty much the same thing generally would mean both would fail to hit 5% and Labour would gratefully pick up the rest of the votes
But one focusing mainly on social issues and one focusing on Green issues might, still probably wouldn’t, just be able to pull it off especially if one party did a deal with Labour
Not a new party. It’s a network within the Greens. Think of it as a pressure group. In the unlikely scenario of these leftists proving they can work together in common cause, it will become a lobby – perhaps even what the yanks call a PAC.
No, don’t recall names easily at my age & never seen him before. Shaved head, probably late twenties or thirties at a guess, skinny, slightly-built. The way to connect would be via either a branch networker or provincial networker for your area, but failing that an email request to Greens head office. Sometimes such emails take a while to elicit a response.
Asking a Green MP via their online email address may work also – could try one of the younger ones not committed to ministerial duties…
Splitters. It’s what leftists do. It was announced by the convenor to the conference as a new network – nothing wrong with that. There’s already a rainbow network, a disabilities network, around half a dozen networks concurrently, although sadly the wild greens network Nandor once led may have lapsed into dormancy.
Given the left still control the party at the top level, this splitter initiative indicates primarily that any kind of pragmatic compromise to build the GP voter base in the center between left & right is anathema to members who are so sectarian they are unable to focus on the common good. Power-sharing is incomprehensible to closet-stalinists! Under-privileged folk must rule everyone! Tacit stuff like this is very powerful in some activists. Self-defeating, but they’ll only figure that out after years of bitter experience…
They sound like a good crew thinking and doing good work – well done to those left activists – diversity of opinion is what is needed – within the green framework of course.
Ah yes, the dark side. Jungian shadow projection: if we follow Monty Python & always look on the bright side, what’s the cost of such denial? Deep philosophical vortex in the discourse there that it’s best for us to sail around..
I can’t see what this issue has to do with left and right or Stalin. This is an issue of how tightly the party should hold to principle versus compromise to achieve wider goals. This was always a question that would need to be worked through once the party was actually part of a government.
Registration is now open for The Return of Economic Planning, a conference co-hosted by the think tank Economic and Social Research Aotearoa and Organise Aotearoa, a new organisation organising against capitalism and its symptoms in Aotearoa/New Zealand.
True, a new communist organisation under the opaque banner of ‘Organise Aotearoa’ has apparently been formed, I hear with as many as 80+ members. But the group is in a half life, apparently made public too early with little information available and erstwhile members seemingly left in the dark. Until there is something more to go on (as far as I know rumors of this ‘new communist party’ have been around since 2014) I don’t know how much this organisation could count. This is only one metric of measuring the matter, however.
ESRA was Sue Bradford’s idea, but I understand she has now left it.
I do think Organise Aotearoa sounds more left and including green politics, rather than affiliated with the Green Party. Henry Cooke’s article says it’s a new movement to the left of the Green party.
And I do think NZ needs a new strongly green left movement and party.
Ah, okay. Looks like we have had an inadvertent conflation of two different groups (that may have over-lapping membership). I can clarify that the label Organise Aotearoa was not used when the network was introduced to the conference, nor by the convenor when he outlined what the network was for. It was just called the leftist Greens network, from memory.
Okay, interesting. Perhaps, then, the explanation could be that it had fallen into disuse? Maybe the speaker & introducer were both unaware of that, since neither mentioned that it was being revived. However you could indeed be right that there has been continuity, and the sense I got that it was new was due to the framing used. That network was not evident at the summer policy conference this year, nor the one in 2015 I attended, nor in the 2015 AGM so far as I can recall.
Andrew Little was very good on Q&A last night talking about transforming the justice system. As usual MSM tried to spin that it was political suicide, but actually most of the panel was supportive and so were the public comments.
As usual the MSM seem to think the public are stupid and hysterical, but actually I think when you look at the low calibre of discourse coming from parliament and MSM journo’s and commentators with their “lock em up” discourse, it is not supported by the average Joe when many people understand something is wrong when suddenly over the last 5 years of the Natz, prison sentences have gone up 30%, coinciding with National’s attempts to build private prisons and fight clubs (now rape clubs by the look of it), National taking away prison votes effecting Maori in particular, rise of Meth, National removing people from receiving benefits, and skyrocking the cost of living while hiding it behind a massive immigration drive of many low and medium income workers and low level course study foreign students who are competing with the poorer NZ’er’s for everything from housing to jobs.
Also of course if you artificially increase the population dramatically you will have the rising levels of crime, especially if the government is not too picky and leaving it up to “market forces” about the people who are coming into NZ to study or work or launder money here (nothing done for example when China’s most wanted gambled over 500 MILLION at Sky City and arguably if he had never got involved with Dot com he would not even been prosecuted as that was not considered a problem).
Also the last 10 years of educational “reforms” making the focus of foreign students, schools making money rather than educational outcomes, possibly at the detriment of struggling students who are now in their teens and twenties and functionally illiterate.
I don’t think it is a coincidence that our prison population reaches an all time high 25 years after Ruth Richardson’s austerity budget and the subsequent bonfire of government services. National broke a generation.
As a note to the Waka jumping, it was made easier for Jenny Shipley to destroy the country when she managed to get Alemein Kopu on board, so due to that, I support the Waka jumping bill. It is more sickening when betrayal comes from places you don’t expect.
In August 1998, Shipley sacked Peters after a dispute over the privatisation of Wellington International Airport. Peters tore up the coalition agreement soon afterwards. However several New Zealand First MPs, including deputy leader Tau Henare and most of the ministers, opted to leave the party and continue to support National. They, mostly now in a new party called Mauri Pacific, and a renegade Alliance MP, Alamein Kopu, formed a new coalition which allowed National to retain power until the 1999 election.
No, I specifically asked what piece of legislation did Jenny Shipley’s Government pass with Alamein Kopu’s vote. I did not ask how did Alamein Kopu come to be linked with her Government.
Do you think that the Fourth National Government should have gone to an early election to avoid having to rely on unelected independents to maintain a majority?
I am glad that NZ, and NZ politicians, have learnt that extremes are not required for NZ.
18 years of centre left and right politics have convinced that while it might be to everyone’s cup of the tea the alternative, hard right or left, would be even worse
Yeah I love my cup of tea luke warm yum yum. There would be no middle unless there was the extremes. The middle muddle and the hard left fight the hard right and the muddle sit there counting how much money they’ll die with. I can’t stand the middle or the people who thrive there. But that’s just me…
Yup … the left/right spectrum is a real and concrete aspect of human social life. Any enduring and sustainable political model has to be capable of encompassing and engaging with most people, most of the time.
This is a reality extremists lose sight of. Certainly we’ve lived through 40 years of unconstrained capitalism and the balance urgently needs to shift; but just like an over-due earthquake, the risk is when the fault line does release there will be a catastrophic overshoot.
Because demanding the ‘end of capitalism’ is directly akin to nuking the village and declaring it peace.
I am glad that NZ, and NZ politicians, have learnt that extremes are not required for NZ.
We’ve been extreme right-wing for the last 30+ years.
18 years of centre left and right politics have convinced that while it might be to everyone’s cup of the tea the alternative, hard right or left, would be even worse
Which is a load of bollocks because we’ve been hard-right for the last 30+ years. Muldoon can be considered the last centrist PM.
Reality has a hard Left bias.
We really do need to live within our means but that’s got nothing to do with money but has everything to do with what resources we have and the environment that keeps us alive.
The ‘centre’ path that you advocate for destroys both of those to make a few people rich with money.
“We’ve been extreme right-wing for the last 30+ years.”
I agree, in particular to do with Laissez-faire free market economics where in which transactions between private parties are free from government intervention such as regulation, privileges, tariffs and subsidies….
Laissez-faire has also been modified so that the government seems to be starting to worship private parties and corporations and expect the public taxes to pay or give free public money or resources (aka water) to them, aka wage subsidies, free water, money to invest etc etc…
Create public companies that have zero accountability, run like private businesses but are paid for by the public taxes and resources, aka state owned enterprises and council COO’s like ports of Auckland and Auckland Transport.
umm no. The real right wing extremists have been grumbling the whole time that we’re still a polish-shipyard socialist hell-hole. They hated John Key because he was far too liberal. So who to believe?
While I’m agree our policy settings and welfare state are indeed too conservative; compared to most other developed nations NZ is still within the ball park. To describe us as ‘extreme’ or any kind of outlier flies in the face of simple observation.
While I’m agree our policy settings and welfare state are indeed too conservative; compared to most other developed nations NZ is still within the ball park.
That only works if you think that the every other nation is centrist when they’re actually extreme right-wing as well.
Every nation that belongs to the WTO is extreme right-wing as the WTO itself is based upon extreme right-wing ideology. The delusional idea that lowering tariffs is what’s needed for free-trade when actually free-trade requires tariffs. It requires a mechanism to ensure that costs are properly accounted for between nations and that’s what tariffs do.
I look at writings, quotes and footage from that era, about people going on about how right wing Muldoon is, and that he plans to privatise everything, ban unions, cut benefits and close schools and hospitals and I think “you dont know how good you have it at the moment, Going to be a lot worse in 10-20 years”.
Geoffrey Palmer actually accused the Muldoon government in Parliament of running “Thatcherite monetary policies that would increase unemployment”. LOL
That depends on how you characterize shades of left and right.
The moderate left governance of my youth would now be painted by trolls such as yourself and the execrable Gosman as hard Left, when they were nothing of the kind – no optional gulags for treacherous scoundrels like Douglas were on offer.
Here is a link to a post by a British conservative thinker, I disagree with his conclusions that to overcome the excesses of an elected dictatorship we need to give more power to the courts the Civil Service and the permanent heads.
Nevertheless, though there is much that I disagree with in this writer’s treatise, and the UK First past the Post system is different to our MMP system, his post contains incites into the very real lack of genuine democracy and an acknowledgement of voter alienation and a general breakdown in public confidence in the political elite, caused by this lack of democracy.
Against the background of a general breakdown of public confidence in the political elite, politicians on both left and right have seen themselves not as part of a broader governing elite but as outsiders,…..
…….the end point of this doctrine is an impoverished political ecology in which the only actor is an omni-competent centralised executive, constrained only by periodic popular election.
There is a very widespread view in Britain that our political culture is dysfunctional. According to the survey carried out for the Hansard Society’s 2013 Audit of Political Engagement, two out of three citizens believe that the present system of governing Britain is in need of significant improvement. When asked how this might best be achieved, a large majority of respondents favoured action to increase the transparency of politics and the popular accountability of elected representatives…..
….. In its narrow sense, democracy means only the appointment of government by popular election…
….It is an intrinsic feature of democracy in the broad sense that executive authority is not absolute. Many of the rules and institutions which constrain the actions of elected governments are by their nature not democratic – in the narrow sense – because they are not subject to popular endorsement.
What seat has Bridges offered ? Epsom and Wairarapa have been promised to others, not all have accepted – yet.
Im wondering if a fairy godmother to replace Gareth Morgan has been conjured up by National- not that they will admit yet.
I don’t think Gareth is going to want to give up pulling the strings. This is his parliamentary baby. Can’t see National getting along with a partner that is into evidence based policy either.
If center lefties were smart they would be getting a few bright stars into tops ranks . With the greens coming up with odd things like more expensive dumping small potatoes around water bottling and expectant mums on bikes they are dog tucker .
TOP leans right no matter how they try to deny it. It’s in the party’s MO and policies: it is a top down, party modelled on the way corporations operate.
And it’s all about a guy wanting political power.
Similarly the Green Party leans left – it is a more collaborative effort. It has a bottom up democratic MO, and focuses on the whole community – basically community values lead economics.
Compared to the Greens ALL other parties are ‘fundamentally right-leaning’. By itself this doesn’t tell us much; just how the Greens tend to view the world.
The problem you have is that less than 10% of the population will reliably vote for you; that means in order to ever be an effective political force you need to find ways to work with the other 90% wherever the opportunity (pun belatedly intended) arises.
I was thinking negotiation time . How a forward thinking lot like top could go with the nats if a labour deal was possible is beyond me .
But yes they need to out winny winny and hoover up votes from every were.
If TOP make it to the next election in decent shape they will have an impact; one is that Winnie will likely retire and this will weaken the nz1 vote substantially. Secondly the Greens will struggle with the usual fate of minor coalition parties (to some degree) and at 5.8% are too damned close to the threshold for comfort.
It’s entirely feasible to think it’s Labour who could need the mmp partner, every bit as much as National. TOP are a fundamentally progressive party (or at the least reformers) and share a good deal in common with the moderate left.
Withdrawing Morgan as a quirky and polarising front face could be a constructive move; but equally it will be hard to decouple his name from the brand image of the party entirely. Long way to go.
I predict TOP will be toppled because Gareth Morgan was probably the person driving the TOP votes, without him as leader and just Simmons, I think the end is probably nigh.
Simmons is only an interim Leader. Part of the plan may well be to try and attract some new recognisable faces. Building a Party without Morgan as their front face will solve some problems, but create some obvious new ones in their place.
It all points to how steep the 5% threshold really is. It’s only there because the people who designed MMP in this country, didn’t really believe in it.
I don’t eat fish, even the babies, so doesn’t affect me but I know lots who do and whitebaiting is a cultural activity now days. Nevertheless I think banning commercial sales should happen now, today.
“Whitebait is the only endangered species you see on the average menu, something Forest and Bird’s Cohen says is morally and practically wrong.”
ÝAs you noticed the other day I hate people cutting people rights by decree . And with probably easily 50% of the general roll anti the Maori seats the get rid of them mob will win .
It needs to be Maori choice to drop them when they are ready .
No it is not a clear sign of anything imo. You are extrapolating into unknown territory. If you want the question answered then ask it. Don’t pull stats out and say whoa lookee here.
They aren’t on the Māori Roll – based on the speculative position put by waggy. Perhaps you should just spell out what you want to say instead of trying to be clever.
When the question is asked re Māori seats I’m sure Māori will answer.
Many people who identify as Maori also identify as Pakeha. All Maori are bicultural to some extent, they have to be to function in a society dominated by Pakeha institutions. Just because some Maori choose to lean to the Pakeha side when deciding what electoral role to join, this does not negate the rights of those Maori who lean to the Maori side in that decision.
“For one, the companies that bottle water often do so cheaply, which means companies are pocketing the vast majority of those billions, instead of sharing them with the cities from which they take water. In the case of Nestlé’s operations in Michigan, the company was paying just $200 in extraction fees, according to a 2017 investigation by Bloomberg. And a price tag was conspicuously absent from news reports on the additional bottling rights Nestlé secured in Michigan this month. In other states like Maine and Texas, the Bloomberg article notes, absolute capture laws allow landowners—whether they’re an average joe or a multinational corporation—to suck every ounce of groundwater beneath their property, free of charge.
In already-arid places like Texas, these loosey-goosey water rights pose clear problems. As groundwater is rapidly depleted across the United States, drought looms ever larger.”
In countries where water is an issue it is sold mostly in 5 gallon bottles, which are reused. Bottled water is a trash commodity like carbonated drinks.
So I’ve been made redundant from the NZDF (well our entire section has, not just me) and Lockheed Martin are taking over and I’ve just finished my interview with them.
What made it interesting though was this morning when I went to print my CV off and the printer wasn’t working, in fact it wasn’t working over the entire camp.
But you know its no big deal I mean I’ve got it on my phone if I need to reference it but ripping my pants while putting on my shoes 15 minutes before the interview was a doozy
No suitable replacement trousers and, when walking, it was pretty obvious but the interview went well so alls well that ends well
All done and dusted, the decision is out of my hands now 🙂
Its interesting watching things like this happen though because I’ve never been made redundant before and watching a company like Lockheed martin come in, makes for interesting times
I hope you got a good redundancy package. It’s been in the news lately that employers no longer hire on the basis of cvs. Too many faking them, plus it takes too long to check their validity.
Re pants ripping, it worked big-time for PJ Proby (depends who’s looking). So how come a US defence contractor is taking over part of the NZDF??
Been on the cards a while now and the rational is to standardise procedures across the entire NZDF, so its going to happen to everyone eventually
I was going to post a clip of Lenny Kravitz splitting his pants during a performance but then I thought maybe not everyone wants to see his old fella 🙂
Can’t say I think this is a good move. A nation’s defence forces run on their logistics and now they’re at the mercy of a foreign corporation that belongs to a nation that we may end up opposing at some point.
What happens if our government again proposes sanctions on Israel and Trump decides to sanction us and every other nation that supports?
No, this is a bad move no matter which way you look at it.
“The 52-year-old aircraft are nearing the end of their operational life and although manufacturer Lockheed Martin says it is currently doing work for the New Zealand Defence Force on how many flying hours the five planes have left, the need for new planes is getting more pressing.”
The $145 million deal with Lockheed Martin replaces one held with the Australian company SPEL, which covers the maintenance and warehousing of army equipment and vehicles at Trentham.
Why do they need a very high overheads company like LM to run maintenance around an Army base.
We are talking building maintenance here , where the most complicated stuff is the heating/cooling system. Its not an f….ing submarine.
Employing carpenters/electricians/ plumbers /painters must be in the wit of NZ companies.
I bet the top execs of the LM NZ company are all ex Defence uniformed personnel and that its ‘who you know’ that meant they got the contract
“…covers the maintenance and warehousing of army equipment and vehicles at Trentham.”
Not the buildings but artillary, radio gear, spare parts etc. There would be gear that only a few people would be skilled at keeping in ‘Ready to go’ shape.
PR, I’m interested in your comments re- Lockheed Martin. Do you know for how long they have had links with the NZDF?
In the late 1980s and early 1990s, I was a civilian working on a RNZAF base and found myself the object of suspicion over the suspected leaking of information to the [then] Airways Corporation over some matter involving Lockheed Martin. It was bullshit. I didn’t even know anyone in the the Airways Corp. Never did find out what it was about.
Good luck PR. Modern times, eh, when jobs stability is a thing of the past and it is not to do with how good you are, but current thinking and policy within a corporation and who gets the tender.
It’s inevitable, only because the current climate puts profit above people.
Sit back and watch Office Space for a laugh.
Other successful countries like Germany are not making people redundant all the time and produce quality items. But who knows in another decade NZ could have a different dominant ideology.
The US Army McAlester Munition factory in Oklahoma fills the Mk 80 series casings made by General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems in Garland Texas.
It doesn’t make CNN accurate, though – it just takes potentially libellous inaccuracy (excuse the pun) down to the realm of mere technical incompetence.
Some of my colleagues have had restructuring looming over their heads for the last few years, like the sword of Damocles. The feeling palls after a while.
But if I had my time on the Breakfast couch again (never going to happen) I like to think I’d play it differently. Tell Mr Henry in stern terms that his little “joke” was puerile (although he already knew that) and shut him down altogether. Better to live with the knowledge that you’ve had the full-blown barney, than the regret of knowing you could have done more.
I don’t read her opinions regularly, but she has done some stuff like this that I think hits nail on head.
I especially like the “I like to think I’d…”. We hope and try to be better people, but sometimes the opportunities pass us by before we react differently.
Carbon farming? For some reason I’m not getting a great feeling from this – could be the planting pine trees ffs, could be the people involved.
“Sir Mark Solomon is looking for 150,000 hectares of Māori land suitable for forests.
He’s part of the new Māori Carbon Foundation, which unveiled its plans in Kaikoura last week.
Other members include former MPs, Hone Harawira, and Murray McCully, former National Party president Michele Boag, technology entrepreneur Maru Nihoniho and communications strategist Jevan Goulter.”
Can’t get your link to open, but from David Fisher (Herald), there is the claim that returns from trading carbon will be about seven years off down the track. Not long then.
And, of course…
The fastest returns were on exotic trees, such as Douglas fir and pinus radiata. Some native trees were suitable but took longer to grow, so produced slower returns.
So, a pile of plantations (green deserts) and Fonterra looking to run bio-fuels in its coal milk drying plants…
The only time I looked at burning wood in lieu of coal, it was meant to be debris from forestry and/or sustainably managed natural woodland. The result has been the decimation of the “everglades” in the US – and that was for one conversion of coal to bio-fuel (The Drax power station in the UK). Oh, and there’s the suggestion that coal would have been less damaging, given the huge (fossil fueled) harvest and transport operations required for the “green” alternative.
Venture Southland have made huge steps in establishing waste-wood boilers for heating in Southland industries. As well, local engineering firms have produced the needed boilers and are leading the market.
Waste wood is a nice subjective term though Robert, and beyond PR, there’s every reason to expect trees to be chopped for burning.
And….well, there’s no room for burning up carbon emitting bio-fuel in the AGW situation that we’re in. Energy has to be carbon free, not “green” carbon.
Very unlabourlike! Therefore will impress voters. I’m interested in the technicalities around it: given that a supposedly-independent body sets that income for them, how has the government achieved this freeze? Ah, I see. It intends to enact the freeze via legislation. The lesson here: the remunerations gang has become addicted to a continual escalation regime. Perpetual growth, just like the capitalists! Who the hell are these people?? There’s only three…
Fran Wilde is a former Minister, Mayor of Wellington, and Chair of the Greater Wellington Regional Council. She was also the CEO of the NZ Trade Development Board … currently Deputy Chair of the New Zealand Transport Agency, Deputy Chair of the Capital Coast District Health Board, Chair of the National Military Heritage Trust and a director of various companies. She is a Chartered Fellow of the NZ Institute of Directors.
Geoff Summers was an owner, director and Principal Consultant with Strategic Pay, a market leader in strategic remuneration and performance management before appointment to the Authority. In addition Geoff has significant experience as Director of Human Resources within state sector organisations and experience in all aspects of employment relationships and human resources policy development. Geoff is a Past President of the Human Resources Institute of New Zealand
Len Cook was the National Statistician of the United Kingdom from 2000 to 2005 and the Government Statistician of New Zealand from 1992 to 2000. Prior to this, he worked in various roles at Statistics New Zealand from 1971, becoming Deputy Government Statistician in 1986. He was a member of the Royal Commission on Social Policy in 1987-88… appointed Families Commissioner in 2015 and Chair of the board of Families Commission. He is Past-President of the Institute of Public Administration.
The misnamed Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) has stated that its goal is the eviction of Jeremy Corbyn from public life.
To this end, the CAA has referred the Labour Party to the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) alleging ‘institutional antisemitism’.
The Chief Executive of the EHRC already stated in 2017 that Labour ‘must do more to establish that it is not a racist party’. She did so on the basis of hearsay that had not been investigated and in fact was false.
Notwithstanding its reckless and cavalier record on this issue, the EHRC’s judgement is likely to carry weight in public discussion.
The CAA is now soliciting testimonies from Labour Party members in support of its complaint.
The Time Is Now for the Silent Majority of Labour Jews to Stand Up and Be Counted!
Resist the Cynical Attack on the Labour Party!
Resist the Trivialisation and Instrumentalisation of Antisemitism!
Defend Our Party and Its Democratically Elected Leadership!
If you believe Labour is being misrepresented and traduced, now is the time to speak up.
We need your testimonies about your experiences in the Labour Party to submit to the EHRC.
Excitement! Brain police attack Labour!! Will they produce evidence of “institutional antisemitism”? Will they fake it? Watch the next thrilling installment!!
“The Equality and Human Rights Commission is Great Britain’s national equality body and has been awarded an ‘A’ status as a National Human Rights Institution (NHRI) by the United Nations. Our job is to help make Britain fairer. We do this by safeguarding and enforcing the laws that protect people’s rights to fairness, dignity and respect.
As a statutory non-departmental public body established by the Equality Act 2006, the Commission operates independently. We aim to be an expert and authoritative organisation that is a centre of excellence for evidence, analysis and equality and human rights law. We also aspire to be an essential point of contact for policy makers, public bodies and business.”
Good morning The Am Show Duncan did your mother teach you manner’s It does not look like it to me.
I say national have troll’s who target your poll’s and your emails and tx there are not that many red neck’s in Aotearoa .
There standard are not very high Amanda .
The stats show there is some thing majorly wrong with the Justice system you no how it is keep telling a lie and a lot of people takes its to be the TRUTH..why do you think trump keep’s up his line’s I can see right through lairs.
I agree with Chester Borrows the media have a hand in the mess of the Justice system jumping on all the negative story’s and not much positive about the people who get sucked into Justice system I no you are being played like a flute and they don’t like ECO.
Wow that’s a mean tornado that hit Ohope and the Naki that shot from Ohope I have seen that view before .
shonky was a talented lier full stop .
The way I see it with all these state worker strikes and protests these people are being manipulated by there ceo neo librals how else do you explane this phenomenon coincidence yea right.
I won’t comment on Australian politics one would all ready know my view’s just with me ECO Maori Ka kite ano P.S you know that the police and crime are a small part of our society and you are talking about them all day every day who dredge te Winz lady up
fox news slandering a awsome socialist country this show’s me fox true colors
what’s wrong with having high tax’s and nearly all the people are happy ka pai
These people did not listen to the capitalist lies Link is below ka kite ano
Good song Thane & Dunc It’s a long way to the top if you want to rock and roll Eco Maori rock and roll’s and I will get to the top Ka pai E ho Ka kite ano
We can not let the Human caused Climate Change deniers win All the intelligent people around Papatuanuku have to stand up and vote for Goverments that care about the Future of the Mokopunas and Papatunuku Kia ha ka kite ano link below.
Not a bad idea (for starters)
Maybe bring them back when senior management / CEOs actually start performing (or not), instead of running Ministries and Departments like their own little feifdoms.
Can anyone think of a Ministry or Department that’s actually been run well over the past decade?
Most public servants work in spite of their senior management masters rather than because of them.
Good evening Newshub It’s awsome that we are looking at reforming our Justice System because it’s the whole Justice system that is causing more Tangata Whenua O Aotearoa to be incarcerated than 99% or other cultures on Papatuanuku that’s reality.
That’s a good out come for those people in Christchurch It is correct that they get compensated for the loss of there property ka pai
Yes I had pet baby marsupials and a few birds to let them go when they we able .
Ka kite an
Good evening The Crowd Goes Wild James and Mulls Retalick had a good game.
Josh who would have guest it thought you were ———- music .
Sore face that’s all I am going to say lol. leg over,
That was a good game of cricket Indian & England
another soreface. E ho James trying to sing Ka kite an
Who likes being sneered at? Nobody. Worse yet, when the sneerer has their facts all wrong, and might well be an idiot.The sneer in question is The adults are in charge now, and it is a sneer offered in retort to criticism of this new Government, no matter how well ...
When in government, Labour pushed to extend the Parliamentary term to four years, to reduce accountability and our ability to vote out a bad government. And now, they're trying to do it through the member's ballot, with a Four-Year Parliamentary Term Legislation Bill. The bill at least requires a referendum ...
A ballot for a single Member's Bill was held today, and the following bill was drawn: Public Works (Prohibition of Compulsory Acquisition of Māori Land) Amendment Bill (Hūhana Lyndon) The bill would prevent the government from stealing Māori land in breach of Te Tiriti o Waitangi. It ...
Simeon Brown, alongside Wayne Brown, is favouring a political figleaf now in exchange for loading up tens of millions in extra interest costs on Auckland ratepayers. Photo: Lynn GrievesonTL;DR: Ratings agency Standard & Poor’s is pushing back hard at suggestions from Local Government Minister Simeon Brown and Mayor Wayne Brown ...
Buzz from the Beehive One headline-grabber from the Beehive yesterday was the OECD’s advice that the government must bring the Budget deficit under control or face higher interest rates. Another was the announcement of a $1.9 billion “investment” in Corrections over the next four years. In the best interests of ...
Chris Trotter writes – Had Zheng He’s fleet sailed east, not west, in the early Fifteenth Century, how different our world would be. There is little reason to suppose that the sea-going junks of the Ming Dynasty, among the largest and most sophisticated sailing vessels ever constructed, would have failed ...
David Farrar writes – Two articles give a useful contrast in balance. Both seek to be neutral explainer articles. This one in the Herald on Social Investment covers the pros and cons nicely. It links to critical pieces and talks about aspects that failed and aspects that are more ...
The tikanga regulations will compel law students to be taught that a system which does not conform with the rule of law is nevertheless law which should be observed and applied…Gary Judd KC writes – I have made a complaint to Parliament’s Regulation ...
The future of Te Huia, the train between Hamilton and Auckland, has been getting a lot of attention recently as current funding for it is only in place till the end of June. The government initially agreed to a five year trial, through to April 2026, but that was subject ...
TL;DR: Hamas has just agreed to Israel’s ceasefire plan. Nelson hospital’s rebuild has been cut back to save money. The OECD suggests New Zealand break up network monopolies, including in electricity. PM Christopher Luxon’s news conference on a prison expansion announcement last night was his messiest yet.Here’s my top six ...
A homicide in Ponsonby, a manhunt with a killer on the run. The nation’s leader stands before a press conference reassuring a frightened nation that he’ll sort it out, he’ll keep them safe, he’ll build some new prison spaces.Sorry what? There’s a scary dude on the run with a gun ...
Hi,I know it’s been awhile since there’s been any Webworm merch — and today that all changes!Over the last four months, I’ve been working with New Zealand artist Jess Johnson to create a series of t-shirts, caps and stickers that are infused with Webworm DNA — and as of right ...
The OECD’s chief economist yesterday laid it on the line for the new Government: bring the deficit under control or face higher Reserve Bank interest rates for longer. And to bring the deficit under control, she meant not borrowing for tax cuts. But there was more. Without policy changes—introducing a ...
After a hiatus of over four months Selwyn Manning and I finally got it together to re-start the “A View from Afar” podcast series. We shall see how we go but aim to do 2 episodes per month if possible. … Continue reading → ...
In 2008, the UK Parliament passed the Climate Change Act 2008. The law established a system of targets, budgets, and plans, with inbuilt accountability mechanisms; the aim was to break the cycle of empty promises and replace it with actual progress towards emissions reduction. The law was passed with near-universal ...
Buzz from the Beehive Local Water Done Well – let’s be blunt – is a silly name, but the first big initiative to put it into practice has gone done well. This success is reflected in the headline on an RNZ report:District mayors welcome Auckland’s new water deal with ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate ConnectionsA farmworker cleans the solar panels of a solar water pump in the village of Jagadhri, Haryana Country, India. (Photo credit: Prashanth Vishwanathan/ IWMI) Decisions made in India over the next few years will play a key role in global ...
Lindsay Mitchell writes – The Children’s Minister, Karen Chhour, intends to repeal Section 7AA from the Oranga Tamariki Act 1989 because it creates conflict between claimed Crown Treaty obligations and the child’s best interests. In her words, “Oranga Tamariki’s governing principles and its act should be colour ...
Geoffrey Miller writes – The gloves are off. That might seem to be the undertone of surprisingly tough talk from New Zealand’s foreign and trade ministers. Winston Peters, the foreign minister, may be facing legal action after making allegations about former Australian foreign minister Bob Carr on Radio New Zealand. ...
Brian Easton writes – This is about the time that the Treasury will be locking up its economic forecasts to be published in the 2024 Budget Economic and Fiscal Update (BEFU) on budget day, 30 May. I am not privy to what they will be (I will report on them ...
TL;DR:Winston Peters is reported to have won a budget increase for MFAT. David Seymour wanted his Ministry of Regulation to be three times bigger than the Productivity Commission. Simeon Brown is appointing a Crown Monitor to Watercare to protect the Claytons Crown Guarantee he had to give ratings agencies ...
The gloves are off. That might seem to be the undertone of surprisingly tough talk from New Zealand’s foreign and trade ministers. Winston Peters, the foreign minister, may be facing legal action after making allegations about former Australian foreign minister Bob Carr on Radio New Zealand. Carr had made highly ...
I could be a florist'Round the corner from Rye LaneI'll be giving daisies to craziesBut, baby, I'll wrap you up real safe Oh, I can give you flowers At the end of every dayFor the center of your table, a rainbowIn case you have people 'round to stay Depending on ...
TL;DR: The six key events to watch in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the week to May 12 include:PM Christopher Luxon is scheduled to hold a post-Cabinet news conference at 4 pm today. Finance Minister Nicola Willis will give a pre-budget speech on Thursday.Parliament sits from Question Time at 2pm on ...
The price of the foreign affairs “reset” is now becoming apparent, with Defence set to get a funding boost in the Budget. Finance Minister Nicola Willis has confirmed that it will be one of the few votes, apart from Health and Education and possibly Police, which will get an increase ...
A listing of 26 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, April 28, 2024 thru Sat, May 4, 2024. Story of the week "It’s straight out of Big Tobacco’s playbook. In fact, research by John Cook and his colleagues ...
Yesterday I received come lovely feedback following my Star Wars themed newsletter. A few people mentioned they’d enjoyed reading the personal part at the beginning.I often begin newsletters with some memories, or general thoughts, before commencing the main topic. This hopefully sets the mood and provides some context in which ...
April 30 was going to be the day we’d be calling Mum from London to wish her a happy birthday. Then it became the day we would be going to St. Paul's at Evensong to remember her. The aim of the cathedral builders was to find a way to make their ...
Rob MacCulloch writes – Can’t remember the last book by a Kiwi author you read? Think the NZ government should spend less on the arts in favor of helping the homeless? If so, as far as Newsroom is concerned, you probably deserve to be called a cultural ignoramus ...
Eric Crampton writes – Grudges are bad. Better to move on. But it can be fun to keep a couple of really trivial ones, so you’re not tempted to have other ones. For example, because of the rootkit fiasco of 2005, no Sony products in our household. ...
A new report warns an estimated third of the adult population have unmet need for health care.Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāHere’s the six key things I learned about Aotaroa’s political economy this week around housing, climate and poverty:Politics - Three opinion polls confirmed support for PM Christopher Luxon ...
Today is May the fourth. Which was just a regular day when my mother took me to see the newly released Star Wars at the Odeon in Rotorua. The queue was right around the corner. Some years later this day became known as Star Wars Day, the date being a ...
Buzz from the Beehive Much more media attention is being paid to something Winston Peters said about former Australian Foreign Minister Bob Carr than to a speech he delivered to the New Zealand China Council. One word is missing from the speech: AUKUS. But AUKUS loomed large in his considerations ...
Is the economy in another long stagnation? If so, why?This is about the time that the Treasury will be locking up its economic forecasts to be published in the 2024 Budget Economic and Fiscal Update (BEFU) on budget day, 30 May. I am not privy to what they will be ...
The annual list of who's been bribing our politicians is out, and journalists will no doubt be poring over it to find the juiciest and dirtiest bribes. The government's fast-track invite list is likely to be a particular focus, and we already know of one company on the list which ...
In the weeks after the October 7 Hamas attacks on Southern Israel I wrote about the possible 2nd, 3rd and even 4th order effects of the conflict. These included new fronts being opened in the West Bank (with Hamas), Golan … Continue reading → ...
Peter Dunne writes – It is one of the oldest truisms that there is never a good time for MPs to get a pay rise. This week’s announcement of pay raises of around 2.8% backdated to last October could hardly have come at a worse time, with the ...
David Farrar writes – Newshub reports: Newshub can reveal a fresh allegation of intimidation against Green MP Julie-Anne Genter. Genter is subject to a disciplinary process for aggressively waving a book in the face of National Minister Matt Doocey in the House – but it’s not the first time ...
The Treasury has published a paper today on the global productivity slowdown and how it is playing out in New Zealand: The productivity slowdown: implications for the Treasury’s forecasts and projections. The Treasury Paper examines recent trends in productivity and the potential drivers of the slowdown. Productivity for the whole economy ...
Winston Peters’ comments about former Australian foreign minister look set to be an ongoing headache for both him and Luxon. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The podcast above of the weekly ‘hoon’ webinar for subscribers features co-hosts and , along with regular guests on Gaza and ...
These puppet strings don't pull themselvesYou're thinking thoughts from someone elseHow much time do you think you have?Are you prepared for what comes next?The debating chamber can be a trying place for an opposition MP. What with the person in charge, the speaker, typically being an MP from the governing ...
The land around Lyme Regis, where Meryl Streep once stood, in a hood, on the Cobb, is falling into the sea.MerylThe land around Lyme Regis, around the Cobb that made it rich, has always been falling slowly but surely into the sea. Read more ...
Buzz from the Beehive Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters was bound to win headlines when he set out his thinking about AUKUS in his speech to the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs. The headlines became bigger when – during an interview on RNZ’s Morning Report today – he criticised ...
The Post reports on how the government is refusing to release its advice on its corrupt Muldoonist fast-track law, instead using the "soon to be publicly available" refusal ground to hide it until after select committee submissions on the bill have closed. Fast-track Minister Chris Bishop's excuse? “It's not ...
As pressure on it grows, the livestock industry’s approach to the transition to Net Zero is increasingly being compared to that of fossil fuel interests. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / Getty ImagesTL;DR: Here’s the top five news items of note in climate news for Aotearoa-NZ this week, and a discussion above ...
The New Zealand Herald reports – Stats NZ has offered a voluntary redundancy scheme to all of its workers as a way to give staff some control over their “future” amidst widespread job losses in the public sector. In an update to staff this morning, seen by the Herald, Statistics New Zealand ...
On Werewolf/Scoop, I usually do two long form political columns a week. From now on, there will be an extra column each week about music and movies. But first, some late-breaking political events:The rise in unemployment numbers for the March quarter was bigger than expected – and especially sharp ...
David Farrar writes – The Herald reports: TVNZ says it is dealing with about 50 formal complaints over its coverage of the latest 1News-Verian political poll, with some viewers – as well as the Prime Minister and a former senior Labour MP – critical of the tone of the 6pm report. ...
Muriel Newman writes – When Meridian Energy was seeking resource consents for a West Coast hydro dam proposal in 2010, local Maori “strenuously” objected, claiming their mana was inextricably linked to ‘their’ river and could be damaged. After receiving a financial payment from the company, however, the Ngai Tahu ...
Alwyn Poole writes – “An SEP,’ he said, ‘is something that we can’t see, or don’t see, or our brain doesn’t let us see, because we think that it’s somebody else’s problem. That’s what SEP means. Somebody Else’s Problem. The brain just edits it out, it’s like a ...
Our trust in our political institutions is fast eroding, according to a Maxim Institute discussion paper, Shaky Foundations: Why our democracy needs trust. The paper – released today – raises concerns about declining trust in New Zealand’s political institutions and democratic processes, and the role that the overuse of Parliamentary urgency ...
This article was prepared for publication yesterday. More ministerial announcements have been posted on the government’s official website since it was written. We will report on these later today …. Buzz from the BeehiveThere we were, thinking the environment is in trouble, when along came Jones. Shane Jones. ...
New Zealand now has the fourth most depressed construction sector in the world behind China, Qatar and Hong Kong. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy at 8:46am on Thursday, May 2:The Lead: ...
Hi,I am just going to state something very obvious: American police are fucking crazy.That was a photo gracing the New York Times this morning, showing New York City police “entering Columbia University last night after receiving a request from the school.”Apparently in America, protesting the deaths of tens of thousands ...
Winston Peters’ much anticipated foreign policy speech last night was a work of two halves. Much of it was a standard “boilerplate” Foreign Ministry overview of the state of the world. There was some hardening up of rhetoric with talk of “benign” becoming “malign” and old truths giving way to ...
Graham Adams assesses the fallout of the Cass Review — The press release last Thursday from the UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls didn’t make the mainstream news in New Zealand but it really should have. The startling title of Reem Alsalem’s statement — “Implementation of ‘Cass ...
This open-for-business, under-new-management cliché-pockmarked government of Christopher Luxon is not the thing of beauty he imagines it to be. It is not the powerful expression of the will of the people that he asserts it to be. It is not a soaring eagle, it is a malodorous vulture. This newest poll should make ...
The latest labour market statistics, showing a rise in unemployment. There are now 134,000 unemployed - 14,000 more than when the National government took office. Which is I guess what happens when the Reserve Bank causes a recession in an effort to Keep Wages Low. The previous government saw a ...
Three opinion polls have been released in the last two days, all showing that the new government is failing to hold their popular support. The usual honeymoon experienced during the first year of a first term government is entirely absent. The political mood is still gloomy and discontented, mainly due ...
National's Finance Minister once met a poor person.A scornful interview with National's finance guru who knows next to nothing about economics or people.There might have been something a bit familiar if that was the headline I’d gone with today. It would of course have been in tribute to the article ...
Rob MacCulloch writes – Throughout the pandemic, the new Vice-Chancellor-of-Otago-University-on-$629,000 per annum-Can-you-believe-it-and-Former-Finance-Minister Grant Robertson repeated the mantra over and over that he saved “lives and livelihoods”.As we update how this claim is faring over the course of time, the facts are increasingly speaking differently. NZ ...
Chris Trotter writes – IT’S A COMMONPLACE of political speeches, especially those delivered in acknowledgement of electoral victory: “We’ll govern for all New Zealanders.” On the face of it, the pledge is a strange one. Why would any political leader govern in ways that advantaged the huge ...
Bryce Edwards writes – The list of former National Party Ministers being given plum and important roles got longer this week with the appointment of former Deputy Prime Minister Paula Bennett as the chair of Pharmac. The Christopher Luxon-led Government has now made key appointments to Bill ...
TL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy at 10:06am on Wednesday, May 1:The Lead: Business confidence fell across the board in April, falling in some areas to levels last seen during the lockdowns because of a collapse in ...
Over the past 36 hours, Christopher Luxon has been dong his best to portray the centre-right’s plummeting poll numbers as a mark of virtue. Allegedly, the negative verdicts are the result of hard economic times, and of a government bravely set out on a perilous rescue mission from which not ...
Auckland Transport have started rolling out new HOP card readers around the network and over the next three months, all of them on buses, at train stations and ferry wharves will be replaced. The change itself is not that remarkable, with the new readers looking similar to what is already ...
A senior, highly respected King’s Counsel with decades of experience in our law courts, Gary Judd KC, has filed a complaint about compulsory tikanga Māori studies for law students - highlighting the utter depths of absurdity this woke cultural madness has taken our society. The tikanga regulations will compel law ...
The Government needs to be clear with the people of the Nelson Marlborough region about the changes it is considering for the Nelson Hospital rebuild, Labour health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall said. ...
Ministers must front up about which projects it will push through under its Fast Track Approvals legislation, Labour environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said today. ...
The Government is again adding to New Zealand’s growing unemployment, this time cutting jobs at the agencies responsible for urban development and growing much needed housing stock. ...
With Minister Karen Chhour indicating in the House today that she either doesn’t know or care about the frontline cuts she’s making to Oranga Tamariki, we risk seeing more and more of our children falling through the cracks. ...
The Labour Party is saddened to learn of the death of Sir Robert Martin, a globally renowned disability advocate who led the way for disability rights both in New Zealand and internationally. ...
Labour is calling for the Government to urgently rethink its coalition commitment to restart live animal exports, Labour animal welfare spokesperson Rachel Boyack said. ...
Today’s Financial Stability Report has once again highlighted that poverty and deep inequality are political choices - and this Government is choosing to make them worse. ...
The Green Party is calling on the Government to do more for our households in most need as unemployment rises and the cost of living crisis endures. ...
Unemployment is on the rise and it’s only going to get worse under this Government, Labour finance spokesperson Barbara Edmonds said. Stats NZ figures show the unemployment rate grew to 4.3 percent in the March quarter from 4 percent in the December quarter. “This is the second rise in unemployment ...
The New Zealand Labour Party welcomes the entering into force of the European Union and New Zealand free trade agreement. This agreement opens the door for a huge increase in trade opportunities with a market of 450 million people who are high value discerning consumers of New Zealand goods and ...
The National-led Government continues its fiscal jiggery pokery with its Pharmac announcement today, Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall says. “The government has increased Pharmac funding but conceded it will only make minimal increases in access to medicine”, said Ayesha Verrall “This is far from the bold promises made to fund ...
This afternoon’s interim Waitangi Tribunal report must be taken seriously as it affects our most vulnerable children, Labour children’s spokesperson Willow-Jean Prime. ...
Te Pāti Māori are demanding the New Zealand Government support an international independent investigation into mass graves that have been uncovered at two hospitals on the Gaza strip, following weeks of assault by Israeli troops. Among the 392 bodies that have been recovered, are children and elderly civilians. Many of ...
Our two-tiered system for veterans’ support is out of step with our closest partners, and all parties in Parliament should work together to fix it, Labour veterans’ affairs spokesperson Greg O’Connor said. ...
Stripping two Ministers of their portfolios just six months into the job shows Christopher Luxon’s management style is lacking, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said. ...
Tonight’s court decision to overturn the summons of the Children’s Minister has enabled the Crown to continue making decisions about Māori without evidence, says Te Pāti Māori spokesperson for Children, Mariameno Kapa-Kingi. “The judicial system has this evening told the nation that this government can do whatever they want when ...
It appears Nicola Willis is about to pull the rug out from under the feet of local communities still dealing with the aftermath of last year’s severe weather, and local councils relying on funding to build back from these disasters. ...
The Government is making short-sighted changes to the Resource Management Act (RMA) that will take away environmental protection in favour of short-term profits, Labour’s environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said today. ...
Labour welcomes the release of the report into the North Island weather events and looks forward to working with the Government to ensure that New Zealand is as prepared as it can be for the next natural disaster. ...
The Labour Party has called for the New Zealand Government to recognise Palestine, as a material step towards progressing the two-State solution needed to achieve a lasting peace in the region. ...
Some of our country’s most important work, stopping the sexual exploitation of children and violent extremism could go along with staff on the frontline at ports and airports. ...
The Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill will give projects such as new coal mines a ‘get out of jail free’ card to wreak havoc on the environment, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said today. ...
The government's decision to reintroduce Three Strikes is a destructive and ineffective piece of law-making that will only exacerbate an inherently biased and racist criminal justice system, said Te Pāti Māori Justice Spokesperson, Tākuta Ferris, today. During the time Three Strikes was in place in Aotearoa, Māori and Pasifika received ...
Cuts to frontline hospital staff are not only a broken election promise, it shows the reckless tax cuts have well and truly hit the frontline of the health system, says Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall. ...
The Green Party has joined the call for public submissions on the fast-track legislation to be extended after the Ombudsman forced the Government to release the list of organisations invited to apply just hours before submissions close. ...
New Zealand’s good work at reducing climate emissions for three years in a row will be undone by the National government’s lack of ambition and scrapping programmes that were making a difference, Labour Party climate spokesperson Megan Woods said today. ...
New Zealand is urging both Israel and Hamas to agree to an immediate ceasefire to avoid the further humanitarian catastrophe that military action in Rafah would unleash, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says. “The immense suffering in Gaza cannot be allowed to worsen further. Both sides have a responsibility to ...
A new online data dashboard released today as part of the Government’s school attendance action plan makes more timely daily attendance data available to the public and parents, says Associate Education Minister David Seymour. The interactive dashboard will be updated once a week to show a national average of how ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters has announced Rosemary Banks will be New Zealand’s next Ambassador to the United States of America. “Our relationship with the United States is crucial for New Zealand in strategic, security and economic terms,” Mr Peters says. “New Zealand and the United States have a ...
The Government is considering creating a new tier of minerals permitting that will make it easier for hobby miners to prospect for gold. “New Zealand was built on gold, it’s in our DNA. Our gold deposits, particularly in regions such as Otago and the West Coast have always attracted fortune-hunters. ...
Minister for Trade Todd McClay today announced that New Zealand and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) will commence negotiations on a free trade agreement (FTA). Minister McClay met with his counterpart UAE Trade Minister Dr Thani bin Ahmed Al Zeyoudi in Dubai, where they announced the launch of negotiations on a ...
New Zealand Sign Language Week is an excellent opportunity for all Kiwis to give the language a go, Disabilities Issues Minister Louise Upston says. This week (May 6 to 12) is New Zealand Sign Language (NZSL) Week. The theme is “an Aotearoa where anyone can sign anywhere” and aims to ...
Six tertiary students have been selected to work on NASA projects in the US through a New Zealand Space Scholarship, Space Minister Judith Collins announced today. “This is a fantastic opportunity for these talented students. They will undertake internships at NASA’s Ames Research Center or its Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), where ...
New Zealanders will be safer because of a $1.9 billion investment in more frontline Corrections officers, more support for offenders to turn away from crime, and more prison capacity, Corrections Minister Mark Mitchell says. “Our Government said we would crack down on crime. We promised to restore law and order, ...
The OECD’s latest report on New Zealand reinforces the importance of bringing Government spending under control, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. The OECD conducts country surveys every two years to review its members’ economic policies. The 2024 New Zealand survey was presented in Wellington today by OECD Chief Economist Clare Lombardelli. ...
The Government has delivered on its election promise to provide a financially sustainable model for Auckland under its Local Water Done Well plan. The plan, which has been unanimously endorsed by Auckland Council’s Governing Body, will see Aucklanders avoid the previously projected 25.8 per cent water rates increases while retaining ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters discussed the need for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, and enhanced cooperation in the Pacific with German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock during her first official visit to New Zealand today. "New Zealand and Germany enjoy shared interests and values, including the rule of law, democracy, respect for the international system ...
The Minister Responsible for RMA Reform, Chris Bishop today released his decision on four recommendations referred to him by the Western Bay of Plenty District Council, opening the door to housing growth in the area. The Council’s Plan Change 92 allows more homes to be built in existing and new ...
Thank you, John McKinnon and the New Zealand China Council for the invitation to speak to you today. Thank you too, all members of the China Council. Your effort has played an essential role in helping to build, shape, and grow a balanced and resilient relationship between our two ...
The Government is modernising insurance law to better protect Kiwis and provide security in the event of a disaster, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly announced today. “These reforms are long overdue. New Zealand’s insurance law is complicated and dated, some of which is more than 100 years old. ...
The coalition Government is refreshing its approach to supporting pay equity claims as time-limited funding for the Pay Equity Taskforce comes to an end, Public Service Minister Nicola Willis says. “Three years ago, the then-government introduced changes to the Equal Pay Act to support pay equity bargaining. The changes were ...
Structured literacy will change the way New Zealand children learn to read - improving achievement and setting students up for success, Education Minister Erica Stanford says. “Being able to read and write is a fundamental life skill that too many young people are missing out on. Recent data shows that ...
Trade Minister Todd McClay says Canada’s refusal to comply in full with a CPTPP trade dispute ruling in our favour over dairy trade is cynical and New Zealand has no intention of backing down. Mr McClay said he has asked for urgent legal advice in respect of our ‘next move’ ...
The rights of our children and young people will be enhanced by changes the coalition Government will make to strengthen oversight of the Oranga Tamariki system, including restoring a single Children’s Commissioner. “The Government is committed to delivering better public services that care for our most at-risk young people and ...
The Government is making it easier for minor changes to be made to a building consent so building a home is easier and more affordable, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says. “The coalition Government is focused on making it easier and cheaper to build homes so we can ...
New Zealand lost a true legend when internationally renowned disability advocate Sir Robert Martin (KNZM) passed away at his home in Whanganui last night, Disabilities Issues Minister Louise Upston says. “Our Government’s thoughts are with his wife Lynda, family and community, those he has worked with, the disability community in ...
Good evening – Before discussing the challenges and opportunities facing New Zealand’s foreign policy, we’d like to first acknowledge the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs. You have contributed to debates about New Zealand foreign policy over a long period of time, and we thank you for hosting us. ...
From today, passengers travelling internationally from Auckland Airport will be able to keep laptops and liquids in their carry-on bags for security screening thanks to new technology, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “Creating a more efficient and seamless travel experience is important for holidaymakers and businesses, enabling faster movement through ...
People with an interest in the health of Northland’s marine ecosystems are invited to a public meeting to discuss how to deal with kina barrens, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones will lead the discussion, which will take place on Friday, 10 May, at Awanui Hotel in ...
Kiwi exporters are $100 million better off today with the NZ EU FTA entering into force says Trade Minister Todd McClay. “This is all part of our plan to grow the economy. New Zealand's prosperity depends on international trade, making up 60 per cent of the country’s total economic activity. ...
There are heartening signs that the extractive sector is once again becoming an attractive prospect for investors and a source of economic prosperity for New Zealand, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. “The beginnings of a resurgence in extractive industries are apparent in media reports of the sector in the past ...
The return of the historic Ō-Rākau battle site to the descendants of those who fought there moved one step closer today with the first reading of Te Pire mō Ō-Rākau, Te Pae o Maumahara / The Ō-Rākau Remembrance Bill. The Bill will entrust the 9.7-hectare battle site, five kilometres west ...
Energy Minister Simeon Brown has announced 25 new high-speed EV charging hubs along key routes between major urban centres and outlined the Government’s plan to supercharge New Zealand’s EV infrastructure. The hubs will each have several chargers and be capable of charging at least four – and up to 10 ...
The coalition Government will not proceed with the previous Government’s plans to regulate residential property managers, Housing Minister Chris Bishop says. “I have written to the Chairperson of the Social Services and Community Committee to inform him that the Government does not intend to support the Residential Property Managers Bill ...
The Government has announced an independent review into the disability support system funded by the Ministry of Disabled People – Whaikaha. Disability Issues Minister Louise Upston says the review will look at what can be done to strengthen the long-term sustainability of Disability Support Services to provide disabled people and ...
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith has attended the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva and outlined the Government’s plan to restore law and order. “Speaking to the United Nations Human Rights Council provided us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while responding to issues and ...
The Government and Rotorua Lakes Council are committed to working closely together to end the use of contracted emergency housing motels in Rotorua. Associate Minister of Housing (Social Housing) Tama Potaka says the Government remains committed to ending the long-term use of contracted emergency housing motels in Rotorua by the ...
Trade Minister Todd McClay heads overseas today for high-level trade talks in the Gulf region, and a key OECD meeting in Paris. Mr McClay will travel to Riyadh to meet with counterparts from Saudi Arabia and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). “New Zealand’s goods and services exports to the Gulf region ...
Education Minister Erica Stanford has outlined six education priorities to deliver a world-leading education system that sets Kiwi kids up for future success. “I’m putting ambition, achievement and outcomes at the heart of our education system. I want every child to be inspired and engaged in their learning so they ...
The new NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) App is a secure ‘one stop shop’ to provide the services drivers need, Transport Minister Simeon Brown and Digitising Government Minister Judith Collins say. “The NZTA App will enable an easier way for Kiwis to pay for Vehicle Registration and Road User Charges (RUC). ...
Whānau with tamariki growing up in emergency housing motels will be prioritised for social housing starting this week, says Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka. “Giving these whānau a better opportunity to build healthy stable lives for themselves and future generations is an essential part of the Government’s goal of reducing ...
Racing Minister Winston Peters has paid tribute to an icon of the industry with the recent passing of Dave O’Sullivan (OBE). “Our sympathies are with the O’Sullivan family with the sad news of Dave O’Sullivan’s recent passing,” Mr Peters says. “His contribution to racing, initially as a jockey and then ...
Assalaamu alaikum, greetings to you all. Eid Mubarak, everyone! I want to extend my warmest wishes to you and everyone celebrating this joyous occasion. It is a pleasure to be here. I have enjoyed Eid celebrations at Parliament before, but this is my first time joining you as the Minister ...
Associate Health Minister David Seymour has announced Pharmac’s largest ever budget of $6.294 billion over four years, fixing a $1.774 billion fiscal cliff. “Access to medicines is a crucial part of many Kiwis’ lives. We’ve committed to a budget allocation of $1.774 billion over four years so Kiwis are ...
Hon Paula Bennett has been appointed as member and chair of the Pharmac board, Associate Health Minister David Seymour announced today. "Pharmac is a critical part of New Zealand's health system and plays a significant role in ensuring that Kiwis have the best possible access to medicines,” says Mr Seymour. ...
Hundreds of New Zealand families affected by Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) will benefit from a new Government focus on prevention and treatment, says Health Minister Dr Shane Reti. “We know FASD is a leading cause of preventable intellectual and neurodevelopmental disability in New Zealand,” Dr Reti says. “Every day, ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Vanita Yadav, Senior Research Fellow, Urban Transformations Research Centre, Western Sydney University Brett Boardman/Belvoir The complex and grappling issue of violence against women takes centre stage in the soul-stirring solo dance drama Nayika: A Dancing Girl. During a dinner conversation ...
Disruption to patient care from a nationwide junior doctors strike is bordering on unsafe, a senior doctor claims, despite what health officials say. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sarah Diepstraten, Senior Research Officer, Blood Cells and Blood Cancer Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute Ground Picture/Shutterstock The anti-cancer drug abemaciclib (also known as Vernezio) has this month been added to the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) to treat certain ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Dominic McAfee, Postdoctoral researcher, marine ecology, University of Adelaide Robbie Porter, OzFish Unlimited Around Australia, hundreds of people are coming together to help a once-prized, but decimated and largely forgotten marine ecosystem. They’re busy restoring Australia’s native oyster and mussel reefs. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sara Webb, Lecturer, Centre for Astrophysics and Supercomputing, Swinburne University of Technology Austin Human/Unsplash How does Earth stop meteors from hitting Earth and hurting people? –Asher, 6 years 11 months, New South Wales Alright, let’s embark on a meteor ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Rory Mulcahy, Associate Professor of Marketing, University of the Sunshine Coast Professional sports organisations regularly promote and develop initiatives to support diversity, equity and inclusion. While sport has the power to change attitudes by sparking conversations about political issues and social ...
Comment: The weekly Monday post-Cabinet press conference is a useful forum for observing Christopher Luxon and how he is developing into the job of Prime Minister. He attempts to convey the impression of a man of action, speaking fast, delivering memorised National Party strategies in a connect-the-slogans kind of way, ...
Double votes, missing ballot boxes, tired tech and stressed staff: how tick-tallying went astray at last year’s election. Cast your mind back to November 2023, that bleary-eyed post-election period duringwhichwewaited, andwaited, for a coalition deal to be hammered out. A distraction from the hotel-hopping of our ...
International audiences are starting to discover what New Zealand already knew about After the Party.When After the Party aired in New Zealand last year, the response was fast and furious. In his preview for Rec Room, Duncan Greive said it was a “gritty, wrenching and highly confronting” series. By ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Shahram Akbarzadeh, Convenor of the Middle East Studies Forum (MESF), and Acting Director the Alfred Deakin Institute for Citizenship and Globalisation, Deakin University Iran’s leadership has been a direct beneficiary of the months-long war in Gaza. With every missile that Israel fires ...
Claire Mabey reviews the haunting and sexy debut novel from Sinéad Gleeson, who is about to touch down in Aotearoa for a string of live events.When Irish writer Sinéad Gleeson was in Aotearoa in 2018 with her spectacular collection of essays, Constellations, she told me she was working on ...
PNG Post-Courier Bougainville Affairs Minister Manasseh Makiba has described the Post-Courier’s front page story yesterday regarding a meeting between Bougainville and national government leaders as “sensationalised” and without substance. The Autonomous Bougainville Government (AGB) had warned it might use “other avenues to gain its independence” should the PNG government “continue ...
Where some saw the worst press conference given by the government to date, Anna Rawhiti-Connell recognised girl maths game.Nicola Willis, recently exasperated by comparisons to Ruth Richardson, said she was “a bit sick of being compared with every female finance minister that’s ever been out there.”Some think that’s ...
The March results are reported against forecasts based on the Half Year Economic and Fiscal Update 2023 (HYEFU 2023), published on 20 December 2023 and the results for the same period for the previous year. ...
Jamie Arbuckle, the district councillor who became an MP but decided to keep getting paid for both roles, will instead donate one salary to charity. ...
Adding gender to the Human Rights Act would simply make the implicit explicit. So why is it so controversial? Paul Thistoll explain. At present, Aotearoa’s 1993 Human Rights Act (HRA) includes sex, marital status, religious belief, ethical belief (meaning a lack of religious belief), colour, race, ethnicity or national origin, ...
As part of our series exploring how New Zealanders live and our relationship with money, an 18-year-old who’s studying and working in hospo shares their approach to spending and saving. Want to be part of The Cost of Being? Fill out the questionnaire here.Gender: Transmasc Age: 18 Ethnicity: Pākehā/Māori Role: Student, ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jane Kelsey, Emeritus Professor of Law, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau Getty Images Resources Minister Shane Jones has reportedly asked officials for advice on whether oil and gas companies could be offered “bonds” as compensation if drilling rights offered by ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kate Gleeson, Associate Professor of Law, Macquarie University Shutterstock The Albanese government is weighing up the costs of delivering an election promise to protect religious people from discrimination in Commonwealth law. Such protections were relatively uncontroversial when included in state anti-discrimination ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Yen Ying Lim, Associate Professor, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University Pexels/Andrea Piacquadio Dementia is often described as “the long goodbye”. Although the person is still alive, dementia slowly and irreversibly chips away at their memories and the ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Judy Bush, Senior Lecturer in Urban Planning, The University of Melbourne Adam Calaitzis/Shutterstock I met with a friend for a walk beside Merri Creek, in inner Melbourne. She had lived in the area for a few years, and as we walked ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By David Throsby, Distinguished Professor of Economics, Macquarie University Arts companies and individual artists in Australia are supported by government arts agencies, philanthropists, industry bodies, private donors and patrons. However, it is frequently overlooked that a major source of support for the arts ...
Harm Reduction Coalition Aotearoa, a new incorporated society dedicated to ending harmful drug policies, officially launched today, seeks a new fit-for-purpose drug law for Aotearoa New Zealand, rooted in science, experience and evidence. ...
The Corrections Minister admits he "muddied the water" after he and the Prime Minister repeatedly provided incorrect information about a $1.9 billion prison spend-up. ...
It took a post-post-cabinet statement to confirm that 810 new beds will be built at Waikeria, writes Stewart Sowman-Lund in this extract from The Bulletin. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here. ...
Lili Tokaduadua was only 15 when she left her family in Fiji to pursue her netball dream in New Zealand. She’d been playing the sport for 10 years and was offered a netball scholarship at Auckland’s Howick College. Now, in her first year out of high school, the 19-year-old defender ...
The beloved local grocers lost a legal challenge to stop a new cycleway outside their store. Joel MacManus reports. In the annals of New Zealand legal history, there are a few brave people who have dared to stand up to the powers that be, no matter how bleak the odds ...
How what we produce and what we eat connects us to the world beyond our shores, visualised. Walking around a supermarket or vege shop, it might be obvious that everything on the shelves came from somewhere. But you might ...
Professor Jemma Geoghegan, of the University of Otago, Otakou Whakaihu Waka, co-leads a Te Niwha project aimed at understanding how and where avian influenza could affect Aotearoa New Zealand, as the highly infectious H5N1 virus spreads globally. The virus has now spread to all continents except Oceania and was recently ...
Thirty years on from Rwanda’s genocide, is guilt over the atrocities is blinding the world to the true nature of its current leadership? The post The repressive underside of Rwanda’s regime appeared first on Newsroom. ...
Opinion: Last week, important recommendations for our criminal justice system were made by the international community. Every five years, each member of the United Nations has its human rights practices reviewed. This rolling event – the Universal Periodic Review – is the culmination of a government reporting on its human ...
Highly pathogenic avian influenza – H5N1, or bird flu – has been flying around the world since the late 1990s. New Zealand, Australia and the Pacific Islands are so far free of it, but now it’s been discovered in mainland Antarctica and scientists say it’s only a matter of time ...
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A,DIV,A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Tuesday 7 May appeared first on Newsroom. ...
The following interview with auto electrician and former caver Stu Berendt, 68, of Charleston on the West Coast, came about because he was part of the caving team that found the rare and amazing fossil remains of the giant Haast eagle, the subject of one of the year’s best books, ...
A $1.8b funding boost for Pharmac still won’t enable it to buy more drugs, raising questions about the Government’s approach to the agency The post Can Pharmac do more with the same pot of money? appeared first on Newsroom. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Eric Stokan, Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of Maryland, Baltimore County If you live in one of the most economically deprived neighborhoods in your city, you might think the government is directing a smaller share of public funds to your community. ...
Wansolwara The news media’s crucial role in climate change and environment journalism was the focus of The University of the South Pacific’s Journalism Programme 2024 World Press Freedom Day celebrations. The European Union Ambassador to the Pacific, Barbara Plinkert, and Pacific Islands Forum Secretary General Henry Puna were the chief ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michael Adams, Professor of Corporate Law & Academic Director of UNE Sydney campus, University of New England Last August, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) launched legal proceedings against Qantas. The consumer watchdog accused the airline of selling thousands of tickets ...
This episode of A View From Afar was recorded LIVE on May 6, 2024 (NZST) which is Sunday evening, May 5, 2024 at 8:30pm (USEST). In an analytical essay titled ‘A moment of friction’ political scientist Dr Paul Buchanan wrote how we are living within a decisive moment ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Alison Taylor, Assistant Professor, Bond University Metro Goldwyn Mayer Pictures At the crux of the critical response to Luca Guadagnino’s new movie Challengers is one word: “sexy”. The film charts a love triangle between three up-and-coming tennis players: Tashi (Zendaya), ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jenny Stewart, Professor of Public Policy, ADFA Canberra, UNSW Sydney For years, First Nations people have been telling governments they want to be listened to. In particular, they want more ownership of the programs and services that are supposed to help them. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Gregory Moore, Senior Research Associate, School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, The University of Melbourne Why do trees have bark? Julien, age 6, Melbourne. This is a great question, Julien. We are so familiar with bark on trees, that most of us ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Anthony Nasser, Senior Lecturer in Physiotherapy, University of Technology Sydney PeopleImages.com – Yuri A/Shutterstock The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is an important ligament in the knee. It runs from the thigh bone (femur) to the shin bone (tibia) and helps stabilise ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Adrian Beaumont, Election Analyst (Psephologist) at The Conversation; and Honorary Associate, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne I covered the May 2 United Kingdom local government elections for The Poll Bludger. The Blackpool South parliamentary byelection was also held, ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Deanna Grant-Smith, Professor of Management, University of the Sunshine Coast The federal government has announced a “Commonwealth Prac Payment” to support selected groups of students doing mandatory work placements. Those who are studying to be a teacher, nurse, midwife or social ...
We round up everything coming to streaming services this week, including Netflix, Amazon Prime, Disney+, Apple TV+, ThreeNow, Neon and TVNZ+. If you love a dark comedy: Bodkin (Netflix, May 9)An English podcaster, an Irish podcaster and American podcaster walk into a pub and…make a TV show? ...
By Eleisha Foon, RNZ Pacific senior journalist A Pacific regionalism academic has called out New Zealand’s Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters for withholding information from the public on AUKUS and says the security deal “raises serious questions for the Pacific region”. Auckland University of Technology academic Dr Marco de Jong ...
How worried should we be about the cloud? This is an excerpt from our weekly environmental newsletter Future Proof. Sign up here. I currently have a few thousand unread emails languishing in my inbox, mostly old marketing newsletters and piles of unread science journal press releases. I have a similar number ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Nuurrianti Jalli, Assistant Professor of Communication Studies College of Arts and Sciences Department of Languages, Literature, and Communication Studies, Northern State University Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, Southeast Asian governments not only have to deal with the virus but also with the false ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By David Murakami Wood, Professor of Critical Surveillance and Securities Studies, L’Université d’Ottawa/University of Ottawa The skyline of Riyadh, the capital and largest city of the Kingdom of Saudia Arabia.(Shutterstock) There is a long history of planned city building by both governments ...
Rule of the Majority, or elected dictatorship?
How much democracy do we actually have?
If we had ‘rule of the majority’ in New Zealand, Parliament would be subservient to the people.
If we had ‘rule of the majority’ in Parliament, Government would be subservient to Parliament.
If we had ‘rule of the majority’ in Government, Government would be subservient to the Caucus.
If we had ‘rule of the majority’ in politics, the Caucus would be subservient to the party.
But in New Zealand, currently, we have it the other way round
In politics, the majority in the party, is subservient to the minority in Caucus.
In government, the majority in the Caucus are subservient to the minority in Cabinet.
In Parliament, the majority in Parliament are subservient to the minority in Government.
And the majority of the people are subservient to the minority in Parliament.
(Some have described this situation as being an elected dictatorship).
Looked at it this way, our so called representative system of government, really doesn’t allow much majority rule at all. And what it does allow, is slowly being eroded away. This lends to a tiny minority of very wealthy, but completely unrepresentative lobbyists a lot of power to pressure, and manipulate, and persuade that tiny minority that rule us, to their bidding, not ours. And this lobbying which is all done behind closed doors by wealthy lobbyists who enjoy special access to our parliamentarians, possessing the swipe cards and necessary security passes to the Beehive, is often against the majority will
But why is this relevant to the latest debate going on inside the Green Party?
Good Guys Finish last
Jeanette Fitzsimons expresses disappointment that the Green Party Caucus has been given power to over rule the party*
My parentheses J.
Fitzsimons’ use of words is telling. Which is why I have put parentheses around them.
When Fitzsimons says ‘we’, what she means is, ‘they’ (meaning the caucus). But doesn’t want to say it.
The choice of worlds represents that Fitzsimons is trying to inhabit her customary role in the party of peace maker between political divisions inside and outside the party. This is a role that Fitzsimons has played throughout her political career. She is clearly not comfortable with confrontation, and will back down in the face of it. (As she did with Clark over the ETS, when she gave the ETS her backing in spite of her own reservations and despite deep opposition against the ETS in the Greens.)
The choice of the word ‘we’ indicates that Fitzsimons is attempting to bridge the division, between the membership and the Caucus giving the impression, ‘we’ are all one, in handing the Caucus the power to rule over the membership.
In line with her self appointed role of peacemaker, Fitzsimons indicates that she has become resigned to the new state of affairs.
Though Fitzsimons thinks that this new power, this new ability of the caucus to legitimately do ‘that’ any time they want to, is “much more serious”.
In line with her self appointed role of peacemaker, Fitzsimons indicates that she has become resigned to the new state of affairs.
*(That battle has been won and lost inside the Labour Party, a long time ago. And was never fought inside New Zealand First. Because NZ First has always been run as a fiefdom from its inception).
Excellent Jenny. Thank you.
I’m really glad that we have the rule of law rather than simple majority rule. Had we had the latter then Maori Treaty rights would not have been recognized but rather the document would have been ripped up long ago. Had this happened NZ most probably descended into the kind of violence we saw in places like Northern Ireland in the 70s.
As far as Jeannette and the Greens is concerned you invent your point:
When Fitzsimons says ‘we’, what she means is, ‘they’ (meaning the caucus). But doesn’t want to say it.
What evidence do you have for putting words in her mouth? How do you know this when the changes to party processes have not been made public?
In identity politics someone may have different identities in different political contexts. The royal “we” has long been employed by leftists when they self-identify as part of the whole. In this instance I believe she is using it to refer to her inclusion as a member, therefore caucus members are implicitly included in that whole.
Referring to parliamentarians as “they” kicks in when the common-interest frame doesn’t apply: when the common interests of caucus members differ from the common interests of party members who aren’t in caucus! There’s a tension at this interface. Members will inevitably feel that when MPs operate independently as a group, their accountability to the party as a whole comes into question.
I’m intrigued by Jenny’s statement that “the Green Party Caucus has been given power to over rule the party”. I’d like to see some evidence that it’s true (rather than merely a personal interpretation). Having just returned from representing my local branch as a delegate at the conference, I encountered no such evidence.
The following is from Henry Cooke via Stuff.
The review was not complete at the time of writing, but its likely that it will give MPs a little bit more freedom to act without consulting members on every decision.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/106388785/bruised-green-party-go-back-to-basics-at-annual-conference
Did you call them out on lying, Dennis? If so, what was their response?
I’m the kind of person who would object to lying if circumstances were appropriate, but no such applied at conference. Depends what you are referring to. Often what one person thinks is a lie, another sees as spin or (mis)interpretation.
It was a very tightly-organised event, carefully designed to cater for lowest-common-denominator democracy only. That’s good when you want efficient production of consensus as output. It’s frustrating for folks like me who also want to steer the gathering in a particular direction at times, when vital points are not being considered.
In other words you were in a minority and didnt like the result
‘designed to cater for lowest-common-denominator democracy only’
Dont they have a separate policy process which is more ‘talk fest’ oriented and produces a more specific outcome?
I’ve spent most of my life being in a minority & not liking the result! But no, the organisers cleverly designed their process to avoid polarisation.
Yeah, talk-fest has been normal for the Greens & still happens somewhat (summer policy conferences) but is better-facilitated towards constructive outputs & efficient time-management now.
I was referring to them claiming their hands were tied re the waka jumping bill.
It’s a shame more vital points weren’t able to be discussed/considered, thus I understand your frustration.
Fitzsimmons has become a bit like Roger Douglas in her old age- obstinate as hell.
Was she the main reason Greens couldnt get a ministerial post during the Clark years ?
RNZ: “Former MPs Jeanette Fitzsimons and Sue Bradford had hoped the caucus might be persuaded this weekend to pull its support from the waka jumping bill.”
Hard to believe either Jeanette or Sue would be that naive, eh? If true, though, it does indicate an unwillingness to consider the other side of the coin. And in politics, reluctance to weigh the merits of both sides of an issue are likely to make you seem incompetent. Retirement is therefore sensible, and lobbying from retirement only a good idea when you operate on a sound basis.
Audrey Young: “Labour insisted on having an insurance policy – a clause in both agreements requiring the Greens and New Zealand First to act in good faith to allow the other’s agreements to be complied with.”
Obviously this ought to have been acknowledged at the press conference (instead of tossing a dead rat at the media on behalf of the leftists in the party). So we got weeks of hoo-ha in which journos claimed the coalition agreements did not bind the Greens. Either they can’t read, or Audrey is wrong. Which?
The advice given to the Greens from the Cabinet Office states good faith is a political statement around how the Greens endeavour to work with the Government. It commits them to work through areas of concern in good faith, but does not bind them to support everything set out in the Labour/New Zealand First coalition agreement.
Therefore, Audrey is wrong.
Looks like you are correct in your diagnosis. She could also be framing her (mis)interpretation to reflect a similar view adopted by the Green caucus. This is just another perception/reality thing. Even lawyers don’t agree on what the law means half the time.
Also, our caucus isn’t necessarily being disingenuous. Choosing to take Cabinet Office advice as more precise than the vagueness implied by your description of it serves the purpose of making the government operate on a consensus basis. I side with our caucus on this.
While I agree lawyers don’t agree on what the law means half the time, this is rather clear cut.
Acting in good faith doesn’t mean one is obligated to approve of everything in negotiation. If it did, they wouldn’t have to act in good faith as everything would have already been agreed upon by agreeing to act in good faith.
All I’m saying is that they are interpreting it as more binding than you are so as to show they are team players rather than separatists. Naturally some leftists got enraged by the spectre of collaboration: those to whom separatism has become a way of life. An addiction. Other leftists are proving they understand that the left can only be successful nowadays via consensus.
They may well be interpreting it as more binding, but they weren’t bound by it as they claimed.
Albeit this Green lot don’t have much fight, I understand they are required to make compromises from time to time. But they don’t have to lie about it.
Audrey is not wrong. There is an expectation (perfectly reasonable) that all parties in a coalition will work together to achieve the key points of their respective policy objectives. To do otherwise would quickly destroy a government.
From what I can see that is what happens with the current government. Each of the parties has got something that is important to them and they expect their partners to support that, not frustrate it, even if it is not something they would specifically want.
Outside of those agreed things, no doubt it is all negotiable, though presumably they all have to be sufficiently ok with it. After all, any one of the parties can prevent something happening. For instance repealing three strikes was abl to be stopped by NZ First. That is they said they would not vote for it.
While there is an expectation that all parties in a coalition will work together to achieve the key points of their respective policy objectives, good faith doesn’t mean they have to comply with all those key points as Audrey implied.
Advice from cabinet office ?
Sounds dodgy to me , as its the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet.
Good faith in a context of industrial relations – which is very familiar to a lot of labour people- means NO absolute no nos as far as to finding an agreement.
ie an employer saying they are opposed to a collective bargaining agreement ‘on principal’ is definitely not in good faith.
Greens not budging on waka jumping in principle is definitely NOT in good faith
They only have to consider it in good faith, they are not bound to support it.
Supporting it to this stage was a show of good faith.
+ 1 yep – a lot of ‘and this means…’ without evidence – it may be true or not.
Hi Solkta. You are right it is an assumption. But I think it is a reasonable assumption, mainly because it makes proper sense, (and meaning), of the sentence.
“I’m more disappointed in the fact the party rules were changed to mean that we can now do that legitimately any time we want to, I think that is much more serious.”
Jeanette is talking about something she doesn’t like, and not supported by her, that lets ‘they’, meaning the caucus, do things the Party, don’t support, but uses the word “We”, meaning the caucus. I can’t think of anyone else Jeanette might be thinking of, who can now over rule the party in parliament. She also says that she thinks that this is “much more serious”. (Than letting the caucus sack dissenting MPs)
No, it is very clear to me that the “we” refers to the Party but Jeanette is not happy about the rule change. The fact that she disagrees does not make her suddenly not part of the party.
that lets ‘they’, meaning the caucus,
Where is the “they” in the sentence you quote? If she had meant “they” as in the caucus she would have said “they”. Jeanette is extremely articulate and is always careful to say what she means.
I would certainly hope not.
Solkta, I think that as I tried to explain before, in my opinion, with her choice of words, Jeanette was trying to straddle the difference between the Caucus and the Party.
Jeanette also expressed resignation that these changes were inevitable.
I was of the opinion that instead of being resigned to these changes and trying to cover over the difference opened up by them, Jeanette should have openly challenged them.
I would have hoped that openly challenging the rule changes, (not yet public), that she disagrees with, would not have entailed her leaving her party.
If it had, things are much worse than I thought.
Personally I hope that I am wrong about all this, and the Green Party Caucus will not be become distant from their membership, and/or isolated and contained in parliament.
Though they now will have a harder time of it, I hope the Green Party Caucus will still strenuously lobby the other MPs in the Government for the legislative changes their members want. And that despite the efforts to constrain them, that the Green Party MPs will be able to get some more wins for the environment and especially the climate on the board.
God knows we need them.
You keep seeing this as a caucus versus party issue when it is really a party versus party issue. Some members, like Jeanette, think the Party should never compromise on policy while others, the majority, think that some level of compromise is acceptable to achieve wider goals.
yes Jenny we need the greens to back NZ First to get ourb regional rail going again after 20 years of neglect.
See this as the reasons.
We hope this new agency ‘EMA’ Shane Jones yesterday announced to plan our ‘inferstucture’ – recommends regional rail to take trucks off the roads that are now the most danerous roads in the developed world now.
One truck wears the road surface 9600 times faster than one car does according to a US study from engineers, according to a US gov’t GAO study.
https://www.vabike.org/vehicle-weight-and-road-damage/
Vehicle Weight and Road Damage
admin December 2, 2009 @vabike 22 comments
Heavy trucks obviously cause more road damage than cars, but how much more? According to a GAO study, Excessive Truck Weight: An Expensive Burden We Can No Longer Afford, road damage from one 18-wheeler is equivalent to 9600 cars (p.23 of study, p.36 of PDF).
The study assumed a fully loaded tractor-trailer at 80,000 pounds, and a typical passenger car at 4,000 pounds. That’s 20 times difference in weight, but the wear and tear caused by the truck is exponentially greater.
Food for thought: a bicycle and rider at 200 pounds is the same 20 times less heavy than a 4000 pound passenger car. Similarly, the wear and tear caused by that bike and rider would be exponentially less than a passenger car’s.
Virginia has already figured out that it’s cheaper to move trucks off our highways and onto trains, than to support those trucks on our roads. Let’s also think about getting motorists out of their cars. Wide shoulders, wide outer lanes and bike lanes, and off-road paths and trails for bicyclists may seem like extra expense, but they’re cheaper than supporting the car trips they can eliminate.
cleangreen, your numbers are lived here in Queensland. The trucks are far more prevalent… so are ruts and potholes.
More serious in the respect that it had to happen?
Because the number of plants in the Greens has grown to the point where they need to give more power to the top? Because there are too many bloos and joos in middle ranks? Plenty of wisdom in the Greens, it will take more than dirty politics to stop them from rising.
This deserves a post all of it’s own. Instead we have some irrelevant article about a potential challenge to the Australian PM.
Are you really a fair arbiter of irrelevancy? An expert in it perhaps?
Feel free to do the research and write a guest post….
Jeanette Fitzsimons of course, is not the only ex-Green MP to warn against these changes.
We should really listen when someone like Sue Bradford, who has successfully achieved getting more bills passed from a minority position, than any other MP in our democracy’s history, also warns against these constraints on party and parliamentary democracy.
From Wikipedia:
It can be strongly argued that if the MPs from other parliamentary parties had been under the hammer of their executives and the possibility of being dismissed from parliament, if they strayed from the party line, that all of Bradford’s bills would have died in committee.
On the contrary. Labour backed the Bill while National gave their MPs a conscience vote. If there had been any crossing of the floor it could only have been Labour MPs to oppose it.
The reason Labour backed minority Green Party MP Sue Bradford’s Bills, is because she and other Green MPs were free to aggressively lobby and win over, Labour (and National Party) MPs without repercussions to these MPs.
Would Sue Bradford have been able to win these Labour Government MPs, (and even some National MPs), to support these Green Party Bills’ if they knew their Party leaders could sack them for supporting a Private Member Bill of a minor non-government party?
This new law will make the Green Party’s job of getting the MPs of the other Partes in parliament to support or take up their policies that much harder.
Bollocks, the Bill won’t prevent MPs from talking with each other.
I think you mean, ‘the Bill won’t prevent MPs from whispering with each other.’
No. I meant what i wrote.
What a load of bollocks above, Jenny.
As for the waka jumping Bill, “Almost too late, almost too late” she said.
Read all about it at tonight’s Daily Review.
Your concern and framing of it in the context of democracy is appropriate & I share it. Newsroom: “Some of the party’s well-known rifts were no doubt aired in these closed sessions.” Not sufficiently, that’s for sure.
Always on the watch for traces of closet-stalinism, I would agree with any member who felt that the agenda was designed to minimise the possibility of members criticising party decision-making in our closed sessions. OTOH I’d also agree with anyone who saw that design as a sophisticated way of inducing a focus on common ground and how to progress via learning better ways of framing issues. Encouraging to see conference organisers deploying diversionary tactics so cleverly. Perhaps Exec & caucus will realise the same expertise can be applied to the media.
“I would agree with any member who felt that the agenda was designed to minimise the possibility of members criticising party decision-making in our closed sessions”
Silencing dissent within the ranks will only lead to more resentment.
So much for healing and strengthening the party.
Yep, the road to hell (see http://altaotearoa.blogspot.com/2015/06/on-road-to-hell.html) but they did design for the healing & strengthening sessions quite well, so readers ought not to get the impression they failed.
My take is that they had too tight a timeframe to allow for venting. The formal AGM structure & business took up half the conference. The rah-rah team-building slots for MPs took up a couple of hours, scattered throughout the schedule to avoid overkill. Did we really need them? Yes & no. Humans get too negative on criticism easily, so reminder of our historic policy achievements in the current govt is a good strategy to balance that tendency.
The necessity for the Greens caucus to do rapid decision-making that requires divergence from GP policy in order to progress our government on the basis of a three-party consensus provoked whatever rule change has happened: support for the waka-jumping bill to the next stage of parliamentary process.
Herald: ” The sweetener for the Greens has been a commitment by the cabinet to compensate for that dead rat by an extension of the Bill of Rights Act – it will give courts the statutory authority to declare a law inconsistent with the Bill of Rights Act (authority which is disputed at present) and when they do, Parliament will be required to review that law. One can only hope that once the courts’ new powers are conferred that the first law to be declared inconsistent with the Bill or Rights Act will be the party-hopping bill.”
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12108919
The journo’s hope seems based on the assumption of poor legal drafting. Winston’s a lawyer, so why would anyone expect him to fall into that trap?? But yes, the option provided by the govt is a good sensible check on party dominance. Democracy was designed for power-sharing, so a balance of powers in governance is necessary.
I’m still waiting to see if amendments to Winston’s bill have emerged in the select committee process to balance the rights of party and electors against the right of an MP to dissent and then jump the waka. We need an integral design satisfying the common interests of all.
If MPs are allowed to fly free when they have sucked up to a Party and its supporters long enough to get elected, nothing is certain except that more bad time wasting acrimonious and self-centred attempts will be made to ram through legislation with doubtful importance compared to the big, becoming unsolvable problems that hang in the closet like disintegrating smelly corpses.
There needs to be time given for bills or deemed legislation to remedy bad social problems that show up and should be dealt with quickly, even by following a procedure agreed on, monitored for benefit and suitability as a pilot scheme.
Having MPs flying round madly on their own trajectories like those flying click beetles near a light, is not of benefit to our human rights.
Have a look at Australia where they have often had trouble with Independents and take note of the latest insect that has crawled through a hole in the wall there. He has gopt into government through them having imperfect legislation allowing a band glued together by negative feelings towards others as Pauline Hanson’s One Party is, then the guy went independent, then joined another small party the Australia Party. He indicates how dangerous and degrading of government independents can be; so narrow minded they are toxic. He is preaching the White Australia Policy return.
Fraser Anning: How only 19 people voting for him secured Senate gig
https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/…/f8d8aaa83f0c2bcab53626455a3698d6
5 days ago – In his offensive and dangerous maiden speech, Senator Fraser … took a pit-stop as an independent, and then joined Katter’s Australian Party.
“(As she did with Clark over the ETS, when she gave the ETS her backing in spite of her own reservations and despite deep opposition against the ETS in the Greens.)”
I understood it was the ETS or nothing. NZF would have been happy with nothing at the time.
You’re heading in the right direction but this is wrong: It’s the majority in parliament that makes up the government.
That’s how Representative Democracy was designed. The rich were concerned that the majority would vote to make them poor.
Of course, we can’t afford the rich so we do need to legislate them out of existence.
Fitzsimons is misrepresenting what has happened and what it allows.
The caucus hasn’t been given power to over-rule the membership.
Kia ora Draco.
I thought carefully before including the line; “….Parliament are subservient to the minority in Government.”
In a narrow sense, Yes of course you are right: “It’s the majority in parliament that makes up the government.”
But if the government lose that majority on some issue during their term; under Standing Orders the Government can invoke a right of Financial Veto. Effectively over ruling Parliament.
The past National Government used Financial Veto to over rule the majority of Parliament to oppose extending paid parental leave to 26 weeks.
Not allowing a vote, in parliament is not democratic, it is rule by fiat.
It is what I mean by the term elected dictatorship.
P.S. As to your other point, that, “Fitzsimons, is misrepresenting what has happened and what it allows”
As the details are being withheld, I suppose time will tell whether you, or jeanette are right. As Jeanette was probably privy to this information, my guess is that her estimation would be more accurate than yours.
I’ve been using the term Elected Dictatorship to describe Representative Democracy for some time.
There are many examples of the government going against the wishes of the populace when they act to protect profits.
‘
What I mean by Elected Dictatorship
The Herald Editorial yesterday makes some very pertinent points about the Waka Jumping Bill:
Indeed
Just as the Herald Editorial says; No self respecting party sure of its vision (which feed into its candidate selection process) need worry about Waka Jumping.
I also think it is a mature position for any political party to hold to accept that sometimes the minority may be right.
In relation to the case of Alamein Kopu, which is always brought up as a reason for the need for a Waka Jumping Bill.
What that snafu revealed to me, was a weakness in the Alliance candidate selection process, resulting from a lack of a united cohesive political vision inside the Alliance. A weakness that expressed itself in their selection process.
It was this lack of a united cohesive vision that led to the Greens Alliance split, and ultimately to the split between the membership and the leadership over New Zealand troop deployment to Afghanistan, (the final dispute that finished them off).
You can’t take the analogy too far but I think that there is a resemblance between New Zealand First and the Alliance, in that both were formed as reactive offshoots to the perceived betrayal of their respective birthing parties, (National >> NZFirst, Labour >> Alliance), One from the Left and the other from the Right.
Both parties encompassed differing political streams under one roof. And both parties were led by stubbourn charismatic leaders who brook no insubordination to their top down style of leadership in each of their respective parties. (Peters more successfully so than Anderton).
Just as the Alliance didn’t survive the departure of their leader (Albeit under likely very different circumstances)
Too bad the Green Party members didn’t carry the day. Our democracy will be the poorer for it.
Indeed
You mean the Green Party members who strongly opposed it. The majority of members did “carry the day”.
It may seem so, but the decision was made by caucus and the Executive didn’t provide delegates at conference with the opportunity to either endorse or reject it, so the numbers supporting the government never got counted!
The thing has been discussed at every level of the Party for eight months now. The only voting members on both the Exec and Policy Committee are the Province reps. Delegates can take control of an AGM if they are of a mind to. Remits can also be prepared in advance. If the majority of members were opposed it could not have happened.
Good answer. Correct in all respects. 🙂
Don’t wobble the waka.
It seems that members (and ex-MPs), opposition to the Waka Jumping Bill, was not discussed at the conference. Leading Jeanette Fitzsimmons to air her misgivings to the media in a break during the conference.
Jeanette Fitzsimons gives warning of “speed wobbles”
Lucy Bennett – NZ Herald, August 20, 2018
Everybody knows Jeanette’s position.
Amusing to see the editor of the Herald putting NZ first while criticising NZ First: “They are elected on the brands of political parties but their first allegiance should be to New Zealand.” Bullshit, of course. It’s what the Herald always provides.
In our representative democracy, the first allegiance of MPs has long been to parties, and the second allegiance to those who elected them. To prove the Herald claim valid, the evidence of an allegiance requirement to the nation would have to be produced. Citations from any employment contract that current legislation applies to them or party rules would suffice.
My Party right, or wrong?
Hi Dennis, I disagree.
God save the rebels!
Dennis, I would like to ask you to consider the consequences of letting party leaderships impose an undemocratic sectarian straight jacket, on our elected MPs.
In my opinion our MPs have an allegiance to the people and the welfare of the nation above sectarian allegiances.
We should guard the right of our elected leaders to obey their conscience.
Let me ask you this Dennis; If a democratically elected MP, feels their leaders or their government are betraying the people who elected them, and then is moved to act on their conscience by crossing the floor or abstaining on some government bill or action they disagree with, that they then should be removed from parliament?
Are you happy to give this power to party executives without any democratic checks and balances from their grass roots party members or the voters?
Wouldn’t you agree that this is undemocratic?
Do you think that Jim Anderton should have been undemocratically thrown out of Parliament when he disagreed with the Lange/Douglas administration over their undemocratic imposition of neoliberalism on the country?
Do you think that Mike Minogue and Marilyn Waring should have undemocratically thrown out of parliament when they disagreed with the Muldoon administration over nuclear ship visits?
It can be strongly argued that these rebels were more in touch with the democratic will of the people and their party grass roots than their party leaders.
Hi Jenny, perhaps you haven’t noticed my earlier comments on this where I endorsed the principled position that you, JF & KL have taken. I’ve just been trying to established a balanced view in support of our current government.
Excessive focus on one side of the issue defeats the consensus process which is essential to successful governance.
So although MPs must have freedom of speech and conscience, and must retain the right to jump the waka when necessary, parliamentary rules and party constitutions must preserve democracy by including the electoral contract to balance their duties and responsibilities. Trust in democracy is vital. Denying it is a fatal design flaw. My concern is to ensure that the select committee produces an integral design instead of a zero-sum design which favours one side and discriminates against the other. Let’s be inclusive!
Jenny, the flaw I see in your analysis is that the status quo allows parliamentarians to betray their electors. Trust is a vital part of parliamentary democracy. We ought to have electoral law that enforces accountability for such betrayal. Winston’s design is inadequate and the select committee process ought to improve it. However this has been raised numerous times already in this forum in recent years so I regret having to reinforce the need for balance!
Dennis, the flaw I see in your analysis is that the Waka Jumping Bill allows political parties to betray their their members, the nation, and the electors. And to silence any MP who objects on pain of dismissal.
Otago University law lecturer and Professor, Andrew Geddis on the Waka Jumping Bill:
‘Waka jumping’ law a cost to democracy
Andrew Geddis – Radio NZ, 25 October 2017
A book review of sorts of Capitalism vs. Freedom by Rob Larson: https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/08/the-meaning-of-freedom
Capitalism isn’t about freedom for everyone. It’s about freedom for the capitalists to negatively affect everyone else.
Capitalism, started, for example, when instead of say mining ore, paper wealth was created instead of actually mining more ore. The price of the existed mined ore went up as the interest in digging for it was depressed, see you could own gold without actually holding it. It was at its core Green, since the planet did not get polluted as much. It’s politics that force new mines, etc upon us, to grow wealth. What we need is less talk about capitalism, more talk about abusing it, since at its core capitalism stops every duck mining, farming inefficiently.
When you can’t burn anymore oil, you’ve essentially found all the gold there is, capitalism stalls as everyone knows the paper wealth has no clothes. Why have we moved into fake news, coz simple, the reality is capitalism has hit the planetary limit, it’s all bollocks now. Less some with a clue, no interest in current value, no call on future wealth, systemically detached, create new avenues, green ways to allot wealth that has no connection to limits. oh I know, the virtual economy, which currently is in the pre economic historical stage, ruled by warlocks and mystics. oh the joys of the pre history.
When you can’t burn anymore oil, you’ve essentially found all the gold there is, capitalism stalls as everyone knows the paper wealth has no clothes. Why have we moved into fake news, coz simple, the reality is capitalism has hit the planetary limit, it’s all bollocks now. Less some with a clue, no interest in current value, no call on future wealth, systemically detached, create new avenues, green ways to allot wealth that has no connection to limits. oh I know, the virtual economy, which currently is in the pre economic historical stage, ruled by warlocks and mystics. oh the joys of the pre history.
Your data is your soul,Google is God now, theocracy of the cloud.
No, capitalism started when some arsehole said that he owned a bit of land and a few people to work it and nobody disagreed with him.
Capitalism, by its very nature, its very structure, is corrupt.
The gory freedom of free foxes in a free chicken run.
And this:
What we have is a plutocracy.
Book is available at the Auckland Public Libraries.
Ta
Milking it: NZ’s milk price: Who’s getting rich?
Consumer NZ estimates that for every $3.56 bottle of milk (an average retail price at present), about $1.19 would go to the farmer, $1.91 to the processor and retailer and 46c to GST.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/106140079/nzs-milk-price-whos-getting-rich
What interests me about the above statistic is that a lot more of the price of milk is going to the processor and retailer than the farmer. You can understand the farmers costs a lot more, they have to pay rates, mortgages and the price of land is increasing, as is the cost of vets, labour, feed, cost of the animals to produce, etc.
But the majority is going not to the farmer but the processor, retailer and GST
When so many in the grocery business are getting on the rich list with just one store you have to wonder why the neoliberal obsession with the price the farmers are paying versus the middle men, (processor and retailer) who seem to be creaming off the profits but often escape scrutiny as why their costs are so high!
Need to by direct from the cow. There are co-ops around just not convenient
Finding a cow who won’t haggle is the trick.
I think there are plenty of cows that’ll turn tricks. There’s a whole opposition in parliament that can attest to that
Treat them with a bit of respect and they’ll at least happily produce enough for the daily cup of chai.
I’m in New Caledonia at the moment. There’s French and NZ milk on the supermarket shelves. The French milk is 75% of the price of NZ milk. Go figure! At least there’s a choice.
It would be interesting to work out the milk processing charge, separate from the milk retailer charge and also who is the processor (is that Fonterra?).
Saw an article about horticulture and they were saying that the supermarket used to pay for the cartage and a whole lot of other costs but have gradually forced all the costs back on the producer as well as being very picky and telling the producer what they want them to produce.
The commerce commission did not do a very good job investigating supermarkets because they seem to be the one that has managed to get control over the food chain well over the small amount of work they do as middle men.
They have also found that fruit and veg has about 30% less nutrition that a generation ago possibly co inciting with the rise of supermarkets, exported food instead of local production and their obsession with shelf life and profits.
Who also have to pay rates, mortgages and other expenses.
How much is going to pay interest from both the farmer and the processor?
That’s the big question and why the banks are slowly being seen as the major drain on the economy (Why we can’t afford the rich, and a few other things I’ve read).
https://i.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/106296981/calls-for-pm-to-bring-nauru-refugee-kids-to-nz
Let’s make a bet. 112 refugee children are taken in by NZ, housed, and their extensive mental health taken care of before disabled are funded properly and basic needs are met.
It’s not either or – we can do both. Stop demonizing innocent people.
I have taken what you say to mean these refugees will get better treatment than citizens. Happy to have got it wrong if that isn’t the case.
You think Pedaduddin will release his hostages sleepy?
From the ‘”Gawd help us, can you get dumber than this” pages’…
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2018/08/expenses-leak-came-from-a-govt-that-wants-to-distract-simon-bridges.html
Mr Bridges says that the leak came not from his side but from the Government which was trying to distract the public.
The dumbest thing was that he was unable to nominate from what the government was trying to distract attention.
The Leader of the Opposition is unable to say what the government might have got wrong enough to want to misdirect voters!
No wonder he has flagged away winning in 2020. He’s like the Wallabies after their 25 point walloping, hands on knees after his exhausting tour of the provinces, his front row collapsing, unable to retain his own ball (singular) even on his own throw in, and kicking possession away for his opposition to run back at him, fumbling, bumbling, and unlike the Wallabies now blaming the opposition.
I bet he will soon be blaming Referee Mallard and the touch judges. The ball boys might even be suspect, someone will have spiked the drinks, and they were bullied even before the game started, the media asked questions, the crowd stayed away and it wasn’t a level playing field……..
Well it might have however I would have advised him not to talk about it until the investigation is done
So he can blame his advisers, or lack of them, or the wrong ones, or they’ve turned against him? It’s Trumpian.
Has he called for someone to be ‘locked up’ yet?
On Morning Report this morning, Bridges came close to blaming Mallard for the enquiry. He also seemed to not understand that the enquiry that he insisted on, would cost a heap of money which could be seen as hypocritical given his complaints of money being spent on other Government enquiries.
In short he was more over the place in this morning’s interview. Not so cocky.
They will walk back from the enquiry for sure. Brownlee who is leader of the house for the Nats was harumping about the ‘eternally sacred private communications between Mps and constituents’ , which for me meant they wont allow access to emails, but they might allow access to ‘network traffic’ or some other way to obstruct finding a culprit. Much like Dunne did for his ‘leaking’
I think they have found’ leakers from cabinet’ before and thats a main reason why some ‘successful’ Mps have ‘retired early’.
He is “not, not open”…
lol how can nearly half the voting public follow and then vote for this idiot.
And his recent statement that dealing with the dumping of tyres would be just another tax by the Greens. Just proves that his party does not give a shit about paptuanuku.
This is interesting.
A new movement called Organise Aotearoa, to the left of the Greens, has sprung up to soak up some of those who might be less comfortable with the compromises.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/106388785/bruised-green-party-go-back-to-basics-at-annual-conference
So will this new party be more environmentally focused or social issue focused do you think?
I know nothing more about it at this stage. But I can’t see why it can’t be focused on both.
Perhaps someone out there can give us so more details?
Well if it was to happen, and as Dennis Frank just stated it won’t, having two parties offer pretty much the same thing generally would mean both would fail to hit 5% and Labour would gratefully pick up the rest of the votes
But one focusing mainly on social issues and one focusing on Green issues might, still probably wouldn’t, just be able to pull it off especially if one party did a deal with Labour
Well theres always TOP I guess
Some would say Labour and National offer pretty much the same thing and they both have no problem getting over 5%.
Let’s face it, the Greens have been a shambles so it wouldn’t take much to out perform them and take their support.
I think you have your pants down troll.
Chair putting the slipper in – all class that wanker.
Not a new party. It’s a network within the Greens. Think of it as a pressure group. In the unlikely scenario of these leftists proving they can work together in common cause, it will become a lobby – perhaps even what the yanks call a PAC.
Thanks for that
Thanks, Dennis.
Do you know who is fronting it?
No, don’t recall names easily at my age & never seen him before. Shaved head, probably late twenties or thirties at a guess, skinny, slightly-built. The way to connect would be via either a branch networker or provincial networker for your area, but failing that an email request to Greens head office. Sometimes such emails take a while to elicit a response.
Asking a Green MP via their online email address may work also – could try one of the younger ones not committed to ministerial duties…
The Chairman is not a party member, he’s just a really crap troll.
Thanks again, Dennis.
An Egg?
Splitters. It’s what leftists do. It was announced by the convenor to the conference as a new network – nothing wrong with that. There’s already a rainbow network, a disabilities network, around half a dozen networks concurrently, although sadly the wild greens network Nandor once led may have lapsed into dormancy.
Given the left still control the party at the top level, this splitter initiative indicates primarily that any kind of pragmatic compromise to build the GP voter base in the center between left & right is anathema to members who are so sectarian they are unable to focus on the common good. Power-sharing is incomprehensible to closet-stalinists! Under-privileged folk must rule everyone! Tacit stuff like this is very powerful in some activists. Self-defeating, but they’ll only figure that out after years of bitter experience…
They sound like a good crew thinking and doing good work – well done to those left activists – diversity of opinion is what is needed – within the green framework of course.
True. Well-intentioned and a vital part of the whole. I just wish they could see the big picture…
“I just wish they could see the big picture…”
Like maybe if they could see the whole of the moon perhaps? 🙂
Ah yes, the dark side. Jungian shadow projection: if we follow Monty Python & always look on the bright side, what’s the cost of such denial? Deep philosophical vortex in the discourse there that it’s best for us to sail around..
There’s no dark side denny, it’s all dark.
I can’t see what this issue has to do with left and right or Stalin. This is an issue of how tightly the party should hold to principle versus compromise to achieve wider goals. This was always a question that would need to be worked through once the party was actually part of a government.
“Organise Aotearoa” is not specifically a Green Party group, unless there’s two groups using that name.
It was first mentioned as a group working with the radical left think tank (Economic and Social Justice Aotearoa) in February this year, as co-organiser of their conference.
It also got a mention in April this year on this left wing blog post:
ESRA was Sue Bradford’s idea, but I understand she has now left it.
I do think Organise Aotearoa sounds more left and including green politics, rather than affiliated with the Green Party. Henry Cooke’s article says it’s a new movement to the left of the Green party.
And I do think NZ needs a new strongly green left movement and party.
Ah, okay. Looks like we have had an inadvertent conflation of two different groups (that may have over-lapping membership). I can clarify that the label Organise Aotearoa was not used when the network was introduced to the conference, nor by the convenor when he outlined what the network was for. It was just called the leftist Greens network, from memory.
There has been a Left Greens Network in the party like forever.
Not in capital letters as such. Perhaps that’s why they decided to make it explicit. Factions don’t work, but they are traditional leftist praxis…
Yes in capital letters. The correct name is: GreenLeft Network
Nothing wrong with this or any of the other network.
Okay, interesting. Perhaps, then, the explanation could be that it had fallen into disuse? Maybe the speaker & introducer were both unaware of that, since neither mentioned that it was being revived. However you could indeed be right that there has been continuity, and the sense I got that it was new was due to the framing used. That network was not evident at the summer policy conference this year, nor the one in 2015 I attended, nor in the 2015 AGM so far as I can recall.
Andrew Little was very good on Q&A last night talking about transforming the justice system. As usual MSM tried to spin that it was political suicide, but actually most of the panel was supportive and so were the public comments.
As usual the MSM seem to think the public are stupid and hysterical, but actually I think when you look at the low calibre of discourse coming from parliament and MSM journo’s and commentators with their “lock em up” discourse, it is not supported by the average Joe when many people understand something is wrong when suddenly over the last 5 years of the Natz, prison sentences have gone up 30%, coinciding with National’s attempts to build private prisons and fight clubs (now rape clubs by the look of it), National taking away prison votes effecting Maori in particular, rise of Meth, National removing people from receiving benefits, and skyrocking the cost of living while hiding it behind a massive immigration drive of many low and medium income workers and low level course study foreign students who are competing with the poorer NZ’er’s for everything from housing to jobs.
Also of course if you artificially increase the population dramatically you will have the rising levels of crime, especially if the government is not too picky and leaving it up to “market forces” about the people who are coming into NZ to study or work or launder money here (nothing done for example when China’s most wanted gambled over 500 MILLION at Sky City and arguably if he had never got involved with Dot com he would not even been prosecuted as that was not considered a problem).
Also the last 10 years of educational “reforms” making the focus of foreign students, schools making money rather than educational outcomes, possibly at the detriment of struggling students who are now in their teens and twenties and functionally illiterate.
I don’t think it is a coincidence that our prison population reaches an all time high 25 years after Ruth Richardson’s austerity budget and the subsequent bonfire of government services. National broke a generation.
As a note to the Waka jumping, it was made easier for Jenny Shipley to destroy the country when she managed to get Alemein Kopu on board, so due to that, I support the Waka jumping bill. It is more sickening when betrayal comes from places you don’t expect.
What legislation did Jenny Shipley pass as a result of having Alamein Kopu’s vote?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_National_Government_of_New_Zealand#The_National-New_Zealand_First_Coalition
You will find answers if you look for them.
No, I specifically asked what piece of legislation did Jenny Shipley’s Government pass with Alamein Kopu’s vote. I did not ask how did Alamein Kopu come to be linked with her Government.
I know you did because you need to distract with red herring specifics.
You can enlighten us when you research for us what legislation was passed by the Shipley government post-August 1998.
Unless you want keep Just Asking Questions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_National_Government_of_New_Zealand#The_National-New_Zealand_First_Coalition
According to this there were hardly any major pieces of legislation passed post August 1998.
lol
Two gossie qualifiers needed: “hardly any” & “major”.
Let’s all pretend that means “none”. 🙂
Hardly any? Enumerate.
Do you think that the Fourth National Government should have gone to an early election to avoid having to rely on unelected independents to maintain a majority?
If you think there was a significant piece of legislation passed post August 1998 then just name it. Don’t expect me to do your work for you.
My work? I am getting you to answer your own question! You know, instead of getting others on here to do your work for you.
I looked and couldn’t find any piece of legislation that would qualify as being so significant it screwed up the entire country.
what, there were no confidence & supply votes in that time?
I am glad that NZ, and NZ politicians, have learnt that extremes are not required for NZ.
18 years of centre left and right politics have convinced that while it might be to everyone’s cup of the tea the alternative, hard right or left, would be even worse
Which means that yes Helen Clark gets a well done
Yeah I love my cup of tea luke warm yum yum. There would be no middle unless there was the extremes. The middle muddle and the hard left fight the hard right and the muddle sit there counting how much money they’ll die with. I can’t stand the middle or the people who thrive there. But that’s just me…
“I can’t stand the middle or the people who thrive there. But that’s just me…”
Good luck with that:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Zealand_general_election,_2017
National: 44.45%
Labour: 36.89%
the middle account for over 80% of the vote so you might be a little lonely up there on your pedestal
Happy with the few who think the same. I don’t need external validation on that one.
I’m a minority in most things – I feel comfortable there tbh.
Fair enough
It’s a yin n yang thing . And the middle provides that . Balancing capitalism with socialism is the angle I come from .
@ bwaghorn
Yup … the left/right spectrum is a real and concrete aspect of human social life. Any enduring and sustainable political model has to be capable of encompassing and engaging with most people, most of the time.
This is a reality extremists lose sight of. Certainly we’ve lived through 40 years of unconstrained capitalism and the balance urgently needs to shift; but just like an over-due earthquake, the risk is when the fault line does release there will be a catastrophic overshoot.
Because demanding the ‘end of capitalism’ is directly akin to nuking the village and declaring it peace.
We’ve been extreme right-wing for the last 30+ years.
Which is a load of bollocks because we’ve been hard-right for the last 30+ years. Muldoon can be considered the last centrist PM.
Reality has a hard Left bias.
We really do need to live within our means but that’s got nothing to do with money but has everything to do with what resources we have and the environment that keeps us alive.
The ‘centre’ path that you advocate for destroys both of those to make a few people rich with money.
“We’ve been extreme right-wing for the last 30+ years.”
I agree, in particular to do with Laissez-faire free market economics where in which transactions between private parties are free from government intervention such as regulation, privileges, tariffs and subsidies….
Laissez-faire has also been modified so that the government seems to be starting to worship private parties and corporations and expect the public taxes to pay or give free public money or resources (aka water) to them, aka wage subsidies, free water, money to invest etc etc…
Create public companies that have zero accountability, run like private businesses but are paid for by the public taxes and resources, aka state owned enterprises and council COO’s like ports of Auckland and Auckland Transport.
umm no. The real right wing extremists have been grumbling the whole time that we’re still a polish-shipyard socialist hell-hole. They hated John Key because he was far too liberal. So who to believe?
While I’m agree our policy settings and welfare state are indeed too conservative; compared to most other developed nations NZ is still within the ball park. To describe us as ‘extreme’ or any kind of outlier flies in the face of simple observation.
That only works if you think that the every other nation is centrist when they’re actually extreme right-wing as well.
Every nation that belongs to the WTO is extreme right-wing as the WTO itself is based upon extreme right-wing ideology. The delusional idea that lowering tariffs is what’s needed for free-trade when actually free-trade requires tariffs. It requires a mechanism to ensure that costs are properly accounted for between nations and that’s what tariffs do.
“Muldoon can be considered the last centrist PM.”
I look at writings, quotes and footage from that era, about people going on about how right wing Muldoon is, and that he plans to privatise everything, ban unions, cut benefits and close schools and hospitals and I think “you dont know how good you have it at the moment, Going to be a lot worse in 10-20 years”.
Geoffrey Palmer actually accused the Muldoon government in Parliament of running “Thatcherite monetary policies that would increase unemployment”. LOL
That depends on how you characterize shades of left and right.
The moderate left governance of my youth would now be painted by trolls such as yourself and the execrable Gosman as hard Left, when they were nothing of the kind – no optional gulags for treacherous scoundrels like Douglas were on offer.
More’s the pity.
” trolls such as yourself and the execrable Gosman”
I don’t know what you’re talking about 🙂
I’m guessing you rushed out for your copy of the NZ Womans Weekly this month?
https://www.nowtolove.co.nz/lifestyle/career/dame-jenny-shipley-and-helen-clark-talk-about-their-friendship-38775
Crikey!
I’m not surprised at all. All experienced, effective politicians recognise and respect the humanity of their opponents.
What I mean by Elected Dictatorship.
Here is a link to a post by a British conservative thinker, I disagree with his conclusions that to overcome the excesses of an elected dictatorship we need to give more power to the courts the Civil Service and the permanent heads.
Nevertheless, though there is much that I disagree with in this writer’s treatise, and the UK First past the Post system is different to our MMP system, his post contains incites into the very real lack of genuine democracy and an acknowledgement of voter alienation and a general breakdown in public confidence in the political elite, caused by this lack of democracy.
Good read Jenny. Thanks.
TOP is back. Simmons has taken over, and full steam ahead.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/106397329/the-opportunities-party-decides-it-isnt-riding-off-into-the-sunset
Good to see that saner heads have prevailed. Looking forward to them making a contribution.
What seat has Bridges offered ? Epsom and Wairarapa have been promised to others, not all have accepted – yet.
Im wondering if a fairy godmother to replace Gareth Morgan has been conjured up by National- not that they will admit yet.
I don’t think Gareth is going to want to give up pulling the strings. This is his parliamentary baby. Can’t see National getting along with a partner that is into evidence based policy either.
national isnt interested in a new partner
Its a pipe dream that they could get over 5%, however if they take say 2% away from greens , maybe just maybe push them below 5% as well
Now thats a minor party national could do business with.
Yeah another act coming up – only good for the gnats and their accolytes.
Interesting .I’ll be watching them . Although if they openly align them selves with national it will be a no go for me
If they’re smart they’ll keep their options open like WinstonFirst, if they’re dumb they’ll be like the Greens and openly commit for one side only
I hope they’re smart
If center lefties were smart they would be getting a few bright stars into tops ranks . With the greens coming up with odd things like more expensive dumping small potatoes around water bottling and expectant mums on bikes they are dog tucker .
TOP leans right no matter how they try to deny it. It’s in the party’s MO and policies: it is a top down, party modelled on the way corporations operate.
And it’s all about a guy wanting political power.
Similarly the Green Party leans left – it is a more collaborative effort. It has a bottom up democratic MO, and focuses on the whole community – basically community values lead economics.
Compared to the Greens ALL other parties are ‘fundamentally right-leaning’. By itself this doesn’t tell us much; just how the Greens tend to view the world.
The problem you have is that less than 10% of the population will reliably vote for you; that means in order to ever be an effective political force you need to find ways to work with the other 90% wherever the opportunity (pun belatedly intended) arises.
Tops a progressive party that must align them with labour far more than nact
But labour are dead to you so nzf?
Hehehe yes they are (although I’ve been known to forgive on occasion )
I voted top last time .
No, they need to keep their cards close to their chests so as to maximise their votes…or do a deal with National
I was thinking negotiation time . How a forward thinking lot like top could go with the nats if a labour deal was possible is beyond me .
But yes they need to out winny winny and hoover up votes from every were.
I’d find it hugely funny if, next election, it was a Labour/Green/Top government especially if Winston got over 5%
That was the one I wanted last time .
If TOP make it to the next election in decent shape they will have an impact; one is that Winnie will likely retire and this will weaken the nz1 vote substantially. Secondly the Greens will struggle with the usual fate of minor coalition parties (to some degree) and at 5.8% are too damned close to the threshold for comfort.
It’s entirely feasible to think it’s Labour who could need the mmp partner, every bit as much as National. TOP are a fundamentally progressive party (or at the least reformers) and share a good deal in common with the moderate left.
Withdrawing Morgan as a quirky and polarising front face could be a constructive move; but equally it will be hard to decouple his name from the brand image of the party entirely. Long way to go.
I predict TOP will be toppled because Gareth Morgan was probably the person driving the TOP votes, without him as leader and just Simmons, I think the end is probably nigh.
I don’t know I think Simmons will appeal to the younguns with a brain .
Simmons is only an interim Leader. Part of the plan may well be to try and attract some new recognisable faces. Building a Party without Morgan as their front face will solve some problems, but create some obvious new ones in their place.
It all points to how steep the 5% threshold really is. It’s only there because the people who designed MMP in this country, didn’t really believe in it.
I don’t eat fish, even the babies, so doesn’t affect me but I know lots who do and whitebaiting is a cultural activity now days. Nevertheless I think banning commercial sales should happen now, today.
“Whitebait is the only endangered species you see on the average menu, something Forest and Bird’s Cohen says is morally and practically wrong.”
https://thespinoff.co.nz/food/16-08-2018/you-wouldnt-eat-a-kiwi-so-why-is-whitebait-okay/
If their is to be a referendum on the Maori seats maybe it should be just voted on by Maori electorate voters . It should be there choice imho .
Good idea.
ÝAs you noticed the other day I hate people cutting people rights by decree . And with probably easily 50% of the general roll anti the Maori seats the get rid of them mob will win .
It needs to be Maori choice to drop them when they are ready .
Surely when more than 50% of maori elect to join the general roll, thats a clear sign.
No it is not a clear sign of anything imo. You are extrapolating into unknown territory. If you want the question answered then ask it. Don’t pull stats out and say whoa lookee here.
So the maori on the general roll will be excluded from any choice about the maori seats because ….?
They aren’t on the Māori Roll – based on the speculative position put by waggy. Perhaps you should just spell out what you want to say instead of trying to be clever.
When the question is asked re Māori seats I’m sure Māori will answer.
In a way its already happening:
https://www.radionz.co.nz/news/te-manu-korihi/356620/drop-in-maori-electoral-roll-numbers
No it isn’t.
Maori on maori roll 247,494 (52%)
Maori on general roll 224,755 (48%)
Once it was it was closer to 60% of Maori were on Maori roll, so yes its been dropping
https://www.elections.org.nz/events/maori-electoral-option-2018/results-statistics
That is no indication of anything other than the roll has dropped. Certainly nothing in connection to waggys point.
if less maori , as a proportion, are on the maori roll , its a drop.
Thats all he was saying , while you are in denial.
What will your reaction be when it gets below 50%, more denial ?
Many people who identify as Maori also identify as Pakeha. All Maori are bicultural to some extent, they have to be to function in a society dominated by Pakeha institutions. Just because some Maori choose to lean to the Pakeha side when deciding what electoral role to join, this does not negate the rights of those Maori who lean to the Maori side in that decision.
No denial and I agreed it was a drop. I said it didn’t relate to – ‘in a way it’s already happening’
I can’t really see what your malfunction is here.
On water bottling in the US…
“For one, the companies that bottle water often do so cheaply, which means companies are pocketing the vast majority of those billions, instead of sharing them with the cities from which they take water. In the case of Nestlé’s operations in Michigan, the company was paying just $200 in extraction fees, according to a 2017 investigation by Bloomberg. And a price tag was conspicuously absent from news reports on the additional bottling rights Nestlé secured in Michigan this month. In other states like Maine and Texas, the Bloomberg article notes, absolute capture laws allow landowners—whether they’re an average joe or a multinational corporation—to suck every ounce of groundwater beneath their property, free of charge.
In already-arid places like Texas, these loosey-goosey water rights pose clear problems. As groundwater is rapidly depleted across the United States, drought looms ever larger.”
https://www.popsci.com/flint-michigan-nestle-bottled-water
Bottled water is an insane product. It’s 100% pure plastic waste in every sense of the word. I’d be totally happy to see it banned.
In countries where water is an issue it is sold mostly in 5 gallon bottles, which are reused. Bottled water is a trash commodity like carbonated drinks.
They are bringing back water fountains in London due to the extreme pollution of plastic bottles during the heat wave.
So I’ve been made redundant from the NZDF (well our entire section has, not just me) and Lockheed Martin are taking over and I’ve just finished my interview with them.
What made it interesting though was this morning when I went to print my CV off and the printer wasn’t working, in fact it wasn’t working over the entire camp.
But you know its no big deal I mean I’ve got it on my phone if I need to reference it but ripping my pants while putting on my shoes 15 minutes before the interview was a doozy
No suitable replacement trousers and, when walking, it was pretty obvious but the interview went well so alls well that ends well
Maybe 🙂
Good luck. Wish you the best!
All done and dusted, the decision is out of my hands now 🙂
Its interesting watching things like this happen though because I’ve never been made redundant before and watching a company like Lockheed martin come in, makes for interesting times
Good luck – I hope the restructuring process was pretty quick, too. The stress of not knowing whether your job’s “in scope” is the worst bit.
I do have more than enough sick days saved up if I need to take stress leave 🙂
Yes good luck. Not much fun going through the process of redundancy – hope it all goes well.
I’m picking most will get picked up (I mean we already know the processes) but one or two probably won’t
I hope you got a good redundancy package. It’s been in the news lately that employers no longer hire on the basis of cvs. Too many faking them, plus it takes too long to check their validity.
Re pants ripping, it worked big-time for PJ Proby (depends who’s looking). So how come a US defence contractor is taking over part of the NZDF??
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/3166107/Lockheed-Martin-wins-huge-NZ-Defence-deal
Been on the cards a while now and the rational is to standardise procedures across the entire NZDF, so its going to happen to everyone eventually
I was going to post a clip of Lenny Kravitz splitting his pants during a performance but then I thought maybe not everyone wants to see his old fella 🙂
More loss to NZ both in skills and money.
Well i have my views on it but it might work out well for me…maybe
Can’t say I think this is a good move. A nation’s defence forces run on their logistics and now they’re at the mercy of a foreign corporation that belongs to a nation that we may end up opposing at some point.
What happens if our government again proposes sanctions on Israel and Trump decides to sanction us and every other nation that supports?
No, this is a bad move no matter which way you look at it.
Very interesting there Puckish? What did you do there?
I just checked the web, and they are advertising for drivers, etc.
Very hush hush stuff you know, you don’t have the security clearance to know…
Just kidding, I’m a storeperson
Where you employed directly by the NZDF or another contractor?
Directly by NZDF
Hmmmm. Not good. Im picking the contact was signed when National was in power, I doubt that this government would have signed off on this.
Lockheed Martin have been around for longer than you think and there are plenty of foreign contractors already at work
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11932974
“The 52-year-old aircraft are nearing the end of their operational life and although manufacturer Lockheed Martin says it is currently doing work for the New Zealand Defence Force on how many flying hours the five planes have left, the need for new planes is getting more pressing.”
https://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/53964/forty-picked-to-lose-jobs-at-army's-trentham-base
The $145 million deal with Lockheed Martin replaces one held with the Australian company SPEL, which covers the maintenance and warehousing of army equipment and vehicles at Trentham.
Why do they need a very high overheads company like LM to run maintenance around an Army base.
We are talking building maintenance here , where the most complicated stuff is the heating/cooling system. Its not an f….ing submarine.
Employing carpenters/electricians/ plumbers /painters must be in the wit of NZ companies.
I bet the top execs of the LM NZ company are all ex Defence uniformed personnel and that its ‘who you know’ that meant they got the contract
I think you might of misread that Duke.
“…covers the maintenance and warehousing of army equipment and vehicles at Trentham.”
Not the buildings but artillary, radio gear, spare parts etc. There would be gear that only a few people would be skilled at keeping in ‘Ready to go’ shape.
Thats an old contract at Trentham, 2010. You might want to read your links date
Hercules is a replacement choice not maintenance. Not sure if that maintenance handled by Airbus NZ ( was SAFE air) or Air NZ at Christchurch
And I’d expect them all to be in our defence force as part its normal operations.
PR, I’m interested in your comments re- Lockheed Martin. Do you know for how long they have had links with the NZDF?
In the late 1980s and early 1990s, I was a civilian working on a RNZAF base and found myself the object of suspicion over the suspected leaking of information to the [then] Airways Corporation over some matter involving Lockheed Martin. It was bullshit. I didn’t even know anyone in the the Airways Corp. Never did find out what it was about.
Good luck PR. Modern times, eh, when jobs stability is a thing of the past and it is not to do with how good you are, but current thinking and policy within a corporation and who gets the tender.
Unfortunately its inevitable
It’s inevitable, only because the current climate puts profit above people.
Sit back and watch Office Space for a laugh.
Other successful countries like Germany are not making people redundant all the time and produce quality items. But who knows in another decade NZ could have a different dominant ideology.
Well…
https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/who-we-are/international/germany.html
CNN has established that the weapon that left dozens of children dead on August 9 was a 500-pound (227 kilogram) laser-guided MK 82 bomb made by
Lockheed Martin,
one of the top US defense contractors
I can state quite honestly that I have absolutely nothing to do with that
CNN is wrong
https://www.army.mil/article/70809/vital_partners_mcalester_army_ammunition_plant_and_gd_ots_garland
The US Army McAlester Munition factory in Oklahoma fills the Mk 80 series casings made by General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems in Garland Texas.
Nothing to do with Lockheed Martin
Yes and no.
Mk82 is dumb.
Stick a Lockheed or Raytheon laser seeker and a tail guidance unit on it and it becomes a GBU-12 Paveway II.
Well OK . The laser guidance didnt ‘leave dozens dead’, it was the bomb part
They worked together.
It doesn’t make CNN accurate, though – it just takes potentially libellous inaccuracy (excuse the pun) down to the realm of mere technical incompetence.
All the best Pucky.
Theres a feeling, and its not a bad one, where everything is completely out of your hands and theres nothing you can do about it
I have that feeling right now and I’m quite liking it…won’t last long though 🙂
Some of my colleagues have had restructuring looming over their heads for the last few years, like the sword of Damocles. The feeling palls after a while.
Alison Mau regrets, in hindsight, not being more overtly critical of Paul Henry’s bigotted “jokes”
I don’t read her opinions regularly, but she has done some stuff like this that I think hits nail on head.
I especially like the “I like to think I’d…”. We hope and try to be better people, but sometimes the opportunities pass us by before we react differently.
Carbon farming? For some reason I’m not getting a great feeling from this – could be the planting pine trees ffs, could be the people involved.
“Sir Mark Solomon is looking for 150,000 hectares of Māori land suitable for forests.
He’s part of the new Māori Carbon Foundation, which unveiled its plans in Kaikoura last week.
Other members include former MPs, Hone Harawira, and Murray McCully, former National Party president Michele Boag, technology entrepreneur Maru Nihoniho and communications strategist Jevan Goulter.”
https://www.waateanews.com/waateanews/x_news/MTk5MDk/Solomon-plan-to-boost-carbon-farming
Can’t get your link to open, but from David Fisher (Herald), there is the claim that returns from trading carbon will be about seven years off down the track. Not long then.
And, of course…
So, a pile of plantations (green deserts) and Fonterra looking to run bio-fuels in its coal milk drying plants…
The only time I looked at burning wood in lieu of coal, it was meant to be debris from forestry and/or sustainably managed natural woodland. The result has been the decimation of the “everglades” in the US – and that was for one conversion of coal to bio-fuel (The Drax power station in the UK). Oh, and there’s the suggestion that coal would have been less damaging, given the huge (fossil fueled) harvest and transport operations required for the “green” alternative.
Yes the exotics are the money makers. An interesting connector from plantations to biofuel – seems likely .
Checked link – worked.
Venture Southland have made huge steps in establishing waste-wood boilers for heating in Southland industries. As well, local engineering firms have produced the needed boilers and are leading the market.
Waste wood is a nice subjective term though Robert, and beyond PR, there’s every reason to expect trees to be chopped for burning.
And….well, there’s no room for burning up carbon emitting bio-fuel in the AGW situation that we’re in. Energy has to be carbon free, not “green” carbon.
And it’s for reasons like this that I am so very proud of our PM….
“The Prime Minister has announced the government will freeze MPs’ salaries and allowances for a year.”
I say that any MP’s that have a problem with this news are nothing but greedy, get on ya bike simon.
https://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/364495/mps-salaries-to-be-frozen-for-a-year
hah – nice. Small gesture, but it counts.
A good start but for the entirety of her time as PM might have been better idea (read into that how you like)
For sure Pucky, but like you said it’s a good start.
I wonder what the limit is for an opposition leaders allowance? lmao, checkmate simon?
Very unlabourlike! Therefore will impress voters. I’m interested in the technicalities around it: given that a supposedly-independent body sets that income for them, how has the government achieved this freeze? Ah, I see. It intends to enact the freeze via legislation. The lesson here: the remunerations gang has become addicted to a continual escalation regime. Perpetual growth, just like the capitalists! Who the hell are these people?? There’s only three…
Fran Wilde is a former Minister, Mayor of Wellington, and Chair of the Greater Wellington Regional Council. She was also the CEO of the NZ Trade Development Board … currently Deputy Chair of the New Zealand Transport Agency, Deputy Chair of the Capital Coast District Health Board, Chair of the National Military Heritage Trust and a director of various companies. She is a Chartered Fellow of the NZ Institute of Directors.
Geoff Summers was an owner, director and Principal Consultant with Strategic Pay, a market leader in strategic remuneration and performance management before appointment to the Authority. In addition Geoff has significant experience as Director of Human Resources within state sector organisations and experience in all aspects of employment relationships and human resources policy development. Geoff is a Past President of the Human Resources Institute of New Zealand
Len Cook was the National Statistician of the United Kingdom from 2000 to 2005 and the Government Statistician of New Zealand from 1992 to 2000. Prior to this, he worked in various roles at Statistics New Zealand from 1971, becoming Deputy Government Statistician in 1986. He was a member of the Royal Commission on Social Policy in 1987-88… appointed Families Commissioner in 2015 and Chair of the board of Families Commission. He is Past-President of the Institute of Public Administration.
Good grief, Fran Wilde never met a trough she didn’t like.
🙂
British Jews in the Labour Party, Speak Up! A Call for Testimonies
August 19, 2018
http://normanfinkelstein.com/2018/08/19/british-jews-in-the-labour-party-speak-up-a-call-for-testimonies/
The misnamed Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) has stated that its goal is the eviction of Jeremy Corbyn from public life.
To this end, the CAA has referred the Labour Party to the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) alleging ‘institutional antisemitism’.
The Chief Executive of the EHRC already stated in 2017 that Labour ‘must do more to establish that it is not a racist party’. She did so on the basis of hearsay that had not been investigated and in fact was false.
Notwithstanding its reckless and cavalier record on this issue, the EHRC’s judgement is likely to carry weight in public discussion.
The CAA is now soliciting testimonies from Labour Party members in support of its complaint.
The Time Is Now for the Silent Majority of Labour Jews to Stand Up and Be Counted!
Resist the Cynical Attack on the Labour Party!
Resist the Trivialisation and Instrumentalisation of Antisemitism!
Defend Our Party and Its Democratically Elected Leadership!
If you believe Labour is being misrepresented and traduced, now is the time to speak up.
We need your testimonies about your experiences in the Labour Party to submit to the EHRC.
Send them ASAP to: EHRCtestimonies@gmail.com by Friday 24 August 2018.
Excitement! Brain police attack Labour!! Will they produce evidence of “institutional antisemitism”? Will they fake it? Watch the next thrilling installment!!
“The Equality and Human Rights Commission is Great Britain’s national equality body and has been awarded an ‘A’ status as a National Human Rights Institution (NHRI) by the United Nations. Our job is to help make Britain fairer. We do this by safeguarding and enforcing the laws that protect people’s rights to fairness, dignity and respect.
As a statutory non-departmental public body established by the Equality Act 2006, the Commission operates independently. We aim to be an expert and authoritative organisation that is a centre of excellence for evidence, analysis and equality and human rights law. We also aspire to be an essential point of contact for policy makers, public bodies and business.”
The board has 13 members. Five are officers of the Empire (https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/who-we-are/our-commissioners-committees-and-governance). So actual imperialists mixed in with the busybodies.
Good morning The Am Show Duncan did your mother teach you manner’s It does not look like it to me.
I say national have troll’s who target your poll’s and your emails and tx there are not that many red neck’s in Aotearoa .
There standard are not very high Amanda .
The stats show there is some thing majorly wrong with the Justice system you no how it is keep telling a lie and a lot of people takes its to be the TRUTH..why do you think trump keep’s up his line’s I can see right through lairs.
I agree with Chester Borrows the media have a hand in the mess of the Justice system jumping on all the negative story’s and not much positive about the people who get sucked into Justice system I no you are being played like a flute and they don’t like ECO.
Wow that’s a mean tornado that hit Ohope and the Naki that shot from Ohope I have seen that view before .
shonky was a talented lier full stop .
The way I see it with all these state worker strikes and protests these people are being manipulated by there ceo neo librals how else do you explane this phenomenon coincidence yea right.
I won’t comment on Australian politics one would all ready know my view’s just with me ECO Maori Ka kite ano P.S you know that the police and crime are a small part of our society and you are talking about them all day every day who dredge te Winz lady up
Here you go a good hounest Kiwi professor he describes our dollar and the exchance rate in layman’s terms Ka pai E ho link below
https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/farming/106399122/exchange-rate-reset-will-breathe-new-life-to-agriculture P.S the situation now is that most primary producers will get to enjoy the gain’s and not just the biggest
fox news slandering a awsome socialist country this show’s me fox true colors
what’s wrong with having high tax’s and nearly all the people are happy ka pai
These people did not listen to the capitalist lies Link is below ka kite ano
https://www.stuff.co.nz/travel/destinations/europe/106427484/tourism-booms-in-a-socialist-hellhole-denmark
It’s obvious trumps mother did not teach him manners link below ana to kai ka kite ano
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=21&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjB25mvjf3cAhXJc94KHUnFBisQFjAUegQIABAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.independent.co.uk%2Fnews%2Fworld%2Famericas%2Ftrump-omarosa-dog-twitter-tweet-tapes-lowlife-crying-kelly-latest-a8491046.html&usg=AOvVaw2xOvrm2aGRhcufnWLtNR_F
Good song Thane & Dunc It’s a long way to the top if you want to rock and roll Eco Maori rock and roll’s and I will get to the top Ka pai E ho Ka kite ano
We can not let the Human caused Climate Change deniers win All the intelligent people around Papatuanuku have to stand up and vote for Goverments that care about the Future of the Mokopunas and Papatunuku Kia ha ka kite ano link below.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/aug/20/summer-weather-is-getting-stuck-due-to-arctic-warming
This person does not even trust what come’s out of his OWN mouth very very intelligent YEA RIGHT that’s the way Eco Maori see’s this link Ka kite ano.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/aug/20/donald-trump-robert-mueller-inquiry-interview
https://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/364586/public-service-performance-bonuses-scrapped
Not a bad idea (for starters)
Maybe bring them back when senior management / CEOs actually start performing (or not), instead of running Ministries and Departments like their own little feifdoms.
Can anyone think of a Ministry or Department that’s actually been run well over the past decade?
Most public servants work in spite of their senior management masters rather than because of them.
Good evening Newshub It’s awsome that we are looking at reforming our Justice System because it’s the whole Justice system that is causing more Tangata Whenua O Aotearoa to be incarcerated than 99% or other cultures on Papatuanuku that’s reality.
That’s a good out come for those people in Christchurch It is correct that they get compensated for the loss of there property ka pai
Yes I had pet baby marsupials and a few birds to let them go when they we able .
Ka kite an
Good evening The Crowd Goes Wild James and Mulls Retalick had a good game.
Josh who would have guest it thought you were ———- music .
Sore face that’s all I am going to say lol. leg over,
That was a good game of cricket Indian & England
another soreface. E ho James trying to sing Ka kite an