I agree with the need for strategic voting in Epsom & Ohariu, but don’t see the real advantage of it in Auckland Central. Kaye is 19th on the Nat list, and Ardern 5th on Labour’s making them both both all but certain to be returned to parliament.
If Labour get a party vote number near the lower end of the current polling, and the Ipredict numbers are anywhere near correct for the electorates it is quite possible for Jacinda Arden to be looking for a new job after 20 September unless she was to win Auckland Central. Labour could end up with only a single List MP.
Not likely perhaps but certainly well within the bounds of possibility.
I am very sceptical about polls and especially Ipredict (which I see has Kaye at 92.4%), even more so after the Hagar book. But; unless there is a mass migration of party votes to the GP or IMPs while those party’s electorate votes all go to LP so creating an overhang, even if Ardern misses out that won’t affect the parliamentary math.
Whereas in Ōhariu and Epsom, a coordinated vote against UF & ACT respectively will remove that party from parliament and lead to their votes being redistributed.
This is interesting, though should be viewed with caution being the bastard fruit of; Roy Morgan polls, Ipredict & “Qrious” (“…better use of information to provide insights that are actionable”):
Showing Ōhariu having about quarter of its votes likely to be split between party and candidate. But Epsom only having around a fifth of intended split votes (the chart scale is a bit hard to read, and there is no precise data nor confidence intervals). Fortunately, Clutha-Southland is one of the lowest split-voting electorates, so it doesn’t look like ACT will be getting in through the backdoor.
I quite agree that there seems to be no advantage to so-called “strategic” voting in Auckland Central, and indeed almost all of your comment.
The only thing I was commenting on was the bit where you say
“Ardern 5th on Labour’s making … all but certain to be returned to parliament”
I used Ipredict because it is about the only way for someone, other than the National and Labour Organisations, to get any real idea of how the electorates may go. They have 27 where the Labour candidate is the favourite. For Arden to get in off the list Labour need to get 29 seats (allowing for Parker taking number 28) which is about 24.2%. Of the 11 polls published this month the lowest 4 were 23.8%, 24.1%, 24.3% and 24.6%. These would all have her on the cusp. The others were mostly around 26% where she is well home.
I wasn’t disagreeing with your view on where strategic voting applies. I shall have a look at the referenced material later. I have to go out.
Incidentally if that is the slogan of Qrious I think I am going to enjoy it.
Excellent article by Lucy Lawless about child poverty.
Some highlights.
“If you don’t want your taxes to help feed poor kids, think again — we’re all already paying a big price.”
“Last week Nigel Latta’s show on the social cost of sugar consumption showed a surgical team extracting the teeth of a 2-year-old child because the mother had been putting Coca Cola in the baby’s bottle. So we are in equal parts horrified by sugar and the stupidity of the mother. But this kind of ignorance is part and parcel of poverty. It steals care, imagination and patience, which hampers the growing child with a whole constellation of impediments.”
Iit only survives when others are made to pay the benefits of others.
Scotland is gojng to vote to leave a corrupt capitalistic policy of Westminster.
There is a case in law where in thye bearly 1900s a rule in USA was made as the blood of the workers is the price of progress.
This standard was used in a aircrarft comapny dispute in Washigton state in 2002.
Beginning of the decline of capitalism.
Scots are very socialistic and this is good, as the Global n clock has turned to rght wing causing a great rift in the gap between the rich and the poor.
For instance the Tories in Westminister to get inot their second term boosted the Lndon realestate market and inflating a red hot property boom speculation to make the large voting block feel the tories were good for them.
Key has repeated this here to buy votes in our largest voting block, and dragging 170 000 chinese into the pot so torries are very dangerous for NZ.
We need to come back to the 1970s where compassion ruled over capital interests
As I write, hundreds if not thousands of computer programs are busy calculating the odds of a “yes” vote and making investments accordingly at a pace that no human being could hope to keep up with. That’s what capitalism looks like now.
Whether or not Salmond manages to establish some form of social democracy in an independent Scotland (and I hope he does), those systems will have an immense effect on how much his government is able to fund. They’ll simply incorporate independence into their set of parameters and look once more to see how much they can screw us out of.
I would be happy but very surprised if Scotland voted for independence. My countrymen and women are canny, cautious folk and would rather just change things a wee bit rather than a wholesale transformation. Enhanced devolution would have won comfortably, which is why the feart Tories did not offer it as an option, but are now panicked into offering it up regardless of whether those voting ‘no’ actually want it …
Incidentally, the suggestion that Scotland is some sort of socialist paradise is misleading. As recently as 1955, the Scottish Unionists were able to win an outright majority of the vote (by a whisker). Obviously, things have changed and the Conservatives can only muster a single Scottish seat at Westminster; but Scotland is more characterised as anti-Conservative than actually socialist.
What happens about money then. Can they keep on using British money and circulate it within Scotland but the Brits won’t integrate it within their system?
Will they use Euros for cross-border transactions? Perhaps they will strike a bawbee representing a Scottish dollar.
I read this article recently, from Australia, that is similar to what has happened here. It’s a bit depressing, says that politics is now “consumed”…..there has been a change from being a voter to consumer (e.g. of Brand Key). Does place the whole dirty politics saga into a “political marketing” perspective. (smarmy term I know, and pure spin…….but also a way to express what we are in the middle of). http://theconversation.com/democracy-is-dead-long-live-political-marketing-2666
No, sorry, I can’t unless I watch it all over again. I don’t think you can do forwarding on that video for some reason! I couldn’t! I watched it live on Wednesday. Lucy Lawless was less than impressive for me. I had better impression of her before that programme.
Scots are very socialistic and this is good, as the Global n clock has turned to rght wing causing a great rift in the gap between the rich and the poor.
For instance the Tories in Westminister to get inot their second term boosted the Lndon realestate market and inflating a red hot property boom speculation to make the large voting block feel the tories were good for them.
Key has repeated this here to buy votes in our largest voting block, and dragging 170 000 chinese into the pot so torries are very dangerous for NZ.
We need to come back to the 1970s where compassion ruled over capital interests
Indebted we are to the NZ Herald for its reminder of what a happy little people we are in the leadup to next weekend’s coronation !
We have a king and we have a prince and the selfie and the walkabout.
There is ‘high charm’ and the king/prince gets ‘mobbed’ by the ‘feverish crowd’. Helpers ‘chirp’ and a selfie subject ‘quips’ and the king/prince says “gidday, how are you ?”
“It’s not always about the money” notes the king/prince – adding that he wasn’t ruling out a ‘break’ for the rich. All the while the king/prince shows ‘ease’ – he is ‘guileless’ – ‘rotten-ethics’ are far far away.
“Awwwh…….how beautiful !” scribbles the beaming Herald reporter as he jumps in his little Noddy car and off to his gingerbread house.
I am so sick of the Herald, and media.
Does anyone know how many (so called) journalists have immediate family members as MPs in NZ?
How many of these so called journalists are from National?
How many of these so called journslists are from Labour?
How many of these so called journalists are from any other political party?
The Herald *broke* the story about Slater vs Blomfield yesterday evening, BELOW a non story, with a BIGGER picture of Len Brown. No content to story, but just to remind readers that Len Brown had an affair. I mean please…..news or history book?
Why is it that we have to exempt the family home from capital gains tax. I have a family home and I don’t mind paying a portion of my capital gains (on sale where lawyers are already involved).
Then we can have a bit more money to pay for those that can’t afford a home and to avoid creating a massive loophole that every rich person with an expensive accountant will waltz through.
If the electorate is intelligent it could be easily sold as offsetting some income tax in the key areas that one might be worried about.
But Labour has to write a 30 page document to ensure us somewhat rich people can stay in the club with the very rich ones and avoid paying tax.
Because it would make changing houses much more expensive for regular families, who don’t use houses as a source of profit, but as machines for living in.
Yes I suppose it discourages mobility between houses for the richer half of us*. But tax always has that sort of a disincentive effect. It also gives us money back in our income that should offset that for most people who don’t own multiple properties.
I would see it as paying what would effectively be an increased level of “rates” and in exchange getting a lower income tax.
Maybe the issue is that effectively the people would be paying the tax in a lump sum when moving houses as opposed to spread out, like the income tax break that offsets it would be?
If so one could work out a method of spreading it out – I do however see that might be harder to sell.
* I say this as an Aucklander. Here – if you have a property you probably have several hundred thousand in equity in it. Far more than any of your renting friend’s total assets.
If every house attracted a CGT upon sale, there would be no perceived extra expense for people selling their home. Everyone would essentially be in the same boat – much like a is now.
But with no CGT, there is a slight financial or market advantage conferred upon people wishing to change home.
Why is it do right wing nut jobs always moan about tax? There is this silly argument it should be fairer, but when ever they say fair, the mean the rich should pay less tax.
For the record to any neo-liberals out there – you economics failed at the end of the 19th century and your second bite at the apple, has really proven you’re lacking in ideas, smarts, or indeed the basic skills in running an economy.
Add the main reason.
“It would cost us the vote of 98% of all the New Zealand voters who own their own home and we would never be in Government again”.
I agree! I just don’t get why people moan about taxes, but are happy (well, compelled and just do pay) to pay fixed costs such as conveyancing fees and estate agent fees on the sale of a property.
People pay these other fixed costs because they have to, but where there is room to negotiate/lobby we fight tooth and nail against a capital gains tax.
*****bright idea: let’s nationalize estate agents!!!!!*******
I don’t particularly think that the fees that estate agents receive are commensurate to the marketing they do. I dont think they are fair. But do we see the populace up in arms?
There are so many other anomalies with our attitude toward taxes – fighting against raises in local council rates, but have larger amounts of tax taken out on our income, when local taxes are way more transparent and give local services that we can use (Mangawhai etc examples excluded of course).
Audrey Young with the beatup about Greens “courting” National, where in reality Greens have not changed their position about working with National in several years. History shows that Labour “works” with National too, when the two parties happen to agree!
Prominence to Craig as well from Herald. Deliberate? I’m sure it would suit National very well to have the Conservatives in, no matter how loopy they are. The party is not making any demands on National, and would allow National to effectively govern alone.
Expect more attacks on Greens, and encouragement of Conservatives in the final days of the campaign
This is the best article I have read about our corrupt media and their role in the support of Key’s government
This is is how it starts.
“Here we sit just a week out from an election. It’s a week in which you face a stark choice. Three more years of smile and wave dirty politics or a new direction
It’s important to remember that, despite how awesome you think John Key may be, he is a liar. He has spent the last six years creating and maintaining a network of bloggers and public relations people whose job was to manipulate the media and the general public to believing what he wants them to believe. All the time Key has managed this negative network he has maintained his smile & wave public persona..”
While John Key as PM secretly attends a Nazi founded Global Elite corporate power control secret society 2011-12 without telling us all.
The bilderberg Group seeks to totallly control the world with their global Government.
He is a very dangerous individual by no coming clean and explian why he attended the Bilderberg group and that he maliciously conspired once before to undermine our currency and economy in 1987 when Lange took power again.
Key partnered NY mst aggressive currency Forex trader Andy Kieger to make big millions on underminig our country.
Now he runs this country so if the MSM dont care we should be worried.
While John Key as PM secretly attends a Nazi founded Global Elite corporate power control secret society 2011-12 without telling us all.
The bilderberg Group seeks to totallly control the world with their global Government.
Can you substantiate this grotesque madness?
The Bilderberg Group was founded by Joseph Retinger, who was part of the Polish Government in Exile in WW2, and who even parachuted into Poland late in the war to organise the resistance to the Nazis.
You might not like their ideas but =/= Nazis, expect in the demented world of the paranoid, conspiratorialist and insane.
If you are going to start howling “Nazi” at people, you’d better be able to prove it. Otherwise, piss off with your crazed diatribes. You’re only a whisker away from “The JOOOOOOOWZ control the whole world.”
I won’t even bother with the claim about what Bilderberg’s goals are.
You have your facts wrong and spin set by the global elite.
Fact, The Nazi hieracy constructed the blueprint for this sercet society, and carried it forward in 1943.
This was in place so if Germany lost the war they were thereb to revive Nazi idology so dont believe you are right because a pole staightened the world out.
(Queen Beatrix Holland royality) family connect to Nazi Party has been head for many years.
Why was Key there and didnt tell the country why so yoou may be happy with secret societies as bilderberg is but we all know better so we call your assesstions bunk.
1954 rather than 1943 and it was organised by Retinger to stop anti-Americanism. After reading up on Retinger I’d say that his is not to be trusted. Not because he was dishonest but because seems to have become a US sycophant.
IMO, there’s no reason for the Bilderberg Group to continue to exist if there was any reason at all.
Reckon the post is worth a thread of its own ( L Prent ?) as the issues covered are so fundamental, so succinctly expressed and, most importantly, targeted to soft National voters who still believe in the cult of Key.
We should all share this article with all our contacts.
I’m just wondering why some of my comments are disappearing today, is there some active moderation going on? If so I would have thought that there were more deserving comments on the blog for deletion than mine.
Rich, 3 of your comments are sitting waiting for moderation – best I leave it for Lynn to sort out, so he can see what’s happening, and maybe sort out any bug.
I can’t see any reason why they’ve gone into moderation.
[lprent: I couldn’t see a reason. Released and I’ll see if any others do. ]
Dirty Tricks , I like the title
The greens abandoning labour must take the cake , any prospect of these two working in harmony together, in an atmosphere of TRUST has gone out the window .
Remember just last week labour / greens ,”National ” , the party of dirty tricks , today the greens , ” we have worked with them in the past and can do so in the future “.
Labour has been left high and dry .
The media attack of diry politics sent this filth and you are parroting them so who pays you to parrot. Troll somewhere else and ask key why he faileed to tell us he is rubbing shoulders with a Nazi based Group Bilderberg while you bare pocking around.
“Greens have not changed their position about working with National in several years”
That is not the point. The point is the TIMING of the announcement 8 days before the election indirectly talking up the Nats and on the day their poll rating fell significantly. Remember also that hundreds of thousands have already voted early and with the push for early voting given by the Green machine, most of those votes would probably have gone to the Greens already and I suspect many of those green voters would be ex Labour people. This move by the Greens has harmed Labour and put soured the left progressive movement.
Luckily Cunliffe and the Labour leadership have been remarkably patient and wise.
..showing those national party voters who care about child-poverty..(and not all national party voters are uncaring about poverty..and the environment..)..
..that those voters can now see that key will do nothing for the environment..
..and that key has refused to take part in a cross-party grouping to end child-poverty..
..shows those national party voters who care..
..that key will also do nothing to end child-poverty..
..and that the greens are a safe alternative-vote for them..
..and good pre-positioning b4 the greenwald revelations..
Attacks on the green are presumably to scare voters who might vote Labour into voting NZ first or National. They are quite likely to help the Greens vs Labour so help the Greens overall.
Supporting the Conservatives on the other hand will be a much simpler equation although most of the soft conservative vote has already gone because if you add NZfirst and Conservatives together they are probably looking at 13% maybe more.
Regardless the Conservatives have a decent chance of making it in on current numbers. This is because like NZfirst, I suspect they will over perform. For one thing – many will be embarrassed to say they support conservatives in a poll that may be even more pronounced than with NZfirst.
Key : DOING WHAT HE HAS TO DO TO PROTECT NZERS
Get a you know what up ya
The arrogance of the prick its the fault of people in his industry that we are in a position of having a social welfare system anway
Every since I can remember shit like him have freeloaded off the workers
They have had the arrogance to say you work for me and Ill have the right to pay you what I please its my money
YEAH RIGHT
People who live off the production of a country but actually dont produce anything of value financiers benificiaries junk merchants that prey on societies weaknesses
Geat real The finance system is what is wrong
People who live off the production of a country but actually dont produce anything of value financiers benificiaries junk merchants that prey on societies weaknesses
Yep, the biggest bludgers in history are the rich who live on income produced by others.
Sorry Scott, Dont agree with you, as most have now seen Conservatives turn right and lay off keys policies. People are brighter than your appear to beieve.
Best you learn about the Global corporate Manipulation of the polls to learn the 1.4million sites confirming poll corruption globally go to Can polls be manipulated. on goggle. dont waste our time with these assertions the polls are correct.
Local Kiwi,
Don’t agree if you want.
But I do know about polls. I usually guess the result of elections globally and my record at those guesses is very good.
you don’t know what we know unless you are a group of folks who have been called by the pollsters and after going through the phone interview after agreeing if we can have the “supervisor listen in as well! then after confirming in all our cases so far that the age was acceptable along with basic questions we went into a series of ten questions and three parts though they just broke off the poll and hung-up.
We have complained about the pollsters and spoken to other pooling companies that are known to be more accurate band they said we have not been polled correctly.
So we know more about the real pollsters unlike you, so read the sites please and learn!
I would say first thing would be to get the representative of ‘capital looking for a manipulated good return’ out of office first and then work on Labour’s chronic lack of attention to the poor over the last 40 or so years.
National has a policy of not having any policy.
I was listening to the radio when they asked Bill English what his new idea was for the next term to help the country. His answer, aside from dodging the question, was basically – “we don’t need new ideas”.
Olympian entrepreneurs like Greene regularly end up seeing themselves as tycoons-cum-savants. When they run for office, they do so as if they were trying to get elected to the board of directors of America, Inc. Some will brook no interference with their will. Property, lots of it, in a society given over to its worship, becomes a blank check: everything is permitted to those who have it.
Which we see regularly from National MPs and their supporters seem to see them the same way.
I was interested to hear that Boris Johnston in London is up for an MP, even PM status, against some Olympian sportsperson. As if being able to control and conquer ones own body to reach an individual physical goal with the mental being totally self-oriented and single-outcome focussed, fits you for a life of interaction with others.
It does not automatically make you excellent at helping to run things for the community, making the right things happen and actually understanding and responding to what the community needs and wants. Also how to spread finances fairly in a balanced way.
Probably neither Boris Johnston nor the other are really good at it. But Boris has had some practice. It seems often that sportspeople are individualistic, right-wing in their approach. They are basically entrepreneurs, working as a sole trader with their own lives and doings, seem to have a permanent narrow focus, and only respect other similarly obssessed types.
Not forgetting Sir Edmund Hillary. But sometimes it is easier to assist those obviously in need in another country. When at home the tail of society becomes an object of derision, just backside wool that a shearer wants to clear from dirtying the major and valuable fleece.
Excellent comment, got me thinking a little more on an icon.
As for Johnston, he’s a right wing populist. I’m not sure why capital is still dealing with guys like that, but I guess they go on more recent Chilean examples rather than earlier European ones.
I seem to have had my first post deleted for mentioning capital and its attraction to right wing populists. Interesting point regarding Hillary, has got me thinking.
Rich 11.26
Hi I don’t think your comment would have been deleted here. If you do a search of your stuff you might find it has turned up in further down than where you expected.
Yes I’ve looked warbler. No they’re definitely disappearing today, I had one go on the ‘Working Poor’ as well, there were only 3 comments there one of them from me suggesting that poverty was policy. That one’s gone.
Prime Minister John Key says he and the head of GCSB would resign if the spy agency were found to have conducted mass surveillance.
He made the comment to reporters at Parliament in the light of assurances that the changes to the GCSB Act 2003 would not mean mass surveillance of New Zealanders.
[…]
For that to happen, the GCSB would have to undertake illegal activity.
He clarified later saying “both” would resign if there was mass surveillance.
“If I wholesale blatantly flout the law as Prime Minister I’m never going to survive anyway.”
Good sound bite for the moment from Donkey. The next moment there would be a different situation. We have to understand these are fast moving times and we have to adjust, be flexible or pass away. Possibly under a bulldozer as in Israel and China and sundry other places.
phip ure
I’m notingthat I understood your points in the previous comment well. And have adjusted to your prose style over a period of orientation! Just not too long please.
What about breaking a long one into paragraphs with central themes. You come out with good stuff so help us with readability.
Did I hear this right??? Russell Norman saying “we have been the opposition this time” Not a direct quote…………………..what is this about???? So Grant Robertson did nothing re Judith Collins and Oravida????? Chris Hipkins versus Hekia and I can name many more.
As a Labour person, I have always been supportive of the Greens, but I am starting to get a bit sick of this. By all means challenge National (and I would much rather Norman had of said there is not way we want anything to do with National).
There are quite a few people have commented in the past that The Greens were the more effective opposition party – that was particularly said during Shearer’s time as leader. Cunliffe has pulled it back quite a bit since he took over leadership.
I also think it’s about the Greens feeling they’ve been under-rated, and maybe been taken for granted a bit much by others, including Labour.
I think the Greens are staking their claim for a strong role in a Labour-Green government. Also, interesting that Cunliffe would not rule out Metiria & Norman as deputy PMs on The Nation today.
Thanks Karol. I always appreciate your very even handed approach.
As a Labour voter who rejected Rogernomics, I cameback to Labour because of Cunliffe.
I think he has run a great campaign. Being very clear about who he will and won’t work with.
10 Reasons to vote Cunliffe (Labour)
1 He has experience in govt and as a Cabinet Minister (and was very effective).
2 He speaks Te Reo
3 He has a business background (this is important for NZ to create good jobs)
4 He admits mistakes and repairs them.
5 He apologized to the woman’s refuge for being a man
6 He has background as a diplomat
7 He promoted his caucus based on merit and didn’t appear to hold grudges (e.g. Annette King), nor did he make Shane or Grant deputy, he chose who he thought was best.
8. He withstood a lot of crap from his own party (Shearer demoting him, sucked it up and got on with being an effective spokeperson for fisheries).
9. He imo has developed the most comprehensive and costed out set of policies (and the really important bit about this is they take Labour back to their roots, inreasing wages, workers rights, Best start (family benefit), Kiwibuild (that’s just a few).
10. He has withstood extremely negative publicity through MSM including smears such as the Dong Liu letter, whale oi, Armstrong “reign!” etc, etec, etc.
Actually there are probably another ten reasons to vote Cunliffe. I may post again!
I wish all parties on the left all the best on 20th Sept. I am very glad they will be lead if successful by DC!
7
I think DC will be an excellent PM. I gave my electorate vote to him in the last few elections. I will give Carmel Sepuloni my electorate vote this election, plus will party vote Green.
I still think Labour needs the Greens influence to keep them on track on poverty, etc. Labour still has a way to go before I will vote for them again.
I have noticed (via tweets from Green people during leader debates) that The Greens were putting the case that they should have been in the leader debates with Key & Cunliffe. I can see their point as any change of government will be a Labour-Green one.
I think they are just putting the case for them to be given more visibility in the election as part of any possible change in government.
It’s a jockeying for position, that I don’t think should be exaggerated as some fragmentation of the left block.
We, the foot soldiers and followers, need to stick together.
I agree Labour needs the Greens’ influence – although I think Labour needs them more for their environmental and conservation strength.
Disagree about “they should have been in the leadership debates”.
– Norman isn’t going to be PM. This was about who would be PM.
– If as I suspect NZFirst gets 9%, Peters could expect to be in the “leadership” debate as well. Too messy.
” – Norman isn’t going to be PM. This was about who would be PM.”
I probably don’t care too much whether Norman/Turei were included or not, but I don’t agree that the debates should be about who is PM. Fuck the glorification of the leader. This should be about policy and team work, and the leaders of parties, not the leader of NZ.
+100 anker 13.2.1…the Left Coalition must remain staunch!…Cunliffe will be a great leader of the Left coalition !.
After working for the Greens campaign and donating to the Greens ( and hopefully getting votes for the Greens) …I am seriously considering giving my Party vote to Internet MANA…mainly because of Laila Harre , who I admire enormously…(but also Hone Harawira , Annette Sykes and John Minto…and Int MANA policies …also Kim Dotcom, now a New Zealander imo , fighting corruption)..my Electorate vote goes to the Labour candidate who is exceptionally good
…We live in crucial times for New Zealand and the Internet MANA party is leading the charge 1.) against John Key, Nact corruption, sell out to overseas big business and an Orwellian surveillance state… and 2.) for defending Democracy for New Zealand ….and for New Zealanders to keep control of their own country….
i know numbers of people on the Left who are having trouble deciding which party to Party vote for….but any vote for Labour, Greens , Internet Mana….and even Wini NZF….is a good vote imo.
We MUST ALL VOTE!…and encourage everyone we know to VOTE!
NZF isn’t a vote to change the govt. It’s a vote to give Peters a choice on which govt we have.
There a pros and cons for each of the 3 leftwing parties. Bear in mind that if the GP get too few MPs, we will have a centrist govt not a left wing one, irrespective of how many MPs IMP get (IMP will not be part of govt). The closer the numbers between NZF and the GP, the less influence the GP will have.
NZF have said they won’t work with IMP, so the question becomes whether a L/GP/NZF coalition will allow the IMP much power or whether it reject them and thus build antagonism over the first term (due to Peters).
I’ve been very tempted to vote for the IMP, because they’re doing great things, and because of Harre, and because we need more progressive voices that will actively work for change in parliament. I’d love to see Miriam Pierard as an MP. But I also think there is a real danger here that IMP votes at the expense of the GP will leave the GP with too little oopmph in the actual govt, and that’s where we need it most this time round. There is a real opportunity at this election to not just get a left wing govt, but get one that is more left wing than centrist. That will only happen with a strong GP presence.
@Chooky: I agree. I would happily vote for Internet-Mana, except that I want to have a strong Labour presence in the next government for long term survival of the coalition and they now need every party vote they can get as the polls indicate.
NZF is also a good option for those wavering, for various reasons from quite a different point of view.
I know where you are coming from Chooky. I have been impressed by InternetMana from the moment they unveiled Laila Harre as Internet Party leader. They are bringing some excitement back into politics and I think a lot of young, first-time voters will go with them.
I think their vote will surprise a lot of people. I can see them getting more votes than the Conservatives. I can also see a fair number of National supporters abstaining this time.
Like you say, one week to go so lets get in behind for a final effort to rid NZ of this corrupt government.
Well said anker. Cunliffe will be a good leader and Labour policies are very well thought out. Hopefully his coalition parties will have the wisdom and common sense to give him full support so that such a progressive coalition government will earn the respect and trust of the people and be able to last not for just one term, but at least three, if not more.
Yes anker you did hear right and I found his comment disappointing and offensive for the same reasons. No acknowledgement of any kind from Russell Norman that Labour have been under three years of sustained attack by the Nats black ops. brigade run out of the PM’s Office – and being supported and exacerbated by the MSM – including as we now know the Donghua Liu affair. No acknowledgement of the enormous amount of work Labour has put into developing excellent policy. I’m afraid on a scale of 1 to 10, Norman has dropped form 8 down to 5 in my book directly as a result of that remark.
Phill, I appreciate your opinion. You may well be correct about transport etc. But Labour have been working hard and effectively in opposition too especially since Cunliffe.
But don’t forget Grant and Oravida and Cunliffe challenges Key on child poverty, which of course the msm reported as Key saying Cunliffe lives in a rich house as well after Cunliffe had said Key needs to get out from the leafy suburbs.
However Normans comments were unhelpful, and I am not impressed with him dissing Labour in this way. NOT O.K.
Cunliffe and Labour have been the target of the smear campaign as well documented on this site and in dirty politics. No other person in parliament or party has been exposed to this level of inteference as Cunliffe/Labour.
And now for my little moan. Gordon Campbell is an excellent journalist, but consistently disses Labour and Cunliffe. As bad as the msm. He list of reasons to vote for a progressive govt is all well and good, but wtf did he do what all the other msm did and go on about Cunliffe not knowing the full detail on CGT???????? Its a detail Gordon. Party of Key’s dirty tricks and you brought into it. Shame on you.
I agree Anker – I am Green moving more and more toward Labour, given the dirty Politiking against Cunliffe. He has had the life sucked out of him through various attacks. Not sure, but Armstrong’s stirrings this week were the first attempt to derail Green’s campaign?; and only because the Nats see them now as a credible threat. I also think that labour needs a considerable shift given recent polls (despite being corrupt/biased/bought polls).
Dramatically increasing Labours actual poll vis-a-vis the polls would also be sending a clear message to Key (middle finger raised), that we are sick to the teeth of dirty Politiking.
I also think that there is so much more freedom of democratic expression on the left, with all the parties. Cunliffe’s three way pledge this week was expedient to try to gain ground in that swinging right-central vote, but at what cost? IMP – Harre in particular is fabulous, getting more left and youth votes out into the polling booths on the 20th Sept. It’s a bit disengenuous to those voters (when considered within a left bloc) to be excluded. Also, not so good to factionalise the left, despite all our differences in opinion…..we need to bury ideological hatchets and get on with the job at hand.
I for one, want nothing more than a change in this Government; and want representation for people, not money and capital.
…..but keep calm and vote left.
The bastards are on the ropes, so they’re trying to increase the non-vote. They think labour’s sorted to <30%, so now they're chipping at the greens, and come tuesday morning it'll be IMP. But national are polling in the mid-40s, and they still have no friends – at best they have winston, who might switch both ways.
Their objective is to stop voters having a bearing, and that’s a LOSER’S mentality. From now on they crumble. But only if we act, only if the people vote.
Fuck the narrative, to hell with the spin, and screw the self-deluded Venal Right Wing Conspiracy. We’re way out of the gates now, it’s coming to the home stretch. Damn them all and vote left. Because the Left vote is the only vote that’s worth the paper it’s ticked on.
+100 McFlock….and Winnie if he ever went with NACTIONAL after all that has gone on in the last couple of years and all he has said ….all his brilliant speeches against John Key in parliament …..would be damned for ever by just about everyone in this country!
….I doubt whether Winnie wants to spend the later half of his life this way…He wants to be remembered as a HERO for DEMOCRACY and a HERO for New Zealand for New Zealanders taking back their own country.
John Key and Nactional are DONE like a dog’s dinner!
Anyone who watches Question Time knows the Greens hold the Government to account, while Labour only wakes up every so often.
However, I am tired of Norman’s ongoing petulance fit just days from an election.
Yes Labour has problems, but it has enough critics without Norman.
Norman should not have been nonchalantly talking about an MOU with National, or about Labour’s shortcomings. He should be as focused as Metiria Turei is in getting rid of this delinquent regime.
Both the Doctors, Norman and Whyte, during this election seem quite sickly suffering from their own nauseating diatribe harmful for coalition health and well being. A long rest is recommended.
Anker, can you please give us some clues where you heard Norman say this? Otherwise it just fuels the rumours that the VRWC are putting out there that Labour and the GP can’t get along.
I heard it on the Nation this morning. I couldn’t quite believe it. So I posted it as “did I hear this right????” Anne has posted that she heard this too.
If anyone has the time to watch the Nation, please do and if I heard it wrong, I stand corrected.
Sorry Weka as a Labour voter, just very frustrated at the moment. In imho Labour have been great under Cunliffe and run a great clear, clean campaign. The one party who have been 100% clear about who they will and won’t work with (feel free to challenge me on this, but clearly there were some waters muddied with Normans comments about National and personally, I would want any party who get’s my vote to say I wouldn’t touch those dirty filthy slimy National B’s with a barge poll)
” The one party who have been 100% clear about who they will and won’t work with (feel free to challenge me on this, but clearly there were some waters muddied with Normans comments about National and personally, I would want any party who get’s my vote to say I wouldn’t touch those dirty filthy slimy National B’s with a barge poll)”
Labour have changed their approach on this a few times. And Norman has been clear that the GP won’t support a National govt, and he did say they wouldn’t touch National with a barge poll, he just said it in his own way.
I just watched the interview with Norman. A couple of thoughts. One is that it was one line, that’s all. Norman didn’t slag off Labour, he said one thing, which was that the GP have been the best in opposition this time round (and I take that over teh whole term, so it’s not about Cunliffe). And he didn’t bring it up, it was a response to Gower.
The other is that the thing that stood out for me most, was Gower’s insistence that Something had happened this week (in this case that the GP reached out to National and got slapped down). Norman says they haven’t talked to National, so who are we going to believe? Norman, or someone who is complicit in the VRWC, and is now taking part in the smearing of the GP that has been going on in the past week?
I think we need to be careful here about who we are getting angry with. I appreciate as a Labour voter you would be upset at the GP actively going after Labour votes, but they’ve always been doing that. And I don’t see them doing much in the way of negative shit towards Labour. I do see the MSM talking up that the GP are doing this, but that is a different thing.
Please bear in mind that the GP reached out to Labour earlier in the year and suggested that they work together going into the election. Labour said no way and made it very clear they would go for whatever left wing votes they could get. So we can’t blame the GP now for pushing the independence line.
All good Weka. Emotions running high at the moment. Have to keep the end goal in sight.
Just think that the smears from Whale Oil/msm have been mainly targetting Labour as the biggest opposition party. I have looked at Labour’s polling and what has happened is this. First there was David Cunliffe’s trust issue. A mistake on his part, but one I believe that came from good intentions, i.e. to keep secret the donors from DC so he wouldn’t be influenced by them. So when it came out, he owned it and repaired it. Promptly. Then what happened was days and days and days of msm focus on it to the point where there was that ridiculous story about Cunliffe helping a friend overseas to buy a house. WHAT HAPPENS NEXT………Labour and Cunliffe drop in the polls. Then next the Dong Liu letter. Utterly clear a black ops job with msm complicit. Cunliffe and Labour drop again in the polls.
I have been fine all along with Labour not teaming up with other parties. Labour is labour. We are getting our Red party back. I don’t believe Cunliffe has ever dissed other parties though????? But maybe I am wrong about that. I know he hasn’t been keen on the internet party.
The treatment of Cunliffe by the MSM has been despicable. Way worse than the treatment of the GP in the past year. Even if the left lose I hope that Cunliffe is given the chance to carry on with the changes that are happening withing Labour. But if we win, am looking forward to seeing how Labour and the GP figure out how to work together. Then there is Winston 😉
I am glad other progressive voters can see and acknowledge what has been going on with Cunliffe. They have targeted him, I believe cause they see him as a threat. And the msm. i read an article today by Derek Chuang (I think, but I may be wrong) of the Herald and it was glowing re Cunliffe. Gosh it’s a shock. Possibly a first.
i think Cunliffe will bring together all the parties and have it working great. I think Meteria will make a great deputy PM, if it goes that way. Remember Cunliffe has worked with his “enemies”/abc’s well in the last year.
+100 agreed weka…any comments by Norman have to be seen in context of the msm undermining of the Greens commitment to Labour and the Left…by the untrue insinuation that the Greens wanted a coalition deal with Key
(….and hence undermining both Greens’ Labour support and the Greens’ integrity)
Norman might just have been reasserting his commitment to the Left and opposition to Nactional by saying the Greens had been the most effective in opposition to Nactional ( an assertive and true statement which was taken by some as one-upmanship and putting down Labour)
I believe the Greens have made no such overtures to Nactional….and John Key’s reaction that he would NOT even work with the Greens on any projects at all if he and Nactional he were re-elected….sounded to me as if overtures from his side had been smacked down by the Greens!
( i know Hooton has sometimes hinted a Green alliance with Nactional could be good)…pigs might fly!
seems like the whole Green overtures to Nactional story was bullshit!
…the Greens and John Key hate each others guts…but I think John Key hates Winnie’s guts too …but that does not stop him trying to woo Winnie because John key is desperate
Conclusion: …. the REAL news about John Key and Nactional sliding in the polls was hidden and turned inside out by brown noser journalists to Keys PR story merchants (eg Hooton) …to make it look as if the Greens were courting John Key…. and then John Key was spurning and rejecting the Green’s advances…when in actual fact Key is in the supplicant begging position to the Greens and Winnie and is losing popularity massively ( many going from his party to the Greens and NZF) …and is desperate
..the whole thing was a msm setup imo
…which means the Left must stay staunch and keep the msm on the REAL story which is John Key’s decline
Norman is getting more and more cocky and puts down Labour and Cunliffe directly or indirectly in his statement. I am disliking him and the Greens more and more now.
I wouldn’t worrty about Clem. They’re a long time hater on the GP and have been distoring reality around them all year. Nothing to do with the current hooha methinks, although that is feeding them I guess.
@weka: I do not hate the Greens at all, but do dislike some of their policies and some of the tactics they use. I would even vote for them if Labour did not need many urgent votes at this election to make them a strong leading party for the long term survival of the potential coalition.
If you don’t hate them you give a pretty good impression that you do. Might want to think about that. I’m not the only person who has commented on this.
I certainly do not hate them. But that does not mean I can not take them to task and criticise them strongly for their silly tactics or for some of their unwise policies or naive statements from Norman that the guy he admires most is Bill English!.
So although you “certainly do not hate them”, you “can […] take them to task and criticise them strongly” to such a degree that “you give a pretty good impression that you do” hate them. Super.
I love it when different factions on the wider Left community reach a consensus and can therefore focus on getting sociopathic, corrupt, and fucking evil (although the last one might be the whisky creating honesty) tories out of government.
’tis an eternal conflict between the arrogance of the “self as unique” and the arrogance of “my opinion = everyone should see it that way”. In the middle is the area where we ain’t dicks, I reckon. We’ll never hit it 100%, all we can do is try 🙂
I don’t think you hate the GP and am pretty sure no-one here has said you do. I haven’t abused you in this thread yeshe, perhaps you could reread the comments. I and others have named Clem’s fairly extreme antagonism towards the GP. There are other people’s comments in the past about this. Nothing to do with you.
“Greens’ members ? I call shame on you for disallowing any view to honestly differ from your own.”
You weren’t disallowed. You had pretty free reign in OM yesterday. But you seem to be saying that you should be allowed to disagree with me but I’m not allowed to disagree with you? You got called out majorly in the previous few days because you repeatedly posted inaccuracies about the GP position, even after a number of people pointed this out, and you did that in the context of a VRWC smear. This is a political blog, I think it’s reasonable for people to react to what you did.
I get you were upset, and I’m sorry you got such a shock from the smear. I think your distress was definitely second to the politics of the situation. My own thoughts are it’s better to deal with that degree of distress offline and then post on places like ts when there is less at stake emotionally.
“You got called out majorly in the previous few days because you repeatedly posted inaccuracies about the GP position, even after a number of people pointed this out, and you did that in the context of a VRWC smear.”
Really?
It was yesterday only. I posted only what came from Norman’s own mouth over several incidents. Julie Genter from her own twitter They were not all sound bites.
The lectures didn’t stop, including accusing me of doing Slater’s work. That is ugly and shocking. You did not agree with me, I did not agree with you.
But the various ones of you never allowed for any perception that differed from your own perfect view of Norman and insisting I was part of a right wing smear.
I call bullshit, weka.
HE MADE MISTAKES. Ask Metiria. I dare you.
Everyone will recover, but sometime in here, take off the rosy glasses and accept that Norman is human and he made some mistakes. Did they get distorted and pounced on by right wing MSM ? Almost certainly and horribly.
But that does not give you or anyone else the grounds to accuse me of being part of, or succumbing to a right wing smear and somehow associating me in posts with the names of the filthy Slater and Lusk.
No, you don’t get my upset, because you have no idea why I am upset.
You are all too busy being reactive in this awful political climate. I suggest “know your enemy” as a new lecture series you could begin.
“I wouldn’t worrty about Clem. They’re a long time hater on the GP and have been distoring reality around them all year. Nothing to do with the current hooha methinks, although that is feeding them I guess.”
I was talking about Clem. That’s why I’ve put their name in the comment. If you look at the threading you will also see that KJT replied directly to Clem, and I replied to KJT. It was nothing to do with you. As I’ve already said. Please take a step back and consider why you are misinterpreting what I said.
Edit: just in case you missed this question, here it is again,
“Tell me this yeshe, do you believe that the GP might support the formation of a National-led govt after the election?”
You write: ” Although that is feeding THEM” which does not refer solely to Clem. It refers to more than one, and it was under my name.
I suggest you read everything I have written if you want an answer to your question.
Don”t make shit up on my behalf like you did yesterday.
I’m not avoiding answering. Have just decided not to as the question is as irrelevant today as it was yesterday. I just am too bloody minded now to answer after all the shit that was made up yesterday and laid at my feet.
Why don’t you address some of what I wrote tonight if you want to engage?
No wonder wars break out.
Goodnight for now weka. Write yourself whatever you need the answer to be and sign my name to it. Then it will make perfect sense for you.
I use ‘them’ regularly to refer to people when I don’t want to assume their gender. You will find that often in my comments. What is really bizarre here is that I’ve clarified that I wasn’t talking about you and you are still insisting that I was. Do you think I am lying?
I have read all your posts from the past day or so, as they came up. My understanding is that you believe that the GP might support the formation of a National govt after the election. It’s a pretty simple thing to clear up if I am wrong, so if you choose not to then I will have to go with my current understanding.
OK I accept you are not lying in spite of how you posted.
Your understanding is your understanding. You misunderstood everything I tried to say yesterday. Everything. You and others were so quick to assume I was part of a right wing smear you never listened to anything I said.
Your whole attack on me yesterday was based on your assumptions and had nothing to do with anything at all I was trying to discover.
Logic would suggest you can therefore safely assume that you have misunderstood and pre-judged any answer to your question. They are your assumptions about me, not mine.
Like your comment I had been repeatedly posting misinformation for days ?? I call bullshit again weka. Why do you write in absolutes that exist only your own mind ?
“You got called out majorly in the previous few days because you repeatedly posted inaccuracies about the GP position, even after a number of people pointed this out, and you did that in the context of a VRWC smear. ”
“OK I accept you are not lying in spite of how you posted.”
Thank-you 🙂
“Your understanding is your understanding. You misunderstood everything I tried to say yesterday. Everything. You and others were so quick to assume I was part of a right wing smear you never listened to anything I said.”
And yet here I am asking for clarification, even in the face of some pretty heated stuff being directed at me.
“Like your comment I had been repeatedly posting misinformation for days ?? I call bullshit again weka. Why do you write in absolutes that exist only your own mind ?”
because you did. Shall I go back and link to some examples? I don’t mean that everything you wrote was misinformation. Obviously. I mean that you made some statements that were misinformation and you repeated them even after others tried to point out the problem.
“Logic would suggest you can therefore safely assume that you have misunderstood and pre-judged any answer to your question. They are your assumptions about me, not mine.”
Hmmm, we’re now in bad faith territory I think. Not really anywhere else to go if you so firmly believe that I am prejudiced against you.
Hi weka … not sure if you will see this, but anyway, here goes on this lovely spring day filled with Glenn Greenwald’s erudition and facts …
No bad faith intended, ok ? Life is just too short, and I am not enjoying needing to fight you off if I post something you don’t like on TS. I would rather go quietly away.
But for now ….
This all began because of something I heard Norman say.
You (and others) told me repeatedly it was just a right wing smear tactic, and I was being fooled, along with some other stuff which we can just leave for now.
Now Russel Norman this morning on The Nation, in discussion with Paddy Gower, acknowledged exactly what I had heard, and during the same discussion explained he did it to flush National out. ( Now that may be a late rationale, when Paddy accused him of being ‘smacked down’ by National, and who could blame him.)
There’s much more to it the discussion, but basically Norman has confirmed it was not a right wing smear, but a deliberate tactic. He has confirmed that what I heard was correct, not me partaking in right wing smear. Time to put down your weapons, you and whoever else it was viciously accusing me.
Now can we leave it ? I have replied here because I am reluctant to open it all up again — I am sure we both have lives to enjoy !
Btw, loved Metiria on Q and A … was this re-building after what had gone on ? I think so. But clever to see them together. She is one very astute and compassionate politician — one day I hope she is PM. ( Privately, I think she has boxed his ears over the last few days, but that is conjecture and nothing else at all.)
Only six more days … may it bring exactly the changes we wish !
@KJT :No bull shit and no earmuffs. It is you that is blind and deaf here. It is Norman that has put a crude spoke in the coalition wheel by his talk about National support at this late stage in the election period, especially when the National vote is on the cusp of collapsing. Why the hell did he need to do that and confuse the voters as well as manage to antagonise Labour, its supporters and candidates? Perhaps he calculated that this tactic will make him somehow stronger and gain a few votes perhaps. But it is like trying to win a battle and lose the war, trust, friends and coalition relationships in the long term. In contrast, see what a clean positive wise campaign Cunliffe has run.
In the ‘Prime Time’ programme yesterday on Prime, even Gerry Brownlee was alluding to Norman’s favourable position with regards to National. He said National has many options including Act, Cons party, UF, Maori, NZF and ‘most recently, even the Green party’, he said! I don’t think the Green party participant, Genter refuted that contentious issue strongly enough.
Riiight. So you now want people to take Gerry Brownlee’s word on this? Do you know what Dirty Politics is?
“It is Norman that has put a crude spoke in the coalition wheel by his talk about National support at this late stage in the election period, especially when the National vote is on the cusp of collapsing.”
You are partaking in the smear, which is ironic given what you accuse Norman of. Corin Dann brought up the National issue, the GP didn’t.
Given that Genter corrected Brownlee on his figures for road use, costs of various transport modes, and even who authored the damned report he was trying to quote, I’m not surprised he had to resort to stirring shit.
lol
she made brownlee look like an oaf who didn’t know his job – big surprise.
My favourite bits were when he was bringing up points and she had this smile almost immediately that said she knew exactly what he was going to say, and had the precise figures at her fingertips to demonstrate his idiocy.
Well prepped, but she needs to work on that tell if she plays poker 🙂
I’ve seen a few interviews in the past months where the GP MPs have been like that. Almost like they can answer the questions while juggling 15 balls in the air. Harre is like that too, sees it all coming. Gods I hope they get to be in govt, simply for the pleasure of having smart competent people there.
No wonder the PM is talking of incorporating CERA into his Orifice.
RadioNZ had this. http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/regional/253563/national-would-make-changes-to-cera
Prime Minister John Key has announced the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority will be merged into the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet, if a National government was re-elected.
Mr Key said change was to maintain the momentum in the Canterbury rebuild and place the disaster recovery work at the core of central government planning. The new arrangement would be in place by next February.
Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Minister Gerry Brownlee said this did not represent a winding down of the recovery efforts, but a recognition the recovery programme is well underway.
However, Labour dismissed the plan saying it wouldn’t help with the recovery.
Saw this. http://rebuildingchristchurch.wordpress.com/2014/09/02/an-admission-of-failure-too-little-too-late/
Ann September 9, 2014 at 10:04 am
Some points of doubt about any value to Chch arising from PM’s action as suggested.
1 PM is already too busy now with what he has on his plate, to actually do and know everything he should – more would be the straw that breaks the camels back. This camel already is on its knees.
2 Anything sent to the PM would go through the PM Office. He has stated that does not mean that it has actually reached him. How does one ensure that this actually occurs and that he reads, and understands and actions, it?
3 The Prime Minister’s Office and team has trouble staying on task of working for the government of the people and strays off into propaganda boosts for the PM and his Party, and planning strategic moves that involve nobbling his political opposition. Can we be assured that they would give Christchurch the blessing of their committed devotion to working to assist its needs? I think, from observation so far, the answer is no!
4 If Christchurch was in Auckland it would be of interest, but to the PM and the Nats it’s just an annoying blob of buildings causing great cost to the country, for what is really just a waystation to the skiing resort of Queenstown. Which, unlike Chch, is trendy, and important to the Tourism portfolio of the PM, and fun for the PM and family to visit for skiing holidays, when they aren’t in Hawaii.
5 Don’t get your hopes up Chch. Don’t throw your portaloos out yet, another wobble and shake and back to the future!
” you accuse Norman of. Corin Dann brought up the National issue, the GP didn’t.”
You are sure about that and that it was not an unwise political tactic/stunt from Norman? Have you spoken to Norman and has he said that Dann has lied about a strategy meeting about this issue taking place that evening? If so, he should sue Dann for misrepresentation. I don’t believe all this was simply made up by bad Dann.
So, if that is really the case, then why doesn’t Norman come out on TV and say that this episode from Dann was all a part of dirty politics? That shouldn’t be hard to do?
I would guess that he won’t do that because (a) it plays into their hands, and (b) the GP adopted a strategy a long time ago of staying focussed on policy. You can see this in pretty much everything he does at the moment. Calling out Dann on his bullshit would be a distraction from that. It would also be hard to prove, so what would be the point? Am pretty sure it would just up the ante too. Turei handled it very well in the aftermath, was very gracious towards Dann. Well played.
I actually find it interesting the large amount of advice being directed at Norman and the GP at the moment about how they should conduct themselves. The thing I keep coming back to is that they did the hard yards for such a long time under a relentlessly negative media and eventually they figured it out so that in recent years they’ve done very well. I think they know what they are doing. This doesn’t mean they don’t make mistakes. I would guess they didn’t see this one coming, but my impression is that they’re here for the long haul and this is just another piece of weird shit along the way.
The Topp Twins nail it on Kim Hill this morning. Stop using nitrates. Nitrates feed the grass and kill the microbes in the soil. The grass grows well that season, but over time the degradation of the soil continues, making nitrates necessary for any growth. Eventually those nitrates end up in the water. Instead, feed the soil (with organic inputs). Healthy soil grows healthy grass and doesn’t have problematic runoffs. Simple.
I’d like to see an analysis of that, that takes into account the labour and work involved in dealing with nitrate mitigation. If we want to make this an economic issue.
More expensive on a large scale, that’s an argument for smaller scale farming. We used to have smaller dairy herds for instance. Artificial fertiliser has artificially inflated our capabilities, and that is not sustainable (certainly not in the physical world, but probably not in the financial world either).
I’m not talking lifestyle block small farming either. There is some impressive sustainable land management being done on big farms too.
Yes, but unlike the finite cost of fences and riparian planting around farm waterways, nutrient run off is a still a major issue and heavy polluter of our streams and rivers. User pays for the practice or has to change the methods. They are the choices. Might as well employ people and at the same time protect the viability of the soil under our feet, rather than pay the fines or compliance fees.
100+ Weka, added to that it also means the soil stops being a carbon sink as it is a sterile system. The misreporting on nitrates is infuriating. Cow pee is blamed for the nitrogen in the rivers but this is dishonest, cows are fed on nitrogen fertilised grass and they excrete these nutrients in excessive amounts. But there is also the leaching from fertiliser directly into rivers from porous soils in particular. Urea a byproduct of the oil industry so misinformation is unsurprising.
+100 Rodel…lol…we must encourage all those elderly relatives, the infirm and the chronically ill … and all those on their death beds to ARISE and VOTE EARLY!
…and all those indigent strugglers, the lazy bastard self- absorbed anarchist gamer youth, the couch layabouts, and all those devil may care revellers and piss heads who drink too much on Friday and recuperate all day Saturday so they can hit the town again Saturday night ….. to go out and VOTE EARLY !
( we need to provide transport and practical moral support as well as encouragement to vote )
…I am voting early too…just in case I get hit by a bus
It felt just like election day today at Grey Lynn when I voted.
There were 3 booths and two were full. Someone was finding out what electorate they were in down in Dunedin. People were pulling in and out of the car park.
To top it all off, it had that classic Auckland deluge that we call “rain” and lots of people hanging around waiting for it to subside so they could get to their home or cars without getting soaked..
I also have to say, on a personal note, that I think early voting – unless necessary – seems like an exercise in hubris. How can anyone be so sure, in advance, that nothing will change their mind between now and election day? It’s like religion. Minds are made without all facts, opinions, outcomes or policies being presented.
*personal opinion, all rights reserved. Individual results may vary
I agree with you in a way. Early voting is fine if one knows in advance that next Saturday would be personally inconvenient or if one wishes to avoid crowds or long lines or some other good reason.
One week is a long time in politics. So for some early voting may turn out to be act in haste, regret at leisure….as I suspect has already happened for some in the last few days.
I suspect that such a voter doesn’t exist. If they did then they would have stopped voting National when Dirty politics was published and we became aware of just how corrupt National really is.
What’s going to happen over the next week as more of National’s corruption and lying comes to light is that a few undecideds will definitely decide not to vote National. I just hope that they decide to vote and vote left so that a full royal inquiry can be mounted and the corruption brought fully to light.
Awesome, it’s Draco. The only man in New Zealand that understands economics, politics, society and computing. How’s that “hacking isn’t really much of a problem” point of view going?
“They keep themselves informed and don’t wait around to be advertised at by the political parties.”
Who was talking about being advertised at? I’m talking about voting early before full policy announcements have been made. You’ll note voting opened before many of the parties had fully released policy proposals. Only a person not interested in weighing the party on it’s policies would decide which party was right for them without actually understanding what the party was actually going to bring to the table by way of policy.
The only man in New Zealand that understands economics, politics, society and computing.
The poor little contrarian is feeling threatened by little old me.
Only a person not interested in weighing the party on it’s policies would decide which party was right for them without actually understanding what the party was actually going to bring to the table by way of policy.
And only a fool would vote purely on policies. Sure, policies are important but the attitude of the party and how it relates to and treats others is more important.
Kiwis are being spied on by the Government Communications Security Bureau, raising serious questions about whether Prime Minister John Key has been telling them the truth, an American journalist says.
[…]
Greenwald said he knew for certain that the New Zealand government engaged in “extraordinary amounts of analysis of metadata”. ” Meaning whose talking to who, for how long, where they are when they speak, on a massive indiscriminate scale not just internationally but of New Zealanders as well.”
New Zealand spent an “extraordinary amount of resource” for a country its size on electronic surveillance and “every single thing that the NSA does…involves NZ directly. They are full fledged allies of this effort.”
That included spying on foreign governments, both friendly and hostile.
Is there any chance someone might point out to Key that all pejoratives he throws at Glenn Greenwald, such as “Dotcom’s little henchman” will end up in The Guardian, and likely other international front pages also.
Long time reader, first time poster—and what a post! It just kept going. Beat mainstream soundbite commentary. That’s why we come here isn’t it.
Anyway…
It’s a week out from the general elections and I’m hedging my bets and these are my predictions. I’ve provided rationale for my estimates and tried to be not biased (I know it’s hard not to be). Don’t ask me what they would be in seats because I can’t find a Sainte-Laguë calculator that accounts for our one seat rule and I’m too rusty on maths for doing it the long way by hand. Rounding to 0.25%.
National: It’s a well know fact the polls consistently over estimate National’s popularity because of the absence of land lines as well as failure to capture social media communication. Corporate media interests will also play down relevant critical factors such as undecided voters or those who refuse to say. History shows polls have them 3-6% above their actual election results, and with recent polls hovering around 47% this might drop. Also they will inevitably be bleeding voters to Conservative and possibly NZ First in the wake of the Hager revelations. However, some centrist supports willing to vote Labour will cling on because they moan about the Green Party et al.
Labour: I admit this may be a little bit biased—just a little—but I think the younger and working-class poor voters might be swayed in this direction especially given the media are finally giving Cunliffe an equal platform with people using their own judgements because of the debates. There will still be the usual centre left people that moan about not liking Cunliffe’s personality without any basis for the claim—so-called “personality voters”. Again, Labour will be loosing votes to the Greens, especially professional middle-class liberals.
Green: I think most polls are reasonably accurate in this area—maybe a slight underestimate, especially if they can capture the notoriously lazy student vote. I don’t see them getting to their desired 15% despite a solid social media campaign. They might be loosing some potential votes to Internet-Mana for appearing more business friendly—albeit in a more sustainability eco-friendly way.
NZ First: The Winston Factor: he always gets across the line (except 2008). Will pick up the Gold-Card vote and possibly a few disgruntled National, and maybe Labour voters. His obstinacy regarding coalition partners will hold him back from anything higher though.
Conservative: The old school National voters disgruntled with their soft stance on social policy, as well as things like farm sales, asset sales, referenda etc. The so-called “moral compass” vote. Might pick up some votes from Winston for the aforementioned reasons. Will pick up some of the fundamentalist fringe New Age Born Again Christian vote.
Internet-Mana: While they started off with a roar, they aren’t going to get near the lofty heights they predicted. However, polls probably underestimate their vote. Hello? Internet Party—they live on smart phones and Facebook. Mana voters tend to be working class poor too. The social media campaign has really lit a fire under them too, especially with the injection of you-know-who’s money, which leads me to my next point: the Dotcom factor. This will put off many people, especially the “radical agitator” rhetoric, which I personally don’t care about—I love the revolutionary talk as much as the next flaming liberal—but I just don’t see this going down well with older lefties or moderates. I think Cunliffe’s refusal to include them in Cabinet will have some people marching back to the Green-Labour (or Māori) camp. The new cannabis policy may see them pick up the stoner vote—if they remember to vote.
ACT: Jamie Whyte is far too ideological and intellectual for simple-minded people. The far-right Americanism of their campaign will have them fall off the rails. New Zealand is just not ready or has the disposition for this shift in direction despite National dancing with it loosely. Nobody knows who David Seymour is or cares about him. He will probably get Epsom for ACT again because National voters do what they’re told, but with a reduced margin because of smart liberal voters wanting to put the last nail in the ACT coffin. Still, Epsom’s wealthy constituents will sadly outnumber the tactical liberal voters. Will inevitably pick up some of the corporate and wealthy migrant vote.
Māori Party: Damaged goods—and despite their best intentions they know it. They might pick up one seat if they can hold back the growing Internet-Mana tide. Elitist Māori will still vote for them however.
United Future: United whom? Apart from bow ties and kowtowing to National for the last six years, nobody knows what this party stands for (if anything). Please somebody put the nail in this coffin! Will probably get Ōhariu back again because of subservient National voters—with a reduced margin—despite the best intentions of tactical Labour and Green voters. If I were living in Wellington Central, Hutt, or Mana, I would make it my duty to somehow get registered in Ōhariu to vote this muppet out.
Others: Aotearoa Legalise Cannabis Party might loose votes to Internet-Mana and Ben Uffindell’s hung-over friends might give him the tick if they can make it to a polling booth. All others not worth mentioning.
Your guesstimate numbers add up to 100.25% so I trimmed back the CP, and (if ACT, MANA, & MP all got an electorate) would give: NP 52 + A 1 + M 1 = 54, vs; LP 38 + GP 16 + IMP 4 = 58 with NZF on 8 as kingmaker. Assuming 120 seats (no overhang).
It’s a fun enough game playing with the various scenarios, but I prefer going out and convincing people to head down to the ballot box at this stage.
Personally I think Internet-Mana has shot its bolt and will not get into Parliament apart from Hone, and perhaps taking in Harre with him. Which is a pity really…
NZ First IMO has done enough to get into Parliament again, and WP will need to decide to have a crack at 2017 or hand over to Ron Mark, and retire to his stud farm in Papakura…
It looks like National will get in again, unless Key falls under a bus between now and next Saturday.
Oh well, Ill probably spend the next week or so National-proofing my life…
It’s suffragette day on Friday Any chance of the Standard having a suffragette themed week(purple & green on open mike? ) just to remind everyone that voting hasn’t always been a right for all. Don’t let great granny down!
Disappointing to see the coverage saying Cunliff’s charity was “wasted” because the person to whom he gave money had already voted Mana. That’s MSM for you.
Great commentary from Curwen Rolinson on the Corin Dann hooha,
This is literally all that Norman meant by “working with” National, and all I can conclude is that TVNZ have deliberately decided to play up the fact the average punter hasn’t got a huge idea about the difference between a coalition, a confidence & supply agreement and merely *voting for another party’s policy every now and then when it’s demonstrably something your own party likes anyway*.
Coming from New Zealand First, I suppose I’ve got a better grasp of this than some in the Press Gallery (or, given the turgid tone of the story, Fleet St) … but one of our mantras sums this up well: we will support good policy and oppose bad policy *no matter where it comes from*. The Green Party’s been really good at reaching across the aisle (as opposed to merely *around* the aisle, if you get my drift) during its previous few terms as our 3rd largest party, and I actually find it kind of sad that such incredibly circumstantial evidence is being used to sketch out a narrative of a powerhungry Green party prepared to do deals with literally anybody in pursuit of office.
Considering the Green Party’s likely pivotal role in this year’s Election; as well as the fact that National’s narrative of invincibility into a third term is floundering due to the fading fortunes of its support partners … the only serious question about this story (aside from “how outraged am I that this is apparently “news”) is which way to read this story in the grand scheme of things.
Craven journalistic opportunism? National kite-flying by getting its pliant friends in the media to test the waters for how palatable an *actual* #BlueGreen2014 (or, more plausibly, 2017 or 20NEVER) coalition would be with the electorate? Or typical Kiwi tall poppy syndrome seeing the only seriously rising force in this campaign and wanting to throw an incredible spanner amidst their midships by promoting sensationalist gossip magazine style tactical projections that may have only a slapping distance relationship with reality.
I really hope Curwen is the future of NZ First, presuming they survive. Otherwise Labour should put out the red carpet. He is an interesting dedicated observer of NZ politics with a bit of passion. You can’t go wrong …
More than 40 former soldiers and current army reservists have signed a letter refusing future service in the Israeli Defence Force (IDF) military intelligence wing, known as Unit 8200.
Unit 8200 is often compared to the United States National Security Agency. It uses sophisticated technology to monitor the lives of Palestinians, gathering information which is then used by Israel’s military. It also carries out surveillance overseas.
But the group of soldiers who served in the unit has spoken out about the methods used and the toll they take on innocent civilians in the occupied Palestinian territories.
@joe90 …Brave soldiers…they restore your faith in humanity!
…but what Israel is doing to the Palestinians is unbearable, blood chilling and horrendous…this State is a disgrace to the memories of the holocaust victims…and should be boycotted around the world…certainly New Zealand and New Zealanders should be very wary…
It is all very well cutting the backrooms of public agencies but it may compromise the frontlines. One of the frustrations of the Productivity Commission’s 2017 review of universities is that while it observed that their non-academic staff were increasing faster than their academic staff, it did not bother to ...
Buzz from the Beehive Two speeches delivered by Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters at Anzac Day ceremonies in Turkey are the only new posts on the government’s official website since the PM announced his Cabinet shake-up. In one of the speeches, Peters stated the obvious: we live in a troubled ...
1. Which of these would you not expect to read in The Waikato Invader?a. Luxon is here to do business, don’t you worry about thatb. Mr KPI expects results, and you better believe itc. This decisive man of action is getting me all hot and excitedd. Melissa Lee is how ...
…it has a restricted jurisdiction which must not be abused: it is not an inquisitionNOTE – this article was published before the High Court ruled that Karen Chhour does not have to appear before the Waitangi Tribunal Gary Judd writes – The High Court ...
Lindsay Mitchell writes – One of reasons Oranga Tamariki exists is to prevent child neglect. But could the organisation itself be guilty of the same?Oranga Tamariki’s statistics show a decrease in the number and age of children in care. “There are less children ...
David Farrar writes: Graeme Edgeler wrote in 2017: In the first five years after three strikes came into effect 5248 offenders received a ‘first strike’ (that is, a “stage-1 conviction” under the three strikes sentencing regime), and 68 offenders received a ‘second strike’. In the five years prior to ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has surprised everyone with his ruthlessness in sacking two of his ministers from their crucial portfolios. Removing ministers for poor performance after only five months in the job just doesn’t normally happen in politics. That’s refreshing and will be extremely ...
TL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the two days to 6:06am on Thursday, April 25:Politics: PM Christopher Luxon has set up a dual standard for ministerial competence by demoting two National Cabinet ministers while leaving also-struggling ...
Hi,Today I mainly want to share some of your thoughts about the recent piece I wrote about success and failure, and the forces that seemingly guide our lives. But first, a quick bit of housekeeping: I am doing a Webworm popup in Los Angeles on Saturday May 11 at 2pm. ...
It is hard to see what Melissa Lee might have done to “save” the media. National went into the election with no public media policy and appears not to have developed one subsequently. Lee claimed that she had prepared a policy paper before the election but it had been decided ...
Open access notablesIce acceleration and rotation in the Greenland Ice Sheet interior in recent decades, Løkkegaard et al., Communications Earth & Environment:In the past two decades, mass loss from the Greenland ice sheet has accelerated, partly due to the speedup of glaciers. However, uncertainty in speed derived from satellite products ...
Buzz from the Beehive A statement from Children’s Minister Karen Chhour – yet to be posted on the Government’s official website – arrived in Point of Order’s email in-tray last night. It welcomes the High Court ruling on whether the Waitangi Tribunal can demand she appear before it. It does ...
Mr Bombastic:Ironically, the media the academic experts wanted is, in many ways, the media they got. In place of the tyrannical editors of yesteryear, advancing without fear or favour the interests of the ruling class; the New Zealand news media of today boasts a troop of enlightened journalists dedicated to ...
It's hard times try to make a livingYou wake up every morning in the unforgivingOut there somewhere in the cityThere's people living lives without mercy or pityI feel good, yeah I'm feeling fineI feel better then I have for the longest timeI think these pills have been good for meI ...
In 1974, the US Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. Nixon, finding that the President was not a King, but was subject to the law and was required to turn over the evidence of his wrongdoing to the courts. It was a landmark decision for the rule ...
Every day now just seems to bring in more fresh meat for the grinder.In their relentlessly ideological drive to cut back on the “excessive bloat” (as they see it) of the previous Labour-led government, on the mountains of evidence accumulated in such a short period of time do not ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Megan Valére SosouMarket gardening site of the Itchèléré de Itagui agricultural cooperative in Dassa-Zoumè (Image credit: Megan Valère Sossou) For the residents of Dassa-Zoumè, a city in the West African country of Benin, choosing between drinking water and having enough ...
Buzz from the Beehive Melissa Lee – as may be discerned from the screenshot above – has not been demoted for doing something seriously wrong as Minister of ...
Morning in London Mother hugs beloved daughter outside the converted shoe factory in which she is living.Afternoon in London Travelling writer takes himself and his wrist down to A&E, just to be sure. Read more ...
Mike Grimshaw writes – The recent announcement of the University Advisory Group, chaired by Sir Peter Gluckman, makes very clear where the Government’s focus and priorities lie. The remit of the Advisory Group is that Group members will consider challenges and opportunities for improvement in the university sector including: ...
Eric Crampton writes – The Reserve Bank of New Zealand desperately wants to find reasons to have workstreams in climate change. It makes little sense. They’ve run another stress test on the banks looking to see if they could find a prudential regulation case. They couldn’t. They ...
Rob MacCullough writes – Pundits from the left and the right are arguing that National’s Fast Track Bill that is designed to speed up infrastructure decisions could end up becoming mired in a cesspool of corruption. Political commentator ...
Looking at the headlines this morning it’s hard to feel anything other than pessimistic about the future of humanity.Note that I’m not speaking about the future of mankind, but the survival of our humanity. The values that we believe in seem to be ebbing away, by the day.Perhaps every generation ...
Swabbing mixed breed baby chicks to test for avian influenzaUh oh. Bird flu – often deadly to humans – is not only being transmitted from infected birds to dairy cows, but is now travelling between dairy cows. As of last Friday, Bloomberg News reports, there were 32 American dairy herds ...
On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
What is it with the mining industry? Its not enough for them to pillage the earth - they apparently can't even be bothered getting resource consent to do so: The proponent behind a major mine near the Clutha River had already been undertaking activity in the area without a ...
Photo # 1 I am a huge fan of Singapore’s approach to housing, as described here two years ago by copying and pasting from The ConversationWhat Singapore has that Australia does not is a public housing developer, the Housing Development Board, which puts new dwellings on public and reclaimed land, ...
Buzz from the Beehive Reactions to news of the government’s readiness to make urgent changes to “the resource management system” through a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) suggest a balanced approach is being taken. The Taxpayers’ Union says the proposed changes don’t go far enough. Greenpeace says ...
I’m starting to wonder if Anna Burns-Francis might be the best political interviewer we’ve got. That might sound unlikely to you, it came as a bit of a surprise to me.Jack Tame can be excellent, but has some pretty average days. I like Rebecca Wright on Newshub, she asks good ...
Chris Trotter writes – Willie Jackson is said to be planning a “media summit” to discuss “the state of the media and how to protect Fourth Estate Journalism”. Not only does the Editor of The Daily Blog, Martyn Bradbury, think this is a good idea, but he has also ...
Graeme Edgeler writes – This morning [April 21], the Wellington High Court is hearing a judicial review brought by Hon. Karen Chhour, the Minister for Children, against a decision of the Waitangi Tribunal. This is unusual, judicial reviews are much more likely to brought against ministers, rather than ...
Both of Parliament’s watchdogs have now ripped into the Government’s Fast-track Approvals Bill. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāMy pick of the six newsey things to know from Aotearoa’s political economy and beyond on the morning of Tuesday, April 23 are:The Lead: The Auditor General,John Ryan, has joined the ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Sarah SpengemanPeople wait to board an electric bus in Pune, India. (Image credit: courtesy of ITDP) Public transportation riders in Pune, India, love the city’s new electric buses so much they will actually skip an older diesel bus that ...
The infrastructure industry yesterday issued a “hurry up” message to the Government, telling it to get cracking on developing a pipeline of infrastructure projects.The hiatus around the change of Government has seen some major projects cancelled and others delayed, and there is uncertainty about what will happen with the new ...
Hi,Over the weekend I revisited a podcast I really adore, Dead Eyes. It’s about a guy who got fired from Band of Brothers over two decades ago because Tom Hanks said he had “dead eyes”.If you don’t recall — 2001’s Band of Brothers was part of the emerging trend of ...
Buzz from the Beehive The 180 or so recipients of letters from the Government telling them how to submit infrastructure projects for “fast track” consideration includes some whose project applications previously have been rejected by the courts. News media were quick to feature these in their reports after RMA Reform Minister Chris ...
It would not be a desirable way to start your holiday by breaking your back, your head, or your wrist, but on our first hour in Singapore I gave it a try.We were chatting, last week, before we started a meeting of Hazel’s Enviro Trust, about the things that can ...
Calling all journalists, academics, planners, lawyers, political activists, environmentalists, and other members of the public who believe that the relationships between vested interests and politicians need to be scrutinised. We need to work together to make sure that the new Fast-Track Approvals Bill – currently being pushed through by the ...
Feel worried. Shane Jones and a couple of his Cabinet colleagues are about to be granted the power to override any and all objections to projects like dams, mines, roads etc even if: said projects will harm biodiversity, increase global warming and cause other environmental harms, and even if ...
Bryce Edwards writes- The ability of the private sector to quickly establish major new projects making use of the urban and natural environment is to be supercharged by the new National-led Government. Yesterday it introduced to Parliament one of its most significant reforms, the Fast Track Approvals Bill. ...
Michael Bassett writes – If you think there is a move afoot by the radical Maori fringe of New Zealand society to create a parallel system of government to the one that we elect at our triennial elections, you aren’t wrong. Over the last few days we have ...
Without a corresponding drop in interest rates, it’s doubtful any changes to the CCCFA will unleash a massive rush of home buyers. Photo: Lynn GrievesonTL;DR: The six things that stood out to me in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, poverty and climate on Monday, April 22 included:The Government making a ...
Sunday was a lazy day. I started watching Jack Tame on Q&A, the interviews are usually good for something to write about. Saying the things that the politicians won’t, but are quite possibly thinking. Things that are true and need to be extracted from between the lines.As you might know ...
In our Weekly Roundup last week we covered news from Auckland Transport that the WX1 Western Express is going to get an upgrade next year with double decker electric buses. As part of the announcement, AT also said “Since we introduced the WX1 Western Express last November we have seen ...
TL;DR: The six key events to watch in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the week to April 29 include:PM Christopher Luxon is scheduled to hold a post-Cabinet news conference at 4 pm today. Stats NZ releases its statutory report on Census 2023 tomorrow.Finance Minister Nicola Willis delivers a pre-Budget speech at ...
A listing of 29 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, April 14, 2024 thru Sat, April 20, 2024. Story of the week Our story of the week hinges on these words from the abstract of a fresh academic ...
The ability of the private sector to quickly establish major new projects making use of the urban and natural environment is to be supercharged by the new National-led Government. Yesterday it introduced to Parliament one of its most significant reforms, the Fast Track Approvals Bill. The Government says this will ...
This is a column to say thank you. So many of have been in touch since Mum died to say so many kind and thoughtful things. You’re wonderful, all of you. You’ve asked how we’re doing, how Dad’s doing. A little more realisation each day, of the irretrievable finality of ...
Identifying the engine type in your car is crucial for various reasons, including maintenance, repairs, and performance upgrades. Knowing the specific engine model allows you to access detailed technical information, locate compatible parts, and make informed decisions about modifications. This comprehensive guide will provide you with a step-by-step approach to ...
Introduction: The allure of racing is undeniable. The thrill of speed, the roar of engines, and the exhilaration of competition all contribute to the allure of this adrenaline-driven sport. For those who yearn to experience the pinnacle of racing, becoming a race car driver is the ultimate dream. However, the ...
Introduction Automobiles have become ubiquitous in modern society, serving as a primary mode of transportation and a symbol of economic growth and personal mobility. With countless vehicles traversing roads and highways worldwide, it begs the question: how many cars are there in the world? Determining the precise number is a ...
Maintaining a safe and reliable vehicle requires regular inspections. Whether it’s a routine maintenance checkup or a safety inspection, knowing how long the process will take can help you plan your day accordingly. This article delves into the factors that influence the duration of a car inspection and provides an ...
Mazda Motor Corporation, commonly known as Mazda, is a Japanese multinational automaker headquartered in Fuchu, Aki District, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan. The company was founded in 1920 as the Toyo Cork Kogyo Co., Ltd., and began producing vehicles in 1931. Mazda is primarily known for its production of passenger cars, but ...
Your car battery is an essential component that provides power to start your engine, operate your electrical systems, and store energy. Over time, batteries can weaken and lose their ability to hold a charge, which can lead to starting problems, power failures, and other issues. Replacing your battery before it ...
In most states, you cannot register a car without a valid driver’s license. However, there are a few exceptions to this rule. Exceptions to the RuleIf you are under 18 years old: In some states, you can register a car in your name even if you do not ...
Mazda, a Japanese automotive manufacturer with a rich history of innovation and engineering excellence, has emerged as a formidable player in the global car market. Known for its reputation of producing high-quality, fuel-efficient, and driver-oriented vehicles, Mazda has consistently garnered praise from industry experts and consumers alike. In this article, ...
Struts are an essential part of a car’s suspension system. They are responsible for supporting the weight of the car and damping the oscillations of the springs. Struts are typically made of steel or aluminum and are filled with hydraulic fluid. How Do Struts Work? Struts work by transferring the ...
Car registration is a mandatory process that all vehicle owners must complete annually. This process involves registering your car with the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) and paying an associated fee. The registration process ensures that your vehicle is properly licensed and insured, and helps law enforcement and other authorities ...
Zoom is a video conferencing service that allows you to share your screen, webcam, and audio with other participants. In addition to sharing your own audio, you can also share the audio from your computer with other participants. This can be useful for playing music, sharing presentations with audio, or ...
Building your own computer can be a rewarding and cost-effective way to get a high-performance machine tailored to your specific needs. However, it also requires careful planning and execution, and one of the most important factors to consider is the time it will take. The exact time it takes to ...
Sleep mode is a power-saving state that allows your computer to quickly resume operation without having to boot up from scratch. This can be useful if you need to step away from your computer for a short period of time but don’t want to shut it down completely. There are ...
Introduction Computer-Assisted Translation (CAT) has revolutionized the field of translation by harnessing the power of technology to assist human translators in their work. This innovative approach combines specialized software with human expertise to improve the efficiency, accuracy, and consistency of translations. In this comprehensive article, we will delve into the ...
In today’s digital age, mobile devices have become an indispensable part of our daily lives. Among the vast array of portable computing options available, iPads and tablet computers stand out as two prominent contenders. While both offer similar functionalities, there are subtle yet significant differences between these two devices. This ...
A computer is an electronic device that can be programmed to carry out a set of instructions. The basic components of a computer are the processor, memory, storage, input devices, and output devices. The Processor The processor, also known as the central processing unit (CPU), is the brain of the ...
Voice Memos is a convenient app on your iPhone that allows you to quickly record and store audio snippets. These recordings can be useful for a variety of purposes, such as taking notes, capturing ideas, or recording interviews. While you can listen to your voice memos on your iPhone, you ...
Laptop screens are essential for interacting with our devices and accessing information. However, when lines appear on the screen, it can be frustrating and disrupt productivity. Understanding the underlying causes of these lines is crucial for finding effective solutions. Types of Screen Lines Horizontal lines: Also known as scan ...
Right-clicking is a common and essential computer operation that allows users to access additional options and settings. While most desktop computers have dedicated right-click buttons on their mice, laptops often do not have these buttons due to space limitations. This article will provide a comprehensive guide on how to right-click ...
Powering up and shutting down your ASUS laptop is an essential task for any laptop user. Locating the power button can sometimes be a hassle, especially if you’re new to ASUS laptops. This article will provide a comprehensive guide on where to find the power button on different ASUS laptop ...
Dell laptops are renowned for their reliability, performance, and versatility. Whether you’re a student, a professional, or just someone who needs a reliable computing device, a Dell laptop can meet your needs. However, if you’re new to Dell laptops, you may be wondering how to get started. In this comprehensive ...
Te Pāti Māori are demanding the New Zealand Government support an international independent investigation into mass graves that have been uncovered at two hospitals on the Gaza strip, following weeks of assault by Israeli troops. Among the 392 bodies that have been recovered, are children and elderly civilians. Many of ...
Our two-tiered system for veterans’ support is out of step with our closest partners, and all parties in Parliament should work together to fix it, Labour veterans’ affairs spokesperson Greg O’Connor said. ...
Stripping two Ministers of their portfolios just six months into the job shows Christopher Luxon’s management style is lacking, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said. ...
Tonight’s court decision to overturn the summons of the Children’s Minister has enabled the Crown to continue making decisions about Māori without evidence, says Te Pāti Māori spokesperson for Children, Mariameno Kapa-Kingi. “The judicial system has this evening told the nation that this government can do whatever they want when ...
It appears Nicola Willis is about to pull the rug out from under the feet of local communities still dealing with the aftermath of last year’s severe weather, and local councils relying on funding to build back from these disasters. ...
The Government is making short-sighted changes to the Resource Management Act (RMA) that will take away environmental protection in favour of short-term profits, Labour’s environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said today. ...
Labour welcomes the release of the report into the North Island weather events and looks forward to working with the Government to ensure that New Zealand is as prepared as it can be for the next natural disaster. ...
The Labour Party has called for the New Zealand Government to recognise Palestine, as a material step towards progressing the two-State solution needed to achieve a lasting peace in the region. ...
Some of our country’s most important work, stopping the sexual exploitation of children and violent extremism could go along with staff on the frontline at ports and airports. ...
The Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill will give projects such as new coal mines a ‘get out of jail free’ card to wreak havoc on the environment, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said today. ...
The government's decision to reintroduce Three Strikes is a destructive and ineffective piece of law-making that will only exacerbate an inherently biased and racist criminal justice system, said Te Pāti Māori Justice Spokesperson, Tākuta Ferris, today. During the time Three Strikes was in place in Aotearoa, Māori and Pasifika received ...
Cuts to frontline hospital staff are not only a broken election promise, it shows the reckless tax cuts have well and truly hit the frontline of the health system, says Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall. ...
The Green Party has joined the call for public submissions on the fast-track legislation to be extended after the Ombudsman forced the Government to release the list of organisations invited to apply just hours before submissions close. ...
New Zealand’s good work at reducing climate emissions for three years in a row will be undone by the National government’s lack of ambition and scrapping programmes that were making a difference, Labour Party climate spokesperson Megan Woods said today. ...
More essential jobs could be on the chopping block, this time Ministry of Education staff on the school lunches team are set to find out whether they're in line to lose their jobs. ...
Te Pāti Māori is disgusted at the confirmation that hundreds are set to lose their jobs at Oranga Tamariki, and the disestablishment of the Treaty Response Unit. “This act of absolute carelessness and out of touch decision making is committing tamariki to state abuse.” Said Te Pāti Māori Oranga Tamariki ...
The Government is trying to bring in a law that will allow Ministers to cut corners and kill off native species, Labour environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said. ...
Cancelling urgently needed new Cook Strait ferries and hiking the cost of public transport for many Kiwis so that National can announce the prospect of another tunnel for Wellington is not making good choices, Labour Transport Spokesperson Tangi Utikere said. ...
A laundry list of additional costs for Tāmaki Makarau Auckland shows the Minister for the city is not delivering for the people who live there, says Labour Auckland Issues spokesperson Shanan Halbert. ...
Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi, and Mema Paremata mō Tāmaki-Makaurau, Takutai Tarsh Kemp, will travel to the Gold Coast to strengthen ties with Māori in Australia next week (15-21 April). The visit, in the lead-up to the 9th Australian National Kapa haka Festival, will be an opportunity for both ...
The Green Party has today launched a step-by-step guide to help New Zealanders make their voice heard on the Government’s democracy dodging and anti-environment fast track legislation. ...
The National Government’s proposed changes to the Residential Tenancies Act will mean tenants can be turfed from their homes by landlords with little notice, Labour housing spokesperson Kieran McAnulty said. ...
Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson is calling on all parties to support a common-sense change that’s great for the planet and great for consumers after her member’s bill was drawn from the ballot today. ...
A significant milestone has been reached in the fight to strike an anti-Pasifika and unfair law from the country’s books after Teanau Tuiono’s members’ bill passed its first reading. ...
New Zealand has today missed the opportunity to uphold the right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment, says James Shaw after his member’s bill was voted down in its first reading. ...
Today’s advice from the Climate Change Commission paints a sobering reality of the challenge we face in combating climate change, especially in light of recent Government policy announcements. ...
Minister for Disability Issues Penny Simmonds appears to have delayed a report back to Cabinet on the progress New Zealand is making against international obligations for disabled New Zealanders. ...
Ambassador Millar, Burgemeester, Vandepitte, Excellencies, military representatives, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen – good morning and welcome to this sacred Anzac Day dawn service. It is an honour to be here on behalf of the Government and people of New Zealand at Buttes New British Cemetery, Polygon Wood – a deeply ...
Distinguished guests - It is an honour to return once again to this site which, as the resting place for so many of our war-dead, has become a sacred place for generations of New Zealanders. Our presence here and at the other special spaces of Gallipoli is made ...
Mai ia tawhiti pamamao, te moana nui a Kiwa, kua tae whakaiti mai matou, ki to koutou papa whenua. No koutou te tapuwae, no matou te tapuwae, kua honoa pumautia. Ko nga toa kua hinga nei, o te Waipounamu, o te Ika a Maui, he okioki tahi me o ...
Paul Goldsmith will take on responsibility for the Media and Communications portfolio, while Louise Upston will pick up the Disability Issues portfolio, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced today. “Our Government is relentlessly focused on getting New Zealand back on track. As issues change in prominence, I plan to adjust Ministerial ...
Recreational catch limits will be reduced in areas of Fiordland and the Chatham Islands to help keep those fisheries healthy and sustainable, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. The lower recreational daily catch limits for a range of finfish and shellfish species caught in the Fiordland Marine Area and ...
Energy Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed an important milestone in New Zealand’s hydrogen future, with the opening of the country’s first network of hydrogen refuelling stations in Wiri. “I want to congratulate the team at Hiringa Energy and its partners K one W one (K1W1), Mitsui & Co New Zealand ...
The coalition Government is delivering on its commitment to improve resource management laws and give greater certainty to consent applicants, with a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) expected to be introduced to Parliament next month. RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop has today outlined the first RMA Amendment ...
Overseas models for regulating the oil and gas sector, including their decommissioning regimes, are being carefully scrutinised as a potential template for New Zealand’s own sector, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. The Coalition Government is focused on rebuilding investor confidence in New Zealand’s energy sector as it looks to strengthen ...
Emergency Management and Recovery Minister Mark Mitchell has today released the Report of the Government Inquiry into the response to the North Island Severe Weather Events. “The report shows that New Zealand’s emergency management system is not fit-for-purpose and there are some significant gaps we need to address,” Mr Mitchell ...
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith is today travelling to Europe where he’ll update the United Nations Human Rights Council on the Government’s work to restore law and order. “Attending the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva provides us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while ...
Associate Agriculture Minister, Mark Patterson, formally reopened the world’s largest wool processing facility today in Awatoto, Napier, following a $50 million rebuild and refurbishment project. “The reopening of this facility will significantly lift the economic opportunities available to New Zealand’s wool sector, which already accounts for 20 per cent of ...
Hon Andrew Bayly, Minister for Small Business and Manufacturing At the Southland Otago Regional Engineering Collective (SOREC) Summit, 18 April, Dunedin Ngā mihi nui, Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Ko Whanganui aho Good Afternoon and thank you for inviting me to open your summit today. I am delighted ...
The Government is delivering on its commitment to bring back the Three Strikes legislation, Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee announced today. “Our Government is committed to restoring law and order and enforcing appropriate consequences on criminals. We are making it clear that repeat serious violent or sexual offending is not ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters has today announced four new diplomatic appointments for New Zealand’s overseas missions. “Our diplomats have a vital role in maintaining and protecting New Zealand’s interests around the world,” Mr Peters says. “I am pleased to announce the appointment of these senior diplomats from the ...
New Zealand is contributing NZ$7 million to support communities affected by severe food insecurity and other urgent humanitarian needs in Ethiopia and Somalia, Foreign Minister Rt Hon Winston Peters announced today. “Over 21 million people are in need of humanitarian assistance across Ethiopia, with a further 6.9 million people ...
Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Paul Goldsmith is congratulating Mataaho Collective for winning the Golden Lion for best participant in the main exhibition at the Venice Biennale. "Congratulations to the Mataaho Collective for winning one of the world's most prestigious art prizes at the Venice Biennale. “It is good ...
The Government is reforming financial services to improve access to home loans and other lending, and strengthen customer protections, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly and Housing Minister Chris Bishop announced today. “Our coalition Government is committed to rebuilding the economy and making life simpler by cutting red tape. We are ...
“China remains a strong commercial opportunity for Kiwi exporters as Chinese businesses and consumers continue to value our high-quality safe produce,” Trade and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay says. Mr McClay has returned to New Zealand following visits to Beijing, Harbin and Shanghai where he met ministers, governors and mayors and engaged in trade and agricultural events with the New ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has completed a successful trip to Singapore, Thailand and the Philippines, deepening relationships and capitalising on opportunities. Mr Luxon was accompanied by a business delegation and says the choice of countries represents the priority the New Zealand Government places on South East Asia, and our relationships in ...
New Zealand is demonstrating its commitment to reducing global greenhouse emissions, and supporting clean energy transition in South East Asia, through a contribution of NZ$41 million (US$25 million) in climate finance to the Asian Development Bank (ADB)-led Energy Transition Mechanism (ETM). Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Climate Change Minister Simon Watts announced ...
The Government is today releasing a list of organisations who received letters about the Fast-track applications process, says RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop. “Recently Ministers and agencies have received a series of OIA requests for a list of organisations to whom I wrote with information on applying to have a ...
Attorney-General Judith Collins today announced the appointment of Wellington Barrister David Jonathan Boldt as a Judge of the High Court, and the Honourable Justice Matthew Palmer as a Judge of the Court of Appeal. Justice Boldt graduated with an LLB from Victoria University of Wellington in 1990, and also holds ...
Education Minister Erica Stanford will lead the New Zealand delegation at the 2024 International Summit on the Teaching Profession (ISTP) held in Singapore. The delegation includes representatives from the Post Primary Teachers’ Association (PPTA) Te Wehengarua and the New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI) Te Riu Roa. The summit is co-hosted ...
A stopbank upgrade project in Tairawhiti partly funded by the Government has increased flood resilience for around 7000ha of residential and horticultural land so far, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones today attended a dawn service in Gisborne to mark the end of the first stage of the ...
Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters will represent the Government at Anzac Day commemorations on the Gallipoli Peninsula next week and engage with senior representatives of the Turkish government in Istanbul. “The Gallipoli campaign is a defining event in our history. It will be a privilege to share the occasion ...
Science, Innovation and Technology and Defence Minister Judith Collins will next week attend the OECD Science and Technology Ministerial conference in Paris and Anzac Day commemorations in Belgium. “Science, innovation and technology have a major role to play in rebuilding our economy and achieving better health, environmental and social outcomes ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon held a bilateral meeting today with the President of the Philippines, Ferdinand Marcos Jr. The Prime Minister was accompanied by MP Paulo Garcia, the first Filipino to be elected to a legislature outside the Philippines. During today’s meeting, Prime Minister Luxon and President Marcos Jr discussed opportunities to ...
The Government has announced that $20 million in funding will be made available to Westport to fund much needed flood protection around the town. This measure will significantly improve the resilience of the community, says Local Government Minister Simeon Brown. “The Westport community has already been allocated almost $3 million ...
The Government is proud to support the first ever Repco Supercars Championship event in Taupō as up to 70,000 motorsport fans attend the Taupō International Motorsport Park this weekend, says Economic Development Minister Melissa Lee. “Anticipation for the ITM Taupō Super400 is huge, with tickets and accommodation selling out weeks ...
Local Government Minister Simeon Brown has announced an increase to the Rates Rebate Scheme, putting money back into the pockets of low-income homeowners. “The coalition Government is committed to bringing down the cost of living for New Zealanders. That includes targeted support for those Kiwis who are doing things tough, such ...
The Coalition Government is investing in a project to boost survival rates of New Zealand mussels and grow the industry, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones has announced. “This project seeks to increase the resilience of our mussels and significantly boost the sector’s productivity,” Mr Jones says. “The project - ...
Benefit figures released today underscore the importance of the Government’s plan to rebuild the economy and have 50,000 fewer people on Jobseeker Support, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. “Benefit numbers are still significantly higher than when National was last in government, when there was about 70,000 fewer ...
The Government’s commitment to doubling New Zealand’s renewable energy capacity is backed by new data showing that clean energy has helped the country reach its lowest annual gross emissions since 1999, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. New Zealand’s latest Greenhouse Gas Inventory (1990-2022) published today, shows gross emissions fell ...
The Government is bringing the earthquake-prone building review forward, with work to start immediately, and extending the deadline for remediations by four years, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says. “Our Government is focused on rebuilding the economy. A key part of our plan is to cut red tape that ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and his Thai counterpart, Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin, have today agreed that New Zealand and the Kingdom of Thailand will upgrade the bilateral relationship to a Strategic Partnership by 2026. “New Zealand and Thailand have a lot to offer each other. We have a strong mutual desire to build ...
RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop and Transport Minister Simeon Brown have today announced the Coalition Government’s intention to extend port coastal permits for a further 20 years, providing port operators with certainty to continue their operations. “The introduction of the Resource Management Act in 1991 required ports to obtain coastal ...
Today’s announcement that inflation is down to 4 per cent is encouraging news for Kiwis, but there is more work to be done - underlining the importance of the Government’s plan to get the economy back on track, acting Finance Minister Chris Bishop says. “Inflation is now at 4 per ...
Refreshed health guidance released today will help parents and schools make informed decisions about whether their child needs to be in school, addressing one of the key issues affecting school attendance, says Associate Education Minister David Seymour. In recent years, consistently across all school terms, short-term illness or medical reasons ...
Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones is streamlining high-level oceans management while maintaining a focus on supporting the sector’s role in the export-led recovery of the economy. “I am working to realise the untapped potential of our fishing and aquaculture sector. To achieve that we need to be smarter with ...
I was initially resistant to the idea often suggested to me that the Government should deliver an arts strategy. The whole point of the arts and creativity is that people should do whatever the hell they want, unbound by the dictates of politicians in Wellington. Peter Jackson, Kiri Te Kanawa, Eleanor ...
Opinion by Lynley Hood. Forty years on from my 1985 Fulbright Grant, my disquiet over the war in Gaza evoked some troubling questions. The answer to my first question – What is the primary purpose of the Fulbright Programme? – was on the Fulbright NZ website. It says: US Senator, ...
The ministers responsible for green-lighting major projects need to be open about potential conflicts of interest, says Transparency International. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Anastasia Powell, Professor, Family and Sexual Violence, RMIT University It has been a particularly distressing start to the year. There is little that can ease the current grief of individuals, families and communities who have needlessly lost a loved one to men’s ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Gregory Moore, Senior Research Associate, School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, The University of Melbourne Lichen, the first described example of symbiosis.AdeJ Artventure/Shutterstock Once known only to those studying biology, the word symbiosis is now widely used. Symbiosis is the intimate ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kim Hemsley, Head, Childhood Dementia Research Group, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University Olena Ivanova/Shutterstock “Childhood” and “dementia” are two words we wish we didn’t have to use together. But sadly, around 1,400 ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Peter Whiteford, Professor, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University The government’s Economic Inclusion Advisory Committee has just published its second report. It was set up by Treasurer Jim Chalmers and Minister for Social Services Amanda Rishworth in 2022 to provide: ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Adrian Beaumont, Election Analyst (Psephologist) at The Conversation; and Honorary Associate, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne The Queensland state election will be held in October. A YouGov poll for The Courier Mail, conducted April 9–17 from a sample ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Amin Naeni, PhD candidate at Alfred Deakin Institute for Citizenship and Globalisation, Deakin University There’s been much talk in recent months about what a possible second Donald Trump presidency in the United States could mean for Europe, Russia’s war in Ukraine, the ...
A brief round-up of submissions on the controversial proposed law. This is an excerpt from our weekly environmental newsletter Future Proof. Sign up here. Last week, submissions on the controversial Fast-track Approvals Bill closed just hours after the government released a list of stakeholder organisations who were sent letters advising how they could ...
A poem from Robin Peace’s new collection Detritus of Empire: feather / grass / rock. Cereal giving I see a woman’s hands, see her curious hands break a stalk as she walks through the tall prairie, the savannah, the steppe, wherever it was. See her idly bite the grass that ...
The only published and available best-selling indie book chart in New Zealand is the top 10 sales list recorded every week at Unity Books’ stores in High St, Auckland, and Willis St, Wellington.AUCKLAND1 Hemingway’s Goblet by Dermot Ross (Mary Egan Publishing, $38)A handsomely produced (debossed cover, lovely ...
The Commissioner's decision validates the longstanding efforts of the local community and ensures that Awataha Marae will be managed to serve the needs of the local community, particularly for hosting tangihanga. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Tristan Salles, Associate professor, University of Sydney Examples of Australian landscapes.Unsplash Seventy thousand years ago, the sea level was much lower than today. Australia, along with New Guinea and Tasmania, formed a connected landmass known as Sahul. Around this time – ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Felicity Castagna, Lecturer, Creative Writing, Western Sydney University Day Day Market, ParramattaPhoto: Garry Trinh I live on the edge of Parramatta, Australia’s fastest-growing city, on the kind of old-fashioned suburban street that has 1950s fibros constructed in the post-war housing boom, ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michael Ryan, Teaching Fellow in Economics, University of Waikato GettyImagesfatido/Getty Images There is an ongoing global debate over whether the high inflation seen in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic can be lowered without a recession. New Zealand is not ...
The ‘Wicked Game’ heartthrob is in his late 60s now. That didn’t stop him putting on a lively, goofy and very sparkly show. Apart from ‘Wicked Game’, which graces a sultry playlist of mine simply called 💋, my last sustained Chris Isaak listening session took place when I was about ...
Analysis - Two ministers were stripped of portfolios in a warning to Cabinet, drama broke out at the Waitangi Tribunal, and the gang patch ban bill ran into opposition. ...
Tara Ward makes an impassioned plea for some vital pop culture merch. In April 1999, I became obsessed with a new reality television show called Popstars. Every Tuesday night, five strangers transformed into music royalty before my very eyes as Joe, Keri, Carly, Erika and Megan were chosen to form ...
PNG Post-Courier In the early hours of ANZAC Day, aerial photographs captured an impressive gathering of Australians and Papua New Guineans at Isurava in the Northern (Oro) Province. The solemn dawn service yesterday was held at a site steeped in history, where some of the fiercest battles of World War ...
The PSA is shocked that Oranga Tamariki has used the cost cutting drive to downgrade its commitment to Te Ao Māori and remove many specialist Māori roles. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ian Kemish, Adjunct Professor, School of Historical and Philosophical Inquiry, The University of Queensland There can be no more powerful symbol of the relationship between Australia and Papua New Guinea than the prime ministers of these neighbouring countries walking together on the ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sharon Robinson, Distinguished Professor and Deputy Director of ARC Securing Antarctica’s Environmental Future (SAEF), University of Wollongong, University of Wollongong Andrew Netherwood Over the last 25 years, the ozone hole which forming over Antarctica each spring has started to shrink. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Viktoria Kahui, Senior Lecturer in Environmental Economics, University of Otago Getty Images/Amy Toensing Biodiversity is declining at rates unprecedented in human history. This suggests the ways we currently use to manage our natural environment are failing. One emerging concept focuses on ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Timothy Colin Bednall, Associate Professor in Management, Swinburne University of Technology marvent/Shutterstock Finding the best person to fill a position can be tough, from drafting a job ad to producing a shortlist of top interview candidates. Employers typically consider information from ...
Wondering where to host your next BYO? Whether its a small gathering or a massive party, we’ve got some recommendations. I was first introduced to the concept of BYOs at Dunedin’s India Gardens, a legendary but sadly defunct establishment, which purveyed enormous quantities of mango chicken to Aotearoa’s drunkest future ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Julien Cooper, Honorary Lecturer, Department of History and Archaeology, Macquarie University Julien Cooper The hyper-arid desert of Eastern Sudan, the Atbai Desert, seems like an unlikely place to find evidence of ancient cattle herders. But in this dry environment, my new ...
The sector says it’s hopeful her replacement Paul Goldsmith will be able to throw it a lifeline, after six months with a minister deemed missing in action, writes Catherine McGregor in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign ...
The government can't just rely on axing public sector jobs and has to do more to cut spending, says the chief economist at a free market think tank. ...
Rock The Vote NZ, known for its advocacy for minor party unity and its role within the Freedoms NZ Coalition during the 2023 General Election, celebrates this merger as a strategic enhancement of its operational strength and outreach. ...
Nearly everyone has experienced the frustration of something you use breaking and being difficult or expensive to fix. Proposed legislation could change that. It’s been raining on and off all Sunday afternoon but people are lining up outside a building in a corner of Gribblehirst Park in Sandringham, Auckland. In ...
What does a forever relationship look like when you don’t believe in marriage? And how do you celebrate it? This essay is part of our Sunday Essay series, made possible thanks to the support of Creative New Zealand.I’m going to do it, right now. I’m going to say ...
The Prime Minister has committed to resuming direct flights to Thailand. But it’s not a promise he will be able to deliver on anytime soon. The post Prime Minister jumps the gun in Thailand appeared first on Newsroom. ...
It’s not that long ago Eliza McCartney was seriously wondering if the Paris Olympics would be her pole vaulting swansong. After years of being hounded by injury after injury, the Rio Olympics bronze medallist was still confident she would compete at her second Olympics in Paris in July, unless something ...
FICTION 1 Take Two by Danielle Hawkins (Allen & Unwin, $36.99) There’s commercial fiction, like this book, and then there’s quality fiction, quality writers, quality literature; the forthcoming Auckland Writers Festival is full of quality, and ReadingRoom has two tickets to give away to the following events: Paul Lynch (Dublin ...
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A[quiz],DIV[quiz],A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Friday 26 April appeared first on Newsroom. ...
You can’t have missed the Gallipoli story as the movies, documentaries, essays and books capture what it was like for New Zealand troops in their eight-month campaign on the Peninsula. But this Anzac Day the Auckland War Memorial Museum has published a book that sheds light on a little-known aspect of the ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra In the free-for-all between the Australian government and Big Tech boss Elon Musk this week, the government had to be on a winner. Most people would have little sympathy with Musk’s vociferous opposition to ...
Asia Pacific Report Chief Mandla Mandela, a member of the National Assembly of South Africa and Nelson Mandela’s grandson, has joined the Freedom Flotilla in istanbul as the ships prepare to sail for Gaza, reports Kia Ora Gaza. Mandela is also the ambassador for the Global Campaign to Return to ...
Pacific Media Watch Journalists who report on environmental issues are encountering growing difficulties in many parts of the world, reports Reporters Without Borders. According to the tally kept by RSF, 200 journalists have been subjected to threats and physical violence, including murder, in the past 10 years because they were ...
Analysis by Dr Bryce Edwards, Democracy Project (https://democracyproject.nz)Political scientist, Dr Bryce Edwards. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has surprised everyone with his ruthlessness in sacking two of his ministers from their crucial portfolios. Removing ministers for poor performance after only five months in the job just doesn’t normally happen in ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By John Hawkins, Senior Lecturer, Canberra School of Politics, Economics and Society, University of Canberra BagzhanSadvakassov/Upsplash, CC BY-SA Australia’s inflation rate has fallen for the fifth successive quarter, and it’s now less than half of what it was back in late 2022. ...
ACT's Rural Communities and Veterans spokesman Mark Cameron responds to cancellations and protests of ANZAC Day commemorations in Wellington. He says, "These pitiful attempts to detract from ANZAC Day are not at all indicative of the feelings of mainstream ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Meighen McCrae, Associate Professor of Strategic & Defence Studies, Australian National University American and Australian stretcher bearers working together near the front line during the Battle of Hamel in 1918.Australian War Memorial While the AUKUS alliance is new, the Australian-American partnership ...
Pōneke based peace activists staged a silent protest at the ANZAC day service to highlight New Zealand’s complicity in war and genocide, and urge the government to take concrete steps to stop the genocide in Palestine. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Magdalena M.E. Bunbury, Postdoctoral Researcher, James Cook University Burial with a horse at the Rákóczifalva site, Hungary (8th century AD).Sándor Hegedűs, Hungarian National Museum, CC BY How do we understand past societies? For centuries, our main sources of information have been ...
Amanda Thompson doesn’t really do Anzac Day. But what she does do is remember the people she knew who had a lifetime to remember stuff they didn’t really want to, because of a war they didn’t ask for. And she does make Anzac biscuits.First published in 2021.All my ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kathryn Willis, Postdoctoral Researcher, CSIRO Xavier Boulenger/Shutterstock In the two decades to 2019, global plastic production doubled. By 2040, plastic manufacturing and processing could consume as much as 20% of global oil production and use up 15% of the annual carbon ...
With our collective remembrance, and steadfast belief in our common humanity, we strengthen our hope and resolve to do what we can to foster dialogue and understanding, and to heal divisions in our pursuit of peace. ...
Principal reasons for the opposition is the loss of the public’s democratic right to have “a fair say” and the vital need for a government free from corruption, said Casey Cravens of Dunedin, president of the New Zealand Federation of Freshwater ...
Never mind the scoreboard – in the 2000 Bledisloe Cup decider, the real trans-Tasman battle was won before kickoff.First published in 2016. The dawn of the new millennium was a dark time for the All Blacks. Their final game pre-Y2K was a 22-18 loss to South Africa in the ...
I’m on the wrong side of 40, I never pursued creative work and now my job is killing my soul. Help! Want Hera’s help? Email your problem to helpme@thespinoff.co.nzDear Hera,May I start with the least original conversation opener you’re likely to hear around the motu at the moment, particularly in Wellington: ...
“Never again - No AUKUS” was the message of the wreath laid at this morning’s national ANZAC Day commemorative service at Pukeahu National War Memorial Park this morning by the Stop AUKUS group. ...
Until this month, Auckland swimmer Hazel Ouwehand had never met a qualifying time in an Olympic event for a New Zealand team, even as a junior. Now she’s very likely off to the Paris Olympics after swimming well under the qualifying standard in the 100m butterfly twice – both in ...
While Anzac Day has experienced a resurgence in recent years, our other day of remembrance has slowly faded from view.The Sunday Essay is made possible thanks to the support of Creative New Zealand. Original illustrations by Hope McConnell.First published in 2022.The high school’s head girl and ...
Time for left voters to vote smarter – strategically using electorate candidate votes – Auck Central, ohariu, Epsom
Every seat counts
+100 Gruntie…and this list is a very concise Electorate Vote Guide for those who want a Left coalition WIN ! ( should be printed everywhere imo)
http://thedailyblog.co.nz/2014/09/03/the-daily-blog-2014-progressive-voter-guide-who-to-vote-for-to-change-the-government/
Gruntee
I agree with the need for strategic voting in Epsom & Ohariu, but don’t see the real advantage of it in Auckland Central. Kaye is 19th on the Nat list, and Ardern 5th on Labour’s making them both both all but certain to be returned to parliament.
http://www.elections.org.nz/events/2014-general-election/information-voters-who-when-and-where/2014-general-election-party-lists
If Labour get a party vote number near the lower end of the current polling, and the Ipredict numbers are anywhere near correct for the electorates it is quite possible for Jacinda Arden to be looking for a new job after 20 September unless she was to win Auckland Central. Labour could end up with only a single List MP.
Not likely perhaps but certainly well within the bounds of possibility.
alwyn
I am very sceptical about polls and especially Ipredict (which I see has Kaye at 92.4%), even more so after the Hagar book. But; unless there is a mass migration of party votes to the GP or IMPs while those party’s electorate votes all go to LP so creating an overhang, even if Ardern misses out that won’t affect the parliamentary math.
Whereas in Ōhariu and Epsom, a coordinated vote against UF & ACT respectively will remove that party from parliament and lead to their votes being redistributed.
This is interesting, though should be viewed with caution being the bastard fruit of; Roy Morgan polls, Ipredict & “Qrious” (“…better use of information to provide insights that are actionable”):
http://www.electionresults.co.nz/split-voting-could-deliver-surprises
Showing Ōhariu having about quarter of its votes likely to be split between party and candidate. But Epsom only having around a fifth of intended split votes (the chart scale is a bit hard to read, and there is no precise data nor confidence intervals). Fortunately, Clutha-Southland is one of the lowest split-voting electorates, so it doesn’t look like ACT will be getting in through the backdoor.
I quite agree that there seems to be no advantage to so-called “strategic” voting in Auckland Central, and indeed almost all of your comment.
The only thing I was commenting on was the bit where you say
“Ardern 5th on Labour’s making … all but certain to be returned to parliament”
I used Ipredict because it is about the only way for someone, other than the National and Labour Organisations, to get any real idea of how the electorates may go. They have 27 where the Labour candidate is the favourite. For Arden to get in off the list Labour need to get 29 seats (allowing for Parker taking number 28) which is about 24.2%. Of the 11 polls published this month the lowest 4 were 23.8%, 24.1%, 24.3% and 24.6%. These would all have her on the cusp. The others were mostly around 26% where she is well home.
I wasn’t disagreeing with your view on where strategic voting applies. I shall have a look at the referenced material later. I have to go out.
Incidentally if that is the slogan of Qrious I think I am going to enjoy it.
Excellent article by Lucy Lawless about child poverty.
Some highlights.
“If you don’t want your taxes to help feed poor kids, think again — we’re all already paying a big price.”
“Last week Nigel Latta’s show on the social cost of sugar consumption showed a surgical team extracting the teeth of a 2-year-old child because the mother had been putting Coca Cola in the baby’s bottle. So we are in equal parts horrified by sugar and the stupidity of the mother. But this kind of ignorance is part and parcel of poverty. It steals care, imagination and patience, which hampers the growing child with a whole constellation of impediments.”
http://m.nzherald.co.nz/editors-picks/news/article.cfm?c_id=1503539&objectid=11323015
Capitalism is dead.
Iit only survives when others are made to pay the benefits of others.
Scotland is gojng to vote to leave a corrupt capitalistic policy of Westminster.
There is a case in law where in thye bearly 1900s a rule in USA was made as the blood of the workers is the price of progress.
This standard was used in a aircrarft comapny dispute in Washigton state in 2002.
Beginning of the decline of capitalism.
Scots are very socialistic and this is good, as the Global n clock has turned to rght wing causing a great rift in the gap between the rich and the poor.
For instance the Tories in Westminister to get inot their second term boosted the Lndon realestate market and inflating a red hot property boom speculation to make the large voting block feel the tories were good for them.
Key has repeated this here to buy votes in our largest voting block, and dragging 170 000 chinese into the pot so torries are very dangerous for NZ.
We need to come back to the 1970s where compassion ruled over capital interests
Hardly.
As I write, hundreds if not thousands of computer programs are busy calculating the odds of a “yes” vote and making investments accordingly at a pace that no human being could hope to keep up with. That’s what capitalism looks like now.
Whether or not Salmond manages to establish some form of social democracy in an independent Scotland (and I hope he does), those systems will have an immense effect on how much his government is able to fund. They’ll simply incorporate independence into their set of parameters and look once more to see how much they can screw us out of.
if scotland does hive off..
..cameron will go into the history books as cameron-the-loser..
..he lost scotland..
..and milliband will be gutted..
..as britain will then be tory forever..
If I were Scottish, I would vote “yes”.
Me too.
for selfish reasons i want a yes vote..
..as..going on shout-outs to the diaspora.. i will likely gain a european citizenship option..
I would be happy but very surprised if Scotland voted for independence. My countrymen and women are canny, cautious folk and would rather just change things a wee bit rather than a wholesale transformation. Enhanced devolution would have won comfortably, which is why the feart Tories did not offer it as an option, but are now panicked into offering it up regardless of whether those voting ‘no’ actually want it …
Incidentally, the suggestion that Scotland is some sort of socialist paradise is misleading. As recently as 1955, the Scottish Unionists were able to win an outright majority of the vote (by a whisker). Obviously, things have changed and the Conservatives can only muster a single Scottish seat at Westminster; but Scotland is more characterised as anti-Conservative than actually socialist.
i dunno lurgee..
..one of salmonds main planks for change is ‘a fairer society’..
..and a country so resolutely labour must move in that direction..
..you’d think..?
If I were Scottish, I would vote “yes”.
Me too. Bugger the repercussions!
What happens about money then. Can they keep on using British money and circulate it within Scotland but the Brits won’t integrate it within their system?
Will they use Euros for cross-border transactions? Perhaps they will strike a bawbee representing a Scottish dollar.
I like your enthusiasm Local Kiwi!
I read this article recently, from Australia, that is similar to what has happened here. It’s a bit depressing, says that politics is now “consumed”…..there has been a change from being a voter to consumer (e.g. of Brand Key). Does place the whole dirty politics saga into a “political marketing” perspective. (smarmy term I know, and pure spin…….but also a way to express what we are in the middle of).
http://theconversation.com/democracy-is-dead-long-live-political-marketing-2666
I watched Lucy Lawless on Back Benches being interviewed. I was not impressed with her answers at all. Take a look here to see what I mean:
http://www.primetv.co.nz/Default.aspx?tabid=93&art_id=8359
That’s an hour long, can you give some clues to where she is?
No, sorry, I can’t unless I watch it all over again. I don’t think you can do forwarding on that video for some reason! I couldn’t! I watched it live on Wednesday. Lucy Lawless was less than impressive for me. I had better impression of her before that programme.
Heres our reflection on why
Scots are very socialistic and this is good, as the Global n clock has turned to rght wing causing a great rift in the gap between the rich and the poor.
For instance the Tories in Westminister to get inot their second term boosted the Lndon realestate market and inflating a red hot property boom speculation to make the large voting block feel the tories were good for them.
Key has repeated this here to buy votes in our largest voting block, and dragging 170 000 chinese into the pot so torries are very dangerous for NZ.
We need to come back to the 1970s where compassion ruled over capital interests
Indebted we are to the NZ Herald for its reminder of what a happy little people we are in the leadup to next weekend’s coronation !
We have a king and we have a prince and the selfie and the walkabout.
There is ‘high charm’ and the king/prince gets ‘mobbed’ by the ‘feverish crowd’. Helpers ‘chirp’ and a selfie subject ‘quips’ and the king/prince says “gidday, how are you ?”
“It’s not always about the money” notes the king/prince – adding that he wasn’t ruling out a ‘break’ for the rich. All the while the king/prince shows ‘ease’ – he is ‘guileless’ – ‘rotten-ethics’ are far far away.
“Awwwh…….how beautiful !” scribbles the beaming Herald reporter as he jumps in his little Noddy car and off to his gingerbread house.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11323732
Compromised media
I am so sick of the Herald, and media.
Does anyone know how many (so called) journalists have immediate family members as MPs in NZ?
How many of these so called journalists are from National?
How many of these so called journslists are from Labour?
How many of these so called journalists are from any other political party?
The Herald *broke* the story about Slater vs Blomfield yesterday evening, BELOW a non story, with a BIGGER picture of Len Brown. No content to story, but just to remind readers that Len Brown had an affair. I mean please…..news or history book?
“..Why We Need Vegans Now More Than Ever..
Veganism confronts the most pressing issues of our time:
– corporate power – destruction of the planet –
– and the ethics of violence..”
(cont..)
http://www.alternet.org/food/why-we-need-vegans-now-more-ever
Why is it that we have to exempt the family home from capital gains tax. I have a family home and I don’t mind paying a portion of my capital gains (on sale where lawyers are already involved).
Then we can have a bit more money to pay for those that can’t afford a home and to avoid creating a massive loophole that every rich person with an expensive accountant will waltz through.
If the electorate is intelligent it could be easily sold as offsetting some income tax in the key areas that one might be worried about.
But Labour has to write a 30 page document to ensure us somewhat rich people can stay in the club with the very rich ones and avoid paying tax.
Because it would make changing houses much more expensive for regular families, who don’t use houses as a source of profit, but as machines for living in.
Yes I suppose it discourages mobility between houses for the richer half of us*. But tax always has that sort of a disincentive effect. It also gives us money back in our income that should offset that for most people who don’t own multiple properties.
I would see it as paying what would effectively be an increased level of “rates” and in exchange getting a lower income tax.
Maybe the issue is that effectively the people would be paying the tax in a lump sum when moving houses as opposed to spread out, like the income tax break that offsets it would be?
If so one could work out a method of spreading it out – I do however see that might be harder to sell.
* I say this as an Aucklander. Here – if you have a property you probably have several hundred thousand in equity in it. Far more than any of your renting friend’s total assets.
If every house attracted a CGT upon sale, there would be no perceived extra expense for people selling their home. Everyone would essentially be in the same boat – much like a is now.
But with no CGT, there is a slight financial or market advantage conferred upon people wishing to change home.
Why is it do right wing nut jobs always moan about tax? There is this silly argument it should be fairer, but when ever they say fair, the mean the rich should pay less tax.
For the record to any neo-liberals out there – you economics failed at the end of the 19th century and your second bite at the apple, has really proven you’re lacking in ideas, smarts, or indeed the basic skills in running an economy.
Add the main reason.
“It would cost us the vote of 98% of all the New Zealand voters who own their own home and we would never be in Government again”.
I agree! I just don’t get why people moan about taxes, but are happy (well, compelled and just do pay) to pay fixed costs such as conveyancing fees and estate agent fees on the sale of a property.
People pay these other fixed costs because they have to, but where there is room to negotiate/lobby we fight tooth and nail against a capital gains tax.
*****bright idea: let’s nationalize estate agents!!!!!*******
I don’t particularly think that the fees that estate agents receive are commensurate to the marketing they do. I dont think they are fair. But do we see the populace up in arms?
There are so many other anomalies with our attitude toward taxes – fighting against raises in local council rates, but have larger amounts of tax taken out on our income, when local taxes are way more transparent and give local services that we can use (Mangawhai etc examples excluded of course).
Dirty tricks time.
Audrey Young with the beatup about Greens “courting” National, where in reality Greens have not changed their position about working with National in several years. History shows that Labour “works” with National too, when the two parties happen to agree!
Prominence to Craig as well from Herald. Deliberate? I’m sure it would suit National very well to have the Conservatives in, no matter how loopy they are. The party is not making any demands on National, and would allow National to effectively govern alone.
Expect more attacks on Greens, and encouragement of Conservatives in the final days of the campaign
This is the best article I have read about our corrupt media and their role in the support of Key’s government
This is is how it starts.
“Here we sit just a week out from an election. It’s a week in which you face a stark choice. Three more years of smile and wave dirty politics or a new direction
It’s important to remember that, despite how awesome you think John Key may be, he is a liar. He has spent the last six years creating and maintaining a network of bloggers and public relations people whose job was to manipulate the media and the general public to believing what he wants them to believe. All the time Key has managed this negative network he has maintained his smile & wave public persona..”
http://boonman.wordpress.com/2014/09/13/a-manufactured-consent/
Questions must be asked here
While John Key as PM secretly attends a Nazi founded Global Elite corporate power control secret society 2011-12 without telling us all.
The bilderberg Group seeks to totallly control the world with their global Government.
He is a very dangerous individual by no coming clean and explian why he attended the Bilderberg group and that he maliciously conspired once before to undermine our currency and economy in 1987 when Lange took power again.
Key partnered NY mst aggressive currency Forex trader Andy Kieger to make big millions on underminig our country.
Now he runs this country so if the MSM dont care we should be worried.
Can you substantiate this grotesque madness?
The Bilderberg Group was founded by Joseph Retinger, who was part of the Polish Government in Exile in WW2, and who even parachuted into Poland late in the war to organise the resistance to the Nazis.
You might not like their ideas but =/= Nazis, expect in the demented world of the paranoid, conspiratorialist and insane.
If you are going to start howling “Nazi” at people, you’d better be able to prove it. Otherwise, piss off with your crazed diatribes. You’re only a whisker away from “The JOOOOOOOWZ control the whole world.”
I won’t even bother with the claim about what Bilderberg’s goals are.
Lurgee
You have your facts wrong and spin set by the global elite.
Fact, The Nazi hieracy constructed the blueprint for this sercet society, and carried it forward in 1943.
This was in place so if Germany lost the war they were thereb to revive Nazi idology so dont believe you are right because a pole staightened the world out.
(Queen Beatrix Holland royality) family connect to Nazi Party has been head for many years.
Why was Key there and didnt tell the country why so yoou may be happy with secret societies as bilderberg is but we all know better so we call your assesstions bunk.
Can you prove a semi-credible source to back up your ASTOUNDING CLAIMS?
Or have they all been ‘censored’ by the Nazi-Lizards?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilderberg_Group
1954 rather than 1943 and it was organised by Retinger to stop anti-Americanism. After reading up on Retinger I’d say that his is not to be trusted. Not because he was dishonest but because seems to have become a US sycophant.
IMO, there’s no reason for the Bilderberg Group to continue to exist if there was any reason at all.
Thanks for linking to a concise and excellent read Paul.
Reckon the post is worth a thread of its own ( L Prent ?) as the issues covered are so fundamental, so succinctly expressed and, most importantly, targeted to soft National voters who still believe in the cult of Key.
We should all share this article with all our contacts.
I agree, but I guess Lyn would have to get permission from whoever wrote it. Maybe if you emailed both of them and tried to get the ball rolling?
I’ll ask.
I’m just wondering why some of my comments are disappearing today, is there some active moderation going on? If so I would have thought that there were more deserving comments on the blog for deletion than mine.
comments don’t usually get removed without an author making a visible note. I would in the first instance assume a bug rather than active moderation.
Do you mean disappearing, or not appearing?
if the latter, sometimes comments drop randomly into the spam or moderation. Nothing to do with active moderation or the commenter or the content.
I sometimes get this coming up under website ‘http://deleted’.
But no, some of my comments are going up and then later disappearing. If it’s a bug, it’s a peculiar one.
Fixed that bug (??) last week. It was happening to anyone who had a URL in their header (like http://deleted).
Turned out that there was a difference between
// text
and
//text
In the auto-moderation list. There was no apparent reason why
Rich, 3 of your comments are sitting waiting for moderation – best I leave it for Lynn to sort out, so he can see what’s happening, and maybe sort out any bug.
I can’t see any reason why they’ve gone into moderation.
[lprent: I couldn’t see a reason. Released and I’ll see if any others do. ]
ok thanks Karol.
+100 Paul @6.1…and good link to boonman
Dirty Tricks , I like the title
The greens abandoning labour must take the cake , any prospect of these two working in harmony together, in an atmosphere of TRUST has gone out the window .
Remember just last week labour / greens ,”National ” , the party of dirty tricks , today the greens , ” we have worked with them in the past and can do so in the future “.
Labour has been left high and dry .
Rich the other.
Picking or trolling are you.
The media attack of diry politics sent this filth and you are parroting them so who pays you to parrot. Troll somewhere else and ask key why he faileed to tell us he is rubbing shoulders with a Nazi based Group Bilderberg while you bare pocking around.
Rich t’other
‘take the cake’….’gone out the window’..’working in harmony’..’high and dry..’
Anymore Crosby Textor meaningless cliches you can string together to try to upset the applecart or put cats among the pigeons?
Oh for some reasoned debate!
“Greens have not changed their position about working with National in several years”
That is not the point. The point is the TIMING of the announcement 8 days before the election indirectly talking up the Nats and on the day their poll rating fell significantly. Remember also that hundreds of thousands have already voted early and with the push for early voting given by the Green machine, most of those votes would probably have gone to the Greens already and I suspect many of those green voters would be ex Labour people. This move by the Greens has harmed Labour and put soured the left progressive movement.
Luckily Cunliffe and the Labour leadership have been remarkably patient and wise.
Do you really believe this?
Have you read Hager’s book?
Affirmative to both of your questions.
And you did not address any of the points I made in my comment.
norman has said he has flushed out key..
..showing those national party voters who care about child-poverty..(and not all national party voters are uncaring about poverty..and the environment..)..
..that those voters can now see that key will do nothing for the environment..
..and that key has refused to take part in a cross-party grouping to end child-poverty..
..shows those national party voters who care..
..that key will also do nothing to end child-poverty..
..and that the greens are a safe alternative-vote for them..
..and good pre-positioning b4 the greenwald revelations..
..you’d think..?
100+ Clemgeopin
Attacks on the green are presumably to scare voters who might vote Labour into voting NZ first or National. They are quite likely to help the Greens vs Labour so help the Greens overall.
Supporting the Conservatives on the other hand will be a much simpler equation although most of the soft conservative vote has already gone because if you add NZfirst and Conservatives together they are probably looking at 13% maybe more.
Regardless the Conservatives have a decent chance of making it in on current numbers. This is because like NZfirst, I suspect they will over perform. For one thing – many will be embarrassed to say they support conservatives in a poll that may be even more pronounced than with NZfirst.
Key : DOING WHAT HE HAS TO DO TO PROTECT NZERS
Get a you know what up ya
The arrogance of the prick its the fault of people in his industry that we are in a position of having a social welfare system anway
Every since I can remember shit like him have freeloaded off the workers
They have had the arrogance to say you work for me and Ill have the right to pay you what I please its my money
YEAH RIGHT
People who live off the production of a country but actually dont produce anything of value financiers benificiaries junk merchants that prey on societies weaknesses
Geat real The finance system is what is wrong
Yep, the biggest bludgers in history are the rich who live on income produced by others.
Sorry Scott, Dont agree with you, as most have now seen Conservatives turn right and lay off keys policies. People are brighter than your appear to beieve.
Best you learn about the Global corporate Manipulation of the polls to learn the 1.4million sites confirming poll corruption globally go to Can polls be manipulated. on goggle. dont waste our time with these assertions the polls are correct.
Local Kiwi,
Don’t agree if you want.
But I do know about polls. I usually guess the result of elections globally and my record at those guesses is very good.
Scott1
you don’t know what we know unless you are a group of folks who have been called by the pollsters and after going through the phone interview after agreeing if we can have the “supervisor listen in as well! then after confirming in all our cases so far that the age was acceptable along with basic questions we went into a series of ten questions and three parts though they just broke off the poll and hung-up.
We have complained about the pollsters and spoken to other pooling companies that are known to be more accurate band they said we have not been polled correctly.
So we know more about the real pollsters unlike you, so read the sites please and learn!
cunnliffe just confirmed labour will do nothing for the childless-poor..
..when asked if he will raise benefit-levels..
..cunnliffe said they will raise at inflation levels..the same as key/national do..
..but that ‘the financial-surplus’ is the more important for labour..
..so the childless-poor are the forgotten/the outsiders/the ignored..for this election..(as children in poverty were so studiously ignored in 2011..)
..and this by yet another labour govt..?
..fuck them..!..
..vote for the parties that have universal basic income policies..
..internet/mana..and the greens..
..i mean..even the fucken conservatives have a policy (first twenty grand tax-free) that will help the childless-poor more than labour would..(!)
..w.t.f..!
So vote Green or Mana
i am just disgusted that labour seem to have learnt nothing from the mistakes/’wrongs’ of their last time in govt..
..they still just don’t fucken care…
..and will leave large numbers of new zealanders living in grinding poverty..
.as i said..fuck them..!
I would say first thing would be to get the representative of ‘capital looking for a manipulated good return’ out of office first and then work on Labour’s chronic lack of attention to the poor over the last 40 or so years.
National has a policy of not having any policy.
I was listening to the radio when they asked Bill English what his new idea was for the next term to help the country. His answer, aside from dodging the question, was basically – “we don’t need new ideas”.
Family capitalism’s insidious return: How billionaires are undermining America
Which we see regularly from National MPs and their supporters seem to see them the same way.
I was interested to hear that Boris Johnston in London is up for an MP, even PM status, against some Olympian sportsperson. As if being able to control and conquer ones own body to reach an individual physical goal with the mental being totally self-oriented and single-outcome focussed, fits you for a life of interaction with others.
It does not automatically make you excellent at helping to run things for the community, making the right things happen and actually understanding and responding to what the community needs and wants. Also how to spread finances fairly in a balanced way.
Probably neither Boris Johnston nor the other are really good at it. But Boris has had some practice. It seems often that sportspeople are individualistic, right-wing in their approach. They are basically entrepreneurs, working as a sole trader with their own lives and doings, seem to have a permanent narrow focus, and only respect other similarly obssessed types.
Not forgetting Sir Edmund Hillary. But sometimes it is easier to assist those obviously in need in another country. When at home the tail of society becomes an object of derision, just backside wool that a shearer wants to clear from dirtying the major and valuable fleece.
Excellent comment, got me thinking a little more on an icon.
As for Johnston, he’s a right wing populist. I’m not sure why capital is still dealing with guys like that, but I guess they go on more recent Chilean examples rather than earlier European ones.
I seem to have had my first post deleted for mentioning capital and its attraction to right wing populists. Interesting point regarding Hillary, has got me thinking.
Rich 11.26
Hi I don’t think your comment would have been deleted here. If you do a search of your stuff you might find it has turned up in further down than where you expected.
Yes I’ve looked warbler. No they’re definitely disappearing today, I had one go on the ‘Working Poor’ as well, there were only 3 comments there one of them from me suggesting that poverty was policy. That one’s gone.
glenn greenwald said the gcsb are engaged in mass-surveillance of nz’ers..
..and that they/we also spy on friendly nations..for the americans..
..oh.well..!..that’s the seat on the un security council flushed down the loo..
..eh..?
Audrey Young, August 20, 2013:
Good sound bite for the moment from Donkey. The next moment there would be a different situation. We have to understand these are fast moving times and we have to adjust, be flexible or pass away. Possibly under a bulldozer as in Israel and China and sundry other places.
phip ure
I’m notingthat I understood your points in the previous comment well. And have adjusted to your prose style over a period of orientation! Just not too long please.
What about breaking a long one into paragraphs with central themes. You come out with good stuff so help us with readability.
Did I hear this right??? Russell Norman saying “we have been the opposition this time” Not a direct quote…………………..what is this about???? So Grant Robertson did nothing re Judith Collins and Oravida????? Chris Hipkins versus Hekia and I can name many more.
As a Labour person, I have always been supportive of the Greens, but I am starting to get a bit sick of this. By all means challenge National (and I would much rather Norman had of said there is not way we want anything to do with National).
There are quite a few people have commented in the past that The Greens were the more effective opposition party – that was particularly said during Shearer’s time as leader. Cunliffe has pulled it back quite a bit since he took over leadership.
i saw it lose focus after harre left..
I also think it’s about the Greens feeling they’ve been under-rated, and maybe been taken for granted a bit much by others, including Labour.
I think the Greens are staking their claim for a strong role in a Labour-Green government. Also, interesting that Cunliffe would not rule out Metiria & Norman as deputy PMs on The Nation today.
It’s about jockeying for position.
Thanks Karol. I always appreciate your very even handed approach.
As a Labour voter who rejected Rogernomics, I cameback to Labour because of Cunliffe.
I think he has run a great campaign. Being very clear about who he will and won’t work with.
10 Reasons to vote Cunliffe (Labour)
1 He has experience in govt and as a Cabinet Minister (and was very effective).
2 He speaks Te Reo
3 He has a business background (this is important for NZ to create good jobs)
4 He admits mistakes and repairs them.
5 He apologized to the woman’s refuge for being a man
6 He has background as a diplomat
7 He promoted his caucus based on merit and didn’t appear to hold grudges (e.g. Annette King), nor did he make Shane or Grant deputy, he chose who he thought was best.
8. He withstood a lot of crap from his own party (Shearer demoting him, sucked it up and got on with being an effective spokeperson for fisheries).
9. He imo has developed the most comprehensive and costed out set of policies (and the really important bit about this is they take Labour back to their roots, inreasing wages, workers rights, Best start (family benefit), Kiwibuild (that’s just a few).
10. He has withstood extremely negative publicity through MSM including smears such as the Dong Liu letter, whale oi, Armstrong “reign!” etc, etec, etc.
Actually there are probably another ten reasons to vote Cunliffe. I may post again!
I wish all parties on the left all the best on 20th Sept. I am very glad they will be lead if successful by DC!
7
I think DC will be an excellent PM. I gave my electorate vote to him in the last few elections. I will give Carmel Sepuloni my electorate vote this election, plus will party vote Green.
I still think Labour needs the Greens influence to keep them on track on poverty, etc. Labour still has a way to go before I will vote for them again.
I have noticed (via tweets from Green people during leader debates) that The Greens were putting the case that they should have been in the leader debates with Key & Cunliffe. I can see their point as any change of government will be a Labour-Green one.
I think they are just putting the case for them to be given more visibility in the election as part of any possible change in government.
It’s a jockeying for position, that I don’t think should be exaggerated as some fragmentation of the left block.
We, the foot soldiers and followers, need to stick together.
I agree Labour needs the Greens’ influence – although I think Labour needs them more for their environmental and conservation strength.
Disagree about “they should have been in the leadership debates”.
– Norman isn’t going to be PM. This was about who would be PM.
– If as I suspect NZFirst gets 9%, Peters could expect to be in the “leadership” debate as well. Too messy.
” – Norman isn’t going to be PM. This was about who would be PM.”
I probably don’t care too much whether Norman/Turei were included or not, but I don’t agree that the debates should be about who is PM. Fuck the glorification of the leader. This should be about policy and team work, and the leaders of parties, not the leader of NZ.
+100 anker 13.2.1…the Left Coalition must remain staunch!…Cunliffe will be a great leader of the Left coalition !.
After working for the Greens campaign and donating to the Greens ( and hopefully getting votes for the Greens) …I am seriously considering giving my Party vote to Internet MANA…mainly because of Laila Harre , who I admire enormously…(but also Hone Harawira , Annette Sykes and John Minto…and Int MANA policies …also Kim Dotcom, now a New Zealander imo , fighting corruption)..my Electorate vote goes to the Labour candidate who is exceptionally good
…We live in crucial times for New Zealand and the Internet MANA party is leading the charge 1.) against John Key, Nact corruption, sell out to overseas big business and an Orwellian surveillance state… and 2.) for defending Democracy for New Zealand ….and for New Zealanders to keep control of their own country….
i know numbers of people on the Left who are having trouble deciding which party to Party vote for….but any vote for Labour, Greens , Internet Mana….and even Wini NZF….is a good vote imo.
We MUST ALL VOTE!…and encourage everyone we know to VOTE!
NZF isn’t a vote to change the govt. It’s a vote to give Peters a choice on which govt we have.
There a pros and cons for each of the 3 leftwing parties. Bear in mind that if the GP get too few MPs, we will have a centrist govt not a left wing one, irrespective of how many MPs IMP get (IMP will not be part of govt). The closer the numbers between NZF and the GP, the less influence the GP will have.
NZF have said they won’t work with IMP, so the question becomes whether a L/GP/NZF coalition will allow the IMP much power or whether it reject them and thus build antagonism over the first term (due to Peters).
I’ve been very tempted to vote for the IMP, because they’re doing great things, and because of Harre, and because we need more progressive voices that will actively work for change in parliament. I’d love to see Miriam Pierard as an MP. But I also think there is a real danger here that IMP votes at the expense of the GP will leave the GP with too little oopmph in the actual govt, and that’s where we need it most this time round. There is a real opportunity at this election to not just get a left wing govt, but get one that is more left wing than centrist. That will only happen with a strong GP presence.
@Chooky: I agree. I would happily vote for Internet-Mana, except that I want to have a strong Labour presence in the next government for long term survival of the coalition and they now need every party vote they can get as the polls indicate.
NZF is also a good option for those wavering, for various reasons from quite a different point of view.
I know where you are coming from Chooky. I have been impressed by InternetMana from the moment they unveiled Laila Harre as Internet Party leader. They are bringing some excitement back into politics and I think a lot of young, first-time voters will go with them.
I think their vote will surprise a lot of people. I can see them getting more votes than the Conservatives. I can also see a fair number of National supporters abstaining this time.
Like you say, one week to go so lets get in behind for a final effort to rid NZ of this corrupt government.
VOTE LEFT!
Well said anker. Cunliffe will be a good leader and Labour policies are very well thought out. Hopefully his coalition parties will have the wisdom and common sense to give him full support so that such a progressive coalition government will earn the respect and trust of the people and be able to last not for just one term, but at least three, if not more.
Yes anker you did hear right and I found his comment disappointing and offensive for the same reasons. No acknowledgement of any kind from Russell Norman that Labour have been under three years of sustained attack by the Nats black ops. brigade run out of the PM’s Office – and being supported and exacerbated by the MSM – including as we now know the Donghua Liu affair. No acknowledgement of the enormous amount of work Labour has put into developing excellent policy. I’m afraid on a scale of 1 to 10, Norman has dropped form 8 down to 5 in my book directly as a result of that remark.
Anne 100+
what were you listening to?
Interview with Norman on TV3’s The Nation this morning.
Here are the interviews on the Nation this morning of Key and Cunliffe [and others]
http://www.3news.co.nz/TVShows/TheNation
@ anker..
..as someone who has done commentaries on/watched most questiontimes for far too long..
..i can confirm that the greens have in the main been a more effective opposition-party..
..and have looked at goff/shearer..tjen cunnliffe in that labour role..over the last three years..
..and who is the labour spokesperson on transport..?..i dunno..
..the greens’ genter owns that portfolio..(as just one example..)
..and norman/turei have been far more effective at a constant holding the govt to account..
..than were goff/shearer/cunliffe..
..so that is quite a reasonable claim for norman to make..
Phill, I appreciate your opinion. You may well be correct about transport etc. But Labour have been working hard and effectively in opposition too especially since Cunliffe.
But don’t forget Grant and Oravida and Cunliffe challenges Key on child poverty, which of course the msm reported as Key saying Cunliffe lives in a rich house as well after Cunliffe had said Key needs to get out from the leafy suburbs.
However Normans comments were unhelpful, and I am not impressed with him dissing Labour in this way. NOT O.K.
Cunliffe and Labour have been the target of the smear campaign as well documented on this site and in dirty politics. No other person in parliament or party has been exposed to this level of inteference as Cunliffe/Labour.
And now for my little moan. Gordon Campbell is an excellent journalist, but consistently disses Labour and Cunliffe. As bad as the msm. He list of reasons to vote for a progressive govt is all well and good, but wtf did he do what all the other msm did and go on about Cunliffe not knowing the full detail on CGT???????? Its a detail Gordon. Party of Key’s dirty tricks and you brought into it. Shame on you.
I agree Anker – I am Green moving more and more toward Labour, given the dirty Politiking against Cunliffe. He has had the life sucked out of him through various attacks. Not sure, but Armstrong’s stirrings this week were the first attempt to derail Green’s campaign?; and only because the Nats see them now as a credible threat. I also think that labour needs a considerable shift given recent polls (despite being corrupt/biased/bought polls).
Dramatically increasing Labours actual poll vis-a-vis the polls would also be sending a clear message to Key (middle finger raised), that we are sick to the teeth of dirty Politiking.
I also think that there is so much more freedom of democratic expression on the left, with all the parties. Cunliffe’s three way pledge this week was expedient to try to gain ground in that swinging right-central vote, but at what cost? IMP – Harre in particular is fabulous, getting more left and youth votes out into the polling booths on the 20th Sept. It’s a bit disengenuous to those voters (when considered within a left bloc) to be excluded. Also, not so good to factionalise the left, despite all our differences in opinion…..we need to bury ideological hatchets and get on with the job at hand.
I for one, want nothing more than a change in this Government; and want representation for people, not money and capital.
…..but keep calm and vote left.
there’s the thing
The bastards are on the ropes, so they’re trying to increase the non-vote. They think labour’s sorted to <30%, so now they're chipping at the greens, and come tuesday morning it'll be IMP. But national are polling in the mid-40s, and they still have no friends – at best they have winston, who might switch both ways.
Their objective is to stop voters having a bearing, and that’s a LOSER’S mentality. From now on they crumble. But only if we act, only if the people vote.
Fuck the narrative, to hell with the spin, and screw the self-deluded Venal Right Wing Conspiracy. We’re way out of the gates now, it’s coming to the home stretch. Damn them all and vote left. Because the Left vote is the only vote that’s worth the paper it’s ticked on.
+100 McFlock….and Winnie if he ever went with NACTIONAL after all that has gone on in the last couple of years and all he has said ….all his brilliant speeches against John Key in parliament …..would be damned for ever by just about everyone in this country!
….I doubt whether Winnie wants to spend the later half of his life this way…He wants to be remembered as a HERO for DEMOCRACY and a HERO for New Zealand for New Zealanders taking back their own country.
John Key and Nactional are DONE like a dog’s dinner!
If Winston has the balance of power… and it’s a big if, he will go with whoever offers him the best baubles.
I suspect he would very much like the Speaker’s position followed with a promise of Ambassador sitting in London or Washington.
Either way this is his last term and his party will then pass away quietly.
Anyone who watches Question Time knows the Greens hold the Government to account, while Labour only wakes up every so often.
However, I am tired of Norman’s ongoing petulance fit just days from an election.
Yes Labour has problems, but it has enough critics without Norman.
Norman should not have been nonchalantly talking about an MOU with National, or about Labour’s shortcomings. He should be as focused as Metiria Turei is in getting rid of this delinquent regime.
Both the Doctors, Norman and Whyte, during this election seem quite sickly suffering from their own nauseating diatribe harmful for coalition health and well being. A long rest is recommended.
Anker, can you please give us some clues where you heard Norman say this? Otherwise it just fuels the rumours that the VRWC are putting out there that Labour and the GP can’t get along.
Hi Weka,
I heard it on the Nation this morning. I couldn’t quite believe it. So I posted it as “did I hear this right????” Anne has posted that she heard this too.
If anyone has the time to watch the Nation, please do and if I heard it wrong, I stand corrected.
Sorry Weka as a Labour voter, just very frustrated at the moment. In imho Labour have been great under Cunliffe and run a great clear, clean campaign. The one party who have been 100% clear about who they will and won’t work with (feel free to challenge me on this, but clearly there were some waters muddied with Normans comments about National and personally, I would want any party who get’s my vote to say I wouldn’t touch those dirty filthy slimy National B’s with a barge poll)
Yes I can understand the frustration.
” The one party who have been 100% clear about who they will and won’t work with (feel free to challenge me on this, but clearly there were some waters muddied with Normans comments about National and personally, I would want any party who get’s my vote to say I wouldn’t touch those dirty filthy slimy National B’s with a barge poll)”
Labour have changed their approach on this a few times. And Norman has been clear that the GP won’t support a National govt, and he did say they wouldn’t touch National with a barge poll, he just said it in his own way.
I’ll see if I can watch it, ta.
Hi Weka,
Have Labour changed their approach? I mean Labour under Cunliffe? My impression is that they have been 100% clear.
Do inform me if I have got this wrong.
I think they have always said, Green, NZ first. I know they have only recently ruled out Maori. But I think three parties is more that enough.
Hi anker,
I just watched the interview with Norman. A couple of thoughts. One is that it was one line, that’s all. Norman didn’t slag off Labour, he said one thing, which was that the GP have been the best in opposition this time round (and I take that over teh whole term, so it’s not about Cunliffe). And he didn’t bring it up, it was a response to Gower.
The other is that the thing that stood out for me most, was Gower’s insistence that Something had happened this week (in this case that the GP reached out to National and got slapped down). Norman says they haven’t talked to National, so who are we going to believe? Norman, or someone who is complicit in the VRWC, and is now taking part in the smearing of the GP that has been going on in the past week?
I think we need to be careful here about who we are getting angry with. I appreciate as a Labour voter you would be upset at the GP actively going after Labour votes, but they’ve always been doing that. And I don’t see them doing much in the way of negative shit towards Labour. I do see the MSM talking up that the GP are doing this, but that is a different thing.
Please bear in mind that the GP reached out to Labour earlier in the year and suggested that they work together going into the election. Labour said no way and made it very clear they would go for whatever left wing votes they could get. So we can’t blame the GP now for pushing the independence line.
All good Weka. Emotions running high at the moment. Have to keep the end goal in sight.
Just think that the smears from Whale Oil/msm have been mainly targetting Labour as the biggest opposition party. I have looked at Labour’s polling and what has happened is this. First there was David Cunliffe’s trust issue. A mistake on his part, but one I believe that came from good intentions, i.e. to keep secret the donors from DC so he wouldn’t be influenced by them. So when it came out, he owned it and repaired it. Promptly. Then what happened was days and days and days of msm focus on it to the point where there was that ridiculous story about Cunliffe helping a friend overseas to buy a house. WHAT HAPPENS NEXT………Labour and Cunliffe drop in the polls. Then next the Dong Liu letter. Utterly clear a black ops job with msm complicit. Cunliffe and Labour drop again in the polls.
I have been fine all along with Labour not teaming up with other parties. Labour is labour. We are getting our Red party back. I don’t believe Cunliffe has ever dissed other parties though????? But maybe I am wrong about that. I know he hasn’t been keen on the internet party.
The treatment of Cunliffe by the MSM has been despicable. Way worse than the treatment of the GP in the past year. Even if the left lose I hope that Cunliffe is given the chance to carry on with the changes that are happening withing Labour. But if we win, am looking forward to seeing how Labour and the GP figure out how to work together. Then there is Winston 😉
I am glad other progressive voters can see and acknowledge what has been going on with Cunliffe. They have targeted him, I believe cause they see him as a threat. And the msm. i read an article today by Derek Chuang (I think, but I may be wrong) of the Herald and it was glowing re Cunliffe. Gosh it’s a shock. Possibly a first.
i think Cunliffe will bring together all the parties and have it working great. I think Meteria will make a great deputy PM, if it goes that way. Remember Cunliffe has worked with his “enemies”/abc’s well in the last year.
“Remember Cunliffe has worked with his “enemies”/abc’s well in the last year.”
Good point.
+100 agreed weka…any comments by Norman have to be seen in context of the msm undermining of the Greens commitment to Labour and the Left…by the untrue insinuation that the Greens wanted a coalition deal with Key
(….and hence undermining both Greens’ Labour support and the Greens’ integrity)
Norman might just have been reasserting his commitment to the Left and opposition to Nactional by saying the Greens had been the most effective in opposition to Nactional ( an assertive and true statement which was taken by some as one-upmanship and putting down Labour)
I believe the Greens have made no such overtures to Nactional….and John Key’s reaction that he would NOT even work with the Greens on any projects at all if he and Nactional he were re-elected….sounded to me as if overtures from his side had been smacked down by the Greens!
( i know Hooton has sometimes hinted a Green alliance with Nactional could be good)…pigs might fly!
Key’s rejection of the GP was funny given how much shit they’ve given him in the past few years.
seems like the whole Green overtures to Nactional story was bullshit!
…the Greens and John Key hate each others guts…but I think John Key hates Winnie’s guts too …but that does not stop him trying to woo Winnie because John key is desperate
Conclusion: …. the REAL news about John Key and Nactional sliding in the polls was hidden and turned inside out by brown noser journalists to Keys PR story merchants (eg Hooton) …to make it look as if the Greens were courting John Key…. and then John Key was spurning and rejecting the Green’s advances…when in actual fact Key is in the supplicant begging position to the Greens and Winnie and is losing popularity massively ( many going from his party to the Greens and NZF) …and is desperate
..the whole thing was a msm setup imo
…which means the Left must stay staunch and keep the msm on the REAL story which is John Key’s decline
Norman is getting more and more cocky and puts down Labour and Cunliffe directly or indirectly in his statement. I am disliking him and the Greens more and more now.
Clemgeo — Yep, he lost my two ticks for GP yesterday.
yeshe —hope you won’t pass them on to NP or AP or CP or DP by mistake!
have no fear .. numpty not 😀
God. More repeating of bullshit. Do you actually listen to what Greens are saying or do you have earmuffs on.
I wouldn’t worrty about Clem. They’re a long time hater on the GP and have been distoring reality around them all year. Nothing to do with the current hooha methinks, although that is feeding them I guess.
@weka: I do not hate the Greens at all, but do dislike some of their policies and some of the tactics they use. I would even vote for them if Labour did not need many urgent votes at this election to make them a strong leading party for the long term survival of the potential coalition.
If you don’t hate them you give a pretty good impression that you do. Might want to think about that. I’m not the only person who has commented on this.
I certainly do not hate them. But that does not mean I can not take them to task and criticise them strongly for their silly tactics or for some of their unwise policies or naive statements from Norman that the guy he admires most is Bill English!.
My comment stands.
Mine too.
non-sequitur
Ah, the old man’s trick, I see!
The moon isn’t made of green cheese, and many a muckle doesn’t make a mickle!
So although you “certainly do not hate them”, you “can […] take them to task and criticise them strongly” to such a degree that “you give a pretty good impression that you do” hate them. Super.
I love it when different factions on the wider Left community reach a consensus and can therefore focus on getting sociopathic, corrupt, and fucking evil (although the last one might be the whisky creating honesty) tories out of government.
Go the whisky!
It might be overstating the case to call Clem and I factions though.
vodka and lime now 🙂
’tis an eternal conflict between the arrogance of the “self as unique” and the arrogance of “my opinion = everyone should see it that way”. In the middle is the area where we ain’t dicks, I reckon. We’ll never hit it 100%, all we can do is try 🙂
‘…that the guy he admires most is Bill English!.’
Yes, just like Cunliffe the other day saying the politician he most admired from another party was Jim Bolger.
I haven’t seen the Norman quote in context, but I assume it was the same premise.
eyes closed, earmuffs on, screaming “lalala greens are stealing left wing labour votes so they can form a coalition with national lalala”.
monomania to be cured by 21st sept, hopefully.
I fear your hope will be dashed McFlock. There’s all the post-election coalition talks to get through.
Just for the record, I am not a long time hater on the GP. Very, very far from it.
Your abuse of me yesterday, and now again today, says much more about you than it does about me.
Fwiw, I think your collective arrogance is just beyond reason. You all lecture endlessly.
Greens’ members ? I call shame on you for disallowing any view to honestly differ from your own.
I don’t think you hate the GP and am pretty sure no-one here has said you do. I haven’t abused you in this thread yeshe, perhaps you could reread the comments. I and others have named Clem’s fairly extreme antagonism towards the GP. There are other people’s comments in the past about this. Nothing to do with you.
“Greens’ members ? I call shame on you for disallowing any view to honestly differ from your own.”
You weren’t disallowed. You had pretty free reign in OM yesterday. But you seem to be saying that you should be allowed to disagree with me but I’m not allowed to disagree with you? You got called out majorly in the previous few days because you repeatedly posted inaccuracies about the GP position, even after a number of people pointed this out, and you did that in the context of a VRWC smear. This is a political blog, I think it’s reasonable for people to react to what you did.
I get you were upset, and I’m sorry you got such a shock from the smear. I think your distress was definitely second to the politics of the situation. My own thoughts are it’s better to deal with that degree of distress offline and then post on places like ts when there is less at stake emotionally.
“You got called out majorly in the previous few days because you repeatedly posted inaccuracies about the GP position, even after a number of people pointed this out, and you did that in the context of a VRWC smear.”
Really?
It was yesterday only. I posted only what came from Norman’s own mouth over several incidents. Julie Genter from her own twitter They were not all sound bites.
The lectures didn’t stop, including accusing me of doing Slater’s work. That is ugly and shocking. You did not agree with me, I did not agree with you.
But the various ones of you never allowed for any perception that differed from your own perfect view of Norman and insisting I was part of a right wing smear.
I call bullshit, weka.
HE MADE MISTAKES. Ask Metiria. I dare you.
Everyone will recover, but sometime in here, take off the rosy glasses and accept that Norman is human and he made some mistakes. Did they get distorted and pounced on by right wing MSM ? Almost certainly and horribly.
But that does not give you or anyone else the grounds to accuse me of being part of, or succumbing to a right wing smear and somehow associating me in posts with the names of the filthy Slater and Lusk.
No, you don’t get my upset, because you have no idea why I am upset.
You are all too busy being reactive in this awful political climate. I suggest “know your enemy” as a new lecture series you could begin.
Tell me this yeshe, do you believe that the GP might support the formation of a National-led govt after the election?
weka: you say “I don’t think you hate the GP and am pretty sure no-one here has said you do”.
No-one else did YOU DID. see your own post at 13.6.2.1
Sorry weka.
Let’s just agree to disagree and not waste any more of our lives on this particular piece? I’m done here for now.
There are some true battles we need to win, and sincerely, I wish you well through the coming days.
13.6.2.1? This?
“I wouldn’t worrty about Clem. They’re a long time hater on the GP and have been distoring reality around them all year. Nothing to do with the current hooha methinks, although that is feeding them I guess.”
I was talking about Clem. That’s why I’ve put their name in the comment. If you look at the threading you will also see that KJT replied directly to Clem, and I replied to KJT. It was nothing to do with you. As I’ve already said. Please take a step back and consider why you are misinterpreting what I said.
Edit: just in case you missed this question, here it is again,
“Tell me this yeshe, do you believe that the GP might support the formation of a National-led govt after the election?”
You write: ” Although that is feeding THEM” which does not refer solely to Clem. It refers to more than one, and it was under my name.
I suggest you read everything I have written if you want an answer to your question.
Don”t make shit up on my behalf like you did yesterday.
I’m not avoiding answering. Have just decided not to as the question is as irrelevant today as it was yesterday. I just am too bloody minded now to answer after all the shit that was made up yesterday and laid at my feet.
Why don’t you address some of what I wrote tonight if you want to engage?
No wonder wars break out.
Goodnight for now weka. Write yourself whatever you need the answer to be and sign my name to it. Then it will make perfect sense for you.
I use ‘them’ regularly to refer to people when I don’t want to assume their gender. You will find that often in my comments. What is really bizarre here is that I’ve clarified that I wasn’t talking about you and you are still insisting that I was. Do you think I am lying?
I have read all your posts from the past day or so, as they came up. My understanding is that you believe that the GP might support the formation of a National govt after the election. It’s a pretty simple thing to clear up if I am wrong, so if you choose not to then I will have to go with my current understanding.
OK I accept you are not lying in spite of how you posted.
Your understanding is your understanding. You misunderstood everything I tried to say yesterday. Everything. You and others were so quick to assume I was part of a right wing smear you never listened to anything I said.
Your whole attack on me yesterday was based on your assumptions and had nothing to do with anything at all I was trying to discover.
Logic would suggest you can therefore safely assume that you have misunderstood and pre-judged any answer to your question. They are your assumptions about me, not mine.
Like your comment I had been repeatedly posting misinformation for days ?? I call bullshit again weka. Why do you write in absolutes that exist only your own mind ?
“You got called out majorly in the previous few days because you repeatedly posted inaccuracies about the GP position, even after a number of people pointed this out, and you did that in the context of a VRWC smear. ”
Fucking bullshit and written by you. BULLSHIT.
rest well. we are all in need of it.
“OK I accept you are not lying in spite of how you posted.”
Thank-you 🙂
“Your understanding is your understanding. You misunderstood everything I tried to say yesterday. Everything. You and others were so quick to assume I was part of a right wing smear you never listened to anything I said.”
And yet here I am asking for clarification, even in the face of some pretty heated stuff being directed at me.
“Like your comment I had been repeatedly posting misinformation for days ?? I call bullshit again weka. Why do you write in absolutes that exist only your own mind ?”
because you did. Shall I go back and link to some examples? I don’t mean that everything you wrote was misinformation. Obviously. I mean that you made some statements that were misinformation and you repeated them even after others tried to point out the problem.
“Logic would suggest you can therefore safely assume that you have misunderstood and pre-judged any answer to your question. They are your assumptions about me, not mine.”
Hmmm, we’re now in bad faith territory I think. Not really anywhere else to go if you so firmly believe that I am prejudiced against you.
Hi weka … not sure if you will see this, but anyway, here goes on this lovely spring day filled with Glenn Greenwald’s erudition and facts …
No bad faith intended, ok ? Life is just too short, and I am not enjoying needing to fight you off if I post something you don’t like on TS. I would rather go quietly away.
But for now ….
This all began because of something I heard Norman say.
You (and others) told me repeatedly it was just a right wing smear tactic, and I was being fooled, along with some other stuff which we can just leave for now.
Now Russel Norman this morning on The Nation, in discussion with Paddy Gower, acknowledged exactly what I had heard, and during the same discussion explained he did it to flush National out. ( Now that may be a late rationale, when Paddy accused him of being ‘smacked down’ by National, and who could blame him.)
There’s much more to it the discussion, but basically Norman has confirmed it was not a right wing smear, but a deliberate tactic. He has confirmed that what I heard was correct, not me partaking in right wing smear. Time to put down your weapons, you and whoever else it was viciously accusing me.
Now can we leave it ? I have replied here because I am reluctant to open it all up again — I am sure we both have lives to enjoy !
Btw, loved Metiria on Q and A … was this re-building after what had gone on ? I think so. But clever to see them together. She is one very astute and compassionate politician — one day I hope she is PM. ( Privately, I think she has boxed his ears over the last few days, but that is conjecture and nothing else at all.)
Only six more days … may it bring exactly the changes we wish !
Thx Weka.
@KJT :No bull shit and no earmuffs. It is you that is blind and deaf here. It is Norman that has put a crude spoke in the coalition wheel by his talk about National support at this late stage in the election period, especially when the National vote is on the cusp of collapsing. Why the hell did he need to do that and confuse the voters as well as manage to antagonise Labour, its supporters and candidates? Perhaps he calculated that this tactic will make him somehow stronger and gain a few votes perhaps. But it is like trying to win a battle and lose the war, trust, friends and coalition relationships in the long term. In contrast, see what a clean positive wise campaign Cunliffe has run.
In the ‘Prime Time’ programme yesterday on Prime, even Gerry Brownlee was alluding to Norman’s favourable position with regards to National. He said National has many options including Act, Cons party, UF, Maori, NZF and ‘most recently, even the Green party’, he said! I don’t think the Green party participant, Genter refuted that contentious issue strongly enough.
Take a look at the video here: [Green-National issue is just after about 16 min or so]
http://www.primetv.co.nz/Default.aspx?tabid=93&art_id=8633
Riiight. So you now want people to take Gerry Brownlee’s word on this? Do you know what Dirty Politics is?
“It is Norman that has put a crude spoke in the coalition wheel by his talk about National support at this late stage in the election period, especially when the National vote is on the cusp of collapsing.”
You are partaking in the smear, which is ironic given what you accuse Norman of. Corin Dann brought up the National issue, the GP didn’t.
Given that Genter corrected Brownlee on his figures for road use, costs of various transport modes, and even who authored the damned report he was trying to quote, I’m not surprised he had to resort to stirring shit.
Heh. I couldn’t bring myself to watch once I realised it was Sean Plunket.
lol
she made brownlee look like an oaf who didn’t know his job – big surprise.
My favourite bits were when he was bringing up points and she had this smile almost immediately that said she knew exactly what he was going to say, and had the precise figures at her fingertips to demonstrate his idiocy.
Well prepped, but she needs to work on that tell if she plays poker 🙂
I’ve seen a few interviews in the past months where the GP MPs have been like that. Almost like they can answer the questions while juggling 15 balls in the air. Harre is like that too, sees it all coming. Gods I hope they get to be in govt, simply for the pleasure of having smart competent people there.
No wonder the PM is talking of incorporating CERA into his Orifice.
RadioNZ had this.
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/regional/253563/national-would-make-changes-to-cera
Prime Minister John Key has announced the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority will be merged into the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet, if a National government was re-elected.
Mr Key said change was to maintain the momentum in the Canterbury rebuild and place the disaster recovery work at the core of central government planning. The new arrangement would be in place by next February.
Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Minister Gerry Brownlee said this did not represent a winding down of the recovery efforts, but a recognition the recovery programme is well underway.
However, Labour dismissed the plan saying it wouldn’t help with the recovery.
Saw this.
http://rebuildingchristchurch.wordpress.com/2014/09/02/an-admission-of-failure-too-little-too-late/
Ann September 9, 2014 at 10:04 am
Some points of doubt about any value to Chch arising from PM’s action as suggested.
1 PM is already too busy now with what he has on his plate, to actually do and know everything he should – more would be the straw that breaks the camels back. This camel already is on its knees.
2 Anything sent to the PM would go through the PM Office. He has stated that does not mean that it has actually reached him. How does one ensure that this actually occurs and that he reads, and understands and actions, it?
3 The Prime Minister’s Office and team has trouble staying on task of working for the government of the people and strays off into propaganda boosts for the PM and his Party, and planning strategic moves that involve nobbling his political opposition. Can we be assured that they would give Christchurch the blessing of their committed devotion to working to assist its needs? I think, from observation so far, the answer is no!
4 If Christchurch was in Auckland it would be of interest, but to the PM and the Nats it’s just an annoying blob of buildings causing great cost to the country, for what is really just a waystation to the skiing resort of Queenstown. Which, unlike Chch, is trendy, and important to the Tourism portfolio of the PM, and fun for the PM and family to visit for skiing holidays, when they aren’t in Hawaii.
5 Don’t get your hopes up Chch. Don’t throw your portaloos out yet, another wobble and shake and back to the future!
” you accuse Norman of. Corin Dann brought up the National issue, the GP didn’t.”
You are sure about that and that it was not an unwise political tactic/stunt from Norman? Have you spoken to Norman and has he said that Dann has lied about a strategy meeting about this issue taking place that evening? If so, he should sue Dann for misrepresentation. I don’t believe all this was simply made up by bad Dann.
Well it is and was, right wing spin.
It all took place in the public domain. Go look it up.
“I don’t believe all this was simply made up by bad Dann.”
I don’t believe that it was simply made up by Dann either. Do you know what Dirty Politics is?
So, if that is really the case, then why doesn’t Norman come out on TV and say that this episode from Dann was all a part of dirty politics? That shouldn’t be hard to do?
I would guess that he won’t do that because (a) it plays into their hands, and (b) the GP adopted a strategy a long time ago of staying focussed on policy. You can see this in pretty much everything he does at the moment. Calling out Dann on his bullshit would be a distraction from that. It would also be hard to prove, so what would be the point? Am pretty sure it would just up the ante too. Turei handled it very well in the aftermath, was very gracious towards Dann. Well played.
I actually find it interesting the large amount of advice being directed at Norman and the GP at the moment about how they should conduct themselves. The thing I keep coming back to is that they did the hard yards for such a long time under a relentlessly negative media and eventually they figured it out so that in recent years they’ve done very well. I think they know what they are doing. This doesn’t mean they don’t make mistakes. I would guess they didn’t see this one coming, but my impression is that they’re here for the long haul and this is just another piece of weird shit along the way.
The Topp Twins nail it on Kim Hill this morning. Stop using nitrates. Nitrates feed the grass and kill the microbes in the soil. The grass grows well that season, but over time the degradation of the soil continues, making nitrates necessary for any growth. Eventually those nitrates end up in the water. Instead, feed the soil (with organic inputs). Healthy soil grows healthy grass and doesn’t have problematic runoffs. Simple.
Organic inputs require more labour and work to create compared to nitrates. This means on a very large scale, they’d be more expensive.
I’d like to see an analysis of that, that takes into account the labour and work involved in dealing with nitrate mitigation. If we want to make this an economic issue.
More expensive on a large scale, that’s an argument for smaller scale farming. We used to have smaller dairy herds for instance. Artificial fertiliser has artificially inflated our capabilities, and that is not sustainable (certainly not in the physical world, but probably not in the financial world either).
I’m not talking lifestyle block small farming either. There is some impressive sustainable land management being done on big farms too.
Yes, but unlike the finite cost of fences and riparian planting around farm waterways, nutrient run off is a still a major issue and heavy polluter of our streams and rivers. User pays for the practice or has to change the methods. They are the choices. Might as well employ people and at the same time protect the viability of the soil under our feet, rather than pay the fines or compliance fees.
Need to make the fines and compliance fees enough to force change. Also need to enforce those laws.
100+ Weka, added to that it also means the soil stops being a carbon sink as it is a sterile system. The misreporting on nitrates is infuriating. Cow pee is blamed for the nitrogen in the rivers but this is dishonest, cows are fed on nitrogen fertilised grass and they excrete these nutrients in excessive amounts. But there is also the leaching from fertiliser directly into rivers from porous soils in particular. Urea a byproduct of the oil industry so misinformation is unsurprising.
My EasyVote card has arrived in the mail. I’ll be off to vote within the hour!
I’m voting next Saturday – I am emotionally invested in the ritual of going out to vote on election day.
Me too, although I am tempted to vote on Friday, which is an anniversary of women’s suffrage.
Do not Russell the horses..
I’m voting Monday. If I kharked it before election day and Key got back I’d never RIP.
+100 Rodel…lol…we must encourage all those elderly relatives, the infirm and the chronically ill … and all those on their death beds to ARISE and VOTE EARLY!
…and all those indigent strugglers, the lazy bastard self- absorbed anarchist gamer youth, the couch layabouts, and all those devil may care revellers and piss heads who drink too much on Friday and recuperate all day Saturday so they can hit the town again Saturday night ….. to go out and VOTE EARLY !
( we need to provide transport and practical moral support as well as encouragement to vote )
…I am voting early too…just in case I get hit by a bus
I voted today. Quite amusing watching people taking selfies *outside* of the Grey Lynn Community Hall with the voting signs behind them.
@Karol
Me too. I love election day
It felt just like election day today at Grey Lynn when I voted.
There were 3 booths and two were full. Someone was finding out what electorate they were in down in Dunedin. People were pulling in and out of the car park.
To top it all off, it had that classic Auckland deluge that we call “rain” and lots of people hanging around waiting for it to subside so they could get to their home or cars without getting soaked..
I also have to say, on a personal note, that I think early voting – unless necessary – seems like an exercise in hubris. How can anyone be so sure, in advance, that nothing will change their mind between now and election day? It’s like religion. Minds are made without all facts, opinions, outcomes or policies being presented.
*personal opinion, all rights reserved. Individual results may vary
I agree with you in a way. Early voting is fine if one knows in advance that next Saturday would be personally inconvenient or if one wishes to avoid crowds or long lines or some other good reason.
One week is a long time in politics. So for some early voting may turn out to be act in haste, regret at leisure….as I suspect has already happened for some in the last few days.
A National voter may have voted last week then go “Fuck” on Monday after Dotcom’s announcement.
May it echo loudly through the land !!
but not too loudly, otherwise they might win on optimistically-cast advance votes 😉
I suspect that such a voter doesn’t exist. If they did then they would have stopped voting National when Dirty politics was published and we became aware of just how corrupt National really is.
What’s going to happen over the next week as more of National’s corruption and lying comes to light is that a few undecideds will definitely decide not to vote National. I just hope that they decide to vote and vote left so that a full royal inquiry can be mounted and the corruption brought fully to light.
yes to full royal inquiries.
Quite easy really. They keep themselves informed and don’t wait around to be advertised at by the political parties.
We’re not omniscient so that’s always going to be the case. Nothing to do with religion.
Awesome, it’s Draco. The only man in New Zealand that understands economics, politics, society and computing. How’s that “hacking isn’t really much of a problem” point of view going?
“They keep themselves informed and don’t wait around to be advertised at by the political parties.”
Who was talking about being advertised at? I’m talking about voting early before full policy announcements have been made. You’ll note voting opened before many of the parties had fully released policy proposals. Only a person not interested in weighing the party on it’s policies would decide which party was right for them without actually understanding what the party was actually going to bring to the table by way of policy.
The poor little contrarian is feeling threatened by little old me.
And only a fool would vote purely on policies. Sure, policies are important but the attitude of the party and how it relates to and treats others is more important.
Yes, so very threatened.
“And only a fool would vote purely on policies.”
And only a fool would vote without considering the policies which is why voting before all the policies have been presented is a silly idea
I made up my mind about my vote in 2012. I wrote about it then.
Ephemeral changes in party positions and strategy are more like advertising than reality.
Four ticks for Labour from us at Te Awamutu. Apparently a solid turnout. Love being able to vote early. Always going to be Labour. No doubt.
Just in case you think we can’t get any worse, via education. Look at this being the model post TPP.
http://www.publicintegrity.org/2014/09/12/15495/koch-foundation-proposal-college-teach-our-curriculum-get-millions
Tracy Watkins on the Greenwald interview:
IT’s Ohhh Ahhhh stuff.
http://www.3news.co.nz/tvshows/thenation/interview-glenn-greenwald-2014091311
watch the cognitive dissonance kick in.
Is there any chance someone might point out to Key that all pejoratives he throws at Glenn Greenwald, such as “Dotcom’s little henchman” will end up in The Guardian, and likely other international front pages also.
Please, only one more week to go of this oaf ….
like when he claimed that he could buy a dozen environmental scientists into saying that many of our rivers aren’t shit-laden.
just like that, Hard Copy all over again. Aren’t we so lucky he is Minister of Tourism ?? only seven more days ….
Have you seen Nixon/Frost is just starting on TV3 ? Very stealthy of somebody to have it playing tonight !! Yay !!!
Hey team,
Long time reader, first time poster—and what a post! It just kept going. Beat mainstream soundbite commentary. That’s why we come here isn’t it.
Anyway…
It’s a week out from the general elections and I’m hedging my bets and these are my predictions. I’ve provided rationale for my estimates and tried to be not biased (I know it’s hard not to be). Don’t ask me what they would be in seats because I can’t find a Sainte-Laguë calculator that accounts for our one seat rule and I’m too rusty on maths for doing it the long way by hand. Rounding to 0.25%.
National: 42%
Labour: 30%
Green: 13%
NZ First: 6.5%
Conservative: 3.75%
Internet-Mana: 3.25%
ACT: 0.75%
Māori Party: 0.5%
United Future: 0.25%
Others: 0.25%
Rationale
National: It’s a well know fact the polls consistently over estimate National’s popularity because of the absence of land lines as well as failure to capture social media communication. Corporate media interests will also play down relevant critical factors such as undecided voters or those who refuse to say. History shows polls have them 3-6% above their actual election results, and with recent polls hovering around 47% this might drop. Also they will inevitably be bleeding voters to Conservative and possibly NZ First in the wake of the Hager revelations. However, some centrist supports willing to vote Labour will cling on because they moan about the Green Party et al.
Labour: I admit this may be a little bit biased—just a little—but I think the younger and working-class poor voters might be swayed in this direction especially given the media are finally giving Cunliffe an equal platform with people using their own judgements because of the debates. There will still be the usual centre left people that moan about not liking Cunliffe’s personality without any basis for the claim—so-called “personality voters”. Again, Labour will be loosing votes to the Greens, especially professional middle-class liberals.
Green: I think most polls are reasonably accurate in this area—maybe a slight underestimate, especially if they can capture the notoriously lazy student vote. I don’t see them getting to their desired 15% despite a solid social media campaign. They might be loosing some potential votes to Internet-Mana for appearing more business friendly—albeit in a more sustainability eco-friendly way.
NZ First: The Winston Factor: he always gets across the line (except 2008). Will pick up the Gold-Card vote and possibly a few disgruntled National, and maybe Labour voters. His obstinacy regarding coalition partners will hold him back from anything higher though.
Conservative: The old school National voters disgruntled with their soft stance on social policy, as well as things like farm sales, asset sales, referenda etc. The so-called “moral compass” vote. Might pick up some votes from Winston for the aforementioned reasons. Will pick up some of the fundamentalist fringe New Age Born Again Christian vote.
Internet-Mana: While they started off with a roar, they aren’t going to get near the lofty heights they predicted. However, polls probably underestimate their vote. Hello? Internet Party—they live on smart phones and Facebook. Mana voters tend to be working class poor too. The social media campaign has really lit a fire under them too, especially with the injection of you-know-who’s money, which leads me to my next point: the Dotcom factor. This will put off many people, especially the “radical agitator” rhetoric, which I personally don’t care about—I love the revolutionary talk as much as the next flaming liberal—but I just don’t see this going down well with older lefties or moderates. I think Cunliffe’s refusal to include them in Cabinet will have some people marching back to the Green-Labour (or Māori) camp. The new cannabis policy may see them pick up the stoner vote—if they remember to vote.
ACT: Jamie Whyte is far too ideological and intellectual for simple-minded people. The far-right Americanism of their campaign will have them fall off the rails. New Zealand is just not ready or has the disposition for this shift in direction despite National dancing with it loosely. Nobody knows who David Seymour is or cares about him. He will probably get Epsom for ACT again because National voters do what they’re told, but with a reduced margin because of smart liberal voters wanting to put the last nail in the ACT coffin. Still, Epsom’s wealthy constituents will sadly outnumber the tactical liberal voters. Will inevitably pick up some of the corporate and wealthy migrant vote.
Māori Party: Damaged goods—and despite their best intentions they know it. They might pick up one seat if they can hold back the growing Internet-Mana tide. Elitist Māori will still vote for them however.
United Future: United whom? Apart from bow ties and kowtowing to National for the last six years, nobody knows what this party stands for (if anything). Please somebody put the nail in this coffin! Will probably get Ōhariu back again because of subservient National voters—with a reduced margin—despite the best intentions of tactical Labour and Green voters. If I were living in Wellington Central, Hutt, or Mana, I would make it my duty to somehow get registered in Ōhariu to vote this muppet out.
Others: Aotearoa Legalise Cannabis Party might loose votes to Internet-Mana and Ben Uffindell’s hung-over friends might give him the tick if they can make it to a polling booth. All others not worth mentioning.
Get out and vote!
Brendan
Here is the Electoral Commission calculator:
http://www.elections.org.nz/voting-system/mmp-voting-system/mmp-seat-allocation-calculator
Your guesstimate numbers add up to 100.25% so I trimmed back the CP, and (if ACT, MANA, & MP all got an electorate) would give: NP 52 + A 1 + M 1 = 54, vs; LP 38 + GP 16 + IMP 4 = 58 with NZF on 8 as kingmaker. Assuming 120 seats (no overhang).
It’s a fun enough game playing with the various scenarios, but I prefer going out and convincing people to head down to the ballot box at this stage.
Brendan +100…great analysis…and enjoyable reading
Personally I think Internet-Mana has shot its bolt and will not get into Parliament apart from Hone, and perhaps taking in Harre with him. Which is a pity really…
NZ First IMO has done enough to get into Parliament again, and WP will need to decide to have a crack at 2017 or hand over to Ron Mark, and retire to his stud farm in Papakura…
It looks like National will get in again, unless Key falls under a bus between now and next Saturday.
Oh well, Ill probably spend the next week or so National-proofing my life…
Good comment Brendan. I don’t disagree with anything you have said. The Winston vote needs a bit more analysis but otherwise spot on.
IMO Internet Mana on ~4%. And I think Key is going to come in circa 44%. Labour should definitely count its lucky stars if it gets 30%-31%.
lol Millsy, I thought you were going to say ” Oh well I will probably spend the next week or so driving a bus”
That is very naughty of me!
It’s suffragette day on Friday Any chance of the Standard having a suffragette themed week(purple & green on open mike? ) just to remind everyone that voting hasn’t always been a right for all. Don’t let great granny down!
Sounds good RB. Anyone got a good graphic?
Disappointing to see the coverage saying Cunliff’s charity was “wasted” because the person to whom he gave money had already voted Mana. That’s MSM for you.
Great commentary from Curwen Rolinson on the Corin Dann hooha,
http://thedailyblog.co.nz/2014/09/12/guest-blog-curwen-rolinson-bluegreen2014-or-the-media-jetskiis-over-a-shark-tank/
I really hope Curwen is the future of NZ First, presuming they survive. Otherwise Labour should put out the red carpet. He is an interesting dedicated observer of NZ politics with a bit of passion. You can’t go wrong …
I was thinking that too. Do you know what he is up to in Epsom?
Nope but he will have thought it through and the ACT activists hate it …
ms…agreed…NZF does have some goodies
“John Key Naked” the Interview published by the Jackal.
Very very funny and very very clever.
Its on the side panel. Don’t know how to put a link.
Decent people speaking up.
More than 40 former soldiers and current army reservists have signed a letter refusing future service in the Israeli Defence Force (IDF) military intelligence wing, known as Unit 8200.
Unit 8200 is often compared to the United States National Security Agency. It uses sophisticated technology to monitor the lives of Palestinians, gathering information which is then used by Israel’s military. It also carries out surveillance overseas.
But the group of soldiers who served in the unit has spoken out about the methods used and the toll they take on innocent civilians in the occupied Palestinian territories.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-09-13/israeli-soldiers-refuse-to-spy-on-palestinians/5741492
@joe90 …Brave soldiers…they restore your faith in humanity!
…but what Israel is doing to the Palestinians is unbearable, blood chilling and horrendous…this State is a disgrace to the memories of the holocaust victims…and should be boycotted around the world…certainly New Zealand and New Zealanders should be very wary…