Petty

Written By: - Date published: 9:17 am, December 28th, 2011 - 126 comments
Categories: Media, national - Tags: , ,

Under cover of Christmas, the Nats are following in their long tradition of intimidating journalists. The Herald reports:

‘Tea tape’ newsman’s costs ‘political vindictiveness’

The Government’s demand for court costs from cameraman Bradley Ambrose can only be seen as “political vindictiveness”, according to political analyst Dr Bryce Edwards.

The Attorney-General has filed a memorandum in the High Court at Auckland seeking $13,669.45 in costs from Mr Ambrose after the freelancer sought a declaration from the High Court on whether the “tea tape” conversation was private. …

Otago University political analyst Dr Bryce Edwards told Newstalk ZB the almost $14,000 request is a small amount for the Government, and it was legitimate for Mr Ambrose to try to get a declaratory judgment on whether the conversation recorded between John Key and John Banks was private.

Dr Edwards felt the demand smacks of revenge. “I don’t think we can see this as anything other than political vindictiveness on the part of the Government, which is a bit scary as we expect the media to be robust,” he said.

126 comments on “Petty ”

  • Comments are now closed

  1. mik e 1
    28 December 2011 at 9:22 am

    brelusconi all over again complete media control

  2. Zetetic 2
    28 December 2011 at 9:58 am

    It’s pure intimidation. They’ve got no chance of actually winning costs.

    a) the attorney-general didn’t have to be at there hearings – it wasn’t as if the PM was on trial. It was an application for a judicial declaration on the status of the meeting, nothing to do with the A-G.

    b) To get costs awarded against someone, they need to do more than just have lost a geniune legal dispute. There needs to be something egregious, eg they were setting out to waste the other side’s time and money without any real hope of winning the case. Ambrose didn’t even lose. The Court declined to give a judgment.

    • aerobubble 2.1
      28 December 2011 at 10:08 am

      Cameramen record background to make the politicians sound better.

      Shame the cameramen can’t forget to do National the favor.

      Wonder how long before th PM buckles.

      So no, I don’t care the the cameraman is being chased for costs.

      He did nothing wrong and every cameraman should be angry by now.

      Why aren’t they? Why haven’t they rebelled? The courts are the last resort and so if the cameramen and women can’t be asked to defend each other by alternative means of course the nazi govt is going to target them.

    • Graeme Edgeler 2.2
      28 December 2011 at 2:17 pm

      a) the Attorney-General is regularly represented at hearings involving an application for a declaratory judgement, especially one where the judgment is sought against the world. And he also regularly represents the Prime Minister, who was clearly involved (as a person).

      b) that’s not how costs work at all. To get all your costs back, there needs to be something egregious. To get some, as the A-G is seeking, is standard.

      If you want to make a point, it might be better to ask why this involved the PM, and not the Leader of the National Party. This might be the far better argument. It was political and not governmental, so arguably John Key should have been paying for this himself. 

      • seeker 2.2.1
        28 December 2011 at 2:34 pm

        @Graeme. Edgeler

        “It was political and not governmental, so arguably John Key should have been paying for this himself. ”

        It certainly was political. Good point Graeme E. Thanks for clarification.

      • mickysavage 2.2.2
        29 December 2011 at 8:25 am

        Interesting point Graeme.  Why should we as taxpayers fund litigation in order to preserve Key National and ACT from political embarrassment.  The point is complicated by the fact that a declaration was applied for but the Cabinet Manual says this:

        4.37  On occasion, Ministers may be sued for acts done while a Minister, but which have a more “personal” aspect. For example, a Minister may be sued in defamation arising from the contents of a particular speech or other public statement. Alternatively, proceedings may be instituted alleging that a Minister has acted dishonestly or in bad faith. The extent to which a Minister will be personally liable will depend on the law relating to the particular matter.

        4.38  By their very nature, cases against a Minister personally raise issues about whether the Minister has acted so far beyond the scope of his or her authority that the Minister should not be indemnified by the Crown in relation to the proceedings. No absolute legal right to indemnity by the Crown exists just because a Minister was acting as a Minister in doing, or refraining from doing, the act that is the subject of the claim.

        4.39  Where a Minister is sued or threatened with legal action personally and it is uncertain whether he or she should be indemnified, the normal arrangement is to seek Cabinet’s agreement in advance to meet the expenses of legal representation. The question of indemnity on costs and damages will be held over until judgment has been given. (See paragraphs 4.49 – 4.52.)

        4.40  If an indemnity is given to a Minister, the government may be called on to answer for it in the House. 

         So put to one side the Solicitor General’s role in handling applications for a declaration it looks like the State has been providing Key with free lawyers.  I wonder if it went through cabinet.  At the very least the Government should be called on in the House to respond.

        • Frida 2.2.2.1
          30 December 2011 at 7:30 am

          I made this point at the time but no one responded.

          The AG was there as contradictor only and should have just abided the court’s decision not made active submissions supporting john key’s position.

          And no need for a costs application as a result.

          Sounds to me like the odious little SG knows he is held in low regard by most in the profession and by the PM and was trying to curry favour.

  3. RedLogix 3
    28 December 2011 at 10:05 am

    Yes… this one really, really worries me. Currently there is no proof of political interference that I’m aware of, but it stinks of bad faith and you have to ask why.

    • Zetetic 3.1
      28 December 2011 at 11:38 am

      the Attorney-General is Finlayson. It was his decision to do this. There’s not the same distance between the actions of a department and the responsibility of the minister when it comes to the A-G.

      • RedLogix 3.1.1
        28 December 2011 at 11:51 am

        Thanks Zet. I kind of suspected that but wasn’t sure about saying it out loud because it just seems so wrong. My instinct would have said that Findlayson would have known better than this…. has he been leaned on?

        Still can we say ‘blatant conflict of interest’?

  4. Colonial Viper 4
    28 December 2011 at 10:45 am

    There are the workers (labourers) in the media industry, the journalists/camera types/sound technicians.
     
    And then there are the controlling editors and owners.

  5. Tiger Mountain 5
    28 December 2011 at 11:16 am

    On the face of it seeking costs is both premature in an undecided case and a pre-emptive punitive action. Do you want a bit of this too? is clearly the subtext intended for other journalists.

    The AG did not have to be there bar obvious political maneuvering in the furnace hot pre election period. If the recorded ShonKey did publicly come across as the prize prick most of the left knows him to be, it could well have dropped the nats down a couple of points and changed the course of the election.

    Ambrose seems a bit of a flake in terms of motive for his actions or lack of. Not that it excuses the costs tactic. Most of us still don’t know if the tapes contain anything of interest, or if Mr Ambrose has any political leanings. Is he hanging on for hope of some pecuniary gain at some point?

    • bbfloyd 5.1
      28 December 2011 at 12:53 pm

      “Ambrose seems a bit of a flake in terms of motive for his actions”…. as depicted by the compliant section of the “news media”…… so why would anyone use what is obviously self serving propaganda as a basis for making value judgements regarding personal motivation?

      if it serves to reinforce flawed, and self serving opinions,…. then i suppose it’s relevant…. not even remotely useful in the wider issues, but useful to those who would seek to undermine any type of intellectual vigor, and independent thought that could lead to our “leaders” being exposed for what they really represent….

    • aerobubble 5.2
      28 December 2011 at 3:27 pm

      I thought to get costs you had to show damages, what damage? If you crash into someone doing their job, and have capable staff around you, no less than the security detail of the PM (whose job it is to check all packages for a small spread device) then how can YOU claim damages when you staff fail. Cameramen need to have a background mic to remove noise from passing trucks etc.

      And no, nobody was going to commit suicide, unless the PM had on the tape…

    • Clipbox 5.3
      28 December 2011 at 9:21 pm

      http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz-national-party/news/article.cfm?o_id=266&objectid=10767157

      The letter notes that Ambrose has always been a National Party voter…

  6. Pundit X 6
    28 December 2011 at 11:56 am

    Yes he is being intimidated but lets not go down the road of Ambrose’s motive. Of course he’s hoping to make some money out of the recording. Robert Fisk gets paid, John Pilger gets paid, why not Ambrose? He gave us what would have been the scoop of the election campaign had the MSN had the courage to run it.

    Ambrose’s problem is that he has chosen to be a videographer in a country whose media both editorially cash strapped and sychophantic towards the right. As a freelance he won’t have made a cent from an unused recording offered on spec. However he did it he showed Key up to the country at large just what a fraud Key actually is and for that he should be journalist of the year…

    • Rob 6.1
      30 December 2011 at 3:02 pm

      Key’s political high point was probably half an hour before he had tea with John Banks I consider for him the next part of his journey is all downhill.

  7. Tiger Mountain 7
    28 December 2011 at 2:00 pm

    get a grip bb and Pundit,
    • there is info out there not from the msm on Ambrose, people can change, but an ex coppers institutionalised core world view? A leap of faith without knowing the guy personally. Actions only can be assessed.
    • of course people should get paid, I remarked at the time of the initial breaking of the “Teapot Tapes’ story that people in the industry are appallingly treated (played off against each other, classified as contractors when there is an obvious dependent contractor or employment relationship) whether they film and edit auto or horse racing or stories like this one.
    • if Bradley Ambrose had chosen “damn the torpedos” to self publish when it became clear others were not going to I would hold him in the regard you two seem to. Sure he might “never work in this town again” if he had done so and that would be a fair enough reason, wanting to eat, to do what he has. The other option was third party ‘unauthorised’ leaking.
    • it would still be most interesting to listen to the recording

    There is something awry in this case, and as much as it might be nice to see Key and Banksie go down in a shower of s**t it all needs to be properly examined.

    • bbfloyd 7.1
      29 December 2011 at 11:05 am

      the grip i have is one where making assumption regarding “motivation” being allowed to colour one’s total viewpoint rather detracts from the accuracy of the conclusions arrived at…. and once more for the intransigent…… quoting a compliant, and duplicious ….(self serving) fourth column is fraught with risk…. principally the risk of being utterly wrong….. or being seen to have an agenda to push, or support, rather than making insightful comment…..

      and where on earth has this “ex coppers institutionalised world view” come from? i’m assuming this is a response to the point i made….

      • Pundit X 7.1.1
        29 December 2011 at 11:19 am

        and where on earth has this “ex coppers institutionalised world view” come from? i’m assuming this is a response to the point i made….

        Ambrose is apparently an ex policeman.

  8. Graeme Edgeler 8
    28 December 2011 at 2:10 pm

    The vast majority of CLO decisions are taken by the Solicitor-General without reference to the Attorney-General (exercising powers given to the S-G under the Constitution Act). Unless you’ve specific evidence that the usual course was not taken in the present case, it would be sensible to conclude the usual course was followed in this instance.

    • Treetop 8.1
      28 December 2011 at 3:43 pm

      Can seeking costs be deemed as interference in a police matter by the executive (Attorney General)as the police commisioner has to be seen to be independent and no crime has yet been established?

      Justice Winkleman was wary of making the declaration as she said it could influence the police’s decision to charge Ambrose.

      Has the Solicitor General now been placed in an untenable position with the Commissioner of Police by the Attorney General as it is not unusual for the Commissioner of Police to seek an opinion from the Solicitor General?

      I noticed Marshall’s appointment was for three years (up in April 2014) and the next election is in late 2014. If Marshall does not tow the line, his appointment may not be extended for the usual five year appointment for a police commissioner.

      • RedLogix 8.1.1
        28 December 2011 at 4:18 pm

        If Marshall does not tow the line, his appointment may not be extended for the usual five year appointment for a police commissioner.

        My understanding from a police source is that Peter Marshall himself made the rather smart call to only take up a three year contract. If you stay in the job long enough some shit-grenade eventually blows up on your watch; Marshall apparently stipulated that he would do the job long enough to achieve the changes he wanted and then step down.

        Otherwise Treetop, I suspect you are very close to correct. The entire matter stinks of bad faith and there has to be an explanation.

        • Treetop 8.1.1.1
          28 December 2011 at 4:35 pm

          I’d like to see Marshall’s “achieve the changes” list and I do not think that a reduced budget is on the list. Take your pick from a bully government to a cash strapped government.

          I’d like to see a bank account opened for Ambrose’s legal fees to let the government know that they cannot silence anyone individual in this country from taking a stand against being vilified.

          • Tazirev 8.1.1.1.1
            28 December 2011 at 4:53 pm

            I would contribute if an account was opened

            • Treetop 8.1.1.1.1.1
              28 December 2011 at 5:11 pm

              Me to. I do not know what the process is to open an account for donations and I hope that this is done soon.

              • Pundit X …
                28 December 2011 at 5:16 pm

                I’d contribute also but only if Ambrose actually published the recording unedited and in full.

                • IrishBill …
                  28 December 2011 at 5:58 pm

                  I’m sure we’d be happy to publish it.

                • Colonial Viper …
                  28 December 2011 at 6:28 pm

                  That’s the one. Let’s hear what was said.

                • the sprout …
                  28 December 2011 at 8:47 pm

                  Happy to contribute too. Also very happy to see the standard publish it.

                • Blue …
                  29 December 2011 at 9:42 am

                  My understanding is that Ambrose does not have a copy of the recording, so he can’t publish it. He said he had turned it over to the HOS.

                  The HOS has already made the decision not to publish. The only way it could be published now would be if one of the other media organisations who have a copy decide to publish, or it gets leaked to someone who will publish it.

                  I would contribute to any fund set up to help him regardless.

                  • Fotran …
                    29 December 2011 at 1:26 pm

                    Winston has a transcript, and will read it out under Parliamentary Privilege as soon as Parliament sits, and he gets a chance. So patience.

                    • Vicky32 …
                      31 December 2011 at 12:38 pm

                      Winston has a transcript, and will read it out under Parliamentary Privilege as soon as Parliament sits, and he gets a chance. So patience.

                      He does and he will? We’ll see… after all, he has to be good for something!

                • Bobby Jr …
                  29 December 2011 at 1:02 pm

                  I would also contribute on the condition that Ambrose admits he deliberately recorded the conversation, knowing full well that was against the wishes of the people present.

                  • Colonial Viper …
                    29 December 2011 at 1:33 pm

                    Why would Ambrose admit something that wasn’t true? Key’s security let the recorder keep running so how do you know that they weren’t OK with it?

                    • Bobby Jr …
                      29 December 2011 at 2:19 pm

                      The recorder was with Ambrose. Only the remote mic was on the table, in a bag. Ambrose knew what he was doing – everyone knows this except people used to conjuring up lawyer-esque “prove it” lines of defence in the face of the obvious.

                    • Colonial Viper …
                      29 December 2011 at 2:54 pm

                      Why were Key’s security men OK with the remote mic on the table? They kept it there.

                  • Treetop …
                    29 December 2011 at 1:36 pm

                    How many people were present and were all those people aware of the wishes of Key and Banks?

                    • Bobby Jr …
                      29 December 2011 at 6:24 pm

                      Dozens.. and all except Ambrose were aware of the wishes.

                      This whole thing seems to stem on the issue whether it is possible to have a private conversation in a public place. And, if a conversation can be deemed to be private once people are asked to leave/not listen – regardless of whether they can see the participants through a glass window. Is visibility the benchmark? Or distance? Or proximity to public space? All of these things seem to get argued pretty conveniently in hindsight depending on which side you support.

                    • Treetop …
                      29 December 2011 at 8:10 pm

                      Bobby Jr in response to your comment 29 Dec at 6.24 pm “Dozens.. and all except Ambrose were aware of the wishes.”

                      You seem to know what the dozens present in the room knew. Please provide the proof of what the dozens present knew at the time of the teapot conversation?

                      See paragraph 3 in my 29 Dec at 2:49 pm comment for my definition of a private conversation.

                      Even clincians in particular counsellors, psychologists, psychiatrists do breach patient confidentiality when it comes to harm to self or harm to others. No doubt there is political harm to self and political harm to others and the enemy is a whistle blower.

                  • Treetop …
                    29 December 2011 at 2:49 pm

                    Bobby Jr in response to your 29 Dec 2:19 pm post to C.V, anyone close by to the table that Key and Banks were sitting at could have been a decoy with a listening device.

                    I now have to ask the question: Was the conversation between Key and Banks ABLE to be overheard?

                    When I have a PRIVATE conversation, I make sure that the ONLY person who can hear me is the person I am having the private conversation with. Maybe next time the PM meets with the SIS boss it can be in a cafe and we can all be invited. Irrelevant on the Banks/Key conversation being taped, that would be my defence were I Ambrose.

                    Key and Banks need to
                    1. Admit the problem
                    2. Own the problem
                    3. Take responsibility for the problem

                    I will not know what their problem is until I hear the teapot tape. I know this much, that what they said is being concealed by them and that both of them are on a witch hunt regarding Ambrose.

                    • RedLogix …
                      29 December 2011 at 3:36 pm

                      Or to put it even more succiently; if Key and Banks wanted a private conversation… they should’ve got a room.

                      Like the rest of us do.

                    • Bobby Jr …
                      29 December 2011 at 11:33 pm

                      Treetop, I thought it was well established that everyone was asked to leave the room and ushered out. I’m not sure what message that was supposed to send to everyone if not: we don’t want you here. I think it’s quite implicit that recording the conversation which would follow was not invited.

                      Whether you believe it was accidental or not it is fair to assume that basically everyone other than Ambrose got the message that mix-n-mingle time was over. Whatever your definition of private conversation is, I’m sure we’ll find out sometime soon whether the courts agree.

                    • Colonial Viper …
                      30 December 2011 at 12:09 am

                      Treetop, I thought it was well established that everyone was asked to leave the room and ushered out

                       
                      Nope, footage clearly shows that other cafe patrons stayed at their seats and continued eating.

                    • Bobby Jr …
                      30 December 2011 at 2:03 am

                      @Colonial Viper. I think it’s pretty clear they meant “other than patrons” who were present.

                      See, this here is exactly the sort of finicky, defence lawyer-esque thread of debate which suits the internet but doesn’t stack up with the way the most people operate in real life. It’s all very well to point out details and claim they’re significant in the scheme of things but they don’t alter the likely fact that everyone who was there to see Key/Banks was aware that social time was over. If not through being told or by realising that all their peers were being shooed out. We’ve seen photos of the media lined up outside the cafe looking in. Don’t you think a normal person at some point would assume they were outside because they’d been asked?

                      The fact that other patrons remained inside could even support this claim as Key’s staff might well have had to go around and confirm people were patrons and not media (or just make a mental note – pity no-one looked at the table right in front of them ha ha).

                      People defending Ambrose here seem to be doing it not because there is any particular case either way, rather that it perfectly suits their dislike of Key to assume whatever position on ANY subject in opposition to whatever he is saying/doing. As others have said, had it been Helen Clark in this position the same people would be here screaming for Ambrose to be arrested.

                    • Colonial Viper …
                      30 December 2011 at 2:14 am

                      @Colonial Viper. I think it’s pretty clear they meant “other than patrons” who were present.

                      See, this here is exactly the sort of finicky, defence lawyer-esque thread of debate which suits the internet but doesn’t stack up with the way the most people operate in real life.

                      So you know there were members of the public dining there. In fact, sitting within a metre or two of Banks and Key. Either the cafe was a public place or it was a private meeting space.

                      Now which is it.

                      If it’s not too finicky to ask, that is. Because since its an important point of NZ privacy law, you better be prepared to answer.

                      As others have said, had it been Helen Clark in this position the same people would be here screaming for Ambrose to be arrested.

                      Actually, Helen Clark wouldn’t have set up this kind of Key and Banks media circus, so it would never have happened.

                    • Treetop …
                      30 December 2011 at 1:44 pm

                      Bobby Jr I asked this question on this thread on 29 Dec at 2.49 pm.

                      Was the conversation between Key and Banks ABLE to be overheard?

                    • Bobby Jr …
                      30 December 2011 at 3:19 pm

                      @Treetop. Sorry, didn’t get around to answering the Q. I think that it’s easy to paint this in a black and white scenario depending what you chose to believe – basically whatever your political leanings lead you to – when there is probably plenty of middle ground. Just what entails a “private conversation” has not been determined as completely private with no-one else around to hear. Likewise, just what entails a “public conversation” hasn’t either. As Colonial Viper said there were patron nearby. Does that automatically make anything Key/Banks said open season for people who were there for the sole reason to record? What about those randomly there for a coffee? (we know Ambrose was present to record for news media so intent is established already surely? It should be up to him to prove that he backed off and accidentally left his recording device on)

                      I think it is absolutely possible to have a private conversation in a public space. It is harder no doubt, but it’s not as clear cut as people seem to want to argue either way. From what we know about the situation it seems pretty clear the intention was for all journalists to leave. Whether all of the journos heard that message or not cannot be proven which is why we end up with this “you cannot prove I heard it” scenario, the sort of argument which makes for good legal defence regardless or not it is the truth. It’s a line of debate far too many people run down as soon as a scenario can be judged from a heavily politically slanted position.

                      Ambrose’s application to the court was to get top legal word on a small aspect of the whole scenario so he could disseminate his tape prior to the election – a situation entirely supported by people who wanted the pending election date to expedite the unravelling of all of this rather than letting the normal legal timeline unravel it. To me that smells much more of a political pursuit rather than any care for the truth or Ambrose’s intentions.

                    • Treetop …
                      30 December 2011 at 5:40 pm

                      Bobby Jr in response to your comment 30 Dec at 3.19 pm

                      “Does that automatically make anything Key/Banks said open season for people who were there for the sole reason to record?”

                      My answer to this is: What was the intent of Key and Banks to have invited the media to film and tape them having a publicised cup of tea in a public area prior to a general election?

                      “What about those randomly there for coffee?”

                      They remained in their seats within hearing distance and anyone of them could have recorded the conversation on a cell phone.

                      Did the DPS ask for all cell phones from those present in the cafe?

                      Had the DPS done their job properly no one would have been left in the cafe or left holding a camera or a bag looking through the glass at Key and Banks. Key and Banks let the cameras roll to get votes, I regard this as being manipulative. I do not like seeing the media being manipulated either as there is such a thing as freedom of speech and I believe it is the job of the media to report the FACTS without favour or bias.

                    • Bobby Jr …
                      30 December 2011 at 6:05 pm

                      @Treetop. Fair call on most of that. I just don’t see that being in a public place automatically makes a conversation public. Especially, as I’ve said, when it was pretty obvious to the people present for the purpose of recording stuff that fun time was over. I agree that people at the cafe randomly could have recorded them – but wouldn’t that still be covert surveillance? That’s how spies have gotten info since day dot. Likewise, does being in a public place mean someone can record you with a parabolic listening device without you having any right to complain? Where is the line? It’s grey as far as I’m concerned and this case is especially grey – in no way falling completely on the media freedom side of the scale. (again, Key haters struggle to separate themselves from the notion that they may be taking the stance they do for no reason other than it suits their dislike of him – hence the Clark comparison)

                      “I do not like seeing the media being manipulated either as there is such a thing as freedom of speech and I believe it is the job of the media to report the FACTS without favour or bias.”

                      I agree totally, but media don’t report the facts without favour/bias and haven’t done for years… except of course when people agree with what they write and all of a sudden it’s good, honest reporting. Blogs are generally even further out to each wing – The Standard, No Right Turn, Kiwiblog, WhaleOil etc are considered gospel to the people who agree with them – and little more than biased fabrications or fronts for various political groups to those who don’t. So far as the mainstream media are concerned it’s not too dissimilar – their integrity is at an all-time low. Nothing they get up to should be viewed as simply “by-chance”. They can coerce almost any situation you could imagine into an ‘ooops, sorry – accidental recording’ one when it suits their purposes and then argue the contents of the tapes automatically fits the “public good” line of reasoning to justify their release. (i.e. mistrust of the mainstream media should be the default starting point imo, not altruistic news reporting)

                    • Colonial Viper …
                      30 December 2011 at 6:23 pm

                      Basically Ambrose was correct to have the judgement sought, and Key is wrong for allowing his Govt to try and chill the course of justice by charging him for it.

                    • RedLogix …
                      30 December 2011 at 6:24 pm

                      I think it is absolutely possible to have a private conversation in a public space.

                      Possible yes, but there is no legal right to one.

                      If you need confidentiality you find a private room where you can be reasonably certain that there are no cameras or microphones to eavesdrop. Anywhere else is just plain bad judgement. Alternately if you don’t want to be embarrassed about what you say if other people might overhear, then don’t say it. Again just plain bad judgement if you act otherwise.

                      For example; I’m sitting on the train sounding off to a mate about my psycho boss.. whose brother-in-law happens to be in the seat behind with his cell-phone recording me. Result? I’m screwed. How far do you think I’d get in an employment Court arguing that I thought I was having a private conversation?

                      In fact I recall a case not so long ago when a salesman was sacked after accidently dialling his boss on his cellphone while at the same time he was sort of bagging the company to a customer. He certainly thought the conversation was private, it wasn’t even in a public place, but the Court didn’t for an instant consider it a private conversation.

                      In other words, while it is possible to have a discrete conversation in a public setting, there is no right to one.

                    • Treetop …
                      30 December 2011 at 7:42 pm

                      Bobby Jr in response to your comment 30 Dec at 6.05 pm.

                      I like what RedLogix has to say about commonsense. Unfortunately this (commonsense) was not exercised by Key and Banks as they could not be assured that their conversation could not be over heard.

                      Were they oblivious to their surroundings?

                      Surely it has not come to this: That you have to cover your ears when the PM is having a conversation in a public place as he may deem it to be private or do the media have to ask the PM in future if he is having a private conversation when the media are invited?

                    • Bobby Jr …
                      30 December 2011 at 8:06 pm

                      @RedLogix, @ Treetop. Good points. I can’t say I disagree with you but still think the fact that journos present were asked to leave and they all did (whether Ambrose heard the request or was just following the pack he did leave the room and was there for quite some time waiting around) – distinguishes him from the “randomly overheard” line of debate. Whether any genuine patrons overheard or not is also a bit irrelevant as none have come forward and said they could at this point. If they could then that would be a very different story, but not for Ambrose. It is almost as if those supporting him want to play both sides of the field – arguing “press freedom” when it suits them and, when that doesn’t seem to get traction, the “it was accidental and anyway it happened in a public place..” – Is that ‘freedom to partake in accidental covert recordings’? lol

                      In short, it’s all a little too convenient to argue it that way for people who basically hate Key and/or Banks as is the case with most people here without any doubt whatsoever. If Ambrose did it deliberately: the tape can’t come out, but since that is basically impossible to prove – and everyone involved knows it – somehow press freedom has entered them mix when it’s really nothing to do with this at all. The situation is either: he covertly recording a private conversation OR he accidentally recorded a conversation which could be considered public or private. Either way the situation would end the same way if an honourable person in the habit of acting ethically was involved.

                      As it stands however we’re dealing with the mainstream media who few could debate often excuse themselves from operating ethically or having any honour in direct correlation to the sauciness of a story. And it seems half of NZ (well, 27% at least) have taken the bait and think ‘poor Mr Ambrose, little guy being given the beat-up by the mean National people.’

  9. Pundit X 9
    28 December 2011 at 5:13 pm

    Where’s Savage when you need him.. This is just an intimidatory salvo, unless a judge orders cost to be paid then there are no costs owing. Surely this is a matter that should have been before the judge when Ambrose made his application and surely his counsel would have informed him of prospective liability? His liability for cost would seem to hinge on whether he is found guilty of recording a private conversation. I’d say the MSN have hung him out to dry.

    As a photojournalist who regularly offered work to the MSN in the UK and the US ( I choose not to work here – no news and no money) I’m astonished at the way this was handled. The editor of New Zealand’s largest Sunday paper phones up the Prime Minister in the middle of an election and gives away the best story of the entire campaign… “Prime Minister sorry to trouble you I know your very busy with the campaign but a freelance videographer has just brought in a recording of your conversation with John Banks and I wondered if you’d mind if we published it? No, thought not but just thought I’d ask.. Incidentally how’s Bronagh and the kids. Best of luck for Saturday.”

    • Treetop 9.1
      28 December 2011 at 9:11 pm

      Anything is possible e.g. Ambrose could have been paid to keep quiet and the Attorney General asking for court costs may be a way of throwing the public off the scent.

      When the public percieve the executive as being too involved with the media or vice versa questions need to be asked about crossing ethical/legal boundaries.

      If there is nothing to hide on the teapot tapes, having the contents released will be the proof.

    • mickysavage 9.2
      29 December 2011 at 8:37 am

      Um it is a huge amount of money but you know how rapacious and greedy the legal profession is …

      The general rule is that costs follow the decision and there is an established schedule of what can be claimed.  Ambrose’s best arguments are:

      1.  The matter is not finalized.  There are defamation proceedings ready to be lodged.
      2.  It was in the nature of a test case and the public interest involved should mean that no costs are awarded.
      3.  Key has essentially protected a private interest by having the State defend the case for him and it would be unjust for Ambrose to have to pay costs.

      There are probably dozens of other grounds to raise but in my holiday brain state this is all I can manage pre coffee. 

  10. Ed 10
    28 December 2011 at 11:09 pm

    This does highlight the issue of the tapes again. Either National are desperate to avoid it being leaked, or someone within National is trying to keep it in the news – Is John Key not actually as uniformly loved by the right as the spin-merchants try to tell us?

  11. Pundit X 11
    28 December 2011 at 11:50 pm

    The fact that the memorandum on expenses has been tabled means it can’t be much longer before the police actually reach a conclusion as to whether or not the recording was made illegally and if so whether or not to charge Ambrose. My take is that we will never actually know (apart from Winston Peters speculation) what was said in the recording. If the police decide the recording was made illegally that effectively suppresses the recording even if they don’t charge Ambrose. If they do charge him and he is found Guilty, still suppressed. If they decide it wasn’t recorded illegally or he is found not guilty then it can be published but as Ambrose is the copyright holder of the recording it can only be published with his consent. I’d say without a buyer in the MSN it will never be heard and the MSN won’t touch it as it is old news, no longer relevant – well that will be their excuse. For Ambrose to then give it away creates a terrible precedent for freelance journos he simply won’t do it. I hope I’m wrong.

    • Colonial Viper 11.1
      29 December 2011 at 1:56 am

      For Ambrose to then give it away creates a terrible precedent for freelance journos he simply won’t do it.

      Doesn’t the content just need to be couched in an alternative way or context eg. as an academic or teaching case study.
      That way the content gets out in the open while no negative precedent for freelance journalism is set.

      then it can be published but as Ambrose is the copyright holder of the recording it can only be published with his consent.

      Again, as long as it were known, couldn’t the entire contents of the recording be discussed and publicly critically reviewed in detail without the recording per se being published/broadcast and hence without copyright being broken?

  12. Bobby Jr 12
    29 December 2011 at 2:30 am

    Ambrose brought this on himself really. He sought a decision from the court on an act he did. Key had no almost part in this sequence of choices Ambrose made which got us to this point.

    He’s just now looking like the kook because what he intended to do in order to make some money has blown up in his face. When you play with fire it happens sometimes. It’s one of the key reasons HoS et al use freelancers – so they get the goods when they want but can treat stuff like this at arms-length.

  13. ghostwhowalksnz 13
    29 December 2011 at 8:25 am

    Giving it away ?
    Well it could be foolish to give it ALL away. But then havent Herald/TV3 got it allready, surely they paid something ?. Otherwise he could release a ‘teaser’ part of it for free.

    This costs thing sounds like firing a shot over the bows. To show who has the biggest bazookas.

  14. Tombstone 14
    29 December 2011 at 9:28 am

    I think we should get behind this journalist and show Key that he is one man, but we are many and when you attack one of us you attack us all. I’ll also happily donate money to help this guy. I don’t have a lot but if I can help I will. I believe in freedom of speech and the right to know the truth about what our elected leaders and politicians are saying about us. Key needs to be taken to task over this and our toothless media need to jack up a hard hitting, no nonsense interview with him and stop all this pandering to Brand Key. It’s pathetic.

  15. Pundit X 15
    29 December 2011 at 10:23 am

    @Blue. It’s a digital recording, I can’t see Ambrose giving it to the HOS in that way without being paid for exclusivity and then as I understand it TV3 also have a copy. Nor can I see Ambrose not keeping an archive copy for himself. As an aside this whole affair does serve as significant reminder of just how unethical the NZ media has become. The recording was made at a photo op called by Key in order to publicise his nod and a wink to the voters of Epsom every news organisation that sent crews to that event knows they were being complicit in helping National win the election. Moreover they all singularly failed to act on the only genuine story to come out of the event. They would probably like it to go away for if the recording was now published it would show us – if any of us had any doubt just what a shower of shit they actually are.

    • Blue 15.1
      29 December 2011 at 12:32 pm

      Ambrose was working for the Herald, in that he was asked by the website arm of the Herald to go and film the meeting that day. So strictly speaking, the Herald actually owns the footage, because they commissioned him.

      I fully agree re media (lack of) ethics. The transcript should have been published by the HOS as soon as they got it. I doubt it will ever be published by any MSM organisation now.

      • Pundit X 15.1.1
        29 December 2011 at 1:03 pm

        It depends on what arrangements were made regarding the commission. Although the law regarding commissioning is straightforward in New Zealand copyright is held by the commissioner. You can agree a licensing or first use deal instead. I can’t see Ambrose putting himself through all this crap if he has no rights to the recording himself. Nor can I see how third parties such as TV 3 were given a copy by HOS if they had sole copyright and had agreed with Key not to publish.

        But just a quick word on copyright and authorship rights in New Zealand as oposed to other Berne Convention signatories. Whilst the rest of Berne signatories were giving authorship rights to authors, artists, photographers in the eighties – Britain did it in 1989. The National government in New Zealand under pressure from the MSN ensure it didn’t happen here. The last Labour government under pressure from creative professionals and organisations such as the AIPA and NZIPP reviewed the situation and it was given to Judith Tizard to review. She stonewalled the creatives in favour of the MSN ( it took her 6 months to respond to my letter) in the very vain hope they would somehow show their appeciation. They caned Labour in the run up to 2008 and the rest as they say is history.

        • Colonial Viper 15.1.1.1
          29 December 2011 at 1:23 pm

          Labour was happy for a for-profit corporate MSM model in this country to continue, and they continue to reap the results.

        • Blue 15.1.1.2
          29 December 2011 at 4:29 pm

          Ambrose didn’t put himself through any of this crap. When he realised what he had inadvertently recorded he gave the footage over to its owner (the Herald) and left it to them and their lawyers to decide what to do with it.

          I can’t imagine that he could have done anything else in that position under the law as it stands.

          • Pundit X 15.1.1.2.1
            29 December 2011 at 4:59 pm

            So it wasn’t Ambrose who sought a judgment on the legality of the recording? So why he being charged for costs? Am I missing something? Are you a friend with an inside take? Or are you speculating like the rest of us?

            • Blue 15.1.1.2.1.1
              29 December 2011 at 7:52 pm

              Ambrose sought the judgment because the police are investigating whether to charge him with making an illegal recording. They are targeting him personally, not the Herald, who hired him.

              He maintains that he made it by accident, but obviously his lawyer tried to go down a different route by trying to challenge the idea that it was a private conversation and nip the potential charge in the bud there and then.

              The court wouldn’t take on such a politically contentious decision before the election, and the action failed and now he’s being charged for costs.

              I know a little about the situation, and the rest is speculation.

          • mickysavage 15.1.1.2.2
            29 December 2011 at 5:06 pm

            I can’t imagine that he could have done anything else in that position under the law as it stands.

            Well, um, he could have played it. There are plenty of examples where data obtained in a public setting has been published. Squillions of them actually.

            • Blue 15.1.1.2.2.1
              29 December 2011 at 7:59 pm

              He doesn’t have an agenda, Micky. He’s not a political activist, in fact he’s on the record as saying he’s a National Party voter.

              He’s not a crusading journalist either. He’s a cameraman who would probably prefer to be going down a volcano than going to some staged cup of tea nonsense in Epsom.

              This was just a job to him. A way to pay the bills.

              • mickysavage …
                29 December 2011 at 8:05 pm

                Um Blue I was responding to your comment suggesting that the taping was illegal and I was suggesting that it was nothing of the sort.

                • Blue …
                  29 December 2011 at 8:19 pm

                  Sorry Micky. I thought you were criticising Ambrose for not publishing the tape himself. Some people seem to think he should be a one-man Wikileaks.

                  • Colonial Viper …
                    30 December 2011 at 9:09 am

                    Blue. Most whistleblowers are single individuals. Private Manning, the source of most of Wikileaks info, was a single individual.

                    Don’t mistake a potential source of info (Ambrose) for the route that info may be disseminated into the public sphere.

                    Hell, anyone at those TV stations could forward a transcript or copy of the recording to Wikileaks if they wanted. That’s what it’s there for.

  16. brett Dale 16
    29 December 2011 at 12:48 pm

    If Paul Henry had of covertly taped Helen Clark, and then denied it, you guys would go nuts and be calling for jail time, but because it happened to John Key Bradley Ambrose or White is a hero.

    • Pundit X 16.1
      29 December 2011 at 1:09 pm

      @ Brett Dale and Bobby J. I see the RWNJ’s have had their morning coffee..

      • mac1 16.1.1
        29 December 2011 at 1:14 pm

        Pundit X, morning coffee but not a read of a good grammar or dictionary. One of the signs of a RWNJ troll.

    • Treetop 16.2
      29 December 2011 at 1:14 pm

      I am making a stand for any person who does not have the influence or resources who is being attacked by those who must be seen to be impartial due to the position they hold.

      Clark would not be so brazenly foolish as Key and Banks were.

      I just hope someone from the police leaks the tape to let Key and Banks know that Marshall runs the police and that no politician pisses on Marshall’s shoes.

    • millsy 16.3
      29 December 2011 at 1:34 pm

      Brett, it is “had have”, not “had of”.

      And it isnt “Should/Would/Could of”, it is “Should/Would/Could have”.

      There is this person I work with who does the same, even in emails to clients, and it really pisses me off.

    • Daveosaurus 16.4
      29 December 2011 at 8:35 pm

      If Paul Henry had covertly taped Helen Clark, and the tape was broadcast, it would probably have too many big words in it for you to easily understand what had been said.

  17. Pundit X 17
    29 December 2011 at 5:01 pm

    This just in from Winston:

    “TEA CUP LEGAL CASE AN ABUSE OF TAXPAYER’S MONEY” SAYS PETERS

    Leader of NZ First Winston Peters is questioning why the teacup tape legal case is being handled as though it is a case involving the Prime Minister, acting as Prime Minister?

    The meeting between Key and John Banks was a meeting between the leader of the National Party and the Act candidate for Epsom.

    This whole affair created, bungled, and since mishandled is being conducted like some affair of state when in point of fact it occurred around the events of a shonky election deal between two political parties, National and Act.

    That being the case why is there tax money involved here when it is a party political, not a taxpayer, matter. In fact most taxpayers think the whole event was disgraceful.

    “Why are government lawyers involved or can we now take it as read that lawyers acting for the government are now moonlighting for the National Party on the taxpayer’s pocket?” asked Mr Peters

    I am calling upon Mr Key and Mr Banks to stop abusing taxpayer’s time and money on a case which has nothing to do with the taxpayer and everything to do with their venal political interests.

    “Mr Key and Mr Banks should pay for this circus yourselves” said Mr Peters

    • Bobby Jr 17.1
      29 December 2011 at 6:32 pm

      Nothing Peters says with regards to the finer points of legality or ethics is worth considering. Laws and interpretations of them seem to bend according to how best suits Peters.

    • the sprout 17.2
      29 December 2011 at 6:38 pm

      It will be good having peters back in the house shoving red hot pins into national on a daily basis. Somehow i cant see labour doing it

      • Anne 17.2.1
        29 December 2011 at 8:33 pm

        No, I can’t see Labour doing it either and I’m still trying to figure out what’s up with them. They sat on their a—s for 3 years and let numerous opportunities to have the NAct govt’s guts for garters slip past them. And even when they did raise the energy to have a go, someone in Labour always mucked it up one way or another. It’s early days I know, but I’m not sure Shearer is going to be any better than Goff when it comes to calling the govt. to account.

        • newsense 17.2.1.1
          30 December 2011 at 1:30 am

          When there’s trouble and strife, and Labour’s voting for bad Govmint legislation
          That’s Pagani

  18. Pundit X 18
    30 December 2011 at 9:01 am

    Brett Dale and Bobby Jr – great handle for a RWNJ seem to be obsessing about Helen Clark. Boys she left office in 2008…

  19. Pundit X 19
    30 December 2011 at 3:11 pm

    Having just been informed of the death on Christmas day of an old friend and colleague, Steve Bent on Christmas Day. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/8983587/Steve-Bent.html

    I was reflecting on Steve’s career and my own and then another post arrived from Bobby Jr on the Petty thread bringing me back to the banal … To introduce a little perspective there are photographers, journalists and news crews out there who are passionate about what they do. Their desire to inform the world on the gravest of issues overiding all thoughts of personal risk or gain.

    Then there is Bradley Ambrose who Blue informs us is no crusading journalist but a former policeman turned camera operator, trying to pay his mortgage, he even votes National. Having unknowingnly recorded the biggest story of the election campaign he dutifully turns it over to his commisioning agent the Herald on Sunday. Who then puts in a quick call to Key to see if he’d mind being politically embarrassed one week out from an election. The rest we know.

    It seems Ambrose is a reluctant hero who clearly doesn’t want to be a standard bearer for press freedom – no pun intended. And yes it our projection that is making him so. The whole issue is quite bizarre. A National voting camera operator whose every action thus far has been completely lawful is picked on by the government and threatened with enormous costs seemingly to intimidate him into not doing what he isn’t going to do anyway making him the poster boy of press freedom in New Zealand. You couldn’t make it up..

    I just hope Ambrose realizes there is more to newsgathering than just pointing the camera and pressing the record button. There is a duty to inform – its why your there. Otherwise you might as well go back to issuing traffic citations…

  20. Pundit X 20
    30 December 2011 at 4:00 pm

    Winston again…

    December 30 2011

    “TEACUP TAPE CASE DOES NOT INVOLVE ATTORNEY GENERAL” PETERS

    New Zealand First says the Attorney General cannot claim court costs from a free lance cameraman over the teacup tape court case because the case does not involve the government – just the National and Act parties.

    Rt. Hon Winston Peters says legal wires have been crossed by the case because it was mistakenly taken up by the government’s own legal system when it should have simply involved lawyers for John Key and John Banks.

    “This case happened during an election campaign when the National Party leader met an Act party candidate to stitch up a deal for the Epsom electorate. It had nothing to do with an affair of state or anything related to the office of prime minister.

    What has happened is that the National Party, acting for political purposes, is using taxpayer resources to have a fight with a private citizen.

    This is abuse of power and it is also illegal.

    Our advice to the cameraman is to ignore the Attorney General’s demand for court costs and to make a claim himself against John Key and John Banks, who in this matter are simply private citizens.” says Mr. Peters.

    • Colonial Viper 20.1
      30 December 2011 at 9:02 pm

      Its holidays but Winston is definitely not on holiday! Unless he simply considers this summer time sports…

  21. Pundit X 21
    30 December 2011 at 7:08 pm

    Author: Bobby Jr
    Comment:

    “I do not like seeing the media being manipulated either as there is such a thing as freedom of speech and I believe it is the job of the media to report the FACTS without favour or bias.”

    So WTF are you arguing about…

  22. Pundit X 22
    30 December 2011 at 8:34 pm

    Author: Bobby Jr
    Comment:

    As it stands however we’re dealing with the mainstream media who few could debate often excuse themselves from operating ethically or having any honour in direct correlation to the sauciness of a story. And it seems half of NZ (well, 27% at least) have taken the bait and think ‘poor Mr Ambrose, little guy being given the beat-up by the mean National people.’

    Bobby you now appear to be arguing in an empty room…There is no evidence to suggest Ambrose behaved in any other way than in a completely professional manner. He is being beaten up end of story. I personally hope that once the police find in his favour the recording will be released in the public interest.

    • deuto 22.1
      30 December 2011 at 9:25 pm

      Pundit X, I havew just popped on here briefly before hitting the sack after a very long day. But just wanted to say that having quickly read your comments above, I totally agree with your perspective that Ambrose has possibly ended up quite unintentionally as the “reluctant hero”. . I am very disturbed by what has happened and is happening in this case, and really feel that the whole situation is quite bizarre. Pleased to see Winnie in on the act, regardless of his motivations.

    • Bobby Jr 22.2
      30 December 2011 at 11:17 pm

      @Pundit X – While that may be the case, there is also no evidence that he didn’t deliberately put the microphone there. All we have is his denial. I think that’d run pretty thin with the people who think they’ve been wronged by him.

      So far as the tapes ever being released, I agree – I hope they come out too – dying to know what’s on them. In any case, there is no doubt at all they will get released ‘somehow’. They simply wont stay private forever given how many people claim to have heard them. Key trying to stop it is pointless, he could only delay it. So, he’s getting beaten up – when you do what he did and the people involved are suspicious it was deliberate – which should be the default assumption with the media these days – I’ve got no doubt some people might want to not take it lying down. Unfortunate for him but these things are bound to happen when you accidentally covertly record a Nation’s leader – regardless of where they are or who they’re speaking to.

      • McFlock 22.2.1
        30 December 2011 at 11:49 pm

        So, if we make the (doubtful) assumption that the conversation between two people in a cafe was reasonably regarded as private, your position is that the camera operator has to prove his innocence (oh, and my understanding is that he deliberately placed the microphone along with everyone else – the question is whether he intentionally left it there and recorded the feed from the mic while knowing it was a private communication)?
          
         Careful, your totalitarianism is showing.

        • Bobby Jr 22.2.1.1
          31 December 2011 at 3:01 am

          @McFlock – The topics of whether it was a public conversation or not, and that of whether it was a covert recording are not the same topic really. They overlap at some point for sure but only a truly partisan person would argue that covert recording of someone in public is moral or ethical. You go up and talk to someone randomly in the street and record the conversation secretly. Can you broadcast that conversation? How about using an eaves-dropping device? Or planting a microphone in a pot-plant near them? Are these situations all open season since they’re in public? Because that’s basically what is being argued by many here.

          Deliberate or not, the recording was done covertly. The shooing away of media, the location, the incompetence of the PM’s minders etc don’t change the fact it was a covert recording one bit.
          A fair few people don’t want to consider this because they seem focussed only on the press freedom/Govt giving cameraman a beatdown line of thinking. Does anyone here have any previous president on dissemination/legality of accidental covert recordings? That should be the key question we’re asking here – with relation to the media who were involved especially – long before we get to the whole court costs, defamation, content of the tapes conversation.

          I totally agree with what you are saying with regards to the cameraman and proving innocence – the onus should be on the accuser for sure. In this case however it would be impossible to ever prove without an admission. But, if you did it on a balance of probabilities the call seems to lie not with any particular pieces evidence, rather a purely ‘do you love or ate Key?’ line in the sand. Here Key is basically despised and no amount of evidence/likelihoods will change views on this. Everyone likes to consider themselves beyond reproach when it comes to impartiality and having a thoughtful, worldly overview of situations but the reality is people here are at least as biased as WhaleOil etc fanboys, just in the opposite direction – a myopia which wouldn’t change even if Ambrose came forward and said “I did it all”. The tune would merely change to ‘they paid him off.’

          Explain this situation to someone who knows nothing about it and I guarantee you will get asked: “he did it deliberately didn’t he?”. There’s a good reason too, because people think alike and recognise potential cunning when they see it.

          • Colonial Viper 22.2.1.1.1
            31 December 2011 at 6:41 am

            Nice irrelevant lawyerish finery. Weren’t you complaining about that a day or two ago.

            I totally agree with what you are saying with regards to the cameraman and proving innocence – the onus should be on the accuser for sure. In this case however it would be impossible to ever prove without an admission.

            Yet Ambrose is being charged $14K. Why did the Government choose to do this?

            Explain this situation to someone who knows nothing about it and I guarantee you will get asked: “he did it deliberately didn’t he?”. There’s a good reason too, because people think alike and recognise potential cunning when they see it.

            Fuck off you dreamy pumpkin.

            You somehow think that people will recognise the cunning by Ambrose and not notice that Prime Minister John Key had a security detail which accidentally and mysteriously left the mic on the table next to the PM in an anonymous black bag (how did they know that it didn’t contain a grenade?) and that afterwards the PM subsequently used every trick in the book to turn the set up cafe event into an election stunt, even staging a media walk out?!

            Do you think people noticed that Prime Ministerial; “cunning”, mate?

            • Bobby Jr 22.2.1.1.1.1
              31 December 2011 at 11:36 am

              @Colonial Viper. Most of what happened that day with regards to the PM and his security detail can probably be put down to plain old incompetence. They had nothing to gain. The same can’t be said of Ambrose.

              • Colonial Viper …
                31 December 2011 at 3:33 pm

                I don’t see how former SAS and anti-terrorist squad members accidentally missed an odd looking black bag resting next to the PM. Do you? You would happily believe that is incomeptence, but can’t believe that Ambrose accidentally left the tape running after being shooed outside in a hurry.

                How selective of you.

          • RedLogix 22.2.1.1.2
            31 December 2011 at 9:00 am

            Deliberate or not, the recording was done covertly.

            It was a political event at which two of the more prominent politicians in the country had invited dozens of media. Nothing in that context can be considered private or covert.

            Neither Key nor Banks are private individuals. What they say is of inherent public interest.

            The event was intended to be openly recorded for public broadcast.

            Merely ‘shooing away’ the crowd of media, while there were still many people remaining within close earshot scarcely denotes that you are about to have a confidential, private conversation. In such a setting Ambrose’s recording can hardly be characterised as ‘covert’… it could be fairly described as ‘unintended’ or that Key and Banks were ‘unaware’ that they were being recorded.

            But that is really their problem; not Ambrose’s.

            Everyone likes to consider themselves beyond reproach when it comes to impartiality and having a thoughtful, worldly overview of situations but the reality is people here are at least as biased

            And when Shane Jones was pinged for watching pornos in his own bedroom… just how high do you think ‘privacy’ concerns ranked among the right-wing fanboys then?

            • Bobby Jr 22.2.1.1.2.1
              31 December 2011 at 11:33 am

              @RedLogix. The microphone was concealed in a bag. Whether Ambrose tried to get in and retrieve it or not the recording was done without the knowledge of Key/Banks or their minders (initially at least). That cannot be anything other than “covert”. Even Ambrose would concede that point. The issues really are whether the setting was a) public or private, and b) whether it was recorded deliberately or not. Ambrose says he didn’t do it deliberately but that point doesn’t matter at this stage because he’s asked the court to decide whether the scenario was public. If it WAS public then recording deliberately or accidentally shouldn’t be an issue if we use the standards being debated by most here. So, as Ambrose knows and his lawyers advised, he asked for the setting to be ruled on by the court which it wasn’t for whatever reason – time-frame, lack of evidence, right wing meddling etc depending on what you want to believe.

              The tapes will come out – there is no doubt about that at all. And the best situation really would have been to rip the band-aid off quickly and get it over and done with (assuming something really dodgy wasn’t being discussed). As it is Ambrose seems to be the sorry pawn between the left and right wing hardcore crews, each debating whatever suits their fancy to get kudos on their respective blogs/boards. If they courts come back saying it was not public all that will result in is a “Nats telling judges what to decide” hooha. They basically can’t win at anything whatsoever until Key is crying on TV resigning from office (sic).

              • RedLogix …
                31 December 2011 at 11:49 am

                The microphone was concealed in a bag.

                Again you are choosing to use a perogative term for something that may well have been perfectly innocent.

                PunditX may well have a more informed view, but I would have thought it quite normal for photojournalists to use bags for their equipment. The microphone may well have been ‘concealed’ from Key and Banks point of view, but there is no evidence that Ambrose intended it to place it in such a fashion.

                Besides it was a pretty clunky ‘concealment’… in a bag in plain view on the top of the table. If Ambrose had stuck a ‘bug’ to the underside of the table, then I’d agree it was a concealed microphone. But even then Key and Banks would have had poor excuse for saying stupid things in such a public and open setting.

                The issues really are whether the setting was a) public or private, and b) whether it was recorded deliberately or not.

                I agree with the first point, but I’d suggest that the second is a non-essential distraction. The fact is that recording exists and everyone knows that; motive is hardly relevant anymore.

                • Treetop …
                  31 December 2011 at 1:43 pm

                  “The issues really are whether the setting was a) public or private, or b) whether it was recorded deliberately or not?”

                  a) Publication is only illegal if publisher knows the interception was illegal. No one can now know that because s215 only applies to private conversations and we are in legal limbo on whether the teapot conversation was private.

                  If the conversation is deemed to be private publication is illegal. If the conversation is deemed to be public publication is legal.

                  b) When I read that an individual is allegedly being held responsible for partaking in a so called covert taping I have to ask: Who is responsible for what Key and Banks said during their conversation in a publc place where the media was present?

                  Ambrose did not make Key or Banks say anything when Key and Banks knowingly knew that they were doing a publicity stunt and that there was an invited audience.

                  Did Key and Banks stipulate why they asked the media to leave if it was either of them, or whoever did this, stipulate why?

                  The motive could have been for Key and Banks to have been the only focus as this would have looked better on camera footage as the cameras were allowed to roll while they were conversing.

                  Key and Banks knowingly knew they were being filmed. Say the FBI received a copy of the footage and provided a transcript: Would this be deemed as a private conversation?

          • McFlock 22.2.1.1.3
            31 December 2011 at 3:22 pm

            only a truly partisan person would argue that covert recording of someone in public is moral or ethical.

             
            Nobody is arguing that here. The issue is legality (when that coincides with morality it is generally a happy coincidence).
                
            Others have addressed the remainder of your irrelevancies. Getting a wee bit slippery there, aren’t you.
             
             

            • Treetop 22.2.1.1.3.1
              31 December 2011 at 5:59 pm

              I want to know why the media were asked to move and who asked them to move and where they were told to move to?

  23. Pundit X 23
    31 December 2011 at 10:12 am

    @ Bobby Jr.

    “While that may be the case, there is also no evidence that he didn’t deliberately put the microphone there. All we have is his denial. I think that’d run pretty thin with the people who think they’ve been wronged by him.”

    We tend to judge others by our moral criteria.. on that basis judging from your posts thus far I’d your one of the most cunning shits I’ve encountered for a while.. I think I’m probably the only photojournalist contributing to this debate. And I’m certain Bobby Jr that you have never ever been under the pressure that Ambrose would have been under working in a pack trying to get the best angle, keeping track of his gear etc. In situations like that and especially for a newbie like Ambrose its easy to leave gear behind – we’ve all done it. Not just mikes, I left The Times 300mm lens at the Reagan Gorbachev summit in Reykjavik. Another colleague at the Times left his bag of lenses on the runway at RAF Brize Norton when flying to Iraq with the then PM John Major. The number of mikes, assorted cables, lenses, lens caps, hoods that I’ve seen left behind at photo ops just like this one as the dash to meet deadline overcomes all else is the stuff of legend. I can well believe Ambrose because those of us who work in the profession have all done it..

    You on the other keep picking away at your assertion in the hope that somehow your ‘little’ big lie will stick and we’ll question Ambrose’s character. What a cunning shit you are..

    • Bobby Jr 23.1
      31 December 2011 at 11:17 am

      @Pundit X. Ummm… Oddly nasty post there but if you have experience with these things then I guess it means you are in a better position to comment on the specifics of gear management etc. As for pressure situations, that’s sort of besides the point here. The “under pressure” line could just as simply be part of the reverse-engineered defence when caught doing something dodgy.

      [A fair point Bobby. While blog commenting is traditionally a robust pastime, after a while most people learn that being nasty, mean or absusive…. just because you can… is usually a distraction from the discussion. And thus counterproductive.

      But we’ve all done it, and most times it’s a moment of passion, anger or frustration at not being heard that prompts it. Usually I only moderate when the negative consistently outweighs the positive in a commenters behaviour.

      So far both you and PunditX are going at it just fine.. remember everyone expresses a view and feelings built on their own unique experience of life. When honestly expressed I’m always willing to forgive much. RL]

      • Pundit X 23.1.1
        31 December 2011 at 12:01 pm

        Nasty Bobby, when you repeatedly insinuate that Ambrose deliberately flouted privacy law as a media professional without a scintilla of evidence. The word cunning is one you have used to describe Ambrose. The word shit as a description of your personal ethics I’ll retract and leave others to form their own opinion of someone who resorts to baseless allegation for political gain…

        • Bobby Jr 23.1.1.1
          31 December 2011 at 12:24 pm

          @Pundit X. You have less knowledge of my personal ethics or morals than we do of Ambrose. We have only each other’s comments to go on. As someone famous said ‘what you say about me says more about you than it does of me’. If what I suggest about Ambrose somehow shows who I am and my ethics then I’d love to know what your hurling abuse at me says about you.

          As the moderator, RL (Rex?)[RL = RedLogix], has commented above, everyone expresses a view and feelings built on their own unique experience of life. I try never to abuse people who don’t agree with me even if I am having a debate on something and wouldn’t say anything here I wouldn’t say to someone/you in person. I’d hope you could also separate the debate from the person. I’m not painting all media as unethical but on the same token, suggesting all operate ethically is also folly.

          In suggesting Ambrose did what happened deliberately I don’t have no evidence at all. Much of the evidence which exists is still open for debate and plenty of it, especially what he did after the fact with the tape, could easily indicate he is not the accidental hero some think he is at all. In the least it could throw his professional ethics into some doubt. As I’ve said above though, ethics is often quite a fluid concept to the media these days.

          • Pundit X 23.1.1.1.1
            31 December 2011 at 3:47 pm

            Your quite right Bobby I don’t know you personally from a bar of soap. The side of your character displayed on this thread is of a man who has spent the last two days determined to impugn another man’s professional integrity having never met him and with no knowledge of the industry in which he works. At this late stage in my life not knowing you is a loss I’m prepared to bear..

            • Colonial Viper 23.1.1.1.1.1
              31 December 2011 at 3:58 pm

              Odd that Bobby is spending so much time and effort in the smear campaign.

              All I want is to hear what Banks and Key said about their post election plans for the country.

              As NZ citizens we are entitled to that.

              • RedLogix …
                31 December 2011 at 4:02 pm

                There’s no point in getting personal about it CV. The guy has made his case diligently with an almost lawyerly thoroughness. He’s explored every angle and given it his best shot.

                And he’s been polite about it. Can’t really ask for more.

                • mickysavage …
                  31 December 2011 at 4:37 pm

                  You are right there RL.  

                  Of course the fundamental flaw with his analysis is that the discussion took place in public in a busy cafe where the media had been invited and where there were probably more digital recording devices per square meter than anywhere else in the country.

                  Doesn’t stop him arguing the point.

                  But the real point is what did Key say and why aren’t we entitled to know this?

                • Pundit X …
                  31 December 2011 at 5:14 pm

                  Yes RL, Bobby Jr does appear to be the most reasoned RWNJ I’ve encountered for some time. A disingenuous apparently reasoned sophistry even if it does ignore all the facts presented is not something you find on Cameron Slater’s blog. But don’t forget it was all employed to Impugn Ambrose’s integrity. And I think we can ask for more, we can ask why its more important to trash Ambrose than to know what was said in the conversation between Banks and Key. You have the floor BobbyJr..

  24. seeker 24
    31 December 2011 at 1:05 pm

    @ Bobby jnr

    You wrote at 3.01am today:

    “Deliberate or not, the recording was done covertly. The shooing away of media, the location, the incompetence of the PM’s minders etc don’t change the fact it was a covert recording one bit.

    I wrote this, as you can see, on Nov23 when commenting on the thread of Eddie’s post “Tea Tape Judgement”. I think it shows that your theorisings are in correct. sorry I don’t have a link to the news reports but I have pointed you to the date.

    seeker 21.3
    23 November 2011 at 5:26 pm

    @ Freedom 3.28pm

    “my decision turns upon the inadequacy of the evidentiary material before me to reach such a view,”

    “It is judicial manipulation of public interest and nothing will change my mind on that.”

    “Maybe you are right, because when the tapes are scrutinised ( I recorded both news channels on this last night) one can see someone quickly clearing Key’s table of objects saying ‘take your mikes’ or something, but they leave that now infamous ‘black bag’ on the table.

    This, I thought, showed
    a) the bag being there was not solely down to Ambrose and
    b) they (security) couldn’t have been too worried about ‘privacy’ if they did not clear the table properly.

    Further, Ambrose asked if he could go and get his bag, so it shows he was probably at the back and didn’t hear what was said when the place was cleared.It seemed to be very spontaneous and hurried clearing, and a bit of a scrum.

    At least he tried to go and get his bag and so ‘clear the table properly, but he was denied access, so was not trying to purposefully ‘tape’ the two Johns.

    It also shows that as Ambrose had needed to ask, if he wanted get his expensive belonging back, that it was there before he left and had not been retrieved and/or given back to him as some one had done in camera sight with other ‘blackish ,baggy’ belongings I saw removed from the table.

    This whole mess is because John Key says one thing in public and apparently another thing, in what amounts to ‘under his breath’, which he calls ‘private’ when he means ‘two faced’ and does not like being caught out about it(who would)

    The other reason for the ‘police’ aspect of this horror mess (especially for a probably pretty ‘innocent of purposefully recording’ said ‘duplicitous’ remarks by John and John, Ambrose) is Stephen ‘call the police’ Joyce.

    I am sure the judge could have seen ‘the clearing of bags from the table by a ‘security’ person on the video recording. I don’t think I am wrong about this .I watched it twice last night.”
    ———————————————–

    I hope you can find this news item Bobby Jnr. I’m still looking, but wanted to post this to you asap so you might
    perhaps find a little peace of mind.

    • Bobby Jr 24.1
      31 December 2011 at 1:26 pm

      @Seeker. Nice one, thanks for posting. If we take Ambrose at his word that it didn’t happen then isn’t it fair also that the default assumption should be that Joyce and others had no part in swaying the court’s decision or the AG’s pursuit of costs – as has been clearly implied many times? The standards being offered to Ambrose under the “lack of proof” defence seem to be conveniently thin on the ground when it suits the story to have them not be the case for others.

      • Colonial Viper 24.1.1
        31 December 2011 at 4:08 pm

        Dont have to take anyone “at their word” mate, lets get a court to examine all the evidence and the events which took place.

        Then maybe we can all listen to the recording of the Key and Banks were planning post-election. Its in the national interest.

  26. deuto 26
    3 January 2012 at 8:57 am

    Again today, the Herald focuses on this issue in a well-reasoned editorial IMO.

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&objectid=10776366

    On 1 January, they also carried an item, which I had missed, on the police investigation. It appears that most of the investigation to date has been carried out in Wellington and the case has only recently been passed to Auckland. Apparently Ambrose is to be “invited” to an interview; but they are interviewing others first, many of whom are away at present. I would have thought that Ambrose would be one of the first to be interviewed, but the processes of the police in such investigations is sometimes something of a mystery……

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=10776188

    • seeker 26.1
      3 January 2012 at 2:52 pm

      Thanks for the links Deuto,and Anne above. Might have been a well reasoned editorial Deuto, but did you see the number of poorly reasoned comments (imo) against Ambrose? Really disheartening. Likewise the comments on Anne’s link.

      I think The Herald should link to this thread and then ask for comments to see if their commenters have changed to a more reasoned stance. Especially with pertinent comments like Graeme Edgelers @ 2.2:

      “If you want to make a point, it might be better to ask why this involved the PM, and not the Leader of the National Party. This might be the far better argument. It was political and not governmental, so arguably John Key should have been paying for this himself. ”

      They could also publish Winston’s comments on this situation which might usefully contribute to people’s understanding.

      * the comments might have been more heartening later on but I only had the patience to read up to page 5 before my heart rate rose to epic proportions.

  27. Bobby Jr 27
    26 January 2012 at 12:38 pm

    Having just heard the tape on youtube (someone leaked it I guess) it seems a little amusing Ambrose said he didn’t know the conversation was intended to be private or that he didn’t hear journalists being asked to leave – the tape has someone asking them move on in the first minute. Ambrose would have heard that when he first listened to the tape.

    So, let’s revisit his assertion that he thinks the conversation was public. It may not have been clear while he was recording but it certainly would have been apparent within the first minute of listening to the recording.

  28. Pundit X 28
    26 January 2012 at 2:39 pm

    According to Ambrose he didn’t listen to the recording until he got back to the Herald so could not have heard those remarks on the tape until the event was over. If anyone apart from Bobby Jr is still interested here’s the link.

CommentsOpinions

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

FeedsPartyGovtMedia

  • Who’s to Blame for the Government?

    I saw no evil when I looked into your eyesI heard no evil while you told me all those liesI spoke no evil when I called out your nameLook at us now, babyWho’s to blame?Lyrics: Hemberger, Hemberger, Mayo, RaseroToday’s newsletter is a bit of a rant; some of you might ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    3 hours ago
  • Hangups

    Hello! Here comes the Saturday edition of More Than A Feilding, catching you up on anything you may have missed. Share Read more ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    6 hours ago
  • Unfortunately, Being a Hero is Mostly Illegal

    Hi,Today is a pretty heavy, weighty Webworm — so maybe get yourself a cup of tea or coffee before you settle in. It’s about, you know, the end of the world and stuff.Before we get to that, I’d like to say I thoroughly enjoyed the notes you left under my ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    7 hours ago
  • My Substack erm… Summer

    Hi all,Apparently it’s the end of Summer, hope you enjoyed it. 🙂The rather Northern Hemisphere centric folks over at Substack have sent this out, I’m not sure what time period it covers, I guess the last three months. In any case you might like to give it a go yourself ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    19 hours ago
  • Pricing Road Usage

    Congestion pricing is easier said than done.The first seminar I attended in Britain – around sixty years ago – explained a scheme for road usage pricing which would eliminate traffic congestion and direct roading investment. It was impressive and elegant (as many such seminar propositions are) but proved impractical and ...
    PunditBy Brian Easton
    19 hours ago
  • Tory Whanau may have to sell Wellington mayoralty to make ends meet

    Tory Whanau has revealed that she’s struggling so much financially that she may have to part with her beloved mayoralty, that of New Zealand’s capital city, if she’s to fund her ever-diminishing lifestyle. Whanau was elected to lead Wellington in 2022, winning an overwhelming victory against the incumbent mayor: the ...
    The CivilianBy Ben Uffindell
    20 hours ago
  • And round we go again…

    One of Labour's few achievements last term was to finally move on RMA reform. Following an independent review and a select committee review of an exposure draft, both aimed at ironing out bugs and producing a compromise most people could live with, Labour passed the Natural and Built Environments Act ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    20 hours ago
  • The Supreme Court stands up for fairness

    National is planning to breach te Tiriti o Waitangi by amending the Marine and Coastal Area Act to effectively make it impossible for the courts to recognise Māori rights over the foreshore and seabed. But its also been playing dirty in other ways. Earlier in the year it announced changes ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    22 hours ago
  • Today’s 10 Politics Headlines: Luxon flails and Simeon Drives

    1/ Jobseeker numbers are going the opposite way of Luxon’s KPIs. Against a target of minus 50,000 by 2030, the new forecast shows the Government is looking at an increase of 24,000 jobseekers in its first term.In Thomas Coughlin’s report, Upton responds by blaming Labour: “We inherited an economy in ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    1 day ago
  • Kaka project: What could a revamped Entrust do with/for/to Vector?

    Long story short, I interviewed transport and energy activist Patrick Reynolds this week about the bid to run Entrust by a new campaign group he’s part of called More for you; better for Auckland. There’s a lot more detail in this GreaterAuckland post and on ‘Better’s’ website.They’re campaigning to win ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 day ago
  • Missing the Feckin’ Targets

    And although my eyes were openThey might just as well have been closedAnd so it was laterWhen the miller told this taleHe said that her face at first just ghostlyAnd then turned a whiter shade of paleSongwriters: Keith Reid / Gary BrookerI want to talk about two things today, subjects ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    1 day ago
  • Deadly floods and streams of non-solutions

    Long stories short, here’s the top six news items of note in climate news for Aotearoa-NZ this week, and a discussion above between Bernard Hickey and The Kākā’s climate correspondent Cathrine Dyer:Central Europe is reeling from the devastating effects of Storm Boris, which has so far caused 21 deaths and ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 day ago
  • Weekly Roundup 20-September-2024

    Welcome to the end of the week, as we head towards the spring equinox. Let us brighten your week with links to stories about how to make our city a little greater. This roundup is brought to you by a largely volunteer crew. If you’d like to support our work ...
    Greater AucklandBy Greater Auckland
    1 day ago
  • Three years of recession deeper than GFC

    Kia ora. Long stories short, here’s my top six things to note in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Friday, September 20:New Zealand’s total GDP contracted less than expected in the June quarter, but per-capita GDP extended its three-year-long slump at a rate that is faster than ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 day ago
  • That’s Gangsta!

    The gang patch legislation finally passed in the House after a long period of fanfare from National. Gangs won’t be allowed to publicly display gang insignia on the body or in vehicles, and if they’re very naughty i.e. caught thrice, police will be able to enter private homes to search.How ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    1 day ago
  • The Hoon around the week to Sept 20

    The podcast above of the weekly ‘Hoon’ webinar for paying subscribers on Thursday night features co-host talking about the week’s news with:The Kākā’s climate correspondent on the latest climate news, including media coverage of extreme events and how big tech is gobbling up so much renewable power growth; ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 day ago
  • A very healthy distrust of how this Government is handling health across the board is needed…

    And alongside that, is the ultimate question for the public, and indeed Opposition Parties trying to appeal for enough of the public to support a change from this heinous direction of travel being imposed on us: how much of the damage here can even be stopped in time? Let us ...
    exhALANtBy exhalantblog
    2 days ago
  • Hang up on him David, just stop

    There is a story I want to tell, but I'm not going to begin with it because it would be too abrupt. I'll start by telling you that I'm a big fan of the way Nicola Toki conveys her message. And Nicola Toki is a big fan of the way Jane ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    2 days ago
  • Tax the rich!

    We already know that the rich people aren't paying their fair share. But it turns out its worse than that: we're a tax-haven! Our rich people pay lower taxes here than in any comparable country: Well-off New Zealanders are paying less tax than their peers in nine similar OECD ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 days ago
  • Worse and worse

    Cancer Minister Casey Costello is in trouble again over her secret, magically appearing tobacco policy document. The Ombudsman has already found that she acted contrary to law in refusing requests for it; now she has been referred to the Chief Archivist over a possible breach of the Public Records Act ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 days ago
  • NZ’s lack of a capital gains tax means the richest here pay vastly less than elsewhere

    The lack of a capital gains tax means the richest Kiwis are sitting pretty compared to taxpayers overseas. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāKia ora. Long stories short, here’s my top six things to note in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Thursday, September 19:New Zealand’s richest ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    2 days ago
  • Verrall to Levy: “Health NZ NDAs are North Korean – Get rid of it.”

    Open article. Note the video of the Health Select Committee excerpts starts at 1:22 In watching the Health Select Committee yesterday, it became clear to me why Margie Apa remains Health NZ CEO.During Levy’s testimony, Apa sat like a rock next to her boss. She nodded supportively, scribbled notes to ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    2 days ago
  • The Show Must Go On

    Empty spaces, what are we living for?Abandoned places, I guess we know the score, on and onDoes anybody know what we are looking for?Another hero, another mindless crimeBehind the curtain, in the pantomimeHold the lineDoes anybody want to take it anymore?The show must go onSongwriters: Brian May / Freddie Mercury ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    2 days ago
  • Managing on-street parking for local benefit

    This guest post by Malcolm McCracken originally appeared on his blog Better Things Are Possible, and is republished here by kind permission. The case for Parking Benefit Districts: managing on-street parking for local benefit Parking is often the centre of debate in our cities; particularly on-street car parks, who gets ...
    Greater AucklandBy Guest Post
    2 days ago
  • Doubling down?

    This is a re-post from And Then There's Physics I wrote a post a little while ago commenting on a Sabine Hossenfelder video suggesting that she was now worried about climate change because the Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity (ECS) could be much higher than most estimates have suggested. I wasn’t too taken with Sabine’s arguments, and there were others ...
    Skeptical Science
    2 days ago
  • Too much haste & waste in Simeon Brown’s need for speed

    Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong story short, the Government’s myopia of only choosing transport policies that reduce travel times means we’re missing out on the health benefits of more cycling and walking, along with the health cost savings from fewer accidents, less pollution and mentally healthier ways of getting ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    2 days ago
  • What seemed so simple is now so complex

    The Health NZ rescue that seemed so simple back in July was presented to a Select Committee yesterday as a complex challenge that could take some years to sort out. In July, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said Health NZ was on track to record a deficit of $1.4 billion for ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    2 days ago
  • The utterances of Shane Jones

    Let us consider the utterances of Shane Jones.Let us consider the derogatory terms of abuseNow is not the time for Green Wombles, it's black and white decision making.We will stand with the energy industry and ensure they are not monstered by Green Termites nibbling away at our economic capital.The Green ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    3 days ago
  • Ukrainian militia receives defective shipment of pagers that just send and receive messages

    There’s been a major setback for one Ukrainian-backed militia on the Russian border, after the group ordered a large shipment of pagers to use as improvised explosive devices. The plan was to litter the pagers throughout abandoned homes and buildings in hopes of wounding Russian soldiers. But upon arrival of ...
    The CivilianBy Ben Uffindell
    3 days ago
  • A constitutional shitshow

    Last month, we learned that the government was half-arsing its anti-gang legislation, adding a significant, pre-planned, BORA-abusing amendment at the committee stage, avoiding all the usual scrutiny processes. But it gets worse. Because having done it once, they're now planning to recall the bill in order to add another such ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    3 days ago
  • Political Round Up

    Note: An earlier version of this article noted Levy was a “party time Health NZ commissioner” - this has been updated - forgive my Freudian slip.Dr Lester Levy is charging $320,000 a year to be a part time Health NZ commissioner. Rachel Thomas reports that Levy is still teaching 2 ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    3 days ago
  • Postcard from Sydney: Southwest and City Metro extension

    This is a guest post from Sydney reader Nik Clement After 2 years in Auckland I moved back to Sydney just over a year ago. While in Auckland, I went to the opening of Puhinui station and used it a fair bit, living in Manukau Central and being able ...
    Greater AucklandBy Guest Post
    3 days ago
  • Tolling revolt brewing in National heartland

    Kia ora. Long stories short, here’s my top six things to note in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Wednesday, September 18:Locals gathered in Woodville last night to protest at the National-ACT-NZ First Government’s decision to toll the new road linking the Manawatu and Hawkes Bay, saying ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    3 days ago
  • The doom spiral

    This is a re-post from The Climate Brink by Andrew Dessler In his last post, Zeke discussed incredible warmth of 2023 and 2024 and its implications for future warming. A few readers looked at it and freaked out: This is terrifying and This update really put me in a ...
    Skeptical Science
    3 days ago
  • Government directs Te Puni Kōkiri to conduct Māori Language Week in English

    The coalition government has issued a directive to Te Puni Kōkiri, the Ministry of Māori Development, instructing them that – in the interests of clear communication – they are to conduct this year’s Māori Language Week primarily or exclusively in English. The directive is in line with the Government’s policy ...
    The CivilianBy Ben Uffindell
    4 days ago
  • Government celebrates fact that New Zealand’s healthcare is so good people are queuing up for it a...

    At yesterday’s post-cabinet press conference, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, flanked by his Health Minister Shane Reti and someone we can’t independently verify was a real sign language interpreter, announced that he had some positive news for the country. “Alright team, I’m just going to hand over to uh, Dr. Shane, ...
    The CivilianBy Ben Uffindell
    4 days ago
  • Heartwarming: Thoughtful driver uses indicator to tell you what they’ve just done

    It’s 4:10pm in the morning, and you’re in the middle lane heading north on the great southern motorway of our nation’s capital, Auckland. There are no cars directly in front of you, but quite a few in the lane to your left. Suddenly, without warning, a black ute enters your ...
    The CivilianBy Ben Uffindell
    4 days ago
  • NPC teams will now be allowed to actually use the Ranfurly Shield in play

    Following decades of controversy, the governing body of New Zealand rugby, New Zealand Rugby, has ruled that the team currently holding the Ranfurly Shield may once again use it in play during the National Provincial Championship (NPC). The ruling restores the utility of a prize that for many years was ...
    The CivilianBy Ben Uffindell
    4 days ago
  • Climbing out of the hamster wheel

    I arrived home with a head full of fresh ideas about mindfulness and curbing impulsive aspects in my character.On the second night home I grabbed a piece of ginger and began swiftly slicing it on our industrial strength mandolin, the one I have learned through painful experience to treat with ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    4 days ago
  • More Notes From Stinky Town

    Good morning, folks. Another wee note from a chilly Rotorua morning that looks much clearer than yesterday. As I write, the pink glow in the east is slowly growing, and soon, the palest of blue skies should become a bit more royal.A couple of people mentioned yesterday that I should ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    4 days ago
  • Make it make sense: why axe valuable local projects?

    Last week, Matt looked at how the government wants to pour a huge chunk of civic infrastructure funding for a generation  into one mega-road up North, at huge cost and huge opportunity cost. A smaller but no less important feature of the National Land Transport Plan devised by Minister of Transport ...
    Greater AucklandBy Jolisa
    4 days ago
  • Driving blind at higher speeds

    An open letter by experts about plans to raise speed limits warns the “tragic consequence will be more New Zealanders losing their lives or suffering severe injury, along with a substantial burden on the nation's healthcare and rehabilitation services”. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāKia ora. Long stories short, here’s ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    4 days ago
  • 2024’s unusually persistent warmth

    This is a re-post from The Climate Brink My inaugural post on The Climate Brink 18 months ago looked at the year 2024, and found that it was likely to be the warmest year on record on the back of a (than forecast) El Nino event. I suggested “there is a real chance ...
    Skeptical Science
    4 days ago
  • National plan for 2000 more Kiwis a year in prison

    Open for allYesterday, Luxon congratulated his government on a job well done with emergency housing numbers, but advocates have been saying it‘s likely many are on the streets and sleeping in cars.Q&A featured some of the folks this weekend - homeless and in cars. Yes.The government’s also confirmed they stopped ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    4 days ago
  • I Found a Note in a Tree

    Hi,On most days I try to go on a walk through nature to clear my head from the horrors of life. Because as much as I like people, I also think it’s incredibly important to get very far away from them. To be reminded that there are also birds, lizards, ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    4 days ago
  • Jacqui Van Der Kaay: Politicians need to lift their game

    Declining trust in New Zealand politicians should be a warning to them to lift their game. Results from the New Zealand Election Study for the 2023 election show that the level of trust in politicians has once again declined. Perhaps it is not surprising that the results, shared as part ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    5 days ago
  • Police say they won’t respond to bomb threats anymore as ‘it’s never anything’

    Police Commissioner Andrew Coster says that New Zealand’s police force will no longer respond to bomb threats, in an attempt to cut costs and redirect police resources to less boring activities. Coster said that threat response and bomb disposal was a “fairly obvious” area for downsizing, as bomb threats are ...
    The CivilianBy Ben Uffindell
    5 days ago
  • A dysfunctional watchdog

    The reality of any right depends on how well it is enforced. But as The Post points out this morning, our right to official information isn't being enforced very well at all: More than a quarter of complaints about access to official information languish for more than a year, ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • Climate Change: The threat of a good example

    Since taking office, the climate-denier National government has gutted agricultural emissions pricing, ended the clean car discount, repealed water quality standards which would have reduced agricultural emissions, gutted the clean car standard, killed the GIDI scheme, and reversed efforts to reduce pollution subsidies in the ETS - basically every significant ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • Vegas Baby

    Good morning, lovely people. Don’t worry. This isn’t really a newsletter, just a quick note. I’m sitting in our lounge, looking out over a gloomy sky. Although being Rotorua, the view is periodically interrupted by steam bursting from pipes and dispersing—like an Eastern European industrial hellscape during the Cold War.Drinking ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    5 days ago
  • Why Entrust Needs New Leadership

    I am part of a new team running in the Entrust election in October. Entrust is a community electricity trust representing a significant part of Auckland, set up to serve the community. It is governed by five trustees are elected every three years in an election the trust itself oversees. ...
    Greater AucklandBy Patrick Reynolds
    5 days ago
  • London Bridge is falling down

    In the UK, London is the latest of council groups to signal potential bankruptcy.That’s after Birmingham, Britain’s second largest city, went bankrupt in June, resulting in reduced sanitation services, libraries cut, and dimmed streetlights.Some in the city described things as “Dickens” like.Please, Sir, Can I have some more?For families with ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    5 days ago
  • Govt may kick elderly out of hospitals

    The Government is considering how to shunt elderly people out of hospitals, and also how to cut their access to other support. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāKia ora. Long stories short, here’s my top six things to note in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Monday, ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    5 days ago
  • Getting the nephs off the couch

    The so-called “Prince of the Provinces”, Shane Jones, went home last Friday. Perhaps not quite literally home, more like 20 kilometres down the road from his house on the outskirts of Kerikeri. With its airport, its rapidly growing (mostly retired) population, and a commercial centre with all the big retail ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    5 days ago
  • De moralibus orcorum: Sargon of Akkad, Rings of Power, Evil, and George R.R. Martin

    I have noted before that The Rings of Power has attracted its unfortunate share of culture war obsessives. Essentially, for a certain type of individual, railing on about the Wokery of Modern Media is a means of making themselves a online livelihood. Clicks and views and advertising revenue, and all ...
    A Phuulish FellowBy strda221
    6 days ago
  • 2024 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #37

    A listing of 31 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, September 8, 2024 thru Sat, September 14, 2024. Story of the week From time to time we like to make our Story of the Week all about us— and ...
    Skeptical Science
    6 days ago
  • Salvation For Us All

    Yesterday, I ruminated about the effects of being a political follower.And, within politics, David Seymour was smart enough on Friday to divert attention from “race blind” policies [what about gender blind I thought - thinking of maternity wards] and cutting school lunches by throwing meat to the media. Teachers were ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    6 days ago
  • A warm embrace

    Far, far away from here lives our King. Some of his subjects can be quite the forelock tuggers, but plenty of us are not like that, and why don't I wheel out my favourite old story once more about Kiwi soldiers in the North African desert?Field Marshal Montgomery takes offence ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    6 days ago
  • Literal clowns are running the place, we must put a timeout on this stupidity… right Aotearoa?

    These people are inept on every level. They’re inept to the detriment of our internal politics, cohesion and increasingly our international reputation. And they are reveling in the fact they are getting away with it. We cannot even have “respectful debate” with a government that clearly rejects the very ...
    exhALANtBy exhalantblog
    7 days ago
  • Fact brief – Does manmade CO2 have any detectable fingerprint?

    Skeptical Science is partnering with Gigafact to produce fact briefs — bite-sized fact checks of trending claims. This fact brief was written by Sue Bin Park from the Gigafact team in collaboration with John Mason. You can submit claims you think need checking via the tipline. Does manmade CO2 have any ...
    Skeptical Science
    7 days ago
  • Judge Not.

    Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. Matthew 7:1-2FOUR HUNDRED AND FORTY men and women professing the Christian faith would appear to have imperilled their immortal souls. ...
    Bowalley Road
    7 days ago
  • Managed Democracy: Letting The People Decide, But Only When They Can Be Relied Upon To Give the Righ...

    Uh-uh! Not So Fast, Citizens! The power to initiate systemic change remains where it has always been in New Zealand’s representative democracy – in Parliament. To order a binding referendum, the House of Representatives must first to be persuaded that, on the question proposed, sharing its decision-making power with the people ...
    Bowalley Road
    7 days ago
  • Looking For Labour’s Vital Signs.

    Flatlining: With no evidence of a genuine policy disruptor at work in Labour’s ranks, New Zealand’s wealthiest citizens can sleep easy.PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN has walked a picket-line. Presidential candidate Kamala Harris has threatened “price-gauging” grocery retailers with price control. The Democratic Party’s 2024 platform situates it well to the left of Sir ...
    Bowalley Road
    7 days ago
  • Forty Years Of Remembering To Forget.

    The Beginning of the End: Rogernomics became the short-hand descriptor for all the radical changes that swept away New Zealand’s social-democratic economy and society between 1984 and 1990. In the bitterest of ironies, those changes were introduced by the very same party which had entrenched New Zealand social-democracy 50 years earlier. ...
    Bowalley Road
    7 days ago
  • Kōrero Mai – Speak to Me.

    Good morning all you lovely people. 🙂I woke up this morning, and it felt a bit like the last day of school. You might recall from earlier in the week that I’m heading home to Rotorua to see an old friend who doesn’t have much time. A sad journey, but ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    1 week ago
  • Winning ways

    Hello! Here comes the Saturday edition of More Than A Feilding, catching you up on anything you may have missed. Street architecture adjustment, KolkataShare Read more ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    1 week ago
  • 48 seconds on a plan that would reverberate for a million years

    Despite fears that Trump presidency would be disastrous for progress on climate change, the topic barely rated a mention in the Presidential debate. Photo: Getty ImagesLong stories short, here’s the top six news items of note in climate news for Aotearoa-NZ this week, and a discussion above between Bernard Hickey ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 week ago
  • Using blunt instruments and magical thinking to ignore evidence of harm

    The abrupt cancellations and suspensions of Government spending also caused private sector hiring, spending, and investment to freeze up for the first six months of the year. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāThis week we learned:The new National/ACT/NZ First Coalition Government ignored advice from Treasury that it didn’t have to ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 week ago
  • Is This A Dagger Which I See Before Me: A Review and Analysis of The Rings of Power Episode 5 (Seaso...

    Another week of The Rings of Power, season two, and another confirmation that things are definitely coming together for the show. The fifth Episode of season one represented the nadir of the series. Now? Amid the firmer footing of 2024, Episode Five represents further a further step towards excellent Tolkien ...
    A Phuulish FellowBy strda221
    1 week ago
  • In Open Seas; A Book

    The background to In Open Seas: How the New Zealand Labour Government Went Wrong:2017-2023Not in Narrow Seas: The Economic History of Aotearoa New Zealand, published in 2020, proved more successful than either I or the publisher (VUP, now Te Herenga Waka University Press) expected. I had expected that it would ...
    PunditBy Brian Easton
    1 week ago
  • The Hoon around the week to Sept 13

    The podcast above of the weekly ‘Hoon’ webinar for paying subscribers on Thursday night features co-hosts and talking about the week’s news with:The Kākā’s climate correspondent on the latest climate science on rising temperatures and the climate implications of the US Presidential elections; and special guests Janet ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 week ago
  • Do or do not. There is no try

    1. Upon receiving evidence that school lunches were doing a marvellous job of improving outcomes for students, David Seymour did what?a. Declared we need much more of this sort of good news and poured extra resources and funding into them b. Emailed Atlas network to ask what to do next c. Cut ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    1 week ago
  • Dangerous ground

    The Waitangi Tribunal has reported back on National's proposed changes to gut the Marine and Coastal Area Act and steal the foreshore and seabed for its greedy fishing-industry donors, and declared it to be another huge violation of ti Tiriti: The Waitangi Tribunal has found government changes to the ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Climate Change: National wants to cheat on Paris

    In 2016, the then-National government signed the Paris Agreement, committing Aotearoa to a 30 (later 50) percent reduction in emissions by 2030. When questioned about how they intended to meet that target with their complete absence of effective climate policy, they made a lot of noise about how it was ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Treasury warned Govt lower debt limits meant less ‘productivity-enhancing investment’

    Treasury’s advice to Cabinet was that the new Government could actually prudently carry net core Crown debt of up to 50% of GDP. But Luxon and Willis instead chose to portray the Government’s finances as in such a mess they had no choice but to carve 6.5% to 7.5% off ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 week ago

  • Tourism on the table for Pacific Ministers’ meet-up

    Tourism and Hospitality Minister Matt Doocey will meet with Trade and Tourism Minister of Australia Don Farrell and Fiji Deputy Prime Minister Manoa Kamikamica in Rotorua this weekend for a trilateral tourism discussion. “Like in New Zealand, tourism plays a significant role in Australia and Fiji’s economy, contributing massively to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    21 hours ago
  • Young people report on family and sexual violence

    The Te Puna Aonui Expert Advisory Group for Children and Young People has presented its report today on improving family and sexual violence outcomes for young people, to the Minister for the Prevention of Family and Sexual Violence, Karen Chhour.  The presentation at the Auckland event was an opportunity for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    21 hours ago
  • $18 million being invested in the victims of crime

    The Government is putting more than $18 million towards improving the experience of the criminal justice system for victims, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith and Minister for Children Karen Chhour say. “No one should experience crime, but for those who through no fault of their own become victims, they need to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    21 hours ago
  • Landmark phonics check in te reo Māori

    For the first time, schools can use a purpose-built tool to check how a child is progressing in reading through te reo Māori. “Around 45 schools are trialling a New Zealand first te reo Māori phonics check, known as Hihira Weteoro. It will help kaiako (teachers) focus on what ākonga ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    23 hours ago
  • New sea walls safeguard Ōpōtiki’s transformation

    Two new breakwater walls at Pākihikura (Ōpōtiki) Harbour will provide boats with safe harbour access to support the continued growth of aquaculture in Bay of Plenty, Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters and Regional Development Minister Shane Jones say. The Ministers and leaders from Tē Tāwharau o Te Whakatōhea and other ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Kitmap to improve access to science infrastructure

    Science, Innovation and Technology Minister Judith Collins today announced an online platform to optimise the use of New Zealand’s science and technology research infrastructure and to link the public and private sector. “This country is home to world-class science, technology, and engineering expertise. Kitmap is set to empower Kiwi innovators, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Driving the uptake of low emission heavy vehicles

    The Government has launched the Low Emissions Heavy Vehicle Fund (LEHVF) to promote innovation and offset the cost of hundreds of heavy vehicles powered by clean technologies, Energy Minister Simeon Brown and Climate Change Minister Simon Watts say. “Boosting economic growth and productivity is a key part of the Government’s plan ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Speech on replacing the Resource Management Act

    Replacing the RMA Hon Chris Bishop: Good morning, it is great to be with you. Can I first acknowledge the Resource Management Law Association for hosting us here today. Can I also acknowledge my Parliamentary Under-Secretary, Simon Court, who is on stage with me. He has assisted me in establishing the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Replacement for the Resource Management Act takes shape

    Two new laws will be developed to replace the Resource Management Act (RMA), with the enjoyment of property rights as their guiding principle, RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop and Parliamentary Under-Secretary Simon Court say. “The RMA was passed with good intentions in 1991 but has proved a failure in practice. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Tough laws pass to make gang life uncomfortable

    Legislation passed through Parliament today will provide police and the courts with additional tools to crack down on gangs that peddle misery and intimidation throughout New Zealand, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith says. “From November 21, gang insignia will be banned in all public places, courts will be able to issue non-consorting orders, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • New levy rates set to ensure continued funding of FENZ

    Minister of Internal Affairs Brooke van Velden says the Government has agreed to the rates for the redesigned levy that will fund Fire and Emergency New Zealand (FENZ) from July 2026.  “Earlier this year FENZ consulted publicly on a 5.2 percent increase to the levy. I was not convinced that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Police allocate Officers to Beat and Gang Units

    The Coalition Government welcomes Police’s announcement today to deploy more police on the beat and staff to Gang Disruption Units.  An additional 70 officers will be allocated to Community Beat Teams across towns and regional centres.  This builds on the deployment of beat officers in Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch CBDs ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Consultation begins on significant updates to the biosecurity system

    Proposals to strengthen the country’s vital biosecurity system, including higher fines for passengers bringing in undeclared high-risk goods, greater flexibility around importing requirements, and fairer cost sharing for biosecurity responses have been released today for public consultation. Biosecurity Minister Andrew Hoggard says “The future is about resilience and the 30-year-old ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Wānaka community to benefit from new overnight health service

    Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says an Overnight Acute Care Service opening in October will provide people in Wānaka and the surrounding area with the assurance of quality overnight care closer to home.  “When I was in Wānaka earlier this year, I announced funding for an overnight health service – ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Preventing potholes with data-driven technology

    The Government is rolling out data collection vans across the country to better understand the condition of our road network to prevent potholes from forming in the first place, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says.  “Increasing productivity to help rebuild our economy is a key priority for the Government and increasing ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • GDP data shows effect of high interest rates

    Gross Domestic Product (GDP) data for the quarter to June 2024 reinforces how an extended period of high interest rates has meant tough times for families, businesses, and communities, but recent indications show the economy is starting to bounce back, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. Stats NZ data released today ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • NZ to host first Fiji, Australia trilateral trade Ministers’ meeting in Rotorua

    Trade Minister Todd McClay will host Fijian Deputy Prime Minister Manoa Kamikamica and Australian Trade Minister Don Farrell for trilateral trade talks in Rotorua this weekend. “Fiji is one of the largest economies in the Pacific and is a respected partner for Australia and New Zealand,” Mr McClay says. Australia and New Zealand ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • NZ hosts Annual CER Trade Ministers’ meeting in Rotorua

    Trade Minister Todd McClay will meet with Australian Trade Minister Don Farrell for the annual Closer Economic Relations (CER) Trade Ministers’ meeting in Rotorua this weekend.  “CER is our most comprehensive agreement covering trade, labour mobility, harmonisation of standards and political cooperation. It underpins an important trading relationship worth $32 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Government proposing changes to jury trials

    The Government is seeking the public’s feedback on two major changes to jury trials in order to improve court timeliness, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith says. “The first proposal would increase the offence threshold at which a defendant can decide to have their case heard by a jury. “The second is ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Business key to regional economic dialogue

    Local businesses and industries need to be front and centre in conversations about how regions plan to grow their economies, Regional Development Shane Jones says. The nationwide series of summits aims to facilitate conversations about regional economic growth and opportunities to drive productivity, prosperity and resilience through the Coalition Government’s Regional ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • More funding for Growing Up in New Zealand study

    The Government is investing $16.8 million over the next four years to extend the Growing Up in New Zealand (GUiNZ) Longitudinal Study. GUiNZ is New Zealand’s largest longitudinal study of child health and wellbeing and has followed the lives of more than 6000 children born in 2009 and 2010, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Tough targets for charter schools will raise achievement

    Associate Education Minister David Seymour says that Charter Schools will face a combination of minimum performance thresholds and stretch targets for achievement, attendance and financial sustainability. “Charter schools will be given greater freedom to respond to diverse student needs in innovative ways, but they will be held to a much ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • NZ votes for Middle East resolution at UN

    New Zealand has voted for a United Nations resolution on Israel’s presence in occupied Palestinian Territory with some caveats, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says.    “New Zealand’s yes vote is fundamentally a signal of our strong support for international law and the need for a two-state solution,” Mr Peters says.    “The Israel-Palestine ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Honouring the legacy of New Zealand’s suffragists

    Suffrage Day is an opportunity to reaffirm New Zealand’s commitment to ensuring we continue to be a world leader in gender equality, Minister for Women Nicola Grigg says. “On 19 September, 131 years ago, New Zealand became the first nation in the world where women gained the right to vote. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Foreign Minister to travel to New York, French Polynesia

    Foreign Minister Winston Peters is travelling to New York next week to attend the 79th session of the United Nations General Assembly, followed by a visit to French Polynesia. “In the context of the myriad regional and global crises, our engagements in New York will demonstrate New Zealand’s strong support for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Thanking social workers on their national day

    “Today, on Aotearoa New Zealand Social Workers’ Day, I would like to recognise the tremendous effort social workers make not just today, but every day,” Children’s Minister and Minister for the Prevention of Family and Sexual Violence Karen Chhour says. “I thank all those working on the front line for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Minister of State for Trade heads to Laos for ASEAN meetings

    Minister of State for Trade Nicola Grigg will travel to Laos this week to attend the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Economic Ministers’ Meetings in Vientiane.   “The Government is committed to strengthening our relationship with ASEAN,” Ms Grigg says. “With next year marking 50 years since New Zealand became ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Members appointed to retail crime MAG

    The Government has appointed four members to the Ministerial Advisory Group for victims of retail crime, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith and Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee say. “I am delighted to appoint Michael Hill’s national retail manager Michael Bell to the group, as well as Waikato community advocate and business ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Speech to the New Zealand Nurses Organisation AGM and Conference 2024

    It’s my pleasure to be here to join the opening of the NZNO AGM and Conference for 2024.  First, I’d like to thank NZNO Kaiwhakahaere Kerri Nuku, NZNO President, Anne Daniels, and Chief Execuitve Paul Gaulter for inviting me to speak today.  Thank you also to all the NZNO members ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Improvements for New Zealand authors

    Minister of Internal Affairs Brooke van Velden says changes to the Public Lending Right [PLR] scheme will help benefit both the National Library and authors who have books available in New Zealand libraries. “I am amending the regulations so that eligible authors will no longer have to reapply every year ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Minister commends Police for gang operation

    Police Minister Mark Mitchell congratulates Police for the outstanding result of their most recent operation, targeting the Comancheros. “That Police have been able to round up the majority of the Comancheros leadership, and many of their patched members and prospects, shows not only the capability of Police, but also shows ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • New appointments to the EPA board

    Environment Minister Penny Simmonds has announced a major refresh of the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) board with four new appointments and one reappointment.   The new board members are Barry O’Neil, Jennifer Scoular, Alison Stewart and Nancy Tuaine, who have been appointed for a three-year term ending in August 2027.  “I would ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Enabling rural recovery works in Hawke’s Bay

    Cabinet has approved an Order in Council to enable severe weather recovery works to continue in the Hawke’s Bay, Environment Minister Penny Simmonds and Minister for Emergency Management and Recovery Mark Mitchell say. “Cyclone Gabrielle and the other severe weather events in early 2023 caused significant loss and damage to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • FamilyBoost childcare payment registrations open

    From today, low-to-middle-income families with young children can register for the new FamilyBoost payment, to help them meet early childhood education (ECE) costs. The scheme was introduced as part of the Government’s tax relief plan to help Kiwis who are doing it tough. “FamilyBoost is one of the ways we ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Prioritising victims with tougher sentences

    The Government has today agreed to introduce sentencing reforms to Parliament this week that will ensure criminals face real consequences for crime and victims are prioritised, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith says. "In recent years, there has been a concerning trend where the courts have imposed fewer and shorter prison sentences ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Targets data confirms rise in violent crime

    The first quarterly report on progress against the nine public service targets show promising results in some areas and the scale of the challenge in others, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon says. “Our Government reinstated targets to focus our public sector on driving better results for New Zealanders in health, education, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Asia Foundation Board appointments announced

    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has announced the appointments of Hone McGregor, Professor David Capie, and John Boswell to the Board of the Asia New Zealand Foundation.  Bede Corry, Secretary of Foreign Affairs and Trade, has also been appointed as an ex-officio member. The new trustees join Dame Fran Wilde (Chair), ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Endeavour Fund projects for economic growth

    New Zealand’s largest contestable science fund is investing in 72 new projects to address challenges, develop new technology and support communities, Science, Innovation and Technology Minister Judith Collins says. “This Endeavour Fund round being funded is focused on economic growth and commercial outputs,” Ms Collins says. “It involves funding of more ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Social Services Providers Whakamanawa National Conference 16 September 2024

    Thank you for the introduction and the invitation to speak to you here today. I am honoured to be here in my capacity as Minister for the Prevention of Family and Sexual Violence, and Minister for Children. Thank you for creating a space where we can all listen and learn, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Parihaka infrastructure upgrades funded

    The Government will provide a $5.8 million grant to improve water infrastructure at Parihaka in Taranaki, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones and Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka say. “This grant from the Regional Infrastructure Fund will have a multitude of benefits for this hugely significant cultural site, including keeping local ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2024-09-21T01:02:38+00:00