Erm... no. The figures for CEO pay rates are inflation-adjusted, and expressed in '2020 dollars', according to the data linked by PsyclingLeft Always. A quick look at the RBNZ inflation calculator says that the purchasing power of $149,200 in 2001 would ...
Goff and Cunliffe, I think you'll find. I don't recall Clark being blindsided by a 'gotcha'-question.
Like really you are keeping score on this? No. I assume people just think Luxon made an ass of himself, which he did.
The post doesn't seem to be considering 'post-election coalitions'. It is referring to Luxon's ruling out a single, specific coalition, apparently not on the basis of policy. If you want to explain the connection to Maori Party policy, then away you go, ...
It seems to be off topic, since it doesn't seem to have any thing to do with Luxon's stated reason for ruling the party out. In fact, I find it considerably more telling that you borught it up than that others didn't.
Really? I don't get the impression that centrists are afraid of ACT. They're clearly more likely to vote National, but that isn't the same thing.
What are you basing that on? They didn't seem to have a problem when Key was keeping the Maori Party on board. I mean, I can understand the point you're making, but that doesn't mean that it's actually true.
There is no down-side to Luxon ruling out TPM – and plenty of up-side (many of his supporters and potential supporters are very wary of the TPM rhetoric). Where's the upside? It seems to me that voters who are that 'wary of the TPM' are only likely to ...
It's possible to ask more than one question at a time.
It seems to me that the appropriateness of your take hinges on the trans-rights demonstrators' aims being to silence women because the latter are women. I don't think that that's established at all. What makes you so certain of that interpretation, rather ...
The problem being, of course, that Labour want to convince people precisely that they are diet National.
I love how you conclude that she wouldn't make the top ten by a demonstrative comparison to (drumroll) nine who were supposedly superior.
But the centre is where most of the votes are. Insofar as 'the centre', ideologically, is the intersection of most people's interests, as perceived by themselves, that is axiomatic. That that centre is necessarily synonymous with an imagined mid-point ...
I agree that Ardern has led a fairly underwhelming government from the point of view of reform and vision, but I also think that she, like anyone, deserves the right to decide to call it a day when she feels she needs to. There is no honour in leading your...
Yes, I should be keen on all of that as well, and it is indeed an opportunity for a leftward tack like that. What shouldn't be ignored, however, is that it is equally an opportunity for a rightward tack. Unfortunately, trends over the last forty years or ...
I agree with mich of that. Contrary to the narrative that is sometimes presented, there is no real evidence that the Labour government is in terminal decline, with polling showing a fairly close race between left and right. Labour's best chance of winning ...
But, on the other hand, if it was any other area of broadcasting, they wouldn't be putting people up who are amateurs at their jobs, and would expect a high level of professionalism. It depends what one thinks their job is in that regard, really. If one ...
Why is that a useful question?
'Held his own' what?
It's a prety boring sport, if you ask me (which, of course, nobody did, but it warrants mentioning occasionally).
Then the onus is simply on Ardern to reply swiftly. It doesn't need to be a brilliant reply, just something to keep the debate going back and forth. If the Crosby-Textor line doesn't stick out for a few seconds and disrupt the debate, then nobody will even...
Then the onus is simply on Ardern to reply swiftly. It doesn't need to be a brilliant reply, just something to keep the debate going back and forth. If the Crosby-Textor line doesn't stick out for a few seconds and disrupt the debate, then nobody will even...
No, Labour should ignore Luxon, talk about Seymour as finance minister if National were ever to form a government, and refer to him, not Luxon, as the leader of the opposition. The Greens should work out who the weakest and dumbest ACT MPs are, what ideas ...
Besides any of the above, you've got a lovely straw man there with your claim that people are pretending it's the only way. It's just a model that has been tried and deemed effective.
Nobody is arguing against Transgender peoples rights here. True, but the vast majority of prominent posts and comments on here proceed from the assumption that there is an enormous repressive apparatus lobbying for them, and presents an argument against ...
"Push back" is at once a vague and a loaded term, though. When one looks over the way gender is dicussed here, with the mischaracterisation of a Media Council ruling just below, and the general tendency to throw all manner of, at best, tenuously related ...
That description seems equally consistent with the system working, though; someone goes over their issues with a psychologist, and decides against a transition; there is some follow-up to ascertain whether the decision was reached in an appropriate manner....
IMO, Labour seems to have the simple goal of clinging to power by any means, no matter what damage is done to democracy. What have they done to damage democracy as a means of clinging to power?
I keep seeing gentitalia and not gentailer. Actual genitalia, or just the word?
I don't think anybody thinks it will be reduced to just two, but the problem is the reduction in viewpoints, yes.
Twitter, in and of itself, is a bad thing overall. Yes, the element of anybody being able to post their musings to as large a potential audience as anybody else's, regardless of wealth, power or prior prominence, is an improvement in terms of openness over...
Recent Comments