I'm sick of this whining about inequality. Suppose I gave you a choice between two societies. * Society 1 has high levels of equality, but everyone is relatively poor. Say they have a GDP per capita of $10,000 per year. * Society 2 has high levels of ...
I am totally happy for you to build a socialist community, as long as I am not compelled to participate. I don't think it will work, but I'm happy for you to try to prove me wrong, as long as I'm allowed to stick with my preferred option. Good luck!
My thoughts exactly. I hope you socialists try this and leave the rest of us to enjoy capitalism. I might even be convinced to donate something to help your experiment get started.
General Election last Saturday that handed a huge victory, with an increased majority, to National Hm About the same vote to National as last time and National will end up with 59 seats out of 121 with with UF and Act. that is 61 out of121 That is as ...
Then Goff should've questioned Key's numbers. He didn't. He didn't know what he was talking about. Labour should release its costings to counter National's. I mean, surely they have worked out the cost of their policies and it's just a matter of writing up...
You guys must've been watching a different debate. Key made Goff look like a fool. Numbers matter and Goff didn't have them. He couldn't explain how he'd pay for his promises. Labour haven't released any info on this. He couldn't weasel his way out of the ...
Labour has a history that it should be proud of. However, the current Labour party is a disgrace to that legacy. That's why their clip focuses on the past, rather than the present. Most of Labour's policies are a throwback to the 70s or earlier. We need ...
All the other countries listed also adopted neo-liberal policies in the 80s and 90s. However many times you deny it, liberalisation has been very successful.
I have no problem with voluntary unions. But I have a very big problem with compulsory unions or unions that otherwise receive government support. If unions are so great, why are so few NZers unionised?
Data please.
Haha, no. It means the union bosses with the right connections needed to influence the govt. Everyone else gets f***ed.
If you look at the data, you will see that our GDP per capita is falling behind. You can't just legislate that away.
a fair days pay for a fair days work Of course, "fair" means a one-size-fits-all rule dictated by some special interest group.
NZ productivity has been falling behind Australia. Fighting each other for more of the shrinking pie is not the way forward. We need to increase our productivity, not just legislate that we should get paid more anyway.
McFlock: You don't have a clue do you? Canada is similar to NZ in many respects, but that wasn't the topic of the discussion. The topic was racially divided elections and, in that respect, NZ is closer to Fiji or Belgium than to Canada.
Katrina: over 1,836 people dead, $81 billion worth of property damage, 26 million litres of oil spilled. Rena: some dead birds, ship and cargo lost, less than a million litres of oil spilled. Ummmm.
Sigh, you're just avoiding my point by pontificating about federalism and geographic mobility. I think we'll just have to leave it there. To those less dogmatic readers: Think about this. The best example of another successful democracy with racially ...
By that logic, gerrymandering in the US also counts as minority representation. Maori seats divide our society along racial lines even if we live and work next to each other. The isolated communities of Nunavut are already isolated by geography. That's the...
No. But it should be comparable to NZ, which Nunavut is not. It would be comparable to, say, Maori dominating an electorate in Northland. You can't compare a minority-majority electorate with electorates that have an explicit racial definition. In NZ your ...
Ah, I see the connection now. Maori live in an isolated and remote part of the country, which is largely devoid of other ethnic groups. They have a semi-traditional lifestyle and little interaction with the rest of the country. And there is an electorate ...
What's your point? I still don't see how it compares to Maori seats.
CV, you're just trolling. Your assertion is both baseless and irrelevant to the topic of race relations.
Nunavut is the largest electorate in the world. It's not like they are specially engineering the borders to accommodate the inuit. Moreover, the inuit of Nunavut are living a semi-traditional lifestyle isolated from the rest of the country. That's very ...
Suggesting that Nunavut is comparable to our Maori seats is utter nonsense. I'm not asking for a clone of our system. I'm asking for another country with a successful democracy that has (at the national level) special representation for different ...
McFlock: So there is a territory in Canada where the inuit are the majority. And? Minority-majority electorates are not news. You can't compare that to having racially reserved seats. If you or I moved to Nunavut, we would be entitled to vote in the same ...
Sigh. You keep bringing up technicalities about how A and B are not exactly the same, as if somehow that matters. Once again, politicians of all colours lie. Do I need to remind you about Goff forgetting about the SIS briefing or Labour contradicting Owen ...
Voice of Reason: If you actually bothered to read the label on the left of your graph, you would see that it is the other way around. Bars are MPs and dots are population. I was right about Maori being well represented and asians being severely ...
Maori are well represented in parliament. From memory, 19% of MPs are Maori, while 15% of the population are. Asians are the most underrepresented ethnic group in parliament.
The standard response is a "you shouldn't have done that" from the electoral commission. Then nothing.
Firstly, that's not a country; it isn't even a proper province of Canada. Secondly, there is no mention of special representation. Only that the (ceremonial) commissioner is appointed by the minister of northern development, who is also the minister of ...
For the record, I think Labour is worse than National when it comes to breaking electoral rules. But I don't want to get into arguing about that, because it is irrelevant. Both parties repeatedly break the electoral rules. Again and again and again they ...
Recent Comments