The End of Life Choice Bill
Written By:
- Date published:
7:30 am, December 21st, 2017 - 155 comments
Categories: act -
Tags: assisted dying, David Seymour, euthanasia, members bills
On the 13th, the government recently withdrew several of its own Members’ bills, with no guarantee their replacements wouldn’t be Opposition bills, (luck was with Labour and NZ First backbenchers, however, and those two parties won all three new bill drawings) in order to advance the End of Life Choice Bill up the members ballot. This means we need to have a serious discussion both about the moralities and practicalities of euthanasia in New Zealand, and I think this is a reasonable issue to revisit, and probably one of the best things ACT in its modern, post-Banks incarnation has done, actually acting like the Liberal right-wing party it claims to be, and being permissive on social reforms.
That said, despite my usually strident stance as a liberal and champion of reform on social policy, this is not a Bill without complications, and this is an issue that in my opinion even supporters should be wary of. This is one of the few bills where I have actually listened to National Party concerns in the debate and actually said to most (but naturally, not all) “actually, these are valid dangers we need to be careful of in writing a Bill like this, and they might arguably have a bit of a point even if they’re taking it too far.” That doesn’t stop me from thinking that cautiously providing people in suffering and near the end of their life or with a terminal condition with a way to end their life with diginity is a good idea, it just makes me think this bill needs dramatic rewrites before it’s an acceptable starting point.
I’m going to do a quick rundown of what the bill does. And by quick, I mean it will be quick for analyzing a Bill that does anything more than a quick fix, so strap in, we’re heading past 2,000 words.
Eligibility and general problems
To even be eligible, people must be:
- Over 18.
- A New Zealander. (citizen or permanent resident)
- Suffering from a terminal illness with a prognosis of six months or less, or have “a grievous and irremediable medical condition.”
- In “an advanced state of irreversible decline in capability.” Capability is NOT explicitly defined in the Bill.
- “[Experiencing] unbearable suffering that cannot be relieved in a manner that he or she considers tolerable.”
- Be (presumably, mentally) capable of understanding both the nature of assisted dying and its consequences.
All of these are, with the possible exception of being over 18, necessary requirements of a reasonable assisted dying law. And the over 18 requirement is absolutely forgivable for a first-shot at this issue, as arguably allowing younger people assistance with the permission of their guardians is an issue that can be left until after the law is reviewed, and would likely need additional caution and/or safeguards beyond what’s in this Bill, because we should probably want to see how the bill works in New Zealand before we consider if it needs to allow for younger people in these situations to have a process to make a decision with the permission of their legal guardian(s). We could also argue with a six-month prognosis, but this does seem a reasonable point to open up the decision given the process seems to be quite lengthy, and sometimes prognoses are optimistic, so I hope those parts are going to remain uncontroversial.
The age restriction is intended to prevent young people taking this option before they’ve had a reasonable chance to develop. The bill definitely prevents large-scale death tourism by locking out non-residents, and prevents those who are mentally not competent to make this decision from being eligible. It may not prevent all death tourism, however, and it may increase immigration requests for, say, Australians who would like to end their lives, or other nearby countries with no law allowing this. The fact that we have laws around not necessarily accepting immigrants who are already sick won’t always stop people applying.
These requirements may not be is sufficiently broad in preventing bad outcomes. Where are they lacking?
Well, there is no requirement that the person’s reason for seeking assisted dying must be related to the effects of their condition, just that they have the condition and find their suffering intolerable, so arguably people who happen to be suffering and have a degenerative condition, but have other reasons to want to die, such as depression, could be said to qualify under the bill. (depression for reasons not caused by the patient’s condition is not usually a loss of capacity to understand, it simply influences decisions in ways that may be self-destructive or harmful, so arguably it should be excluded from the evaluation given current wording!) There is also no reasonable attempt to require affirmative consent throughout the process, just make people aware they can say no, and this issue should really be addressed in legislation that aims to deal with degenerative illness. Other laws that allow euthanasia are very clear that when consent is not obtained it is still illegal to kill someone. The law simply refers to what to do if someone chooses to receive or not to receive the lethal medication. It should instead refer to consenting or not consenting, so that a lack of consent is treated as choosing not to go through with the process.
There is also no allowance for the evaluation to actually conclude that the person involved isn’t in fact suffering, or criteria for what constitutes “unbearable suffering,” meaning that it’s completely open to a reasonable person test. Remember that “reasonable people” in jury decisions allowed us to beat kids with weapons before we repealed §59 of the crimes act, so while it’s an established legal process, that doesn’t mean it will be enforced well, and the risks for this bill letting things go wrong are very high, because we’re talking about people potentially dying when they shouldn’t, here.
Alarmingly, there is little consideration of the very real slippery slope effect this could have for the elderly, gradually broadening the definition of “unbearable suffering.” Already most people who would qualify or want to qualify are likely to be older New Zealanders, and we should be very careful about the effect it might have on our society to lose this many people. While there is provision to avoid active coercion, there is no provision to rule out contributory effects from feeling devalued, or a burden on the community, that arguably have been observed in countries that allow euthanasia, and whether these could be termed “unbearable suffering.” If I were drafting this bill, I would likely be referring to specific categories of symptoms that trigger eligibility rather than suffering in general, such as “intolerable pain,” or listing specific degenerative diseases that affect the brain. (just referring to loss of mental capacity arguably runs into issues with disabilities and the elderly, again, so it would need to be defined carefully to avoid this. Listing specific degenerative diseases, and giving the Minister of Health the ability to add more via the Governor General, would probably be the best bet to avoid this issue)
Finally, there is no separation between terminal or degenerative disease and disability- in fact the requirements can be read to explicitly include any sort of irreversible disability that involves progressive decline in capability, and this too is poorly defined and could broaden in definition over time if not spelled out explicitly in the Bill. There are very real concerns that this Bill will allow for disabled people to be euthanized, and this concern should be taken in the context of previous medical treatments having been performed on disabled people without their consent, often with painful or traumatizing physical or psychological side-effects. A lack of effort in addressing these concerns would likely cause the Bill to fail at second or third reading, because the Greens’ support at the very least in contingent on this issue being addressed.
Conscientious Objection
This was one of the points of objection that the conservative MPs in Parliament had that I most disagreed with. This bill has a thoroughly sensible regime around conscientious objection- any medical practitioner may object to providing this service, but they are compelled to tell their patients who request end of life options that there will be a SCENZ register available where they can find a practitioner that doesn’t object. This means that the patient is adequately informed of alternatives, but the objector never themselves has to do the direct referral, simply tell them that there is an organization which will arrange the referral for them. I would actually consider taking this approach a little further and allowing them to pass off the duty of informing their patient of the SCENZ register to any willing staff member, so long as they confirm their patient was in fact informed, allowing them even more moral distance from the act they object to.
This approach is in fact so sensible, that we should probably extend it to our abortion law, where currently women (or anyone else who needs an abortion) have no right to be informed of where else they might go to get an abortion if they ask someone who objects to providing one. Whatever your personal opinion on abortion, it is a safe medical procedure, (less risky than assisted dying, in fact) and it is absolutely reasonable if this Bill passes into law, to conclude Labour has no excuse for not extending the same treatment to medical practitioners who object to abortions. You could have the Ministry for Women provide the necessary information.
Currently the allowable penalties for failure to comply with this provision are up to three months of jail time, or a fine of up to $10,000 for most offenses against this act, so likely any non-complying conscientious objectors would simply be hit with a fine. I think that’s probably appropriate in most cases, although I can see a judge getting frustrated with repeat offenders and giving them a short stay in jail.
Providing full information and evaluating the request
This part of the bill is quite good, in that nobody can make a final decision on being assisted to die until they have been informed thoroughly of the nature of their condition, any other options for treatment or palliative care, the fact that they can change their mind at any time, informed of their rights both to talk to family, friends, etc… or not talk to them if they don’t want to, and there must be an effort made to ensure this person has not been pressured or compelled into the decision, in fact the attending practitioner is legally required to do this to the best of their abilities.
There is good evidence that making people aware of their options for end of life care including palliative care, and having them make a decision in advance actually decreases both unnecessary treatment and suffering, and desire for more radical solutions like euthanasia in cases where an option for reduced suffering exists that doesn’t require an early death or simply dying due to giving up, so discussing these options with patients in general is good policy, and I welcome its requirement in this bill because where these methods of giving dignity to the dying are utilized at a patient’s request they are a much more preferable outcome for everyone.
Either two or three medical practitioners must assess the patient independently, (a third is necessary if one or both of the first two cannot make a determination as to the mental capacity of the patient to make this decision) so there are reasonable provisions for assessment in the Bill, but again, assessment only safeguards against things the bill requires to be considered in the assessment, such as direct coercion or inability to make and/or comprehend the decision, and its consequences in the latter case. It also doesn’t provide safeguards to prevent involuntary death in terms of administering the lethal drugs. The requirement for a second independent assessment by a person chosen by SCENZ, however, is a reasonable safeguard against fakery regarding the assessment step in most cases, so it does make sure that eligibility is accurately determined. SCENZ will need to be careful, however, in how they assign people to each other, to ensure there is no room for collusion.
Confirming the decision
Basically, a lot of people are required to send a lot of paper trail to each other. While this is important to establish accountability and make sure people take their obligations seriously, this is one of the weaker parts of the bill, and does not in fact act as a failsafe, and I find the Opposition’s arguments reasonably damning here. More safety measures (such as legal requirements to ensure the patient is still sufficiently committed to this course with each evaluation that the process should proceed, rather than simply reminding them they can change their mind, or requiring an independent observer to be present who can halt the procedure if they think the patient is being/has been coerced or unduly influenced) may be a good idea for the initial introduction of this bill, perhaps with a sunset for some of the safeguards that can be triggered by the SCENZ watchdog group as and when it considers it appropriate, or with agreement by the Minister.
What the bill actually allows and requires
Unusually for such a Bill, this Bill allows for both assisted dying, (where the patient is provided drugs but chooses to take them themselves) and for medical practicioners to administer lethal drugs at the patient’s request. There is a very good argument on the precautionary principle that we should start with just assisted dying where the patient actively has to take the drugs themselves, and leave a provision in the law that if SCENZ has no ethical concerns about how the law is being applied, that we can proceed to allowing medical practitioners to administer drugs, too, as in my opinion that is the most dangerous step, because it can theoretically be done by force rather than requiring co-operation.
It also has some reasonable requirements about dealing with medication that isn’t required due to last-minute changes of mind, but again, this focuses a little much on creating a paper trail compared to actual safeguards, although this may be because those safeguards are implicit in requirements on pharmacists and similar professionals.
It also requires SCENZ (an agency set up to assist with administering the law, “Support and Consultation for End of Life in New Zealand”) to report on statistics and concerns to the responsible minister regularly, and makes various provisions relating to BDM that don’t immediately seem controversial.
This bill explicitly states that it doesn’t interfere with or change existing rights in law to effectively end your own life by refusing treatment or food, which is probably a good thing, as these are important legal principles and are well-integrated into our medical ethics in New Zealand.
What’s missing
This bill allows immunity to conviction (presumably on murder or similar charges) for people offering assisted dying in good faith who took reasonable measures to avoid negligence. This is effectively the heart of the bill, and is very simply drafted. However, this is arguably also a problem, because it might require an experienced lawyer to draft instructions on how medical professionals maintain that immunity, and it’s possible that even if these concepts are defined well and uncomplicated to interpret, they may be difficult to explain well to lay people. While the general concepts are easily explained to someone with passing familiarity to the law, and thus likely to any good nurse, (compliance with the law is a large part of the job) the border cases might be difficult to define. I would have preferred an approach where negligence is well-defined in the law as failure to comply with specific provisions to a specified standard, rather than simply leaned on as a legal concept. Good faith is relatively self-explanatory- you are liable to murder charges if you collude to trick someone into ending their life, or to do it for profit, or any other motive that is against the patient’s best interests. This prevents situations where we’re allowing collusion by prison medics to kill prisoners, or allowing killers who are demonstrably so-called “angels of mercy” to have legal immunity, but there needs to be more safeguards to prevent these types of people from potentially infiltrating the medical profession and actually killing people rather than offering a dignified end to those who want and need it in advance, because preventing murder is literally the first job a society has, and there is a reasonably thin line, although an observable one, between euthanasia and murder, or assisted death and suicide. Likely, the opportunities will be rare enough that serial killers, at least, will not be a concern, but we should be cautious at first because any failures in this legislation are very high-stakes.
As I allude to above, the bill is a very strong approach to euthanasia, and fails to include phase-in or phase-out periods for safeguards and additional methods of assisting people to die with dignity that arguably could cause a slippery slope.
As above, there also needs to be a lot better work done about properly defining eligibility in a way that doesn’t allow loopholes or potentially stigmatize disability and old age.
There are also tricky issues of risk around prognosis of terminal illness versus actually having a given terminal illness, and the accuracy of prognoses. Often we just don’t know enough to give accurate timeframes or even diagnoses of when and whether a person has a terminal disease. While doctors often do very well, there is a very real risk that people without a terminal or degenerative condition will end their lives on inaccurate information, and we won’t find out until after their death. I would hope that this is an issue that receives a lot of debate in public, and in parliament, because we may need some reasonable safeguards in the law here.
If you’d like to submit on the bill, Parliament has opened submissions. You can read the bill on our legislation site now if you want to check parts or the whole for yourself to check if you agree with my criticisms or praise. I have already made a submission along the lines in this post, although it is not worded exactly the way I have worded my feedback here, to avoid it seeming like a form letter if anyone chooses to lift parts of this post for their submission. (which you are all welcome to do if any of my criticism or praise speaks to you)
155 comments on “The End of Life Choice Bill ”
- Comments are now closed
- Comments are now closed
Recent Comments
- At a glance – The difference between weather and climate
On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...13 hours ago - More criminal miners
What is it with the mining industry? Its not enough for them to pillage the earth - they apparently can't even be bothered getting resource consent to do so: The proponent behind a major mine near the Clutha River had already been undertaking activity in the area without a ...13 hours ago - Photos from the road
Photo # 1 I am a huge fan of Singapore’s approach to housing, as described here two years ago by copying and pasting from The ConversationWhat Singapore has that Australia does not is a public housing developer, the Housing Development Board, which puts new dwellings on public and reclaimed land, ...14 hours ago - RMA reforms aim to ease stock-grazing rules and reduce farmers’ costs – but Taxpayers’ Union w...
Buzz from the Beehive Reactions to news of the government’s readiness to make urgent changes to “the resource management system” through a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) suggest a balanced approach is being taken. The Taxpayers’ Union says the proposed changes don’t go far enough. Greenpeace says ...15 hours ago - Luxon Strikes Out.
I’m starting to wonder if Anna Burns-Francis might be the best political interviewer we’ve got. That might sound unlikely to you, it came as a bit of a surprise to me.Jack Tame can be excellent, but has some pretty average days. I like Rebecca Wright on Newshub, she asks good ...18 hours ago - In many ways the media that the experts wanted, turned out to be the media they have got
Chris Trotter writes – Willie Jackson is said to be planning a “media summit” to discuss “the state of the media and how to protect Fourth Estate Journalism”. Not only does the Editor of The Daily Blog, Martyn Bradbury, think this is a good idea, but he has also ...19 hours ago - The Waitangi Tribunal Summons; or the more things stay the sameGraeme Edgeler writes – This morning [April 21], the Wellington High Court is hearing a judicial review brought by Hon. Karen Chhour, the Minister for Children, against a decision of the Waitangi Tribunal. This is unusual, judicial reviews are much more likely to brought against ministers, rather than ...19 hours ago
- Both Parliamentary watchdogs hammer Fast-track bill
Both of Parliament’s watchdogs have now ripped into the Government’s Fast-track Approvals Bill. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāMy pick of the six newsey things to know from Aotearoa’s political economy and beyond on the morning of Tuesday, April 23 are:The Lead: The Auditor General, John Ryan, has joined the ...20 hours ago - India makes a big bet on electric busesThis is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Sarah Spengeman People wait to board an electric bus in Pune, India. (Image credit: courtesy of ITDP) Public transportation riders in Pune, India, love the city’s new electric buses so much they will actually skip an older diesel bus that ...22 hours ago
- Bernard’s pick ‘n’ mix of the news links at 6:36am on Tuesday, April 23
TL;DR: These six news links stood out in the last 24 hours to 6:36am on Tuesday, April 22:Scoop & Deep Dive: How Sir Peter Jackson got to have his billion-dollar exit cake and eat Hollywood too NZ Herald-$$$ Matt NippertFast Track Approval Bill: Watchdogs seek substantial curbs on ministers' powers ...24 hours ago - What is really holding up infrastructure
The infrastructure industry yesterday issued a “hurry up” message to the Government, telling it to get cracking on developing a pipeline of infrastructure projects.The hiatus around the change of Government has seen some major projects cancelled and others delayed, and there is uncertainty about what will happen with the new ...1 day ago - “Pure Unadulterated Charge”
Hi,Over the weekend I revisited a podcast I really adore, Dead Eyes. It’s about a guy who got fired from Band of Brothers over two decades ago because Tom Hanks said he had “dead eyes”.If you don’t recall — 2001’s Band of Brothers was part of the emerging trend of ...1 day ago - Bernard's six-stack of substacks for Monday, April 22
Tonight’s six-stack includes: writes via his substack that’s he’s sceptical about the IPSOS poll last week suggesting a slide into authoritarianism here, writing: Kiwis seem to want their cake and eat it too Tal Aster writes for about How Israel turned homeowners into YIMBYs. writes via his ...1 day ago - The media were given a little list and hastened to pick out Fast Track prospects – but the Treaty ...Buzz from the Beehive The 180 or so recipients of letters from the Government telling them how to submit infrastructure projects for “fast track” consideration includes some whose project applications previously have been rejected by the courts. News media were quick to feature these in their reports after RMA Reform Minister Chris ...2 days ago
- Just trying to stay upright
It would not be a desirable way to start your holiday by breaking your back, your head, or your wrist, but on our first hour in Singapore I gave it a try.We were chatting, last week, before we started a meeting of Hazel’s Enviro Trust, about the things that can ...2 days ago - “Unprecedented”Today, former Port of Auckland CEO Tony Gibson went on trial on health and safety charges for the death of one of his workers. The Herald calls the trial "unprecedented". Firstly, it's only "unprecedented" because WorkSafe struck a corrupt and unlawful deal to drop charges against Peter Whittall over Pike ...2 days ago
- Bryce Edwards: Time for “Fast-Track Watch”
Calling all journalists, academics, planners, lawyers, political activists, environmentalists, and other members of the public who believe that the relationships between vested interests and politicians need to be scrutinised. We need to work together to make sure that the new Fast-Track Approvals Bill – currently being pushed through by the ...2 days ago - Gordon Campbell on fast track powers, media woes and the Tiktok banFeel worried. Shane Jones and a couple of his Cabinet colleagues are about to be granted the power to override any and all objections to projects like dams, mines, roads etc even if: said projects will harm biodiversity, increase global warming and cause other environmental harms, and even if ...2 days ago
- The Government’s new fast-track invitation to corruption
Bryce Edwards writes- The ability of the private sector to quickly establish major new projects making use of the urban and natural environment is to be supercharged by the new National-led Government. Yesterday it introduced to Parliament one of its most significant reforms, the Fast Track Approvals Bill. ...2 days ago - Maori push for parallel government structuresMichael Bassett writes – If you think there is a move afoot by the radical Maori fringe of New Zealand society to create a parallel system of government to the one that we elect at our triennial elections, you aren’t wrong. Over the last few days we have ...2 days ago
- An announcement about an announcementWithout a corresponding drop in interest rates, it’s doubtful any changes to the CCCFA will unleash a massive rush of home buyers. Photo: Lynn GrievesonTL;DR: The six things that stood out to me in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, poverty and climate on Monday, April 22 included:The Government making a ...2 days ago
- All the Green Tech in China.
Sunday was a lazy day. I started watching Jack Tame on Q&A, the interviews are usually good for something to write about. Saying the things that the politicians won’t, but are quite possibly thinking. Things that are true and need to be extracted from between the lines.As you might know ...2 days ago - Western Express Success
In our Weekly Roundup last week we covered news from Auckland Transport that the WX1 Western Express is going to get an upgrade next year with double decker electric buses. As part of the announcement, AT also said “Since we introduced the WX1 Western Express last November we have seen ...2 days ago - Bernard’s pick ‘n’ mix of the news links at 7:16am on Monday, April 22
TL;DR: These six news links stood out in the last 24 hours to 7:16am on Monday, April 22:Labour says Kiwis at greater risk from loan sharks as Govt plans to remove borrowing regulations NZ Herald Jenee TibshraenyHow did the cost of moving two schools blow out to more than $400m?A ...2 days ago - The Kaka’s diary for the week to April 29 and beyond
TL;DR: The six key events to watch in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the week to April 29 include:PM Christopher Luxon is scheduled to hold a post-Cabinet news conference at 4 pm today. Stats NZ releases its statutory report on Census 2023 tomorrow.Finance Minister Nicola Willis delivers a pre-Budget speech at ...2 days ago - 2024 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #16A listing of 29 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, April 14, 2024 thru Sat, April 20, 2024. Story of the week Our story of the week hinges on these words from the abstract of a fresh academic ...2 days ago
- Bryce Edwards: The Government’s new fast-track invitation to corruptionThe ability of the private sector to quickly establish major new projects making use of the urban and natural environment is to be supercharged by the new National-led Government. Yesterday it introduced to Parliament one of its most significant reforms, the Fast Track Approvals Bill. The Government says this will ...3 days ago
- Thank you
This is a column to say thank you. So many of have been in touch since Mum died to say so many kind and thoughtful things. You’re wonderful, all of you. You’ve asked how we’re doing, how Dad’s doing. A little more realisation each day, of the irretrievable finality of ...3 days ago - Determining the Engine Type in Your Car
Identifying the engine type in your car is crucial for various reasons, including maintenance, repairs, and performance upgrades. Knowing the specific engine model allows you to access detailed technical information, locate compatible parts, and make informed decisions about modifications. This comprehensive guide will provide you with a step-by-step approach to ...3 days ago - How to Become a Race Car Driver: A Comprehensive GuideIntroduction: The allure of racing is undeniable. The thrill of speed, the roar of engines, and the exhilaration of competition all contribute to the allure of this adrenaline-driven sport. For those who yearn to experience the pinnacle of racing, becoming a race car driver is the ultimate dream. However, the ...3 days ago
- How Many Cars Are There in the World in 2023? An Exploration of Global Automotive StatisticsIntroduction Automobiles have become ubiquitous in modern society, serving as a primary mode of transportation and a symbol of economic growth and personal mobility. With countless vehicles traversing roads and highways worldwide, it begs the question: how many cars are there in the world? Determining the precise number is a ...3 days ago
- How Long Does It Take for Car Inspection?Maintaining a safe and reliable vehicle requires regular inspections. Whether it’s a routine maintenance checkup or a safety inspection, knowing how long the process will take can help you plan your day accordingly. This article delves into the factors that influence the duration of a car inspection and provides an ...3 days ago
- Who Makes Mazda Cars?Mazda Motor Corporation, commonly known as Mazda, is a Japanese multinational automaker headquartered in Fuchu, Aki District, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan. The company was founded in 1920 as the Toyo Cork Kogyo Co., Ltd., and began producing vehicles in 1931. Mazda is primarily known for its production of passenger cars, but ...3 days ago
- How Often to Replace Your Car Battery A Comprehensive GuideYour car battery is an essential component that provides power to start your engine, operate your electrical systems, and store energy. Over time, batteries can weaken and lose their ability to hold a charge, which can lead to starting problems, power failures, and other issues. Replacing your battery before it ...3 days ago
- Can You Register a Car Without a License?In most states, you cannot register a car without a valid driver’s license. However, there are a few exceptions to this rule. Exceptions to the Rule If you are under 18 years old: In some states, you can register a car in your name even if you do not ...3 days ago
- Mazda: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Reliability, Value, and PerformanceMazda, a Japanese automotive manufacturer with a rich history of innovation and engineering excellence, has emerged as a formidable player in the global car market. Known for its reputation of producing high-quality, fuel-efficient, and driver-oriented vehicles, Mazda has consistently garnered praise from industry experts and consumers alike. In this article, ...3 days ago
- What Are Struts on a Car?Struts are an essential part of a car’s suspension system. They are responsible for supporting the weight of the car and damping the oscillations of the springs. Struts are typically made of steel or aluminum and are filled with hydraulic fluid. How Do Struts Work? Struts work by transferring the ...3 days ago
- What Does Car Registration Look Like: A Comprehensive GuideCar registration is a mandatory process that all vehicle owners must complete annually. This process involves registering your car with the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) and paying an associated fee. The registration process ensures that your vehicle is properly licensed and insured, and helps law enforcement and other authorities ...3 days ago
- How to Share Computer Audio on ZoomZoom is a video conferencing service that allows you to share your screen, webcam, and audio with other participants. In addition to sharing your own audio, you can also share the audio from your computer with other participants. This can be useful for playing music, sharing presentations with audio, or ...4 days ago
- How Long Does It Take to Build a Computer?Building your own computer can be a rewarding and cost-effective way to get a high-performance machine tailored to your specific needs. However, it also requires careful planning and execution, and one of the most important factors to consider is the time it will take. The exact time it takes to ...4 days ago
- How to Put Your Computer to SleepSleep mode is a power-saving state that allows your computer to quickly resume operation without having to boot up from scratch. This can be useful if you need to step away from your computer for a short period of time but don’t want to shut it down completely. There are ...4 days ago
- What is Computer-Assisted Translation (CAT)?Introduction Computer-Assisted Translation (CAT) has revolutionized the field of translation by harnessing the power of technology to assist human translators in their work. This innovative approach combines specialized software with human expertise to improve the efficiency, accuracy, and consistency of translations. In this comprehensive article, we will delve into the ...4 days ago
- iPad vs. Tablet Computers A Comprehensive Guide to DifferencesIn today’s digital age, mobile devices have become an indispensable part of our daily lives. Among the vast array of portable computing options available, iPads and tablet computers stand out as two prominent contenders. While both offer similar functionalities, there are subtle yet significant differences between these two devices. This ...4 days ago
- How Are Computers Made?A computer is an electronic device that can be programmed to carry out a set of instructions. The basic components of a computer are the processor, memory, storage, input devices, and output devices. The Processor The processor, also known as the central processing unit (CPU), is the brain of the ...4 days ago
- How to Add Voice Memos from iPhone to ComputerVoice Memos is a convenient app on your iPhone that allows you to quickly record and store audio snippets. These recordings can be useful for a variety of purposes, such as taking notes, capturing ideas, or recording interviews. While you can listen to your voice memos on your iPhone, you ...4 days ago
- Why My Laptop Screen Has Lines on It: A Comprehensive GuideLaptop screens are essential for interacting with our devices and accessing information. However, when lines appear on the screen, it can be frustrating and disrupt productivity. Understanding the underlying causes of these lines is crucial for finding effective solutions. Types of Screen Lines Horizontal lines: Also known as scan ...4 days ago
- How to Right-Click on a LaptopRight-clicking is a common and essential computer operation that allows users to access additional options and settings. While most desktop computers have dedicated right-click buttons on their mice, laptops often do not have these buttons due to space limitations. This article will provide a comprehensive guide on how to right-click ...4 days ago
- Where is the Power Button on an ASUS Laptop?Powering up and shutting down your ASUS laptop is an essential task for any laptop user. Locating the power button can sometimes be a hassle, especially if you’re new to ASUS laptops. This article will provide a comprehensive guide on where to find the power button on different ASUS laptop ...4 days ago
- How to Start a Dell Laptop: A Comprehensive GuideDell laptops are renowned for their reliability, performance, and versatility. Whether you’re a student, a professional, or just someone who needs a reliable computing device, a Dell laptop can meet your needs. However, if you’re new to Dell laptops, you may be wondering how to get started. In this comprehensive ...4 days ago
- Bryce Edwards: Serious populist discontent is bubbling up in New ZealandTwo-thirds of the country think that “New Zealand’s economy is rigged to advantage the rich and powerful”. They also believe that “New Zealand needs a strong leader to take the country back from the rich and powerful”. These are just two of a handful of stunning new survey results released ...4 days ago
- How to Take a Screenshot on an Asus Laptop A Comprehensive Guide with Detailed Instructions and Illu...In today’s digital world, screenshots have become an indispensable tool for communication and documentation. Whether you need to capture an important email, preserve a website page, or share an error message, screenshots allow you to quickly and easily preserve digital information. If you’re an Asus laptop user, there are several ...4 days ago
- How to Factory Reset Gateway Laptop A Comprehensive GuideA factory reset restores your Gateway laptop to its original factory settings, erasing all data, apps, and personalizations. This can be necessary to resolve software issues, remove viruses, or prepare your laptop for sale or transfer. Here’s a step-by-step guide on how to factory reset your Gateway laptop: Method 1: ...4 days ago
- The Folly Of Impermanence.
“You talking about me?” The neoliberal denigration of the past was nowhere more unrelenting than in its depiction of the public service. The Post Office and the Railways were held up as being both irremediably inefficient and scandalously over-manned. Playwright Roger Hall’s “Glide Time” caricatures were presented as accurate depictions of ...4 days ago - A crisis of ambitionRoger Partridge writes – When the Coalition Government took office last October, it inherited a country on a precipice. With persistent inflation, decades of insipid productivity growth and crises in healthcare, education, housing and law and order, it is no exaggeration to suggest New Zealand’s first-world status was ...4 days ago
- Have 308 people in the Education Ministry’s Curriculum Development Team spent over $100m on a 60-p...Rob MacCulloch writes – In 2022, the Curriculum Centre at the Ministry of Education employed 308 staff, according to an Official Information Request. Earlier this week it was announced 202 of those staff were being cut. When you look up “The New Zealand Curriculum” on the Ministry of ...4 days ago
- 'This bill is dangerous for the environment and our democracy'Chris Bishop’s bill has stirred up a hornets nest of opposition. Photo: Lynn Grieveson for The KākāTL;DR: The six things that stood out to me in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, poverty and climate from the last day included:A crescendo of opposition to the Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill is ...4 days ago
- The Bank of our Tamariki and Mokopuna.
Monday left me brokenTuesday, I was through with hopingWednesday, my empty arms were openThursday, waiting for love, waiting for loveThe end of another week that left many of us asking WTF? What on earth has NZ gotten itself into and how on earth could people have voluntarily signed up for ...4 days ago - The worth of it all
Hello! Here comes the Saturday edition of More Than A Feilding, catching you up on the past week’s editions.State of humanity, 20242024, it feels, keeps presenting us with ever more challenges, ever more dismay.Do you give up yet? It seems to ask.No? How about this? Or this?How about this?Full story Share ...4 days ago - What is the Hardest Sport in the World?Determining the hardest sport in the world is a subjective matter, as the difficulty level can vary depending on individual abilities, physical attributes, and experience. However, based on various factors including physical demands, technical skills, mental fortitude, and overall accomplishment, here is an exploration of some of the most challenging ...4 days ago
- What is the Most Expensive Sport?The allure of sport transcends age, culture, and geographical boundaries. It captivates hearts, ignites passions, and provides unparalleled entertainment. Behind the spectacle, however, lies a fascinating world of financial investment and expenditure. Among the vast array of competitive pursuits, one question looms large: which sport carries the hefty title of ...4 days ago
- Pickleball On the Cusp of Olympic GloryIntroduction Pickleball, a rapidly growing paddle sport, has captured the hearts and imaginations of millions around the world. Its blend of tennis, badminton, and table tennis elements has made it a favorite among players of all ages and skill levels. As the sport’s popularity continues to surge, the question on ...4 days ago
- The Origin and Evolution of Soccer Unveiling the Genius Behind the World’s Most Popular SportAbstract: Soccer, the global phenomenon captivating millions worldwide, has a rich history that spans centuries. Its origins trace back to ancient civilizations, but the modern version we know and love emerged through a complex interplay of cultural influences and innovations. This article delves into the fascinating journey of soccer’s evolution, ...4 days ago
- How Much to Tint Car Windows A Comprehensive GuideTinting car windows offers numerous benefits, including enhanced privacy, reduced glare, UV protection, and a more stylish look for your vehicle. However, the cost of window tinting can vary significantly depending on several factors. This article provides a comprehensive guide to help you understand how much you can expect to ...4 days ago
- Why Does My Car Smell Like Gas? A Comprehensive Guide to Diagnosing and Fixing the IssueThe pungent smell of gasoline in your car can be an alarming and potentially dangerous problem. Not only is the odor unpleasant, but it can also indicate a serious issue with your vehicle’s fuel system. In this article, we will explore the various reasons why your car may smell like ...4 days ago
- How to Remove Tree Sap from Car A Comprehensive GuideTree sap can be a sticky, unsightly mess on your car’s exterior. It can be difficult to remove, but with the right techniques and products, you can restore your car to its former glory. Understanding Tree Sap Tree sap is a thick, viscous liquid produced by trees to seal wounds ...4 days ago
- How Much Paint Do You Need to Paint a Car?The amount of paint needed to paint a car depends on a number of factors, including the size of the car, the number of coats you plan to apply, and the type of paint you are using. In general, you will need between 1 and 2 gallons of paint for ...4 days ago
- Can You Jump a Car in the Rain? Safety Precautions and Essential StepsJump-starting a car is a common task that can be performed even in adverse weather conditions like rain. However, safety precautions and proper techniques are crucial to avoid potential hazards. This comprehensive guide will provide detailed instructions on how to safely jump a car in the rain, ensuring both your ...4 days ago
- Can taxpayers be confident PIJF cash was spent wisely?Graham Adams writes about the $55m media fund — When Patrick Gower was asked by Mike Hosking last week what he would say to the many Newstalk ZB callers who allege the Labour government bribed media with $55 million of taxpayers’ money via the Public Interest Journalism Fund — and ...4 days ago
- EGU2024 – An intense week of joining sessions virtuallyNote: this blog post has been put together over the course of the week I followed the happenings at the conference virtually. Should recordings of the Great Debates and possibly Union Symposia mentioned below, be released sometime after the conference ends, I'll include links to the ones I participated in. ...4 days ago
- Submission on “Fast Track Approvals Bill”
The following was my submission made on the “Fast Track Approvals Bill”. This potential law will give three Ministers unchecked powers, un-paralled since the days of Robert Muldoon’s “Think Big” projects.The submission is written a bit tongue-in-cheek. But it’s irreverent because the FTAB is in itself not worthy of respect. ...4 days ago - The Case for a Universal Family Benefit
One Could Reduce Child Poverty At No Fiscal CostFollowing the Richardson/Shipley 1990 ‘redesign of the welfare state’ – which eliminated the universal Family Benefit and doubled the rate of child poverty – various income supplements for families have been added, the best known being ‘Working for Families’, introduced in 2005. ...4 days ago - A who’s who of New Zealand’s dodgiest companiesSubmissions on National's corrupt Muldoonist fast-track law are due today (have you submitted?), and just hours before they close, Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop has been forced to release the list of companies he invited to apply. I've spent the last hour going through it in an epic thread of bleats, ...5 days ago
- On Lee’s watch, Economic Development seems to be stuck on scoring points from promoting sporting e...Buzz from the Beehive A few days ago, Point of Order suggested the media must be musing “on why Melissa is mute”. Our article reported that people working in the beleaguered media industry have cause to yearn for a minister as busy as Melissa Lee’s ministerial colleagues and we drew ...5 days ago
- New Zealand has never been closed for business
1. What was The Curse of Jim Bolger?a. Winston Peters b. Soon after shaking his hand, world leaders would mysteriously lose office or shuffle off this mortal coilc. Could never shake off the Mother of All Budgetsd. Dandruff2. True or false? The Chairman of a Kiwi export business has asked the ...5 days ago - Stop the panic – we’ve been here beforeJack Vowles writes – New Zealand is said to be suffering from ‘serious populist discontent’. An IPSOS MORI survey has reported that we have an increasing preference for strong leaders, think that the economy is rigged toward the rich and powerful, and political elites are ignoring ‘hard-working people’. ...5 days ago
- Release: Budget blunder shows Nicola Willis could cut recovery funding
It appears Nicola Willis is about to pull the rug out from under the feet of local communities still dealing with the aftermath of last year’s severe weather, and local councils relying on funding to build back from these disasters. ...14 hours ago - Further environmental mismanagement on the cards
The Government’s resource management reforms will add to the heavy and ever-growing burden this Government is loading on to our environment. ...17 hours ago - Release: RMA changes will be a disaster for environmentThe Government is making short-sighted changes to the Resource Management Act (RMA) that will take away environmental protection in favour of short-term profits, Labour’s environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said today. ...19 hours ago
- Release: Labour supports urgent changes to emergency management systemLabour welcomes the release of the report into the North Island weather events and looks forward to working with the Government to ensure that New Zealand is as prepared as it can be for the next natural disaster. ...19 hours ago
- Release: Labour calls for New Zealand to recognise PalestineThe Labour Party has called for the New Zealand Government to recognise Palestine, as a material step towards progressing the two-State solution needed to achieve a lasting peace in the region. ...2 days ago
- Release: Three strikes law political posturing of worst kindThe Government is bringing back a law that has little evidential backing just to look tough, Labour justice spokesperson Duncan Webb said. ...2 days ago
- Release: Government cuts unbelievably target child exploitation, violent extremism, ports and airpor...Some of our country’s most important work, stopping the sexual exploitation of children and violent extremism could go along with staff on the frontline at ports and airports. ...2 days ago
- Three strikes has failed before and will fail againResurrecting the archaic three-strikes legislation is an unwelcome return to a failed American-style approach to justice. ...2 days ago
- Release: Environmental protection vital, not ‘onerous’The Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill will give projects such as new coal mines a ‘get out of jail free’ card to wreak havoc on the environment, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said today. ...2 days ago
- Release: Govt cuts doctors and nurses in hiring freezeCuts to frontline hospital staff are not only a broken election promise, it shows the reckless tax cuts have well and truly hit the frontline of the health system, says Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall. ...4 days ago
- Fast-track submissions period must be extendedThe Green Party has joined the call for public submissions on the fast-track legislation to be extended after the Ombudsman forced the Government to release the list of organisations invited to apply just hours before submissions close. ...5 days ago
- Release: Progress on climate will be undone by GovtNew Zealand’s good work at reducing climate emissions for three years in a row will be undone by the National government’s lack of ambition and scrapping programmes that were making a difference, Labour Party climate spokesperson Megan Woods said today. ...5 days ago
- Release: Dark day for Kiwi kids as a third of Govt cuts affect themNews that 1000 jobs at the Ministry of Education and Oranga Tamariki could go is devastating for future generations of New Zealanders. ...7 days ago
- Release: Alarm as Government signals further blow to school lunchesMore essential jobs could be on the chopping block, this time Ministry of Education staff on the school lunches team are set to find out whether they're in line to lose their jobs. ...7 days ago
- Release: Quick, submit – stop Govt’s dodgy approvals billThe Government is trying to bring in a law that will allow Ministers to cut corners and kill off native species, Labour environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said. ...1 week ago
- Government throws coal on the climate crisis fireThe Government’s policy announced today to ease consenting for coal mining will have a lasting impact across generations. ...1 week ago
- Release: Public transport costs to double as National looks at unaffordable roading project insteadCancelling urgently needed new Cook Strait ferries and hiking the cost of public transport for many Kiwis so that National can announce the prospect of another tunnel for Wellington is not making good choices, Labour Transport Spokesperson Tangi Utikere said. ...1 week ago
- Release: Cost of living in Auckland still not a priorityA laundry list of additional costs for Tāmaki Makarau Auckland shows the Minister for the city is not delivering for the people who live there, says Labour Auckland Issues spokesperson Shanan Halbert. ...1 week ago
- Greens look to fast-track submissions on harmful lawThe Green Party has today launched a step-by-step guide to help New Zealanders make their voice heard on the Government’s democracy dodging and anti-environment fast track legislation. ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Govt should stop making people’s lives harder and build more homesThe National Government’s proposed changes to the Residential Tenancies Act will mean tenants can be turfed from their homes by landlords with little notice, Labour housing spokesperson Kieran McAnulty said. ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Melissa Lee missing in action on mediaThe action Melissa Lee promised to protect democracy and the media sector is missing, Media and Communications spokesperson Willie Jackson said. ...2 weeks ago
- Landlord Government leaves little hope for rentersThe Government’s announcement on tenancy rules prove that it does not care about renters. ...2 weeks ago
- Opportunity to build a more sustainable economyGreen Party co-leader Marama Davidson is calling on all parties to support a common-sense change that’s great for the planet and great for consumers after her member’s bill was drawn from the ballot today. ...2 weeks ago
- Significant step forward in fixing cruel and unjust pastA significant milestone has been reached in the fight to strike an anti-Pasifika and unfair law from the country’s books after Teanau Tuiono’s members’ bill passed its first reading. ...2 weeks ago
- Missed opportunity but NZ will surely one day recognise the right to a sustainable environmentNew Zealand has today missed the opportunity to uphold the right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment, says James Shaw after his member’s bill was voted down in its first reading. ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Don’t cut our lunches – clear message sent to GovernmentTens of thousands of people are demanding the Government commits to fully funding free and healthy school lunches. ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Govt makes U-turn on Suicide Prevention OfficeLabour welcomes the Government’s U-turn on the closure of the Suicide Prevention Office, says Labour Mental Health spokesperson Ingrid Leary. ...2 weeks ago
- CCC issues warning over further climate delayToday’s advice from the Climate Change Commission paints a sobering reality of the challenge we face in combating climate change, especially in light of recent Government policy announcements. ...2 weeks ago
- Luxon targets lame and lousy example of leadershipIf talk is cheap, Chris Luxon’s “targets” are bankrupt. ...2 weeks ago
- Luxon targets are lousy example of leadershipIf talk is cheap, Chris Luxon’s “targets” are bankrupt. ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Commitment to disability communities missing from Govt prioritiesMinister for Disability Issues Penny Simmonds appears to have delayed a report back to Cabinet on the progress New Zealand is making against international obligations for disabled New Zealanders. ...2 weeks ago
- Methane target review is dangerous duplicationThe Government’s newly announced review of methane emissions reduction targets hints at its desire to delay Aotearoa New Zealand’s urgent transition to a climate safe future, the Green Party said. ...3 weeks ago
- Release: Government must commit to school building project for disabled studentsThe Government must commit to the Maitai School building project for students with high and complex needs, to ensure disabled students from the top of the South Island have somewhere to learn. ...3 weeks ago
- Release: National must take mental health seriouslyMental Health Minister Matt Doocey and his Government colleagues have made a meal of their mental health commitments, showing how flimsy their efforts to champion the issue truly are, says Labour Mental Health spokesperson Ingrid Leary. ...3 weeks ago
- Referendums for Māori wards a racist step backwardsThe Government's imposed referendum on Māori wards is a racist step backwards for Māori representation, and disregards Te Tiriti o Waitangi. ...3 weeks ago
- Release: Job losses at Health not worth it for tax cutsNew Zealand will feel the harm of the National Government’s reckless cuts to jobs at the health ministry for generations, says Ayesha Verrall. ...3 weeks ago
- Minister welcomes hydrogen milestone
Energy Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed an important milestone in New Zealand’s hydrogen future, with the opening of the country’s first network of hydrogen refuelling stations in Wiri. “I want to congratulate the team at Hiringa Energy and its partners K one W one (K1W1), Mitsui & Co New Zealand ...13 hours ago - Urgent changes to system through first RMA Amendment BillThe coalition Government is delivering on its commitment to improve resource management laws and give greater certainty to consent applicants, with a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) expected to be introduced to Parliament next month. RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop has today outlined the first RMA Amendment ...20 hours ago
- Overseas decommissioning models consideredOverseas models for regulating the oil and gas sector, including their decommissioning regimes, are being carefully scrutinised as a potential template for New Zealand’s own sector, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. The Coalition Government is focused on rebuilding investor confidence in New Zealand’s energy sector as it looks to strengthen ...20 hours ago
- Release of North Island Severe Weather Event InquiryEmergency Management and Recovery Minister Mark Mitchell has today released the Report of the Government Inquiry into the response to the North Island Severe Weather Events. “The report shows that New Zealand’s emergency management system is not fit-for-purpose and there are some significant gaps we need to address,” Mr Mitchell ...21 hours ago
- Justice Minister to attend Human Rights CouncilJustice Minister Paul Goldsmith is today travelling to Europe where he’ll update the United Nations Human Rights Council on the Government’s work to restore law and order. “Attending the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva provides us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while ...2 days ago
- Patterson reopens world’s largest wool scouring facilityAssociate Agriculture Minister, Mark Patterson, formally reopened the world’s largest wool processing facility today in Awatoto, Napier, following a $50 million rebuild and refurbishment project. “The reopening of this facility will significantly lift the economic opportunities available to New Zealand’s wool sector, which already accounts for 20 per cent of ...2 days ago
- Speech to the Southland Otago Regional Engineering Collective Summit, 18 April 2024Hon Andrew Bayly, Minister for Small Business and Manufacturing At the Southland Otago Regional Engineering Collective (SOREC) Summit, 18 April, Dunedin Ngā mihi nui, Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Ko Whanganui aho Good Afternoon and thank you for inviting me to open your summit today. I am delighted ...2 days ago
- Government to introduce revised Three Strikes lawThe Government is delivering on its commitment to bring back the Three Strikes legislation, Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee announced today. “Our Government is committed to restoring law and order and enforcing appropriate consequences on criminals. We are making it clear that repeat serious violent or sexual offending is not ...2 days ago
- New diplomatic appointmentsForeign Minister Winston Peters has today announced four new diplomatic appointments for New Zealand’s overseas missions. “Our diplomats have a vital role in maintaining and protecting New Zealand’s interests around the world,” Mr Peters says. “I am pleased to announce the appointment of these senior diplomats from the ...2 days ago
- Humanitarian support for Ethiopia and SomaliaNew Zealand is contributing NZ$7 million to support communities affected by severe food insecurity and other urgent humanitarian needs in Ethiopia and Somalia, Foreign Minister Rt Hon Winston Peters announced today. “Over 21 million people are in need of humanitarian assistance across Ethiopia, with a further 6.9 million people ...2 days ago
- Arts Minister congratulates Mataaho CollectiveMinister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Paul Goldsmith is congratulating Mataaho Collective for winning the Golden Lion for best participant in the main exhibition at the Venice Biennale. "Congratulations to the Mataaho Collective for winning one of the world's most prestigious art prizes at the Venice Biennale. “It is good ...3 days ago
- Supporting better financial outcomes for KiwisThe Government is reforming financial services to improve access to home loans and other lending, and strengthen customer protections, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly and Housing Minister Chris Bishop announced today. “Our coalition Government is committed to rebuilding the economy and making life simpler by cutting red tape. We are ...3 days ago
- Trade relationship with China remains strong“China remains a strong commercial opportunity for Kiwi exporters as Chinese businesses and consumers continue to value our high-quality safe produce,” Trade and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay says. Mr McClay has returned to New Zealand following visits to Beijing, Harbin and Shanghai where he met ministers, governors and mayors and engaged in trade and agricultural events with the New ...3 days ago
- PM’s South East Asia mission does the businessPrime Minister Christopher Luxon has completed a successful trip to Singapore, Thailand and the Philippines, deepening relationships and capitalising on opportunities. Mr Luxon was accompanied by a business delegation and says the choice of countries represents the priority the New Zealand Government places on South East Asia, and our relationships in ...4 days ago
- $41m to support clean energy in South East AsiaNew Zealand is demonstrating its commitment to reducing global greenhouse emissions, and supporting clean energy transition in South East Asia, through a contribution of NZ$41 million (US$25 million) in climate finance to the Asian Development Bank (ADB)-led Energy Transition Mechanism (ETM). Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Climate Change Minister Simon Watts announced ...5 days ago
- Minister releases Fast-track stakeholder listThe Government is today releasing a list of organisations who received letters about the Fast-track applications process, says RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop. “Recently Ministers and agencies have received a series of OIA requests for a list of organisations to whom I wrote with information on applying to have a ...5 days ago
- Judicial appointments announcedAttorney-General Judith Collins today announced the appointment of Wellington Barrister David Jonathan Boldt as a Judge of the High Court, and the Honourable Justice Matthew Palmer as a Judge of the Court of Appeal. Justice Boldt graduated with an LLB from Victoria University of Wellington in 1990, and also holds ...5 days ago
- Education Minister heads to major teaching summit in SingaporeEducation Minister Erica Stanford will lead the New Zealand delegation at the 2024 International Summit on the Teaching Profession (ISTP) held in Singapore. The delegation includes representatives from the Post Primary Teachers’ Association (PPTA) Te Wehengarua and the New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI) Te Riu Roa. The summit is co-hosted ...5 days ago
- Value of stopbank project proven during cycloneA stopbank upgrade project in Tairawhiti partly funded by the Government has increased flood resilience for around 7000ha of residential and horticultural land so far, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones today attended a dawn service in Gisborne to mark the end of the first stage of the ...5 days ago
- Anzac commemorations, Türkiye relationship focus of visitForeign Affairs Minister Winston Peters will represent the Government at Anzac Day commemorations on the Gallipoli Peninsula next week and engage with senior representatives of the Turkish government in Istanbul. “The Gallipoli campaign is a defining event in our history. It will be a privilege to share the occasion ...5 days ago
- Minister to Europe for OECD meeting, Anzac DayScience, Innovation and Technology and Defence Minister Judith Collins will next week attend the OECD Science and Technology Ministerial conference in Paris and Anzac Day commemorations in Belgium. “Science, innovation and technology have a major role to play in rebuilding our economy and achieving better health, environmental and social outcomes ...5 days ago
- Comprehensive Partnership the goal for NZ and the PhilippinesPrime Minister Christopher Luxon held a bilateral meeting today with the President of the Philippines, Ferdinand Marcos Jr. The Prime Minister was accompanied by MP Paulo Garcia, the first Filipino to be elected to a legislature outside the Philippines. During today’s meeting, Prime Minister Luxon and President Marcos Jr discussed opportunities to ...5 days ago
- Government commits $20m to Westport flood protectionThe Government has announced that $20 million in funding will be made available to Westport to fund much needed flood protection around the town. This measure will significantly improve the resilience of the community, says Local Government Minister Simeon Brown. “The Westport community has already been allocated almost $3 million ...6 days ago
- Taupō takes pole positionThe Government is proud to support the first ever Repco Supercars Championship event in Taupō as up to 70,000 motorsport fans attend the Taupō International Motorsport Park this weekend, says Economic Development Minister Melissa Lee. “Anticipation for the ITM Taupō Super400 is huge, with tickets and accommodation selling out weeks ...6 days ago
- Cost of living support for low-income homeownersLocal Government Minister Simeon Brown has announced an increase to the Rates Rebate Scheme, putting money back into the pockets of low-income homeowners. “The coalition Government is committed to bringing down the cost of living for New Zealanders. That includes targeted support for those Kiwis who are doing things tough, such ...6 days ago
- Government backing mussel spat projectThe Coalition Government is investing in a project to boost survival rates of New Zealand mussels and grow the industry, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones has announced. “This project seeks to increase the resilience of our mussels and significantly boost the sector’s productivity,” Mr Jones says. “The project - ...6 days ago
- Government focused on getting people into workBenefit figures released today underscore the importance of the Government’s plan to rebuild the economy and have 50,000 fewer people on Jobseeker Support, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. “Benefit numbers are still significantly higher than when National was last in government, when there was about 70,000 fewer ...6 days ago
- Clean energy key driver to reducing emissionsThe Government’s commitment to doubling New Zealand’s renewable energy capacity is backed by new data showing that clean energy has helped the country reach its lowest annual gross emissions since 1999, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. New Zealand’s latest Greenhouse Gas Inventory (1990-2022) published today, shows gross emissions fell ...6 days ago
- Earthquake-prone buildings review brought forwardThe Government is bringing the earthquake-prone building review forward, with work to start immediately, and extending the deadline for remediations by four years, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says. “Our Government is focused on rebuilding the economy. A key part of our plan is to cut red tape that ...6 days ago
- Thailand and NZ to agree to Strategic PartnershipPrime Minister Christopher Luxon and his Thai counterpart, Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin, have today agreed that New Zealand and the Kingdom of Thailand will upgrade the bilateral relationship to a Strategic Partnership by 2026. “New Zealand and Thailand have a lot to offer each other. We have a strong mutual desire to build ...7 days ago
- Government consults on extending coastal permits for portsRMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop and Transport Minister Simeon Brown have today announced the Coalition Government’s intention to extend port coastal permits for a further 20 years, providing port operators with certainty to continue their operations. “The introduction of the Resource Management Act in 1991 required ports to obtain coastal ...7 days ago
- Inflation coming down, but more work to doToday’s announcement that inflation is down to 4 per cent is encouraging news for Kiwis, but there is more work to be done - underlining the importance of the Government’s plan to get the economy back on track, acting Finance Minister Chris Bishop says. “Inflation is now at 4 per ...7 days ago
- School attendance restored as a priority in health adviceRefreshed health guidance released today will help parents and schools make informed decisions about whether their child needs to be in school, addressing one of the key issues affecting school attendance, says Associate Education Minister David Seymour. In recent years, consistently across all school terms, short-term illness or medical reasons ...7 days ago
- Unnecessary bureaucracy cut in oceans sectorOceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones is streamlining high-level oceans management while maintaining a focus on supporting the sector’s role in the export-led recovery of the economy. “I am working to realise the untapped potential of our fishing and aquaculture sector. To achieve that we need to be smarter with ...7 days ago
- Patterson promoting NZ’s wool sector at International CongressAssociate Agriculture Minister Mark Patterson is speaking at the International Wool Textile Organisation Congress in Adelaide, promoting New Zealand wool, and outlining the coalition Government’s support for the revitalisation the sector. "New Zealand’s wool exports reached $400 million in the year to 30 June 2023, and the coalition Government ...1 week ago
- Removing red tape to help early learners thriveThe Government is making legislative changes to make it easier for new early learning services to be established, and for existing services to operate, Associate Education Minister David Seymour says. The changes involve repealing the network approval provisions that apply when someone wants to establish a new early learning service, ...1 week ago
- RMA changes to cut coal mining consent red tapeChanges to the Resource Management Act will align consenting for coal mining to other forms of mining to reduce barriers that are holding back economic development, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. “The inconsistent treatment of coal mining compared with other extractive activities is burdensome red tape that fails to acknowledge ...1 week ago
- McClay reaffirms strong NZ-China trade relationshipTrade, Agriculture and Forestry Minister Todd McClay has concluded productive discussions with ministerial counterparts in Beijing today, in support of the New Zealand-China trade and economic relationship. “My meeting with Commerce Minister Wang Wentao reaffirmed the complementary nature of the bilateral trade relationship, with our Free Trade Agreement at its ...1 week ago
- Prime Minister Luxon acknowledges legacy of Singapore Prime Minister LeePrime Minister Christopher Luxon today paid tribute to Singapore’s outgoing Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong. Meeting in Singapore today immediately before Prime Minister Lee announced he was stepping down, Prime Minister Luxon warmly acknowledged his counterpart’s almost twenty years as leader, and the enduring legacy he has left for Singapore and South East ...1 week ago
- PMs Luxon and Lee deepen Singapore-NZ tiesPrime Minister Christopher Luxon held a bilateral meeting today with Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong. While in Singapore as part of his visit to South East Asia this week, Prime Minister Luxon also met with Singapore President Tharman Shanmugaratnam and will meet with Deputy Prime Minister Lawrence Wong. During today’s meeting, Prime Minister Luxon ...1 week ago
- Lessons identified must become lessons learned for emergency preparedness
Opinion: It cost too much, apparently, to implement a ‘common operational picture’ The post Lessons identified must become lessons learned for emergency preparedness appeared first on Newsroom. ...1 hour ago - The state of Taiwan’s silicon shieldTaiwan’s semiconductor industry is seen some as its ‘silicon shield’ against invasion – but how will overseas expansion affect that protection? The post The state of Taiwan’s silicon shield appeared first on Newsroom. ...1 hour ago
- Quake rules in for a shake-upThere’s relief for building owners bending under the weight of earthquake strengthening rules – and costs – that came into force seven years ago. Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk has announced a scheduled 2027 review of the earthquake-prone building regulations will now start this year. Owners will also get ...1 hour ago
- Kiwis are learning how to fight climate change – pollsBucking a common misconception, NZers no longer say recycling is the most effective action they can take to reduce climate pollution The post Kiwis are learning how to fight climate change – polls appeared first on Newsroom. ...1 hour ago
- Daily crossword, Wednesday 24 AprilThe post Daily crossword, Wednesday 24 April appeared first on Newsroom. ...1 hour ago
- Child protection decimation a ‘callous razor gang response’Opinion: It has been announced that nine percent of roles at Oranga Tamariki will be disestablished, presumably to help fund the tax cuts promised by the coalition Government. I am reminded of the graphics used to illustrate pandemic events, where five thousand people are standing in a field and then ...1 hour ago
- ‘Lesser Spotted Kiwi’ survives one of world’s toughest racesAfter more than two sleepless days, running through savage terrain, Greig Hamilton didn’t know if he was going to finish one of the most gruelling psychological assaults in sport. He was metres away from the finish line, a yellow gate made famous in a Netflix documentary; a race he’d dreamed ...1 hour ago
- Newsroom daily quiz, Wednesday 24 AprilLoading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A[quiz],DIV[quiz],A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question? Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Wednesday 24 April appeared first on Newsroom. ...1 hour ago
- ‘I was in awe of Germaine Greer’s face, her neck, her hands’The following interview with former Green Party MP Sue Kedgley came about because she features in the new memoir Hine Toa by activist Ngāhuia te Awekōtuku; the two knew each other at the University of Auckland in the early 70s, when they were both took on leadership roles in the ...1 hour ago
- Murray Horton: Get tough on Israel – we’ve done it before over spies
COMMENTARY: By Murray Horton New Zealand needs to get tough with Israel. It’s not as if we haven’t done so before. When NZ authorities busted a Mossad operation in Auckland 20 years ago, the government didn’t say: “Oh well, Israel has the right to defend itself.” No, it arrested, prosecuted, ...5 hours ago - Fiji journalism – starting with the people and ending with the peopleNEWSMAKERS: By Vijay Narayan, news director of FijiVillage Blessed to be part of the University of Fiji (UniFiji) faculty to continue to teach and mentor those who want to join our noble profession, and to stand for truth and justice for the people of the country. I was privileged to ...5 hours ago
- Beyond the spin, beyond the handouts, here’s how to get a handle on what’s really happening on b...Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Peter Martin, Visiting Fellow, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University Three weeks from now, some of us will be presented with a mountain of budget papers, and just about all of us will get to hear about them on radio, ...7 hours ago
- West Antarctica’s ice sheet was smaller thousands of years ago – here’s why this matters todaySource: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Dan Lowry, Ice Sheet & Climate Modeller, GNS Science Hugh Chittock/Antarctica New Zealand, CC BY-SA As the climate warms and Antarctica’s glaciers and ice sheets melt, the resulting rise in sea level has the potential to displace hundreds of millions of ...7 hours ago
- 'We can't forget those people': Public sector job cuts not just impacting Wellington
At least 400 of the thousands of jobs on the line so far are outside Wellington, according to the Public Service Association. ...8 hours ago - 'There's no evidence that three strikes reduces crime' – lawyersThe government's plan to reintroduce a three strikes regime is being strongly opposed by lawyers, who argue there is no evidence it reduces crime or helps people rehabilitate. ...9 hours ago
- Elon Musk vs Australia: global content take-down orders can harm the internet if adopted widelySource: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Dan Jerker B. Svantesson, Professor specialising in Internet law, Bond University Do Australian courts have the right to decide what foreign citizens, located overseas, view online on a foreign-owned platform? Anyone inclined to answer “yes” to this question should perhaps also ask ...12 hours ago
- Elon Musk says ‘disc replacement’ worked for him. But evidence this surgery helps chronic pain i...Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Giovanni E Ferreira, NHMRC Emerging Leader Research Fellow, Institute of Musculoskeletal Health, University of Sydney Last week in a post on X, owner of the platform Elon Musk recommended people look into disc replacement if they’re experiencing severe neck or back pain. ...12 hours ago
- The NSW treasurer says a slashed share of GST will cost his state $11.9 billion. But where did he ge...Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By David Hayward, Emeritus Professor of Public Policy, RMIT University anek.soowannaphoom/Shutterstock NSW Treasurer Daniel Mookhey caught the headlines yesterday, courtesy of a blistering speech condemning the latest GST carve-up. New South Wales, he claimed, would be A$11.9 billion worse off over the ...12 hours ago
- Anti-gang laws faces heavy criticism at select committeeWhile police are "broadly in favour", the government's proposed anti-gang laws are facing pushback from lawyers, rights groups and former gang members. ...13 hours ago
- Anti-gang laws face heavy criticism at select committeeWhile police are "broadly in favour", the government's proposed anti-gang laws are facing pushback from lawyers, rights groups and former gang members. ...13 hours ago
- PNG’s PM Marape to ‘give hand to his bro’ Albanese on Kokoda TrailBy Miriam Zarriga in Port Moresby Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has arrived at Kokoda Station, Northern province, at the start of his state visit to Papua New Guinea. Both Albanese and Prime Minister James Marape will meet with the locals and the Northern Provincial government before they begin their ...14 hours ago
- Ministry of Social Development accepts 200 voluntary redundancies – PSAThe Public Service Association says further job cuts are likely. ...14 hours ago
- Many Australians face losing their homes right now. Here’s how the government should helpSource: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Chris Wallace, Professor, School of Politics Economics & Society, Faculty of Business Government & Law, University of Canberra Shutterstock An important principle was invoked by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese last week in defence of the government’s Future Made in Australia industry ...14 hours ago
- French security forces in Nouméa ahead of two opposing marches todayBy Patrick Decloitre, RNZ Pacific correspondent French Pacific desk Security forces reinforcements were sent from France ahead of two rival marches in the capital Nouméa today, at the same time and only two streets away one from the other. One march, called by Union Calédonienne party (a component of the ...15 hours ago
- Just 1 In 6 Oppose ‘Three Strikes’ – Poll
A poll last August found that just 16% of New Zealanders oppose bringing back the ‘Three Strikes’ law. The nationwide poll of 1,000 New Zealanders was commissioned by Family First NZ and carried out by Curia Market Research. ...15 hours ago - Scattergun: After the Death of Rūaumoko reveals the frightening talent of Ana Scotney
The solo show from Ana Scotney is both sprawling and intimate, and a must-see, writes Mad Chapman. In the opening moments of Scattergun: After the Death of Rūaumoko, writer and performer Ana Scotney lays out the groundwork, literally. Silently moving around the square stage, Scotney is not so much dancing ...15 hours ago - Curious Kids: who makes the words? Who decides what things like ‘trees’ and ‘shoes’ are call...Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kate Burridge, Professor of Linguistics, Monash University Who makes the words? Why are trees called trees and why are shoes called shoes and who makes the names? – Elliot, age 5, Eltham, Victoria Good question Elliot! Let’s start with ...15 hours ago
- We’re only using a fraction of health workers’ skills. This needs to changeSource: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Stephen Duckett, Honorary Enterprise Professor, School of Population and Global Health, and Department of General Practice and Primary Care, The University of Melbourne at am Rawpixel.com/Shutterstock Roles of health professionals are still unfortunately often stuck in the past. That is, before the ...15 hours ago
- Malcolm Evans: A new low in NZ media’s record of bias over PalestineCOMMENTARY: By Malcolm Evans Last week’s leaked New York Times staff directive, as to what words can and cannot be used to describe the carnage Israel is raining on Palestinians, is proof positive, since those reports are published verbatim here in New Zealand, that our understanding of the conflict is ...16 hours ago
- New Zealand Survey Finds 65 Percent Agree The Economy Is “rigged To Advantage The Rich And Powerfu...In the case of New Zealand, the results confirm that there is no popular support for the vicious austerity program being imposed by the National Party-led government, which is backed in all fundamental respects by the opposition Labour Party. ...16 hours ago
- Is Olivia Rodrigo about to announce a New Zealand show? An investigationThe ‘Vampire’ singer has never visited our part of the world, but that might all be about to change. We assess the evidence. Olivia Rodrigo’s Guts World Tour is pulling in massive crowds as it whips around the US and Europe, even helping to catapult regular supporting act Chappell Roan ...17 hours ago
- Govt Repeal Of Te Mana O Te Wai Condemning Rural Communities To Unsafe Drinking Water – Greenp...Testing of drinking water in rural Canterbury over the weekend by Greenpeace revealed that several public town supplies were reaching levels of nitrate above 5 mg/L - the threshold which a growing body of scientific evidence has linked to increased ...17 hours ago
- Vastly bigger than the Black Summer: 84 million hectares of northern Australia burned in 2023Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Rohan Fisher, Information Technology for Development Researcher, Charles Darwin University It may come as a surprise to hear 2023 was Australia’s biggest bushfire season in more than a decade. Fires burned across an area eight times as big as the 2019–20 Black ...17 hours ago
- RMA Changes Welcome, But Must Go FurtherResponding to the Government’s announcement of changes to resource management laws, Taxpayers’ Union Executive Director, Jordan Williams, said: “These changes are a step in the right direction in terms of removing ideological and unworkable ...17 hours ago
- Papua New Guinea: Slow Progress On Reforms And Ongoing Restrictions To Freedom Of ExpressionMore than two years after the Human Rights Council called for the establishment of a national human rights commission, such a body has yet to be formed. ...17 hours ago
- Familiar laxity on show in Cyclone Gabrielle findingsComment: An emergency management system with wide variations in performance, significant capability gaps, funding shortfalls and above all a setup that is not meeting the needs of New Zealanders at times of crisis. The Government’s inquiry into the response to Cyclone Gabrielle and other severe weather events in the North ...18 hours ago
- Existing roads could be tolled, officials tell Transport Minister Simeon BrownSimeon Brown is being encouraged to look at charging for existing roads to relieve pressure on transport funding. ...18 hours ago
- Independent Review And Interim Coverage Rates Highlight Successful CensusApproximately five million people will be represented in 2023 Census data – that’s more than 99 percent of the population. ...18 hours ago
- Is it time for anti-capitalists to embrace shopping? An argument with myselfWelcome to the whirring wonders of one brain trying to align its actions with its beliefs within a system it thinks is evil. My brain has been spiralling in a woke conundrum ever since I found out a bookshop I’ve never been to was shutting down. Good Books, a bookshop ...18 hours ago
- The Criminal Bar Association Of New Zealand (CBANZ) Strongly Opposes The Proposed Return Of The Thre...We repeat our call for criminal justice policy to be based on evidence, something the three strikes regime neglects to recognise – with no evidence that it either reduces crime or assists with rehabilitation. ...19 hours ago
- No clear winner as lobbying to form next Solomon Islands government intensifiesBy Koroi Hawkins, RNZ Pacific editor in Honiara With only four more seats in the 50-member Parliament yet to be officially declared, there is no outright winner in the Solomon Islands elections. As of Monday, the two largest blocs in the winner’s circle, independents and the incumbent Prime Minister Manasseh ...19 hours ago
- Government reveals first changes to Resource Management ActFarming, mining and other industrial regulations are being scrapped and altered in a reformed RMA. ...19 hours ago
- Space as a tool for change: Inside the innovation of two/fiftysevenTwo/fiftyseven is a multi-purpose space hidden in the heart of Wellington that is paving a way for sustainable building and responsible landlording in Aotearoa and beyond. By 2060 the world is predicted to double its entire building stock, which equates to building an entire New York City every 34 days, ...20 hours ago
- TrueBliss react to their most iconic Y2K Popstars looksPopstars wasn’t just a reality television revolution, it was also a huge moment for Y2K fashion. It’s 25 years since girl group TrueBliss was formed on New Zealand national television, breaking new ground for both the reality television industry and the shiny clothing industry. With the first episode on NZ ...20 hours ago
- Would you be happy as a long-term single? The answer may depend on your attachment styleSource: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Christopher Pepping, Associate Professor in Clinical Psychology, Griffith University Marvin / Shutterstock Are all single people insecure? When we think about people who have been single for a long time, we may assume it’s because single people have insecurities that make ...21 hours ago
- Gone in a puff of smoke: 52,000 sq km of ‘long unburnt’ Australian habitat has vanished in 40 ye...Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By William Geary, Lecturer in Quantitative Ecology & Biodiversity Conservation, The University of Melbourne Trismegist san, Shutterstock Landscapes that have escaped fire for decades or centuries tend to harbour vital structures for wildlife, such as tree hollows and large logs. But these ...21 hours ago
- Ecosystems are deeply interconnected – environmental research, policy and management should be tooSource: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Rebecca Gladstone-Gallagher, Lecturer in Marine Science, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau Shutterstock/S Curtis Why are we crossing ecological boundaries that affect Earth’s fundamental life-supporting capacity? Is it because we don’t have enough information about how ecosystems respond to change? Or ...21 hours ago
- What if the Reserve Bank itself has been feeding inflation? An economist explainsSource: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Matthew Crocker, PhD Student in Economics, Deakin University Here’s something for the board of the Reserve Bank of Australia to ponder as it meets next month to set interest rates. It has pushed up rates on 13 occasions since it began its ...21 hours ago
- The cost of being: A frugal charity director with two teens and two housesAs part of our series exploring how New Zealanders live and our relationship with money, a charity director outlines how she’s saving for retirement and buying secondhand. Want to be part of The Cost of Being? Fill out the questionnaire here. Gender: Female Age: 45 Ethnicity: Pākehā Role: Charity director, mum of ...21 hours ago
- Choice and control: people with disability feel safer when they can select their NDIS providersSource: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sophie Yates, Research Fellow, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University Many Australians with disability feel on the edge of a precipice right now. Recommendations from the disability royal commission and the NDIS review were released late last year. Now a ...22 hours ago
- Government chalks up ‘tough on crime’ point with resurrected three strikes lawIt’s been called a failed experiment and a judicial straightjacket but the government says the revised three strikes law will be a more workable regime, writes Anna Rawhiti-Connell in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here. Three ...22 hours ago
- Israeli Ambassador To New Zealand’s Unchallenged On TVNZ Q+A Programme, Allowed To Spread Misinfor...New Zealand’s Palestinian community and Palestinian Youth Aotearoa are voicing alarm and disappointment with the lack of factual rigour present during the Israeli Ambassador’s appearance as a guest on TVNZ’s Q+A With Jack Tame Sunday (21/04). ...23 hours ago
- Selwyn residents fighting for homes after being told they need to leave them by 2039And entire community has been told it'll be evicted - but some are feeling stressed and cannot afford to buy anywhere else. ...23 hours ago
- Tax cuts: Finance Minister maintains commitment to no extra borrowingNicola Wills says tax cuts will be fully funded through reprioritising money and targeted revenue measures - and won't add to inflation. ...1 day ago
- End of Life Choice Act: Changes needed in review, say advocatesBoth ACT leader David Seymour, who played a key role in drawing up the assisted dying law, and hospice leaders say it's time the legislation was changed. ...1 day ago
- Have gang numbers really ‘skyrocketed’ in recent years?Public submissions on proposed gang control laws are being heard today. Rising gang membership has been cited as rationale for a crackdown – but what do we actually know about how many people belong to gangs in New Zealand? What’s all this then? A rise in the number of gang ...1 day ago
- Why Restore Passenger Rail has set its sights on stopping cruise shipsClimate activists are setting their sights on an unpopular target, and hoping to bring lots of the public with them. It’s hard to miss the Majestic Princess: the enormous cruise ship, docked at Auckland’s Prince’s Wharf, looms over the nearby buildings. The ship, which can fit nearly 6,000 people, ...1 day ago
- West is best? How we stack up against AustraliaOpinion: We’ve kicked the tyres on the perception NZ’s economy is in a parlous state compared to Australia. We take a quick tour of relative trends in GDP, housing markets, labour markets, trade, the fiscal situation, and the outlooks for inflation and interest rates. We find the cyclical positions of ...1 day ago
- Political donor fails in final appeal over Chinese cultural defenceThe Supreme Court rejects a bid to argue a Chinese New Zealander convicted of lying to the SFO did so for cultural reasons The post Political donor fails in final appeal over Chinese cultural defence appeared first on Newsroom. ...1 day ago
- From ling to liquidation for New Zealand Coastal SeafoodsA former director of the Australia-listed company is asking tough questions about disclosure as local operations are liquidated The post From ling to liquidation for New Zealand Coastal Seafoods appeared first on Newsroom. ...1 day ago
- A new kind of city dealOpinion: Making sure developers, local and central government, and landowners are all on the same page makes sense The post A new kind of city deal appeared first on Newsroom. ...1 day ago
- Newsroom daily quiz, Tuesday 23 AprilLoading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A[quiz],DIV[quiz],A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question? Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Tuesday 23 April appeared first on Newsroom. ...1 day ago
- Rotorua kuia: ‘I’m disgusted at the investment of my own iwi in a luxury spa’The following korero between Ngāhuia te Awekōtuku, author of the newly published memoir Hine Toa, one of the year’s most important books, and Dale Husband from e-tangata, was first published in October. It traverses her involvement with the activist group Ngā Tamatoa at Auckland University in the early 1970s, her ...1 day ago
- The de-railing of New ZealandIn the 16 years since it was bought by the government for $690 million, KiwiRail has had several overhauls and turnaround plans worth billions of dollars. Its ambitions as a successful, profitable operator of tourism, freight and ferries have often been derailed by disasters from earthquakes to cyclones, mine explosions ...1 day ago
- Daily crossword, Tuesday 23 AprilThe post Daily crossword, Tuesday 23 April appeared first on Newsroom. ...1 day ago
- King of backs begins her Black Ferns reignBlack Ferns trailblazer Kendra Cocksedge was on the verge of tears when her young protégé, Hannah King, unassumingly broke the news. Three-time Rugby World Cup winner Cocksedge and Lincoln agriculture student King meet every few weeks over a hot chocolate, in an enduring mentorship that’s spanned years. “Before we even ...1 day ago
- New emergency services radio network plans off-trackA new radio network for emergency responders should already be up and running in Canterbury The post New emergency services radio network plans off-track appeared first on Newsroom. ...1 day ago
- NZ’s Foreign Minister Winston Peters ‘defers’ recognition of PalestineBy Russell Palmer, RNZ News digital political journalist New Zealand’s Foreign Minister Winston Peters is putting off recognition of Palestine as a state, despite opposition Labour’s formal request that he make the move. Peters said diplomatic recognition of Palestine was a matter of “when not if”, but doing so now ...1 day ago
- Three strikes 'political posturing' with 'grossly unfair results' – opposi...The opposition has laid into the government's plan to reintroduce a "three strikes" regime, saying it's inequitable and there's very little evidence it works. ...1 day ago
- High Court reserves decision on Waitangi Tribunal summons to Minister for Children Karen ChhourThe Crown claims the Tribunal has acted in an unlawful and coercive manner, despite having the authority to summons Karen Chhour. ...1 day ago
- Elon Musk is mad he’s been ordered to remove Sydney church stabbing videos from X. He’d be more ...Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Rob Nicholls, Senior research associate, University of Sydney Australia’s eSafety Commissioner has ordered social media platform “X” (formerly known as Twitter) to remove graphic videos of the stabbing of Bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel in Sydney last week from the site. The incident ...1 day ago
- Nearly 140 roles proposed to go at Customs and DIANearly 140 roles are proposed to go at Customs and at the Department of Internal Affairs (DIA), a larger number than PSA announced this afternoon. ...2 days ago
- More than coral: the unseen casualties of record-breaking heat on the Great Barrier ReefSource: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By John Turnbull, Postdoctoral Research Associate, University of Sydney John Turnbull, CC BY-NC-ND In past bleaching events on the Great Barrier Reef, the southern region has sometimes been spared worst of the bleaching. Not this time. This year’s intense underwater heat has ...2 days ago
- New play The Exact Dimensions of Hell explores the chaos and contradiction of teenage girlhood – a...Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sarah Austin, Lecturer in Theatre, The University of Melbourne Darren Gill/Mackey, Darling & Collaborators The relationship between witchcraft and teenage girls has been the subject of many books, films and television shows. Over time, the traditional image of witch as crone ...2 days ago
- Bryce Edwards Analysis – Time for “Fast-Track Watch”Analysis by Dr Bryce Edwards, Democracy Project (https://democracyproject.nz) Political scientist, Dr Bryce Edwards. Calling all journalists, academics, planners, lawyers, political activists, environmentalists, and other members of the public who believe that the relationships between vested interests and politicians need to be scrutinised. We need to work together to make sure ...2 days ago
Since yesterday’s unveiling of the Government’s medical cannabis reforms do not specify what happens when a person who is allowed to use cannabis as pain relief (only if they have 12 months to live) fails to die when the specified 12 months have elapsed.
I guess this Bill will solve that potential problem….
The Medical Cannabis Bill is an example of what happens when something is tampered with so much it might be better not to have it at all.
It amazes me that our MPs are fronting up to end of life challenges but do not have the collective courage to legalise cannabis fullstop. Beggars belief.
Intense pain is one reason, of many, that people want to kill themselves. If smoking dope gives them a quality of life it should be permitted imo.
It does seem incongruous that we are discussing legal ways to end a life while tying hands behind backs around cannabis.
So agree with you. My mother is having horrible side effects from oxycodone. (Pharmaceutical grade heroin) so she goes off it and then she wants to die and prays loudly for God to take her now. I just wish she could try marijuana if that would help her.
I feel for you and your mum.
God I feel your pain fairy godmother.
When I was chemically poisoned for the fisrt six months when the pain ripped my body apart as the immune system was attacking my body thinking it was helping it would have been helpful to ave good medical doctoring to treat chemical poisoning affects and their impcts but no such treaments were available so now after we found two doctors one in Canada one in Florida my health slowly improved and the pains subsided.
I nw medicate myself now after 25 yrs living with the long term effects of chemical poisoning.
We wish your family would recieve some assitance from doctors now that we have a new compassionate government, and please dnt give up hope as it was hope that got me through all our family had to endure.
TFG….watch the youtube clip here… https://thestandard.org.nz/the-medicinal-marijuana-bill/#comment-1428775 ….the manufacturers of oxy have a solution to one of the most serious side effects of their product.
And they’re very proud….
Kia kaha.
“If smoking dope gives them a quality of life it should be permitted imo.”
We need to move away from the narrative that medical cannabis is ‘smoked’.
Already there are oils and tinctures that are placed in the mouth (usually under the tongue) and balms that when massaged into areas of pain can give extraordinarily good relief. Medicinal cannabis is being made into capsules.
To my knowledge there have been no reports of adverse effects from using these products, at least not the ones that have been produced and supplied ( often at no cost) by the established ‘Green Fairies’.
Sometimes, and I understand it is not usual, medical cannabis is vaped.
Its no wonder that the old fuddy duddies that appear to be dictating Winston’s intractable stance on this issue are nervous when the narrative that the only way of using cannabis is by setting fire to it and inhaling the smoke persists.
I was not talking about medical marajuana, hence I wrote “smoke dope”.
I just cannot comprehend why this bill is only considering people with a teminal illness, what about people who live with chronic pain – sciatic pain for one example which is unbearable, frankly the terminally ill finally are released from their pain but the chronically ill live with it, it doesn’t kill them but makes their lives a misery. That this Government tinkers around the edges of this bill but can go through the motions of making euthanasia legal is horrible beyond belief.
Let people grow their own dope – its easy to do – take the criminal aspect out of it and just start governing properly, not just dancing around the edges of laws which need to be implemented. Adhern said she had no problems with legalizing cannabis for the ill and chronically disabled people – just do it Jacinda for f…. sake.
they, at the very least could decriminalize the possession and use of it. A bit like the Netherlands.
But i guess that is in the to hard basket, and besides, someone could have fun with it. And that can’t be. IF you want to have fun get pissed.
Completely agree with your comments on this thread, tracey
Why indeed are these two bills which are polar opposites at face value in terms of intrinsic ‘risk’…
Seemingly being embraced the wrong way around…
I would suggest its obvious, but that’s only my point of view..
Death, not life being to the fore of the directives and policies deployed at home and abroad
Reduced capability and unbearable suffering are read together. Being disabled does not mean unbearable suffering per se and is something of a safeguard for someone with a disability wanting out cos of the disability. It is also a chance for us to become more enlightened in our attitudes to disability. For example giving a liveable income not a subsistence income. I am constantly amazed at how many people with disability do not kill themselves given the pittance we give them reducibg tgem to survivors not thrivers. Simple things like a trip to another city or town to visit friend or relative. Not on a benefit you dont.
Doctors and Nurses Councils will draft extensive guidelines if they have not done so already in anticipation. Perhaps those should become Regulations to the Act?
I hope that during this process the experience of other nations will be explained to the public to help us get the best understanding.
Thanks for the post Matthew. I know it would have taken a long time to put together.
“I am constantly amazed at how many people with disability do not kill themselves given the pittance we give them…”
For some in the disability community staying alive and, as Draco T Bastard put it the other day…
https://thestandard.org.nz/nrt-on-submitting-on-the-end-of-life-choice-bill/#comment-1427245
“4. Keeping them alive takes up resources (food, doctors, medicine, nurses, etcetera) that would be better used to keep someone else, who isn’t at deaths door, alive.
That’s the one that you’re really going to hate but it happens to be true. Our resources aren’t unlimited and so we, as a society, have to choose which is the best option for the person dying, for those who can actually be helped with the use of our limited resources and society.”
….is activism.
Perhaps DTB and his like minded and oh so virtuous friends could generate a list of those members of society who are not worthy of consumption of ‘resources’.
It must be so simple in his world.
I am slightly confused by your post. I was referring to people who have a disability, not who are dying and to the fact that we limit their employment opportunities by our attitudes and those who cannot work arecreduced to subsistence. We need to address that and one way is giving them the average wage. Yes average. And watch how quickly Nats stop using average wage as a measure if we did. They would suddenly champion median wage as a measure.
Bill English is incandescent about this Bill but his recotd of supporting the livibg is appalking. EG benefirs to those who are disabled.
“…people who have a disability, not who are dying ”
Effectively one and the same (In the context of throwing valuable resources at folk who are not going to get better) especially if the disability requires a very high level of supports…and I’m talking about nursing care, and medications, and equipment and medical supplies to manage various bodily functions that no longer work…all products that are already rationed to those with high and and complex care needs who are not covered by ACC.
Then why are we not seeing backdoor euthanasia on these folks now or are we? I think that bow is being drawn way too long.
Excuse me…but denying treatment to someone with an existing disability happens…often.
Subsisting on a benefit because of a disability or chronic health condition is bad enough, but combine that with having to re use pre- packed sterile single use catheters because the dhb will only fund 20 per month (it used to be 10) and you live with constant bladder and kidney infections that make you feel like shit all the time and yes, feel like death would be a blessed release…
I get that Rosemary and where is English and other morally outraged anti End of Life people on that? Silent and in English’s case complicit in the degradation of those lives.
He is outraged by this Bill but seemungly totally incapable of seeing how he has been part of making some people’s lives such a misery that they seek death as the answer.
I see no one having the coyrage to challenge him this way.
Sadly, tracey, its not just English and his National mates….at the risk of opprobrium…Labour did/does it too.
I agree. I confess I havent looked at who is opposing so picked on English. Mostly cos he has had his hands on finances for 9 years to make a genuinely christian impact on the lives of the vulnerable
Quite. Very loud whenever their prescriptive morality is challenged, but ask them for resources to make life bearable instead and he’s suddenly awfully quiet, or goes on a rant about how that’s Not The Government’s Job, and people need to be independent of the state.
Why?
It would still be their choice and not anybody else’s.
And, yes, someone choosing to die before their life becomes intolerable to them will free up resources that can be used to help others. That’s simply a fact and one that we need to accept and take into account when considering euthanasia laws.
“It would still be their choice and not anybody else’s.”
You’d have to make damn sure that it is a real ‘choice’…not something they have been marginalised or guilt tripped into making.
“See, I’m a truly virtuous member of the community because I choooose not to persist in consuming valuable and limited resources in keeping my terminally ill/degenerative diseased/disabled arse alive…”
Because, almost every single comments section in articles in MSM is liberally peppered with this narrative.
Yes.
Speaking of resources I can’t help wondering how many people would choose to end their lives with this legislation vs how many more would have improved lives if the costs, time & effort involved with implementing and administering this legislation were redirected into palliative care.
It shouldn’t mean that, Tracey, but the terms used in the bill are very ill-defined in my opinion, and I’m very worried about definition creep. Remember, in the law, it’s whatever the person requesting to end their life deems unbearable, not anyone else.
But it is an and situation not an or situation isnt it Matthew so
Unbearable pain; and
” Suffering from a terminal illness with a prognosis of six months or less, or have “a grievous and irremediable medical condition.”
Neither of those will be definable by the sufferer but by the medical profession?
So, whether they have a terminal illness or irredeemable medical condition is a medical diagnosis, sure, I am very conscious of that. I’m also conscious of the fact that it is an “and” relationship, not an “or.” But, the point is, not everyone who has a terminal illness or an incurable medical condition is in fact suffering at all, or in an “unbearable” fashion, at every given point after their diagnosis, but they could genuinely feel they are and be wrong, because of how life-shattering those diagnoses can be.
The point is that with the patient being the only one legally allowed to determine the unbearable threshold of pain, you get into a situation where as long as the two evaluators of the patient’s condition don’t feel the patient is actually lying, they can end their life for reasons Seymour or the people considering this law probably didn’t intend or anticipate, even if those medical professionals would disagree that they are in extreme suffering, and that their case isn’t one that should qualify. (This is why English claimed in the debate that people who are depressed might qualify- because they just need to be genuinely depressed to the point they’re not lying about how they feel about their suffering, and have either a terminal illness or qualifying medical condition at the same time) It seems obvious that the intent was that there be genuinely and objectively extreme suffering to the point that the patient’s determination of it being unbearable is reasonable, and that the patient’s opinion be given heavy weight in that determination. I feel it’s a huge mistake to allow no say to the two people evaluating the patient’s condition in whether that suffering is in fact objectively of an extreme nature that warrants them to be allowed to take their own life. There needs to be some degree of check on the patient’s own opinion, so that the evaluating practitioners can veto people who are seeking to end their life for highly subjective reasons, or for reasons that don’t relate in some way, even indirectly, to their condition or illness.
The same way that we should be worried about whether this bill safeguards sufficiently against involuntary euthanasia, we should also worry about it being used to allow people to end their own lives when they’re still able to live a happy life, but for whatever reason can’t see it at the time. Not everyone is always a perfect judge of their own circumstances, and there need to be safeguards against that given that the final decision is irrevocable.
A really thoughtful discussion – thanks, Matthew. I’ve also been thinking about this bill, although I can’t claim to have explored it as closely as you. I’ve got mixed feelings about this issue – definitely sympathy for people stuck at the moment with no choices, but concerned about loose definitions and possible complications. In particular, I worry about people who are feeling like a burden. Loneliness or lack of support can be very real issues for people with long term health problems but we should try to provide other possible solutions.
I certainly hope we can make progress with this issue, but I’m not comfortable with the bill as it stands. It’ll need a lot of work at select committee stage. Either that, or lessons could be learned from this bill and a more thorough version developed.
red-blooded
There are provisions to address the lonliness etc situation
“Either two or three medical practitioners must assess the patient independently, (a third is necessary if one or both of the first two cannot make a determination as to the mental capacity of the patient to make this decision)”
Having spoken to , mainly, nurses on this issue I partly see this Bill as protection and guidance for them. Nurses are in the frontline of this issue because they are the ones confronted by patients and family. By requests to assist dying. Who see the suffering. We need to be thinking as much about these professionals as the patient.
It is particularly vital that if this passes sufficient resources are put in place to support these professionals. In the high demand area of nursing not much is in place now to help nurses confronted by this issue with some of the support limited to ” just tell them it is illegal and you will talk to the dr aboyt upping pain relief”. That is not good enough without this proposed Law.
Mental capacity to make a decision is basically being intelligent enough to understand the concept of death, and presumably protects the mentally disabled, people who are unconscious etc. I think it’s drawing a long bow to see it as protecting people who are depressed or lonely and feeling like a burden (and whose feelings could be allieviated in other ways), cleangreen, below, describes his feelings when first dealing with his disability. Maybe someone in that situation would choose euthanasia, when over time they could develop other ways to manage and to find ongoing value in their lives. (cleangreen, I’m not presuming to comment on you in particular, just thinking about the kind of situation where I worry that a decision made at one point would cut off any other possibilities that couldn’t be foreseen at the time.)
Of course, the fact that you and I see mental capacity so differently illustrates one of the problems with the bill as it stands.
Again, I do support the aim of the bill, but I’ve got issues with it as it is currently drafted.
It is not just mental capacity. They must meet multiple factors of which that is one. Do you think 2 to 3 medical practioners will view lonliness and feeling like a burden as qualifying criteria for ” unbearable suffering” and less than 12 months to live? I dont.
” Providing full information and evaluating the request
This part of the bill is quite good, in that nobody can make a final decision on being assisted to die until they have been informed thoroughly of the nature of their condition, any other options for treatment or palliative care, the fact that they can change their mind at any time, informed of their rights both to talk to family, friends, etc… or not talk to them if they don’t want to, and there must be an effort made to ensure this person has not been pressured or compelled into the decision, in fact the attending practitioner is legally required to do this to the best of their abilities.
There is good evidence that making people aware of their options for end of life care including palliative care, and having them make a decision in advance actually decreases both unnecessary treatment and suffering, and desire for more radical solutions like euthanasia in cases where an option for reduced suffering exists that doesn’t require an early death or simply dying due to giving up, so discussing these options with patients in general is good policy, and I welcome its requirement in this bill because where these methods of giving dignity to the dying are utilized at a patient’s request they are a much more preferable outcome for everyone. ”
My hope is those opposing this will put energy into supporting the vulnerable. So come on Bill English, youve had 31 years maybe now you will work to support the vulnerable to thrive?
I have confidence in most of our medical professionals, Tracey, but this Bill is so poorly drafted in some areas that it both ties their hands and makes them consider information that is thoroughly irrelevant to making this decision in a reasonable fashion.
The Bill is very clear in the eligibility section that it’s only the patient’s decision about what is unbearable that qualifies them for eligibility, and that the evaluation is to establish eligibility according to the Bill. So essentially they’re restricted to only confirming that the patient feels their condition is unbearable, and they are not restricted to considering factors that are a direct or indirect result of their illness or condition in that evaluation. If a medical practitioner disagrees that the condition is unbearable but notes that the patient does feel it is, that does not disqualify them under the Bill.
It does limit you to people who are in a terminal condition or have a permanent, incurable illness, true. But among those people, it is absolutely open to factors that are irrelevant to that person’s condition being a driver for their request. The only requirement is that these factors contribute to “unbearable suffering”- you could literally be depressed because you lost a family member as well as your illness, and that could make you request this service, and it would be a factor that had to be considered in the evaluation.
Overall, very poor drafting. The evaluation should give medical staff the ability to make an independent consideration of what qualifies as “unbearable suffering,” not merely attest that the patient feels it, and they should be required to consider only factors related to their medical condition or illness.
Exactly right, Tracey.
In the other thread about this issue, I linked to an article which discussed the attitude of doctors and nurses. The conclusion was that doctors and nurses currently administer drugs, or withhold treatment, knowing that the patient concerned will probably die as a result. Some of these professionals may be breaking the law. They should not be in that position.
Lets remember that Dr Harold Shipman murdered about 250 patients (maybe more). I am not sure he would’ve been able to commit so many murders had similar legislation been in place in the UK.
Thanks for this Ross.
I concur with you Ross & Tracey,
This is a to swiftly produced bill with to many pitfalls for everyone.
Let s go sit arouund n while we all can think awhile.
Rushed bills often wind up being wrongly constructed as this bill is.
100% Red blooded, we must hope for a better outcome here.
After my chemical poisoning I was faced medicallly to revert to gentle less invasive “alternative medicine,” (IV’s + vitamins/minerals and herbs,) that the majority of the “conventional medical community” stll tries to avoid sadly as it was these “alternative” medications that 25yrs later that are taken now that is still keeping me alive and living in some resonable (isolated) lifestyle.
before end life choices are made all other options must be available to us all to have a choice for our own use, not to be ‘excusively’ controlled by the medical ‘establishment as they are draconian souls who understand less than we give them credit for.
This is as big a decision as the abortion debate many decades ago, and has some of the same features. As usual, it starts off with the argument that the legal right to end people’s lives will be incredibly rare, extremely well thought through by everyone having to make a decision through it all, and incredibly well regulated, but the reality is different:
https://teara.govt.nz/en/interactive/29033/abortion-rates
I am aware that the Dutch experience with euthenasia has not been bad overall, but the amount of careful groundwork laid by the entire Dutch medical profession over many decades , prior to the legislative change, meant that they were ready to carefully regulate doctors and educate families about the moments not to prosecute doctors and how to properly regulate it. We are not comparable to the Netherlands on this issue:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2733179/
I want to know if my taxes will go to subsidising killing people. I want to know how much. If this is not a voluntary procedure, then it should not be legal. If it is a voluntary procedure, then no taxpayer funding should go to it.
So this bill is being put to parliament with almost no support from the medical profession, and on the back of overwhelming opposition from the public to parliament against euthenasia only six months ago. What a damn insult to those who put their organisational force into it.
I recommend people read this Parlliamentary Select Committee report that thousands of New Zealanders contributed to:
https://www.parliament.nz/resource/en-NZ/SCR_74759/4d68a2f2e98ef91d75c1a179fe6dd1ec1b66cd24
It made no recommendation to go where this Bill is going.
I want to know why Seymour will do more to assist a dying person than those full of life. I want to know why English is outraged by this Bill but has damaged more lives than this Law would take. He has stood by for 31 years and watched while the disabled are treated like dogs. Their benefits cut. The challenges with ACC made harder. Some are born with disability and some are aquired. If you were working when disabled you get 80% of your earnings. If not working or born with a disability or disabled by illness you get subsistence. If anything English has stood by while some people feel forced to contemplate that death is better than tge life they have.
That is what I want to know.
And where is the current govt on raising, significantly the standard of living of our most vulnerable.
Well put Tracey,
David Seymour seems to be a bitter resentful soul that cares very little of human life and any means to improve the quality of all our lives including the poor, disabled; sick and dying.
“And where is the current govt on raising, significantly the standard of living of our most vulnerable.”
Labour has always struggled to see those with disability or illness as equally deserving of support as those who were once productive members of society and have been disabled through accident.
Look how Labour has been supportive of maintaining or extending ACC cover at the same time as ignoring or further disadvantaging those with impairments not covered by ACC.
There have been pre- election promises by Labour on issues relating to non ACC disabled which some of us have been told by the current incumbents will take some time to be addressed.
Some of us with long standing issues are seriously considering popping down to Welly when parliament opens in the New Year to remind them that we’re not dead yet and we expect them to at least listen to us.
That’s if we can come up with the $$$ for the trip….
100%
Ruth Dyson presided over a sweeping policy to make even the permanently disabled have to be reassessed every year. The stress this put on the disabled and their families seemed to escape them.
Ardern wants to champion children in poverty which is great but like low incomes few of our parties want to address our appalling treatment of the disabled.
Good move Rosemary;
Please let me know when you get ready as we may also join this delegation if we can.
We have already in 2011 had our proposal for those with ‘other disabilities’ recognised under this UN Charter inside our own NZ charter document given to the UN panel in 2012. ‘see under article 8 ‘Other disabilities’ as part of the ‘NZ declaration of the rights of the disabled’.
en.wikipedia.org/…ntion_on_the_Rights_of_Persons…
The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities is an international human rights treaty of the United Nations intended to protect the rights and dignity of …
NZ has signed up to this convention.
United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with …
http://www.odi.govt.nz/…ention-on-the-rights-of-persons...
United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. … United Nations Convention on the Rights …
So New Zealand’ has international obligations now.
Politicians need to be reminder not to discinate against us with cronic disabilities that are not cobvered under present health agencies or ACC to comply with the mamoranding of understanding the Government signed at the UN in 2012 to not disciminate against all those persons with disabilities under the UN Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities
http://www.un.org/…/socdev/enable//rights/ahc3sum24may.doc
I wrote a blg two days ago about infringements against those of us with disabilities and sonme bloggers were unaware of our rights to “dignity” and other considerations. it seems that the general public are yet to understand we with disabilities have rights to be adhered to under the UN charter of disabled human rights. This is our cornerstone protection document now as Australia has confirmed this also.
Yes Rosemary we would be keen to join with you in the trip to Wellington too if allowed.
We assisted changes to the NZ Government submission to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
http://www.hrc.co.nz/…ts/people-disabilities/our-work/crpd
New Zealand ratified the Convention
we included in their submission in artilce 8 a addition of “other disability issues” where some of us are not currently recognised by the NZ medical ‘establishment as Austrlia, Canada, USA, Germany, Denmark and others do at present so this may help our cause to be given the ‘dignity and respect for services’ we are entitled to under the Disability convention now.
Let us know when you are arranging the trip to Wellington please with some notice.
Yep. It’s one of Labour’s big ideological holes IMO that rather than viewing work as something people do to effect positive outcomes in society, that work is somehow a measure of the dignity of a person in general. It’s a pathological attitude that leads to unjustifiable stigma against people who absolutely want to live in ways that will have them participate in and enrich our society, whether it’s paid work or not.
100% Ad.
Agreed.
Did you feel the same way about the overwhelming public opposition to repealling s59 of the Crimes Act?
I agreed with the Select Committee report on the issue.
Why don’t you go and read the Euthenasia one and find a position. that supports this bill.
So the number of polled kiwis supporting or disagreeing was just a red herring.
Nope.
Nothing in the few months since this bill was last introduced has altered the …very complicated, very divisive, and extremely contentiousnature of the issue, and you have to wonder why it is being repeatedly thrust upon us.
While I appreciate the careful work Matthew has done in outlining the holes in the bill, and suggesting amendments, there is a larger question as to whether our institutions are currently capable of holding to firm safeguards that are anything more than defensive paper trails. A society that is under continuous pressure to privilege expedience and usefulness above all things, with a few sentimental values thrown in, cannot be trusted to put these concerns to one side when considering matters of life and death, rendering any safeguards rather flexible. And as Tracey points out, people who lack the status and resources to fight back are permitted very few meaningful safeguards in life, and questions of consent are very hard to settle once a person is dead.
I do wish that progressives would see that their cherished ideals do not reliably play out under predatory capitalism in the same way as they might under a genuinely inclusive social democracy.
This.
Until we decide as a society to value people not money the risks will remain higher. I support euthanasia in principle, but I don’t trust the state or our political culture/processes to get this right just yet.
Me too
It’s not fixed in stone. If the legislation isn’t working as well as it should be it can be changed and amended.
But, IMO, we do need to start somewhere rather than just saying that it’s too hard.
And if the medical profession consider it unclear one of their bodies will quickly seek a court intervention to define terms?
I would hope so.
I don’t think it’s too hard. I think that we should be broadening the conversation out to look at what the risks are. Rosemary’s comments should be highlighted (and offsite, what disabled people are saying), and we need to understand those things in the context of 35 years of neoliberalism. Yes, legislation can be amended, doesn’t mean it will be, or that the people in charge at the time are working in our best interests. I wouldn’t have trusted Key’s govt to get this right for instance. I don’t even trust Ardern’s.
We need a big conversation in NZ around vulnerability and disability and what kind of society we want. This seems like an ideal time.
This is my position too- there are people who really, really, want and need the control and dignity over their death that this Bill will give them, and it’s not okay to not try to do this right, and do it now.
But we do need to look at the bits that some people are saying “too hard!” about, and come up with reasonable solutions before we can proceed safely. While this is a bill that could change our culture about death and make it much more healthy and dignified in some ways, it comes with enormous risks if we set it up incorrectly.
There are also big concerns among Māori groups, who talk about the concept of euthanasia being foreign to their culture. Sure, Seymour says that there’s majority support among Māori in his polling on this issue, but that could absolutely simply be the influence of colonization. That’s something we need to consider carefully before proceeding, too.
There are also big concerns among Māori groups, who talk about the concept of euthanasia being foreign to their culture.
Given that the bill is about voluntary euthanasia, there’s no issue. Anyone who feels voluntary euthanasia is foreign to their culture presumably won’t apply for it. And if they mean involuntary euthanasia is foreign to their culture, well it’s foreign to ours too.
There is absolutely nothing we can do to save Māori Culture in the way that it was. Culture changes all the time and, when confronted with another culture, changes even faster.
Yes, I’m sure that Māori culture didn’t have euthanasia. Many cultures didn’t including that which we’ve brought from England and other European countries.
None of those cultures had the capability of keeping a body alive for 15 years despite the person being, for all intents and purposes, dead. Instead, when some one got sick, they just waited for the natural course of events which would probably only take a few days and of which there was nothing that they could do about it.
Our new capabilities means that we have to pretty much ignore previous culture. If we continue to try to hold ourselves in the 19th century then we’re not going to come up with solutions to the problems that those new capabilities have bequeathed upon us.
EDIT: and what PM said.
Yeah, I’m just saying it’s something we do need to be sensitive to in this debate that we are potentially engaging in some colonialism here, and we need to listen to Māori voices in this debate and engage constructively with their concerns.
I think you’re right that the lack of euthanasia was likely due to different living conditions and that it’s not fundamentally something we’re imposing as European values so much as something that has become necessary to consider due to the conditions modern New Zealanders live in, but I think we do need to be open to the possibility that we’re wrong in that conclusion, or that the conditions modern New Zealanders live in are themselves an imposition of colonialism. Cheers.
I agree with much of what you say. Seymour wants to honour those dying but fucks over many of the vulnerable who are alive. English is morally outraged but has stood by and more recently presided over the degradation of the lives of the vulnerable living.
If we are not prepared to value the living and their right to thrive why are we moving toward the right for the state to help end lives?
I support the notion of the right to end our life. I support the need to support the medical professiionals who are already confronted with this issue daily. And I plead with our society to honour our vulnerable and accord tgem the right to thrive. Lets do the last 2 before the first.
I am not, on principle, in favour of euthanasia, though I am aware that mine is but one position among many, that there is often a fine line between passively allowing someone to die and speeding up the process, and that situations do arise upon which one would have to be callous to pass judgement. In cases like the latter it is within the capacities of the courts to be merciful rather than punitive.
But I am very much opposed to a codified system of euthanasia being introduced to a country that tends to be remiss about safe-guarding people it does not consider useful or valuable, and that lacks the infra-structure to firmly uphold its claimed safe-guards. We cannot even maintain safe work places, and rarely punish those who disregard workers’ safety, even when death results from their disregard.
This was meant to be an answer to Weka, but I struck the wrong “reply” button.
See, this is why I submitted that the bill shouldn’t proceed unless it gets a signoff from the disability community more broadly. (don’t think that’s explicitly in the post anywhere, but it bears mentioning) They are key stakeholders who need to be convinced that this Bill will be safe for them, and if there are any unaddressed concerns they have, that’s a sign that both Labour and the Greens should withdraw support from the bill as a bloc.
If we were a compassionate society that did look after vulnerable people well, would you support euthanasia legislation in principle?
As you can see, my position is a nuanced one, but probably not, because I would still have an issue with the codification, which would invite the search for ways past it, if someone doesn’t want Granny but does want her house. I also worry about people missing out on valuable last moments, or perhaps changing their minds. What if, with a sound mind, you made a living will that included a request for euthanasia, but found yourself enjoying life in a doolally state and decided against it? Which “you” would have the last say?
However, as I have said, I do not regard my own position as the only possible one, and am not hostile toward those who don’t share it. And I would be far more at ease with it in a society that treated vulnerable people well, and also, I would add, had the capacity to uphold its own safeguards and treat them with utmost seriousness.
Nuanced is what is called for imo.
I think if we were a different kind of society there would still be risk, but much smaller and probably worthwhile when put up against other people’s suffering. This is the sharp end of it that lots of pro people don’t like talking about. The fact that there will be mistakes and should we allow it anyway give the benefits elsewhere?
Is there a proposal to allow living wills for euthanasia? I think the Act would still require medical agreement and consultation etc, so no matter what you had said previously at the time you would still need to be considered competent to make the decision.
I think having a living will that prompts doctors to approach you about the process under predetermined circumstances is a great idea.
I also agree that there are concerns that we have the wrong sort of structural attitudes in our culture for euthanasia. I don’t view this as an insurmountable obstacle, so long as the process and the people involved aren’t coming from that place themselves, and are set up to avoid it being taken into consideration.
There’s no way to guarantee that the people involved aren’t coming from that place including doctors.
It’s not just about relatives wanting to bump off their loved ones stuff. I’m thinking about the people whose lives are so shitty they will want a way out sooner rather than later and who fit the criteria for assisted suicide. Shitty not simply because they are in pain and dying, but because they’ve been unsupported across their lives and now they have a way out. That’s the stuff that’s underpinning some of the tension in this debate I think. NZ treats some people so badly they’d rather be dead.
Yes, I absolutely agree with you. That’s why I think the legislation should require those evaluating a case to consider only factors relating directly or indirectly to the condition or illness that is supposed to be the cause of their suffering, and not other factors. (ie. depression is relevant to whether you are suffering unbearably if you are depressed because you have a limited time left to live, or because you’re constantly in pain. It’s not relevant if it’s because your dog died, or your family have devalued your existence, even though you have a legitimate reason to feel bad in all three cases) That way, if they start approving end of life applications on other grounds, like you’re pointing out, we can have SCENZ or whoever say to them “whoah, hold on, what you’re doing here looks medically negligent and non-compliant with the law, you need to stop or someone might charge you with a crime.”
I don’t think we’ll completely eliminate these factors because potentially people could lie and omit them from written reports or whatever and end up getting a second evaluation that agrees with them by chance. That’s absolutely a fair criticism of the bill. I think having one or two independent checks would be a sufficient safeguard if the person requesting an end of life option also appointed an advocate who had the power to stop the process as well and was present for both evaluations and the person being given lethal medicine, because they would be able to take into account whether they thought that the people involved were making a biased decision.
Weka’s right, Matthew. Take the last nine years: how can you compensate for the effects of the National Party on people’s will to live?
Weka’s usually right, and I pay great deference to her opinions. 😉 I just don’t think her being correct with her concern means we can’t structure a bill in a way that makes it difficult or impossible for her concern to actually result in an unjustified suicide. This bill is not yet that bill, but I think it could be, if the government parties put in the effort to reform it.
Good quip though, lol.
a way that makes it difficult or impossible for her concern to actually result in an unjustified suicide.
Health outcomes, including mental health, and life expectancy, don’t just correlate to poverty, but also to the GINI; inequality affects the wealthy too.
That suggests that everyone born or living in NZ between 1984 and the present is more likely to seek assistance in dying than a hypothetical ‘control group’.
We can already see this tendency in the suicide statistics.
In these circumstances, it’s easy for the result to be “unjustified”.
I agree statistics can indicate causative relationships like the one you point out, although I would caution that suicidal behaviour, including inappropriately seeking to use the proposed bill, is only more likely under those statistics, not guaranteed. The determinants of suicidal behaviour are a little more complicated than that, of course, not that they don’t exist within that group in larger numbers.
My point is that a well-designed process should have the health professionals taking into account whether a person’s reasons for assisted dying are related to their illness or medical condition or not, and only those ones reasons that, taken as a whole, genuinely constitute extreme and suffering and are related to their illness or condition should qualify them to go ahead with the process.
If we have the law set up that way, and on the whole medical professionals involved are well-trained and sensitive to how to carry out this process in a matter that is caring, professional, and respects the safeguards mandated by law, then I suspect we’ll avoid the pitfall you seem to be anticipating. Right now, the law does allow this sort of thing through, but I’m confident that there will be sufficient opposition to it if by the time it’s through select committee it hasn’t been tightened up sufficiently.
Yeah, this is actually one of my points against the bill in the post, if you don’t get overwhelmed by the wall-of-text: right now the only safeguard is that you get at least two independent evaluations before the process goes ahead, everything else is paperwork that keeps track of who’s responsible.
This does nothing to ensure that nobody is administered lethal medication against their will, which should be the very real concern in giving this ability to medical practitioners, especially in the context of prior malpractice in certain areas, like involuntary electroconvulsive therapy. Hence why I recommend a nominated observer by the patient (which could be either a family member, friend, or just a volunteer they picked out and trust who is obliged to honour their wishes and privacy requests) must be present and have the power to stop or pause the process at any time on their behalf.
And yes, I do agree that the structural pressures you list will be present in many people, if not all, who are eligible for the process created by this Bill. The Bill should rule out any suffering caused by those attitudes, either explicitly or through the way its eligibility provisions are structured. It currently does no such thing, and that too is deeply worrying.
This does nothing to ensure that nobody is administered lethal medication against their will…
That does seem like one hell of a gap for a voluntary euthanasia bill to have in it. Ensuring the “voluntary” part is one of the core tasks of such a bill.
That said, I wouldn’t want it to be so restricted that you couldn’t create living-will stuff like “If I’ve been in a vegetative state for X weeks, please see me off without further ado.”
Well, Seymour has essentially made a lot of good active chances for people to say no. One of my recommendations in my submission is that he instead restructure the wording so that failing to say “yes” is treated as a no unless and until the patient does manage to say “yes,” so that we’re always looking for active consent. Right now he doesn’t even have a provision in the bill for what happens when someone is offered the choice but doesn’t give a clear yes or no.
To be fair, if people are genuinely following the law in good faith and each one involved is acting as an individual, then Seymour’s structure will work. What it’s not well-designed to prevent is a culture of collusion to kill people without explicit consent, such as when, say, two doctors both know each other and have worked together in the past, and one of them gets assigned to independently review the other’s patient. If both doctors have, say, a dismissive view of the disabled, then they might unethically pressure the person towards killing themselves, and report that they followed the bill. In this situation, it would require someone accidentally barging in to them doing so in order to have any evidence of what they’d done, and to either prevent the killing, or to hold them responsible for murder. Requiring the patient to appoint an advocate who attends these sessions to ensure everything is above-board before the formal evaluations can start would prevent this.
Well said there Olwyn.
Above all else we need to protect life.
No Medical person or agency or service, has the right to decide who should live or die.
Even those who murder found gulty in a court of law is able to decide any death without a legal challege.
No Medical person or agency or service, has the right to decide who should live or die.
Er, yes. Why do you point out this truism? Has someone suggested they should have that right?
What are you even trying to say here, Cleangreen?
This bill, if followed, would put the decision broadly in the hands of the patient. There are some technical issues to work out to make sure that this intention is followed through with in reality and that the safeguards are accurate, but nobody is actually proposing that we let anyone get away with involuntary euthanasia, it’s just a question of whether the bill is well-written enough to prevent that.
(I think it will be with staff who are acting in good faith, what I’m worried about is places where the staff might act in bad faith then be assigned an independent reviewer who also acts in bad faith)
Ad
I’d say that there’s plenty of support for this Bill from the medical profession. I dont think many enjoy watching patients suffer.
Plenty of support for some action on the issue of euthanasia doesn’t necessarily equate with supporting the bill as it now stands. I’m with the Greens on this one – send it to select committee, give people the chance to have an input, look to plug holes and improve definitions, then see whether it’s been rendered fit for purpose or (if the basic concept has support) use it as a learning experience towards drafting a better bill.
Agree with this.
It is very hard for some in the medical profession to be truly honest about what already happens for obvious reasons.
There is support from some parts, and opposition from others.
Naturally, palliative carers are against it. They want to think their option is for everyone, which is a little arrogant in my view, although understandable- what I actually like about this Bill very much is that it steers people who didn’t know about the other options towards them instead if it meets their goals, which is good policy and good medicine.
My girlfriend (who has just qualified as a nurse, and doesn’t follow politics) was actually very surprised that there were medical people against it, though, so there are definitely many who are for it. I think the thing is, they are reluctant to submit as much because there is some very real stigma against openly identifying yourself as a supporter, not least because people might start looking at your patients who died to see if you potentially euthanized any of them, and even if you don’t hold with that sort of thing, that doesn’t mean someone won’t get the wrong idea.
I think the point about the infrastructure and preparation for this being in place is a good one, Ad, and another reason to proceed with caution even if we sort out all of the kinks in this law. It’s a reasonable point to make in a submission, if anyone wants to, I’d say- start the bill in shutdown mode, and give SCENZ and/or the Minister of Health the power to determine when the necessary infrastructure is in place to let it proceed.
I disagree with the idea of allowing these controversial procedures, like euthanasia and abortion, but withdrawing all taxpayer funds from them. That’s not freedom of conscience. That’s economic boycott.
My taxes go to plenty of things I don’t like, (and those things vary from petty objections, like subsidizing rugby, to moral and economic ones, like subsidizing dairy irrigation) but we decide democratically where they go, and if you look at the funding amounts, you can absolutely argue that people who do support these things are the ones funding them, given how small an amount of government money goes to it. If there’s a huge bloc that agrees with you that boycotting our collective money to euthanasia or abortion is okay, and we should restrict it only to people who can financially afford it themselves or get the help of a private charity, then we’ll have to accept it, I guess, but what you are doing there is not conscientious objection, you are trying to deny people access, and you need to own up to that when you call for it, because without taxpayer funding, there will inevitably be a shortfall of people who can’t afford these services, but would like them.
This is the same thing as doctors claiming they have a right not to inform their patients that there are other people who will perform an abortion for them when they object to doing it- it is an attempt to deny people access.
We have a three tier health system: private, public, and inaccessible.
Citizens for whom the system is inaccessible – whether because of underfunding, long waiting lists, or low income, necessarily experience worse health – often throughout their lives. You can work out how that becomes relevant to this bill on your own.
When user pays is dead and buried, and healthcare is genuinely accessible to all, it might be time to have this conversation.
Fourth tier is the NGOs (different from private). So kill and bury user pays, and the competitive funding models, and the utter fuckwittery of the neoliberal push to make everything function within a business model,
https://www.odt.co.nz/news/dunedin/really-sad-social-service-agency-disarray
+111
Private healthcare actually removes necessary resources from the public health system. Healthcare needs to be a public monopoly just like telecommunications and power.
This is actually a very relevant point. Cheers, OAB.
ps. I just trashed your “test” post, to clean up the thread. It went through fine, in case you didn’t see it.
Thanks.
And like that we hand the state the power to regulate killing of its citizens.
What next I wonder, what next…
In so many ways they already do and in other cases we torture them first… but it isnt a Law so some turn a blind eye.
So we should stop the state from killing anyone. Rather than blindly accept it.
No we don’t and you really need to stop with the lies.
You need to get a grip on reality, stop and think beyond your own experience for two minutes.
But then again you thinking the state killing people for economic reasons is acceptable, so I’m not sure you are the best advocate for this bill.
I gave DTB a pass on his reply hoping it wouldn’t get any disagreement, (and because I know he has a tendancy to try and state his position quickly in his first reply and then follow up substantively later, which is a great time-saver where all respondents agree) but I generally would prefer that people disagree respectfully in my posts and actually talk substantively about their opinions.
Draco has strong opinions, like most authors here, but he is not generally one to refuse to think about others’ perspectives, if they articulate them clearly.
What you’ve done, Adam, is just given short lines about your own opinion, not made any substantive argument for it. Perhaps try going into more detail about what your problems are, and why you think this bill will “kill people for economic reasons’ before you accuse an author on this site of being unwilling to listen to your perspective when he has a great history of replying in detail when reasonably challenged.
I’m at least somewhat a critic of this bill despite supporting its aims, and even I think it’s very unlikely that people will succeed in killing people for economic reasons in any significant numbers from this bill as it is now, so I think you’ll need to make a strong case if you want someone like Draco to change his mind.
Cheers.
The state won’t killing any one if this bill, or one like it, goes through.
EDIT: Clarify: This bill does not give the state the right to kill people.
That is absolutely true. What it gives is immunity to medical professionals, when they competently follow this process in good faith.
Killing someone for economic gain is basically the definition of bad faith.
https://thestandard.org.nz/nrt-on-submitting-on-the-end-of-life-choice-bill/#comment-1427245
Just saying.
Yes, I pointed out that there were economic considerations that needed to be addressed whether you like it or not.
At no point have I said that that should then allow anyone to kill someone else.
It’s not a question of like.
Re the murder thing, would you be ok with people who fit the criteria being provided drugs and killing themselves?
Lets not use the word murder, I’ve been told that offends to many people.
Let me try again then,
Re the killing thing (where someone else does the act that kills the person), would you be ok with people who fit the criteria being provided drugs and killing themselves?
Not happy weka, but not opposed.
With caveat that it’s not the state, and it is not another individual involved in the end of the life.
No, it’s simple reality.
If someone asks you to help them die in a way they choose, is that really killing them, Adam? Is it not instead giving them control and dignity over their body and their life?
This is bill largely focuses on terminal patients and people with conditions that are untreatable but lead to suffering. The intent of the bill is good in my opinion, what I’m worried about is the implementation. This bill rushes ahead to allowing practitioners to administer lethal medication at a patient’s request before we’ve even had a regime that lets patients take the medication themselves. That is the appropriate starting point, and it is a good safeguard against people breaking the law and killing people who don’t want to die.
The state already has the power to regulate things that can kill its citizens, by the by. Insufficient resources in health can kill citizens. Insufficient resources in welfare can kill citizens. This Bill isn’t some new moral ground we’re treading on to in that respect, and we’ve debated this issue twice before, too, so it’s not new in that respect, either. What is new is that there seems to be a will, in principle, to go ahead with this, the questions about whether we should from Parliamentarians are largely practical ones at the moment.
The state already has and always has had the power to regulate killing of its citizens. Parliament is sovereign.
And you don’t think that is a problem?
You don’t think that sometimes we will need to regulate when it’s appropriate for people to live and die? We already have a military, that’s absolutely a state-sponsored organization that has authority to kill people. I’m opposed to war on principle in most cases, and even I think that the state needs to have the power to have one.
Likewise, I might oppose the state killing people, but I don’t think that’s what this bill is, in principle. It is giving ordinary people in painful situations the power to decide the manner of their own death, taking away the threat of the state arresting people who help them in order to restore their autonomy and dignity. My objections are entirely practical.
Well, it may be a problem, but it’s not really a relevant problem to the post at hand, given that no involuntary euthanasia bill has been presented to Parliament
Nice side step to my question. And a personal dig in as well. Well done.
Well, what do you want? This bill isn’t about the state killing people. You may wish it was, but it isn’t.
Have a good holiday Psycho Milt.
‘The NZ Experiment’ continues..
The chemical companies will maintain control by leathal death while simultaneously ensuring that cannabis and natural remedies are sidelined for as long as possible, as broardly as possible..
For those commentators in this thread who don’t or can’t reconcile the government /parliaments position on these two topics
Captured and controlled by industry is the reason…
You’re going to have to explain your theory a bit better than that, One Two. While I have big objections to this bill as-is, it’s clear that it is written in such a way that there is no profit incentive to it, in fact killing people for profit would nullify the immunity, ie. make the people involved liable for murder.
Hi Matthew, I appreciated your article, and thought it was objectively written
I see it like this…
NZ Govt takes its medical directives largely from the US/UK/CANADA
The US has industry lobbyist dedicated to maintaining control of chemical drugs over natural plant based ‘medicine/treatments’, is well documented…
The chemical pharmaceutical companies have a conflict of interest between discussions and policy around life/death…they operate on both sides, which make the explanations more detailed/complex than I will go into here..
Simply, and in my opinion, the government of NZ has an ‘easier’ option by not pissing off its corporate sponsors, via the ‘assisted death’ legislation, than it does with the ‘medical marajuana’ legislation..
Medical weed progression will be closely monitored and curtailed by the chemical companies, which can be witnessed with the watering down of the bill…too much is at stake to the chemical industry to stand by passively..
That these two bills are presented simultaneously is not luck, nor is it an accident
Does David Clark meet David Seymour in the secret office where they run everything from, or do they just text one another?
lol.
If this were being driven by powerful corporates, One Two, why would the National Party oppose it?
Ask ‘The National Party’…
It’s convenient to have the bill put forward by Act, as it is convenient to have a mock showing of ‘counter balance’, this time by the NATS
In any case, I posted a number of comments on another thread of the same subject in recent times…
My position is that NZ as a nation is not equipped/mature enough to having this discussion…
We are long way short of being ready, yet here it comes..
It’s not going away, and will become ‘law’ sooner than later..with or without National Party support
They already know that though…
The Nats definitely have real opposition to this Bill, One Two. One of the provisions that Bill English got shouty about is something his wife went to court to prevent being policy on abortion- he’s not inventing his personal anger about this bill, he genuinely has problems with it. (This is the conscientious objection clause, which I praised in the main post)
The nats are largely opposed because there is no significant economic impact, so they’re gonna conscience vote based on whether they’re liberals or conservatives, and the liberals will vote based on whether they think the bill is genuinely workable, wheras the conservatives will oppose en masse because of moral objections.
I’m not opposed to thinking that there are political conspiracies out there to help enrich large corporations. I’m in fact sure that sometimes this does happen, even in New Zealand. But we should be careful about veering in this direction in every case, and I think in this case if you’re thinking it’s a corporate conspiracy, you’re saying that Labour, NZF, and the Greens are all in on it, which is a little ridiculous- Labour might be, but NZF and the Greens are almost reflexively going to be against anything like that.
“every case…
Nope, and that’s not what I’m saying about the political parties…
I’ll say it about the entire system though..captured by big interests and debt!
Nothing is ridiculous, except the ruling out of a serious, in depth conversation …which I don’t believe will happen..it’s not allowed in Nz..Why do you think that might be?
People are free to believe in the political system and frameworks all they like…
I look at the actors, the synergies between them..and past actions of those involved, and those that are likely involved..
Then I look examples abroad to see where the direction which the nz experiment will take..then I lower the bar…
So, you’re saying you have no actual evidence, even circumstantial, behind your allegation that this law is all about corporate profits? Because that’s sure what it sounds like.
“That these two bills are presented simultaneously is not luck, nor is it an accident”
So the Act and Labour Parties are in conspiracy?
While there is provision to avoid active coercion, there is no provision to rule out contributory effects from feeling devalued, or a burden on the community, that arguably have been observed in countries that allow euthanasia, and whether these could be termed “unbearable suffering.”
I don’t see any way a law could cover people’s feelings. Those who require a great deal of care right now are open to feeling devalued or that they’re a burden on their families/society, and there’s no sign of an epidemic of non-assisted suicide. What’s the mechanism by which the possibility of assistance to kill yourself makes you suddenly feel devalued or a burden on society if you didn’t feel that way already?
Actually the law as written makes someone’s feelings a prerequisite for them to qualify. You must FEEL that you are in unbearable suffering, and the evaluations must agree you feel that.
I guess “cover people’s feelings” is the wrong phrase. I’m all for laws that say “If you feel like you want to do this, far be it from the government to try and stop you.” Of less value are laws that say “Well, we can’t let you do this thing you want to do because it might make third party X feel bad.”
As someone with a lived experience of mental health problems, the subjectivity of that test worries me greatly. It is absolutely possible for people to have feelings that are completely out of line with reality. I think what the patient feels is a valid barometer for starting the process, but the evaluation that they be allowed to continue should test if those feelings are grounded in the reality of their circumstances, rather than unrelated poor mental health, or outside social pressure, feeling devalued and stigmatized, etc…
I think there is some risk in doing so that people with genuinely unbearable pain or suffering may feel like they are being asked to prove it, but I think that’s a reasonable ask before we have someone assist them to a death of their own choosing.
Finally, there is no separation between terminal or degenerative disease and disability- in fact the requirements can be read to explicitly include any sort of irreversible disability that involves progressive decline in capability, and this too is poorly defined and could broaden in definition over time if not spelled out explicitly in the Bill. There are very real concerns that this Bill will allow for disabled people to be euthanized…
You seem to be arguing here that the disabled must be excluded from eligibility for voluntary euthanasia, or disabled people could be involuntarily euthanised. On the face of it, that looks like a non-sequitur to me – what’s the logic for your conclusion?
I think we need to tread very carefully around the intersection of euthanasia and disability, and this Bill shows no signs to me that Seymour has even considered this issue. There are hugely complicated histories between the disability community and medical practice. I mentioned involuntary ECT earlier in the thread as an example, and there will be many who will worry that this bill will be abused and people will be killed without their consent, or pressured into taking this option, or that it will create a culture where we devalue people with disabalities even more than we already do. These are all valid feelings given the history of the community, and the Bill needs to address them. I think it has been intended to be cautious, but problems in the drafting mean it isn’t as cautious as it claims to be.
I think we need to be very careful in opening this bill up to people who aren’t already dying that we do so only in situations where their conditions could genuinely be viewed as unbearable and are actually incurable, not simply people who feel that way due to factors not related to their condition, and that we don’t get any sort of definition-creep into euthanising people whose conditions are merely challenging but can be managed and deserve agency and assistance, not stigma. I am not categorically opposed to it, but I think it is a cause for concern as the bill is currently drafted, and I think any concerns that haven’t attempted to be addressed in this area should be a deathblow to the Bill once it’s at second reading, and that all of them need to be sufficiently addressed by third reading.
I’m probably more at the ACT end of the scale on this, but I think there’s only so far that medical authorities should be allowed to overrule the wishes of their patients. I can understand the idea of wanting doctors not to just shrug their shoulders and kill somebody who’s depressed if they request it, but if I was to become a quadriplegic and didn’t fancy continuing living, I wouldn’t want doctors refusing assisted suicide on the basis that being a quadriplegic isn’t fatal and what kind of example would that set for the other quadriplegics? The basis of the bill has to be that people of sound mind get to decide for themselves.
The assumption might be that droves of people with a terminal illness will want to kill themselves. But I suspect the vast majority will choose to carry on living and won’t take up the option of assisted suicide. As David Lange once remarked regarding homosexual sex becoming legal, it’s not compulsory!
we don’t get any sort of definition-creep into euthanising people whose conditions are merely challenging but can be managed and deserve agency and assistance, not stigma
That is surely up to the individual? Personally, I dont like the idea of train drivers having to find another job because they’re sick of watching people walk in front of a train.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=3538206
https://www.stuff.co.nz/taranaki-daily-news/opinion/83225293/rachel-stewart-a-train-drivers-view-of-death-on-the-tracks
The thing is, Ross, just because something is up to the individual doesn’t mean they’ll necessarily be in their right frame of mind when the decision is made. This bill currently only requires they be mentally competent- it doesn’t specify that people evaluating someone are allowed to rule them ineligible because of temporary emotional distress or other factors. A judge might rule that way if a case ends up in court, but it wouldn’t be due to anything explicitly written into this law, so we’d be relying on judges finding a legal justification for common sense, there. I am hoping for this to be addressed in Select Committee.
I don’t mind people ending their lives if they’re suffering and that’s truly something they would want regardless of what happens in the future. But there are very real implications of mental health and disability that this bill doesn’t seem to consider in its drafting, likely because it’s David Seymour writing it and he’s probably never met anyone willing to talk to him about either topic.
For instance, a bipolar person like Stephen Fry might well be highly mentally competent, but if he had a terminal illness or a qualifying medical condition under this act, it’s possible he’d have a depressive period, and might be able to go through this entire process and kill himself if the law doesn’t allow for the people evaluating him to take that into consideration. Isn’t that incredibly dangerous, given that he might in fact have wanted to continue living once he came out of that period?
I’ll be looking at what my submission should say after Christmas and will read every one one of the comments in this post. Excellent post and many thanks Matthew.
Glad if it helped you. I basically used it to draft my own submission, although since I sent it in early, I’ve since had some thoughts of other things I could have said on it. Go figure. Still, someone will likely submit on most of them.
Enjoy your holidays!
Matthew W
Can people put in more than one submission – provided it is not just repetitious?
And vice versa about holidays to you.
I think probably the best way to ensure you can get your say on anything that comes up is to ask to appear before the committee. (if you are in Wellington) I’m pretty sure it’s set up so that you can’t revise your submission once it’s sent so as to make it easier on Parliamentary staff to process submissions.
Talking about ‘legally enabled killing’…
….as a species ‘we’ could hardly claim that we understand how to ‘live’…
If you’re a member of this species, how can you tell? If you don’t know how to live you don’t really know that you’re not living. Even when I’m out of body, or ‘in the zone’ if you prefer, I’m still a member of the species.
Further, since you’re ignorant of how to live, how can you tell that everyone else lacks the information?
Edit: these are rhetorical questions, by the way.
well we are already killing ill people. We don’t have the beds to heal them in our hospitals when they need them.
but hey, that is ok i guess, its the ‘self determination’ that our more authoritarian moralistic fellows have an issue.
What we see here after all the efforts of all respondents shows that there is great “disquiet here at the throught of anyones life being ended by a decision made by regulatory authorities and/or health agencies/facilities rather than the person/persons involved here.
Our feeling is as always it must be the up entirely to the family first and the person whom is under the subject of “end of life choice’ that must rule the day.
otherwise we will potentially have a contion see as ‘summary executions’ one day by authorities with their vested interests placed before ours.
…there is great “disquiet here at the throught of anyones life being ended by a decision made by regulatory authorities and/or health agencies/facilities…
Well, that’s unsurprising if there are people in every discussion on the subject who conflate voluntary euthanasia or assisted suicide with “a decision made by regular authorities.” You bet we’d feel disquiet at the prospect of those people making those decisions, but that isn’t what’s being proposed, so how about your thoughts on what is being proposed?
Our feeling is as always it must be the up entirely to the family first…
WTF? Where does that come from? Maybe you’re happy to hand over decisions about your life and death over to your family, but please don’t use the verb “our.”
Some of those opposed to this Bill possibly also oppose abortion and gay marriage. Some people will forever be on the wrong side of history.
And as flawed as it is, this bill does actually make sure the decision is absolutely in the hands of the person requesting to end their life. It does allow for a doctor to administer the lethal drugs, if requested, but only after the patient finally consents one last time.
It does not, however, give any special rights to their family, (other than for the practicioner who processes the request to check if the patient wants to consult them about their decision) which I think is absolutely appropriate, as they might have very different views on this matter or be estranged, and a patient with a terminal illness or serious medical condition that qualifies for this process deserves their privacy, even if they’re ending their life. It might be heartbreaking for their family, but if they wanted to be involved in this decision then they needed to have made their family member feel like they could trust them with this information.
https://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/346746/woman-granted-permission-to-collect-dead-partner-s-sperm
“…Justice Heath allowed the move before a substantive hearing could be held.
He found the High Court had jurisdiction to make the decision.
But he also said the ethical and moral dilemmas involved in fertility treatment were not well suited to the courts.
Justice Heath concluded the court could protect Ms Long’s right to approach the Ethics Committe…”
The judge wisely concluded that moral and ethical decisions are not well suited to legal (and by implication legislative) solutions. IMHO, the same principle applies to euthanasia.
I am not seeing the connection here. There is no legislation around taking sperm from dead people. If there was, I suspect there wouldnt have been an application to the High Court.
You might recall that Ms Lecretia Seales applied to the High Court to make a judgement about her wish for assistance to end her life. The Court sort of passed the buck and suggested legislation was the answer. So here we are.
Actually concluding an ethical question isn’t well suited to the courts when there is an available ethical committee is very different to concluding that it shouldn’t be legislated on. This is because courts must interpret existing legislation, so if there was no relevant law on the particular subject, (and I don’t think there was here) then an ethical committee is a much better place to hear arguments.
Legislators, however, make the law, so have no such barrier. There is sometimes an argument that sometimes reforming legislation or making legislation is worse than the status quo, (I’ve heard people make that argument regarding abortion law reform) but that’s very different again to saying that Parliament isn’t suited to making those sorts of decisions, it is instead usually one to say we’re divided and that the law is likely to change backwards and forwards if people make decisions one way or another, or at least there will be a backlash of some sort.
As Ross says, it is entirely appropriate for the court in this case to say any remedy would have to be handled by the legislative branch of government if the law is currently silent on a particular matter.
Posted this morning in the Herald….http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11963888
Now, for reasons which might become clear, I’m going to blockquote…
“David Seymour should buy a Lotto ticket
Something unusual happened in Parliament on Wednesday night of last week. Not the 76-44 vote in favour of the first reading of Seymour’s End of Life Choice Bill. That was entirely predictable.
No, it was what happened next which suggests that Seymour is very lucky indeed.
Seymour rose to move that the bill be referred to the Justice Select Committee which would have to report back within nine months. Just a procedural motion, right? Hmm.
The extraordinarily lucky thing for Seymour is that all eight members of that committee had just voted in favour of the first reading. All of them.
Call me suspicious, call me cynical, but that strikes me as … improbable. In fact, it’s a 2.6 per cent probability.
Here’s the maths: 76 of 120 members voted in favour, or a 63.33 per cent likelihood that any individual would vote in favour. The likelihood that 8 randomly selected members all voted in favour is therefore 0.6333 raised to the power of 8, which is 0.02588, or 2.6 per cent between friends.
So either Seymour is very lucky, or it wasn’t random at all. That it was in fact all arranged beforehand.
Now, that’s maybe clever inside politics, but maybe it’s also not very clever outside politics. Because it’s going to raise the level of scrutiny of how the Justice Select Committee goes about its work on this bill. Is it going to be an open, transparent and fair hearing of all New Zealanders who want to have their say?
When you come from a 25 per cent majority constituency (disabled people) who are alarmed to be directly in the loosey-goosey eligibility criteria cross hairs of this bill, open fair and transparent select committee dealings are minimum standard.”
This is an opinion piece by long time disability rights activist and leader of the ‘Not Dead Yet’ campaign.
All good so far?
In typical Herald fashion they have embedded in this article a video clip from a pro – euthanasia commentator…captioned thus…
“Bobbie Carroll, who has terminal blood cancer, fears how she will die if euthanasia isn’t legalised.”
Wendi Wicks’ piece raises some very interesting points and no doubt the more parliamentary procedural savvy in our midst can deduce if she has valid grounds for concern.
But christ on a raft Herald…up your frigging game!
Rosemary, you’re ruling out that the fact they’re on the justice committee having a determination on their opinion about euthanasia.
I would’ve guessed that it’s very rare for conservative MPs to be chosen for the justice select committee. Mostly, liberals of one stripe or another are more likely to be Justice spokespeople for left-wing parties, and if that trend generally holds true relative to the norm for each party, it would make SC members far more sympathetic to the bill.
I’m not surprised at all that in this case he’s referred it to a committee that supports the bill at the moment. The question will be whether it comes out of the SC in a shape that will allow their colleagues to support it to second and third reading.
Thanks Matthew for this post.
Enlightening and a great forum for discussion.
Unfortunately wage slavery calls and prevents me from engaging at any depth.
Cheers too, to the folk who have commented in a largely delicate fashion.
Euthanasia doesn’t sit well with me, (greedy rellies, life ‘seeming’ to have lost quality, growth often accompanies pain, pain is inevitable suffering is optional).
However very limited time and I feel better able to communicate the subtleties in the flesh.
Thanks again.
You’re welcome. I hope you enjoy your holidays, mate. Never apologize for having to focus on surviving or the family. That’s totally reasonable.
Hi Matthew, you may or may not have heard of this story:
https://www.salon.com/2013/10/07/euthanasia_for_emotional_pain_mercy_or_a_culture_of_death/
It has a bearing on some of the issues that have been touched upon in this post + comments. The main point is, in my view, whether we can ever properly evaluate unbearable mental suffering when this is not only inextricably linked to the physical sensation of pain but also when mental and emotional suffering are, in fact, the major cause of wanting to end one’s life even in the absence of physical pain and/or terminal (physiological) illness.