Mum ‘vowing’ to change law around teenage abortion
A mother whose daughter’s school organised an abortion for the teenager without parental consent is petitioning parliament for a law change to prevent it happening again.
No where does Mum blame herself for not having a relationship with her daughter that would allow the girl to come home and say the dreaded words “Mum, I am pregnant”. And yes, i think for a great many girls this is/was the most dreadful thing they could say to their parents, and this girl choose to have an abortion by herself with the aid of her school rather then talk to her mother.
No law can change such a broken relationship,
Parental Notification laws, good for the parents, crap for the kids that are stuck in Families were children are viewed as chattel, and girls are to be virginal and pure until married.
It’s only natural a young teen would be afraid to tell their parents, therefore I wouldn’t rush in and blame the mother and automatically assume their relationship was broken.
A life was unnecessarily taken with a young girl and her family having to live with the consequence of that.
This is a major decision which many would deem to large for a child to make.
Sorry The Chairman – I can’t agree with that view. There are way too many dysfunctional/abusive family relationships out there to legislate that parents must be advised of a pregnancy without the say-so of the girl. Especially given that teen pregnancies are correlated with family dysfunction/abuse. This is a different situation to it being natural to fearful about telling parents difficult news.
It’s of absolute importance that the girl has the necessary support to make a decision about abortion or whether to continue a pregnancy. It’s not important where that support comes from, despite it being hurtful to her parents. It’s up to them to let that go for the sake of their daughter. If they can’t it simply adds to the impression that it was right to go with the girl’s decision to with-hold the information in the first place.
Disclaimer – When I was 15 I made the ‘decision’ to have my child by hiding the pregnancy until it was too late for anything but go through with it, but I would never, ever have told my mother (one of those dysfunctional families, you see – back in the day I couldn’t tell anyone without the fear of her being informed). Not a great way to go about making decisions like this. And as for hidden pregnancies – my heart goes out to these girls who give birth alone, and their often dead babies.
A child coming from a dysfunctional abusive home would be in a less state of mind to make a rational decision.
Parents need to be part of the decision making process. Otherwise we end up with cases like this (where the mother was happy to raise the child but the avenue was never explored as she was not even informed).
I don’t think you understand the will and rationality of pregnant young girls from dysfunctional abusive families, The Chairman. Please forgive my assumption if I’m wrong about that.
In my opinion parents are often the last people who should be involved in this sort of decision-making if the girl does not want that. She has reasons, usually rational, for her judgement. Btw, my mother would have happily raised my son as well, and ruined his and my life in the process.
“I know of one lady that is still struggling to get over he abortion today, saying she was far too young to make a rational call.”
You seem to be assuming that if a young woman is forced to tell her parents then there will be better outcomes. What makes you think that?
As I point out below, in NZ women, including girls, can’t get an abortion without seeing at least 2 doctors and a counsellor. They’re legally not allowed to make the decision on their own.
I understand that our law also allows for doctors to determine if a young pregnant person doesn’t have the mental capacity to make an informed decision.
The simple fact is the vast majority of young pregnant people who seek abortions will talk to a trusted adult. That sometimes won’t be a parent.
And the other simple fact is that sometimes we regret decisions we make. That doesn’t mean they were the wrong decision, or that we shouldn’t have been given the choice to make it.
I’ve read Hilary Kieft’s side of the story, and it’s simply that – her side of the story. Her interpretation of why her daughter attempted suicide. She’s hardly an unbiased party.
Of course, we never hear from her daughter, or from *any* of the children whose parents demand the right to control their children’s reproductive choices. Funny that.
You have no way of knowing if the parents being involved would have bettered or worsened the outcome. You also have no way of knowing the impact on anyone of the girl being forced to give birth. That you consider the survival of the foetus to be more important than anyone else’s wellbeing tells us exactly where your priortities are, and thankfully the law protects me and other women from people like you who would throw us under a bus for the sake of ideology.
Yet for a whole year after the abortion she was unable to talk to her mother or father about it.
Why was that?
Her daughter attempted suicide as a result….
….of her dysfunctional parental relationship and the internal guilt foisted upon her by her religious and do as I say not as I did, anti-pre-marital sex, anti-abortive parents.
You don’t know why she attempted suicide any more than I did – what is clearly apparent though is that she was not able to talk to her parents about what was happening with her.
The picture you keep trying to paint is one of a high-level functioning nurturing parent-child relationship when the evidence – couldn’t tell my parents I was having sex, couldn’t tell my parents I was pregnant, couldn’t tell my parents I had had an abortion paints the opposite picture.
BTW dysfunction does not equal poor (or poor and brown for that matter).
I didn’t claim I know what the outcome would have been.
I clearly stated: In this case the abortion may have been averted, resulting in saving a young life. Which a number of us would consider a better outcome. Do you not agree?
You are the one claiming I consider the survival of the foetus to be more important than anyone else’s well-being. I haven’t claimed or implied that.
And of course the assertion is completely incorrect, thus you haven’t got a clue what my priorities are.
You don’t need protecting from me. However, I’m beginning to feel people may need protection from you.
“I didn’t claim I know what the outcome would have been.”
Yeah, you did. You said that if the abortion had been prevented the outcome would have been better.
“I clearly stated: In this case the abortion may have been averted, resulting in saving a young life. Which a number of us would consider a better outcome. Do you not agree?”
No. I don’t have any way of knowing what should have happened. Keeping the child might have been a disaster. I support women to make the choice, not outsiders.
“You are the one claiming I consider the survival of the foetus to be more important than anyone else’s well-being. I haven’t claimed or implied that.”
You have implied that, when you say that not having an abortion is the better outcome. Better even if the young woman’s life is destroyed.
“And of course the assertion is completely incorrect, thus you haven’t got a clue what my priorities are.”
I think we’ve all got a pretty good idea by now what your priorities are.
“You don’t need protecting from me. However, I’m beginning to feel people may need protection from you.”
🙄
You seek to change a law that would have serious negative impacts on women. So yes, we need protection from that.
Yet for a whole year after the abortion she was unable to talk to her mother or father about it.
Why was that?
Yep. The lack of the young woman’s voice is evident, and suggests that none of us know what happened or should have happened. Without the young woman’s voice how can we know what is true in the story presented in the article?
Can’t you see the difference in the two statements below?
I clearly stated: In this case the abortion may have been averted, resulting in saving a young life. Which a number of us would consider a better outcome.
You said I stated if the abortion had been prevented the outcome would have been better.
Additionally, you were asked whether you considered averting an abortion and saving a young life a better outcome. I wasn’t asking your opinion on the outcome of their life.
“You have implied that, when you say that not having an abortion is the better outcome. Better even if the young woman’s life is destroyed.”
Again, not my words, hence that wasn’t what I was implying (see above).
Serious question for you, do you have a comprehension difficulty that I should be aware of?
Or do you always try spinning things in an attempt to score points?
I’ve already told you my position and again it’s not what you have implied.
I’ll leave it to you to explain why you continue to spin crap and imply otherwise.
I think you are playing games. I can’t be bothered trying to figure out what you are on about seeing as how you’ve had ample opportunity to explain it differently so I can understand but have chosen not to.
TC: In this case the abortion may have been averted, resulting in an unwanted child, beaten and neglected by the boyfriends of a teenage mum who turned to drugs after being thrown out and ostracised by her family and church, and then thirteen years later the kid goes to prison for manslaughter when a dairy robbery goes wrong and a husband and father is killed. Which a number of us would consider a worse outcome. Do you not agree?
“A dysfunctional abusive home can negatively impact a child’s school work let alone their rational to make such a major call”
It certainly can affect a child’s schoolwork. And the people that created that family should be involved in the decisions about the creation of the next generation? I fail to see the rationality there.
The inability to do school work, because of the negative impact of outside influences on the other hand, has nothing to do with a person’s intelligence or rationality.
A child coming from a dysfunctional abusive home would be in a less state of mind to make a rational decision.
Unless the child had gotten better advice from a trusted third party which this one did.
Parents need to be part of the decision making process.
No, really, they don’t. This is because parents often don’t have the information needed to make that decision for the child because a) they’re not the child and b) they’re often running on outdated information that they learned as a child
There’s only one problem with this – the conservative right has been making these attempts for years. They are hoping to sensationalize the facts enough with reporting like this in a bid to further the debate on abortion.
That video just seems to be more of the same BS that has been used by the RWNJs to attack, well, pretty much everybody that they disagree with.
Planned Parenthood commissioned an independent review of the videos and the conclusion – yet another dishonest smear campaign waged by unhinged, deceptive anti-choice arseholes.
A thorough review of these videos in consultation with qualified experts found that they do not present a complete or accurate record of the events they purport to depict.
Each release by CMP contained a short edited video, between eight and fifteen minutes in length, that intercuts clips from the undercover recordings with other content, and a “full footage” video that claims to provide the raw, unedited footage of each interview. A video forensics expert, a television producer, an independent transcription agency, and Fusion GPS staff reviewed this material. While these analysts found no evidence that CMP inserted dialogue not spoken by Planned Parenthood staff, their review did conclude that CMP edited content out of the alleged “full footage” videos, and heavily edited the short videos so as to misrepresent statements made by Planned Parenthood representatives. In addition, the CMP transcript for the “full footage” video shot at Planned Parenthood’s Gulf Coast facility in Texas differs substantially from the content of the tape.
At this point, it is impossible to characterize the extent to which CMP’s undisclosed edits and cuts distort the meaning of the encounters the videos purport to document. However, the manipulation of the videos does mean they have no evidentiary value in a legal context and cannot be relied upon for any official inquiries unless supplemented by CMP’s original material and forensic authentication that this material is supplied in unaltered form. The videos also lack credibility as journalistic products.
That’s no evidence, that’s video heavily edited by unhinged, deceptive anti-choice propaganda arseholes misrepresenting statements made by Planned Parenthood representatives.
.
The Center for Medical Progress argues that these videos show the organization was selling fetal tissue for profit — which is, to be clear, a crime. But abortion clinics are allowed to receive compensation for any time spent procuring fetal tissue — for example, the extra time a staff member has to spend getting consent to donate or the work a lab technician does identifying specific types of tissue. Planned Parenthood says this is all the videos show, and for the most part they’re right.
It’s routinely the fake buyers, not Planned Parenthood, who move the discussion toward money. When Planned Parenthood officials are asked about their motivation, they talk about fetal tissue donation as a real, positive good that could lead to medical advancements. They talk about patients who request these types of services, who like the idea of something productive coming out of their decision to terminate a pregnancy.
So, you show a video that’s proven to be BS. Figuring that that line didn’t work you then show another video made by the same people that’s also BS…
Yeah, I think you need to accept that the people attacking Planned Parenting are just outright liars. It may prevent you from proving that you’re fucken idiot.
Of course, indications from this thread are that you want to believe all the lies because of your forced birth ideology which makes you not only a fucken idiot but a authoritarian fucken idiot.
All this is a load of nonsense TC. Even from a biblical perspective your point of view is plain wrong. All this crap about forced birth is really an emotional way of misleading Christians to support extreme right wing groups such as the Republicans in the US. The Bible does not regard a foetus as fully human until it is born. The mother is more important. Read the following link for more info if you dare. This kind of nonsense just puts people right off Christianity. I am a Christian and I believe it is up to the mother to decide and noone should force her to carry through with a pregnancy. http://www.thechristianleftblog.org/blog-home/abortion
Whatever the truth of what she is saying trying to compare a US revenue driven profit-making health system with what happens here is a nonsense.
I’ve never met a pro-abortionist in New Zealand who would, even with the biggest stretch of imagination, view abortion as a method of generating revenue.
Please show how that video is relevant to the situation in NZ. That Planned Parenthood in the US and FP in NZ both belong to the same international organisation isn’t enough. You need to demonstrate that what that particular video is saying applies here. For instance, are you suggesting that NZ FP runs as a profit-making business whereby it ensures that it generates income from abortions? When you’ve told us the actual connection and the point you are trying to make (apart from ‘abortion is bad’), I’d like some evidence.
AFAIK there is maybe one Family Planning clinic in NZ that provides abortions. All FP clinics do do counselling and referrals. If you have any evidence that FP don’t provide professional, compassionate services that offer women access to all options, I’d like to see that right now. Otherwise your argument is an outright lie.
Being affiliated highlights they have similar aims and objectives.
In 2013 the President of Planned Parenthood was a primary keynote speaker at a NZ Family Planning conference.
While remains in NZ are largely incinerated and not on sold, funding largely comes by from of the NZ taxpayer. Therefore, the more abortions they undertake and services they provide the more funding they can attempt to seek.
Abortion is bad is not the point being made here, that’s a potshot you’ve fired off.
Labour’s justice spokeswoman Jacinda Ardern said there was no question that current practice had failed the family at almost every step.
“The things that are meant to happen in the system didn’t happen for your daughter…she should never have been coerced, she always should have been given options and access to trained counsellors.”
Ms Ardern said GPs who had spoken to the committee on the issue said they worked very hard to convince a young woman to bring in her parents in such a situation, but this didn’t happen in this case.
National MP Jono Naylor said counsellors had told the committee that best practice was to counsel young women to involve their family, unless they judged that such advice could harm the teenager.
Mr Naylor said that did not appear to have happened in the case of Mrs Kieft’s daughter, and the system had failed.
You’re being disingenuous TC. Here’s what Ardern also said,
Ms Ardern said GPs who had spoken to the committee on the issue said they worked very hard to convince a young woman to bring in her parents in such a situation, but this didn’t happen in this case.
Doctors had also reported of seeing young women who had been harmed when their family found out they were pregnant, Ms Ardern said.
“So this is what we’ve got on the one side, on the other side we have got stories like yours. So we are trying to balance those two things.”
You can’t tell from that article what happened to the girl. You also can’t tell why the girl didn’t tell her family, but there is no evidence to suggest that the system prevented her.
You appear to be saying that FP in NZ is making money from foetuses. I’d like you to back that up.
You also appear to be saying that FP in NZ are in general unprofessional in their counselling and referral work. I’d like some evidence of that please. (If the report is correct that she didn’t get offered post-abortion support, then that clinic needs to investigate what happened and make changes, but we don’t have actual evidence of that).
Jono Naylor the National MP who had a stated position prior to being elected as thus:
Naylor said he did not see a need to change abortion laws.
“It’s already too easy for young people, or anyone to have an abortion.”
And of course he is already considers fetuses to be unborn children, thinks abstinence based sex-education should be a priority, and is pro-parental tittle tattling.
You should know how the game is played. Whistle-blowers are often criticized and have their credibility questioned, regardless how much merit they have.
Abby Johnson has shared her insights into their aims and objectives.
Yeah cause in a weird sort of way we champion the grandparents raising their grand-children and vilify the daughters who got pregnant.
Mum’s a hero and the daughter – well you can pick whatever disparaging euphemism you like.
Even now Mum’s fighting the good fight – sacrificing herself for her daughter.
Taking on the power of the state by telling her daughter’s story.
I love how she just so wanted her daughter to not make the same “mistakes” she made, how her own guilt about her own abortion- aided and exacerbated by the church no doubt – drives her to this end.
The religious imposition of guilt would drive more to seek an abortion than any other reason I know of. That’s the whole irony of that type of position.
Well, I can tell you from experience that girls at 15 are sexually active whith many ending up pregnant, and ending that pregnancy with an abortion.
I can tell you also that most of them will go to their parents and speak to them about it, or they go to another person of trust and speak to them maybe to mediate with parents.
I can also tell you that already there is have a life being damaged with an unwanted pregnancy, namely that of the unwilling mother.
I can also tell you that if that girl would have spoken about her mother that she was sexually active the mother could have prevented the pregnacy herself by getting her daughter on the pill, and getting the sexual active boy (and I hope that the sex was consentual) a hundert box of condoms to prevent any sexual transmitted diseases and babies.
So I would assume as the mother is a devout babtist and heavily involved in the Pro Life Movement, aka the Forced Birth Movement, her daughter would have been raised on a steady Sexual Abstinece Diet and Purity till marriage ..the day the father hands you over to your husband.
Now the girls needs to admit to Mum that she a. has had sex, b. has lied to everyone in the congregation about not having sex before marriage, c. gotten herself pregnant, d. does not want the baby.
I can see why she did not want to speak to Mummy dearest.
Not one mention of how this pregnancy could have been prevented if the Girl could have had a. science based sex ed, b. access to reproductive choices such as the pill or plan b, and the same counts for the boy that fathered the child.
No the Mum should go home for a moment and reflect, why did my daughter did not trust me enough to come home and speak to me about the pregnancy and the choices she has.
And she might also ask herself what this law would do to girls that have gotten themselves pregnant with their fathers, stepfathers, uncles, cuzzies, brothers or even priests baby. …..Oh yea….i forgot these things don’t happen, or if they happen its the fault of no-one but the devil, and an un-born lifesaka the zygote trumps the life of the mother anytime.
Can you substantiate your claim that an innocent life (that of the mother) would not have been harmed by having a child?
Can you substantiate that your claim that the girl would have gotten the abortion she obviously wanted if she would have spoken to her mother, taking into account her mothers religious believes and her Pro Un-born Life stance?
Can you substantiate your claim that contraceptives would not have prevented an unwanted pregnancy?
Can you substantiate your claim that this pregnacny would not have prevented had the father of this pregnancy worn condoms?
but maybe you are a proponent of the back alley abortions, cause all the sperm is sacred and all the unborn babies must be born, and the incubating vessel aka the mother will have no say in it. Cause….women.
” An 11-year old girl who became pregnant after being raped by her stepfather and was denied an abortion by Paraguayan authorities has given birth, in the culmination of a case which put renewed focus on Latin America’s strict anti-abortion laws.
The girl, known by the legal pseudonym “Mainumby”, gave birth to a girl weighing 3.55kg (7.8lbs) at the Reina Sofia maternity hospital, a facility run by the Red Cross in Asunción, Paraguay’s capital.
The baby was delivered by Caesarean section as a natural birth was judged to be too dangerous.”
essentially this girl would have died without a cesarean or an abortion. But hey maybe its better for both, mother and child to die, then have an abortion.
“Incidents in the U.S. after 1973[edit]
In 2005, the Detroit News reported that a 16-year-old boy beat his pregnant, under-age girlfriend with a bat at her request to abort a fetus. The young couple lived in Michigan, where parental consent is required to receive an abortion.[24][25][26] In Indiana, where there are also parental consent laws, a young woman by the name of Becky Bell died from an unsafe abortion rather than discuss her pregnancy and wish for an abortion with her parents.[27][28]”
You could look at all of this, and realise that often parents are not helpful but rather the reason for a pregnancy. But you could also put your fingers in your ears and go lalalala, kumbaya all is well.
my answer that you now call a straw man relates to this from you:
“You can assume and tell me whatever you want, but can you substantiate your assertions and assumptions?
Contraceptives are known to fail, thus are not a foolproof solution.
Informing parents doesn’t necessarily mean abortions wouldn’t be done”
———————————————————————————————–
you throw up the concern that contraceptive may fail…..i just provided some back ground data to your statement.
you throw up the concern that by speaking to a parent a girl may still have an abortion…..or may not…..and I just provide a few links to what happened in the /States where parental notification has become law.
You have so far not addressed the issue of sex ed, but linked to a baloney defunct “Planned Parenthood is evil’ by a group that is less then savory.
————————————————————————————————-
I just hope that you lobby our current government for more money to be spend on teenaged mums and their children, that more money will be made available to house these currently homeless pregnant ladies in Auckland, that more money will be made available for schools that will allow teenaged Mums to come with their children, that you will also lobby the government to very aggressively to follow up on child support payments from the fathers and if that means that a teenaged boy will have to leave school to support the child he fathered then so be it.
Oh, and of course you will have no issue adopting a few of these children and raise them like your own.
Or are you advocating the return of the Magdalene Sisters and their their laundry places?
Sometimes, parents facing unpleasant consequences of their own crap parenting want the government to Do Something About It. It doesn’t mean the government should indulge them.
The number of people who could have been born if their prospective parents hadn’t taken steps to prevent it is orders of magnitude greater than the number of people who’ve ever lived. None of them “died,” and it’s not the government’s business to try and ensure that those countless billions do actually get born.
Nevertheless the abortion robbed them of their life, hence the statement a life was unnecessarily taken.
Government has a social responsibly, they create laws and are known to amend them from time to time, of course it’s their business. No one else can amend the law.
They create laws alright, including ones they’ve no business creating, like ones trying to ensure people don’t act to prevent their sex acts producing children. Unfortunately, those who consider other people’s decisions theirs to interfere with make amending those laws difficult.
As to “robbing” people of their lives, I’ve “robbed” maybe a good dozen potential children of their lives just by rolling on a condom. No-one, including the government, is likely to spend any time wailing and gnashing their teeth over this murderous tragedy.
“A life was unnecessarily taken with a young girl and her family having to live with the consequence of that.”
The implication there is that had the girl told the mother, the mother would have prevented the abortion. That’s in direct opposition to the intention of the law, which allows women to have abortions under certain circumstances. The mother is suggesting that the law support that this right be applied selectively depending on what family you are born into. Imagine if other health care were legislated and managed that way.
Any female of childbearing age has a legal right to abortion services under certain circumstances. You are suggesting that access to that be limited for some females depending on what family they were born into. That’s why the law allows abortions for girls without parental consent, to prevent them from being prevented access to healthcare.
There is bugger all difference between someone who is 15 years 8 months and 16 years.
The main argument I see in not allowing girls access without parental consent is to try and reduce abortions. Why not just be honest about that?
There is bugger all difference between someone who is 15 years 8 months and 16 years, so the whole adult/child thing doesn’t wash. Also to get an abortion in NZ you have to see at least 2 doctors and a counsellor and explain yourself, so it’s not like girls are making decisions on their own.
girls that have sex out of wedlock should bear the shame if they have an unwanted pregnancy.
Simple as that. If we follow religious doctrine that sex is for procreation only, and sex for pleasure and fun is evil, than any girl/women that gets pregnant is to carry this pregnancy to term and a. either raise the child, or b. give it up for adoption.
No matter how much harm a nine month pregnancy may does to the mother, no matter how much harm delivery might do to the mother, no matter if the mother is able to financially support herself during pregnancy/delivery and then is financially and emotionally able to take care of the child once born.
And under no circumstances is a women ever able to take the decision to abort a child because women are . a. emotional, b. hysterical, c. scatterbrained, d. heartless, e. slutty, f. not trust worthy…..insert your own reasoning here.
Hence why she has to see 2 doctors and a counselor and explain herself over and over again. Because its not only girls that have to see 2 doctors and a counselor its women aswel.
I especially like how the poster is discounting contraceptives and does not mention sex ed at all.
Cause the only way to never get pregnant is by abstinence only, and then once married, baby after baby, cause contraceptives might cause spontaneous natural abortions.
FFS in no case where an abortion is carried out is “the unborn child” as you put it is protected.
What you’re asking is that the state now involves an assessment of the family in order to determine whether serious harm would occur.
Cool.
There’s evidence that the family is highly religious and having a child out of wedlock will bring shame and embarrassment on the family. The impact on the daughter will mean that she will be assuaged by guilt and that if she has the baby she will be constantly reminded that she bought this shame on the family.
Or Mum will raise this child and will constantly remind her daughter that she is doing this because her daughter sinned and ruined not only her life, but her mothers.
Or that Uncle Fred is the father.
Or whatever scenario…..
There’s consequences also about putting the family further under the microscope to assess whether serious harm will occur.
One would actually be pretty sure that it’s better to assess that based on the current process rather than actually involve the family further.
Unless you somehow think that these young people just make shit up to get an abortion.
What are you going to do when those types of assessments find that actually having the child will harm the potential mother? What support will you throw around the family who have been formally assessed as likely to cause harm? How will you deal with the ramifications of that?
The law in this case didn’t protect the unborn child,
There’s no such thing as an “unborn child” as prior to birth what we have is a foetus that cannot survive outside of the womb and thus, by definition, also isn’t living.
A transcript of a small part of the interview with Robert David Steele, a video link featured on yesterday’s Open Mic
Interviewer: Briefly, what is your major criticism of the TPP?
Steele: Well, first of all the TPP has a number of secret provisions which essentially give corporations to power to overrule the laws of member states. It basically screws workers, it screws benefits, it screws insurance, it screws true cost economics. It is, unfortunately most people haven’t had the chance, nor have the Senators had the chance nor the representatives, to read or see the secret provisions. But Wikileaks has done a major public service, its released a lot of this stuff and anybody reading this understands very clearly the TPP is a form of coup d’état. It is a betrayal of public trust and in a properly run country . . . and I want to pause here because I want to say this in a very measured way . . . in a properly run country, Barak Obama should be impeached for offering the TPP to Congress for passage.
Well, there’s a thought! Can you impeach a prime minister?
That aside, there are only two conclusions to draw from the above: either Groser etc. are incredibly incompetent negotiators, or their actions, and those of the executive of this government, are sinister!
incites or assists any person with force to invade New Zealand
The TPPA is against the will of the people and will allow invasion and rule by the corporates so that could possibly be stretched to apply.
Then there’s the corruption aspect of the Saudi Sheep Deal (Maybe difficult as was McCully that actually did it but the PM should have known):
105F Trading in influence
Every person is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years who corruptly accepts or obtains, or agrees or offers to accept or attempts to obtain, a bribe for that person or another person with intent to influence an official in respect of any act or omission by that official in the official’s official capacity (whether or not the act or omission is within the scope of the official’s authority).
Every one person is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 years who, without reasonable excuse, sells, transfers, or otherwise makes available any document knowing that—
(a) the document was altered, concealed, or made, in whole or in part, as a reproduction of another document; and
(b) the document was dealt with in the manner specified in paragraph (a) with intent to—
(i) obtain any property, privilege, service, pecuniary advantage, benefit, or valuable consideration; or
(ii) cause loss to any other person.
Considering his lies there’s probably numerous laws that he’s broken that would result in him leaving office permanently. We just need to find those laws and manage to have the scum charged.
“A life was unnecessarily taken with a young girl and her family having to live with the consequence of that.”
Ignoring any philosophical argument about defining “life” – really how do you know that?
You can only speculate on what may have happened had she gone through further with the pregnancy. A whole range of possibilities exist from miscarriage, dying in child-birth, to being beaten and abused by the father of the child, to raising the child on DPB and having to live with the opprobrium of the right wingers for the rest of her life, to the child being raised by her parents because the child could not cope, to getting married to the father and the child being raised in a loving, caring relationship.
You have no idea what may have gone on to happen.
I’m well aware of situations where parents have found out and prevented the abortion, the baby born and both mother and child live in a miserable existence – particularly in one case where the child’s father turned out to be of a different race.
There’s no right or wrong here but I do agree with the parents in that there should have been more follow up and support post-abortion, if that didn’t actually occur.
The bigger issue in my view is the societal attitude towards young people having children. The notion that it ruins their lives, the notion that young people breed for a business, the continual parsing of sole parents as bludgers.
If we made young people having children a positive experience then maybe we might get fewer abortions. That would mean having to deal with reality though. You know the reality that young people will have sex and some of them will get pregnant.
Failing to inform her mother robbed her (and her child to be) of exploring the avenue of her mother caring for the child. Perhaps resulting in saving a life.
Therefore, surely we should be considering how we can keep that avenue open?
Although disappointed and regretting more wasn’t done, who’s to say her mother isn’t supporting her decision?
“Failing to inform her mother robbed her (and her child to be) of exploring the avenue of her mother caring for the child.”
No, it didn’t. The whole point about this that you don’t seem to get is choice. The girl chose not to tell her parents. If having her mother adopt the foetus was an option for the girl, what makes you assume she didn’t consider it and decide it was a bad choice?
The mother was more than willing. However, she was never informed, thus her daughter wasn’t fully informed when making her choice. She wasn’t aware of her mothers position and willingness to help.
that’s not logical. The girl might have understood that her mother would raise the child, but chose to have an abortion anyway. If you have some evidence to contradict that, please post it.
You still don’t get it. Unless we heard from the young woman we have no idea why she didn’t tell her mother, or what she thought/didn’t think her options are. In the absence of that you are making stuff up, or willing to take the perspective of someone who is not the pregnant person but has a vested interested (in multiple ways) in preventing the pregnant person from having choice. THAT is why we have the law that we do, to stop younger, vulnerable women from having their choice taken from them.
So the mother had 17 years of raising her child to convey to her that if she ever got pregnant that it would be OK and that she would be very supportive and help to raise her grandchild but didn’t do so.
Man I had those discussions with my children when they were 7 or 8 at the latest.
Maybe the mother should have had those discussions before her daughter got pregnant – they’re not really difficult discussions.
And I know a family where the girls were told when they hit their teens that if they ever came home pregnant they’d have to leave home. A law that says they should tell their parents? yeah right.
That you would even liken the decision that young woman (she’s not a girl by the way once she reaches puberty) made to theft says a lot about how you view the daughter as a possession of the parents.
There’s a difference between parental responsibility and ownership.
as you appear completely unswayed in your beliefs on this topic – despite the deeply concerned, intelligent, passionate, reasoned, and personally experienced writers responding to you –
why do you feel that you have to go on and on and on and on?
Is it to:
a) influence others to forego reason?
or
b) heroically stand against all ‘unbelievers’?
Of course you do have a right to defend your beliefs – but really….. have you not acquired a sliver of understanding of why you might be wrong on this?
women become incubators the moment that they get pregnant. with no say or aganda, cause fetus will over ride any human rights the incubator has enjoyed before pregnancy.
this is essentially what Pro Life boils down to. Forced Birth.
They’re also all about making decisions for women, not listening to women.
This story’s a great example. It’s all about the pregnant person’s mother, and how SHE feels and what SHE wants and HER pain, and we literally hear nothing from the person actually going through the process.
+1 Draco
It is up to the pregnant woman to decide whether she wants to continue with her pregnancy, nobody else. The foetus is not a “life” unless it is capable of surviving outside the womb.
It is also up to her to choose who she should confide in before discussing the options and getting the statutory agreement from two doctors.
The fact that her mother has gone public with her daughter’s story indicates to me why this girl sought help elsewhere.
The attention seeker here is Mother dearest that clearly does not care a lot about the wellbeing of her daughter considering that she drags the decision of her daughter through the mud. It says a lot about Mother dearest that she has not issue to make public in a national News Paper the decision her daughter took. I actually have pity for the daughter.
You know what her mother just did? She publicly shamed her daughter for a. having sex, b. getting pregnant, and c. for having an abortion.
I hope that somewhere around this girl is/are some adults that will help her to get away from this “Mother”.
Thank you Karen for raising the obvious. I am not surprised that this mother wasn’t told. She’s acting like she owns her daughter.
She has no idea of personal boundaries and has no hesitation about discussing her daughter’s personal business in public – in such a way that no doubt the daughter can be identified by the community around her. What ever is going on the glare of publicity is unlikely to be helping.
What right does she have to further abuse her daughter in this way , particularly if she is struggling to cope at some level. There is usually a provision when these sorts of submissions are made at parliament for a level of privacy – so the MSM story was actually deliberate.
As for “the chairman” have you ever considered, apart from all the reasons given above, that a good number of parents would demand their daughters had an abortion regardless of the girl’s wishes.
Can’t have that public shame you know. (sarc)
So if I apply for a job, and someone else is chosen, should I have the successful applicant charged with the theft of the money I would have made if I’d gotten the job?
Which is a different argument from taking a life that didn’t exist. Should that potential be allowed to develop? That’s not up to us or anybody else but the women making the decision.
The contention is young teens are making the decision.
They’re quite capable of making decisions. It’s people like you who prevent them from making decisions and building the self-confidence from doing so that leaves us with people in their 20s that won’t make decisions.
Would you allow a young child to call all the shots in their life?
1. We’re not talking about a young child but a young woman
2. She’s being assisted by other adults
I’m not advocating preventing them from making decisions overall.
Yes you are. You insisting that the decisions get left to the parents whether they be abusers or not, whether they have the best interests of the young adult or not or even have the best information or not. In general in cases like this I suspect the parents are often the worst people to go to.
As explained to McFlock, you can abort a pregnancy.
No, you just kept asserting the same bullshit that had already been shown to be bollocks. As you just did again.
The point you missed was we generally allow decisions to be made relative to age, hence the reference to the young child analogy .
This teen wasn’t assisted. She was failed every step of the way, which begs the question, how widespread is this?
I’m not insisting that the decisions get left to the parents whether they be abusers or not, whether they have the best interests of the young adult or not or even have the best information or not. What rubbish (see my position posted above).
And no. I’m merely correcting your ongoing flawed assertions.
The point you missed was we generally allow decisions to be made relative to age, hence the reference to the young child analogy .
I understood your othering but:
1. She’s a young adult, not a child
2. We also allow and encourage young adults and even children to go to any adult for help. Your insistence that it must be the adults is part of the problem of abusive households that we’re trying to solve
This teen wasn’t assisted. She was failed every step of the way, which begs the question, how widespread is this?
No, she was assisted and she was not failed. Things may not have gone perfectly but she wasn’t failed. Again, the problem is your insistence that the parents be involved.
I’m merely correcting your ongoing flawed assertions.
You’re the one making flawed assertions. I’ve backed up what I’ve said.
Spend a little time looking into the background of Family Planning, population control and eugenics.
You really should look into the dishonest smearing of Planned Parenthood by unhinged, deceptive anti-choice arseholes.
/
. But on to the truth about Margaret Sanger.
Sanger was pro-birth control and anti-abortion. This may surprise you, considering that Planned Parenthood opponents frequently accuse Sanger of erecting abortion clinics in Black neighborhoods, a practice they claim the organization continues to this day.
But this is simply not true.
Sanger opposed abortion. She believed it to be a barbaric practice. In her own words, “[a]lthough abortion may be resorted to in order to save the life of the mother, the practice of it merely for limitation of offspring is dangerous and vicious.” Her views are, ironically, in keeping with the views of many of the anti-choicers who malign and distort her legacy.
Alcohol.
The drug that New Zealand refuses to tackle.
Due to the power of the liquor industry.
With costs that the industry does not pay for.
Costs that society pays for.
And we ram through laws to make drinking ever easier while pushing back laws to give parents paid parental leave.
The difference is that someone will be able to make a profit from the sale of the alcohol and possibly even the damage done to society afterwards whereas no one will be able to make a profit from a woman staying home to look after her child.
Would someone please take a moment to tell me why floating mortgage interest rates here are now back up to 6.75 when our ocr is circa 2.35%..and uk floating mortgage rates are 1.25%… is it pure profit taking by banks…. or hedging against coming ‘economic perfect storm’ plus el nino drought predictions? Many thanks.
As Nz don’t save enough banks borrow a lot offshore to fund montages. The rate reflects these costs and and banks margin ( which is not major component of rate) Say a banks margin is 1pc of the 7pc,, it only takes15pc of loans to default for banks to be loosing money , hence capital adequacy controls. The media beat on about banks profits however they reflect a huge asset and liability base, where return on capital is not over the top, while a stringent focus on credit risk is essential
Yet when I worked for Westpac it was well talked about internally that their was a 1% premium on NZ rates compared to Australian rates.
At the time if you took the inflation rate in both countries and then compared the gap between the interest rates and the inflation rate eg the difference, there was always at least a 1% greater margin in NZ rates.
NZ was always seen as a bit of a cash cow for Oz. Lower overheads as well.
Of course, it’s all a load of bollocks. Foreign money can’t actually buy NZ goods and services (it’s not legal tender) and so borrowing offshore doesn’t actually provide any ‘capital’ and then there’s the fact that the local banks just create the money whenever they make a loan anyway and so do the foreign banks.
The media beat on about banks profits however they reflect a huge asset and liability base, where return on capital is not over the top,
Any return to capital is, as a matter of fact, excessive. Anything above 0 is. As the bailouts of the financial system proved, the banks don’t carry any risk and neither do the lenders.
Wish rest of nz would apply same rules as invercargill re alcohol… all alcohol is purchased through ILT who owns all four (yes four for the city) bottle stores and most of the pubs and hotels. All nett profits go back to the community down here. There is no alcohol for sale in supermarkets or dairies.
Crusty old blazer wearing gin drinking Rotarians who sit upon a mountain of public money, yet dish it out for middle class hobbies. Time for a new broom next year to sweep then all out and for some progressive ideas to be implemented.
After the Berlin Wall fell in 1989, for a while it seemed like border fences and barriers were a thing of the past in Europe. Many on the continent hoped for a new era of integration and receptivity. It didn’t happen. Instead, various pressures have led Europe to adopt wall-building projects that would make Donald Trump proud
“Good to see that you think it is OK for parents to disown/kick out/beat their daughters for falling pregnant.”
Feel free to show me how you came to that flawed conclusion. It’s not what I’m advocating.
I’m hoping we can find a way to better balance the benefits of parents knowing against the negatives you described, in the hope we can save some young lives going forward.
The reality is, that a lot of parents react negatively to their daughter having sex and falling pregnant. So they kick them out on the street, or worse.
Our brothels, prisons and shelters are full of women who were disowned by their parents.
There is never any point in arguing with a forced birther. There are no depths to which they will not sink. Doctored videos, lies, terrorist threats, and even murder. All in the name of these mythical “children” for whom they do not give a toss once they are born. Their “pro-life” proclamations extend only as far as wonen’s uteri – most of them are pro the death penalty and pro war.
I think it was a comedian called Jimmy Tingle who commented that george HW bush was anti-abortion and pro death penalty: “I guess it’s all in the timing, eh George?”
About big finance and business. I heard something on Radionz about a rort involving $600 million. So googled for $600 million rort international and there is a page about big money transactions.
Here is the item I heard about the rort of Malaysian PM and $600 million. This is indicative of how political leaders everywhere are trying to personally advantage themselves. At one time this was something from lesser countries.
http://www.cnbc.com/2015/08/29/malaysians-stage-mass-protest-for-pms-resignation.html The Malaysian leader has weathered weeks of attacks since it was reported that investigators probing the management of debt-laden state fund 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) had discovered the unexplained transfer of more than $600 million.
Protesters hope to spark a people’s power movement forcing Najib out, but political analysts doubt he will be toppled.
Then further down the page under $600 million – which seems a popular amount to be dealing in!
The first one is brief details for cognoscenti and carries this warning “Remember that CFDs are a leveraged product and can result in the loss of your entire deposit. Trading CFDs may not be suitable for you. Please ensure you fully understand the risks involved. ” so don’t complain if you lose all your holiday money.
Schlumberger Limited said it will merge with oilfield equipment maker Cameron in a stock and cash transaction valued at $12.7 billion that will create the world’s largest oil-field services company.
Pixar’s latest animated feature Inside Out is continuing to go from success to success.
After topping the UK box office last weekend and battling with Jurassic World for the top spot in the US earlier in July, Disney’s Pixar now has more to celebrate as Inside Out passes the $600 million worldwide box office mark.
Local politicking – easy-peasy??:
A decade ago, sister towns of West Baden Springs and French Lick (located one mile apart) were in trouble. Jobs were scarce, local shops were closing, and the younger generation was moving away for better opportunities and a brighter future. Locals were not naïve, they knew they had a problem. For years, citizens would caravan to the state capitol in Indianapolis to ask for help. Their goal: to convince politicians to grant a gambling license to a developer who would rebuild and restore French Lick Resort….
Geneva Street, a feisty, red-headed beautician in French Lick, was one of the most vocal supporters. In a deft move, she realized State Senator Larry Borst, a practicing veterinarian, was the logjam. So, she made an appointment for her dog to receive a check-up with veterinarian Borst.
“It was inventive and effective,” stated Saunders. “Although Senator Borst probably felt hoodwinked by the ruse, it worked.”
With a gaming license in hand, the challenge now lay to find a steward, with deep enough pockets and resolve, to rebuild the resort.
Yesterday, Bloomberg reported that the biggest American producer of coking coal, Alpha Natural Resources, could file for bankruptcy as soon as Monday.
Competitor Walter Energy filed for bankruptcy earlier this month, and several others have done the same this year.
Now, two companies are so pressed by ten-year-low coal prices, that they have agreed to sell their jointly-owned Australian coking mine for A$1 ($US0.73). Coking coal, also known as metallurgic coal, is used for steel production.
Then there are airline profits and problems. Qantas has found Jetstar in NZ useful in boosting its turnaround profit. Yet Air NZ can’t wait to drop the regions and that allows Jetstar to achieve a greater share of our domestic market, at a time when the media have a heading that shares are going down as the international economy sags.
And with our lack of sharp concern for our balance of payments, our strategy is lax about more of the domestic earnings being sucked out of NZ to Australia and beyond!
Qantas has turned around a massive loss to report its biggest profit since before the global financial crisis.
The airline reported earnings before tax and one-time items of A$975 million in the year to June 30, compared with a A$646 million loss a year earlier.
The airline attributes the spectacular turnaround to its successful transformation programme, which saw thousands of staff laid off and costs slashed, A$600 million in lower fuel costs helped by hedging, depreciation savings from international fleet impairment and higher revenue per available seat kilometre.
Chief executive Alan Joyce said the bounce back into the black was one of the most spectacular in Australian corporate history. There were record results for Jetstar, which was now making a profit in New Zealand, the airline’s loyalty scheme and freight operations.
Google Air NZ annual profit to get interesting coverage. Air New Zealand has posted an annual profit of $327 million, up 24 per cent, and expects earnings to grow significantly. The growth in earnings was driven by capacity growth and strong demand, along with cost efficiencies and lower fuel prices, the airline said. http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/71456978/air-new-zealand-posts-record-annual-result
Air NZ shares dive despite soaring profit
Concern about Air New Zealand’s ability to profitably fill capacity increases as economies weaken and competition increases has weighed on its shares. http://home.nzcity.co.nz/news/article.aspx?id=212249
Air NZ shares fall, analysts query capital return strategy
Following this year’s result, analysts covering the stock have bumped up their expected 2016 earnings based on jet fuel savings, 11 percent capacity growth, and a stronger contribution from its 26 percent stake in Virgin Australia. That’s partly offset by concern about new competition including Jetstar on regional routes, Chinese airlines, and from Qantas alliance partner American Airlines on trans-Pacific flights. http://www.sharechat.co.nz/article/ef9fe9f6/air-nz-shares-fall-analysts-query-capital-return-strategy.html
edited
A long time ago I wrote this calling for better information to be available for people to make decisions. It also calls for the effect of those decisions to be shown on the real economy and for those decisions to be made real.
Now somebody has put together this which does the first part which is going to go a long way to getting the rest going as well.
Oh dear, the news just gets worse and worse for the Blairites in Britain.
They’ve expended a good deal of energy portraying Jeremy Corbyn’s supporters as little more than a cadre of Posh, out-of-touch Trots and affluent Islington drawing-room liberals.
Turns out that research by pollster YouGov reveals Corbyn’s supporters are actually closer (than those of the other 3 leadership candidates) to the UK demographic average in 3 out of 4 indicators.
The supporters of self-identified Blairite candidate Liz Kendall are more likely to be affluent, upper-middle class and in professional, well-healed occupations. Corbyn’s support base is much more a mix of working and lower-middle class, in tune with the wider British electorate.
Household Income over 40k
Great Britain 27%
Corbyn Support 26%
Burnham Support 29%
Cooper Support 32%
Kendall Support 44%
Social Grade A/B
Great Britain 35%
Corbyn Support 36%
Burnham Support 40%
Cooper Support 48%
Kendall Support 65%
Voted Lib Dem in 2010
Great Britain 15%
Corbyn Support 18%
Burnham Support 9%
Cooper Support 9%
Kendall Support 10%
The only measure where Corbyn supporters were further (than those of the other candidates) from the GB average was their preference for social media over the MSM.
Social Media a main source of News
Great Britain 32%
Corbyn Support 57%
Burnham 39%
Cooper 41%
Kendall 38%
Tony Blair again launches a plea for Labour voters to vote for a leader that will dial back public spending to pre Crimean war levels, as opposed to the Tories who want Walpole era spending levels.
I’ve seen more sensible commentary around abortion on this site, including today, than almost anywhere else I can think of.
From personal stories, to debunking bull-shit, to presenting logical challenges to what is being said it is heartening to see such a diverse range of people supporting the choice of women to make their own decisions, based on their own individual circumstances.
It seems that many of these failed business owing millions of $ have histories of not paying IRD before their collapse.
Surely this is a pretty good indicator of firms in trouble and non-payment should be a matter of public record when it occurs, not waiting til the total collapse of the business.
I still argue for a much simpler tax system where there’s a low rate of tax on gross income (before expenses) which would both broaden the tax base and make collection at the point of sale direct to IRD possible for all but cash and cheque sales.
Even without including fraudulent issues around taxation it seems that the collapsed business value of non-paid legitimate tax must run into hundreds of millions of dollars.
Add non-paid PAYE payments and non-paid student loan payments into the mix and the missing amounts must be enormous.
I know from personal experience that if you can show that your employer deducted your student loan payments from your pay but didn’t pay them to IRD then the tax-payer picks up the tab. Yet another employer subsidy.
The July 31 murders in Duma and at the gay pride march were not ordinary homicides. They were moral arguments: Yishai Schlissel’s moral obsession with overly happy gays and the “price tag” movement’s fleet-footed moral flanking maneuver in punishing Israel by allegedly burning Palestinians. Two simultaneous climaxes of Jewish extremism, two moments of Jewish spiritual pathology that were seen by many Israelis, from far-left to far-right, not as criminal aberrations but as signals of a possibly grim future.
Mmmm! Many years ago I lost a classmate to a backstreet abortion…and no need to talk about an 11 yr old from South America when this has even to my knowledge happened in NZ .
Linked ethically is the suicide of a N.Z.schoolboy who went to his spiritual “guide” for help with his newly- realised homosexuality only to be told to go and sin no more.
I assure you, these families are no more or I would not be exposing these facts.
Apart from the Greenpeace protest, tonight Parliament will have the most attention focused onto it for the year I reckon, when the All Blacks are announced there. Sad state of affairs, especially when you’re not a huge rugby fan.
On 3 news tonight, Kelvin Davis and another Labour MP attending a fundraiser for a charter school. Labour policy is against charter schools. Their party needs to make sure that none of their MPs does anything controversial like this. Such easy pickings for the media to imply that Labour are not ready for Government.
C’mon guys, no post on 2 Labour MP’s defying leader and heading to a Charter School fund raiser?…lol, guess the obvious is better to leave slone that look head on eh?
Let me guess, you guys have one of 3 ‘excuses”:
1: They are there for their constituents, as unlike leader…they actually had someone that voted for them (Kelvin Davis)
2: they were excising their democratic right (pun intended) to do as they wish.
3: It’s Whanau!, as it’s Maori MP’s and shhhh it’s their rite to do as they wish as culture out wins leader of the party 🙂
Now….if thus were National MP’s going against Key, OMG it’s National are collapsing and all are against Key and he will be knifed and a new leader soon, LOL georgeous!
On a serious note…I DO believe in a strong opposition, and still having McCarten employed as a stratagem and a ‘bunker war office head’ really is killing and making 2017 a walk over! worst result in 92yrs last election and Matt still employed….beggars belief and long may he continue in that role (to me, Little is a Union man, McCarten is a union man, that owes $150K for not paying his workers Kiwi Saver contributions nor tax….ummmmm)
[lprent: I suspect that is
1. defamatory
2. incorrect
3. earned you a permanent ban unless you can provide proof from a reputable source or apologise. See the policy of ‘asserting facts’.
4. bye bye. I will keep you on moderation for 2 days before putting you in the lying arsehole club along with the other lusers who are too stupid to comment here. ]
April has been a quiet month at A Phuulish Fellow. I have had an exceptionally good reading month, and a decently productive writing month – for original fiction, anyway – but not much has caught my eye that suggested a blog article. It has been vaguely frustrating, to be honest. ...
A listing of 31 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, April 21, 2024 thru Sat, April 27, 2024. Story of the week Anthropogenic climate change may be the ultimate shaggy dog story— but with a twist, because here ...
Hi,I spent about a year on Webworm reporting on an abusive megachurch called Arise, and it made me want to stab my eyes out with a fork.I don’t regret that reporting in 2022 and 2023 — I am proud of it — but it made me angry.Over three main stories ...
The new Victoria University Vice-Chancellor decided to have a forum at the university about free speech and academic freedom as it is obviously a topical issue, and the Government is looking at legislating some carrots or sticks for universities to uphold their obligations under the Education and Training Act. They ...
Do you remember when Melania Trump got caught out using a speech that sounded awfully like one Michelle Obama had given? Uncannily so.Well it turns out that Abraham Lincoln is to Winston Peters as Michelle was to Melania. With the ANZAC speech Uncle Winston gave at Gallipoli having much in ...
She was born 25 years ago today in North Shore hospital. Her eyes were closed tightly shut, her mouth was silently moving. The whole theatre was all quiet intensity as they marked her a 2 on the APGAR test. A one-minute eternity later, she was an 8. The universe was ...
Skeptical Science is partnering with Gigafact to produce fact briefs — bite-sized fact checks of trending claims. This fact brief was written by Sue Bin Park in collaboration with members from our Skeptical Science team. You can submit claims you think need checking via the tipline. Is Antarctica gaining land ice? ...
Images of US students (and others) protesting and setting up tent cities on US university campuses have been broadcast world wide and clearly demonstrate the growing rifts in US society caused by US policy toward Israel and Israel’s prosecution of … Continue reading → ...
Barrie Saunders writes – Dear Paul As the new Minister of Media and Communications, you will be inundated with heaps of free advice and special pleading, all in the national interest of course. For what it’s worth here is my assessment: Traditional broadcasting free to air content through ...
Many criticisms are being made of the Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill, including by this writer. But as with everything in politics, every story has two sides, and both deserve attention. It’s important to understand what the Government is trying to achieve and its arguments for such a bold reform. ...
Peter Dunne writes – The great nineteenth British Prime Minister, William Gladstone, once observed that “the first essential for a Prime Minister is to be a good butcher.” When a later British Prime Minister, Harold Macmillan, sacked a third of his Cabinet in July 1962, in what became ...
Ele Ludemann writes – New Zealanders had the OECD’s second highest tax increase last year: New Zealanders faced the second-biggest tax raises in the developed world last year, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) says. The intergovernmental agency said the average change in personal income tax ...
We all know something’s not right with our elections. The spread of misinformation, people being targeted with soundbites and emotional triggers that ignore the facts, even the truth, and influence their votes.The use of technology to produce deep fakes. How can you tell if something is real or not? Can ...
This video includes conclusions of the creator climate scientist Dr. Simon Clark. It is presented to our readers as an informed perspective. Please see video description for references (if any). This year you will be lied to! Simon Clark helps prebunk some misleading statements you'll hear about climate. The video includes ...
It is all very well cutting the backrooms of public agencies but it may compromise the frontlines. One of the frustrations of the Productivity Commission’s 2017 review of universities is that while it observed that their non-academic staff were increasing faster than their academic staff, it did not bother to ...
Buzz from the Beehive Two speeches delivered by Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters at Anzac Day ceremonies in Turkey are the only new posts on the government’s official website since the PM announced his Cabinet shake-up. In one of the speeches, Peters stated the obvious: we live in a troubled ...
1. Which of these would you not expect to read in The Waikato Invader?a. Luxon is here to do business, don’t you worry about thatb. Mr KPI expects results, and you better believe itc. This decisive man of action is getting me all hot and excitedd. Melissa Lee is how ...
…it has a restricted jurisdiction which must not be abused: it is not an inquisitionNOTE – this article was published before the High Court ruled that Karen Chhour does not have to appear before the Waitangi Tribunal Gary Judd writes – The High Court ...
Lindsay Mitchell writes – One of reasons Oranga Tamariki exists is to prevent child neglect. But could the organisation itself be guilty of the same?Oranga Tamariki’s statistics show a decrease in the number and age of children in care. “There are less children ...
David Farrar writes: Graeme Edgeler wrote in 2017: In the first five years after three strikes came into effect 5248 offenders received a ‘first strike’ (that is, a “stage-1 conviction” under the three strikes sentencing regime), and 68 offenders received a ‘second strike’. In the five years prior to ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has surprised everyone with his ruthlessness in sacking two of his ministers from their crucial portfolios. Removing ministers for poor performance after only five months in the job just doesn’t normally happen in politics. That’s refreshing and will be extremely ...
TL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the two days to 6:06am on Thursday, April 25:Politics: PM Christopher Luxon has set up a dual standard for ministerial competence by demoting two National Cabinet ministers while leaving also-struggling ...
Hi,Today I mainly want to share some of your thoughts about the recent piece I wrote about success and failure, and the forces that seemingly guide our lives. But first, a quick bit of housekeeping: I am doing a Webworm popup in Los Angeles on Saturday May 11 at 2pm. ...
It is hard to see what Melissa Lee might have done to “save” the media. National went into the election with no public media policy and appears not to have developed one subsequently. Lee claimed that she had prepared a policy paper before the election but it had been decided ...
Open access notablesIce acceleration and rotation in the Greenland Ice Sheet interior in recent decades, Løkkegaard et al., Communications Earth & Environment:In the past two decades, mass loss from the Greenland ice sheet has accelerated, partly due to the speedup of glaciers. However, uncertainty in speed derived from satellite products ...
Buzz from the Beehive A statement from Children’s Minister Karen Chhour – yet to be posted on the Government’s official website – arrived in Point of Order’s email in-tray last night. It welcomes the High Court ruling on whether the Waitangi Tribunal can demand she appear before it. It does ...
Mr Bombastic:Ironically, the media the academic experts wanted is, in many ways, the media they got. In place of the tyrannical editors of yesteryear, advancing without fear or favour the interests of the ruling class; the New Zealand news media of today boasts a troop of enlightened journalists dedicated to ...
It's hard times try to make a livingYou wake up every morning in the unforgivingOut there somewhere in the cityThere's people living lives without mercy or pityI feel good, yeah I'm feeling fineI feel better then I have for the longest timeI think these pills have been good for meI ...
In 1974, the US Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. Nixon, finding that the President was not a King, but was subject to the law and was required to turn over the evidence of his wrongdoing to the courts. It was a landmark decision for the rule ...
Every day now just seems to bring in more fresh meat for the grinder.In their relentlessly ideological drive to cut back on the “excessive bloat” (as they see it) of the previous Labour-led government, on the mountains of evidence accumulated in such a short period of time do not ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Megan Valére SosouMarket gardening site of the Itchèléré de Itagui agricultural cooperative in Dassa-Zoumè (Image credit: Megan Valère Sossou) For the residents of Dassa-Zoumè, a city in the West African country of Benin, choosing between drinking water and having enough ...
Buzz from the Beehive Melissa Lee – as may be discerned from the screenshot above – has not been demoted for doing something seriously wrong as Minister of ...
Morning in London Mother hugs beloved daughter outside the converted shoe factory in which she is living.Afternoon in London Travelling writer takes himself and his wrist down to A&E, just to be sure. Read more ...
Mike Grimshaw writes – The recent announcement of the University Advisory Group, chaired by Sir Peter Gluckman, makes very clear where the Government’s focus and priorities lie. The remit of the Advisory Group is that Group members will consider challenges and opportunities for improvement in the university sector including: ...
Eric Crampton writes – The Reserve Bank of New Zealand desperately wants to find reasons to have workstreams in climate change. It makes little sense. They’ve run another stress test on the banks looking to see if they could find a prudential regulation case. They couldn’t. They ...
Rob MacCullough writes – Pundits from the left and the right are arguing that National’s Fast Track Bill that is designed to speed up infrastructure decisions could end up becoming mired in a cesspool of corruption. Political commentator ...
Looking at the headlines this morning it’s hard to feel anything other than pessimistic about the future of humanity.Note that I’m not speaking about the future of mankind, but the survival of our humanity. The values that we believe in seem to be ebbing away, by the day.Perhaps every generation ...
Swabbing mixed breed baby chicks to test for avian influenzaUh oh. Bird flu – often deadly to humans – is not only being transmitted from infected birds to dairy cows, but is now travelling between dairy cows. As of last Friday, Bloomberg News reports, there were 32 American dairy herds ...
On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
What is it with the mining industry? Its not enough for them to pillage the earth - they apparently can't even be bothered getting resource consent to do so: The proponent behind a major mine near the Clutha River had already been undertaking activity in the area without a ...
Photo # 1 I am a huge fan of Singapore’s approach to housing, as described here two years ago by copying and pasting from The ConversationWhat Singapore has that Australia does not is a public housing developer, the Housing Development Board, which puts new dwellings on public and reclaimed land, ...
Buzz from the Beehive Reactions to news of the government’s readiness to make urgent changes to “the resource management system” through a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) suggest a balanced approach is being taken. The Taxpayers’ Union says the proposed changes don’t go far enough. Greenpeace says ...
I’m starting to wonder if Anna Burns-Francis might be the best political interviewer we’ve got. That might sound unlikely to you, it came as a bit of a surprise to me.Jack Tame can be excellent, but has some pretty average days. I like Rebecca Wright on Newshub, she asks good ...
Chris Trotter writes – Willie Jackson is said to be planning a “media summit” to discuss “the state of the media and how to protect Fourth Estate Journalism”. Not only does the Editor of The Daily Blog, Martyn Bradbury, think this is a good idea, but he has also ...
Graeme Edgeler writes – This morning [April 21], the Wellington High Court is hearing a judicial review brought by Hon. Karen Chhour, the Minister for Children, against a decision of the Waitangi Tribunal. This is unusual, judicial reviews are much more likely to brought against ministers, rather than ...
Both of Parliament’s watchdogs have now ripped into the Government’s Fast-track Approvals Bill. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāMy pick of the six newsey things to know from Aotearoa’s political economy and beyond on the morning of Tuesday, April 23 are:The Lead: The Auditor General,John Ryan, has joined the ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Sarah SpengemanPeople wait to board an electric bus in Pune, India. (Image credit: courtesy of ITDP) Public transportation riders in Pune, India, love the city’s new electric buses so much they will actually skip an older diesel bus that ...
The infrastructure industry yesterday issued a “hurry up” message to the Government, telling it to get cracking on developing a pipeline of infrastructure projects.The hiatus around the change of Government has seen some major projects cancelled and others delayed, and there is uncertainty about what will happen with the new ...
Hi,Over the weekend I revisited a podcast I really adore, Dead Eyes. It’s about a guy who got fired from Band of Brothers over two decades ago because Tom Hanks said he had “dead eyes”.If you don’t recall — 2001’s Band of Brothers was part of the emerging trend of ...
Buzz from the Beehive The 180 or so recipients of letters from the Government telling them how to submit infrastructure projects for “fast track” consideration includes some whose project applications previously have been rejected by the courts. News media were quick to feature these in their reports after RMA Reform Minister Chris ...
It would not be a desirable way to start your holiday by breaking your back, your head, or your wrist, but on our first hour in Singapore I gave it a try.We were chatting, last week, before we started a meeting of Hazel’s Enviro Trust, about the things that can ...
Calling all journalists, academics, planners, lawyers, political activists, environmentalists, and other members of the public who believe that the relationships between vested interests and politicians need to be scrutinised. We need to work together to make sure that the new Fast-Track Approvals Bill – currently being pushed through by the ...
Feel worried. Shane Jones and a couple of his Cabinet colleagues are about to be granted the power to override any and all objections to projects like dams, mines, roads etc even if: said projects will harm biodiversity, increase global warming and cause other environmental harms, and even if ...
Bryce Edwards writes- The ability of the private sector to quickly establish major new projects making use of the urban and natural environment is to be supercharged by the new National-led Government. Yesterday it introduced to Parliament one of its most significant reforms, the Fast Track Approvals Bill. ...
Michael Bassett writes – If you think there is a move afoot by the radical Maori fringe of New Zealand society to create a parallel system of government to the one that we elect at our triennial elections, you aren’t wrong. Over the last few days we have ...
Without a corresponding drop in interest rates, it’s doubtful any changes to the CCCFA will unleash a massive rush of home buyers. Photo: Lynn GrievesonTL;DR: The six things that stood out to me in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, poverty and climate on Monday, April 22 included:The Government making a ...
Sunday was a lazy day. I started watching Jack Tame on Q&A, the interviews are usually good for something to write about. Saying the things that the politicians won’t, but are quite possibly thinking. Things that are true and need to be extracted from between the lines.As you might know ...
In our Weekly Roundup last week we covered news from Auckland Transport that the WX1 Western Express is going to get an upgrade next year with double decker electric buses. As part of the announcement, AT also said “Since we introduced the WX1 Western Express last November we have seen ...
TL;DR: The six key events to watch in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the week to April 29 include:PM Christopher Luxon is scheduled to hold a post-Cabinet news conference at 4 pm today. Stats NZ releases its statutory report on Census 2023 tomorrow.Finance Minister Nicola Willis delivers a pre-Budget speech at ...
A listing of 29 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, April 14, 2024 thru Sat, April 20, 2024. Story of the week Our story of the week hinges on these words from the abstract of a fresh academic ...
The ability of the private sector to quickly establish major new projects making use of the urban and natural environment is to be supercharged by the new National-led Government. Yesterday it introduced to Parliament one of its most significant reforms, the Fast Track Approvals Bill. The Government says this will ...
This is a column to say thank you. So many of have been in touch since Mum died to say so many kind and thoughtful things. You’re wonderful, all of you. You’ve asked how we’re doing, how Dad’s doing. A little more realisation each day, of the irretrievable finality of ...
Identifying the engine type in your car is crucial for various reasons, including maintenance, repairs, and performance upgrades. Knowing the specific engine model allows you to access detailed technical information, locate compatible parts, and make informed decisions about modifications. This comprehensive guide will provide you with a step-by-step approach to ...
Introduction: The allure of racing is undeniable. The thrill of speed, the roar of engines, and the exhilaration of competition all contribute to the allure of this adrenaline-driven sport. For those who yearn to experience the pinnacle of racing, becoming a race car driver is the ultimate dream. However, the ...
Introduction Automobiles have become ubiquitous in modern society, serving as a primary mode of transportation and a symbol of economic growth and personal mobility. With countless vehicles traversing roads and highways worldwide, it begs the question: how many cars are there in the world? Determining the precise number is a ...
Maintaining a safe and reliable vehicle requires regular inspections. Whether it’s a routine maintenance checkup or a safety inspection, knowing how long the process will take can help you plan your day accordingly. This article delves into the factors that influence the duration of a car inspection and provides an ...
Mazda Motor Corporation, commonly known as Mazda, is a Japanese multinational automaker headquartered in Fuchu, Aki District, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan. The company was founded in 1920 as the Toyo Cork Kogyo Co., Ltd., and began producing vehicles in 1931. Mazda is primarily known for its production of passenger cars, but ...
Your car battery is an essential component that provides power to start your engine, operate your electrical systems, and store energy. Over time, batteries can weaken and lose their ability to hold a charge, which can lead to starting problems, power failures, and other issues. Replacing your battery before it ...
Te Pāti Māori are demanding the New Zealand Government support an international independent investigation into mass graves that have been uncovered at two hospitals on the Gaza strip, following weeks of assault by Israeli troops. Among the 392 bodies that have been recovered, are children and elderly civilians. Many of ...
Our two-tiered system for veterans’ support is out of step with our closest partners, and all parties in Parliament should work together to fix it, Labour veterans’ affairs spokesperson Greg O’Connor said. ...
Stripping two Ministers of their portfolios just six months into the job shows Christopher Luxon’s management style is lacking, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said. ...
Tonight’s court decision to overturn the summons of the Children’s Minister has enabled the Crown to continue making decisions about Māori without evidence, says Te Pāti Māori spokesperson for Children, Mariameno Kapa-Kingi. “The judicial system has this evening told the nation that this government can do whatever they want when ...
It appears Nicola Willis is about to pull the rug out from under the feet of local communities still dealing with the aftermath of last year’s severe weather, and local councils relying on funding to build back from these disasters. ...
The Government is making short-sighted changes to the Resource Management Act (RMA) that will take away environmental protection in favour of short-term profits, Labour’s environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said today. ...
Labour welcomes the release of the report into the North Island weather events and looks forward to working with the Government to ensure that New Zealand is as prepared as it can be for the next natural disaster. ...
The Labour Party has called for the New Zealand Government to recognise Palestine, as a material step towards progressing the two-State solution needed to achieve a lasting peace in the region. ...
Some of our country’s most important work, stopping the sexual exploitation of children and violent extremism could go along with staff on the frontline at ports and airports. ...
The Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill will give projects such as new coal mines a ‘get out of jail free’ card to wreak havoc on the environment, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said today. ...
The government's decision to reintroduce Three Strikes is a destructive and ineffective piece of law-making that will only exacerbate an inherently biased and racist criminal justice system, said Te Pāti Māori Justice Spokesperson, Tākuta Ferris, today. During the time Three Strikes was in place in Aotearoa, Māori and Pasifika received ...
Cuts to frontline hospital staff are not only a broken election promise, it shows the reckless tax cuts have well and truly hit the frontline of the health system, says Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall. ...
The Green Party has joined the call for public submissions on the fast-track legislation to be extended after the Ombudsman forced the Government to release the list of organisations invited to apply just hours before submissions close. ...
New Zealand’s good work at reducing climate emissions for three years in a row will be undone by the National government’s lack of ambition and scrapping programmes that were making a difference, Labour Party climate spokesperson Megan Woods said today. ...
More essential jobs could be on the chopping block, this time Ministry of Education staff on the school lunches team are set to find out whether they're in line to lose their jobs. ...
Te Pāti Māori is disgusted at the confirmation that hundreds are set to lose their jobs at Oranga Tamariki, and the disestablishment of the Treaty Response Unit. “This act of absolute carelessness and out of touch decision making is committing tamariki to state abuse.” Said Te Pāti Māori Oranga Tamariki ...
The Government is trying to bring in a law that will allow Ministers to cut corners and kill off native species, Labour environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said. ...
Cancelling urgently needed new Cook Strait ferries and hiking the cost of public transport for many Kiwis so that National can announce the prospect of another tunnel for Wellington is not making good choices, Labour Transport Spokesperson Tangi Utikere said. ...
A laundry list of additional costs for Tāmaki Makarau Auckland shows the Minister for the city is not delivering for the people who live there, says Labour Auckland Issues spokesperson Shanan Halbert. ...
Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi, and Mema Paremata mō Tāmaki-Makaurau, Takutai Tarsh Kemp, will travel to the Gold Coast to strengthen ties with Māori in Australia next week (15-21 April). The visit, in the lead-up to the 9th Australian National Kapa haka Festival, will be an opportunity for both ...
The Green Party has today launched a step-by-step guide to help New Zealanders make their voice heard on the Government’s democracy dodging and anti-environment fast track legislation. ...
The National Government’s proposed changes to the Residential Tenancies Act will mean tenants can be turfed from their homes by landlords with little notice, Labour housing spokesperson Kieran McAnulty said. ...
Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson is calling on all parties to support a common-sense change that’s great for the planet and great for consumers after her member’s bill was drawn from the ballot today. ...
A significant milestone has been reached in the fight to strike an anti-Pasifika and unfair law from the country’s books after Teanau Tuiono’s members’ bill passed its first reading. ...
New Zealand has today missed the opportunity to uphold the right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment, says James Shaw after his member’s bill was voted down in its first reading. ...
Hon Paula Bennett has been appointed as member and chair of the Pharmac board, Associate Health Minister David Seymour announced today. "Pharmac is a critical part of New Zealand's health system and plays a significant role in ensuring that Kiwis have the best possible access to medicines,” says Mr Seymour. ...
Hundreds of New Zealand families affected by Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) will benefit from a new Government focus on prevention and treatment, says Health Minister Dr Shane Reti. “We know FASD is a leading cause of preventable intellectual and neurodevelopmental disability in New Zealand,” Dr Reti says. “Every day, ...
Regional Development Minister Shane Jones today attended the official opening of Kaikohe’s new $14.7 million sports complex. “The completion of the Kaikohe Multi Sports Complex is a fantastic achievement for the Far North,” Mr Jones says. “This facility not only fulfils a long-held dream for local athletes, but also creates ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters’ engagements in Türkiye this week underlined the importance of diplomacy to meet growing global challenges. “Returning to the Gallipoli Peninsula to represent New Zealand at Anzac commemorations was a sombre reminder of the critical importance of diplomacy for de-escalating conflicts and easing tensions,” Mr Peters ...
Ambassador Millar, Burgemeester, Vandepitte, Excellencies, military representatives, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen – good morning and welcome to this sacred Anzac Day dawn service. It is an honour to be here on behalf of the Government and people of New Zealand at Buttes New British Cemetery, Polygon Wood – a deeply ...
Distinguished guests - It is an honour to return once again to this site which, as the resting place for so many of our war-dead, has become a sacred place for generations of New Zealanders. Our presence here and at the other special spaces of Gallipoli is made ...
Mai ia tawhiti pamamao, te moana nui a Kiwa, kua tae whakaiti mai matou, ki to koutou papa whenua. No koutou te tapuwae, no matou te tapuwae, kua honoa pumautia. Ko nga toa kua hinga nei, o te Waipounamu, o te Ika a Maui, he okioki tahi me o ...
Paul Goldsmith will take on responsibility for the Media and Communications portfolio, while Louise Upston will pick up the Disability Issues portfolio, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced today. “Our Government is relentlessly focused on getting New Zealand back on track. As issues change in prominence, I plan to adjust Ministerial ...
Recreational catch limits will be reduced in areas of Fiordland and the Chatham Islands to help keep those fisheries healthy and sustainable, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. The lower recreational daily catch limits for a range of finfish and shellfish species caught in the Fiordland Marine Area and ...
Energy Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed an important milestone in New Zealand’s hydrogen future, with the opening of the country’s first network of hydrogen refuelling stations in Wiri. “I want to congratulate the team at Hiringa Energy and its partners K one W one (K1W1), Mitsui & Co New Zealand ...
The coalition Government is delivering on its commitment to improve resource management laws and give greater certainty to consent applicants, with a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) expected to be introduced to Parliament next month. RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop has today outlined the first RMA Amendment ...
Overseas models for regulating the oil and gas sector, including their decommissioning regimes, are being carefully scrutinised as a potential template for New Zealand’s own sector, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. The Coalition Government is focused on rebuilding investor confidence in New Zealand’s energy sector as it looks to strengthen ...
Emergency Management and Recovery Minister Mark Mitchell has today released the Report of the Government Inquiry into the response to the North Island Severe Weather Events. “The report shows that New Zealand’s emergency management system is not fit-for-purpose and there are some significant gaps we need to address,” Mr Mitchell ...
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith is today travelling to Europe where he’ll update the United Nations Human Rights Council on the Government’s work to restore law and order. “Attending the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva provides us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while ...
Associate Agriculture Minister, Mark Patterson, formally reopened the world’s largest wool processing facility today in Awatoto, Napier, following a $50 million rebuild and refurbishment project. “The reopening of this facility will significantly lift the economic opportunities available to New Zealand’s wool sector, which already accounts for 20 per cent of ...
Hon Andrew Bayly, Minister for Small Business and Manufacturing At the Southland Otago Regional Engineering Collective (SOREC) Summit, 18 April, Dunedin Ngā mihi nui, Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Ko Whanganui aho Good Afternoon and thank you for inviting me to open your summit today. I am delighted ...
The Government is delivering on its commitment to bring back the Three Strikes legislation, Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee announced today. “Our Government is committed to restoring law and order and enforcing appropriate consequences on criminals. We are making it clear that repeat serious violent or sexual offending is not ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters has today announced four new diplomatic appointments for New Zealand’s overseas missions. “Our diplomats have a vital role in maintaining and protecting New Zealand’s interests around the world,” Mr Peters says. “I am pleased to announce the appointment of these senior diplomats from the ...
New Zealand is contributing NZ$7 million to support communities affected by severe food insecurity and other urgent humanitarian needs in Ethiopia and Somalia, Foreign Minister Rt Hon Winston Peters announced today. “Over 21 million people are in need of humanitarian assistance across Ethiopia, with a further 6.9 million people ...
Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Paul Goldsmith is congratulating Mataaho Collective for winning the Golden Lion for best participant in the main exhibition at the Venice Biennale. "Congratulations to the Mataaho Collective for winning one of the world's most prestigious art prizes at the Venice Biennale. “It is good ...
The Government is reforming financial services to improve access to home loans and other lending, and strengthen customer protections, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly and Housing Minister Chris Bishop announced today. “Our coalition Government is committed to rebuilding the economy and making life simpler by cutting red tape. We are ...
“China remains a strong commercial opportunity for Kiwi exporters as Chinese businesses and consumers continue to value our high-quality safe produce,” Trade and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay says. Mr McClay has returned to New Zealand following visits to Beijing, Harbin and Shanghai where he met ministers, governors and mayors and engaged in trade and agricultural events with the New ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has completed a successful trip to Singapore, Thailand and the Philippines, deepening relationships and capitalising on opportunities. Mr Luxon was accompanied by a business delegation and says the choice of countries represents the priority the New Zealand Government places on South East Asia, and our relationships in ...
New Zealand is demonstrating its commitment to reducing global greenhouse emissions, and supporting clean energy transition in South East Asia, through a contribution of NZ$41 million (US$25 million) in climate finance to the Asian Development Bank (ADB)-led Energy Transition Mechanism (ETM). Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Climate Change Minister Simon Watts announced ...
The Government is today releasing a list of organisations who received letters about the Fast-track applications process, says RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop. “Recently Ministers and agencies have received a series of OIA requests for a list of organisations to whom I wrote with information on applying to have a ...
Attorney-General Judith Collins today announced the appointment of Wellington Barrister David Jonathan Boldt as a Judge of the High Court, and the Honourable Justice Matthew Palmer as a Judge of the Court of Appeal. Justice Boldt graduated with an LLB from Victoria University of Wellington in 1990, and also holds ...
Education Minister Erica Stanford will lead the New Zealand delegation at the 2024 International Summit on the Teaching Profession (ISTP) held in Singapore. The delegation includes representatives from the Post Primary Teachers’ Association (PPTA) Te Wehengarua and the New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI) Te Riu Roa. The summit is co-hosted ...
A stopbank upgrade project in Tairawhiti partly funded by the Government has increased flood resilience for around 7000ha of residential and horticultural land so far, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones today attended a dawn service in Gisborne to mark the end of the first stage of the ...
Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters will represent the Government at Anzac Day commemorations on the Gallipoli Peninsula next week and engage with senior representatives of the Turkish government in Istanbul. “The Gallipoli campaign is a defining event in our history. It will be a privilege to share the occasion ...
Science, Innovation and Technology and Defence Minister Judith Collins will next week attend the OECD Science and Technology Ministerial conference in Paris and Anzac Day commemorations in Belgium. “Science, innovation and technology have a major role to play in rebuilding our economy and achieving better health, environmental and social outcomes ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon held a bilateral meeting today with the President of the Philippines, Ferdinand Marcos Jr. The Prime Minister was accompanied by MP Paulo Garcia, the first Filipino to be elected to a legislature outside the Philippines. During today’s meeting, Prime Minister Luxon and President Marcos Jr discussed opportunities to ...
The Government has announced that $20 million in funding will be made available to Westport to fund much needed flood protection around the town. This measure will significantly improve the resilience of the community, says Local Government Minister Simeon Brown. “The Westport community has already been allocated almost $3 million ...
The Government is proud to support the first ever Repco Supercars Championship event in Taupō as up to 70,000 motorsport fans attend the Taupō International Motorsport Park this weekend, says Economic Development Minister Melissa Lee. “Anticipation for the ITM Taupō Super400 is huge, with tickets and accommodation selling out weeks ...
Local Government Minister Simeon Brown has announced an increase to the Rates Rebate Scheme, putting money back into the pockets of low-income homeowners. “The coalition Government is committed to bringing down the cost of living for New Zealanders. That includes targeted support for those Kiwis who are doing things tough, such ...
The Coalition Government is investing in a project to boost survival rates of New Zealand mussels and grow the industry, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones has announced. “This project seeks to increase the resilience of our mussels and significantly boost the sector’s productivity,” Mr Jones says. “The project - ...
Benefit figures released today underscore the importance of the Government’s plan to rebuild the economy and have 50,000 fewer people on Jobseeker Support, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. “Benefit numbers are still significantly higher than when National was last in government, when there was about 70,000 fewer ...
The Government’s commitment to doubling New Zealand’s renewable energy capacity is backed by new data showing that clean energy has helped the country reach its lowest annual gross emissions since 1999, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. New Zealand’s latest Greenhouse Gas Inventory (1990-2022) published today, shows gross emissions fell ...
The Government is bringing the earthquake-prone building review forward, with work to start immediately, and extending the deadline for remediations by four years, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says. “Our Government is focused on rebuilding the economy. A key part of our plan is to cut red tape that ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and his Thai counterpart, Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin, have today agreed that New Zealand and the Kingdom of Thailand will upgrade the bilateral relationship to a Strategic Partnership by 2026. “New Zealand and Thailand have a lot to offer each other. We have a strong mutual desire to build ...
RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop and Transport Minister Simeon Brown have today announced the Coalition Government’s intention to extend port coastal permits for a further 20 years, providing port operators with certainty to continue their operations. “The introduction of the Resource Management Act in 1991 required ports to obtain coastal ...
The protest outside the White House correspondents’ dinner hotel. Image: Anatolu video screenshot APR More than two dozen Palestinian journalists had called for a boycott of the dinner, writing an open letter urging their American colleagues not to attend. “You have a unique responsibility to speak truth to power and ...
“Our exporters should, therefore, be deeply concerned that the Fast-track Approvals Bill was not assessed for consistency with any of our free trade commitments prior to being introduced to the House,” says Gary Taylor, Chief Executive of the Environmental ...
NZCTU President Richard Wagstaff is calling on all political parties to support the new Member’s Bill from Labour’s workplace relations and safety spokesperson Camilla Belich MP that would ensure negligent companies are held accountable when their employees ...
A historian with an uncanny track record of predicting US election winners tells RNZ's Sunday Morning that President Biden looks to be on track for another term, but things could still go very wrong for him. ...
A historian with a track record of predicting US election winners tells RNZ's Sunday Morning that President Biden looks to be on track for another term, but things could still go wrong for him. ...
Ngaio Marsh House is one of Christchurch’s best kept secrets – and contains more than a few mysteries of its own.Trust Ngaio Marsh to leave more than a few mysteries scattered through her house long after her departure. For a start, there’s the curious concrete portal in the garden, ...
Appointment viewing has been lost to the mists of time, but memories of Montana Sunday Theatre can still be conjured by hitting play on a particular piece of classical music. “You’re not going to be able to sell it.” Over 30 years on, Karen Bieleski still recalls how the task ...
Performance Review King Luxon sat behind His massive polished oak desk. It is Performance Review time. There is a knock on the door. “Enter!” says the King. In steps Minister of Disabilities and Carer Pedicures, Penny Simmonds. “I can explain everything …” she begins. “Fine,” says King Luxon, pressing the ...
The pair opened their first fully collaborative exhibition, Nina for Flowers, last Saturday. Gabi Lardies visited their studio to find out who Nina is and what working together was like.‘It didn’t start out like, ‘This is a show about Nina,’” says Josephine Jelicich, gripping a thermos of peppermint tea. ...
Thank you, Dr Maximilian Oskar Bircher-Benner, for your brilliant invention. I’m another mid-20s Kiwi who had an OE last year. I hopped on my bicycle where France meets the Atlantic and cycled east. I pedalled through the Loire Valley, down rivers lined with willows and ancient wisteria-draped chateaus. I relished ...
Asia Pacific Report From France to Australia, university pro-Palestine protests in the United States have now spread to several countries with students pitching on-campus camps. And students at Columbia and other US universities remain defiant as campuses have witnessed the biggest protests since the anti-Vietnam war and anti-apartheid eras in ...
Analysis by Dr Bryce Edwards, Democracy Project (https://democracyproject.nz)New Zealand Government’s Fast Track legislation. Many criticisms are being made of the Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill, including by this writer. But as with everything in politics, every story has two sides, and both deserve attention. It’s important to understand what the Government ...
Tara Ward talks to presenter Naomi Toilalo about the new TV show that turns food waste into a three course feast. Naomi Toilalo is standing in the warehouse at Good Neighbour Tauranga, helping unpack the two-and-a-half tonnes of rejected food that will arrive at the community support hub that day. ...
Scout is our latest Dog of the Month. This feature was offered as a reward during our What’s Eating Aotearoa PledgeMe campaign. Thank you to Scout’s human, Avril, for her support. Dog name: Scout (named after the little girl in To Kill a Mockingbird – she inherited the independent spirit ...
Megan Alatini takes us through her life in TV, including ‘terrible’ daytime TV, the class of Carol Hirschfeld and her most embarrassing TrueBliss moment. When she responded to a vague newspaper ad asking “do you have what it takes to be a popstar?” 25 years ago, Megan Alatini never guessed ...
A new exhibition in Wellington showcases the faces behind your local goods and services. Back in 1977, when I was a fine arts student at the University of Canterbury, I took a series of photographs of Christchurch shopkeepers. The photos were for a calendar – a project for my end ...
Toomaj and his resistance to tyranny through his songs have become an icon for the youth of Iran, so his sentence has hit the nation hard. Toomaj Salehi is not the first artist to pay the price for standing with the people. ...
My cousin Dylan and I spotted these big eels under the bridge that summer. We watched them lounging under the dark weed, facing into the flow of water, their mouths frozen open. Dylan and I couldn’t stop thinking about those eels. The night we went down to the creek, we ...
Newsroom, home of satire. My long-running weekly satirical series The Secret Diary has moved to Newsroom and will appear every Saturday, with Victor Billot’s wildly popular satirical Odes continuing to appear every Sunday. Diaries, Odes – while serious political columnists toil at meaningful opinions and stroke their chins to an ...
Tara Ward unravels the many nuanced layers of a cartoon about talking dogs.This is an excerpt from our weekly pop culture newsletter Rec Room. Sign up here. It’s not often an episode of a children’s cartoon has adults sobbing into their sleeves, but that’s exactly what happened this week when ...
Working as a doctor in developing countries to help communities achieve better health outcomes is nothing short of a life goal for Jessica Tater. The University of Otago medical student has her sights firmly set on joining the international humanitarian organisation Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) when she qualifies ...
There’s an island in the far reaches of Auckland’s territory, sitting off the tip of the Coromandel Peninsula, 30 minutes by air from the city or four hours on the slow boat. Aotea Great Barrier is off-grid, it has a population of fewer than a thousand people … and most ...
Asia Pacific Report An Australian author and advocate, Jim Aubrey, today led a national symbolic one minute’s silence to mark the “blood debt” owed to Papuan allies during the Second World War indigenous resistance against the invading Japanese forces. “A promise to most people is a promise,” Aubrey said in ...
Asia Pacific Report The Freedom Flotilla is ready to sail to Gaza, reports Kia Ora Gaza. All the required paperwork has been submitted to the port authority, and the cargo has been loaded and prepared for the humanitarian trip to the besieged enclave. However, organisers received word of an “administrative ...
Pacific Media Watch Palestine solidarity protesters today demonstrated at the Auckland headquarters of Television New Zealand, accusing the country’s major TV network of broadcasting “propaganda” backing Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza. About 50 protesters targeted the main entrance to the TVNZ building near Sky Tower and also picketed a side ...
Opinion by Lynley Hood. Forty years on from my 1985 Fulbright Grant, my disquiet over the war in Gaza evoked some troubling questions. The answer to my first question – What is the primary purpose of the Fulbright Programme? – was on the Fulbright NZ website. It says: US Senator, ...
The ministers responsible for green-lighting major projects need to be open about potential conflicts of interest, says Transparency International. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Anastasia Powell, Professor, Family and Sexual Violence, RMIT University It has been a particularly distressing start to the year. There is little that can ease the current grief of individuals, families and communities who have needlessly lost a loved one to men’s ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Gregory Moore, Senior Research Associate, School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, The University of Melbourne Lichen, the first described example of symbiosis.AdeJ Artventure/Shutterstock Once known only to those studying biology, the word symbiosis is now widely used. Symbiosis is the intimate ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kim Hemsley, Head, Childhood Dementia Research Group, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University Olena Ivanova/Shutterstock “Childhood” and “dementia” are two words we wish we didn’t have to use together. But sadly, around 1,400 ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Peter Whiteford, Professor, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University The government’s Economic Inclusion Advisory Committee has just published its second report. It was set up by Treasurer Jim Chalmers and Minister for Social Services Amanda Rishworth in 2022 to provide: ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Adrian Beaumont, Election Analyst (Psephologist) at The Conversation; and Honorary Associate, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne The Queensland state election will be held in October. A YouGov poll for The Courier Mail, conducted April 9–17 from a sample ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Amin Naeni, PhD candidate at Alfred Deakin Institute for Citizenship and Globalisation, Deakin University There’s been much talk in recent months about what a possible second Donald Trump presidency in the United States could mean for Europe, Russia’s war in Ukraine, the ...
A brief round-up of submissions on the controversial proposed law. This is an excerpt from our weekly environmental newsletter Future Proof. Sign up here. Last week, submissions on the controversial Fast-track Approvals Bill closed just hours after the government released a list of stakeholder organisations who were sent letters advising how they could ...
A poem from Robin Peace’s new collection Detritus of Empire: feather / grass / rock. Cereal giving I see a woman’s hands, see her curious hands break a stalk as she walks through the tall prairie, the savannah, the steppe, wherever it was. See her idly bite the grass that ...
The only published and available best-selling indie book chart in New Zealand is the top 10 sales list recorded every week at Unity Books’ stores in High St, Auckland, and Willis St, Wellington.AUCKLAND1 Hemingway’s Goblet by Dermot Ross (Mary Egan Publishing, $38)A handsomely produced (debossed cover, lovely ...
The Commissioner's decision validates the longstanding efforts of the local community and ensures that Awataha Marae will be managed to serve the needs of the local community, particularly for hosting tangihanga. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Tristan Salles, Associate professor, University of Sydney Examples of Australian landscapes.Unsplash Seventy thousand years ago, the sea level was much lower than today. Australia, along with New Guinea and Tasmania, formed a connected landmass known as Sahul. Around this time – ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Felicity Castagna, Lecturer, Creative Writing, Western Sydney University Day Day Market, ParramattaPhoto: Garry Trinh I live on the edge of Parramatta, Australia’s fastest-growing city, on the kind of old-fashioned suburban street that has 1950s fibros constructed in the post-war housing boom, ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michael Ryan, Teaching Fellow in Economics, University of Waikato GettyImagesfatido/Getty Images There is an ongoing global debate over whether the high inflation seen in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic can be lowered without a recession. New Zealand is not ...
The ‘Wicked Game’ heartthrob is in his late 60s now. That didn’t stop him putting on a lively, goofy and very sparkly show. Apart from ‘Wicked Game’, which graces a sultry playlist of mine simply called 💋, my last sustained Chris Isaak listening session took place when I was about ...
Analysis - Two ministers were stripped of portfolios in a warning to Cabinet, drama broke out at the Waitangi Tribunal, and the gang patch ban bill ran into opposition. ...
Tara Ward makes an impassioned plea for some vital pop culture merch. In April 1999, I became obsessed with a new reality television show called Popstars. Every Tuesday night, five strangers transformed into music royalty before my very eyes as Joe, Keri, Carly, Erika and Megan were chosen to form ...
PNG Post-Courier In the early hours of ANZAC Day, aerial photographs captured an impressive gathering of Australians and Papua New Guineans at Isurava in the Northern (Oro) Province. The solemn dawn service yesterday was held at a site steeped in history, where some of the fiercest battles of World War ...
The PSA is shocked that Oranga Tamariki has used the cost cutting drive to downgrade its commitment to Te Ao Māori and remove many specialist Māori roles. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ian Kemish, Adjunct Professor, School of Historical and Philosophical Inquiry, The University of Queensland There can be no more powerful symbol of the relationship between Australia and Papua New Guinea than the prime ministers of these neighbouring countries walking together on the ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sharon Robinson, Distinguished Professor and Deputy Director of ARC Securing Antarctica’s Environmental Future (SAEF), University of Wollongong, University of Wollongong Andrew Netherwood Over the last 25 years, the ozone hole which forming over Antarctica each spring has started to shrink. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Viktoria Kahui, Senior Lecturer in Environmental Economics, University of Otago Getty Images/Amy Toensing Biodiversity is declining at rates unprecedented in human history. This suggests the ways we currently use to manage our natural environment are failing. One emerging concept focuses on ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Timothy Colin Bednall, Associate Professor in Management, Swinburne University of Technology marvent/Shutterstock Finding the best person to fill a position can be tough, from drafting a job ad to producing a shortlist of top interview candidates. Employers typically consider information from ...
Wondering where to host your next BYO? Whether its a small gathering or a massive party, we’ve got some recommendations. I was first introduced to the concept of BYOs at Dunedin’s India Gardens, a legendary but sadly defunct establishment, which purveyed enormous quantities of mango chicken to Aotearoa’s drunkest future ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Julien Cooper, Honorary Lecturer, Department of History and Archaeology, Macquarie University Julien Cooper The hyper-arid desert of Eastern Sudan, the Atbai Desert, seems like an unlikely place to find evidence of ancient cattle herders. But in this dry environment, my new ...
The sector says it’s hopeful her replacement Paul Goldsmith will be able to throw it a lifeline, after six months with a minister deemed missing in action, writes Catherine McGregor in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign ...
The government can't just rely on axing public sector jobs and has to do more to cut spending, says the chief economist at a free market think tank. ...
Rock The Vote NZ, known for its advocacy for minor party unity and its role within the Freedoms NZ Coalition during the 2023 General Election, celebrates this merger as a strategic enhancement of its operational strength and outreach. ...
Mum ‘vowing’ to change law around teenage abortion
A mother whose daughter’s school organised an abortion for the teenager without parental consent is petitioning parliament for a law change to prevent it happening again.
https://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/new-zealand/-she-is-still-a-child-mum-vowing-to-change-law-around-teenage-abortion-q07846.html?autoPlay=4446386269001
No where does Mum blame herself for not having a relationship with her daughter that would allow the girl to come home and say the dreaded words “Mum, I am pregnant”. And yes, i think for a great many girls this is/was the most dreadful thing they could say to their parents, and this girl choose to have an abortion by herself with the aid of her school rather then talk to her mother.
No law can change such a broken relationship,
Parental Notification laws, good for the parents, crap for the kids that are stuck in Families were children are viewed as chattel, and girls are to be virginal and pure until married.
It’s only natural a young teen would be afraid to tell their parents, therefore I wouldn’t rush in and blame the mother and automatically assume their relationship was broken.
A life was unnecessarily taken with a young girl and her family having to live with the consequence of that.
This is a major decision which many would deem to large for a child to make.
Sorry The Chairman – I can’t agree with that view. There are way too many dysfunctional/abusive family relationships out there to legislate that parents must be advised of a pregnancy without the say-so of the girl. Especially given that teen pregnancies are correlated with family dysfunction/abuse. This is a different situation to it being natural to fearful about telling parents difficult news.
It’s of absolute importance that the girl has the necessary support to make a decision about abortion or whether to continue a pregnancy. It’s not important where that support comes from, despite it being hurtful to her parents. It’s up to them to let that go for the sake of their daughter. If they can’t it simply adds to the impression that it was right to go with the girl’s decision to with-hold the information in the first place.
Disclaimer – When I was 15 I made the ‘decision’ to have my child by hiding the pregnancy until it was too late for anything but go through with it, but I would never, ever have told my mother (one of those dysfunctional families, you see – back in the day I couldn’t tell anyone without the fear of her being informed). Not a great way to go about making decisions like this. And as for hidden pregnancies – my heart goes out to these girls who give birth alone, and their often dead babies.
+1
A child coming from a dysfunctional abusive home would be in a less state of mind to make a rational decision.
Parents need to be part of the decision making process. Otherwise we end up with cases like this (where the mother was happy to raise the child but the avenue was never explored as she was not even informed).
I don’t think you understand the will and rationality of pregnant young girls from dysfunctional abusive families, The Chairman. Please forgive my assumption if I’m wrong about that.
In my opinion parents are often the last people who should be involved in this sort of decision-making if the girl does not want that. She has reasons, usually rational, for her judgement. Btw, my mother would have happily raised my son as well, and ruined his and my life in the process.
A dysfunctional abusive home can negatively impact a child’s school work let alone their rational to make such a major call.
I know of one lady that is still struggling to get over he abortion today, saying she was far too young to make a rational call.
At the time, she felt she got the right advice and was doing the right thing.
“I know of one lady that is still struggling to get over he abortion today, saying she was far too young to make a rational call.”
You seem to be assuming that if a young woman is forced to tell her parents then there will be better outcomes. What makes you think that?
As I point out below, in NZ women, including girls, can’t get an abortion without seeing at least 2 doctors and a counsellor. They’re legally not allowed to make the decision on their own.
I understand that our law also allows for doctors to determine if a young pregnant person doesn’t have the mental capacity to make an informed decision.
The simple fact is the vast majority of young pregnant people who seek abortions will talk to a trusted adult. That sometimes won’t be a parent.
And the other simple fact is that sometimes we regret decisions we make. That doesn’t mean they were the wrong decision, or that we shouldn’t have been given the choice to make it.
+1
It’s probably best you have a read of this.
Her daughter attempted suicide as a result
http://m.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11503837
I’ve read Hilary Kieft’s side of the story, and it’s simply that – her side of the story. Her interpretation of why her daughter attempted suicide. She’s hardly an unbiased party.
Of course, we never hear from her daughter, or from *any* of the children whose parents demand the right to control their children’s reproductive choices. Funny that.
In this case the abortion may have been averted, resulting in saving a young life. Which a number of us would consider a better outcome.
The debate is not about whether or not they are consulted, it’s whether parents should be informed and their in put considered.
You have no way of knowing if the parents being involved would have bettered or worsened the outcome. You also have no way of knowing the impact on anyone of the girl being forced to give birth. That you consider the survival of the foetus to be more important than anyone else’s wellbeing tells us exactly where your priortities are, and thankfully the law protects me and other women from people like you who would throw us under a bus for the sake of ideology.
Yet for a whole year after the abortion she was unable to talk to her mother or father about it.
Why was that?
Her daughter attempted suicide as a result….
….of her dysfunctional parental relationship and the internal guilt foisted upon her by her religious and do as I say not as I did, anti-pre-marital sex, anti-abortive parents.
You don’t know why she attempted suicide any more than I did – what is clearly apparent though is that she was not able to talk to her parents about what was happening with her.
The picture you keep trying to paint is one of a high-level functioning nurturing parent-child relationship when the evidence – couldn’t tell my parents I was having sex, couldn’t tell my parents I was pregnant, couldn’t tell my parents I had had an abortion paints the opposite picture.
BTW dysfunction does not equal poor (or poor and brown for that matter).
Pull your head in, Weka.
You are making some rather wild allegations.
Lets deal with them one by one.
I didn’t claim I know what the outcome would have been.
I clearly stated: In this case the abortion may have been averted, resulting in saving a young life. Which a number of us would consider a better outcome. Do you not agree?
You are the one claiming I consider the survival of the foetus to be more important than anyone else’s well-being. I haven’t claimed or implied that.
And of course the assertion is completely incorrect, thus you haven’t got a clue what my priorities are.
You don’t need protecting from me. However, I’m beginning to feel people may need protection from you.
actually, you did:
That’s your assumption.
“I didn’t claim I know what the outcome would have been.”
Yeah, you did. You said that if the abortion had been prevented the outcome would have been better.
“I clearly stated: In this case the abortion may have been averted, resulting in saving a young life. Which a number of us would consider a better outcome. Do you not agree?”
No. I don’t have any way of knowing what should have happened. Keeping the child might have been a disaster. I support women to make the choice, not outsiders.
“You are the one claiming I consider the survival of the foetus to be more important than anyone else’s well-being. I haven’t claimed or implied that.”
You have implied that, when you say that not having an abortion is the better outcome. Better even if the young woman’s life is destroyed.
“And of course the assertion is completely incorrect, thus you haven’t got a clue what my priorities are.”
I think we’ve all got a pretty good idea by now what your priorities are.
“You don’t need protecting from me. However, I’m beginning to feel people may need protection from you.”
🙄
You seek to change a law that would have serious negative impacts on women. So yes, we need protection from that.
Yet for a whole year after the abortion she was unable to talk to her mother or father about it.
Why was that?
Yep. The lack of the young woman’s voice is evident, and suggests that none of us know what happened or should have happened. Without the young woman’s voice how can we know what is true in the story presented in the article?
Hey Weka
Can’t you see the difference in the two statements below?
I clearly stated: In this case the abortion may have been averted, resulting in saving a young life. Which a number of us would consider a better outcome.
You said I stated if the abortion had been prevented the outcome would have been better.
Additionally, you were asked whether you considered averting an abortion and saving a young life a better outcome. I wasn’t asking your opinion on the outcome of their life.
“You have implied that, when you say that not having an abortion is the better outcome. Better even if the young woman’s life is destroyed.”
Again, not my words, hence that wasn’t what I was implying (see above).
Serious question for you, do you have a comprehension difficulty that I should be aware of?
Or do you always try spinning things in an attempt to score points?
I’ve already told you my position and again it’s not what you have implied.
I’ll leave it to you to explain why you continue to spin crap and imply otherwise.
I think you are playing games. I can’t be bothered trying to figure out what you are on about seeing as how you’ve had ample opportunity to explain it differently so I can understand but have chosen not to.
Look to your own communication skills, not mine.
TC: In this case the abortion may have been averted, resulting in an unwanted child, beaten and neglected by the boyfriends of a teenage mum who turned to drugs after being thrown out and ostracised by her family and church, and then thirteen years later the kid goes to prison for manslaughter when a dairy robbery goes wrong and a husband and father is killed. Which a number of us would consider a worse outcome. Do you not agree?
“A dysfunctional abusive home can negatively impact a child’s school work let alone their rational to make such a major call”
It certainly can affect a child’s schoolwork. And the people that created that family should be involved in the decisions about the creation of the next generation? I fail to see the rationality there.
The inability to do school work, because of the negative impact of outside influences on the other hand, has nothing to do with a person’s intelligence or rationality.
Unless the child had gotten better advice from a trusted third party which this one did.
No, really, they don’t. This is because parents often don’t have the information needed to make that decision for the child because a) they’re not the child and b) they’re often running on outdated information that they learned as a child
Advice like this?
https://youtu.be/Rpmh4SSq2xE
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2015/07/14/conservatives-everywhere-swear-this-new-secret-video-proves-planned-parenthood-is-evil-video/
That video just seems to be more of the same BS that has been used by the RWNJs to attack, well, pretty much everybody that they disagree with.
Planned Parenthood commissioned an independent review of the videos and the conclusion – yet another dishonest smear campaign waged by unhinged, deceptive anti-choice arseholes.
A thorough review of these videos in consultation with qualified experts found that they do not present a complete or accurate record of the events they purport to depict.
Each release by CMP contained a short edited video, between eight and fifteen minutes in length, that intercuts clips from the undercover recordings with other content, and a “full footage” video that claims to provide the raw, unedited footage of each interview. A video forensics expert, a television producer, an independent transcription agency, and Fusion GPS staff reviewed this material. While these analysts found no evidence that CMP inserted dialogue not spoken by Planned Parenthood staff, their review did conclude that CMP edited content out of the alleged “full footage” videos, and heavily edited the short videos so as to misrepresent statements made by Planned Parenthood representatives. In addition, the CMP transcript for the “full footage” video shot at Planned Parenthood’s Gulf Coast facility in Texas differs substantially from the content of the tape.
At this point, it is impossible to characterize the extent to which CMP’s undisclosed edits and cuts distort the meaning of the encounters the videos purport to document. However, the manipulation of the videos does mean they have no evidentiary value in a legal context and cannot be relied upon for any official inquiries unless supplemented by CMP’s original material and forensic authentication that this material is supplied in unaltered form. The videos also lack credibility as journalistic products.
Here’s the report
(bolding mine)
Seeing you call BS is disappointing, but that’s your prerogative.
I thought the profit motive may have stricken a chord.
Nevertheless, at least you viewed it, thus got another perspective of whats going on.
Where you position yourself is totally your call.
Profit motive my arse. Planned Parenthood isn’t about abortion, it’s primarily about contraception and reproductive health.
http://msnbcmedia3.msn.com/j/ap/planned%20parenthood-245654727_v2.grid-6×2.jpg
Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) or often just Planned Parenthood is a non-profit organization which provides reproductive health and maternal and child health services.
I thought that PPFA being a non-profit organisation that runs on federal grants and donations proved conclusively that the video was BS.
Ha, again you disappoint me. Surely you know non profits actually make a profit?
http://smallbusiness.chron.com/make-money-nonprofit-organization-935.html
And here is evidence to the contrary
https://youtu.be/MjCs_gvImyw
So, you show a video that’s proven to be BS. Figuring that that line didn’t work you then show another video made by the same people that’s also BS…
Yeah, I think you need to accept that the people attacking Planned Parenting are just outright liars. It may prevent you from proving that you’re fucken idiot.
Of course, indications from this thread are that you want to believe all the lies because of your forced birth ideology which makes you not only a fucken idiot but a authoritarian fucken idiot.
All this is a load of nonsense TC. Even from a biblical perspective your point of view is plain wrong. All this crap about forced birth is really an emotional way of misleading Christians to support extreme right wing groups such as the Republicans in the US. The Bible does not regard a foetus as fully human until it is born. The mother is more important. Read the following link for more info if you dare. This kind of nonsense just puts people right off Christianity. I am a Christian and I believe it is up to the mother to decide and noone should force her to carry through with a pregnancy.
http://www.thechristianleftblog.org/blog-home/abortion
The last video has not been shown to be BS and it clearly speaks for itself.
You’re turning into tosser territory now.
Whatever the truth of what she is saying trying to compare a US revenue driven profit-making health system with what happens here is a nonsense.
I’ve never met a pro-abortionist in New Zealand who would, even with the biggest stretch of imagination, view abortion as a method of generating revenue.
+1 Might have reached the end of reasoned debate today.
+1
Looks like it.
Best you do some research.
Planned Parenthood are affiliated with NZ Family Planning.
http://www.ippf.org/our-work/where-we-work/east-and-south-east-asia-and-oceania/new-zealand
Please show how that video is relevant to the situation in NZ. That Planned Parenthood in the US and FP in NZ both belong to the same international organisation isn’t enough. You need to demonstrate that what that particular video is saying applies here. For instance, are you suggesting that NZ FP runs as a profit-making business whereby it ensures that it generates income from abortions? When you’ve told us the actual connection and the point you are trying to make (apart from ‘abortion is bad’), I’d like some evidence.
AFAIK there is maybe one Family Planning clinic in NZ that provides abortions. All FP clinics do do counselling and referrals. If you have any evidence that FP don’t provide professional, compassionate services that offer women access to all options, I’d like to see that right now. Otherwise your argument is an outright lie.
“Advice like this?”
How does that relate to NZ?
See above.
And I’m still calling BS on that video. As I said, it’s looks more like planned lies from the RWNJs than actual fact.
Being affiliated highlights they have similar aims and objectives.
In 2013 the President of Planned Parenthood was a primary keynote speaker at a NZ Family Planning conference.
While remains in NZ are largely incinerated and not on sold, funding largely comes by from of the NZ taxpayer. Therefore, the more abortions they undertake and services they provide the more funding they can attempt to seek.
Abortion is bad is not the point being made here, that’s a potshot you’ve fired off.
Labour’s justice spokeswoman Jacinda Ardern said there was no question that current practice had failed the family at almost every step.
“The things that are meant to happen in the system didn’t happen for your daughter…she should never have been coerced, she always should have been given options and access to trained counsellors.”
Ms Ardern said GPs who had spoken to the committee on the issue said they worked very hard to convince a young woman to bring in her parents in such a situation, but this didn’t happen in this case.
National MP Jono Naylor said counsellors had told the committee that best practice was to counsel young women to involve their family, unless they judged that such advice could harm the teenager.
Mr Naylor said that did not appear to have happened in the case of Mrs Kieft’s daughter, and the system had failed.
http://m.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11503837.
These similar aims and objectives are?……
You’re being disingenuous TC. Here’s what Ardern also said,
Ms Ardern said GPs who had spoken to the committee on the issue said they worked very hard to convince a young woman to bring in her parents in such a situation, but this didn’t happen in this case.
Doctors had also reported of seeing young women who had been harmed when their family found out they were pregnant, Ms Ardern said.
“So this is what we’ve got on the one side, on the other side we have got stories like yours. So we are trying to balance those two things.”
You can’t tell from that article what happened to the girl. You also can’t tell why the girl didn’t tell her family, but there is no evidence to suggest that the system prevented her.
You appear to be saying that FP in NZ is making money from foetuses. I’d like you to back that up.
You also appear to be saying that FP in NZ are in general unprofessional in their counselling and referral work. I’d like some evidence of that please. (If the report is correct that she didn’t get offered post-abortion support, then that clinic needs to investigate what happened and make changes, but we don’t have actual evidence of that).
Jono Naylor the National MP who had a stated position prior to being elected as thus:
Naylor said he did not see a need to change abortion laws.
“It’s already too easy for young people, or anyone to have an abortion.”
And of course he is already considers fetuses to be unborn children, thinks abstinence based sex-education should be a priority, and is pro-parental tittle tattling.
http://valueyourvote.org.nz/2014-general-election/candidates/jono-naylor
This Abby Johnson?.
https://web.archive.org/web/20091106105336/http://feministsforchoice.com/planned-parenthood-clinic-director-quits-citing-change-of-heart.htm
https://web.archive.org/web/20100114083206/http://feministsforchoice.com/abby-johnsons-story-doesnt-hold-water.htm
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/category/people/abby-johnson
You should know how the game is played. Whistle-blowers are often criticized and have their credibility questioned, regardless how much merit they have.
Abby Johnson has shared her insights into their aims and objectives.
“Insights” ah what a nice word full of gravitas….. it almost makes it sound like you respect this person’s proven lies
Yeah cause in a weird sort of way we champion the grandparents raising their grand-children and vilify the daughters who got pregnant.
Mum’s a hero and the daughter – well you can pick whatever disparaging euphemism you like.
Even now Mum’s fighting the good fight – sacrificing herself for her daughter.
Taking on the power of the state by telling her daughter’s story.
I love how she just so wanted her daughter to not make the same “mistakes” she made, how her own guilt about her own abortion- aided and exacerbated by the church no doubt – drives her to this end.
The religious imposition of guilt would drive more to seek an abortion than any other reason I know of. That’s the whole irony of that type of position.
+1. A concise and considered reply, even without your personal story.
Thanks for writing it.
Well, I can tell you from experience that girls at 15 are sexually active whith many ending up pregnant, and ending that pregnancy with an abortion.
I can tell you also that most of them will go to their parents and speak to them about it, or they go to another person of trust and speak to them maybe to mediate with parents.
I can also tell you that already there is have a life being damaged with an unwanted pregnancy, namely that of the unwilling mother.
I can also tell you that if that girl would have spoken about her mother that she was sexually active the mother could have prevented the pregnacy herself by getting her daughter on the pill, and getting the sexual active boy (and I hope that the sex was consentual) a hundert box of condoms to prevent any sexual transmitted diseases and babies.
So I would assume as the mother is a devout babtist and heavily involved in the Pro Life Movement, aka the Forced Birth Movement, her daughter would have been raised on a steady Sexual Abstinece Diet and Purity till marriage ..the day the father hands you over to your husband.
Now the girls needs to admit to Mum that she a. has had sex, b. has lied to everyone in the congregation about not having sex before marriage, c. gotten herself pregnant, d. does not want the baby.
I can see why she did not want to speak to Mummy dearest.
Not one mention of how this pregnancy could have been prevented if the Girl could have had a. science based sex ed, b. access to reproductive choices such as the pill or plan b, and the same counts for the boy that fathered the child.
No the Mum should go home for a moment and reflect, why did my daughter did not trust me enough to come home and speak to me about the pregnancy and the choices she has.
And she might also ask herself what this law would do to girls that have gotten themselves pregnant with their fathers, stepfathers, uncles, cuzzies, brothers or even priests baby. …..Oh yea….i forgot these things don’t happen, or if they happen its the fault of no-one but the devil, and an un-born lifesaka the zygote trumps the life of the mother anytime.
+1
You can assume and tell me whatever you want, but can you substantiate your assertions and assumptions?
Contraceptives are known to fail, thus are not a foolproof solution.
Informing parents doesn’t necessarily mean abortions wouldn’t be done.
But it would make them harder to impossible to access for some girls. Why would you want that?
Making it harder to impossible all depends on if and how the law is amended.
How so? You think that if the parents have to be notified that some girls aren’t going to be forced to go through with the pregnancy?
Stopping legal abortions doesn’t mean abortions won’t be done. You must have little understanding of the history of back-street abortion.
Telling young people to abstain from sex has a pretty high failure rate – even among the people doing the telling eg Briston Palin.
Not giving young people sex-education has a pretty high failure rate.
Religious guilt has a pretty high failure rate.
I guarantee contraception has a lower failure rate than any of those methods.
New Zealand is just full of families with 8 or 9 or 11 or 12 kids. Used to be quite common in my grandparents day.
Now it’s almost exclusively the domain of the religious.
Can you substantiate your claim that an innocent life (that of the mother) would not have been harmed by having a child?
Can you substantiate that your claim that the girl would have gotten the abortion she obviously wanted if she would have spoken to her mother, taking into account her mothers religious believes and her Pro Un-born Life stance?
Can you substantiate your claim that contraceptives would not have prevented an unwanted pregnancy?
Can you substantiate your claim that this pregnacny would not have prevented had the father of this pregnancy worn condoms?
Wikipedia on the effectiveness of contraception
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_birth_control_methods
http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/unintendedpregnancy/contraception.htm
some reads on teenage pregnancyd
http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/graph/30862/teenage-pregnancy-international-comparisons
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054139X14003875
but maybe you are a proponent of the back alley abortions, cause all the sperm is sacred and all the unborn babies must be born, and the incubating vessel aka the mother will have no say in it. Cause….women.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/aug/13/paraguay-11-year-old-gives-birth-abortion
” An 11-year old girl who became pregnant after being raped by her stepfather and was denied an abortion by Paraguayan authorities has given birth, in the culmination of a case which put renewed focus on Latin America’s strict anti-abortion laws.
The girl, known by the legal pseudonym “Mainumby”, gave birth to a girl weighing 3.55kg (7.8lbs) at the Reina Sofia maternity hospital, a facility run by the Red Cross in Asunción, Paraguay’s capital.
The baby was delivered by Caesarean section as a natural birth was judged to be too dangerous.”
essentially this girl would have died without a cesarean or an abortion. But hey maybe its better for both, mother and child to die, then have an abortion.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsafe_abortion
“Incidents in the U.S. after 1973[edit]
In 2005, the Detroit News reported that a 16-year-old boy beat his pregnant, under-age girlfriend with a bat at her request to abort a fetus. The young couple lived in Michigan, where parental consent is required to receive an abortion.[24][25][26] In Indiana, where there are also parental consent laws, a young woman by the name of Becky Bell died from an unsafe abortion rather than discuss her pregnancy and wish for an abortion with her parents.[27][28]”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/03/back-alley-abortions_n_5065301.html
And here is a lovely wikipedia that lists all the very youngest mothers by age.
the youngest was barely seven.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_youngest_birth_mothers
You could look at all of this, and realise that often parents are not helpful but rather the reason for a pregnancy. But you could also put your fingers in your ears and go lalalala, kumbaya all is well.
Ha, I didn’t make those so called claims. Strawman much?
my answer that you now call a straw man relates to this from you:
“You can assume and tell me whatever you want, but can you substantiate your assertions and assumptions?
Contraceptives are known to fail, thus are not a foolproof solution.
Informing parents doesn’t necessarily mean abortions wouldn’t be done”
———————————————————————————————–
you throw up the concern that contraceptive may fail…..i just provided some back ground data to your statement.
you throw up the concern that by speaking to a parent a girl may still have an abortion…..or may not…..and I just provide a few links to what happened in the /States where parental notification has become law.
You have so far not addressed the issue of sex ed, but linked to a baloney defunct “Planned Parenthood is evil’ by a group that is less then savory.
————————————————————————————————-
I just hope that you lobby our current government for more money to be spend on teenaged mums and their children, that more money will be made available to house these currently homeless pregnant ladies in Auckland, that more money will be made available for schools that will allow teenaged Mums to come with their children, that you will also lobby the government to very aggressively to follow up on child support payments from the fathers and if that means that a teenaged boy will have to leave school to support the child he fathered then so be it.
Oh, and of course you will have no issue adopting a few of these children and raise them like your own.
Or are you advocating the return of the Magdalene Sisters and their their laundry places?
A life was unnecessarily taken…
A life was taken? Who died?
Sometimes, parents facing unpleasant consequences of their own crap parenting want the government to Do Something About It. It doesn’t mean the government should indulge them.
The child prevented from being born.
Sometimes Government get laws wrong, therefore it’s up to Government to consider public submissions and if need be, amend the law.
The number of people who could have been born if their prospective parents hadn’t taken steps to prevent it is orders of magnitude greater than the number of people who’ve ever lived. None of them “died,” and it’s not the government’s business to try and ensure that those countless billions do actually get born.
Nevertheless the abortion robbed them of their life, hence the statement a life was unnecessarily taken.
Government has a social responsibly, they create laws and are known to amend them from time to time, of course it’s their business. No one else can amend the law.
They create laws alright, including ones they’ve no business creating, like ones trying to ensure people don’t act to prevent their sex acts producing children. Unfortunately, those who consider other people’s decisions theirs to interfere with make amending those laws difficult.
As to “robbing” people of their lives, I’ve “robbed” maybe a good dozen potential children of their lives just by rolling on a condom. No-one, including the government, is likely to spend any time wailing and gnashing their teeth over this murderous tragedy.
“A life was unnecessarily taken with a young girl and her family having to live with the consequence of that.”
The implication there is that had the girl told the mother, the mother would have prevented the abortion. That’s in direct opposition to the intention of the law, which allows women to have abortions under certain circumstances. The mother is suggesting that the law support that this right be applied selectively depending on what family you are born into. Imagine if other health care were legislated and managed that way.
We’re talking about teenage girls, not adult women.
The intention of the law that basically allows children to make such a call is exactly what is in contention.
Any female of childbearing age has a legal right to abortion services under certain circumstances. You are suggesting that access to that be limited for some females depending on what family they were born into. That’s why the law allows abortions for girls without parental consent, to prevent them from being prevented access to healthcare.
There is bugger all difference between someone who is 15 years 8 months and 16 years.
The main argument I see in not allowing girls access without parental consent is to try and reduce abortions. Why not just be honest about that?
There is bugger all difference between someone who is 15 years 8 months and 16 years, so the whole adult/child thing doesn’t wash. Also to get an abortion in NZ you have to see at least 2 doctors and a counsellor and explain yourself, so it’s not like girls are making decisions on their own.
girls that have sex out of wedlock should bear the shame if they have an unwanted pregnancy.
Simple as that. If we follow religious doctrine that sex is for procreation only, and sex for pleasure and fun is evil, than any girl/women that gets pregnant is to carry this pregnancy to term and a. either raise the child, or b. give it up for adoption.
No matter how much harm a nine month pregnancy may does to the mother, no matter how much harm delivery might do to the mother, no matter if the mother is able to financially support herself during pregnancy/delivery and then is financially and emotionally able to take care of the child once born.
And under no circumstances is a women ever able to take the decision to abort a child because women are . a. emotional, b. hysterical, c. scatterbrained, d. heartless, e. slutty, f. not trust worthy…..insert your own reasoning here.
Hence why she has to see 2 doctors and a counselor and explain herself over and over again. Because its not only girls that have to see 2 doctors and a counselor its women aswel.
I especially like how the poster is discounting contraceptives and does not mention sex ed at all.
Cause the only way to never get pregnant is by abstinence only, and then once married, baby after baby, cause contraceptives might cause spontaneous natural abortions.
Have you ever considered some believe 16 is still to young to make such a major call?
Moreover, 2 doctors and a counsellor is insufficient?
fortunately we have legal system to protect us from people who think that.
I’m advocating for the parents to have the right to be informed.
How that is structured into the law and how that impacts the consent process is yet to be seen.
For example, the Government could decide to inform parents and make them come before a panel to consider their input.
Do I value life? Of course. Just as I accept there are circumstances warranting an abortion.
“I’m advocating for the parents to have the right to be informed.”
Nah now you’re just minimising what you’re advocating in order to appease or to appear reasonable.
Look at that shitty video you posted or your comments about a “life” being taken.
You’re advocating for far more than parents right to be informed.
Rubbish.
Seems your argument has run out of puff. You are now playing the player and not the ball.
“Just as I accept there are circumstances warranting an abortion.”
Elucidate.
Under what circumstances do you consider an abortion to be warranted?
Rubbish.
Seems your argument has run out of puff. You are now playing the player and not the ball.
But the evidence is that the parents shouldn’t have that right as it could cause serious harm to the young women who find themselves pregnant.
The law is there to protect people, not to cause them harm.
If there is evidence that informing parents will lead to serious harm in certain cases, an amendment must consider protection for this.
The law in this case didn’t protect the unborn child, thus the call for a rethink.
FFS in no case where an abortion is carried out is “the unborn child” as you put it is protected.
What you’re asking is that the state now involves an assessment of the family in order to determine whether serious harm would occur.
Cool.
There’s evidence that the family is highly religious and having a child out of wedlock will bring shame and embarrassment on the family. The impact on the daughter will mean that she will be assuaged by guilt and that if she has the baby she will be constantly reminded that she bought this shame on the family.
Or Mum will raise this child and will constantly remind her daughter that she is doing this because her daughter sinned and ruined not only her life, but her mothers.
Or that Uncle Fred is the father.
Or whatever scenario…..
There’s consequences also about putting the family further under the microscope to assess whether serious harm will occur.
One would actually be pretty sure that it’s better to assess that based on the current process rather than actually involve the family further.
Unless you somehow think that these young people just make shit up to get an abortion.
What are you going to do when those types of assessments find that actually having the child will harm the potential mother? What support will you throw around the family who have been formally assessed as likely to cause harm? How will you deal with the ramifications of that?
There’s no such thing as an “unborn child” as prior to birth what we have is a foetus that cannot survive outside of the womb and thus, by definition, also isn’t living.
Your bias…
and then in a comment further down
Both those statements can only refer to a person: someone alive who is then killed. But abortions don’t kill people.
A transcript of a small part of the interview with Robert David Steele, a video link featured on yesterday’s Open Mic
Interviewer: Briefly, what is your major criticism of the TPP?
Steele: Well, first of all the TPP has a number of secret provisions which essentially give corporations to power to overrule the laws of member states. It basically screws workers, it screws benefits, it screws insurance, it screws true cost economics. It is, unfortunately most people haven’t had the chance, nor have the Senators had the chance nor the representatives, to read or see the secret provisions. But Wikileaks has done a major public service, its released a lot of this stuff and anybody reading this understands very clearly the TPP is a form of coup d’état. It is a betrayal of public trust and in a properly run country . . . and I want to pause here because I want to say this in a very measured way . . . in a properly run country, Barak Obama should be impeached for offering the TPP to Congress for passage.
Well, there’s a thought! Can you impeach a prime minister?
That aside, there are only two conclusions to draw from the above: either Groser etc. are incredibly incompetent negotiators, or their actions, and those of the executive of this government, are sinister!
well, treason is still on the books:
The TPPA is against the will of the people and will allow invasion and rule by the corporates so that could possibly be stretched to apply.
Then there’s the corruption aspect of the Saudi Sheep Deal (Maybe difficult as was McCully that actually did it but the PM should have known):
Then there’s his misuse of the OIA act:
Considering his lies there’s probably numerous laws that he’s broken that would result in him leaving office permanently. We just need to find those laws and manage to have the scum charged.
“A life was unnecessarily taken with a young girl and her family having to live with the consequence of that.”
Ignoring any philosophical argument about defining “life” – really how do you know that?
You can only speculate on what may have happened had she gone through further with the pregnancy. A whole range of possibilities exist from miscarriage, dying in child-birth, to being beaten and abused by the father of the child, to raising the child on DPB and having to live with the opprobrium of the right wingers for the rest of her life, to the child being raised by her parents because the child could not cope, to getting married to the father and the child being raised in a loving, caring relationship.
You have no idea what may have gone on to happen.
I’m well aware of situations where parents have found out and prevented the abortion, the baby born and both mother and child live in a miserable existence – particularly in one case where the child’s father turned out to be of a different race.
There’s no right or wrong here but I do agree with the parents in that there should have been more follow up and support post-abortion, if that didn’t actually occur.
The bigger issue in my view is the societal attitude towards young people having children. The notion that it ruins their lives, the notion that young people breed for a business, the continual parsing of sole parents as bludgers.
If we made young people having children a positive experience then maybe we might get fewer abortions. That would mean having to deal with reality though. You know the reality that young people will have sex and some of them will get pregnant.
Barring compilations leading to death, a life was indeed taken.
How that life would have turned out is pure speculation.
Follow up after the fact is akin to placing an ambulance at the bottom of the cliff.
And the person who is pregnant is in a much better position to judge her own circumstances than either you or I.
Whatever her decision she should have been supported by her parent/s once they found out.
Failing to inform her mother robbed her (and her child to be) of exploring the avenue of her mother caring for the child. Perhaps resulting in saving a life.
Therefore, surely we should be considering how we can keep that avenue open?
Although disappointed and regretting more wasn’t done, who’s to say her mother isn’t supporting her decision?
“Failing to inform her mother robbed her (and her child to be) of exploring the avenue of her mother caring for the child.”
No, it didn’t. The whole point about this that you don’t seem to get is choice. The girl chose not to tell her parents. If having her mother adopt the foetus was an option for the girl, what makes you assume she didn’t consider it and decide it was a bad choice?
Of course it did.
The mother was more than willing. However, she was never informed, thus her daughter wasn’t fully informed when making her choice. She wasn’t aware of her mothers position and willingness to help.
citation needed for that please.
Really?
It was the crust of the story. The mother wasn’t informed, but was willing to care for the baby if had been.
However, seeing as the daughter didn’t inform her mother, she wasn’t aware of her mother’s position and willingness to help.
that’s not logical. The girl might have understood that her mother would raise the child, but chose to have an abortion anyway. If you have some evidence to contradict that, please post it.
Again it’s the crust of the story. Offhand, it’s in the first link (TV1).
If the daughter had known the mother believes the outcome (abortion) may have been averted, hence is pushing for the law to be amended.
You still don’t get it. Unless we heard from the young woman we have no idea why she didn’t tell her mother, or what she thought/didn’t think her options are. In the absence of that you are making stuff up, or willing to take the perspective of someone who is not the pregnant person but has a vested interested (in multiple ways) in preventing the pregnant person from having choice. THAT is why we have the law that we do, to stop younger, vulnerable women from having their choice taken from them.
So the mother had 17 years of raising her child to convey to her that if she ever got pregnant that it would be OK and that she would be very supportive and help to raise her grandchild but didn’t do so.
Man I had those discussions with my children when they were 7 or 8 at the latest.
Maybe the mother should have had those discussions before her daughter got pregnant – they’re not really difficult discussions.
+1
And I know a family where the girls were told when they hit their teens that if they ever came home pregnant they’d have to leave home. A law that says they should tell their parents? yeah right.
Perhaps she didn’t want to encourage her becoming pregnant at such a young age.
Yeah ’cause explaining how she would be supported should she get pregnant equals encouraging her to get pregnant.
and it tells us a lot about how valued that foetus really is.
Indeed. It can be seen as sending the wrong message, hence be construed as acceptance, thus encouragement.
Ironic laughter ensues…
That you would even liken the decision that young woman (she’s not a girl by the way once she reaches puberty) made to theft says a lot about how you view the daughter as a possession of the parents.
There’s a difference between parental responsibility and ownership.
I didn’t liken the teen’s decision to theft. I highlighted she was robbed of the avenue to make a fully informed choice.
rob
verb
past tense: robbed; past participle: robbed
take property unlawfully from (a person or place) by force or threat of force.
Unlawfully? Well the system did fail her every step of the way.
According someone who is not her …
The Chairman – i’d like to ask you
as you appear completely unswayed in your beliefs on this topic – despite the deeply concerned, intelligent, passionate, reasoned, and personally experienced writers responding to you –
why do you feel that you have to go on and on and on and on?
Is it to:
a) influence others to forego reason?
or
b) heroically stand against all ‘unbelievers’?
Of course you do have a right to defend your beliefs – but really….. have you not acquired a sliver of understanding of why you might be wrong on this?
No, it wasn’t. When a foetus is incapable of living without the mothers biological support then it is not alive.
women become incubators the moment that they get pregnant. with no say or aganda, cause fetus will over ride any human rights the incubator has enjoyed before pregnancy.
this is essentially what Pro Life boils down to. Forced Birth.
They’re also all about making decisions for women, not listening to women.
This story’s a great example. It’s all about the pregnant person’s mother, and how SHE feels and what SHE wants and HER pain, and we literally hear nothing from the person actually going through the process.
A little more background.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/taranaki-daily-news/news/68841247/family-presents-chester-borrows-with-abortion-petition
+1 Draco
It is up to the pregnant woman to decide whether she wants to continue with her pregnancy, nobody else. The foetus is not a “life” unless it is capable of surviving outside the womb.
It is also up to her to choose who she should confide in before discussing the options and getting the statutory agreement from two doctors.
The fact that her mother has gone public with her daughter’s story indicates to me why this girl sought help elsewhere.
Most would agree it is up to the pregnant woman to decide. However, the contention here is with young teens.
In her effort to draw attention and get the law changed she had little choice but to go public.
Nope she had plenty of other choices. Some of them involved thinking.
The attention seeker here is Mother dearest that clearly does not care a lot about the wellbeing of her daughter considering that she drags the decision of her daughter through the mud. It says a lot about Mother dearest that she has not issue to make public in a national News Paper the decision her daughter took. I actually have pity for the daughter.
You know what her mother just did? She publicly shamed her daughter for a. having sex, b. getting pregnant, and c. for having an abortion.
I hope that somewhere around this girl is/are some adults that will help her to get away from this “Mother”.
Thank you Karen for raising the obvious. I am not surprised that this mother wasn’t told. She’s acting like she owns her daughter.
She has no idea of personal boundaries and has no hesitation about discussing her daughter’s personal business in public – in such a way that no doubt the daughter can be identified by the community around her. What ever is going on the glare of publicity is unlikely to be helping.
What right does she have to further abuse her daughter in this way , particularly if she is struggling to cope at some level. There is usually a provision when these sorts of submissions are made at parliament for a level of privacy – so the MSM story was actually deliberate.
As for “the chairman” have you ever considered, apart from all the reasons given above, that a good number of parents would demand their daughters had an abortion regardless of the girl’s wishes.
Can’t have that public shame you know. (sarc)
Yes, it was.
That fetus would have developed into a child. And that child’s life was taken when the fetus was aborted.
No it wasn’t as it didn’t have one.
The abortion prevented that life eventuating.
so there was never a living thing from which life could be taken.
No, it was as a result a life was taken.
But taken from nobody, because they never existed.
You can’t take anything from imaginary people.
You can’t take anything from imaginary people, but you can abort a pregnancy. Thus, prevent a baby being born, which was the life that was taken.
So if I apply for a job, and someone else is chosen, should I have the successful applicant charged with the theft of the money I would have made if I’d gotten the job?
Or is it the employer who is culpable?
Your analogy is not even close. Care to try again?
True.
But I’m having difficulty inventing imagined wrongs against people who do not exist.
Which is a different argument from taking a life that didn’t exist. Should that potential be allowed to develop? That’s not up to us or anybody else but the women making the decision.
Being pregnant generally implies a life is on the way. Which is the life I’m implying has been taken away.
The contention is young teens are making the decision.
Except, as McFlock has already pointed out to you, you can’t take away that which doesn’t exist.
They’re quite capable of making decisions. It’s people like you who prevent them from making decisions and building the self-confidence from doing so that leaves us with people in their 20s that won’t make decisions.
Would you allow a young child to call all the shots in their life?
Of course not. Why? Because they are to young and lack the experience and knowledge required to deal with the major ones.
I’m not advocating preventing them from making decisions overall.
As explained to McFlock, you can abort a pregnancy. Thus, prevent a baby being born, which was the life that was taken.
1. We’re not talking about a young child but a young woman
2. She’s being assisted by other adults
Yes you are. You insisting that the decisions get left to the parents whether they be abusers or not, whether they have the best interests of the young adult or not or even have the best information or not. In general in cases like this I suspect the parents are often the worst people to go to.
No, you just kept asserting the same bullshit that had already been shown to be bollocks. As you just did again.
The point you missed was we generally allow decisions to be made relative to age, hence the reference to the young child analogy .
This teen wasn’t assisted. She was failed every step of the way, which begs the question, how widespread is this?
I’m not insisting that the decisions get left to the parents whether they be abusers or not, whether they have the best interests of the young adult or not or even have the best information or not. What rubbish (see my position posted above).
And no. I’m merely correcting your ongoing flawed assertions.
You are, however, insisting that the teenager has no control over who is informed about a pregnancy she doesn’t want.
I understood your othering but:
1. She’s a young adult, not a child
2. We also allow and encourage young adults and even children to go to any adult for help. Your insistence that it must be the adults is part of the problem of abusive households that we’re trying to solve
No, she was assisted and she was not failed. Things may not have gone perfectly but she wasn’t failed. Again, the problem is your insistence that the parents be involved.
You’re the one making flawed assertions. I’ve backed up what I’ve said.
The arguments from the Chairman have reminded me of a Monty Python song:
Don’t worry about Monty, Karen.
Spend a little time looking into the background of Family Planning, population control and eugenics.
You really should look into the dishonest smearing of Planned Parenthood by unhinged, deceptive anti-choice arseholes.
/
.
But on to the truth about Margaret Sanger.
Sanger was pro-birth control and anti-abortion. This may surprise you, considering that Planned Parenthood opponents frequently accuse Sanger of erecting abortion clinics in Black neighborhoods, a practice they claim the organization continues to this day.
But this is simply not true.
Sanger opposed abortion. She believed it to be a barbaric practice. In her own words, “[a]lthough abortion may be resorted to in order to save the life of the mother, the practice of it merely for limitation of offspring is dangerous and vicious.” Her views are, ironically, in keeping with the views of many of the anti-choicers who malign and distort her legacy.
http://rhrealitycheck.org/article/2015/08/20/false-narratives-margaret-sanger-used-shame-black-women/
Alcohol.
The drug that New Zealand refuses to tackle.
Due to the power of the liquor industry.
With costs that the industry does not pay for.
Costs that society pays for.
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/282783/ashburton-police-break-up-second-public-brawl
And we ram through laws to make drinking ever easier while pushing back laws to give parents paid parental leave.
The difference is that someone will be able to make a profit from the sale of the alcohol and possibly even the damage done to society afterwards whereas no one will be able to make a profit from a woman staying home to look after her child.
Would someone please take a moment to tell me why floating mortgage interest rates here are now back up to 6.75 when our ocr is circa 2.35%..and uk floating mortgage rates are 1.25%… is it pure profit taking by banks…. or hedging against coming ‘economic perfect storm’ plus el nino drought predictions? Many thanks.
ANZ 6.24%
Japan ca 1%
As Nz don’t save enough banks borrow a lot offshore to fund montages. The rate reflects these costs and and banks margin ( which is not major component of rate) Say a banks margin is 1pc of the 7pc,, it only takes15pc of loans to default for banks to be loosing money , hence capital adequacy controls. The media beat on about banks profits however they reflect a huge asset and liability base, where return on capital is not over the top, while a stringent focus on credit risk is essential
Yet when I worked for Westpac it was well talked about internally that their was a 1% premium on NZ rates compared to Australian rates.
At the time if you took the inflation rate in both countries and then compared the gap between the interest rates and the inflation rate eg the difference, there was always at least a 1% greater margin in NZ rates.
NZ was always seen as a bit of a cash cow for Oz. Lower overheads as well.
Montage?
Of course, it’s all a load of bollocks. Foreign money can’t actually buy NZ goods and services (it’s not legal tender) and so borrowing offshore doesn’t actually provide any ‘capital’ and then there’s the fact that the local banks just create the money whenever they make a loan anyway and so do the foreign banks.
Any return to capital is, as a matter of fact, excessive. Anything above 0 is. As the bailouts of the financial system proved, the banks don’t carry any risk and neither do the lenders.
Wish rest of nz would apply same rules as invercargill re alcohol… all alcohol is purchased through ILT who owns all four (yes four for the city) bottle stores and most of the pubs and hotels. All nett profits go back to the community down here. There is no alcohol for sale in supermarkets or dairies.
similar to West Auckland….where the Liquor Trust is a huge gravy train for the old boy network,complete with a blackout on individual sinecures….!
Because Trusts can’t make a profit?
dont think theres any rule saying community trusts cant run a surplus.
Crusty old blazer wearing gin drinking Rotarians who sit upon a mountain of public money, yet dish it out for middle class hobbies. Time for a new broom next year to sweep then all out and for some progressive ideas to be implemented.
Supermarket lobby is massive
Bernard Hickey’s article is a must read.
There will be a major crash.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11504932
Thanks Paul. The article is very clear and easy to read. But not to think about.
Building walls to keep people out.
.
After the Berlin Wall fell in 1989, for a while it seemed like border fences and barriers were a thing of the past in Europe. Many on the continent hoped for a new era of integration and receptivity. It didn’t happen. Instead, various pressures have led Europe to adopt wall-building projects that would make Donald Trump proud
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/08/28/map-the-walls-europe-is-building-to-keep-people-out/?
Good to see that you think it is OK for parents to disown/kick out/beat their daughters for falling pregnant.
How very progressive of you.
BTW Hilary Kleift is heavily involved with the Baptist Church and the anti-abortion movement, but our media is too useless to publicise that fact.
“Good to see that you think it is OK for parents to disown/kick out/beat their daughters for falling pregnant.”
Feel free to show me how you came to that flawed conclusion. It’s not what I’m advocating.
I’m hoping we can find a way to better balance the benefits of parents knowing against the negatives you described, in the hope we can save some young lives going forward.
The reality is, that a lot of parents react negatively to their daughter having sex and falling pregnant. So they kick them out on the street, or worse.
Our brothels, prisons and shelters are full of women who were disowned by their parents.
That post above was intended for Chairman. .
There is never any point in arguing with a forced birther. There are no depths to which they will not sink. Doctored videos, lies, terrorist threats, and even murder. All in the name of these mythical “children” for whom they do not give a toss once they are born. Their “pro-life” proclamations extend only as far as wonen’s uteri – most of them are pro the death penalty and pro war.
…most of them are pro the death penalty and pro war.
and Climate Change deniers.
I think it was a comedian called Jimmy Tingle who commented that george HW bush was anti-abortion and pro death penalty: “I guess it’s all in the timing, eh George?”
I’m no forced birther. Nor am I pro death penalty, a climate change denier, or pro war.
My comment was nothing to do with you. Just a general observation in reply to Visubversa. I haven’t been following the debate. Too busy.
That’s fine, Anne. It gave me the opportunity to set the record straight.
There seems to be a bit of mud slinging coming my way.
Yes, it happens from time to time – when you least expect it.
About big finance and business. I heard something on Radionz about a rort involving $600 million. So googled for $600 million rort international and there is a page about big money transactions.
Here is the item I heard about the rort of Malaysian PM and $600 million. This is indicative of how political leaders everywhere are trying to personally advantage themselves. At one time this was something from lesser countries.
http://www.cnbc.com/2015/08/29/malaysians-stage-mass-protest-for-pms-resignation.html
The Malaysian leader has weathered weeks of attacks since it was reported that investigators probing the management of debt-laden state fund 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) had discovered the unexplained transfer of more than $600 million.
Protesters hope to spark a people’s power movement forcing Najib out, but political analysts doubt he will be toppled.
Then further down the page under $600 million – which seems a popular amount to be dealing in!
The first one is brief details for cognoscenti and carries this warning “Remember that CFDs are a leveraged product and can result in the loss of your entire deposit. Trading CFDs may not be suitable for you. Please ensure you fully understand the risks involved. ” so don’t complain if you lose all your holiday money.
Schlumberger Limited said it will merge with oilfield equipment maker Cameron in a stock and cash transaction valued at $12.7 billion that will create the world’s largest oil-field services company.
Pixar’s latest animated feature Inside Out is continuing to go from success to success.
After topping the UK box office last weekend and battling with Jurassic World for the top spot in the US earlier in July, Disney’s Pixar now has more to celebrate as Inside Out passes the $600 million worldwide box office mark.
Local politicking – easy-peasy??:
A decade ago, sister towns of West Baden Springs and French Lick (located one mile apart) were in trouble. Jobs were scarce, local shops were closing, and the younger generation was moving away for better opportunities and a brighter future. Locals were not naïve, they knew they had a problem. For years, citizens would caravan to the state capitol in Indianapolis to ask for help. Their goal: to convince politicians to grant a gambling license to a developer who would rebuild and restore French Lick Resort….
Geneva Street, a feisty, red-headed beautician in French Lick, was one of the most vocal supporters. In a deft move, she realized State Senator Larry Borst, a practicing veterinarian, was the logjam. So, she made an appointment for her dog to receive a check-up with veterinarian Borst.
“It was inventive and effective,” stated Saunders. “Although Senator Borst probably felt hoodwinked by the ruse, it worked.”
With a gaming license in hand, the challenge now lay to find a steward, with deep enough pockets and resolve, to rebuild the resort.
Yesterday, Bloomberg reported that the biggest American producer of coking coal, Alpha Natural Resources, could file for bankruptcy as soon as Monday.
Competitor Walter Energy filed for bankruptcy earlier this month, and several others have done the same this year.
Now, two companies are so pressed by ten-year-low coal prices, that they have agreed to sell their jointly-owned Australian coking mine for A$1 ($US0.73). Coking coal, also known as metallurgic coal, is used for steel production.
Then there are airline profits and problems. Qantas has found Jetstar in NZ useful in boosting its turnaround profit. Yet Air NZ can’t wait to drop the regions and that allows Jetstar to achieve a greater share of our domestic market, at a time when the media have a heading that shares are going down as the international economy sags.
And with our lack of sharp concern for our balance of payments, our strategy is lax about more of the domestic earnings being sucked out of NZ to Australia and beyond!
Qantas has turned around a massive loss to report its biggest profit since before the global financial crisis.
The airline reported earnings before tax and one-time items of A$975 million in the year to June 30, compared with a A$646 million loss a year earlier.
The airline attributes the spectacular turnaround to its successful transformation programme, which saw thousands of staff laid off and costs slashed, A$600 million in lower fuel costs helped by hedging, depreciation savings from international fleet impairment and higher revenue per available seat kilometre.
Chief executive Alan Joyce said the bounce back into the black was one of the most spectacular in Australian corporate history. There were record results for Jetstar, which was now making a profit in New Zealand, the airline’s loyalty scheme and freight operations.
Google Air NZ annual profit to get interesting coverage.
Air New Zealand has posted an annual profit of $327 million, up 24 per cent, and expects earnings to grow significantly. The growth in earnings was driven by capacity growth and strong demand, along with cost efficiencies and lower fuel prices, the airline said.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/71456978/air-new-zealand-posts-record-annual-result
Air NZ shares dive despite soaring profit
Concern about Air New Zealand’s ability to profitably fill capacity increases as economies weaken and competition increases has weighed on its shares.
http://home.nzcity.co.nz/news/article.aspx?id=212249
Air NZ shares fall, analysts query capital return strategy
Following this year’s result, analysts covering the stock have bumped up their expected 2016 earnings based on jet fuel savings, 11 percent capacity growth, and a stronger contribution from its 26 percent stake in Virgin Australia. That’s partly offset by concern about new competition including Jetstar on regional routes, Chinese airlines, and from Qantas alliance partner American Airlines on trans-Pacific flights.
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/article/ef9fe9f6/air-nz-shares-fall-analysts-query-capital-return-strategy.html
edited
A long time ago I wrote this calling for better information to be available for people to make decisions. It also calls for the effect of those decisions to be shown on the real economy and for those decisions to be made real.
Now somebody has put together this which does the first part which is going to go a long way to getting the rest going as well.
Thanks for that – http://figure.nz/ A useful initiative.
Oh dear, the news just gets worse and worse for the Blairites in Britain.
They’ve expended a good deal of energy portraying Jeremy Corbyn’s supporters as little more than a cadre of Posh, out-of-touch Trots and affluent Islington drawing-room liberals.
Turns out that research by pollster YouGov reveals Corbyn’s supporters are actually closer (than those of the other 3 leadership candidates) to the UK demographic average in 3 out of 4 indicators.
The supporters of self-identified Blairite candidate Liz Kendall are more likely to be affluent, upper-middle class and in professional, well-healed occupations. Corbyn’s support base is much more a mix of working and lower-middle class, in tune with the wider British electorate.
Household Income over 40k
Great Britain 27%
Corbyn Support 26%
Burnham Support 29%
Cooper Support 32%
Kendall Support 44%
Social Grade A/B
Great Britain 35%
Corbyn Support 36%
Burnham Support 40%
Cooper Support 48%
Kendall Support 65%
Voted Lib Dem in 2010
Great Britain 15%
Corbyn Support 18%
Burnham Support 9%
Cooper Support 9%
Kendall Support 10%
The only measure where Corbyn supporters were further (than those of the other candidates) from the GB average was their preference for social media over the MSM.
Social Media a main source of News
Great Britain 32%
Corbyn Support 57%
Burnham 39%
Cooper 41%
Kendall 38%
We do live in exciting times.
Tony Blair again launches a plea for Labour voters to vote for a leader that will dial back public spending to pre Crimean war levels, as opposed to the Tories who want Walpole era spending levels.
I’ve seen more sensible commentary around abortion on this site, including today, than almost anywhere else I can think of.
From personal stories, to debunking bull-shit, to presenting logical challenges to what is being said it is heartening to see such a diverse range of people supporting the choice of women to make their own decisions, based on their own individual circumstances.
Thanks. I feel uplifted today.
Thanks, good insight into the debate today.
+1 Much appreciated.
Yet another business collapse owing hundreds of thousands to IRD.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/money/71481959/failed-property-developer-puts-a-ring-on-it
It seems that many of these failed business owing millions of $ have histories of not paying IRD before their collapse.
Surely this is a pretty good indicator of firms in trouble and non-payment should be a matter of public record when it occurs, not waiting til the total collapse of the business.
I still argue for a much simpler tax system where there’s a low rate of tax on gross income (before expenses) which would both broaden the tax base and make collection at the point of sale direct to IRD possible for all but cash and cheque sales.
Even without including fraudulent issues around taxation it seems that the collapsed business value of non-paid legitimate tax must run into hundreds of millions of dollars.
Add non-paid PAYE payments and non-paid student loan payments into the mix and the missing amounts must be enormous.
I know from personal experience that if you can show that your employer deducted your student loan payments from your pay but didn’t pay them to IRD then the tax-payer picks up the tab. Yet another employer subsidy.
A sliver of light?.
.
Crimes of hate
The July 31 murders in Duma and at the gay pride march were not ordinary homicides. They were moral arguments: Yishai Schlissel’s moral obsession with overly happy gays and the “price tag” movement’s fleet-footed moral flanking maneuver in punishing Israel by allegedly burning Palestinians. Two simultaneous climaxes of Jewish extremism, two moments of Jewish spiritual pathology that were seen by many Israelis, from far-left to far-right, not as criminal aberrations but as signals of a possibly grim future.
http://www.timesofisrael.com/the-blood-of-summer-and-our-collective-sins-of-omission/
.
The author follows up.
.
http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/a-letter-to-those-fuming-that-im-a-leftist/
For Weka et al who support Medical Cannabis, tune in to Tv1 tonight at 7pm.
for a preview….
http://yournz.org/2015/08/30/mother-admits-giving-daughter-medicinal-cannabis/
Mmmm! Many years ago I lost a classmate to a backstreet abortion…and no need to talk about an 11 yr old from South America when this has even to my knowledge happened in NZ .
Linked ethically is the suicide of a N.Z.schoolboy who went to his spiritual “guide” for help with his newly- realised homosexuality only to be told to go and sin no more.
I assure you, these families are no more or I would not be exposing these facts.
Apart from the Greenpeace protest, tonight Parliament will have the most attention focused onto it for the year I reckon, when the All Blacks are announced there. Sad state of affairs, especially when you’re not a huge rugby fan.
Obviously a statement of National gravitas.
I guess National HQ (aka Sky City) is not sufficiently solemn.
But. but..politics and sport don’t mix…..
Hard to believe this crap (http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=11505332) – what happened to the separation of the state and religion? Hope John is working on his three-way handshake technique, or are he and Andrew hoping to try a four-way.
On 3 news tonight, Kelvin Davis and another Labour MP attending a fundraiser for a charter school. Labour policy is against charter schools. Their party needs to make sure that none of their MPs does anything controversial like this. Such easy pickings for the media to imply that Labour are not ready for Government.
Christ all bloody mighty.
Is it too much to ask that Labour MP’s should show some backbone and support the continual public provision of education/schooling as a service?
C’mon guys, no post on 2 Labour MP’s defying leader and heading to a Charter School fund raiser?…lol, guess the obvious is better to leave slone that look head on eh?
Let me guess, you guys have one of 3 ‘excuses”:
1: They are there for their constituents, as unlike leader…they actually had someone that voted for them (Kelvin Davis)
2: they were excising their democratic right (pun intended) to do as they wish.
3: It’s Whanau!, as it’s Maori MP’s and shhhh it’s their rite to do as they wish as culture out wins leader of the party 🙂
Now….if thus were National MP’s going against Key, OMG it’s National are collapsing and all are against Key and he will be knifed and a new leader soon, LOL georgeous!
On a serious note…I DO believe in a strong opposition, and still having McCarten employed as a stratagem and a ‘bunker war office head’ really is killing and making 2017 a walk over! worst result in 92yrs last election and Matt still employed….beggars belief and long may he continue in that role (to me, Little is a Union man, McCarten is a union man, that owes $150K for not paying his workers Kiwi Saver contributions nor tax….ummmmm)
[lprent: I suspect that is
1. defamatory
2. incorrect
3. earned you a permanent ban unless you can provide proof from a reputable source or apologise. See the policy of ‘asserting facts’.
4. bye bye. I will keep you on moderation for 2 days before putting you in the lying arsehole club along with the other lusers who are too stupid to comment here. ]