So, you’re talking with someone about politics and they say something really dumb and wrong and you know it’s wrong but you don’t have the arguments and facts at your fingertips to make a decisive point. That’s where our election series, The Standard line, comes in. The info you need in bite-size form. Today: Nanny State
- ask for specific examples of this so-called ‘Nanny State’ and why they are so awful that they are the decision someone would base their vote on. Does that example of ‘nanny sate’ really affect their life?
- in response to the Child Displicine Bill being raised, you can point out that:
- under the previous law people were being let off for hitting children with riding crops and other weapons,
- National supported the law and won’t reverse it,
- no-one has yet been convicted of assault on a child for a simple smack.
- It was just a minor change in the law to make sure child abusers weren’t getting protected by the law.
- on the lightbulbs
- The Government sets energy efficiency standards for all types of things – fridges, microwaves, and lights. All that happened was the standard for lights was raised to a point that most incandescent bulbs can’t match.
- You can still buy a huge range of bulbs, not just CFLs, halogen and LED as well.
- CFLs are not dangerous, they use a tiny amount of mercury, too little to have any health affect even if it were to somehow get in your body, and they are much cheaper to run, you can save hundreds a year.
- Shouldn’t we want a more energy efficent, smarter economy rather than keep on using out-dated technology?
- why does National make such a big deal over these minor things? Because they doen’t want you talking about things that matter like National’s policy to privatise ACC, cut work rights, lower wages, and gut Kiwisaver.