Written By:
Guest post - Date published:
10:45 pm, May 18th, 2009 - 3 comments
Categories: law and "order", Media -
Tags:
The Herald are currently running a poll asking ‘[s]hould people facing charges punishable by less than three years imprisonment be able to be tried by a judge alone?’
The only problem with this question is that currently unless the defendant elects otherwise all such charges if possibly punishable by more than three months jail are tried before a Judge alone. It is only if the defendant makes a conscious decision to elect having a jury trial that such a trial can eventuate.
It would help for a properly reasoned debate about the issues for the correct information to be supplied by our media.
Greg
The current rise of populism challenges the way we think about people’s relationship to the economy.We seem to be entering an era of populism, in which leadership in a democracy is based on preferences of the population which do not seem entirely rational nor serving their longer interests. ...
The server will be getting hardware changes this evening starting at 10pm NZDT.
The site will be off line for some hours.
Yep. Expectations set waaaaaaaaay too high.
Its up there with if you opposed the anti-smacking bill that meant you were indifferent to child abuse.
No, it’s up there with “anti-smacking bill”.
My partner is studying law and they have been talking about this change. I don’t know what it’s like in other countries but basically they are saying our court systems are clogged.