web analytics

How to wreck your brand in one easy step

Written By: - Date published: 8:29 pm, February 8th, 2012 - 87 comments
Categories: babies - Tags: , ,

Publicly attack an All Black and loving father for how he chooses to raise his child. This isn’t about the rights and wrongs of breast vs formula vs expressing. I can’t speak to the science of that. But I’ll tell you that La Leche, Plunket, and the Council of Midwives have done massive damage to their own cause with this PR fiasco. Just pure, arrogant stupidity.

If there’s a few mores of New Zealand culture it’s that All Blacks are close to gods, people hate being told how to raise their kids (but are happy for others to be told how to raise theirs), and any sign of arrogance or busy-bodiness attracts a strong backlash.

By getting an anti-smoking ad withdrawn because it showed 2 seconds of Piri Weepu bottle-feeding his daughter on the justification that this would ‘send a bad message’, La Leche and co made a serious PR misjudgement. Plunket and the Council of Midwives have now shamefacedly backed down, which leaves La Leche looking arrogant and out of touch.

If you want mothers to breastfeed, don’t try to berate them into doing it and don’t humiliate a national hero who loves his daughter and was just trying to help another great cause. Don’t brand him and his partner bad parents with no knowledge of their circumstances (or even if it was breastmilk in the bottle!). Think about how that looks to every woman who is having trouble breastfeeding or is apprehensive (also known as La Leche’s target  audience). This fiasco will just make women less receptive to listening to breastfeeding advocates and, therefore, less likely to breastfeed, which, presumably, isn’t La Leche’s objective.

There’s a broader lesson here for any activist or political group:

Pick your fights – you need a chance of winning (and have a definition of what winning is) and the ‘evil’ that you’re fighting has to be worth the blowback. Not everyone who fails to comply completely with your agenda is an enemy that you have to crush – the more you try to bash people for minor doctrinal infringements, the fewer friends and the less power you will be left with.

Get your messaging right – People respond to positive messages, not negative ones. Be careful that you never come across as whinging (Labour, I’m looking at you), hectoring (the Greens have largely stopped doing that) or arrogant (something National is coming across as increasingly).

Know when you’re beat and quit before you do yourself more damage.

[update: because commenters seem to have trouble with this, I’ll say it again: I’m not arguing a side on breast v bottle, and I’m not anti-La Leche. If anything this post is pro-La Leche because it’s about explaining how their actions have run counter to their own objectives, which is something they probably want to avoid]

87 comments on “How to wreck your brand in one easy step”

  1. Zorr 1

    ummm… LLL did *NOT* attack him in public. They were consulted by HSC before the ad ever aired and provided feedback. The Herald then got this and made a witch hunt out of it…

    Sorry Zet, you’re on the wrong side of this one…

    • I agree with you zorr – well said.

    • Zetetic 1.2

      La Leche said that it was sending the wrong message for Weepu to be seen bottle-feeding his daughter.

      Whether it is sending a bad message or not is irrelevant. What is relevant to La Leche, surely, is the impact of their actions on their objectives. I see little evidence that La Leche is coming out ahead in this issue. In fact, their brand has been seriously damaged. That’s going to make it harder for them to encourage women to breastfeed.

      I’m not against La Leche. I’m highlighting its actions in this case as an example of what not to do if you want to achieve your objectives.

      • Zorr 1.2.1

        LLL was asked by HSC to provide feedback. LLL provided feedback. End of story…

        How is this even an issue is my question? They never said ANYTHING in public yet that is what your argument is based off… see the issue?

        • rosy 1.2.1.1

          +1

        • Zetetic 1.2.1.2

          do you think that La Leche is coming out of this well? If they’re not, then what did they do wrong? That’s the only question this post attempts to answer.

          • Zorr 1.2.1.2.1

            This post is attempting to answer a nonexistent question… if you want the real question – how should we treat muck rating MSM organizations that publish a story designed to promote the witch hunt?

            I mean… how could LLL have improved their messaging? In this case, possibly the only correct answer is to have never responded to the HSC request because anything they did would have been interpreted in a very similar way… so, they do nothing? What use are they then?

            You are not actually asking a constructive question OR providing any analysis based on facts. I had been beginning to enjoy your invective filled rants because they were hitting some good points but you are currently proving that a stopped watch is generally only right twice a day…

          • Matthew Whitehead 1.2.1.2.2

            So you’re covering the outrage instead of the issue? Since when did you become a right-wing troll, Zetetic? o_O

            • Zetetic 1.2.1.2.2.1

              because its the public reaction that matters to La Leche achieving its goals and not I nor you have the expertise to rule on bottle v breast v expressing.

              As for calling me a rightwinger. I’ve never been so insulted. That kind of left-on-left abuse is exactly what I’m talking about when I say “Not everyone who fails to comply completely with your agenda is an enemy that you have to crush – the more you try to bash people for minor doctrinal infringements, the fewer friends and the less power you will be left with”

              You’re a good sort, Matthew. So I’m going to make an exception and not ban you for calling me a rightwinger. Don’t do it again. Ever.

              • I was not intending to call you a right-winger directly, and I apologise given how much that comparison obviously hurt your feelings.

                If you don’t mind me explaining myself, I was intending to imply that it is a common right-wing tactic to obfuscate issues by doing exactly what you’re doing here- claiming that public reaction is the important thing, not the facts of the case- and then they take it a step further by completely ignoring the facts of the case after they’ve declared that public opinion has made their point, and that picking similarly misleading debate styles, deliberately or not, (I would assume not in this case) feeds into the perception that it’s okay to be misleading or trollish in political debate. Both opinions and facts matter in the real world.

                I’m just not sure why you’d go to directly claiming that public opinion is more important without an in-depth discussion of what caused that opinion (and whether the outrage is in fact justified) and whether there are lessons to be learned in how we can align fact and perception.

                That, and even if there were an attack on an all black’s personal life for political reasons, I think I’m okay with that, because I think people are wrong to hero-worship the all blacks, and they are public figures who should lead a good example where they can, not get defensive when they’re indirectly criticised.

    • Kotahi Tane Huna 1.3

      +1

      Very surprised that Zet has got this so wrong, just because you read it in the Herald is no excuse – in fact that should be a pretty good indication that the truth is somewhere else entirely.

  2. Margaret 2

    Um are you trying to alienate your female readers? Try reading this article and then having a think about your stance. Given that only 30% of women breastfeed in NZ and only 15% of them make it to 6months this is definitely a fight worth having. But actually no-one was trying to have one. And you just fell for the Herald kicking mums for their own f***ing headlines. Thanks for that.

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/blogs/pg-parental-guidance-advised/6373194/Parenting-is-more-than-a-feeding-choice

  3. grumpy 3

    very good post Zet. the comments above just prove the points you made.

    [lprent: fixed the typo on your handle. ]

    • grumpy 3.1

      Sorry to put you to the trouble – must have been my fingers shaking with the cold. Made the BBC news!!!!

  4. Hilary 4

    Zetetic – do you know anything about the global politics of breast feeding, and how the big corporates like Nestle have killed children by persuading their mothers to bottle feed when they can neither afford it nor have the right equipment?

    Women have always had to fight for everything to do with controlling our own fertility and child rearing and this ongoing battle to breast feed our children is just one more chapter.The numbers who breast feed are already really low. Ever been kicked out of a cafe for breast feeding? Ever received looks of disgust when trying to breast feed a baby in public, or even in a private home? Or received support from La Leche League when breastfeeding was painful and everyone else was telling you to give up? If you have had you wouldn’t be so keen to join the global capitalist patriarchy. Next are we going to have another ‘bash the midwife’ story?
    I expected better analysis from the Standard.

    • Zetetic 4.1

      this post isn’t about breast vs bottle.

      It’s about an organisation’s actions frustrating it’s own objectives.

      If you support La Leche’s cause, then surely you don’t want them fucking up.

      If anything, my post is pro-La Leche and its objectives.

    • grumpy 4.2

      As Zet says (and his post is applicable to all political movements), fighting a losing battle from the start is stupid. Commenters here “explaining” the original and trying to reargue the point just add to the fact that chosing a losing argument and then prolonging the agony by trying to explain your way out of it is non productive.

    • Pete 4.3

      Eleanor Black raised a very good point: “How do we know by simply looking at the image that Weepu is not giving his baby expressed mother’s milk?”

      A lot of young men need a role model to demonstrate how nurturing, loving fathers behave, rather than simply abrogating their responsibilities – or worse, being actively abusive. And from that standpoint, the glimpse that Weepu – an All Black, the epitome of New Zealand masculinity – offers into his loving family life would have been a very positive message. Instead, we get the message that caring for a baby is women’s work. No men allowed.

      • PoliticallyCorrected 4.3.1

        Eleanour Black may think she has raised a very good point; but I doubt many if any person thinking about this footage thinks ‘wow a dad feeding expressed breast milk in a bottle to his child’.

        For the record Pete the camera crew spent all day with Weepu which included up to an hour with him at home with his two children. There was or should have been plenty of imagery available to show a father ‘parenting’ his off spring.

        Yes our young men do need good role models to demonstrate how nuturing and loving fathers behave. Unfortunately Weepu in TV3’s Campbell Live piece unwittingly set the cause back decades with his claims “no one will tell him how to raise his kids”.

  5. hellonearthis 5

    What’s up with that ad on the left?
    http://ads.tlvmedia.com/clk?3,eAGljEEOgjAQRS.EgqG0QBoXI2iCWpFYVNhJUVSILpSInt6qyAWcxeT.l5kHhCsgFiuYs3eBeR5QDoRSBbmzI9QwOecWOK5DGAPTwPdEUT4t.dDeik.FxWES3r9Rbw0vXUkQYxyhvJK4I8cqbvrLv4LfnNufNUQsv7KCmPkmSIa9OkCYyxQyuapnMnmIJ96EHNdiadL0lGmm7EwWlVinkErVis6j.weG8QL-4U5K,

    It goes to a download site that wants to run some exe.

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v639/takeme2/oh_what.jpg

    Sorry, ad blocker is going back on.

    [lprent: On our site? It isn’t one of the ads that is meant to be running. I’ll send that to scoop. ]

  6. Hilary 6

    The All Blacks are a brand. Piri Weepu may be a brand. La Leche League is an community support group of volunteers. It is not a brand.
    In a perverse sort of way this controversy has highlighted the option of breast feeding and the LLL organisation – which may ultimately be a good thing in marketing terms for them both.

    • Zetetic 6.1

      Not all publicity is good publicity.

      I’m not foolish enough to write a post about something so sensitive without talking to people with personal experience. The feedback I have is that the behaviour of the pro-breastfeeding groups has made women who have had trouble breastfeeding or have reservations about trying it less inclined towards breastfeeding and more resentful towards the ‘pressure’ they feel to breastfeed.

      Now, when an organisation’s objective is to promote something and its actions turn its target demographic off that thing and off the organisation, that’s a failure. A failure that all activist groups can learn from.

  7. PoliticallyCorrected 7

    From my understanding it was the off (smoke free) message ‘bottle vs breast’ debate the Health Council wished to avoid when they sought the various organisations input re Weepu’s bottle feeding footage.

    Thank you NZ Herald, as always the gift of irony keeps giving and giving and giving.

  8. dancerwaitakere 8

    This is completely, spot on.

    From the moment this story broke, it was a TOTAL face-palm!

    A reminded that the as the left, we need to be more clever.

  9. Hilary 9

    So groups are just supposed to put their principles away for a Very Important Role Model?

    • Zetetic 9.1

      No. They’re supposed to act in ways that advance their objectives, rather than frustrate them.

      Now, you and I might not like that Piri Weepu is massive public goodwill just because he’s good at rugby but it is reality. Any organisation that wants to achieve its objectives can’t do that effectively if it ignores reality.

      One can, of course seek to change reality. But I don’t think that diminishing the god-like status of All Black’s is part of La Leche’s goals. And I don’t think they achieve that by attacking his parenting.

      • rosy 9.1.1

        attacking his parenting
        They didn’t attack his parenting. They commented on the objectives of the ad, and how it might compromise other public health objectives. I’m wondering how this commenting got into the public domain, and why it has been reported at all.

        • Zetetic 9.1.1.1

          So, they said that his parenting compromises public health objectives.

          any organisation ought to work on the assumption that any official position it takes may end up in the media.

          we didn’t whine about the secret tapes or the tea tapes coming out. It would be hypocritical to whine about this.

          an activist group blaming the media is like a seawrecked captain blaming the tides. You can’t change it, so learn the rules and use it to your advantage

          • rosy 9.1.1.1.1

            They said his parenting compromised public health objectives?
            I thought they said:

            “It was important for us that people understood the key message of the ad was about smoke-free air for our kids. We didn’t want that to get lost in a controversy around bottle-feeding.” [and] “It’s really important that those messages are consistent across the board. It’s been resolved and was really a storm in a tea cup.”

            I can’t see a problem with that.

  10. Benjamin B. 10

    Yeps you just disqualified yourself. Hilary at #4 makes a good point. Also that stuff article: “So in modelling good parenting, how his daughter is fed is irrelevant, right? Which is what La Leche said. Without those few seconds, the ad still conveys a positive parenting message, and the anti-smoking message, while not compromising the government-funded breastfeeding campaign. It’s a shame that Piri’s core message has been overwhelmed by finger-pointing and name-calling, and that a volunteer organisation that helps parents who come to it has been so vilified and attacked.”

    Breathe, think, apologise.

    • Zetetic 10.1

      I’m not arguing against La Leche’s objectives. This post isn’t about breast v bottle. I’m arguing that they’ve worked against their own objectives by their actions and that there’s lessons for all in that.

      • Benjamin B. 10.1.1

        They haven’t. The Herald has.

      • PoliticallyCorrected 10.1.2

        Zetetic can you please spell out exactly what actions you think La Leche could have done better, differently, not taken, etc.,?

        • Benjamin B. 10.1.2.1

          ++

        • Zetetic 10.1.2.2

          It should have not said that 2 seconds of Piri Weepu feeding his daughter in an anti-smoking ad was ‘sending a bad message’ and should be cut.

          It was 2 seconds that no-one would have noticed, let alone taken the message that they ought to bottle feed because Weepu does. La Leche blew it out of all proportion. Their case that the scene ought to have been cut was extremely weak and looked it.

          That made them look like busy-body’s telling a good father (for all we know, that was breastmilk in the bottle) that he is a bad person. That has caused a public backlash, which will make it harder for La Leche to achieve its goals and has turned their target audience off their message.

          Sometimes letting trivial things go is the smart move. Winning a battle can lose a war.

          • Zorr 10.1.2.2.1

            How are people who are asked for their opinion “busy bodys”? WTF Zet?

            • Zetetic 10.1.2.2.1.1

              i’m not saying they are busybodies, i’m saying the public perception is they are (read the herald comments for example. that perception is the reality that is affecting La Leche, saying ‘it’s not fair’ changes nothing.

          • the sprout 10.1.2.2.2

            And if an anti-smoking group were asked to comment on a public health message ad that included 2 sec of a very prominent role model smoking, what should they do? Forget why they exist and say nothing?

            • Zetetic 10.1.2.2.2.1

              this equating of non-breastfeeding with smoking is part of the problem. there are many valid reasons why women don’t breastfeed and, for all we know, that was expressed breastmilk in the bottle.

              Basically, La Leche saying that not breastfeeding your kid is as irresponsible and unheathly as smoking around them. Making women feel they are ‘evil’ if they don’t breastfeed is only going to turn women off their message.

              • that’s your real point I think z – the so called ‘making women feel they are evil for not breastfeeding’ – maybe try talking to some different friends

                • Zetetic

                  I like the ones I’ve got.

                  And this is the point, people in La Leche’s target demographic are feeling alienated and put upon because of La Leche’s actions. Successful organisations don’t engage in self-defeating behaviour.

              • rosy

                La Leche saying that not breastfeeding your kid is as irresponsible and unheathly as smoking around them

                No they’re not. They are saying that it is better not to confuse public health messages.

                I don’t know why you’ve chosen to get on the bandwagon with this – a bad experience somewhere? If so, highlight that, not a valid response to request for comment. Breast-feeding is always a contentious issue, no matter how reasonable (or not) the advocates.

                I reckon you’ve got the wrong end of the stick with this one.

              • Roy

                Bottle-feeding rather than breastfeeding is associated with a statistically significant difference in IQ, with bottle-fed infants coming out several points below breast-fed infants when all other variables are corrected for, so it is not unreasonable to portray bottle-feeding as being harmful to the health as sidestream smoke. I think parents who choose to bottle-feed rather than breastfeed are making a choice that is harmful their children, and should be told that. This does not, of course, apply to those mothers who for whatever reason are physically unable to breastfeed.

                As for the worship of All Blacks and rugby, it is stupid and should not be encouraged.

                • insider

                  That’s a highly debateable ‘fact’. statistical significance does not equate to clinical significance ie you might score 3points more on a test but at that level it may have no effect on actual ‘brightness’. And I’ve read plenty of reports criticising the studies for ignoring other confounding issues that may be more likely and for the studies focussing on a particular type of IQ – verbal = which may not be indicative of underlying IQ ie deafness could be the cause. There is also research showing that the longer you breastfeed the lower the IQ.

                  And frankly it just fails the idiot test – large groups of bottle fed children and adults going back generations are just not showing any sign of being dumber than their breast fed peers. In fact this controversy seems like proof the other way.

            • rocky 10.1.2.2.2.2

              And if an anti-smoking group were asked to comment on a public health message ad that included 2 sec of a very prominent role model smoking, what should they do? Forget why they exist and say nothing?

              Thanks Sprout – I was just about to say exactly that but less succinctly 🙂

          • PoliticallyCorrected 10.1.2.2.3

            Zetetic I’m struggling to find anywhere in the original article and/or the editorial on the HoS on the same day that has La Leche or any other group saying Weepu bottle feeding his daughter was ‘sending a bad message’? I do read however La Leche spokesperson stating that the bottle feeding footage in the Health Sponsorship Council ad would not be consistent with other government health messages. Their case, far from been weak was spot on. The issue was and still is, no matter how much anyone wants to portray it differently, was a problem with consistency of messages.

        • the sprout 10.1.2.3

          If you look carefully over the facts and timelines, you’ll see LLL just did their job and gave sound advice when it was sought after. It’s the herald who’ve started the witchhunt.

          • Zetetic 10.1.2.3.1

            the herald’s doing what the herald does. I don’t like it but that’s the way it is.

            a savvy organisation would foresee that risk and say ‘look, is this really a fight we need over something so trivial?’

  11. I think you are missing the point z – an advocacy group was asked for an opinion and they gave it and then that has been developed into a news story to sell some papers. The paper wanted an angle and they got it but that is not the fault of the advocacy group, it is all about the paper and their deliberate generation of heat around that – to sell papers.

    So statements like, “Just pure, arrogant stupidity” and so forth just indicate to me that you have fallen for the papers spin.

    disclaimer – I am a bloke and the issue of breast feeding is an area that i think women can work out for themselves.

    • Zorr 11.1

      I would make the note here that when your source is a Herald article, your main support in comments are the RWNJ trolls that frequent here, and you are being corrected on major points – you should realize that you probably have the wrong end of the stick…

      • Zetetic 11.1.1

        this post is about not losing media battles. La Leche is losing one. There are lessons in it.

        And, no, one of them isn’t ‘blame the media’. You may as well rail against winter when the weather gets colder. Successful organisations use the environment they operate in to their advantage, they don’t waste time complaining about how ‘unfair’it is.

  12. felix 12

    I’m glad we’ve moved on to the big issues. It’s not like there’s anything else happening eh?

  13. Jilly Bee 13

    I have been following this thread since it was first published with a certain amount of anguish. When my first child was born I struggled to breast feed him [due to inverted nipples] and in the end had to be content with formula – it occurred with my following 2 children, so I have raised a family of 3 bottle fed offspring. With my first baby I was berated by the wife of a colleague of my partner [who was a La Leche devotee], bordering on ‘nipple nazi’ advocacy for not breast feeding him, which made me feel less than adequate as a new mum. Thank goodness my Plunket Nurse could see my problem and encouraged me when I made the decision to bottle feed my son full time. Said son is now 43 and doesn’t appear to have be overly disadvantaged by being fed formula as a baby, as has my two subsequent children.

    • Anne 13.1

      Well said Jilly Bee. There are plenty of women who can’t breastfeed their babies for valid reason.
      I see Plunket has apologised profusely to those women and others who, for whatever reason, feel betrayed by the furore. I think it would be appropriate if La Leche did the same thing for the same reason. It would help their admirable cause enormously to show a little humility…

      • Anne 13.1.1

        Oh, and just remembered. Thought yesterday’s Herald cartoon summed it up in a humorous way.

        http://www.nzherald.co.nz/news-cartoons/news/article.cfm?c_id=500814&objectid=10784032

      • Margaret 13.1.2

        Um what on earth do they have to apologise to us for? They are an organisation that promotes best practice for parenting and the best public health out-comes are reached by breastfeeding. Nobody has said ‘you bottle feed and you’re a crap parent’ instead they have indicated a contradiction in a public health message. I don’t want an apology from anyone. Well, perhaps from all those people that seem intent on undermining a volunteer group of women who support other women with breastfeeding. 

        • Anne 13.1.2.1

          I don’t want an apology from anyone.

          I doubt many people care whether you want (or don’t want) an apology Margaret. It’s not about you. The Plunket Society clearly recognise that even though they are not responsible for what has happened, there are a lot of people feeling unfairly maligned. They have shown their concern by way of an apology. A sensible and mature attitude to take IMO.

          • Margaret 13.1.2.1.1

            Oh, my mistake Anne. I thought you and Zetitic were patronizingly assuming what women who couldn’t breast feed their babies felt. Yes, I think it’s always sensible and mature to allow the Herald to frame a debate in a way the maligns women, volunteers and public health and trumpets populist knee jerk reactions and billion dollar formula industries. Hurrah all round

            • Anne 13.1.2.1.1.1

              Stop misconstruing what commenters say Margaret. I didn’t in any shape or form describe “The Herald” as being sensible and mature. Indeed they have to take much of the responsibilty for this silly debate about something all are agreed upon and that is “breast is best”.

              Btw, grow a sense of humour.

              • Margaret

                Anne, for a lot of women this really isn’t funny. It’s heartbreaking. So if you didn’t mean to blame La Leche maybe you should ‘grow an ability to articulate your point’. Or if you did, you’re buying the Herald’s framing. 

  14. the sprout 14

    Basically, La Leche saying that not breastfeeding your kid is as irresponsible and unheathly as smoking around them. Making women feel they are ‘evil’ if they don’t breastfeed

    No, they aren’t even remotely saying anything close to that. If they were I’d be grabbing my pitchfork too, but that line is 100% Herald – to sell papers, to serve their advertising clients. It is not the position of LLL as represented in any of their communications on this matter or anywhere else.

    As you are an astute observer Zet, i am at a loss as to why this time you’ve swallowed the herald hook line and sinker on this one, and continue to dig yourself deeper, denying key facts and relying on dubious sources like the herald. Is it worth wrecking your brand? Is this a fight worth picking for you?

  15. Zetetic 15

    nice turnabout there mate. Well played.

  16. jbc 16

    Zetetic has made a pretty clear point as far as I can tell.

    The problem is that the bottle feeding was censored and a lot of public reaction to that is negative.

    Whether the Herald played a part in stirring that sentiment is irrelevant – they had the material and worked with it. It’s what they do. [not saying I like it]

    If La Leche, Plunket, and the Council of Midwives had thought for a second about the message that the their edit suggestion would send then this would never have happened. As it turns out it seems to have distracted from both campaigns (anti-smoking and pro-breastfeeding).

    La Leche may have said that it won’t diminish the anti-smoking message if the bottle-feed clip is removed – and if the whole matter had been kept secret that may be true – but it is beside the point. Secret dealings eventually get uncovered and look a whole lot worse for it.

    Here’s another example: the govt not being happy with the timing of a particular documentary screening and ‘suggesting’ via an intermediary that such items be delayed until after elections. After all, it won’t change the meaning of the documentary, right? And it keeps the govt message clear, right? Result: anger at the meddling.

    [Disclaimer: I often bottle-fed my two kids. Their mother’s expressed milk in the first 6-9 months or so, and formula from time to time after that. Mums need all the sleep they can get – and many other valid reasons]

    • PoliticallyCorrected 16.1

      jbc …

      Fault lies squarely at the feet of the Health Sponsorship Council. The HSC should never have allowed the footage to make it to the editing room, let alone a draft cut.

      They sought advice on the footage because they knew it would be contenious; an ultimately distract from their own campaign. According to their post on a ‘Positive Men’ facebook page today, the HSC chose the bottle feeding footage for re-editing approximately two weeks ago .

      The groups responsibilities in this drama llama start and end there. The groups were only responding in a manner consistent with their own mission statements and the government’s own public health messages.

      The HSC owe La Leche, Plunket and the Council of Midwives a public apology.

      • jbc 16.1.1

        Not really. They (HSC) obviously thought it was part of their message, the imagery of the dad feeding the baby.

        Are you suggesting they should have self-censored? I have a problem with that too. I mean: it happened while filming. Is it something to be hidden?

        • PoliticallyCorrected 16.1.1.1

          Yes. Particularly if the goal is to protect their own message, which it was when HSC sought outside advice.

          Knowing it was contenious, they didn’t want their adverts to become fodder for a bottle vs breast debate, ultimately distracting from their message and sought advice on the footage prior to a final cut. They were given the advice that bottle feeding would be inconsistent with other government health messages on breast feeding. Remember the production team had spent an hour at home with Weepu while he played with his two children. It is not like they did not have other footage for positive parenting to use.

          Now we are left with Campbell Live sound bites of Piri Weepu the role model telling the world no one will tell him how to raise his kids despite him featuring in an advert that tells people how to raise their kids.

          • jbc 16.1.1.1.1

            Isn’t that just shifting the issue? Then you have the cameraman or editor saying “we got this really cute shot of Piri feeding his daughter but the HSC said it was controversial and asked us to edit it out.”

            To me the essence of the problem is that this sensitivity overrode practical wisdom – and then that fact became public knowledge.

            • PoliticallyCorrected 16.1.1.1.1.1

              If they were clever they’d say “hey Karitane, we have this really cute shot of Piri bottle feeding his daughter.”

              Or if they were really smart they’d go to Tommy Tipee and say, “hey Tommy Tipee we have this really cute shot of Piri bottle feeding his daughter. Want to use the footage to promote positive fathering of a dad feeding his baby expressed breast milk from one of your bottles? We can centre a whole campaign around why breast is best kept in a Tommy Tipee bottle and how every Dad can be a Tommy Tipee Dad.”

              No I don’t think it’s shifting the issue and you are correct in one thing, sensitivity did override practical wisdom and that is HSC taking it outside their department to make a decision.

              I recall Sony co-founder Akio Morita talking on America, he was saying the problem with America is it has too many consultants, everyones too scared to make a decision, so they use consultants, then they can have someone to blame if it goes wrong, no one stands up and makes their own decision.

            • rosy 16.1.1.1.1.2

              And then you have them not editing the film and feedback after the fact providing evidence that the shot of a well-respected role model bottle-feeding has made it more difficult to promote the breastfeeding messages. (I don’t know about breastfeeding, but I do know there is plenty of research showing role models have a huge impact on other behaviours – makes sense really otherwise why use them advertising and in public health campaigns?)

              I also think HSC did the responsible thing by asking for advice from other public health organisations. Public Health organisations must ensure their messages don’t impinge on each other’s messages. Healthy eating, sunsmart, alcohol, smoking, gambling, physical activity, immunisation, breastfeeding, domestic violence, depression… the chance for conflict in areas an organisation might not know much about is very real.

              • jbc

                But I don’t think that would have happened. [made it more difficult to promote the breastfeeding messages]

                It is far easier to defend its inclusion than its censorship. The burden is much higher for the latter.

                Slightly OT and tangential, but the reality is that breastfeeding doesn’t go smoothly for everyone. Pumps and bottles and formula will even be recommended by pro-breastfeeders (at least the pragmatic ones).

                So the image is not even off-message. It is entirely consistent with a pro-breastfeeding campaign and very easily explained.

                In fact, this could have been turned into a very positive message if someone had taken the blinkers off.

  17. jbc 17

    [edit: hrm. parent post seems to have disappeared]

    Absolutely.

    Did you read my post? The reference to secret dealings was what not to do to avoid the current situation.

    Basically: if you are thinking about censoring, think twice about the message that the act of censorship will send. Is that message bigger than the result you seek to achieve?

    I’m not saying La Leche, Plunket, and the Council of Midwives had bad intentions – just that their hyper-sensitivity sends a message of its own.

    What I am saying is: it would have been better for them to just shut up and let it slip by. Nobody would have noticed. No Herald story. No mobs with pitchforks.

    In my opinion the pro-breastfeeding (I assume breast milk) lobby should be acknowledging bottle feeding rather than trying to hide it. But my opinion is not to the point.

  18. Ed 18

    I did not see the Herald article, but I did see the interview on television with the La Leche representative. The article and discussion above suggests to me that the La Leche representative may have been less controversial if she had taken the line that
    1. there is nothing wrong with a father giving a bottle to a baby; a lot of mothers express milk forthat purpose
    2. La Leche had been asked for their opinion, and they had advised that it would be better if the image had the father interacting in another way because bottle feeding can be seen as controversial; other activities can be just as powerful for the advertising message being sought.
    3. The reason bottle feeding could be a distraction from the message of the advertisement is that commercial advertising of bottle feeding formula is seen as unduly advocating bottle feeding; while that is not as prevalent as it was in New Zealand, and while for various reasons some mothers need to bottle feed, we still have a low proportion of mothers breastfeeding. For that reason images of bottle feeding can be unhelpful
    and then repeat the positive message the ad was trying to deliver – it was not about bottle feeding!

    The initial post rightly said that it was not a public relations success for La Leche – as with many news items information was missing leading to misleading conclusions. Many of the comments have similarly missed some content. As for applying these lessons to politics in general, perhaps we need to be more generous in re-framing perceptions of posts by others into as positive framing as possible; and don’t automatically see advice as criticism.

    As in many discussions on The Standard, I do feel better informed from the post and subsequent discussion. Apart from obvious trolls, discussions are at least intellectually honest; it is the mix of different ideas and viewpoints that give the left strength, and also the knowledge that care is needed if what we say is not to be misrepresented; Zetetic’s broader lessons are valid for all of us.

    • Blueberrymac 18.1

      La Leche League have not had any representatives appear on TV. How on earth can you have seen that interview? In your imagination?

  19. Margaret 19

    Zetitic, your post is becoming increasingly offensive. Did you write it because you think LLL has ruined their brand (by following their objectives quietly behind closed doors when asked to by another Health Organisation) or did you write your post because:

    And this is the point, people in La Leche’s target demographic are feeling alienated and put upon because of La Leche’s actions. Successful organisations don’t engage in self-defeating behaviour.

    Um I don’t. Did you ask me? Nope, you seem to be basing this post on some friends that got upset. I tried for three months to breastfeed, and did everything possible to make it work for my baby and me. But it didn’t and so we used mixed feeding and eventually exclusive bottle. I am still totally committed to breast feeding my next child and the only guilt I felt was mine at not being able to feed my child because I wanted to. Nothing from an organisation who as volunteers for christsake are available anytime of the day or night to assist women to breastfeed if that is their choice.

    The Herald has been so incredibly awful in what they’ve done to women in this search for headlines. I can’t believe you are doing the same. Your first point about a ‘brand’ doesn’t hold up to scrutiny so please explain what you are trying to achieve.

    [lprent: Neatly framed to avoid when I would start defending an author. But it is getting pretty close. You should argue less about the authors motivations. I had to reread this comment a few times in moderator mode which means that it was at the edge of my programmed reactions. ]

  20. Hateatea 20

    I have mixed feelings about La Leche’s role in this. Like almost everyone else, I would like to think that as many children as possible are fed breast milk for as long as possible. I also know though, that this is not possible for a number of reasons, maternal health being one.

    Perhaps the irony that it was a very middle class organisation with a reputation of being quite strident with ‘non-conforming’ mothers promoting bottle feeding as a bigger risk than smoking, or am I just being unusually dense.

    We see constant Maori bashing, especially male Maori, yet an iconic Maori male will not be seen because the baby drank from a bottle. The positive, anti smoking, pro child message will be delivered differently and another opportunity to influence a specific target group will be missed.

    I understand La Leche’s role but I think the HC over reacted. In the scheme of things, most people would have missed the ‘not breast feeding’ message in favour of the nurturing, loving man who puts his children first.

    Thanks for hosting the discussion, Zetetic 

  21. Tangled up in blue 21

    It should have not said that 2 seconds of Piri Weepu feeding his daughter in an anti-smoking ad was ‘sending a bad message’ and should be cut.

    It was 2 seconds that no-one would have noticed, let alone taken the message that they ought to bottle feed because Weepu does.

    This is it.

  22. Snowflake 22

    Hi Zetetic,

    I think you are right on the money with your assessment. I have good friends at HSC and this was a done deal which would never have made it into the media at all…..When they went through their normal review process they identified that the image might get negative feedback from LLL, Plunket and College of Midwives. So as they are supposed to do they sought feedback and based on that feedback decided to make changes to the ad. However someone associated with LLL decided that relaying the situation to a range of Breastfeeding advocacy groups and encouraging them to contact HSC would drive home the message and guarantee that HSC made the changes being sought. Cue many many emails to HSC. That still would not have made the news, but as is the way with things internet, someone took it to Facebook to get wider exposure and from then on it was out and guaranteed to hit the media.

    They MSM constantly monitor twitter, facebook and the like to get free story leads. In this case all the elements for a headline were there. So even after effectively winning the battle quietly and discretely – the noise made to reinforce the position was the first shot in the foot and since that point LLL have not managed to get out from under the negative feedback.

    I feel very sorry for them now, as theirs is a very valuable advocacy/support which has been severely diminished in the publics eyes (in many ways unfairly). But as you noted by picking the wrong battle in the wrong arena with an ill conceived approach against the backdrop of a massively popular figure they have self inflicted PR wounds. Plunket and College of Midwives have attempted to rehabilitate their image with broad apologies but LLL have remained steadfast with their line of ‘We just provided feedback’ – sorry but the story is only out because of one of their own peoples actions. Win the battle lose the war…..

  23. Matthew Hooton 23

    As you note, how did they know it wasn’t expressed breast milk in the bottle? If mum has to work or is going out, it is not unknown for dad to use a bottle to feed the child mum’s milk. My wife breastfed both our kids for a year, but wasn’t keen to be housebound for the whole year. Surely this is to be encouraged by the breast-is-best lobby!

  24. vto 24

    I think Matthew Hooten’s right. Not that I have followed any of this thread and issue except from afar but …………… how would Piri Weepu breastfeed his child?

    I realise there are more manboobs around these days but from what I can tell they not milk-producing boobs. Happy to be proved wrong though.

  25. I’m reminded of the debate/hysteria a couple of years ago about putting vitamin B9 (folic acid ) into bread…

    • marty mars 25.1

      yea it’s amazing how some people can be sucked in by a newspaper deliberately hyping up a story just to sell some papers – but that was explained way up in the very first comment of this post and it happens every day of the week in this country.

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Low-emissions options for heavy transport a step closer
    Getting low-emission trucks on the road is a step closer with investment in infrastructure to support hydrogen vehicles, the Energy and Resources Minister Megan Woods has announced. The Infrastructure Reference Group has provisionally approved $20 million for New Plymouth company Hiringa Energy to establish a nationwide network of hydrogen-fuelling stations. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    14 hours ago
  • New training centre to upskill workers
    A new trades training centre to upskill the local workforce will be built in the South Waikato town of Tokoroa through funding from the Government’s COVID-19 Response and Recovery Fund, Education Minister Chris Hipkins and Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones have announced. The Government will contribute $10.84 million from ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    14 hours ago
  • Subsequent children legislation to change
    The Government has agreed to repeal part of the Oranga Tamariki Act subsequent children provisions, Minister for Children Tracey Martin announced today. “There are times when children need to go into care for their safety – the safety and care of children must always be paramount,” Minister Martin said. “But ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    15 hours ago
  • Funding to expand mental health support for Pacific peoples
    A $1.5 million boost to grow primary mental health and addiction services for Pacific peoples in Auckland, Hamilton and Canterbury will lead to better outcomes for Pacific communities, Associate Health Minister Jenny Salesa says.  Pasifika Futures has received funding to expand services through The Fono, Aotearoa New Zealand’s largest by ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    15 hours ago
  • Funding boost for sustainable food and fibre production
    Twenty-two projects to boost the sustainability and climate resilience of New Zealand’s food and fibres sector have been announced today by Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor. The $18m funding will deliver practical knowledge to help farmers and growers use their land more sustainably, meet environmental targets, remain prosperous, and better understand ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    18 hours ago
  • Mature Workers Toolkit launched on business.govt.nz
    Employment Minister Willie Jackson welcomes an initiative that assists employers to get mature workers into New Zealand small businesses. The disadvantages that older people face in the workplace was highlighted in the whole of Government Employment Strategy.  In order to address this, a Mature Workers Toolkit has been developed and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    18 hours ago
  • Trans-Tasman cooperation in a COVID-19 world
    New Zealand and Australia reaffirmed today the need for the closest possible collaboration as they tackle a global environment shaped by COVID-19, Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters said. “In these challenging times, our close collaboration with Australia is more vital than ever,” said Mr Peters. Mr Peters and his Australian ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    18 hours ago
  • Pike recovery efforts now in unexplored territory
    The recovery and forensic examination of the loader driven by survivor Russell Smith means the underground team are now moving into an area of the Pike River Mine that has not been seen since the explosion, Minister Responsible for Pike River Re-entry Andrew Little said. “The fifth and last robot ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    19 hours ago
  • Government confirms CovidCard trial to go ahead
    The Government has confirmed a community-wide trial of CovidCard technology as it explores options for COVID-19 contact tracing. “Effective contact tracing is a vital part of the COVID-19 response,” Minister of Health Chris Hipkins said. “While manual processes remain the critical component for contact tracing, we know digital solutions can ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    19 hours ago
  • Enhanced process for iwi aquaculture assets
    The government is proposing changes to aquaculture legislation to improve the process for allocating and transferring aquaculture assets to iwi. Fisheries Minister Stuart Nash has introduced the Maori Commercial Aquaculture Claims Settlement Amendment Bill to Parliament. It proposes a limited new discretionary power for Te Ohu Kaimoana Trustee Limited (ToKM). ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    19 hours ago
  • Bill introduced to fix National’s Family Court reform failures
    The Minister of Justice has today introduced the Family Court (Supporting Children in Court) Legislation Bill – the next step in the ongoing programme of work to fix the failed 2014 Family Court reforms led by then Justice Minister Judith Collins.  The Bill arises from the report of the Independent ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    20 hours ago
  • DOC takes action to adapt to climate change
    A new Department of Conservation (DOC) action plan tackles the impacts of climate change on New Zealand’s biodiversity and DOC managed infrastructure including tracks, huts and cultural heritage. Minister of Conservation Eugenie Sage says extreme weather events around the country have really brought home our vulnerability to changing weather patterns. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    20 hours ago
  • Reduced international Antarctic season commences
    A heavily scaled back international Antarctic season will commence this week, Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters and Research, Science and Innovation Minister Megan Woods have confirmed. “Antarctica is the only continent that is COVID-19 free,” Mr Peters said. “Throughout the global pandemic, essential operations and long-term science have continued at ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    20 hours ago
  • New high performance sports hub for Upper Hutt
    The Government is providing up to $30 million to help fund the NZ Campus of Innovation and Sport in Upper Hutt - an investment that will create 244 jobs. “The sports hub is designed to be a world-leading shared service for a range of sports, offering the level of facilities ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    20 hours ago
  • Govt keeps projects on road to completion
    Transport Minister Phil Twyford announced today transport projects currently in construction will continue at pace due to extra Government support for transport projects to mitigate the impact of COVID-19. To keep the $16.9 billion 2018-21 National Land Transport Programme going the Government has allocated funding from the COVID Response and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    21 hours ago
  • First project utilising $50 million ‘shovel ready’ fund for rural broadband announced
    $50 million for further rural broadband digital connectivity has been allocated from the $3 billion infrastructure fund in the COVID Response and Recovery Fund has been announced by Shane Jones, Minister for Infrastructure and Kris Faafoi, Minister for Broadcasting, Communications and Digital Media. The investment will go to boosting broadband ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    22 hours ago
  • Ultra-fast Broadband programme hits major milestone with more than one million connections
    The Minister for Broadcasting, Communications and Digital Media has congratulated the Ultra-fast Broadband (UFB) programme on its major milestone of connecting more than 1 million New Zealand households and businesses to UFB. “This milestone has been 10 years in the making and demonstrates the popularity of the UFB network. “Uptake ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    24 hours ago
  • Vaping legislation passes
    Landmark legislation passed today puts New Zealand on track to saving thousands of lives and having a smokefree generation sooner rather than later, Associate Health Minister, Jenny Salesa says. The Smokefree Environments and Regulated Products (Vaping) Amendment Bill regulates vaping products and heated tobacco devices. “There has long been concern ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Government repeals discriminatory law
    A discriminatory law that has been a symbol of frustration for many people needing and providing care and support, has been scrapped by the Government. “Part 4A of the New Zealand Public Health and Disability Amendment Bill (No 2) was introduced under urgency in 2013 by a National Government,” Associate ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • More competitive fuel market on the way
    Kiwi motorists are set to reap the benefits of a more competitive fuel market following the passing of the Fuel Industry Bill tonight, Energy and Resources Minister Megan Woods says.  “This Act is where the rubber meets the road in terms of our response to the recommendations made in the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Government delivers on rental reforms promise
    The Government has delivered on its promise to New Zealanders to modernise tenancy laws with the passing of the Residential Tenancies Amendment (RTA) Bill 2020 today, says Associate Minister of Housing (Public Housing), Kris Faafoi. “The Residential Tenancies Act 1986 was out-dated and the reforms in the RTA modernise our ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • New rules in place to restore healthy rivers
    New rules to protect and restore New Zealand’s freshwater passed into law today. Environment Minister David Parker and Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor welcomed the gazetting of the new national direction on freshwater management. “These regulations deliver on the Government’s commitment to stop further degradation, show material improvements within five years and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Foreign Minister announces new Consul-General in Los Angeles
    Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters has announced the appointment of Jeremy Clarke-Watson as New Zealand’s new Consul-General in Los Angeles. “New Zealand and the United States share a close and dynamic partnership, based on a long history of shared values and democratic traditions,” Mr Peters said. “Mr Clarke-Watson is a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Rental reforms provide greater support for victims of family violence
    Victims of family violence can end a tenancy with two days’ notice Landlords can terminate tenancies with 14 days’ notice if tenants assault them Timeframe brought forward for limiting rent increases to once every 12 months Extension of time Tenancy Tribunal can hear cases via phone/video conference Reform of New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Apprenticeships support kicks off today
    Two employment schemes – one new and one expanded – going live today will help tens of thousands of people continue training on the job and support thousands more into work, the Government has announced. Apprenticeship Boost, a subsidy of up to $12,000 per annum for first year apprentices and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Infrastructure to transform Omokoroa
    The Government is funding a significant infrastructure package at Omokoroa which will create 150 new jobs and help transform the Western Bay of Plenty peninsula, Urban Development Minister Phil Twyford announced today. Phil Twyford says the Government is investing $14 million towards the $28 million roading and water package. This ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Bill passes for managed isolation charges
    The Bill allowing the Government to recover some costs for managed isolation and quarantine passed its third reading today, with charges coming into force as soon as regulations are finalised. Putting regulations into force is the next step. “The COVID-19 Public Health Response Amendment Bill and its supporting regulations will ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Unemployment drop shows Govt plan to protect jobs and support businesses is working
    Today’s unemployment data shows the Government’s plan to protect jobs and cushion the blow for businesses and households against the economic impact of COVID-19 was the right decision, Finance Minister Grant Robertson says. Stats NZ said today that New Zealand’s unemployment rate in the June quarter – which includes the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • New role to champion reading for children
    A new role of New Zealand Reading Ambassador for children and young people is being established, Prime Minister and Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Jacinda Ardern and Minister for Internal Affairs and for Children, Tracey Martin announced today. The Reading Ambassador, announced at a Celebration of Reading event at ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Funding boost for Community Law Centres
    Community Law Centres will receive a funding boost to meet the increased need for free legal services due to COVID-19, Justice Minister Andrew Little said. The $3.5m funding is for the next three financial years and is additional to the almost $8 million for Community Law Centres announced in Budget ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • New Zealand joins initiative to boost women’s role in global trade
    New Zealand has joined Canada and Chile in a new trade initiative aimed at increasing women’s participation in global trade. Trade and Export Growth Minister David Parker, together with Canada’s Minister for Small Business, Export Promotion and International Trade Mary Ng, Chile’s Minister of Foreign Affairs Andrés Allamand, and Chile’s Vice ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Government provides $2.2m to heritage buildings for quake strengthening
    Building owners around New Zealand have benefited from the latest round of Heritage EQUIP funding with grants totalling $2,230,166. “The Heritage EQUIP grants for seismic strengthening assist private building owners to get the professional advice they need to go ahead with their projects or support them to carry out the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Better hospital care for Northland babies and their whānau
    •    New paediatric facilities, including a Special Baby Care Unit •    Up to 50 extra inpatient beds  •    New lab facilities  Northland babies and their whānau will soon have access to improved hospital care when they need it with Health Minister Chris Hipkins today confirming new paediatric facilities and more ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Green light for Wellington and Wairarapa in $220m nationwide cycleways package
    People walking and cycling between Featherston and Greytown, or along Wellington’s Eastern Bays will soon have a safe shared path, as part of a $220 million shovel-ready cycleways package announced by Associate Transport Minister Julie Anne Genter. “During lockdown we saw many more families and kids out on their bikes, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • New Zealand expresses condolences on passing of Vanuatu High Commissioner
    Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters today extended New Zealand’s condolences following the death of Vanuatu’s High Commissioner to New Zealand, Johnson Naviti, who passed away yesterday afternoon in Wellington. “Our thoughts are with the High Commissioner’s family and colleagues during this difficult time. This is a terrible loss both to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Government announces allocation of three waters funds for councils
    The Government has today set out the regional allocations of the $761 million Three Waters stimulus and reform funding for councils announced by Prime Minister Hon Jacinda Ardern this month.  "I want to thank Councils around the country for engaging with the Central Local Government Steering Group who have been ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Funding boost for students with highest learning support needs
    Students with high and complex learning needs, as well as their teachers and parents, will benefit from a substantial increase to Ongoing Resourcing Scheme (ORS) funding, Associate Education Minister Martin announced today. “Nearly $160 million will go towards helping these students by lifting their base support over the next four ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Govt connecting kiwis to affordable, healthy food
    Funding for innovative projects to connect Kiwis with affordable, safe and wholesome food, reduce food waste, and help our food producers recover from COVID-19 has been announced today by Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor. “COVID-19 has seen an increasing number of families facing unprecedented financial pressure. Foodbanks and community food service ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Getting infrastructure for housing underway
    Eight shovel-ready projects within Kāinga Ora large-scale developments, and the Unitec residential development in Auckland have been given the go-ahead, Minister for Housing Dr Megan Woods announced today. Megan Woods says these significant infrastructure upgrades will ensure that the provision of homes in Auckland can continue apace. “The funding announced ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Napier walk and cycleway to improve safety
    The Government is funding a new separated walking and cycleway path along Napier’s Chambers and Ellison streets to provide safer access for local students and residents across Marine Parade and State Highway 51, Transport Minister Phil Twyford and Police Minister Stuart Nash announced today. Funding of $2.7 million has been ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago