web analytics

IMF: higher taxes for rich will cut inequality and won’t hurt growth

Written By: - Date published: 12:30 pm, October 14th, 2017 - 104 comments
Categories: bill english, capital gains, don brash, Economy, gst, john key, labour, tax, winston peters - Tags: , , ,

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) says it now favours higher taxes on the rich and has demolished the myth this might adversely affect economic growth.

The authoritative Washington-based think tank in its influential half-yearly monitor also argued for taxes on capital, suggesting a wealth and/or land taxes should be considered, something that will make Gareth Morgan as happy as if the Opportunities Party was in election talks, or even in parliament.

Scaremongers on the Right regularly trot out the high taxes will damage growth fable to scare the electorate and other parties against advocating a more progressive tax regime. Labour has bought into this myth which is why it was too timid to go to the electorate with a firm policy of higher taxes for the 1 percent.

Don Brash, John Key, Bill English and many bank economists have long argued that hitting the rich is bad for economic growth, but the IMF notes there should be “significantly higher” taxes on those with higher incomes than currently prevail.

Advanced economies with relatively low levels of progressivity in their personal income tax (PIT) may therefore have scope for raising the top marginal tax rates without hampering economic growth,” it added.

Empirical analysis suggest that there is no systemic adverse trade-offs between increasing growth and decreasing equality,” the IMF noted.

The IMF argument is backed by the OECD, another respected body that could hardly be described as radical or leftist, which in a 2014 paper, Trends in Inequality and its impact on Economic Growth, studied the economic performance of its advanced nation members over a long period and found more equal societies have better economic performance.

The thrust of the IMF paper is a warning to governments about excessive inequality, which it says can erode social cohesion, lead to political polarisation and ultimately lower economic growth.

The paper says it is difficult to rationalise the decline of progressivity in OECD countries since the 1980s.

New Zealand, which once prided itself on being one of the most equal socially cohesive societies in the world, has had one of the steepest rises in inequality in a world of rising inequality.

Since the 1980s, New Zealand’s inequality, has moved closer to unequal countries like the United States. New Zealand’s rate of increase in inequality has been exceeded only by Finland and Sweden.

One measure of inequality in New Zealand compares the incomes of those near the top (the 80th percentile) with those near the bottom (the 20th percentile). In 1980, someone near the top earned 2.4 times what someone near the bottom did, after factoring in housing costs. Now, they earn three times more.

The IMF paper, also argued that different types of wealth taxes should be considered as part of a nation’s armoury to fight excessive inequality.

It notes capital income is even more unequally distributed than labour income and it is rising, and it is often taxed at a lower rate than labour (for New Zealand make that zero).

It says there needs to be adequate tax of capital to protect the progressivity of the tax system, as the wealthy, due to their superior resources, have far more ability to reclassify their income as capital (ie tax dodge).

Many countries (none named) should emphasise reducing opportunities for tax evasion and avoidances.

Taxes on real estate or land are both equitable and efficient and remain underused,” the paper says.

In countries, where there is a low capital gains tax, or in New Zealand’s case, none, the degree to which the fairness of the tax system has diminished since the 1980s is even more exaggerated, the IMF authors state.

In reality, tax systems may be even less progressive than suggested… because wealthy individuals often have more access to tax relief and more opportunities to avoid taxes.

The wealthier have more resources to dedicate to tax planning, as well as incentives to engage in such activities.

The authors cite another paper by Alstadsaeter Johannesen and Zucman who provided empirical evidence “that tax evasion is particularly high at the upper end of the income distribution” – ie the lack of a capital gains tax gives the 1 percent even more opportunity to rort and cheat.

In what would be even more music to the ears of Mr Morgan, the IMF paper explores the merits of a universal basic income (UBI) as a means of reducing inequality. While it could significantly reduce poverty and reduce income uncertainty resulting from the affects of automation (robots), it is not suitable for countries with a relatively good safety net welfare system.

In such countries “a UBI would result in a very large reduction in progressivity and losses in the size of benefits for many poor households and could even lead to higher poverty”.

The IMF paper taxes a sideswipe at regressive value added taxes, such as GST, which it says are good for increasing revenue but “not to enhance equity”.

The authors says that health and education play a vital role in reducing income inequality over the medium term, addressing the persistence of poverty across generations, enhancing social mobility and ultimately promoting sustained inclusive growth.

They say that in some advanced countries the life expectancy gap between those with tertiary education and those without has even widened in recent years as has the infant mortality rate between the top and bottom socioeconomic quintiles.

The authors, however, are sceptical about the prospect of countries redressing the inequities identified. They say it will be difficult to politically implement a return to a more progressive and fairer tax system, such as prevailed before the 1980s, “because better-off individuals tend to have more influence”, via lobbying, access to the media and political engagement.

It is especially difficult because, unlike in the UK, the Labour Party does not even have a policy of restoring progressivity to the tax system and it might be even more difficult if Winston Peters and New Zealand decide that enough is not enough.

 


Simon Louisson formerly worked for The Wall Street Journal, NZPA, Reuters, The Jerusalem Post and was a political and media adviser to the Green Party around the 2014 election

104 comments on “IMF: higher taxes for rich will cut inequality and won’t hurt growth”

  1. RedLogix 1

    Absolutely excellent post Simon. This is the kind of work I enjoy a lot and watching the IMF slowly come on board is like the mirage of an oasis, slowly turning out to be real. (Of course reality never quite measures up to hope, but it’s still way better than the sterile, harsh desert of hard-core neo-liberalism I’ve lived with most my adult life.)

    Really worth reading in conjunction with this post is this interesting article from the Gran:

    Every few years the New Economics Foundation publishes the Happy Planet Index – a measure of progress that looks at life expectancy, wellbeing and equality rather than the narrow metric of GDP, and plots these measures against ecological impact. Costa Rica tops the list of countries every time. With a life expectancy of 79.1 years and levels of wellbeing in the top 7% of the world, Costa Rica matches many Scandinavian nations in these areas and neatly outperforms the United States. And it manages all of this with a GDP per capita of only $10,000 (£7,640), less than one fifth that of the US.

    In this sense, Costa Rica is the most efficient economy on earth: it produces high standards of living with low GDP and minimal pressure on the environment.

    https://www.theguardian.com/working-in-development/2017/oct/07/how-to-avert-the-apocalypse-take-lessons-from-costa-rica

    Again Costa Rica is not paradise on earth. Nor is Cuba which is another Latin American country which has also … almost accidentally hit the wealth/inequality sweet spot.

    But like the Nordic countries, Finlan, Denmark, etc they do provide some fascinating data points, aspects that are worth thinking about.

  2. bwaghorn 2

    whats this i hear . Top had ideas that would help fix the problems , well i never

  3. Bill 3

    I don’t think there has ever been any doubt about what the IMF are proposing.

    The argument that an economy will suffer if the richer are taxed more has always just been a distraction or cover that allowed for the limiting and rolling back of working class power that had accompanied the (mostly) post WWII experiment with social democracy.

    It’s primarily what the promotion of 19thC Liberalism from the 1970s has always been about – a realignment of power within society.

    • It’s primarily what the promotion of 19thC Liberalism from the 1970s has always been about – a realignment of power within society.

      And that realignment has been detrimental to society as it’s increased poverty and slowed or even stopped development of local economies.

      • Bill 3.1.1

        Well yes. But the point is that those who favoured a return to Liberalism and the power it would deliver to them don’t give a rats arse about poverty or much of whatever else besides power.

        Corbyn (just an old school social democrat) has some reasonable stuff to say about it (the power Liberalism delivers and some of what might be done about it) in this Guardian article from today.

  4. It says there needs to be adequate tax of capital to protect the progressivity of the tax system, as the wealthy, due to their superior resources, have far more ability to reclassify their income as capital (ie tax dodge).

    Yeah, that one’s even more important than raising the top rate. Those of us on wages and salaries don’t get to choose how much income tax we pay, but the wealthy do. If the top rate were to go up, I wouldn’t have any qualms about it and probably wouldn’t even notice the difference, but it would rankle if the wealthy were left to continue dodging their own taxes. Don’t do one without the other.

    • Antoine 4.1

      If you draw your argument to the logical conclusion, you might as well just add the capital tax and leave the top income tax rate (which the wealthy can avoid anyway) where it is??

      A.

      • tracey 4.1.1

        Because?

        • Antoine 4.1.1.1

          Because “the wealthy get to choose how much income tax they pay” so raising the top tax rate is not effective at fighting excessive inequality? It penalises the upper middle class without touching the 1%ers?

          A.

          • Stuart Munro 4.1.1.1.1

            The answer to that of course is to impose substantial additional taxes on their evasion vehicles. Got a trust? Pay up.

            • Patricia Bremner 4.1.1.1.1.1

              One of the greatest tax dodges has been religious groups and so-called charities.

              They should have to prove they distribute 75% of their income to qualify for tax free status.

              Further they should have to produce audits yearly.

              If this was done, religions and charities would become much rarer beasts IMO.

              The super wealthy should have special taxes, to avoid money bottlenecks.

              The super poor should have reverse taxes to add to their living income.

              We find the 1% often turn themselves into charities or foundations. Is that a tax dodge??

              • Stuart Munro

                NZ’s non-tithing core churches are not particularly exploitive, though I’m not sure they’d meet your 75% threshold – they run on mighty slender margins and most are involved in real charity work.

                Outfits like Sanitarium and the Exclusive Brethren are obvious targets. The Mormon Church would be… unhappy… and might flex some international muscle to resist.

      • Psycho Milt 4.1.2

        If you draw your argument to the logical conclusion, you might as well just add the capital tax and leave the top income tax rate (which the wealthy can avoid anyway) where it is??

        I guess that’s a matter of opinion. I’m starting from the subjective view that the reduction of progressiveness in income tax by previous governments is that something that should be rolled back, even if only partly, so the top tax rate should increase.

        • Antoine 4.1.2.1

          Whereas I start from the view that the top personal income tax rate, trust rate and company rate should be aligned at the same level and that level should preferably not be very high.

          > the reduction of progressiveness in income tax by previous governments is that something that should be rolled back

          You get the progressiveness through the capital tax, don’t need to do it through the income tax as well?

          A.

          • Draco T Bastard 4.1.2.1.1

            Whereas I start from the view that the top personal income tax rate, trust rate and company rate should be aligned at the same level and that level should preferably not be very high.

            They should all be aligned at a very high rate as this would encourage more investment.

            A company has three options of either investment (tax deductible), keeping the money in the company (taxed at high rate) or paying out in dividends (also tax deductible (if it isn’t it should be) but taxed on the personal income rate of the shareholders). Same would also apply to trusts. the best option for the company and the shareholders if they want to avoid paying tax is the investment option. Else they pay the tax.

            You get the progressiveness through the capital tax, don’t need to do it through the income tax as well?

            Part of the reason for high income taxes is actually to prevent people having excessively high incomes. No point in paying someone $1m if they’re only going to get $10,000 more per year than paying them $500,000. The $1m income would just be a waste for the company.

            • Incognito 4.1.2.1.1.1

              Part of the reason for high income taxes is actually to prevent people having excessively high incomes.

              IMO this is the root cause of the problem that a redistributive ‘corrective’ measure such as progressive tax is aimed at (actually, that’s only one side of the redistribution, and it never gets taken to full completion); it is perceived as penalising and even as ‘legalised theft’ by some. In other words, ‘giving’ heaps to someone and then trying to take away heaps from them is all back-to-front to me. Deal with the root cause of income & wealth inequality and the tax problem largely disappears. Taxes are generally seen as the key issue but they are merely a distraction and used as such by the well-heeled; the incomes and assets almost always escape real scrutiny.

              • Taxes are generally seen as the key issue but they are merely a distraction and used as such by the well-heeled; the incomes and assets almost always escape real scrutiny.

                QFT

          • Psycho Milt 4.1.2.1.2

            …the top personal income tax rate, trust rate and company rate should be aligned at the same level…

            No arguments there, only about where that level should be.

            You get the progressiveness through the capital tax, don’t need to do it through the income tax as well?

            I don’t believe so. The capital tax only restricts the ability of the wealthy to dodge paying taxes while whinging to anyone who’ll listen about the onerous tax burden that’s placed on them. The progressive part comes from taxing higher incomes at higher rates, and successive governments over the last 30 years have reduced the progressiveness of our income tax rates.

          • mikesh 4.1.2.1.3

            ¨You get the progressiveness through the capital tax, don’t need to do it through the income tax as well?¨

            I see a ¨capital¨ tax as a tax on capital´s yield – in other words a form of income tax – rather than a tax on capital itself. I don´t see any justification for taxing capital (except possibly where it is part of an inheritance tax levied at death). This implies excluding capital gains taxes since, contrary to what many think, capital gain is capital rather than income. It might not exclude, however,
            Gareth Morgan´s proposal to tax ¨Imputed income¨.

  5. Andre 5

    As always, Nick Hanauer’s latest rant on the topic of top tax rates and a healthy economy is worth reading.

    http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/10/11/republican-tax-cut-for-rich-economy-215696

    • UncookedSelachimorpha 5.2

      An quote worth repeating from the newer Hanauer article:

      “The rich are “job creators,” we’ve told you. The more money and incentives we wealthy few have to invest in creating jobs, the better the economy is for everybody—especially you.

      That’s a lie.

      There is is simply no empirical evidence nor plausible economic mechanism to support the claim that cutting top tax rates spurs economic growth.”

      • Andre 5.2.1

        Growing up a good mate’s family had a small business that they did very well out of, and they had expensive recreational habits.

        When there was some new levy or policy introduced that effectively amounted to a tax raise, the subject came up of what they would do about it. And the father said something about how if he wanted to keep getting his new toys, he would have to figure out how to get more income. So he did things he would have preferred not to do and grew the business, employing more people.

        Then when the Douglas tax cuts came and they were keeping a lot more of their gross income, he decided the aggravation running a bigger business for the extra cash in hand wasn’t needed and he scaled back, shedding those extra people.

        Which shows shows an exactly opposite example to the myth that give rich people more money then they’ll create more jobs.

  6. Incognito 6

    Another great post today!

    In my view, the last two paragraphs are the most telling ones.

    We can equal the concerted actions of those “better-off individuals” to status quo protected by Establishment at all cost! Their collective influence is through dictating & owning the narrative, in public political discourse.

    We will never make any serious headway if our ‘progressive’ parties timidly buy into this narrative, time after time. If IMF and OECD can (slowly) change their tune then so could our so-called Left! They not only could, they should!! Not just the ‘tune’ but the whole darn hymn sheet while they’re at it.

    I don’t have a lot of confidence in IMF trail blazing a path to a truly more equal and equitable society; they will only go as far as to find the sweet spot that maximises ROI (profits) and leaves ownership untouched and in the hands of the same few people as before, IMHO. I see it in the same light as National proclaiming to have suddenly found a social conscience as is supposedly evident through their social investment practices; it sounds compelling but really it is a Trojan horse.

  7. tracey 7

    Great post thanks. I had understood it was usually accepted economic theory that if you gave tax cuts to the lower earners in tight times you boost the economy cos it goes back in spending. More generally if you give tax cuts tot he high earners they pay down debts or go on hols (money out of the country)…

    • Andre 7.1

      That’s not the economic theory promoted by RWNJs. Their theory is give more money to the people that already have the most and it somehow trickles down to everyone else, like a kind of golden shower.

  8. Philj 8

    IMF – higher taxes on the rich? Just when exactly did they wake up to this amazing realisation? No credibility.

    • RedLogix 8.1

      The important thing here is not that you or I rate the IMF’s ‘credibility’ poorly, but that many people do.

      Ten years ago this would have been unthinkable; now it’s not.

      • People are going to be looking at these major institutions that have been changing their tune over taxes on the rich over the last few years and realise that the Left* have been saying that for decades. At that point we can hope that the majority of people will realise that it’s the Left with credible economic capabilities and not the Right-wing**.

        * Excluding Labour
        ** Including Labour

    • Hongi Ika 8.2

      Nah trickle down works best.

  9. The Chairman 9

    Clearly, our history has shown the income tax rate at the top end has considerably dropped.

    On the other hand, our CGT has (over the years) been more rigorously enforced and strengthen by the bright line test.

    It wasn’t a high CGT that produced a more equal society, it was (among other things) the high rate of income tax.

    Therefore, if we want to improve equality, we must consider correctly identifying and reversing the drivers which have led to the inequality we currently face.

    Which points to the changes in the income tax rate and the share of the income pool employees attain opposed to upper management.

    Tax minimisation also has to be addressed. Losses should be ring-fenced to the business they were made in and tax liabilities in general should be harder to wright off.

    When considering a land or wealth tax, one mustn’t make the mistake Garth made. Which was lumping all property owners together and classing them (therefore taxing them) as if they are all well off.

    Treating a struggling home owning pensioner the same as a well to do home owning successful high-flyer will create more inequality

    The high cost of housing (which is due to a mix of contributing factors that I won’t delve into now) also needs to be addressed.

    • Losses should be ring-fenced to the business they were made in and tax liabilities in general should be harder to wright off.

      I think that all finances of a business needs to be ring-fenced. Shouldn’t be able to right a loss of one business off the income of another business even if the one making the loss is a subsidiary.
      Transfer Pricing needs to be banned. Apple US should not be able to charge Apple NZ for using its logo and it most definitely shouldn’t be a tax write-off.
      A business shouldn’t be able to borrow to pay dividends. And the interest on the loan most definitely shouldn’t then be a tax write-off.

      Basically, if a business has a tax write-off then there should be a way for the government to tax that payment. I.e, A business buys something from another business in the same country then the second business pay tax on their profit. The government doesn’t lose any taxes. On the other hand a tax write off for a local business which spent outside of the country the government isn’t going get the tax from that second business.

      • The Chairman 9.1.1

        Yes, I largely agree. It’s a matter of identifying the holes and plugging them.

        • Descendant Of Sssmith 9.1.1.1

          The simplest way to avoid tax writeoffs is to tax at gross sales and leave the issue of expenses, etc to the owners and shareholders to sort out.

          I’ve argued this for many years now.

          Deducting the tax at POS for electronic transactions through the EFTPOS system and this amount going direct to government the hundreds of millions of dollars lost each year by businesses not paying and going bust will be almost eliminated.

          The broadening of the tax base to all businesses for all sales in the NZ economy, including those that currently expense it away offshore, would mean that many current NZ businesses would pay less while the banks and international companies would pay more.

          Ultimately you could net off all wages under a certain amount (say for instance $100,000) and simply have progressive tax rates for everything over that and lift the minimum wage to a living wage.

          The fact is for most wage earners the employer pays the PAYE and removing the tax burden of the PAYE to the employer for incomes up to $100,000 will encourage more employment not less because you’ve reduced the real cost and puts people labour on the same cost basis to a large extent as the emerging work force of robots for whom no PAYE gets paid.

          Businesses would still need to file monthly returns for gross cash sales and pay the tax on this each month.

          You can leave the tax collection rate as collect same amount of tax as is done now and make the tax gains from less avoidance (due to the difficulty to evade based on gross income), reduced black market (due to the low rate), more immediate payment and less defaulting.

          Additionally governments should forecast collection amounts for the year in budgets and by law 50% of tax collected over that total in a year should be returned to the businesses from whom it was collected.

          The other 50% can be used by government with a focus on reducing government debt.

          South Africa already does this for small businesses:

          http://www.sars.gov.za/TaxTypes/TT/Pages/default.aspx

          • mikesh 9.1.1.1.1

            Such a tax would seriously disadvantage a high volume/low margin company. eg if the revenue tax rate was set at, say, 0.5%, a company whose profit was 2% of revenue would find that its tax bill was 5 times its profit. However a company with a profit rate of 10% of turnover would enjoy a tax rate of 50% of profit.

            • Descendant Of Sssmith 9.1.1.1.1.1

              Nonsense because your whole premise for that statement is the status quo in that you believe there should be a relationship between tax and profit.

              The level of profit in such a tax system is irrelevant – the issue of expenses and profit is between the owners and shareholders. If they have an issue with not enough profit then they should take more interest in what the actual costs of the business are.

              Every business should pay tax as part of the cost of operating in New Zealand to help pay for the legal and societal framework in which they can operate and flourish.

              Those that pay no tax now because they make no profit or can shift it offshore are freeloading off the businesses that do make a profit.

              Profit is let’s face it simply a form of private taxation.

              The purpose is to ensure the tax base is wider than it is now.

              First you have to get past the paradigm that tax and profit have some sort of useful relationship. What we’ve seen is the ability to shift and minimise that profit despite high earnings makes that type of relationship pretty useless.

              • mikesh

                ¨Nonsense because your whole premise for that statement is the status quo in that you believe there should be a relationship between tax and profit.

                The level of profit in such a tax system is irrelevant – the issue of expenses and profit is between the owners and shareholders. If they have an issue with not enough profit then they should take more interest in what the actual costs of the business are.¨

                It´s the after tax profit that is of interest to the shareholders. Introducing a tax that is not proportional to profit is simply unsound economically. A tax based on revenue would to all intents and purposes would be just another expense, but one not related to any service provided to the company.

                This is different from, say, a land tax. A land tax would be an expense which could be taken into account when forming a budget. However, unlike a land tax, if one tried to budget for a revenue tax by raising prices, the revenue tax payable would also rise.

                • Descendant Of Sssmith

                  It´s the after tax profit that is of interest to the shareholders.

                  Fundamentally that’s one of the problems. Minimising profit to reduce tax liability, often to nil, is seen as good management by many. There’s far too much focus on that than what real expenses are being extracted, including massive amounts of capital via high executive salaries for one.

                  A tax based on revenue would to all intents and purposes would be just another expense, but one not related to any service provided to the company.

                  The society the business operates in provides many, many services to all companies. From education and health systems, to roads and other infrastructure, to the civilness and lawfulness of society, ……

                  Every business should pay significantly towards this. No business should ever pay nothing.

                  • Nic the NZer

                    “Minimising profit to reduce tax liability, often to nil, is seen as good management by many. ”

                    Doesn’t that mean no dividend payments to shareholders? What do they get for their investment? It sounds like such a company is being operated in the interests of managers over shareholders in this instance.

                  • Nic the NZer

                    Another way to deal with this (which I heard suggested by ultra progressive economists) is to have no company tax and instead impute all profits onto the owners (where it is taxed). This seems a much better strategy than what presently happens where company tax is passed onto consumers often times.

                    • mikesh

                      I have often thought that this would be a good idea. All profits should be tax free, but paid to shareholders as dividends, with the latter paying tax on their dividends at their own personal tax rates. If a company wished to retain all or part of the profit for investment purposes, they would issue new shares, in lieu of dividends, to their shareholders.

                  • mikesh

                    There are different sorts of tax: Some are based on ownership eg land tax, capital gains tax; some are ¨punitive¨ eg taxes on alcohol and tobacco; some are based on productive activity eg income tax, company tax. Generally speaking it is considered that the taxing of productive activity should be more or less proportional to the returns on that activity (while recognising the need for progressiveness). A revenue tax seems to be a tax on productive activity, but one that is no longer proportional to the returns obtained. Activities involving large turnover at small margins are disadvantaged as compared with lower turnover at larger margins.

                    It may be argued, as you do, that earnings and profits should be irrelevant to the amount of tax paid, but most people seem to think the those who earn more should shoulder a larger proportion of the governmentś need for revenue.

                  • mikesh

                    ¨Fundamentally that’s one of the problems. Minimising profit to reduce tax liability, often to nil, is seen as good management by many. There’s far too much focus on that than what real expenses are being extracted, including massive amounts of capital via high executive salaries for one.¨

                    I don´t think a revenue tax would discourage the extraction of ¨massive amounts of capital via high executive salaries¨. And as far as ¨minimising profit to to reduce tax liability¨ is concerned, I don´t think that happens except in the case of transfer pricing from overseas. However, I don´t think we should mess up our own tax system just to combat this; which is not to say that transfer pricing is not something we should be fighting against.

                    ¨The society the business operates in provides many, many services to all companies. From education and health systems, to roads and other infrastructure, to the civilness and lawfulness of society, ……

                    Every business should pay significantly towards this. No business should ever pay nothing.¨

                    I have never suggested that we should not pay taxes. However a revenue tax is not a payment for a service provided specifically to a company (unlike ,say, a land tax), but generally to the community as a whole.

                • A tax based on revenue would to all intents and purposes would be just another expense, but one not related to any service provided to the company.

                  A viable society with an educated populace is a service rendered by society to business.

                  Introducing a tax that is not proportional to profit is simply unsound economically.

                  It would still be proportional.

                  However, unlike a land tax, if one tried to budget for a revenue tax by raising prices, the revenue tax payable would also rise.

                  Proving it’s proportionality.

                  • KJT

                    DTB. How do you tax a builder on Revenue compared with an accountant.
                    Over 3/4 of a builders revenue is expenses such as materials, tools and staff.
                    An accountant. Can work from home, and just keep their copies of the accounting standards up to date.

            • Draco T Bastard 9.1.1.1.1.2

              But isn’t it the point of capitalism that if a business can’t survive it doesn’t?

              It’s not the governments job to ensure a faulty business model can continue.

              • mikesh

                A business model may be faulty under one system of taxation while OK under another. The governmentś job is to provide a tax system which achieves a fair outcome. Fairness is best achieved if the tax burden is shared in proportion to income received. A tax based on revenue doesn´t achieve this.

                • The tax system should apply equally to all participants with everyone paying their fair share. When some get advantages then the tax system is actually wrong. If a business can only work when the tax system is wrong then the business shouldn’t be in existence.

                  And, yes, a tax based upon revenue does achieve this. Or are you saying that PAYE is wrong and that we should treat everyone the same as businesses with all their tax write-offs?

                  • KJT

                    Childcare, travel to work, uniform and protective gear should be tax deductible for employees, as it once was.

                    The principle was that employers would pay all work related expenses out of their, tax deductible income. Of course this is not happening.

                    Taxing gross revenue is totally distorting, as the amount of profit over revenue varies greatly according to the business. High turnover businesses such as supermarkets, typically have 3 to 4% margins for example.

                    • mikesh

                      ¨Childcare, travel to work, uniform and protective gear should be tax deductible for employees, as it once was.¨

                      Uniform and protective gear should be provided by the employer, but if the employee has to provide his own he should be paid an allowance. This used to be a provision in most industrial awards. I´m not sure what the situation is now that the award system has been discontinued.

                      Child care and travel to work should not be deductible since these do not contribute to the earning of taxable income as required by the Income Tax Act.

                      Interest is another oddball expense. It doesn´t contribute directly to the earning of taxable income but the Act allows it., which would seem to be something of an anomaly.

                    • Child care and travel to work should not be deductible since these do not contribute to the earning of taxable income as required by the Income Tax Act.

                      But they do for the people on PAYE.

                    • mikesh

                      ¨But they do for the people on PAYE.¨

                      They don´t, actually. They put people in positions where they can start to earn taxable income, but they don´t contribute to the actual earning of that income. Anyhow, that´s the Commissioner of Inland Revenue´s position on the matter.

                      Arguably it´s the same with interest. Borrowing enables borrowers to invest, but it´s the actual investing that earns the taxable income.

                  • mikesh

                    ¨When some get advantages then the tax system is actually wrong.¨

                    That is it in a nutshell. A tax system based on revenue rather than income gives some people an advantage.

  10. Great post but , … its all been said BEFORE. We know all this.

    We’ve had the John Pilgers , the Hugh Prices , the Alister Barry’s , – all brilliant and all factual , concise , prophetic and who have provided the counter arguments against neo liberalism.

    My question is ,… WHY has it taken 33 years to even timidly revisit all this ?

    IMF and OECD aside , – really ?!!?

    And yes I realize these ‘report’s’ are delivered as a generic global critique , – but they are directly relevant to this country because we were the TEST CASE GUINEA PIGS !!!

    Did we have to wait until 2017 ( 33 years after the fact ! ) to receive a mild report from them on what we all knew ALREADY ? How many more representatives from social agency’s do we have to sagely nod our heads in agreement towards then ignore , – how many more Metiria’s do we need to crucify before we start to actually get off our arses, and set our sights squarely on those treasonous fuckers who caused all this to happen in this country ?

    All these excuses , all this inertia about ‘ it cant be done’ , ‘ the problems too big ‘ , ‘ it could never happen because ‘the cards are all stacked against us ‘ ,…

    BULL BLOODY SHIT !!!

    The very self same heads of the neo liberal treason are the very same treasonous bastards who ,- after leaving cushy and influential govt appointed positions such as Treasury and the Reserve Bank , – are the very self same scumbags such as Don Brash , Ruth Richardson , Jenny Shipley and Chris Tremain – who after fucking us all up , – are now CEO’s heading such illustrious outfits as the China Construction Bank (CCB) NZ , the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) ,The Bank of China .

    Shipley v Brash: Who earns more Chinese bank cash? | Stuff.co.nz
    http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/…/Shipley-v-Brash-Who-earns-more-Chinese-bank-cash

    You’ve HAD all the evidence . You KNOW all the players. You’ve all SEEN what they’ve done to this country.

    And yet like Cambodia or post Nazi Germany or any number of east European or South American banana republics , – you let these crooks , plunderer’s and thieves walk the streets free while sneering contemptuously at the poor , – the very same poverty class THEY created and yet all you / we ever do is wring your hands and pontificate on how we ever got to this level !!!

    THAT is the real criminality in all of this :

    A beaten , hollowed out public ground down by ALLOWING these perfidious thugs the ability to do what they did to us and walk scot bloody free! And then to add injury to insult? – then allowing the filthy shitheads to keep on doing it , never learning the lesson and then voting the pricks back in again !

    These white collar penpushers went WAY beyond just being simply parsimonious : these fuckers had an agenda. A viscous agenda. And yes I know , – this article is all about taxation and equality , – and some would say this little rant is going off topic. BUT IS IT ?!!? ,- REALLY ?!!? , – because last time I looked it was also about society’s being EQUITABLE !!!

    Here’s a good read :

    New Right Fight – Who are the New Right?
    http://www.newrightfight.co.nz/pageA.html

    Now then , – if New Zealanders , – and those in particular on the Left , are serious about change , … one of the first things that need to be done is the dismantling of much of what these treasonous bastards managed to get into law . And , – by association , – exposure of the same for their crimes. In doing that, it would give a kind of ‘catarrh – ick ‘ – like momentum to expelling the ideology of these self serving trougher society wreckers and hopefully resulting in convictions and long prison sentences for their acts of treason by stealth. That and the corruption of our democratic foundations.

    THEN , … we can talk about problem solving and finding a solution.

    And just so we all know where we stand on all this , – here’s a few good documentary’s provided by Ed a day or so ago that actually not only names and shames these bastards – but gives close up footage of every eye movement , every averted glance and every falter of the voice of these liars in action.

    Enjoy.

    New Zealand – In a Land of Plenty Full Doco – YouTube
    Video for New Zealand – In a Land of Plenty Full Doco▶ 1:44:13

    • And here’s the second one .

      New Zealand – Somebody Elses Country Full Doco – YouTube
      Video for New Zealand – Somebody Elses Country Full Doco▶ 1:47:20

      • cleangreen 10.1.1

        Thanks Wild Katipo.

        Shit I just finished watching it I was blown away as during 1987-1998 I was in Canada working and never saw this all before.

        Just as well I was away then, I loved seeing Winston there fighting for us and MMP then with Jim Anderton.

        Two great guys. Thanks again mate.

    • Philj 10.2

      Good rant WK. I enjoyed reading it. We are not alone or powerless. Cheers.

    • Ed 10.3

      Brilliant Wild Kapito.
      We share a lot of ideas. I love the passion you speak with; if only we had courageous and passionate politicians who would take on the establishment.
      The UK have Corbyn.
      Who do we have?

  11. tuppence shrewsbury 11

    outside a handful of second rate property developers, who i’ll include in that description those who purchase homes primary, secondary and tertiary for profit with no intention of improving the housing stock qualitatively or quantitively, i don’t think you’ll find too many people will argue against a capital tax AS LONG AS there is a reduction in income tax, for which the vast majority of capital owners, income is derived from capital. the positive impacts of changing the gearing of the various taxes to be more equitable between will greatly discourage any form of gaming, gearing in anticipation of events related to tax and avoidance, as by it’s very nature it makes these things redundant.

    The problem for New Zealand is that the current system has been established for too long to not cause immense pain in it’s implementation. So a transitional period of say 5 years is necessary. this is problematic in itself due to the election cycle being only three years and allows for pandering to interested parties. The transitional period should allow for tax free sales of existing stock only, once it’s changed hands it’s liable for tax. once 5 years is up, it’s all taxed regardless.

    simply increasing overall tax rates will not be a panacea to inequality.

    • The Chairman 11.1

      “Simply increasing overall tax rates will not be a panacea to inequality”

      Of course not. But tax increases for the top end plays a vital role in the required correction.

  12. Whispering Kate 12

    “The authors, however, are sceptical about the prospect of countries redressing the inequities identified. They say it will be difficult to politically implement a return to a more progressive and fairer tax system, such as prevailed before the 1980s, “because better-off individuals tend to have more influence”, via lobbying, access to the media and political engagement.”

    The above paragraph doesn’t make for optimistic results for a fairer system. Political parties are too frightened of their own shadow to make contentious legislation. The last time anybody had a pair of cojones was the pig farmer and what a pig’s breakfast he created. Now there is so much wealth and influence saturating our country true democracy just doesn’t work anymore.

    • The Chairman 12.1

      “The authors, however, are sceptical about the prospect of countries redressing the inequities identified. They say it will be difficult to politically implement a return to a more progressive and fairer tax system, such as prevailed before the 1980s, “because better-off individuals tend to have more influence”, via lobbying, access to the media and political engagement.”

      And yet, isn’t it interesting that better-off individuals are using their influence to call for a CGT?

      http://www.newshub.co.nz/home/money/2017/10/bnz-chief-calls-for-capital-gains-tax-to-fight-the-big-gap-between-rich-and-poor.html

      • CoroDale 12.1.1

        And yet, interesting that they don’t call for restrictions on private banks creating money with debt. Lets spin positive and say CGT is a first step, towards the truth about all.

      • Incognito 12.1.2

        And yet, isn’t it interesting that better-off individuals are using their influence to call for a CGT?

        Before I open the bubbly I’d like to see much much more evidence of a real change of heart. To me it is a little too convenient, too cute, and too piecemeal to point to some kind of epiphany. It reminds me of Bill English and his so-called Hardship Budget in 2015 to tackle child poverty. It was heralded amongst much fanfare as a game-changer and as “the first, beyond inflation, since 1977” and a “package to lift children out of poverty will see benefits rise beyond inflation for the first time in 30 years” – note that arithmetic has never been Bill’s strongest skill. So, more than two years later, how much impact has this made? Is child poverty substantially less now? Obviously, it is not and the message is that we have to view these kinds of announcements from IMF and BNZ alike under a similar light of healthy scepticism and critical analysis.

        • The Chairman 12.1.2.1

          The well to do calling for a CGT tends to be a distraction from us focusing on increasing the tax rate on their huge salaries and returns.

          A number want to offset a CGT with lower income tax.

          Labour are doing similar. Advocating for a CGT, but avoiding calling for income tax increases at the top end.

      • mikesh 12.1.3

        ¨And yet, isn’t it interesting that better-off individuals are using their influence to call for a CGT?¨

        Where this is the case I think they do so because they fear that, if they don´t, they may find themselves faced with something even less palatable.

        • Incognito 12.1.3.1

          I agree; it is not a step forward in the right direction but more of a ‘tactical retreat’ to consolidate power.

        • The Chairman 12.1.3.2

          Indeed, mikesh

          As I said above, the well to do calling for a CGT tends to be a distraction from us focusing on increasing the tax rate on their huge salaries and returns.

          A number want to offset a CGT with lower income tax.

          Keeping in mind, it wasn’t a CGT that helped make us a more equal society in the past. It was (among other things) our high income tax rate.

        • mikesh 12.1.3.3

          It was interesting that the BNZ CEO, interviewed on The Nation yesterday, opined that a capital gains tax would do little to improve the economy, and that the case for CGT rested mainly on the issue of fairness. However, except in situations covered by the brightline test, I don´t see CGT enhancing fairness in the tax system, so I guess we might as well consign it to the waste paper bin.

          • Stuart Munro 12.1.3.3.1

            No, let’s keep it.

            Best indicator of how necessary it is how much property speculators hate the idea. It’s a proven idea worldwide – in fact we are almost the only advanced country stupid enough not to have one.

            No need to reinvent the wheel – CGT – just like everyone else.

            • mikesh 12.1.3.3.1.1

              I am not aware that property speculators ¨hate the idea¨, and, even if they did, it´s not evidence that capital gains taxes make for a fairer tax system.
              And just because other countries have stupid tax systems doesn´t mean we have to.

              • KJT

                A “fair” tax system is where all income is treated equally.

                Whatever the semantics, capital gains is money income to those that are fortunate enough to acquire it.

                We are the ones that have the stupid tax system, where consumption and wages are overtaxed, and capital is way under taxed. To the advantage of those who already have lots of money capital and to the detriment of everyone else.

                It was Adam Smith who said tax rentiers and landowners, not entrepreneurs and workers. Though I think he would have had something to say about today’s financial entrepreneurs.

                • mikesh

                  [[ “fair” tax system is where all income is treated equally.]]

                  True.

                  [[Whatever the semantics, capital gains is money income to those that are fortunate enough to acquire it.]]

                  Untrue. Except where property (or shares) is purchased for the purpose of resale; these situations are covered by the ¨brightline¨ test.

                  The Income Tax Act leaves income undefined, but I think you will find that legal and tax experts agree that capital gain is not income.

                  [[We are the ones that have the stupid tax system, where consumption and wages are overtaxed, and capital is way under taxed. To the advantage of those who already have lots of money capital and to the detriment of everyone else.]]

                  Very likely true. But why not, in that case, tax the whole of capital rather than just the capital gain. Land and/or property taxes collected on a regualar basis, in much the same way that rates are collected, would seem to be a better idea where real estate is concerned.

                  [[It was Adam Smith who said tax rentiers and landowners, not entrepreneurs and workers. Though I think he would have had something to say about today’s financial entrepreneurs.]]

                  You seem to be confused about this. Rentiers don´t sell their properties for ¨capital gain¨ but rent them out for the rental income that they can yield.

    • Tracey 12.2

      They will pay for some different experts

  13. cleangreen 13

    So why was the agressive global “austerity” plan implimented even in NZ (slowly) and all other countries that forced all our sale of viable assets at fire sale prices?????????/

    Was that the ‘vehicle’ to rob us of our assets?????

    Probably it was another rort by the golbal elite again..

  14. UncookedSelachimorpha 14

    Great post, thanks Simon.

  15. DH 15

    I wish they’d both leave taxes alone the meddling pricks.

    A tax increase is a pay cut and no-one is going to take that quietly. The management class has a great deal of influence over their pay and when you raise their taxes they simply scratch each others backs and pay themselves more to make up for it.

    Wage rises don’t appear out of thin air, they take their pay rises off the lesser paid who don’t have any influence over their pay. The Unions used to watch those management salaries like a hawk but they’re all dead or gone now.

    When Clarke’s Labour Govt raised the top rate to 39% we saw all the already overpaid bureaucrats indulge in an orgy of huge pay rises for themselves and the end result was a widening of the gap between those at the top … and those at the bottom.

    Actions have consequences and tax increases don’t occur in a vacuum. Leave the bloody thing alone.

    • The Chairman 15.1

      Tax increases or not, salaries of the management class continue to soar regardless.

      And there are a number of contributing factors for that, weak unions is one of them.

      Tax increases don’t occur in a vacuum, hence it’s only one of a number of factors that need to be addressed.

      • Nic the NZer 15.1.1

        The left needs to pick its battles.

        Some other factors driving inequality the IMF doesn’t discuss,
        1) The government aiming to have about 1 in 25 workers be unemployed (which effects wages).
        2) The cuts to most public services since the 1980’s reducing access to public services.
        3) The cuts to most public services pushing those working in those sectors down the overall pay scale.
        4) The overall growth rate of the economy being lower since the 1980’s and this improving the relative profitability of asset speculation.
        5) The de-regulation of lending making it much easier to facilitate asset speculation.

        The government of today could address all these areas by regulating stronger or simply by spending more on some sectors. It can do this without raising a cent more in taxes.

        Even the more reasonable research faction (which has almost no say in which policies are prescribed when the IMF negotiates) of the IMF still believes that the status quo should prevail in these areas.

        • The Chairman 15.1.1.1

          Raising taxes would give the Government more scope to spend more on public services.

          Nevertheless, you forgot to add foreign ownership, thus returns heading offshore. Leaving a fiscal hole in our economy.

          Since the 80’s, this country has off loaded a number of our most lucrative sectors/businesses to offshore investors and done away with capital controls.

          • Nic the NZer 15.1.1.1.1

            “Raising taxes would give the Government more scope to spend more on public services.”

            No it would not. Though effectively taxation creates a higher level of unemployment (reduces total spending), which may increase the amount that the government is able to spend on the economy without running into inflation constraints of the economy. But in no way does the governments spending program ever depend on the availability of funding. Simply put the government can at all times afford to purchase everything for sale in NZ dollars.

            Further if you want the IMF’s effective beliefs on this (as exposed by their forecasts and policy prescriptions) it gets even more bizarre they believe in negative spending multipliers, probably through some Ricardian Equivalence mechanism. That means they believe when the government increases its spending then the private sector automatically sequesters its spending (to pay for taxes they expect in the future) meaning there would be no need for taxation at all to restrict total spending. In practice this does not appear to occur however.

            “Nevertheless, you forgot to add foreign ownership, thus returns heading offshore. Leaving a fiscal hole in our economy”

            Returns heading off shore *can* leave a hole in total spending in the economy (a fiscal hole would pertain to government tax collection) when those profits are not re-spent on the economy again. This, like non-investment style saving (or repayment of private debt), like taxation reduces total spending, increases unemployment and so just creates more opportunity for government spending to fill that gap.

            • The Chairman 15.1.1.1.1.1

              “But in no way does the governments spending program ever depend on the availability of funding”. 

              It wasn’t what I was claiming.

              The availability of funding in the hand does however improve their scope to spend. However, I wasn’t suggesting Government spending was totally reliant on it.

              “Though effectively taxation creates a higher level of unemployment” 

              We’ve had higher taxes in the past with low unemployment, thus I disagree on this point.

              Higher tax at the top end allows for the revenue to be redistributed, increasing demand, thus is an economic stimulus. When met by more production, inflation will be fine and it will result in more tax revenue.

              • Nic the NZer

                I can’t discern the meaning of the statement,

                “The availability of funding in the hand does however improve their scope to spend.”

                It appears to imply some kind of spending constraint. As I already commented,

                “Simply put the government can at all times afford to purchase everything for sale in NZ dollars.”

                “We’ve had higher taxes in the past with low unemployment, thus I disagree on this point.”

                That’s a fair comment (I didn’t explain this well), however, just as taxation reduces total spending (and thus increases unemployment) government spending increases total spending (it adds directly to GDP actually) and thus increases employment and at the times you are referring to public spending was much larger compensating fully for the higher taxation.
                Also, obviously its much more straight forward, when seeking to increase demand, to simply increase demand, rather than hoping to redistribute that spending enough to influence demand.

  16. joe90 16

    Corporate tax rates, according to Dwight D.

    • Andre 16.1

      Note that Dwight D.’s argument for high corporate tax rates pushes companies to a high-capital-gain low-dividend mode, which is OK if capital gains are taxed at a rate similar to ordinary income. As they were in the US, but not in NZ (although Dubya dramatically lowered the CGT rate and Obama didn’t push it back up).

      Another difference is that in the US, corporate profits are taxed before dividends are paid, then the shareholders that receive the dividends pay income tax on them. Whereas in NZ, corporate tax paid creates imputation credits, which effectively means NZ shareholders then don’t have to pay income tax on the dividends.

      • mikesh 16.1.1

        ¨Another difference is that in the US, corporate profits are taxed before dividends are paid, then the shareholders that receive the dividends pay income tax on them. Whereas in NZ, corporate tax paid creates imputation credits, which effectively means NZ shareholders then don’t have to pay income tax on the dividends.¨

        Shareholders do pay tax on dividends. The imputation credit provides them a tax credit for portion of the tax, paid by the company, included in the dividend. If the shareholder´s personal tax rate is therefor greater than the company´s he will have to pay extra tax; if less, he can claim a tax refund of the the difference.

  17. One Two 17

    So how much in $$ do ‘ The Realm of New Zealand’, and other debtor nations OWE THE IMF…

    IMF trying to position itself in a positive light, using deflection..

    IMF is very much part of the problem!

  18. Richard 18

    The Dutch have got the answer!

  19. Adrian 19

    In the IMF s case it’s philosophy comes from the top, only when the change in the form of new directorate comes at the top does this change, as has happened recently.
    Of course they are comfortable with higher taxes because IMF salaries and perks are huge to start with and any increased taxes will be negated by a lift in these payments.
    In a conversation about 12 years ago with a relative who is a senior staffer I posited an argument and was accused of being a Marxist, that wouldn’t happen today maybe a gentle ” .. well, you’ve always been a bit of a socialist Adrian “.

    • Nic the NZer 19.1

      I think (as they are employed internationally) IMF staff are typically exempt from, taxation one way or another. This is not to say they are fairly paid however, given the costs and destruction imposed by almost every intervention they have ever done they would still be to expensive even if they worked entirely Pro Bono. More simply the world would be a better place if the IMF didn’t exist.

  20. CHCOff 20

    Whatever the politics of the methodology, where public sectors are designated, they would give better value using wide spread lay persons accounting in their organisational trees of things:

    What is present value, what are incomings, what are outgoings tallies, all within the one and same mechanism.

    In an ideal world that would be the approach in the private sector also, but in terms of pragmatic functionalism and practicality, a compliment of styles would be best.

  21. Michael 21

    Will one of you lot in Labour’s inner circle pass this on to Grant Robertson? I think he (and the rest of us) would benefit from his reading it. It’s a shame the report wasn’t around before the last election but Grant will have another three years to reflect on it and produce a tax policy before the next one.

  22. CoroDale 22

    IMF / World Bank Annual Meetings conclude today, and this year the European Investment Bank was participating.
    Note worthy that the European Investment Bank (EIB) is being forced by German restrictions; from a banking bail-out phase, to an uncharted phase of banking bail-in. Expect confidence in the financial system to reach new lows.
    For example; protests in France today, opposing Agenda 21 style austerity.
    Despite the debt-elephant in the room; meeting agenda was on strengthening Europe, greening business, unilateral vs multilateral development, and naturally the weather. (http://www.KenFM.de, http://www.actvism.org, http://www.eib.org)

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • New Zealand First Statement on Muller Resignation
    Rt Hon Winston Peters, Leader of New Zealand First New Zealand First Leader Winston Peters acknowledged today the heavy price of trying to lead the National Party today. ‘One’s sympathy goes out to Todd Muller and his family. Todd is a good man, unlike most of his colleagues he does ...
    8 hours ago
  • Week That Was: Keeping New Zealand moving
    We're keeping New Zealand moving, one progress-packed week at a time. Read below to find out how we're creating jobs, protecting the environment, looking out for the health of New Zealanders', and upgrading our critical infrastructure - and that's only this week. ...
    1 day ago
  • Week That Was: Keeping New Zealand moving
    We're keeping New Zealand moving, one progress-packed week at a time. Read below to find out how we're creating jobs, protecting the environment, looking out for the health of New Zealanders', and upgrading our critical infrastructure - and that's only this week. ...
    1 day ago
  • Government backs Northland innovation and enterprise park
    Hon Shane Jones, Minister for Regional Economic Development The Provincial Growth Fund is providing up to $19.5 million to boost innovative primary sector businesses and create training and job opportunities for Northland locals through the construction of an innovation and enterprise park at Ngawha, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones ...
    1 day ago
  • Green Party unveils Clean Energy Plan
    The Green Party is today unveiling part one of its plan for a fossil-fuel free Aotearoa, including an immediate ban on new industrial coal boilers. ...
    2 days ago
  • New Zealand First calls for tahr cull halt
    Mark Patterson MP, Spokesperson for Primary Industry New Zealand First is supporting calls by hunters and the New Zealand Tahr Foundation (NZTF) to halt a large scale cull of Himalayan Tahr by the Department of Conservation in National Parks. The calls are supported by a 40,000 strong petition and the ...
    1 week ago
  • Response to Spin-off allegations
    Rt Hon Winston Peters, Leader of New Zealand First New Zealand First leader Winston Peters today scoffed at suggestions that a team of six political operatives have been dispatched to New Zealand to assist his campaign. ‘As President Ronald Reagan once said, ‘there they go again.’ ‘The clickbait journos can’t ...
    1 week ago
  • Jenny Marcroft MP to represent New Zealand First in Auckland Central
    New Zealand First is pleased to announce Jenny Marcroft as the party’s election 2020 candidate for the Auckland Central electorate. Jenny spent years working in Auckland Central, having spent a vast proportion of her broadcasting career there. She says she, "knows the place and knows the people." Ms Marcroft says ...
    1 week ago
  • Creating jobs and cleaning up our rivers
    New Zealanders deserve healthy rivers and lakes that are safe to swim in - but they have been getting worse for decades. That's why, with our latest announcement, we're investing in projects that will help clean up our rivers and lakes and restore them to health, within a generation. ...
    1 week ago
  • Jacinda Ardern: 2020 Labour Congress Speech
    Jacinda Ardern's speech to the 2020 Labour Party Congress. ...
    1 week ago
  • Kelvin Davis: 2020 Labour Congress Speech
    Kelvin Davis' speech to the 2020 Labour Party Congress. ...
    1 week ago
  • Week That Was: Another week of major progress
    This week we moved into the second half of 2020 - and our Government delivered another week of big changes and major progress for New Zealanders. Read below for a wrap of the key things moments from the week - from extending paid parental leave, to making major investments in ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Green Party opposes RMA fast-track bill that cut corners on environmental safeguards and public cons...
    The Green Party has opposed the COVID-19 Recovery Fast-track Consenting Bill which shortcuts normal consenting processes under the Resource Management Act (RMA), reduces public participation and narrows environmental considerations. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Site of new freight hub revealed
    Hon Shane Jones, Minister of Regional Economic Development A regional freight hub for the lower North Island will be built just northeast of Palmerston North, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones has announced. The Government is investing $40 million through the Provincial Growth Fund to designate and buy land and design ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Greens call for Guaranteed Minimum Income to alleviate skyrocketing debt with MSD
    Green Party Co-leader Marama Davidson is calling for the introduction of a Guaranteed Minimum Income to lift hundreds of thousands of people out of poverty and prevent more families entering into further debt with the Ministry of Social Development.  ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Winston Peters: Facts matter when taxpayer money is on the line
    There has been renewed focus on New Zealand First acting as a handbrake on the Government after our decision to not support Auckland light rail. We are a handbrake for bad ideas, that is true, but our track record since 2017 has seen New Zealand First constructively also serve as an ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Bill raising minimum residency requirement for NZ Super passes first reading
    Mark Patterson MP, New Zealand First List MP New Zealand First’s Fair Residency for Superannuation Bill passed its First Reading in Parliament today. The Bill makes a significant change to NZ Super by raising the minimum residency requirement from 10 to 20 years, after age 20. “Currently, a migrant of ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Harsher penalties for assaults on first responders one step closer
    Darroch Ball MP, Spokesperson for Law and Order A New Zealand First member’s bill in the name of Darroch Ball introducing a six-month minimum prison sentence for assaults on first responders has passed its second reading in Parliament. The new offence of "injuring a first responder or corrections officer with ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Criminal Cases Review Commission delivers Coalition promise
    Fletcher Tabuteau MP, Deputy Leader of New Zealand First New Zealand First welcomes the launch of the new Criminal Cases Review Commission, gifted with the name from Waikato-Tainui - Te Kāhui Tātari Ture, announced in Hamilton today by Justice Minister Andrew Little. “New Zealand First has long believed in and ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Greens welcome huge new investment in sustainable projects
    The Green Party is celebrating over $800m in new funding for green projects, which will get people into jobs while solving New Zealand’s long-term challenges. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • New Zealand First demands answers from Meridian Energy
    Mark Patterson MP, Spokesperson for Primary Industries New Zealand First is appalled that Meridian seems to have been unnecessarily spilling water from its dams to drive up its profits."While New Zealanders have been coming together in some of our darkest hours, we don’t expect power gentailers to waste water and ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Getting New Zealand moving again: June 2020
    We wrapped up the first half of 2020 with a busy month, taking additional steps to support New Zealanders as we continue with our economic recovery. We rolled out targeted packages to support key industries like tourism and construction, helped create jobs in the environmental and agriculture sectors, and set ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Māori union leader appointed to Infrastructure Commission board
    Hon Shane Jones, Minister for Infrastructure Infrastructure Minister Shane Jones has welcomed the appointment of Maurice Davis and his deep infrastructure and construction experience to the board of the Infrastructure Commission. Mr Davis (Ngāti Maniapoto), is the seventh and final appointment to the board led by former Reserve Bank Governor ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Click-bait journalism at its worst
    Rt Hon Winston Peters, Leader of New Zealand First New Zealand’s click bait journalism is taking a turn for the worse, with yet another example of sensationalist, wilful-misrepresentation of the facts. “New Zealand First has worked constructively with its Coalition partner on hundreds of pieces of legislation and policy, and ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Green Party proposes transformational Poverty Action Plan
    The Green Party is today unveiling its Poverty Action Plan, which includes a Guaranteed Minimum Income to ensure people have enough to live with dignity.     ...
    2 weeks ago
  • PGF accelerates Rotorua projects
    Rt Hon Winston Peters, Deputy Prime Minister Fletcher Tabuteau MP, Under-Secretary for Regional Economic Development The Rotorua Museum redevelopment and Whakarewarewa and Tokorangi Forest projects will be accelerated thanks to a $2.09 million Provincial Growth Fund (PGF) boost, Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters and Under-Secretary for Regional Economic Development Fletcher ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Week That Was: Getting people into jobs
    This week, we rolled out the next steps of our recovery plan, with new infrastructure investment, extra support for tourism operators, and a new programme to get Kiwis into agriculture careers. The global economic consequences of COVID-19 will continue to be a challenge, but we have a detailed plan to ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Coalition commitment establishing Mental Health Commission delivered
    Jenny Marcroft MP, Spokesperson for Health New Zealand First welcomes the passage of the Mental Health and Wellbeing Commission Bill through its final reading in Parliament today fulfilling a coalition agreement commitment. “This is an important step in saving the lives of New Zealanders and delivers a key coalition commitment ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Whakatāne gets a $2.5m ‘turbo boost’
    Whakatāne has been given a $2.5 million boost to speed up previously funded projects and create more than 450 jobs in the next decade. Of those, the equivalent of 160 full-time jobs could be delivered in the next six weeks. Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters is in town to make ...
    3 weeks ago
  • $2.5m PGF funding to speed up economic recovery in Whakatāne
    Rt Hon Winston Peters, Deputy Prime Minister Fletcher Tabuteau MP, Under-Secretary for Regional Economic Development The Provincial Growth Fund (PGF) is investing $2.5 million to accelerate three infrastructure projects in Whakatāne, Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters and Under-Secretary for Regional Economic Development Fletcher Tabuteau announced today. “This package is about ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Shane Jones calls out those holding drought-stricken Auckland ‘to ransom’ over water
    Infrastructure Minister Shane Jones is throwing his weight behind a bid by the Auckland Council to fast-track the more than doubling of the city's water allowance from the Waikato River. And he's coming out strongly against anyone who plans on getting in the way of this campaign. "It is my ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Another Green win as climate change considerations inserted into the RMA
    The Green Party is thrilled to see changes to the Resource Management Act (RMA) that mean consents for large projects can be declined if they will have significant climate change implications that are inconsistent with the Zero Carbon Act and Aotearoa New Zealand’s Paris Agreement obligations.  ...
    3 weeks ago
  • New Navy vessel Aotearoa to arrive in New Zealand
    Hon Ron Mark, Minister of Defence The Royal New Zealand Navy’s new ship, Aotearoa, set sail for New Zealand on 10 June from the Republic of Korea, and is due to arrive in Auckland tomorrow, announced Minister of Defence Ron Mark. “Aotearoa is the Royal New Zealand Navy’s new fleet ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Racing Industry Bill passes third reading
    Rt Hon Winston Peters, Deputy Prime Minister, Minister for Racing Racing Minister Winston Peters has today welcomed the Racing Industry Bill passing its third reading, creating the legislative framework for revitalising the racing industry while limiting the need for future government intervention. “For too long our domestic racing industry has ...
    3 weeks ago

  • Wellbeing infrastructure for Kaipara
    A package of wellbeing infrastructure investments in Kaipara which focuses on improving the lives of the elderly and upgrading the iconic Kauri Museum has been announced by Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones today. “These shovel-ready projects will have significant benefits for their respective communities and I’m pleased this funding ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 hours ago
  • More support rolls out for SMEs
    More support is rolling out for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) from the COVID Response and Recovery Fund, to help them adapt and innovate to deal with the impact of the virus. The Ministers for Economic Development and Small Business have announced a further $40 million for the Regional Business ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    8 hours ago
  • District Court Judge appointed
    Stephen Clark, Māori Land Court Judge of Hamilton has been appointed as a District Court Judge with jury jurisdiction to be based in Hamilton, Attorney-General David Parker announced today. Judge Clark graduated with an LLB from Auckland University in 1988 and was admitted to the Bar in the same year. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Hawke’s Bay Airport agreement protects jobs, safeguards terminal development
    The Crown will provide a loan to Hawke’s Bay Airport to ensure it can trade through COVID-19 economic impacts, support the region’s recovery and protect up to 200 jobs. The Crown has a 50 percent shareholding in Hawke’s Bay Airport Limited (HBAL), with Napier City Council holding 26 percent and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Funding boost for four cultural events
    Four celebrated Māori and Pasifika events will receive up to $100,000 each in funding from the new Creative and Cultural Events Incubator fund, Economic Development Minister Phil Twyford announced today. The four events that were successful in the inaugural funding round are: Kia Mau Festival, Wellington Māoriland Film Festival, Otaki ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Inaugural launch of Kiribati Language Week
    The Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio is pleased to announce the inaugural launch of Kiribati Language Week as part of the 2020 Pacific language Weeks programme. “I am so pleased that this year we are able to provide resourcing support to the Kiribati community in Aotearoa which will ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • New support package for wildlife institutions
    Wildlife institutions affected by a loss of visitor revenue during the COVID-19 lockdown are set to receive government support with nearly $15 million of funding available announced Minister of Conservation Eugenie Sage.  “Eco-sanctuaries, zoos, aquariums, wildlife parks, and wildlife rescue, hospital and rehabilitation facilities provide crucial support for the recovery ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • 300,000 students to benefit from free mental health services
    The Government is expanding and accelerating frontline mental health and wellbeing services at tertiary education institutes (TEI) to help students manage ongoing stresses related to COVID-19. “The lockdown has been hugely disruptive for students. Many of them have had to relocate and move to online learning, isolating them from their ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Gang crime, meth harm targeted in Waikato
    The Minister of Police says a major operation against the Mongrel Mob in Waikato will make a big dent in drug harm and violent offending linked to organised crime networks. “Senior leadership of the Waikato Mongrel Mob has been taken out as a result of Operation Kingsville, which resulted in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Supporting victims and families to attend mosque attack sentencing
    The Government is extending the border exception criteria to enable some offshore victims and support people of the Christchurch mosque attacks to attend the sentencing of the accused beginning on 24 August2020, says Immigration Minister Iain Lees-Galloway. “We want to support our valued Muslim brothers and sisters who were directly ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Boost for community freshwater restoration projects
    A project to support volunteer efforts to look after streams and rivers is getting a boost thanks to support from DOC’s Community Conservation Fund announced Minister of Conservation Eugenie Sage today.  “The government is backing efforts to look after waterways with $199,400 for the Mountains to Sea Conservation Trust from ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • More support for women and girls
    Minister for Women Julie Anne Genter today announced that funding for the COVID-19 Community Fund for women and girls will be doubled, as the first successful funding applications for the initial $1million were revealed. “Women and girls across the country have suffered because of the effects of COVID-19, and I ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Crown accounts stronger than forecast with higher consumer spending
    The Government’s books were better than forecast with a higher GST take as the economy got moving again after lockdown, Finance Minister Grant Robertson says. The Crown Accounts for the 11 months to the end of May indicate the year end results for tax revenue will be stronger than forecast. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Govt releases plan to revitalise wool sector
    A plan to revitalise New Zealand’s strong wool sector and set it on a new, more sustainable and profitable path was unveiled today by Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor. The newly-released report - Vision and Action for New Zealand’s Wool Sector - was developed by the Wool Industry Project Action Group ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Funding for Predator Free Whangārei
    Community efforts to create a Predator Free Whangārei will receive a $6 million boost, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones and Conservation Minister Eugenie Sage announced today. The new funding, through Government company Predator Free 2050 Ltd, will create around 12 jobs while enabling the complete removal of possums over ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • New Zealand to review relationship settings with Hong Kong
    Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters has announced that the New Zealand Government is reviewing the settings of its relationship with Hong Kong. “China’s decision to pass a new national security law for Hong Kong has fundamentally changed the environment for international engagement there,” Mr Peters said. “New Zealand remains deeply ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Funding for Whangārei’s infrastructure projects revealed
    Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones has announced details of a multimillion-dollar investment in Whangārei for infrastructure projects that will help it recover from the economic fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic. More than 200 jobs are expected to be created through the $26 million investment from the Government’s rejuvenation package ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Managed isolation and quarantine update
    Following a second incident in which a person escaped from a managed isolation facility, security is being enhanced, including more police presence onsite, Minister Megan Woods said. “The actions of some individuals who choose to break the very clear rules to stay within the facilities means that more resourcing is ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Funding for Kaipara district community waste programmes
    Waste reduction and recycling programmes in Kaipara are set to get a boost with Associate Environment Minister Eugenie Sage today announcing a $361,447 grant from the Ministry for the Environment’s Waste Minimisation Fund (WMF) Sustainable Kaipara. “The new funding will allow Sustainable Kaipara to partner with local schools, kura, community ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Government will support the people and economy of Southland
    The Government will support the Southland economy in the wake of multinational mining company Rio Tinto’s decision to follow through with its long signalled closure of the Tiwai Point aluminium smelter. “This day has unfortunately been on the cards for some time now, but nevertheless the final decision is a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • New transformational tools for the Predator Free 2050 effort
    New tools being developed to help boost Aotearoa’s Predator Free 2050 effort were unveiled today by Minister of Conservation Eugenie Sage and Under Secretary for Regional Economic Development Fletcher Tabuteau. A new rat poison, a camera with predator recognition software to detect and report predators, a new predator lure and a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • New Armoured vehicles for New Zealand Army
    The Coalition Government has approved the purchase of a fleet of Bushmaster vehicles to replace the New Zealand Army’s armoured Pinzgauers, Defence Minister Ron Mark has announced today. The new fleet of 43 Australian-designed and built Bushmaster NZ5.5 will provide better protection for personnel and improved carrying capacity. “The age ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Community-led solutions to prevent family violence
    The Government’s three prevention frameworks to reduce family violence in Aotearoa were launched this week by Associate Minister for Social Development Poto Williams.   The frameworks were developed in partnership with communities around New Zealand, and build on the work the Government has already begun with its new family violence prevention ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Govt confirms investment in better radiology and surgical services for Hawke’s Bay
    The Government is pleased to confirm funding for improvements to radiology and surgical services at Hawke's Bay DHB, Health Minister Chris Hipkins says.     "The Minister of Finance the Hon Grant Robertson and former Health Minister Dr David Clark approved funding for Hawke's Bay DHB’s redevelopment of their radiology facilities ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Specialist alcohol and drug addiction services strengthened across New Zealand
    •    New funding for four beds at Napier’s Springhill Residential Addiction Centre •    A new managed withdrawal home and community service, and peer support before and after residential care at Tairāwhiti DHB  •    A co-ordinated network of withdrawal management services throughout the South Island •    Peer support in Rotorua and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Coastal Shipping Webinar
    Introduction, seafarers and POAL Good morning everyone, I am delighted to be online with you all today. Before I begin, I have to acknowledge that COVID-19 has disrupted the maritime sector on an unprecedented scale. The work of seafarers and the maritime industry is keeping many economies around the world ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Support for resilient rail connection to the West Coast
    A $13 million investment from Government will create jobs and improve the resilience of the rail connection between Christchurch and the West Coast, Infrastructure Minister Shane Jones and Regional Economic Development Under-Secretary Fletcher Tabuteau say. The funding comes from the tagged contingency set aside in Budget 2020 for infrastructure projects ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Major investment in safe drinking water
    The Government is investing $761 million to assist local government upgrade under-pressure water services across the country, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and Local Government Minister Nanaia Mahuta announced today.  The announcement was made at the site of the water bore that was found to be the source of the fatal ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Supporting stranded seasonal workers to keep working with more flexible options
    Recognised Seasonal Employers and migrant seasonal workers stranded in New Zealand will be able to continue working and supporting themselves with more flexible hours and roles, says Immigration Minister Iain Lees-Galloway. The time-limited visa changes are: Stranded RSE workers will be able to work part-time (a minimum of 15 hours ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Relief for temporary migrants, employers and New Zealanders who need work
    The Government is making immediate short-term changes to visa settings to support temporary migrants already onshore in New Zealand and their employers, while also ensuring New Zealanders needing work are prioritised, Immigration Minister Iain Lees-Galloway says. We are: Extending temporary work visas due to expire by the end of 2020 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Freshwater commissioners and fast-track consenting convenor appointed
    Professor Peter Skelton CNZM has been appointed as Chief Freshwater Commissioner and Alternate Environment Court Judge Craig James Thompson as Deputy Chief Freshwater Commissioner for the newly established Freshwater Planning Process (FPP). Environment Minister David Parker today also announced the appointment of Chief Environment Court Judge Laurie Newhook as the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Appointment of Judge of the High Court
    Auckland Queen’s Counsel Neil Campbell has been appointed a Judge of the High Court, Attorney‑General David Parker announced today. Justice Campbell graduated with a BCom and LLB (Hons) from the University of Auckland in 1992. He spent two years with Bell Gully Buddle Weir in Auckland before travelling to the United ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Feedback sought – Commercial Film and Video Production Facilities
    The Associate Minister for Greater Christchurch Regeneration, Poto Williams, is seeking feedback on a proposal to better enable the development and operation of commercial film and video facilities in Christchurch. The Proposal, developed by Regenerate Christchurch in response to a request from Christchurch City Council, asks that powers under section ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Govt launches bold primary sector plan to boost economic recovery
    The Government has launched a bold plan to boost primary sector export earnings by $44 billion over the next decade, while protecting the environment and growing jobs. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern today released Fit for a Better World – Accelerating our Economic Potential, a 10-year roadmap to unlock greater value ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Wellbeing of whanau at heart of new hub
    A new approach to prevent family harm that encourages greater collaboration across government and community groups is being celebrated at the opening of a new facility in Auckland. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern today opened the Multi-Disciplinary Family Harm Prevention Hub Te Taanga Manawa in Lambie Road in Manukau. The facility ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New Report on Auckland Port Relocation
    The Government has released a major new report on the options for relocating the Port of Auckland’s freight operations while deferring any decision on the issue. “That decision needs to be informed by policy analysis that is still to be completed. As a result it will be up to a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Dual place names for Te Pātaka-o-Rākaihautū / Banks Peninsula features
    The history of Rāpaki is being restored through the inclusion of te reo in thirteen official place names on Te Pātaka-o-Rākaihautū / Banks Peninsula and around Lyttelton Harbour/Whakaraupō, the Minister for Land Information, Eugenie Sage, announced today.   “I am pleased to approve the proposals from Te Hapū o Ngāti ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government and Air New Zealand agree to manage incoming bookings
    Bookings for seats on Air New Zealand flights into New Zealand will be managed in the short term to ensure the Government is able to safely place New Zealanders arriving home into a managed isolation or quarantine facility, says Housing Minister Megan Woods.  “Last week Air Commodore Darryn Webb and I ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • $80 million for sport recovery at all levels
    Grant Robertson has today announced the first major release of funding from the $265 million Sport Recovery Package announced at Budget 2020.  “Today we’re setting out how $80 million will be invested, with $54 million of that over the 2020/2021 financial year for organisations from community level through to elite ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Keeping ACC levies steady until 2022
    The Government is maintaining current levy rates for the next 2 years, as part of a set of changes to help ease the financial pressures of COVID-19 providing certainty for businesses and New Zealanders, ACC Minister Iain Lees-Galloway says. “New Zealanders and businesses are facing unprecedented financial pressures as a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago