immigration profiling

Written By: - Date published: 8:00 am, April 10th, 2018 - 43 comments
Categories: human rights, immigration, law, racism - Tags:

The good news is that our Immigration Minister has put the “pilot data modelling programme” on hold, with assurances that race and nationality were never used.  I sincerely hope so, because there are huge issues if it does get used.  From Gordon Campbell:

Apparently….age, gender, ethnicity and country of origin are all “data sets” that go into the model guiding how INZ makes its decisions about which immigrants should be allowed access to this country’s resources and opportunities …and as Alistair Murray. INZ’s head of Compliance and Investigations helpfully told RNZ yesterday, the profiling involved even extends to “interactions” with Police, as to whether a Police decision to prosecute should simply be superseded by an INZ decision to deport the person in question. Yep, no danger there of confirming each other’s biases, surely.

The Murray interview is hair-raising, and can be heard here.

It seems that INZ has been loading data into its “harm model” for the past 18 months, on such things as unpaid hospital bills, use of healthcare or criminal activity. Thus, the demographic attributes of Person A who has been responsible for such costs in the past gets loaded into the model, and if and when another immigrant showing some of the same data characteristics ( age, gender, country of origin) comes over the horizon then bam ! ….”We’ll move to deport them at the first opportunity,” Murray says, “ so that they don’t have the chance to do that sort of harm.”

You would think that this kind of thing would breach our human rights laws.  Except for the fact that our immigration system does not have to comply with the Human Rights Act in any way.  I remember submitting to the review of the then Immigration Act review back in 2007, as did the Human Rights Commission.  The Commission argued that immigration law shouldn’t have a Human Rights Act exemption, even though there were instances where discrimination in immigration was valid.  However, the Commission argued, each case of discrimination should be able to be justified and should be transparent.

Well, s392 of the Immigration Act 2009, exempts this Act from the Human Rights Act.  There can be no complaints to the Human Rights Commission nor can the Commission itself take any proceeding forward in relation to the Immigration Act.  Which means that the kind of profiling that Mr Murray speaks about is entirely legal and there is no recourse through the justice system.

And just in case it isn’t clear, profiling means that the individual has done nothing wrong except match a profile that someone in Immigration New Zealand decides is a bad one.  Despite the fact that many people fitting that same profile will have caused no harm and in fact will have been model citizens.  I’m sure any profiling project will not factor in discriminatory practices in New Zealand that shut certain types of people out of high paying jobs, that they are less likely to be selected to positions of leadership, that they are paid less.  It will not incorporate the factors which ensure that certain types of people are set up to fail, but it will punish people for the failure of others or the failure of a system with in-built discrimination.

Of course we want an immigration system that works for New Zealand.  But we can have such a system without discriminating against people on the basis of ethnicity and nationality.

UPDATE:

Tze Ming Mok has linked to the briefing given to the Minister by Immigration NZ.  See her excellent Twitter thread which starts here.  It seems that the profiling discriminates between men and women ie all else being equal, a woman would be deported where a man wouldn’t, based on the model.   But also, apparently they assess potential victims on the basis of their cost to New Zealand.  This is beyond awful.

(Photo from here)

43 comments on “immigration profiling ”

  • Comments are now closed

  1. dukeofurl 1
    10 April 2018 at 9:23 am

    This seems to be recurrent claim
    “And just in case it isn’t clear, profiling means that the individual has done nothing wrong except match a profile that someone in Immigration New Zealand decides is a bad one.”

    The only reason immigration would be interested in these circumstances is that they are in the country illegally. Which of course doenst mean they have done any thing wrong at all. By definition they are ‘illegal’

    It seems RNZ who made a huge blunder in their online story by saying ‘immigrants’ which they later corrected to ‘overstayer’ ( without comment) has led to a widespread belief that the people of interest to INZ were of course the many hundreds of thousands of migrants who are here legally and of course going about their everyday lives.

    • Chris T 1.1
      10 April 2018 at 9:42 am

      I noticed that as well

      I find the whole thing a bit hype

      They are here illegally and profiling is used all the time without anyone batting an eyelid, and they weren’t even using ethnicity

      I don’t see anyone up in arms over how insurance companies decide their premiums for certain peoples likelihood of a claim.

      It isn’t an accident you are more likely to be searched at the boarder if you are young and coming back from a couple of days in Asia, than if you are a family of 4 back from a week in Fiji.

      • Carolyn_Nth 1.1.1
        10 April 2018 at 9:46 am

        The problem is that they are using this sort of profiling for anything. It looks a lot like Bill English’s social investment strategy.

        And how will this impact on the decision-making of immigration officials when they make judgments on others who apply to immigrate here?

        Surely people should be able to appeal the initial decisions by people who have arrived in NZ without the required visas, etc?

        And that’s where the whole system SHOULD be subject to the Human Rights ACT

        • dukeofurl 1.1.1.1
          10 April 2018 at 10:09 am

          Overstayers means they have had the required visas which have expired – most have a time limit, eg holiday visas, work visas etc.

          Yes thay can appeal, and Immigration has very wide discretion to give what is called a S61 visa to regularise their situation.
          http://communitylaw.org.nz/community-law-manual/chapter-32-immigration-and-refugees/if-youre-here-illegally-understanding-your-options-chapter-32/

          This gives more detail, but emphasize that its has to be out of the ordinary to get one.

          The HRC themselves make clear why Immigration restrictions arent covered by Human Rights Act
          “The reason for this is found in subsection (3) where it recognizes that “immigration matters inherently involve different treatment on the basis of personal characteristics” (such as health, age, national origin).

          https://www.hrc.co.nz/enquiries-and-complaints/faqs/immigration-and-human-rights/

          • stargazer 1.1.1.1.1
            10 April 2018 at 10:52 am

            yes, i actually mention in the post that HRC agree that there are legitimate reasons for discrimination. but their position also was that INZ should be transparent about those reasons and justify them, rather than having a blanket exemption from the Human Rights Act. and definitely, profiling on the basis that victims cost more is not at all acceptable to me – even if they are dealing with overstayers. in terms of victims of NZ citizens & residents, surely they should be taking into account the fact that perpetrators withhold passports and use immigration status to coerce and abuse, rather than profiling those victims for deportation.

            and that’s just one of the problems with using this kind of profiling system.

            • dukeofurl 1.1.1.1.1.1
              10 April 2018 at 11:36 am

              You didnt point out, but I did, that S61 visas can be used in those sort of extreme cases.
              And how are they going to find out people are being held against their will in the first place ?
              Wait for tipoffs ? or would it be a good idea to prioritise people who they think are overstayers but against their own will.

              Doing nothing doesnt help this small group who may be in indentured labour or sex work.

              • stargazer …
                10 April 2018 at 11:47 am

                and yet they do find out – when they do raids of restaurants that use these tactics against migrant workers; when women present to the police and various other measures. deporting people who are victims does nothing to solve the problem, is hugely unfair and just means that the perpetrators are left to carry on with a new set of victims. they actually should be using resources to work with police & the justice system to stop victimisation. simple removal of victims is a cop-out and a punishment of vulnerable people because that is the easiest and cheapest thing to do.

                • dukeofurl …
                  10 April 2018 at 12:15 pm

                  You are ignoring the wide discretion for a S61 visa for those who are real victims.

                  Of course most removed just havent bothered with the ‘legalities’

                  As for the claim the perpetrators are left to carry on, theres no evidence of that .But this shows the contrary.
                  http://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2018/02/auckland-construction-site-sweep-uncovers-190-illegal-malaysian-workers.html

                  The Kingpin as they called it has been arrested

                  • stargazer …
                    10 April 2018 at 12:33 pm

                    in which case they wouldn’t need a data-modelling system that pre-emptively targets victims of harm – which is what the briefing to the minister specifically states that this project would do. your assertion that most “haven’t bothered with the legalities” is pure assumption. i’m well aware of the illegal malaysian workers case, which is why i mentioned raiding employers. if they do the raids, then they don’t need to do the profiling and target people that may or may not at some future times be victims through a data-modelling system.

                    • dukeofurl …
                      10 April 2018 at 3:34 pm

                      As for evidence of those deported just ““haven’t bothered with the legalities”
                      There is the community law circumstances where you have a good chance of a S61 waiver , and what does it cover ?

                      “your current situation – including why you need to stay in New Zealand, how long you’ve already been here unlawfully, why you don’t have a current visa, what efforts you’ve made to try to get one, and whether your unlawful status is because of something outside your control”
                      and
                      “you haven’t deliberately attempted to stay here unlawfully for a long time.”

                      http://communitylaw.org.nz/community-law-manual/chapter-32-immigration-and-refugees/if-youre-here-illegally-understanding-your-options-chapter-32/

                      Clearly those who havent bothered with the legalities are exactly those who dont get S61 visas to regularise their situation. Result is then deportation

      • Michelle 1.1.2
        10 April 2018 at 11:13 am

        You are almost more likely to be checked if you are brown chris t and might I add also pulled over by our police have you experienced this ?

        • Chris T 1.1.2.1
          10 April 2018 at 11:30 am

          Nope

          I have been pulled over by the police a few times and am not Maori though.

          I think it was more I was young and was driving a V8

          And been searched on my way back from Bangkok.

          But you could probably swap the V8 there with not having shaved for a week and wearing a crappy old T-Shirt

          • Michelle 1.1.2.1.1
            10 April 2018 at 11:51 am

            yes chris t but have you been pulled over and then they (the police) had to make up an excuse because they pulled you over for nothing and might I add they did u turn to pull you over

        • dukeofurl 1.1.2.2
          10 April 2018 at 11:42 am

          Brown ?
          As the largest numbers here illegally are from The pacific should they have a quota of those removed to match the numbers
          For every 5 pacific islanders , we must deport 4 from china, 3 from India and 2 from Europe?
          That system would be absurd, and yet would pass the ‘non discrimination test.’

          For good reasons we have a ‘brown only ‘ category of pacific island seasonal workers ( around 11000 pa) and for good reasons we have a Samoa only category of work visas ( outside the current system).

          • stargazer 1.1.2.2.1
            10 April 2018 at 11:49 am

            the quota is there for foreign policy reasons, and part of the pacific aid programme. you are getting into nonsense territory with this comment.

            • dukeofurl 1.1.2.2.1.1
              10 April 2018 at 12:17 pm

              I said its for good reasons , multiple times

              Try reading what I said, rather than dismissing it as nonsense

              • weka …
                10 April 2018 at 12:24 pm

                You said “For good reasons we have a ‘brown only ‘ category of pacific island seasonal workers”.

                Stargazer said that’s a foreign policy issue, part of the pacific aid programme (in other words, certain nations are treated specifically by NZ) . You appear to be saying it’s because those people are brown. Can you clarify what you meant?

                (btw, the comment you replied to appeared to be pointing out that the NZ police will stop Māori and PI people because they are brown. That’s not controversial, and it’s a problem that the police do that simply on the basis of perceived ethnicity).

                • dukeofurl …
                  10 April 2018 at 12:36 pm

                  The ‘brown’ was only shorthand that had been used earlier for pacific people.

                  As for NZ police its outrageous that pacific and maori people are discriminated against.
                  But is this connected to immigration from many countries and the millions of people on visitor visas?

    • Matthew Whitehead 1.2
      10 April 2018 at 10:12 am

      Using illegal profiling methods against people in the country illegally is still itself illegal, dukeofurl.

      INZ notes only that its discrimination can be legal as per their carveout, if well-justified for immigration policy reasons based on sound policy. That is not the same thing as definitely being legal. They provide no such basis for profiling on country of origin, (which they admit to having withheld data on in this release, so it may still be in the original model) age, or sex, so all these factors should be assumed to be discriminatory until proven otherwise, and are likely to be found so in court if challenged.

      There is also reference to people’s current visa type, and given people who are overstaying do not have visas, this suggests that the tool is actually used for more than just overstayers, which is a definite problem, and does reinforce the initial perception that they are in fact profiling all immigrants, not just people who are overstaying after their visa has expired.

      • dukeofurl 1.2.1
        10 April 2018 at 12:49 pm

        I get your intial point about the carve out.

        But dont you think you are then relying ‘perceptions’ that they are profiling all immigrants. ( With an excel spreadsheet?)

        IRD ‘profiles all taxpayers’ to target groups that may be involved in tax fraud.

        ie those with cash payments
        http://www.pkffa.co.nz/news/news/ird-targets-undeclared-cash-by-dale-adamson/

        One of those groups involved in tax fraud is also targeted for immigration fraud, restaurants.

        Is that not a good thing.

        I had a heat pump installed by 2 guys from eastern europe, I presume that were on work visas as they were working as electricians for a reputable company.
        Sometimes people on visas from eastern europe are involved in credit card fraud and ATM skimming.
        The correct paperwork would mean ( should mean) they would move onto others who arent.

    • weka 1.3
      10 April 2018 at 10:13 am

      “It seems RNZ who made a huge blunder in their online story by saying ‘immigrants’ which they later corrected to ‘overstayer’ ( without comment) has led to a widespread belief that the people of interest to INZ were of course the many hundreds of thousands of migrants who are here legally and of course going about their everyday lives.”

      Can you please link to the piece you are referring to?

      • dukeofurl 1.3.1
        10 April 2018 at 11:48 am

        Sure . Thats they very annoying thing about the RNZ story, the made a huge blunder and didnt say so when it was corrected. So its pretty hard to link to a un changed version. Cant impinge on the ‘journalist infallibility.’, no sirree

        But this blog covers the change in detail
        https://www.statschat.org.nz/2018/04/05/15641/

        “[update: Radio NZ have now changed the first word of the story from “Immigrants” to “Overstayers”. ]

  2. Carolyn_Nth 2
    10 April 2018 at 9:27 am

    Thanks, stargazer.

    I’m glad the government has suspended this pilot. But it also should be ditched altogether.

    Tze Ming Mok’s twitter thread says the

    As there is no key to the variable values, I have no idea whether they are discriminating against men (assumed to be more violent?) or women (have babies that drain the health system?). 12/

    But she points out, as does the briefing notes, that the profiling system isn’t an adequate method to identify who should be deported. It’s meant to be some sort of guide to the humans who DO make the final decisions.

    The cut off points for whether an immigrant is considered a high risk or low risk on certain categories, is arbitrary.

    • dukeofurl 2.1
      10 April 2018 at 9:35 am

      The immigration system has arbitrary cutoffs all the time

      Age ? Yes at some point older people are cut off

      Qualifications? many qualifications are more important than others, some jobs are favoured over others.

      Money , yes that too is arbitary, too much money is always good.

      Ethnic origin, that too has special quotas for some countries. Other countries have no restrictions at all , ie Australia, Cook Islands

    • dukeofurl 2.2
      10 April 2018 at 10:28 am

      Women who are on a visa and either pregnant when they arrive and do so after wards have these restrictions
      https://www.immigration.govt.nz/new-zealand-visas/apply-for-a-visa/tools-and-information/general-information/pregnant-applicants

      Clearly its mostly men who would be involved in violence so an arrest and conviction could mean deportation or visa cancelled.

      • stargazer 2.2.1
        10 April 2018 at 10:56 am

        i’m actually trying to get support for someone advocating for a situation where 2 people from the same country applied for holiday visas, both similar age & very similar financial situation. the male got through, the female was denied – no pregnancy issues involved. which begs the question regarding unfair discrimination of women, and whether the profiling is symptomatic of how they are behaving across the board.

        • dukeofurl 2.2.1.1
          10 April 2018 at 11:30 am

          Apply for holiday visas ?

          They are only ‘profiling’ those who are here already and stayed beyond the limit of the visa.
          You might also know ‘national origin’ discrimination already occurs for visitor visas- a whole band of countries dont require a visitor visa application at all.

          But once you arrive, being poor, pregnant and a criminal history ( again discrimination based on personal characteristics) will still apply.

          As for women who arrive on a tourist waiver, there may be evidence they are intending to work in sex industry, but I would think actual evidence is required and not just a suspicion. They can and do search phones, paperwork, look at records back in home country.

          • stargazer 2.2.1.1.1
            10 April 2018 at 11:42 am

            perhaps read tze ming’s thread – she worked at INZ and is saying that profiling happened across the board. you”would think” that actual evidence is required in this particular case i mentioned, but none has been provided and there is no evidence that she has any such intention.

            • dukeofurl 2.2.1.1.1.1
              10 April 2018 at 11:55 am

              ‘profiling is applied across the board’

              well of course it is.
              Criminal history, being poor , medical history is a reason for exclusion before you arrive- they do collect this data. Thats often called evidence as well.
              people who are criminals have criminal history.

              And once you arrive and then stay beyond the time of the visa, then the same exclusions apply.

              Read the link I provided from the HRC where they say that personal characteristics are at the heart of what immigration do.
              https://www.hrc.co.nz/enquiries-and-complaints/faqs/immigration-and-human-rights/

              • stargazer …
                10 April 2018 at 12:11 pm

                and read my numerous comments that they should be justifying the discrimination and not have a blanket exemption. if they have a reasonable case for discrimination, put it up and let it be challenged.

                • dukeofurl …
                  10 April 2018 at 3:20 pm

                  You have switched from Immigration profiling of those illegally in NZ to possible discrimination of those who havent even arrived yet ?

                  “i’m actually trying to get support for someone advocating for a situation where 2 people from the same country applied for holiday visas..”

                  A needle in a haystack considering the millions who arrive on visitor visas. And trying to parse between 2 similar but different people and not know all the background info immigration has .
                  It could well be corruption and fraud by the staff or even just high handedness.
                  http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11897599

                  We know from the details of Kim Dotcoms immigration file he shouldnt have got residency status based on his driving offences here, but he did.
                  The chips fell in his favour there, but we can assume that other factors were working there, plus being rich means nothing is a problem.

    • dukeofurl 3.1
      10 April 2018 at 12:09 pm

      Its interesting that its repeated so many times
      “This is illegal discrimination.”

      You would think that someone who has worked in Immigration but a different section -Refugee Status Branch 2001-2002) would understand just a little bit that the
      WHOLE Immigration system is intentionally discriminatory.
      eg
      Visitor visas discrimnate againt various countries which have waivers and those who dont.

      Work visas discriminate against age groups, occupation groups etc

      Health status is checked at all stages, so that those in the country on a visa are not a burden on the health system – but again theres discrimination on that with some countries with reciprocal health arrangements are not covered.

      What part of the immigration system isnt discriminatory.?

      • stargazer 3.1.1
        10 April 2018 at 12:15 pm

        again, see my comment above. yes, there are sometimes valid reasons, so be transparent, don’t have a blanket exemption and allow challenge. perhaps what she has seen is actually discrimination that can’t be justified, there is no valid reason. just like the case i mentioned above. which is why she is calling it illegal – if the human rights exemption wasn’t there and the decision could be challenged, it would turn out that they don’t have decent reason that would stand up to scrutiny. you seem to be constantly ignoring this in numerous comments, and i’m getting tired of it.

        • dukeofurl 3.1.1.1
          10 April 2018 at 12:30 pm

          I could see where an official is making blatantly discriminating decisions outside the policies, bureaucracies can be like that and should be subject to review.

          That would be reprehensible. But it wouldnt seem to be connected to ‘overstayers’ .
          Is there a case mentioned above, I cant find it here.
          https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/983439681848258561.html?refreshed=yes

          I believe that Tze Ming Mok would have observed discrimination that was illegal and ouside the policies. But is a bit hard to think about something 15 years ago in where the rules would have changed so much since then.

  4. Draco T Bastard 4
    10 April 2018 at 12:47 pm

    But also, apparently they assess potential victims on the basis of their cost to New Zealand.

    If they’re staying here unlawfully then isn’t NZ the victim of their crimes?

    I’d say that all over-stayers need to be rounded up and thrown out. But at the same time their probably needs to be some sort of prioritisation of use of limited resources. The other option is to increase the number of people policing immigration.

  5. OnceWasTim 5
    10 April 2018 at 2:08 pm

    I’m left wondering (in all of the above) whether @DukeofEarl and various others [deleted] -which will of course come with an agenda designed to preserve the status quo.
    DukeofEarl doesn’t appear to understand a number of inconsistencies that are now apparent in the initial account put forward by officials and the assurances given to the responsible Munster.
    Nor might I add, does Ad, who appears to be a cheerleader for the glorious Joyce vanity projek: MBIE (going forward)
    Except they’ve fucked themselves up.
    The question now is whether this coalition government is prepared to deal with it.
    Even DracoTBuggery surprises me .

    … but there ya go. Funny ole whurl eh?
    Actually, there’s a bigger question relating to whether or not the responsible Minister has the ***** to deal with it all.

    [please don’t speculate about the IRL identity of commenters using pseudonyms – weka]

  6. mikes 6
    10 April 2018 at 2:11 pm

    “..profiling means that the individual has done nothing wrong except match a profile that someone in Immigration New Zealand decides is a bad one. ”

    They have done something wrong, they’re in this country illegally. we’re talking about illegal immigrants but the author keeps referring to them as simply immigrants. If they’re here illegally they should be kicked out, I couldn’t care less what sort of profiling they use to prioritize the order they get kicked out in.

    These are not victims, they are here illegally.

    • weka 6.1
      10 April 2018 at 2:43 pm

      Are you arguing that the state should be enabled to act with institutional racism against overstayers while in the process of assessing their immigration status? Why?

      • dukeofurl 6.1.1
        10 April 2018 at 3:06 pm

        Where is it happening that the state is acting outside the existing ‘discrimination policy carveouts’ when they take action on those people still in the country illegally
        ?
        is there knowledge of individual an circumstance that would confirm the claim of institutional racism ?

        A friend of mine did work for some years in a market garden, he told about one person from Samoa who the other workers referred to being an overstayer.
        This person was apparently away from work for some weeks and then returned and apparently the situation was resolved. I dont know how much of this is really true, but does seem to be a good outcome.
        To me when there are myriad rules about visas and how long they last and moving between one sort and another, when people are caught in the gaps , the system can help no matter their origin or type of work.

  7. Craig H 7
    11 April 2018 at 10:26 pm

    Given limited resources i.e. the staff numbers required to actually deal with 11,000 overstayers in the manner required by legislation (a reasonably time-consuming process), what would be an acceptable way to decide which order they will be dealt with?

  8. Stuart Munro 8
    12 April 2018 at 11:50 am

    The short answer to me is to hire enough staff to process all overstayers expeditiously. Having a hundred or so running around at any given time is unavoidable in a country of this size, but over 10,000? It means our laws are not being enforced. A debate about profiling is no substitute for curtailing large scale lawbreaking. Process all of them according to existing law – those are 10,000 local jobs not going to citizens and not benefitting the country.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • New measures to protect powerlines from trees
    Energy Minister Simeon Brown has announced that the Government will make it easier for lines firms to take action to remove vegetation from obstructing local powerlines. The change will ensure greater security of electricity supply in local communities, particularly during severe weather events.  “Trees or parts of trees falling on ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Wairarapa Moana ki Pouakani win top Māori dairy farming award
    Wairarapa Moana ki Pouakani were the top winners at this year’s Ahuwhenua Trophy awards recognising the best in Māori dairy farming. Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka announced the winners and congratulated runners-up, Whakatōhea Māori Trust Board, at an awards celebration also attended by Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Finance Minister ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • DJ Fred Again – Assurance report received
    "On the 27th of March, I sought assurances from the Chief Executive, Department of Internal Affairs, that the Department’s correct processes and policies had been followed in regards to a passport application which received media attention,” says Minister of Internal Affairs Brooke van Velden.  “I raised my concerns after being ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • District Court Judges appointed
    Attorney-General Judith Collins has announced the appointment of three new District Court Judges, to replace Judges who have recently retired. Peter James Davey of Auckland has been appointed a District Court Judge with a jury jurisdiction to be based at Whangarei. Mr Davey initially started work as a law clerk/solicitor with ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • Unions should put learning ahead of ideology
    Associate Education Minister David Seymour is calling on the Post Primary Teachers’ Association (PPTA) to put ideology to the side and focus on students’ learning, in reaction to the union holding paid teacher meetings across New Zealand about charter schools.     “The PPTA is disrupting schools up and down the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • Craig Stobo appointed as chair of FMA
    Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly today announced the appointment of Craig Stobo as the new chair of the Financial Markets Authority (FMA). Mr Stobo takes over from Mark Todd, whose term expired at the end of April. Mr Stobo’s appointment is for a five-year term. “The FMA plays ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • Budget 2024 invests in lifeguards and coastguard
    Surf Life Saving New Zealand and Coastguard New Zealand will continue to be able to keep people safe in, on, and around the water following a funding boost of $63.644 million over four years, Transport Minister Simeon Brown and Associate Transport Minister Matt Doocey say. “Heading to the beach for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • New Zealand and Tuvalu reaffirm close relationship
    New Zealand and Tuvalu have reaffirmed their close relationship, Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters says.  “New Zealand is committed to working with Tuvalu on a shared vision of resilience, prosperity and security, in close concert with Australia,” says Mr Peters, who last visited Tuvalu in 2019.  “It is my pleasure ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • New Zealand calls for calm, constructive dialogue in New Caledonia
    New Zealand is gravely concerned about the situation in New Caledonia, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says.  “The escalating situation and violent protests in Nouméa are of serious concern across the Pacific Islands region,” Mr Peters says.  “The immediate priority must be for all sides to take steps to de-escalate the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • New Zealand welcomes Samoa Head of State
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon met today with Samoa’s O le Ao o le Malo, Afioga Tuimalealiifano Vaaletoa Sualauvi II, who is making a State Visit to New Zealand. “His Highness and I reflected on our two countries’ extensive community links, with Samoan–New Zealanders contributing to all areas of our national ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • Island Direct eligible for SuperGold Card funding
    Transport Minister Simeon Brown has announced that he has approved Waiheke Island ferry operator Island Direct to be eligible for SuperGold Card funding, paving the way for a commercial agreement to bring the operator into the scheme. “Island Direct started operating in November 2023, offering an additional option for people ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • Further sanctions against Russia
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters today announced further sanctions on 28 individuals and 14 entities providing military and strategic support for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.  “Russia is directly supported by its military-industrial complex in its illegal aggression against Ukraine, attacking its sovereignty and territorial integrity. New Zealand condemns all entities and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • One year on from Loafers Lodge
    A year on from the tragedy at Loafers Lodge, the Government is working hard to improve building fire safety, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says. “I want to share my sincere condolences with the families and friends of the victims on the anniversary of the tragic fire at Loafers ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • Pre-Budget speech to Auckland Business Chamber
    Ka nui te mihi kia koutou. Kia ora and good afternoon, everyone. Thank you so much for having me here in the lead up to my Government’s first Budget. Before I get started can I acknowledge: Simon Bridges – Auckland Business Chamber CEO. Steve Jurkovich – Kiwibank CEO. Kids born ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • New Zealand and Vanuatu to deepen collaboration
    New Zealand and Vanuatu will enhance collaboration on issues of mutual interest, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says.    “It is important to return to Port Vila this week with a broad, high-level political delegation which demonstrates our deep commitment to New Zealand’s relationship with Vanuatu,” Mr Peters says.    “This ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • Penk travels to Peru for trade meetings
    Minister for Land Information, Chris Penk will travel to Peru this week to represent New Zealand at a meeting of trade ministers from the Asia-Pacific region on behalf of Trade Minister Todd McClay. The annual Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Ministers Responsible for Trade meeting will be held on 17-18 May ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • Minister attends global education conferences
    Minister of Education Erica Stanford will head to the United Kingdom this week to participate in the 22nd Conference of Commonwealth Education Ministers (CCEM) and the 2024 Education World Forum (EWF). “I am looking forward to sharing this Government’s education priorities, such as introducing a knowledge-rich curriculum, implementing an evidence-based ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • Education Minister thanks outgoing NZQA Chair
    Minister of Education Erica Stanford has today thanked outgoing New Zealand Qualifications Authority Chair, Hon Tracey Martin. “Tracey Martin tendered her resignation late last month in order to take up a new role,” Ms Stanford says. Ms Martin will relinquish the role of Chair on 10 May and current Deputy ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • Joint statement of Christopher Luxon and Emmanuel Macron: Launch of the Christchurch Call Foundation
    New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and President Emmanuel Macron of France today announced a new non-governmental organisation, the Christchurch Call Foundation, to coordinate the Christchurch Call’s work to eliminate terrorist and violent extremist content online.   This change gives effect to the outcomes of the November 2023 Call Leaders’ Summit, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Panel announced for review into disability services
    Distinguished public servant and former diplomat Sir Maarten Wevers will lead the independent review into the disability support services administered by the Ministry of Disabled People – Whaikaha. The review was announced by Disability Issues Minister Louise Upston a fortnight ago to examine what could be done to strengthen the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Minister welcomes Police gang unit
    Today’s announcement by Police Commissioner Andrew Coster of a National Gang Unit and district Gang Disruption Units will help deliver on the coalition Government’s pledge to restore law and order and crack down on criminal gangs, Police Minister Mark Mitchell says. “The National Gang Unit and Gang Disruption Units will ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • New Zealand expresses regret at North Korea’s aggressive rhetoric
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has today expressed regret at North Korea’s aggressive rhetoric towards New Zealand and its international partners.  “New Zealand proudly stands with the international community in upholding the rules-based order through its monitoring and surveillance deployments, which it has been regularly doing alongside partners since 2018,” Mr ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • New Chief of Defence Force appointed
    Air Vice-Marshal Tony Davies MNZM is the new Chief of Defence Force, Defence Minister Judith Collins announced today. The Chief of Defence Force commands the Navy, Army and Air Force and is the principal military advisor to the Defence Minister and other Ministers with relevant portfolio responsibilities in the defence ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Government puts children first by repealing 7AA
    Legislation to repeal section 7AA of the Oranga Tamariki Act has been introduced to Parliament. The Bill’s introduction reaffirms the Coalition Government’s commitment to the safety of children in care, says Minister for Children, Karen Chhour. “While section 7AA was introduced with good intentions, it creates a conflict for Oranga ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Defence Minister to meet counterparts in UK, Italy
    Defence Minister Judith Collins will this week travel to the UK and Italy to meet with her defence counterparts, and to attend Battles of Cassino commemorations. “I am humbled to be able to represent the New Zealand Government in Italy at the commemorations for the 80th anniversary of what was ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Charter schools to lift educational outcomes
    The upcoming Budget will include funding for up to 50 charter schools to help lift declining educational performance, Associate Education Minister David Seymour announced today. $153 million in new funding will be provided over four years to establish and operate up to 15 new charter schools and convert 35 state ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • COVID-19 Inquiry terms of reference consultation results received
    “The results of the public consultation on the terms of reference for the Royal Commission into COVID-19 Lessons has now been received, with results indicating over 13,000 submissions were made from members of the public,” Internal Affairs Minister Brooke van Velden says. “We heard feedback about the extended lockdowns in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago

  • The Pacific family of nations – the changing security outlook
    Foreign Minister, Defence Minister, other Members of Parliament Acting Chief of Defence Force, Secretary of Defence Distinguished Guests  Defence and Diplomatic Colleagues  Ladies and Gentlemen,  Good afternoon, tēna koutou, apinun tru    It’s a pleasure to be back in Port Moresby today, and to speak here at the Kumul Leadership ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago

  • NZ and Papua New Guinea to work more closely together
    Health, infrastructure, renewable energy, and stability are among the themes of the current visit to Papua New Guinea by a New Zealand political delegation, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says.   “Papua New Guinea carries serious weight in the Pacific, and New Zealand deeply values our relationship with it,” Mr Peters ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago

  • Driving ahead with Roads of Regional Significance
    The coalition Government is launching Roads of Regional Significance to sit alongside Roads of National Significance as part of its plan to deliver priority roading projects across the country, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says.  “The Roads of National Significance (RoNS) built by the previous National Government are some of New Zealand’s ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • New Zealand congratulates new Solomon Islands government
    A high-level New Zealand political delegation in Honiara today congratulated the new Government of Solomon Islands, led by Jeremiah Manele, on taking office.    “We are privileged to meet the new Prime Minister and members of his Cabinet during his government’s first ten days in office,” Deputy Prime Minister and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • New Zealand supports UN Palestine resolution
    New Zealand voted in favour of a resolution broadening Palestine’s participation at the United Nations General Assembly overnight, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says.    “The resolution enhances the rights of Palestine to participate in the work of the UN General Assembly while stopping short of admitting Palestine as a full ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Speech to the 2024 Infrastructure Symposium
    Introduction Good morning. It’s a great privilege to be here at the 2024 Infrastructure Symposium. I was extremely happy when the Prime Minister asked me to be his Minister for Infrastructure. It is one of the great barriers holding the New Zealand economy back from achieving its potential. Building high ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • $571 million for Defence pay and projects
    Defence Minister Judith Collins today announced the upcoming Budget will include new funding of $571 million for Defence Force pay and projects. “Our servicemen and women do New Zealand proud throughout the world and this funding will help ensure we retain their services and expertise as we navigate an increasingly ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Climate change – mitigating the risks and costs
    New Zealand’s ability to cope with climate change will be strengthened as part of the Government’s focus to build resilience as we rebuild the economy, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. “An enduring and long-term approach is needed to provide New Zealanders and the economy with certainty as the climate ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Getting new job seekers on the pathway to work
    Jobseeker beneficiaries who have work obligations must now meet with MSD within two weeks of their benefit starting to determine their next step towards finding a job, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. “A key part of the coalition Government’s plan to have 50,000 fewer people on Jobseeker ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago

  • Accelerating Social Investment
    A new standalone Social Investment Agency will power-up the social investment approach, driving positive change for our most vulnerable New Zealanders, Social Investment Minister Nicola Willis says.  “Despite the Government currently investing more than $70 billion every year into social services, we are not seeing the outcomes we want for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago

  • Getting Back on Track
    Check against delivery Good morning. It is a pleasure to be with you to outline the Coalition Government’s approach to our first Budget. Thank you Mark Skelly, President of the Hutt Valley Chamber of Commerce, together with  your Board and team, for hosting me.   I’d like to acknowledge His Worship ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago

  • NZ – European Union ties more critical than ever
    Your Excellency Ambassador Meredith,   Members of the Diplomatic Corps and Ambassadors from European Union Member States,   Ministerial colleagues, Members of Parliament, and other distinguished guests, Thank you everyone for joining us.   Ladies and gentlemen -    In diplomacy, we often speak of ‘close’ and ‘long-standing’ relations.   ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago

  • Therapeutic Products Act to be repealed
    The Therapeutic Products Act (TPA) will be repealed this year so that a better regime can be put in place to provide New Zealanders safe and timely access to medicines, medical devices and health products, Associate Health Minister Casey Costello announced today. “The medicines and products we are talking about ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2024-05-20T00:30:20+00:00