web analytics

ImperatorFish: Teacher Development and Smaller Class Sizes: We Can Have Both

Written By: - Date published: 2:19 pm, June 18th, 2012 - 60 comments
Categories: education, newspapers, schools, tertiary education - Tags: ,

Scott at Imperator Fish has kindly given us permission to syndicate posts from his blog – the original of this post is here.

It’s not often that I get grumpy enough to take a Herald on Sunday columnist to task over their opinion piece.  I would certainly never be spoiled for choice. I don’t mind that a newspaper presents a range of opinions, from left to right, so long as they’re not of the barking-mad variety (e.g. Paul Holmes on an off day, Michael Laws every Sunday), and so long as there’s some attempt at balance overall.

Of late, however, the Herald group of newspapers seems to have taken a frenzied approach towards the hiring of curmudgeons, Actoids and libertarians to write opinion pieces. Have they spotted a hole in the right-wing opinion market that others (Roughan, O’Sullivan, Hopkins, Holmes. Woodham etc) aren’t filling?

The column by one such opinionator, Damien Grant, in the HOS got my blood boiling. I don’t know much about Grant, except that he’s a liquidator and a libertarian. I’m not sure if he’s a full-blooded objectivist, but he does appear to contribute regularly on Lindsay Perigo’s odd Solo Passion site, including on discussions regarding their prophet, the somewhat batty Ayn Rand. And when I say “odd” I’m actually being charitable.

So it stood to reason that Grant would hold views somewhat outside the political mainstream, I was not disappointed.

Bill English mocked the demonstrating post-graduates and suggested they take lessons in rioting from the Greeks. They do not need to look that far; New Zealand’s teacher unions have provided a fine lesson in how vested self-interest groups can defend their entitlements.

That these teachers dared to defend themselves when the government tried to sack a bunch of them! The shame! The shame! Presumably they should have just rolled over and agreed to the loss of their livelihoods so that people like Damien Grant would feel better about the tax cut he got.

What has been lost in the debacle is that the Treasury Secretary pointed to hard evidence that showed class sizes made little difference. What mattered was teacher quality. John Key made the point that in the past 10 years the teacher roll had increased 12.5 per cent to 50,000 and student numbers had risen by 2.5 per cent. Rebalancing was in order.

“Rebalancing” is one of those terrible euphemisms, like “collateral damage”, that means something much more unpleasant that it sounds. In this case it means firing teachers and sending them to the scrapheap.

The “hard evidence” Grant refers to doesn’t say what he thinks it does. There is evidence that marginal changes in class sizes are not as critical a factor to a child’s education as the quality of the teacher, but the argument does not follow that we can therefore just increase the average class size without any impact. There will be some impact, however minor.

Otherwise, why wouldn’t we just create classes of 100 kids per student? If you think that’s an absurd argument to use, bear in mind that it’s pretty much the same argument John Key used in the 2011 election campaign to attack Labour’s minimum wage increase policy: if a marginal change has no effect on employers, why not make the minimum wage $20 or $30 an hour? Allow me then to beat Mr Key with the same stick, since he’s no longer using it.

There is a larger problem with Grant’s overall argument. It relies on with the assumption that we have a general problem with teacher performance. I would argue the opposite. Sure there are some rubbish teachers (I have also met some terrible, terrible liquidators in my time), but New Zealand’s education system is admired around the world. I would guess this is in no small part down to the motivation, enthusiasm and dedication of teachers. For many teachers it isn’t the money that motivates them, because if it was all about the cash most of them would have found another career by now. Sure they want to be remunerated fairly, but if you paid them a bit more it wouldn’t necessarily result in better quality teachers.

In a tight economic environment, a policy was devised to cut the teacher roll marginally and introduce performance pay to attract and retain quality teachers. How hard a political sell is that?

The problem with such a sell is that voters can usually sniff out bullshit when it’s served up to them. As for “marginally”, when the policy was first announced some schools said they were going to lose up to 10 or 11 teachers. Intermediate schools were going to have to drop or severely curtail metalwork, woodwork and other technical subjects.

Would you rather have little Johnny in a room of 30 kids being taught by a competent, energetic pedagogue or in a class of 28 being taught by an unmotivated dullard?

Where are these dullards? Which schools are they currently teaching in? How would the proposed policy have got rid of them?

This, however, was not the question that was asked in the mindless vox pop quiz to the “man in the street”.

The question was “do you want larger class sizes” and not “do you want your kids taught by unmotivated dullards?”

Perhaps because that would have been a really stupid, dishonest thing to ask people. Most teachers are not unmotivated dullards, so how would not increasing class sizes make them so?

Teacher unions were always going to react to a cull. Overstaffing benefits them significantly but the burden of this is spread over all taxpayers.

Clearly this is untrue, considering that some taxpayers got rather handsome tax cuts, and that a large number of our super-wealthy continue to use every trick under the sun to minimise their taxpaying obligations. To Rand-worshipping objectivists those avoiders are probably heroes, but to the rest of society they are the real bludgers.

The “burden” as Grant describes it, is a world-class education system that other countries admire. It should also be remembered that in most private schools the average number of students per class is even smaller. Clearly those who choose to pay for private education (including our Prime Minister and a significant proportion of his cabinet) understand the importance of small class sizes, even if some of them refuse to countenance the same ratios in public schools.  New Zealand schools are not overstaffed.

We remain passive while the unions successfully exert enough pressure to keep their snouts in the Government’s trough.

No we don’t remain passive at all, as the debacle over classroom sizes shows. Grant is one of a small minority who don’t get the genuine anger most parents of school-age children felt over this issue. It wasn’t something the unions just whipped up. If it was it would gone nowhere, just as union protests over National Standards have.

Presumably Grant thinks those unions with their “snouts in the Government’s trough” should just disestablish themselves on the basis that our wise and benevolent government will do the right thing by our kids. However, this fiasco shows that teachers and parents know more abut what’s good for kids than Treasury officials.

We can only assume that Grant has never himself sipped from the Government’s trough. Presumably he has a firm policy of never acting for Government agencies, and has never claimed any sort of benefit or entitlement from the Government.

Key talks about economic growth like farmers talk about summer. It will arrive; we just have to wait long enough. If only that were true.

Well we agree on something at least.

Improving the standard of education was something real he could have achieved and it would have had a positive impact on economic growth. It is an opportunity missed.

Grant appears to think that if he repeats this line about improving the quality of our education it might become true. I fear his hopes will be disappointed.

If Grant wants more money spent on teacher development (and that’s a big “if”; I suspect his frustration over National’s backdown comes from watching an opportunity to slash teacher numbers go by, rather than a desire to increase the quality of our education system), then he should argue for the government to still spend that money. There’s plenty of money to pay for it, and we wouldn’t have to increase class sizes, if we reversed some of National’s tax cuts or re-prioritised some of National’s other spending.

Following the unions’ example, the demonstrating postgraduates must feel confident about overturning the Budget change that prevents them being able to claim student allowances. They can, however, borrow money from the taxpayer at the very attractive interest rate of zero. They can still apply to tutor undergraduates, seek sponsorship, do private teaching work or, heaven forbid, get their hands dirty working at McDonald’s, assuming McDonald’s will take them.

Many students already work part-time to supplement their measly student allowances. I would confidently predict that students work much harder in general than they did when Mr Grant was at University (I am making an assumption that Grant was university educated). Such is the cost of accommodation and transport that many students still struggle to survive.

Let’s keep in mind that student fees do not cover the total cost of a university education. The budget provides $1.1 billion for universities (presumably including renamed technical institutions like AUT) to cater for 118,000 students. This comes out at more than $9000 a year per student, or $29,000 per degree. Plus student allowances.

The Government still subsidises the cost of postgraduate education. Expecting students to do some work is not a cause for rioting.

This boils down to Grant saying that by investing more in the development of teachers we will keep them motivated and performing, and by investing less in university students we will achieve the same result. Can anyone else see a problem with that argument?

The government tried to sell this policy as a trade-off between smaller class sizes and better teachers, as if we cannot have both of these things. If teacher development is so important to the government they should find the money for it. There’s plenty of money for motorways. Let’s put some of it into education.

60 comments on “ImperatorFish: Teacher Development and Smaller Class Sizes: We Can Have Both ”

  1. quartz 1

    Presumably he has a firm policy of never acting for Government agencies, and has never claimed any sort of benefit or entitlement from the Government.

    Damien has spent some time at the taxpayers’ expense: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10731661

    Helpfully, the National Business Review this week detailed in technicolour some of those mistakes, specifically that in my early-20s I spent just over a year in prison for dishonesty.

  2. Adrian 2

    ” liquidator is the wrong nomenclture, dude ( apologies to the Big Lebowski ) it’s White-Collar- Looter.
    The best thing a leftist government could to for this country is the abolishment of all private liquidators and form a Management service. Liquidators are a seething nest of corrupt, lying, thieving arseholes.

  3. Dr Terry 3

    Not easy to get much background on this guy who is apparently impersonating a journalist. How is it that the HOS took such a person on as a columnist?? He even admits “My failure was one of character and personal integrity”. Well, that seems to be what he is charging our fine teachers with! (Projection, in a word!) Fortunately very few teachers lack character and personal integrity but are above reproach, professionally and personally. Possibly Grant attended university, I know not, but even if he did, that does not tell us whether or not he graduated, and is not a guarantee that he learned anything (of value).
    Does anybody know more about him? Maybe there is something worth knowing?
    Grant does not offer an “argument” you will notice, rather, he is “telling us” through a heap of spurious rhetoric. I have been hoping the Herald might at last depart from employing very little other than extreme opinions of the Right, but it is not looking promising. (John Armstrong does make some endeavours at impartiality. Matt McCarten, deserving of attention, gets a bit at the bottom of a page. Bernard Hickey is certainly worth a look).
    The offering above from the Standard is first class, and makes the points most calling for strong emphasis.

  4. ianmac 4

    No word on just how are “they” going to improve teacher quality?

  5. Murray Olsen 5

    “Solo Passion” is such a great name for a libertarian site.

  6. Adrian 6

    I wrote my comments about liquidators before I found out that this particular CLTA had done time. I rest my case.
    P.s, how the hell did he get a job like that with dishonesty offences. I suppose his employers recognised a kindred spirit.
    Oh, Murray it just sounds like a euphenism for “wanker”.

  7. Adrian 7

    Oh Murray, its just a euphenism for “wanker”. I’m surprised at his self realisation.

  8. Georgy 8

    NZ consistently comes out in the top few countries ranked by OECD for educational achievement. If this is the case is there actually an issue around teacher quality? What is the real issue the nats are trying to ‘deal to’ ?

    • Draco T Bastard 8.1

      If this is the case is there actually an issue around teacher quality?


      What is the real issue the nats are trying to ‘deal to’ ?

      There’s two issues:
      1.) They want to cut taxes for themselves and their rich mates and that means cutting public services and
      2.) They don’t want the majority of people to be educated well enough to think and thus realise that the policies that NACT espouse are bad for the country.

    • Murray Olsen 8.2

      They don’t see a need for universal education, but they do see an opportunity to shovel more wealth into their mates’ snouts via charter schools. The only issue for them is that there are still a few crumbs left that they haven’t got their thieving hands on yet.

  9. Logie97 9

    Seems we are not the only country discussing the issue

  10. Damien grant 10

    The issue, folks, is that class rolls went up 2.5%, teacher rolls went up ten percent.

    The idea proposed was to pay better teachers more and pay for this by dropping poor performers.

    This would result in better education for children, that was what Heika Parata wanted.

    The teacher unions killed this off, as they should, they are there to protect their members. That is what us libertarians think a union should do.

    As for my past, yep. Knock yourself out. If you cannot play the ball play the man.

    • millsy 10.1

      So you think that overcrowded classrooms are acceptable then?

    • felix 10.2

      “The idea proposed was to pay better teachers more and pay for this by dropping poor performers.”

      Really? The govt, especially Key and Parata, have been very keen to note that they were only adjusting the funding and any decisions on how that (smaller amount of) funding was spent would be up to the schools.

    • Murray Olsen 10.3

      Personally, I don’t give a stuff about your past. I do care about our kids’ futures though, and in a way that would be completely foreign to anyone who thinks Ayn Rand was a goddess.

    • Draco T Bastard 10.4

      The issue, folks, is that class rolls went up 2.5%, teacher rolls went up ten percent.

      Yeah, probably has something to do with maths and the fact that both numbers start off quite considerably different.

      The idea proposed was to pay better teachers more and pay for this by dropping poor performers.

      This would result in better education for children, that was what Heika Parata wanted.

      Except that’s not what would happen – we’d lose the best teachers because they couldn’t be bothered putting up with the BS that the government was dishing out. Teachers don’t do teaching because of the money but because they want to do it. Put more stress on them and they won’t want to do it.

      • Draco T Bastard 10.4.1

        Yeah, probably has something to do with maths and the fact that both numbers start off quite considerably different.

        100,000 pupils with 1 teacher per 26 = 3847 teachers
        102500 pupils with 1 teacher per 26 = 3942 teachers

        Do the sums and that’s a 2.5% increase in students and a 5% increase in teachers while keeping the ratio the same.

        Fuck, you RWNJs are idiots. Can’t even do basic maths.

  11. Damien grant 11

    Millsy, no. I think that good teachers do not get paid enough and leave the industry. You get what you pay for.

    If the state wants to teach children and has limited money, it is better to a smaller number of good teachers than a larger number of poor ones.

    • Murray Olsen 11.1

      If a state has limited money, why the tax cuts for the top income earners? How will the good teachers be evaluated? As with the poor, will we see categories of deserving and undeserving teachers? Why was the Moerewa school attacked when it was succeeding in teaching kids whose needs weren’t otherwise being met? If the teachers killed off this enlargement of class sizes, did the parents play no role at all? If the union is so powerful, why haven’t they been able to overturn nactional standards? Which teachers have left the profession (not industry) because they did not get paid enough?

      • Damien grant 11.1.1

        Murray, lots of questions. The government is runing a deficit equal to four percent of GDP, so we are borrowing, there is limited funds.

        Performance ranking of teachers, not that hard. The unions say it cannot be done. Really? There is now way to tell if a teacher is useless? Nonsense.

        • Murray Olsen

          Lots of questions, maybe, but a real paucity of answers from you. Try answering them one at a time if it’s easier.
          1. If the state has limited money, why the tax cuts for the top income earners?

          • Damien grant

            Because if you tax the highly productive they work less, swapping time at work for time watching television.

            It is also important to note that the top two percent of tax payers pay seventeen percent of all tax (or close to, I’m going from memory), fairness dictates they get a break.

            • felix

              “Because if you tax the highly productive they work less, swapping time at work for time watching television.”

              lolz, not a chance. Highly productive people are highly productive people. They don’t quit being highly productive because they. get paid 2% less on the top 10% of an enormous amount of money.

              Pure fantasy, never demonstrated in a real life situation.

              “It is also important to note that the top two percent of tax payers pay seventeen percent of all tax “

              Wow, I wonder why that is. Any ideas? Maybe, I don’t know, they get paid, like, 17% of the money or something…

            • Murray Olsen

              My idea of fairness dictates that children have clothing, housing and food. Your idea seems to lead to the idea that the tax evasion uncovered recently should be rewarded by knighthoods. After all, if the poor things hadn’t been busy hiding this taxable income from the IRD they might have had to watch television instead.

    • McFlock 11.2

      Your assumption is that teachers are just mercenaries. What about the possibility that good teachers are leaving because they can’t do a good job with National Standards or other constraints imposed by national? The old “vocational pride” coming into play?

      • Damien grant 11.2.1

        No. I am assuming that teachers, like everyone else, respond to incentives. Teachers are not angels. They are people. You need to praise and reward success and manage the performance of those not doing well and fire the no hopers

        • McFlock

          Cash is not the only incentive. ” I think that good teachers do not get paid enough and leave the industry.” leaves no space for vocational incentives.

          • Damien grant

            I agree, but cash is both an incentive and a just reward for good performance.

            • Draco T Bastard

              But not enough of one to counter the fact that NACT were making it impossible to do a good job.

            • McFlock

              But not the only incentive, so it’s not just about money. It’s also about being under constant threat of the latest budget cuts, worse conditions, and being servants of barbarians who think that the only things schools should produce are peons who can perform the 3 Rs just enough to be exploited in the workforce by people who got tax cuts in times of austerity.

              • Damien grant

                The private sector is very good at doing just this. The idea that teachers are the only profession whose performance cannot be measured is nonsense.

                I agree money is not the only incentive that matters but it does matter.

                • McFlock

                  Indeed money matters.
                  Which is why those who benefit most from our economy should pay a greater proportionof their income for the privilege. Otherwise we can’t afford class sizes of 35, let alone 28 students.

  12. Damien grant 12

    Felix, Parata has been very clear on linking performance pay with this policy.

  13. Damien grant 13

    Murray, Ayn Rand has nothing to do with this. As a libertarian, however, I think unions should support their members, I am most surely not anti union. But this is a narrow issue of how to allocate limited education money for best effect.

    • felix 13.1

      “Limited” only by the govt’s willingness to prioritise education higher than some of the other bullshit they’ve wasted money on.

      They didn’t have any trouble finding 1.7 billion to cover bad investments including paying interest (!!!!) in the SCF scam.

      This policy was pennies in comparison. “Limited education money” my arse.

      • Damien grant 13.1.1

        Yes. Well. You will not find me supporting the scf bailout. Nor the AMI bailout. I’m pretty consistent there.

        • felix

          Yes I suspected you would be.

          And what about education? Why is that money “limited”?

          • Damien grant

            Because all capital is limited. The government does not have unlimited resources. If smaller classes were better, ok, but there is not enough money or competent teachers to teach kids one to one. There is a trade off to be made. Who says 28 is the optimal level?

            • Draco T Bastard

              If smaller classes were better, ok, but there is not enough money or competent teachers to teach kids one to one.

              We aren’t looking for one to one – just a reasonable ratio and there’s enough money for that if the government cancelled useless roading projects and/or put taxes back up.

              • Damien grant

                Or charged parents for the cost of sending their kids to school.

                • Draco T Bastard

                  We already do – it’s called taxes and it’s far cheaper and more efficient than charging individually. That’s why we do it that way.

                  • Damien grant

                    No. Actually. State run outfits usually work less effectively than private run ones. This is why wealthy parents like to send their children to private schools.

                    • Kotahi Tane Huna

                      If that were true, you would have to demonstrate it by comparing apples with apples. So let’s do that. Before public education was introduced, private schools manifestly did not work more “effectively” – they simply didn’t educate the majority at all.

                      In fact, they still don’t – not in NZ anyway. Show me some private schools that educate all deciles and make your case.

                      Then explain how it is that the best education in the world can currently be had in Finland, with NZ five places behind that.

                      Put up or shut up.

            • felix

              Who said anything about one to one ratios?

              You must have done your research – how much was the proposed education clusterfuck supposed to save?

              • Damien grant

                Enough to pay good teachers more, to attract and retain them, so the students get a better education.

                • felix

                  You must know the numbers though – you wrote an article about it.

                  How much?

                  • Damien grant

                    Felix, I did when I wrote it a week ago it has been a long week and it is tomorrow already. What does it matter?

                    • felix

                      It matters because you said there were limits.

                      I’m asking you to define them, in a round about way.

                      How much exactly was too much to spend on improving teaching, such a burden that it had to be cut from elsewhere (from teaching, as it happens)?

            • ianmac

              Pay the “good” teachers more.
              This rewards those who are already good.
              It does nothing for the bulk of teachers who do not fit the good.
              It discourages the sharing of innovation which NZ Education has previously flourished in.
              Many studies have been done on just what a “good” teacher might be. So far there is no consistent criteria. Good teaching has been measured for strict and for liberal and everywhere in between. Some kids flourish with one teacher but in the same class others do not. How would you measure Primary teachers as they teach in 7 subject areas, and do not have pass/fail exams to measure by. And what a dumb way to assess teaching anyway.

              Damien Grant. There is nothing that you have written which would stand inspection by any informed reality. Nothing.

        • ianmac

          Teacher pupil ratios increasing faster than pupil growth because it was a catch up on international figures. Still way behind OECD figures.

    • millsy 13.2

      Damien, now that you are outed as a libertarian, this discussion is moot, as the ultimate libertarian goal is to close down the public education system.

  14. Damien grant 14

    Bed time.

    Good night Standard Readers, maybe I’ll see you in two weeks.

    Nice to drop by,


    • felix 14.1

      Bye bye. Next time bring some facts to go with your beliefs.

    • Kotahi Tane Huna 14.2

      Swapping criminal dishonesty for journalistic dishonesty doesn’t seem like a particularly long journey to me.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Tokelau Language Week reminds us to stay united and strong
    Staying strong in the face of challenges and being true to our heritage and languages are key to preserving our cultural identity and wellbeing, is the focus of the 2020 Tokelau Language Week. Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio, says this year’s theme, ‘Apoapo tau foe, i nā tāfea ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • NZ announces a third P-3 deployment in support of UN sanctions
    The Government has deployed a Royal New Zealand Air Force P-3K2 Orion (P-3) maritime patrol aircraft to support the implementation of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions imposing sanctions against North Korea, announced Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters and Minister of Defence Ron Mark. “New Zealand has long supported ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Pacific trade and development agreement a reality
    Pacific regional trade and development agreement PACER Plus will enter into force in 60 days now that the required eight countries have ratified it. Trade and Export Growth Minister David Parker welcomed the announcement that the Cook Islands is the eighth nation to ratify this landmark agreement. “The agreement represents ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Securing a pipeline of teachers
    The Government is changing its approach to teacher recruitment as COVID-19 travel restrictions continue, by boosting a range of initiatives to get more Kiwis into teaching. “When we came into Government, we were faced with a teacher supply crisis,” Education Minister Chris Hipkins said. “Over the past three years, we ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Border exceptions for a small number of international students with visas
    The Government has established a new category that will allow 250 international PhD and postgraduate students to enter New Zealand and continue their studies, in the latest set of border exceptions. “The health, safety and wellbeing of people in New Zealand remains the Government’s top priority. Tight border restrictions remain ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • First COVID-19 vaccine purchase agreement signed
    The Government has signed an agreement to purchase 1.5 million COVID-19 vaccines – enough for 750,000 people – from Pfizer and BioNTech, subject to the vaccine successfully completing all clinical trials and passing regulatory approvals in New Zealand, say Research, Science and Innovation Minister Megan Woods and Health Minister Chris Hipkins. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • International statement – End-to-end encryption and public safety
    We, the undersigned, support strong encryption, which plays a crucial role in protecting personal data, privacy, intellectual property, trade secrets and cyber security.  It also serves a vital purpose in repressive states to protect journalists, human rights defenders and other vulnerable people, as stated in the 2017 resolution of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Ministry of Defence Biodefence Assessment released
    The Ministry of Defence has today released a Defence Assessment examining Defence’s role across the spectrum of biological hazards and threats facing New Zealand. Biodefence: Preparing for a New Era of Biological Hazards and Threats looks at how the NZDF supports other agencies’ biodefence activities, and considers the context of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Approaches to Economic Challenges: Confronting Planetary Emergencies: OECD 9 October 2020
    New Approaches to Economic Challenges: Confronting Planetary Emergencies: OECD 9 October 2020 Hon David Parker’s response following Thomas Piketty and Esther Duflo. Good morning, good afternoon, and good evening, wherever in the world you might be. I first acknowledge the excellent thought provoking speeches of Thomas Piketty and Esther ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Kaipara Moana restoration takes next step
    A Memorandum of Understanding has been signed today at Waihāua Marae between the Crown, local iwi and councils to protect, restore and enhance the mauri of Kaipara Moana in Northland. Environment Minister David Parker signed the document on behalf of the Crown along with representatives from Ngā Maunga Whakahī, Ngāti ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Zealand and Uruguay unite on reducing livestock production emissions
    Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor and Uruguayan Minister of Livestock, Agriculture and Fisheries Carlos María Uriarte have welcomed the launch of a three-year project that will underpin sustainable livestock production in Uruguay, Argentina, and Costa Rica.  The project called ‘Innovation for pasture management’ is led by Uruguay’s National Institute of Agricultural ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • 3100 jobs created through marae upgrades
    Hundreds of marae throughout the country will be upgraded through investments from the Provincial Growth Fund’s refocused post COVID-19 funding to create jobs and put money into the pockets of local tradespeople and businesses, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones and Māori Development Minister Nanaia Mahuta have announced. “A total ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Health volunteers recognised in annual awards
    Health Minister Chris Hipkins has announced 9 teams and 14 individuals are the recipients of this year’s Minister of Health Volunteer Awards.  “The health volunteer awards celebrate and recognise the thousands of dedicated health sector volunteers who give many hours of their time to help other New Zealanders,” Mr Hipkins ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Community COVID-19 Fund supports Pacific recovery
    The Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio says a total of 264 groups and individuals have successfully applied for the Pacific Aotearoa Community COVID-19 Recovery Fund, that will support Pacific communities drive their own COVID-19 recovery strategies, initiatives, and actions. “I am keen to see this Fund support Pacific ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Community benefits from Māori apprenticeships
    Up to 50 Māori apprentices in Wellington will receive paid training to build houses for their local communities, thanks to a $2.75 million investment from the Māori Trades and Training Fund, announced Employment Minister Willie Jackson today. “This funding will enable Ngāti Toa Rangatira Incorporated to provide its Ngā Kaimahi ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Training fund supports Māori jobseekers
    Rapidly growing sectors will benefit from a $990,000 Māori Trades and Training Fund investment which will see Wellington jobseekers supported into work, announced Employment Minister Willie Jackson today. “This funding will enable Sapphire Consultants Ltd. to help up to 45 Māori jobseekers into paid training initiatives over two years through ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Ruakura Inland Port development vital infrastructure for Waikato
    The Government is investing $40 million to develop an inland port at Ruakura which will become a freight super-hub and a future business, research and residential development for the Waikato, Urban Development and Transport Minister Phil Twyford, and Māori Development Minister Nanaia Mahuta announced today. The funding has been has ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Appointments made to Defence Expert Review Group
    Defence Minister Ron Mark announced today the establishment of an Expert Review Group to review a number of aspects of the New Zealand Defence Force’s (NZDF) structure, information management and record-keeping processes.  The Expert Review Group’s work arises out of the first recommendation from the Report of the Government’s Inquiry ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • No active community cases of COVID-19
    There are no active community cases of COVID-19 remaining in the country after the last people from the recent outbreak have recovered from the virus, Health Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “This is a big milestone. New Zealanders have once again through their collective actions squashed the virus. The systems ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Clean energy upgrade for more public buildings
    More public buildings will be supported by the Government to upgrade to run on clean energy, the Minister for Climate Change James Shaw announced today. Minister Shaw announced that Lincoln and Auckland universities will receive support through the Clean-Powered Public Service Fund to replace fossil fuel boilers. Southern, Taranaki, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago