International Women’s Day, 47 years on, how far have we come?

Written By: - Date published: 7:22 pm, March 8th, 2017 - 50 comments
Categories: Deep stuff, feminism - Tags:

Text of a speech given today by feminist icon Sandra Coney

Greetings on this International Women’s Day, a day when we should celebrate the progress of women, but also think about the tasks that are still unfinished and need to be addressed.

I have very vivid memories of the early women’s liberation movement and am often brought up short when I realise how long ago it was. Broadsheet was started 45 years ago and even the Cartwright Inquiry was 30 years ago.

In 1970, I gave birth to my second son. A group of us was in the 5th year of getting a crèche – the 1st in New Zealand – up and running on the campus. We were famously told by a member of the University Council that we had to choose between motherhood and higher education – we couldn’t have both.

I got involved in women’s liberation not long after, on the invitation of the late Sharyn Cederman, a colleague of Sue Kedgeley’s, though I said to her I didn’t need it for myself as I had a kind husband, but could see that other women needed help.

When my marriage broke up, it is worth comparing what wasn’t there with now, as I find younger women completely oblivious of the gains that were made. There was no DPB, nor benefit of any sort, and many women with babies were forced to take unpaid housekeeping jobs that involved sleeping with the boss.

In 1970 there was no equal sharing of the marital chattels on marriage breakup. There was no Matrimonial Property Act, you received what your husband agreed to give you. If you went to court, your role in running a household and bringing up children counted pretty well for nothing.

If you came out of that with enough to put a deposit on a house, the bank would expect you to have a male guarantor.

Of course, there was no such thing as equal pay in the private sector in 1970. Only 4% of working women in the private sector had equal pay laid down in an award.

My first job was as a counsellor at New Zealand first abortion clinic, in Remuera Auckland. This made it possible for women who could get there to terminate an unwanted pregnancy.

The road to reasonably available safe free abortion was a long one. Just that one battle involved multiple fronts and huge effort: there were police raids of the clinic, a High Court case against the clinic doctor, Jim Woolnough, a royal commission, serious arson, a planned bomb attack on the hospital, and several acts of parliament by MPs opposed to abortion.

It’s interesting, thinking back, how every battle that was fought or won, involved multiple antagonistic stakeholders. It was not the same group that opposed abortion, as fought equal pay, or opposed home birth. Sometimes they coalesced, but feminists had to be flexible, nimble and persistent, and everywhere.

On IWD it is good to reflect on where to from here? What are the big issues that need tackling for women and how can we tackle them.

I want to raise here a precept of the early women’s liberation movement that is still highly relevant. That is, you measure women’s progress not by how women are doing at the top but how they are doing at the bottom.

Yes, women on boards, and women as CEOs and so on, are important, but it is much more important to put effort into improving the position of the women who are doing worst.

That’s why I think that the campaign for a Living Wage is so important. Women workers are disproportionately clustered in low paid work, part time work, and casualised work.

To its credit, Wellington City Council has already adopted a Living Wage and I am pleased to say that the Auckland Council mayor, Phil Goff, has supported a living wage and this has gone out for consultation in the Annual Plan.
So, Number 1, a Living Wage.

Number 2, restoring the relativity of benefits, and increasing benefit levels and other support for sole parents who are disproportionately poor. The well-argued programme put forward by the group Child Poverty Action would improve the position of many women immensely.

Number 3, a real campaign against sexual stereotyping of girls

The women’s liberation movement made this a priority. We focused on education and sex stereotyping in children’s literature and the school curriculum. Those campaigns were very successful at bringing about change.

But we have slipped backwards. I am astonished at the gendering of toy shops, the aisles of pink, the fairy shops, the tulle dresses, the hair bows for babies – the enormous slippage that has occurred since we boycotted shops and letter-bombed manufacturers who stereotyped girls and boys. You hardly ever see a girl these days with short hair. Girls are being groomed as tiny Princess Elsas or Annas, rather than a Mowgli who does not need the opposite sex as a motivation.

Number 4, action on Violence against women.

In the Auckland Sunday paper, Ruth Herbert, the founder of a new organisation speaking for victims of domestic abuse, The Backbone Collective, pointed out we have the highest rate of women experiencing violence and abuse in the developed world.

Violence against women is New Zealand’s dirty big secret.

The first refuge was set up in 1974 in Christchurch, 43 years ago. There have been numerous initiatives to help women who face violence, but it is my perception that it has got worse, and the level of violence has got worse.

Until we face the causes of the violence, no number of “It’s Not OK” marches through the street will get us very far. There is something badly wrong about the way we model masculinity in New Zealand.

So why haven’t we made more progress in these “unfinished business” issues.

The women’s movement really ceased to exist as an organised force in the mid-1980s. This coincided, probably not randomly, with enormous structural change to New Zealand.

You will recall that the Govt, a Labour one, continued by the following National govt, went into a death dance with the captains of corporate industry and international finance. Govt institutions and agencies were handed over to these millionaires to reshape the New Zealand public sector in the model of the market. This also involved winding back the state, which had been the support and safety net people of my generation and those before.

Perversely, despite subsequent market failures and international money market collapses, despite the accumulating evidence of the social cost of restructuring, there has been no resiling from this course.

The 80s fracturing of the social structure and the social consensus it relied on, with the new dogma of individual responsibility, was something the women’s movement did not survive.

At the beginning of this period, 30 years ago, Phillida Bunkle and I published the Metro article – the unfortunate experiment at NWH – which led to the Cartwright Inquiry and sweeping reforms in the health sector. We did this through the organisation Women’s Health Action, but we were supported by a network of feminist women’s health groups throughout New Zealand, a strong union movement, and the Ministry of Women’s Affairs. The Ministry was represented throughout the Inquiry by legal counsel and played a key role in drawing out issues for women, and especially Maori women.

It is this strong, organised feminist network that is missing now. Could a Cartwright Inquiry be achieved in 2017? The answer is somewhere between No and Only with the greatest difficulty.

For right now, the truth is, the women’s liberation activist groups have withered away, and we only have the mainstream women’s groups to provide any longevity, stability and sustainability for the women’s movement.

What they have got going for them, and what is lacking elsewhere, is organisation: doing the hard yards, progressing through the formal routes, keeping agendas on the table year after year. And when you look at issues like pay equity, it is very much year after year, decade after decade.

New methods have come along, such as social media, online petitions, and so on. I am a little dubious about the effectiveness of these. They are instantly activated, but are equally instantly gone. They lack sustainability and it is not clear how much they achieve.

Just a final question for IWD. The Auckland Sunday paper magazine led with a feature article “Has Feminism become Feminism Lite” as in L I T E. This feminism will be “guaranteed not to – add weight, Increase body hair, Reduce sex appeal, Offend anyone and Change anything.”

So my final question is, can women have it all? Can we cling onto to some of the trappings of traditional femininity, and be powerful agents for change. My answer is No. You cant make compromises and not be compromised. You cannot expect to be treated like an adult while hugging your chains.

One of the slogans of the women’s movement, was, We don’t want a slice of the pie, we want to rebake it.

Well, we haven’t. We’ve been satisfied with the slice. We’ve argued about getting a bigger slice, but we haven’t rebaked the pie. In fact the pie we started with in the 1970s, based on the welfare state, was better for women than the New Zealand we have today. Women were powerless to hold back the restructuring of New Zealand, and indeed some thought they could make gains for women within it. Some women even led the changes.

We have ended up with a New Zealand with wide and worsening inequalities, and women suffer most in this type of society, directly and indirectly.

On this International Women’s Day, as a task for New Zealand women, I’d like to see the setting of an agreed agenda that would bring about real significant change for girls and women at all levels. A bit like a Working Women’s Charter updated for the 21st century. Now that would be a project women everywhere could work on, and it might just bring us back together as a powerful force for change.

50 comments on “International Women’s Day, 47 years on, how far have we come?”

  1. Carolyn_nth 1

    Oh. Yes. That’s telling it as it was and is. Interesting how the naming went from “Women’s Liberation Movement”, to Women’s Movement”, and now “feminism”. Also important to note the explanation of how feminism became Feminism LITE in the neoliberal era, with the organised women’s movement decimated.

    And I think Coney lays out well some beginning points for a new, reinvigorated feminist charter:

    1. a Living Wage.

    2. restoring the relativity of benefits, and increasing benefit levels and other support for sole parents who are disproportionately poor.

    3. a real campaign against sexual stereotyping of girls

    4. action on Violence against women.

    • weka 1.1

      “Also important to note the explanation of how feminism became Feminism LITE in the neoliberal era, with the organised women’s movement decimated.”

      I also think that there was an intentional backlash from anti-feminists. I doubt that neoliberalism cares one way or the other about feminism, so long as it gets what it wants, so sure, happy to co-opt the bits that worked and reject the stuff that threatened it. But the backlash against feminism was also about making sure that politically organised women didn’t become more of a threat than they already were to the dominating culture (and by dominating culture I mean the 5,000 year old one, not that young whippersnapper one of Rogernomics).

      Good speech from Sandra Coney.

      • Carolyn_nth 1.1.1

        Yes. There’s the threat thing.

        I’ve just been listening to RNZ’s discussion with 5 women posted online today:

        Contemporary Feminism 1: Feminism – the Morning After


        “It’s not so much that we went forward and now we’re going backward,” says Dr Anne Else. “It’s always been in flux.”

        “And the resistance to feminism has always found new ways to come out. The resistance is a measure of the threat that we are.”

        • weka 1.1.1.1

          Thanks for the link. That’s a good quote from Anne Else.

          Seeing these women, my contemporaries or older, and I don’t know whether I am inspired or depressed 😉 So much gained, so much still fucked up. I do feel incredibly grateful to them.

          “And the resistance to feminism has always found new ways to come out. The resistance is a measure of the threat that we are.”

          Just to give an example, I’m sitting here debating whether to name some of those on the largest left wing blog in NZ.

          • Carolyn_nth 1.1.1.1.1

            I think it’s important to recall how shackled women were back in the 1950s and 60s – how difficult it was to be financially independent.

            An example in the RNZ discussion about a woman fronting up to the NZ Herald and being told they didn’t employ women in the role she wanted.

            And the problems to survive financially when a woman split up with her husband, as Sandra Coney experienced in the late 60s and early 1970s.

            But there’s also the problem today that many young women are expected to look great (with help from consumerist products) and also be doing a fabulous job. While other women are struggling to survive on less than a living wage, and single mothers are often getting a meagre benefit and being treated punitively.

            • greywarshark 1.1.1.1.1.1

              Carolyn nth
              Those are good points.

              Sandra Coney knows the road, and takes us along it pointing out the milestones but also that vandals keep pinching ir swinging round the road signs.

              The emphasis is still on Princess something, rather than Dora the Explorer.
              And the past of good gains for women has been overlooked, almost abandoned like weekend time together for families, at home, at sport with enough money to participate.

              Time and money are denied to both men and women, but women are still mainly the child rearers and there we notice how much lip service there is to the role of parenthood, and how much it is regarded as an individual hobby by influential society. And I have read disparaging comments about mothers alone by a post writer on this blog.

              Single women show up in searching analysis in NZ as the poorest people in society, and usually they won’t have caused that by imbibing costly substances such as alcohol or drugs. They are often quietly working away being the salt-of-the-earth citizens being paid 81% or whatever of the male wage but being charged possibly 100% of the market cost of anything they buy.

              • Carolyn_nth

                Well said, greyw.

                I think solo mothers are those whose lives and families have been the most damaged by the neoliberal agenda: struggling to make a good life for their children, while being demonised by some with way more wealth and power.

                But I didn’t realise single women generally were the poorest in society.

                • Anne

                  But I didn’t realise single women generally were the poorest in society.

                  They often are… yes. They are also the ones who are perceived as the most vulnerable, and cop the back-lash from a stereotyping society. This applies to young women as well as older single women.

                  I have a part-time job, and yesterday I heard a young woman crying in one of the staff toilets. She emerged a short time later and I noted she was young, attractive, nicely dressed and… Indian. The location was an up-market mall and it went through my head she was being bullied in the work-place. I could have been wrong, but having been down the bully-boy road more times than I can remember I detected the same signs.

                • greywarshark

                  carolyn nth
                  I am sorry that I don’t have the link to hand to back up that poorest in society statement. It is something I saw years ago and it stuck in my mind out of surprise. And I think it was single women alone, not single parents whom I would have thought would have been the most disadvantaged which struck me.

                  There is or was help gained as Sandra says, now government does in a grudging way, for single and solo parents but single women bear the brunt of costs and living alone. Without someone to share household tasks with, and their lives are made more difficult by being discrinated against by lower wages things are more burdensome for them. Also they are not widely socially acceptable because they aren’t the accepted mixed gender pair, though a pair of women these days would usually be okay I think.

                  Co-housing is the answer to happier mingling and affordability! It’s on the move in people’s minds around NZ.

                  Living wage, and true support and respect for parents would give the country a boost from the doleful place, with outbursts of volcanic violence, that it mostly is for those in Struggle Lane.

          • Antoine 1.1.1.1.2

            Share?

            International Womens Day is surely the time, if ever there was one

            A.

            • weka 1.1.1.1.2.1

              TS often isn’t a particularly safe place for feminists or conducive to good feminist discussions. It’s part of why there are no regular feminists posting here on feminism, why many women find it difficult to comment here, and why TS doesn’t have a good reputation in this area.

              In terms of Anne Else’s point about resistances to feminism, I would name those safety and macho culture issues as a vehicle for how women’s voices are resisted in 2017. Some of that is just the culture of TS, some of it is active and intentional.

              On the other hand, there are some positive aspects to the culture here. There is general support amongst the authors to make the place better for women, and I’ve seen many times here when men commenters have stepped up and argued the important points in support of women’s politics. That gives me hope 🙂

              #shePersisted

              • Antoine

                I would have thought a reduction in the general level of aggro would help

                Also a reduction in the specific level of aggro directed at newbies

                • James

                  It’s not just Agro – it’s downright personal abuse at times.

                  It would not be accepted in the workplace, or if people saw a woman being spoken to like that in the street it would be called abuse. Yet on here sadly it seems to pass often unchecked or supported by other commenters.

                • Carolyn_nth

                  It seems to me that the wider political culture is pretty combative, and some of that gets incorporated into TS comments.

                  I think every guy, gal and transgender person that takes a non-aggro approach here, helps improve the level of discussion.

                • weka

                  that’s a separate issue IMO.

                  • Antoine

                    I think it’s a women’s issue because women, on average, are less inclined to hang around aggro places than are men.

                    (I admit I may have this wrong however, being a man myself)

                    A.

                    • weka

                      Yet there are places that are polite that are still sexist and exclusionary. TS is here for posts and robust debate, but even the women who want robust debate can find it difficult to be here.

                      Yes we could have a discussion about where the balance is on robust debate vs aggro/abusive, but it’s pretty hard to separate that out from what happens when RWers run politically offensive lines in a left wing space 😉 I’d really rather not go down that track in this thread.

                    • Antoine

                      OK, it’s not my kaupapa

    • Draco T Bastard 1.2

      3. a real campaign against sexual stereotyping of girls

      Not just girls but boys as well.

    • Miles Cederman 1.3

      Amazing to find this article (and its mention of my mother, Sharyn Cederman) on International Women’s Day – a wonderful speech by Sandra and a great reminder of how many challenges we still need to solve.

      • greywarshark 1.3.1

        Good to hear from you Miles. The family behind the activist are part of the person’s strength and character, and it is hard to do much without that, so thanks.

  2. Heather Tanguay 2

    Well said Sandra. Yes we remember those times, hard work by community groups supporting each other for change. Change came and, as you say has been lost.
    There are many today that believe that a woman’s place is in the kitchen making the scones.
    I remember when I went to my first Local Government Conference and on registering, I was asked if I was there fore the partner’s programme! I am sure there have been some gains made in Local Government. But when you look at different council photographs, they are still dominated by men. Look at Auckland Council with a male Mayor and Deputy Mayor. In Norway, as a matter of course, there is gender balance.
    I too am disturbed by the casual acceptance of young girls being made into adults with their dress, makeup and hair styles.
    Thank you Sandra for such an excellent look back at history.

    • mickysavage 2.1

      And thank you Heather for your contribution as well.

    • weka 2.2

      What time period was the conference?

      The gender stereotyping part of the speech was most interesting. There’s a whole gordian knot of issues there.

      • Antoine 2.2.1

        Is it too late to win the battle on gender stereotyping? Pop culture seems so all pervasive…

        A.

        • weka 2.2.1.1

          Pretty sure that was what was being said back in the day too 😉 Never too late.

          • Carolyn_nth 2.2.1.1.1

            Yes. And like everything else, pop culture continually changes. I understand there’s quite a bit of feminist discussion by young NZ women on facebook, etc, that tends to go under the radar, because it’s among personal networks.

          • Draco T Bastard 2.2.1.1.2

            It only becomes too late if you stop.

            IMO, those who are asking if it’s too late are usually the ones who want you to stop.

            • weka 2.2.1.1.2.1

              I thought that too

            • Antoine 2.2.1.1.2.2

              You can do what you like for all of me!

              • Antoine

                For myself, I think you can’t get rid of gender stereotyping and nor can you keep it away from your kids (once they reach a certain age). The best you can do is to steer through it as you try to raise your kids to be good people.

                That’s just me though.

                A.

              • Draco T Bastard

                Well, that’s just it – we’re trying to change all of society which means it’s not just you but you’re most definitely one of the people standing in the way of that societal change.

  3. Awesome article thanks

    • Carolyn_nth 4.1

      Although Jessie Crispin actually is a feminist, but she is protesting against, what Sandra Coney calls Feminism L I T E – which aims not to offend, but incorporates commodification of women.

  4. AB 5

    “We don’t want a slice of the pie, we want to rebake it.”
    Yes totally – and this is how we close the gap between ‘identity-based’ and ‘class-based’ action

    • weka 5.1

      That looks like an inclusive framing. Care to say more?

      • AB 5.1.1

        Well I guess I am dealing in generalities again…
        I start from the principle that even though humans aren’t equally clever, beautiful, talented or hard working, they are all equally capable of suffering. And that suffering and wasted potential is the enemy whatever its origins, be that a broken economic system or engrained discrimination against identity groups. Our rebaked cake needs to address all these things. It really is possible to chew gum and walk at the same time. And personally Id be really interested to hear what feminists think that rebaked cake should look like.What would they have to say about economic justice and the environment for example?

  5. swordfish 6

    In 1970, I gave birth to my second son. A group of us was in the 5th year of getting a crèche – the 1st in New Zealand – up and running on the campus.

    May have been the first on a University campus …. but certainly not the first crèche in New Zealand – not even remotely !!! My Grandmother for example took an active role in the establishment of the Wellington Railway Station crèche way back in 1937 !

    And that was by no means the very first.

    She was also – I might point out – part of the very energetic and vigorous 1940s-1950s campaign for Equal Pay in the Public Service – involved many women (and progressive men) and – along with other key feminist campaigns during the allegedly “quiet” era between the 2 (Boomer-identified) waves – shouldn’t be downplayed in favour of sole emphasis on the Second Wave.

    • Antoine 6.1

      Thats pretty interesting

    • Carolyn_nth 6.2

      I think also, some of the earliest feminists pre-dated the first wave.

      e.g. Mary Wollestoncraft who wrote The vindication of the Rights of Women (1792)

      Wikipedia calls her a proto-feminist

      Apparently my grandmother gave a talk or two on the rights of married women to, i think, something like the National Organisation of Women. That’d have been in the 30s or 40s, I think.

      The struggle has continued throughout and between the acknowledged waves.

    • greywarshark 6.3

      WE should never forget swordfish, to stop and remember today the almost forgotten people from the past.
      There was Margaret Thorn for instance. And I wouldn’t be surprised if it wasn’t you who replied to my request about this wonderful woman whom I had just heard about somewhere.
      http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/biographies/4t16/thorn-margaret

      A person who becomes interested in being a citizen probably learns the habit of thinking about their world, at home! Mum and Dad actually talk about important things.

      <i Margaret Anderson was born in Manchester, England, on 11 February 1897, one of twelve children of James Anderson, a master bricklayer, and his wife, Margaret Blanshard.

      Her primary schooling in the outlying village of Crab was supplemented by informal education in her extended family, where music, good literature and challenging books on social questions were discussed. The realities of working-class life made her a lifelong rebel against poverty and injustice, especially as they affected women.

      In 1912, when she was 15, Margaret arrived in New Zealand with her parents, three younger sisters and a brother. For a start the family ran the cookhouse at the Maunganui timber mill, 10 miles into the Tararua Range behind Waikanae. They moved to Palmerston North in the year of the 1913 waterfront and general strikes.

      There, her father worked at his trade; Margaret was employed as a waitress while attending lectures on economics at the WEA and lessons on bookkeeping at a commercial college. She joined the Social Democratic Party along with her father, later becoming its local secretary.

      Here she became friendly with James Thorn, a journalist,

      I wonder if there are any Thorn-bricked houses still in Palmy?

  6. AsleepWhileWalking 7

    I think the attitudes of the males in Wellington College say it all – not very far. I imagine they celebrated the day by pissing over their own mothers.

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/education/90165634/investigation-launched-over-rape-comments-made-on-facebook-by-wellington-college-students

    • Carolyn_nth 7.1

      On the other hand, John Campbell, talked to the head teacher on Checkpoint, about ways guys can help their boys to be better people.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=40&v=2U4foDSBUOs

      And, I think it was in the RNZ discussion I linked to above, the women talked of how it was judges, and men in authority who publicly made rape jokes back in the 60s.

    • greywarshark 7.2

      AWW
      Many males don’t find it beyond-the-pale to use the term ‘motherf…..rs’ or just to shorten the term to ‘mothers’ which they use to express utter contempt for anything, not necessarily related to females. And ‘fuck’ is a word expressing outrage or annoyance similar to ‘shit’. So while watching every word shouldn’t be enforced or dictated, there is a background of putdowns to females in the minds of the public, in this mainly heterosexual society, coupled with sexual overtones.

      Teenage boys are said to go through an anti-female stage, probably in a psychological phase as they grow into being male individuals and separate from being a child under their mother’s influence. This is a recognised stage in development of young adults, (and girls will undergo it too, taking a different path).

  7. bwaghorn 8

    How do you stop woman dressing their sub teen girls up like spice girls, shops will stock what sells so blaming them is wrong.

    • Carolyn_nth 8.1

      Do not under-estimate the power of marketing.

      Back in the 60s and 70s women’s liberationists strongly campaigned against marketing women as objects and this had quite a significant impact. But then came the commodification of everything and the marketing of girl power, spice girls, etc.

      There was, though a counter alt. type of music that resisted that – the whole riot grrrl thing.

  8. Ad 9

    I’m a little surprised she didn’t comment on sexual attack, pornography and teaching young men about respect. You can’t fit everything into one speech, but the normalization of internet pornography, and anecodes about the normalisation of internet commentary about drunk rape, would be worth raising.

  9. Simonm 10

    And yet another thing to celebrate. NZ has the most progressive sex-work legislation and practices in the world, which set the gold standard for a harm minimisation approach. Ain’t it wonderful, Sandra!

  10. greywarshark 11

    I think this song gives an idea of how women are up against unreasonable attitudes, This song is about a woman who is unmarried and she says never had an offer to step out with some feller. Then there are the ones who got sent to the Magdalene Home for being too pretty and looking as if they were going to have it off before being married and dacent.

    Steeleye Span and The Old Maid in the Garret and a good reel
    (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8IhFbTfX2o

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Labour to build replacement for Gorge Road
    Labour will build a new road to replace the Manawatu Gorge Road as quickly as possible, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. ...
    2 hours ago
  • Government suppresses better transport options for Auckland
    A newly-revealed un-redacted report into options for Auckland freight movement shows the Government has been actively trying to suppress more efficient and cost-effective options to construct a third rail line, says Labour’s Transport spokesperson Michael Wood. “While Auckland’s congestion gets ...
    5 hours ago
  • How to vote and keep your info private
    Going to vote or enrolling to vote can be scary. Having your details out there can open a can of worms. I wish we lived in a country where everyone was safe and secure enough to be openly enrolled, but ...
    GreensBy Jan Logie
    6 hours ago
  • Coleman’s lost control of his Ministry
    Basic blunders and chronic underfunding revealed in Treasury documents obtained by Labour clearly show Health Minister Jonathan Coleman has lost control of his ministry, says Labour’s Health spokesperson David Clark. “Every New Zealander deserves affordable access to quality healthcare but ...
    6 hours ago
  • Household Living Costs hit poorer Kiwis hardest
    Standards of living for the poorest and most vulnerable New Zealanders are being eroded by rising prices for basic living costs, while National has stood idly by, says Labour’s Finance Spokesperson Grant Robertson. “Statistics New Zealand data released today is ...
    1 day ago
  • The clock is ticking
      Labour strongly supports the latest report by the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment to have carbon emission targets set in legislation, carbon budgeting and an independent climate commission says Labour’s spokesperson on Climate Change Megan Woods.  “Dr Jan Wright’s ...
    1 day ago
  • Public support keeps Healthy Homes Bill on track
    The strong call from the public for warm, dry, healthy rentals has helped the Healthy Homes Guarantee Bill to pass its second reading, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. ...
    1 day ago
  • More proof National not delivering for New Zealanders
    The Ministry of Social Development’s latest Household Incomes Report is more hard evidence of the growing poverty in New Zealand, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. “National claims to be delivering for New Zealanders. This report puts the lie ...
    3 days ago
  • Strong support from medical community for Healthy Homes Bill
    More than a thousand medical professionals, medical students, and other New Zealanders have shown their support for Labour’s Healthy Homes Guarantee Bill, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. ...
    3 days ago
  • Labour will fund Buller Health Centre
    A Labour Government will fully fund the Buller Integrated Family Health Centre in Westport, confirming its commitment to the people of the West Coast and the role of central government to fund essential public services, says Labour’s Health spokesperson David ...
    3 days ago
  • National’s affordable promise for Auckland more smoke and mirrors
    The 26,000 additional houses National plans to build in Auckland on public land over the next decade include fewer than 5,000 affordable homes, while more than 60 per cent will be available for speculators to buy, says Leader of the ...
    3 days ago
  • National out of touch over immigration
    National’s abrupt backflip on their recently-announced changes to immigration shows they never understood the problem and just came up with a confused knee jerk response, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. “Regional communities and businesses were quite right to ...
    4 days ago
  • English out of touch on homelessness
    Bill English’s comments that he doesn’t know why people are complaining about the blowout in the number of homeless families the government is putting up in motels just shows how tired and out of touch National is after nine years, ...
    4 days ago
  • All Kiwis to have same standard of cancer care
    Labour is promising that all New Zealanders will have access to the same level of cancer care no matter where they live in the country, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little.   “As someone who has survived cancer I ...
    5 days ago
  • Infrastructure announcement too long coming
    “What took you so long?” is Labour’s response to the Government’s announcement of a new infrastructure investment vehicle. Labour’s Auckland Issues spokesperson Phil Twyford says Labour announced its policy in 2015 to debt-finance infrastructure and service that debt with targeted ...
    5 days ago
  • Time for a breather on immigration
    National has no idea how to house the record number of people entering New Zealand, let alone cope with the pressure on health, education, and transport from this record population growth, says Labour’s Immigration spokesperson Iain Lees-Galloway. ...
    1 week ago
  • Labour to invest $4 billion in education
    Labour’s Education Manifesto will bring positive change across the education sector and is backed by a massive investment, says Labour’s Education Spokesperson Chris Hipkins.  “Labour’s plan will see an extra $4 billion invested over the next four years. It’s organised ...
    1 week ago
  • National’s shame: worst homelessness in the OECD
    National’s legacy is a housing crisis that has given New Zealand the worst homeless rate in the developed world, says Labour’s Housing spokesperson Phil Twyford. ...
    1 week ago
  • Labour taking action on school donations
    Labour will end so-called voluntary school donations for the majority of parents across the country under its $4 billion plan to revitalise the education sector, says Labour Leader Andrew Little. “Labour has always been committed to a world-class free education ...
    1 week ago
  • Labour to work with Queenstown to build more houses
    Labour will work with Queenstown-Lakes District Council, iwi, and the Community Housing Trust to build the modern, affordable housing Queenstown desperately needs, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. ...
    1 week ago
  • Nats blow the Budget on motels after bowling state houses
    National is spending $140,000 a day putting homeless families in motels, the legacy of nine years of selling off and knocking down state houses, says Labour Housing spokesperson Phil Twyford. ...
    1 week ago
  • New revelations in Joanne Harrison report
    The State Services Commission’s report into the treatment of whistle-blowers by Joanne Harrison has revealed new accusations against the convicted fraudster, says Labour MP Sue Moroney.  “The report found that four staff inside the Ministry of Transport who had raised ...
    1 week ago
  • Snafu at Princess Margaret
    Jonathan Coleman has to stop the stalling over a new building for mental health services in Christchurch to replace the quake damaged Princess Margaret Hospital, says Labour’s Health spokesperson David Clark. “The Government must accept that Christchurch is still recovering ...
    1 week ago
  • Labour’s fiscal plan to build a fairer New Zealand
    Labour will re-build our housing, health and education while responsibly managing New Zealand’s finances, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little.  “Under Labour’s Fiscal Plan we will deliver big investments in the services we all need and care about, invest ...
    1 week ago
  • Nats show they’re the tax dodgers’ best friends
    The government is taking the knife to IRD at a time when we need a highly skilled department to ensure that multinationals and speculators don’t get away with dodging tax, says Labour’s Revenue spokesperson Michael Wood. ...
    1 week ago
  • Labour secures the future for NZ Super
    A Labour Government will secure the future for New Zealand Superannuation so we can continue to provide superannuation to those retiring at age 65, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. “One of the first things a Labour-led Government will ...
    1 week ago
  • Multinationals must pay fair share of tax
    A Labour Government will crack down on multinational companies that are dodging paying their fair share of tax, says Labour Leader Andrew Little. “New Zealanders are missing out by hundreds of millions according to the IRD because multinational companies can ...
    1 week ago
  • ACT’s approach to children backward and ill informed
    Act’s new deputy leader’s claim that Labour’s support for families could “extend the misery of child poverty and even child abuse” is ill informed and offensive, says Labour’s Deputy Leader Jacinda Ardern. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Canterbury hatchet job a disgrace
    The Government’s glib acceptance of advice that the Canterbury District Health Board doesn’t need more money is a hatchet job and a disgrace, says Labour’s Health Spokesperson David Clark. “To claim that the DHB was using tactics to leverage more ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Quality for Kiwi kids at ECE
    After more than a decade of rapid growth in the number of children participating in Early Childhood Education (ECE), it’s time to take stock and map out a clear plan for the future, says Labour’s Education spokesperson Chris Hipkins. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Labour to boost ECE quality
    Labour will ensure kids get the best start in life by boosting funding for Early Childhood Centres to employ 100 per cent qualified and registered teachers, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Labour will stump up a million dollars for Maniototo Hospital
    A Labour led Government will make a million dollars available to rebuild the Maniototo Base hospital in Ranfurly, says the Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little.  “This will be a much needed boost for a long overdue rebuild that has ...
    2 weeks ago
  • No vision for the West Coast
    The West Coast welcomes any Government investment in our region but the lack of any real alternative vision for the West Coast’s economy is disappointing, says Damien O’Connor Labour’s West Coast-Tasman MP.  “The establishment of a Mining Research Unit will ...
    2 weeks ago
  • National’s youth work scheme too little too late
    After nine years, National’s belated attempt to provide work opportunities for unemployed youth should be seen for what it is, a half-hearted, election gimmick from a party that’s ignored the problem till now, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Kiwis won’t fall for Joyce’s spin
    Steven Joyce’s embarrassingly obvious spin on Labour’s Families Package won’t fool anyone, says Labour’s Finance spokesperson Grant Robertson. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Labour prioritises families and public services
    Labour’s Families Package delivers a bigger income boost to more than 70 per cent of families with children than Budget 2017. By not spending $1.5 billion a year on tax cuts, Labour is able to do more for lower and ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Kiwis can’t sleep in your ghost houses, Nick
    The Government’s housing infrastructure announcement is another Nick Smith special – over-promising with no detail on delivery, says Labour’s Housing spokesperson Phil Twyford. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Labour helps older New Zealanders and low income families with winter heating bills
    Labour will further boost its commitment to warm, healthy housing with a Winter Energy Payment for superannuitants and people receiving main benefits, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. “Everyone deserves a warm, healthy home to live in. But that’s ...
    3 weeks ago