So if the first-home buyers are being shut out of the property market, who is going to do the buying?
Greedy property-portfolio buyers are my guess.
And this government won’t introduce a capital gains tax on multi properties.
Money men running things eh? You gotta luv ’em haven’t ya.
From what was said on RadioNZ National this morning that’s exactly who the current wave of house buyers in Auckland are,
Speculators, not stupid by any means are sucking up Auckland properties knowing that there will only be a few months to wait while the first home buyers save another 10% towards a deposit,
As the first home buyers come back into the market the speculators will make some grand windfall profits from having played middle man for 6 months…
I can understand the need to implement a policy to slow house price increases but a government has lost the plot if it implements a policy that makes it harder for 1st home buyers and not investors. Home ownership is important to encourage strong communities, but this policy has assisted the people who are causing the house price bubble, property investors. But I guess with the number of National MP’s with investment houses, no wonder….
But something that I have often reflected on is why does the Reserve Bank put so much effort in trying to control inflation saying that inflation will lead to “wage growth” while at the same time ignoring house price inflation, certainly last decade this was the case.
But something that I have often reflected on is why does the Reserve Bank put so much effort in trying to control inflation saying that inflation will lead to “wage growth”…
You’re looking at it the wrong way around. The RBNZ tries to control the speed of the economy so as to reduce upward trends in wages which would, in theory, push up prices. They’re effectively trying to maintain 6%+ unemployment so as to keep wages down. Of course, they really don’t give a fuck about the wages/salaries/income at the top because they make up such a small amount of the population that no matter how much they increase they won’t actually push up inflation. It’s only wages for the majority.
…while at the same time ignoring house price inflation, certainly last decade this was the case.
Because people see house price inflation as themselves getting richer and telling people that they can’t have that would piss people off.
That really made my blood boil this morning. I’m absolutely livid.
So much for the Govt focus on improving education outcomes! You don’t do that by wrecking public education and pouring millions into private schools.
God I hate these Nat bandits! The very thought of another term with National makes me want to scream.
This government has never been focused on lifting education outcomes – they’ve been focused on privatising education. The result of which, as we see, is a decrease in our education system and the outcomes of that system.
John Armstrong, of all people, comments on the Parata smokescreen issued in Gisborne.
Her 20 page speech was not available before her talk nor after and signals National hunting around for some hot acceptable directions for Education.
I think that the slippage for NZ rankings reflects what happened in the UK. The more they tested and ranked the lower the UK fell in international rankings. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11164426
Another IT fuck up from National National standards a complete cock up.
Chorus cockup.
Brownlee can’t admit he’s had to comprimise.
Because he has been sucking up to Parker who Fucked up .
Now Daziel is there things are working better.
National could organize a piss up in a brewery.
Very good post from David Beatson on his continuing investigations into the TV digital switchover and Freeview.
He reckons that the 2006 government agreement with SOE Kordia has been breached by Kordia. A response to an OIA about how Kordia carried out its allocations of digital frequencies – to check if it followed the processes/rules as laid out in the 2006 agreement – has resulted in Kordia saying they can’t find relevant emails and documentation. it seems the evidence has mysteriously disappeared.
Beatson also explains how regional TV channels have been hard hit by the switchover, with only 10 of the 20 previously licensed channels surviving. And the ones that are available on freeview can only be accessed by those with Freeview terrestrial, and not to those with Freeview satellite.
Further more, Beatson says:
Four [regional channels] are operating under the radar on their own, independent digital transmitters because they couldn’t afford the cost of switching to Freeview. They just have to hope their viewers can find them without the help of the Freeview electronic guide.
I’m not sure how anyone would find such channels manually. Don’t know if they are accessible to all regions: i.e. would I be able to receive Canterbury’s CTV on my Freeview Terrestrial receiver on the DTT (Digital Terrestrial TV) platform?
Note that those who live in Blenheim are forced to use a dish and as shown on your linked chart we get fewer choices. Mind you there is little to watch on TV anyway.
Beatson’s been great on this issue, Kordia’s been a strange place of late with quite a few clashes and departures as well as the shedding of Orcon.
Freeview should be the great enabler in a digital world but it’s effectively reducing choice and dumbing down what’s available free to air.
Sky having SBS turned off on our freeview/sky sattelite in 2012 shows who is calling the shots in broadcasting. 4 channels, excellent news and many quality shows showed up what dross we have dished up to us.
Kordia’s been a strange place of late with quite a few clashes and departures as well as the shedding of Orcon.
Yeah, I’ve been noticing that as well. I get the distinct impression that someone in the background is pulling strings. Kordia’s selling of it’s successful ISP, Orcon, with the excuse well, we’ve learned a lot and now it’s time to move on read as pure BS. Considering this government’s adherence to the private is good, public is bad false dichotomy I don’t think it takes that much guessing to figure out who’s sending the hidden commands.
FYI – key points that I made at the 2013 Australian Public Sector Anti-Corruption Conference,
26 – 28 November 2013:
NB: NOBODY else was making these points……
_______________________________________________________________________________
If it is the (privatisated) contracting-out / procurement model which is the cause of so much corruption – why not get rid of the (privatisated) contracting-out / procurement model ???
_______________________________________________________________________________
Where is the ‘cost-benefit analysis’ which proves that the contracting-out of services once provided ‘in-house’ by local and central government under the ‘public service’ model, is more cost-effective for the public majority?
_______________________________________________________________________________
It appears that the only people benefitting from the ‘business’ model are those businesses which get the contracts.
______________________________________________________________________________
How can private sector businesspeople ‘transmogrify’ into competent PUBLIC SERVANTS?
They come from a different planet – where the laws/ regulations culture are completely different.
_______________________________________________________________________________
(Really jammed some buttons on FULL – when I told folks that I had polled 4th in the recent Auckland Council Mayoral election with nearly 12,000 votes (11,723 votes), campaigning against corrupt corporate control of the Auckland region, and hadn’t paid any rates since 2008!
And I WON’T until the ‘books are open’ and we are told EXACTLY where rates monies are being spent.)
I am now of the firm opinion that the root cause of corruption is the neo-liberal ‘commercialise, corporatise – PRIVATISE model, based upon the unsubstantiated myth that ‘public is bad – private is good’, and that if ‘anti-corruption’ bodies / agencies aren’t focused on addressing this underpinning cause, then they’re not really serious about preventing or fighting corruption.
Good on you Penny. You and your supporters issues are often slow burners and complex so your shorter posts here with links are seeing the ‘penny’ drop with a few more readers now.
There is an nteresting accounting shuffle that enable contractors to be taken on (usually costing more than regular employees) but the cost of the contractors does not appear against the wages budget for a department, it comes out of another separate budget and so the department head can appear to be running a lean staff of surmised, competent extremely efficient people as an example of good management.
Instead the department staff are all scrambling to keep the place going with inadequate staff numbers and no time to monitor basic jobs of maintenance of security, emergency systems, good functioning and updating of hardware and software. But the obvious gaps are filled by off-budget expenditure on contractors and the dedicated staff usually having to give advice to the contractors on the particular quirks of their systems.
depends on which statistics are settled on- from the article- “In the year to March 2013, national accounts statistics show spending up by 2.6%, incomes risen by just 1.8% “: medians vs averages were addressed yesterday.
Not in my house we’re not Seti. We’re so downwardly mobile at such a high speed we broke through the crash net. Never in my life, until recent years have I had to use a credit card to pay living expenses like Dr’s bills and the F- ing part payment you have make for physio because ACC no longer fully fund rehab. The salary earner hasn’t had a pay rise in 5 years and costs go up and up and up. Thats your brighter future. Right there.
Ave weekly household spend up to $90 more if comparing with 3 years ago, ie $30 a week rise on ave per year.
Average household income up by $170 – presumably this would be by week.
But because of the big gap in wages and salaries being paid to people all of whom are doing good work, but only a few well paid, it should be noted that some with below average income could be receiving only a $170 per annum rise.
I know someone in a skilled job who only had a rise of .7% p.a. – on $40,000 would give rise of $280.00 per annum.
The median income is up by $100 a week? From three years ago? If the average spending is up to $90, then it would be likely that those on the median would spend less than the average per week. They might be at the level where they have a net $10 more per week, if they are lucky and likely they are not better off, maybe worse.
The majority may seem better off. But are these figures inflation adjusted. The measurement of the CPI is in itself a limited gauge of inflation as it doesn’t take in housing prices and other things. I don’t know what an analyst’s measure of NZ’s true inflation would be as it affects the average citizen personally. If all factors were taken into account there would be at least a sizable minority who are worse off.
Averages can be used to hide the reality. IIRC, 45% of people haven’t seen a pay rise in years. Many have seen a pay reduction not only in real terms but in nominal terms. As an example, in 2007 builders were on $35/hr+. Today they’d be lucky to get $30.
If you look more closely at the statistics average household incomes have gone up because of huge rises at the extreme top end (17% in 2012 year) and loss of jobs, and or being refused social welfare, and hence dropping off the list, at the bottom.
The reality for most skilled people in the middle, the ones we need, has been pay rises below the inflation rate for decades. Which is why so many of us went overseas.
My main job, which is highly skilled, (takes 10 years or more to reach proficiency), in extremely high demand, (been on the immigration depts shortage of skills list for years), pays 40% less now, in relation to headline CPI changes, in NZ, than in 1984.
That’s why we all work offshore while being replaced with cheap immigrants with substandard skills.
And for low income people, prices of things they have to buy, such as housing, health, transport and food , have risen at a much greater rate than the overall CPI. Baked beans have risen in price much more than sirloin steak. Not to mention the many things that used to be State supplied which are now, “user pays”.
Being able to buy cheaper luxury cars and flat screen TV’s does not help those who can barely afford food.
NZ now has one of the lowest median disposable household incomes in the OECD in relation to prices. We are down there with other Neo-liberal “successes”, like Greece.
Sweden is the latest country to swallow the poison pill. Watch them going down in all indicators, even the RWNJ’s favourite, economic growth!
Roger Douglas’ and John Key’s brighter future.
Still see Douglas in the NBR saying we need more of his prescription. Straight out of the medical textbook from the 1870’s that said if bleeding the patient doesn’t work, take more blood.
Graham Gill,
General Manager,
Evaluation & Intelligence,
Serious Fraud Office
New Zealand.
‘Open Letter’
Good morning Graham,
Can you confirm a timeframe by which we can expect a decision on your evaluation of the request from Lisa Prager and myself for the NZ Serious Fraud Office to conduct an urgent inquiry into alleged bribery and corruption, involving Auckland Mayor Len Brown and Sky City Auckland?
(I am still in Sydney, now the 2013 Australian Public Sector Anti-Corruption Conference has ended, and I am keen to give an update to Australian media who may be interested.)
Kind regards,
Penny Bright
‘Anti-corruption /anti-privatisation Public Watchdog’
The police have found a new weapon that when fired doesn’t penetrate on impact. Truncheon, taser, wot now? Sponge nosed. Why not paint balls – that can mark the crim as well as bruising them. Aren’t harsh words good enough? Allo, allo put your hands up you scummy little… (in some Brit stories the crims are called chummies).
yes, ‘won’t penetrate on impact’ – was expecting the replacement of male officers by eunuchs…
sponge-round, -gas-launched, (none of your hand-whipped cream), 40mm round (small piece for everyone), range of 30m, inflicts pain, bruises and abrasions (raspberry jam splatters); Limited offer to the AOS in Ak, Wgtn and Chch and the NSTG.
“let them eat sponge-rounds” accompanied with a cup of piping-hot pepper-spray, hold the icing-sugar.
Lolz last time they had me handcuffed to a chair was in the old Taranaki Street station, the instrument of threat that nite was a convenient hefty chair leg which the plod didn’t use,(maybe coz i was laughing so hard),
What started the whole incident was a car load of D-men cruising Wellingotn’s Vivien street, me and a mate were sitting in a V8 Rambler discussing a little something befor going into Bryon Legros first club for a couple out of the tea pot,
The third time the car-load of suits cruised by giving us the eyeball i said to my mate ”you watch this”, leapt out of the car and gapped it down Vivien street, Lolz plods came from everywhere and by the time they tackled me down by Trades Hall i had already started laughing like a loon,
They had to let me go after half an hour of threats,”vy verr you running”,and we spent the rest of the nite drinking out of Legros teapot laughing like maniacs…
Yes median and average incomes are actually meaningless mumbo jumbo statistics designed to hide the real level of poverty experienced in New Zealand, those with a social conscience might be mollified by totals like the medium being 80 0dd thousand but for the third of the economy that eanrs below 20 bucks an hour that’s just a sad f**king joke,
The only statistics that will tell the real story of income is the production of charts showing how many of us are in what income bracket defined every 10 thousand dollars…
I suppose private for profit education providers and the politicians who support them are more likely to put children first then? Nah, didn’t think so.
If you look more closely at the statistics average household incomes have gone up because of huge rises at the extreme top end (17% in 2012 year) and loss of jobs, and or being refused social welfare, and hence dropping off the list, at the bottom.
The reality for most skilled people in the middle, the ones we need, has been pay rises below the inflation rate for decades. Which is why so many of us went overseas.
My main job, which is highly skilled, (takes 10 years or more to reach proficiency), in extremely high demand, (been on the immigration depts shortage of skills list for years), pays 40% less now, in relation to headline CPI changes, in NZ, than in 1984.
That’s why we all work offshore while being replaced with cheap immigrants with substandard skills.
And for low income people, prices of things they have to buy, such as housing, health, transport and food , have risen at a much greater rate than the overall CPI. Baked beans have risen in price much more than sirloin steak. Not to mention the many things that used to be State supplied which are now, “user pays”.
Being able to buy cheaper luxury cars and flat screen TV’s does not help those who can barely afford food.
NZ now has one of the lowest median disposable household incomes in the OECD in relation to prices. We are down there with other Neo-liberal “successes”, like Greece.
Sweden is the latest country to swallow the poison pill. Watch them going down in all indicators, even the RWNJ’s favourite, economic growth!
Roger Douglas’ and John Key’s brighter future.
Still see Douglas in the NBR saying we need more of his prescription. Straight out of the medical textbook from the 1870’s that said if bleeding the patient doesn’t work, take more blood.
• New Zealand 15-year-old students’ overall reading performance was substantially higher than the average for the 34 OECD countries.
• Of the 65 countries or economies participating in PISA 2009, only two OECD countries, and two non-OECD partner economies performed better than New Zealand. Four countries were similar and the other 56 countries performed at a significantly lower level.
• Close to one in six of New Zealand students were top-performing readers.”
Yes, it reported problems with boys’ reading and disproportionately lower reading performance amongst Maori and Pasifika students. Nevertheless, highlighting that the education system has produced ‘no improvement’ in performance is a bit like telling a child that it’s still only getting 90% in its English exams.
If the PPTA is the ‘problem’ and puts itself before children, that seems to be having very little downward effect on children’s reading (or maths or science) performance relative to other countries.
Assuming that the about to be released PISA findings show a decrease in either ranking or – worse – actual reading performance of children then, according to your analysis, it will be because National is less able to counter the nefarious effects of the PPTA than was the Labour-led government OR something National has instituted in the education system hasn’t worked OR that there has been some random unidentified factor that has caused performances either to deteriorate or at least not improve.
Given that the changes National introduced were intended to improve performances – especially in the supposed ‘tail’ – then if there has been no improvement in performances those changes have failed to achieve their aim.
What Tolley is terrified of is Jacinta and the local MP in tow will find out about the number of senior CRIME fighting officers who are leaving after being ordered to go on night shifts to drive traffic cars and hit ticket ” targets ” which are the old quotas by a different name.
The officers are finding that juries tend to have a few people on them that are a bit fucked off with the cops for being caught doing 5 or 6 km over the limit, and the chances of getting covictions is falling through the floor. Funny that. BTW, the 104 theshold has been in for a while.
These cops know by the Polices own research that there is neglible difference between 100 and 110 in accident and injury stats.
So the ones we really need are walking away because they are fed up.
Rounding up suspects in rape cases, clearing burgularies, arresting in DV callouts nah.
Of course they have time to raid newspaper offices, descend on an alleged copyright infringement case (72 + helicopter?), chase down protesters and get a new sort of bullet to use agaibnst whoom exactly?
If Nact are to boast about their “get tough on crime strategy” success it must be hard work trying to keep the number of complaints down so nothing enters the front end of the system.
The only police I’ve seen lately are at breath test stoppage (outside library on a Tuesday evening! I didn’t realise that book borrowers had joined the criminal classes en masse.), running around my ‘hood in one piece boiler suits waving batons although we are pretty law abiding and handing out something that I think was for white ribbon day at the station. (somehow that doesn’t make up for the no arrest policy).
Bossy and controlling Anne Tolley and don’t any of us dare disagree with her.
My belief in socialism has always been predicated on the arbitrary and undeserved inequalities of power under capitalism. This goes beyond mere money or employment relationships into almost every facet of life.
For me, supporting the struggle of the pointlessly disempowered against the pointlessly powerful, wherever it occurs, is the essence of being “left wing”.
So I guess my question for left-wing social conservatives today is “when did some of the different facets of ‘identity politics’ stop being integral parts of the left-win mission, and instead become distractions from what you might call ‘true-left’ activism?”
Was it when husbands were no longer able to beat severely beat “their” wives at will?
Was it when homosexuality was no longer regarded as a mental illness?
Was it when the government stopped blatantly stealing land and resources from indigenous people?
Was it when husbands were no longer legally allowed to rape “their” wives?
Was it when women got the vote?
Was it when an interracial relationship was no longer a brave social statement in TV shows?
Was it when a same-sex relationship was no longer the “surprise twist” in TV shows?
Was it when a same-sex relationship was no longer a brave social statement in TV shows [whoops, still isn’t quite there yet]?
Was it when “he made a pass at me and I panicked so beat him to death” was no longer a legal defence for a man to be found guilty of manslaughter rather than murder [removed when the “provocation” defence was removed, though the argument might still work on a jury]?
Was it when women no longer needed to be certified by two doctors as being in danger of going insane before a zygote could be legally removed from their body, but were instead regarded as being competent to make their own decisions [whoops, hasn’t happened yet]?
Was it when brown people achieved approximately the same average or median income as lighter-skinned people [whoops, hasn’t happened yet]?
Was it when women achieved approximately the same average or median income as men [whoops, hasn’t happened yet]?
Was it when a 13 year old girl could make a rape complaint to police with the complete assurance that it would be thoroughly investigated[whoops, hasn’t happened yet]?
Seriously, I missed the memo: at what point was I supposed to stop giving a fuck about any social analysis deeper than “working class vs capitalist class”?
Apparently when the working class/capitalist class issue is sorted, all the other ones go away magically. Although for the life of me I can’t understand how that won’t just result in a different sort of heirarchal, oppressive structure. Working class white men are going to share their power once they get it? Really? Why would they do that?
I found myself irked the other day when I read Bryce Edwards referring to QoT as an ‘identity politics’ blogger. Am trying to decide if it’s a better strategy to appropriate the term or demolish it.
So it’s about voter perceptions and not matters of principle and social justice and a decent life, equality, etc for all?
So, should the left stop giving a fuck about (working) class politics, now that increasing numbers of voters say today class is not an issue? And if the majority say they don’t give a fuck about class issues, does the left wing of politics throw in the towel?
So it’s about voter perceptions and not matters of principle and social justice and a decent life, equality, etc for all?
Oh, I thought McFlock was talking about identity politics. Gender/race/relationship/reproductive politics in other words.
So, should the left stop giving a fuck about (working) class politics, now that increasing numbers of voters say today class is not an issue?
Where’s your statistics from around that claim? How many of the 800,000 non-voters do you think stayed away from the polls because our political parties don’t focus enough on delivering on identity politics?
Because nobody has gender, race, relationship, and reproductive aspects to their identity, therefore we can ignore all those issues of power and powerlessness and still provide social justice and a decent life, equality, etc for all”. /sarc
You’re a clever man McFlock. I’ll run it this way. IMO for most NZers, gender, race, relationship and reproductive politics are 2nd, 3rd and 4th orders of concern, not first order.
therefore we can ignore all those issues of power and powerlessness and still provide social justice and a decent life, equality, etc for all”. /sarc
The current fucked up state of the western world with regards to social justice and providing a decent life to all has not occurred because of identity politics (whether too much/too little).
It’s been entirely due to the unchecked influence of banks, corporations and international capital. But whatever. You know better.
I’ll run it this way. IMO for most NZers, gender, race, relationship and reproductive politics are 2nd, 3rd and 4th orders of concern, not first order.
Well, you can run your Maslow’s Hierarchy of give-a-fuck all you want, but when a 13yo makes a rape complaint that appears to have been followed by inaction, that’s not entirely due to the global corporate financiers. And addressing that problem does not stop Labour addressing issues of capitalist power – don’t blame “identity politics” for your party dropping the ball on other issues that you happen to care about.
BTW nice pivot. Because you know that quite unlike gender/race/relationship politics, making sure that police do their job and do their job well is a 1st order of concern for most voters.
And addressing that problem does not stop Labour addressing issues of capitalist power – don’t blame “identity politics” for your party dropping the ball on other issues that you happen to care about.
As I said, its easy to default to a socially liberal programme. Confronting capitalist power is actually the hard agenda. And right now it is the one which is an absolute existential matter of survival.
Not a pivot. It is actually the point. It’s the culture and power dynamic that meant the police apparently did not feel inclined or capable of doing their job. The concept that complainant+witnesses != “INsufficient evidence” to move the investigation forward but does equal a plausible defence for inactivity, that is the problem.
As for what you claim is an “easy” programme to “default to” – well, that just means that you’ve been prepared to ignore pretty much every facet of reality, right there.
McFlock, I find it hard to argue against any of the issues you raise questions on being something any normal liberally minded person would not support. Left or Right.And that to me is at the crux of the issue of “identity” politics.
What I believe has happened is that the questions you attribute with being “left wing” issues have been adopted by a “Left” that has struggled for an electable identity and a clear “Left” path (whatever that is). To me the “Left” has looked like a bucket shop for all the issues that the “Right” probably assessed as too contrary to garnering votes, and cynically dumped into a vacuum for others to pick up. And they no doubt knew that the “Left” would adopt them because, as previously stated any liberally minded people would.
These issues are in my view (which could be right or wrong) “libertarian” issues. Despite being “libertarian” when it comes to issues related to money and property the Right is decidedly stand offish if other “libertarian” ideas cost them money. Which may explain why they end up “gifted” to the “Left”.
Maybe the liberals of the Left, (the “identity’ politics groups) need to understand is that their stance is neither wrong or correct. It is that the Left like the Right has another duality: it contains conservative elements as well as liberal.
The result is that the Left have a problem: how they can be a broad church for the greater good that tolerates and encompasses all viewpoints, even when they are difficult to reconcile. “Identity” politics cannot lead, nor can their opponents. They do however have to find a common cause.
I disagree with putting issues of gender, “race”/(post)colonisation, and sexuality into the “liberal”/”libertarian” basket. Those labels apply to an individualistic take on society. Putting them into that basket denies that it involves groups of people who are marginalised and oppressed via the structure and culture of our society, because they are part of said group -not because of any individual qualities they posses.
Basically, it amounts to a politics that privileges a pakeha and/or masculine focus on class and denies how other oppressions, and intersectionality are experienced in practice.
To me “identity politics” is the wrong term – it’s about the politics of disadvantage and oppression.
Basically, my bag’s the politics of class. And that (obviously) has an economic focus. And I agree that neither class, nor race nor gender should be separated out or elevated to the detriment of any of the three main areas or fields of disadvantage and oppression.
That said, the fcking Labour Party and the liberal or social democratic left of this country needs a severe kick in the head for doing precisely that with class politics. It elevated gender and race issues and kinda pretended that class didn’t exist. And that led to a lot of fucked off people and ultimately all kinds of negative impacts on the issues of race and gender (the Labour Party) chose to focus on.
And now we have a sort of hungover schism – maybe reflected in Ennui’s comment.
That said, the fcking Labour Party and the liberal or social democratic left of this country needs a severe kick in the head for doing precisely that with class politics. It elevated gender and race issues and kinda pretended that class didn’t exist.
That’s probably a fair enough description, although many of the “elevated” actions were a)from allied/coalition parties and b)long overdue anyway.
But I guess in the glaring economic, industrial and social silence from Labour, some people could hear the “identity” pins finally drop and now have a headache from the rattle 🙂
For me it has always been that issues of class, race, gender and sexuality are inter-related and, in many ways intertwined”: sometimes they overlap, sometimes they are separate – and on occasions they are in conflict. for instance, women have long provided a reserve army of labour, marginalised at times, but preferred by employers when it suits them -usually when they want to lower wages or casualise the workforce.
I think I always had a perspective that is now called “intersectionality.
I don’t really think the left/labour movement have elevated gender & “race” that much. To me it seems like a thin veneer over the top a a still very traditionally masculine culture.
I got into the women’s movement in the late 70s in London because it provided a context where I felt most comfortable. The women’s movement there was very left on class – taking Marxism/socialism as read and the basis for all politics.
There, and I think here, women organised separately from the mainstream of the left because they felt poorly treated there: treated as the people to make the tea and/or provide sexual service. I heard a few stories from women who began in the mainstream left, of being sexual harassment (and worse) by left wing men.
Neoliberalism picked up on a very narrowed version of feminism: girl power spun through glossy consumerism. That got mixed into the neoliberal shift within Labour Parties (in various countries).
On the left, “race” and Maori issues also have been adopted in a weakened form. Remember how Clark backed off from “closing the gaps”. And then there was the foreshore and seabed issue – hardly embraced by parliamentary Labour.
Where are all these elevated policies of gender and race that have allegedly pushed aside class issues and dominate the left? To me it seems that there’s a few such policies proposed, and they get highlighted because they get so much resistance from the media and some in the left. they are hardly at the core of the (neoliberalised) left.
It seems to me that class and the struggle for socio-economic equality and inclusiveness got undermined in the same ways as feminism and anti-racism have been narrowed on the left, and at the same time. Prior to the mid 80s, there had been some progress in the struggle to integrate race, gender, sexuality etc, with class on the left.
And if this blog, and other left wing ones are anything to go by, males and a fairly conventional kind of masculinity runs through left wing politics. Here for instance, males seem to outnumber females, and when feminist/gender/sexuality issues get raised there’s quite a bit of resistance from some quarters – though there are also many here who are supportive.
Over the years I have seen some women refer to TS as not being a positive space for women/feminists. I actually think TS is more welcoming and positive than that on balance.
But, really, I’m just not seeing the left dominated by gender and race issues. neither am I seeing a broader left really pushing for strongly core Labour/socialist policies. For me Mana and Greens actually embrace the strongest left wing approaches/policies. Mana also has a strong Maori perspective, while the Greens are more positive on issues of gender, sexuality and disability. This is maybe because they are relatively new parties. Labour, and the broader labour movement have been a long time shedding their originating white male dominance. And every step forward gets treated as some major take-over by (so-called) “identity politics”.
Only broadly speaking and merely as an example – ‘the closing the gaps’ policy that the Clark government backed off from was seen as being preferential, rather than as a policy addressing disadvantage.
If an overt class centered policy had accompanied the closing gaps policy in such a way as to show that all the lower boats would be rising with the lowest of all rising more to some common predetermined level, then I reckon there’d have been bugger all resistance and bullshit.
But those going backwards in a purely class sense, were essentially been told to F.O. and that there were no issues affecting them. And, as we know, it’s just not the case that white working class people weren’t suffering during the Clark years. Result: resentment and piss all solidarity.
I do agree that working class people of all colours suffered during the period of the Clark government.
Do you really think a closing the gaps policy that addressed all on low income people would have succeeded without massive resistance in the Clark years? If not, why didn’t the Labour government do that?
My answer is that it would have been met with as much, or more resistance from various quarters (with the MSM cheerleading), as closing the gaps.
Poverty does hit large numbers of Maori and Pacific people extremely hard.
PS: Back to my earlier point: closing the gap never happened. So, ultimately there was no programme activated that specifically addressed Maori/Pacific needs. Is it that people are still resenting that such a policy was even considered, and continuing to use such policies as reason to blame “identity politics” for lack of focus/progress on class issues – because there also was a lack of progress on the dire circumstances that large numbers of Maori and Pacific people still live in.
“But, really, I’m just not seeing the left dominated by gender and race issues. neither am I seeing a broader left really pushing for strongly core Labour/socialist policies.”
It’s interesting to hear people like Tat arguing that indentity politics have sidelined class politics. Because I look at what they are talking about and the politics look to me like middle class politics not identity politics. It’s the middle class capture of Labour, and those ideals and needs coming through.
Karol, I don’t disagree about it being the politics of disadvantage and oppression. My point is that I neither the Left or Right have an exclusive position on being the beneficiaries or exponents of advantage or disadvantage. The marginalised / oppressed people: you intimate that this is because of pakeha / masculine focus on class. That is a little simplistic, as a generality it may be so, but in saying so you exclude a whole bunch of pakeha males who probably are just as oppressed in any number of other ways.
Can you pick who this is? XXXXX ranks as one of the founders of the welfare state. With Herbert Asquith and David Lloyd George, he was the principal driving force behind the Liberal Party’s welfare reforms of 1908–1911. At the Board of Trade, he pioneered measures to reduce poverty and unemployment through state intervention in the labour market. In 1909, he toured Britain campaigning for the ‘People’s Budget’ and its radical proposals for the taxation of wealth. At the Home Office, his penal reforms as well as his measures to improve working conditions in shops and coal-mines were reflections of a continuing drive for social reform that was cut short by his transfer, in 1911, to the Admiralty. In the course of a lifetime in party politics,XXXXX often touched on social questions, and there were other phases of his career in which he bore some responsibility for the development of social policy.
XXXX was from the “Right”: that arch Conservative, pakeha male imperialist Winston Churchill. Concurrently a certain Lenin and Stalin (and a female from an oppressed minority, Rosa Luxemburg) were proposing a “Leftist” state where equality for all would be a fait accompli. Under these lovely “socialists” a whole lot of identity people met their fate. The lesson of history is don’t be too quick to label the “Left” as good guys when it comes to disadvantage and oppression, nor the Right as the natural bad guys.
Not sure using Winston Churchill is that good an example. Particularly for a New Zealand audience.
While he did have some fine qualities, and it does seem likely that WWII would have had a very different outcome had he not been involved in British politics at the time. He’s not exactly a saint.
Winston Churchill was hardly a paragon of progressive thought. He believed that women shouldn’t vote – telling the House of Commons that they are “well represented by their fathers, brothers, and husbands”. He was fiercely opposed to self-determination for the people of the Empire, advocating the use of poisoned gas against “uncivilized tribes” in Mesopotamia in 1919. In 1947, on the eve of Indian independence, he had to be tricked into a bar by two Conservative MPs so as not to embarrass himself during the debate
Closer to home, there is also his involvement in Gallipoli, after which he was forced to resign as First Lord of the Admiralty.
Ennui: The marginalised / oppressed people: you intimate that this is because of pakeha / masculine focus on class.
No, that is not what I was saying at all. And I’m not denying or negating the oppression of working class pakeha men – I thought I made that clear. How many times do I have to say I have been against class oppression since …. I guess sometimes in my teens?
It just seems that some people see oppression of various sectors of the society in either/or terms. They all operate – sometimes in concert, sometimes in differnet ways for each group.
Other forms of disadvantage/oppression are not primarily caused by a masculine focus on class. But focus on class exclusively has been a stumbling block to progress for other oppressed groups. It has been a long struggle to get a reasonable number of people on the left to engage with issues of gender, “race” etc.
Don’t know who XXX is. But there have long been individual women in politics, among a very male and masculine dominated context. Like Thatcher, they usually succeed by embracing enough of the masculine values. Not surprising that some such women do devilish things.
I always understood it was the Beveridge Report of the 1940s that provided the architecture of the British welfare state.
But to me they’re not separate issues: they are the same issue of powerful people structuring a society to preserve their own power. All the same problem, it’s just down to the granularity with which one looks at the problem.
The right wing oppose equality of the currently less powerful simply to preserve their own power.
To bring it back to your final paragraph, should people on “the Left” even tolerate all viewpoints? Should we associate with someone argues that some people should shut up about their powerlessness on the doubtful likelihood of possibly preserving a couple of percentage points for a fairly soft-left party anyway? Even if they do demand the nationalisation of essential infrastructure and better rights for workers, or are trustees on charity boards, or whatever.
Let me put it this way: as I recall, the Catholic Church decided that Liberation Theology was heresy because the perspective used to interpret scripture came from Marxism, and that therefore a doctrine with atheist roots cannot be regarded as church doctrine. Similarly, how much part of the left are people who choose to preserve the powerlessness of their comrades simply to provide their issues or interests with greater democratic power? I don’t care if they can sing 4 verses of the Internationale, they’re still preserving their security, power and status at the expense of perpetuating other peoples’ powerlessness. And that sounds awfully familiar.
A couple of answers before beer o’clock. Should people on the Left tolerate all viewpoints: hell no BUT we need to become better at encompassing them within a broad coalition with a common aim. The alternative is to be divided and conquered. Its not always nice but its better to be in control together than separately on the receiving end.
And with regard to the preservation of security, power and status….I remember the Douglas / Lange cabinet who merely took these over. Beware your “friends”..all the more reason for a common cause that tolerates and encompasses incompatible viewpoints.
Bankers, corporates and financial capital raise minimal objection to progress on identity politics. They don’t care because it doesn’t affect the power and financial structures which actually matter in determining the control of a country.
So when Left wing parties spend their time, energy and political capital on identity politics, all is fine.
And to answer your question directly
So I guess my question for left-wing social conservatives today is “when did some of the different facets of ‘identity politics’ stop being integral parts of the left-win mission
I mark it as when the Left decided to abandon the 40 hour week and the penal rates associated with it.
So we have gay marriage now (which is a good thing) but no 40 hour week and no penal rates. And zero whispers about even looking at bringing them back.
So I guess my question for left-wing social conservatives today is “when did some of the different facets of ‘identity politics’ stop being integral parts of the left-win mission
I mark it as when the Left decided to abandon the 40 hour week and the penal rates associated with it.
WTF?
Non-economic power issues stopped being left wing when NZLabour dropped left wing economic policies? On what planet does that even make sense?
I’m going to guess it maybe refers to the resentment that built up among those who were principally economically exploited when they were more or less sidelined by parliamentary politics etc. And over time, any empathy or sympathy or interest that might have been held towards those subjected to non-economic oppressions kinda withered – ie, non-economic issues came to be seen as gazumping economic issues and the Labour Party lost a heap of support as a result.
But that’s just a guess and in no way meant to be a defense of any social conservatism. The ‘this/and’ principle I’ve mentioned in other threads on other matters would seem to apply here if the left wants to avoid any repeat of the chest puffing bullshit from the 80’s and before (ie, before class was banished) that would have class trump anything and everything with the idea that ‘the girls’ and ‘our coloured cousins’ should just get in line, keep their mouths shut and their heads down and await the glorious day when the class war was won and the brain dead vanguard clowns would resolve gender and race issues a bit like Tommy Cooper – y’know? – “just like that”.
the idea that ‘the girls’ and ‘our coloured cousins’ should just get in line, keep their mouths shut and their heads down and await the glorious day when the class war was won
The cruel irony: increasing economic hardship strikes at women, girls, minorities, and the disabled far harder and far faster due to the manifest inequitable attitudes and structures in our society.
The corporate profit/banker driven destruction of our biosphere and our natural resources is also going to strike at these groups the hardest.
So? What is it about feminism or indigenous rights that makes you think they don’t take on capitalism too?
If you want to blame someone for ignoring and undermining the working class, blame Labour in the 80s. Identity politics isn’t to blame, it’s what Labour did that is the problem. Appropriation of identity politics was just a tool, not the cause.
Karol might want to comment on this, but my understanding is that a big part of feminism in the 70s was women getting out of socialist groups and into feminist groups, because they were sick of being told to wait until class issues were dealt with before bringing their issues to the table. That and having to make all teh cups of tea. On both counts it was good reason to take their politics into the emerging second wave of feminism.
I’d like to see some evidence that if everyone else puts their needs aside then when capitalism finalling falls that then everyone else will get a chance. I just don’t see it. It looks like just a turning of the same old power structures into new hands.
weka @ 8.26pm: I commented on that at length above at 18.3.1.1.3.
Yes, also the left was not dealing well with issues relevant to women.
In the 70s in London, left wing women were critical of the way the class system was usually characaterised. Basically both a Marxist notion of class and the more standard at the time Registrar General’s occupation-based classifications of class, tended to be male focused. They had a their core a notion of the male breadwinner.
Women tended to be classed according to their father or husband’s occupation. And a woman could slide up or down the class ladder depending on their husband’s occupation – a woman could go up or down a clas on marriage. And often women experienced a big drop in class level/income on divorce.
Increasing numbers of women were working. But the “manual” categories favoured traditionally male occupations. What of some women’s low paid jobs (sales or clerical) that tended to be classified as white collar?
So women were encouraged to leave socialist groups and join feminist groups in the 70s. Great. What do you think of the last 40 years of results for both the socialist groups and the feminist groups?
Are you impressed with how the strategy has played out?
Women weren’t ‘encouraged’ to leave socialist groups, they left because they wanted something they weren’t getting in socialist groups.
I think feminism has done remarkably well given what it was up against and given the waves of backlash since the 70s.
Women, and IMO all people, are better off for feminism for sure. I can’t comment on socialist groups or their overall strategies, other than what I said about Labour, and what I said about women being largely failed by them.
I assume your implication is to somehow blame feminism for socialism’s failures? And that because feminism hasn’t overturned the patriarchy yet it would have been better off if women had just stuck to making cups of tea. Pull the other one.
It’s not feminism that is creating an either or situation here. It’s you and other people who insist on marginalising so called identity politics.
Women took the initiative. My experience in London was that there was a loose network of left wing, feminist, Afro-Carribean etc groups. They weren’t isolated from each other and cooperated on some actions. It was very anarchistic.
Groups came and went, while others endured. It was usually just a case of a few women getting together and deciding to set up a group, with whatever focus they chose. They would meet wherever they could find a space: in people’s homes, in squats, in community halls, etc.
There were some newsletters and main women’s centres where groups could post notices about their meetings or planned actions. Some groups were affiliated with mixed left wing groups: e.g. there was a group run by some women who were in the socialist workers’ party – had their own publication: ‘Women’s Voice” – oh it looks like the Aussie version began in 1900.
I was fairly eclectic – read that, Spare rib, and other stuff like Flame, as well as Time Out, which was a general London leftie listings mag.
I had male and female friends in various general left wing groups. Some of the women in leftie groups were also involved in women’s groups.
The results? Basically, in the UK, Thatcher set out to destroy the urban base for left wing networks, including feminist ones. It made it harder to sustain groups and networks: disbanding the Greater London Council, making it harder for the hubs (key community centres etc) to be maintained – pressuring people to spend more of their time working etc.
And Thatcher maneuvered to get sympathisers in key MSM editorial positions – so the neoliberal propaganda gained momentum.
What happened since the 80s was not cause by feminism or various ethnic groups. Such groups were very successful, which is why the neoliberals moved to kneecap them.
Those left wing networks were grassroots, community-based. The neoliberal revolution was one from above. IMO, the lesson is, and left wing campaign needs to be both grassroots initiated, but to have a strategy for combating the power of the wealthy elites.
“What happened since the 80s was not cause by feminism or various ethnic groups. Such groups were very successful, which is why the neoliberals moved to kneecap them.”
yes, and it’s incorrect for Tat to say that the ruling powers allow identity politics because they’re not threat. The backlashes against feminism are well documented, and ask Maori if they think they’ve been allowed to advance their causes with no resistance from the top. Identity politics are allowed to advance to the extent that that serves the heirarchical powers. Once they press beyond that all sorts of shit happens.
yes, and it’s incorrect for Tat to say that the ruling powers allow identity politics because they’re not threat.
My context was within political parties. Parties can push identity politics far easier than anything along the lines of controlling corporates or corporate super taxes, as two specific examples. In that way parties of the Economic Left ended up primarily as Socially Liberal parties with Centre Right Economics.
The backlashes against feminism are well documented, and ask Maori if they think they’ve been allowed to advance their causes with no resistance from the top.
Not quite – the litmus test is – are you threatening capitalist control and profits.
If you are a feminist labour group demanding equal pay as men or longer parental leave then of course you are a threat to capitalist profits and must therefore be stymied.
If you are an Iwi demanding the return of a hundred thousand hectares of prime farm land than again you are a threat to capitalist profits and must therefore be stymied.
The cruel irony: increasing economic hardship strikes at women, girls, minorities, and the disabled far harder and far faster due to the manifest inequitable attitudes and structures in our society.
Which will continue to happen as long as non-economic issues aren’t addressed.
It’s not one or the other – just because labour dropped the economic ball doesn’t mean every other issue need wait. The alternative is that those bearing the brunt should shut up and continue to do so, just because those two rungs from the bottom of the ladder don’t want to share their rung.
Sure maybe the political left wing can win on identity politics and economics at the same time. But where’s the formula for doing so? Do you have it? Please share.
Simple.
Work on the economic paradigm in the same way non-economic issues.
After all, in the last 30 yrs same-sex relationships have gone from illegal to legally-married, ToW settlements have been signed where before land occupations had just gotten started, and we’ve had two female prim ministers from when female mps were counted on one hand.
Meanwhile, we’ve gone 150yrs backwards in economic policies and support.
You and I weka know what need to be done in the next 10-20 years for our biosphere to have any shot at remaining in a reasonable state. It requires nothing less than a complete rethinking and re-implementation of the economy as we know it.
For billions of people around the world regardless of gender, sexuality, race, etc. the outcome of this will likely become a fundamental, existential issue of survival.
In this particular context the niceties around the proper setting of academic debate topics is not something which even registers on my scale.
Well I disagree with that Tat. I think the same powers that enforce the current economic paradigm, also enforce sexism, racism etc. It’s that power that needs to be undone if we are to have any hope in teh future. You believe that focussing on the economy will solve the problems, I don’t because the problems are attitudinal as much as they are structural. You can break the capitalist paradigm and if you don’t also make change at the social level you will just get another version of power over.
You said earlier that most people will prioritise the economy. But I think this is about how you ask the question. If you ask people what is more important, the economy or [insert relevant other identity politics], then people are forced to choose. But if you ask them: would you prefer NZ to be run taking into account the economy and social issues, or do you think that we should focus on the economy alone, I think you will get a different answer. Pretty much everyone I know values more than the economy, and most women I know certainly won’t take kindly to being told their issues are a sideline to the Important Issue of the economy. That’s because they can see it’s possible to do both. Likewise, most Maori I have talked politics with don’t see the issues in such a reductionist way.
The main issue I have with your approach is that you create a completely unnecessary duality (economy vs identity politics), and that duality simply reinforces the power over paradigm that is the problem in the first place. I’m curious what you think about Bill’s comments, because he gets the importance of what you are saying I think (that the working class has been hugely betrayed in the past 30 yrs, and the economic/political structures that have enabled that), but he also can see that it’s not necessary to marginalise other classes of people in order to redress that.
Feminism, Maori politics, disability politics etc are all capable of being inclusive of the issues that you bring to the table. Why can you not do the same?
I’m also unclear why you need to blame ‘us’ instead of ‘them.
Simply put, I don’t view power in society in the same way as you do weka.
I think trans-national corporate and capitalist power is dominant and oppressive. It determines how we relate to each other, what we hear and see (and what we don’t), and of course, our perspective of the economy, environment and natural resources.
I have significant interest in rolling back corporate and banking power in terms of how it defines our country and our society. As a close second I am keen on steps to democratise both income distribution and the management of the economy as a whole across all people. But dealing with patriarchy per se, regardless of what that term means to different people, I don’t get amped about, at all.
Of course, the above economic objectives all beautifully serve to undermine patriarchy but as I said, I don’t particularly care about that. It is an incidental nice to have for other people who do, perhaps.
Why is this? Because as mean spirited and cruel partriarchy can be, it doesn’t hold a candle to the global and community catastrophe being caused by current systems of corporate and banking power. As Chris Hedges says – they literally are systems of death, our civilisation’s embodiment of Thanatos.
I don’t want to convert or change the mind of the assailant, like you seem to want to do. I want to take the machine gun he is pointing at all of us, off him. Is he still going to be a prick and a arsehole afterwards? Probably. But he’ll be a prick and an arsehole without a machine gun, and that I can live with.
But if you ask them: would you prefer NZ to be run taking into account the economy and social issues, or do you think that we should focus on the economy alone, I think you will get a different answer…most women I know certainly won’t take kindly to being told their issues are a sideline
Agree. But most women also dislike being told what their issues are. Even if the people doing the telling are other women.
You bring up “social issues” and correctly remark that people often consider that at least as important as the economy. They remain important in NZers voting considerations. Health, education, social welfare, law and order are usually top of the things that voters think about, for instance. But that’s not what you are talking about is it.
“how are you going to “remove the capitalists’ machine guns” without changing anyone’s mind?”
Mind’s change because circumstances change. They are not isolated, monadic devices calculating the world in some fume-like, immaterial dimension. They are in and of the world.
In politics, if you want to change attitudes change circumstances. That’s what Roger Douglas did back in the 80s and, lo and behold, attitudes have changed – ‘we’re all neoliberal now’.
It’s also why people change their attitudes when they change their jobs – suddenly being a manager is not such a terrible thing when you become a manager, rather than being dominated by a manager.
Mind’s are just our means of navigating circumstances. Change circumstances; change minds.
And, yes, minds (of others) are circumstances for a mind – what we say to each other and indicate through our behaviour can alter how someone else reacts. But that’s still not because we have ‘changed their mind’ or ‘changed their attitude’ – it’s because we have changed the circumstances within which their minds have to navigate.
And how do you change the circumstances in a democracy?
You change the minds of the leadership, either by bureaucratic capture like lab4, or by popular action (maybe by changing the leadership).
@McFlock. What do permanent positions of leadership have to do with democracy? And what does our fundamentally undemocratic mode of governance have to do with democracy?
Maybe it’s a smattering of democracy that could be the necessary change in circumstances that would facilitate or even go hand in hand with a change in attitude/behaviour…a self reinforcing cycle of circumstance and attitude?
“And how do you change the circumstances in a democracy?”
By makIng it difficult for a politician to act otherwise or making it in their interests to do what you want. You change the circumstances within which they act. Forget about their minds – they will either follow or be irrelevant.
Bill’s right. How would someone act exploitative in circumstances that provide them with no power? Conversely, why would someone with power change their mind and not only give it away but also dismantle the structure that gave them power?
The focus on the “economy” divorced from the rest of society, is a narrowed version of “economy” – it is pretty patriarchal. Many Marxists, like Raymond Williams began to move towards an equal role for “culture” and other socially constructed institutions and discourses in the 1970s. The neocons, reclaimed the economy as having primary status in the 1980s and beyond.
One of the problems I had with much Marxist theory is the way it gives primacy to the production base upon which the (“secondary”) social/cultural/political et al superstructure is considered to be built. Forces of production often gets narrowed into “economic” terms.
And this is also a pretty patriarchal thing to do, whereby the focus is pretty “instrumental” (task oriented and focused on technical details) – a characteristic often associated with traditional masculinity. This is in contrast with more traditionally “feminine” expressive (nurturing, socially focused) qualities. Doesn’t so much match the reality (which is far messier), as form part of cultural attitudes about gender differences, and the hierarchical status applied to them – thereby influencing behaviour/discourse in some ways.
I think the “forces of production” and superstructure interact and play off each other. The forces of production and activities of the capitalist elites are saturated with cultural discourses, and integrated with diverse social institutions. These social and cultural institutions/activities and human relationships both justifies and sustains the “forces of production. These include all kinds of ways to divide people according to socially constructed status and power.
It is very gendered and also the elites maintain their power by demonising various groups of people with little power. All these things are interconnected.
So, given that the same dynamic, or set of dynamics, promotes and entrenches various oppressions, is there any point to fighting an economic issue without taking into account the ramifications or implications on gender, race issues? I think not. If it’s essentially the same dynamic then it will ‘bleed’ from the areas that have been sidelined and reinfect the area that was the focus of attention.
Further to that and crucial, to my way of thinking, there is no point in fighting for economic justice – or anything really – if the means employ methods or structures that embodying elements of oppression.
My question is, is there any mode of organisation, short of ones embracing substantial democracy, that wont lead to forms of sexism, economic exploitation, racism etc becoming reasserted in some form or other?
If there are, I’m all ears. If there aren’t, then why do ‘we’ insist on using fundamentally flawed and ultimately self defeating organisational structures when we are seeking meaningful change?
Nice analysis, but I would say – so what? Draw all the interconnections you want – so what? Write a paper on it? Have a debate? Maybe its just the way my “masculine” brain works, but what are the next steps?
I think the elite 0.1% will have much less sway over all of us and over NZ society if we roll back the power of the banks, financial system and trans-national corporates. And that to me is the must have. Why? Because Thanatos is embodied in the economic systems that they define. And that is an influence which both masculine and feminine energies contain very much of.
One of the problems I had with much Marxist theory is the way it gives primacy to the production base upon which the (“secondary”) social/cultural/political et al superstructure is considered to be built. Forces of production often gets narrowed into “economic” terms.
Most of the western world’s production has been outsourced. For economic reasons of the 0.1% I should add, not social reasons to do with our communities. So Marx was correct. Forces of production are overwhelmingly economically defined (although cultural and social factors also have bearing).
Regardless, Marxian analysis of the dynamics of capitalism remain spot on. The interests of capital and labour are often not the same.
The additional wrinkle – catastrophic climate change and resource depletion isn’t caused by patriarchy, it’s caused by transnational corporations and capital.
is there any point to fighting an economic issue without taking into account the ramifications or implications on gender, race issues? I think not.
Partly it depends on what you define as an “economic issue.” Are our prisons an “economic issue” – well I would say yes they are and yes lets take into account gender and race issues.
But if you want to tackle the economics coal mine safety, deep sea drilling, the 40 hour week and Reserve Bank statistic targeting by including gender and race components within each of those fights. Fine, that’s one way ahead, but I probably wouldn’t choose that way.
Tat, I still have a lot of time for Marx. however, he is weak on issues of gender, and traditional Marxism tends to be based on men’s position in the workforce.
The system has been reconfigured in many ways since the 70s, but economics and social dynamics of “race” gender etc are still interwoven. There are a disproportionate amounts of Maori and Pacific people amongst those in poverty. And Maori and Pacific women have been particularly oppressed by Bennett’s reforms. Women make up a significant proportion of the precariat, with insecure, part time and casual work.
Bill, I agree that we need a totally different system. The problem is how to dismantle the system we have and replace it with a more democratic one, when the elites will find ever slicker ways of protecting their systems of privilege?
Tat: I think the elite 0.1% will have much less sway over all of us and over NZ society if we roll back the power of the banks, financial system and trans-national corporates. And that to me is the must have. etc.
Those institutions are already highly gendered. They can’t be tackled without the highly masculine culture being taken on. There’s much academic stuff been written about the highly masculine culture of finance traders. Some even have monitored testosterone levels, while other s have merely focused on the masculine behaviour: the aggression, competitiveness – the sexual harassment etc.
Those institutions are already highly gendered. They can’t be tackled without the highly masculine culture being taken on.
I believe that they can be tackled without directly or explicitly addressing issues of gender and patriarchy – I believe this, because it has been done before. Just look at how a White House and Congress stacked with white men passed the New Deal and the Glass Steagall Act defanged banks and corporate capital. (For a while, and not without resistance of course).
Tat – the ‘so what’ is that if you get rid of economic exploitation but do so in a way that leaves gender and race oppressions untouched, then the dynamics and structural biases present in those areas will ‘colonise’ the economic sphere you ‘won’ and it will become a sphere of oppression again.
Karol – I can never get my head around the idea that we dismantle and replace. Why the two (or three?) step process? The replacing is implicit to the dismantling (or process of disempowering and delegitimising)…which is why I constantly bang on about there being no point in using organisational structures that mimic those undemocratic and elitist structures that are prevalent today (eg, heirarchical or top/down and so on). If we do, no meaningful change will ever occur.
some Radical democracy…
“Laclau and Mouffe claim that liberal democracy and deliberative democracy, in their attempts to build consensus, oppress differing opinions, races, classes, genders and worldviews. radical democracy is not only accepting of difference, dissent and antagonisms, but is dependent upon it… Oppressive relations should be made visible, re-negotiated and altered.”
“No pedagogy which is truly liberating can remain distant from the oppressed by treating them as unfortunates, by presenting for their emulation models from among the oppressors. The oppressed must be their own example in the struggle for their redemption.”
–Paulo Friere ; 1970.
then the dynamics and structural biases present in those areas will ‘colonise’ the economic sphere you ‘won’ and it will become a sphere of oppression again.
Again? I’m not sure there is that much time left to do a cyclical revisit. The available angles to avoid the worst effects of fossil fuels decline and financial neo-feudalism were small enough to start with in the 1990’s and 2000’s. These days…all bets are off.
Bill @ 3.10 pm. I don’t think it matters if the replacement, dismantling, disempowerment, etc happen simultaneously or in various steps, or with top down and/or bottom down. The people with the power will resist with every wily strategy they can think of. That’s the problem I was mainly referring to. And trying to build a different, grass roots, democratic system/society, will never succeed without some strategy for ending the current power structure.
But if you want to simply dismantle you are effectively creating a vacuum. And that is probably easiest filled by powerful and probably institutional actors. Maybe think of Eastern Europe post Soviet collapse and who was best able to exploit the fact that the apparatus of the USSR had been dismantled/abandoned.
But if parallel democratic institutions had been developed as part and parcel of any challenge to the legitimacy of those who presided over the USSR, then ‘the west’ couldn’t have simply sauntered into an empty space….it would have been occupied.
Meanwhile, if it had been occupied by systems that merely had the form of democracy without the substance – top down or whatever and recreating institutional hierarchies (and assuming ‘western’ actors failed to get traction) – then a simple transfer of powers from one elite to another would have been all that occurred.
So complete and necessarily democratic action as opposed to incomplete undemocratic action is required (ie, not first *this* and then *that* at some later juncture – but *this* and *that* simultaneously…hand in glove if you like, where both are linked/dependent and one ascends at the direct expense of or in direct relation to the diminishing of the other).
Otherwise we go round and around as we have done these past however many hundreds of years with their attendant (so called) revolutions.
“My belief in socialism has always been predicated on the arbitrary and undeserved inequalities of power under capitalism.”
That’s well put.
But I think the word ‘arbitrary’ is not the right one. I don’t think that there’s anything arbitrary about, for example, the disempowering of women in societies (capitalist and pre-capitalist) that privilege production (and, today, growth) over reproduction and, therefore, have the side-effect of privileging men over women (and, incidentally, marginalising the needs of children and sending them to school for the bulk of their young lives).
Similarly, there’s nothing arbitrary about societies that are based on exploitation of resources (including other humans) actively oppressing, abusing and dehumanising indigenous people (or people of other religions) found sitting on exploitable resources (or being able – as slaves – to be exploited as resources).
Similarly, there’s nothing arbitrary about an economic system that, for its own replication, valorises competitive, alpha-male masculine values also marginalising and oppressing homosexuals and lesbians.
I guess all I’d add (or emphasise) is that a good part – at least in my eyes – of why these particular inequalities have existed and still exist in our society is because the overall economic system is intent on sorting people into the few capitalists and the many workers. An historically obvious – but messy – route to entrenching that sorting process involves using potential prejudices as first approximations (i.e., attempts) to layer a society into these two fundamental classes.
The only other explanation of these particular inequalities that I’ve heard is that sexism, racism and ‘homophobia’ (there isn’t a word simply for discrimination against gay people – is there?) is in human nature. I don’t think that’s the case – although, self-evidently, the potential is always there and able to emerge, given a facilitating economic system.
Interestingly, any progress on these forms of inequality should, over time, bring into starker relief the inequality of class upon which our economic system is based.
Yeah I couldn’t think of a better word than arbitary.
I sort of think that many inequalities are accidents of history rather than just the product of struggles for resources unfairly giving advantage to the strongest.
Like is there any real reason that europeans took slaves from africa to the americas, rather than africans enslaving europeans? Maybe if africa had had a rennaissance before europe, we’d still have the same issues but with different players. Africa had empires and cities before europeans went wandering about. Why didn’t rome have an industrial revolution? They had all the ingredients that england had in 1600.
So I was sort of stabbing for a way to describe how many of our inequalities aren’t just unfair, but the initial conditions that enabled them were just rolls of the dice.
Jared Diamond in his book ‘Guns, Germs and Steel’ took a kind of nuanced environmental determinism argument to explain why the Spanish ended up conquering South America rather than the reverse. Which is a bit like your question about Africans and slavery.
I agree that accidents of history are part of it – but it’s the accidents that favour one group over another in ‘struggles for resources’ (in the broadest sense of the term ‘resource’ – something that can be used, at a historical moment, for a significantly advantageous purpose). Luck plays its part in who gets the resources (and who needs them – some groups don’t need what others need) but the outcome that flows down through history is who ends up in control over them.
It’s not everything of course, but it’s pretty important.
Yeah, but I wanted to really emphasise that there’s no reason one group is powerful over another – just that the start condition of the current situation lucked out that way. Often just an idea that occurred to one kook who changed history.
Eg colombus found it hard to fund his expedition because navigators who thought the world was round knew that there wasn’t a shitshow of being able to sale to china. They knew the distance involved. Columbus was just lucky america was there. And spain was lucky that they had the readies to throw three tubs away on a punt – and possibly that isabella had a heart flutter.
Yes, history is a tape that only gets played once and it’s just ‘one damn thing after another’.
But arbitrariness in that context only makes sense when compared with a world of counterfactuals, a world populated not by actual events but by logical possibilities. In that sense it is true that our world is ‘arbitrary’, but it’s also true that everything we actually care about begins in a world of circumstances that pre-date it and, therefore constrain it – more and more, as time goes by, ‘luck’ starts to fall in line with one group rather than another.
So, yes, women could have come to dominate men in the way that today’s patriarchal society dominates women but the dice were loaded against that a long time ago – when capitalism, and its precursors, came along it was already odds-on that we’d end up with something like what we got in terms of patterns of power inequalities.
The quirky one-off events that could change everything in a moment became less and less likely. Concerted and prolonged resistance and struggle then becomes the sensible option and has, in fact, proved to be the way most progress has been made – conversely, waiting to win history’s lotto game of ‘luck’ hasn’t so far been a winning strategy for overcoming power inequalities (as many of your original examples of (lack of) progress illustrate).
Today’s world isn’t destiny, and we can definitely change it (and should) but the particular forms of power inequalities that exist now have been a lot more than just arbitrary ‘bad luck’ (e.g., for women) in the roll of history’s dice for quite some time. It’s not arbitrary any more – it’s ’caused’ by the way things are arranged and therefore makes sense in the light of how things are arranged. And that was the point I was trying to make.
History – on whatever timescale – has a habit of ratcheting up very small advantages (perhaps initially created by ‘luck’) into massive, structurally embedded advantages over time, advantages that reliably replicate themselves from generation to generation.
Having said all of that, I think we agree on the important points. When I made my comment ‘criticising’ use of the word ‘arbitrary’ I wasn’t so much trying to disagree with you as use it as a springboard to highlight why our world can still be resistant to making progress on those ‘arbitrary’ inequalities.
Off to bed for me – interesting to chat about these things. Thanks.
Progress update on my request for the NZ OAG to conduct an inquiry into the lack of ‘due diligence’ by OFCANZ regarding the increased risk of money-laundering at Sky City casino?
Dear Lyn,
The 2013 Australian Public Sector Anti-Corruption Conference is now over, during which I met a number of persons deeply involved in fighting corruption, including the following Auditors-General:
Mr John Doyle
Victorian Auditor-General
Mr Colin Murphy
Auditor-General for Western Australia
Mr Mike Blake
Auditor-General of Tasmania
I also had the privilege of meeting, (amongst others) the Hon James Wood AO QC, Chairperson of the NSW Law Reform Commission:
Rose Gill Hearn, Commissioner, Dept of Investigation (DOI), New York,
and Assoc Prof Ken Coghill PhD, Dept of Management, Monash University.
Having taken over a ‘hard copy’ of the following OFCANZ OIA reply, and shown it to a number of APSAC Conference attendees, I think it would be fair to say that the reaction was one of bemusement (to say the least?)
OFCANZ OIA REPLY (DATED 13 AUGUST 2013) PROVING THAT OFCANZ HAS FAILED TO CARRY OUT ‘DUE DILIGENCE’ REGARDING THE INCREASED RISK OF MONEY-LAUNDERING ARISING FROM THE NZ INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION CENTRE BILL:
Are you able to give a time frame to confirm whether or not, as the NZ Auditor-General, you will be conducting an investigation into the lack of ‘due diligence’ by OFCANZ regarding the increased risk of money-laundering arising from the NZ International Convention Centre Act 2013?
FYI – currently, I am still in Sydney, and will return to New Zealand on Sunday 1 December 2013.
Whilst I am here, it is my intention to make further contact with members of the Australian media – particularly those who have focused on exposing corruption.
Kind regards,
Penny Bright
‘Anti-corruption / anti-privatisation Public Watchdog’
2013 Auckland Mayoral candidate (polled 4th with 11,723 votes)
I’ve heard a rumour that the National Party volunteer caught tearing down Poto William signs wasn’t a Young Nat volunteer at all – it was the Nat’s Auckland organiser – so a staff member…
The forestry workers got special legislation. Twenty years ago, the National government deliberately attacked their rights to belong to a union, which had been their best protection against employers.
The real criminals are the politicians who changed the laws that put forestry workers,mine workers etc etc at risk so their friends in Wall Street could make even more money.
Roger Douglas and the whole neo-liberal csbal should be tried for treason.
I love this line fromTony Abbott on the revelations from Snowden that Oz listened to the Indonesian leaderships private phone calls.
“Asked about the spying revelations in a separate interview, Abbott said: “To use the term spying, it’s kind of loaded language … researching maybe. Talking to people. Understanding what’s going on.”
Researching. Brilliant. Then later he falls back on the standard no comment refrain we’ve heard from John Key ad nauseam:
“On Monday a spokesman for Abbott said: “Consistent with the long-standing practice of Australian governments, and in the interest of national security, we do not comment on intelligence matters.””
Now Indonesia has changed it’s Australian foreign policy stance from ‘cooperation’ to ‘stick it up your ass’:
“National police chief Sutarman told the Indonesian parliament’s Commission I on foreign affairs that there was now no cooperation between his forces and Australia on counter-terrorism, information sharing and international crime.
Defence minister Purnomo Yusgiantoro told parliament that three joint exercises with Australian troops had been cancelled…”
Ah yes, wholesale spying on friends and enemies alike, making the world a safer place. Well done five eyes.
yes crazy ass Tony and his gov’t haven’t taken long to show true colours. From crikey:
‘an ideologically and politically confused government. A free-market government dumping market mechanism for climate action in favour of handouts and considering reacquiring old governments assets. A government that talks of being “open for business” that slams the door on foreign investors. A government that complains of the fiscal indiscipline of its predecessors and then demands a whopping increase in the debt ceiling so it can continue to borrow. …Australia is open for business — if you’ve got a dodgy deal to offer the new crowd in Canberra’
then there’s the gonski education funding 180 turn, australia you’re standing in it.
oh yes and they’re proposing to buy back/lease the ageing telstra copper network which costs $1b p.a. to keep from collapsing and other former public assets.
Private can’t squeeze anymore cash out of it so taxpayer gets to buy it back, sound familiar
We will evaluate your complaint and respond to you within 30 working days.
Regards
Graham
Graham Gill | General Manager – Evaluation & Intelligence | Serious Fraud Office
___________________________________________________________________________
29 November 2013
Graham Gill
General Manager,
Evaluation & Intelligence,
Serious Fraud Office
New Zealand.
Dear Graham,
Sorry to be a nuisance, but with the upcoming Xmas and holiday break, I am unclear as to when the ’30 working days’ time period you have given for your response for a decision on your evaluation of the request from Lisa Prager and myself for the NZ Serious Fraud Office to conduct an urgent inquiry into alleged bribery and corruption, involving Auckland Mayor Len Brown and Sky City Auckland, will be up?
This is the third or forth post from you here today Penny, You seem to be running some kind of mayoral campaign on open mike and I can only speak for myself but I find it bloody annoying reading your latest letters to the editor every five minutes.
In spite of the government-backed malignancy of Edwards’ doomed assignment, the Clark government’s attack on Lynley Hood was a light comedy sketch compared to the Obama regime’s orchestrated campaign to denigrate, defame and destroy Julian Assange.
I am pleased to announce that a key plank in the assault on this dissenter has been formally acknowledged to be a dismal failure. A multi-million-dollar Hollywood/Washington hatchet job called The Fifth Estate, funded by Disney and Dreamworks, and approved by the U.S. regime, has earned a miserable $6 million at the global box office on a budget of $28 million—not counting the massive amount spent on a fruitless advertising campaign for the turkey.
One more forestry worker killed today, and the MBIE can only comment they are “looking into it.” 29 miners died at Pike River, 9 forestry workers have died this year, and what does this Government do ? If one ‘rich prick’ was killed, all hell would break loose, but hard working Kiwi’s – cannon fodder for this Government’s lax employment laws.
Simon Bridges was more upset about Geoff Robinson retiring, than he is about the deaths of those killed at worked, and I don’t say that disrespectfully about Geoff Robinson.
One more forestry worker killed today, and the MBIE can only comment they are “looking into it.” 29 miners died at Pike River, 9 forestry workers have died this year, and what does this Government do ? If one ‘rich prick’ was killed, all hell would break loose, but hard working Kiwi’s – cannon fodder for this Government’s lax employment laws.
Simon Bridges was more upset about Geoff Robinson retiring, than he is about the deaths of those killed at worked, and I don’t say that disrespectfully about Geoff Robinson.
From 2 years ago, a huge crowd of women flooding into a Victoria’s Secret on Black Friday until it is shoulder to shoulder immobile in the store.
For bonus points, Victoria’s Secret has a significant proportion of their lingerie made by prisoners (most of whom are black or latino) and paid next to nothing in the US correctional system.
Reminds me of some of the things that happen in Jennifer Government. Shootings, tramplings etc, etc and all because of the corporations and their need to sell, sell, sell..
“Christmas permits the global bullshit industry to recruit the values with which so many of us would like the festival to be invested – love, warmth, a community of spirit – to the sole end of selling things that no one needs or even wants.
Are we so bored, so affectless, that we need to receive this junk to ignite one last spark of hedonic satisfaction? Have people become so immune to fellow feeling that they are prepared to spend £46 on a jar for dog treats or £6.50 a bang on personalised crackers, rather than give the money to a better cause? Or is this the western world’s potlatch, spending ridiculous sums on conspicuously useless gifts to enhance our social status? If so, we must have forgotten that those who are impressed by money are not worth impressing.
To service this peculiar form of mental illness, we must wear down the knap of the Earth, ream the surface of the planet with great holes, fleetingly handle the products of that destruction then dump the materials into another hole. ”
has revealed that the party’s powerful and secretive Candidate Selection and Electoral Process Committee (CSEPC) has recommended to the party’s executive committee that he should not be accepted into the candidate pool in 2014.
Mr Hay says “I don’t know exactly why the CSEPC made its negative recommendation, but if the party executive accepts it, that would prevent me from being ranked on the party list and therefore from becoming a Green MP next year. I have asked for a copy of the CSEPC report to executive under the Privacy Act, and that request has been refused.”
“I know that the executive met by telephone call on 22 October and could not make a decision on my candidacy. The vote was split 3-6 with some abstentions. Under party rules a 75% majority is required for a decision. I have asked executive to make a final decision tomorrow, by simple majority if necessary. I do not intend to appeal it.”
Mr Hay has defended his abilities as a candidate on his blog, saying “In my view, for the party to reject my application for the candidate pool would be nothing less than an act of collective self-mutilation.”
Mr Hay has also revealed how few Green Party candidates from Auckland are likely to make it into the list rankings in 2014, reinforcing his concern about the lack of Green Party presence in Auckland after the next election.
The Green Party executive is currently holding a three day face-to-face meeting in Auckland.
Lolz well if He wasn’t selected as a high list candidate on October the 22nd the current little tantrum will sure as hell make it a forgone conclusion,
My vote goes to Russell, His dogged sticking to the ‘task’ says that He has earned it…
Brilliant PR disaster on the cards for the Greens.
A failed Australian communist who did a u turn on printing money when he realised how silly that policy was vs a born and raised Kiwi. This is going to turn into a mud slinging match.
The greens are going to suffer over this and hopefully mean a bigger labour vote and more strength in the next election. Labour needs to be strong and ensure the Greens can’t control them.
Labour needs to keep out of it and let them implode.
Yeah bleating to the media, bad form from anyone in any political party, if the party gets to vote my pick will be 10 to 1 in favor of Russell Norman who has lead the opposition for most of the past 5 years while Labour went missing in action…
I see regular Tory troll, Fisani, argues (Mickeysavage’s post on Chch East by-election yesterday) that private polling suggests Poto Williams will win with a majority of 3000, and therefore erstwhile Greens should continue to vote for the Green candidate.
Possibly, but I have my doubts (and polling would suggest percentages, not majorities – which are, of course, entirely dependent on turnout).
I remain quite concerned that Labour may just be a little blasé about the result, with Williams agreeing with a RNZ journo that the by-election may well be a referendum on Cunliffe’s leadership and Cunliffe agreeing that it may be a referendum on the Nat’s post-quake efforts in Chch. Meanwhile, the National party hierarchy and Farrar have assiduously stuck to a series of carefully crafted (and highly misleading) little soundbytes, designed to massively downplay National’s chances. And these have slowly but surely transformed into received wisdom for a number of senior journos (eg Armstrong and the editor of The Press). Result: if National win or Labour take it by a very close margin (either of which are highly possible, in my opinion), then the result will be portrayed as an utterly unprecedented electoral catastrophe for Labour.
Here’s the text of a Letter-to-the-Editor that I sent to the Dom Post 2 weeks ago (They decided, in their infinite wisdom, not to bother publishing it). It pretty much encapsulates the wider analysis of the by-election that I’ve been working on.
TEXT: Over recent months, National has made strenuous efforts to shape media expectations of the up-coming Christchurch East by-election. Through a series of carefully crafted soundbytes, they’ve cast National as the ultimate underdog.
In reality, Christchurch East is an unusually vulnerable seat for Labour. Never before in New Zealand’s by-election history has the retiring MP’s majority been entirely dependent on voters whose primary political allegiance lies elsewhere.
Largely because of the post-quake exodus, National easily won the 2011 party-vote in Christchurch East, with popular Labour MP Lianne Dalziel’s candidate-vote (56%) massively out-performing Labour’s party-vote (32%).
Dalziel’s 5334 majority was thus an entirely personal one. Almost two-thirds of it coming from people who had party-voted for a National government (NZ First and Green voters comprising the rest). Consequently, National can win this by-election seat from Labour without needing any swing at all from those who voted for a Labour government in 2011. That is unprecedented. TEXT ENDS.
still have one comment (part 1) awaiting moderation. At the moment, there’s part 2 but no part 1, which makes me look like a bit of a dickhead, but, then again, what’s new ?
by Molten Moira from Motueka If you want to be a woman let me tell you what to do Get a piece of paper and a biro tooWrite down your new identification And boom! You’re now a woman of this nationSpelled W O M A Na real trans woman that isAs opposed ...
Buzz from the Beehive New Zealand Education Minister Jan Tinetti is hosting the inaugural Conference of Pacific Education Ministers for three days from today, welcoming Education Ministers and senior officials from 18 Pacific Island countries and territories, and from Australia. Here’s hoping they have brought translators with them – or ...
Let’s say you’ve come all the way from His Majesty’s United Kingdom to share with the folk of Australia and New Zealand your antipathy towards certain other human beings. And let’s say you call yourself a women’s rights activist.And let’s say 99 out of 100 people who listen to you ...
James Shaw gave the Green party's annual "state of the planet" address over the weekend, in which he expressed frustration with Labour for not doing enough on climate change. His solution is to elect more Green MPs, so they have more power within any government arrangement, and can hold Labour ...
RNZ this morning has the first story another investigative series by Guyon Espiner, this time into political lobbying. The first story focuses on lobbying by government agencies, specifically transpower, Pharmac, and assorted universities, and how they use lobbyists to manipulate public opinion and gather intelligence on the Ministers who oversee ...
Nick Matzke writes – Dear NZ Herald, I am a Senior Lecturer in the School of Biological Sciences at the University of Auckland. I teach evolutionary biology, but I also have long experience in science education and (especially) political attempts to insert pseudoscience into science curricula in ...
James Shaw has again said the Greens would be better ‘in the tent’ with Labour than out, despite Labour’s policy bonfire last week torching much of what the Government was doing to reduce emissions. File Photo: Lynn Grieveson/Getty ImagesTL;DR: The Green Party has never been more popular than in some ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Sarah Wesseler Poor air quality is a long-standing problem in Los Angeles, where the first major outbreak of smog during World War II was so intense that some residents thought the city had been attacked by chemical weapons. Cars were eventually discovered ...
Yesterday I was reading an excellent newsletter from David Slack, and I started writing a comment “Sounds like some excellent genetic heritage…” and then I stopped.There was something about the phrase genetic heritage that stopped me in tracks. Is that a phrase I want to be saying? It’s kind of ...
Brian Easton writes – Two senior economists challenge some of the foundations of current economics. It is easy to criticise economic science by misrepresenting it, by selective quotations, and by ignoring that it progresses, like all sciences, by improving and abandoning old theories. The critics may go ...
This week marks the twentieth anniversary of the Iraq War. While it strongly opposed the US-led invasion, New Zealand’s then Labour-led government led by Prime Minister Helen Clark did deploy military engineers to try to help rebuild Iraq in mid-2003. With violence soaring, their 12-month deployment ended without being renewed ...
After seventy years, Auckland’s motorway network is finally finished. In July 1953 the first section of motorway in Auckland was opened between Ellerslie-Panmure Highway and Mt Wellington Highway. The final stage opens to traffic this week with the completion of the motorway part of the Northern Corridor Improvements project. Aucklanders ...
National’s appointment of Todd McClay as Agriculture spokesperson clearly signals that the party is in trouble with the farming vote. McClay was not an obvious choice, but he does have a record as a political scrapper. The party needs that because sources say it has been shedding farming votes ...
Rays of white light come flooding into my lounge, into my face from over the top of my neighbour’s hedge. I have to look away as the window of the conservatory is awash in light, as if you were driving towards the sun after a rain shower and suddenly blinded. ...
The columnists in Private Eye take pen names, so I have not the least idea who any of them are. But I greatly appreciate their expert insight, especially MD, who writes the medical column, offering informed and often damning critique of the UK health system and the politicians who keep ...
A chronological listing of news articles posted on the Skeptical Science Facebook Page during the past week: Sun, Mar 12, 2023 thru Sat, Mar 18, 2023. Story of the Week Guest post: What 13,500 citations reveal about the IPCC’s climate science report IPCC WG1 AR6 SPM Report Cover - Changing ...
Buzz from the Beehive The building of financial capability was brought into our considerations when Social Development and Employment Minister Carmel Sepuloni announced she had dipped into the government’s coffers for $3 million for “providers” to help people and families access community-based Building Financial Capability services. That wording suggests some ...
Do you ever come across something that makes you go Hmmmm?You mean like the song?No, I wasn’t thinking of the song, but I am now - thanks for that. I was thinking of things you read or hear that make you stop and go Hmmmm.Yeah, I know what you mean, ...
By the end of the week, the dramas over Stuart Nash overshadowed Hipkins’ policy bonfire. File photo: Lynn GrieveasonTLDR: This week’s news in geopolitics and the political economy covered on The Kākā included:PM Chris Hipkins’ announcement of the rest of a policy bonfire to save a combined $1.7 billion, but ...
When word went out that Prime Minister Chris Hipkins would be making an announcement about Stuart Nash on the tiles at parliament at 2:45pm yesterday, the assumption was that it was over. That we had reached tipping point for Nash’s time as minister. But by 3pm - when, coincidentally, the ...
Two senior economists challenge some of the foundations of current economics. It is easy to criticise economic science by misrepresenting it, by selective quotations, and by ignoring that it progresses, like all sciences, by improving and abandoning old theories. The critics may go on to attack physics by citing Newton.So ...
Photo by Walker Fenton on UnsplashIt’s that time of the week again when and I co-host our ‘hoon’ webinar with paying subscribers to The Kaka for an hour at 5 pm. Jump on this link on Riverside (we’ve moved from Zoom) for our chat about the week’s news with ...
In a nice bit of news, my 2550-word deindustrial science-fiction piece, The Dream of Florian Neame, has been accepted for publication at New Maps Magazine (https://www.new-maps.com/). I have published there before, of course, with Of Tin and Tintagel coming out last year. While I still await the ...
And so this is Friday, and what have we learned?It was a week with all the usual luggage: minister brags and then he quits, Hollywood red carpet is full of twits. And all the while, hanging over the trivial stuff: existential dread, and portents of doom.Depending on who you read ...
When I changed the name of this newsletter from The Daily Read to Nick’s Kōrero I was a bit worried whether people would know what Kōrero meant or not. I added a definition when I announced the change and kind of assumed people who weren’t familiar with it would get ...
There was a time when a political party’s publicity people would counsel against promoting a candidate as queer. No matter which of two dictionary meanings the voting public might choose to apply – the old meaning of odd, strange, weird, or aberrant, or the more recent meaning of gay, homosexual ...
Photo by Joakim Honkasalo on UnsplashIt’s that time of the week for an ‘Ask Me Anything’ session for paying subscribers about the week that was for the next hour, including:PM Chris Hipkins announcement of the rest of a policy bonfire to save a combined $1.7 billion, but which blew up ...
Even though concern over the climate change threat is becoming more mainstream, our governments continue to opt out of the difficult decisions at the expense of time, and cost for future generations. Photo: Lynn Grieveson/Getty ImagesTLDR: Now we have a climate liability number to measure the potential failure of the ...
Thomas Cranmer writesLike it or not, the culture wars have entered New Zealand politics and look set to broaden and intensify. The culture wars are often viewed as an exclusively American phenomenon, but the reality is that they are becoming increasingly prominent in countries around the world, ...
Here’s an analogy for the Stuart Nash saga. If people are to be forgiven for their sins,Catholic dogma requires two factors to be present. There has to be a sincere act of confession about what has been done, but also a sincere act of contrition, which signals a painful ...
Here’s an analogy for the Stuart Nash saga. If people are to be forgiven for their sins,Catholic dogma requires two factors to be present. There has to be a sincere act of confession about what has been done, but also a sincere act of contrition, which signals a painful ...
Human Destabilisers: Russia now has a new strategic weapon – migratory waves of unwelcome human-beings. Desperate people with different coloured skins and different religious beliefs arriving at, or actually breaching, the national borders of Russia’s enemies can wreak as much havoc, culturally and politically, as a hypersonic missile exploding in the ...
Hi,After Webworm contributor Hayden Donnell wrote his latest piece, ‘RIP to Millennials Killing Everything’, he delivered this exciting and important bonus content.It will make more sense if you’ve read his piece.David. Read more ...
Hi,Before we get to Hayden’s column — RIP to Millennials Killing Everything — a quick observation.There was a day last week where it had suddenly reached 10pm and I hadn’t eaten all day. Hunger had suddenly gripped me with a panicky all-consuming force, so I jumped onto Uber Eats and ...
We add some of the CMIP6 models to the updateable MSU comparisons. After my annual update, I was pointed to some MSU-related diagnostics for many of the CMIP6 models (24 of them at least) from Po-Chedley et al. (2022) courtesy of Ben Santer. These are slightly different to what ...
In a memorable Pulp Fiction scene, Vincent inadvertently shoots their backseat passenger in the head. This leads our heroes Jules and Vincent to express alarm about their predicament.We're on a city street in broad daylight here!says Vincent. We gotta get this car off the roads. You know cops tend to ...
Primary, secondary and kindergarten teachers are all on strike today, demanding higher pay and an end to systematic understaffing. While the former is important - wages should at least keep up with inflation - its the latter which is the real issue. As with the health system, teachers have been ...
So the teachers are on strike, marching across Aotearoa today to press their demands for better pay and working conditions.Children remained in bed this brisk morning, many no doubt quite pleased about a day off school. Parents perhaps taking the day off to look after the kids, or working from ...
After the Cold War the consensus among Western military strategists was that the era of Big Wars, defined as peer conflict between large states with full spectrum military technologies, was at an end, at least for the foreseeable future. The … Continue reading → ...
Dairy giant Fonterra has posted a 50% lift in net profit to $546m, doubled its interim dividend, and is proposing a return of capital of 50c a share, injecting a note of optimism into the nation’s dairy industry. Fonterra’s strong performance is against a backdrop of market volatility. It ...
Buzz from the Beehive The bothersome economic news today is that New Zealand’s GDP fell by 0.6% in the December quarter, weaker than market forecasts of a fall of around 0.2% and much weaker than the Reserve Bank’s assumption of a 0.7% rise. This followed the even-more-bothersome news yesterday that ...
Ouch: Hipkins’ policy bonfire has resulted in an expensive self-administered removal of a Budgetary foot with an explosive device. File Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTLDR: Bonfires can be dangerous things when they get out of control. They also create a lot of smoke and heat and burn the grass. ...
* Dr Bryce Edwards writes – I teach a first-year course at Victoria University of Wellington about government and the political process in New Zealand. In “Introduction to Government and Law”, students learn there are rules preventing senior public servants from getting involved in big political debates – as we ...
I teach a first year course at Victoria University of Wellington about government and the political process in New Zealand. In “Introduction to Government and Law”, students learn there are rules preventing senior public servants from getting involved in big political debates – as we have recently witnessed with Rob ...
An issue of integrity has claimed the first ministerial scalp in Prime Minister Chris Hipkins’ premiership. Police Minister Stuart Nash lasted mere weeks in the role after admitting in a radio interview this morning that he had called Police Commissioner Andrew Coster to ask him if police were going to ...
For some time now we’ve known that the cost and completion timeframe for the City Rail Link would increase. Yesterday we finally learned by just how much. Costs City Rail Link Ltd (CRL Ltd) today confirms it has submitted a formal funding request to its Sponsors – the Crown and ...
The Government’s decision to back peddle on lowering speed limits is hitting potholes. At this stage, although it is part of the Government’s reprioritisation efforts to free up money to alleviate cost of living increases, the speed limit change looks unlikely to do that. And it appears that it ...
The University of Otago – the oldest university in New Zealand – towers over my home city of Dunedin. When classes are on, something like a fifth of Dunedin’s population are university students. It is also the largest employer in the South Island. To say that this is a ...
Last weekend brought the latest instalment in Stuff’s bravura satirical series Of course you can afford a house! Just dig deeper!I love how much their appreciation of humour has evolved in just a few short years since the days when I would get to produce, for a few meagre dollars, ...
Australia’s move to strengthen its defence capability with five nuclear-powered attack submarines underlines how relatively defenceless New Zealand is in the Pacific. Kiwis may gasp that the Labor government in Australia recognises it must outlay $400bn on the nuclear subs, but this ensures that Australia is not exposed ...
Ironically, a repurposed Auckland Ratepayers Alliance placard (with a demand for climate action on the front) featured at the recent climate march. Voting ratepayers don’t want ‘bureaucrats in cushy council jobs’ borrowing or increasing rates, even when the need for investment is becoming increasingly obvious. So is council cost-cutting a ...
The quarterly ETS auction was held today. In the past, these have seen collusion by big players to game the price and force a dump of extra credits from the cost-containment reserve (essentially, trying to pick stuff up cheap now in the belief that it will be more valuable later). ...
Buzz from the Beehive Exempting bikes, electric bikes and scooters from fringe benefit tax looked like something of a sop for a Green Party that had good grounds to grumble after a bunch of climate change measures was tossed on to the PM’s policy bonfire. The combustibles included the clean car ...
Today is a Member's Day, the first of the year. Unfortunately it also looks to be a boring one. First, there's a two hour debate on the budget policy statement (somehow inexplicably "member's business", despite it being fundamentally a government thing). Then there's a couple of "private bills" - people ...
Most days, Chris Hipkins and James Shaw seem a bit like the Seals and Crofts of the centre-left: Earnest, inoffensive, and capable of quite nice harmonies at times. They blow gently through the jasmine in your mind, but you know they’re never going to rock your world. Back in 2020, ...
The reflection gazed back at him. Pale and a little paunchy, he wasn’t a well man.He had a toga made from a fitted sheet and it kept bunching up under his armpits.His Laurel wreath was made from some Christmas tree branches he’d found in the shed, not a real pine ...
Yesterday we covered the government’s latest policy/delivery changes with a focus on light rail. But there was another important transport part of the announcement: The government will also intends to scale back its road safety plans. The programmes that are being reprioritised include: Significantly narrowing the speed reduction programme to ...
Unbridled Consumption: This civilisation we have built (we being the whole human species) is the most astonishingly wonderful thing homo sapiens has ever seen. We love it. We cannot imagine how awful life would be without it. And, we most certainly are not going to co-operate with anyone who advises ...
On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
Let’s start with the absolute truisms.Politics is the art of the possibleHalf of something is better than all of nothingLet us now consider these with reference to the Under New Management government.What is a supporter of progressive politics to make of the abandonment of various policies, as announced in recent post-cabinet ...
Chris Hipkins has surprised even some of his closest friends and backers with the bounce he has secured for Labour in public polls since he became Prime Minister. He has been put to the test since he took over from Jacinda Ardern in the top job, and has shown a ...
Buzz from the Beehive It was a big day for the stopping or slowing of a second tranche of government programmes, an exercise which Beehive publicists are pitching as measures to allow the Government to focus more time, energy and resources on “the bread and butter issues” facing New Zealanders. ...
Last night there was a One News political poll which was welcomed by the left and will cause some concern in the opposition camp. A poll that showed no path to victory for ACT and National and which would likely result in another Labour/Greens government, possibly with the inclusion, or ...
Our young renters can vote Labour or Green as often as they like, but will end up paying the price of more and bigger climate emergencies, while also paying most of their after-tax income on rent with little hope of owning their own homes. Photo: Lynn Grieveson/Getty ImagesTLDR:PM ...
Dr Bryce Edwards writes – Labour’s shift in focus is working. Under Jacinda Ardern they were a party and government focused on the voters and ideologies of liberal Grey Lynn and Wellington Central. Now under Prime Minister Chris Hipkins Labour has a laser-like focus directed at ...
Labour’s shift in focus is working. Under Jacinda Ardern they were a party and government focused on the voters and ideologies of liberal Grey Lynn and Wellington Central. Now under Prime Minister Chris Hipkins Labour has a laser-like focus directed at the working class politics of places like West Auckland ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Chris Baraniuk It was an engineering problem that had bugged Zhibin Yu for years — but now he had the perfect chance to fix it. Stuck at home during the first UK lockdown of the Covid-19 pandemic, the thermal engineer suddenly had all ...
Hi,I just wanted to say hello as this week really gets going, and check in about a few things. They’re a series of fractured random thoughts, so bear with me! First up — I haven’t watched the Oscars in ages and I’m really glad I watched yesterday. It felt like ...
Yesterday the Prime Minister laid out the next tranche of plans to scale back the ambition of Labour’s policy/delivery programme – and this time the Auckland light rail project gets a mention. “I can also confirm today that we will roll out transport projects in Auckland in stages. “Reducing transport ...
The Hipkins Government revealed its true colours yesterday as it chopped a whole series of “nice to have” policies — many of them promoted by the Greens — and instead diverted the savings to relieve the impact of inflation. His approach is all about taking action; no more excuses, ...
Saving The People From ... The People: The strangest aspect of the mass Israeli protests, from a New Zealand perspective, is that the judicial reforms proposed by Benjamin Netanyahu’s government would only confer upon Israel’s parliament, the Knesset, powers which the New Zealand House of Representatives has not only exercised ...
Political parties that want to negotiate with the Green Party must come to the table with much faster, bolder climate action, co-leaders James Shaw and Marama Davidson emphasised in their State of the Planet speech today. ...
Political parties that want to negotiate with the Green Party after the election must come to the table with much faster, bolder climate action, co-leaders James Shaw and Marama Davidson emphasised today. ...
You will never truly understand, from the pictures you’ve seen in the newspapers or on the six o-clock news, the sheer scale of the devastation wrought by Cyclone Gabrielle. ...
We’re boosting incomes and helping ease cost of living pressures on Kiwis through a range of bread and butter support measures that will see pensioners, students, families, and those on main benefits better off from the start of next month. ...
The error Labour Ministers made by stopping work on a beverage container return scheme will be reversed by the Greens at the earliest opportunity as part of the next Government. ...
“Cabinet needs to do better - and today has shown exactly why we need Green Ministers in cabinet, so we can prioritise action to cut climate pollution and support people to make ends meet,” says Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson. ...
Biggest increase in food prices for over three decades shows the need for an excess profit tax on corporations to help people put food on the table. ...
The Green Party has today launched a submission guide to help Aucklanders give crucial input and prevent potentially disastrous Auckland Council budget proposals. ...
With calls growing for inquiries and action on bank profits, the Greens say the Government has all the information it needs to act now and put a levy on banks. ...
As large parts of Aotearoa recover from two of the worst climate disasters we have ever experienced, it would be a huge mistake for the Government to deprioritise climate action from future transport investments, the Green Party says. ...
The Green Party is celebrating the signing of a historic United Nations Ocean Treaty, and calls on the new Oceans and Fisheries Minister to urgently step up protection for Aotearoa’s oceans. ...
This year has seen a series of extreme weather events, unparalleled in New Zealand’s recent history. From Cape Reinga in the far north down to the Tararua Ranges, families and businesses across the country have suffered enormous loss and hardship. While the severe weather hasn’t directly affected every part of ...
Prime Minister Chris Hipkins has today appointed Ginny Andersen as Minister of Police. “Ginny Andersen has a strong and relevant background in this important portfolio,” Chris Hipkins said. “Ginny Andersen worked for the Police as a non-sworn staff member for around 10 years and has more recently been chair of ...
Six further bailey bridge sites confirmed Four additional bridge sites under consideration 91 per cent of damaged state highways reopened Recovery Dashboards for impacted regions released The Government has responded quickly to restore lifeline routes after Cyclone Gabrielle and can today confirm that an additional six bailey bridges will ...
Foreign Minister Nanaia Mahuta departs for China tomorrow, where she will meet with her counterpart, State Councillor and Foreign Minister Qin Gang, in Beijing. This will be the first visit by a New Zealand Minister to China since 2019, and follows the easing of COVID-19 travel restrictions between New Zealand and China. ...
Education Ministers from across the Pacific will gather in Tāmaki Makaurau this week to share their collective knowledge and strategic vision, for the benefit of ākonga across the region. New Zealand Education Minister Jan Tinetti will host the inaugural Conference of Pacific Education Ministers (CPEM) for three days from today, ...
A vital transport link for communities and local businesses has been restored following Cyclone Gabrielle with the reopening of State Highway 5 (SH5) between Napier and Taupō, Associate Minister of Transport Kiri Allan says. SH5 reopened to all traffic between 7am and 7pm from today, with closure points at SH2 (Kaimata ...
Internal Affairs Minister Barbara Edmonds has thanked generous New Zealanders who took part in the special Lotto draw for communities affected by Cyclone Gabrielle. Held on Saturday night, the draw raised $11.7 million with half of all ticket sales going towards recovery efforts. “In a time of need, New Zealanders ...
The Government has announced funding of $3 million for providers to help people, and whānau access community-based Building Financial Capability services. “Demand for Financial Capability Services is growing as people face cost of living pressures. Those pressures are increasing further in areas affected by flooding and Cyclone Gabrielle,” Minister for ...
Minister of Education, Hon Jan Tinetti, has announced appointments to the Board of Education New Zealand | Manapou ki te Ao. Tracey Bridges is joining the Board as the new Chair and Dr Therese Arseneau will be a new member. Current members Dr Linda Sissons CNZM and Daniel Wilson have ...
Fifteen ākonga Māori from across Aotearoa have been awarded the prestigious Ngarimu VC and 28th (Māori) Battalion Memorial Scholarships and Awards for 2023, Associate Education Minister and Ngarimu Board Chair, Kelvin Davis announced today. The recipients include doctoral, masters’ and undergraduate students. Three vocational training students and five wharekura students, ...
High Court Judge Jillian Maree Mallon has been appointed a Judge of the Court of Appeal, and District Court Judge Andrew John Becroft QSO has been appointed a Judge of the High Court, Attorney‑General David Parker announced today. Justice Mallon graduated from Otago University in 1988 with an LLB (Hons), and with ...
The economy has continued to show its resilience despite today’s GDP figures showing a modest decline in the December quarter, leaving the Government well positioned to help New Zealanders face cost of living pressures in a challenging global environment. “The economy had grown strongly in the two quarters before this ...
Aucklanders now have more ways to get around as Transport Minister Michael Wood opened the direct State Highway 1 (SH1) to State Highway 18 (SH18) underpass today, marking the completion of the 48-kilometre Western Ring Route (WRR). “The Government is upgrading New Zealand’s transport system to make it safer, more ...
This section contains briefings received by incoming ministers following changes to Cabinet in January. Some information may have been withheld in accordance with the Official Information Act 1982. Where information has been withheld that is indicated within the document. ...
Aotearoa New Zealand Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta reaffirmed her commitment to working together with the new Government of Fiji on issues of shared importance, including on the prioritisation of climate change and sustainability, at a meeting today, in Nadi. Fiji and Aotearoa New Zealand’s close relationship is underpinned by the Duavata ...
The Government is delivering a coastal shipping lifeline for businesses, residents and the primary sector in the cyclone-stricken regions of Hawkes Bay and Tairāwhiti, Regional Development Minister Kiri Allan announced today. The Rangitata vessel has been chartered for an emergency coastal shipping route between Gisborne and Napier, with potential for ...
The Government will progress to the next stage of the NZ Battery Project, looking at the viability of pumped hydro as well as an alternative, multi-technology approach as part of the Government’s long term-plan to build a resilient, affordable, secure and decarbonised energy system in New Zealand, Energy and Resources ...
This morning I was made aware of a media interview in which Minister Stuart Nash criticised a decision of the Court and said he had contacted the Police Commissioner to suggest the Police appeal the decision. The phone call took place in 2021 when he was not the Police Minister. ...
The Government’s sharp focus on trade continues with Aotearoa New Zealand set to host Trade Ministers and delegations from 10 Asia Pacific economies at a meeting of Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) Commission members in July, Minister for Trade and Export Growth Damien O’Connor announced today. “New Zealand ...
$25 million boost to support more businesses with clean-up in cyclone affected regions, taking total business support to more than $50 million Demand for grants has been strong, with estimates showing applications will exceed the initial $25 million business support package Grants of up to a maximum of $40,000 per ...
80 per cent of 2021 Resident Visas applications have been processed – three months ahead of schedule Residence granted to 160,000 people 84,000 of 85,000 applications have been approved Over 160,000 people have become New Zealand residents now that 80 per cent of 2021 Resident Visa (2021RV) applications have been ...
The Lead Coordination Minister for the Government’s Response to the Royal Commission’s Report into the Terrorist Attack on the Christchurch Mosques travels to Melbourne, Australia today to represent New Zealand at the fourth Sub-Regional Meeting on Counter-Terrorism and Transnational Security. “The Government is committed to reducing the threat of terrorism ...
The health and safety practices at our nation’s ports will be improved as part of a new industry-wide action plan, Workplace Relations and Safety, and Transport Minister Michael Wood has announced. “Following the tragic death of two port workers in Auckland and Lyttelton last year, I asked the Port Health ...
Bikes, electric bikes and scooters will be added to the types of transport exempted from fringe benefit tax under changes proposed today. Revenue Minister David Parker said the change would allow bicycles, electric bicycles, scooters, electric scooters, and micro-mobility share services to be exempt from fringe benefit tax where they ...
Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta will hold bilateral meetings with Fiji this week. The visit will be her first to the country since the election of the new coalition Government led by Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Sitiveni Rabuka. The visit will be an opportunity to meet kanohi ki ...
The Government is introducing the Severe Weather Emergency Legislation Bill to ensure the recovery and rebuild from Cyclone Gabrielle is streamlined and efficient with unnecessary red tape removed. The legislation is similar to legislation passed following the Christchurch and Kaikōura earthquakes that modifies existing legislation in order to remove constraints ...
Approximately 1.4 million people will benefit from increases to rates and thresholds for social assistance to help with the cost of living Superannuation to increase by over $100 a pay for a couple Main benefits to increase by the rate of inflation, meaning a family on a benefit with children ...
$1 billion in savings which will be reallocated to support New Zealanders with the cost of living A range of transport programmes deferred so Waka Kotahi can focus on post Cyclone road recovery Speed limit reduction programme significantly narrowed to focus on the most dangerous one per cent of state ...
The remaining state of national emergency over the Tairāwhiti and Hawke’s Bay regions will end on Tuesday 14 March, Minister for Emergency Management Kieran McAnulty announced today. Minister McAnulty gave notice of a national transition period over these regions, which will come into effect immediately following the end of the ...
The Government is today delivering on one of its commitments as part of the New Zealand Government’s Dawn Raids apology, welcoming a cohort of emerging Pacific leaders to Aotearoa New Zealand participating in the He Manawa Tītī Scholarship Programme. This cohort will participate in a bespoke leadership training programme that ...
Industry Transformation Plan to transform advanced manufacturing through increased productivity and higher-skilled, higher-wage jobs into a globally-competitive low-emissions sector. Co-created and co-owned by business, unions and workers, government, Māori, Pacific peoples and wider stakeholders. A plan to accelerate the growth and transformation of New Zealand’s advanced manufacturing sector was launched ...
New Zealand will provide support for Pacific countries to prevent the spread of harmful animal diseases, Associate Minister of Agriculture Meka Whaitiri said. The Associate Minister is attending a meeting of Pacific Ministers during the Pacific Week of Agriculture and Forestry in Nadi, Fiji. “Highly contagious diseases such as African ...
The Public Transport Futures project will deliver approximately: 100 more buses providing a greater number of seats to a greater number of locations at a higher frequency Over 470 more bus shelters to support a more enjoyable travel experience Almost 200 real time display units providing accurate information on bus ...
All but six schools and kura have reopened for onsite learning All students in the six closed schools or kura are being educated in other schools, online, or in alternative locations Over 4,300 education hardpacks distributed to support students Almost 38,000 community meals provided by suppliers of the Ka Ora ...
A new health centre has opened with financial support from the Government and further investment has been committed to projects that will accelerate Māori economic opportunities, Regional Development Minister Kiri Allan says. Community health provider QE Health will continue its long history in Rotorua with the official opening of the ...
The new three year NZ UK Working Holiday Visas (WHV) will now be delivered earlier than expected, coming into force by July this year in time to support businesses through the global labour shortages Prime Minister Chris Hipkins says. The improved WHV, successfully negotiated alongside the NZ UK Free trade ...
It seems like only yesterday that we launched the discussion document Enabling Investment in Offshore Renewable Energy, which is the key theme for this Forum. Everyone in this room understands the enormous potential of offshore wind in Aotearoa New Zealand – and particularly this region. Establishing a regime to pave ...
Police has reached a major milestone filing over 28,000 charges related to Operation Cobalt. “I’m extremely proud of the fantastic work that our Police has been doing to crack down on gangs, and keep our communities safe. The numbers speak for themselves – with over 28,000 charges, Police are getting ...
The Government will provide $15 million in the short term to local councils to remove rubbish, as a longer-term approach is developed, the Minister for Emergency Management Kieran McAnulty announced today. “Several regions are facing significant costs associated with residential waste removal, which has the potential to become a public ...
$15 million of immediate reimbursement for marae, iwi, recognised rural and community groups $2 million for community food providers $0.5 million for additional translation services Increasing the caps of the Community and Provider funds The Government has announced $17.5 million to further support communities and community providers impacted by Cyclone ...
The Government’s approach of using frontline service providers to address inequities for Māori with mental health and addiction needs is making good progress in many communities, a new report says. An independent evaluation into the Māori Access and Choice programme, commissioned by Te Whatu Ora has highlighted the programme’s success ...
Loading...(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A[quiz],DIV[quiz],A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Frank Jotzo, Professor, Crawford School of Public Policy and Head of Energy, Institute for Climate Energy and Disaster Solutions, Australian National University IISD/ENB The world is in deep trouble on climate change, but if we really put our shoulder to ...
RNZ Pacific New Caledonia’s only daily newspaper, Les Nouvelles Calédoniennes, has folded after the commercial court accepted the publishing company’s request for its liquidation. The court had deferred its decision by a day after an injunction by the public prosecutor who wanted to see if there was still a possibility ...
By Arieta Vakasukawaqa in Suva The installation of the Turaga Bale na Vunivalu Na Tui Kaba, Ratu Epenisa Cakobau, clearly indicates that Fiji’s traditional chiefly system still has a strong footing and chiefs still command respect among the country’s citizens. This is the view of Dr Paul Geraghty, the University ...
ANALYSIS:By Shailendra Bahadur Singh in Suva The long-running row between the former Fiji government and the Suva-based regional University of the South Pacific (USP) has come back to haunt former Fiji Prime Minister Voreqe Bainimarama, who spent a night in a police cell on March 9 before appearing in ...
By Antoine Samoyeau in Pape’ete About 3000 activists of French Polynesia’s pro-independence Tavini Huiraatira party met for six hours at the weekend with the executives insisting that they were “united’ after a recent upheaval over leadership. The party also presented a “renewed” slate of 73 candidates for next month’s territorial ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra The first arrest has been made following the Brereton inquiry into allegations that Australians committed war crimes in Afghanistan. Former SAS soldier, Oliver Schulz, 41, has been remanded in custody after his arrest by ...
We have our 2023 finalists after a big Sunday double-header at North Shore Stadium. Alice Soper reviews.Matatū vs BluesMatatū have scored the first try in every match they have played this season. It looked like this streak was going to be broken as the Blues finally found ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Robert Park, Judith and David Coffey Chair in Sustainable Agriculture, Plant Breeding Institute, University of Sydney Shutterstock Some 70% of the World Heritage-listed Lord Howe Island has been closed to non-essential visitors in response to a recurrence of the plant ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Suranga Seneviratne, Senior Lecturer – Security, University of Sydney Shutterstock Are you tired of receiving SMS scams pretending to be from Australia Post, the tax office, MyGov and banks? You’re not alone. Each year, thousands of Australians fall victim to ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Misha Ketchell, Editor, The Conversation Thanks in no small part to the work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), today few people would be foolish enough to dispute the scientific consensus on the climate crisis. But as ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Eric Windholz, Senior Lecturer and Associate, Monash Centre for Commercial Law and Regulatory Studies, Monash University Inadequate, inequitable, and in some cases possibly in breach of workers’ compensation laws. That’s how bad the current insurance arrangements are for Australia’s professional sports people, ...
The newly-minted Police Minister, Ginny Andersen, has been called on by the Council of Licensed Firearm Owners (COLFO) to investigate how the previous Minister allowed Police to propose extraordinary fee increases for licensed firearm owners without ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Richard Kingsford, Professor, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Sydney Bill Ormonde, Author provided Millions of dead fish float on the surface of the river. Native bony herring and introduced young carp, as well as a few mature ...
Things make more sense when people are speaking your language! This CAB Awareness Week (20-26 March), we are celebrating diversity and multiculturalism within our service. At the Citizens Advice Bureau, we are committed to making sure our service ...
The second week of the Auckland Arts Festivals showed the versatility of the city’s spaces, even when not matched entirely correctly with shows. Sam Brooks reviews (with assistance from Shanti Mathias).I often dismay at the lack of performance spaces we have in Auckland, and it takes something like the ...
The free and easy SMS two factor authentication (2FA) to log into your Twitter account ends today. That concerns Privacy Commissioner Michael Webster because it takes away one of the most common ways to verify who users are on their free accounts, which ...
New Zealand’s new minister of police will be one of the freshest faces around the cabinet table. Ginny Andersen, the MP for Hutt South, has been named as the new minister taking over from Stuart Nash. Andersen first became an MP in 2017 and only became a minister for the ...
The government has announced further roading reconnections, several weeks on from Cyclone Gabrielle. Earlier this morning it was confirmed the link between Napier and Taupō had been reestablished. And now, transport minister Michael Wood said another six bailey bridges would be constructed. “Our immediate priority has been to reopen lifeline ...
The Taxpayers’ Union has slammed the revelation that government agencies and State Owned Enterprises are spending hundreds of thousands of taxpayers’ dollars on lobbying firms as revealed by Radio NZ this morning. Taxpayers’ Union Campaigns Manager, ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Peter McNeil, Distinguished Professor of Design History, UTS, University of Technology Sydney Sydney World Pride and Mardi Gras 2023 were a huge success. Sydney was activated in a way rarely seen – block and street parties, cultural festivals and dance parties for ...
For the first time since 2019, a New Zealand minister will head to China this week. Foreign minister Nanaia Mahuta will meet with her Chinese counterpart Qin Gang in Beijing. “I intend to discuss areas where we cooperate, such as on trade, people-to-people and climate and environmental issues. I will ...
The Chief Ombudsman Peter Boshier has completed his investigation into complaints about Auckland Council’s role in the National Erebus Memorial project. The complaints relate to the council’s approval and consents process for the memorial site in ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Hal Pawson, Professor of Housing Research and Policy, and Associate Director, City Futures Research Centre, UNSW Sydney Pandemic-generated pressures have left our rental housing market reeling. Australia-wide, vacancy rates are at rock-bottom levels. Rents are soaring at record rates. Queensland has ...
The first edition felt like a breath of fresh, local music-filled air. This year, with many of the same headliners as 2008 (and every year since), the formula has grown stale. It’s finally time to admit that on a cold night in Palmy 20 years ago, I felt Shihad frontman ...
The first edition felt like a breath of fresh, local music-filled air. This year, with many of the same headliners as 2008 (and every year since), the long-running Wellington festival has grown stale. It’s finally time to admit that on a cold night in Palmy 20 years ago, I felt ...
The anti-transgender activist that provoked aggressive protests in Australia over the weekend may not be able to enter New Zealand. Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull, the British anti-transgender campaigner, is scheduled to visit New Zealand next weekend for two public events. But according to a new statement from Immigration NZ, her ability to ...
The New Zealand Taxpayers’ Union is pleased to hear that the Minister of Local Government, Kieran McAnulty, has invited concerned mayors to the Beehive to discuss the Three Waters reforms but believe he should meet with the country’s largest ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Adrian Beaumont, Election Analyst (Psephologist) at The Conversation; and Honorary Associate, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne Dan Himbrechts/Paul Braven/AAP The New South Wales state election will be held on Saturday. I had a preview of both ...
Whether the anti-trans campaigner can enter the country without a visa is now up in the air. Controversy surrounds the upcoming visit by Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull, the British anti-transgender campaigner on a global tour who is scheduled to visit New Zealand next weekend for two public events. During an appearance in Melbourne ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Lynne Chepulis, Associate Professor Health Sciences, University of Waikato Getty Images The controversial 2021 decision by the government drug-buying agency Pharmac to prioritise Māori and Pacific patients in its funding of two game-changing new diabetes drugs appears to have paid ...
The idea of the Greens flirting with National gets an airing before almost every election. It remains as much of a nonstarter as ever, writes Henry Cooke.This article was first published in Henry Cooke’s politics newsletter, Museum Street. It’s far more reliable than clockwork. Every election cycle – often several ...
With half the value of all Lotto, Powerball and Strike tickets going to cyclone relief, the "Must-be-won" draw for $15.5 million on Saturday went to a Canterbury player. ...
Auckland’s mayor has taken aim at road closures and traffic disruption around the super city, revealing a plan to reduce road cones. Wayne Brown had previously pledged to clean up the city of road cones and set it out as an “immediate priority” for the council’s transport agency. Now, he’s ...
The name's Bond – unhedged Treasury bond. Jonathan Milne argues that bond traders have again become sexy, for all the wrong reasons.Analysis: Giant Swiss bank UBS has agreed to buy its rival Credit Suisse for 3 billion Swiss francs (US$3.23 billion) and to assume up to $5.4 billion in losses, in a shotgun ...
‘Don’t fucking come and talk to me, write a submission,’ reckons Mayor Wayne Brown. So how do you do that?Let’s be honest, most people don’t understand local politics. We know that we vote for a mayor and councillors every couple of years, and that’s about it. But local politics ...
The link between Napier and Taupō has reopened this week for the first time since it was damaged in Cyclone Gabrielle. State highway five will be open to all traffic between 7am and 7pm, with overnight closure points at Kaimata Road, Glengarry Road and Matea Road. Kiri Allan, the associate ...
Analysis by By Geoffrey Miller. Political Roundup: NZ’s Middle East strategy, 20 years after the Iraq War This week marks the twentieth anniversary of the Iraq War. While it strongly opposed the US-led invasion, New Zealand’s then Labour-led government led by Prime Minister Helen Clark did deploy military engineers to try to help rebuild Iraq ...
If you find yourself stressing about the cost of living crisis and how it will impact your home loan, talking to your bank as soon as possible is important. If you are experiencing financial challenges or think you might in the future, it’s important to reach out to your bank ...
Despite being entrenched practice in New Zealand schools, the practice of academic streaming in schools might not be around much longer. A plan launched today sets out a pathway to achieve this.If you went to school in Aotearoa, odds are that streaming was part of your experience. The numerically-inclined ...
The Paediatric Society of New Zealand/Te Kāhui Mātai Arotamariki o Aotearoa are very concerned about the high number of tamariki injured by dogs in Aotearoa. Auckland emergency doctor Natasha Duncan-Sutherland says, “Over 2800 dog-related injuries ...
MP Ibrahim Omer will replace Grant Robertson as Labour’s candidate in the Wellington Central electorate after beating former party president Claire Szabo in the candidate selection race. Omer arrived in New Zealand as a refugee and worked as a cleaner before enrolling at Victoria University in 2014. “As someone who has ...
A new report from Australia highlights the significant community exposure to alcohol advertising through social media platforms. Over a one-year period researchers observed nearly 40,000 advertisements from a subset of alcohol-related accounts on Meta platforms ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Leah Ruppanner, Professor of Sociology and Founding Director of The Future of Work Lab, The University of Melbourne pexels/tara winstead, CC BY-SA You’ve probably heard about the “great resignation” which saw large numbers of people resigning from their jobs in ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Emma Beckett, Senior Lecturer (Food Science and Human Nutrition), School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle Shutterstock You’ve probably heard about the medication Ozempic, used to manage type 2 diabetes and as a weight loss drug. Ozempic (and ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Menna Elizabeth Jones, Associate Professor in Zoology, University of Tasmania Human life on Earth is utterly dependent on biodiversity but our activities are driving an increase in extinctions. Yet some extinct species continue to hold our fascination. New methods in genetics and ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Paul Kidson, Senior Lecturer in Educational Leadership, Australian Catholic University Shutterstock Australian schools have been under huge pressures in recent years. On top of concerns about academic progress and staff shortages, schools have faced significant, ongoing disruptions due to ...
The Green Party has made it clear it’s frustrated after being shafted by Labour during last week’s so-called policy bonfire. The prime minister recently ditched a number of policies announced during Jacinda Ardern’s tenure, many of which were backed strongly by the Greens. In a state of the nation address ...
The US banking crisis may help force a rethink by the Reserve Bank here, writes Catherine McGregor in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here.Did last week’s turmoil stop interest rate hikes in their tracks? ...
The Greens have laid down a challenge to potential coalition partners: come to the table with faster and stronger climate action if you want our support. ...
The early days of Māori Television were chaotic. After the founding CE was fired and imprisoned for fraud, Dr. Jim Mather was tapped to lead the fledging broadcaster. An account with no previous media experience, he was an unlikely choice for the role, but ended up leading the channel through ...
Regional public transport is where money can do the most good in the shortest time. So why is the government giving the regions’ funding to the main centres? I used to think of public transport mainly as a way to reduce our environmental impact. It was only when I started ...
The most recent piece of research on actual menstrual blood volume was conducted in 1964, which has left many people without key health information, writes researcher Claire Badenhorst. Last month, after being in the office for only half a day, I headed home early for the sole reason that I ...
Does it pay to be a great novelist in New Zealand? The Detail talks to two authors about how they make a living spinning a good yarn.Catherine Chidgey Catherine Chidgey has been writing novels for almost 30 years - and she's one of our most celebrated writers on the scene ...
The amazing success story of a Takapuna writer In 2021, I self-published The Lighthouse, a novel I had been working on for 10 years. Something that kept me going was the thought I might one day walk into a bookstore and see my book sitting on the shelf. Would ...
Watch video: In part 4 of our video series, The Way Forward, Rod Oram looks at big new ideas that can lead our response to climate change and improve sustainability. Agriculture generates half New Zealand’s greenhouse gases, but the sector is still moving very slowly and reluctantly towards cutting ...
The precious metal surged almost 4 percent as investors, shaken by US bank collapses and trouble at the venerable Swiss bank Credit Suisse, fled to a safe haven ...
The jargon-dense economic commentary reinforces our belief we are unqualified to have a view on how our economy should be designed, but it's time to democratise economics and demand an economy that works for people and the planetOpinion: Imagine a day when you tune into the financial news and the announcer reports: ...
Loading...(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A[quiz],DIV[quiz],A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions. ...
By Miriam Zarriga in Port Moresby Papua New Guinea’s Internal Security Minister Peter Tsiamalili Jr says the Royal PNG Constabulary is “stretched” with only 5000 men and women serving the country of more than 9 million people. “Now more than ever we need leadership, we are stretched as a force, ...
From his office at NIWA headquarters in Wellington, scientist Craig Stewart gets updates from the Southern Ocean, where climate change is starting to melt the ice shelves.All week on The Spinoff we’re delving into our relationship with the world of work in Aotearoa. For more Work Week stories, click ...
Celebrate the last of the summer veg with this crisp, crunchy, flavour-packed salad. If you grow zucchini or are lucky enough to know someone who does then you’ll know that when they come on, they produce in abundance – and figuring out exactly what to do with them all can ...
Unless, that is, the crowd truly demands it.Mt Smart Stadium was a sea of colour and noise last week. Handwritten signs, screams, singalongs and hollered appreciation of the main attraction via the chant, “Harry, Harry, Harry [contd]”. Puzzlingly, however, when Mr Styles departed the stage after 70 minutes or ...
The Auckland Mayor’s comments belittle the skills, expertise and commitment of library staff and undermine the library profession more generallyOpinion: Volunteer-run libraries for Auckland have been proposed by Mayor Wayne Brown as a cost-cutting measure that could help the council address the spiralling costs of the City Rail Link ...
Though venting has its place and can be a helpful way to cope under the right conditions, there are many other strategies that offer benefits more consistentlyOpinion: When we have a long and stressful day, we often want to talk about it with someone close to us. Whether it ...
Bard Billot on the Labour blathererMates "Mate," says Lord of Punishings Stu, "Can we get a bit more enthusiastic With the floggings and beheadings?" "Sure, mate," replies Centurion Andronicus, "Just give us the word, mate." The mates companionably swill a yard of warm ale And watch the ...
So if the first-home buyers are being shut out of the property market, who is going to do the buying?
Greedy property-portfolio buyers are my guess.
And this government won’t introduce a capital gains tax on multi properties.
Money men running things eh? You gotta luv ’em haven’t ya.
“Money men running things eh? ”
Yep.
Our money markets authority, the FMA, the police of the financial wide boys, has just appointed a new boss…..
And guess who it is ……… go on…….
It is none other than a person who has worked for Merrill Lynch for the last 17 years. Merrill Lynch for fucks sake.
They have appointed one of their own. Appointed a financial wide boy to police the financial wide boys.
Absolutely staggering.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/9452511/FMA-names-new-chief-executive
The opposition should be jumping on this
The institution of rentier capitalism favours the rentier capitalists.
Those younger and seeking their first home who are say less than 30 years of old, aren’t seen as a significant voting block by this govt.
From what was said on RadioNZ National this morning that’s exactly who the current wave of house buyers in Auckland are,
Speculators, not stupid by any means are sucking up Auckland properties knowing that there will only be a few months to wait while the first home buyers save another 10% towards a deposit,
As the first home buyers come back into the market the speculators will make some grand windfall profits from having played middle man for 6 months…
I can understand the need to implement a policy to slow house price increases but a government has lost the plot if it implements a policy that makes it harder for 1st home buyers and not investors. Home ownership is important to encourage strong communities, but this policy has assisted the people who are causing the house price bubble, property investors. But I guess with the number of National MP’s with investment houses, no wonder….
But something that I have often reflected on is why does the Reserve Bank put so much effort in trying to control inflation saying that inflation will lead to “wage growth” while at the same time ignoring house price inflation, certainly last decade this was the case.
You’re looking at it the wrong way around. The RBNZ tries to control the speed of the economy so as to reduce upward trends in wages which would, in theory, push up prices. They’re effectively trying to maintain 6%+ unemployment so as to keep wages down. Of course, they really don’t give a fuck about the wages/salaries/income at the top because they make up such a small amount of the population that no matter how much they increase they won’t actually push up inflation. It’s only wages for the majority.
Because people see house price inflation as themselves getting richer and telling people that they can’t have that would piss people off.
This is what happens when you don’t sell assets.
“Super City lands airport windfall”
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11164414
Yip. CHCH never sold it’s assets and now is coming under pressure to sell them in order to pay for the earthquake.
Hopefully we won’t do it, but it shows that we now have the assets in store for a rainy day if we need them.
what has me gobsmacked about/over this shareholder windfall is..
..ok..as a side issue the council gets a payout on their shares..
..but pulling back to the big picture for a mo’..
..about a week ago the govt sold the shares to the elites/institutions..
..and the gummint crowed about how they had made (about) (350 million from this sale..
..then..a week later..the airline goes..’oh..!..!..hang on..!..we are doing so well..we are going to give our shareholders (about) $450 million..’..
..question one:..who knew about this impending windfall for old and new imvestors..?
..and why the fuck wasn’t this paid out out..i dunno..a couple of weeks ago..?
..(didn’t they know then..?..)
..am i the only one smelling a rort-stench from this latest gummint-‘deal’….?
..phillip ure..
You’re confused. Auckland Airport is returning capital to shareholders, not Air NZ.
doh..!
phillip ure..
If things are going so bloody well why are they having to borrow to buy out shareholders?
But still nowhere near as cheap as the income that the company has coming in from it’s operations.
Well surprise, surprise, look who got wheeled out to do the softening-up exercise ahead of yet more bad news in the Education Ministry next week.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11164425
testing and so on. one two three
Oops
NZ education facing a bad report
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11164425
Education Minister Hekia Parata is preparing for an embarrassing drop in New Zealand’s education rankings in an international survey next week.
She says a drop in the OECD’s Programme for International Student Assessment (Pisa) is “probable” and will be due to Asian countries’ improvement.
But Labour says any drop in the rankings should be sheeted home to an excessive focus by National on “testing” over the past five years.
Yep those Nat Standard are certainly raising achievement NOT
That really made my blood boil this morning. I’m absolutely livid.
So much for the Govt focus on improving education outcomes! You don’t do that by wrecking public education and pouring millions into private schools.
God I hate these Nat bandits! The very thought of another term with National makes me want to scream.
This government has never been focused on lifting education outcomes – they’ve been focused on privatising education. The result of which, as we see, is a decrease in our education system and the outcomes of that system.
John Armstrong, of all people, comments on the Parata smokescreen issued in Gisborne.
Her 20 page speech was not available before her talk nor after and signals National hunting around for some hot acceptable directions for Education.
I think that the slippage for NZ rankings reflects what happened in the UK. The more they tested and ranked the lower the UK fell in international rankings.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11164426
Another IT fuck up from National National standards a complete cock up.
Chorus cockup.
Brownlee can’t admit he’s had to comprimise.
Because he has been sucking up to Parker who Fucked up .
Now Daziel is there things are working better.
National could organize a piss up in a brewery.
Very good post from David Beatson on his continuing investigations into the TV digital switchover and Freeview.
He reckons that the 2006 government agreement with SOE Kordia has been breached by Kordia. A response to an OIA about how Kordia carried out its allocations of digital frequencies – to check if it followed the processes/rules as laid out in the 2006 agreement – has resulted in Kordia saying they can’t find relevant emails and documentation. it seems the evidence has mysteriously disappeared.
Beatson also explains how regional TV channels have been hard hit by the switchover, with only 10 of the 20 previously licensed channels surviving. And the ones that are available on freeview can only be accessed by those with Freeview terrestrial, and not to those with Freeview satellite.
Further more, Beatson says:
I’m not sure how anyone would find such channels manually. Don’t know if they are accessible to all regions: i.e. would I be able to receive Canterbury’s CTV on my Freeview Terrestrial receiver on the DTT (Digital Terrestrial TV) platform?
You can check which channels are available on each platform here.
Note that those who live in Blenheim are forced to use a dish and as shown on your linked chart we get fewer choices. Mind you there is little to watch on TV anyway.
Beatson’s been great on this issue, Kordia’s been a strange place of late with quite a few clashes and departures as well as the shedding of Orcon.
Freeview should be the great enabler in a digital world but it’s effectively reducing choice and dumbing down what’s available free to air.
Sky having SBS turned off on our freeview/sky sattelite in 2012 shows who is calling the shots in broadcasting. 4 channels, excellent news and many quality shows showed up what dross we have dished up to us.
Yeah, I’ve been noticing that as well. I get the distinct impression that someone in the background is pulling strings. Kordia’s selling of it’s successful ISP, Orcon, with the excuse well, we’ve learned a lot and now it’s time to move on read as pure BS. Considering this government’s adherence to the private is good, public is bad false dichotomy I don’t think it takes that much guessing to figure out who’s sending the hidden commands.
“Considering this government’s adherence to the private is good, public is bad false dichotomy”
This coming from Draco, whose adherence to public is good, private is bad false dichotomy, shows an outstanding lack of insight into himself.
DNFTT
Watch what happens with the frequency sell off….follow the money kids.
For the last day or 2, after I submit a comment on TS, I get a blank comment with this url:
http://thestandard.org.nz/wp-comments-post.php
I then need to go back to the TS main page via my bookmark. Comment has always been posted.
Yes, I’ve been getting that too.
Got that myself last night. Delays to akismet run into the script timeout.
http://blog.akismet.com/2013/11/28/api-outage-november-28th/
Looks like it is still an issue
Yes. But it has been steadily diminishing since the UTC 28th. I’m going to add an extra layer of checks back in to cover for akismet going out again.
FYI – key points that I made at the 2013 Australian Public Sector Anti-Corruption Conference,
26 – 28 November 2013:
NB: NOBODY else was making these points……
_______________________________________________________________________________
If it is the (privatisated) contracting-out / procurement model which is the cause of so much corruption – why not get rid of the (privatisated) contracting-out / procurement model ???
_______________________________________________________________________________
Where is the ‘cost-benefit analysis’ which proves that the contracting-out of services once provided ‘in-house’ by local and central government under the ‘public service’ model, is more cost-effective for the public majority?
_______________________________________________________________________________
It appears that the only people benefitting from the ‘business’ model are those businesses which get the contracts.
______________________________________________________________________________
How can private sector businesspeople ‘transmogrify’ into competent PUBLIC SERVANTS?
They come from a different planet – where the laws/ regulations culture are completely different.
_______________________________________________________________________________
(Really jammed some buttons on FULL – when I told folks that I had polled 4th in the recent Auckland Council Mayoral election with nearly 12,000 votes (11,723 votes), campaigning against corrupt corporate control of the Auckland region, and hadn’t paid any rates since 2008!
And I WON’T until the ‘books are open’ and we are told EXACTLY where rates monies are being spent.)
I am now of the firm opinion that the root cause of corruption is the neo-liberal ‘commercialise, corporatise – PRIVATISE model, based upon the unsubstantiated myth that ‘public is bad – private is good’, and that if ‘anti-corruption’ bodies / agencies aren’t focused on addressing this underpinning cause, then they’re not really serious about preventing or fighting corruption.
Cheers!
Penny Bright
‘Her Warship’
http://www.pennybright4mayor.org.nz
Keep on keeping on Penny. You’re doing a great job.
Good on you Penny. You and your supporters issues are often slow burners and complex so your shorter posts here with links are seeing the ‘penny’ drop with a few more readers now.
There is an nteresting accounting shuffle that enable contractors to be taken on (usually costing more than regular employees) but the cost of the contractors does not appear against the wages budget for a department, it comes out of another separate budget and so the department head can appear to be running a lean staff of surmised, competent extremely efficient people as an example of good management.
Instead the department staff are all scrambling to keep the place going with inadequate staff numbers and no time to monitor basic jobs of maintenance of security, emergency systems, good functioning and updating of hardware and software. But the obvious gaps are filled by off-budget expenditure on contractors and the dedicated staff usually having to give advice to the contractors on the particular quirks of their systems.
Cost of Living Rises, Hit Families Hard
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11164389
From the article –
Yet the average household income has gone up by $170 and the median income is up by $100, more than covering the spending increase.
The majority are actually better off.
depends on which statistics are settled on- from the article- “In the year to March 2013, national accounts statistics show spending up by 2.6%, incomes risen by just 1.8% “: medians vs averages were addressed yesterday.
Not in my house we’re not Seti. We’re so downwardly mobile at such a high speed we broke through the crash net. Never in my life, until recent years have I had to use a credit card to pay living expenses like Dr’s bills and the F- ing part payment you have make for physio because ACC no longer fully fund rehab. The salary earner hasn’t had a pay rise in 5 years and costs go up and up and up. Thats your brighter future. Right there.
Ave weekly household spend up to $90 more if comparing with 3 years ago, ie $30 a week rise on ave per year.
Average household income up by $170 – presumably this would be by week.
But because of the big gap in wages and salaries being paid to people all of whom are doing good work, but only a few well paid, it should be noted that some with below average income could be receiving only a $170 per annum rise.
I know someone in a skilled job who only had a rise of .7% p.a. – on $40,000 would give rise of $280.00 per annum.
The median income is up by $100 a week? From three years ago? If the average spending is up to $90, then it would be likely that those on the median would spend less than the average per week. They might be at the level where they have a net $10 more per week, if they are lucky and likely they are not better off, maybe worse.
The majority may seem better off. But are these figures inflation adjusted. The measurement of the CPI is in itself a limited gauge of inflation as it doesn’t take in housing prices and other things. I don’t know what an analyst’s measure of NZ’s true inflation would be as it affects the average citizen personally. If all factors were taken into account there would be at least a sizable minority who are worse off.
Averages can be used to hide the reality. IIRC, 45% of people haven’t seen a pay rise in years. Many have seen a pay reduction not only in real terms but in nominal terms. As an example, in 2007 builders were on $35/hr+. Today they’d be lucky to get $30.
If you look more closely at the statistics average household incomes have gone up because of huge rises at the extreme top end (17% in 2012 year) and loss of jobs, and or being refused social welfare, and hence dropping off the list, at the bottom.
The reality for most skilled people in the middle, the ones we need, has been pay rises below the inflation rate for decades. Which is why so many of us went overseas.
My main job, which is highly skilled, (takes 10 years or more to reach proficiency), in extremely high demand, (been on the immigration depts shortage of skills list for years), pays 40% less now, in relation to headline CPI changes, in NZ, than in 1984.
That’s why we all work offshore while being replaced with cheap immigrants with substandard skills.
And for low income people, prices of things they have to buy, such as housing, health, transport and food , have risen at a much greater rate than the overall CPI. Baked beans have risen in price much more than sirloin steak. Not to mention the many things that used to be State supplied which are now, “user pays”.
Being able to buy cheaper luxury cars and flat screen TV’s does not help those who can barely afford food.
NZ now has one of the lowest median disposable household incomes in the OECD in relation to prices. We are down there with other Neo-liberal “successes”, like Greece.
Sweden is the latest country to swallow the poison pill. Watch them going down in all indicators, even the RWNJ’s favourite, economic growth!
Roger Douglas’ and John Key’s brighter future.
Still see Douglas in the NBR saying we need more of his prescription. Straight out of the medical textbook from the 1870’s that said if bleeding the patient doesn’t work, take more blood.
FYI
_____________________________________________________________________________
29 November 2013
Graham Gill,
General Manager,
Evaluation & Intelligence,
Serious Fraud Office
New Zealand.
‘Open Letter’
Good morning Graham,
Can you confirm a timeframe by which we can expect a decision on your evaluation of the request from Lisa Prager and myself for the NZ Serious Fraud Office to conduct an urgent inquiry into alleged bribery and corruption, involving Auckland Mayor Len Brown and Sky City Auckland?
(I am still in Sydney, now the 2013 Australian Public Sector Anti-Corruption Conference has ended, and I am keen to give an update to Australian media who may be interested.)
Kind regards,
Penny Bright
‘Anti-corruption /anti-privatisation Public Watchdog’
http://www.pennybright4mayor.org.nz
The police have found a new weapon that when fired doesn’t penetrate on impact. Truncheon, taser, wot now? Sponge nosed. Why not paint balls – that can mark the crim as well as bruising them. Aren’t harsh words good enough? Allo, allo put your hands up you scummy little… (in some Brit stories the crims are called chummies).
yes, ‘won’t penetrate on impact’ – was expecting the replacement of male officers by eunuchs…
sponge-round, -gas-launched, (none of your hand-whipped cream), 40mm round (small piece for everyone), range of 30m, inflicts pain, bruises and abrasions (raspberry jam splatters); Limited offer to the AOS in Ak, Wgtn and Chch and the NSTG.
“let them eat sponge-rounds” accompanied with a cup of piping-hot pepper-spray, hold the icing-sugar.
Wet sponges at thirty paces, spose if it stops the trigger happy blowing away innocents on the Auckland motorway it might be a help…
Whoa RT you’re brain is getting fevered. Have a nice cup of tea.
I wonder how many of them will be used at 2 metres, into the gonads of someone handcuffed to a chair?
ha! lol
Lolz last time they had me handcuffed to a chair was in the old Taranaki Street station, the instrument of threat that nite was a convenient hefty chair leg which the plod didn’t use,(maybe coz i was laughing so hard),
What started the whole incident was a car load of D-men cruising Wellingotn’s Vivien street, me and a mate were sitting in a V8 Rambler discussing a little something befor going into Bryon Legros first club for a couple out of the tea pot,
The third time the car-load of suits cruised by giving us the eyeball i said to my mate ”you watch this”, leapt out of the car and gapped it down Vivien street, Lolz plods came from everywhere and by the time they tackled me down by Trades Hall i had already started laughing like a loon,
They had to let me go after half an hour of threats,”vy verr you running”,and we spent the rest of the nite drinking out of Legros teapot laughing like maniacs…
seti
what about recent oecd reports on disposable incomes and affordability
SETI
You say the majority are better off because the average income has risen.
You should be taking about the medians, because one very large rise will skew the average
Yes median and average incomes are actually meaningless mumbo jumbo statistics designed to hide the real level of poverty experienced in New Zealand, those with a social conscience might be mollified by totals like the medium being 80 0dd thousand but for the third of the economy that eanrs below 20 bucks an hour that’s just a sad f**king joke,
The only statistics that will tell the real story of income is the production of charts showing how many of us are in what income bracket defined every 10 thousand dollars…
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11164390
– Jacinda Ardern needs to realise not everything revolves around her
It’s part of Adern’s job that the minister has banned. An hour of police time won’t make that much difference so what are they trying to hide?
tsk tsk Tolley; gotta have a the last word.
http://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/oecd-study-confirms-gap-between-high-and-low-achievers
“Further, there has been no change in our reading performance since 2000, and in maths since 2003”
– I don’t think this is about Labour vs National but rather its time the PPTA (not the teachers) started to put children ahead of themselves
Hear, hear. Good bloody call!
More myth from a RWNJ.
The teachers do put the children first. The PPTA is made up of teachers.
Teachers put children first but the PPTA use children to protect themselves and their members
I suppose private for profit education providers and the politicians who support them are more likely to put children first then? Nah, didn’t think so.
/facepalm
You really, really just don’t get it do you? Must hold on to those false meme’s that come out of National’s Research unit no matter what.
zzzzz
If you look more closely at the statistics average household incomes have gone up because of huge rises at the extreme top end (17% in 2012 year) and loss of jobs, and or being refused social welfare, and hence dropping off the list, at the bottom.
The reality for most skilled people in the middle, the ones we need, has been pay rises below the inflation rate for decades. Which is why so many of us went overseas.
My main job, which is highly skilled, (takes 10 years or more to reach proficiency), in extremely high demand, (been on the immigration depts shortage of skills list for years), pays 40% less now, in relation to headline CPI changes, in NZ, than in 1984.
That’s why we all work offshore while being replaced with cheap immigrants with substandard skills.
And for low income people, prices of things they have to buy, such as housing, health, transport and food , have risen at a much greater rate than the overall CPI. Baked beans have risen in price much more than sirloin steak. Not to mention the many things that used to be State supplied which are now, “user pays”.
Being able to buy cheaper luxury cars and flat screen TV’s does not help those who can barely afford food.
NZ now has one of the lowest median disposable household incomes in the OECD in relation to prices. We are down there with other Neo-liberal “successes”, like Greece.
Sweden is the latest country to swallow the poison pill. Watch them going down in all indicators, even the RWNJ’s favourite, economic growth!
Roger Douglas’ and John Key’s brighter future.
Still see Douglas in the NBR saying we need more of his prescription. Straight out of the medical textbook from the 1870’s that said if bleeding the patient doesn’t work, take more blood.
NZ educational achievement international comparisons about to slide Down The Drain ; no holding ‘Charlie’ back at eastern high tide.
HEY PR how do explain why the PPTA kept working when Novapay wasn’t paying them?
Hi Puckish Rogue,
Have a read of the actual report (or just the summary on p. 3).
Here’s some quotes you might like:
“Reading literacy (main focus)
• New Zealand 15-year-old students’ overall reading performance was substantially higher than the average for the 34 OECD countries.
• Of the 65 countries or economies participating in PISA 2009, only two OECD countries, and two non-OECD partner economies performed better than New Zealand. Four countries were similar and the other 56 countries performed at a significantly lower level.
• Close to one in six of New Zealand students were top-performing readers.”
Yes, it reported problems with boys’ reading and disproportionately lower reading performance amongst Maori and Pasifika students. Nevertheless, highlighting that the education system has produced ‘no improvement’ in performance is a bit like telling a child that it’s still only getting 90% in its English exams.
If the PPTA is the ‘problem’ and puts itself before children, that seems to be having very little downward effect on children’s reading (or maths or science) performance relative to other countries.
Assuming that the about to be released PISA findings show a decrease in either ranking or – worse – actual reading performance of children then, according to your analysis, it will be because National is less able to counter the nefarious effects of the PPTA than was the Labour-led government OR something National has instituted in the education system hasn’t worked OR that there has been some random unidentified factor that has caused performances either to deteriorate or at least not improve.
Given that the changes National introduced were intended to improve performances – especially in the supposed ‘tail’ – then if there has been no improvement in performances those changes have failed to achieve their aim.
It will be interesting to see the results.
PR
thanks fir a couple of chuckles today
BUT PR Don’t you see the huge increase in the scores after Nat Standards were introduced.
O But there aren’t any Opps.
Thats why I don’t think National or Labour are to blame
What Tolley is terrified of is Jacinta and the local MP in tow will find out about the number of senior CRIME fighting officers who are leaving after being ordered to go on night shifts to drive traffic cars and hit ticket ” targets ” which are the old quotas by a different name.
The officers are finding that juries tend to have a few people on them that are a bit fucked off with the cops for being caught doing 5 or 6 km over the limit, and the chances of getting covictions is falling through the floor. Funny that. BTW, the 104 theshold has been in for a while.
These cops know by the Polices own research that there is neglible difference between 100 and 110 in accident and injury stats.
So the ones we really need are walking away because they are fed up.
No, the police said we’re busy can you reschedule so nothing like the claims of “banning” though it makes for a good headline I suppose
So, what exactly are they so busy doing?
Rounding up suspects in rape cases, clearing burgularies, arresting in DV callouts nah.
Of course they have time to raid newspaper offices, descend on an alleged copyright infringement case (72 + helicopter?), chase down protesters and get a new sort of bullet to use agaibnst whoom exactly?
If Nact are to boast about their “get tough on crime strategy” success it must be hard work trying to keep the number of complaints down so nothing enters the front end of the system.
The only police I’ve seen lately are at breath test stoppage (outside library on a Tuesday evening! I didn’t realise that book borrowers had joined the criminal classes en masse.), running around my ‘hood in one piece boiler suits waving batons although we are pretty law abiding and handing out something that I think was for white ribbon day at the station. (somehow that doesn’t make up for the no arrest policy).
Bossy and controlling Anne Tolley and don’t any of us dare disagree with her.
“The Left” and/vs “Identity Politics”.
My belief in socialism has always been predicated on the arbitrary and undeserved inequalities of power under capitalism. This goes beyond mere money or employment relationships into almost every facet of life.
For me, supporting the struggle of the pointlessly disempowered against the pointlessly powerful, wherever it occurs, is the essence of being “left wing”.
So I guess my question for left-wing social conservatives today is “when did some of the different facets of ‘identity politics’ stop being integral parts of the left-win mission, and instead become distractions from what you might call ‘true-left’ activism?”
Was it when husbands were no longer able to beat severely beat “their” wives at will?
Was it when homosexuality was no longer regarded as a mental illness?
Was it when the government stopped blatantly stealing land and resources from indigenous people?
Was it when husbands were no longer legally allowed to rape “their” wives?
Was it when women got the vote?
Was it when an interracial relationship was no longer a brave social statement in TV shows?
Was it when a same-sex relationship was no longer the “surprise twist” in TV shows?
Was it when a same-sex relationship was no longer a brave social statement in TV shows [whoops, still isn’t quite there yet]?
Was it when “he made a pass at me and I panicked so beat him to death” was no longer a legal defence for a man to be found guilty of manslaughter rather than murder [removed when the “provocation” defence was removed, though the argument might still work on a jury]?
Was it when women no longer needed to be certified by two doctors as being in danger of going insane before a zygote could be legally removed from their body, but were instead regarded as being competent to make their own decisions [whoops, hasn’t happened yet]?
Was it when brown people achieved approximately the same average or median income as lighter-skinned people [whoops, hasn’t happened yet]?
Was it when women achieved approximately the same average or median income as men [whoops, hasn’t happened yet]?
Was it when a 13 year old girl could make a rape complaint to police with the complete assurance that it would be thoroughly investigated[whoops, hasn’t happened yet]?
Seriously, I missed the memo: at what point was I supposed to stop giving a fuck about any social analysis deeper than “working class vs capitalist class”?
Very good McFlock.
Apparently when the working class/capitalist class issue is sorted, all the other ones go away magically. Although for the life of me I can’t understand how that won’t just result in a different sort of heirarchal, oppressive structure. Working class white men are going to share their power once they get it? Really? Why would they do that?
I found myself irked the other day when I read Bryce Edwards referring to QoT as an ‘identity politics’ blogger. Am trying to decide if it’s a better strategy to appropriate the term or demolish it.
Most voters stopped giving a fuck at around
So it’s about voter perceptions and not matters of principle and social justice and a decent life, equality, etc for all?
So, should the left stop giving a fuck about (working) class politics, now that increasing numbers of voters say today class is not an issue? And if the majority say they don’t give a fuck about class issues, does the left wing of politics throw in the towel?
Oh, I thought McFlock was talking about identity politics. Gender/race/relationship/reproductive politics in other words.
Where’s your statistics from around that claim? How many of the 800,000 non-voters do you think stayed away from the polls because our political parties don’t focus enough on delivering on identity politics?
Lol.
Because nobody has gender, race, relationship, and reproductive aspects to their identity, therefore we can ignore all those issues of power and powerlessness and still provide social justice and a decent life, equality, etc for all”. /sarc
You’re a clever man McFlock. I’ll run it this way. IMO for most NZers, gender, race, relationship and reproductive politics are 2nd, 3rd and 4th orders of concern, not first order.
The current fucked up state of the western world with regards to social justice and providing a decent life to all has not occurred because of identity politics (whether too much/too little).
It’s been entirely due to the unchecked influence of banks, corporations and international capital. But whatever. You know better.
Well, you can run your Maslow’s Hierarchy of give-a-fuck all you want, but when a 13yo makes a rape complaint that appears to have been followed by inaction, that’s not entirely due to the global corporate financiers. And addressing that problem does not stop Labour addressing issues of capitalist power – don’t blame “identity politics” for your party dropping the ball on other issues that you happen to care about.
BTW nice pivot. Because you know that quite unlike gender/race/relationship politics, making sure that police do their job and do their job well is a 1st order of concern for most voters.
As I said, its easy to default to a socially liberal programme. Confronting capitalist power is actually the hard agenda. And right now it is the one which is an absolute existential matter of survival.
Not a pivot. It is actually the point. It’s the culture and power dynamic that meant the police apparently did not feel inclined or capable of doing their job. The concept that complainant+witnesses != “INsufficient evidence” to move the investigation forward but does equal a plausible defence for inactivity, that is the problem.
As for what you claim is an “easy” programme to “default to” – well, that just means that you’ve been prepared to ignore pretty much every facet of reality, right there.
[edit: missed the “in” in “insufficient :)]
nevertheless, voters consider police effectiveness and propriety a first order issue, so good pick.
although the advrertisers who got wj and jt a holiday indicate there’s more to it than just a cop forgetting how to do their job.
Of course there’s more to it, but it’s nothing a left wing political party is going to fix.
Not with you in charge.
National sure as shit wasn’t doing anything about it. They just didn’t want it on the internet.
The left wing parties made it a parliamentary issue.
But then that’s exactly the sort of thing you’re arguing against.
Mr. Grumpy.
McFlock, I find it hard to argue against any of the issues you raise questions on being something any normal liberally minded person would not support. Left or Right.And that to me is at the crux of the issue of “identity” politics.
What I believe has happened is that the questions you attribute with being “left wing” issues have been adopted by a “Left” that has struggled for an electable identity and a clear “Left” path (whatever that is). To me the “Left” has looked like a bucket shop for all the issues that the “Right” probably assessed as too contrary to garnering votes, and cynically dumped into a vacuum for others to pick up. And they no doubt knew that the “Left” would adopt them because, as previously stated any liberally minded people would.
These issues are in my view (which could be right or wrong) “libertarian” issues. Despite being “libertarian” when it comes to issues related to money and property the Right is decidedly stand offish if other “libertarian” ideas cost them money. Which may explain why they end up “gifted” to the “Left”.
Maybe the liberals of the Left, (the “identity’ politics groups) need to understand is that their stance is neither wrong or correct. It is that the Left like the Right has another duality: it contains conservative elements as well as liberal.
The result is that the Left have a problem: how they can be a broad church for the greater good that tolerates and encompasses all viewpoints, even when they are difficult to reconcile. “Identity” politics cannot lead, nor can their opponents. They do however have to find a common cause.
I disagree with putting issues of gender, “race”/(post)colonisation, and sexuality into the “liberal”/”libertarian” basket. Those labels apply to an individualistic take on society. Putting them into that basket denies that it involves groups of people who are marginalised and oppressed via the structure and culture of our society, because they are part of said group -not because of any individual qualities they posses.
Basically, it amounts to a politics that privileges a pakeha and/or masculine focus on class and denies how other oppressions, and intersectionality are experienced in practice.
To me “identity politics” is the wrong term – it’s about the politics of disadvantage and oppression.
Basically, my bag’s the politics of class. And that (obviously) has an economic focus. And I agree that neither class, nor race nor gender should be separated out or elevated to the detriment of any of the three main areas or fields of disadvantage and oppression.
That said, the fcking Labour Party and the liberal or social democratic left of this country needs a severe kick in the head for doing precisely that with class politics. It elevated gender and race issues and kinda pretended that class didn’t exist. And that led to a lot of fucked off people and ultimately all kinds of negative impacts on the issues of race and gender (the Labour Party) chose to focus on.
And now we have a sort of hungover schism – maybe reflected in Ennui’s comment.
That’s probably a fair enough description, although many of the “elevated” actions were a)from allied/coalition parties and b)long overdue anyway.
But I guess in the glaring economic, industrial and social silence from Labour, some people could hear the “identity” pins finally drop and now have a headache from the rattle 🙂
same bag Bill, believe it or not.
For me it has always been that issues of class, race, gender and sexuality are inter-related and, in many ways intertwined”: sometimes they overlap, sometimes they are separate – and on occasions they are in conflict. for instance, women have long provided a reserve army of labour, marginalised at times, but preferred by employers when it suits them -usually when they want to lower wages or casualise the workforce.
I think I always had a perspective that is now called “intersectionality.
I don’t really think the left/labour movement have elevated gender & “race” that much. To me it seems like a thin veneer over the top a a still very traditionally masculine culture.
I got into the women’s movement in the late 70s in London because it provided a context where I felt most comfortable. The women’s movement there was very left on class – taking Marxism/socialism as read and the basis for all politics.
There, and I think here, women organised separately from the mainstream of the left because they felt poorly treated there: treated as the people to make the tea and/or provide sexual service. I heard a few stories from women who began in the mainstream left, of being sexual harassment (and worse) by left wing men.
Neoliberalism picked up on a very narrowed version of feminism: girl power spun through glossy consumerism. That got mixed into the neoliberal shift within Labour Parties (in various countries).
On the left, “race” and Maori issues also have been adopted in a weakened form. Remember how Clark backed off from “closing the gaps”. And then there was the foreshore and seabed issue – hardly embraced by parliamentary Labour.
Where are all these elevated policies of gender and race that have allegedly pushed aside class issues and dominate the left? To me it seems that there’s a few such policies proposed, and they get highlighted because they get so much resistance from the media and some in the left. they are hardly at the core of the (neoliberalised) left.
It seems to me that class and the struggle for socio-economic equality and inclusiveness got undermined in the same ways as feminism and anti-racism have been narrowed on the left, and at the same time. Prior to the mid 80s, there had been some progress in the struggle to integrate race, gender, sexuality etc, with class on the left.
And if this blog, and other left wing ones are anything to go by, males and a fairly conventional kind of masculinity runs through left wing politics. Here for instance, males seem to outnumber females, and when feminist/gender/sexuality issues get raised there’s quite a bit of resistance from some quarters – though there are also many here who are supportive.
Over the years I have seen some women refer to TS as not being a positive space for women/feminists. I actually think TS is more welcoming and positive than that on balance.
But, really, I’m just not seeing the left dominated by gender and race issues. neither am I seeing a broader left really pushing for strongly core Labour/socialist policies. For me Mana and Greens actually embrace the strongest left wing approaches/policies. Mana also has a strong Maori perspective, while the Greens are more positive on issues of gender, sexuality and disability. This is maybe because they are relatively new parties. Labour, and the broader labour movement have been a long time shedding their originating white male dominance. And every step forward gets treated as some major take-over by (so-called) “identity politics”.
Only broadly speaking and merely as an example – ‘the closing the gaps’ policy that the Clark government backed off from was seen as being preferential, rather than as a policy addressing disadvantage.
If an overt class centered policy had accompanied the closing gaps policy in such a way as to show that all the lower boats would be rising with the lowest of all rising more to some common predetermined level, then I reckon there’d have been bugger all resistance and bullshit.
But those going backwards in a purely class sense, were essentially been told to F.O. and that there were no issues affecting them. And, as we know, it’s just not the case that white working class people weren’t suffering during the Clark years. Result: resentment and piss all solidarity.
I do agree that working class people of all colours suffered during the period of the Clark government.
Do you really think a closing the gaps policy that addressed all on low income people would have succeeded without massive resistance in the Clark years? If not, why didn’t the Labour government do that?
My answer is that it would have been met with as much, or more resistance from various quarters (with the MSM cheerleading), as closing the gaps.
Poverty does hit large numbers of Maori and Pacific people extremely hard.
PS: Back to my earlier point: closing the gap never happened. So, ultimately there was no programme activated that specifically addressed Maori/Pacific needs. Is it that people are still resenting that such a policy was even considered, and continuing to use such policies as reason to blame “identity politics” for lack of focus/progress on class issues – because there also was a lack of progress on the dire circumstances that large numbers of Maori and Pacific people still live in.
Karol,
“But, really, I’m just not seeing the left dominated by gender and race issues. neither am I seeing a broader left really pushing for strongly core Labour/socialist policies.”
It’s interesting to hear people like Tat arguing that indentity politics have sidelined class politics. Because I look at what they are talking about and the politics look to me like middle class politics not identity politics. It’s the middle class capture of Labour, and those ideals and needs coming through.
Karol, I don’t disagree about it being the politics of disadvantage and oppression. My point is that I neither the Left or Right have an exclusive position on being the beneficiaries or exponents of advantage or disadvantage. The marginalised / oppressed people: you intimate that this is because of pakeha / masculine focus on class. That is a little simplistic, as a generality it may be so, but in saying so you exclude a whole bunch of pakeha males who probably are just as oppressed in any number of other ways.
Can you pick who this is? XXXXX ranks as one of the founders of the welfare state. With Herbert Asquith and David Lloyd George, he was the principal driving force behind the Liberal Party’s welfare reforms of 1908–1911. At the Board of Trade, he pioneered measures to reduce poverty and unemployment through state intervention in the labour market. In 1909, he toured Britain campaigning for the ‘People’s Budget’ and its radical proposals for the taxation of wealth. At the Home Office, his penal reforms as well as his measures to improve working conditions in shops and coal-mines were reflections of a continuing drive for social reform that was cut short by his transfer, in 1911, to the Admiralty. In the course of a lifetime in party politics,XXXXX often touched on social questions, and there were other phases of his career in which he bore some responsibility for the development of social policy.
XXXX was from the “Right”: that arch Conservative, pakeha male imperialist Winston Churchill. Concurrently a certain Lenin and Stalin (and a female from an oppressed minority, Rosa Luxemburg) were proposing a “Leftist” state where equality for all would be a fait accompli. Under these lovely “socialists” a whole lot of identity people met their fate. The lesson of history is don’t be too quick to label the “Left” as good guys when it comes to disadvantage and oppression, nor the Right as the natural bad guys.
hmmm. ” Class analysis” is still my bag ; no time to debate, a Christmas function awaits.Personally, Not convinced Flockie and Ennui
Not sure using Winston Churchill is that good an example. Particularly for a New Zealand audience.
While he did have some fine qualities, and it does seem likely that WWII would have had a very different outcome had he not been involved in British politics at the time. He’s not exactly a saint.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielknowles/100169841/time-to-scotch-the-myth-of-winston-churchills-infallibility/
Closer to home, there is also his involvement in Gallipoli, after which he was forced to resign as First Lord of the Admiralty.
Ennui: The marginalised / oppressed people: you intimate that this is because of pakeha / masculine focus on class.
No, that is not what I was saying at all. And I’m not denying or negating the oppression of working class pakeha men – I thought I made that clear. How many times do I have to say I have been against class oppression since …. I guess sometimes in my teens?
It just seems that some people see oppression of various sectors of the society in either/or terms. They all operate – sometimes in concert, sometimes in differnet ways for each group.
Other forms of disadvantage/oppression are not primarily caused by a masculine focus on class. But focus on class exclusively has been a stumbling block to progress for other oppressed groups. It has been a long struggle to get a reasonable number of people on the left to engage with issues of gender, “race” etc.
Don’t know who XXX is. But there have long been individual women in politics, among a very male and masculine dominated context. Like Thatcher, they usually succeed by embracing enough of the masculine values. Not surprising that some such women do devilish things.
I always understood it was the Beveridge Report of the 1940s that provided the architecture of the British welfare state.
Thank you
But to me they’re not separate issues: they are the same issue of powerful people structuring a society to preserve their own power. All the same problem, it’s just down to the granularity with which one looks at the problem.
The right wing oppose equality of the currently less powerful simply to preserve their own power.
To bring it back to your final paragraph, should people on “the Left” even tolerate all viewpoints? Should we associate with someone argues that some people should shut up about their powerlessness on the doubtful likelihood of possibly preserving a couple of percentage points for a fairly soft-left party anyway? Even if they do demand the nationalisation of essential infrastructure and better rights for workers, or are trustees on charity boards, or whatever.
Let me put it this way: as I recall, the Catholic Church decided that Liberation Theology was heresy because the perspective used to interpret scripture came from Marxism, and that therefore a doctrine with atheist roots cannot be regarded as church doctrine. Similarly, how much part of the left are people who choose to preserve the powerlessness of their comrades simply to provide their issues or interests with greater democratic power? I don’t care if they can sing 4 verses of the Internationale, they’re still preserving their security, power and status at the expense of perpetuating other peoples’ powerlessness. And that sounds awfully familiar.
A couple of answers before beer o’clock. Should people on the Left tolerate all viewpoints: hell no BUT we need to become better at encompassing them within a broad coalition with a common aim. The alternative is to be divided and conquered. Its not always nice but its better to be in control together than separately on the receiving end.
And with regard to the preservation of security, power and status….I remember the Douglas / Lange cabinet who merely took these over. Beware your “friends”..all the more reason for a common cause that tolerates and encompasses incompatible viewpoints.
Bankers, corporates and financial capital raise minimal objection to progress on identity politics. They don’t care because it doesn’t affect the power and financial structures which actually matter in determining the control of a country.
So when Left wing parties spend their time, energy and political capital on identity politics, all is fine.
And to answer your question directly
I mark it as when the Left decided to abandon the 40 hour week and the penal rates associated with it.
So we have gay marriage now (which is a good thing) but no 40 hour week and no penal rates. And zero whispers about even looking at bringing them back.
WTF?
Non-economic power issues stopped being left wing when NZLabour dropped left wing economic policies? On what planet does that even make sense?
he he, you got Tat there it appears. (Class still my backpack )
I’m going to guess it maybe refers to the resentment that built up among those who were principally economically exploited when they were more or less sidelined by parliamentary politics etc. And over time, any empathy or sympathy or interest that might have been held towards those subjected to non-economic oppressions kinda withered – ie, non-economic issues came to be seen as gazumping economic issues and the Labour Party lost a heap of support as a result.
But that’s just a guess and in no way meant to be a defense of any social conservatism. The ‘this/and’ principle I’ve mentioned in other threads on other matters would seem to apply here if the left wants to avoid any repeat of the chest puffing bullshit from the 80’s and before (ie, before class was banished) that would have class trump anything and everything with the idea that ‘the girls’ and ‘our coloured cousins’ should just get in line, keep their mouths shut and their heads down and await the glorious day when the class war was won and the brain dead vanguard clowns would resolve gender and race issues a bit like Tommy Cooper – y’know? – “just like that”.
The cruel irony: increasing economic hardship strikes at women, girls, minorities, and the disabled far harder and far faster due to the manifest inequitable attitudes and structures in our society.
The corporate profit/banker driven destruction of our biosphere and our natural resources is also going to strike at these groups the hardest.
So? What is it about feminism or indigenous rights that makes you think they don’t take on capitalism too?
If you want to blame someone for ignoring and undermining the working class, blame Labour in the 80s. Identity politics isn’t to blame, it’s what Labour did that is the problem. Appropriation of identity politics was just a tool, not the cause.
Karol might want to comment on this, but my understanding is that a big part of feminism in the 70s was women getting out of socialist groups and into feminist groups, because they were sick of being told to wait until class issues were dealt with before bringing their issues to the table. That and having to make all teh cups of tea. On both counts it was good reason to take their politics into the emerging second wave of feminism.
I’d like to see some evidence that if everyone else puts their needs aside then when capitalism finalling falls that then everyone else will get a chance. I just don’t see it. It looks like just a turning of the same old power structures into new hands.
weka @ 8.26pm: I commented on that at length above at 18.3.1.1.3.
Yes, also the left was not dealing well with issues relevant to women.
In the 70s in London, left wing women were critical of the way the class system was usually characaterised. Basically both a Marxist notion of class and the more standard at the time Registrar General’s occupation-based classifications of class, tended to be male focused. They had a their core a notion of the male breadwinner.
Women tended to be classed according to their father or husband’s occupation. And a woman could slide up or down the class ladder depending on their husband’s occupation – a woman could go up or down a clas on marriage. And often women experienced a big drop in class level/income on divorce.
Increasing numbers of women were working. But the “manual” categories favoured traditionally male occupations. What of some women’s low paid jobs (sales or clerical) that tended to be classified as white collar?
Thanks karol, still catching up on all the thread.
So women were encouraged to leave socialist groups and join feminist groups in the 70s. Great. What do you think of the last 40 years of results for both the socialist groups and the feminist groups?
Are you impressed with how the strategy has played out?
Women weren’t ‘encouraged’ to leave socialist groups, they left because they wanted something they weren’t getting in socialist groups.
I think feminism has done remarkably well given what it was up against and given the waves of backlash since the 70s.
Women, and IMO all people, are better off for feminism for sure. I can’t comment on socialist groups or their overall strategies, other than what I said about Labour, and what I said about women being largely failed by them.
I assume your implication is to somehow blame feminism for socialism’s failures? And that because feminism hasn’t overturned the patriarchy yet it would have been better off if women had just stuck to making cups of tea. Pull the other one.
It’s not feminism that is creating an either or situation here. It’s you and other people who insist on marginalising so called identity politics.
Women took the initiative. My experience in London was that there was a loose network of left wing, feminist, Afro-Carribean etc groups. They weren’t isolated from each other and cooperated on some actions. It was very anarchistic.
Groups came and went, while others endured. It was usually just a case of a few women getting together and deciding to set up a group, with whatever focus they chose. They would meet wherever they could find a space: in people’s homes, in squats, in community halls, etc.
There were some newsletters and main women’s centres where groups could post notices about their meetings or planned actions. Some groups were affiliated with mixed left wing groups: e.g. there was a group run by some women who were in the socialist workers’ party – had their own publication: ‘Women’s Voice” – oh it looks like the Aussie version began in 1900.
UK version began in 1972 – 1982.
I was fairly eclectic – read that, Spare rib, and other stuff like Flame, as well as Time Out, which was a general London leftie listings mag.
I had male and female friends in various general left wing groups. Some of the women in leftie groups were also involved in women’s groups.
The results? Basically, in the UK, Thatcher set out to destroy the urban base for left wing networks, including feminist ones. It made it harder to sustain groups and networks: disbanding the Greater London Council, making it harder for the hubs (key community centres etc) to be maintained – pressuring people to spend more of their time working etc.
And Thatcher maneuvered to get sympathisers in key MSM editorial positions – so the neoliberal propaganda gained momentum.
What happened since the 80s was not cause by feminism or various ethnic groups. Such groups were very successful, which is why the neoliberals moved to kneecap them.
Those left wing networks were grassroots, community-based. The neoliberal revolution was one from above. IMO, the lesson is, and left wing campaign needs to be both grassroots initiated, but to have a strategy for combating the power of the wealthy elites.
“What happened since the 80s was not cause by feminism or various ethnic groups. Such groups were very successful, which is why the neoliberals moved to kneecap them.”
yes, and it’s incorrect for Tat to say that the ruling powers allow identity politics because they’re not threat. The backlashes against feminism are well documented, and ask Maori if they think they’ve been allowed to advance their causes with no resistance from the top. Identity politics are allowed to advance to the extent that that serves the heirarchical powers. Once they press beyond that all sorts of shit happens.
My context was within political parties. Parties can push identity politics far easier than anything along the lines of controlling corporates or corporate super taxes, as two specific examples. In that way parties of the Economic Left ended up primarily as Socially Liberal parties with Centre Right Economics.
Not quite – the litmus test is – are you threatening capitalist control and profits.
If you are a feminist labour group demanding equal pay as men or longer parental leave then of course you are a threat to capitalist profits and must therefore be stymied.
If you are an Iwi demanding the return of a hundred thousand hectares of prime farm land than again you are a threat to capitalist profits and must therefore be stymied.
Which will continue to happen as long as non-economic issues aren’t addressed.
It’s not one or the other – just because labour dropped the economic ball doesn’t mean every other issue need wait. The alternative is that those bearing the brunt should shut up and continue to do so, just because those two rungs from the bottom of the ladder don’t want to share their rung.
Of course its not one or the other. You can lose all fronts simultaneously.
or you can win on all fronts simultaneously, rather than making those worst-off wait gthe longest for relief.
Sure maybe the political left wing can win on identity politics and economics at the same time. But where’s the formula for doing so? Do you have it? Please share.
Simple.
Work on the economic paradigm in the same way non-economic issues.
After all, in the last 30 yrs same-sex relationships have gone from illegal to legally-married, ToW settlements have been signed where before land occupations had just gotten started, and we’ve had two female prim ministers from when female mps were counted on one hand.
Meanwhile, we’ve gone 150yrs backwards in economic policies and support.
Maybe you should stop whining and start learning.
Just keep pushing identity politics mate, you clearly think there is much more to do on that front despite your upbeat analysis, so good for you.
What’s the formula for winning on economics alone?
You and I weka know what need to be done in the next 10-20 years for our biosphere to have any shot at remaining in a reasonable state. It requires nothing less than a complete rethinking and re-implementation of the economy as we know it.
For billions of people around the world regardless of gender, sexuality, race, etc. the outcome of this will likely become a fundamental, existential issue of survival.
In this particular context the niceties around the proper setting of academic debate topics is not something which even registers on my scale.
So we know the problems, but after all your puffery you have no idea how to get people to implement the solutions.
You’re a navigator without a map.
McFlock, good luck with the clever pot shots, the clock is ticking.
Well I disagree with that Tat. I think the same powers that enforce the current economic paradigm, also enforce sexism, racism etc. It’s that power that needs to be undone if we are to have any hope in teh future. You believe that focussing on the economy will solve the problems, I don’t because the problems are attitudinal as much as they are structural. You can break the capitalist paradigm and if you don’t also make change at the social level you will just get another version of power over.
You said earlier that most people will prioritise the economy. But I think this is about how you ask the question. If you ask people what is more important, the economy or [insert relevant other identity politics], then people are forced to choose. But if you ask them: would you prefer NZ to be run taking into account the economy and social issues, or do you think that we should focus on the economy alone, I think you will get a different answer. Pretty much everyone I know values more than the economy, and most women I know certainly won’t take kindly to being told their issues are a sideline to the Important Issue of the economy. That’s because they can see it’s possible to do both. Likewise, most Maori I have talked politics with don’t see the issues in such a reductionist way.
The main issue I have with your approach is that you create a completely unnecessary duality (economy vs identity politics), and that duality simply reinforces the power over paradigm that is the problem in the first place. I’m curious what you think about Bill’s comments, because he gets the importance of what you are saying I think (that the working class has been hugely betrayed in the past 30 yrs, and the economic/political structures that have enabled that), but he also can see that it’s not necessary to marginalise other classes of people in order to redress that.
Feminism, Maori politics, disability politics etc are all capable of being inclusive of the issues that you bring to the table. Why can you not do the same?
I’m also unclear why you need to blame ‘us’ instead of ‘them.
Simply put, I don’t view power in society in the same way as you do weka.
I think trans-national corporate and capitalist power is dominant and oppressive. It determines how we relate to each other, what we hear and see (and what we don’t), and of course, our perspective of the economy, environment and natural resources.
I have significant interest in rolling back corporate and banking power in terms of how it defines our country and our society. As a close second I am keen on steps to democratise both income distribution and the management of the economy as a whole across all people. But dealing with patriarchy per se, regardless of what that term means to different people, I don’t get amped about, at all.
Of course, the above economic objectives all beautifully serve to undermine patriarchy but as I said, I don’t particularly care about that. It is an incidental nice to have for other people who do, perhaps.
Why is this? Because as mean spirited and cruel partriarchy can be, it doesn’t hold a candle to the global and community catastrophe being caused by current systems of corporate and banking power. As Chris Hedges says – they literally are systems of death, our civilisation’s embodiment of Thanatos.
I don’t want to convert or change the mind of the assailant, like you seem to want to do. I want to take the machine gun he is pointing at all of us, off him. Is he still going to be a prick and a arsehole afterwards? Probably. But he’ll be a prick and an arsehole without a machine gun, and that I can live with.
Agree. But most women also dislike being told what their issues are. Even if the people doing the telling are other women.
You bring up “social issues” and correctly remark that people often consider that at least as important as the economy. They remain important in NZers voting considerations. Health, education, social welfare, law and order are usually top of the things that voters think about, for instance. But that’s not what you are talking about is it.
how are you going to “remove the capitalists’ machine guns” without changing anyone’s mind?
You can’t do it by yourself, and if nobody’s mind needed to be changed to help you, it would have already been done.
“how are you going to “remove the capitalists’ machine guns” without changing anyone’s mind?”
Mind’s change because circumstances change. They are not isolated, monadic devices calculating the world in some fume-like, immaterial dimension. They are in and of the world.
In politics, if you want to change attitudes change circumstances. That’s what Roger Douglas did back in the 80s and, lo and behold, attitudes have changed – ‘we’re all neoliberal now’.
It’s also why people change their attitudes when they change their jobs – suddenly being a manager is not such a terrible thing when you become a manager, rather than being dominated by a manager.
Mind’s are just our means of navigating circumstances. Change circumstances; change minds.
And, yes, minds (of others) are circumstances for a mind – what we say to each other and indicate through our behaviour can alter how someone else reacts. But that’s still not because we have ‘changed their mind’ or ‘changed their attitude’ – it’s because we have changed the circumstances within which their minds have to navigate.
And how do you change the circumstances in a democracy?
You change the minds of the leadership, either by bureaucratic capture like lab4, or by popular action (maybe by changing the leadership).
Hoodoo ; may I be of assistance?
@McFlock. What do permanent positions of leadership have to do with democracy? And what does our fundamentally undemocratic mode of governance have to do with democracy?
Maybe it’s a smattering of democracy that could be the necessary change in circumstances that would facilitate or even go hand in hand with a change in attitude/behaviour…a self reinforcing cycle of circumstance and attitude?
Bill, would you be able to re-phrase your comment to clarify please. 🙂
Not sure what you mean by “permanent positions of leadership” in nz, bill.
“And how do you change the circumstances in a democracy?”
By makIng it difficult for a politician to act otherwise or making it in their interests to do what you want. You change the circumstances within which they act. Forget about their minds – they will either follow or be irrelevant.
Bill’s right. How would someone act exploitative in circumstances that provide them with no power? Conversely, why would someone with power change their mind and not only give it away but also dismantle the structure that gave them power?
I think we’re beginning to talk past each other, and are at the reply limit anyhoo.
Definitely an interesting conversation.
I’m working on some thoughts along these latest lines for an OM in the next few days (time permitting).
Agree, weka.
The focus on the “economy” divorced from the rest of society, is a narrowed version of “economy” – it is pretty patriarchal. Many Marxists, like Raymond Williams began to move towards an equal role for “culture” and other socially constructed institutions and discourses in the 1970s. The neocons, reclaimed the economy as having primary status in the 1980s and beyond.
One of the problems I had with much Marxist theory is the way it gives primacy to the production base upon which the (“secondary”) social/cultural/political et al superstructure is considered to be built. Forces of production often gets narrowed into “economic” terms.
And this is also a pretty patriarchal thing to do, whereby the focus is pretty “instrumental” (task oriented and focused on technical details) – a characteristic often associated with traditional masculinity. This is in contrast with more traditionally “feminine” expressive (nurturing, socially focused) qualities. Doesn’t so much match the reality (which is far messier), as form part of cultural attitudes about gender differences, and the hierarchical status applied to them – thereby influencing behaviour/discourse in some ways.
I think the “forces of production” and superstructure interact and play off each other. The forces of production and activities of the capitalist elites are saturated with cultural discourses, and integrated with diverse social institutions. These social and cultural institutions/activities and human relationships both justifies and sustains the “forces of production. These include all kinds of ways to divide people according to socially constructed status and power.
It is very gendered and also the elites maintain their power by demonising various groups of people with little power. All these things are interconnected.
So, given that the same dynamic, or set of dynamics, promotes and entrenches various oppressions, is there any point to fighting an economic issue without taking into account the ramifications or implications on gender, race issues? I think not. If it’s essentially the same dynamic then it will ‘bleed’ from the areas that have been sidelined and reinfect the area that was the focus of attention.
Further to that and crucial, to my way of thinking, there is no point in fighting for economic justice – or anything really – if the means employ methods or structures that embodying elements of oppression.
My question is, is there any mode of organisation, short of ones embracing substantial democracy, that wont lead to forms of sexism, economic exploitation, racism etc becoming reasserted in some form or other?
If there are, I’m all ears. If there aren’t, then why do ‘we’ insist on using fundamentally flawed and ultimately self defeating organisational structures when we are seeking meaningful change?
Nice analysis, but I would say – so what? Draw all the interconnections you want – so what? Write a paper on it? Have a debate? Maybe its just the way my “masculine” brain works, but what are the next steps?
I think the elite 0.1% will have much less sway over all of us and over NZ society if we roll back the power of the banks, financial system and trans-national corporates. And that to me is the must have. Why? Because Thanatos is embodied in the economic systems that they define. And that is an influence which both masculine and feminine energies contain very much of.
Most of the western world’s production has been outsourced. For economic reasons of the 0.1% I should add, not social reasons to do with our communities. So Marx was correct. Forces of production are overwhelmingly economically defined (although cultural and social factors also have bearing).
Regardless, Marxian analysis of the dynamics of capitalism remain spot on. The interests of capital and labour are often not the same.
The additional wrinkle – catastrophic climate change and resource depletion isn’t caused by patriarchy, it’s caused by transnational corporations and capital.
Partly it depends on what you define as an “economic issue.” Are our prisons an “economic issue” – well I would say yes they are and yes lets take into account gender and race issues.
But if you want to tackle the economics coal mine safety, deep sea drilling, the 40 hour week and Reserve Bank statistic targeting by including gender and race components within each of those fights. Fine, that’s one way ahead, but I probably wouldn’t choose that way.
Tat, I still have a lot of time for Marx. however, he is weak on issues of gender, and traditional Marxism tends to be based on men’s position in the workforce.
The system has been reconfigured in many ways since the 70s, but economics and social dynamics of “race” gender etc are still interwoven. There are a disproportionate amounts of Maori and Pacific people amongst those in poverty. And Maori and Pacific women have been particularly oppressed by Bennett’s reforms. Women make up a significant proportion of the precariat, with insecure, part time and casual work.
Bill, I agree that we need a totally different system. The problem is how to dismantle the system we have and replace it with a more democratic one, when the elites will find ever slicker ways of protecting their systems of privilege?
Tat: I think the elite 0.1% will have much less sway over all of us and over NZ society if we roll back the power of the banks, financial system and trans-national corporates. And that to me is the must have. etc.
Those institutions are already highly gendered. They can’t be tackled without the highly masculine culture being taken on. There’s much academic stuff been written about the highly masculine culture of finance traders. Some even have monitored testosterone levels, while other s have merely focused on the masculine behaviour: the aggression, competitiveness – the sexual harassment etc.
Some traders are boosting their testosterone levels in order to be more successful in terms of that system.
I believe that they can be tackled without directly or explicitly addressing issues of gender and patriarchy – I believe this, because it has been done before. Just look at how a White House and Congress stacked with white men passed the New Deal and the Glass Steagall Act defanged banks and corporate capital. (For a while, and not without resistance of course).
Tat – the ‘so what’ is that if you get rid of economic exploitation but do so in a way that leaves gender and race oppressions untouched, then the dynamics and structural biases present in those areas will ‘colonise’ the economic sphere you ‘won’ and it will become a sphere of oppression again.
Karol – I can never get my head around the idea that we dismantle and replace. Why the two (or three?) step process? The replacing is implicit to the dismantling (or process of disempowering and delegitimising)…which is why I constantly bang on about there being no point in using organisational structures that mimic those undemocratic and elitist structures that are prevalent today (eg, heirarchical or top/down and so on). If we do, no meaningful change will ever occur.
some Radical democracy…
“Laclau and Mouffe claim that liberal democracy and deliberative democracy, in their attempts to build consensus, oppress differing opinions, races, classes, genders and worldviews. radical democracy is not only accepting of difference, dissent and antagonisms, but is dependent upon it… Oppressive relations should be made visible, re-negotiated and altered.”
“No pedagogy which is truly liberating can remain distant from the oppressed by treating them as unfortunates, by presenting for their emulation models from among the oppressors. The oppressed must be their own example in the struggle for their redemption.”
–Paulo Friere ; 1970.
Again? I’m not sure there is that much time left to do a cyclical revisit. The available angles to avoid the worst effects of fossil fuels decline and financial neo-feudalism were small enough to start with in the 1990’s and 2000’s. These days…all bets are off.
Thanks, bill, interesting points.
Bill @ 3.10 pm. I don’t think it matters if the replacement, dismantling, disempowerment, etc happen simultaneously or in various steps, or with top down and/or bottom down. The people with the power will resist with every wily strategy they can think of. That’s the problem I was mainly referring to. And trying to build a different, grass roots, democratic system/society, will never succeed without some strategy for ending the current power structure.
Strategy – yes. Always.
But if you want to simply dismantle you are effectively creating a vacuum. And that is probably easiest filled by powerful and probably institutional actors. Maybe think of Eastern Europe post Soviet collapse and who was best able to exploit the fact that the apparatus of the USSR had been dismantled/abandoned.
But if parallel democratic institutions had been developed as part and parcel of any challenge to the legitimacy of those who presided over the USSR, then ‘the west’ couldn’t have simply sauntered into an empty space….it would have been occupied.
Meanwhile, if it had been occupied by systems that merely had the form of democracy without the substance – top down or whatever and recreating institutional hierarchies (and assuming ‘western’ actors failed to get traction) – then a simple transfer of powers from one elite to another would have been all that occurred.
So complete and necessarily democratic action as opposed to incomplete undemocratic action is required (ie, not first *this* and then *that* at some later juncture – but *this* and *that* simultaneously…hand in glove if you like, where both are linked/dependent and one ascends at the direct expense of or in direct relation to the diminishing of the other).
Otherwise we go round and around as we have done these past however many hundreds of years with their attendant (so called) revolutions.
it’s the wastage and exploitation of the capitalist ideology that finds me calling out the goats.
“My belief in socialism has always been predicated on the arbitrary and undeserved inequalities of power under capitalism.”
That’s well put.
But I think the word ‘arbitrary’ is not the right one. I don’t think that there’s anything arbitrary about, for example, the disempowering of women in societies (capitalist and pre-capitalist) that privilege production (and, today, growth) over reproduction and, therefore, have the side-effect of privileging men over women (and, incidentally, marginalising the needs of children and sending them to school for the bulk of their young lives).
Similarly, there’s nothing arbitrary about societies that are based on exploitation of resources (including other humans) actively oppressing, abusing and dehumanising indigenous people (or people of other religions) found sitting on exploitable resources (or being able – as slaves – to be exploited as resources).
Similarly, there’s nothing arbitrary about an economic system that, for its own replication, valorises competitive, alpha-male masculine values also marginalising and oppressing homosexuals and lesbians.
I guess all I’d add (or emphasise) is that a good part – at least in my eyes – of why these particular inequalities have existed and still exist in our society is because the overall economic system is intent on sorting people into the few capitalists and the many workers. An historically obvious – but messy – route to entrenching that sorting process involves using potential prejudices as first approximations (i.e., attempts) to layer a society into these two fundamental classes.
The only other explanation of these particular inequalities that I’ve heard is that sexism, racism and ‘homophobia’ (there isn’t a word simply for discrimination against gay people – is there?) is in human nature. I don’t think that’s the case – although, self-evidently, the potential is always there and able to emerge, given a facilitating economic system.
Interestingly, any progress on these forms of inequality should, over time, bring into starker relief the inequality of class upon which our economic system is based.
Yeah I couldn’t think of a better word than arbitary.
I sort of think that many inequalities are accidents of history rather than just the product of struggles for resources unfairly giving advantage to the strongest.
Like is there any real reason that europeans took slaves from africa to the americas, rather than africans enslaving europeans? Maybe if africa had had a rennaissance before europe, we’d still have the same issues but with different players. Africa had empires and cities before europeans went wandering about. Why didn’t rome have an industrial revolution? They had all the ingredients that england had in 1600.
So I was sort of stabbing for a way to describe how many of our inequalities aren’t just unfair, but the initial conditions that enabled them were just rolls of the dice.
Good questions.
Jared Diamond in his book ‘Guns, Germs and Steel’ took a kind of nuanced environmental determinism argument to explain why the Spanish ended up conquering South America rather than the reverse. Which is a bit like your question about Africans and slavery.
I agree that accidents of history are part of it – but it’s the accidents that favour one group over another in ‘struggles for resources’ (in the broadest sense of the term ‘resource’ – something that can be used, at a historical moment, for a significantly advantageous purpose). Luck plays its part in who gets the resources (and who needs them – some groups don’t need what others need) but the outcome that flows down through history is who ends up in control over them.
It’s not everything of course, but it’s pretty important.
Yeah, but I wanted to really emphasise that there’s no reason one group is powerful over another – just that the start condition of the current situation lucked out that way. Often just an idea that occurred to one kook who changed history.
Eg colombus found it hard to fund his expedition because navigators who thought the world was round knew that there wasn’t a shitshow of being able to sale to china. They knew the distance involved. Columbus was just lucky america was there. And spain was lucky that they had the readies to throw three tubs away on a punt – and possibly that isabella had a heart flutter.
put down that drink my fwend. 😀
Yes, history is a tape that only gets played once and it’s just ‘one damn thing after another’.
But arbitrariness in that context only makes sense when compared with a world of counterfactuals, a world populated not by actual events but by logical possibilities. In that sense it is true that our world is ‘arbitrary’, but it’s also true that everything we actually care about begins in a world of circumstances that pre-date it and, therefore constrain it – more and more, as time goes by, ‘luck’ starts to fall in line with one group rather than another.
So, yes, women could have come to dominate men in the way that today’s patriarchal society dominates women but the dice were loaded against that a long time ago – when capitalism, and its precursors, came along it was already odds-on that we’d end up with something like what we got in terms of patterns of power inequalities.
The quirky one-off events that could change everything in a moment became less and less likely. Concerted and prolonged resistance and struggle then becomes the sensible option and has, in fact, proved to be the way most progress has been made – conversely, waiting to win history’s lotto game of ‘luck’ hasn’t so far been a winning strategy for overcoming power inequalities (as many of your original examples of (lack of) progress illustrate).
Today’s world isn’t destiny, and we can definitely change it (and should) but the particular forms of power inequalities that exist now have been a lot more than just arbitrary ‘bad luck’ (e.g., for women) in the roll of history’s dice for quite some time. It’s not arbitrary any more – it’s ’caused’ by the way things are arranged and therefore makes sense in the light of how things are arranged. And that was the point I was trying to make.
History – on whatever timescale – has a habit of ratcheting up very small advantages (perhaps initially created by ‘luck’) into massive, structurally embedded advantages over time, advantages that reliably replicate themselves from generation to generation.
Having said all of that, I think we agree on the important points. When I made my comment ‘criticising’ use of the word ‘arbitrary’ I wasn’t so much trying to disagree with you as use it as a springboard to highlight why our world can still be resistant to making progress on those ‘arbitrary’ inequalities.
Off to bed for me – interesting to chat about these things. Thanks.
FYI
29 November 2013
Lyn Provost
NZ Auditor-General
‘Open Letter’
Progress update on my request for the NZ OAG to conduct an inquiry into the lack of ‘due diligence’ by OFCANZ regarding the increased risk of money-laundering at Sky City casino?
Dear Lyn,
The 2013 Australian Public Sector Anti-Corruption Conference is now over, during which I met a number of persons deeply involved in fighting corruption, including the following Auditors-General:
Mr John Doyle
Victorian Auditor-General
Mr Colin Murphy
Auditor-General for Western Australia
Mr Mike Blake
Auditor-General of Tasmania
I also had the privilege of meeting, (amongst others) the Hon James Wood AO QC, Chairperson of the NSW Law Reform Commission:
Rose Gill Hearn, Commissioner, Dept of Investigation (DOI), New York,
and Assoc Prof Ken Coghill PhD, Dept of Management, Monash University.
Having taken over a ‘hard copy’ of the following OFCANZ OIA reply, and shown it to a number of APSAC Conference attendees, I think it would be fair to say that the reaction was one of bemusement (to say the least?)
OFCANZ OIA REPLY (DATED 13 AUGUST 2013) PROVING THAT OFCANZ HAS FAILED TO CARRY OUT ‘DUE DILIGENCE’ REGARDING THE INCREASED RISK OF MONEY-LAUNDERING ARISING FROM THE NZ INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION CENTRE BILL:
http://www.pennybright4mayor.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/SKY-CITY-OFCANZ-OIA-REPLY-NO-DUE-DLIGENCE-RE-MONEY-LAUNDERING-bright-penny-06-c211711-2-sent-reply.pdf
Are you able to give a time frame to confirm whether or not, as the NZ Auditor-General, you will be conducting an investigation into the lack of ‘due diligence’ by OFCANZ regarding the increased risk of money-laundering arising from the NZ International Convention Centre Act 2013?
FYI – currently, I am still in Sydney, and will return to New Zealand on Sunday 1 December 2013.
Whilst I am here, it is my intention to make further contact with members of the Australian media – particularly those who have focused on exposing corruption.
Kind regards,
Penny Bright
‘Anti-corruption / anti-privatisation Public Watchdog’
2013 Auckland Mayoral candidate (polled 4th with 11,723 votes)
http://www.pennybright4mayor.org.nz
2009 Australian Public Sector Anti-Corruption Conference Attendee
2010 Transparency International Anti-Corruption Conference Attendee
2013 Australian Public Sector Anti-Corruption Conference Attendee
I’ve heard a rumour that the National Party volunteer caught tearing down Poto William signs wasn’t a Young Nat volunteer at all – it was the Nat’s Auckland organiser – so a staff member…
That would be interesting…
Mcflock
well said
8 forestry workers dead this year.
3 children drown in swimming pools each year.
who got special legislation
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/9458522/Forestry-worker-killed-in-accident
The second forestry death this week.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/9458522/Forestry-worker-killed-in-accident
The second forestry death this week.
Sadly make that 9 forestry workers dead this year. 🙁
The forestry workers got special legislation. Twenty years ago, the National government deliberately attacked their rights to belong to a union, which had been their best protection against employers.
And so this happens…
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11164727
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/rotorua-daily-post/news/article.cfm?c_id=1503438&objectid=11163442
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11163233
The real criminals are the politicians who changed the laws that put forestry workers,mine workers etc etc at risk so their friends in Wall Street could make even more money.
Roger Douglas and the whole neo-liberal csbal should be tried for treason.
And/or murder.
IIRC, they were told at the time that shit like would happen and now it has.
I love this line fromTony Abbott on the revelations from Snowden that Oz listened to the Indonesian leaderships private phone calls.
“Asked about the spying revelations in a separate interview, Abbott said: “To use the term spying, it’s kind of loaded language … researching maybe. Talking to people. Understanding what’s going on.”
Researching. Brilliant. Then later he falls back on the standard no comment refrain we’ve heard from John Key ad nauseam:
“On Monday a spokesman for Abbott said: “Consistent with the long-standing practice of Australian governments, and in the interest of national security, we do not comment on intelligence matters.””
Now Indonesia has changed it’s Australian foreign policy stance from ‘cooperation’ to ‘stick it up your ass’:
“National police chief Sutarman told the Indonesian parliament’s Commission I on foreign affairs that there was now no cooperation between his forces and Australia on counter-terrorism, information sharing and international crime.
Defence minister Purnomo Yusgiantoro told parliament that three joint exercises with Australian troops had been cancelled…”
Ah yes, wholesale spying on friends and enemies alike, making the world a safer place. Well done five eyes.
yes crazy ass Tony and his gov’t haven’t taken long to show true colours. From crikey:
‘an ideologically and politically confused government. A free-market government dumping market mechanism for climate action in favour of handouts and considering reacquiring old governments assets. A government that talks of being “open for business” that slams the door on foreign investors. A government that complains of the fiscal indiscipline of its predecessors and then demands a whopping increase in the debt ceiling so it can continue to borrow. …Australia is open for business — if you’ve got a dodgy deal to offer the new crowd in Canberra’
then there’s the gonski education funding 180 turn, australia you’re standing in it.
oh yes and they’re proposing to buy back/lease the ageing telstra copper network which costs $1b p.a. to keep from collapsing and other former public assets.
Private can’t squeeze anymore cash out of it so taxpayer gets to buy it back, sound familiar
Large military those Indonesians!
SFO developments:
(Email received this morning 29 November 2013)
Dear Penny
We will evaluate your complaint and respond to you within 30 working days.
Regards
Graham
Graham Gill | General Manager – Evaluation & Intelligence | Serious Fraud Office
___________________________________________________________________________
29 November 2013
Graham Gill
General Manager,
Evaluation & Intelligence,
Serious Fraud Office
New Zealand.
Dear Graham,
Sorry to be a nuisance, but with the upcoming Xmas and holiday break, I am unclear as to when the ’30 working days’ time period you have given for your response for a decision on your evaluation of the request from Lisa Prager and myself for the NZ Serious Fraud Office to conduct an urgent inquiry into alleged bribery and corruption, involving Auckland Mayor Len Brown and Sky City Auckland, will be up?
Thanks for your help.
Kind regards,
Penny Bright
This is the third or forth post from you here today Penny, You seem to be running some kind of mayoral campaign on open mike and I can only speak for myself but I find it bloody annoying reading your latest letters to the editor every five minutes.
It could be worse. At least she hasn’t started begging, sorry, asking for donations, again.
If the info in this article about GMOs and the TPP are right then we should be very worried.
http://www.maxkeiser.com/2013/11/monsanto-the-tpp-and-global-food-dominance/#more-69910
I am hoping that people with a far greater understanding than me could read the article and comment.
Maybe the President should have pardoned THIS turkey for Thanksgiving;
Film-goers unconvinced by official hatchet-job on dissenter
A decade ago, Dr. Brian Edwards tried his hand at being the attack-dog of the Labour government. There was only one problem with that plan: Edwards was laughably incompetent. It’s worth spending some time reading the following transcript and watching him come unstuck against the far superior Lynley Hood….
http://www.peterellis.org.nz/docs/2003/HoodComplaint/2003-0816_TV1_BrianEdwardsWithLynleyHood.htm
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/nz.general/lBS_cJY5bqs
In spite of the government-backed malignancy of Edwards’ doomed assignment, the Clark government’s attack on Lynley Hood was a light comedy sketch compared to the Obama regime’s orchestrated campaign to denigrate, defame and destroy Julian Assange.
I am pleased to announce that a key plank in the assault on this dissenter has been formally acknowledged to be a dismal failure. A multi-million-dollar Hollywood/Washington hatchet job called The Fifth Estate, funded by Disney and Dreamworks, and approved by the U.S. regime, has earned a miserable $6 million at the global box office on a budget of $28 million—not counting the massive amount spent on a fruitless advertising campaign for the turkey.
Benedict Cumberpatch’s attempt at an Aussie accent was quite good; looks like the general public is not prepared to indulge the vicious dishonesty of the whole movie, however…..
http://www.forbes.com/sites/dorothypomerantz/2013/11/25/2013s-biggest-turkeys-the-films-that-flopped/
If it wasn’t for those damned democrats in Ecuador, this is the kind of vengeance the U.S. regime would unleash on Assange….
http://ui.sina.com/2013/0808/U142P5029DT20130808095231_1_1.jpeg
One more forestry worker killed today, and the MBIE can only comment they are “looking into it.” 29 miners died at Pike River, 9 forestry workers have died this year, and what does this Government do ? If one ‘rich prick’ was killed, all hell would break loose, but hard working Kiwi’s – cannon fodder for this Government’s lax employment laws.
Simon Bridges was more upset about Geoff Robinson retiring, than he is about the deaths of those killed at worked, and I don’t say that disrespectfully about Geoff Robinson.
These people should face a people’s court.
One more forestry worker killed today, and the MBIE can only comment they are “looking into it.” 29 miners died at Pike River, 9 forestry workers have died this year, and what does this Government do ? If one ‘rich prick’ was killed, all hell would break loose, but hard working Kiwi’s – cannon fodder for this Government’s lax employment laws.
Simon Bridges was more upset about Geoff Robinson retiring, than he is about the deaths of those killed at worked, and I don’t say that disrespectfully about Geoff Robinson.
The joys of consumerism, knocking people over to get shit that you desperately need.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/28/walmart-fight-black-friday_n_4357939.html
Consumerism is viral.
ae, sigh
They should call it Black-Eye Friday.
From 2 years ago, a huge crowd of women flooding into a Victoria’s Secret on Black Friday until it is shoulder to shoulder immobile in the store.
For bonus points, Victoria’s Secret has a significant proportion of their lingerie made by prisoners (most of whom are black or latino) and paid next to nothing in the US correctional system.
This really is the “Hunger Games.”
Someone’s doing the score keeping.
http://blackfridaydeathcount.com/
Tu meke, The track I’ve had on my mind?… What A Fool Belives ? Nah, yeah 😀
Reminds me of some of the things that happen in Jennifer Government. Shootings, tramplings etc, etc and all because of the corporations and their need to sell, sell, sell..
Monbiot nails it.
“Christmas permits the global bullshit industry to recruit the values with which so many of us would like the festival to be invested – love, warmth, a community of spirit – to the sole end of selling things that no one needs or even wants.
Are we so bored, so affectless, that we need to receive this junk to ignite one last spark of hedonic satisfaction? Have people become so immune to fellow feeling that they are prepared to spend £46 on a jar for dog treats or £6.50 a bang on personalised crackers, rather than give the money to a better cause? Or is this the western world’s potlatch, spending ridiculous sums on conspicuously useless gifts to enhance our social status? If so, we must have forgotten that those who are impressed by money are not worth impressing.
To service this peculiar form of mental illness, we must wear down the knap of the Earth, ream the surface of the planet with great holes, fleetingly handle the products of that destruction then dump the materials into another hole. ”
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/nov/25/christmas-selling-things-nobody-wants
“Sour grapes” Hay had been deselected from the Green Party list for 2014.
Green Party Press Release:… or is it a David Hay Press Release?
Stirrer. Hay,
Lolz well if He wasn’t selected as a high list candidate on October the 22nd the current little tantrum will sure as hell make it a forgone conclusion,
My vote goes to Russell, His dogged sticking to the ‘task’ says that He has earned it…
Brilliant PR disaster on the cards for the Greens.
A failed Australian communist who did a u turn on printing money when he realised how silly that policy was vs a born and raised Kiwi. This is going to turn into a mud slinging match.
The greens are going to suffer over this and hopefully mean a bigger labour vote and more strength in the next election. Labour needs to be strong and ensure the Greens can’t control them.
Labour needs to keep out of it and let them implode.
Yeah, this is not Greens imploding.
It’s just one member publicly removing himself from any future leadership position within the green party.
It’s a bit embarassing, but you know, democracy and stuff.
In other news, rumour has it that Metiria will be challenged for her leadership by a giant robot dinosaur vagina.
Been looking at tweets:
😆
Yeah bleating to the media, bad form from anyone in any political party, if the party gets to vote my pick will be 10 to 1 in favor of Russell Norman who has lead the opposition for most of the past 5 years while Labour went missing in action…
just a test to see if my comment will work.
just a test to see if my comment will work.
all good, fire away swordfish.
Part 1:
I see regular Tory troll, Fisani, argues (Mickeysavage’s post on Chch East by-election yesterday) that private polling suggests Poto Williams will win with a majority of 3000, and therefore erstwhile Greens should continue to vote for the Green candidate.
Possibly, but I have my doubts (and polling would suggest percentages, not majorities – which are, of course, entirely dependent on turnout).
I remain quite concerned that Labour may just be a little blasé about the result, with Williams agreeing with a RNZ journo that the by-election may well be a referendum on Cunliffe’s leadership and Cunliffe agreeing that it may be a referendum on the Nat’s post-quake efforts in Chch. Meanwhile, the National party hierarchy and Farrar have assiduously stuck to a series of carefully crafted (and highly misleading) little soundbytes, designed to massively downplay National’s chances. And these have slowly but surely transformed into received wisdom for a number of senior journos (eg Armstrong and the editor of The Press). Result: if National win or Labour take it by a very close margin (either of which are highly possible, in my opinion), then the result will be portrayed as an utterly unprecedented electoral catastrophe for Labour.
Part 2
Here’s the text of a Letter-to-the-Editor that I sent to the Dom Post 2 weeks ago (They decided, in their infinite wisdom, not to bother publishing it). It pretty much encapsulates the wider analysis of the by-election that I’ve been working on.
TEXT: Over recent months, National has made strenuous efforts to shape media expectations of the up-coming Christchurch East by-election. Through a series of carefully crafted soundbytes, they’ve cast National as the ultimate underdog.
In reality, Christchurch East is an unusually vulnerable seat for Labour. Never before in New Zealand’s by-election history has the retiring MP’s majority been entirely dependent on voters whose primary political allegiance lies elsewhere.
Largely because of the post-quake exodus, National easily won the 2011 party-vote in Christchurch East, with popular Labour MP Lianne Dalziel’s candidate-vote (56%) massively out-performing Labour’s party-vote (32%).
Dalziel’s 5334 majority was thus an entirely personal one. Almost two-thirds of it coming from people who had party-voted for a National government (NZ First and Green voters comprising the rest). Consequently, National can win this by-election seat from Labour without needing any swing at all from those who voted for a Labour government in 2011. That is unprecedented. TEXT ENDS.
still have one comment (part 1) awaiting moderation. At the moment, there’s part 2 but no part 1, which makes me look like a bit of a dickhead, but, then again, what’s new ?
Appreciate you sharing your thoughts with us.
agree wholeheartedly swordfish. this seat is marginal at best makjng it an interesting bafometer of earghquake recovery sentiment.
Test comment
Seeing you, Tat.