Resignation-watch: Suit cash a confidence vote on Collins

Written By: - Date published: 8:16 am, April 2nd, 2012 - 61 comments
Categories: Judith Collins, law - Tags: , , , ,

Cabinet today will decide whether the Crown will pick up the tab for Judith Collins’ defamation suits against Trevor Mallard, Andrew Little, and Radio New Zealand. These suits haven’t a hope of winning. The suit against RNZ, whose offence was to do live interviews, is particularly egregious and calculated to chill media comment. But that’s straight out of Key’s playbook, eh?

I mean, this is the PM who had three media outlets raided by the police during an election campaign to intimidate them into not publishing the tea tapes, all on the grounds of a ludicrous police complaint that wouldn’t have been given the time of day by the cops had it come from an ordinary citizen. Key even had the gall to claim that the Police had ‘spare time’ to investigate while 220,000 crimes went unsolved last year.

Collins’ behaviour is entirely consistent with this modus operandi. Public money will be used and limited state resources – this time of the Courts – tied up for a purely political agenda.

It will be unprecedented for the public to pay for a minister to take defamation suits. But we will. If Cabinet were to vote against that decision, it would be a vote of no confidence in Collins, which would undercut Key who has been giving her his backing.

I don’t think Collins’ opponents are united enough to go there. But it’s interesting to see though the Brat Pack faction in the form of David Farrar moving to undermine Collins again by saying that it will be a political disaster if the public is made to pay for Collins’ politically-motivated law suits.

61 comments on “Resignation-watch: Suit cash a confidence vote on Collins”

  1. Jim Nald 1

    Taxpayers underwriting Judith Collins’ antics is such a bloody waste of taxpayers’ money when the government itself is making a virtue of madly cutting and slashing public services, and Cabinet should not stomach the kind of gagging nonsense that John Key is so fond of playing.

  2. The more I think of this issue the worse it gets.  

    If this is approved the Governement will be using state funded terrorism of opposition politicians by lawyers to bludgeon them into submission.  If it is funded it will have a chilling effect on the effectiveness of our opposition parties.

    And how paradoxical it will be if at the same time that legal aid for the poor is being cut legal aid for the rich and powerful is increased. 

    The cabinet vote will be interesting.  If Collins is turned down her days may be numbered. 

  3. james 111 3

    Yes and she should get the money to defend her name just as other Mps including Philip Taito Fields, and Winston Peters have got it before her.

    • James you could at least know what you were talking about before you make a statement.

      Tell me:

      1.  What financial assistance did Field get to conduct a defamation suit or otherwise?
      2.  What financial assistance did Peters get to conduct a defamation suit or otherwise?

      And if the answer to both questions is “none” do you promise to check on things before making any further statements? 

      • Colonial Viper 3.1.1

        James you could at least know what you were talking about before you make a statement.

        Wow, that’s way too challenging high expectations for Jimmie boy.

    • Jackal 3.2

      That’s funny, I wasn’t aware that they had even requested funding to take defamation cases against other Members of Parliament? Collins is digging a pretty large hole for herself if you ask me… let’s hope it sucks the rest of the corrupt Natz down as well.

  4. ghostwhowalksnz 4

    I remember once Ruth Richardson claimed she was defamed by a Christchurch newspaper, but wisely, she said it wasnt strategically a good idea to be embroiled in a legal dispute with the ‘hometown’ newspaper.

    A pointer to the reasons for Collins choosing opposition MPs and a state owned radio network ?
    The trouble with pursuing a political case like this to the bitter end, is the courts may extend the defence of fair comment even further when its another MP and its directly political comment.

  5. Will who pays for Mallard and Littles defence be a Labour vote of confidence or no confidence in them?

    Exactly the same reasoning you are trying to apply to Collins, where you seem to be trying to guarantee yourself a win. That will gurantee yourself a loss with your own.

    If Collins chooses to proceed with a defamation suit I think she should fund itn herself.

    And if Mallard and Little choose to not back down and defend it they should fund that themselves.

    Same rules apply.

    [ this comment displays a disturbing lack of knowledge from someone who ran for parliament last year. Mallard and Little aren’t part of the Executive so there is no option for their costs to be covered by the Crown. Eddie]

    [lprent: Nope. The disturbing lack of knowledge is yours. They can apply to get defence if whatever they are defending could be construed as defending something they did as part of their duties. It happens reasonably frequently.

    Anita below has the relevant link… ]

    • Jackal 5.1

      What are you talking about Pete George? Mallard and Little have said they will pay for their own defense… I suggest they also seek costs against Collins personally. Why should we pay for her defamation cases when the question of the leaked Boag email remains unanswered?

    • So Petey you agree the taxpayer should not fund Collins. 

      You then lurch into a diatribe about how Mallard’s and Little’s should not be funded.  There is no proposal that this should occur.

      You have no idea about how the Government’s finances work Petey do you. 

      • ghostwhowalksnz 5.2.1

        Its not supposed to happen but the disgraced Nick Smith was funded by the taxpayer for shooting his mouth off when he was a mere MP.
        I hope he wasnt also paid some costs when he was convicted of contempt of court, the circumstances of which led to his colleagues supporting him and attacking the Solicitor General , who acted on the complaint of a judge that he was interring with a witness during a hearing.

    • Pascal's bookie 5.3

      Hi again Pete.

      As noted above, it’s been reported that the Labour mps will be paying their own costs. It was reported in the same story where the 5pm deadline passed with the mps ignoring it.

      Earlier on that day, you claimed that the reaction to the deadline would possibly tell us something about how honest the Labour MPs were being. Whether or not they were just maliciously lying or what have you.

      Would you care to follow up on that comment of yours?*

      Does the way things have panned out tell us anything?

      Or was that a one way bet you were making?

      *laughs, of course you don’t. It was yet another hit and run passive aggressive smear that didn’t work out, and you won’t take back.**

      **prove me wrong and take it back, in detail***

      ***And I’ll ask why you needed to be prodded; doesn’t exactly make you look honest.

    • Anita 5.4

      Eddie writes:


      [ this comment displays a disturbing lack of knowledge from someone who ran for parliament last year. Mallard and Little aren’t part of the Executive so there is no option for their costs to be covered by the Crown. Eddie]

      Actually MPs can have their legal costs covered by the crown. This explains the rules quite neatly.

      It is worth noting that as the payment would come out of the party leader’s fund it wouldn’t actually increase the cost to taxpayers as the party would have to spend less on other things.

      • mickysavage 5.4.1

        Hi Anita

        I can assure you the Labour leader’s budget would not be spent on such frivolities.  I am not sure I know how Smith did it … 

  6. DavidW 6

    Hold the horses a minute. Has Collins actually requested funding from Cabinet? If so Eddie can you please point us towards a reference that confirms she has?
    If she hasn’t asked, Cabinet will not decide today.

    I know the latest poll must have screwed with your mind eddie but sheesh, you could attempt to use fact as a basis for your rambling.

    • KATY 6.1

      If She hasn’t why are cabinet considering giving it to her ?.

      • DavidW 6.1.1

        Don’t believe everything the Herald published about political matters Katy – it is far from an authoritative source on what passes for news these days.

    • Craig Glen Eden 6.2

      Key said Cabinet would discuss the funding of Collins defamation case today, when he was on Q and A on Sunday morning. Sheesh DavidW could you at least have some idea about what you are posting about. You Nat supporters and PeterG are really starting to look so bloody stupid!

    • deuto 6.3

      Perhaps you should keep up with the play before airing off .

      Or perhaps you should air off at the Herald for example – http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=10796093

      I seem to recall that this was also discussed in Key’s interview of Q & A yesterday.

      There are a number of discussions on other blogs about this – for example, Farrar on Kiwiblog. Farrar is less than enthusiastic at taxpayer funding of Collins’ defamation action.

  7. ianmac 7

    Of course there will be a very long delay between a Defamation charge being laid and the actual hearing in court. Maybe years? Next minit or decade or so, who will know or care? By then Trevor will be tending his roses and reminiscing about cycling he has done as he hobbles down to see if the paper has come..

  8. tsmithfield 8

    My view is that the public shouldn’t be funding these sorts of cases unless it is an obviously outrageous sort of defamation. However, if it is just what the public would view as political point scoring, then politicians should fund it themselves if they feel strongly enough about it.

    For this reason, I hope the government doesn’t fund Collin’s for her defamation case. It might well be other National politicians think along the same lines. So, refusal to fund might not be an indication that Collins lacks credibility on the issue.

    • OK TS what about funding the action against Radio New Zealand?
       
      Putting Mallard to one side, the use of our tax dollars so one part of state can sue another part makes no sense whatsoever except to the Legal Profession, doncha think?

      • tsmithfield 8.1.1

        I agree. In saying that, I am not suggesting that Collins’s case is without merit. To me, it just doesn’t seem to cross the threshold for public funding. If it had been suggested she has sex with 13 year old boys or something, then that would be different. But when it is something as banal as claims about leaking a letter, which most in the public probably think is common place for politicians anyway, then I don’t see the justification in funding this publicly.

        Public funding is probably inevitable for Radio NZ, if they intend to defend the claim. OTOH, I wouldn’t want to see anyone stripped of their rights to take legal action if they felt strongly about it. So, they will have to seek costs back from Collins if she loses.

        • Pascal's bookie 8.1.1.1

          If it had been suggested she has sex with 13 year old boys or something, then that would be different.

          Why? That would seem to be an entirely private matter.

          • tsmithfield 8.1.1.1.1

            In her beehive office then?

            I am sure you get the drift of what I mean. And I think we would all benefit by not going any further down this line of thought. 🙂

        • lprent 8.1.1.2

          If it had been suggested she has sex with 13 year old boys or something, then that would be different.

          Why? That is still a personal matter of protecting her reputation. If she wants to protect her reputation then she should pay for it.

          So, they will have to seek costs back from Collins if she loses.

          NZ courts will usually award less than 50% of the costs to whoever wins. That is kind of a bogus argument.

          The only reason that I would consider that the public purse should be used to fund MP’s in defamation suits is for MP’s to defend against a plaintiff. Being a MP or a minister means that you are a target for nuisance suits as part of your job. There is a clear need for the employer to defend MP’s ability to say what they think where it isn’t actual defamation without being stymied by the risk of being sued in nuisance suits. The success rate of such state assisted defences over the years shows the value of them.

          That a minister with a thin skin can call on state resources to sue someone else for defamation is somewhat ridiculous. It is also outright dangerous because it would be a great way to launch unfounded nuisance suits like this one to stifle criticism – which is what this daft action appears to be. She cannot win unless she manages to completely turn L v A on it’s head.

          • tsmithfield 8.1.1.2.1

            “The only reason that I would consider that the public purse should be used to fund MP’s in defamation suits is for MP’s to defend against a plaintiff.”

            I expect that the PM may also share that view. If that is the case, then it would be inaccurate to assume other motives for not backing the case.

  9. deuto 9

    So, refusal to fund might not be an indication that Collins lacks credibility on the issue.

    Perhaps not, but I wait with interest to her (probably bollistic) response if that happens!

  10. ghostwhowalksnz 10

    Normally the taxpayer pays legal costs for ministers , who “inadvertently” defame a private individual or company during the course of their public duties.
    To pursue a vendetta, against another MP ? Ridiculous

  11. On the herald site there is an article about acc it states ‘VIP’S get preferential treatment’
    by John Gibb of the otago daily times.
    Just what is going on in acc,it was set up for the people and yet it is not acting
    in accordance with those rules.
    ACC has continually turned away genuine cases.
    Key and Collins must step down, there is questionable antics going on in
    acc,there is more than meets the eye and the whole system should be
    investigated,of course key and collins wont want a full scale enquiry
    they have plenty to hide,their jobs are at stake.
    Collins threw her toys out of the cot and
    needed to create a diversion,the cabinet meeting will be more of how to manage
    the fallout,free speach is not national’s
    idea of the public’s rights in nz.

    • just saying 11.1

      The VIP unit was going under Labour, and so was much of the routine shafting of ordinary people. It effectively means that most of those whose opinions would be reported in the media, or who have the ear of the political class, are treated differently, allowing ACC to treat ordinary people like crap with impunity. There is a similar situation whereby “important” people are more likely to access private health services, and this allows the disgraceful conditions in many of our public hospitals to go unchecked. It seems that disproportionate resources go into emergency, cardiac, and ICU wards, which are more like to be frequented by one percenters (whose lives are the only ones that actually matter).

    • Draco T Bastard 11.2

      ACC ‘VIP claims’ policy under fire

      Dr Denise Powell, president of Acclaim Otago, a support group for ACC claimants, said that if VIPs had an accident, they received “preferential treatment within ACC”.

      The corporation’s delegation manual stated that these claims were to be handled differently, she said.

      “If the service provided by ACC is world leading, why would the manager of the ACC service centre have to handle the VIP claim, rather than the service centre staff?” she asked.

  12. 80% of nz’ers say that tax payers should not fund collins defamation costs,herald poll.

  13. PunditX 13

    Err no Starlight. 80% of people who respond to Herald polls say that tax payers should not fund collins defamation costs,herald poll. Not quite the same thing..

  14. captain hook 14

    ACC has melted down into a sorry venal mess of typical money grubbing kiwis looking for the main chance.
    It needs proper supervsion and a total rework of their culture, attitude and efficiency.
    it stinks like a dead mackerel in the moonlight.

    • Craig Glen Eden 14.1

      Acc actually works well at least it did till National got in. While people will always have there issues with any system on the whole it works way better than private insurance.I deal with Acc on a daily basis and while they are more annal under National I still prefer to deal with them than the private insurance companies.

  15. Pascal's bookie 15

    So Collins is paying for it herself.

    Good; also and too; haha.

    Just this morning she was reported talking about how the way to avoid the cost to the taxpayer was for Mallard et al to apologise.

    Looks like Cabinet declined to proceed with funding this folly, despite the fact that the original press release announcing the suit was from the NZ Government and headed by the Minister of ACC, and referring to the Minister throughout.

    I suspect preliminary legal advice was short. It’s a shame it’s not OIAable

  16. DavidW 16

    I suppose it would be a pointless exercise to obtain retractions (apologies would be even nicer) from those who maintained that Cabinet would be considering funding Collins defamation case today and an acknowledgement that there was much hot air for nought now that Collins has announced that the proceedings would continue and that she HAS NOT ASKED CABINET for government funding. This from ZB news at 1600hrs 2 April 2012. Eddie, are you listening?

    • Pascal's bookie 16.1

      Lol.

      If you believe the only discussion had was her saying to cabinet that “I won’t be asking” you’re an idiot.

      If she wasn’t going to ask, then why on earth would she have not said so days ago?

      Why was her office saying that she hadn’t made her mind up, but that the taxpayer could avoid the cost if Mallard et al apologised? That certainly seems to be a comment leaning towrds her asking for it to be funded.

      She obviously ultimately decided not to ask, but all evidence, from the initial press release through to her office’s comments, point toward that being aface saving decision along the lines of not asking when you know what the answer is going to be.

      Honestly, do you not find it a teeny weeny bit strange that she announces this after Cabinet, and not immediatly before?

      What could possibly explain that, derp derp.

    • deuto 16.2

      The fact that Collins has now said that the defamation proceedings will continue but that she has not asked Cabinet for government funding does not rule out that Cabinet may well have discussed this today.

      In view of:

      1. the Cabinet Manual provisions which I understand require any Minister to get approval via a number of steps which would at the least take a couple of days BEFORE initiating any legal action. [Collins announced her decision to take defamation action only about an hour after the National Radio interview and certainly could not have gone through the required processes in that time.]

      2. there being no precedence for the circumstances of this particular case of a Minister initiating defamation against other Members of Parliament and a Crown entity

      3. mounting public opinion against taxpayers footing the bill

      – IMO this (Collins continuing with the defamation action but supposedly paying for it herself) is a face-saving compromise which may well have been discussed in Cabinet, but if not, with Key and other Ministers, National Party gurus etc.

      It is exactly the sort of “solution” I was expecting.

    • Frida 16.3

      David W. Naive. I think you’ll find the Solicitor-general told her to bugger off and Cabinet took that advice!

  17. DavidW 17

    Too much fun having the usual suspects flailing around speculating, taking some hack’s report in the Herald about the Cabinet Agenda as gospel and reaching for some whacky (or should that be whacked out) conclusions.

    Either way there was much frothing around the dentures for bugger all effect.

  18. Collins funding her own defamation case, that will cost her some big bikies.

  19. Pascal's bookie 19

    Felix Marwick reporting that Key is saying Collins told him she’d foot the bill last wednesday. erm, yeah ok.

    But leaving aside the obvious, why not speak up till now then. He was all over the media saying there was no decision yet, he didn’t know, nor did she.

    They wanted the crown to pay for it, but hve been guzzumped by the backlash. Now backpeddling.

    • deuto 19.1

      Agreed re back peddling etc. Re the big bickies, some of Collins’ political friends may be willing to help out.

  20. DavidW 20

    Never miss the opportunity for a good conspiracy theory to hatch eh? I think it was the inimitable Mr Prentice who explained about Occam’s Razor once. Perhaps you should check it out.

    [lprent: You forgot the word “sarcastically” as in “sarcastically explained”. I never use that unless I am being sarcastic. ]

    • Pascal's bookie 20.1

      So what is the most parsimonious explaination for the facts to date, including:

      the form and tone of the press release; http://t.co/u78pm9b6 (nb: the letter head, and the mention of her office, who issued the press release, etc)

      her reluctance to say anything at all about who might be funding the case untill after the cabinet meeting.

      According to Key, she told him on Wednesday night that she would be funding it, so why delay announcing that?

      Get yer razor out Davi, show me how it’s done.

      I’d say the most parsimonious explaination is that she wanted cabinet to approve, found out they wouldn’t, and has fallen back to ‘I didn’t ask’.

      Explains all the facts quite nicely I should think.

  21. Blue 21

    Lovely little gem from Collins: “Even though I am fully entitled to do so, I have not asked Cabinet for funding.”

    Pure born-to-rule arrogance and entitlement. Thank heavens she doesn’t have a moat.

    • Anita 21.1

      Worth noting that she’s saying she is entitled to ask, not entitled to receive 🙂

      • mickysavage 21.1.1

        Aye she is entitled to ask and entitled to be told by independent legal officers that her case is ridiculous.  She should fund it herself or forget.

        She is in face saving mode.

        Either she comes up with $300-400k and goes the full hog to receive minimal damages because she has been accused of being a Machiavellian politician or she forgets it.

        But if she forgets it she has to explain how Nick Smith’s blood came to be all over her hands.

        I almost feel sorry for her … 

        • Kotahi Tane Huna 21.1.1.1

          Don’t. She’s just another Tory when it comes down to it. These people deserve our understanding, but not our sympathy.

  22. DavidW 22

    Blue, the Cabinet Manual says she is entitled to ask fro funding, there is nothing automatic about it nor is there any entitlement to funds as of right.

Leave a Comment

Show Tags

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Bring back the Mental Health Commission
    The People’s Mental Health Review is a much needed wake up call for the Government on mental health, says the Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little.   “I applaud their proposal to restore a Mental Health Commission and their call for ...
    2 days ago
  • And the band played on…
    Making Amy Adams the Housing Minister five months out from the election is just the orchestra playing on as National’s Titanic housing crisis slips below the waves – along with the hopes and dreams of countless Kiwi families, says Labour’s ...
    2 days ago
  • Hotel no place for children in care
    ...
    5 days ago
  • Maybe not, Minister? Nick Smith’s housing measure suppressed
    Sir Humphrey: Minister, remember the Housing Affordability Measure work you asked us to prepare back in 2012? Well, it’s ready now.Minister Smith: Oh goodie, what does it say?Sir Humphrey: Nothing.Minister Smith: Nothing?Sir Humphrey: Well, sir, you asked us to prepare ...
    5 days ago
  • Inflation data shows many New Zealanders are worse off under National
    The latest inflation data from Statistics New Zealand shows that too many New Zealanders are now worse off under the National Government, said Labour’s Finance Spokesperson Grant Robertson “Consumer Price Inflation (CPI) is now running at 2.2 per cent, and ...
    6 days ago
  • Another emergency housing grant blow out
      Emergency housing grants data released today show another blow out in spending on putting homeless people up in motels, says Labour’s Housing spokesperson Phil Twyford.   ...
    6 days ago
  • Families struggle as hardship grants increase
    The considerable increase in hardship grants shows that more and more Kiwi families are struggling to put food on the table and pay for basic schooling, says Labour’s Social Development spokesperson Carmel Sepuloni. ...
    6 days ago
  • More tinkering, no leadership from Nats on immigration
    National’s latest tinkering with the immigration system is another attempt to create the appearance of action without actually doing anything meaningful, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. ...
    7 days ago
  • Suicide figures make for grim reading
    The 506 suspected suicides of Kiwis who have been in the care of mental health services in the last four years show that these services are under severe stress, says Labour’s Health spokesperson David Clark.   “If you do the ...
    1 week ago
  • Pay equity deal a victory for determination and unions
    The pay equity settlement revealed today for around 55,000 low-paid workers was hard-won by a determined Kristine Bartlett backed by her union, up against sheer Government resistance to paying Kiwis their fair share, says Labour Leader Andrew Little. “Labour welcomes ...
    1 week ago
  • DHB’s forced to make tough choices
    The Minister of Health today admitted that the country’s District Health Boards were having to spend more than their ring fenced expenditure on Mental Health, says Labour’s Health spokesperson David Clark.   “The situation is serious with Capital and Coast ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Nats break emergency housing pledge – deliver just five more places
    Despite National’s promises of 2,200 emergency housing beds, just 737 were provided in the March Quarter, an increase of only five from six months earlier, says Labour’s Housing spokesperson Phil Twyford. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Research underlines need for KiwiBuild
    New research showing the social and fiscal benefits of homeownership underlines the need for a massive government-backed building programme like KiwiBuild, says Labour’s housing spokesperson Phil Twyford. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Social data security review too little, too late
    The independent review into the Ministry of Social Development’s individual client level data IT system is too little, too late, says Labour’s Social Development spokesperson Carmel Sepuloni. “The Minister of Social Development has finally seen some sense and called for ...
    2 weeks ago
  • More questions raised on CERA conflicts
    With the admission that three more former CERA staff members are under suspicion of not appropriately managing conflicts of interest related to the Canterbury rebuild, it’s imperative that CERA’s successor organisation Ōtākaro fronts up to Parliamentary questions, says Labour’s Canterbury ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Labour to tackle Hutt housing crisis
    Labour will build a mix of 400 state houses and affordable KiwiBuild homes in the Hutt Valley in its first term in government to tackle the housing crisis there, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. “Housing in the Hutt ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Farewell to John Clarke
    This wonderfully talented man has been claimed by Australia, but how I remember John Clarke is as a young Wellington actor who performed satirical pieces in a show called “Knickers” at Downstage Theatre. The show featured other future luminaries like ...
    GreensBy Catherine Delahunty
    2 weeks ago
  • Valedictory Speech
    Te papa pounamu Aotearoa NZ Karanga karanga karanga; Nga tupuna Haere haere haere; Te kahui ora te korowai o tenei whare; E tu e tu ... tutahi tonu Ki a koutou oku hoa mahi ki Te Kawanatanga; Noho mai noho ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Buck stops with Gerry Brownlee
    The fact that the State Services Commission has referred the CERA conflict of interest issue to the Serious Fraud Office is a positive move, but one that raises serious questions about the Government’s oversight of the rebuild, says Labour Canterbury ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Teachers deserve a democratic Education Council
    Teachers around New Zealand reeling from the news that their registration fees could more than double will be even angrier that the National Government has removed their ability to have any say about who sits on the Council that sets ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Free trade backers are simply out of touch
    Are the backers of free trade out of touch with public opinion? This was the question asked when the Chartered Accountants launched their Future of Trade study. I was astonished by the answer in a room of free trade enthusiasts ...
    GreensBy Barry Coates
    2 weeks ago
  • John Clarke aka Fred Dagg will be missed by all Kiwis
    The man who revolutionised comedy on both sides of the Tasman, John Clarke, will be sadly missed by Kiwis and Aussies alike, says the Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little.   “I grew up with Fred Dagg and I am ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Labour’s modern approach to monetary policy
    A commitment to full employment and a more transparent process to provide market certainty are the hallmarks of Labour’s proposals for a new approach to monetary policy, says Labour’s Finance spokesperson Grant Robertson. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Greens back Labour’s plan for monetary policy reform
    Labour plans to change the way we do monetary policy in New Zealand and the Green Party supports them fully. We’re now of a single mind on this. Labour will move away from our reliance on a single, unelected person ...
    GreensBy robert.ashe
    2 weeks ago
  • Greens back Labour’s monetary policy reform
    Labour plans to change the way we do monetary policy in New Zealand and the Green Party supports them fully. We’re now of a single mind on this. Labour will move away from our reliance on a single, unelected person ...
    GreensBy James Shaw
    2 weeks ago
  • Govt drops ball on Masters Games housing squeeze
    Families currently living in emergency accommodation face being forced out onto the street as motel accommodation in Auckland is filled up by contestants and visitors of the World Masters Games in coming weeks, says Labours social development spokesperson Carmel Sepuloni. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • State inquiry for Nga Morehu – The Survivors of State Abuse
    The Prime Minister must show humanitarian leadership and launch an independent inquiry into historic claims of abuse of children who were in State care, says Labour’s Deputy Leader Jacinda Ardern. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Coleman – ‘overwhelmed by disinterest’ and ‘conked out’
    Today’s trenchant criticism of the Government’s health policy by Ian Powell the executive director of the Association of Salaried Medical Specialists must trigger action by the Minister, says Labour’s spokesperson for Health David Clark. ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Statement on Syria
    Like the rest of the world, I have been horrified at the chemical attack on innocent Syrians that led to the deaths of so many men, women and children,” says Labour Leader Andrew Little. “The deliberate attack on civilians as ...
    3 weeks ago
  • The hard truth about that soft drink ad
    I am relieved that Pepsi has pulled its ridiculous commercial that obscenely co-opted the #BlackLivesMatter movement. At the very least, it was an awkward failure that tried too hard to be something it could never be. At its worst, it ...
    GreensBy Marama Davidson
    3 weeks ago
  • Journalism Matters: Interesting the public in the public interest
    Last week I launched two policies to support Kiwi journalism because as Bill Moyers put it, “the quality of democracy and the quality of journalism is deeply intertwined.” Journalism matters because it’s how we discover what’s happening in our world, ...
    GreensBy Gareth Hughes
    3 weeks ago
  • Homeownership rate hits new low; KiwiBuild needed now
    The homeownership rate has fallen to just 63.1 per cent, according to Statistics New Zealand’s newly released Dwelling and Household estimates. That’s down three per cent under National to the lowest level since 1951, confirming the need for Labour’s KiwiBuild ...
    3 weeks ago
  • OECD endorses Labour’s Future of Work approach
    An OECD report released today, highlighting the need for increased support for workers who are made redundant, is a strong endorsement of the direction of Labour’s Future of Work Commission, says Labour’s Employment spokesperson Grant Robertson. “We welcome the OECD’s ...
    3 weeks ago
  • The Government knows diddly squat about health funding
    Asked about the funding of the Auckland Regional Public Health Service, the Associate Minister of Health was at sea today on the typhoid outbreak, says Labour’s Health spokesperson David Clark.   “When I asked Nicky Wagner who was responsible for the ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Nicky Wagner blames disability workers for Govt’s funding failure
    Nicky Wagner displayed disrespect and sheer arrogance when she insulted disability support workers today, says Labour’s Disability Issues spokesperson Poto Williams. ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Parata in denial over special education crisis
    Hekia Parata has her head buried in the sand when it comes to the pressure that schools are under as they attempt to cope with an increasing number of children with severe behavioural and other learning support needs, says Labour’s ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Data-for-funding move hits Privacy roadblock
    The Government’s much-criticised grab for private client data from social service organisations has suffered another defeat after the Privacy Commissioner’s damning report, says Labour’s Social Development spokesperson Carmel Sepuloni. “This is a defeat for the Government’s plans to force social ...
    3 weeks ago
  • New research shows need for government-led house building
    Research by economist Shamubeel Eaqub shows the need for the government to lead the building of affordable starter homes, as would happen under Labour’s KiwiBuild policy, says Labour’s Housing spokesperson Phil Twyford. ...
    3 weeks ago