Thanks RL. If only opposition parties could develop some policies of their own.
This inconsistency is very strange. I am very surprised there has not been a short statement from the family or Police confirming when, why and the process under which he is being detained. This is a sitting MP not an ordinary citizen. Only once that is ...
Siiiigh. Shane Jones. Head in hands!
The slump is down to piss poor reporting, what a B.S excuse for an interview was that with Paul Henry and Don Key, News Worthy? Not so news worthy!! cant stand the way they sit down in those stupid chairs especially the guy who leans back like its a talk ...
I am in the bath. After everything that has gone on this week I felt like I needed a good scrubbing. As you were, I shall resume my lurking.
Fisiani; The irony of Nicky Hager writing a book using stolen emails when he is a person who constantly rails against spying by the state, is lost on this lot. The fact that he has written and profited from three books using stolen property, he openly ...
Ever since Key arrived on the scene I described him as a streaky piece of shit, and so far I have not been proven wrong. If somehow he manages to secure/steal a third term he will need to start wearing a bullet proof vest and up his security detail because...
No I don't want to flee, I would like to debate issues in an adult manner. That certainly doesn't warrant calling me an arsehole. I am sure if the comment was reciprocated to any of this site's authors or regular contributors I would become "persona non ...
No to the Immigration Office concerning Liu, that's who we are talking about.
That's interesting. Your authors can harangue contributors with impunity and if someone should answer back you threaten them with that. The biggest problem here is that people start by debating the topic and very soon authors and longtime contributors ...
No, if you were smart you would check anyway just to make sure there were no gotchas!
Again, the other side did it so it's OK. If that's the ongoing quality of the debate here it is no wonder you are having trouble getting your message across to the punters.
Others might have, I didn't, so please reply in kind. [lprent: Just been looking at your comments. Don't hector authors. Read our policy about demanding from them. Adding you to auto moderation until I see an improvement in behaviour towards them. ]
OIA to the Immigration Office what's so hard about that?
Again you try and debate this issue by saying that the others do it too so that therefore it is OK. Debate this point without saying "But the others do it too!" As I said before schoolboy playground stuff.
Tracey So what if National did? Any smart operator should have seen this coming and kept their powder dry or at least have made absolutely sure they knew all their facts. To make an absolute statement NO, NO and thrice NO only to be tripped up the next day...
"Drill back to" So your man offers an absolute NO as an answer and is found to be perpetrating a terminological inexactitude. As I said earlier "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence." Nan-bots indeed! Karol please ...
Call it semantics, call it whatever you will, but your man said "I have been approached..." that indicates that he had met him. At least that is what most people would take that to mean. If it wasn't then different wording should be used. As to that being ...
So your defense of Cunnlife's actions or lack of them is to say "What about some other person and what they may or may not have done?" Schoolboy playground stuff do i need to say more?
"Sorry the statement was completely and perfectly accurate" As was his statement when asked if he ever met the man was an emphatic "NO" (somewhat Winstonesque), when the first 4 words of the letter were "I have been approached...."! Pray tell how are those...
KK. They honestly can't see it! Hanlon's Razor describes it more than adequately; "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence."
'misogynist, vindictive, spiteful and nasty' Yep, that pretty much sums up Collins and most of the national cabinet.
Jelly doughnuts?
Again let's not argue the issue, albeit you started to, but when that gets too hard let's just throw insults around at the commentators as an answer.
So somehow your reply excuses Ms Bright from paying her dues? Your reply is about taxes not rates so it is hardly an apples for apples response.
All that "be as it may" but that doesn't excuse you from not paying your rates. You may have some idea that there is a greater purpose here but that is your call. If you think others should somehow show sympathy for your plight just because you can fill ...
I somehow think the irony of the "unthinkable" action beneficiaries being denied access to "Working" for Families is somehow lost on you.
You are up to your eyeballs in the bullshit Johnny!
"Claims she drinks milk. Doesn’t……..she squirts it." Isn't it ironic that this that the comments here have come down to this disgusting level. Had this been somebody making similar comments about a female Labour MP they would have been had a lifetime ban ...
I suppose the question should be when did this little "gem" become known? Because if it was anything but yesterday it doesn't look good!
Considering this happened nearly 6 months ago and was obviously a non event at the time, evidenced by no outrage from anyone, until now. One can only assume the release of this "major development" was a defense mechanism to take the focus off other less ...
Recent Comments