.... I didn't. My alias is Gypsy. That's it. I do find...
"Actually, no, I’m looking at the system logs here " Look, this is quite simple. You gave me a weeks ban. I served that and came back. Why would I use another alias? I think you're having a crack at shutting down a commentator whose opinions you don't like...
"Not good enough, try again, and explain why 2 user names come from the same source on the same day, i.e., yours." It didn't. You're making this up.
I'm not. You tried this the other day. I think you're getting a bit obsessed.
"No failure but developments with adjustments and recalibration along the way – that’s life." Good spin. The 'adjustments and recalibrations' began years before Labour won the 2017 election, and just over a year after being elected Labour the great reset ...
... the govt's housing building program Gypsy." The government promised to build...
"State + transitional + kiwibuild = Govt's massive building program, the largest in decades." Yes + kiwibuild. Which is about home ownership.
"And you already know the answer." Yep. "KiwiBuild is enabling more home ownership opportunities for New Zealanders." KiwiBuild works in two key ways: Working with developers to expedite residential development and increase the pace new homes come to ...
"Nope, KB and mental health spending have nothing in common other than being Government initiatives. " In the context of Louis' comment, the thing they have in common is government failure. The spending of only 0.2% of an allocation when we have a mental ...
"See link from Louis to Megan Woods piece. " Are you suggesting Kiwibuild is no longer about home ownership. It's a simple question.
"You went along nicely until you suddenly and out of the blue decided to divert away to KB in the middle of the tread on mental health spending." The KB comment was entirely relevant. It went to the heart of the comment Louis made about the mental health ...
"Exactly, “was”, past tense and before the Great Reset." Are you suggesting Kiwibuild is no longer about Home Ownership?
"it's part of this govt's massive building plan that includes Kiwibuild." Kiwibuild was not about social/state housing. Kiwibuild was about home ownership. So far they've built 1365 out of 100,000.
"You’re creating another diversion here." Nope. The topic has been on government spending money and not getting results, or wasteful/ineffective spending. You've spent a hell of a lot of time engaging in a diversion if you think it is one. "I don’t need to...
"you diverted the convo to KB," Yep. Because it was directly relevant to Louis 'let's hold our breath' argument. "is known as link-spamming" Really? Ok, I'll do one at a time. Do you think it's a good idea to spend "up to $600,000 in rent for an empty high...
"No commentary, no explanation, no argument" I gave all the commentary that was needed. "You didn't link to my comment, but I assume you mean my accusations of wasteful/ineffective spending. There are plenty of examples:" No doubt it's hard for you to ...
"Why the fuck should I have to answer your questions about that spending?" Because that would show you have honest intent, rather than coming in and trying to shut down the discussion. "It started with your misleading and disingenuous comment @ 3.6.2.1.1.1...
"No, you're wrong Gypsy," From your own source: "So ...
"KB was a 10 yr plan, there's been a reset and the govt have, so far, also built thousands of state and transitional housing as well, with more currently under construction." The 'reset' was the result of the failure of the scheme. The state houses built ...
"So, stop playing games here." You're the one playing games. Small minded games, that avoid answering the real question of why 0.2% of the allocation has been spent and no more.
" broad-brush pathetic swipe at Government without any substance or content matter. " You didn't link to my comment, but I assume you mean my accusations of wasteful/ineffective spending. There are plenty of examples: Government pays up to $600k for prime ...
"the money will be spent, in due course" The government has spent 0.2% of the total allocation in 2 years. Andrew Little said he was ""extraordinarily" frustrated that despite making commitments and setting aside funding they seemed to be a "long way ...
"I'm not sure why you find this surprising, the current government has been particularly woeful over the last 12 months. I find it surprising that so many of the commenters continue to be so supportive of the current lot despite their poor performance." ...
I didn't quote Kerre, I quoted Blade, and only to point to the part of his comment I was responding to. So chill.
Pointing out that the government spent 0.2% of an allocation in 2 years may be 'meaningless' to you, but it is a pattern of wasteful and/or ineffective spending by this government.
Why did it take 2 years to spend 0.2% of the allocation?
There you go again. Why would Kerre say "Kerre said"? I didn't quote Kerre, I quoted Blade. Hence the italics.
I didn't link to Kerre's opinion. I linked to, and quoted directly, a comment by Wendy Esera. "It's a 4 yr plan Gypsy." You mean like Kiwibuild was a 10 year plan?
"Kerre's opinion is not fact..." Irrelevant. I haven't put forward Kerre's opinion as fact. I haven't put Kerre's opinion forward to justify anything I have said. "Little said the money is being spent and it is making a difference." Why was only 0.2% of ...
Yep, it as. As demonstrated in this example by their own Minister's frustration.
"In mental health, as in other areas, this government seems quite adept at allocating and/or spending a lot of money but getting little in the way of results." Happy now?
Recent Comments