web analytics

Snowden on US-NZ intelligence

Written By: - Date published: 9:51 pm, July 8th, 2013 - 87 comments
Categories: accountability, democracy under attack, john key, slippery, Spying, telecommunications, us politics - Tags:

This just up on Stuff, about Edward Snowden making links between US and NZ intelligence services, as well as between other “5 Eyes” participants.  The article, taken from The Sydney Morning Herald, begins:

United States whistleblower Edward Snowden has disclosed a link between New Zealand and US global surveillance, identifying the Waihopai spy base as a contributor to a key American intelligence collection programme.

Classified US National Security Agency maps leaked by Snowden and published by US journalist Glenn Greenwald in the Brazilian O Globo newspaper reveal the locations of dozens of US and allied signals intelligence collection sites that contribute to interception of telecommunications and internet traffic worldwide.

The New Zealand Government Security Communications Bureau facility at Waihopai near Blenheim contributes to the NSA’s collection programme codenamed X-Keyscore.

X-Keyscore! Ripe for puns about a big time gambler!

Today Bomber Bradbury highlighted a comment by Kim Dotcom in the last week, andspeculated that it may indicate Dotcom had been in contact with Snowden.  Bomber suggested that this was Dotcom’s source for the (alleged) evidence that Key had lied about having prior knowledge about Dotcom before the raid on his mansion.  Bradbury pointed out:

On Campbell Live last week, John asked Kim about Edward Snowden. Kim replied that he didn’t know Snowden personally and that he’d rather leave it at that with a large wry smile.

In the above linked Stuff article, there’s this bit:

Snowden also argued that the “Five eyes” partnerships are organised so that authorities in each country can “insulate their political leaders from the backlash” when it became public “how grievously they’re violating global privacy”.

So what evidence does Snowden have on such insulation, and is it as specific as Bradbury suggests?  However it plays out, there’s a lot more mileage in this issue yet.


87 comments on “Snowden on US-NZ intelligence”

  1. Bill 1

    Well, seeing as how echelon would allow NZ (say) to ask the US for any info it has on NZ citizens…and seeing as how all the info is collectively collected…. and so circumventing any laws disallowing spying on ones own nationals is a dawdle….

    • One Anonymous Knucklehead 1.1

      So why did the GCSB break the law and spy on Kiwis?

      Is it that they thought the cops and SIS weren’t secure enough to handle the information (that the NSA/CIA/MI6/by-this-point-it-leaks-like-a-sieve-so-what-does-it-matter-who-else are doing it anyway)? Or that they weren’t important enough to need to know? Or because they thought they wouldn’t get caught in the act?

      Or are they just stupid and incompetent?

      • McFlock 1.1.1

        because the folk who wanted the data had no idea how to activate protocols implemented 30 years ago? But the spook at the embassy is real nice when he pops by to say how professional and smart they all are…

      • Colonial Viper 1.1.2

        You need to think about the model of intelligence collection now being led by the USA. Which is to be able to understand everything about the behaviours, interests, contacts and motivations of every single person in the world.

        So why did the GCSB break the law and spy on Kiwis?

        Given the above model of intelligence gathering, this question is irrelevant.

        The only relevant question is how seriously the USA respected the privileges that NZ has as a “2nd party” intelligence partner.

        • McFlock

          irrelevant from the US perspective, maybe.

          But a valid question as to what NZ gets in a supposedly “reciprocal” organisation. Especially considering the Rainbow Warrior. the wise oppressor throws some crumbs to their serfs – bread and circuses, etc.

          • Colonial Viper

            The Rainbow Warrior occurred in a different era, when the geopolitics and technology of the world were immensely different. Further, it was not, except in a peripheral way, an attack against NZ.

            • McFlock

              [splutters coffee] you forgot the sarc tag?

              • Colonial Viper

                I’m serious. Don’t make the mistake of every armchair general – and most real ones. Making preparations to fight the last war.

                • felix

                  Fair ’nuff re:- last war.

                  But the bombing of the RW was most definitely an attack on NZ. It was an act of terrorism against a small nation who dared to take an independent stance in the face of the nuclear establishment.

                • McFlock

                  Oh well then, drone strikes aren’t attacks against the nations they occur in. /sarc

                • Colonial Viper

                  Oh well then, drone strikes aren’t attacks against the nations they occur in. /sarc

                  They are certainly an attack on the sovereignty and independence of those nations, particularly if they have not freely given the US authorisation to conduct the operations.

                  • McFlock

                    But sending in troops to carry out a similar strike is only an attack in “a peripheral way”.

            • AmaKiwi

              But the Rainbow Warrior is the ONLY terrorist attack to have taken place in NZ (and was by an allied government!)

              The Law Society criticized Key for giving no reasons to justify increasing GCSB’s powers. In the USA and UK they can only justify their Big Brother spying because of “the threat of terrorism.”

              So Key’s GCSB empowerment is NOT about national security. What is it about, Mr. Key? It’s about spying on you and me for commercial and political purposes.

              • Populuxe1

                Neil Roberts blowing himself up at the Whanganui Computer?

                • McFlock

                  Ernie Abbott being murdered.

                  • felix

                    The constant threat of another “Fly My Pretties”.

                  • Anne

                    Ernie Abbott

                    May 1984. The Wellington Trade Union building caretaker killed by a bomb. Pat Kelly and other unionists were domiciled there – all prominent anti nuclear campaigners. The Lange govt. elected about a month later… anti nuclear sentiment reaches its zenith. A year later the Rainbow Warrior bombing. French Secret Service the culprits.

                    Anti nuclear legislation passes in parliament. The majority of NZers rejoice. The UK/USA indulge in petty tantrums.

                    The police close file on Ernie Abbott murder.

      • Geoff Dunbar 1.1.3

        Or is it that they are confident (with historically justified reason) that the NZ PUBLC is “stupid and incompetent” enough to continually fail to ascertain when it is being royally screwed by its own “representatives” (which is just about all of the time)?

  2. You know if this base, was what they say it was, I doubt two people would’ve got anywhere
    near it.

    • One Anonymous Knucklehead 2.1

      That’s because you’re cherry-picking what they say it is and who “they” are.

      • Brett Dale 2.1.1

        Not much of a spy base if protestors can walk up to it, take their shoes off and scream shame shame for seven hours.

        • Colonial Viper

          Why not? Were actual data collection and signal operations interrupted in any way?

          • One Anonymous Knucklehead

            Tinfoil strips and a lemon cannon might. Just saying 🙂

            • One Anonymous Knucklehead

              On reflection, I realise that this comment could get people into trouble. If you’re going to test this hypothesis, please conduct test trials in open ground, work out a way to weave tinfoil strips together so that they unravel for maximum effect, that sort of thing. If you’re going to get arrested at least demonstrate some bloody competence!

              PS: and lemon cannons are dangerous: treat all equipment with respect.

              • Lanthanide

                Never heard of a “lemon cannon” before, apparently it’s just a potato cannon though.

    • tracey 2.2

      I see Mr Key has messed up facts again… this time over MRP…

      Having accused Cosgrove of making it up… he then backtracked and fell back on olf faithful.

      “”I haven’t actually seen those myself, well I can’t recall them.”

      You must feel so proud Brett

  3. Wouldnt it be like fort knox, no matter what?

    • weka 3.1

      Brett, if you are going to take over another thread, can you please at least use the reply button so that your comments appear in some kind of context?

    • One Anonymous Knucklehead 3.2

      Brett, while you’re figuring out how to use the reply button, ask yourself what would Waihopai gain by “being like Fort Knox”. Are protesters, for example, unable to stand outside Fort Knox?

      Then ask yourself what you look like.

      • Brett Dale 3.2.1


        Its simple if this was real spy base, people would not get close enough to cause damage to it. I think some people have watched to many movies.

        • karol

          And yet, Nicky Hager was able to talk to members of NZ’s branch of Echelon (GCSB) and to use that information to publicly Out the network. This resulted in the “5 Eyes” governments publicly confirming it’s existence. Hager was able to do this because of the low key approach in NZ, making it a weak security link in the system.

        • felix

          Brett, it happened.

          You’re arguing that the sun didn’t come up this morning.

          • Brett Dale


            Its not what you think it is.

            President Obama is not saying, “Wow some guy from Hornby, did a post
            on the website the standard, then he went to the library and got out
            Alex Jones’s book, then he went to the University cafe coffee shop
            with members of socialist aotearoa and made jokes about John Key.

            I think he has more important things to do with his time.

            • framu

              so if its not a real spy base brett – what is it?

              come one lets hear it – whats your oh so logical explanation for its existence (considering what is already in the public domain)

              wind farm?
              geodesic dome for woofers?
              what exactly?

              • Framu:

                Not a spy base in terms of finding out what the average kiwi is doing, library records, how many cups of coffee you buy, what cds you listen to.

                If you think they’re spending hundreds of millions to find out what youtube videos
                of cats tap dancing people are watching, then your sadly mistake.

                Perhaps they’re looking for certain phrases? to see what the international crims are up to, terrorists, child traffickers, global drug rings.

                • Pascal's bookie

                  And to find those phrases and patterns, Brett, they grab everything.

                  • Pascal:

                    I think not, if they looking for a certain phrase, they looking for that phrase, not
                    innocent phrases. Now if they find a sinister phrase from someone, they may
                    then grab everything, but not the other way around.

                • One Anonymous Knucklehead

                  As usual, Brett adopts a position bereft of the most basic thought or consideration. He cannot, for example, imagine what the United States would look like now if King George had had PRISM.

                  I can only hope that in the future he falls foul of the authorities, thus serving the dual purpose of educating himself and sparing us his feeble offerings.

                  • Knucklehead?

                    What is wrong with what I said? You think the US Government cares
                    about if Joe Bloggs is watching clips of the Sopranos on youtube?

                    • Pascal's bookie

                      Not particularly, but they don’t know that Soprano clips is what Joe Bloggs is looking at until they have a look at what he is looking at.

                    • One Anonymous Knucklehead

                      You don’t think at all, do you?

                      I harbour too much contempt for you to bother spending too much time explaining this, so if this is too cryptic tough shit.

                      It’s 1960. You’re gay. The government has PRISM. Think about it.

                    • Colonial Viper

                      Or it’s 1937 Nazi Germany and you are Jewish.
                      Or it’s 1950 Tibet and you are a supporter of the Dalai Lama.
                      Or it’s 1959 USA and you’re a negro in Louisiana.
                      Or it’s 1980 South Africa and you’re white while your lover is black.

                    • McFlock

                      Or “the government” (or eager prosecutors therein) think you’re the “prime suspect” in a murder, so use your youtube records because the sopranos was violent, therefore watching the sopranos “shows a fascination with violence”. Top ten grossest clips shown in succession to the jury? Character sorted.

                      Or maybe he pissed off someone, so the chached video becomes “publishing/pirating” and copyright violation.

                      Or you have a VOIP phone, so the traffic interception is as good as a wiretap.

                      The police already have a very good computer forensics unit. They don’t need warrantless wiretapping. And we as a society don’t need it, either.

  4. Wayne 4


    One of your assertions in this piece is that Kim Dotcom is correct about the PM’s knowledge. But you also know that the PM emphatically denied any such knowledge on TV immediately after the hearing. There was no doubt or hesitation. And he knows what is at stake in making that statement.

    Now in my experience when a politician makes such a statement in these circumstances they are correct. For instance if he had any doubt he may have met Dotcom or heard about the Police operation earlier than the day before, he would have qualified his answer, something like,”I certainly don’t recall”.

    Remember nothing actually hangs on whether the PM knew earlier to when he has previously said he first knew about the police operation, except his credibility.

    It is not like Peter Dunne, who knows a leak is a career killer, or President Clinton who was covering up something that was extremely embarrassing

    And it is not surprising the PM did not know about Dotcom. I have friends who live opposite the Dotcom mansion, and they never told me about him, and they are in the IT business. I guess they just assumed that Dotcom’s world and mine would never intersect. They may have said a rich guy lived there, since I knew the owner of Chrisco had left, but of course only a rich guy could live there.

    • One Anonymous Knucklehead 4.1

      Wayne, did you wake up from a ten-year sleep or something? The Prime Minister has form we can go on. There were fifty thousand shares yeah a hundred thousand shares. His lies are always delivered with “sincerity”.

    • karol 4.2

      Wayne, John Key backed up that “emphatic” denial by saying that they had done a thorough search of his office’s records and found no evidence of any such prior knowledge.

      But the new slant provided by the Snowden comments, is that there is something built into the Echelon system to “insulate political leaders from any backlash” from Echelon’s “grievous” violation of “global privacy”.

    • Pascal's bookie 4.3

      Wayne, the PM has couched many of his claims in terms of ‘proof’. And Polioticians make bold claims that are false, all the time. Surely you remember Winston’s NO sign? Or the PMs quick reversal on his claims about how many tranzrail shares he owned? It’s not a short list.

      And if Key knew about the raid earlier, it brings all sorts of things into play. Like his extent of knowledge about GCSB/SIS activity, particularly his awareness about the questions of illegality, and what he did about it. If Key was involved earlier in discussions about the DotCom raid than he has been letting on, then he is in the frame over the illegality of the GCSBs involvement in those raids.

      • Wayne 4.3.1

        The PM has been consistent on this one for many weeks. As you say he has checked his files, and seemingly rechecked them. I am sure he has thought about this a lot, to try and remember if someone may have said him something about Dotcom. And the PM remains adamant.

        Your proposition now is that he has to continue with a falsehood, and restate it many times because to do otherwise “brings all sorts of things into play”. But that would be truly playing with fire. Exposure in that case would bring about the John Armstrong scenario (usually a hated pundit for Standardnistas). If you were right the PM would say nothing more on the subject, because to say more, digs the hole deeper.

        Well, I just don’t buy that.

        Most of the so called “lies” you raise occur when he answers something on the fly.

        He is an extremely accessible PM by any reasonable standard, and answers all sorts of questions on a vast range of topics. It is hardly surprising he does not immediately recollect everything and sometimes has to amend answers after he has had time to think about it. I am sure we have all been in that situation, and we don’t have to deal with, and remember the range of things the PM does.

        • One Anonymous Knucklehead

          😆 Just, by an amazing coincidence, his brain fades always manage to cast him in a good light, and the corrections always come with caveats where apologies belong.

          Dr. Mapp and the invisible bias.

        • Anne

          …he has checked his files, and seemingly rechecked them. I am sure he has thought about this a lot, to try and remember if someone may have said him something about Dotcom. And the PM remains adamant.

          You are an ignorant bunny aren’t you Wayne.

          Of course he and his staff didn’t find anything. He knew they wouldn’t find anything. There are other ways to communicate information without leaving a paper, electronic or some other visible trail. These ‘ways’ are not available to ordinary citizens, but many people know they exist. For example I worked for a few years on a Defence Force base and picked up on a few security of information techniques. I never knew how they worked, but the results were a big eye-opener.

          • Wayne

            Anne, You may know my prior role. I know a bit about the relevant organisations.

            • Anne

              So do I Wayne.

              And if you are who I suspect you are, then I know well (or in one case knew) a couple of others who were in the same role as yourself. They didn’t have rose tinted spectacles on their noses like you. Take them off Wayne and perceive John Key for what he is – a pretender who really works for offshore networks and not NZ. He doesn’t give a damm about ordinary people. I look forward to that zany individual Kim Dotcom putting him in his place once and for all.

        • Pascal's bookie

          Your proposition now is that he has to continue with a falsehood, and restate it many times because to do otherwise “brings all sorts of things into play”. But that would be truly playing with fire. Exposure in that case would bring about the John Armstrong scenario (usually a hated pundit for Standardnistas). If you were right the PM would say nothing more on the subject, because to say more, digs the hole deeper.

          It’s not my proposition ‘now’, it’s simply obvious. If the PM lied when first asked about this, then he needs to keep lying about it. Those other things are in play whether or not he says anymore on the subject. They were set in play when/if first lied; if it was a lie.

          Assuming for the sake of argument that it was a lie, he wouldn’t have lied for no reason. If he lied, it was to keep something that might have costed him the job from us. For example, that he knew the spying was possibly illegal and did nothing not knowing it was going to come out due to a judge’s ruling. Perhaps.

          The “John Armstrong scenario” (although I think Armstrong is weak on this*) has therefore always been in play. Right when he told the supposed lie. The thesis is that Key knew something about this earlier than he has been letting on, and that he has taken steps to be in a position of plausible deniability. That may or may not be true, but if it isn’t true, then it seems like either gross incompetence or a freakish series of coincidences that kept him out of the loop.

          How would him saying nothing more on the subject make his initial denials go away? They wouldn’t. So either his story will hold, or it will not. His comments range from outright denial, which was his initial position, to ‘You can’t prove it’.

          He also claims that DotCom is a fantasist and blah blah who isn’t worth discussing, and yet he also seems to have been through Mr DotCom’s filings for the extradition case looking for evidence of something he claims not to exist. Now that doesn’t mean anything at one level, it could also suggest that he isn’t sure that actual documents might exist.

          There were a lot of very close calls when Key might have found out about DotCom. And some very odd things later when nobody talked to him about failings in the GCSB, or signing unusual documents on his behalf, or having electorate matters handled by Simon Power without the PM being told, all while the PM was having discussions with US people who also had an interest in DotCom.

          None of that proves anything. But it does look odd, and it requires some sort of explanation.

          The current potential explanations are, as far as I can see; slack oversight combined with series of coincidences and poor cabinet communication leading to the PM being out of the loop, slack oversight combined with a deliberate attempt to genuinely keep the PM out of the loop, plausible deniability of the PM being in the loop, or the PM lying about being in the loop.


          *Armstrong seems to think that Key would have to resign just because he was busted lying about knowing about DotCom. I think it would take a few dots being joined. He’d probably survive something that he could claim was something he didn’t pay attention to, or could have forgotten.

    • tracey 4.4

      “PM emphatically denied any such knowledge on TV immediately after the hearing. There was no doubt or hesitation. And he knows what is at stake in making that statement.”

      yea but wayne yesterday he said cosgrove was making up the allocation of 100 to Soolid energy from MRP sale… but by today he is saying this

      “”I haven’t actually seen those myself, well I can’t recall them.”

      • Wayne 4.4.1

        And that is the point. He has not had different views. He has got more emphatic about Dotcom, especially after he checked.

        • felix

          Nonsense. His denials have become more specific and limited in their scope.

          Saying “to the best of my recollection” means fuck all when you have the brain of a goldfish. He can’t remember the Springbok tour FFS!

  5. framu 5

    “PM emphatically denied any such knowledge”

    yeah wayne – good one. Its not like our PM has never, ever been caught out bullshitting with gay abandon in front of the press before is it?

    you must be a real hoot down the cossie club mate with jokes like that

  6. Anne 6

    Snowden also argued that the “Five eyes” partnerships are organised so that authorities in each country can “insulate their political leaders from the backlash” when it became public “how grievously they’re violating global privacy”.

    So where was Ian Fletcher in August of last year when Key flew off to America to watch his son play baseball and disappeared into the bowels of Hollywood for a couple of days first? Did Fletcher have a little private holiday at the same time too?

    Key was up to shonky business that is a given, and its long been my view it was to do with Dotcom – an update where things were at… and what do do about it? Shonky John still thinks any comms with the FBI/NSA is as safe as houses. Perhaps that has given him a false confidence.

    Whatever, as tempting as it is to want to know what Dotcom knows… Dotcom will not release it until the time is exactly right for him. Fair enough. He’s the bloke in the firing line.

    • MrSmith 6.1

      Kim.com’s extradition is a political decision yes? and so if I had the goods then I would let the other party know somehow then sit on it. Call it what you like but after I had had my home invaded illegally the gloves would be off.
      And so we may never know what he has.

  7. Sable 7

    Both Labour and National are selling out our country to foreign interests. Based on how things have progressed its clear they have been for quite a while. Time to put these political dinosaurs out of their misery and look at other alternatives.

    • Colonial Viper 8.1

      The man is good, that’s for sure.

      Greenwald, although not out on a limb as far as Snowden, must know that him and everyone he comes in contact with is under round the clock surveillance.

  8. Knucklehead

    1960 Gay Prism:

    Its not 1960, its 2013, maybe 50 odd years ago, they would use
    it to spy and take away gay people, in 2013, they’re dont care.

    Too hard for you too understand?

    • One Anonymous Knucklehead 9.1

      Obviously far too hard for you to grasp, Brett, that there might be an analogous situation today. What a waste of oxygen.

  9. GUYS,

    It’s 2013 now.

    Yes, in the past some Governments would of used it for the
    wrong reasons.

    In 2013, they dont give a fuck if some tosser is watching
    Hamster on a mother fukin piano.

    Oh bTW if some green party hacker, hacked into say
    Cameron Slater’s email and got some juicy information,
    you guys would be cheering them on.

    • karol 10.1

      Did you see the oral submission from the anti-nuclear and peace activists at the GCSB hearing? Been under surveillance for decades – still happening.

      • insider 10.1.1

        So they say. They appeared to me to have fairly active imaginations and revel in their self proclaimed victim hood.

        • Colonial Viper

          There are many many instances now internationally of ordinary political activist groups being blacklisted as “extremists” and targetted by government surveillance and pressure.

          Yes, in the past some Governments would of used it for the
          wrong reasons.

          What’s this “in the past” business?

          This is what is happening every day and in every way internationally, and NZ’s spymasters are learning the same tricks from the US and the UK.

    • Pascal's bookie 10.2

      Nothing bad happens today Brett, it’s ok.

      Sleep well young fella.


  10. pascal:

    If a terrorist at gitmo had of died because of a hunger strike,
    people would’ve said “They should’ve forced feed him”

    • Pascal's bookie 11.1

      Do you know how many people in gitmo aren’t terrorists Brett?

      Also, what they doing in that video. Comfortable watching it mate?

      And too, I wouldn’t being saying “They should’ve forced feed him”, nor would Amnesty, or any civil liberties group I can think of.

      And as an aside, your comment there. Reckon it would be out of place on Fox News? Hannitty maybe?

      • Brett Dale 11.1.1


        I Loathe Faux News:

        No that statement would’nt been said on faux news, they would say.

        “That guy is a known terrorist who taught all the other terrorist, he should
        be billed for the food down the tube, and his family should all be read the
        bible, while shown a big picture of George W Bush,and tvs should be put
        in his cell, so he can watch fox news, because we are fair and balance, unlike
        the LIBERAL MEDIA. (and they would say liberal media in a real scary voice)
        while flashing a picture of jane fonda on the screen.

        • Pascal's bookie

          Nah, that’s a cartoon version.

          They’d just imply that everyone in gitmo is a terrorist, and that they are being treated well, and that people complaining are just dishonest liberals doing so for political reasons and would complain anyway. Like you did.

  11. Pascal:

    No one has any idea the level that faux news will go to.

    Hell to see rove on election night, was just so bizarre, what was
    more bizarre is that they showed it.

    • Pascal's bookie 12.1

      No more bizarre than many other things said on Fox. But there are levels of bizarre. And a common level on fox is that one you ran with. Responding in that way you did to what was in that clip.

      • Brett Dale 12.1.1


        You dont let the person die, its ugly I know, its looks terrible. but what else do you do?

        • Pascal's bookie

          Not lock them up in a legal blackhole Brett. It’s not difficult mate.

          • Brett Dale


            Ya can blame Bush for that, believe me President Obama will do his best to close it buy the end of his term.

            • Pascal's bookie

              Why should I believe you Brett?

              The Obama administration had argued the court did not have jurisdiction. Under federal law, civilian courts do not have jurisdiction to hear cases concerning the detention, treatment or conditions of confinement of any enemy combatant, Kessler wrote, citing a 2009 court decision. Government lawyers said the government had well-established legal authority to force-feed hunger-striking detainees.

              Read more: Guantanamo Inmates Request To Stop Force Feeding Denied – The Gitmo Torture Obama Is Ignoring – Esquire
              Follow us: @Esquiremag on Twitter | Esquire on Facebook
              Visit us at Esquire.com

              That’s Obama using Bush era legal arguments in court in order to what? Hold people in gitmo even if that means torturing them.

              • He cant do nothing while the repugs control the house.

                • When I saw you’d commented on a post about intelligence, Brett, I decided it was time to call it a day. Then curiosity got the better of me (I really wanted to know whether “Brett Dale” and “intelligence” weren’t an oxymoron) and to my surprise I found a little gem. “…repugs control the house”. Brilliant.

                • felix

                  The legal opinion above doesn’t come from the the house, Brett. It comes from the executive.

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts


  • September benefit figures disappointing
    The Government is out of touch with the reality that fewer people are going off the benefit and into employment or study, says Labour’s Social Development spokesperson Carmel Sepuloni.  “The quarterly benefit numbers for September are concerning. They show that ...
    3 days ago
  • MFAT officials refuse to back Prime Minister on Saudi sheep claims
    An Ombudsman’s interim decision released about the existence or otherwise of legal advice on the multimillion dollar Saudi sheep deal shows MFAT has failed to back up the Prime Minister’s claims on the matter, says Labour MP David Parker. “The ...
    3 days ago
  • Nats still planning to take Housing NZ dividend
    Housing New Zealand’s Statement of Performance Expectations shows that the National Government intends to pocket $237m from Housing New Zealand this year including a $54m “surplus distribution”, despite promises that dividends would stop, says Labour’s Housing spokesperson Phil Twyford. “After ...
    4 days ago
  • Parliament must restore democracy for Ecan
    Parliament has a chance to return full democracy to Canterbury with the drawing of a member’s bill that would replace the Government’s appointed commissioners with democratically elected councillors, says Labour’s Canterbury Spokesperson Megan Woods. “In 2010, the Government stripped Cantabrians ...
    4 days ago
  • Police struggle to hold the line in Northland
    Labour’s promise of a thousand extra police will go a long way to calming the fears of people in the North, says the MP for Te Tai Tokerau Kelvin Davis.  “Police are talking about the Northland towns of Kaitaia and ...
    4 days ago
  • Urgent action on agriculture emissions needed
    Immediate action is required to curb agricultural emissions is the loud and clear message from Climate change & agriculture: Understanding the biological greenhouse gases report released today by the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, says Labour’s Climate Change spokesperson Megan ...
    5 days ago
  • Super Fund climate change approach a good start
    Labour Finance Spokesperson Grant Robertson and Climate Change Spokesperson Dr Megan Woods have welcomed the adoption of a climate change investment strategy by the New Zealand Super Fund. “This is a good start. It is a welcome development that the Super ...
    5 days ago
  • Raising the age the right thing to do
    The announcement today that the Government will leave the door open for young people leaving state care still means there is a lot of work to do, says Labour's Spokesperson for Children, Jacinda Ardern "The Government indicated some time ago ...
    5 days ago
  • Coleman plays down the plight of junior doctors
    Junior doctors are crucial to our health services and the industrial action that continues tomorrow shows how desperately the Government has underfunded health, says Labour’s Health spokesperson Annette King.  “Jonathan Coleman’s claim that he has not seen objective evidence of ...
    6 days ago
  • Inflation piles pressure on National and Reserve Bank
    While many households will welcome the low inflation figures announced today, they highlight serious questions for both the National government and the Reserve Bank, Labour’s  Finance Spokesperson Grant Robertson said.  "While low inflation will be welcomed by many, the ...
    6 days ago
  • Officials warned Nat’s $1b infrastructure fund ineffective and rushed
    Treasury papers show the Government rushed out an infrastructure announcement officials told them risked making no significant difference to housing supply, says Labour’s housing spokesperson Phil Twyford.  “Like so much of National’s housing policy, this was another poll-driven PR initiative ...
    6 days ago
  • More cops needed to tackle P
    New Police statistics obtained in Written Questions show John Key is losing his War on P, highlighting the need for more Police, says Opposition Leader Andrew Little.  “New Zealanders expect serious action on P but today’s hodgepodge of half-measures won’t ...
    7 days ago
  • MBIE docs show country needs KiwiBuild, not Key’s pretend “building boom”
    John Key’s spin that New Zealand is in a building boom does not change the massive shortfall in building construction as new MBIE papers reveal, says Labour Party housing spokesperson Phil Twyford.  “We can fix the housing crisis, by the ...
    1 week ago
  • 1 in 7 Akl houses now going to big property speculators
    Speculators are running riot in the Auckland housing market making life tougher for first home buyers, says Labour’s housing spokesperson Phil Twyford.  Newly released data from Core Logic shows a 40 per cent increase in the share of house sales ...
    1 week ago
  • Labour mourns passing of Helen Kelly
    Helen Kelly was a passionate advocate for working New Zealanders and for a safe and decent working life, Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little says.  “Helen Kelly spent her adult life fighting for the right of every working person to ...
    1 week ago
  • Andrew Little: Speech to the Police Association Conference 2016
    Police Association delegates, Association life members and staff, representatives from overseas jurisdictions. Thank you for inviting me here today. The Police Association has become a strong and respected voice for Police officers and for policing in New Zealand. There is ...
    2 weeks ago
  • 1,000 more police for safer communities
    Labour will fund an extra 1,000 Police in its first term to tackle the rising rate of crime, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. “Labour will put more cops on the beat to keep our communities safe. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Call for all-party round table on homelessness
    Labour is calling on the Government to take part in a roundtable meeting to hammer out a cross-party agreement on ending homelessness.  Labour’s housing spokesperson Phil Twyford said the country wanted positive solutions to homelessness, and wanted the political parties ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Working people carrying the can for the Government
    Today’s announcement of a Government operating surplus is the result of the hard work of many Kiwi businesses and workers, who will be asking themselves if they are receiving their fair share of growth in the economy, Grant Robertson Labour ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Breast cancer drugs should be available
    Labour supports the Breast Cancer Aotearoa Coalition’s campaign for better access to cancer treatments as more patients are denied what is freely available in Australia, says Labour’s Health spokesperson Annette King.  “In the last three years, PHARMAC’s funding has been ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Community law centres get much needed support from banks
      New Zealand’s network of community law centres, who operate out of more than 140 locations across the country, have today received a much needed boost, says Labour’s Justice spokesperson Jacinda Ardern.  “After more than 8 years of static funding ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Just 18 affordable homes in Auckland SHAs – It’s time for KiwiBuild
    New data revealing just 18 affordable homes have been built and sold to first home buyers in Auckland’s Special Housing Areas show National’s flagship housing policy has failed and Labour’s comprehensive housing plan is needed, says Leader of the Opposition ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Pasifika wins big in Auckland elections
    The Labour Party’s Pacific Candidates who stood for local elections in Auckland came out on top with 14 winners, says Labour’s Pacific Island Affairs spokesperson Su’a William Sio. “Our candidates have won seats on one ward, four local boards, two ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Seven7 hikoi to stop sexual violence
    2 weeks ago
  • Road toll passes 2013 total
    The road toll for the year to date has already passed the total for the whole of 2013, raising serious questions about the Government’s underfunding of road safety, says Labour’s Transport spokesperson Sue Moroney.  “According to the Ministry of Transport, ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Bay principals slam charter school decision
    A letter from Hawke’s Bay principals to the Education Minister slams the lack of consultation over the establishment of a charter school in the region and seriously calls into question the decision making going on under Hekia Parata’s watch, says ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Government needs to act on voter turnout crisis
    With fewer than 40 per cent of eligible voters having their say in the 2016 local elections, the Government must get serious and come up with a plan to increase voter turnout, says Labour’s Local Government Spokesperson Meka Whaitiri. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Inquiry presents solutions to homelessness – Govt must act
    Labour, the Green Party and the Māori Party are calling on the Government to immediately adopt the 20 recommendations set out in today's Ending Homelessness in New Zealand report. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • A good night for Labour’s local government candidates
    It has been a good night for Labour in the local government elections. In Wellington, Justin Lester became the first Labour mayor for 30 years, leading a council where three out of four Labour candidates were elected. Both of Labour’s ...
    2 weeks ago
  • More contenders for fight clubs
    Allegations of fight clubs spreading to other Serco-run prisons must be properly investigated says Labour’s Corrections spokesperson Kelvin Davis. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Minister runs for cover on job losses
    Māori Development Minister Te Ururoa Flavell’s refusal to show leadership and provide assurances over the future of the Māori Land Court is disappointing, given he is spearheading contentious Maori land reforms which will impact on the functions of the Court, ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Kiwisaver contribution holiday not the break workers were looking for
    The number of working New Zealanders needing to stop Kiwisaver payments is another sign that many people are not seeing benefit from growth in the economy, says Grant Robertson Labour’s Finance spokesperson. "There has been an increase of 14 ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Fight Club failings
    The Corrections Minister must take full responsibility for the widespread management failings within Mt Eden prison, says Labour’s Corrections spokesperson Kelvin Davis. ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Rethink welcomed
    The Labour Party is pleased that Craig Foss is reconsidering the return of New Zealand soldiers buried in Malaysia, says Labour’s Foreign Affairs spokesperson David Shearer. “For the families of those who lie there, this will a welcome move. The ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Disappointment over UN vote
    Helen Clark showed her characteristic drive and determination in her campaign to be UN Secretary General, and most New Zealanders will be disappointed she hasn't been selected, says the Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. "Helen Clark has been an ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Māori need answers on Land Court job losses
    Māori landowners, Māori employees and Treaty partners need answers after a Ministry of Justice consultation document has revealed dozens of roles will be disestablished at the Māori Land Court, says Ikaroa-Rāwhiti MP Meka Whaitiri. ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Key’s ‘efficiencies’ = DHBs’ pain
          John Key’s talk of ‘efficiencies’ ignores the fact the Government is chronically underfunding health to the tune of $1.7 billion, says Labour’s Acting Health spokesperson Dr David Clark.       ...
    3 weeks ago
  • More than 1,300 schools to face budget cuts
    The latest Ministry of Education figures reveal thousands of schools will face cuts to funding under National’s new operations grant funding model, says Labour's Education spokesperson Chris Hipkins. ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Speculation fever spreads around country
    House prices in Wellington, Hamilton and Tauranga are going off as a result of uncontrolled property speculation spilling over from the Auckland market, says Labour’s housing spokesperson Phil Twyford.  “Speculators who have been priced out of Auckland are now fanning ...
    3 weeks ago
  • New Zealand lags on aid targets
      The National Government needs to live up to its commitments and allocate 0.7 per cent of Gross National Income on development assistance, says Labour’s spokesperson on Pacific Climate Change Su’a William Sio.  “The second State of the Environment Report ...
    3 weeks ago
  • War on drugs needs more troops
    The Minister of Police must urgently address the number of officers investigating illegal drugs if she is serious about making a dent in the meth trade, says Labour’s Police spokesperson Stuart Nash.  “Answers from written questions from the Minister show ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Doctors strike symptom of health cuts
    The notice of strike action issued by the junior doctors today is the result of years of National’s cuts to the health system, says Labour’s Associate Health spokesperson Dr David Clark. ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Government starves RNZ into selling Auckland asset
    Just weeks after TVNZ opened its refurbished Auckland head office costing more than $60 million, RNZ (Radio New Zealand) has been forced to put its Auckland office on the market to keep itself afloat, says Labour’s Broadcasting spokesperson Clare Curran. ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Government must be more than a bystander on the economy
    Despite what he might think John Key is not a political commentator, but actually a leader in a Government who needs to take responsibility for the conditions that mean a rise in interest rates, says Labour’s Finance Spokesperson Grant Robertson.  “John ...
    3 weeks ago