web analytics

The $10b hole in National’s budget

Written By: - Date published: 9:00 am, July 20th, 2011 - 61 comments
Categories: privatisation - Tags:

Things are going from bad to worse for Steven Joyce. Labour has released its estimate of the cost of lost dividends by 2025 if National’s asset sales plan goes ahead: $9.7b. All omitted from National’s budget. Labour has challenged National to concede the numbers or provide its own. Instead, Joyce’s excuses just show he doesn’t understand accounting. This is getting seriously embarrassing for National.

We all know now that National has booked the revenue from asset sales, which it doesn’t have a mandate for, but not booked the costs. Budget 2011 includes the revenue but not the loss in dividends. Bill English confirmed it in Parliament last week to David Cunliffe when discussing the debt track in the Budget:

Hon David Cunliffe: Given that the Minister’s 2011 Budget has already booked the proceeds of those asset sales, for which he has just confirmed that he lacks a mandate, did his Government’s Budget 2011 Fiscal Strategy Report set the upper net debt ceiling at 35 percent, and what guarantee can he offer that his policies will not break this limit when his Budget does not properly account for the costs of his Government’s plan to sell public assets?

Hon BILL ENGLISH: The 35 percent ceiling is well above where we expect net debt to peak, which will be just under 30 percent. I think this will be more of an issue for the member. If he says he will use a capital gains tax to offset sales of assets, he cannot count the dividends, because they are still in the Budget now. He cannot add dividends from retaining State assets. They are still in the Budget.

Labour took the asset sales revenue out of its debt track but didn’t add in dividends. Instead, it deducted the dividends from National. That gives the solid blue line in their graph, which includes asset sales revenue as well as lost dividends:

Labour haven’t released the full calculations but they reckon it will add up to $9.7 billion by 2025, lost dividends and the interest resulting from extra borrowing as a result combined.

That seems like a lot but we’re talking 10-13 years’ dividends on $7 billion worth of assets. Add in inflation, add in compounding interest, and $10 billion could well be in the right ballpark.

At any rate, it’s up to National to provide their own numbers to counter Labour’s. Steven Joyce, who is fronting the issue [is Bill English overseas as well as Key? – Eddie], has refused. Instead, he says:

“The Treasury has advised that any reduction in dividends as a result of extending the mixed ownership model would be offset by reduced debt servicing costs due to the proceeds from sales”

Oh dear. Joyce hasn’t been listening to the boss: the proceeds from sales and their impact on debt are already booked in the Budget, the lost dividends have not been. So, he can’t say ‘oh, the lost dividends will be offset by reduced borrowing’ because that would be counting the sale proceeds twice.

I hope he didn’t do that when he used to run Mediaworks.

– Bright Red

 

61 comments on “The $10b hole in National’s budget ”

  1. Lanthanide 1

    Serious Fraud Office should investigate and put out a press release, if nothing else. If this sort of dodgy accounting was done by a finance company, they’d be in the poo for it.

    Steven Joyce’s excuse doesn’t even make sense. If the dividend stream were offset by reduced debt costs, then we would see a line item in the budget called “Interest costs” that was lower, and the line item that said “Dividends from SoEs” would also be lower. You don’t record reduced Interest Costs by keeping Interest Costs the same and Dividends from SoEs the same.

    • lprent 1.1

      I thought this type of crap accounting that English put in his budget (counting the revenue, but not the downstream costs) was specifically forbidden by Fiscal Responsibility Act?

      • Pascal's bookie 1.1.1

        I thought so too.

      • bbfloyd 1.1.2

        maybe that’s one of the changes made under urgency that we are yet to discover.. there must be a mountain of them considering how profligate they have been with secrecy..

        • Lanthanide 1.1.2.1

          Eh?

          Laws passed under urgency are still public knowledge.

          • Draco T Bastard 1.1.2.1.1

            There’s a difference between them being publicly available and being advertised.

            • Lanthanide 1.1.2.1.1.1

              I’m sure if National had rushed through a change to the Fiscal Responsibility Act under urgency we would have heard about it.

      • mickysavage 1.1.3

        I believe Blinglish is avoiding the requirement to put in the lower dividend stream because the actual amounts are “unquantified”.  Beggars me how he can do it.  If there are figures there for expected income from dividends then you just have to deduct 49% from the figure.
         
        This is shonky in the extreme and everyone I have explained it to assume a dazed look when they try to understand how it can be happening.
         
        Where is the MSM when you need them?
         

        • Draco T Bastard 1.1.3.1

          Where is the MSM when you need them?

          Kissing NActs butt just like their owners want then to.

  2. Jared 2

    Im confused, is the inference that Nationals Budget has or hasnt included the dividends it would have received if they kept full ownership of the SOE’s?

    • lprent 2.1

      They have counted in receiving the full dividends from the their current shareholding in their revenue, whilst also counting in the revenue from the sales of part of the shares.

      Effectively they have double counted the revenue since you cannot receive dividends from shares that you have sold.

    • mik e 2.2

      This is typical National telling the country they are better at running the country . In reality the the only thing they are better at is telling porkies, while they flog off our high performance assets to their mates.

      • Colonial Viper 2.2.1

        the issue is that over half of all people seem blithely oblivious or uncaring to all the %^$# going down.

        Definitely need an independent Left MSM.

        • Roflcopter 2.2.1.1

          Independent left MSM? How does that work? 🙂

          • Colonial Viper 2.2.1.1.1

            yeah I know its a bit of an oxymoron lol

            I’d settle for an MSM which asked some decent probing questions around the place and didn’t put up with being fobbed off with one liners 🙂

            • Ozimandeus 2.2.1.1.1.1

              We don’t necessarily need an independent LEFT MSM. We just need and INDEPEDENT MSM. Loving the murdoch strife!

  3. Colonial Viper 3

    Can we please have a Government of nation builders and investors in the people, and not one rushing to make a quick buck, treating Aoteroa as the latest hot property to flip to the Chinese.

  4. Craig Glen Eden 4

    Cunliffe is all over these three Key, English and Joyce. If the media do their job even a half baked one the Nats are really going to struggle to get out of this.

    • bbfloyd 4.1

      you know that’s not what they have been paid to do.. it’s a nice fantasy though.

  5. Lazy Susan 5

    English pulls out the “double dip” routine again.

    This really demonstrates the contempt Key, English and Joyce have for integrity and due process. If the MSM were doing their job NAct might be a bit more cautious about playing so fast and loose.

    Cunliffe is doing a great job – he’s tenacious and has a gravitas that walks all over these three muppets,

  6. mik e 6

    The media are not tackling Joyce on this or any other issues because they are media trained and know how to answer a question with a question or just spin or cut short an interview not give an interview. But they do go on their networks mediaworks where they get asked passive questions by friendly hosts not independent genuine reporters.

  7. Tangled up in blue 7

    Oh dear. Joyce hasn’t been listening to the boss: the proceeds from sales and their impact on debt are already booked in the Budget

    So just to clarify; the money saved from paying less interest on Govt. debt has been factored in already?

    • Lanthanide 7.1

      No, because the budget effectively says:

      Before asset sales: $X/year in revenues.
      After asset sales: $X/year in revenues.

      If the interest payments are decreased, the correct way to account for that in the budget would be like this:
      Before asset sales: $X/year in revenues, $Z/year in interest costs

      After asset sales: $Y/year in revenues. $W/year in interest costs

      Where Y < X and W < Z.

      Either the government made a mistake that anyone with common sense, let alone accountancy 101, would spot, or they are producing a budget that they know is untrue.

      Choose: woefully incompetent or fraudulently corrupt.

      • Tangled up in blue 7.1.1

        Choose: woefully incompetent or fraudulently corrupt.

        I’ll take “woefully incompetent” for 500, Alex .

    • mik e 7.2

      TGIB is that why Joyce is not answering any Questions about these figures his beloved govt funded treasury predictions didn,t include longterm loss of income from selling of our best performing assets at fire sale prices why don,t you ask him tangled one.maybe its tangled up in the fobby figures like the other treasury prediction from treasury of a170000 new jobs in 4years, or we are going to catch up with Australia

      • Draco T Bastard 7.2.1

        …best performing assets at fire sale prices…

        That something that needs to asked. How much, in today’s terms, did these assets cost us to build?

        If sale price is less than the cost to build them then we will be directly subsidising the private owners for the difference.

        • Colonial Viper 7.2.1.1

          Ah good question. Replacement value of those assets. Need to find that out.

  8. tsmithfield 8

    1. There is the offset in reduced interest costs for the government not having to borrow so much to take into account.

    2. If the partially sold entities are able to raise funds through equity sales rather than borrowing, then the percentage yield to equity holders (including the government) will increase as the money saved in interest is passed through to equity holders (including the government) as increased dividends. Also, if the entities are able to more easily raise funds for expansion etc and thus increase profitability faster, the dividend returns to equity holders (including the government) will increase in percentage terms.

    3. It is likely that the superfund will invest purchase shares in the entities. Thus a portion of any short-term loss in dividend will be returned in the form of longer-term returns to the superfund.

    Taking these factors into account, I am not sure it is at all clear that the government will be losing revenue as a result of asset sales.

  9. johnm 9

    Let’s leave out the rational techno management accounting BS.These asset sales are DAYLIGHT ROBBERY from the Public purse which empowers us(Whom the Government is supposed to represent-all of us!) to help all NZers not just the rich!(And foreign Investors,a Neo-Liberal tenet is that foreign investment is always good in your economy-look what happened to the Celtic tiger!) However NeoLiberalism does not recognise the Public commons but seeks to have us ruled by BS bankers and accountants,ruled by the Profit motive not the common good.

    “Neoliberalism, at its heart, is class war from above waged under the guise of rational, technocratic management of an economy that must – as neoliberals claim – be shielded from the corrosive influences of democratic politics. But if inequality and social injustice is to be reversed, we need more politicization, more class conflict, not less.”

    The simple answer is to obtain more revenue: We need a CGT retrospective for the last 10 years plus a reversal of the last tax cuts for the rich.

    • Colonial Viper 9.1

      The simple answer is to obtain more revenue: We need a CGT retrospective for the last 10 years plus a reversal of the last tax cuts for the rich.

      The retrospective CGT is not likely to be do-able.

      One reason being that anyone who owned a house through that period and sold now, would likely not be left with enough to buy another home at current market prices, any where in NZ.

      Another reason being that many of the people who sold out during that time and realised those gains are either long gone, or their money is.

      Thirdly, the effect of the mortgage debt overhang on the system needs to be considered. Asset prices may fall but the debt remains. Enforcing a broadly retrospective CGT would cause many home owners to go ‘under water’ as housing prices fell precipitously.

  10. mik e 10

    You would think Queenstreet farmer would have all the answers for Joyce aye !I think they will just keep Quiet an hope the mainstream media doesn,t ask the hard questions

  11. TightyRighty 11

    so labour, who can’t be trusted to cost anything, say that the costs of of nationals plan are wrong? they can’t even figure out how to cost an election campaign, so must borrow from the public purse skirting dangerously close to the law. this is classic blue star digital misdirection by labour to deflect attention away from the poorly thought out grab bag “game changer” that is there announced fiscal policy. yawning, so tired from being bored by the parrots and sock puppets on this site slavering away at the altar of opposition.

    • lprent 11.1

      I realize that after casting your brain patterns in concrete that you might have a problem. But you can satisfy yourself that having a calcified intelligence and a unwillingness to face inevitable change is the mark of a true bonehead conservative.

      Or you could look at the content of the post – something you are obviously too afraid to do.

      • TightyRighty 11.1.1

        oh, I looked. I did the math and cunliffe and BR have it wrong. As usual. I don’t know why i bothered to do the math seeing as it was silent t opening his mouth and making sounds roughly equivalent to a make cow defecating, but i did, and Silent T and BR are wrong. quell horreur.

        • TightyRighty 11.1.1.1

          and by the way, i’m not a conservative who clings desperately to the old ways. I’m a classical liberal. I actually support the idea of a CGT, but as part of a wider measure to reduce paye-tax levels for all earners, that doesn’t include a no income tax bracket. backed up by a two tier income tax system with low rates and no exemptions anywhere, a benefit regime that is closer to sweden than stalinist russia and little difference between business, personal and trust tax rates. Labours policies are shit because they formulated by politicians who have passed through the parliamentary digestive tract and are about to be shat out of parliament. Like cheap meat, they have hung around in the digestive track for far to long.

          • lprent 11.1.1.1.1

            i’m not a conservative who clings desperately to the old ways.

            You could have fooled me.

            ..but as part of a wider measure..

            And your statement of which that was a part had this uncanny sound of Sir Humphrey to me. I finally tracked it down to the phrase above. Wasn’t that his signature phrase for when he was dissembling into a very long way of saying “I don’t want to do it?”.

            The point is that you can study this kind of thing as much as you like, it makes no difference. At some point it just has to be done. Since damn near every other OECD country has a CGT it is easy enough to put one in that works roughly the way we need it to and then change it over the long term as the need arises.

            As for other tax adjustments – after significant revenue starts arriving from a CGT (because it’ll take a decade with grandfathering) then you will have had a lot of time to consider how you’d adjust the overall tax package. But the primary effect; a slow change in investment behavior will happen from pretty much the time that the tax bill is introduced.

            Face it, you’re just blithering like Sir Humphrey..

            • Secret Squirrel 11.1.1.1.1.1

              But the primary effect; a slow change in investment behavior will happen from pretty much the time that the tax bill is introduced.

              If different investment types are all treated the same with CGT why would behaviour change? Unless you mean structuring to avoid CGT?

              • Colonial Viper

                It changes because you don’t seem to (want to) understand the impact of a CGT around leverage and gearing around property vis a vis SMEs and start ups.

                A CGT changes the balance of business cases in several subtle ways.

                Do a bit of reading up on it is my suggestion.

                • We can only guess at what it would change, leading up to, and then short and longer term afterwards. We can guess a bit better looking at what has happened elsewhere but we would be changing from different conditions to anywhere else in quite different economic times.

                  Expecting to change behaviour is a major punt.

                  About the only thing that’s certain is there will be predicted consequences and unpredicted consequences.

                  • Lanthanide

                    It’s really not “guessing”, it’s an informed estimate, or forecast of what is expected.

                    “Expecting to change behaviour is a major punt.”

                    If behaviour isn’t changed, then the government will get a greater revenue stream than what they’re predicting, won’t they?

                  • Colonial Viper

                    Expecting to change behaviour is a major punt.

                    What, don’t you believe that people are economically rational agents? That’s one of the foundation stones of Chicago school neoliberal economics.

                    🙄

                  • Even Labour aren’t sure of a lot of details, they’re leaving plenty to the Expert Group.

                    What the Expert Group recommends and Labour ends up doing will be critical to how it works – you can be sure that loopholes will be searched for, and some will be found, and that will determine behaviour as much as anything does.

                    So until the Expert Group does it’s bit, and until Labour implements the final structure, there has to be a lot of guessing. And even then it will take years to see what works as intended, what loopholes are used, what loopholes prove popular, and what holes are plugged etc etc.

                    Revenue streams are also major guesswork (from both parties). Even with existing tax structures with known foibles and effects the forecasts are often awry.

                    • Colonial Viper

                      wah wah wah

                      If you don’t like uncertainty please don’t be a politician

                      Getting to the same point in repaid debt but without selling off our key strategic assets seems like a bloody good deal mate.

                      As your broker, I recommend you take it.

                    • One thing you can say with certainty Squirrel if you had an appreciation of history is that Cullen consistently adopted a cautious prudent set of figures and they were always better than forecast whereas Blinglish has this habit of pulling figures out of his arse and the actual figures are worse.
                       
                      Revenue streams are not major guesswork.  Leaving in an income stream that will half is dishonesty verging on fraud.

                    • I agree that Cullen was generally prudent, although that could be argued on policies that cost big time like student loans and WFF. And if he predicted his revenue streams carefully he knowingly screwed wage workers with bracket creep.

                      But like every country Cullen would have had difficulty predicitng revenue streams from 2008 through to now.

                      And he would have even more trouble predicting revenue 15 years ahead on a complex, unfinished and untested new tax regime.

                    • Colonial Viper

                      If you can’t deal with uncertainty in working with the long term future of the country (not that planning forwards 15 years is particularly long term), don’t be a politician.

                    • lprent

                      That is the point of legislation (and any other type of software). You know that it won’t be perfect when released – what you’re after is that it works, is functional and doesn’t have any known blue screen flaws. You’ll have to tweak it several times as the real world (and the accounts, lawyers, and courts have a go at it). You do that by releasing updates (and amendments) as required. Hopefully if you get it right, after the first couple of years, you’ll only have to update every decade unlesss you put out a marketing (political) release.

                      I’m afraid that I have zero time for people that want anything to be perfect when released. They obviously don’t spend a lot of time engineering systems. I do it for a living and you build with the best development systems in the world and the damn things will still spring bugs in the real world…..

                      Of course I’m not a randite or any other type of branch of the politically religious

                    • Colonial Viper

                      S.S. has at least 15 years of work experience in an R&D focussed company. So he has said previously.

          • mik e 11.1.1.1.2

            you can tell when the right are wrong they have no other option than to be abusive bullies

          • Draco T Bastard 11.1.1.1.3

            I’m a classical liberal.

            Yeah, a conservative. An idiot looking back to the failed ideas of the 18th century as a solution to today’s problems caused by those failed ideas.

          • Craig Glen Eden 11.1.1.1.4

            Show us your figures Tighty,its show and tell time genius!

        • Lanthanide 11.1.1.2

          If you “did the math”, surely you wouldn’t mind sharing it with us to show us how Cunliffe and BR are wrong?

          In other words: put up, or shut up.

        • lprent 11.1.1.3

          If you “did the math”, surely you wouldn’t mind sharing it with us to show us how Cunliffe and BR are wrong?

          Pretty much my thought as well.

          All I did was to check that the relevant bits were in and out of the budget as Cunliffe had specified (and yes he was correct). Then a bit of the back of a piece of paper to see what kind of compounding I got something in the right order. It had bugger all to do with any kind of calcs – it was simply a matter of book-keeping. They put both types of revenue into the budget despite ‘selling’ the source of the revenue. In my views that is simply criminal accounting.

          I was thinking about doing a NPV on the revenue streams but realized that our governmental accountants weren’t treating this like a project, so there wasn’t any discount rate.

          • Ozimandeus 11.1.1.3.1

            And that is the point surely? To claim the value of the sale of assets without accounting for the loss of revenue from the sold assets into the future ( I am unable to write “going forward”) is conscious fraud. I am no accountant but I can see a cheat at work

  12. tc 12

    Attention all you believers in the Nats budget and economic plan…..I gotta few bridges I’d like to sell you, great return, good patronage, one careful owner….just like our power compaines.

  13. Jum 13

    (Hope this is okay to transfer) – found this on Public Address: priceless…

    ‘Monopoly 101, never sell the utilities…

    The utilities were lame assets in Monopoly. The average payout from landing on them if someone owned both was $70. Compare that with $700 for landing on one of just the weak blue properties with a hotel on it. Or $2000 for landing on Mayfair with a hotel – game over, most times.

    The railways were pretty good earners too, the best thing being the constant drip feed of cash since they’re evenly distributed…

    You can’t force anyone to stay at a Mayfair hotel, but if you own the electricity and water, you can pretty much force them to pay you every month.

    You could quite easily make Mayfair an undesirable suburb by cutting the power and water.’

    Let’s cut off the power and water to Key in Parnell and Joyce on his holiday highway…

    (Given that I haven’t forgiven Russell Brown for getting it so wrong on the Warner Bros sellout by Key)

  14. mik e 14

    Tighty Ireland Portugal Greece the piigs are being forced to sell their assets no one wants them except Greeces lotto business which has been sold for 400million euros yet it is returning 900million euros in profit each year its true value should be around the $15-$20 bilion dollars. Same with our assets they are returning 700million+ a year they should be worth $10-$13 billion not the 1/2 that price National are trying to sell them for . Steven Murdoch Joyces figures only covered a 5 year period after the sale not the consequences of the lost income after that period when the govt would lose the $700 million a year lost income however they won,t be around then so all they care about is winning this election .If he was able to get their true value i wouldn,t have to call them and you economically ignorant.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • NZ announces a third P-3 deployment in support of UN sanctions
    The Government has deployed a Royal New Zealand Air Force P-3K2 Orion (P-3) maritime patrol aircraft to support the implementation of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions imposing sanctions against North Korea, announced Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters and Minister of Defence Ron Mark. “New Zealand has long supported ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Pacific trade and development agreement a reality
    Pacific regional trade and development agreement PACER Plus will enter into force in 60 days now that the required eight countries have ratified it. Trade and Export Growth Minister David Parker welcomed the announcement that the Cook Islands is the eighth nation to ratify this landmark agreement. “The agreement represents ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Securing a pipeline of teachers
    The Government is changing its approach to teacher recruitment as COVID-19 travel restrictions continue, by boosting a range of initiatives to get more Kiwis into teaching. “When we came into Government, we were faced with a teacher supply crisis,” Education Minister Chris Hipkins said. “Over the past three years, we ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Border exceptions for a small number of international students with visas
    The Government has established a new category that will allow 250 international PhD and postgraduate students to enter New Zealand and continue their studies, in the latest set of border exceptions. “The health, safety and wellbeing of people in New Zealand remains the Government’s top priority. Tight border restrictions remain ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • First COVID-19 vaccine purchase agreement signed
    The Government has signed an agreement to purchase 1.5 million COVID-19 vaccines – enough for 750,000 people – from Pfizer and BioNTech, subject to the vaccine successfully completing all clinical trials and passing regulatory approvals in New Zealand, say Research, Science and Innovation Minister Megan Woods and Health Minister Chris Hipkins. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • International statement – End-to-end encryption and public safety
    We, the undersigned, support strong encryption, which plays a crucial role in protecting personal data, privacy, intellectual property, trade secrets and cyber security.  It also serves a vital purpose in repressive states to protect journalists, human rights defenders and other vulnerable people, as stated in the 2017 resolution of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Ministry of Defence Biodefence Assessment released
    The Ministry of Defence has today released a Defence Assessment examining Defence’s role across the spectrum of biological hazards and threats facing New Zealand. Biodefence: Preparing for a New Era of Biological Hazards and Threats looks at how the NZDF supports other agencies’ biodefence activities, and considers the context of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New Approaches to Economic Challenges: Confronting Planetary Emergencies: OECD 9 October 2020
    New Approaches to Economic Challenges: Confronting Planetary Emergencies: OECD 9 October 2020 Hon David Parker’s response following Thomas Piketty and Esther Duflo. Good morning, good afternoon, and good evening, wherever in the world you might be. I first acknowledge the excellent thought provoking speeches of Thomas Piketty and Esther ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Kaipara Moana restoration takes next step
    A Memorandum of Understanding has been signed today at Waihāua Marae between the Crown, local iwi and councils to protect, restore and enhance the mauri of Kaipara Moana in Northland. Environment Minister David Parker signed the document on behalf of the Crown along with representatives from Ngā Maunga Whakahī, Ngāti ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Zealand and Uruguay unite on reducing livestock production emissions
    Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor and Uruguayan Minister of Livestock, Agriculture and Fisheries Carlos María Uriarte have welcomed the launch of a three-year project that will underpin sustainable livestock production in Uruguay, Argentina, and Costa Rica.  The project called ‘Innovation for pasture management’ is led by Uruguay’s National Institute of Agricultural ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • 3100 jobs created through marae upgrades
    Hundreds of marae throughout the country will be upgraded through investments from the Provincial Growth Fund’s refocused post COVID-19 funding to create jobs and put money into the pockets of local tradespeople and businesses, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones and Māori Development Minister Nanaia Mahuta have announced. “A total ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Health volunteers recognised in annual awards
    Health Minister Chris Hipkins has announced 9 teams and 14 individuals are the recipients of this year’s Minister of Health Volunteer Awards.  “The health volunteer awards celebrate and recognise the thousands of dedicated health sector volunteers who give many hours of their time to help other New Zealanders,” Mr Hipkins ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Community COVID-19 Fund supports Pacific recovery
    The Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio says a total of 264 groups and individuals have successfully applied for the Pacific Aotearoa Community COVID-19 Recovery Fund, that will support Pacific communities drive their own COVID-19 recovery strategies, initiatives, and actions. “I am keen to see this Fund support Pacific ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Community benefits from Māori apprenticeships
    Up to 50 Māori apprentices in Wellington will receive paid training to build houses for their local communities, thanks to a $2.75 million investment from the Māori Trades and Training Fund, announced Employment Minister Willie Jackson today. “This funding will enable Ngāti Toa Rangatira Incorporated to provide its Ngā Kaimahi ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Training fund supports Māori jobseekers
    Rapidly growing sectors will benefit from a $990,000 Māori Trades and Training Fund investment which will see Wellington jobseekers supported into work, announced Employment Minister Willie Jackson today. “This funding will enable Sapphire Consultants Ltd. to help up to 45 Māori jobseekers into paid training initiatives over two years through ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Ruakura Inland Port development vital infrastructure for Waikato
    The Government is investing $40 million to develop an inland port at Ruakura which will become a freight super-hub and a future business, research and residential development for the Waikato, Urban Development and Transport Minister Phil Twyford, and Māori Development Minister Nanaia Mahuta announced today. The funding has been has ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Appointments made to Defence Expert Review Group
    Defence Minister Ron Mark announced today the establishment of an Expert Review Group to review a number of aspects of the New Zealand Defence Force’s (NZDF) structure, information management and record-keeping processes.  The Expert Review Group’s work arises out of the first recommendation from the Report of the Government’s Inquiry ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • No active community cases of COVID-19
    There are no active community cases of COVID-19 remaining in the country after the last people from the recent outbreak have recovered from the virus, Health Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “This is a big milestone. New Zealanders have once again through their collective actions squashed the virus. The systems ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Clean energy upgrade for more public buildings
    More public buildings will be supported by the Government to upgrade to run on clean energy, the Minister for Climate Change James Shaw announced today. Minister Shaw announced that Lincoln and Auckland universities will receive support through the Clean-Powered Public Service Fund to replace fossil fuel boilers. Southern, Taranaki, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Schools back donations scheme for the second year
    More schools have opted in to the donations scheme for 2021, compared to 2020 when the scheme was introduced. “The families of more than 447,000 students will be better off next year, with 94% of eligible schools and kura opting into the scheme,” Education Minister Chris Hipkins said. “This is ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Ruapehu cycle trails gets PGF boost
    The spectacular Mountains to Sea cycle trail in Ruapehu District will receive $4.6 million in funding from the Provincial Growth Fund for two additional trails, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones announced today. “This is an exciting development for the local community, and one that will provide significant economic opportunities ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Update to air border order strengthens crew requirements
    Additional measures coming into effect on Monday will boost our defence against COVID-19 entering New Zealand through the air border, Health Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “As part of our precautionary approach and strategy of constant review, we’re tightening the requirements around international aircrew,” Chris Hipkins said. The COVID-19 Public ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • A true picture of Māori business activity
    A better picture of the contribution Māori businesses make to the economy will be possible with changes to the way information is collected about companies and trading enterprises. Māori Development Minister Nanaia Mahuta and Small Business Minister Stuart Nash have announced a new option for Māori enterprises who are part ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • PGF funding for Taranaki projects
    The South Taranaki museum, a New Plymouth distillery and a Pasifika building firm will benefit from a Government investment totalling more than $1 million, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones says. The $1.05m in grants and loans from the Provincial Growth Fund (PGF) will help the recipients expand and create ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Fijian Language Week 2020 inspires courage and strength during COVID-19 pandemic
    The Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio says the theme for the 2020 Fijian Language Week reflects the strong belief by Fijians that their language and culture inspires courage and strength that is strongly needed in times of emergencies, or through a significant challenge like the global COVID-19 pandemic ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Trades training builds on iwi aspirations
    An investment of $2.025 million from the Māori Trades and Training Fund will support Māori to learn new skills while making a positive difference for their communities, announced Employment Minister Willie Jackson today. “K3 Development Limited Partnership will receive $2,025,000 for its Takitimu Tuanui apprenticeship programme, which will support the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago