The Greens’ election campaign launch: game on

Written By: - Date published: 6:05 am, July 24th, 2023 - 66 comments
Categories: election 2023, greens, james shaw - Tags:

New Zealand Green Party co-leader James Shaw knocked it out of the park with his speech to members at the party’s election campaign launch yesterday. Video below starts around 19m. Speech transcript is here.

It’s always worth listening to the Greens in their own words if you want to understand what they are doing, so I encourage people to watch or read the speech. Here are some of the important bits that jumped out at me.

More Ministers, inside Cabinet

Success in this election will be measured by how many Green Ministers the party has inside cabinet in a post-election government. This means a Labour-led government (no, the Greens won’t be considering supporting Nact into government, because a Nact government is antithetical to Green Party policy and direction).

Having Ministers inside cabinet matters. In the last two governments the Greens have been locked out of the power they needed to action progressive policies on climate transition and ending poverty via a GMI and wealth tax. They have had Ministers via their relationship with the Labour/NZ First government and then the Labour majority government, but those Ministers have been outside of cabinet. This means they are excluded from the core decision making processes the government uses, an oft ignored fact by those critical of the Greens for not doing enough.

More votes equals more Ministers which means faster and better change.

The wealth tax and ending poverty

The Greens are not toning down taxing the most wealthiest of New Zealanders in order to lift everyone out of poverty, they’re doubling down. This includes now openly criticising Labour election year policy,

The leader of the Labour Party ruling out any meaningful change to the tax system. 

“With many Kiwi households struggling, now is simply not the time for a big shake-up of our tax system,” he said.

We disagree. 

Let’s be clear: there has *never* been a better time to shake-up our tax system. 

Inequality is not an inevitability. 

It is a political decision – and different decisions can be made. 

Ruling out tax changes that would benefit millions is essentially saying to thousands of people who cannot afford to put food on the table, that’s it. 

That’s your lot. 

Well, we say, the time for half measures is over.

The time for political courage is now. 

End of story. 

Volunteers will determine the election

Yesterday’s speech was for the members and supporters to encourage them to step up and make the election happen for the Greens. There’s a lot here about the power of volunteers, and the importance in this tight election of every door knock and billboard.

No matter what it is, no matter who you are, or where you’re from, this election is about you. 

And only you have the power to make a difference. 

So use it.

We will win this election not because we’ve got millions in the bank, but because we have the most powerful tool any campaign has ever had: 

You. 

The cross benches option

Which brings me to the final, and most exciting point. I was cheering when Shaw said this,

The Green Party has never been interested in power for its own sake. We are – and have always been – focused on what you do with it. 

Which is why no party who wants to work with us after 14th October should ever take our support for granted. 

Whatever hand we are dealt after this election, New Zealanders should be in no doubt that we will make use of every inch of it. 

If that means more Green Ministers in Cabinet, or sitting on the cross benches and fighting on every piece of legislation, we will use our power in the most effective way we can to get the change we so desperately need.  

You probably have to watch the speech to get the full force of that, and understand the process it’s taken to get here and why the Greens are choosing this election to play their final card,

I believe, with every fibre of my being, that we will only achieve the urgent change that our communities need right now, when there are more Green Ministers, sitting around the Cabinet table. 

But even more than that, I know that we cannot afford another term of little steps and half-measures.

The way I see it, if political leaders are not willing to take difficult decisions on behalf of the people of the country they purport to lead, why be in politics at all?

This is a significant shift from the Greens’ long held position of working co-operatively and proactively on government formation rather using the balance of power that small parties can have within the MMP structure. For many years the Greens have courted Labour to establish and maintain a strong working relationship in government formation (remember 2016 and Andrew Little speaking at the Greens AGM as part of the Green Party’s Our Plan to Change the Government?).

Their commitment has been to maintaining that relationship because of the high value placed on consensus within the party and how this enhances democracy. It outweighs the downsides like the risk for smaller parties of being subsumed, or blamed for the larger party’s policy failures (think climate). This has by and large worked in the Greens’ favour and given them time to establish Ministerial experience and make changes within the related government departments.

The shift now to not simply considering the cross benches but actively campaigning on that option, can only be understood in the context of the true nature of the climate and ecology crises, including the absolute urgency of acting now. Not in three or six years, but now. Thus the party’s campaign slogan is “The Time is Now”. Most people are still not acting as if the climate crisis is that urgent, but this is exactly what needs to happen: acting as if we have no time to lose. Finally we have a party in parliament who is willing to lead on this not with rhetoric but action.

People can join the volunteer team (you don’t have to be a member), or donate to the Green Party.

66 comments on “The Greens’ election campaign launch: game on ”

  1. Tony Veitch 1

    Go the Greens!

  2. Ad 2

    Certainly looking attractive compared to my home party.

  3. Roy Cartland 3

    Unless you're TDB, this is a great launch. I like how he suggests we take personalities and crap out of it and look at, I dunno, the policies maybe?

  4. Dennis Frank 4

    Too soon to draw any conclusions about the timing – as far as I know, they still haven't finished deciding their candidate rankings. So the time is now to launch, but the ship hasn't yet been fully constructed.

    Just how sensible this is remains to be seen. Did they even notify the public when their list would be finalised?? You know, as if the electorate ought to take them seriously.

    Hoopla is all very well but doesn't really cut the mustard. They have to play it how their internal process constrains them to do, fair enough. I'll reserve judgment till I see how high they rate Abel, the environmentalist. And how many pc-uttering sloganeering virtue signallers get put above him. Question of sham vs substance…

    • weka 4.1

      The list was announced in May. Abel is at 9. My take on it,

      I'm pretty happy with that. Seven existing MPs, and the new people coming in have a strong environmental focus to redress the imbalance to social justice that was happening before.

      The Greens currently have enough vote for 10 MPs (only 9 in parliament currently because Kerekere decided to stay on as an independent, thus dropping the GP representation). Would be great to see Efeso Collins and Scott Willis coming in at the least.

      Lots of good experience and perspective to vote for here.

      https://thestandard.org.nz/green-party-list-announced-2/#comment-1950564

      • Dennis Frank 4.1.1

        Oh, somehow I must have missed it! Since Kerekere isn't there, looks like you must be right about that: https://www.greens.org.nz/2023_candidates

        After the furore they said they'd go back to members to modify the list & I never saw the media report the result of that process.

        I'm ok with Efeso @ #11. Glad also to see another environmentalist at #6, making her likely to get in…

        • weka 4.1.1.1

          The Standard is often a good source. Use the search box, and search posts, then comments.

  5. SPC 5

    It's an unsurprising response to the Labour's own chosen course to reassure the centre that they will determine the nature of any government they lead.

    It basically means continuance of Labour in office would be as a minority government with confidence and supply from Greens and TPM.

    They would see this as making them more attractive to the centre than NACT.

    In practice Labour would have to make one off deals with Greens (and TPM) each year (budget programme), rather than a coalition deal for the three year period. Be constantly on notice, as to making progress, than just staying in power.

    • weka 5.1

      It also means the Greens would be free to say whatever they like on all Labour policy.

      • Michael P 5.1.1

        Yes but under a confidence and supply agreement they have to ensure the government is stable so can't really say they oppose a policy and then vote for it so that leaves them with saying things like "we support this policy but think it should go further" and things like that. They can't really oppose the government without bringing it down

        So is that a better position for the Greens than having MP's in cabinet and possible policy or parts of policy implemented as part of a coalition government? Do they prefer a Labour led government or a Nat / ACT government because if they don't support Labour then NAT / ACT will be in government.

  6. MickeyBoyle 6

    How can the Greens keep talking about wealth taxes when Chris Hipkins has ruled this out whilst he is PM?

    Are they planning to be able to form a government without Labour?

    Or are they planning for Labour to win the election and then Hipkins stands down?

    It's all very well saying you are for something, but if you have zero chance of delivering it, shouldn't you be honest with voters?

    • SPC 6.1

      It's about being available as a vehicle for those who support wealth taxes, Labour can expect pressure on them to reduce inequality and increase tax revenues by other means.

    • Dennis Frank 6.2

      My take, on the basis of a couple of 5-yr stints as a member, is that they feel it is essential to signal the virtue of the wealth tax. I have no personal objection to that.

      Think of it as moral guidance: a traditional strand of political influence that stretches back through history & has biological roots in prehistory. Then there's also a practical benefit: they use it as a strategy to maximise their party vote.

      The thing then kicks in when the aftermath of a close election produces a feasible Labour-led govt scenario. They use it as leverage to shift Labour: it works in ratio to TMP and/or NZF providing Labour with an alternative option to the Greens.

    • UncookedSelachimorpha 6.3

      Very unlikely, but if Greens+TPM got combined vote greater than Labour, you could get a G/TPM/L government without Labour leading it, I suppose.

    • weka 6.4

      If Labour don't have a majority after the election (extremely unlikely they will), how will they form government without the Greens?

      Small parties always campaign on what they want to have happen.

    • Ad 6.5

      Because it's the right thing to do.

  7. That_guy 7

    Greens are saying the right thing on the clima-eco-apocaypt-omnishambles. Tick.

    Greens understand that when you are living in poverty then your priorities are to not be poor, and you can't expect anyone to change those priorities unless the situation changes. Tick.

    Nobody else seems to want to tax me. Tick.

    Guess it's the Greens. I see this as a low turnout election though.

  8. Corey 8

    A lot of people don't seem to understand mmp 27 years after it was implemented and still seem to think the only way a party can have influence is being kingmaker.

    If Labour and the Greens can pull off a miracle and form a minority or majority coalition, the greens will have bottom lines and both will have to swallow dead rats and come up with a coalition agreement.

    If Labour offers them something like 2020, where the greens had no sway, the greens can threaten to sit in the cross benches making governing a literal nightmare for labour.

    No party will get everything they want but if Labour needs the greens, the greens will force labour to the left on a bunch of issues.

    And if Labour needs the greens and Maori party, both parties will be pushing Labour to the left.

    • weka 8.1

      This.

      It will be interesting to see how Labour manage a situation like that. eg if they have to reverse their position of no wealth tax.

      • MickeyBoyle 8.1.1

        Labour won't be reversing their position on a wealth tax whilst Hipkins is PM.

        He has ruled it out. To reverse that would make his position untenable, the media and public would hammer him.

        It's not happening, wake up to reality.

        • weka 8.1.1.1

          how will Labour form government without the Greens?

          • Belladonna 8.1.1.1.1

            Cross benches? Shaw has already strongly indicated that this would be a preferred option – without substantial change in tax policy from Labour.

            Leaving Labour as a minority government, needing to negotiate legislation piece-by-piece with TPM and GP.

            That scenario is more likely to maintain the status quo of current legislation (since Labour has to get 2 party approval), than to initiate major change.

            • weka 8.1.1.1.1.1

              yes, I know, I wrote the post about it. MB is implying that the Greens don't have much leverage. I'm pointing out that it's extremely likely that the only way Labour get to be government again is by the grace of the Greens. And the Greens have now changed their negotiation position.

        • That_guy 8.1.1.2

          Easy recipe: add one walloping to Labour so that Hipkins is rolled. A dash of good results to the parties and people (eg Parker, TPM, Greens) who are in favour of a wealth tax. Stew for 3 years , and then serve.

          • weka 8.1.1.2.1

            do you mean Labour out of govt for a term? Or Hipkins being rolled before or after the election?

            • Phillip ure 8.1.1.2.1.1

              I think the possibility exists for hipkins to be rolled post election/during coalition negotiations…if grns/tmp hold the keys to a third term..

              And Parker is the obvious (if considering wealth tax) successor .

              • That_guy

                I think Labour will be out of government for a term, yes, and as a result Hipkins will be rolled if that loss can be clearly traced to his craven position on tax.

                • Belladonna

                  I would say that if Labour loses the election, Hipkins will be rolled.

                  He was the compromise candidate to draw Labour back to the centre in order to win the election. If he fails to do this, then there is no need for compromise, and he's out.

                  More interestingly, what will happen if Labour wins, and is able to form a government with the Greens – and TPM support?

                  Will Hipkins remain? Or will he be rolled by the left of the party (who have a more natural alliance with the above? If so – who's the next leader? Wood had a stab earlier this year – but has comprehensively ruled himself out, at least this year. Parker has close to zero charisma – but that doesn't matter so much after the election. He's ruled himself out of contention previously – but could be in line for the Treasury for a more hard-left PM.

                • Drowsy M. Kram

                  I would say that if National loses the election, Luxon will be rolled.

                  He's an inexperienced MP, anointed by Key and elected leader of the opposition Nat party a little over a year after Collins (now National’s spokesperson on Science Innovation and Technology, Foreign Direct Investment) led her party to a big election defeat (didn't ACT do well).

                  Christopher Luxon voted new National Party leader as Simon Bridges withdraws [30 November 2021]

                  It followed Judith Collins' tumultuous exit as leader last week, after she summarily demoted Bridges last week.

                  Shellshocked, MPs went into a hastily called caucus the next morning and cast a vote of no confidence in her. Deputy Shane Reti became interim leader and the vote for leader was set down for today.

                  Expectations are high – if Luxon fails to win, he's out (imho).

                  So who would be National's next leader? Collins would be a disaster, but that's never stopped her. Willis doesn't own as many properties as Luxon, and it seems unlikely that Nat voters could get behind another woman, particularly with the memory of Collins still relatively fresh.

                  National Party leader Chris Luxon’s women drought – Luxon sets 50% women goal but men got most National’s winnable seats s [24 June 2023]

                  Perhaps Reti, Doocey, or S. Brown II (Minister for Potholes in waiting)?

                  Mitchell could be the hard right dark horse – I can't take Bishflap seriously.

                  https://www.national.org.nz/team

                  • Belladonna

                    I agree that Luxon is on thin ice if National loses. Although he's certainly brought the polling up to the point where National is a serious contender (contrast the polls immediately pre-Luxon and now).

                    But, I'd say he's unlikely to be on equally thin ice if National wins.

                    Collins has had her shot. And failed badly. There is little, if any chance that she'd be re-appointed.

                    I suspect you might be looking at the senior women MPs. Willis or Stanford. [Assuming this was actually a serious question]. Remembering that National had the first NZ female PM, Jenny Shipley (much to Helen Clark's fury).

    • Corey-they have something similar to MMP in Spain (not quite the same or as good).

      But people don't understand MMP there either. The western media today was full of the view that "Partido Popular have won". [PP=the Nats here] This is rubbish.

      In fact, while PP have won the most seats, nobody has yet "won". Under MMP and similar systems the "winner" is the party that can put together a coalition that can rule-a government.

      There are lots of small but mostly left wing parties who may yet reelect Pedro Sanchez (PSOE=Labour) by supporting him in coalition to the magic number of 176 seats.

      • Res Publica 8.2.1

        [PP=the Nats here]

        PP is less like the Nats and probably closer to NZ First.

        It was initially born out of the rump of the old Falangist party and was led by a (cautiously) reformist former senior Francoist. Then absorbed a bunch of smaller super reactionary and/or christian democrat parties.

        • Bearded Git 8.2.1.1

          ah ok, that is interesting. More conservative and further to the Right than the Nats then. Though I guess all parties evolve over time.

          Thanks for that res.

          BTW, in the election just held the new left-wing Sumar grouping that includes Podemos needed around 100,000 votes for each of its parliamentary seats while PP needed only 58,000. Just to show how far from true MMP the system is.

    • Michael P 8.3

      "If Labour offers them something like 2020, where the greens had no sway, the greens can threaten to sit in the cross benches making governing a literal nightmare for labour."

      If Labor offers them something like 2020, where the greens had no sway, the greens can threaten to sit in the cross benches and allow NAT / ACT to form a minority coalition…"

      If it's a choice between Labor with Greens support or NAT / ACT, which would the Green party prefer? I'm not sure that the Green Party allowing NAT / ACT into office would gain them any supporters.

      That's one of the problems with our MMP system. Although it is obviously better than FPP in terms of democracy and having a wider range of representation, it is still essentially FPP it's just that at the moment it's 2 on 2 instead of 1 on 1.

      • Belladonna 8.3.1

        That's one of the problems with our MMP system. Although it is obviously better than FPP in terms of democracy and having a wider range of representation, it is still essentially FPP it's just that at the moment it's 2 on 2 instead of 1 on 1.

        However, that hasn't been historically true in the past (even the recent past)

        This election is an anomaly in that there isn't a centrist party – which can go either right or left. NZF and UF both fulfilled that role since MMP was established in NZ.

        ATM, even if Winston manages to resurrect NZF – it won't be as a centrist party. More of a plague on all your houses one – drawing nutters from all corners of the political spectrum. (My sarcastic interpretation based on the media coverage of the conference)

        • Dennis Frank 8.3.1.1

          Good insight. I've a hunch NZF could return, but not on current form. Rabbit still in hat. That 12% undecided portion of the electorate await something substantial from all the various pretenders. Underwhelming in all directions.

  9. BAW 9

    Nat voter here.

    Act and the Greens have the same problem – they have only one party they can work with.

    You can sit on the cross benches – but that does mean that Labour can always talk to the Nats in exchange for getting righty stuff through.

    A wealth tax creates a flag for grumpy people to rally around and attack. But if you tinker with the system – then you have a wealth tax in all but name. Perhaps

    • The sale of any share has capital gains tax.
    • Stamp duty increase.
    • Debt interest is not tax deducutable
    • The sale of any house has capital gains tax.
    • Development levies are charged right away when land is rezoned.

    Oh and Lichtenstein (tax haven) has a wealth tax.

    • weka 9.1

      A wealth tax creates a flag for grumpy people to rally around and attack. But if you tinker with the system – then you have a wealth tax in all but name. Perhaps

      • The sale of any share has capital gains tax.
      • Stamp duty increase.
      • Debt interest is not tax deducutable
      • The sale of any house has capital gains tax.
      • Development levies are charged right away when land is rezoned.

      What is the purpose of this kind of taxation?

      • SPC 9.1.1

        He is suggesting incremental ways to make changes in lieu of a CGT (all but us in the OECD), gift duties/estate tax (2/3rd of the OECD) or a wealth tax.

        At the moment we have the debt interest not being being deductible against rent income and the bright-line test on investment property up to 10 years (which is far better than a CGT on family homes).

        He is suggesting stamp duties (at time of sale – I'd zero rate for all but investors buying up existing property)

        and development levies when land is rezoned for this (a bit aggressive, that's of a design to force people to pay up levies, or sell to developers). The Oz approach of a tax on vacant land in such areas would be better (prevents land banking in these areas) and maybe a levy when applying for consent to develop (to assist councils with their costs – as to infrastructure – more capacity for water removal etc).

        Of course the most obvious alternative to a wealth tax is not a CGT on the family home sales, but an estate tax (with prior gift duties) (where most family homes are below the exemption level),

        A tax on CG on shares, would be best applied where someone has a certain amount of wealth in shares, with most peoples level of ownership being exempt. Thus be a form of wealth tax on share ownership (especially if made based on unrealised gain rather than sales – CGT form)

        • weka 9.1.1.1

          I was asking what the purpose was. The Greens' WT is to fund a GMI etc.

          • SPC 9.1.1.1.1

            Does it need an allocation purpose? The bright-line test money had none, nor does the extra tax of rent income from the loss of mortgage cost deductability.

            (then again a CGT on the family home would make Labour un-electable, thus some sort of purpose to a National party voter)(and placing levies on family home owners, if their suburb is designated for development, would also be seen as onerous).

            • weka 9.1.1.1.1.1

              well sure, government can tinker and use WTs revenue gathering for general purposes.

              The Greens' WT policy exists to end poverty. That's a different thing and imo can't be done with tinkering.

              • SPC

                Sure, only the scale enables real change.

                • weka

                  the scale, but also the design. A whole systems approach that makes fundamental changes vs tinkering around a neoliberal BAU system.

              • Michael P

                It can't be done with tinkering but it can't be done even less in opposition.

                If the Green Party decides to sit on the cross benches then they would have to have a confidence and supply agreement with Labour else Labour couldn't form a minority government and that could open the door for a National Party / ACT minority coalition or even a National minority Government. (Assuming Labour get more MP's than National. )

                That's the thing with our MMP system and due to the fact that the Greens won't ever enter a coalition with National and ACT won't ever enter a coalition with Labor, it is essentially still just FPP, the Greens being the left wing of the Labour Party and ACT being the right wing of the National Party.

                The Greens I'm assuming would prefer a Labour led government to a Nat / Act govt so they have to either form a majority / minority coalition government with Labour or a confidence and supply agreement with a minority Labour government. The alternative is a National / ACT government which I'm assuming would be the Green Party and their supporters least favorable option?

                Assuming that the Green Party will never, certainly not in the short term, get more mp's elected than either the National or Labour governments, then a coalition agreement is more likely to give progress in their policy direction and a minority coalition will most likely give them more positions inside cabinet than what their share of the vote might suggest.

                I don't see how sitting in opposition with a confidence and supply agreement will ever get more Green Party policy through than what they can negotiate in a coalition agreement.

    • weka 9.2

      You can sit on the cross benches – but that does mean that Labour can always talk to the Nats in exchange for getting righty stuff through.

      And the Greens can point that out every time, alongside presenting a more progressive policy/position, including in 2026. It's about shifting the Overton Window, presenting alternative narratives, and being free to talk about climate and poverty.

    • Phillip ure 9.3

      @ baw…

      As a nat voter..do you think there are many of your ilk..who are soft nat voters ..

      Do you think many of them are scared of act…and will flee national/ vote to avert that possibility..?

    • foreign waka 9.4

      Hi BAW Perhaps, and only perhaps, if all those having the means to influence the tax laws would front up with honesty about the white elephant in the room, the nation can move on. It is about equality in the eyes of he tax laws, I mean equality because this is a basis of all laws. I refer to tax exemptions. No one trading in anything and registering income and/or profit should fall under that insidious creeping in of favouritism. Right now this is not the case and the middle and low income earners have to shoulder the burden of maintaining an ever increasing expenditure of providing the basics. The country need investment, how about having everybody paying their share.

  10. Thinker 10

    Except that if you have seats at the Cabinet Table aren't you bound to accept and not challenge the consensus? Aren't they the rules?

    When Marilyn Waring crossed the floor, she did so as an individual, but here we are talking about a party that is wanting to be part of government decision making and have the right to oppose it at the same time.

    The only two ways I can see that happening are:

    1. If they agree to be a partner for confidence and supply, with everything else supported or not on a case-by-case basis, but they would need to be outside Cabinet.

    2. If they go into a coalition government, but with the threat that they will tear up the coalition agreement and send the government into chaos at their choosing, which won't endear itself to Labour (natural partner) and certainly won't endear itself to any not-natural partners.

    I don't think it has been well thought-out.

    • weka 10.1

      but here we are talking about a party that is wanting to be part of government decision making and have the right to oppose it at the same time.

      Depends on what you mean by the party. My reading of Shaw's speech is that it's either this or that, not both. He deeply believes that having a decent number of Ministers within Cabinet is the best way to effect change. However members have been pushing and pointing out that that's not what is happening and that the party might be better off on the cross benches rather than having such limits on power/action.

      For instance, atm, the Minister for Climate sits outside of Cabinet, and is restricted to an extent in what he can say about Labour climate policy or how cabinet are restraining good climate action. Green MPs without a ministerial portfolio are free to speak on GP policy and criticise Labour but there are informal limits on that I think because of the needs to maintain good working relationships.

      How much of that is in the agreement and how much is Shaw/MP's commitment to relationship I don't know. But there is no doubt that Shaw and the party disagree with Labour's positions on climate and is unable to openly criticise that more than he does.

      If the Greens got 15 MPs after the election and the possibility of 5 Ministers, inside cabinet, and they got some decent movement on core climate and poverty/tax policies, then it's worth not being able to openly criticise Labour.

      If they get 10 MPs, and the climate portfolio outside of cabinet, and Labour refusing to move on climate and the WT, they may be better off outside of government altogether, and Labour having to talk to them for every piece of legislation they want to pass. I don't think we've had that kind of government arrangement before and I'm not sure how it would work. I assume it means no confidence and supply, but then would the government even be able to form?

      With the new environmentally focused candidates, the ability to speak strongly on climate alone is gold.

      • weka 10.1.1

        and again, this has to be understood in the context of how urgent the climate crisis is. It's in everything now.

    • Res Publica 10.2

      Except that if you have seats at the Cabinet Table aren't you bound to accept and not challenge the consensus? Aren't they the rules?

      The "rules" (such as they are) are quite flexible. And can vary between governments depending on the arrangements at the time.

      For example, when Winston Peters was Minister for Foreign Affairs, NZ First was only bound by the principle of collective cabinet responsibility when it came to his portfolio. Everything else was fair game.

  11. James Simpson 11

    Chiipy's conservatism is what scares me.

    I think it is critically important that the party's support increases to 15%+. It will be very difficult to demand more than the two ministerial positions that they currently have if support stays around where it is now.

    Hipkins has shown himself to be conservative and centrist, and is unlikely to entertain the "tail wagging the dog". That's why every single party vote Green is so important in this election

  12. Michael P 12

    "The shift now to not simply considering the cross benches but actively campaigning on that option"

    How does that marry up with this quote from Shaw

    "I'm not even contemplating the idea that we won't get into government after October"

    If he's not even contemplating not being in government then he's hardly actively campaigning on being in opposition. (Or do you mean actively campaigning on considering the cross benches rather than active campaigning on being on the cross benches)

    https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2023/07/election-2023-greens-send-warning-shot-at-labour-at-campaign-launch.html

    If the Green party has gained any votes from Labour voters and is talking about cross benches then it is far more likely to lose those voters back to Labour in my opinion.

  13. Chris 13

    Parker, Robertson and a few of their mates need to join the Greens.

  14. tWiggle 14

    Te Karere reports on Batchelor's latest meeting.

    After a protester was manhandled and dragged out of a meeting in PN the other day, now Batchelor also manhandled a person in a Hawkes Bay meeting who pulled out his projector plug and accused him of hate speech against their community. The police were in the meeting and escorted them out. Is this assault by Batchelor?

    BigHairyNews have an interesting discussion between 33-48 min on freedom of expression and counter-protest.

    We need some guidance from the PM on the questions rsised by BHN.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Pharmac Chair appointed
    Hon Paula Bennett has been appointed as member and chair of the Pharmac board, Associate Health Minister David Seymour announced today. "Pharmac is a critical part of New Zealand's health system and plays a significant role in ensuring that Kiwis have the best possible access to medicines,” says Mr Seymour. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    16 hours ago
  • Taking action on Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder
    Hundreds of New Zealand families affected by Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) will benefit from a new Government focus on prevention and treatment, says Health Minister Dr Shane Reti. “We know FASD is a leading cause of preventable intellectual and neurodevelopmental disability in New Zealand,” Dr Reti says.  “Every day, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • New sports complex opens in Kaikohe
    Regional Development Minister Shane Jones today attended the official opening of Kaikohe’s new $14.7 million sports complex. “The completion of the Kaikohe Multi Sports Complex is a fantastic achievement for the Far North,” Mr Jones says. “This facility not only fulfils a long-held dream for local athletes, but also creates ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Diplomacy needed more than ever
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters’ engagements in Türkiye this week underlined the importance of diplomacy to meet growing global challenges.    “Returning to the Gallipoli Peninsula to represent New Zealand at Anzac commemorations was a sombre reminder of the critical importance of diplomacy for de-escalating conflicts and easing tensions,” Mr Peters ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Anzac Commemorative Address, Buttes New British Cemetery Belgium
    Ambassador Millar, Burgemeester, Vandepitte, Excellencies, military representatives, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen – good morning and welcome to this sacred Anzac Day dawn service.  It is an honour to be here on behalf of the Government and people of New Zealand at Buttes New British Cemetery, Polygon Wood – a deeply ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Anzac Commemorative Address – NZ National Service, Chunuk Bair
    Distinguished guests -   It is an honour to return once again to this site which, as the resting place for so many of our war-dead, has become a sacred place for generations of New Zealanders.   Our presence here and at the other special spaces of Gallipoli is made ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Anzac Commemorative Address – Dawn Service, Gallipoli, Türkiye
    Mai ia tawhiti pamamao, te moana nui a Kiwa, kua tae whakaiti mai matou, ki to koutou papa whenua. No koutou te tapuwae, no matou te tapuwae, kua honoa pumautia.   Ko nga toa kua hinga nei, o te Waipounamu, o te Ika a Maui, he okioki tahi me o ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • PM announces changes to portfolios
    Paul Goldsmith will take on responsibility for the Media and Communications portfolio, while Louise Upston will pick up the Disability Issues portfolio, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced today. “Our Government is relentlessly focused on getting New Zealand back on track. As issues change in prominence, I plan to adjust Ministerial ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • New catch limits for unique fishery areas
    Recreational catch limits will be reduced in areas of Fiordland and the Chatham Islands to help keep those fisheries healthy and sustainable, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. The lower recreational daily catch limits for a range of finfish and shellfish species caught in the Fiordland Marine Area and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Minister welcomes hydrogen milestone
    Energy Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed an important milestone in New Zealand’s hydrogen future, with the opening of the country’s first network of hydrogen refuelling stations in Wiri. “I want to congratulate the team at Hiringa Energy and its partners K one W one (K1W1), Mitsui & Co New Zealand ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Urgent changes to system through first RMA Amendment Bill
    The coalition Government is delivering on its commitment to improve resource management laws and give greater certainty to consent applicants, with a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) expected to be introduced to Parliament next month. RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop has today outlined the first RMA Amendment ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Overseas decommissioning models considered
    Overseas models for regulating the oil and gas sector, including their decommissioning regimes, are being carefully scrutinised as a potential template for New Zealand’s own sector, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. The Coalition Government is focused on rebuilding investor confidence in New Zealand’s energy sector as it looks to strengthen ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Release of North Island Severe Weather Event Inquiry
    Emergency Management and Recovery Minister Mark Mitchell has today released the Report of the Government Inquiry into the response to the North Island Severe Weather Events. “The report shows that New Zealand’s emergency management system is not fit-for-purpose and there are some significant gaps we need to address,” Mr Mitchell ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Justice Minister to attend Human Rights Council
    Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith is today travelling to Europe where he’ll update the United Nations Human Rights Council on the Government’s work to restore law and order.  “Attending the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva provides us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Patterson reopens world’s largest wool scouring facility
    Associate Agriculture Minister, Mark Patterson, formally reopened the world’s largest wool processing facility today in Awatoto, Napier, following a $50 million rebuild and refurbishment project. “The reopening of this facility will significantly lift the economic opportunities available to New Zealand’s wool sector, which already accounts for 20 per cent of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Speech to the Southland Otago Regional Engineering Collective Summit, 18 April 2024
    Hon Andrew Bayly, Minister for Small Business and Manufacturing  At the Southland Otago Regional Engineering Collective (SOREC) Summit, 18 April, Dunedin    Ngā mihi nui, Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Ko Whanganui aho    Good Afternoon and thank you for inviting me to open your summit today.    I am delighted ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Government to introduce revised Three Strikes law
    The Government is delivering on its commitment to bring back the Three Strikes legislation, Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee announced today. “Our Government is committed to restoring law and order and enforcing appropriate consequences on criminals. We are making it clear that repeat serious violent or sexual offending is not ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • New diplomatic appointments
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has today announced four new diplomatic appointments for New Zealand’s overseas missions.   “Our diplomats have a vital role in maintaining and protecting New Zealand’s interests around the world,” Mr Peters says.    “I am pleased to announce the appointment of these senior diplomats from the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Humanitarian support for Ethiopia and Somalia
    New Zealand is contributing NZ$7 million to support communities affected by severe food insecurity and other urgent humanitarian needs in Ethiopia and Somalia, Foreign Minister Rt Hon Winston Peters announced today.   “Over 21 million people are in need of humanitarian assistance across Ethiopia, with a further 6.9 million people ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Arts Minister congratulates Mataaho Collective
    Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Paul Goldsmith is congratulating Mataaho Collective for winning the Golden Lion for best participant in the main exhibition at the Venice Biennale. "Congratulations to the Mataaho Collective for winning one of the world's most prestigious art prizes at the Venice Biennale.  “It is good ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Supporting better financial outcomes for Kiwis
    The Government is reforming financial services to improve access to home loans and other lending, and strengthen customer protections, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly and Housing Minister Chris Bishop announced today. “Our coalition Government is committed to rebuilding the economy and making life simpler by cutting red tape. We are ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Trade relationship with China remains strong
    “China remains a strong commercial opportunity for Kiwi exporters as Chinese businesses and consumers continue to value our high-quality safe produce,” Trade and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay says.   Mr McClay has returned to New Zealand following visits to Beijing, Harbin and Shanghai where he met ministers, governors and mayors and engaged in trade and agricultural events with the New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • PM’s South East Asia mission does the business
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has completed a successful trip to Singapore, Thailand and the Philippines, deepening relationships and capitalising on opportunities. Mr Luxon was accompanied by a business delegation and says the choice of countries represents the priority the New Zealand Government places on South East Asia, and our relationships in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • $41m to support clean energy in South East Asia
    New Zealand is demonstrating its commitment to reducing global greenhouse emissions, and supporting clean energy transition in South East Asia, through a contribution of NZ$41 million (US$25 million) in climate finance to the Asian Development Bank (ADB)-led Energy Transition Mechanism (ETM). Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Climate Change Minister Simon Watts announced ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Minister releases Fast-track stakeholder list
    The Government is today releasing a list of organisations who received letters about the Fast-track applications process, says RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop. “Recently Ministers and agencies have received a series of OIA requests for a list of organisations to whom I wrote with information on applying to have a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Judicial appointments announced
    Attorney-General Judith Collins today announced the appointment of Wellington Barrister David Jonathan Boldt as a Judge of the High Court, and the Honourable Justice Matthew Palmer as a Judge of the Court of Appeal. Justice Boldt graduated with an LLB from Victoria University of Wellington in 1990, and also holds ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Education Minister heads to major teaching summit in Singapore
    Education Minister Erica Stanford will lead the New Zealand delegation at the 2024 International Summit on the Teaching Profession (ISTP) held in Singapore. The delegation includes representatives from the Post Primary Teachers’ Association (PPTA) Te Wehengarua and the New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI) Te Riu Roa.  The summit is co-hosted ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Value of stopbank project proven during cyclone
    A stopbank upgrade project in Tairawhiti partly funded by the Government has increased flood resilience for around 7000ha of residential and horticultural land so far, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones today attended a dawn service in Gisborne to mark the end of the first stage of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Anzac commemorations, Türkiye relationship focus of visit
    Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters will represent the Government at Anzac Day commemorations on the Gallipoli Peninsula next week and engage with senior representatives of the Turkish government in Istanbul.    “The Gallipoli campaign is a defining event in our history. It will be a privilege to share the occasion ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Minister to Europe for OECD meeting, Anzac Day
    Science, Innovation and Technology and Defence Minister Judith Collins will next week attend the OECD Science and Technology Ministerial conference in Paris and Anzac Day commemorations in Belgium. “Science, innovation and technology have a major role to play in rebuilding our economy and achieving better health, environmental and social outcomes ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Comprehensive Partnership the goal for NZ and the Philippines
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon held a bilateral meeting today with the President of the Philippines, Ferdinand Marcos Jr.  The Prime Minister was accompanied by MP Paulo Garcia, the first Filipino to be elected to a legislature outside the Philippines. During today’s meeting, Prime Minister Luxon and President Marcos Jr discussed opportunities to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government commits $20m to Westport flood protection
    The Government has announced that $20 million in funding will be made available to Westport to fund much needed flood protection around the town. This measure will significantly improve the resilience of the community, says Local Government Minister Simeon Brown. “The Westport community has already been allocated almost $3 million ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Taupō takes pole position
    The Government is proud to support the first ever Repco Supercars Championship event in Taupō as up to 70,000 motorsport fans attend the Taupō International Motorsport Park this weekend, says Economic Development Minister Melissa Lee. “Anticipation for the ITM Taupō Super400 is huge, with tickets and accommodation selling out weeks ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Cost of living support for low-income homeowners
    Local Government Minister Simeon Brown has announced an increase to the Rates Rebate Scheme, putting money back into the pockets of low-income homeowners.  “The coalition Government is committed to bringing down the cost of living for New Zealanders. That includes targeted support for those Kiwis who are doing things tough, such ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Government backing mussel spat project
    The Coalition Government is investing in a project to boost survival rates of New Zealand mussels and grow the industry, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones has announced. “This project seeks to increase the resilience of our mussels and significantly boost the sector’s productivity,” Mr Jones says. “The project - ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Government focused on getting people into work
    Benefit figures released today underscore the importance of the Government’s plan to rebuild the economy and have 50,000 fewer people on Jobseeker Support, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. “Benefit numbers are still significantly higher than when National was last in government, when there was about 70,000 fewer ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Clean energy key driver to reducing emissions
    The Government’s commitment to doubling New Zealand’s renewable energy capacity is backed by new data showing that clean energy has helped the country reach its lowest annual gross emissions since 1999, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. New Zealand’s latest Greenhouse Gas Inventory (1990-2022) published today, shows gross emissions fell ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Earthquake-prone buildings review brought forward
    The Government is bringing the earthquake-prone building review forward, with work to start immediately, and extending the deadline for remediations by four years, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says. “Our Government is focused on rebuilding the economy. A key part of our plan is to cut red tape that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Thailand and NZ to agree to Strategic Partnership
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and his Thai counterpart, Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin, have today agreed that New Zealand and the Kingdom of Thailand will upgrade the bilateral relationship to a Strategic Partnership by 2026. “New Zealand and Thailand have a lot to offer each other. We have a strong mutual desire to build ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Government consults on extending coastal permits for ports
    RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop and Transport Minister Simeon Brown have today announced the Coalition Government’s intention to extend port coastal permits for a further 20 years, providing port operators with certainty to continue their operations. “The introduction of the Resource Management Act in 1991 required ports to obtain coastal ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2024-04-28T13:55:14+00:00