web analytics

This is extremely dangerous to our democracy

Written By: - Date published: 9:00 am, April 3rd, 2018 - 29 comments
Categories: Abuse of power, internet, making shit up, Media, Politics, spin, the praiseworthy and the pitiful, you couldn't make this shit up, youtube - Tags:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQMJximufV0

29 comments on “This is extremely dangerous to our democracy ”

  1. joe90 1

    Make of this what you will.

    Part….

    “At my station, everyone was uncomfortable doing it,” a local anchor said. The person insisted on anonymity because they believed they would be fired for speaking out.

    Other local anchors also said the promos were a source of dismay in their newsrooms.

    As scripted, the promos decry “fake stories” from national news outlets — echoing President Trump’s inflammatory rhetoric about “fake news.”
    sinclair anchor script quote 2

    The promos are supposed to start airing on local stations later this month. The instructions sent to station news directors say that the 60- and 75-second spots should run frequently “to create maximum reach and frequency.”

    The promo requirements are the latest reason why some Sinclair journalists are upset with the company’s Maryland-based management. In recent years Sinclair’s owners, the Smith family, have made several programming decisions that reflect a right-wing agenda.

    […]

    The instructions for producing and airing the localized versions went into great detail about how the promos “should look and sound,” according to another document obtained by CNN.

    “Talent should dress in jewel tones — however they should not look political in their dress or attire,” one of the documents says. “Avoid total red, blue and purples dresses and suits. Avoid totally red, blue and purple ties, the goal is to look apolitical, neutral, nonpartisan yet professional. Black or charcoal suits for men…females should wear yellow, gold, magenta, cyan, but avoid red, blue or purple.”

    http://money.cnn.com/2018/03/07/media/sinclair-broadcasting-promos-media-bashing/index.html

    …of the plan….

    One evening in July, David Smith, the executive chairman of Sinclair Broadcast Group, strolled into the newsroom at WJLA, the ABC affiliate for Washington, DC, and the crown jewel of his company’s 193-station empire. Smith lacks the name recognition of Rupert Murdoch or the late Roger Ailes. But his company—with holdings concentrated in midsize markets like Tulsa, Flint, and Boise—owns more television stations than any other broadcaster in the country, reaching 2 out of every 5 American homes.

    […]

    After a campaign season spent boosting Trump, Sinclair looks set to grow even bigger thanks to the president’s appointees at the Federal Communications Commission: In May, the company announced a $3.9 billion deal to acquire Tribune Media’s 42 TV stations, which would give Sinclair access to New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago, the nation’s three largest media markets. The deal—and, for many, Sinclair itself—came to prominence after John Oliver blasted it in an episode of his HBO show, Last Week Tonight, that has been seen more than 6 million times on YouTube. Experts believe the FCC will approve the merger, despite critics on the left and right who argue the deal will give Sinclair far more reach into American households than the law allows.

    https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2017/10/ready-for-trump-tv-inside-sinclair-broadcastings-plot-to-take-over-your-local-news-1/

    …to create an outlet for the age, I reckon.

    At about 6:15 AM, my wife and I were getting ready for Church and paused for a moment to have coffee. I turned on the television on KOMO (an ABC affiliate in Seattle), and the first program we saw was Mark Hyman’s “Behind the Headlines” episode called “Ignoring History”. In the episode, he compared the drive by minorities and liberals to remove statues celebrating Confederate “heroes” from the Civil War to the decision by the Taliban to blow up the 2000 year-old “Buddha of Bamiyan” statues in Afghanistan. I immediately began fretting and fuming — Hyman actually had the temerity to compare the removal of statues of what were by definition traitors from taxpayer-funded government property to the destruction of archaeological treasures!

    https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/8/12/1689068/-Sinclair-Broadcast-News-exposed-its-white-nationalist-agenda-today

  2. adam 3

    Go back to sleep, it’s OK. The corporations have taken over, just be happy with the little scraps they throw you, the politicians are all in their back pockets. Go back to sleep. It’s OK.

    Now, Shut Up, and do as your told. There’s a good little liberal democrat.

  3. Bill 4

    Well, I’m kind of laughing at the irony.

    Putting aside the script seems to have been written for a number of syndicated TV stations (and so is legit in that regard), the suggestion that inaccurate and/or downright false information only peculates social media is risible.

    It’s also very much the general line from the US establishment (whichever side).

    Which brings me on to all this ‘recently undermined mainstream media’ imploring and encouraging people to kill their facebook accounts. Facebook accounts that the likes of Sanders and Corbyn successfully used to by-pass the brick wall of mainstream media.

    Where the left and right, liberal and conservative are all handies in glovies… surely that’s where the “extremely dangerous” lies, no?

    • patricia bremner 4.1

      Yes Bill! I thought “some politicians are able through Facebook, to talk to the people directly”

      Well that can’t happen, what the politicos say should be amplified for the right and muffled for the left…. that’s democracy modern style.

  4. Stuart Munro 5

    Though Fox’s beat up is concerning, the real fake news proliferators remain a serious problem. There is yellow press like Fox, and there is increasing use of ‘opinion’ within otherwise reputable news, which is basically gossip. There are the ranter blogs and websites, which ready recruit the uncritical (most of our Putinistas for example), as well as less obvious assaults like those perpetrated through facebook and google.

    So what’s the antidote? Reading helps – a solid background on the matter under discussion renders one almost immune to less sophisticated attempts to sway or to deceive. Personal contacts – genuine input from concerned people in Syria or Ukraine or Myanmar or Yemen debunks the crafted narratives and often reveals issues that might otherwise be overlooked. Genuine reporting – which uses sources can be good too, but the standards vary even between accounts by the same individual.

    Does it matter? Yes. At present a great deal of potential progressive energy is being diverted to defend the imperialist ambitions of the Russian state. That’s not particularly functional, for all that dining with the US requires a mighty long spoon.

    • Bill 5.1

      Oh the sweet, sweet irony 🙂

      To dismiss critical voices as “Putinistas”, at the same time as imploring people to educate themselves, before swinging off into some supposed waste of energy spent to defend the imperialist ambitions of the Russian state.

      That would be the imaginary line ascribed to critics of interventionist liberal policy by interventionist liberals. Whose take on things is defended from criticism or analysis by the sole issuing cry of “Putinista!”

      • Stuart Munro 5.1.1

        Bill, you’re better informed than some, but a lot of Putinistas don’t have a clue what they’re defending. It’s not pretty.

        • Bill 5.1.1.1

          So…you saying I’m a better informed Putinista? And also that my commentary or opinion is in the defence of something to do with Russia?

          Can you not see how those assumptions (thoroughly wrongheaded as they are) might simply be indicative of just how “one eyed” you are?

          • Stuart Munro 5.1.1.1.1

            I consider an embrace of Putin’s cause incompatible with claims of progressive values.

            So people who repeat the dezinformatsiya of that regime lose credibility with me, regardless of the reasoning they claim to employ.

            • Bill 5.1.1.1.1.1

              Very good Stuart. Bar one small detail.

              Of all the comments and opinions I’ve read, I’d be pushed to identify those that “embrace Putin’s cause” – whatever that may be.

              There is bugger all repeating of “dezinformatsiya of that regime” as you term it, for the simple fact that all (more or less) of the information we receive is information from “our” governments…amplified and echoed across major liberal or corporate media outlets.

              That information comes in two broad forms.

              1. Information that originates from “our” governments, and
              2. Information from elsewhere that “our” governments, and/or major liberal/corporate media outlets, filter and spin.

              I mean, do you have any idea of the make-up of factions within the Kremlin; what they stand for; who is who or anything much besides the ‘knowledge’ fed to us and that we’re meant to run with – that the Kremlin is a mafia style set-up?

              • Stuart Munro

                As it happens Bill, I don’t follow the Kremlin cliques – that’s a task and a half, much as one imagines Washington or even Wellington is. But I have a couple of Russian speaking friends who do, who occasionally bring things to my attention.

                Your presumptions about information sources are less than encyclopedic, there are huge reserves of personal accounts that flesh out the crude skeletons the media publish.

                OK, so you want to challenge the ‘kleptocracy’ label often applied to Russia. Is it because you have evidence of scrupulous dealing, or just that you distrust the framers or bearers of that news?

                • Bill

                  This is getting a bit silly.

                  If you think the information we receive is somehow “neutral” or “objective”, then we have very different takes on how media works across “the west”.

                  I wouldn’t know jack-shit about the internal machinations of Russian politics, but when I hear the catch-all phrase of “mafia state” being applied to Russia, I wonder where meant to position Russia in relation to Italy as far as that type of corruption goes. Or whether I’m to think Russian politics is more, or less, influenced by money than US politics. Or whether Russia’s extra-parliamentary networks have a greater or lesser influence on the Russian parliament than Britain’s do on Westminster.

                  Actually, I don’t lose any sleep over any of the above. They’re all in the same boat as far as I’m concerned, and the sooner we’re shot of the lot of them, whether in NZ, Russia, the US or the UK, the better it will be for all of us 🙂

                  • Stuart Munro

                    Well you see that’s where we differ.

                    May is nothing special, but except for unresolved wheatfield issues and the pathological neoliberalism one expects from a British banker’s wife she is not dangerous.

                    Opposition politicians in Russia are routinely killed however, and dissidents, even those as divorced from conventional politics as Pussy Riot, are routinely imprisoned.

                    They are not “all in the same boat” to me, and accepting that equivalence would tend to erode rather than elevate local politics. I’d rather see standards rising myself.

                    • Bill

                      So apart from the fact that May’s dangerous, May isn’t dangerous. I wonder if the same was said of Thatcher…or Blair.

                      Opposition politicians and activists (eg unionists) aren’t routinely murdered in Mexico, Columbia and many ‘elsewheres”?

                      Ordinary people aren’t (some would say routinely) shot dead by representatives of the state in the US?

                      Vendettas aren’t carried out by powerful actors against other powerful actors the world over?

                      You can slice it and dice it however you like, but at the end of the day it all comes back to the same shit. Now sure, you can grade it and say “this” is worse than “that” if you want to give a free pass to some pretty terrible shit.

                    • Stuart Munro

                      Meh – your all sama sama just lets Putin off the hook. And that boy’s got a real long butcher’s bill. You want to put May in the same box, you’ve got to show multiple bodies, and multiple invasions.

        • gsays 5.1.1.2

          Is ‘putinista’ a variant on ‘tinfoil hat wearer’?
          A dismissive title for someone who doesn’t swallow everything the guardian regurgitates.

          I have noticed post election, the spite, the snarkiness and intolerance of dissenting views increasing here on TS.
          I get with ‘lefties’ a desire to be purer than thou, but some of the crap that has been going down here recently is unattractive.

          We can look for what unites us.
          To do otherwise is dangerous to our democracy.

          This is not in any way a criticism of the moderation, I think it has been even handed.

          • Stuart Munro 5.1.1.2.1

            That would be a matter of perspective. I use it to mean a supporter of Putin, which is in line with similar historical uses – Zapatistas were supporters of Zapata for example.

            When we come to a matter like Syria or the Ukraine, I’m happy to accommodate the differing opinions of actual progressives. But I’m not happy to make space for the propaganda of a belligerent despot. So that those who knowingly or unknowingly repeat it, lose standing, at least from my perspective.

    • adam 5.2

      Woohoo more labels, I’m getting a collection.

      Why bother thinking critically when we can all throw labels around as insults, glorious days, just glorious!!

      Bugger the ordinary folk, we have a way of life to defend!!

  5. Macro 6

    Just remember:

    You are free to be a drunkard, an idler, a coward, a backbiter, a fornicator; but you are not free to think for yourself.

    Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past

    In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act

    Eric Arthur Blair aka George Orwell
    What we have now is the reincarnation of the Ministry of Truth.
    Ed – Carlin didn’t work this out first Orwell, had it well sussed by 1949. But then he was just analysing the work of Goebbels:

    A lie told once remains a lie but a lie told a thousand times becomes the truth. … If you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it, and you will even come to believe it yourself. … Propaganda must therefore always be essentially simple and repetitious.

  6. R.P McMurphy 7

    just make some better shit up or even tell the truth and sling it back. freakout friday. let them have it. here, facebook, anywhere. its fun. guranteed. this is democracy in action.

  7. Macro 8

    A recently published study by Researchers at Ohio State has found evidence that the publishing of 3 Fake News stories during the 2016 campaign could well have been influential in swinging the vote to Trump and away from Clinton. The study shows that the 3 fake news stories were closely linked to a swing away from Clinton of about 2.2 or 2.3 points apiece in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Clinton lost Michigan by 0.2 points and Pennsylvania and Wisconsin by 0.72 and 0.76 points, respectively.

    Our post-election survey asked our respondents 281 questions that included, in addition to the standard election-survey items, three fake news statements. Two of these were negative statements about Hillary Clinton and one was a positive statement involving Donald Trump. All three were widely disseminated through the internet, twitter, and other devices and were picked up by the broadcast media as well.
    The first is the claim that “Hillary Clinton is in very poor health due to a serious illness.”
    Twenty-five percent of all respondents in our nationally representative sample believed that this was “definitely true” or “probably true,” as did 12 percent of our former Obama supporters. The second is a statement that “Pope Francis endorsed Donald Trump for president prior to the election.” About 10 percent of our national sample and 8 percent of Obama supporters thought this statement was true. Finally, we asked our respondents if they believed that “During her time as U.S. Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton approved weapon sales to Islamic jihadists, including ISIS.” 35 percent of our national sample believed that Clinton had approved weapons sales to ISIS, as did 20 percent of former Obama voters.
    Belief in these fake news stories is very strongly linked to defection from the Democratic ticket by 2012 Obama voters. Among those who didn’t believe any of the three fake news stories, 89 percent cast ballots for Hillary Clinton in 2016; 61 percent of those who believed one fake news item voted for Clinton; but only 17 percent of those who believed 2 or all 3 of these false assertions voted for Clinton (Tau-b correlation=.50).

  8. Macro 9

    And further to the above.
    Anonymous journos employed within the Sinclair group of media outlets have written an essay here:
    https://www.vox.com/first-person/2018/4/5/17202336/sinclair-broadcasting-promo-deadspin
    They express dismay at the developing editorial direction the top management are directing. Many would leave, but it is not that simple, as to resign under their current contract would cost them thousands of dollars because they are contract for a specific term!

    The penalty for breaking a contract is a payment to Sinclair of part of the employee’s annual salary, based on a complex formula. That’s money most employees simply don’t have. It’s a decision between possibly going bankrupt or sticking it out for another X number of years.

  9. Macro 10

    If people are not worried about the Sinclair Group taking over control of media in the US they should be. This is extremely dangerous for the left, in the US, and we should be concerned.
    Currently the Sinclair Broadcasting Group is already one of the most powerful media companies in the country. It owns nearly 200 local television stations in nearly 100 markets they reach nearly 39% of US households. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) doesn’t allow a single company to own stations that reach more than 39 percent of US television homes. However, the Sinclair group are in the process of buying out another local TV network, Tribune, and using loopholes in the legislation they will then control access to up to 72% of TV households in the US. Local TV is the main medium by which most households in the US gain their “News”.
    https://www.vox.com/2018/4/6/17202824/sinclair-tribune-map
    The resulting network can be seen in the link above.
    The centralisation of local news and the censoring of major political items is dangerous, and reminiscent of the 1984’s “Ministry of Truth” .

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Tokelau Language Week reminds us to stay united and strong
    Staying strong in the face of challenges and being true to our heritage and languages are key to preserving our cultural identity and wellbeing, is the focus of the 2020 Tokelau Language Week. Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio, says this year’s theme, ‘Apoapo tau foe, i nā tāfea ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • NZ announces a third P-3 deployment in support of UN sanctions
    The Government has deployed a Royal New Zealand Air Force P-3K2 Orion (P-3) maritime patrol aircraft to support the implementation of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions imposing sanctions against North Korea, announced Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters and Minister of Defence Ron Mark. “New Zealand has long supported ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Pacific trade and development agreement a reality
    Pacific regional trade and development agreement PACER Plus will enter into force in 60 days now that the required eight countries have ratified it. Trade and Export Growth Minister David Parker welcomed the announcement that the Cook Islands is the eighth nation to ratify this landmark agreement. “The agreement represents ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Securing a pipeline of teachers
    The Government is changing its approach to teacher recruitment as COVID-19 travel restrictions continue, by boosting a range of initiatives to get more Kiwis into teaching. “When we came into Government, we were faced with a teacher supply crisis,” Education Minister Chris Hipkins said. “Over the past three years, we ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Border exceptions for a small number of international students with visas
    The Government has established a new category that will allow 250 international PhD and postgraduate students to enter New Zealand and continue their studies, in the latest set of border exceptions. “The health, safety and wellbeing of people in New Zealand remains the Government’s top priority. Tight border restrictions remain ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • First COVID-19 vaccine purchase agreement signed
    The Government has signed an agreement to purchase 1.5 million COVID-19 vaccines – enough for 750,000 people – from Pfizer and BioNTech, subject to the vaccine successfully completing all clinical trials and passing regulatory approvals in New Zealand, say Research, Science and Innovation Minister Megan Woods and Health Minister Chris Hipkins. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • International statement – End-to-end encryption and public safety
    We, the undersigned, support strong encryption, which plays a crucial role in protecting personal data, privacy, intellectual property, trade secrets and cyber security.  It also serves a vital purpose in repressive states to protect journalists, human rights defenders and other vulnerable people, as stated in the 2017 resolution of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Ministry of Defence Biodefence Assessment released
    The Ministry of Defence has today released a Defence Assessment examining Defence’s role across the spectrum of biological hazards and threats facing New Zealand. Biodefence: Preparing for a New Era of Biological Hazards and Threats looks at how the NZDF supports other agencies’ biodefence activities, and considers the context of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Approaches to Economic Challenges: Confronting Planetary Emergencies: OECD 9 October 2020
    New Approaches to Economic Challenges: Confronting Planetary Emergencies: OECD 9 October 2020 Hon David Parker’s response following Thomas Piketty and Esther Duflo. Good morning, good afternoon, and good evening, wherever in the world you might be. I first acknowledge the excellent thought provoking speeches of Thomas Piketty and Esther ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Kaipara Moana restoration takes next step
    A Memorandum of Understanding has been signed today at Waihāua Marae between the Crown, local iwi and councils to protect, restore and enhance the mauri of Kaipara Moana in Northland. Environment Minister David Parker signed the document on behalf of the Crown along with representatives from Ngā Maunga Whakahī, Ngāti ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Zealand and Uruguay unite on reducing livestock production emissions
    Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor and Uruguayan Minister of Livestock, Agriculture and Fisheries Carlos María Uriarte have welcomed the launch of a three-year project that will underpin sustainable livestock production in Uruguay, Argentina, and Costa Rica.  The project called ‘Innovation for pasture management’ is led by Uruguay’s National Institute of Agricultural ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • 3100 jobs created through marae upgrades
    Hundreds of marae throughout the country will be upgraded through investments from the Provincial Growth Fund’s refocused post COVID-19 funding to create jobs and put money into the pockets of local tradespeople and businesses, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones and Māori Development Minister Nanaia Mahuta have announced. “A total ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Health volunteers recognised in annual awards
    Health Minister Chris Hipkins has announced 9 teams and 14 individuals are the recipients of this year’s Minister of Health Volunteer Awards.  “The health volunteer awards celebrate and recognise the thousands of dedicated health sector volunteers who give many hours of their time to help other New Zealanders,” Mr Hipkins ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Community COVID-19 Fund supports Pacific recovery
    The Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio says a total of 264 groups and individuals have successfully applied for the Pacific Aotearoa Community COVID-19 Recovery Fund, that will support Pacific communities drive their own COVID-19 recovery strategies, initiatives, and actions. “I am keen to see this Fund support Pacific ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Community benefits from Māori apprenticeships
    Up to 50 Māori apprentices in Wellington will receive paid training to build houses for their local communities, thanks to a $2.75 million investment from the Māori Trades and Training Fund, announced Employment Minister Willie Jackson today. “This funding will enable Ngāti Toa Rangatira Incorporated to provide its Ngā Kaimahi ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Training fund supports Māori jobseekers
    Rapidly growing sectors will benefit from a $990,000 Māori Trades and Training Fund investment which will see Wellington jobseekers supported into work, announced Employment Minister Willie Jackson today. “This funding will enable Sapphire Consultants Ltd. to help up to 45 Māori jobseekers into paid training initiatives over two years through ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Ruakura Inland Port development vital infrastructure for Waikato
    The Government is investing $40 million to develop an inland port at Ruakura which will become a freight super-hub and a future business, research and residential development for the Waikato, Urban Development and Transport Minister Phil Twyford, and Māori Development Minister Nanaia Mahuta announced today. The funding has been has ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Appointments made to Defence Expert Review Group
    Defence Minister Ron Mark announced today the establishment of an Expert Review Group to review a number of aspects of the New Zealand Defence Force’s (NZDF) structure, information management and record-keeping processes.  The Expert Review Group’s work arises out of the first recommendation from the Report of the Government’s Inquiry ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • No active community cases of COVID-19
    There are no active community cases of COVID-19 remaining in the country after the last people from the recent outbreak have recovered from the virus, Health Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “This is a big milestone. New Zealanders have once again through their collective actions squashed the virus. The systems ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Clean energy upgrade for more public buildings
    More public buildings will be supported by the Government to upgrade to run on clean energy, the Minister for Climate Change James Shaw announced today. Minister Shaw announced that Lincoln and Auckland universities will receive support through the Clean-Powered Public Service Fund to replace fossil fuel boilers. Southern, Taranaki, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Schools back donations scheme for the second year
    More schools have opted in to the donations scheme for 2021, compared to 2020 when the scheme was introduced. “The families of more than 447,000 students will be better off next year, with 94% of eligible schools and kura opting into the scheme,” Education Minister Chris Hipkins said. “This is ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago