Hipkins needs to keep at it consistently and get noticed by the msm which is a tough task.
There are rewards for those who want it and now is the time to step up as others should like whoever is on social welfare, health, justice and ministerial standards to name a few.
Collins, banks, adams, smith etc there is plenty of material.
Political polls have been and still are covered poorly by news organisations. This seems to be based on ignorance and headline mongering.
There are some promising changes that at least give relevant information if you did for it. Roy Morgan have been good and now Colmar Brunton supply excellent information. If particular note:
The data does not take into account the effects of non-voting and therefore cannot be used to predict the outcome of an election. Undecided voters, non-voters and those who refused to answer are excluded from the data on party support.
The results are therefore only indicative of trends in party support, and it would be misleading to report otherwise.
So… which capacity are you posting in today? Your role as the voice of Dunne complete with utter idiocy… or your role as RWNJ fact checker who can’t even check his own facts?
Yes, I believe so. He said as much in a post on his YourNZ site some months ago, and that his membership lapsed and he wouldn’t be renewing it. I can’t be bothered going and looking for the quote though.
Maybe seeing as Pete is back in town he can clarify his UF stance here on TS
(Let’s hope the voters of Ohariu can take a leaf out of Petey’s book and give Dunne up)
In the last four elections I’ve voted for (in reverse order) UF, National, Labour, Greens.
When I decided to get involved in politics after the 2008 election I first approached Labour as I thought they might want fresh ideas and input in order to rebuild. Response from two MPs wasn’t encouraging, they only wanted political labourers, not people with ideas. So I got involved in various things on my own.
In early 2011 I floated a new party idea. That got a bit of interest but not enough and I realised the odds were ovewhelmingly stacked against success unless you attracted a Craig or Dotcom to bankroll it. So I publicly announced I’d stand as an independent in Dunedin North, intending to network and gain experience. In July UF asked if I would stand for them and I decided to do that, it proved useful for what I was doing.
Since then I’ve dabbled in a range of political activities on my own account. I’ve never been fed any information from UF, anything I have got from Dunne I have asked for with specific questions. I’ve also interacted with other MPs, any that are willing. All my blogging has been my own work unless specifically quoting a source.
Last year I stood as an independent in the Dunedin mayoral and council elections with a main plank of better transparency and greater public interaction with local body politics. A number of other candidates were positive on this and if I had time I’d be working on building on that.
While I think there’s a big opening for a moderate centre party I reached the conclusion that UF didn’t have the people to achieve it. I’m too similar to Dunne (in some ways) to offer enough difference, like any party they need a new generation. So I decided to become independent again and go back to my earlier goals – better democracy and stronger parties.
Unlike the win and defeat attitude of politically aligned activists I want all parties to be better and stronger to give voters better choices. I think this will strengthen Parliament, Government and the country.
I think the MMP threshold should be minimal if at all, giving any party an opportunity to represent voters – and this will give the larger parties more options and will make Government by the majority more effective.
The influence of the media without being accountable is a major issue I think needs addressing.
While I get drawn into the political fray (it’s been very useful experience) I keep coming back to looking at ways of doing politics more transparently, honestly and positively, and that’s where I want to put most focus and effort.
If more people put petty politics aside and recognise the benefits of all parties being stronger and all MPs behaving to the standards they should then I think we will be better off. Then the important issues facing us will be dealt with more cooperatively and effectively.
Robust debate and contesting of ideas are essential in a good democracy, but so are decent behaviour and working for the common good. Accepting different ideas and approaches are things to be worked with rather than fought against.
I understand that many political activists have an entrenched warfare attitude where anyone not always agreeing must be treated as an enemy to be trashed, but I think a significant proportion of MPs and voters are turned off by negative and nasty politics. Confronting crap is necessary but care has to be taken not to just become a part of the shitstorm.
If politicians and parties want more people to vote for them they have to behave better, look better and look capable of cooperative positive change.
So I want to do what I can to assist and encourage better politics – with all parties and politicians.
Um. With respect, I did read your comment twice and the main thing I garnered, apart from your personal political history was that you want “parties being (or to be better and stronger)stronger” and you suggest this can be done through MP’s behaving better and listening to one another.
I’m all for “decent behaviour and working for the common good” but I don’t see how this “strengthens” a Party. Also if we want to point to the finger at badly behaving MP’s then we need not look any further than our current lot of Ministers and the P.M himself. If anyone needs lessons in how to Behave Like An Adult it’s that lot.
And speaking of fingers, I would rather those on the Left pull theirs. Less of the naval gazing, more of the finger pulling!
For some of us, it’s not about which party we support and then participating in warfare on their behalf. For me it’s about values and the kind of society I want to live in. Each electoral term I choose to vote for the party that is closest to achieving those values. National and ACT, and UF, are so far from those values, they rarely do anything that gets my support. Labour gets my support some of the time.
I am interested to know your views/answers to these ten questions :
[1] Was the policy of selling 49% of our valuable power company assets which primarily went to the wealthy and big corporates a good policy?
[2] When a large majority of people voted in the referendum against these asset sales, should this government have continued with the sales in spite of this verdict?
[3] Do you think that the non National MPs, Banks and Dunne, are just leeches and parasites to have supported National’s asset sales?
[4] Do you think that Dunne deserves to be re elected again?
[5] Do you think that Dunne leaked confidential cabinet papers?
[6] Who do you trust more, Key or Cunliffe?
[7] Do you agree that this National government kept many of the last Labour government’s social policies such as WFF, Kiwi Saver, Kiwi Bank, Interest Free Student Loans, Paid Parental Leave etc for political expediency rather than for ideological reasons?
[8] If UF or Dunne get back into parliament, who should they support, the Left block or the right block?
[9] Do you support the idea of having the Internet Party?
[10] Should the MPs and the public support the TPPA without knowing any of the details as of now?
That’s a a bit of a challenge. I’ll do them one at a time (entirely my opinion).
[1] Was the policy of selling 49% of our valuable power company assets which primarily went to the wealthy and big corporates a good policy?
I question your assertion that the shares went “primarily went to the wealthy and big corporates” – it’s not possible to say that. Some went to small shareholders. Quite a few will have gone to funds like Kiwisaver funds that could be spread over many people.
There were pros and cons to the overall policy. Mixed ownership was proven to work with Air New Zealand being a successful example.
I think as by far the biggest party in Parliament National had a right to progress their flagship policy. However there were two things in particular that I didn’t agree with:
– trying to fit a specific sales program into one election cycle rather than timing things to best suit market conditions.
– selling too much of the same type of energy sector stocks to close together.
I thought that limiting the sales to 49% was an important principle and (with the help of R0b post here) I helped ensure that National did not sneak in a cabinet amendment that would have allowed more than 49% sales.
I think they should have pulled the plug perhaps on Genesis in the meantime.
I thought that the Green/Labour action that probably adversely affected the sales returns was cynical and costly for the country.
With so many misgivings why do you think that Dunne still voted for the asset sales? With so many misgivings about the GCSB why do you think Dunne stll voted for the spy bill?
Is he a coward, greedy for office or just an unprincipled kind of ‘political prostitute’?
I hope you will answer the questions above and the question below honestly and truthfully.
Are you actually Peter Dunne with the handle, Pete George here?
If not, how are you connected with Dunne?
My misgivings are not Dunne’s misgivings. Dunne still voted for the asset sales because he made a confidence & supply commitment to do so. He also forced National to discard an attempt to work around the 49% sale limit.
Dunne got what he obviously thought were adequate improvements to the GCSB bill.
He’s a pragmatic politician. He understands that with just one vote he has limited influence. Politics is mostly a numbers game.
My identity is well known, I’m not Peter Dunne. I’m not connected to him in any way, except that occasionally I ask him questions and he responds, the same as with other MPs. I’ve always acted independently of any politician or party.
Fair call, I did represent UF. But I was virtually independent, just about everything I did then was my choice and done on my own. Party support was negligible.
[2] When a large majority of people voted in the referendum against these asset sales, should this government have continued with the sales in spite of this verdict?
If it halted legislation progress it would have set an awful precedent.
They had every right to continue. And it may have made it harder politically for National to admit they should back off with their policy a bit.
A single question petition and referendum is not a sound basis for deciding all but simple policy, that’s why Parliament has more extensive processes.
If any major policy initiatives could be forced to be put on hold pending the possible success of a petition and then the results of a referendum Parliament couldn’t function effectively.
I’m fairly sure that if a Labour+Green Government comes in in September/October and wants to increase the minimum wage they would not be happy to put it on hold simply because National cranked up opposition and started a petition.
“A single question petition and referendum is not a sound basis for deciding all but simple policy, that’s why Parliament has more extensive processes.”
Makes me wonder why National legislated for citizens initiated referenda.
My guess is it was a sop to the public to give an appearance of direct democracy but designed to be ineffective in practice. It’s a very flawed and useless system.
It would be easy to set up a far better way of measuring public opinion on pending legislation but there seems to be no interest in this from any of the major parties.
“If it halted legislation progress it would have set an awful precedent.”
yeah how awful would that be… imagine the horror of living in a democratic country where the government does radical shit like deciding to halt the juggernaut of ram-raid legislation simply to listen to the clearly stated desires of the very people that elected it.
You are, and always will be, nothing but an apologist for authority Pete .
Nope. I think there’s far more effective ways of challenging Parliament than the toothless tools we’ve been deliberately dumped with. The incumbent parties aren’t likely to give up any of their power, so we have to take some people power. It can be done if there’s a will and co-operation.
so the best way you have to do that is to allow the governments to continue to do whatever they like despite the obvious widespread aversion to the policy?
“You are, and always will be, nothing but an apologist for authority Pete .”
[3] Do you think that the non National MPs, Banks and Dunne, are just leeches and parasites to have supported National’s asset sales?
No. It was normal pragmatic politics that is an essential part of our system of MMP, the same as it was under the Clark government.
I’ve seen supporters of both main parties call small party MPs things like leeches and parasites but I think it’s just pissiness at not being able to rule on their own.
If a Labour+Green+NZFirst+Mana+Maori Party+Internet Party coalition forms the next government I don’t think any of them will be leeches or parasites, they will all be trying to do their jobs as MPs.
” UF (United Future) did not specifically campaign for the ‘mixed ownership model for the electricity companies and Air New Zealand’ because it was not UF (United Future) policy”
“There is STILL no mandate for asset sales! No majority – no mandate!”
“Back on 2 March 2013, I put out the following Press Release:
“There is NO mandate for asset sales – Peter Dunne and United Future never campaigned for asset sales,” says anti-privatisation campaigner, Auckland Mayoral candidate, Penny Bright.
“What has changed? NOTHING.”
“Please be reminded of the FACTS?”
2 March 2013
“”There is NO mandate for asset sales – Peter Dunne and United Future never campaigned for asset sales,” Penny Bright 2013 Auckland Mayoral Candidate.”
WHERE IS THE ‘MANDATE’ FOR ASSET SALES????
Yes – National did campaign for asset sales – albeit in a a not very ‘open and transparent’ way?
You will note that their 2011 pre-election policy did NOT say – “National supports asset sales”, or “National supports the Mixed Ownership Model for key state assets”.
National is increasing savings and creating jobs built on exports and productive investment.
We’re getting on top of debt, and returning to surplus sooner.
We will extend the successful mixed-ownership model – where the Government owns most of acompany, but offers a minority stake to investors – to four state-owned energy companies, and reduce the government’s stake in Air New Zealand.
This will give Kiwis a chance to invest in large New Zealand companies.”
The 2011 election results?
National got 59 out of 121 MPs.
The final vote on the Public Finance (Mixed Ownership Model) Amendment Act 2012, was 61 – 60
A party vote was called for on the question, That the Public Finance (Mixed Ownership Model) Amendment Bill be now read a third time.
Ayes 61
New Zealand National 59; ACT New Zealand 1; United Future 1.
Noes 60
New Zealand Labour 34; Green Party 14; New Zealand First 8; Maori Party 3; Mana 1.
HOWEVER:
” UF (United Future) did not specifically campaign for the ‘mixed ownership model for the electricity companies and Air New Zealand’ because it was not UF (United Future)policy”
In my considered opinion – the voting public of Ohariu were thus effectively misled by United Future and Peter Dunne on the issue of support for the ‘Mixed Ownership Model’ for State-Owned electricity assets and Air New Zealand.
In my considered opinion, United Future and Peter Dunne SOLD OUT the voting public of Ohariu by voting in support of the Public Finance (Mixed Ownership) Amendment Act 2012.
Had Peter Dunne kept faith with the voting public of Ohariu – the Public Finance (Mixed Ownership Model) Amendment Bill should have BEEN DEFEATED 60 – 61.
I thus believe that I am absolutely correct in my statement that THERE IS NO MANDATE FOR ASSET SALES – given that this minority National Government (which DID campaign on asset sales) has only 59 out of 121 MPs.
No point in the popcorn. Pete’s more recent tactic is to mostly only discuss the stuff he he leads/gets given the lead on. He ignores the stuff he doesn’t like even when it is a direct question.
Penny Bright, You impress me a lot as a caring, dedicated and hard working politically astute person. Have you put forth your name as a candidate for any political party for the coming elections? You should. It is concerned people like you that are essential for politics and our parliament.
I refer to Banks and Dunne as parasites, leeches and political whores because they could not win their seats on their own but for Key/National manipulating the system to get them in as pathetic coat-tailers.
[4] Do you think that Dunne deserves to be re elected again?
That’s not my call, it’s up to the voters of Ohariu.
Any MP who’s been around as long as Dunne has accumulated many critics, but he also gets praise for work done in his electorate and as a usually competent and reliable Minister (both Helen Clark and John Key have thought so).
He deserves credit for the Psychotic Substances Bill at least.
It looks easier for him this year with rookie low profile candidates for each of National, Labour and Greens, but it depends on whether he has damaged himself too much last year or not as well.
[5] Do you think that Dunne leaked confidential cabinet papers?
I’m not certain one way or the other about the Kitteridge report leak. There’s nowhere near compelling proof that he did. The inquiry was severely flawed and ignored significant possibilities, for example that the leaker might have communicated with Vance outside the parliamentary communications systems.
He has denied it publicly. I have heard him deny it twice in person, once with his wife present and the other time with UF board members present, so if he was lying he was also either lying to them or they were in on a lie.
I remain prepared to believe Dunne unless there’s evidence produced or an admission that says otherwise.
Neither more or less. Generally I trust them both, I think they both genuinely want to do what they think is best for the country.
All politicians get caught out embellishing the truth, fibbing and exaggerating – as every human being would if we are put under anywhere near the scrutiny they are.
Politicians are pretty much forced to fib. For example any MP who is asked “do you fully support your leader” has pretty much no option but to say they are fully behind their leader. Especially if they are not they would get politically crucified.
If an MP says something wrong and are challenged on it enormous pressure can be put on them to turn it into an ongoing lie because the consequences of the alternative can end their career, whether deserved or not.
If I ever had to deal with either Key or Cunliffe one on one I’m confident I could trust them. I’ve heard numerous reports that in person they are both genuinely good blokes.
[7] Do you agree that this National government kept many of the last Labour government’s social policies such as WFF, Kiwi Saver, Kiwi Bank, Interest Free Student Loans, Paid Parental Leave etc for political expediency rather than for ideological reasons?
Mostly pragmatic reasons. Undoing things like WFF or interest free student loans at the onset of a major financial crisis would have had major negative effects. It’s widely believed that we needed some sort of encouragement to boost retirement savings.
The reality of modern day politics is that ideologies, especially extreme ideologies, are pretty much obsolete. Most policies involve practical rather than ideological considerations and often require a prudent balance of socialist and capitalist considerations.
I think it’s unlikely that a Labour led government would put any priority on winding back the asset sales – which happen to be a balance between socialism and capitalism.
[8] If UF or Dunne get back into parliament, who should they support, the Left block or the right block?
That’s up to them, nothing to do with me. I don’t care.
Dunne is on record as saying he could work with National again, and Key has indicated he could work with Dunne again.
Dunne has also indicated he that while he could work with Labour they would have to move from some of their current positions. He is dead against a CGT for example.
[9] Do you support the idea of having the Internet Party?
Interesting question. I support the right of the Internet Party to form and stand in the election, as I support the right of any party, for example the Focus New Zealand Party that registered in January.
I support most of their ten point Action Agenda to varying degrees.
When I floated the idea of a new party in 2011 some of the concepts were quite similar to those of the Internet Party, being pragmatic and issued base rather than ideological or left or right.
I have some reservations about their democratic processes, and in particular with the potential influence of once person who is financing everything.
But it’s up to members and candidates to support it, and then it’s up to them to try and get voter support. I’m just an interested observer.
In general I support the idea of having multiple parties and would like a smaller or no threshold so more had a chance of succeeding. That would give us a more representative Parliament and give the main parties more flexibility and options ensuring majority decisions on legislation.
[10] Should the MPs and the public support the TPPA without knowing any of the details as of now?
They don’t have to. It’s healthy for them to remain skeptical until they know details, but outright support or outright opposition can look like petty politicking.
It’s common for international agreements to be negotiated without details being made public. It’s often essential to do the groundwork in private.
Despite their token protestations I think senior Labour MPs know this, they’ve done deals with other countries themselves successfully.
If the inter-country negotiations conclude successfully then Parliament should have all the details necessary to make an informed decision on whether we accept the agreement or not.
PG, you’re kidding yourself about not having an “ideology”. Your answers, especially on asset sales, the TPPA and “pragmatism” situate you as being for the “neoliberal consensus” and TINA that has been in play since the 80s. You are supporting the status quo, when the world and NZers, especially those struggling most, need an alternative.
That’s very simplistic assumptions. I’m not a status quo person, I’m very willing to consider viable alternatives.
I think we need to look at radically overhauling and simplifying our overly convoluted tax and welfare systems. I think serious consideration should be given to something like a Universal Basic Income. I think we should seriously reconsider our drug laws in relation to cannabis.
What I would like to have seen with the energy company part sales was to put all the proceeds into first, energy conservation, and second, alternative energy options, so re-investing in future proofing our energy.
I’d like to see an effective fast reaction system of public input into our Parliamentary system and have ideas on how this would work. CIR are too slow and flawed.
I’m not a status quo person, I’m very willing to consider viable alternatives.
Yes you are and no your not.
Everything you’ve ever said on this board shows that you’re fully inline with National’s ideology.
What I would like to have seen with the energy company part sales was to put all the proceeds into first, energy conservation, and second, alternative energy options, so re-investing in future proofing our energy.
Like that BS. We could easily have put money into all of those things without selling our nation out as National, Act and UF did.
I’m not fully in line with National’s or any party’s ideology.
What is National’s ideology? What is Labour’s ideology? Greens? NZ First? Political ideologies are some quaint historical theories. Apart from a small number of Socialists involved with Mana I don’t see any significant ideologies in any of the parties. Greens talk semi-socialism but their policies are hybrids.
Modern politics is far more complex than simplistic ideologies.
You have a very muddled notion of the meaning of “ideology”. You equate it with party policies and historical theories. There are more “ideologies” than socialism or capitalism. And there you show where you are aiming for some idea of pragmatic “balance” between the two. However, a (so-called) “hybrid” is also an “ideology”.
Actually, I’m not keen on the word, “ideology”. In Marxism terms its a set of beliefs or values that distort the underlying reality, in the interests of the ruling classes.
I have been using it in the everyday sense. I also use it to refer to the values that underpin any political policies or ideas.
You claim not to work on the basis of “ideology” – yet you first and foremost espouse a managerialist approach – your main aim to make politics more open, honest and transparent, etc – is to improve politcs – but to do that, you have already accepted the status quo re-underlying values (short hand term for this is “neoliberal consensus”).
Your claim that modern politics is more complex than “simplistic ideologies” is a way of disavowing your underlying political perspective – which, going by your answer to the above questions, is centre right.
“It’s common for international agreements to be negotiated without details being made public”
hey Pete, your braincell is misfiring or you are being deliberately misleading.
– which is so unlike you
This is not about the public being informed it is about those people in the negotiating room being allowed to read the entire text of the agreement that they are negotiating.
Q11: Is it difficult writing stuff that you know is complete horsepuckey?
Lolz Rosie, you asked for it, i had grand visions on Pete’s behalf of Him first storming the UF presidency and soon after rearranging the candidates selection process so as to install Himself over the ‘hairdo’ as the candidate for Ohariu,
Just wouldn’t listen tho would He despite the fact that the promise was there that he ‘might’ have doubled His vote from the Dunedin experience,(a huge victory),
Pete’s ‘high’ on transparency and a more unkind person,(snigger), than me might suggest that such a noble aim has been fully achieved by Him and that the people have ‘seen right through Him’…
well bad, the topic of “transparency” as a high would be a different take on the other highs that yourself and your plaything have explored in recent weeks.
I see your plaything will be absent for a week. I hope you don’t feel this loss too keenly. Others of us may be glad of the respite……………….
Lolz Rosie, i think i was lucky to escape a ‘spanking’ myself after the other day’s exchange of pleasantries,
Naughty of me to take offense at the piss weak comment directed my way because i refuse to even think about giving up my little tobacco addiction, especially coming from that one,
Will have to self-moderate my further exchanges with that one and meanwhile i can enjoy a phill-free week,(nah i don’t miss Him i havn’t an inbred need to engage in peeing up the wall contests although with that one it is hard to resist)…
I found Phil’s judgement and intolerance in what he perceived as “weaknesses” in those with an addiction(s), no matter what it is/was, really offensive but wasn’t prepared to take it up with him, given the exhausting round about of discussion him and I had about his militant veganism and subsequent alienation of thoughtful people who were already taking steps to eat more humanely.
Its all or nothing with folks like him. Kind of a shame as his good humour and knowledge is tarnished by his ego and his fanaticism.
Belladonna, you have often been supportive of Phillip’s stance but don’t you see that if he wants to encourage folks to eat more humanely then insulting them isn’t really the way to go about it?
He alienated with his words, not the concept of veganism, which has enough merit on it’s own to sell itself to a willing audience. Shouting at people isn’t going to get them on side. I had been vegetarian for 30 years until I started up with fish again and included it in my vegan and vegetarian meal schedule, but 30 years of no meat wasn’t good enough for him. That’s militancy. And see how blind he was with bad12, below? Everyone who reads TS knows bad was making some changes, but not Phillip. It was like he was on a perma rant and nothing could stop him.
“My way or the high way” isn’t a very mature way of approaching change.
The food one was hilarious, tossing the insipid rhetoric at me about cows blah blah blah, when all the time i have been on the fish/vege/fruit diet since Christmas, it was more fun to let him keep tossing the slurs…
I dont always agree with Phillip but like him I am passionate about veganism.
Rosie – you included fish in your vegan diet, sorry but if you eat fish you are not a vegetarian or vegan. Why did you stop eating meat, must be for health reasons I suspect not because of animal cruelty issues. Bad12 I think you goaded Phillip a lot of the time, he probably would have been better to ignore you but I do think you have a cruel streak in you which would bring out antagonism in a lot of people. It is frustrating as a vegan to understand why such terrible cruelty can be ignored by good and intelligent people but then again I was vegetarian for many years before I stopped eating dairy and eggs. Just sorry it took so long for me to ‘get it’.
Belladonna, me too as far as health reasons being the spur to turn the diet upside down,
Me goad Phillip, perlease never, well actually yes, when some addict calls me piss weak for smoking tobacco while admitting that he is in fact a poly addict of various drugs then to me, and what you think about this is immaterial, that is an open invitation, a demand if you will for me to have a wee tinker with His mind,
A cruel streak i wont deny, see the handle i comment under, you now need not wonder why it was chosen,
i happily climbed inside the mind of someone that was happy to engage in the tossing of infantile insults in my direction, until that is, i seen that dark black writing under one of my comments,
The last line above is the actual difference between the two of us…
you are very naughty bad12 …you lured poor Phil into a spanking from BIG Daddy….i have seen kids do this …lure another into trouble…however i do enjoy both Phil’s and your comments …so hope they will continue
….i dont mind that Phil is fanatical about Veganism….wish i could be a vegan …but obviously not so hard that i do become one…so being somewhat of a fanatic myself at times i do enjoy his diatribes about the SINS of meat eaters…it is all TRUE!…and he is very funny at times …..and if i had to kill critters to eat them i wouldnt do it….but as others do the killing and it is a fait accompli and as i had nothing to do with it …i will sup ( with the devil) and accept i am a Vegan’s sinner
Actually No Chooky, i was more worried about getting the cane myself than luring Phillip into such a trap,very machiavellian of you to think this tho i might add, which is why when the Dark Notes began to play i found something that needed doing elsewhere and my sandpit playmate became even more strident,
That’s my story anyway, plausible don’t you think, believe me tho doing the dance with Phill, to see who could crack who first was all pleasure here, i havn’t laughed so much for ages,
Lolz i am happy to kill it as well as munch on it, although these days with the lack of mobility the choices are pretty slim in that department,(the neighbors i am sure would become a little more then irate if i begin sauteing the local cat population,
The diet change for me was purely health driven, threw out the Statins the doc gave me and turned the diet upside down, a weeek of thinking/reading about it and a week to change it,(can’t see why all these vegans get all puffed up about doing this as if they deserve a medal),
Lolz even the Butter on the toast has been replaced by Guacamole, i don’t miss the stuff…
Run out of reply buttons but I do hope this comes out as a reply to Belladonna @7pm.
I said “vegan and vegetarian meal schedule”. Since I took up fish I have not referred to myself as either vegetarian or vegan. I eat those kind of meals still of course, and that’s why I said “schedule”, as in recipe schedule for the week for purchased and prepared meals.
You ask why I stopped eating meat and assumed it was for health reasons. It wasn’t. At age 14, back in 1984 I couldn’t care less about my health. I’ve lived around animals all my life( and still do) and I had a sudden freak out one day after a steak dinner that I had just ate a critter that under normal circumstances I would strike up a bit of communication with and have respect for, as its own self.
And so it began and remains, apart from the fishies. (which as well as animal welfare concerns there are many environmental considerations)
As for the fishies, I have taken them up for health reasons – now I’m middle aged and have a long family history, on both sides, of heart disease and looked at the fish consuming populations of the planet (Indian ocean countries, Nordic, Celtic and Pacific) and their traditional health trends, in my consideration of fish consumption.
I’ve mentioned this all before with Phillip and don;’t really think its appropriate to rehash a discussion of personal food choices, I’m not really into justifications, I’m just answering your questions.
but if you are on heavy blood thinner meds you should check it out with your doctor first…(personally i steer clear of doctors except when absolutely necessary…smirk …so take my suggestions at your own risk)
Lolz Chooky, befor i take up any of your suggestions i will need a signed declaration that you aint an assassin hired by you know who to end my miserable little life,(joking of course),
Oh believe me i view everything the doctors say with a ample amount of scepticism, the reasoning behind the throwing of the Statins is two-fold, first one of the big Phama Co’s had to withdraw theirs from the market as they were implicated in the deaths of, i think it was 30 people,
Second, one side effect that they don’t tell anyone about, because it aint paifull and you don’t notice the effect is that the Statins make the body expel Magnesium,
Magnesium along with Calcium are vitally important in managing the blood sugar levels,SO, if you have both, high cholesterol and high blood sugar they give you drugs for both BUT, if what i have read is correct, you are then on the merry-go-round of the Magnesium being stripped from the body putting the Magnesium/Calcium balance out of kilter which makes the blood sugar level go haywire,
i will see if i can hunt out the story and post a link tomorrow, but, i will probably not go looking for too much of the homeopathic stuff as it is diet that is all important and i don’t want to start trying to do a fast strip of cholesterol from the body as there are good fats and there are bad fats and i don’t want to be stripping out the good with the bad,
What i have done is basically gone to a diet that only has fish oils, vege oils in it, the reasoning behind this is from what i read so far, is that rather than go completely ‘fat free’ it is better to replace the ‘bad fats’ in the body with ‘good fats’ which the body actually has a use for…
Karol, yesterdays ‘Open Mike’ is pretty much an explanation, the caning is only for a week and from memory for ‘abuse’,(although being a willing participant you wont hear me complaining about how Phillip chose to structure His side of the conversation),
Once i read the first Dark Letters i knew it was time to halt the proceedings and it seems that Phillip also did for a while, i have the sneaking suspicion tho that He hatched a cunning plan to sneak back later when Lprent wasn’t looking to get in that all important last words as happens in such little ego games,
Unfortunately for Phill He was, looking that is,
The funny of it all is that someone earlier in the day had a little whine which i assumed by its wording was directed at what i had been writing in the exchanges with Phillip asking the Mods to step in(perhaps all that psychological stuff cut way to close to something going on in that ones head),
Pity if the complaint was directed at my writing only as it seemed to be because if Lprent decided to put a stop to proceedings based on that plea then i should imagine She/he who complained wont be too thrilled with the outcome…
[lprent: You just got either lucky or cunning (from this comment it sounds like cunning/wisdom). I didn’t see a pointless abuse comment from you after I’d issued some “dark letters” ]
What I would like to know Pete is the script used in the latest Herald Digipoll and the latest Three News Reid Research poll. Having seen what was polled the order of questions could have had a significant result.
Also 3news apparently asked should Judith Collins be sacked. Why wasn’t the results of this reported?
I haven’t found details on the Reid Research poll questions. Reid Research have a page on 3 News polls but there is scant information and the last result is Jan-14. 3 News als has stuff all (and make poor presumptions that NZ First miss the cut and Conservatives get two seats). The lack of details is very poor.
I can’t find anything on the Collins sacking apart from a comment at Public Address by Andrew Geddis:
I was polled in this poll. On the basis of the questions asked me, he doesn’t.
There should, however, be a story along the lines of One News’ “should Collins resign over Oravida?” Because I was asked that!
Of course he had the day off yesterday. Was it pre-arranged? Certainly. Suggests to me his blatant, biased set ups of David Cunliffe in particular has his bosses’ approval!
What I would like to know Pete is the script used in the latest Herald Digipoll and the latest Three News Reid Research poll. Having seen what was polled the order of questions could have had a significant result.
I’ve come to the conclusion that published polls need to have the questions published as well. That way they could be properly analysed.
“Eligible New Zealand voters who live in New Zealand households that have a landline telephone.
SAMPLE SELECTION: Nationwide random digit dialling of landline telephones using stratified probability
sampling to ensure the sample includes the correct proportion of people in urban
and rural areas. Interviewers ask to speak to the person in each household aged 18
years or over with the next birthday. When required, multiple calls are made to
reach that person. Voting eligibility is determined at the first question.”
3. Our decision about not randomly dialing cell phones (yet) has very little to do with the cost of calling cell phones (in fact the cost is not that substantial). It’s due more to a) the degree to which the additional sample frame will reduce bias versus increase variance (produce less stable results), and b) the structure of the New Zealand cell phone system.
5. At present my view is that, in New Zealand, non-response is a far far bigger source of error than non-coverage. If non-coverage of cell only households is such a big issue, how come most polls seem to over-state support for the Green party? And why don’t they under-state support for the Labour Party?
6. In New Zealand, does calling cell phones decrease non-response or increase it? Don’t underestimate the importance of this.
Calling cells is not, and will never be, the magic bullet for opinion polling.
Roy Morgan polls cellphones. While their last polling period was earlier than Colmar Brunton and Reid Research the main party results for the last three polls were quite close:
You’re the “fact checker” as you advertise yourself. How about answering that yourself instead of looking like a disingenuously partisan amateur?
One thing you’ve go to realise is that is you advertise yourself as a United Figleaf candidate or “Fact Checker”, then you’ve got to actually do some work.
Putting on a beige cardigan and wagging your finger rather selectively doesn’t qualify. I already know that you’re a tedious dick and frankly I would welcome your insults, but if you pretend to professional competence, you have to show it at all times, not – as you do, whenever it suits you – pretend that you have some special exception in those rather frequent exceptions.
You really should have taken up stamp collecting on your retirement – it would have been so much less irritating to people who have to wade through your self-promotion to find comments worth reading.
I think journalists understand that, and their editors. They are deliberately presenting polls as they wiosh to. I dont believe it is from any kind of ignorance of polling basics.
It’s interesting to see what Chris Trotter has to say about last Saturday’s TPPA protests at http://bowalleyroad.blogspot.co.nz/
While he argues that such marches are ineffective because of more profound reasons, I think the oppositions’ very limited time, money and resources are a core issue. I think the left should not automatically turn to protest marches to make its points unless they are certain they are going to have a sizeable impact. When the turnout is small, it only encourages the government and encourages the public view through the media that those against such things like the TPPA are in the minority. Those who are fighting the government tend for the most part to have extremely limited money, time and energy, partly because they are often on low wage jobs and so on. I would have loved to have gone to the march to support it even though I wasn’t convinced it would be effective but couldn’t afford the travel costs, or loss of income from an extra part time job. This government knows that by attacking the opposition on all fronts eg environment, employment, education it makes their protests weak in comparison to its own virtually unlimited resources which it channels from private funding along with eight years of shaping government departments to do its bidding. The opposition has to start thinking of more creative ways of protesting that work within the limitations of its supporters, rather than yet another march. In other words, a more strategic approach is needed. People’s time, energy and money have to be bundled up and directed at specific targets, rather than a scatter gun approach.
I think the oppositions’ very limited time, money and resources are a core issue.
Interestingly enough I think that the left have forgotten what having a party is all about. It is, quite simply, to provide that time, money and resources. Not for everyone but for a few to do the necessary work.
I think the left should not automatically turn to protest marches to make its points unless they are certain they are going to have a sizeable impact.
I think you’re right there. I think we’d be better off using the time and resources provided by being in political parties to run polls, the advertising of those polls and the pushing of referenda. We need to engage everybody and not just the few who are already engaged and thus willing to turn up to protests.
I would have loved to have gone to the march to support it even though I wasn’t convinced it would be effective but couldn’t afford the travel costs
I would have gone to the protest but I had a choice of going for a job interview or going to the protest – the job interview won out.
The polls aside, I’m really worried. I caught David Cunliffe talking about asset sales this morning and worried more. He is a very good speaker but so negative and attack-oriented in an almost childish way. “New Zealanders don’t like asset sales and this will show up in the ballot box”. What??? I want to hear good reasons why the ongoing asset sales are bad for NZ. Why we need to keep Genesis. Don’t attack John Key all the time. He’s almost impregnable. Attack the right wing policies that are so bad for NZ. Show you can transcend petty party politics and can be a PM. Who’s advising him? Why has he changed? What happened to the fire in his belly?
He accused John Key of having a secret trust for donors.
David Farrar did a post on it yesterday:
Quoted from breakfast interview DAVID CUNLIFFE: Absolutely not. In fact there’s a huge difference between what I did, which was to open up a campaign trust that wasn’t even under the Electoral Act, it was an internal party matter, for a trivially small amount of money and said to all of the potential donors through the trustee, you must make yourselves public. The Prime Minister has done none of that. The Prime Minister’s trusts have taken millions of dollars over the last few years and he’s refused to name even a single donor. So I’m afraid the National Party is in absolutely no position to be high minded with me. I have done everything I can to be transparent and frankly, I’ve had about enough of National’s hypocrisy on that matter.
i would put money on the claim being accurate. key is hardly honest by any stretch of the imagination
and if its a secret trust in the same vein as cunliffes “secret” trust (because it wasnt secret) – the nats have used that method for years via several trusts
so not so much a lie – but an unsupported claim that you dont agree with
According to Farrar the trust that people used to donate through was wound up in 2007.
I’d be surprised if Cunliffe didn’t know about this, so one has to wonder what trust he’s talking about.
Maybe Cunliffe should come forward and present his proof.
“According to Farrar” – hand me the salt so i can get some very big grains:-)
question for those who know – does national still use trusts to hide the identity of donors?
“Maybe Cunliffe should come forward and present his proof.” – yep, and maybe we should refrain from calling him a lier untill that time? – express doubt? – sure, get stuck in
small note – in your quote above cunliffe doesnt accuse key of having a secret trust – he accuses him of hiding the donors via the trust
What’s he going to do if Key goes for him over this accusation, where’s the proof? because if he can’t stump up with any than his honesty levels with the voter are going to take yet another dive.
Don’t be surprised to see Winston Peters over taking Cunliffe in the preferred PM poll.
question for those who know – does national still use trusts to hide the identity of donors?
Can’t see any trusts in the donation list for 2013/14 but there was Antione’s Restaurant which donated $60,000 as, seemingly, a result of a $5000/person dinner. None of the diners are named.
Sorry, didnt you think that because there was no proof DotCom HAD NOT donated to cunliffe it was fair to suggest he might have, but Cunliffe is a liar for the same kind of thing?
Or are you holding Cunliffe to a higher standard than John Key who speaks out of both sides of hismouth. I am not a labour supporter but even I can see you are accusing Cunliffe of things you defend Key.
No, DC asked the donors if they were willing to be named. Two weren’t so he returned those donations. Given that the donors were told before they donated that they would be anonymous, DC seems to have done the honourable thing.
Somehow I knew you’d think it was different. So Key doesn’t have to have proof that Unite and Dotcom donated to Cunliffe when saying it, but Cunliffe has to have proof that key has got a secret trust???
Totally agree with your point about going after policies. For some time I have thought that younger voters (I am in my 60’s) just don’t care about left/right. They seem more focused on what is fair/unfair; reasonable/unreasonable; just/unjust; and so on. To attack one of the most popular PM’s in history (if not the most popular) is just plain stupid, especially when so many of the attacks backfire. Now every time there is a similar attack voters can just shrug it off as more spitefulness from Labour.
I think this is a very hard ask for Labour as many people (my opinion only) will find it hard to connect with Cunliffe. How does an affluent, double income, business trained, leafy suburb resident resonate with the less fortunate? I am sure Helen Clark was quite well off, but she didn’t sport the trappings so obviously. I just can’t see the missing 800,000 coming out in these circumstances. And that assumes that they would vote differently from the rest of the national electorate.
From what I’ve seen (I’m so childish about politics that I’m too scared to watch sometimes), Cunliffe’s attacks on Key and the Nats aren’t working. They’re not working for me as a voter; they’re not working in the polls. I feel that most people here could mount a persuasive argument about asset sales or many other issues and convince some of the undecided that another three years of National will set NZ back. As a voter I want these issues articulated in a positive way … I want to feel proud of belonging to the Labour party. I want a strong Labour/Green alliance. As things are now I’m voting Green, probably my natural home anyway, but for a moment there I thought that Labour would do it for me. And it’s not just me, my friends and family feel the same way: Baby Boomers and the generation below. Maybe we’re not the target audience but heck, I’m worried.
what attacks on key? Can you list them? I am interested to know the extent of the attack in your mind, cos in mine, I have only noticed it when brought up here and one or two times (like when key attacked sallies and cunliffe foolishly pitted mansion against mansion).
the thing for me though maureen, is the only place i see this negativity is in accusations directed at cunliffe or in media framing (see gower). Im concerned that you, your friends and your family are relying upon media pundits and not the words of the person, or party, in question
ask yourself – is your view of party positions derived from traditional media or from actual first hand experience/research? (not “blaming the media” here – just pointing out that what you see there isnt what your getting)
just where are these relentless attacks on john key? (note – valid, measured and well argued criticism isnt a personal attack in my book)
but they do like it when key lies tot hem? You seem to thrive on it. Key said Unite and Dotcom donated to Cunliffe, he had no proof and was being negative.
His personal polling popularity is higher than national’s party polling… ergo, his popularity is largely unimportant. His party is neck-and-neck or close to neck-and-neck with Labour/Greens.
Shit sorry. I assumed from the way the rightwing posters were going on and on the other day about how popular key was that he must be polling higher than hisparty…
Well, perhaps you should read the material on this blog Tracey. You will find left wing posters going on and on about how popular Cunliffe is and you may assume that he must be polling higher than his party.
On the other hand if you think about it you may find that Labour are on about 30% and Cunliffe is on 8%. Just ignore it. It cannot possibly be true.
I sure I could quickly flag a few entries here where people rave about Cunliffe.
I can’t show you, since they are as anonymous as the contributors to DC slush fund, that they are inside the Labour Party. I doubt, on the other hand, that you could point out where National Party supporters differ greatly from many Labour ones in highlighting Key’s popularity. Look at Brian Edwards or Chris Trotter for examples.
Does it matter. Of course not. It’s just that everyone who takes any interest in politics this far out from an election are, as both you and I and most people who make comments here, totally deranged on the whole subject.
The only thing that really matters, as you put in the first line is the final party vote. However we are getting ever further into a Presidential type contest and an unpopular leader is going to affect the popularity of their party. As the election gets closer people in general, outside the hard core, are going to decide their vote and a lot of this will depend on how much they like the leader.
so when the herald prints a statement of the pm which has no factual basis and which they dont check before publishing,that has no impact on his or cunliffes popularity
How does an affluent, double income, business trained, leafy suburb resident resonate with the less fortunate?
Uggh? Is that comment said in jest Once was Pete?
John Key was worth $50million in 2008 – probably closer to $100 million now.
David Cunliffe might hit the $3million mark but isn’t likely to be much higher than that.
John Key has half a dozen homes/mansions.
David Cunliffe has one to my knowledge.
John Key lives in a huge mansion surrounded by leafy trees in the most expensive area in NZ.
David Cunliffe lives in a fairly ordinary sized house – with leafy trees granted – in an expensive area but less so than Key.
John Key grew up to be a selfish, self centred, money obsessed plutocrat who has lied and cheated his way into the hearts of some very gullible NZers – including some in the MSM who should know better.
David Cunliffe is devoting his efforts into lifting the poor out of their abject poverty and to make NZ a better place for everyone.
You really have bought into the MSM disinformation campaign haven’t you. One of the gullible NZers?
John key is rich and the devil incarnate.
David Cunliffe is less rich but quite well off and is the messiah
Anyone who doesn’t believe this is gullible
Tracey I was attempting to make a point which must have gone over your head.
If those of on the left can only come up with rubbish such as that put forward by Anne we have no chance of connecting with the voting public but that’s probably fine from her perspective as she can put down another miserable failure by the Labour party and their ‘brains trust’ to the ‘gullible NZ voters’
I was pointing out the contradictions in Once was Pete’s statement at 5.2..
He attacks David Cunliffe for being (I paraphrase) so-called rich, living in a leafy suburb, has a business background and therefore couldn’t possibly relate to poor people. While at the same time he ignores the fact John Key is filthy rich (off the backs of the self same poor people) lives in an even leafier suburb, has umpteen dozen other properties and secret trusts all over the place but somehow that’s all OK folks. Key good, Cunliffe bad.
Thanks for the compliment. Such a raving, incoherent response can only mean I hit a bulls eye. 🙂
Being rich is not an impediment to be the leader of a party and work towards policies that make the lives of people, including the poor, the workers, the family and the unemployed better.
Helen Clark was rich. So were/are most of the Labour leaders here and abroad.
Working towards social policies does not mean the leader or the socialist politicians should abandon all their wealth and live poor. Even Mahatma Gandhi was a London educated/practicing barrister from a wealthy family.
Here is an analogy:
The pope is very wealthy but he advocates not only for his Church but also for the poor of the world. So do lots of nuns and priests. Mother Theresa had millions at her disposal and she used it to help the sick, the poor and the dying.
“There’s a tax bias in favour of speculators. We want to be an innovative economy; actually, we’re a speculative one.
“Until we have a government that has the courage to address the problem of tax-free capital gains, like every other developed country virtually has done, we won’t fix that problem and Labour’s going to do that.”
Have problem [speculative economy] + will do something about it [capital gains] (which is, btw, economically orthodox) = sounds pretty positive to me.
I admit my concerns are emotional and not based on a solid attention to the campaigning that’s going on. I should concentrate, I know, before I decide who to vote for. But that bit I heard about people not liking asset sales and that will show up in the ballot box is an aspect of Cunliffe’s campaigning I’ve heard before. Kind of facile comments that don’t seem worthy of the man he was before. Believe me, I want to believe him, vote for him, see him get in. If my casual assumptions are wrong, wrong, wrong, then I’m glad.
Maybe he does what I’m doing here, making a bold statement without evidence? I promise I will pay more attention from now on:)
Some of us vote Green, have some criticisms of some of Labour’s policies, and are not really getting into the rightwing framing re- their attacks on Cunliffe.
Hi Maureen, Nice reply to my rather snippy comment. I do think the evidence for assets sales as a deal for the taxpayer is cannot be anything but negative, sadly. That is not Cunliffe’s fault, that’s the fault of the government which has sold the assets off.
He said he believed voters would punish the Government at the ballot box, and vote Labour so we can buy some of these assets back [my bold]
That is not negative, That is a positive response, that if wasn’t included in the piece you caught suggests maybe the report was cut-off rather than Cunliffe being overly negative.
@DG
I thought Cunliffe was excellent on the TV this morning.
Bear in mind that Cunliffe had to pitch to people who had just woken up and, like me, don’t want too much fire and brimstone on their cornflakes.
Cunliffe is performing extremely well on TV as a leader. He does the beakfast slots very well. His interview with Nercep on National showed great skill and a steely core.
Have faith DG. He took over before Christnas an organisation and caucus that was in disarray and un-lead. We now have a leader who, despite a couple of gaffes, is an interviewee and speaker in whom we can be very proud. A major step up from where we were six months ago.
Agree NPS Staffer. Cunliffe is performing well in the media. He has made a couple of stuff-ups but get over this! It’s not like Key hasn’t made plenty of stuff-ups!
When the policy starts to roll out it will all change, and I think people will be surprised how good Cunliffe will be in the election debates.
The left only needs to add 3.5% to take the treasury benches.
Incidentally I wonder if Key will dare to debate Cunliffe head to head?
Nice to see that the MH370 disaster is good news for some. Some scabby Wairarapa millionaire is leasing his private jet out to help co-ordinate the comms. That’s leasing, not gifting. Charity is for suckers.
Yep. a nice little earner on a cost plus basis. Plus the credibility bonus of having the media saying ‘Sir Peter flies in to save search’ or similar bollocks.
“The jet was not donated to help in the search effort, rather the company which operated the jet had accepted a charter offer with Sir Peter’s permission …”
A leaked conversation between Turkey’s intelligence chief and the war room reveals plot to create a casus belli for war with Syria by using ISIL, an alQaeda offshoot, to threaten a turkish shrine Suleiman Shah Tomb. Turkey has blocked youtube in order to cover up the leaks. Turkish Foreign Ministry confirmed the recording of planning for a military incursion into Syria adding that a ‘network of treason’ was responsible for leak. Part two of the leaked conversation implicates John Kerry US secretary of state in the plot.
On Al Jazeera news the other night was shown ‘rebel’ groups in Syria openly flying the flag of al Qaeda,
George Bush, both junior and senior are likely to be well pleased with such and outcome,the House of Saud positively beaming and i am sure that Barak Obama can offer up an eloquent piece of oratory about a homeless al Qaeda providing stability in a war torn region without the merest hint of an outright guffaw…
From the Herald:
“Dairy product prices had the biggest drop in almost 20 months at Fonterra’s latest GlobalDairyTrade auction as whole milk powder fell to its lowest level in more than a year…..”
But never mind. The Government will be prepared to subsidise the industry since it is the one shot mainstay of the NZ economy.
hate to spoil the party but until someone comes up with a viable alternative then dairy for better or for worse is the bedrock of the economy so if you want teevees, cars, aeroplane rides to exotic foreign destinations then dont knock it. oh and dont forget teachers wages.
Hate to spoil the party and the little homily by captain hook but everyone realises how we rely on dairy.
And we are angry that this reliance is maintained and fostered so putting us ever further in a precarious one shot position.
If anything goes wrong it could turn to custard, and indeed we might have to live on custard as we would have a huge oversupply of milk. Then we would get huge river pollution as dairy farmers had to spread it on their paddocks or dump it in the river. Blow on blow it would be. And our government would probably hop on their jets and operate the Cabinet from somewhere in Sydney near a casino.
Perhaps if the world was going to continue in its present form but it isn’t, is it – so making TV’s cars and planes are really sunset industries with a unlikely future. Sustainable farming, diversity, and non-monocropping (including dairy), planting trees and food forests and so on would be much better ways to go than creating consumables even really big ones imo.
so making TV’s cars and planes are really sunset industries with a unlikely future.
True but it’s a good example of diversification.
Sustainable farming, diversity, and non-monocropping (including dairy), planting trees and food forests and so on would be much better ways to go than creating consumables even really big ones imo.
Although I agree with all of that there’s not a lot of diversification there.
We also, IMO, have to get away from regarding computers and phones as consumables. First off they’re necessary to modern life and that isn’t going to change even with power down. Secondly, these days they should be lasting about 5 years or more each.
No but some parts of it are and they’re also desirable, i.e, make life better. Computers are part of that because they help make communications and thus democracy better, help to make better plans for limited resources and, of course, means that we can maintain the massive productivity that allows us to have a life of plenty that can be extended to everyone.
That’s true. One question that arises is how can things be produced to last and still be made by businesses? How did businesses make themselves sustainable back when products were made to last?
They didn’t and a hell of a lot of them got direct or indirect government funding to set up and continue.
Please note: I’m not against government funding of services, I’m against the people who profit from that government funding claiming that they did it all by themselves.
Computers won’t make it I suspect, as JMG says, and I agree with,
If you want to build and maintain computers, you need an industrial infrastructure that can manufacture integrated circuits and other electronic components, and that requires an extraordinarily complex suite of technologies, sprawling supply chains, and a vast amount of energy—all of which has to be paid for. It’s unlikely that any society in the deindustrial dark ages will have that kind of wealth available; if any does, many other uses for that wealth will make more sense in a deindustrialized world; and in an age when human labor is again much cheaper than mechanical energy, it will be more affordable to hire people to do the routine secretarial, filing, and bookkeeping tasks currently done by computers than to find the resources to support the baroque industrial infrastructure needed to provide computers for those tasks.
This life of plenty is an illusion even now and it is folly to believe that it can be extended to everybody. Much better imo to front up and rediscover technologies and techniques that are sustainable in the world we are creating.
If you want to build and maintain computers, you need an industrial infrastructure that can manufacture integrated circuits and other electronic components, and that requires an extraordinarily complex suite of technologies, sprawling supply chains, and a vast amount of energy—all of which has to be paid for.
All of which already exist or if it doesn’t exist can be built up from what already does. Hell, we could make it from scratch using the basic knowledge that we already have. Energy for manufacture will be a problem in some places but NZ isn’t one of them.
It’s unlikely that any society in the deindustrial dark ages will have that kind of wealth available; if any does, many other uses for that wealth will make more sense in a deindustrialized world; and in an age when human labor is again much cheaper than mechanical energy, it will be more affordable to hire people to do the routine secretarial, filing, and bookkeeping tasks currently done by computers than to find the resources to support the baroque industrial infrastructure needed to provide computers for those tasks.
That’s the bit that JMG doesn’t get – we’re not going to de-industrialise. We’ll probably use less than we do now but we won’t stop using it altogether and in many places we’ll use more – like those automated bike factories that I was talking about.
We’re still going have tractors down at the farms but they’ll be electric rather than diesel. Nanometre are already electric and so the change will be from using fossil fuels to produce that electricity to using renewables. Really, about the only thing that we’ll lose is cars and I’m pretty sure that most people will come to see that as a Good Thing.
and computers laptops smartphones guzzle power like there isno tomorrow
But we have enough power and it’s renewable anyway.
maybe dotcom should announce he is going to be build a server farm in nz powered by solar and wind…
Why? The Greens have already said that they’re going to help people put solar power on their roof. Just need both the Greens and Labour to announce that they’re going to replace all fossil fueled generation with wind, solar and geothermal from purely NZ resources.
Your idealistic belief that we won’t deindustrialise is quaint and doesn’t stack up – and this idea that magially renewables will fill the void left when (relatively) cheap energy effectively runs out – well JMG has smashed that one to bits numerous times – it’s up there with aliens arriving to save everything.
Nope. Money isn’t a problem and never has been. As long as we have people to do the job and the necessary physical resources then we can “pay” for it all.
Your idealistic belief that we won’t deindustrialise is quaint and doesn’t stack up – and this idea that magially renewables will fill the void left when (relatively) cheap energy effectively runs out – well JMG has smashed that one to bits numerous times – it’s up there with aliens arriving to save everything.
And that’s load of bollocks as well. We have enough energy available now to produce everything. Build a few hundred wind turbines (yes, we have enough resources) and we no longer need the fossil fueled generators.
It’s not a question “cheap” as in do we have enough money but do we have enough resources. The answer to the latter is yes we do.
Both you and JMG have proven, time and time again, that you haven’t got a friggen clue as to what economics is. Not that that’s surprising – neither do the economists.
Computers should be lasting far more than 5 years. My last laptop lasted eight years. That’s without trying too hard, and I’m a bit hard on them in terms of use. The main reason for having to buy a new one is that after 8 years the parts are no longer available for repair, so they could last a lot longer.
My cell phone is 7 years old. It’s about to die, but I can’t see a technical reason why it couldn’t be repaired.
IME, computers tend to get replaced more because of the need for more computing power than the computer breaking. My last computer lasted me six years before I upgraded – I still have it and still use it even (It’s my Linux box (minus the box)). My last cell phone is sitting on my desk in near perfect condition including the battery (really, why is it that people don’t know how to look after batteries any more?).
It’s about to die, but I can’t see a technical reason why it couldn’t be repaired.
There isn’t a technical reason – there’s a cost reason and the a new cell phone is a hell of a lot better reason. The real problem is that it won’t be recycled either and that comes down to the cost reason again (Yeah, it’s still “cheaper” to unsustainably dig up more resources than it is to recycle resources already dug up and processed).
Lolz weka, i beat up on my old second hand laptop so bad that the ivories have taken to separating from the little rubber cones underneath them that give them their bounce,
Always adaptable and way too cheap to spend upon a tube of glue i have a.s.d.e. all sitting on bits of scrunched up rolly paper(minutely measured i might add by my radial optical metrical laser to the nth degree),which does the trick nicely,
(i feel and urge coming on to hang out my ‘computer repairs” shingle, any takers)…
You say that your last laptop worked for 8 years. The reason that they are replaced, usually quite a lot before that, is that Moore’s law continues to operate. A new computer will have about 32 times the power of one that is 8 years old.
I replaced my desk top about a month ago. The only reason for doing so is that Microsoft have dropped support for Windows XP and Windows 8.1 won’t really run on a 5 year old system. I wasn’t willing to use Internet banking on a system with no security updates.
I also bought a new cell phone the other day. It cost the grand total, including $20 worth of time, of $17. It would cost about $17 for a repair shop to decide that an old phone wasn’t actually working without even thinking about repairing it.
There is no technical reason why they cannot be fixed but it doesn’t make any economic sense to do so.
There are of course economic reasons to repair them – you’re just not factoring in the subsidised development costs, the discounting of the actual cost to manufacture by the phone companies who make their profit from their contracts not from the phone itself, the subsidised cost of manufacture via cheap labour, the cost and use of the mineral extraction, the costs associated with deliberate built in obsolesence and the cost of the disposal of waste.
If you factored those in there there’s clearly good economic reasons to repair them.
“hate to spoil the party but until someone comes up with a viable alternative then dairy for better or for worse is the bedrock of the economy so if you want teevees, cars, aeroplane rides to exotic foreign destinations then dont knock it. oh and dont forget teachers wages.”
Yeah, nah. There’s something wrong with that equation. We got sold the same line with tourism, so how come we need dairying now? If this is about economic growth, what’s going to come after dairying? And at what cost?
Besides, I thought we were all borrowing to pay for our teevees and overseas holidays.
Hidden over in the ‘Opinion’ section of the Herald online is an interesting piece by business reporter Chris Barton,
He provides a good analysis of DotCom’s recent loss at the Supreme Court where that Court was the final arbiter of DotComs attempt to ‘discover’ the evidence the US will use against Him at His New Zealand extradition hearing,
DotCom of course lost this case in a majority decision with the dissenting voice being that of Chief Justice Sian Elias,
Chris Barton’s opinion is that DotCom has been badly maligned by the Courts decision and He gives some compelling reasons why he has come to this conclusion,
i totally agree with Him,(no matter what i think of DotCom as a person), the New Zealand system of Justice requires a ‘no surprises’ discovery of evidence to be used in Courts against any accused and just because another Stated,(the US), is pursuing this prosecution of DotCom it cannot be right that New Zealand subjugate its legal system to match the whims or mores of a foreign State pursuing a case through our Courts,
Well worth a read for an explanation of the legal (un)niceties surrounding the Courts decision…
Just as an afterthought on this Karol, perhaps the treatment being meted out to DotCom is the forerunner to what could be expected Corporations V Governments/others in a world ruled by the Trans-Pacfic Partnership…
Interesting to see the times the CJ is the dissenting opinion. Of note for me was her dissenting voice in a SC decision over council liability for certifiers. Not surprisingly I agree with her reasoning in that decision. BUT she is the dissenting voice too often for me to feel entirely comfortable about the bench on the SC.
Hone was very sharp and handled that interview really well. He made a good case for an alliance with TIP (The Internet Party), while also acknowledging that many in Mana were still wary of such – to be worked out when the Mana Party people get together (myself I’m still not convinced that a formal Mana-TIP alliance is the way to go).
Also talked up Annette Sykes on the ground campaigning. And Hone made it sound like he is networking well with some Labour MPs while also having a very good relationship with the Greens.
Yes i was well pleased to hear that Annette Sykes spent Her Christmas,(with help), door knocking every home in the Waiariki electorate,
There’s a simple message being delivered to the voters there and that is a vote for Te Ururoa Flavell is a vote for another 3 years of National Government,
Hone believes that the Mana Party machine in Waiariki,(with a smaller rohe to cover),is if anything better than His own in Te Tai Tokerau and with the Mana Party AGM in Rotorua this year i should think that the feet on the ground will be able to do another door knock,(hopefully the first one gathered a good data base of where the Mana Party/Maori Party voters are in the electorate as Mana need to pull apart the support Flavell has in the electorate),
i am still in ‘tai ho’ mode regarding the proposed Mana/internet Party alliance, it is the nuts and bolts of the ‘carve up’ when it comes to the relevant strengths of the perceived % gained at the election that will convince me,
i ‘see’ a possible four MP’s coming from such an alliance, IF the proposed ‘carve up’ were to put Annette,Hone and John Minto +one from the Internet Party into the next Parliament then it is probable looking from this far out that i will cast a Party Vote their way,
i don’t see the Internet Parties lack of Social Policy to be a problem, this is obviously well covered by Mana just as the reverse is true surrounding ‘internet issues’, so if they both adopt each other’s relevant policies there isn’t really any discord inherent,
Hone made one small slip of the tongue when He said there were ‘other arrangements’ surrounding the Waiariki electorate, and then lolz, wished He hadn’t,all in all tho a very good display from the Mana Party leader on the radio this morning…
@karol +100…yes i think Mana is going to attract a lot of votes with Dotcom…very impressive interview with Hone Harawira and Kathryn Ryan asked the hard questions
I was impressed with the way that he handled that interview. He came across as relaxed, confident and to the point.
Mana and the Internet Party have common ground if you that good internet access is a way out of poverty.
When people like Duncan Garner talk like this:
‘Dotcom wants internet freedom. Many of Hone’s rural supporters in outback Hokianga and Kaikohe don’t even own computers, let alone have super-fast broadband at their doorstep.
Hone wants jobs, opportunities and better wages; Dotcom wants to stay in NZ.’
They’re talking as though they can’t imagine a world where Maori in rural Kaikohe and the Hokianga use computers to access the web, and this speaks volumes about the kinds jobs they see them doing. It’s an unthinking, casual kind of assumption that sees poverty as a kind of entrenched natural order.
If poverty is an inability to participate in society then the internet is a powerful tool that can break down the barriers that prevent participation.
The people of rural Hokianga and Kaikohe should have computers as well as super-fast broadband because it’s a path towards jobs, opportunities and better wages for them.
yeah. i was impressed with that interview too. i see a way forward with mana & the internet party joining forces. the internet party want a revolution, so do mana. its very exciting stuff, a total new way of doing things. & really could get that missing vote, to paraphrase a blog i read yesterday, “no wonder the suits are shitting themselves”. indeed~!
Labour (UK) at “crossroads”; warned against “pale shade of austerity”
In a speech to political journalists at a Westminster lunch, the Unite general secretary said the Labour party has reached a crossroads and will risk losing the support of Britain’s largest trade union unless it shows it is the “voice” of workers.
McCluskey said he hoped that the Labour policy review would present a genuine alternative to the coalition. He said: “If it’s a pale shade of austerity then I believe Labour will be defeated at the next election … I believe the British electorate are of a mind that unless there is a real alternative to say, ‘We’d best stick with the devil we know.’
“And so Ed’s challenge is to simply demonstrate that he’s on the side of ordinary people. Miliband has got to give hope to the poor, he’s got to demonstrate that we’re going to do something different in power. If he does that with some passion, if he does that with some conviction then in my view the polls will begin to alter and he will begin to be seen as a genuine alternative.”
McCluskey said he could envisage his union disaffiliating from Labour when he was asked whether he could imagine supporting another party…”Labour consistently has to demonstrate that it is our voice; we created it. At the beginning of the last century, ordinary working people sat down to create a party of labour so that we had a voice in the political arena. Is Labour still that voice? I’m hoping the answer to that is yes, but we are at a stage in politics at the moment where just bumbling along in the old ways is not going to happen any more.
the key is getting those workers who have swallowed the rhetoric, and been given more money if not in a union, to see the downside.
Especially as unions are there for non union members badly treated, maybe that has to change? Those who pile vitriol on unions seem to overlook that many unions will act for an unjustifiably dismissed worker who did not join the union… as long as they join from that point. That doesn’t smack of a bullying fee hungry organisation but rather one that genuinely gives a toss about workers
A good lawyer will do a much better job of handling an employment dispute if the worker has a case. You could save the union fee in a fund, and draw on it once a decade when you need an employment lawyer.
I won’t bother telling you you’re a wanker, SSLands. Plenty already have, and you take it as a compliment to your self sufficiency.
I will state the obvious: an employment dispute can be handled by a lawyer when the employee has very specific and in demand skills, and is difficult to replace. And no, I don’t mean overpaid CEOs or consultants, who should be a dime a dozen. Under your system, the average worker would have less rights than they have today. You should understand leverage, but obviously don’t. You are an idiot, and deserve the world you are trying to make. The rest of us don’t.
Labour is putting party before the Scottish workers. The current Scottish Labour leader in the Scottish Parliament, Johann Lamont, is very ineffective. The Scottish Nationalist Party has more votes and credibility than Labour. http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/msps.aspx
Labour in Scotland will get punished severely in the referendum in September. Labour in England will be seen to have been wrong on Scotland and too close to the Tories on the independence question. They will get punished in time for that also. This is a great pity as it might let the Tories win the next general election. Ironically the increasing likelihood of a Tory win in Westminster is the best bet for the people of Scotland. The Tories have only ONE (1) Scottish seat in Westminster.
Jackson has an aircraft which cost him $80 million and who knows how much to run. It is probably a managed asset, viz. available for charter. He has made it available in the search. We can hardly expect it to be deployed at his personal cost.
We should also hardly expect that a business transaction be trumpeted as ‘Jackson Kiwi Icon’. There is a hint of that implication in the style of the Herald coverage unfortunately.
If in this case Jackson’s kind heart is to the fore let us hear about it. If not STFU Herald. Unless of course you want to do a pap piece on Air NZ provincial and the rental car company I availed to meet needs on the occasion of my brother’s untimely death in the South Island.
Jackson’s plane, according to the news report I heard this morning, is faster and has a longer range than anything our airforce has. Of course, a search requires that the plane go as slow as it possibly can and that it have the actual equipment to do the search which I doubt that Jackson’s plane has. In other words, this is nothing but a PR exercise for Jackson.
Came here to post about this being the top story on the news. Matt D’s remarks are hilarious: “A lot of civilian and military aircraft are involved in the search and it’s kind of disappointing that because one is owned by a celebrity it becomes a matter of news when there are [over] 200 people missing.”
Not nearly as disappointing as you getting NZ law changed to suit yourselves.
Or a tax write off/ rebate for owning the jet, the only thing going for it is it has rather long legs apart form that bugger all as the Observers down the back have relay the good old Mk1 eyeball to spot anything down there
Well, the international search coordinators seem to think they needed a communications relay.
My understanding is that the search aircraft are flying at low level. That will cut their radio range, including data links.
Even if all aircraft and ships had satellite comms, chartering a relay aircraft might be a faster, more reliable, or simply a backup option to coordinate the search.
The fact it is jackson’s jet is beside the point – it would have been leased via an aircraft lease company on the basis of what was available with the specific endurance, size and communications capabilities. The reason it has been chartered – by the Australians, not John Key – is to provide communications relay. The search area is far enough off shore that it means low flying planes won’t necessarily be able to communicate clearly with Perth.
The jet has significant endurance so will likely fly out to the search area and fly around in circles at its most economical speed and altitude. It has an endurance of probably 15 hours which means it can be on station at dawn and leave at dusk – and coordinate the 20 odd search planes that come and go over the whole day. Bear in mind the search planes are actually flying at maybe 1500 feet. The air force plans have much shorter endurances and in any case using one of them to co-ordinate would leave one less search plane.
Your standard Maritime/ SAR Mission heights once on station are about 250 to 300ft off the deck (sea level) and it also depends on the current sea state/ weather or both especially in southern ocean at this time of the year. Also the wing span of the P3 Orion is 150ft long and if they are flying on 3 engines, 90% of all Maritime Ops are on 3 engines once on station as this increase the amount of time on station weather permitting.
But this height there is very little room for error if something goes wrong esp you hit one those large birds down south ” the feather type”. If any of you get a chance to do a Maritime Patrol on P3 they bloody fun and you get watch 13 plus aircrew work their butts off. Its some of the best teamwork you would ever see anywhere.
The RAAF has deployed one of its Wedgetail “Airborne Early Warning Control Aircraft” to control the rather crowded Airspace also act as a re trans (radio) relay to the ships and back to land.
I know some here hate or don’t like the RNZAF P3’s and want the RNZAF to have a cheaper /Short range MPA “I hope you have a change of heart after this operation” . But they are prefer aircraft that AMSA/ RAAF want to use due too the recent sensor upgrade they got under Labour. Some on the ground are saying its better than the sensors on broad the P8 MPA (design to replace the P3) and the RNZAF crews know how operated in the Southern Oceans unlike the other Nations taking part in the recovery effort in other words the go too people.
True, they have been RNZAF service since 1965-66, but they starting to like my granddads old axe ie the P3’s have that many rebuilds in the last 15yrs that they almost new aircraft and more than any other P3 operator in the world that’s including USN and RAAF who have been operating them the longest.
Under National they had a major Structure rebuild including new wings and wing box that RNZAF/ MOD and Safe Air pioneer, that’s after Lockheed said it can’t be done! It’s a good thing that the MOD and Safe Air copyright their idea for 50yrs plus. It expected the with that rebuild they would at least another 20yrs out of them (look how long the B52 has been USAF service) but only issue from what I’ve told is the engines.
Labour has given them 3 sensor upgrades, Rigel 1, Rigel 2 and the last sensor which has been the most complex and technical upgrade done by any P3 user to date.
Can i see the script of the next Jackson epic being written as His jet streaks across the sky of the search area,
Perhaps wee Pete is on board hoovering up ideas and atmosphere so as to have a clue how to script something other than the usual pap written by someone else that He prefers…
I listened to a couple of reports online. I’m not inclined to listen to the whole programmes – I’d rather skim through the topics online & select.
Good report on power companies profiteering from the poor.
On fare evasions on Auckland trains – they only focused on fare evading and the Auckland Transport approach. They didn’t ask why many (focus on furthest out from the city in west Auckland) evade fares – the most obvious thingthat was ignored, is the high cost to those in transport poverty, for a low to medium quality service.
A report with no context and limited in depth analysis.
Auckland Transport have made it so that it’s possible to walk onto some stations and then the trains without paying first and then it’s a simple act of being missed by the fare wardens. I assume they did this for speed to roll out the AT Hop card. It’s certainly not to do with cost as the proper equipment will need to be rolled out eventually and will cost more later.
And then there’s the reasons as to why people are evading fares.
How was Farrar’s reporting on Cunliffe? Was he selectively posting the transcript?
If not…
Cunliffe’s interview today with NewstalkZB. Ugh. I’m done. His response to a question about his time in government “well, let’s talk about Hollyoake or when Muldoon was a boy”. Fuck that. That is such an intellectually dishonest answer.
How about you own your time in government, David? Say what you did right. Say what you did wrong, why you did it then, what’s changed now and explain why you’re changing what you previously did. Explain these things to the voter. Treat them with a little respect.
All he did today was basically do a John Key “pfft” and ensure that National can keep talking about his time in government. Unless Farrar is playing tricky himself with the transcript.
For example, on hitting the straps with NZ Power, what sounds better?
A: Look, National needs to grow up. Helen Clark isn’t in power anymore. They can’t complain about what we did. I’m not going to talk about that. We might as well talk about Muldoon if we’re going to do that.
B: Look, I’m proud of what the Fifth Labour Government achieved and I’m glad I got the experience to be under the leadership of Helen. But, let’s be clear. We got some things wrong. We allowed energy prices to soar. My future government won’t make that same mistake. We understand that this hurts people, National doesn’t. That’s why we’re taking action. That’s why we’re campaigning on NZ Power.
It’s not hard. Cunliffe is leaving a lot to be desire as leader.
The question the righties have been slamming has to do with power prices
Transcript:
TIM FOOKES: How big an issue is this power price and the costs to households going to be for Labour leading up to the election?
DAVID CUNLIFFE: This is a significant issue. It’s part of a bigger issue, which is called the cost of living. And what is happening is that middle income New Zealanders are getting squeezed. They pay a lot of tax. They can’t dodge tax. They have families to bring up. They’re trying to get ahead, they’re working hard, they’re playing by the rules. And what happens? They get slammed with price rise after price rise, whether it’s crazy rents and mortgages – and remember that house mortgages are headed for eight per cent now, according to the banks, so if you’re paying a 500 buck a week mortgage, that’s $136 extra, folks.
TIM FOOKES: But, hang on, it was eight and a half per cent or close to 10 per cent in those 2007-2008 years, as well. So why…
DAVID CUNLIFFE: Yeah, and we could go back to the Holyoake years, and justify all sins by saying, well, when Rob Muldoon was a boy, or Keith Jacka was in Parliament, you know, things were different then. Well, sorry, the current Government has been in power nearly six years. It’s time they manned up and took some responsibility. They cannot get away with excuse after excuse, wah, wah, wah, it was different under Helen Clark. Sorry, guys, grow up
Before this, in response to a question from a caller Cunliffe talks of seeing first hand when he was first an PM, seeing people living in energy poverty. He talks about the current way the electricity market is working badly for people.
CUNLIFFE: We have tried and tried and tried to get those damn Max Bradford reforms to work and after 15 years of trying I’m sick of it. And we’re actually going to move in and give consumers a decent deal.
Fookes asks Cunliffe about the figures he uses from 2008 onwards:
CUNLIFFE: Before you go on, look, power prices rose before 2008 as well.
FOOKES: But they rose by more
CUNLIFFE: Well, they did rise in some cases by more, although there’s been a real open drawing (?) since of the residential versus industrial power prices. And of course now, thanks to John key and his mob, half of that money goes to private investors, most of them offshore. Under the Labour government it all went back to taxpayers because the dividends got recycled. It’s a completely different ball game now at the moment. We’re making foreign institutions rich not
Damn – hit submit by accident before I’d finished transcribing.
But, yeah, I’d say the rightie transcript was pretty selective cherrypicking.
Cunliffe then talks about having worked on this since 2001 and that he and Parker have a thorough knowledge of the issues. Cunliffe then talks about the wider context is one of increasing cost of living.
Then comes the above righies’ cherry-picked transcript.
” It’s time they manned up and took some responsibility. They cannot get away with excuse after excuse, wah, wah, wah, it was different under Helen Clark. Sorry, guys, grow up”
Last week I had a banger of a courtesy car from the panel beater. I could only get ZB! It is an appalling reactionary shit hole. Cunliffe was courageous to go on air there. I respect his cojones is trying to engage with their listeners.
Hmm. That’s certainly better from Cunliffe. But I still think he should be more proactive on both celebrating and reflecting on his previous time in government.
Thanks, Karol for providing the fuller picture! Much appreciated.
Unlike say, Slater, I have a fair bit of time for Farrar. But yeah, you can’t take everything he says at face value. There’s a fair bit of spin to wade through.
i dont read or click through to slater. i will occassionally read farrar. i dont like the tone of many of kiwiblogs commenters but david doesnt seem to stoop.
he rarely publishes the other side if it is unhelpful to him or his side… hence he wont post the correction to keys fabricated figures.
It was a partial transcript, I transcribed more of the ZB programme – mainly stuff on the same topic to give context to the selective right wing transcript.
The blogger took exception to Cunliffe having a go at National.
Cunliffe is doing heaps of interviews and doing them well. He has found his stride in the leadership role. He was always brilliant being interviewed when he was a minister. It is different job when leader and he has now got it.
Cunliffe is stratospheric when compared to Shearer. Thanks Marya Street for rolling him.
he’s also getting around the country, as are the greens. Clark did this very well in 1998 and 1999. She understood that meeting people in the flesh has a lasting impact, and doesn’t reply ont he media spreading your message.
Thank you Wyndham and Tracey for your positive observations. Apart from that little Trust donation hiccup I have only viewed Cunliffe as being consistent, clear and steady and don’t understand why his would- be supporters such as Maureen, above, are turning off him, unless they are well and truly under the spell of the media and Henny Penny stories of the sky falling in.
As for getting around the country – it would be fantastic if he were to come to Ohariu and speak. We need his presence here and he needs to show his support for our new candidate (after the bubba is due). Stephanie Rodgers mentioned the other day she was on the Labour campaign team for Ohariu – Stephanie, is there any chance of having David Cunliffe to talk on our turf?
At this stage National haven’t put a candidate up (although I need to look into this) and the local gossip is that they won’t, and that they will rely on Dunne to retain the seat, because like bad12’s Waiariki Flavell/Sykes example above, a vote for Dunne is a vote for another 3 years of National.
Is Maureen a would be supporter? I though she was a died in the wool Nat who spins a line that she would vote but….etc etc. Perhaps I mis-read her intent.
At 5.2.1.1. at 10.12am Maureen states “I want to feel proud of belonging to the Labour party….” so I’m assuming she is actually a member. She also says she wants a strong Labour Green alliance. But these words are at odds somehow as the tone expresses alarmed “concern” and accusation that Cunliffe is personally failing her and friends and family.
It did set off a whole BM led tangent, so maybe they are in cahoots?
Campbell live last night did an interesting little piece on the savings to be gained from doing the fruit and vege shopping at the local Sunday market,
Having for the first time taken the plunge,(its only taken 58 years a mere blink in the fabric of history), and visited the Harbuor-side Market here in Wellington on Sunday i can confirm the savings suggested on the Campbell Live program are possible,
i was going to leave commenting on the relevant prices between market/supermarket until i had spent at least a month doing such a split shopping so i could get a proper ‘feel’ for the overall prices between the two,
i can say tho that for the same spend that i normally do in the supermarket on fruit and vege i tripled the amount of fruit i usually buy and my normal weeks vege was definitely cheaper in most cases by more than a dollar for each item,
Such savings tho have to be balanced against the transport cost of getting to your local market but having also done this weeks ‘general’ grocery shop i can say that there is a definite plus either way, dollars saved/increased amount of fruit and vege for dollars spent…
you can also save money by eating seasonable fruit and veggies and by preserving the summer fruit.
I no longer shop at my local supermarket (Countdown) and have shopped at a local fruit and veg store for some time. The prices are sometimes better, not more expensive BUT quality is WAY better.
The bonus for me is that with my pile of stuffed bones i was only just managing to get around the whole supermarket,using the trolley as a walking frame, i imagine makes me look like Quasimoto, and back to the car,
i have been thinking for months that it is nearly time to do the shopping via the internet and have it delivered but stupid me would rather suffer the pain than ‘give up’,
Effectively splitting the shopping in half works for me on that level as well as being of benefit to the pocket,(lolz i have packets of painkillers here that i look at thinking i refuse to become hooked on that),
i will try the market over at the Newtown School next, the literature on the web says that prices are cheaper at that one…
The Newtown School market on Saturdays is good, bad12. It is not as big as the Harbourside market, but you can get a good range of fruit/vegs – very fresh etc provided you go in the morning and don’t leave it until early afternoon in hot weather. It is usually all over by about 2.30pm. Newtown prices are excellent IMO and probably lower than the Harbourside market as they cater to a lower income clientele.
Running shoes might be a requirement to do that SSLands, what sort of dork,oops sorry i mean economist comes all the way from the Kapiti Coast into South Wellington to buy a bit of fruit and vege…
Ha-Ha-Ha SSLands, that is just soooo funny on sooo many levels and simply leaves you wide open for me to reveal to you even more of the bad vein of nastiness that runs through my mind with every comment you make here at the Standard,
It is tho late so for tonight you can escape my wrath, but, if your that soft in the head i do have a slightly used bridge for sale….
If S Rylands is parking in the hospital carpark, he is risking a heavy parking fine as the hospital is now clamping down hard on people parking there and going to the market, and not legitimately there to visit the hospital.
I have never had a problem with parking, bad12. Don’t bother with Mein Street – almost impossible, but there are a couple of little side streets close to the school off the main drag where I have always found a park. In particular in the side street going to the main entrance to the school at the main road junction where Rintoul and Riddiford Streets meet. At the end of that street, there is also a public parking area on the school grounds right next to the market.
My understanding is that some growers supply all the markets while others just do some of the markets.or just one. I also understand that the actual sellers at the markets vary – sometimes the actual growers or their family/staff/ friends; and others use sellers employed strictly to sell the produce at the market.
I have also been pleased to note that Karbosh (?) and other similar organisations that are donated food to redistribute to the needy are well supported by the sellers at the Newtown market later in the day when the market is ending.
Yeah vv, as far as Kabosh goes, don’t they do a great job, the amount of food they collect and recycle is phenomenal, not sure of it was 12,000 tonne or 120,000 tonne in a year,
Even down at the local community hall there is now an unofficial food-bank running a couple of days a week, it started with bread but has now grown to include fruit and veg every now and then,(presumably via Kabosh),
Lolz, i could stop in there and get some freebies but the remaining shreds of my personal honesty prohibit me to do so on the basis that my particular budget,(at the moment), leaves me with enough to pay for the stuff so its best to leave the ‘freebies’ for others that have higher costs and less skills at budgeting….
(Karbosh? Kabosh? Kaibosh? lolz unsure but i got the picture)…
They have a list of their current donors (including the Newtown Market) under the “Who donates?” in the dropdown box entitled “Donate food”. Island Bay NW is not listed but I have seen their trucks there regularly over recent months.
On general principles, once you decide to give up on physical activity because you find it difficult, you enter a downward spiral where you eventually stop doing more and more.
Better to stay active as long as you possibly can.
Definitely Lanth, was my point about seeing not doing the shopping as ‘giving in’,my bones tho don’t allow me much free range activity,
So its a matter of thinking up the methodology of getting what physical activity i need to and can do in smaller bites than what i have been used to accomplishing all my life,(my method of digging my garden still has me sniggering at myself, the important thing tho is that it works and keeps the pain level below that of the ‘handful of broken glass’ in the joints which is the point at which i begin again my love affair with the painkillers)…
I did my first shift at the Avondale Market last Sunday, with my Labour Party rosette and pamphlets exhorting people to a) make sure they are on the electoral roll and b) make sure they vote (for Labour, of course). I had not been to that market before and I was absolutely gobsmacked at the amount of produce available and the excellent quality – it certainly made me think seriously about how to purchase fruit and veges in the future and other stuff, obviously. It was also an eye opener watching people with families fossicking through boxes of well used blankets, rugs and other household items – it was fairly obvious that they could not afford to purchase these goods from retail outlets – even, the Warehouse, K-Mart, Briscoes etc.
As an aside, did anyone else consider that John Key had consumed far too much wine at that business luncheon today at Takapuna – his speech seemed to be rather more slurred and mangled than usual. Perhaps he needs the Piri Weepu stroke test. Just saying!!
I can’t even bear to listen to him or to see him. There is something about him that sends my blood pressure soaring, It’s verging on the irrational…………….
.I missed Campbell tonight but assume the interview was about his giddy excitement about issuing tons more mining exploration permits for our land and sea. I haven’t even started on his E.R.A Amendment Bill which passed it’s second reading last week, that will take away from workers their right to a break as well as including about 7 or 8 Union busting amendments….
I haven’t decided if he’s genuinely thick, or purposefully speaking slowly so as to draw out the interview in order to reduce the number of questions he has to answer as well as give his brain more time to work out what he’s going to say next.
its the haircut that gives him away. what an infantile ‘do. does he think he’s gonna impress sum skoolgurls or sumfing. he doesn’t look like he knows anything about anything and what comes out of his gob verges on nonsense that hooton writes to confuse people.
uggggggggghhhh.
Is that the best the national party can do.
They specialise in lowbrows but he is the bottom of the barrel.
Lolz, just in behind wee simple Simons eyes lies a snake, as Slippery the Prime Minister has anointed wee Simon as the future of the National Party i dare say if we stick around long enough we will get to see this snake really hiss…
Completed reads for April: The Difference Engine, by William Gibson and Bruce Sterling Carnival of Saints, by George Herman The Snow Spider, by Jenny Nimmo Emlyn’s Moon, by Jenny Nimmo The Chestnut Soldier, by Jenny Nimmo Death Comes As the End, by Agatha Christie Lord of the Flies, by ...
On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
Have a story to share about St Paul’s, but today just picturesPopular novels written at this desk by a young man who managed to bootstrap himself out of father’s imprisonment and his own young life in a workhouse Read more ...
The list of former National Party Ministers being given plum and important roles got longer this week with the appointment of former Deputy Prime Minister Paula Bennett as the chair of Pharmac. The Christopher Luxon-led Government has now made key appointments to Bill English, Simon Bridges, Steven Joyce, Roger Sowry, ...
Newsroom has a story today about National's (fortunately failed) effort to disestablish the newly-created Inspector-General of Defence. The creation of this agency was the key recommendation of the Inquiry into Operation Burnham, and a vital means of restoring credibility and social licence to an agency which had been caught lying ...
Holding On To The Present:The moment a political movement arises that attacks the whole idea of social progress, and announces its intention to wind back the hands of History’s clock, then democracy, along with its unwritten rules, is in mortal danger.IT’S A COMMONPLACE of political speeches, especially those delivered in ...
Stuck In The Middle With You:As Christopher Luxon feels the hot breath of Act’s and NZ First’s extremists on the back of his neck and, as he reckons with the damage their policies are already inflicting upon a country he’s described as “fragile”, is there not some merit in reaching out ...
The unpopular coalition government is currently rushing to repeal section 7AA of the Oranga Tamariki Act. The clause is Oranga Tamariki's Treaty clause, and was inserted after its systematic stealing of Māori children became a public scandal and resulted in physical resistance to further abductions. The clause created clear obligations ...
Buzz from the Beehive The government’s official website – which Point of Order monitors daily – not for the first time has nothing much to say today about political happenings that are grabbing media headlines. It makes no mention of the latest 1News-Verian poll, for example. This shows National down ...
It Takes A Train To Cry:Surely, there is nothing lonelier in all this world than the long wail of a distant steam locomotive on a cold Winter’s night.AS A CHILD, I would lie awake in my grandfather’s house and listen to the traffic. The big wooden house was only a ...
Packing A Punch: The election of the present government, including in its ranks politicians dedicated to reasserting the rights of the legislature in shaping and determining the future of Māori and Pakeha in New Zealand, should have alerted the judiciary – including its anomalous appendage, the Waitangi Tribunal – that its ...
Dead Woman Walking: New Zealand’s media industry had been moving steadily towards disaster for all the years Melissa Lee had been National’s media and communications policy spokesperson, and yet, when the crisis finally broke, on her watch, she had nothing intelligent to offer. Christopher Luxon is a patient man - but he’s not ...
Chris Trotter writes – New Zealand politics is remarkably easy-going: dangerously so, one might even say. With the notable exception of John Key’s flat ruling-out of the NZ First Party in 2008, all parties capable of clearing MMP’s five-percent threshold, or winning one or more electorate seats, tend ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Polling shows that Wellington Mayor Tory Whanau has the lowest approval rating of any mayor in the country. Siting at -12 per cent, the proportion of constituents who disapprove of her performance outweighs those who give her the thumbs up. This negative rating is ...
Luxon will no doubt put a brave face on it, but there is no escaping the pressure this latest poll will put on him and the government. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on Aotearoa-NZ’s political ...
This is a re-post from The Climate Brink by Andrew Dessler In the wake of any unusual weather event, someone inevitably asks, “Did climate change cause this?” In the most literal sense, that answer is almost always no. Climate change is never the sole cause of hurricanes, heat waves, droughts, or ...
Something odd happened yesterday, and I’d love to know if there’s more to it. If there was something which preempted what happened, or if it was simply a throwaway line in response to a journalist.Yesterday David Seymour was asked at a press conference what the process would be if the ...
Hi,From time to time, I want to bring Webworm into the real world. We did it last year with the Jurassic Park event in New Zealand — which was a lot of fun!And so on Saturday May 11th, in Los Angeles, I am hosting a lil’ Webworm pop-up! I’ve been ...
Education Minister Erica Standford yesterday unveiled a fundamental reform of the way our school pupils are taught. She would not exactly say so, but she is all but dismantling the so-called “inquiry” “feel good” method of teaching, which has ruled in our classrooms since a major review of the New ...
Exactly where are we seriously going with this government and its policies? That is, apart from following what may as well be a Truss-Lite approach on the purported economic “plan“, and Victorian-era regression when it comes to social policy.Oh it’ll work this time of course, we’re basically assured, “the ...
Hey Uncle Dave, When the Poms joined the EEC, I wasn't one of those defeatists who said, Well, that’s it for the dairy job. And I was right, eh? The Chinese can’t get enough of our milk powder and eventually, the Poms came to their senses and backed up the ute ...
Polling shows that Wellington Mayor Tory Whanau has the lowest approval rating of any mayor in the country. Siting at -12 per cent, the proportion of constituents who disapprove of her performance outweighs those who give her the thumbs up. This negative rating is higher than for any other mayor ...
Buzz from the Beehive Pharmac has been given a financial transfusion and a new chair to oversee its spending in the pharmaceutical business. Associate Health Minister David Seymour described the funding for Pharmac as “its largest ever budget of $6.294 billion over four years, fixing a $1.774 billion fiscal cliff”. ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Many criticisms are being made of the Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill, including by this writer. But as with everything in politics, every story has two sides, and both deserve attention. It’s important to understand what the Government is trying to achieve and its ...
TL;DR: Here’s my top 10 ‘pick ‘n’ mix of links to news, analysis and opinion articles as of 10:10am on Monday, April 29:Scoop: The children's ward at Rotorua Hospital will be missing a third of its beds as winter hits because Te Whatu Ora halted an upgrade partway through to ...
span class=”dropcap”>As hideous as David Seymour can be, it is worth keeping in mind occasionally that there are even worse political figures (and regimes) out there. Iran for instance, is about to execute the country’s leading hip hop musician Toomaj Salehi, for writing and performing raps that “corrupt” the nation’s ...
Yesterday marked 10 years since the first electric train carried passengers in Auckland so it’s a good time to look back at it and the impact it has had. A brief history The first proposals for rail electrification in Auckland came in the 1920’s alongside the plans for earlier ...
Right now, in Aotearoa-NZ, our ‘animal spirits’ are darkening towards a winter of discontent, thanks at least partly to a chorus of negative comments and actions from the Government Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on ...
You make people evil to punish the paststuck inside a sequel with a rotating castThe following photos haven’t been generated with AI, or modified in any way. They are flesh and blood, human beings. On the left is Galatea Young, a young mum, and her daughter Fiadh who has Angelman ...
April has been a quiet month at A Phuulish Fellow. I have had an exceptionally good reading month, and a decently productive writing month – for original fiction, anyway – but not much has caught my eye that suggested a blog article. It has been vaguely frustrating, to be honest. ...
A listing of 31 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, April 21, 2024 thru Sat, April 27, 2024. Story of the week Anthropogenic climate change may be the ultimate shaggy dog story— but with a twist, because here ...
Hi,I spent about a year on Webworm reporting on an abusive megachurch called Arise, and it made me want to stab my eyes out with a fork.I don’t regret that reporting in 2022 and 2023 — I am proud of it — but it made me angry.Over three main stories ...
The new Victoria University Vice-Chancellor decided to have a forum at the university about free speech and academic freedom as it is obviously a topical issue, and the Government is looking at legislating some carrots or sticks for universities to uphold their obligations under the Education and Training Act. They ...
Do you remember when Melania Trump got caught out using a speech that sounded awfully like one Michelle Obama had given? Uncannily so.Well it turns out that Abraham Lincoln is to Winston Peters as Michelle was to Melania. With the ANZAC speech Uncle Winston gave at Gallipoli having much in ...
She was born 25 years ago today in North Shore hospital. Her eyes were closed tightly shut, her mouth was silently moving. The whole theatre was all quiet intensity as they marked her a 2 on the APGAR test. A one-minute eternity later, she was an 8. The universe was ...
Skeptical Science is partnering with Gigafact to produce fact briefs — bite-sized fact checks of trending claims. This fact brief was written by Sue Bin Park in collaboration with members from our Skeptical Science team. You can submit claims you think need checking via the tipline. Is Antarctica gaining land ice? ...
Images of US students (and others) protesting and setting up tent cities on US university campuses have been broadcast world wide and clearly demonstrate the growing rifts in US society caused by US policy toward Israel and Israel’s prosecution of … Continue reading → ...
Barrie Saunders writes – Dear Paul As the new Minister of Media and Communications, you will be inundated with heaps of free advice and special pleading, all in the national interest of course. For what it’s worth here is my assessment: Traditional broadcasting free to air content through ...
Many criticisms are being made of the Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill, including by this writer. But as with everything in politics, every story has two sides, and both deserve attention. It’s important to understand what the Government is trying to achieve and its arguments for such a bold reform. ...
Peter Dunne writes – The great nineteenth British Prime Minister, William Gladstone, once observed that “the first essential for a Prime Minister is to be a good butcher.” When a later British Prime Minister, Harold Macmillan, sacked a third of his Cabinet in July 1962, in what became ...
Ele Ludemann writes – New Zealanders had the OECD’s second highest tax increase last year: New Zealanders faced the second-biggest tax raises in the developed world last year, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) says. The intergovernmental agency said the average change in personal income tax ...
We all know something’s not right with our elections. The spread of misinformation, people being targeted with soundbites and emotional triggers that ignore the facts, even the truth, and influence their votes.The use of technology to produce deep fakes. How can you tell if something is real or not? Can ...
This video includes conclusions of the creator climate scientist Dr. Simon Clark. It is presented to our readers as an informed perspective. Please see video description for references (if any). This year you will be lied to! Simon Clark helps prebunk some misleading statements you'll hear about climate. The video includes ...
It is all very well cutting the backrooms of public agencies but it may compromise the frontlines. One of the frustrations of the Productivity Commission’s 2017 review of universities is that while it observed that their non-academic staff were increasing faster than their academic staff, it did not bother to ...
Buzz from the Beehive Two speeches delivered by Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters at Anzac Day ceremonies in Turkey are the only new posts on the government’s official website since the PM announced his Cabinet shake-up. In one of the speeches, Peters stated the obvious: we live in a troubled ...
1. Which of these would you not expect to read in The Waikato Invader?a. Luxon is here to do business, don’t you worry about thatb. Mr KPI expects results, and you better believe itc. This decisive man of action is getting me all hot and excitedd. Melissa Lee is how ...
…it has a restricted jurisdiction which must not be abused: it is not an inquisitionNOTE – this article was published before the High Court ruled that Karen Chhour does not have to appear before the Waitangi Tribunal Gary Judd writes – The High Court ...
Lindsay Mitchell writes – One of reasons Oranga Tamariki exists is to prevent child neglect. But could the organisation itself be guilty of the same?Oranga Tamariki’s statistics show a decrease in the number and age of children in care. “There are less children ...
David Farrar writes: Graeme Edgeler wrote in 2017: In the first five years after three strikes came into effect 5248 offenders received a ‘first strike’ (that is, a “stage-1 conviction” under the three strikes sentencing regime), and 68 offenders received a ‘second strike’. In the five years prior to ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has surprised everyone with his ruthlessness in sacking two of his ministers from their crucial portfolios. Removing ministers for poor performance after only five months in the job just doesn’t normally happen in politics. That’s refreshing and will be extremely ...
TL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the two days to 6:06am on Thursday, April 25:Politics: PM Christopher Luxon has set up a dual standard for ministerial competence by demoting two National Cabinet ministers while leaving also-struggling ...
Hi,Today I mainly want to share some of your thoughts about the recent piece I wrote about success and failure, and the forces that seemingly guide our lives. But first, a quick bit of housekeeping: I am doing a Webworm popup in Los Angeles on Saturday May 11 at 2pm. ...
It is hard to see what Melissa Lee might have done to “save” the media. National went into the election with no public media policy and appears not to have developed one subsequently. Lee claimed that she had prepared a policy paper before the election but it had been decided ...
Open access notablesIce acceleration and rotation in the Greenland Ice Sheet interior in recent decades, Løkkegaard et al., Communications Earth & Environment:In the past two decades, mass loss from the Greenland ice sheet has accelerated, partly due to the speedup of glaciers. However, uncertainty in speed derived from satellite products ...
Buzz from the Beehive A statement from Children’s Minister Karen Chhour – yet to be posted on the Government’s official website – arrived in Point of Order’s email in-tray last night. It welcomes the High Court ruling on whether the Waitangi Tribunal can demand she appear before it. It does ...
Mr Bombastic:Ironically, the media the academic experts wanted is, in many ways, the media they got. In place of the tyrannical editors of yesteryear, advancing without fear or favour the interests of the ruling class; the New Zealand news media of today boasts a troop of enlightened journalists dedicated to ...
It's hard times try to make a livingYou wake up every morning in the unforgivingOut there somewhere in the cityThere's people living lives without mercy or pityI feel good, yeah I'm feeling fineI feel better then I have for the longest timeI think these pills have been good for meI ...
In 1974, the US Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. Nixon, finding that the President was not a King, but was subject to the law and was required to turn over the evidence of his wrongdoing to the courts. It was a landmark decision for the rule ...
Every day now just seems to bring in more fresh meat for the grinder.In their relentlessly ideological drive to cut back on the “excessive bloat” (as they see it) of the previous Labour-led government, on the mountains of evidence accumulated in such a short period of time do not ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Megan Valére SosouMarket gardening site of the Itchèléré de Itagui agricultural cooperative in Dassa-Zoumè (Image credit: Megan Valère Sossou) For the residents of Dassa-Zoumè, a city in the West African country of Benin, choosing between drinking water and having enough ...
Buzz from the Beehive Melissa Lee – as may be discerned from the screenshot above – has not been demoted for doing something seriously wrong as Minister of ...
Morning in London Mother hugs beloved daughter outside the converted shoe factory in which she is living.Afternoon in London Travelling writer takes himself and his wrist down to A&E, just to be sure. Read more ...
Mike Grimshaw writes – The recent announcement of the University Advisory Group, chaired by Sir Peter Gluckman, makes very clear where the Government’s focus and priorities lie. The remit of the Advisory Group is that Group members will consider challenges and opportunities for improvement in the university sector including: ...
Eric Crampton writes – The Reserve Bank of New Zealand desperately wants to find reasons to have workstreams in climate change. It makes little sense. They’ve run another stress test on the banks looking to see if they could find a prudential regulation case. They couldn’t. They ...
Rob MacCullough writes – Pundits from the left and the right are arguing that National’s Fast Track Bill that is designed to speed up infrastructure decisions could end up becoming mired in a cesspool of corruption. Political commentator ...
Looking at the headlines this morning it’s hard to feel anything other than pessimistic about the future of humanity.Note that I’m not speaking about the future of mankind, but the survival of our humanity. The values that we believe in seem to be ebbing away, by the day.Perhaps every generation ...
Swabbing mixed breed baby chicks to test for avian influenzaUh oh. Bird flu – often deadly to humans – is not only being transmitted from infected birds to dairy cows, but is now travelling between dairy cows. As of last Friday, Bloomberg News reports, there were 32 American dairy herds ...
On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
What is it with the mining industry? Its not enough for them to pillage the earth - they apparently can't even be bothered getting resource consent to do so: The proponent behind a major mine near the Clutha River had already been undertaking activity in the area without a ...
Photo # 1 I am a huge fan of Singapore’s approach to housing, as described here two years ago by copying and pasting from The ConversationWhat Singapore has that Australia does not is a public housing developer, the Housing Development Board, which puts new dwellings on public and reclaimed land, ...
This afternoon’s interim Waitangi Tribunal report must be taken seriously as it affects our most vulnerable children, Labour children’s spokesperson Willow-Jean Prime. ...
Te Pāti Māori are demanding the New Zealand Government support an international independent investigation into mass graves that have been uncovered at two hospitals on the Gaza strip, following weeks of assault by Israeli troops. Among the 392 bodies that have been recovered, are children and elderly civilians. Many of ...
Our two-tiered system for veterans’ support is out of step with our closest partners, and all parties in Parliament should work together to fix it, Labour veterans’ affairs spokesperson Greg O’Connor said. ...
Stripping two Ministers of their portfolios just six months into the job shows Christopher Luxon’s management style is lacking, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said. ...
Tonight’s court decision to overturn the summons of the Children’s Minister has enabled the Crown to continue making decisions about Māori without evidence, says Te Pāti Māori spokesperson for Children, Mariameno Kapa-Kingi. “The judicial system has this evening told the nation that this government can do whatever they want when ...
It appears Nicola Willis is about to pull the rug out from under the feet of local communities still dealing with the aftermath of last year’s severe weather, and local councils relying on funding to build back from these disasters. ...
The Government is making short-sighted changes to the Resource Management Act (RMA) that will take away environmental protection in favour of short-term profits, Labour’s environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said today. ...
Labour welcomes the release of the report into the North Island weather events and looks forward to working with the Government to ensure that New Zealand is as prepared as it can be for the next natural disaster. ...
The Labour Party has called for the New Zealand Government to recognise Palestine, as a material step towards progressing the two-State solution needed to achieve a lasting peace in the region. ...
Some of our country’s most important work, stopping the sexual exploitation of children and violent extremism could go along with staff on the frontline at ports and airports. ...
The Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill will give projects such as new coal mines a ‘get out of jail free’ card to wreak havoc on the environment, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said today. ...
The government's decision to reintroduce Three Strikes is a destructive and ineffective piece of law-making that will only exacerbate an inherently biased and racist criminal justice system, said Te Pāti Māori Justice Spokesperson, Tākuta Ferris, today. During the time Three Strikes was in place in Aotearoa, Māori and Pasifika received ...
Cuts to frontline hospital staff are not only a broken election promise, it shows the reckless tax cuts have well and truly hit the frontline of the health system, says Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall. ...
The Green Party has joined the call for public submissions on the fast-track legislation to be extended after the Ombudsman forced the Government to release the list of organisations invited to apply just hours before submissions close. ...
New Zealand’s good work at reducing climate emissions for three years in a row will be undone by the National government’s lack of ambition and scrapping programmes that were making a difference, Labour Party climate spokesperson Megan Woods said today. ...
More essential jobs could be on the chopping block, this time Ministry of Education staff on the school lunches team are set to find out whether they're in line to lose their jobs. ...
Te Pāti Māori is disgusted at the confirmation that hundreds are set to lose their jobs at Oranga Tamariki, and the disestablishment of the Treaty Response Unit. “This act of absolute carelessness and out of touch decision making is committing tamariki to state abuse.” Said Te Pāti Māori Oranga Tamariki ...
The Government is trying to bring in a law that will allow Ministers to cut corners and kill off native species, Labour environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said. ...
Cancelling urgently needed new Cook Strait ferries and hiking the cost of public transport for many Kiwis so that National can announce the prospect of another tunnel for Wellington is not making good choices, Labour Transport Spokesperson Tangi Utikere said. ...
A laundry list of additional costs for Tāmaki Makarau Auckland shows the Minister for the city is not delivering for the people who live there, says Labour Auckland Issues spokesperson Shanan Halbert. ...
Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi, and Mema Paremata mō Tāmaki-Makaurau, Takutai Tarsh Kemp, will travel to the Gold Coast to strengthen ties with Māori in Australia next week (15-21 April). The visit, in the lead-up to the 9th Australian National Kapa haka Festival, will be an opportunity for both ...
The Green Party has today launched a step-by-step guide to help New Zealanders make their voice heard on the Government’s democracy dodging and anti-environment fast track legislation. ...
The National Government’s proposed changes to the Residential Tenancies Act will mean tenants can be turfed from their homes by landlords with little notice, Labour housing spokesperson Kieran McAnulty said. ...
Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson is calling on all parties to support a common-sense change that’s great for the planet and great for consumers after her member’s bill was drawn from the ballot today. ...
The return of the historic Ō-Rākau battle site to the descendants of those who fought there moved one step closer today with the first reading of Te Pire mō Ō-Rākau, Te Pae o Maumahara / The Ō-Rākau Remembrance Bill. The Bill will entrust the 9.7-hectare battle site, five kilometres west ...
Energy Minister Simeon Brown has announced 25 new high-speed EV charging hubs along key routes between major urban centres and outlined the Government’s plan to supercharge New Zealand’s EV infrastructure. The hubs will each have several chargers and be capable of charging at least four – and up to 10 ...
The coalition Government will not proceed with the previous Government’s plans to regulate residential property managers, Housing Minister Chris Bishop says. “I have written to the Chairperson of the Social Services and Community Committee to inform him that the Government does not intend to support the Residential Property Managers Bill ...
The Government has announced an independent review into the disability support system funded by the Ministry of Disabled People – Whaikaha. Disability Issues Minister Louise Upston says the review will look at what can be done to strengthen the long-term sustainability of Disability Support Services to provide disabled people and ...
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith has attended the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva and outlined the Government’s plan to restore law and order. “Speaking to the United Nations Human Rights Council provided us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while responding to issues and ...
Trade Minister Todd McClay heads overseas today for high-level trade talks in the Gulf region, and a key OECD meeting in Paris. Mr McClay will travel to Riyadh to meet with counterparts from Saudi Arabia and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). “New Zealand’s goods and services exports to the Gulf region ...
Education Minister Erica Stanford has outlined six education priorities to deliver a world-leading education system that sets Kiwi kids up for future success. “I’m putting ambition, achievement and outcomes at the heart of our education system. I want every child to be inspired and engaged in their learning so they ...
The new NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) App is a secure ‘one stop shop’ to provide the services drivers need, Transport Minister Simeon Brown and Digitising Government Minister Judith Collins say. “The NZTA App will enable an easier way for Kiwis to pay for Vehicle Registration and Road User Charges (RUC). ...
Whānau with tamariki growing up in emergency housing motels will be prioritised for social housing starting this week, says Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka. “Giving these whānau a better opportunity to build healthy stable lives for themselves and future generations is an essential part of the Government’s goal of reducing ...
Racing Minister Winston Peters has paid tribute to an icon of the industry with the recent passing of Dave O’Sullivan (OBE). “Our sympathies are with the O’Sullivan family with the sad news of Dave O’Sullivan’s recent passing,” Mr Peters says. “His contribution to racing, initially as a jockey and then ...
Assalaamu alaikum, greetings to you all. Eid Mubarak, everyone! I want to extend my warmest wishes to you and everyone celebrating this joyous occasion. It is a pleasure to be here. I have enjoyed Eid celebrations at Parliament before, but this is my first time joining you as the Minister ...
Associate Health Minister David Seymour has announced Pharmac’s largest ever budget of $6.294 billion over four years, fixing a $1.774 billion fiscal cliff. “Access to medicines is a crucial part of many Kiwis’ lives. We’ve committed to a budget allocation of $1.774 billion over four years so Kiwis are ...
Hon Paula Bennett has been appointed as member and chair of the Pharmac board, Associate Health Minister David Seymour announced today. "Pharmac is a critical part of New Zealand's health system and plays a significant role in ensuring that Kiwis have the best possible access to medicines,” says Mr Seymour. ...
Hundreds of New Zealand families affected by Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) will benefit from a new Government focus on prevention and treatment, says Health Minister Dr Shane Reti. “We know FASD is a leading cause of preventable intellectual and neurodevelopmental disability in New Zealand,” Dr Reti says. “Every day, ...
Regional Development Minister Shane Jones today attended the official opening of Kaikohe’s new $14.7 million sports complex. “The completion of the Kaikohe Multi Sports Complex is a fantastic achievement for the Far North,” Mr Jones says. “This facility not only fulfils a long-held dream for local athletes, but also creates ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters’ engagements in Türkiye this week underlined the importance of diplomacy to meet growing global challenges. “Returning to the Gallipoli Peninsula to represent New Zealand at Anzac commemorations was a sombre reminder of the critical importance of diplomacy for de-escalating conflicts and easing tensions,” Mr Peters ...
Ambassador Millar, Burgemeester, Vandepitte, Excellencies, military representatives, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen – good morning and welcome to this sacred Anzac Day dawn service. It is an honour to be here on behalf of the Government and people of New Zealand at Buttes New British Cemetery, Polygon Wood – a deeply ...
Distinguished guests - It is an honour to return once again to this site which, as the resting place for so many of our war-dead, has become a sacred place for generations of New Zealanders. Our presence here and at the other special spaces of Gallipoli is made ...
Mai ia tawhiti pamamao, te moana nui a Kiwa, kua tae whakaiti mai matou, ki to koutou papa whenua. No koutou te tapuwae, no matou te tapuwae, kua honoa pumautia. Ko nga toa kua hinga nei, o te Waipounamu, o te Ika a Maui, he okioki tahi me o ...
Paul Goldsmith will take on responsibility for the Media and Communications portfolio, while Louise Upston will pick up the Disability Issues portfolio, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced today. “Our Government is relentlessly focused on getting New Zealand back on track. As issues change in prominence, I plan to adjust Ministerial ...
Recreational catch limits will be reduced in areas of Fiordland and the Chatham Islands to help keep those fisheries healthy and sustainable, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. The lower recreational daily catch limits for a range of finfish and shellfish species caught in the Fiordland Marine Area and ...
Energy Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed an important milestone in New Zealand’s hydrogen future, with the opening of the country’s first network of hydrogen refuelling stations in Wiri. “I want to congratulate the team at Hiringa Energy and its partners K one W one (K1W1), Mitsui & Co New Zealand ...
The coalition Government is delivering on its commitment to improve resource management laws and give greater certainty to consent applicants, with a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) expected to be introduced to Parliament next month. RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop has today outlined the first RMA Amendment ...
Overseas models for regulating the oil and gas sector, including their decommissioning regimes, are being carefully scrutinised as a potential template for New Zealand’s own sector, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. The Coalition Government is focused on rebuilding investor confidence in New Zealand’s energy sector as it looks to strengthen ...
Emergency Management and Recovery Minister Mark Mitchell has today released the Report of the Government Inquiry into the response to the North Island Severe Weather Events. “The report shows that New Zealand’s emergency management system is not fit-for-purpose and there are some significant gaps we need to address,” Mr Mitchell ...
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith is today travelling to Europe where he’ll update the United Nations Human Rights Council on the Government’s work to restore law and order. “Attending the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva provides us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while ...
Associate Agriculture Minister, Mark Patterson, formally reopened the world’s largest wool processing facility today in Awatoto, Napier, following a $50 million rebuild and refurbishment project. “The reopening of this facility will significantly lift the economic opportunities available to New Zealand’s wool sector, which already accounts for 20 per cent of ...
Hon Andrew Bayly, Minister for Small Business and Manufacturing At the Southland Otago Regional Engineering Collective (SOREC) Summit, 18 April, Dunedin Ngā mihi nui, Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Ko Whanganui aho Good Afternoon and thank you for inviting me to open your summit today. I am delighted ...
The Government is delivering on its commitment to bring back the Three Strikes legislation, Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee announced today. “Our Government is committed to restoring law and order and enforcing appropriate consequences on criminals. We are making it clear that repeat serious violent or sexual offending is not ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters has today announced four new diplomatic appointments for New Zealand’s overseas missions. “Our diplomats have a vital role in maintaining and protecting New Zealand’s interests around the world,” Mr Peters says. “I am pleased to announce the appointment of these senior diplomats from the ...
New Zealand is contributing NZ$7 million to support communities affected by severe food insecurity and other urgent humanitarian needs in Ethiopia and Somalia, Foreign Minister Rt Hon Winston Peters announced today. “Over 21 million people are in need of humanitarian assistance across Ethiopia, with a further 6.9 million people ...
Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Paul Goldsmith is congratulating Mataaho Collective for winning the Golden Lion for best participant in the main exhibition at the Venice Biennale. "Congratulations to the Mataaho Collective for winning one of the world's most prestigious art prizes at the Venice Biennale. “It is good ...
The Government is reforming financial services to improve access to home loans and other lending, and strengthen customer protections, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly and Housing Minister Chris Bishop announced today. “Our coalition Government is committed to rebuilding the economy and making life simpler by cutting red tape. We are ...
“China remains a strong commercial opportunity for Kiwi exporters as Chinese businesses and consumers continue to value our high-quality safe produce,” Trade and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay says. Mr McClay has returned to New Zealand following visits to Beijing, Harbin and Shanghai where he met ministers, governors and mayors and engaged in trade and agricultural events with the New ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has completed a successful trip to Singapore, Thailand and the Philippines, deepening relationships and capitalising on opportunities. Mr Luxon was accompanied by a business delegation and says the choice of countries represents the priority the New Zealand Government places on South East Asia, and our relationships in ...
New Zealand is demonstrating its commitment to reducing global greenhouse emissions, and supporting clean energy transition in South East Asia, through a contribution of NZ$41 million (US$25 million) in climate finance to the Asian Development Bank (ADB)-led Energy Transition Mechanism (ETM). Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Climate Change Minister Simon Watts announced ...
The Government is today releasing a list of organisations who received letters about the Fast-track applications process, says RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop. “Recently Ministers and agencies have received a series of OIA requests for a list of organisations to whom I wrote with information on applying to have a ...
Attorney-General Judith Collins today announced the appointment of Wellington Barrister David Jonathan Boldt as a Judge of the High Court, and the Honourable Justice Matthew Palmer as a Judge of the Court of Appeal. Justice Boldt graduated with an LLB from Victoria University of Wellington in 1990, and also holds ...
Education Minister Erica Stanford will lead the New Zealand delegation at the 2024 International Summit on the Teaching Profession (ISTP) held in Singapore. The delegation includes representatives from the Post Primary Teachers’ Association (PPTA) Te Wehengarua and the New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI) Te Riu Roa. The summit is co-hosted ...
A stopbank upgrade project in Tairawhiti partly funded by the Government has increased flood resilience for around 7000ha of residential and horticultural land so far, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones today attended a dawn service in Gisborne to mark the end of the first stage of the ...
Asia Pacific Report A Pacific civil society alliance has condemned French neocolonial policies in Kanaky New Caledonia, saying Paris is set on “maintaining the status quo” and denying the indigenous Kanak people their inalienable right to self-determination. The Pacific Regional Non-Governmental Organisations (PRNGOs) Alliance, representing some 15 groups, said in ...
Koi Tū New Zealand cannot sit back and see the collapse of its Fourth Estate, the director of Koi Tū: The Centre for Informed Futures, Sir Peter Gluckman, says in the foreword of a paper published today. The paper, “If not journalists, then who?” paints a picture of an industry ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra Foreign investment proposals with implications for Australia’s strategic or economic security will face tougher scrutiny, under a policy overhaul to be announced by Treasurer Jim Chalmers on Wednesday. At the same time, the government ...
A Waitangi Tribunal inquiry report has warned government that a repeal of Section 7AA of the Oranga Tamariki Act could cause harm to children in care. ...
The Treasury has published today three new papers covering government consumption multipliers, automatic stabilisers and the impacts of global shocks on New Zealand’s economy. ...
Asia Pacific Report The Pacific state of Hawai’i’s House of Representatives has joined the state’s Senate in calling for a ceasefire in Israel’s war on Gaza, becoming the first state to pass such a resolution, reports Hawaii News Now. In March, the Senate passed a ceasefire resolution with a 24–1 ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Christopher Ferrie, A/Prof, UTS Chancellor’s Postdoctoral Research and ARC DECRA Fellow, University of Technology Sydney PsiQuantum The Australian government has announced a pledge of approximately A$940 million (US$617 million) to PsiQuantum, a quantum computing start-up company based in Silicon Valley. Half ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Hunter Bennett, Lecturer in Exercise Science, University of South Australia Cameron Prins/Shutterstock If you spend a lot of time exploring fitness content online, you might have come across the concept of heart rate zones. Heart rate zone training has become more ...
SPECIAL REPORT:By Eugene Doyle He is the most popular Palestinian leader alive today — and yet few people in the West even know his name. Absolutely no one in Gaza or the West Bank does not know him. That difference speaks volumes about who dominates the media narrative that ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Will McCallum, PhD Candidate – School of Communication and Creative Arts, Deakin University Earlier this year, Opposition Leader Peter Dutton accused Prime Minister Anthony Albanese of not supporting Operation Sovereign Borders – the military-led border security operation that has “closed Australia’s borders ...
By Melyne Baroi in Port Moresby A Papua New Guinea MP, Peter Isoaimo, who had been ousted by the National Court in an alleged bribery case, has been reinstated by the Supreme Court on appeal. A three-member Supreme Court bench found that the National Court had erred in finding that ...
Publisher Chris Holdaway reflects on the unique project of collecting the work of the late, terrific poet Schaeffer Lemalu. One of the nice things you can do as a truly independent publisher is to make the books that writers want to make, whatever they happen to be. That’s how I’ve ...
Those profiled in the stamp series served on overseas deployments from 1995 onwards, and all have been awarded theNew Zealand Operational Service Medal. ...
Last night’s dismal poll result for the coalition government shows the limits of trying to govern as an opposition, argues Joel MacManus. There’s a quote from the American political activist Barbara Deming: “Vengeance is not the point; change is. But the trouble is that in most people’s minds, the thought ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Shireen Morris, Associate Professor and Director of the Radical Centre Reform Lab at Macquarie University Law School, Macquarie University Leonid Andronov/Shutterstock Foreign interference in Australian democracy poses a growing risk to our national sovereignty. It refers to coercive, corrupt or ...
A defendant charged by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has pleaded guilty to four charges of obtaining by deception in relation to a mortgage fraud scheme. Sentencing has been scheduled for 14 August 2024. ...
What to say when pesky journalists ask gotcha questions like ‘can you name a single book you’ve ever read?’ and ‘did you read it, or did you just see the movie?’This week, Act Party arts spokesperson Todd Stephenson foolishly agreed to an interview with Newsroom’s Steve Braunias regarding his ...
Explainer - What will a ban on cellphones in schools achieve? Can students use them during lunch breaks? And what happens if you need to contact your child? ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jodi Rowley, Curator, Amphibian & Reptile Conservation Biology, Australian Museum, UNSW Sydney Jodi Rowley, CC BY-NC-ND In winter 2021, Australia’s frogs started dropping dead. People began posting images of dead frogs on social media. Unable to travel to investigate the deaths ...
In the year ended March 2024, 0.4 percent of home transfers were to people who didn’t hold New Zealand citizenship or a resident visa, according to figures released by Stats NZ today. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Wasay Majid, Research Assistant , University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau New Zealand’s accommodation supplement scheme is facing scrutiny, with Social Development Minister Louise Upston recently saying “there is merit in considering whether the current settings are fair and sustainable long-term”. The ...
By Koroi Hawkins, RNZ Pacific editor The first prime ministerial candidate has been announced in Solomon Islands and it is not Manasseh Sogavare. The man of the hour is Jeremiah Manele, the MP for Hograno/Kia/Havulei constituency in Isabel Province, who served as minister of foreign affairs in the last government. ...
Protesting the removal of bins by leaving piles of your dog’s shit for others to deal with doesn’t make you a hero – it’s precious and entitled behaviour. You haven’t truly lived until you’ve stood on the shoreline of Auckland’s Cheltenham beach, desperately trying to scoop increasingly liquid dog shit ...
Analysis - Christopher Luxon will be alert to the factors driving the dire polling, but won't be waving the white flag just yet, RNZ political editor Jo Moir writes. ...
Writer, teacher and academic Vincent O’Sullivan died on Sunday 28 April. Here we gather tributes from friends, colleagues, and students who remember his extraordinary contributions. I went down to the garage tonight. There was a bird shrieking out in the bush, in the dark, maybe a kākā. Miraculously, through the ...
As part of our series exploring how New Zealanders live and our relationship with money, a burnt-out corporate escapee explains how she gets by ‘working as little as possible’. Want to be part of The Cost of Being? Fill out the questionnaire here.Gender: Female Age: 31 Ethnicity: Pākehā Role: Contractor in ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Timothy Schmidt, Professor of Chemistry, UNSW Sydney Albert Russ / Shutterstock The icebreaker of many a barbeque conversation is something like “what do you do for a crust?” “I teach chemistry at university,” is what we usually reply. Then silence. Our ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Asher Flynn, Associate Professor of Criminology, Monash University Shutterstock Sexual harassment is often considered to be a person-to-person act, but new research shows Australians are also experiencing and perpetrating workplace harassment in large numbers through technology. Our latest study shows one ...
A petition signed by more than 16,500 people, demanding the government take stronger action to halt the genocide of Palestinians by the State of Israel, is being presented to the House of Representatives today by Hon Phil Twyford. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Peter Burnett, Honorary Associate Professor, ANU College of Law, Australian National University jenmartin/Shutterstock April has been a bad month for the Australian environment. The Great Barrier Reef was hit, yet again, by intense coral bleaching. And Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek delayed ...
Winston Peters might not give a ‘rat’s derriere’ about last night’s poll, but it revealed the unusual absence of a honeymoon period and little payoff for the government’s action plan approach, writes Anna Rawhiti-Connell in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Marco de Jong, Lecturer, Law School, Auckland University of Technology Getty Images Details released by the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet under the Official Information Act reveal New Zealand officials have been considering involvement in AUKUS from the outset. ...
The government's treatment of Māori raised eyebrows, with countries saying New Zealand needed to do more to reduce health, education and justice inequities. ...
The age of criminal responsibility was one of numerous human rights issues raised during Aotearoa New Zealand’s UPR. Other key themes were racism and discrimination, the disproportionate representation of Māori in prison, and to uphold the UN Declaration ...
In a sitdown interview ahead of his final day at Parliament this week, the former Green Party co-leader tells RNZ about his lowest point during 2017's rough election campaign. ...
Is the fringe radio station really in a financial crisis, or is it just running a hyped-up donation drive? Fringe internet radio station Reality Check Radio was launched by the anti-vaccine mandates group Voices for Freedom in March 2023. For the next year, it undertook probably the most aggressive promotional ...
Above the Fold: On Monday, the biggest Māori screen production company faced down the biggest funder of Māori content at the High Court. It was an incredibly tense moment – then, just as quickly, it resolved. Duncan Greive breaks down a strange day in the screen sector.Yesterday morning, Māori ...
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A,DIV,A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Tuesday 30 April appeared first on Newsroom. ...
It’s a ride that’s lasted almost 30 years for mother and daughter BMX riders Nancy and Toni James, and the next stop is the World Championships in Rock Hill, South Carolina. Almost 27 years ago, Nancy and her husband Gerrard took their oldest child, Daniel, to the Waitākere BMX Club. ...
When it comes to talking about the Government’s controversial fast-track consenting process, political scientist Richard Shaw refers to the famous Chinese sci-fi novel Three-Body Problem, while RNZ’s In Depth journalist Farah Hancock talks about zombie projects. Shaw is referring to the three-party coalition Government and how the proposed legislation is ...
Opinion: The debate over single gender versus co-educational schooling has long been controversial. I went to a co-ed school and was inspired by a remarkable woman who was my maths teacher, and because of her deep knowledge and passion for the subject, I knew that maths was definitely an option ...
He won everything and he earned a knighthood and he was a senior literary figure to the point that he was a living monument to himself until his death in the weekend at 86, but there was something about Vincent O’Sullivan that flew under the radar, that was independent and ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Rick Sarre, Emeritus Professor of Law and Criminal Justice, University of South Australia The rate of women killed by their partners in Australia grew by 28% from 2021–22 to 2022–23, according to new statistics released today by the Australian Institute of Criminology ...
Ministry of Disabled People employees were promised a permanent role, but were told to start packing three weeks before their fixed term contract finished, says a former employee. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Andrew Blakers, Professor of Engineering, Australian National University Clean Energy Council / Neoen As Australia’s rapid renewable energy rollout continues, so too does debate over land use. Nationals Leader David Littleproud, for example, claimed regional areas had reached “saturation point” and ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Brendan C. Walsh, Sessional Academic, The University of Queensland Arrest for witchcraft (1866) by John PettieNGV, CC BY-NC In recent decades, governments the world over have increasingly taken action to address the dark history of witch-hunting. In western Europe, memorials to ...
By Mark Rabago, RNZ Pacific Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas correspondent The US Department of Justice is being urged to condemn and cease its reliance on the “Insular Cases” — a series of US Supreme Court opinions on US territories, which have been labelled racist. Senate Judiciary Committee chair Dick ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kara Dadswell, Senior Lecturer in Psychology, Victoria University Ask your son or daughter, niece, or nephew to draw you a picture of a sport coach. They will most probably draw a man. Why? Our latest research published in the Psychology of Sport ...
I know Chris Hipkins gets little change around here but he’s certainly making the right noises about education.
http://howmelulaterseesit.blogspot.co.nz/2014/04/what-i-saw-and-heard-sue-moroney-and.html
hes been mentioned a few times here including his recent parliamentary questions in education and to tony ryall (?)
Hipkins needs to keep at it consistently and get noticed by the msm which is a tough task.
There are rewards for those who want it and now is the time to step up as others should like whoever is on social welfare, health, justice and ministerial standards to name a few.
Collins, banks, adams, smith etc there is plenty of material.
Political polls have been and still are covered poorly by news organisations. This seems to be based on ignorance and headline mongering.
There are some promising changes that at least give relevant information if you did for it. Roy Morgan have been good and now Colmar Brunton supply excellent information. If particular note:
All political journalists should have to learn this and other polling basics. Polling 101 and kudos for Colmar Brunton.
So… which capacity are you posting in today? Your role as the voice of Dunne complete with utter idiocy… or your role as RWNJ fact checker who can’t even check his own facts?
i think PG has given up on United Future as a vehicle to further His political ambitions,(delusions of grandeur???),
i did suggest ages ago that He mount a palace coup against the ‘Hairdo’ as being the only possible logical means of furthering such ambitions…
Yes, I believe so. He said as much in a post on his YourNZ site some months ago, and that his membership lapsed and he wouldn’t be renewing it. I can’t be bothered going and looking for the quote though.
Maybe seeing as Pete is back in town he can clarify his UF stance here on TS
(Let’s hope the voters of Ohariu can take a leaf out of Petey’s book and give Dunne up)
I’ll clarify my whole political stance.
In the last four elections I’ve voted for (in reverse order) UF, National, Labour, Greens.
When I decided to get involved in politics after the 2008 election I first approached Labour as I thought they might want fresh ideas and input in order to rebuild. Response from two MPs wasn’t encouraging, they only wanted political labourers, not people with ideas. So I got involved in various things on my own.
In early 2011 I floated a new party idea. That got a bit of interest but not enough and I realised the odds were ovewhelmingly stacked against success unless you attracted a Craig or Dotcom to bankroll it. So I publicly announced I’d stand as an independent in Dunedin North, intending to network and gain experience. In July UF asked if I would stand for them and I decided to do that, it proved useful for what I was doing.
Since then I’ve dabbled in a range of political activities on my own account. I’ve never been fed any information from UF, anything I have got from Dunne I have asked for with specific questions. I’ve also interacted with other MPs, any that are willing. All my blogging has been my own work unless specifically quoting a source.
Last year I stood as an independent in the Dunedin mayoral and council elections with a main plank of better transparency and greater public interaction with local body politics. A number of other candidates were positive on this and if I had time I’d be working on building on that.
While I think there’s a big opening for a moderate centre party I reached the conclusion that UF didn’t have the people to achieve it. I’m too similar to Dunne (in some ways) to offer enough difference, like any party they need a new generation. So I decided to become independent again and go back to my earlier goals – better democracy and stronger parties.
Unlike the win and defeat attitude of politically aligned activists I want all parties to be better and stronger to give voters better choices. I think this will strengthen Parliament, Government and the country.
I think the MMP threshold should be minimal if at all, giving any party an opportunity to represent voters – and this will give the larger parties more options and will make Government by the majority more effective.
The influence of the media without being accountable is a major issue I think needs addressing.
While I get drawn into the political fray (it’s been very useful experience) I keep coming back to looking at ways of doing politics more transparently, honestly and positively, and that’s where I want to put most focus and effort.
If more people put petty politics aside and recognise the benefits of all parties being stronger and all MPs behaving to the standards they should then I think we will be better off. Then the important issues facing us will be dealt with more cooperatively and effectively.
Robust debate and contesting of ideas are essential in a good democracy, but so are decent behaviour and working for the common good. Accepting different ideas and approaches are things to be worked with rather than fought against.
I understand that many political activists have an entrenched warfare attitude where anyone not always agreeing must be treated as an enemy to be trashed, but I think a significant proportion of MPs and voters are turned off by negative and nasty politics. Confronting crap is necessary but care has to be taken not to just become a part of the shitstorm.
If politicians and parties want more people to vote for them they have to behave better, look better and look capable of cooperative positive change.
So I want to do what I can to assist and encourage better politics – with all parties and politicians.
Thanks Peter.
Um. With respect, I did read your comment twice and the main thing I garnered, apart from your personal political history was that you want “parties being (or to be better and stronger)stronger” and you suggest this can be done through MP’s behaving better and listening to one another.
I’m all for “decent behaviour and working for the common good” but I don’t see how this “strengthens” a Party. Also if we want to point to the finger at badly behaving MP’s then we need not look any further than our current lot of Ministers and the P.M himself. If anyone needs lessons in how to Behave Like An Adult it’s that lot.
And speaking of fingers, I would rather those on the Left pull theirs. Less of the naval gazing, more of the finger pulling!
Thanks for this Pete
For some of us, it’s not about which party we support and then participating in warfare on their behalf. For me it’s about values and the kind of society I want to live in. Each electoral term I choose to vote for the party that is closest to achieving those values. National and ACT, and UF, are so far from those values, they rarely do anything that gets my support. Labour gets my support some of the time.
I dislike the whole politics as game approach.
And I definitely want a more accountable media.
Pete George
I am interested to know your views/answers to these ten questions :
[1] Was the policy of selling 49% of our valuable power company assets which primarily went to the wealthy and big corporates a good policy?
[2] When a large majority of people voted in the referendum against these asset sales, should this government have continued with the sales in spite of this verdict?
[3] Do you think that the non National MPs, Banks and Dunne, are just leeches and parasites to have supported National’s asset sales?
[4] Do you think that Dunne deserves to be re elected again?
[5] Do you think that Dunne leaked confidential cabinet papers?
[6] Who do you trust more, Key or Cunliffe?
[7] Do you agree that this National government kept many of the last Labour government’s social policies such as WFF, Kiwi Saver, Kiwi Bank, Interest Free Student Loans, Paid Parental Leave etc for political expediency rather than for ideological reasons?
[8] If UF or Dunne get back into parliament, who should they support, the Left block or the right block?
[9] Do you support the idea of having the Internet Party?
[10] Should the MPs and the public support the TPPA without knowing any of the details as of now?
That’s a a bit of a challenge. I’ll do them one at a time (entirely my opinion).
[1] Was the policy of selling 49% of our valuable power company assets which primarily went to the wealthy and big corporates a good policy?
I question your assertion that the shares went “primarily went to the wealthy and big corporates” – it’s not possible to say that. Some went to small shareholders. Quite a few will have gone to funds like Kiwisaver funds that could be spread over many people.
There were pros and cons to the overall policy. Mixed ownership was proven to work with Air New Zealand being a successful example.
I think as by far the biggest party in Parliament National had a right to progress their flagship policy. However there were two things in particular that I didn’t agree with:
– trying to fit a specific sales program into one election cycle rather than timing things to best suit market conditions.
– selling too much of the same type of energy sector stocks to close together.
I thought that limiting the sales to 49% was an important principle and (with the help of R0b post here) I helped ensure that National did not sneak in a cabinet amendment that would have allowed more than 49% sales.
I think they should have pulled the plug perhaps on Genesis in the meantime.
I thought that the Green/Labour action that probably adversely affected the sales returns was cynical and costly for the country.
not possible to say that, I tell you!
What an asshole
With so many misgivings why do you think that Dunne still voted for the asset sales? With so many misgivings about the GCSB why do you think Dunne stll voted for the spy bill?
Is he a coward, greedy for office or just an unprincipled kind of ‘political prostitute’?
I hope you will answer the questions above and the question below honestly and truthfully.
Are you actually Peter Dunne with the handle, Pete George here?
If not, how are you connected with Dunne?
My misgivings are not Dunne’s misgivings. Dunne still voted for the asset sales because he made a confidence & supply commitment to do so. He also forced National to discard an attempt to work around the 49% sale limit.
Dunne got what he obviously thought were adequate improvements to the GCSB bill.
He’s a pragmatic politician. He understands that with just one vote he has limited influence. Politics is mostly a numbers game.
My identity is well known, I’m not Peter Dunne. I’m not connected to him in any way, except that occasionally I ask him questions and he responds, the same as with other MPs. I’ve always acted independently of any politician or party.
“I’ve always acted independently of any politician or party”
a-hem. Except as a UF candidate last election. I think that’s pretty majorly not independent however you might like to frame it.
Fair call, I did represent UF. But I was virtually independent, just about everything I did then was my choice and done on my own. Party support was negligible.
[2] When a large majority of people voted in the referendum against these asset sales, should this government have continued with the sales in spite of this verdict?
If it halted legislation progress it would have set an awful precedent.
They had every right to continue. And it may have made it harder politically for National to admit they should back off with their policy a bit.
A single question petition and referendum is not a sound basis for deciding all but simple policy, that’s why Parliament has more extensive processes.
If any major policy initiatives could be forced to be put on hold pending the possible success of a petition and then the results of a referendum Parliament couldn’t function effectively.
I’m fairly sure that if a Labour+Green Government comes in in September/October and wants to increase the minimum wage they would not be happy to put it on hold simply because National cranked up opposition and started a petition.
Awful, simply awful.
What an asshole.
“A single question petition and referendum is not a sound basis for deciding all but simple policy, that’s why Parliament has more extensive processes.”
Makes me wonder why National legislated for citizens initiated referenda.
My guess is it was a sop to the public to give an appearance of direct democracy but designed to be ineffective in practice. It’s a very flawed and useless system.
It would be easy to set up a far better way of measuring public opinion on pending legislation but there seems to be no interest in this from any of the major parties.
Oops forgot the /sarc tag
There’s no way any major party could easily undo the referenda legislation. On this there would be a cross-party consensus.
“If it halted legislation progress it would have set an awful precedent.”
yeah how awful would that be… imagine the horror of living in a democratic country where the government does radical shit like deciding to halt the juggernaut of ram-raid legislation simply to listen to the clearly stated desires of the very people that elected it.
You are, and always will be, nothing but an apologist for authority Pete .
Nope. I think there’s far more effective ways of challenging Parliament than the toothless tools we’ve been deliberately dumped with. The incumbent parties aren’t likely to give up any of their power, so we have to take some people power. It can be done if there’s a will and co-operation.
so the best way you have to do that is to allow the governments to continue to do whatever they like despite the obvious widespread aversion to the policy?
“You are, and always will be, nothing but an apologist for authority Pete .”
[3] Do you think that the non National MPs, Banks and Dunne, are just leeches and parasites to have supported National’s asset sales?
No. It was normal pragmatic politics that is an essential part of our system of MMP, the same as it was under the Clark government.
I’ve seen supporters of both main parties call small party MPs things like leeches and parasites but I think it’s just pissiness at not being able to rule on their own.
If a Labour+Green+NZFirst+Mana+Maori Party+Internet Party coalition forms the next government I don’t think any of them will be leeches or parasites, they will all be trying to do their jobs as MPs.
Credit where credit is due, even an asshole is right two times per day.
Have you forgotten this Pete George?
” UF (United Future) did not specifically campaign for the ‘mixed ownership model for the electricity companies and Air New Zealand’ because it was not UF (United Future) policy”
[ Pete George – [United Future Dunedin North 2011 candidate[ (16,292) Says: February 15th, 2013 at 10:28 pm]
http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/a_lie.html/comment-page-1#comment-1097573
SO WHY DID PETER DUNNE / UNITED FUTURE VOTE FOR the Public Finance (Mixed Ownership Model) Amendment Act 2012????
3 September 2013
Press Release: Penny Bright Auckland Mayoral candidate:
“There is STILL no mandate for asset sales! No majority – no mandate!”
“Back on 2 March 2013, I put out the following Press Release:
“There is NO mandate for asset sales – Peter Dunne and United Future never campaigned for asset sales,” says anti-privatisation campaigner, Auckland Mayoral candidate, Penny Bright.
“What has changed? NOTHING.”
“Please be reminded of the FACTS?”
2 March 2013
“”There is NO mandate for asset sales – Peter Dunne and United Future never campaigned for asset sales,” Penny Bright 2013 Auckland Mayoral Candidate.”
WHERE IS THE ‘MANDATE’ FOR ASSET SALES????
Yes – National did campaign for asset sales – albeit in a a not very ‘open and transparent’ way?
You will note that their 2011 pre-election policy did NOT say – “National supports asset sales”, or “National supports the Mixed Ownership Model for key state assets”.
http://www.national.org.nz/mixed-ownership.aspx
THIS is the arguably rather sly way that National wiggled in their stated asset sale policy – prior to the 2011 election:
http://www.national.org.nz/PDF_General/Future_Investment_Fund_policy.pdf
“Building savings and investment
National is increasing savings and creating jobs built on exports and productive investment.
We’re getting on top of debt, and returning to surplus sooner.
We will extend the successful mixed-ownership model – where the Government owns most of acompany, but offers a minority stake to investors – to four state-owned energy companies, and reduce the government’s stake in Air New Zealand.
This will give Kiwis a chance to invest in large New Zealand companies.”
The 2011 election results?
National got 59 out of 121 MPs.
The final vote on the Public Finance (Mixed Ownership Model) Amendment Act 2012, was 61 – 60
http://www.parliament.nz/en-NZ/PB/Debates/Debates/e/8/e/50HansD_20120626_00000012-State-Owned-Enterprises-Amendment-Bill-Public.htm
A party vote was called for on the question, That the Public Finance (Mixed Ownership Model) Amendment Bill be now read a third time.
Ayes 61
New Zealand National 59; ACT New Zealand 1; United Future 1.
Noes 60
New Zealand Labour 34; Green Party 14; New Zealand First 8; Maori Party 3; Mana 1.
HOWEVER:
” UF (United Future) did not specifically campaign for the ‘mixed ownership model for the electricity companies and Air New Zealand’ because it was not UF (United Future)policy”
[ Pete George – [United Future Dunedin North 2011 candidate[ (16,292) Says: February 15th, 2013 at 10:28 pm]
http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2013/02/a_lie.html/comment-page-1#comment-1097573
In my considered opinion – the voting public of Ohariu were thus effectively misled by United Future and Peter Dunne on the issue of support for the ‘Mixed Ownership Model’ for State-Owned electricity assets and Air New Zealand.
In my considered opinion, United Future and Peter Dunne SOLD OUT the voting public of Ohariu by voting in support of the Public Finance (Mixed Ownership) Amendment Act 2012.
Had Peter Dunne kept faith with the voting public of Ohariu – the Public Finance (Mixed Ownership Model) Amendment Bill should have BEEN DEFEATED 60 – 61.
I thus believe that I am absolutely correct in my statement that THERE IS NO MANDATE FOR ASSET SALES – given that this minority National Government (which DID campaign on asset sales) has only 59 out of 121 MPs.
Do the maths folks!
It ISN’T complicated?
NO MAJORITY – NO MANDATE.
Penny Bright
‘Anti-corruption campaigner’
A Spokesperson for the ‘Switch Off Mercury Energy’ community group.
http://www.facebook.com/SwitchOffMercuryEnergy?fref=ts
2013 Auckland Mayoral candidate
opens popcorn
No point in the popcorn. Pete’s more recent tactic is to mostly only discuss the stuff he he leads/gets given the lead on. He ignores the stuff he doesn’t like even when it is a direct question.
Haven’t you noticed?
Penny Bright, You impress me a lot as a caring, dedicated and hard working politically astute person. Have you put forth your name as a candidate for any political party for the coming elections? You should. It is concerned people like you that are essential for politics and our parliament.
I refer to Banks and Dunne as parasites, leeches and political whores because they could not win their seats on their own but for Key/National manipulating the system to get them in as pathetic coat-tailers.
[4] Do you think that Dunne deserves to be re elected again?
That’s not my call, it’s up to the voters of Ohariu.
Any MP who’s been around as long as Dunne has accumulated many critics, but he also gets praise for work done in his electorate and as a usually competent and reliable Minister (both Helen Clark and John Key have thought so).
He deserves credit for the Psychotic Substances Bill at least.
It looks easier for him this year with rookie low profile candidates for each of National, Labour and Greens, but it depends on whether he has damaged himself too much last year or not as well.
What I think isn’t my call either.
No, this just in, I’m an asshole.
“That’s not my call,”
Dude, it’s your brain! You can do whatever you like with it 🙄
[5] Do you think that Dunne leaked confidential cabinet papers?
I’m not certain one way or the other about the Kitteridge report leak. There’s nowhere near compelling proof that he did. The inquiry was severely flawed and ignored significant possibilities, for example that the leaker might have communicated with Vance outside the parliamentary communications systems.
He has denied it publicly. I have heard him deny it twice in person, once with his wife present and the other time with UF board members present, so if he was lying he was also either lying to them or they were in on a lie.
I remain prepared to believe Dunne unless there’s evidence produced or an admission that says otherwise.
Once an asshole, always an asshole.
[6] Who do you trust more, Key or Cunliffe?
Neither more or less. Generally I trust them both, I think they both genuinely want to do what they think is best for the country.
All politicians get caught out embellishing the truth, fibbing and exaggerating – as every human being would if we are put under anywhere near the scrutiny they are.
Politicians are pretty much forced to fib. For example any MP who is asked “do you fully support your leader” has pretty much no option but to say they are fully behind their leader. Especially if they are not they would get politically crucified.
If an MP says something wrong and are challenged on it enormous pressure can be put on them to turn it into an ongoing lie because the consequences of the alternative can end their career, whether deserved or not.
If I ever had to deal with either Key or Cunliffe one on one I’m confident I could trust them. I’ve heard numerous reports that in person they are both genuinely good blokes.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
[7] Do you agree that this National government kept many of the last Labour government’s social policies such as WFF, Kiwi Saver, Kiwi Bank, Interest Free Student Loans, Paid Parental Leave etc for political expediency rather than for ideological reasons?
Mostly pragmatic reasons. Undoing things like WFF or interest free student loans at the onset of a major financial crisis would have had major negative effects. It’s widely believed that we needed some sort of encouragement to boost retirement savings.
The reality of modern day politics is that ideologies, especially extreme ideologies, are pretty much obsolete. Most policies involve practical rather than ideological considerations and often require a prudent balance of socialist and capitalist considerations.
I think it’s unlikely that a Labour led government would put any priority on winding back the asset sales – which happen to be a balance between socialism and capitalism.
Asshole pretends to know what Socialism and Capitalism are having previously demonstrated understanding of neither.
[8] If UF or Dunne get back into parliament, who should they support, the Left block or the right block?
That’s up to them, nothing to do with me. I don’t care.
Dunne is on record as saying he could work with National again, and Key has indicated he could work with Dunne again.
Dunne has also indicated he that while he could work with Labour they would have to move from some of their current positions. He is dead against a CGT for example.
As an asshole I have no opinion. Why don’t you believe me?
[9] Do you support the idea of having the Internet Party?
Interesting question. I support the right of the Internet Party to form and stand in the election, as I support the right of any party, for example the Focus New Zealand Party that registered in January.
I support most of their ten point Action Agenda to varying degrees.
When I floated the idea of a new party in 2011 some of the concepts were quite similar to those of the Internet Party, being pragmatic and issued base rather than ideological or left or right.
I have some reservations about their democratic processes, and in particular with the potential influence of once person who is financing everything.
But it’s up to members and candidates to support it, and then it’s up to them to try and get voter support. I’m just an interested observer.
In general I support the idea of having multiple parties and would like a smaller or no threshold so more had a chance of succeeding. That would give us a more representative Parliament and give the main parties more flexibility and options ensuring majority decisions on legislation.
An asshole says me me me me me me me me me.
[10] Should the MPs and the public support the TPPA without knowing any of the details as of now?
They don’t have to. It’s healthy for them to remain skeptical until they know details, but outright support or outright opposition can look like petty politicking.
It’s common for international agreements to be negotiated without details being made public. It’s often essential to do the groundwork in private.
Despite their token protestations I think senior Labour MPs know this, they’ve done deals with other countries themselves successfully.
If the inter-country negotiations conclude successfully then Parliament should have all the details necessary to make an informed decision on whether we accept the agreement or not.
PG, you’re kidding yourself about not having an “ideology”. Your answers, especially on asset sales, the TPPA and “pragmatism” situate you as being for the “neoliberal consensus” and TINA that has been in play since the 80s. You are supporting the status quo, when the world and NZers, especially those struggling most, need an alternative.
That’s very simplistic assumptions. I’m not a status quo person, I’m very willing to consider viable alternatives.
I think we need to look at radically overhauling and simplifying our overly convoluted tax and welfare systems. I think serious consideration should be given to something like a Universal Basic Income. I think we should seriously reconsider our drug laws in relation to cannabis.
What I would like to have seen with the energy company part sales was to put all the proceeds into first, energy conservation, and second, alternative energy options, so re-investing in future proofing our energy.
I’d like to see an effective fast reaction system of public input into our Parliamentary system and have ideas on how this would work. CIR are too slow and flawed.
I’ll leave it at that for now.
Yes you are and no your not.
Everything you’ve ever said on this board shows that you’re fully inline with National’s ideology.
Like that BS. We could easily have put money into all of those things without selling our nation out as National, Act and UF did.
I’m not fully in line with National’s or any party’s ideology.
What is National’s ideology? What is Labour’s ideology? Greens? NZ First? Political ideologies are some quaint historical theories. Apart from a small number of Socialists involved with Mana I don’t see any significant ideologies in any of the parties. Greens talk semi-socialism but their policies are hybrids.
Modern politics is far more complex than simplistic ideologies.
Oh dear, pg @6.58am
You have a very muddled notion of the meaning of “ideology”. You equate it with party policies and historical theories. There are more “ideologies” than socialism or capitalism. And there you show where you are aiming for some idea of pragmatic “balance” between the two. However, a (so-called) “hybrid” is also an “ideology”.
Actually, I’m not keen on the word, “ideology”. In Marxism terms its a set of beliefs or values that distort the underlying reality, in the interests of the ruling classes.
In common everyday language it just means a set of ideas and ideals that underpin “economic or political theory or policy.”
I have been using it in the everyday sense. I also use it to refer to the values that underpin any political policies or ideas.
You claim not to work on the basis of “ideology” – yet you first and foremost espouse a managerialist approach – your main aim to make politics more open, honest and transparent, etc – is to improve politcs – but to do that, you have already accepted the status quo re-underlying values (short hand term for this is “neoliberal consensus”).
Your claim that modern politics is more complex than “simplistic ideologies” is a way of disavowing your underlying political perspective – which, going by your answer to the above questions, is centre right.
+100 karol.
Petty asshole.
“It’s common for international agreements to be negotiated without details being made public”
hey Pete, your braincell is misfiring or you are being deliberately misleading.
– which is so unlike you
This is not about the public being informed it is about those people in the negotiating room being allowed to read the entire text of the agreement that they are negotiating.
Q11: Is it difficult writing stuff that you know is complete horsepuckey?
Lolz Rosie, you asked for it, i had grand visions on Pete’s behalf of Him first storming the UF presidency and soon after rearranging the candidates selection process so as to install Himself over the ‘hairdo’ as the candidate for Ohariu,
Just wouldn’t listen tho would He despite the fact that the promise was there that he ‘might’ have doubled His vote from the Dunedin experience,(a huge victory),
Pete’s ‘high’ on transparency and a more unkind person,(snigger), than me might suggest that such a noble aim has been fully achieved by Him and that the people have ‘seen right through Him’…
well bad, the topic of “transparency” as a high would be a different take on the other highs that yourself and your plaything have explored in recent weeks.
I see your plaything will be absent for a week. I hope you don’t feel this loss too keenly. Others of us may be glad of the respite……………….
Lolz Rosie, i think i was lucky to escape a ‘spanking’ myself after the other day’s exchange of pleasantries,
Naughty of me to take offense at the piss weak comment directed my way because i refuse to even think about giving up my little tobacco addiction, especially coming from that one,
Will have to self-moderate my further exchanges with that one and meanwhile i can enjoy a phill-free week,(nah i don’t miss Him i havn’t an inbred need to engage in peeing up the wall contests although with that one it is hard to resist)…
I found Phil’s judgement and intolerance in what he perceived as “weaknesses” in those with an addiction(s), no matter what it is/was, really offensive but wasn’t prepared to take it up with him, given the exhausting round about of discussion him and I had about his militant veganism and subsequent alienation of thoughtful people who were already taking steps to eat more humanely.
Its all or nothing with folks like him. Kind of a shame as his good humour and knowledge is tarnished by his ego and his fanaticism.
If thoughtful people can be alienated from veganism by what is perceived as militant views then they are not that thoughtful in my opinion.
Belladonna, you have often been supportive of Phillip’s stance but don’t you see that if he wants to encourage folks to eat more humanely then insulting them isn’t really the way to go about it?
He alienated with his words, not the concept of veganism, which has enough merit on it’s own to sell itself to a willing audience. Shouting at people isn’t going to get them on side. I had been vegetarian for 30 years until I started up with fish again and included it in my vegan and vegetarian meal schedule, but 30 years of no meat wasn’t good enough for him. That’s militancy. And see how blind he was with bad12, below? Everyone who reads TS knows bad was making some changes, but not Phillip. It was like he was on a perma rant and nothing could stop him.
“My way or the high way” isn’t a very mature way of approaching change.
Very hard to get the Omega’s 3 and 6 out of just a fruit and vege diet too Rosie, just finished a yummy bowl of raw fish for tea…
The food one was hilarious, tossing the insipid rhetoric at me about cows blah blah blah, when all the time i have been on the fish/vege/fruit diet since Christmas, it was more fun to let him keep tossing the slurs…
I dont always agree with Phillip but like him I am passionate about veganism.
Rosie – you included fish in your vegan diet, sorry but if you eat fish you are not a vegetarian or vegan. Why did you stop eating meat, must be for health reasons I suspect not because of animal cruelty issues. Bad12 I think you goaded Phillip a lot of the time, he probably would have been better to ignore you but I do think you have a cruel streak in you which would bring out antagonism in a lot of people. It is frustrating as a vegan to understand why such terrible cruelty can be ignored by good and intelligent people but then again I was vegetarian for many years before I stopped eating dairy and eggs. Just sorry it took so long for me to ‘get it’.
Belladonna, me too as far as health reasons being the spur to turn the diet upside down,
Me goad Phillip, perlease never, well actually yes, when some addict calls me piss weak for smoking tobacco while admitting that he is in fact a poly addict of various drugs then to me, and what you think about this is immaterial, that is an open invitation, a demand if you will for me to have a wee tinker with His mind,
A cruel streak i wont deny, see the handle i comment under, you now need not wonder why it was chosen,
i happily climbed inside the mind of someone that was happy to engage in the tossing of infantile insults in my direction, until that is, i seen that dark black writing under one of my comments,
The last line above is the actual difference between the two of us…
you are very naughty bad12 …you lured poor Phil into a spanking from BIG Daddy….i have seen kids do this …lure another into trouble…however i do enjoy both Phil’s and your comments …so hope they will continue
….i dont mind that Phil is fanatical about Veganism….wish i could be a vegan …but obviously not so hard that i do become one…so being somewhat of a fanatic myself at times i do enjoy his diatribes about the SINS of meat eaters…it is all TRUE!…and he is very funny at times …..and if i had to kill critters to eat them i wouldnt do it….but as others do the killing and it is a fait accompli and as i had nothing to do with it …i will sup ( with the devil) and accept i am a Vegan’s sinner
Actually No Chooky, i was more worried about getting the cane myself than luring Phillip into such a trap,very machiavellian of you to think this tho i might add, which is why when the Dark Notes began to play i found something that needed doing elsewhere and my sandpit playmate became even more strident,
That’s my story anyway, plausible don’t you think, believe me tho doing the dance with Phill, to see who could crack who first was all pleasure here, i havn’t laughed so much for ages,
Lolz i am happy to kill it as well as munch on it, although these days with the lack of mobility the choices are pretty slim in that department,(the neighbors i am sure would become a little more then irate if i begin sauteing the local cat population,
The diet change for me was purely health driven, threw out the Statins the doc gave me and turned the diet upside down, a weeek of thinking/reading about it and a week to change it,(can’t see why all these vegans get all puffed up about doing this as if they deserve a medal),
Lolz even the Butter on the toast has been replaced by Guacamole, i don’t miss the stuff…
Run out of reply buttons but I do hope this comes out as a reply to Belladonna @7pm.
I said “vegan and vegetarian meal schedule”. Since I took up fish I have not referred to myself as either vegetarian or vegan. I eat those kind of meals still of course, and that’s why I said “schedule”, as in recipe schedule for the week for purchased and prepared meals.
You ask why I stopped eating meat and assumed it was for health reasons. It wasn’t. At age 14, back in 1984 I couldn’t care less about my health. I’ve lived around animals all my life( and still do) and I had a sudden freak out one day after a steak dinner that I had just ate a critter that under normal circumstances I would strike up a bit of communication with and have respect for, as its own self.
And so it began and remains, apart from the fishies. (which as well as animal welfare concerns there are many environmental considerations)
As for the fishies, I have taken them up for health reasons – now I’m middle aged and have a long family history, on both sides, of heart disease and looked at the fish consuming populations of the planet (Indian ocean countries, Nordic, Celtic and Pacific) and their traditional health trends, in my consideration of fish consumption.
I’ve mentioned this all before with Phillip and don;’t really think its appropriate to rehash a discussion of personal food choices, I’m not really into justifications, I’m just answering your questions.
lol bad12….well i accept you didnt deliberately try to get Phil banned…just more street wise
on home help health issues …Allicin garlic is supposed to be good for the arteries and heart …check it out
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allicin
but if you are on heavy blood thinner meds you should check it out with your doctor first…(personally i steer clear of doctors except when absolutely necessary…smirk …so take my suggestions at your own risk)
@ bad12 Lecithin is also good for combating chloresterol
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lecithin
You can get both Lecithin and Allicin from health shops
Why was Phil banned & for how long?
[lprent: pointless abuse after being warned, and just for a week. ]
Lolz Chooky, befor i take up any of your suggestions i will need a signed declaration that you aint an assassin hired by you know who to end my miserable little life,(joking of course),
Oh believe me i view everything the doctors say with a ample amount of scepticism, the reasoning behind the throwing of the Statins is two-fold, first one of the big Phama Co’s had to withdraw theirs from the market as they were implicated in the deaths of, i think it was 30 people,
Second, one side effect that they don’t tell anyone about, because it aint paifull and you don’t notice the effect is that the Statins make the body expel Magnesium,
Magnesium along with Calcium are vitally important in managing the blood sugar levels,SO, if you have both, high cholesterol and high blood sugar they give you drugs for both BUT, if what i have read is correct, you are then on the merry-go-round of the Magnesium being stripped from the body putting the Magnesium/Calcium balance out of kilter which makes the blood sugar level go haywire,
i will see if i can hunt out the story and post a link tomorrow, but, i will probably not go looking for too much of the homeopathic stuff as it is diet that is all important and i don’t want to start trying to do a fast strip of cholesterol from the body as there are good fats and there are bad fats and i don’t want to be stripping out the good with the bad,
What i have done is basically gone to a diet that only has fish oils, vege oils in it, the reasoning behind this is from what i read so far, is that rather than go completely ‘fat free’ it is better to replace the ‘bad fats’ in the body with ‘good fats’ which the body actually has a use for…
Karol, yesterdays ‘Open Mike’ is pretty much an explanation, the caning is only for a week and from memory for ‘abuse’,(although being a willing participant you wont hear me complaining about how Phillip chose to structure His side of the conversation),
Once i read the first Dark Letters i knew it was time to halt the proceedings and it seems that Phillip also did for a while, i have the sneaking suspicion tho that He hatched a cunning plan to sneak back later when Lprent wasn’t looking to get in that all important last words as happens in such little ego games,
Unfortunately for Phill He was, looking that is,
The funny of it all is that someone earlier in the day had a little whine which i assumed by its wording was directed at what i had been writing in the exchanges with Phillip asking the Mods to step in(perhaps all that psychological stuff cut way to close to something going on in that ones head),
Pity if the complaint was directed at my writing only as it seemed to be because if Lprent decided to put a stop to proceedings based on that plea then i should imagine She/he who complained wont be too thrilled with the outcome…
[lprent: You just got either lucky or cunning (from this comment it sounds like cunning/wisdom). I didn’t see a pointless abuse comment from you after I’d issued some “dark letters” ]
@ bad12..(…ha ha..i wouldnt try and do you in …you and phil are too amusing and besides which i agree with most of what you say)
…those arent homeopathics i suggested …but extracts found in ordinary food
…yes always take anything very carefully and based on your own research…and try to go natural if at all possible
…statins can have very bad side effects…so dont blame you for giving them the biff
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/10/09/statin-cholesterol-lowering-drugs.aspx
on a related theme – re: hairdo – watching this Sunday i/v
http://tvnz.co.nz/q-and-a-news/climate-report-jamie-whyte-do-nothing-video-5879217
what struck me was if you put the hairdo on Whyte he’s a dead ringer for ‘highest bidder’ Dunne.
What I would like to know Pete is the script used in the latest Herald Digipoll and the latest Three News Reid Research poll. Having seen what was polled the order of questions could have had a significant result.
Also 3news apparently asked should Judith Collins be sacked. Why wasn’t the results of this reported?
I haven’t found details on the Reid Research poll questions. Reid Research have a page on 3 News polls but there is scant information and the last result is Jan-14. 3 News als has stuff all (and make poor presumptions that NZ First miss the cut and Conservatives get two seats). The lack of details is very poor.
I can’t find anything on the Collins sacking apart from a comment at Public Address by Andrew Geddis:
Russell Brown has been trying to ask Gower about this but he was MIA yesterday, perhaps it was his day off.
Andrew geddis ought to go to TVone and Nat Radio about it…. they may be interested to paint a rival network as unreliable?
@publicaddress
Of course he had the day off yesterday. Was it pre-arranged? Certainly. Suggests to me his blatant, biased set ups of David Cunliffe in particular has his bosses’ approval!
Time for Labour to go onto the attack…
@publicaddress
I’ve come to the conclusion that published polls need to have the questions published as well. That way they could be properly analysed.
+1 Drax. Great idea.
Agree
which is why the poll questions arent published.
Roy Morgan and Colmar Brunton publish their questions. The others need to be encouraged to do likewise.
^Good to know
Can you link to these please?
Roy Morgan’s 21 March 2014 poll:
http://www.roymorgan.com/~/media/Files/Findings%20PDF/2014/March/5489-NZ-National-Voting-Intention.pdf
Colmar Brunton’s 30 March 2014 poll:
http://www.colmarbrunton.co.nz/images/140401B_ONE_News_Colmar_Brunton_Poll_report_22-26_Mar_2014_prelim.pdf
Colmar Brunton only ring landlines.
“Eligible New Zealand voters who live in New Zealand households that have a landline telephone.
SAMPLE SELECTION: Nationwide random digit dialling of landline telephones using stratified probability
sampling to ensure the sample includes the correct proportion of people in urban
and rural areas. Interviewers ask to speak to the person in each household aged 18
years or over with the next birthday. When required, multiple calls are made to
reach that person. Voting eligibility is determined at the first question.”
Grumpollie on polling and cellphones:
Roy Morgan polls cellphones. While their last polling period was earlier than Colmar Brunton and Reid Research the main party results for the last three polls were quite close:
National – RM 45.5, CB 47, RR 45.9
Labour – RM 31.5, CB 31, RR 31.2
Greens – RM 14, CB 11, RR 11.3
Does polling cellphones overestimate Green support or was the earlier polling period a factor?
You’re the “fact checker” as you advertise yourself. How about answering that yourself instead of looking like a disingenuously partisan amateur?
One thing you’ve go to realise is that is you advertise yourself as a United Figleaf candidate or “Fact Checker”, then you’ve got to actually do some work.
Putting on a beige cardigan and wagging your finger rather selectively doesn’t qualify. I already know that you’re a tedious dick and frankly I would welcome your insults, but if you pretend to professional competence, you have to show it at all times, not – as you do, whenever it suits you – pretend that you have some special exception in those rather frequent exceptions.
You really should have taken up stamp collecting on your retirement – it would have been so much less irritating to people who have to wade through your self-promotion to find comments worth reading.
All together now.
Petey’s such an asshole.
For a minute there I thought you had started a blog OAB ;-p
Pete
I think journalists understand that, and their editors. They are deliberately presenting polls as they wiosh to. I dont believe it is from any kind of ignorance of polling basics.
Wow Pete George is on here much much more than some of the usual suspects. Especially now he’s draped in a cloak of pseudo-semi-respectability.
It’s interesting to see what Chris Trotter has to say about last Saturday’s TPPA protests at http://bowalleyroad.blogspot.co.nz/
While he argues that such marches are ineffective because of more profound reasons, I think the oppositions’ very limited time, money and resources are a core issue. I think the left should not automatically turn to protest marches to make its points unless they are certain they are going to have a sizeable impact. When the turnout is small, it only encourages the government and encourages the public view through the media that those against such things like the TPPA are in the minority. Those who are fighting the government tend for the most part to have extremely limited money, time and energy, partly because they are often on low wage jobs and so on. I would have loved to have gone to the march to support it even though I wasn’t convinced it would be effective but couldn’t afford the travel costs, or loss of income from an extra part time job. This government knows that by attacking the opposition on all fronts eg environment, employment, education it makes their protests weak in comparison to its own virtually unlimited resources which it channels from private funding along with eight years of shaping government departments to do its bidding. The opposition has to start thinking of more creative ways of protesting that work within the limitations of its supporters, rather than yet another march. In other words, a more strategic approach is needed. People’s time, energy and money have to be bundled up and directed at specific targets, rather than a scatter gun approach.
The TPPA demos got pretty positive coverage on the evening TV 6pm news and in the main daily newspapers. That’s a positive outcome.
Interestingly enough I think that the left have forgotten what having a party is all about. It is, quite simply, to provide that time, money and resources. Not for everyone but for a few to do the necessary work.
I think you’re right there. I think we’d be better off using the time and resources provided by being in political parties to run polls, the advertising of those polls and the pushing of referenda. We need to engage everybody and not just the few who are already engaged and thus willing to turn up to protests.
I would have gone to the protest but I had a choice of going for a job interview or going to the protest – the job interview won out.
which march did chris attend? If he didn’t, what was the last march he attended and when.
The polls aside, I’m really worried. I caught David Cunliffe talking about asset sales this morning and worried more. He is a very good speaker but so negative and attack-oriented in an almost childish way. “New Zealanders don’t like asset sales and this will show up in the ballot box”. What??? I want to hear good reasons why the ongoing asset sales are bad for NZ. Why we need to keep Genesis. Don’t attack John Key all the time. He’s almost impregnable. Attack the right wing policies that are so bad for NZ. Show you can transcend petty party politics and can be a PM. Who’s advising him? Why has he changed? What happened to the fire in his belly?
Yesterday he was out and out lying on breakfast TV about John Key.
Really bizarre.
I get the feeling he’s starting to crack under the pressure.
really? – what were these lies?
didnt see it so im actually interested
He accused John Key of having a secret trust for donors.
David Farrar did a post on it yesterday:
depends if theres proof or not though doesnt it
i would put money on the claim being accurate. key is hardly honest by any stretch of the imagination
and if its a secret trust in the same vein as cunliffes “secret” trust (because it wasnt secret) – the nats have used that method for years via several trusts
so not so much a lie – but an unsupported claim that you dont agree with
Sorry I added a bit after you posted.
According to Farrar the trust that people used to donate through was wound up in 2007.
I’d be surprised if Cunliffe didn’t know about this, so one has to wonder what trust he’s talking about.
Maybe Cunliffe should come forward and present his proof.
“According to Farrar” – hand me the salt so i can get some very big grains:-)
question for those who know – does national still use trusts to hide the identity of donors?
“Maybe Cunliffe should come forward and present his proof.” – yep, and maybe we should refrain from calling him a lier untill that time? – express doubt? – sure, get stuck in
small note – in your quote above cunliffe doesnt accuse key of having a secret trust – he accuses him of hiding the donors via the trust
See this is where it can get messy for Cunliffe.
What’s he going to do if Key goes for him over this accusation, where’s the proof? because if he can’t stump up with any than his honesty levels with the voter are going to take yet another dive.
Don’t be surprised to see Winston Peters over taking Cunliffe in the preferred PM poll.
do JK and the nats have a trust that hides the identity of donors? yes/no
is key refusing to disclose who these donors are? – yes
dont see much thats messy there – cunliffe only has to prove one thing which should be accessable via donations returns
i think your getting hung up on the word secret a bit too much here
Did Cunliffe use the word secret? Or did BM make that up?
lolz, yeah let’s all worry about DC being able to provide proof on the basis that you claim he lied despite you not having any proof.
The burden of proof is on Cunliffe. Key is probably the one who should call him on it, Cunliffe is hardly going to respond to some random poster.
The burden of proof for what?
the burden of proof to deny the accusation made by BM, obviously. /sarc 🙂
Can’t see any trusts in the donation list for 2013/14 but there was Antione’s Restaurant which donated $60,000 as, seemingly, a result of a $5000/person dinner. None of the diners are named.
Did Farrar call for key to bring forward proof that Unite and DotCom had donated to Cunliffe’s leadership campaign? Link please.
Was 2007 when the National Party became a charity and the trust was no longer needed?
As to who’s telling porkies – given the choice of Cunliffe, or you, Farrar, and Key?? Hmmm, I don’t think it’s Cunliffe.
Sorry, didnt you think that because there was no proof DotCom HAD NOT donated to cunliffe it was fair to suggest he might have, but Cunliffe is a liar for the same kind of thing?
Or are you holding Cunliffe to a higher standard than John Key who speaks out of both sides of hismouth. I am not a labour supporter but even I can see you are accusing Cunliffe of things you defend Key.
Cunliffe could have easily cleared things up if he just said who the two donors were, but since he didn’t of course people are going to speculate.
By not fronting up all it did is give the impression that he was doing something shifty and had something to hide like Dot com donating to him.
Would be rather embarrassing for Cunliffe if that was the case, which may explain all the secrecy.
No, DC asked the donors if they were willing to be named. Two weren’t so he returned those donations. Given that the donors were told before they donated that they would be anonymous, DC seems to have done the honourable thing.
Somehow I knew you’d think it was different. So Key doesn’t have to have proof that Unite and Dotcom donated to Cunliffe when saying it, but Cunliffe has to have proof that key has got a secret trust???
Cunliffe never said he didn’t receive donations from Vladimir Putin either, I see what you mean BM, it’s really shifty…./sarc
I see your astroturfing masters still aren’t paying you that well BM.
as opposed to John key who was on television lying about John key? Key’s not cracking of course, under the pressure of the lies, he’s so used to it.
Totally agree with your point about going after policies. For some time I have thought that younger voters (I am in my 60’s) just don’t care about left/right. They seem more focused on what is fair/unfair; reasonable/unreasonable; just/unjust; and so on. To attack one of the most popular PM’s in history (if not the most popular) is just plain stupid, especially when so many of the attacks backfire. Now every time there is a similar attack voters can just shrug it off as more spitefulness from Labour.
I think this is a very hard ask for Labour as many people (my opinion only) will find it hard to connect with Cunliffe. How does an affluent, double income, business trained, leafy suburb resident resonate with the less fortunate? I am sure Helen Clark was quite well off, but she didn’t sport the trappings so obviously. I just can’t see the missing 800,000 coming out in these circumstances. And that assumes that they would vote differently from the rest of the national electorate.
John key has been attacking Cunliffe intensively.
Why is it different for Cunliffe to attack Key.
How popular is Key exactly?
I’m not convinced he is highly popular except among many sycophants in the MSM.
From what I’ve seen (I’m so childish about politics that I’m too scared to watch sometimes), Cunliffe’s attacks on Key and the Nats aren’t working. They’re not working for me as a voter; they’re not working in the polls. I feel that most people here could mount a persuasive argument about asset sales or many other issues and convince some of the undecided that another three years of National will set NZ back. As a voter I want these issues articulated in a positive way … I want to feel proud of belonging to the Labour party. I want a strong Labour/Green alliance. As things are now I’m voting Green, probably my natural home anyway, but for a moment there I thought that Labour would do it for me. And it’s not just me, my friends and family feel the same way: Baby Boomers and the generation below. Maybe we’re not the target audience but heck, I’m worried.
what attacks on key? Can you list them? I am interested to know the extent of the attack in your mind, cos in mine, I have only noticed it when brought up here and one or two times (like when key attacked sallies and cunliffe foolishly pitted mansion against mansion).
the thing for me though maureen, is the only place i see this negativity is in accusations directed at cunliffe or in media framing (see gower). Im concerned that you, your friends and your family are relying upon media pundits and not the words of the person, or party, in question
ask yourself – is your view of party positions derived from traditional media or from actual first hand experience/research? (not “blaming the media” here – just pointing out that what you see there isnt what your getting)
just where are these relentless attacks on john key? (note – valid, measured and well argued criticism isnt a personal attack in my book)
It’s negative, people don’t want to hear negativity.
Turns people completely off.
whats negative? “its”?
Cunliffe attacking and making up stuff about Key.
No one wants to hear that, as Maureen wrote people want to hear why Cunliffe would be a better choice as PM than Key.
apart from your one exagerated quote where you insert the secret meme i dont see it
i do see key acting like a private school bully on a daily basis though and people seem to like him (according to the polls)
and your ingnoring my point – where does the negativity come from? Gower?
but they do like it when key lies tot hem? You seem to thrive on it. Key said Unite and Dotcom donated to Cunliffe, he had no proof and was being negative.
And yet National uses it constantly, i.e, labelling Cunliffe as “tricky”.
Last night on One News I saw Key attacking Cunliffe and Labour & not the opposite.
The night before I say Gower use a montage of Key calling Cunliffe “tricky” and not attacks from Cunliffe.
Yes, but BM does his “thinking” vicariously through WO and Kiwiblog. Do you see the difference?
Maureen -Have you ever watched a parliament session? have you seen how Key behaves?
If you haven’t I recommend you do. Urgently.
His personal polling popularity is higher than national’s party polling… ergo, his popularity is largely unimportant. His party is neck-and-neck or close to neck-and-neck with Labour/Greens.
Tracey, you have got it the wrong way round.
Key’s popularity on the latest polls is lower than the Nat share of the party vote.
And he is polling as preferred PM in the low 40% range – so doesn’t look like the majority of Kiwis rate him that highly.
Shit sorry. I assumed from the way the rightwing posters were going on and on the other day about how popular key was that he must be polling higher than hisparty…
Well, perhaps you should read the material on this blog Tracey. You will find left wing posters going on and on about how popular Cunliffe is and you may assume that he must be polling higher than his party.
On the other hand if you think about it you may find that Labour are on about 30% and Cunliffe is on 8%. Just ignore it. It cannot possibly be true.
the important part, alwyn is labour/greens equal to national in some polls and a smidge behind in others.
where the maori seats go will also be important.
could you post the link to where people have gone “on and on” about how popular cunliffe is outside the labour party which selected him?
I sure I could quickly flag a few entries here where people rave about Cunliffe.
I can’t show you, since they are as anonymous as the contributors to DC slush fund, that they are inside the Labour Party. I doubt, on the other hand, that you could point out where National Party supporters differ greatly from many Labour ones in highlighting Key’s popularity. Look at Brian Edwards or Chris Trotter for examples.
Does it matter. Of course not. It’s just that everyone who takes any interest in politics this far out from an election are, as both you and I and most people who make comments here, totally deranged on the whole subject.
The only thing that really matters, as you put in the first line is the final party vote. However we are getting ever further into a Presidential type contest and an unpopular leader is going to affect the popularity of their party. As the election gets closer people in general, outside the hard core, are going to decide their vote and a lot of this will depend on how much they like the leader.
raving about cunliffe is not the same as “going on and on about how popular cunliffe is”. thats why i doubt you can find such links.
Always they conflate that John Key scoring high in the preferred prime minister polls means that he is really popular.
In the absence of a viable alternative…….he’s the preferred choice. I think it says more about Cunliffe than Key.
Cunliffe has never had a fair showing in the MSM. There has been constant negativity about him via the MSM, since before he became caucus leader.
On the other hand, Key was given and endless honeymoon period and lots of positivity since before he even became leader of the Nats.
It’s not been a level playing field.
so when the herald prints a statement of the pm which has no factual basis and which they dont check before publishing,that has no impact on his or cunliffes popularity
agree Karol-Key is certainly not “impregnable” as someone said above
Uggh? Is that comment said in jest Once was Pete?
John Key was worth $50million in 2008 – probably closer to $100 million now.
David Cunliffe might hit the $3million mark but isn’t likely to be much higher than that.
John Key has half a dozen homes/mansions.
David Cunliffe has one to my knowledge.
John Key lives in a huge mansion surrounded by leafy trees in the most expensive area in NZ.
David Cunliffe lives in a fairly ordinary sized house – with leafy trees granted – in an expensive area but less so than Key.
John Key grew up to be a selfish, self centred, money obsessed plutocrat who has lied and cheated his way into the hearts of some very gullible NZers – including some in the MSM who should know better.
David Cunliffe is devoting his efforts into lifting the poor out of their abject poverty and to make NZ a better place for everyone.
You really have bought into the MSM disinformation campaign haven’t you. One of the gullible NZers?
Shorter Anne……
John key is rich and the devil incarnate.
David Cunliffe is less rich but quite well off and is the messiah
Anyone who doesn’t believe this is gullible
It’s about their policies and politics, not where they live and how much money they have.
how clever you were there. not having to mount any kind of actual argument with any facts…. you are probably fine with john keys latest lies.
Tracey I was attempting to make a point which must have gone over your head.
If those of on the left can only come up with rubbish such as that put forward by Anne we have no chance of connecting with the voting public but that’s probably fine from her perspective as she can put down another miserable failure by the Labour party and their ‘brains trust’ to the ‘gullible NZ voters’
Rubbish out dear little sockpuppet?
I was pointing out the contradictions in Once was Pete’s statement at 5.2..
He attacks David Cunliffe for being (I paraphrase) so-called rich, living in a leafy suburb, has a business background and therefore couldn’t possibly relate to poor people. While at the same time he ignores the fact John Key is filthy rich (off the backs of the self same poor people) lives in an even leafier suburb, has umpteen dozen other properties and secret trusts all over the place but somehow that’s all OK folks. Key good, Cunliffe bad.
Thanks for the compliment. Such a raving, incoherent response can only mean I hit a bulls eye. 🙂
John Key thinks child poverty and problem gambling are a bloody good laugh.
Cunliffe doesn’t.
Important difference. It doesn’t matter how much you’ve made, but what you are going to do.
So your response is “Cunliffe is rich , but not as rich as Key”, that’ll gain the votes of the poor.
Oh dear Blue can’t you read? There’s some excellent night classes available for….. ooops sorry, Paula Bennett did away with them.
+1 Anne 🙂
Nope, it was the Tolley that killed the excellent low cost (13 million dollars) community Education night classes. Bastards.
Being rich is not an impediment to be the leader of a party and work towards policies that make the lives of people, including the poor, the workers, the family and the unemployed better.
Helen Clark was rich. So were/are most of the Labour leaders here and abroad.
Working towards social policies does not mean the leader or the socialist politicians should abandon all their wealth and live poor. Even Mahatma Gandhi was a London educated/practicing barrister from a wealthy family.
Here is an analogy:
The pope is very wealthy but he advocates not only for his Church but also for the poor of the world. So do lots of nuns and priests. Mother Theresa had millions at her disposal and she used it to help the sick, the poor and the dying.
You “caught” David Cunliffe saying something negative about asset sales, Maureen? As if the reasons why this is bad policy haven’t been done to death.
Concern, much?
He also said, according to Stuff
Have problem [speculative economy] + will do something about it [capital gains] (which is, btw, economically orthodox) = sounds pretty positive to me.
I admit my concerns are emotional and not based on a solid attention to the campaigning that’s going on. I should concentrate, I know, before I decide who to vote for. But that bit I heard about people not liking asset sales and that will show up in the ballot box is an aspect of Cunliffe’s campaigning I’ve heard before. Kind of facile comments that don’t seem worthy of the man he was before. Believe me, I want to believe him, vote for him, see him get in. If my casual assumptions are wrong, wrong, wrong, then I’m glad.
Maybe he does what I’m doing here, making a bold statement without evidence? I promise I will pay more attention from now on:)
If not labour, who are you thinking of voting for?
Some of us vote Green, have some criticisms of some of Labour’s policies, and are not really getting into the rightwing framing re- their attacks on Cunliffe.
that describes me too karol. i am wondering though whether it describes maureen.
Hi Maureen, Nice reply to my rather snippy comment. I do think the evidence for assets sales as a deal for the taxpayer is cannot be anything but negative, sadly. That is not Cunliffe’s fault, that’s the fault of the government which has sold the assets off.
Just a note on the ‘punish at the ballot box’ comment that you didn’t like. Stuff has that line quoted more fully as:
That is not negative, That is a positive response, that if wasn’t included in the piece you caught suggests maybe the report was cut-off rather than Cunliffe being overly negative.
@DG
I thought Cunliffe was excellent on the TV this morning.
Bear in mind that Cunliffe had to pitch to people who had just woken up and, like me, don’t want too much fire and brimstone on their cornflakes.
Cunliffe is performing extremely well on TV as a leader. He does the beakfast slots very well. His interview with Nercep on National showed great skill and a steely core.
Have faith DG. He took over before Christnas an organisation and caucus that was in disarray and un-lead. We now have a leader who, despite a couple of gaffes, is an interviewee and speaker in whom we can be very proud. A major step up from where we were six months ago.
Agree NPS Staffer. Cunliffe is performing well in the media. He has made a couple of stuff-ups but get over this! It’s not like Key hasn’t made plenty of stuff-ups!
When the policy starts to roll out it will all change, and I think people will be surprised how good Cunliffe will be in the election debates.
The left only needs to add 3.5% to take the treasury benches.
Incidentally I wonder if Key will dare to debate Cunliffe head to head?
if mana win two seats and mp only got one maori seat, how would this impact final outcomes?
Nice to see that the MH370 disaster is good news for some. Some scabby Wairarapa millionaire is leasing his private jet out to help co-ordinate the comms. That’s leasing, not gifting. Charity is for suckers.
Plane, crew, fuel, insurance for a special activity, airport fees, etc that’s many thousands in costs to the owner per flight search hour.
Yep. a nice little earner on a cost plus basis. Plus the credibility bonus of having the media saying ‘Sir Peter flies in to save search’ or similar bollocks.
You have absolutely no foundation for these comments. Outrageous!
“The jet was not donated to help in the search effort, rather the company which operated the jet had accepted a charter offer with Sir Peter’s permission …”
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=11230625
I don’t think he wanted the publicity they reckon…
link?
http://beforeitsnews.com/politics/2014/03/exposed-kerry-implicated-in-turkey-false-flag-using-alqaeda-to-start-war-with-syria-_syriangirlpartisan-2609538.html
A leaked conversation between Turkey’s intelligence chief and the war room reveals plot to create a casus belli for war with Syria by using ISIL, an alQaeda offshoot, to threaten a turkish shrine Suleiman Shah Tomb. Turkey has blocked youtube in order to cover up the leaks. Turkish Foreign Ministry confirmed the recording of planning for a military incursion into Syria adding that a ‘network of treason’ was responsible for leak. Part two of the leaked conversation implicates John Kerry US secretary of state in the plot.
On Al Jazeera news the other night was shown ‘rebel’ groups in Syria openly flying the flag of al Qaeda,
George Bush, both junior and senior are likely to be well pleased with such and outcome,the House of Saud positively beaming and i am sure that Barak Obama can offer up an eloquent piece of oratory about a homeless al Qaeda providing stability in a war torn region without the merest hint of an outright guffaw…
From the Herald:
“Dairy product prices had the biggest drop in almost 20 months at Fonterra’s latest GlobalDairyTrade auction as whole milk powder fell to its lowest level in more than a year…..”
But never mind. The Government will be prepared to subsidise the industry since it is the one shot mainstay of the NZ economy.
hate to spoil the party but until someone comes up with a viable alternative then dairy for better or for worse is the bedrock of the economy so if you want teevees, cars, aeroplane rides to exotic foreign destinations then dont knock it. oh and dont forget teachers wages.
Hate to spoil the party and the little homily by captain hook but everyone realises how we rely on dairy.
And we are angry that this reliance is maintained and fostered so putting us ever further in a precarious one shot position.
If anything goes wrong it could turn to custard, and indeed we might have to live on custard as we would have a huge oversupply of milk. Then we would get huge river pollution as dairy farmers had to spread it on their paddocks or dump it in the river. Blow on blow it would be. And our government would probably hop on their jets and operate the Cabinet from somewhere in Sydney near a casino.
We would be far better off if we made the TVs, cars and aeroplanes than trying to forever produce more farming on a very small part of the world.
Perhaps if the world was going to continue in its present form but it isn’t, is it – so making TV’s cars and planes are really sunset industries with a unlikely future. Sustainable farming, diversity, and non-monocropping (including dairy), planting trees and food forests and so on would be much better ways to go than creating consumables even really big ones imo.
True but it’s a good example of diversification.
Although I agree with all of that there’s not a lot of diversification there.
We also, IMO, have to get away from regarding computers and phones as consumables. First off they’re necessary to modern life and that isn’t going to change even with power down. Secondly, these days they should be lasting about 5 years or more each.
Is modern life sustainable?
No but some parts of it are and they’re also desirable, i.e, make life better. Computers are part of that because they help make communications and thus democracy better, help to make better plans for limited resources and, of course, means that we can maintain the massive productivity that allows us to have a life of plenty that can be extended to everyone.
That’s true. One question that arises is how can things be produced to last and still be made by businesses? How did businesses make themselves sustainable back when products were made to last?
They didn’t and a hell of a lot of them got direct or indirect government funding to set up and continue.
Please note: I’m not against government funding of services, I’m against the people who profit from that government funding claiming that they did it all by themselves.
Computers won’t make it I suspect, as JMG says, and I agree with,
http://thearchdruidreport.blogspot.co.nz/2014/01/seven-sustainable-technologies.html
This life of plenty is an illusion even now and it is folly to believe that it can be extended to everybody. Much better imo to front up and rediscover technologies and techniques that are sustainable in the world we are creating.
All of which already exist or if it doesn’t exist can be built up from what already does. Hell, we could make it from scratch using the basic knowledge that we already have. Energy for manufacture will be a problem in some places but NZ isn’t one of them.
That’s the bit that JMG doesn’t get – we’re not going to de-industrialise. We’ll probably use less than we do now but we won’t stop using it altogether and in many places we’ll use more – like those automated bike factories that I was talking about.
We’re still going have tractors down at the farms but they’ll be electric rather than diesel. Nanometre are already electric and so the change will be from using fossil fuels to produce that electricity to using renewables. Really, about the only thing that we’ll lose is cars and I’m pretty sure that most people will come to see that as a Good Thing.
and computers laptops smartphones guzzle power like there isno tomorrow
maybe dotcom should announce he is going to be build a server farm in nz powered by solar and wind…
But we have enough power and it’s renewable anyway.
Why? The Greens have already said that they’re going to help people put solar power on their roof. Just need both the Greens and Labour to announce that they’re going to replace all fossil fueled generation with wind, solar and geothermal from purely NZ resources.
It is the ‘paid for’ bit that is the key draco.
Your idealistic belief that we won’t deindustrialise is quaint and doesn’t stack up – and this idea that magially renewables will fill the void left when (relatively) cheap energy effectively runs out – well JMG has smashed that one to bits numerous times – it’s up there with aliens arriving to save everything.
Nope. Money isn’t a problem and never has been. As long as we have people to do the job and the necessary physical resources then we can “pay” for it all.
And that’s load of bollocks as well. We have enough energy available now to produce everything. Build a few hundred wind turbines (yes, we have enough resources) and we no longer need the fossil fueled generators.
It’s not a question “cheap” as in do we have enough money but do we have enough resources. The answer to the latter is yes we do.
Both you and JMG have proven, time and time again, that you haven’t got a friggen clue as to what economics is. Not that that’s surprising – neither do the economists.
“Both you and JMG have proven, time and time again, that you haven’t got a friggen clue as to what economics is.”
lol – you are such an egotistical dreamer.
Computers should be lasting far more than 5 years. My last laptop lasted eight years. That’s without trying too hard, and I’m a bit hard on them in terms of use. The main reason for having to buy a new one is that after 8 years the parts are no longer available for repair, so they could last a lot longer.
My cell phone is 7 years old. It’s about to die, but I can’t see a technical reason why it couldn’t be repaired.
IME, computers tend to get replaced more because of the need for more computing power than the computer breaking. My last computer lasted me six years before I upgraded – I still have it and still use it even (It’s my Linux box (minus the box)). My last cell phone is sitting on my desk in near perfect condition including the battery (really, why is it that people don’t know how to look after batteries any more?).
There isn’t a technical reason – there’s a cost reason and the a new cell phone is a hell of a lot better reason. The real problem is that it won’t be recycled either and that comes down to the cost reason again (Yeah, it’s still “cheaper” to unsustainably dig up more resources than it is to recycle resources already dug up and processed).
Lolz weka, i beat up on my old second hand laptop so bad that the ivories have taken to separating from the little rubber cones underneath them that give them their bounce,
Always adaptable and way too cheap to spend upon a tube of glue i have a.s.d.e. all sitting on bits of scrunched up rolly paper(minutely measured i might add by my radial optical metrical laser to the nth degree),which does the trick nicely,
(i feel and urge coming on to hang out my ‘computer repairs” shingle, any takers)…
You say that your last laptop worked for 8 years. The reason that they are replaced, usually quite a lot before that, is that Moore’s law continues to operate. A new computer will have about 32 times the power of one that is 8 years old.
I replaced my desk top about a month ago. The only reason for doing so is that Microsoft have dropped support for Windows XP and Windows 8.1 won’t really run on a 5 year old system. I wasn’t willing to use Internet banking on a system with no security updates.
I also bought a new cell phone the other day. It cost the grand total, including $20 worth of time, of $17. It would cost about $17 for a repair shop to decide that an old phone wasn’t actually working without even thinking about repairing it.
There is no technical reason why they cannot be fixed but it doesn’t make any economic sense to do so.
Hmmm my last cellphone is a land-line.
There are of course economic reasons to repair them – you’re just not factoring in the subsidised development costs, the discounting of the actual cost to manufacture by the phone companies who make their profit from their contracts not from the phone itself, the subsidised cost of manufacture via cheap labour, the cost and use of the mineral extraction, the costs associated with deliberate built in obsolesence and the cost of the disposal of waste.
If you factored those in there there’s clearly good economic reasons to repair them.
“hate to spoil the party but until someone comes up with a viable alternative then dairy for better or for worse is the bedrock of the economy so if you want teevees, cars, aeroplane rides to exotic foreign destinations then dont knock it. oh and dont forget teachers wages.”
Yeah, nah. There’s something wrong with that equation. We got sold the same line with tourism, so how come we need dairying now? If this is about economic growth, what’s going to come after dairying? And at what cost?
Besides, I thought we were all borrowing to pay for our teevees and overseas holidays.
Hidden over in the ‘Opinion’ section of the Herald online is an interesting piece by business reporter Chris Barton,
He provides a good analysis of DotCom’s recent loss at the Supreme Court where that Court was the final arbiter of DotComs attempt to ‘discover’ the evidence the US will use against Him at His New Zealand extradition hearing,
DotCom of course lost this case in a majority decision with the dissenting voice being that of Chief Justice Sian Elias,
Chris Barton’s opinion is that DotCom has been badly maligned by the Courts decision and He gives some compelling reasons why he has come to this conclusion,
i totally agree with Him,(no matter what i think of DotCom as a person), the New Zealand system of Justice requires a ‘no surprises’ discovery of evidence to be used in Courts against any accused and just because another Stated,(the US), is pursuing this prosecution of DotCom it cannot be right that New Zealand subjugate its legal system to match the whims or mores of a foreign State pursuing a case through our Courts,
Well worth a read for an explanation of the legal (un)niceties surrounding the Courts decision…
Yes. Read that yesterday. Very good summary of the article, bad.
Just as an afterthought on this Karol, perhaps the treatment being meted out to DotCom is the forerunner to what could be expected Corporations V Governments/others in a world ruled by the Trans-Pacfic Partnership…
Agreed.
Interesting to see the times the CJ is the dissenting opinion. Of note for me was her dissenting voice in a SC decision over council liability for certifiers. Not surprisingly I agree with her reasoning in that decision. BUT she is the dissenting voice too often for me to feel entirely comfortable about the bench on the SC.
Mana Party leader Hone Harawira is doing an ‘election year’ interview on RadioNZ National about…now…
Hone was very sharp and handled that interview really well. He made a good case for an alliance with TIP (The Internet Party), while also acknowledging that many in Mana were still wary of such – to be worked out when the Mana Party people get together (myself I’m still not convinced that a formal Mana-TIP alliance is the way to go).
Also talked up Annette Sykes on the ground campaigning. And Hone made it sound like he is networking well with some Labour MPs while also having a very good relationship with the Greens.
Yes i was well pleased to hear that Annette Sykes spent Her Christmas,(with help), door knocking every home in the Waiariki electorate,
There’s a simple message being delivered to the voters there and that is a vote for Te Ururoa Flavell is a vote for another 3 years of National Government,
Hone believes that the Mana Party machine in Waiariki,(with a smaller rohe to cover),is if anything better than His own in Te Tai Tokerau and with the Mana Party AGM in Rotorua this year i should think that the feet on the ground will be able to do another door knock,(hopefully the first one gathered a good data base of where the Mana Party/Maori Party voters are in the electorate as Mana need to pull apart the support Flavell has in the electorate),
i am still in ‘tai ho’ mode regarding the proposed Mana/internet Party alliance, it is the nuts and bolts of the ‘carve up’ when it comes to the relevant strengths of the perceived % gained at the election that will convince me,
i ‘see’ a possible four MP’s coming from such an alliance, IF the proposed ‘carve up’ were to put Annette,Hone and John Minto +one from the Internet Party into the next Parliament then it is probable looking from this far out that i will cast a Party Vote their way,
i don’t see the Internet Parties lack of Social Policy to be a problem, this is obviously well covered by Mana just as the reverse is true surrounding ‘internet issues’, so if they both adopt each other’s relevant policies there isn’t really any discord inherent,
Hone made one small slip of the tongue when He said there were ‘other arrangements’ surrounding the Waiariki electorate, and then lolz, wished He hadn’t,all in all tho a very good display from the Mana Party leader on the radio this morning…
how would such an outcome, four seats to mana impact the makeup of parl based on the recent poll figures?
@karol +100…yes i think Mana is going to attract a lot of votes with Dotcom…very impressive interview with Hone Harawira and Kathryn Ryan asked the hard questions
I was impressed with the way that he handled that interview. He came across as relaxed, confident and to the point.
Mana and the Internet Party have common ground if you that good internet access is a way out of poverty.
When people like Duncan Garner talk like this:
‘Dotcom wants internet freedom. Many of Hone’s rural supporters in outback Hokianga and Kaikohe don’t even own computers, let alone have super-fast broadband at their doorstep.
Hone wants jobs, opportunities and better wages; Dotcom wants to stay in NZ.’
They’re talking as though they can’t imagine a world where Maori in rural Kaikohe and the Hokianga use computers to access the web, and this speaks volumes about the kinds jobs they see them doing. It’s an unthinking, casual kind of assumption that sees poverty as a kind of entrenched natural order.
If poverty is an inability to participate in society then the internet is a powerful tool that can break down the barriers that prevent participation.
The people of rural Hokianga and Kaikohe should have computers as well as super-fast broadband because it’s a path towards jobs, opportunities and better wages for them.
+1
as many are now contemplating- internet access is a basic citizenship right these days.
yeah. i was impressed with that interview too. i see a way forward with mana & the internet party joining forces. the internet party want a revolution, so do mana. its very exciting stuff, a total new way of doing things. & really could get that missing vote, to paraphrase a blog i read yesterday, “no wonder the suits are shitting themselves”. indeed~!
Labour (UK) at “crossroads”; warned against “pale shade of austerity”
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/apr/01/ed-miliband-election-unite-financial-support-len-mccluskey
And the same would be true of NZ Labour. ATM, it’s too busy being good to business and forgetting the people.
the key is getting those workers who have swallowed the rhetoric, and been given more money if not in a union, to see the downside.
Especially as unions are there for non union members badly treated, maybe that has to change? Those who pile vitriol on unions seem to overlook that many unions will act for an unjustifiably dismissed worker who did not join the union… as long as they join from that point. That doesn’t smack of a bullying fee hungry organisation but rather one that genuinely gives a toss about workers
A good lawyer will do a much better job of handling an employment dispute if the worker has a case. You could save the union fee in a fund, and draw on it once a decade when you need an employment lawyer.
A much better job than what? A much better job than if the employee doesn’t have a case? Obviously.
A much better job of handling the case than a good union’s lawyer? You have no evidence to support that.
A good lawyer would do a much better job than a bad union’s bad lawyer? Obviously.
You comment is, at best, a baseless claim. At worst it’s a waste of space.
calling bs on that srylands.
and you wont get health or disability cover from your lawyer or the higher wage union members tend to enjoy.
in a fund you say? like lombard finance or scf or bridgecorp or….
Or you could pay the union fee and get the ongoing benefits like increased wages every year.
I won’t bother telling you you’re a wanker, SSLands. Plenty already have, and you take it as a compliment to your self sufficiency.
I will state the obvious: an employment dispute can be handled by a lawyer when the employee has very specific and in demand skills, and is difficult to replace. And no, I don’t mean overpaid CEOs or consultants, who should be a dime a dozen. Under your system, the average worker would have less rights than they have today. You should understand leverage, but obviously don’t. You are an idiot, and deserve the world you are trying to make. The rest of us don’t.
Labour is putting party before the Scottish workers. The current Scottish Labour leader in the Scottish Parliament, Johann Lamont, is very ineffective. The Scottish Nationalist Party has more votes and credibility than Labour. http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/msps.aspx
Labour in Westminster and the Scottish Labour leadership was caught out collaborating with the Tories in saying that the Pound will not be a currency option for an Independent Scotland. It has come out now that this stance was purely a bullying tactic.
http://www.heraldscotland.com/politics/referendum-news/swinney-condemns-currency-bluff.1396364298
Labour in Scotland will get punished severely in the referendum in September. Labour in England will be seen to have been wrong on Scotland and too close to the Tories on the independence question. They will get punished in time for that also. This is a great pity as it might let the Tories win the next general election. Ironically the increasing likelihood of a Tory win in Westminster is the best bet for the people of Scotland. The Tories have only ONE (1) Scottish seat in Westminster.
Jackson has an aircraft which cost him $80 million and who knows how much to run. It is probably a managed asset, viz. available for charter. He has made it available in the search. We can hardly expect it to be deployed at his personal cost.
We should also hardly expect that a business transaction be trumpeted as ‘Jackson Kiwi Icon’. There is a hint of that implication in the style of the Herald coverage unfortunately.
If in this case Jackson’s kind heart is to the fore let us hear about it. If not STFU Herald. Unless of course you want to do a pap piece on Air NZ provincial and the rental car company I availed to meet needs on the occasion of my brother’s untimely death in the South Island.
Oligarchy is not perfumed.
“We can hardly expect it to be deployed at his personal cost.”
Why not?
Jackson’s plane, according to the news report I heard this morning, is faster and has a longer range than anything our airforce has. Of course, a search requires that the plane go as slow as it possibly can and that it have the actual equipment to do the search which I doubt that Jackson’s plane has. In other words, this is nothing but a PR exercise for Jackson.
they said on the news that it was for running messages – my immediate response was – cellphones? radio? satellite phone? email?
what are these messages that require a plane to deliver them?
jackson can do what he likes with his plane – but its weird that this is running as the lead, most important story of a news bulletin
Came here to post about this being the top story on the news. Matt D’s remarks are hilarious: “A lot of civilian and military aircraft are involved in the search and it’s kind of disappointing that because one is owned by a celebrity it becomes a matter of news when there are [over] 200 people missing.”
Not nearly as disappointing as you getting NZ law changed to suit yourselves.
i think the message being ‘run’ might be Jackson crying ”look at me me me me me me me”…
Or a tax write off/ rebate for owning the jet, the only thing going for it is it has rather long legs apart form that bugger all as the Observers down the back have relay the good old Mk1 eyeball to spot anything down there
None. As you say, the airforce will have all required electronic communications. There’s no need for face to face comms either.
Well, the international search coordinators seem to think they needed a communications relay.
My understanding is that the search aircraft are flying at low level. That will cut their radio range, including data links.
Even if all aircraft and ships had satellite comms, chartering a relay aircraft might be a faster, more reliable, or simply a backup option to coordinate the search.
The fact it is jackson’s jet is beside the point – it would have been leased via an aircraft lease company on the basis of what was available with the specific endurance, size and communications capabilities. The reason it has been chartered – by the Australians, not John Key – is to provide communications relay. The search area is far enough off shore that it means low flying planes won’t necessarily be able to communicate clearly with Perth.
The jet has significant endurance so will likely fly out to the search area and fly around in circles at its most economical speed and altitude. It has an endurance of probably 15 hours which means it can be on station at dawn and leave at dusk – and coordinate the 20 odd search planes that come and go over the whole day. Bear in mind the search planes are actually flying at maybe 1500 feet. The air force plans have much shorter endurances and in any case using one of them to co-ordinate would leave one less search plane.
McFlock and nadis
ahh – thanks for that – didnt realise the bit re: altitude and radio range
still dont see how its the most important story of the day – did nothing of greater importance really not happen?
Sorry Guys,
Some of what you lot have said a are wrong,
Your standard Maritime/ SAR Mission heights once on station are about 250 to 300ft off the deck (sea level) and it also depends on the current sea state/ weather or both especially in southern ocean at this time of the year. Also the wing span of the P3 Orion is 150ft long and if they are flying on 3 engines, 90% of all Maritime Ops are on 3 engines once on station as this increase the amount of time on station weather permitting.
But this height there is very little room for error if something goes wrong esp you hit one those large birds down south ” the feather type”. If any of you get a chance to do a Maritime Patrol on P3 they bloody fun and you get watch 13 plus aircrew work their butts off. Its some of the best teamwork you would ever see anywhere.
The RAAF has deployed one of its Wedgetail “Airborne Early Warning Control Aircraft” to control the rather crowded Airspace also act as a re trans (radio) relay to the ships and back to land.
I know some here hate or don’t like the RNZAF P3’s and want the RNZAF to have a cheaper /Short range MPA “I hope you have a change of heart after this operation” . But they are prefer aircraft that AMSA/ RAAF want to use due too the recent sensor upgrade they got under Labour. Some on the ground are saying its better than the sensors on broad the P8 MPA (design to replace the P3) and the RNZAF crews know how operated in the Southern Oceans unlike the other Nations taking part in the recovery effort in other words the go too people.
The only thing wrong with the RNZAF’s P3s is that they’re beyond their lifespan. Basically, we need some new aircraft even if it is just some new P3s.
True, they have been RNZAF service since 1965-66, but they starting to like my granddads old axe ie the P3’s have that many rebuilds in the last 15yrs that they almost new aircraft and more than any other P3 operator in the world that’s including USN and RAAF who have been operating them the longest.
Under National they had a major Structure rebuild including new wings and wing box that RNZAF/ MOD and Safe Air pioneer, that’s after Lockheed said it can’t be done! It’s a good thing that the MOD and Safe Air copyright their idea for 50yrs plus. It expected the with that rebuild they would at least another 20yrs out of them (look how long the B52 has been USAF service) but only issue from what I’ve told is the engines.
Labour has given them 3 sensor upgrades, Rigel 1, Rigel 2 and the last sensor which has been the most complex and technical upgrade done by any P3 user to date.
Can i see the script of the next Jackson epic being written as His jet streaks across the sky of the search area,
Perhaps wee Pete is on board hoovering up ideas and atmosphere so as to have a clue how to script something other than the usual pap written by someone else that He prefers…
What do we think of it so far?–the Guyon and Susie show…
Is there a “main stream” media front person anywhere in the whole country that is not a filthy tory or closet filthy tory?
I listened to a couple of reports online. I’m not inclined to listen to the whole programmes – I’d rather skim through the topics online & select.
Good report on power companies profiteering from the poor.
On fare evasions on Auckland trains – they only focused on fare evading and the Auckland Transport approach. They didn’t ask why many (focus on furthest out from the city in west Auckland) evade fares – the most obvious thingthat was ignored, is the high cost to those in transport poverty, for a low to medium quality service.
A report with no context and limited in depth analysis.
Auckland Transport have made it so that it’s possible to walk onto some stations and then the trains without paying first and then it’s a simple act of being missed by the fare wardens. I assume they did this for speed to roll out the AT Hop card. It’s certainly not to do with cost as the proper equipment will need to be rolled out eventually and will cost more later.
And then there’s the reasons as to why people are evading fares.
Are AT socialists?
They’re doing news and current affairs, not investigative journalism.
How was Farrar’s reporting on Cunliffe? Was he selectively posting the transcript?
If not…
Cunliffe’s interview today with NewstalkZB. Ugh. I’m done. His response to a question about his time in government “well, let’s talk about Hollyoake or when Muldoon was a boy”. Fuck that. That is such an intellectually dishonest answer.
How about you own your time in government, David? Say what you did right. Say what you did wrong, why you did it then, what’s changed now and explain why you’re changing what you previously did. Explain these things to the voter. Treat them with a little respect.
All he did today was basically do a John Key “pfft” and ensure that National can keep talking about his time in government. Unless Farrar is playing tricky himself with the transcript.
For example, on hitting the straps with NZ Power, what sounds better?
A: Look, National needs to grow up. Helen Clark isn’t in power anymore. They can’t complain about what we did. I’m not going to talk about that. We might as well talk about Muldoon if we’re going to do that.
B: Look, I’m proud of what the Fifth Labour Government achieved and I’m glad I got the experience to be under the leadership of Helen. But, let’s be clear. We got some things wrong. We allowed energy prices to soar. My future government won’t make that same mistake. We understand that this hurts people, National doesn’t. That’s why we’re taking action. That’s why we’re campaigning on NZ Power.
It’s not hard. Cunliffe is leaving a lot to be desire as leader.
Was the interview today or yesterday?
This one on ZB yesterday with callers asking him questions?
It must have been part one.
The question the righties have been slamming has to do with power prices
Transcript:
Before this, in response to a question from a caller Cunliffe talks of seeing first hand when he was first an PM, seeing people living in energy poverty. He talks about the current way the electricity market is working badly for people.
Fookes asks Cunliffe about the figures he uses from 2008 onwards:
Damn – hit submit by accident before I’d finished transcribing.
But, yeah, I’d say the rightie transcript was pretty selective cherrypicking.
Cunliffe then talks about having worked on this since 2001 and that he and Parker have a thorough knowledge of the issues. Cunliffe then talks about the wider context is one of increasing cost of living.
Then comes the above righies’ cherry-picked transcript.
Thanks Karol. That reads really well from Cunliffe, imo.
” It’s time they manned up and took some responsibility. They cannot get away with excuse after excuse, wah, wah, wah, it was different under Helen Clark. Sorry, guys, grow up”
😀
Great to hear he was on ZB – I don’t bother myself.
Thankyou for taking the time to transcribe for us.
Last week I had a banger of a courtesy car from the panel beater. I could only get ZB! It is an appalling reactionary shit hole. Cunliffe was courageous to go on air there. I respect his cojones is trying to engage with their listeners.
Hmm. That’s certainly better from Cunliffe. But I still think he should be more proactive on both celebrating and reflecting on his previous time in government.
Thanks, Karol for providing the fuller picture! Much appreciated.
“How was Farrar’s reporting on Cunliffe? Was he selectively posting the transcript?”
Good on you for being sceptical…
Farrar doesn’t report, he spins and he massages for his “side”.
Unlike say, Slater, I have a fair bit of time for Farrar. But yeah, you can’t take everything he says at face value. There’s a fair bit of spin to wade through.
i dont read or click through to slater. i will occassionally read farrar. i dont like the tone of many of kiwiblogs commenters but david doesnt seem to stoop.
he rarely publishes the other side if it is unhelpful to him or his side… hence he wont post the correction to keys fabricated figures.
I got the transcript from another right wing blog – keeping stock I think.
so it was possible to get the transcript right. …
It was a partial transcript, I transcribed more of the ZB programme – mainly stuff on the same topic to give context to the selective right wing transcript.
The blogger took exception to Cunliffe having a go at National.
imagine attacking national… when the right is pretending the right isnt indulging in smear and attacks on cunliffe and the greens….
the right can be such sensitive wee sausages.
Thanks Karol. Even as a transcript you can hear the passion and this should reach the ears of prospective voters.
Cunliffe is doing heaps of interviews and doing them well. He has found his stride in the leadership role. He was always brilliant being interviewed when he was a minister. It is different job when leader and he has now got it.
Cunliffe is stratospheric when compared to Shearer. Thanks Marya Street for rolling him.
he’s also getting around the country, as are the greens. Clark did this very well in 1998 and 1999. She understood that meeting people in the flesh has a lasting impact, and doesn’t reply ont he media spreading your message.
Thank you Wyndham and Tracey for your positive observations. Apart from that little Trust donation hiccup I have only viewed Cunliffe as being consistent, clear and steady and don’t understand why his would- be supporters such as Maureen, above, are turning off him, unless they are well and truly under the spell of the media and Henny Penny stories of the sky falling in.
As for getting around the country – it would be fantastic if he were to come to Ohariu and speak. We need his presence here and he needs to show his support for our new candidate (after the bubba is due). Stephanie Rodgers mentioned the other day she was on the Labour campaign team for Ohariu – Stephanie, is there any chance of having David Cunliffe to talk on our turf?
At this stage National haven’t put a candidate up (although I need to look into this) and the local gossip is that they won’t, and that they will rely on Dunne to retain the seat, because like bad12’s Waiariki Flavell/Sykes example above, a vote for Dunne is a vote for another 3 years of National.
Nat candidates: I guess TBA = To Be Announced(?)
http://www.mynational.org.nz/Category?Action=View&Category_id=389
Is Maureen a would be supporter? I though she was a died in the wool Nat who spins a line that she would vote but….etc etc. Perhaps I mis-read her intent.
Well it is curious ianmac.
At 5.2.1.1. at 10.12am Maureen states “I want to feel proud of belonging to the Labour party….” so I’m assuming she is actually a member. She also says she wants a strong Labour Green alliance. But these words are at odds somehow as the tone expresses alarmed “concern” and accusation that Cunliffe is personally failing her and friends and family.
It did set off a whole BM led tangent, so maybe they are in cahoots?
I did wonder if she was a concern troll…
“Thank you Wyndham and Tracey for your positive observations.”
+1, much appreciated. We need to balance out the criticisms and critiques I think.
Campbell live last night did an interesting little piece on the savings to be gained from doing the fruit and vege shopping at the local Sunday market,
Having for the first time taken the plunge,(its only taken 58 years a mere blink in the fabric of history), and visited the Harbuor-side Market here in Wellington on Sunday i can confirm the savings suggested on the Campbell Live program are possible,
i was going to leave commenting on the relevant prices between market/supermarket until i had spent at least a month doing such a split shopping so i could get a proper ‘feel’ for the overall prices between the two,
i can say tho that for the same spend that i normally do in the supermarket on fruit and vege i tripled the amount of fruit i usually buy and my normal weeks vege was definitely cheaper in most cases by more than a dollar for each item,
Such savings tho have to be balanced against the transport cost of getting to your local market but having also done this weeks ‘general’ grocery shop i can say that there is a definite plus either way, dollars saved/increased amount of fruit and vege for dollars spent…
you can also save money by eating seasonable fruit and veggies and by preserving the summer fruit.
I no longer shop at my local supermarket (Countdown) and have shopped at a local fruit and veg store for some time. The prices are sometimes better, not more expensive BUT quality is WAY better.
Yes, I saw that and was a little rueful because I work on Sundays. Will check out where the nearest market is though and try to visit.
The bonus for me is that with my pile of stuffed bones i was only just managing to get around the whole supermarket,using the trolley as a walking frame, i imagine makes me look like Quasimoto, and back to the car,
i have been thinking for months that it is nearly time to do the shopping via the internet and have it delivered but stupid me would rather suffer the pain than ‘give up’,
Effectively splitting the shopping in half works for me on that level as well as being of benefit to the pocket,(lolz i have packets of painkillers here that i look at thinking i refuse to become hooked on that),
i will try the market over at the Newtown School next, the literature on the web says that prices are cheaper at that one…
The Newtown School market on Saturdays is good, bad12. It is not as big as the Harbourside market, but you can get a good range of fruit/vegs – very fresh etc provided you go in the morning and don’t leave it until early afternoon in hot weather. It is usually all over by about 2.30pm. Newtown prices are excellent IMO and probably lower than the Harbourside market as they cater to a lower income clientele.
Nice one vv, am definitely an early bird, was just wondering to myself a few minutes ago are they the same growers at both markets,
Hell i was rapt with the prices at the Harbour-side one, avacado a dollar something each,
One other question, what’s the parking like first thing at the school???…
“One other question, what’s the parking like first thing at the school???…”
Terrible. I parked in the hospital last Saturday. I’ll watch out for you.
Running shoes might be a requirement to do that SSLands, what sort of dork,oops sorry i mean economist comes all the way from the Kapiti Coast into South Wellington to buy a bit of fruit and vege…
One who has a daughter living in the city who wants to be taken shopping.
Ha-Ha-Ha SSLands, that is just soooo funny on sooo many levels and simply leaves you wide open for me to reveal to you even more of the bad vein of nastiness that runs through my mind with every comment you make here at the Standard,
It is tho late so for tonight you can escape my wrath, but, if your that soft in the head i do have a slightly used bridge for sale….
If S Rylands is parking in the hospital carpark, he is risking a heavy parking fine as the hospital is now clamping down hard on people parking there and going to the market, and not legitimately there to visit the hospital.
I have never had a problem with parking, bad12. Don’t bother with Mein Street – almost impossible, but there are a couple of little side streets close to the school off the main drag where I have always found a park. In particular in the side street going to the main entrance to the school at the main road junction where Rintoul and Riddiford Streets meet. At the end of that street, there is also a public parking area on the school grounds right next to the market.
My understanding is that some growers supply all the markets while others just do some of the markets.or just one. I also understand that the actual sellers at the markets vary – sometimes the actual growers or their family/staff/ friends; and others use sellers employed strictly to sell the produce at the market.
I have also been pleased to note that Karbosh (?) and other similar organisations that are donated food to redistribute to the needy are well supported by the sellers at the Newtown market later in the day when the market is ending.
Yeah vv, as far as Kabosh goes, don’t they do a great job, the amount of food they collect and recycle is phenomenal, not sure of it was 12,000 tonne or 120,000 tonne in a year,
Even down at the local community hall there is now an unofficial food-bank running a couple of days a week, it started with bread but has now grown to include fruit and veg every now and then,(presumably via Kabosh),
Lolz, i could stop in there and get some freebies but the remaining shreds of my personal honesty prohibit me to do so on the basis that my particular budget,(at the moment), leaves me with enough to pay for the stuff so its best to leave the ‘freebies’ for others that have higher costs and less skills at budgeting….
(Karbosh? Kabosh? Kaibosh? lolz unsure but i got the picture)…
“Kaibosh” – here is a link to their website
http://www.kaibosh.org.nz/
They have a list of their current donors (including the Newtown Market) under the “Who donates?” in the dropdown box entitled “Donate food”. Island Bay NW is not listed but I have seen their trucks there regularly over recent months.
On general principles, once you decide to give up on physical activity because you find it difficult, you enter a downward spiral where you eventually stop doing more and more.
Better to stay active as long as you possibly can.
Definitely Lanth, was my point about seeing not doing the shopping as ‘giving in’,my bones tho don’t allow me much free range activity,
So its a matter of thinking up the methodology of getting what physical activity i need to and can do in smaller bites than what i have been used to accomplishing all my life,(my method of digging my garden still has me sniggering at myself, the important thing tho is that it works and keeps the pain level below that of the ‘handful of broken glass’ in the joints which is the point at which i begin again my love affair with the painkillers)…
I did my first shift at the Avondale Market last Sunday, with my Labour Party rosette and pamphlets exhorting people to a) make sure they are on the electoral roll and b) make sure they vote (for Labour, of course). I had not been to that market before and I was absolutely gobsmacked at the amount of produce available and the excellent quality – it certainly made me think seriously about how to purchase fruit and veges in the future and other stuff, obviously. It was also an eye opener watching people with families fossicking through boxes of well used blankets, rugs and other household items – it was fairly obvious that they could not afford to purchase these goods from retail outlets – even, the Warehouse, K-Mart, Briscoes etc.
As an aside, did anyone else consider that John Key had consumed far too much wine at that business luncheon today at Takapuna – his speech seemed to be rather more slurred and mangled than usual. Perhaps he needs the Piri Weepu stroke test. Just saying!!
Watching Simon Bridges n Campbell live. OMG What a simple Simon… Shudder to think he’s in charge of anything to do with me.
His way of speaking is painful to warch.
I can’t even bear to listen to him or to see him. There is something about him that sends my blood pressure soaring, It’s verging on the irrational…………….
.I missed Campbell tonight but assume the interview was about his giddy excitement about issuing tons more mining exploration permits for our land and sea. I haven’t even started on his E.R.A Amendment Bill which passed it’s second reading last week, that will take away from workers their right to a break as well as including about 7 or 8 Union busting amendments….
An abhorrent man.
Words do fail to describe my thoughts about him.
I haven’t decided if he’s genuinely thick, or purposefully speaking slowly so as to draw out the interview in order to reduce the number of questions he has to answer as well as give his brain more time to work out what he’s going to say next.
its the haircut that gives him away. what an infantile ‘do. does he think he’s gonna impress sum skoolgurls or sumfing. he doesn’t look like he knows anything about anything and what comes out of his gob verges on nonsense that hooton writes to confuse people.
uggggggggghhhh.
Is that the best the national party can do.
They specialise in lowbrows but he is the bottom of the barrel.
“They specialise in lowbrows but he is the bottom of the barrel.”
I agree he is the bottom of the barrel, but as far as lowbrows (and poor haircuts) go, Nathan Guy is in the club too, in all senses of the word.
Lolz, just in behind wee simple Simons eyes lies a snake, as Slippery the Prime Minister has anointed wee Simon as the future of the National Party i dare say if we stick around long enough we will get to see this snake really hiss…
SEIZED THE MOMENT!
Went out to the wilds of the North Harbour Stadium today, to try and catch NZ PM John Key giving his address to business leaders.
Ended up with it just outside the entrance to the Stadium and caught lots of business types in very flash cars coming out.
Didn’t see the PM – but I’m sure someone will have passed the message on….
Just me and this banner – which got a rather ungentlemanly response from 3 older males (all gave me the fingers! HOW RUDE!
Moment seized and sorted – there will be a ripple amongst those who fly at 30,000 feet …………
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151885282121790&set=t.100000081045781&type=3&theater
Penny Bright
+100 Go GIRL!
Hey Penny, be prepared, yourself or a friend, with a camera next time and make sure you snap some pictures of those pricks.