It's badly considered implementation will also lead to further division along racial lines.
If the current government wanted to create a programme that provoked backlash against Māori, they couldn't have done better than what they have done with education, co-governance and this type of policy:
Auckland surgeons are now being required to consider a patient’s ethnicity alongside other factors when deciding who should get an operation first.
Several surgeons say they are upset by the policy, which was introduced in Auckland in February and gave priority to Māori and Pacific Island patients – on the grounds that they have historically had unequal access to healthcare.
Inequality is not addressed by switching the players.
That just means it is a different demographic that is now experiencing it.
If Maori and PIs are amongst the most needy so far as medical care is concerned, then they will be more likely to receive priority on the basis of need without needing to reference race at all.
A system based on need is intrinsically fair, and easy for people to understand and accept.
Firstly, how do you operationalise the term "Maori" because that can vary a lot depending on the percentage of Maori ancestory a person has. And, also is likely to be reflected in outcomes.
Secondly, does your research include multi-factorial analysis? Because, there will likely be a high overlap between Maori/PI and groups represented in poverty or low income. If that is the case, then targeting need should also target those at risk communities. Whereas, targeting groups on the basis of race will capture a lot of people who aren't disadvantgaged due to specific life circumstances.
Finally, don't you think the issue is really at a more fundamental level than surgical operations? Shouldn't we be targeting the root causes that lead to the outcomes you describe?
Shouldn't we be targeting the root causes that lead to the outcomes you describe?
Indeed 'we' should, given those disgraceful outcomes. Your questions are intriguing, but imagine the shoe was on the other foot – wouldn't you want something done in a timely manner, until "targeting the root causes" took effect?
A quote from Mac1's comment @1.3.2.1 (copied below) sums it up for me.
Māori have the highest rate of lung cancer in the world with three times the mortality rate and a 7 year gap in life expectancy compared to non-Māori. This high mortality stems mostly from late presentation, delays in treatment and low surgical rates for early stage disease.
Some Kiwis simply don't believe that long-standing (race-based) inequality of health outcomes justifies immediate positive discrimination – convenient eh?
Also, HT II @1.8
Treatment under our health system must be colour blind, like our justice system is meant to be.
A quote from Mac1's comment @1.3.2.1 (copied below) sums it up for me….
But, that still doesn't answer the question, really. I think it is important to know the criteria on which the group was divided into Maori and Non-Maori. For instance, would someone with 5% Maori blood be in the Maori or Non-Maori group?
And, how does that figure change once relevant variables such as income, education status, and similar factors are controlled for.
Quite often, when doing multi-variate analysis, the surface level effect will often disappear or become inconsequential when over-lapping factors are controlled for.
So, once those factors are controlled for, we might find that poorly educated people from low socio-economic backgrounds are more prone to poor health outcomes than those from better backgrounds, and that race has little to do with it.
Thus, interventions around health etc can be targetted much more accurately than on a broad, blunt dimension such as race, which includes both people who may need interventions, and those who don't.
But, that still doesn't answer the question, really. I think it is important to know the criteria on which the group was divided into Maori and Non-Maori. For instance, would someone with 5% Maori blood be in the Maori or Non-Maori group?
We don't use blood quantum in NZ. Māori afaik primarily use whakapapa to understand who is Māori. Another reason why it's inappropriate in this context is that the issue is ethnicity not race. Think of ethnicity as something that arises out of ancestry and culture. The bodies that we inherit play into health outcomes, and so does the culture we come from. Arguing that there should be no ethnicity factor, is saying that we should ignore both those things.
(as an aside, I'm curious now if illnesses with a very strong genetic component that pass through families are affected by how many great grandparents were of a specific ethnicity. I'm guessing no much other than increasing chance).
And yes, it's not possible to design a policy that is good and fair for every individual. No health policy reaches that standard, which is why we have public health. It's based on assessing data about populations.
So, once those factors are controlled for, we might find that poorly educated people from low socio-economic backgrounds are more prone to poor health outcomes than those from better backgrounds, and that race has little to do with it.
We already know it is both. When access to health care is shown to differ across ethnicities, we can understand the ethnicity side of it. Mac's prostate cancer example is a good one. One of the inequities is that the system enables Pākehā to get better access than Māori (beyond issues like poverty). I will see what research pops up in the debate over the next few days, but in my understanding this isn't controversial and has been known for a long time. I remember these issues being discussed in the 90s.
Weka, I guess the race/ethnicity side of the equation can really only relate to genetics. And, I assume those genetic effects would likely apply both to Maori and PI populations. For instance, the tendency for people from a Polynesian background to have higher BMIs, and the associated negative health outcomes that result.
But, while there may be a higher prevalence of individuals with high BMIs in Polynesian groups (including Maori), they also exist in other ethnicities.
Other factors that aren't genetic have to logically fit into the socio-economic basket which affects many people from a variety of ethnicities, though represented more highly by Maori and PI.
So, I think it is possible to set a specification of relevant factors, including genetic ones, that do not specify race or ethnicity at all, but still capture the target populations that are at most need.
If there is an issue of access, then that surely comes down to factors such as distance from health care, education etc. Surely, it is better to ensure those factors are correct in the first place. Because then a lot of problems can be solved before operations are even needed.
Weka, I guess the race/ethnicity side of the equation can really only relate to genetics.
I just explained that ethnicity is also about culture, in addition to ancestry. Being treated differently in the health system arises in part because people treat Māori differently based on perception and belief. Māori trying to access a system that doesn't understand their needs is Māori would be another example.
While it's possible separate out genetics sometimes, in a healthcare setting like a surgical ward, both factors are at play and it's just not feasible to ask Māori to leave culture at the door (although that is often what is done).
And, I assume those genetic effects would likely apply both to Maori and PI populations. For instance, the tendency for people from a Polynesian background to have higher BMIs, and the associated negative health outcomes that result.
But, while there may be a higher prevalence of individuals with high BMIs in Polynesian groups (including Maori), they also exist in other ethnicities.
Yes, which is why clinical relevance is one of the criteria.
Other factors that aren't genetic have to logically fit into the socio-economic basket which affects many people from a variety of ethnicities, though represented more highly by Maori and PI.
nope. Socioeconomic class is considered in the deprivation consideration. It's distinct from ethnicity. You don't have to be poor to get worse healthcare, you just have to be Polynesian.
So, I think it is possible to set a specification of relevant factors, including genetic ones, that do not specify race or ethnicity at all, but still capture the target populations that are at most need.
Meanwhile, the criteria were named in the article, and including ethnicity has good rationales that you haven't addressed. Your system would have bias against poor Māori conpared to poor Pākehā. Which is what we have now.
The issues you have outlined aren't really to do with the final surgical outcomes, which is where the controversy is. It is more to do with accessing the health system in the first place. I think that is the first issue that needs to be solved.
We could prioritise Maori and PIs in terms of surgery as much as we like, and the actual health outcomes may not improve all that much. Simply because the access problem has not been solved, so many slip through the net. And, if the behavioural aspects related to various conditions persist, then people may well lose the benefit of any health interventions fairly quickly any way.
But, I still don't think we need to focus on ethnicity. I think we need to focus on ensuring there is adequate doctors, for instance, in poorer areas so symptoms can be quickly identified, and ensuring people get good education about symptoms to look out for etc. And good education about how to prevent risk factors. For instance, smoking cessation interventions in communities with high smoking rates etc.
Opportunity of access used to solely depend upon capacity (and need)…now opportunity of access first depends upon (declared) ethnicity…that is not equality.
As capacity continues to decline the preferred ethnicity will obviously access the diminished access…that is where your backlash will present, as it already is.
Opportunity of access used to solely depend upon capacity (and need)…now opportunity of access first depends upon (declared) ethnicity…that is not equality.
I've not seen anything that says access first depends on ethnicity. So please present compelling evidence for your statement or withdraw it.
[you know better than that. Present your argument, use quotes, and back it up with the relevant link. I don’t have time to read whole webpages to try and parse your argument, the onus os on you – weka]
I think it is important to know the criteria on which the group was divided into Maori and Non-Maori.
Presumably there are agreed and reasonably robust criteria for identifying Māori Kiwis, otherwise it would be difficult to produce reliable statistics on the inequitous health and longevity outcomes for Māori and non-Māori.
It's just that whenever I read a list of questions that suggest improving something (anything) now might not be straightforward, I get the feeling that the authors of such lists are pretty comfortable with the status quo. Just a feeling, of course – perhaps there are Māori health experts who have raised questions similar to yours @1.2.1.1.
Finally, don't you think the issue is really at a more fundamental level than surgical operations? Shouldn't we be targeting the root causes that lead to the outcomes you describe?
From personal experience of a friend being told to "Come back if it gets worse", and having to pay for "no service".. I insisted she got tests or a second opinion.
A silence then Marina Maori woman aged 56 was grudgingly given a blood tests script. Result….
Diabetes and after further tests thyroid cancer. The delays are not always caused by the patient.
Now if they are saying, because Maori die earlier, 56 may be 63/4 and therefore race should be considered….but it is so triggering to the treat everyone the same = equity group. That actually favours the longer lived Europeans and Asians. imo
Note Marina died 2 years later, a year after her husband. Neither lived to receive the pension, but that is another race based equity battle for another day.
Inequities exist right across government for Maori.
This was recognised in the 80's for welfare with John Rangihuna's report Puao-Te-Ata-Tu and continues today in health and justice well outlined in documents such as Pharmac's equity report.
Any outrage that steps are being taken to address this in different organisations should be treated as the faux-outrage that it is and that it stems from either ignorance or racist dog-whistling.
The same bull-shit about about what makes a Maori, how do you prioritise, what if little white me misses out, etc has been trotted out for years and years while the actual practise has been well established.
Maori identity in NZ is is based upon direct whakapapa and self identification. Long may it stay that way. It is a cultural identification. It has nothing to do with race because as we all know, and as Darwin rightly said race is a non-sensical construct.
Darwin gently ribs them, pointing out that the range of races was anything between one and 63, depending on who’s counting.
Instead, he concludes, with typically voluminous evidence, that all races are indeed one species, and that proposed boundaries of physical or behavioural characteristics that separated the races were false, and the differences we see are graduated between different populations. He argues against racial essentialism – the idea that racial characteristics are fixed in populations.
The overseas experience of having to have a percentage of blood leads to silly situations esp for mixed race people where parents are deemed to be of one race and their children are not.
Prioritisation based on positive discrimination has always been on the basis of all things being equal and having a limited resource choice then you give precedence to the disadvantaged group.
That limited resource may be a job vacancy, a position on a course, an operation of which only so many are funded, the vaccine medication – which still didn't get it right by ignoring the broader issue of larger families, increased over crowding etc which meant you should have prioritised the whole family not just an age related occupant.
These things are not new and have been in place for years and years.
Employers do this sort of negative prioritisation all the time by flicking out the foreign name sounding CV's, or those over 50, or those who said something the employer doesn't like on facebook or blacklisting those who have taken personal grievances.
Where there are equity issues are in things like hospitals having people in them on staff who look like me and who can relate to me. Health has a long, long way to go with this. Once upon a time children of doctors were prioritised for medical school, children of chemists were next off the rank. As few doctors were Maori sufficient numbers could not get into medical school – regardless of ability as there simply were no spaces.
Maori were generous in giving land for hospitals and schools. Many of those rural hospitals and schools have been closed by successive governments meaning access is limited and more difficult. We talk about access as an individual problem but in reality it is us who chose not to fund rural health – and continue to make that choice.
It will take time to build up capacity for Maori to be more involved in health service provision to Maori. That we choose to try and do it seperately is also a failure – an inability to recruit, train and integrate into existing systems, and to once when in that system a preference to mould that person into a system image rather than have the system change.
I'd agree with you Molly, but I'd like to see the wording of the directive, as it might just be being misrepresented.
What we must acknowledge, and the medicos as well must recognise this, are the two decades of inequality that have elapsed since the first report (that I know of).
A good outcome will be that it is recognised that Māori did suffer for a long time with unequal treatment.
I am a prostate cancer survivor, and was treated quickly and well to achieve that status.
I am not happy to have been so well treated when I discovered later that my Māori brothers with prostate cancer for example were not afforded equal opportunities.
The source of my original information, reports all available on the Web, was actually my surgeon who addressed a prostate survivor's group and mentioned this injustice.
He was aware but within the NZ context it continued.
To add some more information to the 'inequality' of health provision, I would add another learning gained from Tom Scott's book on Charles Upham, VC and bar.
Scott mentioned that Māori soldiers returning from WW2 were excluded from rehab loans. That has just been in the news recently also.
Upham himself would have been outraged as Scott mentioned his hatred of racism towards Māori.
Thanks for the pdf, Mac1. I agree with need to scrutinise the wording, but given there has been indications of ethnic preference in Covid response, it doesn't appear to be a policy that has no precedents.
IF – this is in any way enacted – then it is entirely the wrong response for addressing inequity, because the solution itself contains inequity. Having some kind of universal rating system that is transparent, would be a responsive and equitable solution.
I'll have a closer look at the pdf and the references contained within. But my criticism of the solution proposed remains the same.
Fair enough, Molly. My research, such as it is, brings me to the conclusion now that perhaps in order for Māori to achieve equality in a system adjudged racist by a Pakeha oncologist, there needs to be 'preferential' treatment to get to equality since the contributing factors I outline in my opinion below at 1.3.2.1 will still apply, I'm sure.
It's already being enacted. Doctors in Auckland have been instructed to take race into consideration in establishing medical priority for treatment since the beginning of the year.
From the original article
A document on the equity adjustor which was leaked to Newstalk ZB shows two Māori patients, both aged 62 and who have been waiting more than a year, ranked above others on the list. A 36-year-old Middle Eastern patient who has been waiting almost two years has a much lower priority ranking.
Belladonna, what factors were considered beside ethnicity in the three diagnoses and prioritising? The article doesn't say- BUT there are more factors.
I am surprized that your surgeon is politicizing treatment Mac 1 I.e talking to patients about Maori access to health care. This is inappropriate in my opinion. By all means let him lobby whoever to get better treatment, but talking to vulnerable patients who have just had a brush with cancer?? Frankly I think that is disgraceful.
About 15 years ago when there was a scheme for free counselling (six sessions could be accessed via Primary Health Care). Funding was cut and the service only became available to those under 25 years and Maori.
So prioritizing people by race has been going on for sometime. My friend who is a psychologist told me about this. She said suitability for therapy was based on so many factors (not everyone benefits). So the race criteria was arbitary and not helpful.
Of course as the health system continues to run down under Labour, it is likely that treatment will become less available to us all. My own example a case in point. I will need to have cataract surgery in the next year or two. I asked my optician how easy it was to access on the public health. Almost impossible was her reply. Relatively easy 5 years ago. I have many, many other stories like this re the public health system. Try not to need an MRI in Dunedin. The wait times go into the hundreds.
[“About 15 years ago when there was a scheme for free counselling (six sessions could be accessed via Primary Health Care). Funding was cut and the service only became available to those under 25 years and Maori”
Because this is a controversial political topic, please provide evidence for this. This needs to be reliable evidence, not ‘someone said’ evidence. Quote and links. If you cannot provide evidence, then please withdraw this claim of fact. In premod until either of these two things happen – weka]
The studies I found went back to 2002-2005 btw and therefore encompass both National and Labour terms of government.
I recently wrote the following in a short newsletter article, inspired as I wrote above by my oncologist who said very plainly, "The New Zealand health system is racist'.
BTW, if stating the truth is 'politicising' then we should all be politicians!
"Cancer impacts more heavily on Māori, with large inequalities in the experience and quality of care from diagnosis to treatment to outcomes.
Māori have a higher incidence and higher mortality from for all cancers compared to non-Māori.
Inequalities in cancer death rates are increasing, which is a major reason for the 8 year gap in life expectancy for Māori compared to non-Māori.
Survival rates for Māori are poorer, with disparities in access to all cancer services.
Māori are nearly twice as likely to die from cancer, even though they are only 18% more likely to have cancer. One reason may be that diagnosis comes when the cancer has reached a more advanced stage.
Māori have the highest rate of lung cancer in the world with three times the mortality rate and a 7 year gap in life expectancy compared to non-Māori. This high mortality stems mostly from late presentation, delays in treatment and low surgical rates for early stage disease.
The emergency department is the most common method of entry to secondary care. This suggests that access barriers (e.g. financial, cultural, geographic) may still exist in the primary care sector along with other factors influencing late presentation such as patient fear.
Māori were more likely to have delays in receiving treatment, four times less likely than Europeans to receive curative treatment. Treatment for Māori was aimed at relieving symptoms.
The differences in types of treatment received may reflect the stage of cancer at presentation and higher rates of comorbidity (e.g. renal disease, cardiovascular disease) for Māori, which would preclude the use of curative treatments."
Ayesha Verrall's Beehive press release, 17 Nov 2022, states that Maori daily smoking rates for 2021/22 were almost 20% for Maori, and a little more than 18% for Pacific people.
Comcare in Christchurch provides wrap-round support for mental health clients, including housing services. I was told the Maori population of Christchurch was ~7%, while around half of Comcare's clients were Maori.
Regarding cataracts, where you live has an impact. In the town I'm in, last year a 60 yo friend got their one eye cataract done within 4 months of diagnosis by the optician, through the public health system.
I live in a big city t Wiggle. I am lucky I will find a way to afford the operations and I won't go on a waiting list because there are people who won't have a hope in hell of getting the op done privately.
Me too. I pay for health insurance because my eyes are rubbish.
I had cataract surgery last year and it took 6 months and about 4 visits to get all the measurements done so that the right sort of lens could be constructed. At one stage, my opthalmologist said to me "this machine is calibrated to measure from 0 to 20. You are minus 4".
It took 3 years to get the corneal graft right in my other eye about 20 years ago. I got very used to seeing someone advancing on my eye with a scalpel and a pair of tweezers.
If I was in the public system, I may end up under the knife in a demonstration class, but otherwise – I don't think it would cope. Fortunately, I can afford to pay for it at the moment.
Hi anker, I put your last 4 comments into spam because you haven’t responded to the mod note above. Can you please respond now. I’d also like to know if you know how to use the Replies tab on TS so that you can see when a moderator has replied to you. thanks.
I am not sure I can find a link for it. It is one of my inside information quotes. I know it to be true, but can't disclose the source. I accept this may not meet the standards for evidence on TS
I asked you to either provide evidence or withdraw the claim, and you have done neither. Instead you have doubled down by saying you know it is true.
The problem is that you made a serious claim you are not willing to back up and did so in a hot topic conversation. You are right that it doesn't meet the standards here for debate, but my concern is that you will do similar again instead of respect the ethos here and that this will create more work for the mods.
It's not about you accepting that your comment doesn't meet the standards, it's about what the moderators have to do to stop people from misleading debate in this way. It looks to me like you don't understand why this matters and think that your own view is the priority.
There is no obligation on you to make claims that can't be substantiated, there is however an obligation to provide back up when asked. In other words, if you cannot back up your claims of fact were you to be asked, then please don't make them!
This is an issue with a number of people and I will add it to the moderation post I am writing (and see if I can explain it more clearly).
Returning maori were excluded from what returning pakeha soldiers received..
That was over 100 years ago…and I am not maori…
But that racist injustice to those who put their lives on the line..(what more could any individual do for their country..than put their life in jeopardy..in its defence?)
That really really pisses me off..
And for me the treatment of maori soldiers after both world wars.. (apart from land theft)..
is the most egregious racism/injustice inflicted upon maori…
"I am not happy to have been so well treated when I discovered later that my Māori brothers with prostate cancer for example were not afforded equal opportunities.".
Would you be equally willing to say that
"I would be happy to have had my urgently required cancer treatment delayed by six months in order that my Māori brothers with less serious requirements should be treated first".
If not, why not?
The fact that one group of people were badly treated in the past requires that other people who have some characteristics in common with them should now be treated more rapidly is not the same as saying that in the future treatment in the future should be colour blind.
See my 1.2.1.1. I have a feeling that NZ in parts needs to be seen to be doing, or aspire to be doing, more than it needs in order to achieve equality.
In terms of voice projection in a theatre I was told as an actor to project my voice to a spot beyond the last row in the audience.
That way, the inattentive, the hard of hearing, and the general audience would hear.
In terms of race and equality, we surely have our inattentive and hard of hearing……..
I have spent some time wrestling with your last paragraph in 1.3.4
But I now see that you left out after 'more rapidly" the comparison "than others" which would have made perfect sense. I saw the other meaning of "more rapidly" as a simple comparative adverb.
There's a lesson in there about how what we write and read can be misinterpreted. That of course is the main topic of all this thread- namely, what did the Auckland surgeons get told exactly and have Barry Soper and the Herald represented the issue fairly? Weka brought us back to this point way down at 9.2.1
Yes. I wasn't happy with the convoluted sentence I wrote at the time. Adding "than others" would have been a distinct improvement. It is what I meant.
As far as what the surgeons were told I thought this email was pretty clear.
"An email by Te Whatu Ora business support manager Daniel Hayes in April said: “Hi team, Heads up. This is going to be the new criteria for outsourcing your patients going forward. Just putting this on your radar now so that you can begin to line up patients accordingly. Over 200 days for Māori and Pacific patients. Over 250 days for all other patients.”
Once again, is this the complete email? Is this the only instruction given? Into what context is this 'heads up' to be inserted?
I'm not a corporate language speaker so don't know the answer to this question, but does a 'heads up' imply that more detailed instructions will follow? If so, what did they say?
The way the email is phrased seems like it is a response to an earlier query? If so, what was that query and what information and knowledge is assumed to be held by 'the team"?
The further detail in the press release does mention 5 factors to be considered. The article also acknowledges that timeliness is an issue, and if there is still an issue about much later times when a Māori presents for this kind of prioritising, then that is definitely a factor to be considered.
The reports I read related that reporting times for Māori with symptoms was generally later, due to factors such as fear, locality, distance, and culture.
Culture might include "don't make a fuss", "don't put yourself forward of the needs of others" or blokish "man up" or "don't wanna know" avoidance of possible difficulties especially with parts of the body that are barely mentioned, let alone examined. My uncle talked about "problems with the waterworks, boy".
Some men also do not help other men to get to a doctor by puerile behaviour in raising fears about DREs.
That example in the Herald article about two Māori men getting advancement above a Middle Eastern man only mentioned the time factor. None of the other four factors and their possible bearing on the priority decision was mentioned.
If men for example are reporting for prostate problems later through these factors then that time elapse needs to be factored in.
In my case as I went through the system with two separate diagnoses and treatments for both bladder and prostate cancer, four in all, I noticed that the official letter of diagnosis and outlining treatment stared with a paragraph describing me the patient, not in terms of these factors but more about my personality and value to the community.
It did make me wonder whether there is a different measure of triage that is not mentioned officially…….
There are indications that Māori have accessed healthcare unequally. What hasn't been determined is exactly why.
Regardless, the goal that should be sought is to improve the access for all, and ensure equal treatment for all. Not provide a solution built on inequity due to ethnicity.
"Like I said..are you effing kidding..?"
This type of response is getting tiresome to read.
I had a similar response tbf. At this point in history, it's very strange to see politically commentary that doubts that Māori and Pasifica face additional barriers to health care that cannot be explained in other ways (eg poverty).
For the record Phillip I guess my lens is coloured by being married to a Maori and seeing what happens to his family. And I also did provide evidence about Maori getting access to counselling that Pakeha weren't entitled to
Inequality is not addressed by switching the players.
There's no doubt that Māori have been less likely to receive early referral and effective healthcare. Even now, being Māori and poor is a double disadvantage in receiving healthcare. At an individual level though, why should anyone have delayed care just because of who they are?
If you want to see economic and ethnic inequality in action, spend a day watching who walks in and out of public hospitals and then spend the next day doing the same at a large private hospital.
Aside from dealing with structural and personal ethnic bias against Māori, the most effective way of addressing inequality in health without shuffling poor health and low life expectancy among the disadvantaged is to remove private healthcare.
Or, give free sign up to private healthcare providers to Māori and other people living in poverty.
I'm not disagreeing with you – transferring resorces from one group in need to another group in need has always bugged me, whatever the service.
I'm saying the priotitisation is fraught and uneven and will continue to be that way for as long as we have a 2-tiered system – and practitioner bias, wherever they work..
However, research also shows a level of bias in who gets to be seen in the first place but this policy is a blunt tool that will harm social cohesion. E.g. in a research project I was doing, I was going to interview an older Māori woman. A nurse in the department said "no point in putting her on your list, she wont's turn up, she's Māori." I put her on my list, she did turn up, I interviewed her, and yes, she's Māori and she had missed appts – because:
Casual work meant she struggled to get time off
Kids needed to be looked after
No car
Public transport meant the appointment was a 2 hours travel for a 30 min wait and 10 min appt
Her husband wasn't also quite controlling, it seems.
But yeah, she missed appts because she was Māori, not for any of the circumstances above, according to the nurse. Until we get that kind of bias out of the health system – and it's pretty common from what I can tell, maybe we have to make some rules around who is prioritised.
The problem with the ethnicity tool is it's blunt, and does nothing tom improve social cohesion, or inclusion (just like private hospitals, it will probably make it worse).
I'd be surprised if they're prioritising Māori and Pasifika on the basis of ethnicity. From what I can tell, the decision makers now have to take ethnicity into account alongside other factors. It's not like there is a stream for Polynesians and a stream for everyone else.
Then there are second-order effects of ethnicity – where ethnicity is a marker for other things with a clinical effect – such as deprivation which might result in a more rapid decline of untreated patients or poorer recovery after treatment because of the affordability of follow up care.
Both of these things are valid considerations in my opinion. What would not be acceptable is having two clinically-equivalent patients (bearing in mind the factors just discussed) where one is prioritised over the other on the basis of ethnicity. Clinical equivalence of that type is probably only a theoretical possibility not a real one. But that doesn't stop it being the jumping off point for an anxiety about positive discrimination, especially in a febrile political environment where parties of the Right want to stoke the myth of Maori Privilege – not because they really believe it's happening, but because what they want the political power to reset the economy into a direction that favours them.
If actual positive discrimination is happening (which I doubt), it’s a silly mistake and a weak cop-out. The problem of historical injustice is not solved by creating an additional injustice within a process like healthcare. It is solved by removing all the causes of that historical injustice in the present – ending poverty would be a good start.
"What would not be acceptable is having two clinically-equivalent patients (bearing in mind the factors just discussed) where one is prioritised over the other on the basis of ethnicity."
Let’s not forget the 7-year gap in life expectancy of Māori vs. non-Māori. Only when this gap has been closed can we truly speak of ‘privilege’. Until then, anybody who ignores this vital fact [pun intended] is too lazy to think, too ignorant, or simply just disingenuous.
There is also a three and a half year gap in life expectancy of men and women in New Zealand. Should we pay men their super earliar, or give them priority for medical care?
After all, wouldn't you think that "anybody who ignores this vital fact [pun intended] is too lazy to think, too ignorant, or simply just disingenuous."?
I’d definitely prioritise men over women with prostate cancer. Perhaps you prefer a mammogram and want to identify as a woman to get one instead of getting a digital rectal examination.
Question for you: have you surpassed the average life expectancy of a Māori male yet?
It looks like you and some others here aka the usual suspects are acting as disingenuous trolls again. I do feel like a good winter clean-out of trolls, until after the general election. Are you volunteering because you have already self-identified as a prime candidate?
Incognito, having had a prostatectomy, I therefore no longer fear, if I ever did, a digital rectal examination.
But, I sometimes think there is some sort of correlation of fear between those who fear DREs and those who fear Te Tiriti, te reo rangatira and co-governance.
In the immortal words of Lance-corporal Jones in 'Dad's Army' ………..(and I don't mean "Don't panic Don't panic!")
Mrs Mac1 and I have just watched the episode, series 6 episode 3 which we recorded recently. Very funny. The episode is actually 50 years old, being first broadcast in 1973. Lots of panic but not much up'em! Walmington-on-Sea btw. Jones in fine comedic form.
Both you and weka are completely fucking out of control as moderators. It is blatantly obvious and I am loosing count of how many good faith and acceptable contributors you have either burned off or intimidated. You have both had too much power for too long, immune to any criticism or accountability.
I have pondered this a week or so now and I will no longer falsify my words to please you.
I know exactly what you are going to do next – you are going to ban me for 'undermining your integrity as a moderator'. Except that you did that to yourself.
[If weka and I are out of control, as you claim, then we will cop it. Until then, your commenting privileges have been removed until further notice, because neither weka nor I should put up with this kind of shit from you or anybody else, no matter who you are.
I trust you know how to contact Lynn – plead your case with him, if you wish – Incognito]
There is also a 5 year gap between Asian males and the male population as a whole. Perhaps non Asian males should get their super earlier, or get priority for medical care.
Veil of Ignorance
The Veil of Ignorance is a device for helping people more fairly envision a fair society by pretending that they are ignorant of their personal circumstances.
Some people just need a little more help than others, is all.
Who wouldn't choose a life of Maari privilege – alas, ethnicity is a lottery.
What is the Veil of Ignorance?
The Veil of Ignorance (sometimes referred to as "the original position") is a thought experiment popularized by 20-century philosopher John Rawls with the goal of thinking more clearly and impartially about the fair organizing principles of a society based on solidarity.
The actual thought experiment is both brilliant as simple. The authors of Net Positive describe it as follows:
"Imagine you are setting up a political and economic system, but you don't know your place in society, class position or social status… [or] fortune in the distribution of natural assets and abilities, intelligence and strength.
What kind of system would you design if you didn't know whether you would be born a white male in a wealthy country, or a Syrian girl in a refugee camp? What kind of policies would you want in place, and how would you want companies to behave?
The answer is obvious. Respect, equity, compassion, humanity, and justice would be at the core. The system would provide a basic foundation of well-being and dignity for all, with people at the center, not money."
"A basic foundation of well-being and dignity for all, with people at the center, not money." – frightful !
Oh indeed it is. I am of an ethnic minority that suffers poorer health outcomes than others. The reasons are complex, and require more nuanced solutions than race based preference.
Privilege and it's effects are in our face(s) – we need only look.
The reasons are complex, and require more nuanced solutions than race based preference.
What we know about inequality of outcomes suggests (to me) that timely solutions are needed. As for "more nuanced solutions", why not, just as long as that's not code for yet more ‘back to the drawing board‘ delay to change. We've known about these iniquitous outcomes longer than we’ve known about anthropogenic climate change, ffs.
Growth in life expectancy slows [20 April 2021]
The gap between Māori and non-Māori life expectancy at birth was 7.5 years for males and 7.3 years for females in 2017–2019.
Let’s not forget the 7-year gap in life expectancy of Māori vs. non-Māori.
Has poverty been taken into account in that equation?
A good number of Māori suffer from poverty compared to non-Māori.
Research from the Imperial College of London revealed the life expectancy gap between the most affluent and most deprived sectors of society increased from 6.1 years in 2001 to 7.9 years in 2016 for women, and from 9.0 to 9.7 years in men.
"No one I have seen, or heard has argued that clinical judgments must not dominate here. (Noting that differences in access and nature of facilities also play a role in different outcomes and need to be addressed in design and operational process as many are).
If there are persistent and widespread imbalances in waiting lists between different populations, then anything but the most narrow of clinical judgments would regard that as something to be taken into account in prioritising.
Remember that the private hospitals are not, shall we say to be generous, weighted in their services towards Māori and Pasifika patients."
Consideration for surgery should be based on the urgency or otherwise of the patients. Other factors might need to be taken into account but to give priority to the ethnicity of the patient is asking for trouble.
I find it hard to believe that public hospitals in NZ make surgery choices based on ethnicities. It may have happened in the past but those days have long gone. So what is the purpose of resurrecting a past grievance that has already been corrected.
There may be some factors such as actual access – ie. distance from healthcare, cost prohibitors, aversion to attendance – that play a part in inequities.
Determining factors that do play a part, and addressing those factors benefits both those who access healthcare and those who deliver it.
The different DHB's had different responses and timeframes for treatment for similar ailments. Depending on the diagnosis, someone living in Central Auckland might have had a noticeably different diagnositic and treatment experience, than someone living in the Manukau District Health Board. Due to ethnic demographics in both areas, differences could relate to address – rather than ethnicity itself.
The amalgamation of the DHBs may have addressed that in some way.
A good summing up of the differentials involved between urban and rural communities and the differing experiences related to certain DHBs at least in the past.
Chris Hipkins at his weekly press conference has now explained the full intention of the measure and what provision of services it covers. He has also asked the Health Ministry (I think it was the ministry) to look at the provisions announced to ensure they are the most appropriate available. [I have paraphrased so hope I am reporting what he said correctly.]
It looks to me like another example of a new policy announcement which has not been satisfactorily presented to the public. Who is to blame? Time will tell.
It is morally reprehensible, it is medically unethical, unjustifiable and utterly unacceptable.
The only people I've seen try to defend this policy and others like it are the most one eyed tribal labour supporters, criticizing doctors for speaking up. Oy vey.
Policies like these cause deep divisions, distrust and anger in our society.
Medical access is supposed to be based off need not box ticking and the admin for this is going to be extremely expensive.
TWO/Health NZ is about as popular with medical professionals and IT professionals as a bucket of cold sick.
Reforming the public health system during a pandemic was peak foolishness, and reforming it based off failed UK reforms was mind bogglingly stupid.
It's hated by everyone in the medical field. Again the only people who defend it are the most one eyed tribal labour supporters, orrr the bureaucracy hired to oversea it.
And this issue sums up just about everything wrong with public health and govt services in NZ ATM:
There's far too many bureaucrats, consultants, community outreach, managers, PR, Hr, advisors and business managers like Hayes, and not enough nurses or doctors.
The 6th Labour govt has been a horrible failure when it comes to delivery in our public services.
Labour has been obsessed with spending up large and going on in management and hr hiring sprees to reform the internal culture of our government agencies rather than hiring front line staff and improving delivery.
How the hell, are our state agencies work forces all bigger than they've ever been before, with larger budgets than they've ever had before, with more staff than ever before but have worse service than ever before.
No NZ govt department will ever answer a god damn phone and as someone who has been dealing with USA/Canadian Govt agencies lately, I nearly fainted when they actually answered the phone a couple minutes on hold….
Usually it's a couple hours (if at all here)
Tldr we need more front line staff, less backroom staff and need to focus on improving delivery above all else…. And this morally indefensible shit needs to be thrown out, it's election losing shit.
When you see how much more money we spend on corey state services and how much the delivery of those service has deteriorated, because govt isn't hiring front line it's hiring backroom, it's hard to disagree with nat/act that a massive purge of the civil service is needed, especially when you see the disgusting ideas some of these middle management types come up with… Like racial profiling in surgeries in NZ… In…2023…. Disgusting.
Medical access is supposed to be based off need not box ticking and the admin for this is going to be extremely expensive.
We haven't used that as sole criteria for a long time. Budget is a big factor (which is why we have waiting lists). But here's the list from the article,
clinical priority
how long on a waiting list
geography (remote areas)
ethnicity
deprivation level
Whoever is making the decision has to factor all of those in, not just clinical need alone. And they're working within the constraints of infrastructure, staff and budget.
“In December 2019, NZ had 253 people waiting more than 12 months for their first specialist assessment. By June 2022, this number had jumped to 4,255 people and while Te Whatu Ora – Health NZ is squirrelly about the latest stats, recent reports suggest that things are getting much worse very quickly. There are many other appalling stats.”
Without increased specialist capacity I would expect it is going up. We have an aging population with the first baby boomers turning 80 in a couple of years.
I'm expecting it to rapidly accelerate.
Should have been training and bonding more people twenty years ago. Health already has one of the oldest workforce in NZ which will be exacerbating the problem.
No doubt if National gets in they will do their usual trick of kicking people off the waiting lists.
Were people upset when Bill English prioritised children? Did old white people go full Moving Pictures on him.
Health Minister Bill English announced today that children would be given priority on hospital waiting lists for assessments and surgery with the new money the Government was planning to allocate to elective surgery.
"Children deserve the best possible start in life and this Government is committed to improving child health. Making children a priority on waiting lists is only one area we need to work on, but it shows the Government is determined to make a difference for children."
Without knowing how many have had them it isn't possible to tell that.
You need to know demand, actualisation and supply.
You then need to understand the increase in demand – it may be health, it might be greater expectation from a labour government, it might be that National's strategy of telling people we won't put you on the waiting list if you are going to get one within six months is a better strategy that understates demand but better matches to realistic likelihood, it might be playing catch-up after not being able to go during COVID-19 lock downs etc.
Going by the change in A&E residents I'd strongly suggest some is an aging population.
Sadly for them this approach is supported by actual surgeons. Maybe not by the ex-South African one locally who is also a racist snot I guess.
The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons has spoken out about the new surgery wait-list rank system, explaining this isn’t about putting Māori and Pacific health above the health of other people, rather it’s about reducing existing health institutional bias.
Although the college did not have a hand in developing the scale, it supports its use as a means to provide “fairer access and treatment to surgical patients”.
Right. I am going to identify as being Maori and insist on getting priority medical treatment.
It isn't my father that is missing from a birth certificate but there is one of my ancestors who was in this situation. No father given.
Like those men who self-identify as female I am going, from now on, to identify as Maori. Let them prove otherwise if they don't want to prioritise my operation.
Look forward to you heading off to the marae you claim to whakapapa from and helping out. Yours is the argument racists fall back on after the quantum one has failed. Apparently white people can only think in binary – either there aren't any full blooded Maori any more or we are all Maori if we want to be. It isn't like you give a shit about better outcomes for Maori in any way shape or form.
National's gun control policy supports ACT's position, and will pass firearms licencing to COLFO, the gun users organisation for which ACT's McKee was previously spokesperson.
After 'the Government's gun laws reforms following the Christchurch terror attacks. COLFO at the time "suggested that members hold on to banned firearms." '
I live close to the local Deerstalkers Assn Hall, and think one of them, who hires the hall for social gatherings, is a (discrete) gang member and a Deerstalkers member, both.
China’s Xi Jinping backs ‘just cause’ of Palestinian statehood
"A solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict lies in the establishment of an “independent Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital”, Xi was quoted as saying by Chinese state media"
Well at least one or two of the major powers are ready to go in and bat for the poor Palestinians….it is just a plain fact that the West has failed them totally, in fact the West has failed in The Middle East full stop…and failed in Africa and in Latin America, and of course who can forget our many unjust and destructive actions in East Asia… little wonder they are all open to alternative diplomacy and partnerships.
Brics is looking like it will be the back bone of this new World trade alliance..who knows, maybe this will bring in something less ultra aggressive than the USA and her allies have been on to the world stage for the past century…lets hope so, because it is happening whether we in the West like it or not.
"In the next five years, Bloomberg predicts that the Brics countries (acronym for Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) will increase their share of the global economy to nearly 35%, beating the world’s strongest economic conglomerate —the G7 countries (US, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, UK)."
This is a good backgrounder to a n international shift from $US as the international trade currency. It has implications for the US economy, and for US debt. "Currently, central banks still hold about 60% of their foreign exchange reserves in dollars."
"Concerned about America’s dominance over the global financial system and the country’s ability to ‘weaponize’ it, other nations have been testing alternatives to reduce the dollar’s hegemony.
As the United States and other Western nations imposed economic sanctions against Russia in response to its invasion of Ukraine, Moscow and the Chinese government have been teaming up to reduce reliance on the dollar and to establish cooperation between their financial systems."
..yeah it is kind of ironic that the massive sanctions piled onto Russia by the West, is looking like it could well be in the future, be historically regarded as the tipping point that ended Western hegemony…a real self goal of epic proportions.
Confusion reigns over whether Meng Foon has or has not resigned as Race Relations Conciliator. He claims he has not, yet (and it seems clear that he doesn't want to), Russell says he has (or she'll fire him)
Foon told Breakfast that he had only written a note to Prime Minister Chris Hipkin’s office about the situation and his resignation, or potential removal by Associate Justice Minister of Justice Deborah Russell.
“I actually haven’t formally written to the minister about my resigning because I didn’t want to surprise the Prime Minister. So, I sent him a note and said look, the social justice minister is looking at dismissing me or I resign,” he said.
”I am still in the process of resigning, or not, and in actual fact I want to receive a letter with her reason as to why she thinks I should go and I would like to say, given the evidence, that I think she should not overreact.”
…
Russell said she then held a meeting with Foon “where he explained his actions”.
She said her preliminary view after the meeting was that “his actions were serious enough to warrant removal”.
But Foon in the meantime resigned.
“Had the process been completed it is probable I would have determined his actions represented a serious breach of the Crown Entities Act and I would have taken the next steps to recommend to the Governor-General to remove him from his office.
So RNZ published this anonymous report that he'd resigned. Anon due to the author seeking refuge from accountability??
Perhaps RNZ has another disinformation agent lurking in the woodwork. Perhaps an entire infestation ecosystem?
Associate justice minister Deborah Russell had been considering the matter with the preliminary view it was serious enough to remove him from the role. But Foon resigned before a decision was reached, she said.
Was she being naughty & telling a fib? Will someone demand she produce evidence she was telling the truth? Will the news media actually do their job??
So Hipkins has a leaker in his office. Will he do something about that?? And while it's encouraging that the govt apparently didn't make an idiot into the Race Relations Commissioner, they may have appointed a Don Quixote:
Foon told Breakfast he's "not an idiot" and plans to challenge the Government.
Oughta make a good reality tv show.
Foon said he's still in the process of a formal resignation and is still waiting for a letter from Russell.
Well, she has to get someone to write it, eh? Then it will have to be run past govt lawyers to see if it's fit for purpose. Could land on some manager's desk & get shuffled under a pile of other letters. Best not to hold our breath waiting.
"I've never seen in any board policy, especially the human rights one, that there is no rules or policy to actually declare financial information, there's nothing."
You can see why he's bewildered, if he's being expected to conform to some official document that doesn't actually exist…
If this did indeed leak from Hipkins office – he should be justifiably furious.
Really, really poor behaviour and lack of loyalty.
He's protected them from the Nash fallout, and from the Wood one (in both cases, staffers made politically poor decisions and/or failed to refer issues to him in a timely manner).
Third time (that we know of). Gloves should be off, and dismissals (or transfers to filing in the basement) should be happening.
Whoever the leaker is – they've created a political storm which could have been entirely unnecessary. Hipkins should have had the time to call Russell and Foon into his office – and get them to sort it out – without political bloodshed (if possible). And for his government to form a coherent political policy on conflicts of interest (why is Foon's worse than Wood's, for example).
Instead, he's got a potential duel on the front pages of the media.
I cannot believe that there are right-wing moles in the leader's office. So this can only be internal white-anting.
Happening right now, transforming potential into actuality:
Meng Foon has accused the Prime Minister's Office of leaking news about his planned resignation and is now reconsidering his decision to quit as Race Relations Commissioner. He was planning to formally tender his resignation on Sunday after concerns were raised about whether he had adequately declared his interests. But Foon now says he changed his mind after he was blindsided on Friday when news of his pending resignation emerged.
The former Gisborne Mayor says he will wait for the Government's process around his declarations to play out further and then decide whether to resign. Newshub has contacted the Prime Minister' Office for a response.
Sounds like he is an entitled attention seeker to me.
How hard is it to write a resignation letter?
How on earth can this be an issue with the government when this idiot has a genuine COI (unlike Wood's) which he failed to declare, agreed to resign because of this, and then is incapable of writing a 5 minute resignation letter?
Foon says he is uncertain whether he has officially resigned or not, and he is waiting to hear from the government about next steps. The government announced on Friday Foon had tendered his resignation after failing to adequately disclose a conflict of interest relating to more than $2 million paid to a company he was director of, for accommodation including emergency housing.
Foon told RNZ he had on Friday morning emailed the prime minister to warn of his intention to resign… However, he did not offer his resignation on Sunday because the news of his resignation had been "leaked" on Friday. "I'm as confused as you are regarding my resignation," he said. "The news had already said that I had resigned, so that message must have leaked out into the cosmos somehow. "Yeah, they need to tell me what the process is … was the one that I sent to the prime minister enough? You know what I mean."
Reading the tea-leaves here, it looks like he was seeking advice on due process. His courtesy note to the PM Friday morn apparently remains un-answered. Perhaps the PM sought legal advice & the lawyers are in a huddle trying to figure it out??
He also continued to dispute the government's claim he had not declared his interests in the emergency housing provider.
"I refute strongly. I did declare," he said. "I sent it to the Ministry of Justice that I was involved in Emergency Housing and I sent it to the Human Rights Commission before I was formally signed off by the Governor-General and before I actually started at the Human Rights Commission."
I'd say his problem seems to stem from oddly thinking that a declaration of a conflict of interest is a one-off role related duty – rather than individual event related duty.
Someone attending or chairing a particular event (meeting, policy discussion, etc) isn't gong to know about the general declaration he might have made a year ago.
He should know better being mayor previously.
I do wonder these things are occurring because landlording has been so normalised amongst the landlord ruling class that is isn't seen as anything like a conflict cause everyone is doing it – at lease everyone they mix with. Doesn't even enter their little landlording heads that it might be.
Oh dear Denis Frank……what particular piece of policy or legislation has Meng Foon upset the Govt or Hon Russell over?
And as far as the offending conflict of interest notification is concerned, I worked years with statutory boards, as company or board secretary and with staff who might have potential conflicts. The conflicts of interest register we operated, to best legal precedent and advice from the PM's dept had a requirement to enter the conflict once.
Once it was entered it stood for all time and often/usually the Chair noted the idea that XXX & yyyy may have a conflict. Most people stood themselves out, as I feel Meng Foon would have, had there been a day to day requirement to that was not covered by his existing declaration.
The Chair had the CoI register with him at every meeting and at every meeting when controversial subjects came up would ask for advice of CoI. There was usually a convo saying you will note my earlier declaration etc etc. These were always written up in the minutes.
Sounds very much like the old forced resignations of yore when staff found that they were managed/magiced out of a job with the twinkling or waving of a letter they had been forced to sign. For staff, constructive dismissal has a lengthy Tribunal precedential history against this practice.
I know Ministerial appointments are subject to complete Ministerial whim, more's the pity, often based on rumour that such & such a statutory chair is a Nat or Labour supporter…..depending on who is in power…
The Race Relations Commissioner is appointed by the GG on the recommendation of the Minister of Justice so one would have thought any resignation process would have been carried out with care and attention and extending goodwill to the incumbent. I have seen a postion description but I cannot see the date of this. This says the usual term is 5 years. He has time from 2019 (4 years) but surely if a person is doing a good job then an extension for another term from 2024 could be useful.
I know also in days of yore when there were Ministerial appointments coming up, it was done in a caring, compassionate way with letters of thanks and thanks meetings taking place with the appointing Minister.
This failed in spectacular fashion when I was working close to a Board Chair. His term came up & he received nothing (no thanks or reappointment) except to note a couple of his board members had been reappointed. (only because they came to his office to let him know.)
His was not a political appointment, he was a lay person with highly specialised qualifications that were needed. He had been appointed by a National Minister & received no thanks from a National Minister.
To say I found a guy close to tears would not have been far wrong. I tried to tell him that the process may have got away on the Minister/staff/department and he would be formally advised. Right up to the time of his death, eight years later, this former chair person had not received any thanks from the people/person who appointed him.
As with anything if people are treated badly one looks for the 'grown -up' in the process. The grown up there was the Minister and if he had not known better then some of his staff should have.
The grown-ups seem to have gone to ground and left those who may not have good manners and knowledge of good admin procedures holding the fort. To my mind this is arrogance and can catch out longer serving Governments, as it clearly did in my example above. People just become expendable.
And talking of Conflicts of Interest I note that the possible conflict of interest by Paul Hunt, who has been a signatory to a pro trans declaration, did not seem to stop him from coming out most strongly against the ability of women to meet a la Posy Parker, and pro the lovey dovey festival once the pesky women wanting to talk women's issues were out of the way…..in Wellington.
I was puzzled over the issue of what actually happened – did he resign or not. The murk around conflicts of interest is too subjective to opine on, for me. Situation now clarified…
At his post-Cabinet media briefing, Hipkins read out the email he had received from Foon. "It says, 'I am resigning as the Race Relations Commissioner, as I didn't declare the amount of money my gold investments was receiving from MSD. I'll resign Sunday'," Hipkins said. Hipkins said he had been advised the government was right to accept Foon's email as a resignation letter.
So while Foon thought he was entering the process of resigning, and seeking legal clarification of the basis for doing so, lawyers told the PM his language in the email meant he had (inadvertently) resigned – by saying he was resigning.
There must be established case law indicating that declaring intent to resign trumps actually doing so?? Lawyers being wackydoodle…
I didn't declare the amount of money my gold investments was receiving from MSD.
Sounds a bit mocking/spoofy to me or he the first person ever to receive anything substantial from MSD that needs declaring? Or does MSD not stand for Ministry of Social Development?
Surely an intention to resign or thought he may resign not followed up by the actual formal resignation is not a resignation.
Sounds a bit like a storm/teacup but once people have got the bit between their teeth they see CoIs etc everywhere? Sarc/:
Surely an intention to resign or thought he may resign not followed up by the actual formal resignation is not a resignation.
That's my view too, and seemingly his until the PM clarified the govt position today, which Foon now seems to accept.
My take is that formality is now too old-fashioned to believe in. Govt & lawyers are making it up as they go along, 21st-century style. Sir Geoffrey will not be amused by this. He may harumph quite loudly…
It may have been directly from Hipkins himself. He may have been told that Foon had said he would resign, rather than that he would resign in preference to being sacked and he repeated it.
In that case it wouldn't have been a leak. After all he is PM and in the immortal words of one of his illustrious predecessors, By definition I cannot leak
Imo little as it means, Chris Isaak (his tv show The Chris Isaak Show was another to go virtually unnoticed)and Josh Homme should have made greater cut thru in the misic business, not sure if it was their decisions or others as to why their quintin tarantino coolness isn’t matched
"One key part of the strategy is the Māori Pathways programme – a ground-breaking series of initiatives underway around the country that are designed in partnership with Māori to reduce reoffending and improve outcomes for whānau. We have launched Māori Pathways in Christchurch Women’s Prison, Northland Regional Corrections Facility and Hawke’s Bay Regional Prison. We’re also replacing Upper Waikeria prison with a modern design, including a 100-bed mental health and addiction facility."
That last bit’s really important, due to the heavy penetration of meth into Maori rural communities.
That wasn't one of my questions but thanks for your input.
Can you tell me what the success rate is for the Māori Pathways programme?
That last bit’s really important, due to the heavy penetration of meth into Maori rural communities.
Indeed. And not only due to the heavy penetration but also its related impact on crime. Therefore, I take it you'd also be disappointed with this failure to deliver – see link below.
It's a sad indictment on our justice system that the best way to help te iwi Māori is to keep them out of our justice system
Then went on to say:
I agree with the words of Bill English that our prison system is a moral and fiscal failure," she said. "It costs New Zealanders far more in taxpayer money – we should put our efforts into making sure people never need to go there in the first place.
So she seems to be having a go at the justice system and corrections.
The Corrections Minister, the Police Minister, the Justice Minister and the Health Minister should all be putting pressure on the Welfare Minister and the Finance Minister to sort out poverty. As poverty has a negative impact on their portfolios.
A race based justice system is where one is openly treated differently based on race.
actually it does, that's the point. If there is bias in a system against a particular ethnic group, then one way of solving that is to redress that systemic bias. To some people this looks like 'race based' something or other, but all it's doing is attempting to remove the bias.
AB's comment earlier has a good differentiation between addressing inequity and positive discrimination.
Positive discrimination has been around for years and is part of the solution.
FFS it is worth about 2 points out of 100 in terms of prioritisation. Enough to make a subtle difference not enough to not have overall medical need as the primary consideration.
It isn't like the moaners about this are putting up any viable solutions – like pay more tax so more operations can be done or to bring services closer to the communities they serve or to actively recruit and train staff from those communities. They are the same people that oppose services for Maori by Maori and pretty much any attempt to solve these disparities.
They are pretty good at blaming the individual – don't turn up to appointments, access services late, etc almost like the system itself. Our local hospital got closed as part of the Douglas reforms and it wasn't unusual to travel 2 hours to hospital and find your appointment was cancelled but they couldn't get hold of you – cause you were travelling 2 hours leaving at 6:30 in the morning, or to be greeted with the ever welcoming "what are you still living in that shithole for". A predominantly Maori population who once had a good rural hospital.
The argument that it is not helping solve it is non-sensical. If their is capacity to do 100 operations and currently only 13 Maori can access those operations when 20 should be and this means 15 now do it is part of the solution. That 2 non-Maori have to wait longer is always going to happen regardless of the method used. Pulling names out of a hat could equally be viable. A small tweak to shift the balance is just that.
Bill English did a similar thing to prioritise children. That is what governments do – prioritise resources to particular groups to help solve particular problems. All governments do it.
You may disagree on the prioritisation but that is why you elect different governments. Pretending that the world is going to end because there is some prioritisation of Maori or Pacifika in order to address systemic difficulties and currently worse outcomes for those communities is just nonsense.
Systemic racism. I'm not avoiding looking at that.
And, having looked at systemic racism in Aotearoa NZ, what are yourtimely solutions for "directly addressing that" – assuming you can see systemic racism, and cause-and-effect relationships between systemic racism and iniquitous health outcomes for some Kiwis.
Here's a link to a thought-provoking NZMJ viewpoint, written by two Kiwi health professionals – makes you think?
Pākehā/Palangi positionality: disentangling power and paralysis [2 Sept 2022; PDF]
Until Pākehā/Palangi recognise our power is strengthened by racist systems we will continue to look outside of ourselves for solutions rather than within.
…
“Proactive, mutually supportive, and innovative relationships between Tangata Whenua and Tangata Tiriti are our future. We should embrace the change and reflect it within our new outcome-focused and equitable health system.” [ – Sharon Shea]
Challenging stuff (for me), but what do 'they' know. And wot DoS said.
Foster's selections are as baffling as ever. He says he wants us to be more direct and quicker, but he picks a nobody from Canterbury at second five and has gone out of his way over the past four years to not select or scapegoat the direct options. Laumape, Fainga'anuku, Aumua – "direct" options all – have all been treated shabbily or ignored by Foster. I don't know what some of those lazy, gutless wonders in the Blues forward pack have to do to get dropped. Beauden Barrett? I think Foster would pick him even if he had a leg amputated. He has had a dreadful season. It obvious – Barret has lost his pace and with that his confidence has gone.
But anyway, ""more direct and faster" just seems code for trying harder to do what hasn't worked since the 2017 Lions worked Hansen out.
Foster is a bad coach. His tactics are so stale even Argentina worked him out. His selections and management appointments are so loyal they have veered in crony mediocrity. His selections have been bizarre for four years now, with a ton of players who have worked out that the All Blacks set up under Foster has become a chummocracy that smells of boiled cabbage having left to go offshore.
Still, I think we'll beat the French, who'll be over-confident, and probably make it to the semifinals cos we have got the Saffa's number in the head department. And our journey will end there.
DemocracyNZ has advertised its political platform as “freedom, family and farming”. Much of its rhetoric concerns opposition to the pandemic response and climate change regulations.
It had been seen as the leading light for the so-called freedom movement, which is split between various parties, including the Brian Tamaki and Sue Grey-led Freedoms NZ and the recently announced Leighton Baker party.
The far-right in kiwiland often looks like a rabble due to lack of consensus on a political brand to unify the disparate elements. You could go with the Fundamentalist Freedom Front (FFF)…
Even Winston Peters didn't stoop that low. Last I read, Baker was struggling to sign on enough members at $20 a pop to reach the 500 member/$10000 threshhold.
I know at least 10 Māori journalists who would provide balance and perspective to the current "health inequities" story. The problem is that there is an inequity of platforms for Māori, so you aren't hearing them.
It's systemic, both health access and media coverage. This means that the systems are structured in such a way as to create barriers. We could change that.
It feels like prioritizing surgery by ethnicity is actually an ambulance at the bottom of the cliff approach designed to obscure the fact that the real issues are poverty and access to appropriate and timely primary healthcare.
Sadly from what I hear Te Whatu Ora have pulled or heavily reduced funding to a number of community health organizations that did a heap of the heavy lifting during covid and are actually well placed to help address a bunch of the issues around access.
I suspect that the answer to number of the issues sits with funding small community based service providers that are embedded in the community rather than top down edicts from bloated national bodies.
I tend to agree. Problem is, when Clark’s Labour government tried to fund in that way, there was a racist backlash and the funding got axed. Sad we are still so bad at this, including apparently on the left.
Concentrating on ethnicity is a real mistake imho the focus needs to be around class. Poverty is what drives the horrific and worsening outcomes in New Zealand. Everything else is just obfusticating that undeniable fact.
I disagree. Two working class people, one Māori the other Pākehā, both face class based barriers. The Māori person faces ethnicity based ones too. Ethnicity factors in at least two important ways: one is that the system is structurally prejudiced against Māori in terms of assessment and treatment. The other is that even if the system weren't that, it would still be designed around Pākehā needs, which is an additional barrier for many Māori.
An example. How family can access patients in hospital is based around Pākehā family structures and needs, not whānau extended family structures and needs. Isolating Māori from their whānau makes it harder for that person to navigate the system, deal with the stress, make good decisions.
The good news is that if we change that part of the system, it benefits everyone.
Due to cultural, societial and govt policies at the time and still exist there is a large number of people out there who are missing predominately their paternal but can also be their maternal lineage. This is due to factors like no father being listed on the birth certificate, adoption etc. if we are going to have ethnicity as a contributing factor for the basis of delivering resources what of these people ?? Or do we say they look european/Asian /Māori/PI so deliver based on appearance ?? And even if you are aware of the missing family link but it is not documented or there is no accountability/acceptance by the father to acknowledge ?? Do then accept another injustice ???
Where due to fathers names missing on birth cert (Plus those adopted) – Those children have lost their paternal link. I am predominately thinking of the instance where there is a un recorded Maori/PI father and an European mother. There are many out there who this example fits !!!
Right. I am going to identify as being Maori and insist on getting priority medical treatment.
It isn't my father that is missing from a birth certificate but there is one of my ancestors who was in this situation. No father given.
Like those men who self-identify as female I am going, from now on, to identify as Maori. Let them prove otherwise if they don't want to prioritise my operation.
"Māori youth aged 15-18…were over three times more likely to die in the 30 days following major trauma than non-Māori in the same age group. Overall, it found Māori were 56 percent more likely than non-Māori to die in the first month after a major trauma, excluding serious brain injury.
Māori were 37% more likely to not receive a CT scan, which is used to assess and understand the severity of the trauma and has an impact on mortality outcomes…"I think every clinician would like to think [unconscious bias] doesn't have a role to play but there's a chance to examine not only your own hospital but also yourself and have a think about those questions."
We know unconscious bias exists for treatment of women compared with men. I don’t believe the criterion of ethnicity was added to the evaluation guidelines simply for woke reasons. A 3x increased chance of dying is huge.
A '2018 study found that doctors often view men with chronic pain as “brave” or “stoic,” but view women with chronic pain as “emotional” or “hysterical.”…doctors [of both sexes] were more likely to treat women’s pain as a product of a mental health condition.'
I get where you are coming from, what im trying to get across is to make the political focus class based, within that the solutions could be informed from a maori world view and from the view of other marginlized communties.
Its about finding things that work. Currently we're just generating animosity and no real solutions.
I agree our current approach is causing problems, and likely to get worse as the world crises deepen. Using a class based approach and finding Māori and Pasifika world view within that is an interesting idea. Can say more about that?
From Health New Zealand has introduced an Equity Adjustor Score, which aims to reduce inequity in the system by using an algorithm to prioritise patients according to multiple criteria, one of which is ethnicity, to prioritizing [sic] surgery by ethnicity.
'Here, it’s important to note that “population specific needs” is not a term that supports biological determinism, which is the concept that biology is the defining factor in health risks and outcomes – a concept that leads straight to eugenics. Biologically, ethnic groups are not fundamentally different from one another. Research shows that the use of ethnicity as a determinant of health is actually a stand-in for many other complex issues. Rather than being a purely biological difference, ethnicity often dictates how we are perceived by others, and therefore how we are treated.'
Trying to use a teacher’s reaction to a teenage trans student as a wedge issue by putting it at the top of their page and emphasising religion in their headline.
Not often acknowledged by those banging on about keeping children in bathrooms safe is that trans teens suffer terrible mental health consequences and high suicide rates.
Re-publicising and hyping this story can only affect its original victim. Shame on you.
The headline is certainly misleading. We need to read a long way through the article to find out what really bothers this teacher …
The teacher’s submissions also comprised what he believed was the “obvious next sin” after transitioning, which he claimed was homosexuality.
He also presented to the tribunal multiple examples of scripture from the Bible that read “man should only lie with a woman” and homosexuality steps away from “God’s plan”.
The teacher went as far as comparing changing one’s name to potential circumstances of a child identifying as a different race, an animal – “a cat, a dog or a dinosaur,” or as “Your Honour.”
“Compelling me to call a girl student by a boy's name is asking me to go against my core Christian belief, the belief that is also foundational for New Zealand,” he said.
And I notice there has been a lot of flapping from the usual suspects about ethnicity being included as one of the criteria for the speed required on surgery.
I have a modest proposal to bring us to more equality in ethnic health outcome statistics and it would possibly help the housing market too…
The latest labour market statistics, showing a rise in unemployment. There are now 134,000 unemployed - 14,000 more than when the National government took office. Which is I guess what happens when the Reserve Bank causes a recession in an effort to Keep Wages Low. The previous government saw a ...
Three opinion polls have been released in the last two days, all showing that the new government is failing to hold their popular support. The usual honeymoon experienced during the first year of a first term government is entirely absent. The political mood is still gloomy and discontented, mainly due ...
National's Finance Minister once met a poor person.A scornful interview with National's finance guru who knows next to nothing about economics or people.There might have been something a bit familiar if that was the headline I’d gone with today. It would of course have been in tribute to the article ...
Rob MacCulloch writes – Throughout the pandemic, the new Vice-Chancellor-of-Otago-University-on-$629,000 per annum-Can-you-believe-it-and-Former-Finance-Minister Grant Robertson repeated the mantra over and over that he saved “lives and livelihoods”.As we update how this claim is faring over the course of time, the facts are increasingly speaking differently. NZ ...
Chris Trotter writes – IT’S A COMMONPLACE of political speeches, especially those delivered in acknowledgement of electoral victory: “We’ll govern for all New Zealanders.” On the face of it, the pledge is a strange one. Why would any political leader govern in ways that advantaged the huge ...
Bryce Edwards writes – The list of former National Party Ministers being given plum and important roles got longer this week with the appointment of former Deputy Prime Minister Paula Bennett as the chair of Pharmac. The Christopher Luxon-led Government has now made key appointments to Bill ...
TL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy at 10:06am on Wednesday, May 1:The Lead: Business confidence fell across the board in April, falling in some areas to levels last seen during the lockdowns because of a collapse in ...
Over the past 36 hours, Christopher Luxon has been dong his best to portray the centre-right’s plummeting poll numbers as a mark of virtue. Allegedly, the negative verdicts are the result of hard economic times, and of a government bravely set out on a perilous rescue mission from which not ...
Auckland Transport have started rolling out new HOP card readers around the network and over the next three months, all of them on buses, at train stations and ferry wharves will be replaced. The change itself is not that remarkable, with the new readers looking similar to what is already ...
Completed reads for April: The Difference Engine, by William Gibson and Bruce Sterling Carnival of Saints, by George Herman The Snow Spider, by Jenny Nimmo Emlyn’s Moon, by Jenny Nimmo The Chestnut Soldier, by Jenny Nimmo Death Comes As the End, by Agatha Christie Lord of the Flies, by ...
On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
Have a story to share about St Paul’s, but today just picturesPopular novels written at this desk by a young man who managed to bootstrap himself out of father’s imprisonment and his own young life in a workhouse Read more ...
The list of former National Party Ministers being given plum and important roles got longer this week with the appointment of former Deputy Prime Minister Paula Bennett as the chair of Pharmac. The Christopher Luxon-led Government has now made key appointments to Bill English, Simon Bridges, Steven Joyce, Roger Sowry, ...
Newsroom has a story today about National's (fortunately failed) effort to disestablish the newly-created Inspector-General of Defence. The creation of this agency was the key recommendation of the Inquiry into Operation Burnham, and a vital means of restoring credibility and social licence to an agency which had been caught lying ...
Holding On To The Present:The moment a political movement arises that attacks the whole idea of social progress, and announces its intention to wind back the hands of History’s clock, then democracy, along with its unwritten rules, is in mortal danger.IT’S A COMMONPLACE of political speeches, especially those delivered in ...
Stuck In The Middle With You:As Christopher Luxon feels the hot breath of Act’s and NZ First’s extremists on the back of his neck and, as he reckons with the damage their policies are already inflicting upon a country he’s described as “fragile”, is there not some merit in reaching out ...
The unpopular coalition government is currently rushing to repeal section 7AA of the Oranga Tamariki Act. The clause is Oranga Tamariki's Treaty clause, and was inserted after its systematic stealing of Māori children became a public scandal and resulted in physical resistance to further abductions. The clause created clear obligations ...
Buzz from the Beehive The government’s official website – which Point of Order monitors daily – not for the first time has nothing much to say today about political happenings that are grabbing media headlines. It makes no mention of the latest 1News-Verian poll, for example. This shows National down ...
It Takes A Train To Cry:Surely, there is nothing lonelier in all this world than the long wail of a distant steam locomotive on a cold Winter’s night.AS A CHILD, I would lie awake in my grandfather’s house and listen to the traffic. The big wooden house was only a ...
Packing A Punch: The election of the present government, including in its ranks politicians dedicated to reasserting the rights of the legislature in shaping and determining the future of Māori and Pakeha in New Zealand, should have alerted the judiciary – including its anomalous appendage, the Waitangi Tribunal – that its ...
Dead Woman Walking: New Zealand’s media industry had been moving steadily towards disaster for all the years Melissa Lee had been National’s media and communications policy spokesperson, and yet, when the crisis finally broke, on her watch, she had nothing intelligent to offer. Christopher Luxon is a patient man - but he’s not ...
Chris Trotter writes – New Zealand politics is remarkably easy-going: dangerously so, one might even say. With the notable exception of John Key’s flat ruling-out of the NZ First Party in 2008, all parties capable of clearing MMP’s five-percent threshold, or winning one or more electorate seats, tend ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Polling shows that Wellington Mayor Tory Whanau has the lowest approval rating of any mayor in the country. Siting at -12 per cent, the proportion of constituents who disapprove of her performance outweighs those who give her the thumbs up. This negative rating is ...
Luxon will no doubt put a brave face on it, but there is no escaping the pressure this latest poll will put on him and the government. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on Aotearoa-NZ’s political ...
This is a re-post from The Climate Brink by Andrew Dessler In the wake of any unusual weather event, someone inevitably asks, “Did climate change cause this?” In the most literal sense, that answer is almost always no. Climate change is never the sole cause of hurricanes, heat waves, droughts, or ...
Something odd happened yesterday, and I’d love to know if there’s more to it. If there was something which preempted what happened, or if it was simply a throwaway line in response to a journalist.Yesterday David Seymour was asked at a press conference what the process would be if the ...
Hi,From time to time, I want to bring Webworm into the real world. We did it last year with the Jurassic Park event in New Zealand — which was a lot of fun!And so on Saturday May 11th, in Los Angeles, I am hosting a lil’ Webworm pop-up! I’ve been ...
Education Minister Erica Standford yesterday unveiled a fundamental reform of the way our school pupils are taught. She would not exactly say so, but she is all but dismantling the so-called “inquiry” “feel good” method of teaching, which has ruled in our classrooms since a major review of the New ...
Exactly where are we seriously going with this government and its policies? That is, apart from following what may as well be a Truss-Lite approach on the purported economic “plan“, and Victorian-era regression when it comes to social policy.Oh it’ll work this time of course, we’re basically assured, “the ...
Hey Uncle Dave, When the Poms joined the EEC, I wasn't one of those defeatists who said, Well, that’s it for the dairy job. And I was right, eh? The Chinese can’t get enough of our milk powder and eventually, the Poms came to their senses and backed up the ute ...
Polling shows that Wellington Mayor Tory Whanau has the lowest approval rating of any mayor in the country. Siting at -12 per cent, the proportion of constituents who disapprove of her performance outweighs those who give her the thumbs up. This negative rating is higher than for any other mayor ...
Buzz from the Beehive Pharmac has been given a financial transfusion and a new chair to oversee its spending in the pharmaceutical business. Associate Health Minister David Seymour described the funding for Pharmac as “its largest ever budget of $6.294 billion over four years, fixing a $1.774 billion fiscal cliff”. ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Many criticisms are being made of the Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill, including by this writer. But as with everything in politics, every story has two sides, and both deserve attention. It’s important to understand what the Government is trying to achieve and its ...
TL;DR: Here’s my top 10 ‘pick ‘n’ mix of links to news, analysis and opinion articles as of 10:10am on Monday, April 29:Scoop: The children's ward at Rotorua Hospital will be missing a third of its beds as winter hits because Te Whatu Ora halted an upgrade partway through to ...
span class=”dropcap”>As hideous as David Seymour can be, it is worth keeping in mind occasionally that there are even worse political figures (and regimes) out there. Iran for instance, is about to execute the country’s leading hip hop musician Toomaj Salehi, for writing and performing raps that “corrupt” the nation’s ...
Yesterday marked 10 years since the first electric train carried passengers in Auckland so it’s a good time to look back at it and the impact it has had. A brief history The first proposals for rail electrification in Auckland came in the 1920’s alongside the plans for earlier ...
Right now, in Aotearoa-NZ, our ‘animal spirits’ are darkening towards a winter of discontent, thanks at least partly to a chorus of negative comments and actions from the Government Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on ...
You make people evil to punish the paststuck inside a sequel with a rotating castThe following photos haven’t been generated with AI, or modified in any way. They are flesh and blood, human beings. On the left is Galatea Young, a young mum, and her daughter Fiadh who has Angelman ...
April has been a quiet month at A Phuulish Fellow. I have had an exceptionally good reading month, and a decently productive writing month – for original fiction, anyway – but not much has caught my eye that suggested a blog article. It has been vaguely frustrating, to be honest. ...
A listing of 31 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, April 21, 2024 thru Sat, April 27, 2024. Story of the week Anthropogenic climate change may be the ultimate shaggy dog story— but with a twist, because here ...
Hi,I spent about a year on Webworm reporting on an abusive megachurch called Arise, and it made me want to stab my eyes out with a fork.I don’t regret that reporting in 2022 and 2023 — I am proud of it — but it made me angry.Over three main stories ...
The new Victoria University Vice-Chancellor decided to have a forum at the university about free speech and academic freedom as it is obviously a topical issue, and the Government is looking at legislating some carrots or sticks for universities to uphold their obligations under the Education and Training Act. They ...
Do you remember when Melania Trump got caught out using a speech that sounded awfully like one Michelle Obama had given? Uncannily so.Well it turns out that Abraham Lincoln is to Winston Peters as Michelle was to Melania. With the ANZAC speech Uncle Winston gave at Gallipoli having much in ...
She was born 25 years ago today in North Shore hospital. Her eyes were closed tightly shut, her mouth was silently moving. The whole theatre was all quiet intensity as they marked her a 2 on the APGAR test. A one-minute eternity later, she was an 8. The universe was ...
Skeptical Science is partnering with Gigafact to produce fact briefs — bite-sized fact checks of trending claims. This fact brief was written by Sue Bin Park in collaboration with members from our Skeptical Science team. You can submit claims you think need checking via the tipline. Is Antarctica gaining land ice? ...
Images of US students (and others) protesting and setting up tent cities on US university campuses have been broadcast world wide and clearly demonstrate the growing rifts in US society caused by US policy toward Israel and Israel’s prosecution of … Continue reading → ...
Barrie Saunders writes – Dear Paul As the new Minister of Media and Communications, you will be inundated with heaps of free advice and special pleading, all in the national interest of course. For what it’s worth here is my assessment: Traditional broadcasting free to air content through ...
Many criticisms are being made of the Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill, including by this writer. But as with everything in politics, every story has two sides, and both deserve attention. It’s important to understand what the Government is trying to achieve and its arguments for such a bold reform. ...
Peter Dunne writes – The great nineteenth British Prime Minister, William Gladstone, once observed that “the first essential for a Prime Minister is to be a good butcher.” When a later British Prime Minister, Harold Macmillan, sacked a third of his Cabinet in July 1962, in what became ...
Ele Ludemann writes – New Zealanders had the OECD’s second highest tax increase last year: New Zealanders faced the second-biggest tax raises in the developed world last year, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) says. The intergovernmental agency said the average change in personal income tax ...
We all know something’s not right with our elections. The spread of misinformation, people being targeted with soundbites and emotional triggers that ignore the facts, even the truth, and influence their votes.The use of technology to produce deep fakes. How can you tell if something is real or not? Can ...
This video includes conclusions of the creator climate scientist Dr. Simon Clark. It is presented to our readers as an informed perspective. Please see video description for references (if any). This year you will be lied to! Simon Clark helps prebunk some misleading statements you'll hear about climate. The video includes ...
It is all very well cutting the backrooms of public agencies but it may compromise the frontlines. One of the frustrations of the Productivity Commission’s 2017 review of universities is that while it observed that their non-academic staff were increasing faster than their academic staff, it did not bother to ...
Buzz from the Beehive Two speeches delivered by Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters at Anzac Day ceremonies in Turkey are the only new posts on the government’s official website since the PM announced his Cabinet shake-up. In one of the speeches, Peters stated the obvious: we live in a troubled ...
1. Which of these would you not expect to read in The Waikato Invader?a. Luxon is here to do business, don’t you worry about thatb. Mr KPI expects results, and you better believe itc. This decisive man of action is getting me all hot and excitedd. Melissa Lee is how ...
…it has a restricted jurisdiction which must not be abused: it is not an inquisitionNOTE – this article was published before the High Court ruled that Karen Chhour does not have to appear before the Waitangi Tribunal Gary Judd writes – The High Court ...
Lindsay Mitchell writes – One of reasons Oranga Tamariki exists is to prevent child neglect. But could the organisation itself be guilty of the same?Oranga Tamariki’s statistics show a decrease in the number and age of children in care. “There are less children ...
David Farrar writes: Graeme Edgeler wrote in 2017: In the first five years after three strikes came into effect 5248 offenders received a ‘first strike’ (that is, a “stage-1 conviction” under the three strikes sentencing regime), and 68 offenders received a ‘second strike’. In the five years prior to ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has surprised everyone with his ruthlessness in sacking two of his ministers from their crucial portfolios. Removing ministers for poor performance after only five months in the job just doesn’t normally happen in politics. That’s refreshing and will be extremely ...
TL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the two days to 6:06am on Thursday, April 25:Politics: PM Christopher Luxon has set up a dual standard for ministerial competence by demoting two National Cabinet ministers while leaving also-struggling ...
Hi,Today I mainly want to share some of your thoughts about the recent piece I wrote about success and failure, and the forces that seemingly guide our lives. But first, a quick bit of housekeeping: I am doing a Webworm popup in Los Angeles on Saturday May 11 at 2pm. ...
It is hard to see what Melissa Lee might have done to “save” the media. National went into the election with no public media policy and appears not to have developed one subsequently. Lee claimed that she had prepared a policy paper before the election but it had been decided ...
Open access notablesIce acceleration and rotation in the Greenland Ice Sheet interior in recent decades, Løkkegaard et al., Communications Earth & Environment:In the past two decades, mass loss from the Greenland ice sheet has accelerated, partly due to the speedup of glaciers. However, uncertainty in speed derived from satellite products ...
Buzz from the Beehive A statement from Children’s Minister Karen Chhour – yet to be posted on the Government’s official website – arrived in Point of Order’s email in-tray last night. It welcomes the High Court ruling on whether the Waitangi Tribunal can demand she appear before it. It does ...
Mr Bombastic:Ironically, the media the academic experts wanted is, in many ways, the media they got. In place of the tyrannical editors of yesteryear, advancing without fear or favour the interests of the ruling class; the New Zealand news media of today boasts a troop of enlightened journalists dedicated to ...
It's hard times try to make a livingYou wake up every morning in the unforgivingOut there somewhere in the cityThere's people living lives without mercy or pityI feel good, yeah I'm feeling fineI feel better then I have for the longest timeI think these pills have been good for meI ...
In 1974, the US Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. Nixon, finding that the President was not a King, but was subject to the law and was required to turn over the evidence of his wrongdoing to the courts. It was a landmark decision for the rule ...
Every day now just seems to bring in more fresh meat for the grinder.In their relentlessly ideological drive to cut back on the “excessive bloat” (as they see it) of the previous Labour-led government, on the mountains of evidence accumulated in such a short period of time do not ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Megan Valére SosouMarket gardening site of the Itchèléré de Itagui agricultural cooperative in Dassa-Zoumè (Image credit: Megan Valère Sossou) For the residents of Dassa-Zoumè, a city in the West African country of Benin, choosing between drinking water and having enough ...
Buzz from the Beehive Melissa Lee – as may be discerned from the screenshot above – has not been demoted for doing something seriously wrong as Minister of ...
Morning in London Mother hugs beloved daughter outside the converted shoe factory in which she is living.Afternoon in London Travelling writer takes himself and his wrist down to A&E, just to be sure. Read more ...
Mike Grimshaw writes – The recent announcement of the University Advisory Group, chaired by Sir Peter Gluckman, makes very clear where the Government’s focus and priorities lie. The remit of the Advisory Group is that Group members will consider challenges and opportunities for improvement in the university sector including: ...
Labour is calling for the Government to urgently rethink its coalition commitment to restart live animal exports, Labour animal welfare spokesperson Rachel Boyack said. ...
Today’s Financial Stability Report has once again highlighted that poverty and deep inequality are political choices - and this Government is choosing to make them worse. ...
The Green Party is calling on the Government to do more for our households in most need as unemployment rises and the cost of living crisis endures. ...
Unemployment is on the rise and it’s only going to get worse under this Government, Labour finance spokesperson Barbara Edmonds said. Stats NZ figures show the unemployment rate grew to 4.3 percent in the March quarter from 4 percent in the December quarter. “This is the second rise in unemployment ...
The New Zealand Labour Party welcomes the entering into force of the European Union and New Zealand free trade agreement. This agreement opens the door for a huge increase in trade opportunities with a market of 450 million people who are high value discerning consumers of New Zealand goods and ...
The National-led Government continues its fiscal jiggery pokery with its Pharmac announcement today, Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall says. “The government has increased Pharmac funding but conceded it will only make minimal increases in access to medicine”, said Ayesha Verrall “This is far from the bold promises made to fund ...
This afternoon’s interim Waitangi Tribunal report must be taken seriously as it affects our most vulnerable children, Labour children’s spokesperson Willow-Jean Prime. ...
Te Pāti Māori are demanding the New Zealand Government support an international independent investigation into mass graves that have been uncovered at two hospitals on the Gaza strip, following weeks of assault by Israeli troops. Among the 392 bodies that have been recovered, are children and elderly civilians. Many of ...
Our two-tiered system for veterans’ support is out of step with our closest partners, and all parties in Parliament should work together to fix it, Labour veterans’ affairs spokesperson Greg O’Connor said. ...
Stripping two Ministers of their portfolios just six months into the job shows Christopher Luxon’s management style is lacking, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said. ...
Tonight’s court decision to overturn the summons of the Children’s Minister has enabled the Crown to continue making decisions about Māori without evidence, says Te Pāti Māori spokesperson for Children, Mariameno Kapa-Kingi. “The judicial system has this evening told the nation that this government can do whatever they want when ...
It appears Nicola Willis is about to pull the rug out from under the feet of local communities still dealing with the aftermath of last year’s severe weather, and local councils relying on funding to build back from these disasters. ...
The Government is making short-sighted changes to the Resource Management Act (RMA) that will take away environmental protection in favour of short-term profits, Labour’s environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said today. ...
Labour welcomes the release of the report into the North Island weather events and looks forward to working with the Government to ensure that New Zealand is as prepared as it can be for the next natural disaster. ...
The Labour Party has called for the New Zealand Government to recognise Palestine, as a material step towards progressing the two-State solution needed to achieve a lasting peace in the region. ...
Some of our country’s most important work, stopping the sexual exploitation of children and violent extremism could go along with staff on the frontline at ports and airports. ...
The Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill will give projects such as new coal mines a ‘get out of jail free’ card to wreak havoc on the environment, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said today. ...
The government's decision to reintroduce Three Strikes is a destructive and ineffective piece of law-making that will only exacerbate an inherently biased and racist criminal justice system, said Te Pāti Māori Justice Spokesperson, Tākuta Ferris, today. During the time Three Strikes was in place in Aotearoa, Māori and Pasifika received ...
Cuts to frontline hospital staff are not only a broken election promise, it shows the reckless tax cuts have well and truly hit the frontline of the health system, says Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall. ...
The Green Party has joined the call for public submissions on the fast-track legislation to be extended after the Ombudsman forced the Government to release the list of organisations invited to apply just hours before submissions close. ...
New Zealand’s good work at reducing climate emissions for three years in a row will be undone by the National government’s lack of ambition and scrapping programmes that were making a difference, Labour Party climate spokesperson Megan Woods said today. ...
More essential jobs could be on the chopping block, this time Ministry of Education staff on the school lunches team are set to find out whether they're in line to lose their jobs. ...
Te Pāti Māori is disgusted at the confirmation that hundreds are set to lose their jobs at Oranga Tamariki, and the disestablishment of the Treaty Response Unit. “This act of absolute carelessness and out of touch decision making is committing tamariki to state abuse.” Said Te Pāti Māori Oranga Tamariki ...
The Government is trying to bring in a law that will allow Ministers to cut corners and kill off native species, Labour environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said. ...
Cancelling urgently needed new Cook Strait ferries and hiking the cost of public transport for many Kiwis so that National can announce the prospect of another tunnel for Wellington is not making good choices, Labour Transport Spokesperson Tangi Utikere said. ...
A laundry list of additional costs for Tāmaki Makarau Auckland shows the Minister for the city is not delivering for the people who live there, says Labour Auckland Issues spokesperson Shanan Halbert. ...
Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi, and Mema Paremata mō Tāmaki-Makaurau, Takutai Tarsh Kemp, will travel to the Gold Coast to strengthen ties with Māori in Australia next week (15-21 April). The visit, in the lead-up to the 9th Australian National Kapa haka Festival, will be an opportunity for both ...
The Green Party has today launched a step-by-step guide to help New Zealanders make their voice heard on the Government’s democracy dodging and anti-environment fast track legislation. ...
From today, passengers travelling internationally from Auckland Airport will be able to keep laptops and liquids in their carry-on bags for security screening thanks to new technology, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “Creating a more efficient and seamless travel experience is important for holidaymakers and businesses, enabling faster movement through ...
People with an interest in the health of Northland’s marine ecosystems are invited to a public meeting to discuss how to deal with kina barrens, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones will lead the discussion, which will take place on Friday, 10 May, at Awanui Hotel in ...
Kiwi exporters are $100 million better off today with the NZ EU FTA entering into force says Trade Minister Todd McClay. “This is all part of our plan to grow the economy. New Zealand's prosperity depends on international trade, making up 60 per cent of the country’s total economic activity. ...
There are heartening signs that the extractive sector is once again becoming an attractive prospect for investors and a source of economic prosperity for New Zealand, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. “The beginnings of a resurgence in extractive industries are apparent in media reports of the sector in the past ...
The return of the historic Ō-Rākau battle site to the descendants of those who fought there moved one step closer today with the first reading of Te Pire mō Ō-Rākau, Te Pae o Maumahara / The Ō-Rākau Remembrance Bill. The Bill will entrust the 9.7-hectare battle site, five kilometres west ...
Energy Minister Simeon Brown has announced 25 new high-speed EV charging hubs along key routes between major urban centres and outlined the Government’s plan to supercharge New Zealand’s EV infrastructure. The hubs will each have several chargers and be capable of charging at least four – and up to 10 ...
The coalition Government will not proceed with the previous Government’s plans to regulate residential property managers, Housing Minister Chris Bishop says. “I have written to the Chairperson of the Social Services and Community Committee to inform him that the Government does not intend to support the Residential Property Managers Bill ...
The Government has announced an independent review into the disability support system funded by the Ministry of Disabled People – Whaikaha. Disability Issues Minister Louise Upston says the review will look at what can be done to strengthen the long-term sustainability of Disability Support Services to provide disabled people and ...
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith has attended the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva and outlined the Government’s plan to restore law and order. “Speaking to the United Nations Human Rights Council provided us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while responding to issues and ...
The Government and Rotorua Lakes Council are committed to working closely together to end the use of contracted emergency housing motels in Rotorua. Associate Minister of Housing (Social Housing) Tama Potaka says the Government remains committed to ending the long-term use of contracted emergency housing motels in Rotorua by the ...
Trade Minister Todd McClay heads overseas today for high-level trade talks in the Gulf region, and a key OECD meeting in Paris. Mr McClay will travel to Riyadh to meet with counterparts from Saudi Arabia and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). “New Zealand’s goods and services exports to the Gulf region ...
Education Minister Erica Stanford has outlined six education priorities to deliver a world-leading education system that sets Kiwi kids up for future success. “I’m putting ambition, achievement and outcomes at the heart of our education system. I want every child to be inspired and engaged in their learning so they ...
The new NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) App is a secure ‘one stop shop’ to provide the services drivers need, Transport Minister Simeon Brown and Digitising Government Minister Judith Collins say. “The NZTA App will enable an easier way for Kiwis to pay for Vehicle Registration and Road User Charges (RUC). ...
Whānau with tamariki growing up in emergency housing motels will be prioritised for social housing starting this week, says Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka. “Giving these whānau a better opportunity to build healthy stable lives for themselves and future generations is an essential part of the Government’s goal of reducing ...
Racing Minister Winston Peters has paid tribute to an icon of the industry with the recent passing of Dave O’Sullivan (OBE). “Our sympathies are with the O’Sullivan family with the sad news of Dave O’Sullivan’s recent passing,” Mr Peters says. “His contribution to racing, initially as a jockey and then ...
Assalaamu alaikum, greetings to you all. Eid Mubarak, everyone! I want to extend my warmest wishes to you and everyone celebrating this joyous occasion. It is a pleasure to be here. I have enjoyed Eid celebrations at Parliament before, but this is my first time joining you as the Minister ...
Associate Health Minister David Seymour has announced Pharmac’s largest ever budget of $6.294 billion over four years, fixing a $1.774 billion fiscal cliff. “Access to medicines is a crucial part of many Kiwis’ lives. We’ve committed to a budget allocation of $1.774 billion over four years so Kiwis are ...
Hon Paula Bennett has been appointed as member and chair of the Pharmac board, Associate Health Minister David Seymour announced today. "Pharmac is a critical part of New Zealand's health system and plays a significant role in ensuring that Kiwis have the best possible access to medicines,” says Mr Seymour. ...
Hundreds of New Zealand families affected by Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) will benefit from a new Government focus on prevention and treatment, says Health Minister Dr Shane Reti. “We know FASD is a leading cause of preventable intellectual and neurodevelopmental disability in New Zealand,” Dr Reti says. “Every day, ...
Regional Development Minister Shane Jones today attended the official opening of Kaikohe’s new $14.7 million sports complex. “The completion of the Kaikohe Multi Sports Complex is a fantastic achievement for the Far North,” Mr Jones says. “This facility not only fulfils a long-held dream for local athletes, but also creates ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters’ engagements in Türkiye this week underlined the importance of diplomacy to meet growing global challenges. “Returning to the Gallipoli Peninsula to represent New Zealand at Anzac commemorations was a sombre reminder of the critical importance of diplomacy for de-escalating conflicts and easing tensions,” Mr Peters ...
Ambassador Millar, Burgemeester, Vandepitte, Excellencies, military representatives, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen – good morning and welcome to this sacred Anzac Day dawn service. It is an honour to be here on behalf of the Government and people of New Zealand at Buttes New British Cemetery, Polygon Wood – a deeply ...
Distinguished guests - It is an honour to return once again to this site which, as the resting place for so many of our war-dead, has become a sacred place for generations of New Zealanders. Our presence here and at the other special spaces of Gallipoli is made ...
Mai ia tawhiti pamamao, te moana nui a Kiwa, kua tae whakaiti mai matou, ki to koutou papa whenua. No koutou te tapuwae, no matou te tapuwae, kua honoa pumautia. Ko nga toa kua hinga nei, o te Waipounamu, o te Ika a Maui, he okioki tahi me o ...
Paul Goldsmith will take on responsibility for the Media and Communications portfolio, while Louise Upston will pick up the Disability Issues portfolio, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced today. “Our Government is relentlessly focused on getting New Zealand back on track. As issues change in prominence, I plan to adjust Ministerial ...
Recreational catch limits will be reduced in areas of Fiordland and the Chatham Islands to help keep those fisheries healthy and sustainable, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. The lower recreational daily catch limits for a range of finfish and shellfish species caught in the Fiordland Marine Area and ...
Energy Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed an important milestone in New Zealand’s hydrogen future, with the opening of the country’s first network of hydrogen refuelling stations in Wiri. “I want to congratulate the team at Hiringa Energy and its partners K one W one (K1W1), Mitsui & Co New Zealand ...
The coalition Government is delivering on its commitment to improve resource management laws and give greater certainty to consent applicants, with a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) expected to be introduced to Parliament next month. RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop has today outlined the first RMA Amendment ...
Overseas models for regulating the oil and gas sector, including their decommissioning regimes, are being carefully scrutinised as a potential template for New Zealand’s own sector, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. The Coalition Government is focused on rebuilding investor confidence in New Zealand’s energy sector as it looks to strengthen ...
Emergency Management and Recovery Minister Mark Mitchell has today released the Report of the Government Inquiry into the response to the North Island Severe Weather Events. “The report shows that New Zealand’s emergency management system is not fit-for-purpose and there are some significant gaps we need to address,” Mr Mitchell ...
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith is today travelling to Europe where he’ll update the United Nations Human Rights Council on the Government’s work to restore law and order. “Attending the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva provides us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while ...
Associate Agriculture Minister, Mark Patterson, formally reopened the world’s largest wool processing facility today in Awatoto, Napier, following a $50 million rebuild and refurbishment project. “The reopening of this facility will significantly lift the economic opportunities available to New Zealand’s wool sector, which already accounts for 20 per cent of ...
Hon Andrew Bayly, Minister for Small Business and Manufacturing At the Southland Otago Regional Engineering Collective (SOREC) Summit, 18 April, Dunedin Ngā mihi nui, Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Ko Whanganui aho Good Afternoon and thank you for inviting me to open your summit today. I am delighted ...
The Government is delivering on its commitment to bring back the Three Strikes legislation, Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee announced today. “Our Government is committed to restoring law and order and enforcing appropriate consequences on criminals. We are making it clear that repeat serious violent or sexual offending is not ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters has today announced four new diplomatic appointments for New Zealand’s overseas missions. “Our diplomats have a vital role in maintaining and protecting New Zealand’s interests around the world,” Mr Peters says. “I am pleased to announce the appointment of these senior diplomats from the ...
New Zealand is contributing NZ$7 million to support communities affected by severe food insecurity and other urgent humanitarian needs in Ethiopia and Somalia, Foreign Minister Rt Hon Winston Peters announced today. “Over 21 million people are in need of humanitarian assistance across Ethiopia, with a further 6.9 million people ...
Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Paul Goldsmith is congratulating Mataaho Collective for winning the Golden Lion for best participant in the main exhibition at the Venice Biennale. "Congratulations to the Mataaho Collective for winning one of the world's most prestigious art prizes at the Venice Biennale. “It is good ...
The Government is reforming financial services to improve access to home loans and other lending, and strengthen customer protections, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly and Housing Minister Chris Bishop announced today. “Our coalition Government is committed to rebuilding the economy and making life simpler by cutting red tape. We are ...
“China remains a strong commercial opportunity for Kiwi exporters as Chinese businesses and consumers continue to value our high-quality safe produce,” Trade and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay says. Mr McClay has returned to New Zealand following visits to Beijing, Harbin and Shanghai where he met ministers, governors and mayors and engaged in trade and agricultural events with the New ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has completed a successful trip to Singapore, Thailand and the Philippines, deepening relationships and capitalising on opportunities. Mr Luxon was accompanied by a business delegation and says the choice of countries represents the priority the New Zealand Government places on South East Asia, and our relationships in ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra The Albanese government will introduce legislation to ban deepfake pornography and provide more funding for the eSafety Commission to pilot age-assurance technologies. The contribution of internet sites to gender-based violence was one major issue ...
Average ordinary time hourly earnings, as measured by the Quarterly Employment Survey (QES), increased 5.2 percent in the year to the March 2024 quarter, according to figures released by Stats NZ today. Annual wage cost inflation, as measured by the ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Dimitrios Salampasis, FinTech Capability Lead | Senior Lecturer, Emerging Technologies and FinTech, Swinburne University of Technology Clem Onojeghuo/Unsplash In the digital era, the job market is increasingly becoming a minefield – demanding and difficult to navigate. According to the Australian Bureau ...
As of the March 2024 quarter, we can now look back on 20 years of data related to youth not in employment, education, or training (NEET), as collected by the Household Labour Force Survey (HLFS), according to figures released by Stats NZ today. "The ...
Thousands of workers attended public events in Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch today to celebrate International Workers’ Day (May Day), but union representatives are urging caution and vigilance over the Government’s blatantly "anti-worker" ...
The seasonally adjusted unemployment rate was 4.3 percent in the March 2024 quarter, compared with 4.0 percent in the previous quarter, according to figures released by Stats NZ today. ...
The PSA is warning the Government that the sensitive information of New Zealanders held by various agencies will fall into the wrong hands if the latest round of proposed cuts goes ahead. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Talitha Best, Professor of Psychology, CQUniversity Australia Victoria Rodriguez/Unsplash How do sugar rushes work? – W.H, age nine, from Canberra What a terrific question W.H! Let’s explore this, starting with some of the basics. What is sugar? ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Karinna Saxby, Research Fellow, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne MART PRODUCTION/Pexels Increasing income support could help keep women and children safe according to new work demonstrating strong links between financial insecurity and domestic violence. ...
ANALYSIS:By Olli Hellmann, University of Waikato When New Zealanders commemorate Anzac Day today on April 25, it’s not only to honour the soldiers who lost their lives in World War I and subsequent conflicts, but also to mark a defining event for national identity. The battle of Gallipoli against ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Mark A Gregory, Associate Professor, School of Engineering, RMIT University The telecommunications industry faces a major shakeup following the release of the post-incident report on last November’s 12-hour Optus outage. Telecommunications companies will have to share more information with customers during future ...
Welcome to The Spinoff Bookseller Confessional, in which we get to know Aotearoa’s booksellers. This week: Eden Denyer, bookseller at Unity Books Auckland.Weirdest question/request you’ve had on the shop floorA mother came in looking for anything we might have on Alaskan bison as that was her little boy’s ...
NZCTU Economist Craig Renney said new data released by Statistics New Zealand shows the need for Government to act now, with unemployment rising from 3.4% to 4.3%. ...
The outpouring of anger over Maiki Sherman’s hyperbolic presentation of this week’s ‘nightmare’ poll is itself an overreaction, argues Stewart Sowman-Lund. Politicians love nothing more than to pretend they don’t care about polls. This week, deputy prime minister Winston Peters said he didn’t give a “rat’s derriere” about a TVNZ ...
Asia Pacific Report Ngāti Kahungunu in Aotearoa New Zealand’s Hawkes Bay region has become the first indigenous Māori iwi (tribe) to sign a resolution calling for a “ceasefire in Palestine”, reports Te Ao Māori News. Reporter Te Aniwaniwa Paterson talked to Te Otāne Huata, who has been organising peace rallies ...
By Dale Luma in Port Moresby “We want grants and not concessional loans,” is the crisp message from Papua New Guinea businesses directly affected by the Black Wednesday looting four months ago. The businesses, which lost millions after the January 10 rioting and looting, say they need grants as part ...
Happy May Day. Join a union. Q: What’s worse than a staff break room where the only place to sit and have a cup of tea is on a teetering stack of old pornography magazines? A: Your boss replacing the magazine stacks with chairs that are “heartily encrusted with ...
By Koroi Hawkins, RNZ Pacific editor Former opposition leader Matthew Wale has been announced as the second prime ministerial candidate ahead of the election in Solomon Islands tomorrow. He will face off against former foreign affairs minister Jeremiah Manele, who was announced by the Coalition for National Unity and Transformation ...
We get but one birthday a year – why not make it last as long as possible by scheduling as many meals with friends and family as you can? This is an excerpt from our weekly food newsletter, The Boil Up. How do you celebrate your birthday? Do you celebrate at ...
A Koi Tū discussion paper released today proposes sweeping changes to New Zealand’s media industry. The principal’s key author, Gavin Ellis, explains how journalists have a key role to play in making others value their role in society. This is an abridged version of a piece first published on knightlyviews.com ...
The Government’s spending cuts are again targeting support for Māori with proposed reform of the agency charged with advising on Māori wellbeing and development. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ian Douglas, Honorary Senior Lecturer, UNSW Aviation., UNSW Sydney The history of budget jet airlines in Australia is a long road littered with broken dreams. New entrants have consistently struggled to get a foothold. Low-cost carrier Bonza has just become the industry’s ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Rosalind Dixon, Director, Gilbert + Tobin Centre of Public Law, UNSW Sydney Australia is finally having a sustained conversation about violence against women and what we can do about it. It is more than time. Australian women and girls continue to experience ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Stephen Duckett, Honorary Enterprise Professor, School of Population and Global Health, and Department of General Practice and Primary Care, The University of Melbourne stockfour/Shutterstock Preliminary bulk billing data released this week shows a 2.1% rise in bulk billing up to March. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Samantha Schulz, Senior Lecturer, University of Adelaide Australia is once again grappling with how we can stop gendered violence in our country. Protests over the weekend show there is enormous community anger over the number of women who are dying and National ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Peter Martin, Visiting Fellow, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University AnastasiaDudka/Shutterstock What if the government was doing everything it could to stop thieves making off with our money, except the one thing that could really work? That’s how it ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Erin Harrington, Senior Lecturer in English and Cultural Studies, University of Canterbury The Conversation It seems to be a time of old favourites. This month our experts have recommended two new seasons – the second season of Alone Australia (although ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jonti Horner, Professor (Astrophysics), University of Southern Queensland A bright Eta Aquariid meteor photobombed this photo of comet C/2020 F8 (SWAN) in May 2020.Jonti Horner Meteors – commonly known as shooting stars – can be seen on any night of the ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Tim Flannery, Honorary fellow, The University of Melbourne Shutterstock Current concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO₂) in Earth’s atmosphere are unprecedented in human history. But CO₂ levels today, and those that might occur in coming decades, did occur millions of years ago. ...
Winston Peters has been keen to dismiss speculation on our involvement in Aukus but will give a speech tonight on the direction of our foreign policy, writes Anna Rawhiti-Connell in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Patrick Usmar, Lecturer in Critical Media Literacies, Auckland University of Technology Getty Images With the coalition government’s ban of student mobile phones in New Zealand schools coming into effect this week, reaction has ranged from the sceptical (kids will just get ...
Hospitals around the country are not allowed to make a single hiring decision without the approval of Te Whatu Ora's head office, including for cleaners and administration staff. ...
A new report on protecting journalism and democracy in New Zealand recommends a levy be charged on global platforms like Facebook and Google to fund media firms undertaking public interest reporting. It also calls for the reinstatement of a powerful Broadcasting Commission to distribute public funding for journalism and other ...
On International Workers' Day, also known as May Day, the New Zealand Council of Trade Unions Te Kauae Kaimahi and the wider union movement are celebrating the proud history of the labour movement during a tough time for working people. ...
From bills to beards, a walk through the former Green co-leader’s time in politics. After close to a decade in politics, James Shaw is preparing to bid farewell to parliament. Tonight will see the former minister deliver his valedictory address, certain to be a speech filled with Shaw’s trademark wit ...
Two months ago, MPs unanimously voted to give themselves a week off in Efeso Collins’ honour. On Tuesday, most were too busy to give even an hour of their time. The day Fa’anānā Efeso Collins died, parliament felt different. In a building that operates at a breakneck pace, everyone stopped ...
India’s election involves hundreds of millions of people and is a months-long affair. Here’s how voting works and what’s at stake.The biggest-ever election in world history started on April 19, with more than 10% of the world’s population eligible to vote. Elections in India, the world’s most populous country ...
Comment: Journalists are very good at telling other people’s stories, but they fall well short when writing about their own profession. Perhaps that is why it is so undervalued. Every successive poll on the public’s attitude toward journalism is more alarming than the last. In the last month we have ...
Opinion: A young Māori woman and her Pacific partner arrive at their local hospital by ambulance. She has gone into labour at just under 24 weeks, but the couple haven’t recognised the symptoms – and don’t know the risks of premature birth for their baby. By the time they arrive, ...
Behind closed doors, NZ First will be arguing fiercely against any watering down of the ministerial decision-making powers in the Bill The post Bishop backtracks after fast-track backlash appeared first on Newsroom. ...
Emotional scenes played out in the Invercargill courthouse on the first two days of the coronial inquest into the death of Gore toddler Lachlan Jones, in which the boy’s mother was accused of disposing of her son’s body. The second season of Newsroom’s award-nominated podcast The Boy in the Water ...
Opinion: The impression from the carpark is very inviting. The area is well fenced but barred so there is easy visibility of loved ones. Inside, the spaces are welcoming and clean and staff are friendly and clearly comfortable. I am greeted by ‘Kim’. She has worked here for three years, ...
After the Christchurch earthquake, the then-national civil defence boss compared his experience to “putting a team on the rugby field who have never ever played together before”. Now, eight years later – and following a damning inquiry into the emergency response of cyclones Gabrielle, Hale and the Auckland anniversary weekend floods – ...
“I had just come off the end of a major robbery case which I had been working on for six months when I got a call on the afternoon of September 1, 1992, that some remains had been found at a building site in Devonport, so I drove over with ...
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A,DIV,A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Wednesday 1 May appeared first on Newsroom. ...
Asia Pacific Report A Pacific civil society alliance has condemned French neocolonial policies in Kanaky New Caledonia, saying Paris is set on “maintaining the status quo” and denying the indigenous Kanak people their inalienable right to self-determination. The Pacific Regional Non-Governmental Organisations (PRNGOs) Alliance, representing some 15 groups, said in ...
Koi Tū New Zealand cannot sit back and see the collapse of its Fourth Estate, the director of Koi Tū: The Centre for Informed Futures, Sir Peter Gluckman, says in the foreword of a paper published today. The paper, “If not journalists, then who?” paints a picture of an industry ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra Foreign investment proposals with implications for Australia’s strategic or economic security will face tougher scrutiny, under a policy overhaul to be announced by Treasurer Jim Chalmers on Wednesday. At the same time, the government ...
A Waitangi Tribunal inquiry report has warned government that a repeal of Section 7AA of the Oranga Tamariki Act could cause harm to children in care. ...
The Treasury has published today three new papers covering government consumption multipliers, automatic stabilisers and the impacts of global shocks on New Zealand’s economy. ...
Asia Pacific Report The Pacific state of Hawai’i’s House of Representatives has joined the state’s Senate in calling for a ceasefire in Israel’s war on Gaza, becoming the first state to pass such a resolution, reports Hawaii News Now. In March, the Senate passed a ceasefire resolution with a 24–1 ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Christopher Ferrie, A/Prof, UTS Chancellor’s Postdoctoral Research and ARC DECRA Fellow, University of Technology Sydney PsiQuantum The Australian government has announced a pledge of approximately A$940 million (US$617 million) to PsiQuantum, a quantum computing start-up company based in Silicon Valley. Half ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Hunter Bennett, Lecturer in Exercise Science, University of South Australia Cameron Prins/Shutterstock If you spend a lot of time exploring fitness content online, you might have come across the concept of heart rate zones. Heart rate zone training has become more ...
SPECIAL REPORT:By Eugene Doyle He is the most popular Palestinian leader alive today — and yet few people in the West even know his name. Absolutely no one in Gaza or the West Bank does not know him. That difference speaks volumes about who dominates the media narrative that ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Will McCallum, PhD Candidate – School of Communication and Creative Arts, Deakin University Earlier this year, Opposition Leader Peter Dutton accused Prime Minister Anthony Albanese of not supporting Operation Sovereign Borders – the military-led border security operation that has “closed Australia’s borders ...
By Melyne Baroi in Port Moresby A Papua New Guinea MP, Peter Isoaimo, who had been ousted by the National Court in an alleged bribery case, has been reinstated by the Supreme Court on appeal. A three-member Supreme Court bench found that the National Court had erred in finding that ...
If this is correct – the policy is inexcusable.
It's badly considered implementation will also lead to further division along racial lines.
If the current government wanted to create a programme that provoked backlash against Māori, they couldn't have done better than what they have done with education, co-governance and this type of policy:
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/auckland-surgeons-must-now-consider-ethnicity-in-prioritising-patients-for-operations-some-are-not-happy/ONGOC263IFCF3LADSRR6VTGQWE/
Inequality is not addressed by switching the players.
That just means it is a different demographic that is now experiencing it.
Yip great way to get unelected, I'll be considering swapping sides (top most likely)if labours finger prints are on this.
Chippie on te news gave a reasonable explanation, all is forgiven for now, but I'm watching!!!
Yes, this is unnecessary bullshit.
If Maori and PIs are amongst the most needy so far as medical care is concerned, then they will be more likely to receive priority on the basis of need without needing to reference race at all.
A system based on need is intrinsically fair, and easy for people to understand and accept.
tsmithfield, I am afraid you are wrong. I would genuinely like to say that you are right.
However, the evidence is otherwise. See my comment at 1.3.2.1 for why I contradict you.
The question of race is why there was inequality of treatment. Has it changed within 2 years?
it certainly needs to change for us to be able to say we live in an equal and fair society.
Thanks, I had a look at your post further down.
Several questions:
Firstly, how do you operationalise the term "Maori" because that can vary a lot depending on the percentage of Maori ancestory a person has. And, also is likely to be reflected in outcomes.
Secondly, does your research include multi-factorial analysis? Because, there will likely be a high overlap between Maori/PI and groups represented in poverty or low income. If that is the case, then targeting need should also target those at risk communities. Whereas, targeting groups on the basis of race will capture a lot of people who aren't disadvantgaged due to specific life circumstances.
Finally, don't you think the issue is really at a more fundamental level than surgical operations? Shouldn't we be targeting the root causes that lead to the outcomes you describe?
Indeed 'we' should, given those disgraceful outcomes. Your questions are intriguing, but imagine the shoe was on the other foot – wouldn't you want something done in a timely manner, until "targeting the root causes" took effect?
A quote from Mac1's comment @1.3.2.1 (copied below) sums it up for me.
Some Kiwis simply don't believe that long-standing (race-based) inequality of health outcomes justifies immediate positive discrimination – convenient eh?
Also, HT II @1.8
But, that still doesn't answer the question, really. I think it is important to know the criteria on which the group was divided into Maori and Non-Maori. For instance, would someone with 5% Maori blood be in the Maori or Non-Maori group?
And, how does that figure change once relevant variables such as income, education status, and similar factors are controlled for.
Quite often, when doing multi-variate analysis, the surface level effect will often disappear or become inconsequential when over-lapping factors are controlled for.
So, once those factors are controlled for, we might find that poorly educated people from low socio-economic backgrounds are more prone to poor health outcomes than those from better backgrounds, and that race has little to do with it.
Thus, interventions around health etc can be targetted much more accurately than on a broad, blunt dimension such as race, which includes both people who may need interventions, and those who don't.
We don't use blood quantum in NZ. Māori afaik primarily use whakapapa to understand who is Māori. Another reason why it's inappropriate in this context is that the issue is ethnicity not race. Think of ethnicity as something that arises out of ancestry and culture. The bodies that we inherit play into health outcomes, and so does the culture we come from. Arguing that there should be no ethnicity factor, is saying that we should ignore both those things.
(as an aside, I'm curious now if illnesses with a very strong genetic component that pass through families are affected by how many great grandparents were of a specific ethnicity. I'm guessing no much other than increasing chance).
And yes, it's not possible to design a policy that is good and fair for every individual. No health policy reaches that standard, which is why we have public health. It's based on assessing data about populations.
We already know it is both. When access to health care is shown to differ across ethnicities, we can understand the ethnicity side of it. Mac's prostate cancer example is a good one. One of the inequities is that the system enables Pākehā to get better access than Māori (beyond issues like poverty). I will see what research pops up in the debate over the next few days, but in my understanding this isn't controversial and has been known for a long time. I remember these issues being discussed in the 90s.
Weka, I guess the race/ethnicity side of the equation can really only relate to genetics. And, I assume those genetic effects would likely apply both to Maori and PI populations. For instance, the tendency for people from a Polynesian background to have higher BMIs, and the associated negative health outcomes that result.
But, while there may be a higher prevalence of individuals with high BMIs in Polynesian groups (including Maori), they also exist in other ethnicities.
Other factors that aren't genetic have to logically fit into the socio-economic basket which affects many people from a variety of ethnicities, though represented more highly by Maori and PI.
So, I think it is possible to set a specification of relevant factors, including genetic ones, that do not specify race or ethnicity at all, but still capture the target populations that are at most need.
If there is an issue of access, then that surely comes down to factors such as distance from health care, education etc. Surely, it is better to ensure those factors are correct in the first place. Because then a lot of problems can be solved before operations are even needed.
I just explained that ethnicity is also about culture, in addition to ancestry. Being treated differently in the health system arises in part because people treat Māori differently based on perception and belief. Māori trying to access a system that doesn't understand their needs is Māori would be another example.
While it's possible separate out genetics sometimes, in a healthcare setting like a surgical ward, both factors are at play and it's just not feasible to ask Māori to leave culture at the door (although that is often what is done).
Yes, which is why clinical relevance is one of the criteria.
nope. Socioeconomic class is considered in the deprivation consideration. It's distinct from ethnicity. You don't have to be poor to get worse healthcare, you just have to be Polynesian.
Meanwhile, the criteria were named in the article, and including ethnicity has good rationales that you haven't addressed. Your system would have bias against poor Māori conpared to poor Pākehā. Which is what we have now.
But I agree with you in terms of root causes.
The issues you have outlined aren't really to do with the final surgical outcomes, which is where the controversy is. It is more to do with accessing the health system in the first place. I think that is the first issue that needs to be solved.
We could prioritise Maori and PIs in terms of surgery as much as we like, and the actual health outcomes may not improve all that much. Simply because the access problem has not been solved, so many slip through the net. And, if the behavioural aspects related to various conditions persist, then people may well lose the benefit of any health interventions fairly quickly any way.
But, I still don't think we need to focus on ethnicity. I think we need to focus on ensuring there is adequate doctors, for instance, in poorer areas so symptoms can be quickly identified, and ensuring people get good education about symptoms to look out for etc. And good education about how to prevent risk factors. For instance, smoking cessation interventions in communities with high smoking rates etc.
Opportunity of access used to solely depend upon capacity (and need)…now opportunity of access first depends upon (declared) ethnicity…that is not equality.
As capacity continues to decline the preferred ethnicity will obviously access the diminished access…that is where your backlash will present, as it already is.
Equity my arse.
I've not seen anything that says access first depends on ethnicity. So please present compelling evidence for your statement or withdraw it.
https://www.immunise.health.nz/about-vaccines/nz-immunisations/flu-influenza-vaccine/#free
https://www.timetoscreen.nz/bowel-screening/50-74-screening-maori-and-pacific-people/
[you know better than that. Present your argument, use quotes, and back it up with the relevant link. I don’t have time to read whole webpages to try and parse your argument, the onus os on you – weka]
mod note.
Presumably there are agreed and reasonably robust criteria for identifying Māori Kiwis, otherwise it would be difficult to produce reliable statistics on the inequitous health and longevity outcomes for Māori and non-Māori.
It's just that whenever I read a list of questions that suggest improving something (anything) now might not be straightforward, I get the feeling that the authors of such lists are pretty comfortable with the status quo. Just a feeling, of course – perhaps there are Māori health experts who have raised questions similar to yours @1.2.1.1.
I keep telling you you need to vote Green.
As I have mentioned previously, I have signed a couple of Greenpeace petitions before. Voting Greens is probably a bit of a stretch lol.
But, as far as I am concerned, good ideas are good ideas. It doesn't matter which side of the fence they come from.
From personal experience of a friend being told to "Come back if it gets worse", and having to pay for "no service".. I insisted she got tests or a second opinion.
A silence then Marina Maori woman aged 56 was grudgingly given a blood tests script. Result….
Diabetes and after further tests thyroid cancer. The delays are not always caused by the patient.
Now if they are saying, because Maori die earlier, 56 may be 63/4 and therefore race should be considered….but it is so triggering to the treat everyone the same = equity group. That actually favours the longer lived Europeans and Asians. imo
Note Marina died 2 years later, a year after her husband. Neither lived to receive the pension, but that is another race based equity battle for another day.
Inequities exist right across government for Maori.
This was recognised in the 80's for welfare with John Rangihuna's report Puao-Te-Ata-Tu and continues today in health and justice well outlined in documents such as Pharmac's equity report.
https://pharmac.govt.nz/assets/achieving-medicine-access-equity-in-aotearoa-new-zealand-towards-a-theory-of-change.pdf
Any outrage that steps are being taken to address this in different organisations should be treated as the faux-outrage that it is and that it stems from either ignorance or racist dog-whistling.
The same bull-shit about about what makes a Maori, how do you prioritise, what if little white me misses out, etc has been trotted out for years and years while the actual practise has been well established.
Maori identity in NZ is is based upon direct whakapapa and self identification. Long may it stay that way. It is a cultural identification. It has nothing to do with race because as we all know, and as Darwin rightly said race is a non-sensical construct.
Darwin gently ribs them, pointing out that the range of races was anything between one and 63, depending on who’s counting.
Instead, he concludes, with typically voluminous evidence, that all races are indeed one species, and that proposed boundaries of physical or behavioural characteristics that separated the races were false, and the differences we see are graduated between different populations. He argues against racial essentialism – the idea that racial characteristics are fixed in populations.
The overseas experience of having to have a percentage of blood leads to silly situations esp for mixed race people where parents are deemed to be of one race and their children are not.
Prioritisation based on positive discrimination has always been on the basis of all things being equal and having a limited resource choice then you give precedence to the disadvantaged group.
That limited resource may be a job vacancy, a position on a course, an operation of which only so many are funded, the vaccine medication – which still didn't get it right by ignoring the broader issue of larger families, increased over crowding etc which meant you should have prioritised the whole family not just an age related occupant.
These things are not new and have been in place for years and years.
Employers do this sort of negative prioritisation all the time by flicking out the foreign name sounding CV's, or those over 50, or those who said something the employer doesn't like on facebook or blacklisting those who have taken personal grievances.
Where there are equity issues are in things like hospitals having people in them on staff who look like me and who can relate to me. Health has a long, long way to go with this. Once upon a time children of doctors were prioritised for medical school, children of chemists were next off the rank. As few doctors were Maori sufficient numbers could not get into medical school – regardless of ability as there simply were no spaces.
Maori were generous in giving land for hospitals and schools. Many of those rural hospitals and schools have been closed by successive governments meaning access is limited and more difficult. We talk about access as an individual problem but in reality it is us who chose not to fund rural health – and continue to make that choice.
It will take time to build up capacity for Maori to be more involved in health service provision to Maori. That we choose to try and do it seperately is also a failure – an inability to recruit, train and integrate into existing systems, and to once when in that system a preference to mould that person into a system image rather than have the system change.
I'd agree with you Molly, but I'd like to see the wording of the directive, as it might just be being misrepresented.
What we must acknowledge, and the medicos as well must recognise this, are the two decades of inequality that have elapsed since the first report (that I know of).
A good outcome will be that it is recognised that Māori did suffer for a long time with unequal treatment.
I am a prostate cancer survivor, and was treated quickly and well to achieve that status.
I am not happy to have been so well treated when I discovered later that my Māori brothers with prostate cancer for example were not afforded equal opportunities.
Here’s an example of academic studies/ https://www.otago.ac.nz/otago832492.pdf
The source of my original information, reports all available on the Web, was actually my surgeon who addressed a prostate survivor's group and mentioned this injustice.
He was aware but within the NZ context it continued.
To add some more information to the 'inequality' of health provision, I would add another learning gained from Tom Scott's book on Charles Upham, VC and bar.
Scott mentioned that Māori soldiers returning from WW2 were excluded from rehab loans. That has just been in the news recently also.
Upham himself would have been outraged as Scott mentioned his hatred of racism towards Māori.
Thanks for the pdf, Mac1. I agree with need to scrutinise the wording, but given there has been indications of ethnic preference in Covid response, it doesn't appear to be a policy that has no precedents.
IF – this is in any way enacted – then it is entirely the wrong response for addressing inequity, because the solution itself contains inequity. Having some kind of universal rating system that is transparent, would be a responsive and equitable solution.
I'll have a closer look at the pdf and the references contained within. But my criticism of the solution proposed remains the same.
Fair enough, Molly. My research, such as it is, brings me to the conclusion now that perhaps in order for Māori to achieve equality in a system adjudged racist by a Pakeha oncologist, there needs to be 'preferential' treatment to get to equality since the contributing factors I outline in my opinion below at 1.3.2.1 will still apply, I'm sure.
It's already being enacted. Doctors in Auckland have been instructed to take race into consideration in establishing medical priority for treatment since the beginning of the year.
From the original article
Belladonna, what factors were considered beside ethnicity in the three diagnoses and prioritising? The article doesn't say- BUT there are more factors.
I am surprized that your surgeon is politicizing treatment Mac 1 I.e talking to patients about Maori access to health care. This is inappropriate in my opinion. By all means let him lobby whoever to get better treatment, but talking to vulnerable patients who have just had a brush with cancer?? Frankly I think that is disgraceful.
About 15 years ago when there was a scheme for free counselling (six sessions could be accessed via Primary Health Care). Funding was cut and the service only became available to those under 25 years and Maori.
So prioritizing people by race has been going on for sometime. My friend who is a psychologist told me about this. She said suitability for therapy was based on so many factors (not everyone benefits). So the race criteria was arbitary and not helpful.
Of course as the health system continues to run down under Labour, it is likely that treatment will become less available to us all. My own example a case in point. I will need to have cataract surgery in the next year or two. I asked my optician how easy it was to access on the public health. Almost impossible was her reply. Relatively easy 5 years ago. I have many, many other stories like this re the public health system. Try not to need an MRI in Dunedin. The wait times go into the hundreds.
[“About 15 years ago when there was a scheme for free counselling (six sessions could be accessed via Primary Health Care). Funding was cut and the service only became available to those under 25 years and Maori”
Because this is a controversial political topic, please provide evidence for this. This needs to be reliable evidence, not ‘someone said’ evidence. Quote and links. If you cannot provide evidence, then please withdraw this claim of fact. In premod until either of these two things happen – weka]
Hi Anker, I have posted one citation above. Here's another. This is also in reply to your 1.4 below.
https://www.otago.ac.nz/wellington/departments/publichealth/research/cancercontrol/OTAGO660412
The studies I found went back to 2002-2005 btw and therefore encompass both National and Labour terms of government.
I recently wrote the following in a short newsletter article, inspired as I wrote above by my oncologist who said very plainly, "The New Zealand health system is racist'.
BTW, if stating the truth is 'politicising' then we should all be politicians!
"Cancer impacts more heavily on Māori, with large inequalities in the experience and quality of care from diagnosis to treatment to outcomes.
Māori have a higher incidence and higher mortality from for all cancers compared to non-Māori.
Inequalities in cancer death rates are increasing, which is a major reason for the 8 year gap in life expectancy for Māori compared to non-Māori.
Survival rates for Māori are poorer, with disparities in access to all cancer services.
Māori are nearly twice as likely to die from cancer, even though they are only 18% more likely to have cancer. One reason may be that diagnosis comes when the cancer has reached a more advanced stage.
Māori have the highest rate of lung cancer in the world with three times the mortality rate and a 7 year gap in life expectancy compared to non-Māori. This high mortality stems mostly from late presentation, delays in treatment and low surgical rates for early stage disease.
The emergency department is the most common method of entry to secondary care. This suggests that access barriers (e.g. financial, cultural, geographic) may still exist in the primary care sector along with other factors influencing late presentation such as patient fear.
Māori were more likely to have delays in receiving treatment, four times less likely than Europeans to receive curative treatment. Treatment for Māori was aimed at relieving symptoms.
The differences in types of treatment received may reflect the stage of cancer at presentation and higher rates of comorbidity (e.g. renal disease, cardiovascular disease) for Māori, which would preclude the use of curative treatments."
Mac 1 I would agree that financial and geographical access plays a role in healthcare outcomes.
What do you think it means that there are cultural barriers to healthcare?
As for lung cancer. Maori have much higher rates of smoking than Pakeha. I will try and find the link, but this does account for the discrepancy.
Ayesha Verrall's Beehive press release, 17 Nov 2022, states that Maori daily smoking rates for 2021/22 were almost 20% for Maori, and a little more than 18% for Pacific people.
Europeans came in at 7.2% and Asian people 2.6%.
why do you think that is?
Comcare in Christchurch provides wrap-round support for mental health clients, including housing services. I was told the Maori population of Christchurch was ~7%, while around half of Comcare's clients were Maori.
Regarding cataracts, where you live has an impact. In the town I'm in, last year a 60 yo friend got their one eye cataract done within 4 months of diagnosis by the optician, through the public health system.
I live in a big city t Wiggle. I am lucky I will find a way to afford the operations and I won't go on a waiting list because there are people who won't have a hope in hell of getting the op done privately.
Good luck! My friend described their first few days post-surgery as hallucinogenically coloured!
Me too. I pay for health insurance because my eyes are rubbish.
I had cataract surgery last year and it took 6 months and about 4 visits to get all the measurements done so that the right sort of lens could be constructed. At one stage, my opthalmologist said to me "this machine is calibrated to measure from 0 to 20. You are minus 4".
It took 3 years to get the corneal graft right in my other eye about 20 years ago. I got very used to seeing someone advancing on my eye with a scalpel and a pair of tweezers.
If I was in the public system, I may end up under the knife in a demonstration class, but otherwise – I don't think it would cope. Fortunately, I can afford to pay for it at the moment.
mod note.
Hi anker, I put your last 4 comments into spam because you haven’t responded to the mod note above. Can you please respond now. I’d also like to know if you know how to use the Replies tab on TS so that you can see when a moderator has replied to you. thanks.
Ok I see this mod note.
I am not sure I can find a link for it. It is one of my inside information quotes. I know it to be true, but can't disclose the source. I accept this may not meet the standards for evidence on TS
I asked you to either provide evidence or withdraw the claim, and you have done neither. Instead you have doubled down by saying you know it is true.
The problem is that you made a serious claim you are not willing to back up and did so in a hot topic conversation. You are right that it doesn't meet the standards here for debate, but my concern is that you will do similar again instead of respect the ethos here and that this will create more work for the mods.
It's not about you accepting that your comment doesn't meet the standards, it's about what the moderators have to do to stop people from misleading debate in this way. It looks to me like you don't understand why this matters and think that your own view is the priority.
There is no obligation on you to make claims that can't be substantiated, there is however an obligation to provide back up when asked. In other words, if you cannot back up your claims of fact were you to be asked, then please don't make them!
This is an issue with a number of people and I will add it to the moderation post I am writing (and see if I can explain it more clearly).
Same with the 1914-18 war..
Returning maori were excluded from what returning pakeha soldiers received..
That was over 100 years ago…and I am not maori…
But that racist injustice to those who put their lives on the line..(what more could any individual do for their country..than put their life in jeopardy..in its defence?)
That really really pisses me off..
And for me the treatment of maori soldiers after both world wars.. (apart from land theft)..
is the most egregious racism/injustice inflicted upon maori…
You say that
"I am not happy to have been so well treated when I discovered later that my Māori brothers with prostate cancer for example were not afforded equal opportunities.".
Would you be equally willing to say that
"I would be happy to have had my urgently required cancer treatment delayed by six months in order that my Māori brothers with less serious requirements should be treated first".
If not, why not?
The fact that one group of people were badly treated in the past requires that other people who have some characteristics in common with them should now be treated more rapidly is not the same as saying that in the future treatment in the future should be colour blind.
See my 1.2.1.1. I have a feeling that NZ in parts needs to be seen to be doing, or aspire to be doing, more than it needs in order to achieve equality.
In terms of voice projection in a theatre I was told as an actor to project my voice to a spot beyond the last row in the audience.
That way, the inattentive, the hard of hearing, and the general audience would hear.
In terms of race and equality, we surely have our inattentive and hard of hearing……..
I'm afraid 1.2.1.1 was by tsmithfield.
1.3.1.1. Thanks, Alwyn.
I have spent some time wrestling with your last paragraph in 1.3.4
But I now see that you left out after 'more rapidly" the comparison "than others" which would have made perfect sense. I saw the other meaning of "more rapidly" as a simple comparative adverb.
There's a lesson in there about how what we write and read can be misinterpreted. That of course is the main topic of all this thread- namely, what did the Auckland surgeons get told exactly and have Barry Soper and the Herald represented the issue fairly? Weka brought us back to this point way down at 9.2.1
Yes. I wasn't happy with the convoluted sentence I wrote at the time. Adding "than others" would have been a distinct improvement. It is what I meant.
As far as what the surgeons were told I thought this email was pretty clear.
"An email by Te Whatu Ora business support manager Daniel Hayes in April said: “Hi team, Heads up. This is going to be the new criteria for outsourcing your patients going forward. Just putting this on your radar now so that you can begin to line up patients accordingly. Over 200 days for Māori and Pacific patients. Over 250 days for all other patients.”
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/auckland-surgeons-must-now-consider-ethnicity-in-prioritising-patients-for-operations-some-are-not-happy/ONGOC263IFCF3LADSRR6VTGQWE/
Once again, is this the complete email? Is this the only instruction given? Into what context is this 'heads up' to be inserted?
I'm not a corporate language speaker so don't know the answer to this question, but does a 'heads up' imply that more detailed instructions will follow? If so, what did they say?
The way the email is phrased seems like it is a response to an earlier query? If so, what was that query and what information and knowledge is assumed to be held by 'the team"?
The further detail in the press release does mention 5 factors to be considered. The article also acknowledges that timeliness is an issue, and if there is still an issue about much later times when a Māori presents for this kind of prioritising, then that is definitely a factor to be considered.
The reports I read related that reporting times for Māori with symptoms was generally later, due to factors such as fear, locality, distance, and culture.
Culture might include "don't make a fuss", "don't put yourself forward of the needs of others" or blokish "man up" or "don't wanna know" avoidance of possible difficulties especially with parts of the body that are barely mentioned, let alone examined. My uncle talked about "problems with the waterworks, boy".
Some men also do not help other men to get to a doctor by puerile behaviour in raising fears about DREs.
That example in the Herald article about two Māori men getting advancement above a Middle Eastern man only mentioned the time factor. None of the other four factors and their possible bearing on the priority decision was mentioned.
If men for example are reporting for prostate problems later through these factors then that time elapse needs to be factored in.
In my case as I went through the system with two separate diagnoses and treatments for both bladder and prostate cancer, four in all, I noticed that the official letter of diagnosis and outlining treatment stared with a paragraph describing me the patient, not in terms of these factors but more about my personality and value to the community.
It did make me wonder whether there is a different measure of triage that is not mentioned officially…….
Thanks for posting Molly.
What is the evidence that they have had historically had unequal access to healthcare?
Now when Seymour or Luxon call it out, wait for the "racist dog whistle" crowd to pile on.
We have ideologues in Te Whatu Ora. Expect more of this rubbish
Are you effing kidding anker..?
You are calling for evidence that maori have traditionally had unequal access to heathcare..?
Like I said..are you effing kidding..?
There are indications that Māori have accessed healthcare unequally. What hasn't been determined is exactly why.
Regardless, the goal that should be sought is to improve the access for all, and ensure equal treatment for all. Not provide a solution built on inequity due to ethnicity.
"Like I said..are you effing kidding..?"
This type of response is getting tiresome to read.
I had a similar response tbf. At this point in history, it's very strange to see politically commentary that doubts that Māori and Pasifica face additional barriers to health care that cannot be explained in other ways (eg poverty).
tbf yes Weka
thanks Molly. Saved me from having to respond.
For the record Phillip I guess my lens is coloured by being married to a Maori and seeing what happens to his family. And I also did provide evidence about Maori getting access to counselling that Pakeha weren't entitled to
There's no doubt that Māori have been less likely to receive early referral and effective healthcare. Even now, being Māori and poor is a double disadvantage in receiving healthcare. At an individual level though, why should anyone have delayed care just because of who they are?
If you want to see economic and ethnic inequality in action, spend a day watching who walks in and out of public hospitals and then spend the next day doing the same at a large private hospital.
Aside from dealing with structural and personal ethnic bias against Māori, the most effective way of addressing inequality in health without shuffling poor health and low life expectancy among the disadvantaged is to remove private healthcare.
Or, give free sign up to private healthcare providers to Māori and other people living in poverty.
I understand the inequities faced by those who have access to private healthcare options, and those that don't.
But the issue here is the provision of state funded healthcare and how it should be implemented.
I'm not disagreeing with you – transferring resorces from one group in need to another group in need has always bugged me, whatever the service.
I'm saying the priotitisation is fraught and uneven and will continue to be that way for as long as we have a 2-tiered system – and practitioner bias, wherever they work..
However, research also shows a level of bias in who gets to be seen in the first place but this policy is a blunt tool that will harm social cohesion. E.g. in a research project I was doing, I was going to interview an older Māori woman. A nurse in the department said "no point in putting her on your list, she wont's turn up, she's Māori." I put her on my list, she did turn up, I interviewed her, and yes, she's Māori and she had missed appts – because:
But yeah, she missed appts because she was Māori, not for any of the circumstances above, according to the nurse. Until we get that kind of bias out of the health system – and it's pretty common from what I can tell, maybe we have to make some rules around who is prioritised.
The problem with the ethnicity tool is it's blunt, and does nothing tom improve social cohesion, or inclusion (just like private hospitals, it will probably make it worse).
I'd be surprised if they're prioritising Māori and Pasifika on the basis of ethnicity. From what I can tell, the decision makers now have to take ethnicity into account alongside other factors. It's not like there is a stream for Polynesians and a stream for everyone else.
I suspect that you are right Weka.
There are some genuine cases where ethnicity affects purely clinical decision-making. The example of differences in how hypertension should be treated in African Americans versus Caucasians has been known about for ages.
Then there are second-order effects of ethnicity – where ethnicity is a marker for other things with a clinical effect – such as deprivation which might result in a more rapid decline of untreated patients or poorer recovery after treatment because of the affordability of follow up care.
Both of these things are valid considerations in my opinion. What would not be acceptable is having two clinically-equivalent patients (bearing in mind the factors just discussed) where one is prioritised over the other on the basis of ethnicity. Clinical equivalence of that type is probably only a theoretical possibility not a real one. But that doesn't stop it being the jumping off point for an anxiety about positive discrimination, especially in a febrile political environment where parties of the Right want to stoke the myth of Maori Privilege – not because they really believe it's happening, but because what they want the political power to reset the economy into a direction that favours them.
If actual positive discrimination is happening (which I doubt), it’s a silly mistake and a weak cop-out. The problem of historical injustice is not solved by creating an additional injustice within a process like healthcare. It is solved by removing all the causes of that historical injustice in the present – ending poverty would be a good start.
"What would not be acceptable is having two clinically-equivalent patients (bearing in mind the factors just discussed) where one is prioritised over the other on the basis of ethnicity."
and yet we are doing exactly that constantly
I expect that’s the situation too. However, just like 3 Waters and co-governance, it’s going to be reported as a Māori privilege.
Let’s not forget the 7-year gap in life expectancy of Māori vs. non-Māori. Only when this gap has been closed can we truly speak of ‘privilege’. Until then, anybody who ignores this vital fact [pun intended] is too lazy to think, too ignorant, or simply just disingenuous.
There is also a three and a half year gap in life expectancy of men and women in New Zealand. Should we pay men their super earliar, or give them priority for medical care?
After all, wouldn't you think that "anybody who ignores this vital fact [pun intended] is too lazy to think, too ignorant, or simply just disingenuous."?
I’d definitely prioritise men over women with prostate cancer. Perhaps you prefer a mammogram and want to identify as a woman to get one instead of getting a digital rectal examination.
Question for you: have you surpassed the average life expectancy of a Māori male yet?
It looks like you and some others here aka the usual suspects are acting as disingenuous trolls again. I do feel like a good winter clean-out of trolls, until after the general election. Are you volunteering because you have already self-identified as a prime candidate?
Woman can’t get prostate cancer.
Transgender women can get prostate cancer. I don't think that was Incognito's point, though.
IMHO Trans women are not women.
And no, the point of Incognitos reply was to use their mod privilege to bully people they disagree with. They have form.
Incognito, having had a prostatectomy, I therefore no longer fear, if I ever did, a digital rectal examination.
But, I sometimes think there is some sort of correlation of fear between those who fear DREs and those who fear Te Tiriti, te reo rangatira and co-governance.
In the immortal words of Lance-corporal Jones in 'Dad's Army' ………..(and I don't mean "Don't panic Don't panic!")
They don't like it up em?
First prize a week in Warmington-on-Sea. 🙂
For old time's sake:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Royal_Train
My sides are aching just reading the story. Absolute classic series.
Mrs Mac1 and I have just watched the episode, series 6 episode 3 which we recorded recently. Very funny. The episode is actually 50 years old, being first broadcast in 1973. Lots of panic but not much up'em! Walmington-on-Sea btw. Jones in fine comedic form.
Both you and weka are completely fucking out of control as moderators. It is blatantly obvious and I am loosing count of how many good faith and acceptable contributors you have either burned off or intimidated. You have both had too much power for too long, immune to any criticism or accountability.
I have pondered this a week or so now and I will no longer falsify my words to please you.
I know exactly what you are going to do next – you are going to ban me for 'undermining your integrity as a moderator'. Except that you did that to yourself.
[If weka and I are out of control, as you claim, then we will cop it. Until then, your commenting privileges have been removed until further notice, because neither weka nor I should put up with this kind of shit from you or anybody else, no matter who you are.
I trust you know how to contact Lynn – plead your case with him, if you wish – Incognito]
Mod note
There is also a 5 year gap between Asian males and the male population as a whole. Perhaps non Asian males should get their super earlier, or get priority for medical care.
Some people just need a little more help than others, is all.
Who wouldn't choose a life of Maari privilege – alas, ethnicity is a lottery.
"A basic foundation of well-being and dignity for all, with people at the center, not money." – frightful !
“ethnicity is a lottery.”
Oh indeed it is. I am of an ethnic minority that suffers poorer health outcomes than others. The reasons are complex, and require more nuanced solutions than race based preference.
Privilege and it's effects are in our face(s) – we need only look.
What we know about inequality of outcomes suggests (to me) that timely solutions are needed. As for "more nuanced solutions", why not, just as long as that's not code for yet more ‘back to the drawing board‘ delay to change. We've known about these iniquitous outcomes longer than we’ve known about anthropogenic climate change, ffs.
“Current debates that seek to revive animosities between ‘iwi’ vs ‘Kiwi,’ for example, are classic Cartesian devices – anachronistic, divisive colonial throwbacks.”
Has poverty been taken into account in that equation?
A good number of Māori suffer from poverty compared to non-Māori.
https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/189149/poorest-dying-nearly-years-younger-than/
Rob Campbell weighs in at the Herald
"No one I have seen, or heard has argued that clinical judgments must not dominate here. (Noting that differences in access and nature of facilities also play a role in different outcomes and need to be addressed in design and operational process as many are).
If there are persistent and widespread imbalances in waiting lists between different populations, then anything but the most narrow of clinical judgments would regard that as something to be taken into account in prioritising.
Remember that the private hospitals are not, shall we say to be generous, weighted in their services towards Māori and Pasifika patients."
A good piece. Thanks for linking
"No one I have seen, or heard has argued that clinical judgments must not dominate here."
If you dont look you wont find.
If you are deprioritised in a rationed system then you dont receive service until the need is acute (if at all).
Health is personal and rationing on the basis of arbitrary measures (in this instance, cultural identity) must therefore override clinical judgement.
Yes. I had a similar reaction.
Consideration for surgery should be based on the urgency or otherwise of the patients. Other factors might need to be taken into account but to give priority to the ethnicity of the patient is asking for trouble.
I find it hard to believe that public hospitals in NZ make surgery choices based on ethnicities. It may have happened in the past but those days have long gone. So what is the purpose of resurrecting a past grievance that has already been corrected.
It encourages racist comment in reverse.
There may be some factors such as actual access – ie. distance from healthcare, cost prohibitors, aversion to attendance – that play a part in inequities.
Determining factors that do play a part, and addressing those factors benefits both those who access healthcare and those who deliver it.
The different DHB's had different responses and timeframes for treatment for similar ailments. Depending on the diagnosis, someone living in Central Auckland might have had a noticeably different diagnositic and treatment experience, than someone living in the Manukau District Health Board. Due to ethnic demographics in both areas, differences could relate to address – rather than ethnicity itself.
The amalgamation of the DHBs may have addressed that in some way.
Thanks Molly
A good summing up of the differentials involved between urban and rural communities and the differing experiences related to certain DHBs at least in the past.
Chris Hipkins at his weekly press conference has now explained the full intention of the measure and what provision of services it covers. He has also asked the Health Ministry (I think it was the ministry) to look at the provisions announced to ensure they are the most appropriate available. [I have paraphrased so hope I am reporting what he said correctly.]
It looks to me like another example of a new policy announcement which has not been satisfactorily presented to the public. Who is to blame? Time will tell.
All sorts of things will be taken into account when making decisions about surgery.
Health status e.g smoking, weight, blood pressure are most likely important. These indicate that surgery increases risk for adverse events.
It is morally reprehensible, it is medically unethical, unjustifiable and utterly unacceptable.
The only people I've seen try to defend this policy and others like it are the most one eyed tribal labour supporters, criticizing doctors for speaking up. Oy vey.
Policies like these cause deep divisions, distrust and anger in our society.
Medical access is supposed to be based off need not box ticking and the admin for this is going to be extremely expensive.
TWO/Health NZ is about as popular with medical professionals and IT professionals as a bucket of cold sick.
Reforming the public health system during a pandemic was peak foolishness, and reforming it based off failed UK reforms was mind bogglingly stupid.
It's hated by everyone in the medical field. Again the only people who defend it are the most one eyed tribal labour supporters, orrr the bureaucracy hired to oversea it.
And this issue sums up just about everything wrong with public health and govt services in NZ ATM:
There's far too many bureaucrats, consultants, community outreach, managers, PR, Hr, advisors and business managers like Hayes, and not enough nurses or doctors.
The 6th Labour govt has been a horrible failure when it comes to delivery in our public services.
Labour has been obsessed with spending up large and going on in management and hr hiring sprees to reform the internal culture of our government agencies rather than hiring front line staff and improving delivery.
How the hell, are our state agencies work forces all bigger than they've ever been before, with larger budgets than they've ever had before, with more staff than ever before but have worse service than ever before.
No NZ govt department will ever answer a god damn phone and as someone who has been dealing with USA/Canadian Govt agencies lately, I nearly fainted when they actually answered the phone a couple minutes on hold….
Usually it's a couple hours (if at all here)
Tldr we need more front line staff, less backroom staff and need to focus on improving delivery above all else…. And this morally indefensible shit needs to be thrown out, it's election losing shit.
When you see how much more money we spend on corey state services and how much the delivery of those service has deteriorated, because govt isn't hiring front line it's hiring backroom, it's hard to disagree with nat/act that a massive purge of the civil service is needed, especially when you see the disgusting ideas some of these middle management types come up with… Like racial profiling in surgeries in NZ… In…2023…. Disgusting.
We haven't used that as sole criteria for a long time. Budget is a big factor (which is why we have waiting lists). But here's the list from the article,
Whoever is making the decision has to factor all of those in, not just clinical need alone. And they're working within the constraints of infrastructure, staff and budget.
What crap generalizations, I work for Te Whatu Ora, I don't hate it, it has huge benefits for NZ, the change has been seamless.
NZ health care has always been race based, whites first.
‘Seamless’? Are you joking?
Are you joking? what's your point?
The claim was ‘the change has been seamless’. This is easily refuted, as there have been numerous examples of transition problems with TWO, including inaccurate and out of date data (https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/491572/health-data-out-of-date-after-inaccurate-figures-pulled-from-te-whatu-ora-website), the sacking of the Chair of Health NZ (https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/485021/health-nz-chairperson-rob-campbell-fired-over-politicised-comments-health-minister-says), a CV lack of transparency (https://businessdesk.co.nz/article/health/delayed-and-forgotten-oias-what-we-did-not-learn-from-te-whatu-ora), and overt political bias (https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2023/03/revealed-health-minister-dr-ayesha-verrall-s-inappropriate-puff-profile-publication-cost-14k.html).
This op piece casts more light on the situation:
https://businessdesk.co.nz/article/opinion/healthcare-the-next-policy-mess-that-needs-to-go-on-hipkins-bonfire-1
Without increased specialist capacity I would expect it is going up. We have an aging population with the first baby boomers turning 80 in a couple of years.
I'm expecting it to rapidly accelerate.
Should have been training and bonding more people twenty years ago. Health already has one of the oldest workforce in NZ which will be exacerbating the problem.
No doubt if National gets in they will do their usual trick of kicking people off the waiting lists.
Were people upset when Bill English prioritised children? Did old white people go full Moving Pictures on him.
Health Minister Bill English announced today that children would be given priority on hospital waiting lists for assessments and surgery with the new money the Government was planning to allocate to elective surgery.
"Children deserve the best possible start in life and this Government is committed to improving child health. Making children a priority on waiting lists is only one area we need to work on, but it shows the Government is determined to make a difference for children."
https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/children-get-priority-waiting-lists
An aging population doesn’t explain a near 17 fold increase in people waiting for first specialist assessments.
Without knowing how many have had them it isn't possible to tell that.
You need to know demand, actualisation and supply.
You then need to understand the increase in demand – it may be health, it might be greater expectation from a labour government, it might be that National's strategy of telling people we won't put you on the waiting list if you are going to get one within six months is a better strategy that understates demand but better matches to realistic likelihood, it might be playing catch-up after not being able to go during COVID-19 lock downs etc.
Going by the change in A&E residents I'd strongly suggest some is an aging population.
“Without knowing how many have had them it isn't possible to tell that.”
Had what?? This is about the number of people waiting for first assessments. An aging population cannot account for a 16 fold increase in 2.5 years.
Have you got proof this is labours directive, Corey
Lots of racists come out of the woodwork today.
Sadly for them this approach is supported by actual surgeons. Maybe not by the ex-South African one locally who is also a racist snot I guess.
The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons has spoken out about the new surgery wait-list rank system, explaining this isn’t about putting Māori and Pacific health above the health of other people, rather it’s about reducing existing health institutional bias.
Although the college did not have a hand in developing the scale, it supports its use as a means to provide “fairer access and treatment to surgical patients”.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/surgeon-organisation-backs-surgical-ranking-policy-says-it-reduces-institutional-biases/EOV33GU5XJCKDGNIVVQRKIRYLY/
And as for Alwyn little bit of racist ranting.
Right. I am going to identify as being Maori and insist on getting priority medical treatment.
It isn't my father that is missing from a birth certificate but there is one of my ancestors who was in this situation. No father given.
Like those men who self-identify as female I am going, from now on, to identify as Maori. Let them prove otherwise if they don't want to prioritise my operation.
Look forward to you heading off to the marae you claim to whakapapa from and helping out. Yours is the argument racists fall back on after the quantum one has failed. Apparently white people can only think in binary – either there aren't any full blooded Maori any more or we are all Maori if we want to be. It isn't like you give a shit about better outcomes for Maori in any way shape or form.
Treatment under our health system must be colour blind, like our justice system is meant to be.
lol. Quite. The whole point is that it isn't (health or justice). Māori do badly in both systems, because of the systems.
So black people now have a lower priority for surgery?
I'm loving how many of you have jump on the race aspect – makes me wonder did you actually read how it's being implemented?
But at least those fixated on not giving people a hand up are outing themselves on this site. Week in and week out.
National's gun control policy supports ACT's position, and will pass firearms licencing to COLFO, the gun users organisation for which ACT's McKee was previously spokesperson.
After 'the Government's gun laws reforms following the Christchurch terror attacks. COLFO at the time "suggested that members hold on to banned firearms." '
Nick@Stray dog, 9.20 AM 27th April, 2021
Guns for Gangs!
I live close to the local Deerstalkers Assn Hall, and think one of them, who hires the hall for social gatherings, is a (discrete) gang member and a Deerstalkers member, both.
China’s Xi Jinping backs ‘just cause’ of Palestinian statehood
"A solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict lies in the establishment of an “independent Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital”, Xi was quoted as saying by Chinese state media"
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/6/14/chinas-xi-jinping-backs-just-cause-of-palestinian-statehood
Well at least one or two of the major powers are ready to go in and bat for the poor Palestinians….it is just a plain fact that the West has failed them totally, in fact the West has failed in The Middle East full stop…and failed in Africa and in Latin America, and of course who can forget our many unjust and destructive actions in East Asia… little wonder they are all open to alternative diplomacy and partnerships.
Brics is looking like it will be the back bone of this new World trade alliance..who knows, maybe this will bring in something less ultra aggressive than the USA and her allies have been on to the world stage for the past century…lets hope so, because it is happening whether we in the West like it or not.
"In the next five years, Bloomberg predicts that the Brics countries (acronym for Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) will increase their share of the global economy to nearly 35%, beating the world’s strongest economic conglomerate —the G7 countries (US, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, UK)."
https://www.funds-europe.com/insights/a-new-brics-currency
https://elements.visualcapitalist.com/de-dollarization-more-countries-seek-alternatives-to-the-u-s-dollar/
This is a good backgrounder to a n international shift from $US as the international trade currency. It has implications for the US economy, and for US debt. "Currently, central banks still hold about 60% of their foreign exchange reserves in dollars."
"Concerned about America’s dominance over the global financial system and the country’s ability to ‘weaponize’ it, other nations have been testing alternatives to reduce the dollar’s hegemony.
As the United States and other Western nations imposed economic sanctions against Russia in response to its invasion of Ukraine, Moscow and the Chinese government have been teaming up to reduce reliance on the dollar and to establish cooperation between their financial systems."
Thanks, will check that link out..
..yeah it is kind of ironic that the massive sanctions piled onto Russia by the West, is looking like it could well be in the future, be historically regarded as the tipping point that ended Western hegemony…a real self goal of epic proportions.
Yup.
Confusion reigns over whether Meng Foon has or has not resigned as Race Relations Conciliator. He claims he has not, yet (and it seems clear that he doesn't want to), Russell says he has (or she'll fire him)
…
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/race-relations-commissioner-meng-foon-reveals-he-hasnt-formally-resigned-and-makes-call-for-explanation-of-potential-removal/SIPXQVFEJRE7DBNEKXYGE5YXMY/
This is amusing. An official normally resigns via a formal letter, right? Such conventions are part of the process of our democracy.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/492119/meng-foon-resigns-as-race-relations-commissioner
So RNZ published this anonymous report that he'd resigned. Anon due to the author seeking refuge from accountability??
Perhaps RNZ has another disinformation agent lurking in the woodwork. Perhaps an entire infestation ecosystem?
Was she being naughty & telling a fib? Will someone demand she produce evidence she was telling the truth? Will the news media actually do their job??
And here's the latest:
So Hipkins has a leaker in his office. Will he do something about that?? And while it's encouraging that the govt apparently didn't make an idiot into the Race Relations Commissioner, they may have appointed a Don Quixote:
Oughta make a good reality tv show.
Well, she has to get someone to write it, eh? Then it will have to be run past govt lawyers to see if it's fit for purpose. Could land on some manager's desk & get shuffled under a pile of other letters. Best not to hold our breath waiting.
You can see why he's bewildered, if he's being expected to conform to some official document that doesn't actually exist…
If this did indeed leak from Hipkins office – he should be justifiably furious.
Really, really poor behaviour and lack of loyalty.
He's protected them from the Nash fallout, and from the Wood one (in both cases, staffers made politically poor decisions and/or failed to refer issues to him in a timely manner).
Third time (that we know of). Gloves should be off, and dismissals (or transfers to filing in the basement) should be happening.
Whoever the leaker is – they've created a political storm which could have been entirely unnecessary. Hipkins should have had the time to call Russell and Foon into his office – and get them to sort it out – without political bloodshed (if possible). And for his government to form a coherent political policy on conflicts of interest (why is Foon's worse than Wood's, for example).
Instead, he's got a potential duel on the front pages of the media.
I cannot believe that there are right-wing moles in the leader's office. So this can only be internal white-anting.
Happening right now, transforming potential into actuality:
Whether it will lead the news tonight on both channels depends if some other shit hits the fan or not…
The Platform has been given a document dump by Foon, and he’s on with Sean Plunkett at 9.00 tomorrow morning.
Sounds like he is an entitled attention seeker to me.
How hard is it to write a resignation letter?
How on earth can this be an issue with the government when this idiot has a genuine COI (unlike Wood's) which he failed to declare, agreed to resign because of this, and then is incapable of writing a 5 minute resignation letter?
entitled
I get the impression he feels entitled to know the legal basis of his prospective resignation. He isn't aware of doing something wrong.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/492264/meng-foon-says-government-handling-of-resignation-absolute-shambles
Reading the tea-leaves here, it looks like he was seeking advice on due process. His courtesy note to the PM Friday morn apparently remains un-answered. Perhaps the PM sought legal advice & the lawyers are in a huddle trying to figure it out??
I'd say his problem seems to stem from oddly thinking that a declaration of a conflict of interest is a one-off role related duty – rather than individual event related duty.
Someone attending or chairing a particular event (meeting, policy discussion, etc) isn't gong to know about the general declaration he might have made a year ago.
He should know better being mayor previously.
I do wonder these things are occurring because landlording has been so normalised amongst the landlord ruling class that is isn't seen as anything like a conflict cause everyone is doing it – at lease everyone they mix with. Doesn't even enter their little landlording heads that it might be.
Oh dear Denis Frank……what particular piece of policy or legislation has Meng Foon upset the Govt or Hon Russell over?
And as far as the offending conflict of interest notification is concerned, I worked years with statutory boards, as company or board secretary and with staff who might have potential conflicts. The conflicts of interest register we operated, to best legal precedent and advice from the PM's dept had a requirement to enter the conflict once.
Once it was entered it stood for all time and often/usually the Chair noted the idea that XXX & yyyy may have a conflict. Most people stood themselves out, as I feel Meng Foon would have, had there been a day to day requirement to that was not covered by his existing declaration.
The Chair had the CoI register with him at every meeting and at every meeting when controversial subjects came up would ask for advice of CoI. There was usually a convo saying you will note my earlier declaration etc etc. These were always written up in the minutes.
Sounds very much like the old forced resignations of yore when staff found that they were managed/magiced out of a job with the twinkling or waving of a letter they had been forced to sign. For staff, constructive dismissal has a lengthy Tribunal precedential history against this practice.
I know Ministerial appointments are subject to complete Ministerial whim, more's the pity, often based on rumour that such & such a statutory chair is a Nat or Labour supporter…..depending on who is in power…
The Race Relations Commissioner is appointed by the GG on the recommendation of the Minister of Justice so one would have thought any resignation process would have been carried out with care and attention and extending goodwill to the incumbent. I have seen a postion description but I cannot see the date of this. This says the usual term is 5 years. He has time from 2019 (4 years) but surely if a person is doing a good job then an extension for another term from 2024 could be useful.
I know also in days of yore when there were Ministerial appointments coming up, it was done in a caring, compassionate way with letters of thanks and thanks meetings taking place with the appointing Minister.
This failed in spectacular fashion when I was working close to a Board Chair. His term came up & he received nothing (no thanks or reappointment) except to note a couple of his board members had been reappointed. (only because they came to his office to let him know.)
His was not a political appointment, he was a lay person with highly specialised qualifications that were needed. He had been appointed by a National Minister & received no thanks from a National Minister.
To say I found a guy close to tears would not have been far wrong. I tried to tell him that the process may have got away on the Minister/staff/department and he would be formally advised. Right up to the time of his death, eight years later, this former chair person had not received any thanks from the people/person who appointed him.
As with anything if people are treated badly one looks for the 'grown -up' in the process. The grown up there was the Minister and if he had not known better then some of his staff should have.
The grown-ups seem to have gone to ground and left those who may not have good manners and knowledge of good admin procedures holding the fort. To my mind this is arrogance and can catch out longer serving Governments, as it clearly did in my example above. People just become expendable.
And talking of Conflicts of Interest I note that the possible conflict of interest by Paul Hunt, who has been a signatory to a pro trans declaration, did not seem to stop him from coming out most strongly against the ability of women to meet a la Posy Parker, and pro the lovey dovey festival once the pesky women wanting to talk women's issues were out of the way…..in Wellington.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yogyakarta_Principles
https://tikatangata.org.nz/news/no-human-right-eclipses-another-is-lesson-from-parker
And a bit of an acid view from Karl du Fresne
http://karldufresne.blogspot.com/2023/03/new-zealands-most-useless-public-servant.html
I was puzzled over the issue of what actually happened – did he resign or not. The murk around conflicts of interest is too subjective to opine on, for me. Situation now clarified…
So while Foon thought he was entering the process of resigning, and seeking legal clarification of the basis for doing so, lawyers told the PM his language in the email meant he had (inadvertently) resigned – by saying he was resigning.
There must be established case law indicating that declaring intent to resign trumps actually doing so?? Lawyers being wackydoodle…
Sounds a bit mocking/spoofy to me or he the first person ever to receive anything substantial from MSD that needs declaring? Or does MSD not stand for Ministry of Social Development?
Surely an intention to resign or thought he may resign not followed up by the actual formal resignation is not a resignation.
Sounds a bit like a storm/teacup but once people have got the bit between their teeth they see CoIs etc everywhere? Sarc/:
Surely an intention to resign or thought he may resign not followed up by the actual formal resignation is not a resignation.
That's my view too, and seemingly his until the PM clarified the govt position today, which Foon now seems to accept.
My take is that formality is now too old-fashioned to believe in. Govt & lawyers are making it up as they go along, 21st-century style. Sir Geoffrey will not be amused by this. He may harumph quite loudly…
"If this did indeed leak from Hipkins' office".
It may have been directly from Hipkins himself. He may have been told that Foon had said he would resign, rather than that he would resign in preference to being sacked and he repeated it.
In that case it wouldn't have been a leak. After all he is PM and in the immortal words of one of his illustrious predecessors, By definition I cannot leak
The ginger Elvis is back.
Queens of the Stone Age release their new album "In Times New Roman…" on the 16th June.
Here is a live concert from a few days ago. Very tight performance and a happy looking band.
Imo little as it means, Chris Isaak (his tv show The Chris Isaak Show was another to go virtually unnoticed)and Josh Homme should have made greater cut thru in the misic business, not sure if it was their decisions or others as to why their quintin tarantino coolness isn’t matched
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Chris_Isaak_Show
So Ginny (our Police Minister) has had a go at our justice system. See link below.
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2023/06/police-minister-ginny-andersen-attacks-new-zealand-s-prison-system-says-it-s-no-place-for-m-ori-offenders.html
As poverty is a driver of crime, will she also have a go at our welfare system and Finance Minister for not better funding it?
Anybody know what the Justice Minister has to say about it? Moreover, what she plans to do to make improvements?
Additionally, is this a move towards a race based justice system?
What is Labour's justice policy regarding Maori? Easy enough to find out…
https://www.labour.org.nz/justice
"One key part of the strategy is the Māori Pathways programme – a ground-breaking series of initiatives underway around the country that are designed in partnership with Māori to reduce reoffending and improve outcomes for whānau. We have launched Māori Pathways in Christchurch Women’s Prison, Northland Regional Corrections Facility and Hawke’s Bay Regional Prison. We’re also replacing Upper Waikeria prison with a modern design, including a 100-bed mental health and addiction facility."
That last bit’s really important, due to the heavy penetration of meth into Maori rural communities.
That wasn't one of my questions but thanks for your input.
Can you tell me what the success rate is for the Māori Pathways programme?
Indeed. And not only due to the heavy penetration but also its related impact on crime. Therefore, I take it you'd also be disappointed with this failure to deliver – see link below.
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2023/06/government-set-to-break-methamphetamine-programme-rollout-promise.html
I doubt that she can speak publicly about another Minister's portfolio.
What is a race based justice system?
The Minister said:
Then went on to say:
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2023/06/police-minister-ginny-andersen-attacks-new-zealand-s-prison-system-says-it-s-no-place-for-m-ori-offenders.html
So she seems to be having a go at the justice system and corrections.
The Corrections Minister, the Police Minister, the Justice Minister and the Health Minister should all be putting pressure on the Welfare Minister and the Finance Minister to sort out poverty. As poverty has a negative impact on their portfolios.
A race based justice system is where one is openly treated differently based on race.
As opposed to being treated differently in a closed way? It's already a race based system, we just aren't honest about it.
One doesn't justify the other.
actually it does, that's the point. If there is bias in a system against a particular ethnic group, then one way of solving that is to redress that systemic bias. To some people this looks like 'race based' something or other, but all it's doing is attempting to remove the bias.
AB's comment earlier has a good differentiation between addressing inequity and positive discrimination.
.https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-19-06-2023/#comment-1955177
Introducing bias to address bias is not solving bias.
taking an abstract philosophical position when people are being harmed in real life is a form of bias.
Nonsense
It's not an abstract philosophical position. It's a logical position.
Solving bias requires it to be addressed head on. Call it out and correct it from where it stems.
Being logical doesn't mean it's not abstract.
I am calling it out. The problem is systemic racism. You are avoiding looking at that, and the your philosophical position is an aid in that.
You may be calling it out but you also seem to be willing to accept it as some sort of counter measure thinking that is solving it. Is that correct?
Because it's not solving it.
Systemic racism. I'm not avoiding looking at that. I'm saying you won't solve it by adding more bias. That will only fuel the fire.
You say the problem is systemic racism. Therefore, to solve it you must directly address that, not merely attempt to offset it with further bias.
Seems to me that is avoiding the problem.
Positive discrimination has been around for years and is part of the solution.
FFS it is worth about 2 points out of 100 in terms of prioritisation. Enough to make a subtle difference not enough to not have overall medical need as the primary consideration.
It isn't like the moaners about this are putting up any viable solutions – like pay more tax so more operations can be done or to bring services closer to the communities they serve or to actively recruit and train staff from those communities. They are the same people that oppose services for Maori by Maori and pretty much any attempt to solve these disparities.
They are pretty good at blaming the individual – don't turn up to appointments, access services late, etc almost like the system itself. Our local hospital got closed as part of the Douglas reforms and it wasn't unusual to travel 2 hours to hospital and find your appointment was cancelled but they couldn't get hold of you – cause you were travelling 2 hours leaving at 6:30 in the morning, or to be greeted with the ever welcoming "what are you still living in that shithole for". A predominantly Maori population who once had a good rural hospital.
The argument that it is not helping solve it is non-sensical. If their is capacity to do 100 operations and currently only 13 Maori can access those operations when 20 should be and this means 15 now do it is part of the solution. That 2 non-Maori have to wait longer is always going to happen regardless of the method used. Pulling names out of a hat could equally be viable. A small tweak to shift the balance is just that.
Bill English did a similar thing to prioritise children. That is what governments do – prioritise resources to particular groups to help solve particular problems. All governments do it.
You may disagree on the prioritisation but that is why you elect different governments. Pretending that the world is going to end because there is some prioritisation of Maori or Pacifika in order to address systemic difficulties and currently worse outcomes for those communities is just nonsense.
More of the iwi/kiwi bullshit.
And, having looked at systemic racism in Aotearoa NZ, what are your timely solutions for "directly addressing that" – assuming you can see systemic racism, and cause-and-effect relationships between systemic racism and iniquitous health outcomes for some Kiwis.
Here's a link to a thought-provoking NZMJ viewpoint, written by two Kiwi health professionals – makes you think?
Challenging stuff (for me), but what do 'they' know. And wot DoS said.
Sorry Chair, I couldn’t bring myself to read beyond "So Ginny (our Police Minister)".
Some interesting All Black selections. It loos well rounded though and generally based on form.
Nerve wracking 4 -5 months ahead of us.
Foster's selections are as baffling as ever. He says he wants us to be more direct and quicker, but he picks a nobody from Canterbury at second five and has gone out of his way over the past four years to not select or scapegoat the direct options. Laumape, Fainga'anuku, Aumua – "direct" options all – have all been treated shabbily or ignored by Foster. I don't know what some of those lazy, gutless wonders in the Blues forward pack have to do to get dropped. Beauden Barrett? I think Foster would pick him even if he had a leg amputated. He has had a dreadful season. It obvious – Barret has lost his pace and with that his confidence has gone.
But anyway, ""more direct and faster" just seems code for trying harder to do what hasn't worked since the 2017 Lions worked Hansen out.
Foster is a bad coach. His tactics are so stale even Argentina worked him out. His selections and management appointments are so loyal they have veered in crony mediocrity. His selections have been bizarre for four years now, with a ton of players who have worked out that the All Blacks set up under Foster has become a chummocracy that smells of boiled cabbage having left to go offshore.
Still, I think we'll beat the French, who'll be over-confident, and probably make it to the semifinals cos we have got the Saffa's number in the head department. And our journey will end there.
Neanderthal in-fighting update: https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/300908441/political-party-democracynz-in-turmoil-after-candidate-exodus
The far-right in kiwiland often looks like a rabble due to lack of consensus on a political brand to unify the disparate elements. You could go with the Fundamentalist Freedom Front (FFF)…
Embarrassing that Leighton's party is called The Leighton Baker Party. Me First.
Even Winston Peters didn't stoop that low. Last I read, Baker was struggling to sign on enough members at $20 a pop to reach the 500 member/$10000 threshhold.
Mihingarangi Forbes
https://twitter.com/Mihi_Forbes/status/1670513323882991616
It's systemic, both health access and media coverage. This means that the systems are structured in such a way as to create barriers. We could change that.
It feels like prioritizing surgery by ethnicity is actually an ambulance at the bottom of the cliff approach designed to obscure the fact that the real issues are poverty and access to appropriate and timely primary healthcare.
Sadly from what I hear Te Whatu Ora have pulled or heavily reduced funding to a number of community health organizations that did a heap of the heavy lifting during covid and are actually well placed to help address a bunch of the issues around access.
I suspect that the answer to number of the issues sits with funding small community based service providers that are embedded in the community rather than top down edicts from bloated national bodies.
I tend to agree. Problem is, when Clark’s Labour government tried to fund in that way, there was a racist backlash and the funding got axed. Sad we are still so bad at this, including apparently on the left.
Concentrating on ethnicity is a real mistake imho the focus needs to be around class. Poverty is what drives the horrific and worsening outcomes in New Zealand. Everything else is just obfusticating that undeniable fact.
I disagree. Two working class people, one Māori the other Pākehā, both face class based barriers. The Māori person faces ethnicity based ones too. Ethnicity factors in at least two important ways: one is that the system is structurally prejudiced against Māori in terms of assessment and treatment. The other is that even if the system weren't that, it would still be designed around Pākehā needs, which is an additional barrier for many Māori.
An example. How family can access patients in hospital is based around Pākehā family structures and needs, not whānau extended family structures and needs. Isolating Māori from their whānau makes it harder for that person to navigate the system, deal with the stress, make good decisions.
The good news is that if we change that part of the system, it benefits everyone.
in case it's not obvious, we should definitely be addressing socioeconomic class issues, including within the health system.
Due to cultural, societial and govt policies at the time and still exist there is a large number of people out there who are missing predominately their paternal but can also be their maternal lineage. This is due to factors like no father being listed on the birth certificate, adoption etc. if we are going to have ethnicity as a contributing factor for the basis of delivering resources what of these people ?? Or do we say they look european/Asian /Māori/PI so deliver based on appearance ?? And even if you are aware of the missing family link but it is not documented or there is no accountability/acceptance by the father to acknowledge ?? Do then accept another injustice ???
what’s the another injustice?
Where due to fathers names missing on birth cert (Plus those adopted) – Those children have lost their paternal link. I am predominately thinking of the instance where there is a un recorded Maori/PI father and an European mother. There are many out there who this example fits !!!
Right. I am going to identify as being Maori and insist on getting priority medical treatment.
It isn't my father that is missing from a birth certificate but there is one of my ancestors who was in this situation. No father given.
Like those men who self-identify as female I am going, from now on, to identify as Maori. Let them prove otherwise if they don't want to prioritise my operation.
Sounds reasonable Alwyn and if anyone has an issue with your identification you can complain that you are the victim of a hate crime.
Pretty racist, but because of the rise of the ACT party that shit just flies in today's New Zealand.
2021 RNZ report on worse outcomes for Maori during trauma care
"Māori youth aged 15-18…were over three times more likely to die in the 30 days following major trauma than non-Māori in the same age group. Overall, it found Māori were 56 percent more likely than non-Māori to die in the first month after a major trauma, excluding serious brain injury.
Māori were 37% more likely to not receive a CT scan, which is used to assess and understand the severity of the trauma and has an impact on mortality outcomes…"I think every clinician would like to think [unconscious bias] doesn't have a role to play but there's a chance to examine not only your own hospital but also yourself and have a think about those questions."
We know unconscious bias exists for treatment of women compared with men. I don’t believe the criterion of ethnicity was added to the evaluation guidelines simply for woke reasons. A 3x increased chance of dying is huge.
A '2018 study found that doctors often view men with chronic pain as “brave” or “stoic,” but view women with chronic pain as “emotional” or “hysterical.”…doctors [of both sexes] were more likely to treat women’s pain as a product of a mental health condition.'
I get where you are coming from, what im trying to get across is to make the political focus class based, within that the solutions could be informed from a maori world view and from the view of other marginlized communties.
Its about finding things that work. Currently we're just generating animosity and no real solutions.
I agree our current approach is causing problems, and likely to get worse as the world crises deepen. Using a class based approach and finding Māori and Pasifika world view within that is an interesting idea. Can say more about that?
Yes we have to own our built in racism and call it when we see it.
Of note in OM today is that we are relying on a MSM article and not a lot else, and people are forming strong opinions on the basis of that.
From Health New Zealand has introduced an Equity Adjustor Score, which aims to reduce inequity in the system by using an algorithm to prioritise patients according to multiple criteria, one of which is ethnicity, to prioritizing [sic] surgery by ethnicity.
//
This paragraph from a Spinoff article on a study examining medical bias in NZ seems to capture the crux of the race-based debate going on here.
'Here, it’s important to note that “population specific needs” is not a term that supports biological determinism, which is the concept that biology is the defining factor in health risks and outcomes – a concept that leads straight to eugenics. Biologically, ethnic groups are not fundamentally different from one another. Research shows that the use of ethnicity as a determinant of health is actually a stand-in for many other complex issues. Rather than being a purely biological difference, ethnicity often dictates how we are perceived by others, and therefore how we are treated.'
Ar 9.37 I wrote, "but I'd like to see the wording of the directive, as it might just be being misrepresented."
I haven't seen anyone give any evidence to what Barry Soper wrote in that MSM article.
What did the agency say, and what did it mean?
The Herald ought to be ashamed.
Trying to use a teacher’s reaction to a teenage trans student as a wedge issue by putting it at the top of their page and emphasising religion in their headline.
Not often acknowledged by those banging on about keeping children in bathrooms safe is that trans teens suffer terrible mental health consequences and high suicide rates.
Re-publicising and hyping this story can only affect its original victim. Shame on you.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/christian-teacher-stripped-of-registration-after-refusing-to-use-trans-students-pronouns/WFGT2FVSSNGGDGY4ZEQ5U2E74I/
The headline is certainly misleading. We need to read a long way through the article to find out what really bothers this teacher …
The teacher’s submissions also comprised what he believed was the “obvious next sin” after transitioning, which he claimed was homosexuality.
He also presented to the tribunal multiple examples of scripture from the Bible that read “man should only lie with a woman” and homosexuality steps away from “God’s plan”.
So, not really about pronouns at all.
The teacher went as far as comparing changing one’s name to potential circumstances of a child identifying as a different race, an animal – “a cat, a dog or a dinosaur,” or as “Your Honour.”
“Compelling me to call a girl student by a boy's name is asking me to go against my core Christian belief, the belief that is also foundational for New Zealand,” he said.
Bigot. Gives Christians a bad name.
And I notice there has been a lot of flapping from the usual suspects about ethnicity being included as one of the criteria for the speed required on surgery.
I have a modest proposal to bring us to more equality in ethnic health outcome statistics and it would possibly help the housing market too…