Public broadcasting: an election issue

15 comments on “Public broadcasting: an election issue ”

• Comments are now closed

1. Bill 1

   23 July 2014 at 10:48 am

   Each day 83% of all Kiwis watch the regular television channels…

   Yeah. But what do they watch? I had a really quick look through the final report and so may have missed it, but I saw no breakdown into ‘current affairs and news’, ‘sport’, ‘reality TV’ , ‘soaps’, etc.

   I suspect that more people than imagined no longer watch ‘the news’ or whatever partly because they already acknowledge that what they will be shown and what they will be told just doesn’t measure up in terms of information. Meanwhile on the other channel, at least the sport is real and less likely to depress you for no good reason.
   • karol 1.1

     23 July 2014 at 11:06 am

     Public service broadcasting is wider than “the news”, re the Entertain, Educate, Inform framework.

     The BPB article on that, refers to the quality of some of the channels – shopping channels, etc.

     Ultimately, our current corporate media focuses on consumer values, and diverts people from really engaging critically with what’s happening in the world.

     The think about the wider framework is to help the public to be culturally, socially and politically aware, through a diverse range of programmes.

     The success of the neoliberal scamm has been achieved through full spectrum dominance of their values inserted in diverse programmes and platforms, from entertainment, through reality TV to the (alleged) News slots – not a lot of genuine informing going on there.
     • Bill 1.1.1

       23 July 2014 at 11:39 am

       I agree. The current state of teevee results from the ‘dumb down cause that’s what people want’ nonsense that’s been going on for….years. But that puts the problem beyond mere standards of reporting or airing of meaningful documentaries/current affairs programmes. Are there any light entertainment programmes on now that would offer some measure of food for thought as any one of a number of series from the 70s did…or that programmes in the very early years of Channel 4 in the UK did?
     • Populuxe1 1.1.2

       23 July 2014 at 12:56 pm

       Ok, I’ll bring up the elephant in the room.
       While you are sneering at “consumer values”, which is to say “what ordinary people want to watch”, you are ignoring that if you do not broadcast in a format that people actually do want to watch, they aren’t going to watch.

       You can lead a horse to water, yadda yadda.

       Also, while you are quite right to criticise the full spectrum dominance of neoliberal values in the media, I am by no means convinced replaceing them with your values would be any less, how does one put this… Oppressive ideological bullying.

       So unless you can address these two issues, it’s pretty much Potayto Potahto.
       • Colonial Viper 1.1.2.1

         23 July 2014 at 1:12 pm

         Kiwi community and neighbourly values need to be reflected in broadcasting, not international commercial corporate values. It’s not that a hard (or oppressive) a concept.
         • Populuxe1 1.1.2.1.1

           23 July 2014 at 1:28 pm

           That rather depends on your community/neighbourhood, doesn’t it?
     • Chooky 1.1.3

       23 July 2014 at 1:12 pm

       +100 karol…Thanks for the Post …an important issue and at the moment New Zealand is served poorly!… both by newspapers and television…imo radionz is better and i particularly liked the comments by Gavin Ellis…i do not listen to private radio stations so i can not comment , but i suspect they have quite an impact.

       Maybe the Left could have a Media Watch with Critique and ratings( a bit like a weather report or temperature guage 1-10)…that the general public could refer to quickly
2. Weepus beard 2

   23 July 2014 at 11:38 am

   From open mike 21/07:

   I had asked the Fairfax reporter in question, Steve Kilgallon, directly about his motives and methods for this article. This was his response.

   (Weepus beard)
   You’re confusing me with someone with an agenda. I have none. I just report interesting stories. The story is genuine and the source is real. Whether you like what they say or not is up to you. As regards my career and job prospects, you’re best directing such enquiries to my editor
   All the best
   Steve

   So he claims impartiality and that it’s just an interesting story. It certainly is an interesting story but one which appears, in the views of both Dr Gavin Ellis and Kathryn Ryan, to be a breach of our already eroded broadcasting standards.

   Let’s call Kilgallon’s article what it is, tabloid journalism.

   Thought I’d take Steve advice and direct and enquiry to his editor but it seems editors go though the SST like last night’s curry. Even Wikipedia can’t keep up.

   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sunday_Star-Times
   http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10842848
   http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11160085

   Could it be that Steve Kilgallon didn’t provide the name of his editor because he too can’t keep up?

   The SST is clearly in trouble and this sort of desperate article is the result.
   • Kiwiri 2.1

     23 July 2014 at 1:27 pm

     Newspaper editors are anonymous?

     Well, bloggers with their pseudonyms are one up on them!

     /grin
3. Tom Gould 3

   23 July 2014 at 12:54 pm

   Maybe it is time we grew up somewhat and simply listed media and chooks by political bias? They seem to do it with newspapers in the UK. We play their game by pretending they are all ‘fair, accurate and balanced’ when we know they are not. Take the National Herald for example, which no longer even pretends to be anything other than a daily National Party newsletter. And as for the radio shock-jocks …
4. Chooky 4

   23 July 2014 at 1:07 pm

   Question is …does a Lefty participate in obviously Right wing media outlets or do they boycott them?
   Martyn Bradbury invites comments to his dilemma:

   “Dear Seven Sharp – I have little interest in appearing on your show so that you can pretend to have some type of balance’

   By Martyn Bradbury / July 23, 2014 / No Comments

   As the largest left wing blog in NZ, The Daily Blog has a responsibility to challenge the mainstream media narrative, if readers want me to appear on Seven Sharp, leave your vote on this post, or email me or Facebook me or Twitter me and I will decide at the end of the day.

   • See more at: http://thedailyblog.co.nz/2014/07/23/dear-seven-sharp-i-have-little-interest-in-appearing-on-your-show-so-that-you-can-pretend-to-have-some-type-of-balance/#sthash.o7TkYPg4.dpuf
5. Ron 5

   23 July 2014 at 4:04 pm

   OK I have decided to join the CBB and hope that we can get a big improvement in Broadcasting in New Zealand
   Hope you all join
6. Jenny 6

   24 July 2014 at 5:59 am

   Will Labour back down to TVNZ?

   And let them have that vile Right wing scum bag moderate the election leaders debate?

   http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/10303335/Labour-claims-Hoskings-biased

   In my opinion if Labour stick to their guns and refuse to attend a debate hosted by Hoskings how could they have a debate?

   It will also put a spotlight on media bias.

   Will Labour do it?

   Or will they collapse like a soufle in the rain.
7. Sable 7

   24 July 2014 at 11:23 am

   This really does not go far enough. Its time to organize public protest and debate. There are a range of sites on offer than make this possible and they do work And yet instead we have a forum that is easy to ignore and no doubt will be.

   Interesting to see people watch the news on TV. I have not done this in more than a few years given how trashy and subjective journalism in NZ has become. The nice thing about on line news is its easier to seek out sources that have at least some integrity.

   I suspect with the internet generation coming to maturity this will all change…
8. Lorraine 8

   26 July 2014 at 3:56 am

   The shocking deterioration of democracy in this country and media agenda to maline, defame, mock the Labour party and in particular David Cunliffe. The media is implying unsubstantiated claims by Right wing influences that Labour and David Cunliffe in particular is untrustworthy and worse when they are in fact doing nothing wrong. Meanwhile government MPs are getting away with not being held accountable for breaking laws, facilitating criminals fleeing the country, covering up embezzlement of tax payers money, and the list goes on and on, while the right wing media slings slander and mud constantly at the left wing, especially Labour. This is shocking. There is not an unbiased one amongst those so called journalists. They are not journalists. They are government propaganda mouthpieces just like in dictatorships where the news organisations spout the government line to the exclusion of the opposition parties. We haven’t quiet got to the locking up of politicians that don’t follow the government line but our democracy is being eroded away by corrupt foreigners and government politicians that behave like the law does not apply to them, that are not being held accountable for their wrongful actions and get away with it scot free.
   I am so sick of panels, political commentators, and interviewers that are so right wing biased and wouldn’t know a impartial presentation if it hit them in the face. I would like to see them all sacked and a fresh lot of journalists bought in that aren’t pushing the right wing agenda that the current crop does in the way Fox news does.
   Why are old bigots like Mike Hoskins and Paul Henry still being bought back onto prime time tv when they should have been put out to pasture long ago. They can’t open their mouths without spouting some bigoted comment.
   Bring back true democracy for the sack of people who still believe in human rights.

• Comments are now closed

• Log in
• Donate
• Contribute post

• Articles RSS