web analytics

Break Up Social Media Itself

Written By: - Date published: 8:31 am, March 2nd, 2018 - 23 comments
Categories: Deep stuff, democracy under attack, facebook, International, Media, uk politics, us politics - Tags:

Does technology threaten democracy? Here’s a recent dialogue from the most recent Munich Security Conference which suggests that it does.

It is time to regulate the power of cyber criminals and cyber monopolies.

I’m going to approach this briefly in two ways.

The first is through cyber-security.

The second is through the lens of social media dominance.

Right. If what happened in the United States 2016 elections occurred in New Zealand or Australia’s 2017 elections, we would be justifiably outraged, expect the traitorous perpetrators to be on trial, take relevant diplomatic actions, and change a whole suite of laws and enforcement powers to stop it from happening again. With me?

Maybe Kim DotCom had a point. We should take lessons from what we have already seen. The British get it: “So I have a very clear message for Russia: we know what you are trying to do and you will not succeed.” – British Prime Minister Theresa May, 13 November 2017.

Social media platform attacks using near-monopoly providers are now the major way that political campaigns are run in every developed democracy. They are used by these campaigns and their proxies and funded with tens of millions of dollars because they work. This is a national security issue for the world.

Yet proposing strong global regulation of such international cybercrime is not an easy row to hoe. It has been tried many times before.

The international cybernorms process again came to a halt this summer when the relevant United Nations group of Governmental Experts could not agree on a final communiqué. Some fundamental disagreements have come to the fore despite progress made over the past years. Contentious topics included, in particular, the applicability of the rules of international law. However, the nature of what cybersecurity entails also remains open to debate. The U.S. and its Western allies primarily focus on the security of infrastructure, hardware/software, and data, whereas Russia, China, and other states would prefer to broaden the debate to include “information security,” which would also consider content as a threat that should be addressed.

As a result, the way forward for cybernorms is unclear. The U.S. and Europe have shown signs of developing an approach that would unite and concentrate on the effectiveness of a naming-and-shaming approach.

Cybercrime has reached unprecedented levels of activity and scale in 2017, in particular with ransomware attacks such as WannaCry, which in May of 2017 eclipsed all previous attacks and infected an estimated 300,000 victims in 150 countries. Whereas the focus of cybersecurity efforts in previous years was on occasional worst-case scenarios such as large attacks on critical infrastructure, increasingly it is every day.

Now let me just name China for a moment: it has a full alliance between authoritarian states and large, data-rich IT monopolies, bringing together nascent systems of corporate surveillance with already-developed systems of state-sponsored surveillance. When they attack they attack with skill and with power. New Zealand certainly has greater social freedom than China, but the power of China upon us including our social networks is real and growing.

There are plenty of other countries to name as the origins of attacks, but I am sure you already know them.

Attempts to get a global framework around this issue include:
• 2011 SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organisation) Draft international Code of Conduct for International Security
• 2013 OSCE Confidence-building measures
• 2014 NATO Wales Summit Declarataion
• 2015 SCO Draft International Code of Conduct for Information Security (revised)
• 2016 NATO Cyber Defence Pledge
…plus bunches of United Nations sponsored dialogues, which continue. A full list of efforts underway can be found in the Cyber Policy Initiative, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Which is to say, we don’t need to wait for the results of any one investigation into any one country or any one election or any one attack. Each of those summits has fat reports worth reading, and plenty of tough diplomatic efforts to strengthen states against sustained cyber-terrorism, which is what one country attacking another through digital devices really is. Efforts have been underway for a while to get proper global policing over this massive global problem, which haven’t worked so far, but will continue probably until it gets so bad that they do.

This is where we segue into the need to regulate ordinary social media.

Mining and oil companies exploit the physical environment; social media companies exploit our social minds. This is particularly nefarious, because these companies influence how we think and behave without them even being aware of it. This interferes with the functioning of democracy and the integrity of elections. Because internet platform companies are networks, they enjoy rising marginal returns, which accounts for their phenomenal growth. The network effect is truly unprecedented and transformative, but it is also unsustainable.

It took Facebook eight and a half years to reach a billion users, and half that time to reach the second billion. At this rate, Facebook will run out of people to convert in less than three years. You can comfortably say that Facebook alone has more direct social power on humanity than the United Nations and all its entities put together.

There is a similarity between Internet platforms and gambling companies. Casinos have developed techniques to hook customers to the point that they gamble away all of their money, even money they don’t have. Such digital industries are usually age-controlled. Social media companies deceive their users through manipulation, deliberatively engineering addiction to the services they provide. Given the power over adolescents of social media as a form of addiction, it’s time to open that debate about putting age restrictions on social media as a whole.

Something potentially irreversible is happening to human attention in our digital age. This is not a matter of mere distraction; monopolistic social media companies are actually inducing people to surrender their autonomy. This of course sounds pretty similar to those who decried the expansion of television in the 1970s following colourisation, and those 1950s arguments about the ‘debasement of the youth’ with comic books. But just because the argument has the same flavour, doesn’t mean it’s nutrition-comparable. We are talking about the rapid and immersive commercialisation of how we actually speak to each other, and asks us to do that simple addiction test: can you socialise without it? Young people today, I mean really …….

Seriously, it takes significant effort to assert and defend what John Stuart Mill called the freedom of mind. Once lost, those who grow up in the digital age may have difficulty regaining it.

This has far-reaching political consequences. People without the freedom of mind can be easily manipulated. This danger does not loom only in the future; it already played an important role in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Claiming social media doesn’t influence elections is as naïve as the U.S. television companies in the 1960s who decried any limit to political advertising or monopolistic power. So they were regulated. The best parallel moment we are in is to television: during its early years, the United States Federal Communications Commission permitted a single company to own a maximum of five television stations nationwide. It also reminds me now of the era in which the Bell company was forcibly broken up into a series of “baby Bells”. The state must powerfully regulate the social media monopolies with a similarly-sized stick.

In the U.S., regulators are currently not strong enough to stand up to the monopolies’ political influence, as we saw recently in the “net neutrality” debate.

The E.U., however, uses a different definition of monopoly power from the U.S. Whereas U.S. law enforcement focuses primarily on monopolies created by acquisition, E.U. law prohibits the abuse of monopoly power regardless of how it is achieved. Europe has much stronger privacy and data protection laws than America.

The E.U. Commissioner for Competition Margrethe Vestager is the champion of the European approach. Look her up: she’s a champ. It took the E.U. seven years to build a case against Google. As a result of its success, the process of instituting adequate regulation has been greatly accelerated. Moreover, thanks to Vestager’s efforts, the European approach has begun to affect attitudes in the U.S.
So it can be done. It’s possible.

Global political control of social media through monopolistic platform corporations is now the single largest control over the social behaviour of humanity. It’s more directly powerful than the whole of Islam. While the many efforts to rein in the influence of either social media or cyber-policing have only rarely been successful, the collective effort to do so must continue if states are to retain any semblance of their future capacity to govern.

This post goes out not only to the left, but also to this government, to the GCSB, the SIS, to Google, Facebook, Baidu, and all foreign governments who seek to twist our autonomy for their own interests.

23 comments on “Break Up Social Media Itself ”

  1. Sparky 1

    Govts will not stop this from happening. Many are, in my opinion, co-opted globalists who represent big business lobbyists.

    If anything, govts will, I predict, go on working closely with big money to ensure the public only gets the messages they deem suitable. Which amounts to “everything is fine, nothing to see here, go about your business”.

    Ironically by cracking down on line activism and whistle blowing they may well bring people together directly which is probably where real change will occur. Armchair activism is really just that and no more.

  2. Kevin 2

    Wow. When their political aspirations are threatened, then its time for action.

    Its a pity they don’t show as much concern for corporate monopolies whose behaviour threatens the aspirations of Joe Public.

  3. Sparky 3

    A timely article on govt and freedom on line…..


  4. SpaceMonkey 4

    Technology can just as easily be used for the betterment of Democracy as it can to undermine Democracy. In other words (and apologies to Shakespeare), technology is neither good nor bad; it’s our thinking that makes it so.

    It sounds to me like TPTB are worried at their inability to control the public discourse through digital channels, especially social media.

    And as to what happened in the US 2016 elections… it doesn’t NEED to happen here as we freely allow foreign donations to our political parties. Predominantly American and Chinese interests can literally buy their political power in NZ.

    This is a good post Ad… lots to digest.

    • Ad 4.1

      Much appreciated SpaceMonkey.

      Fully agree about China – we are getting really strong warnings from Australian intelligence and security agencies, as well as from academia.

  5. adam 5

    Thanks Ad missing out the greed factor of the corporations, but more importantly corporate terrorism seems a bit odd. Considering that the spy bases we here, were accused of that in relation with Europeans in recent times. And I think not talking about corporations actively influencing election in the USA, Brexit and others is a missed opportunity. It’s too easy to just blame other governments.

    Again the solutions are not going to work if we ignore the state of transnational organisations with their own agendas. Most of that time that agenda is greed. Personally it all seems like a band aid at the end of capitalism, ‘ant going to cut it.

    Thanks for writing this post.

    • One Anonymous Bloke 5.1

      So far as I can grasp, the European measures are aimed precisely at those transnational interests you mention.

      They’re changing their behaviour to suit,
      Job done? Probably not.

      • adam 5.1.1

        I found it all just a bit smoke and mirrors.

        Maybe I’m a cynic, as we been down this road before with finance, and it just meant they changed what they did on the outside, but stayed exactly the same on the inside.

  6. D'Esterre 6

    “Right. If what happened in the United States 2016 elections occurred in New Zealand or Australia’s 2017 elections, we would be justifiably outraged, expect the traitorous perpetrators to be on trial, take relevant diplomatic actions, and change a whole suite of laws and enforcement powers to stop it from happening again. With me?”

    Nope. I don’t know what you’re talking about. What happened in the 2016 US elections, to which you’ve taken exception?

    “The British get it: “So I have a very clear message for Russia: we know what you are trying to do and you will not succeed.” – British Prime Minister Theresa May, 13 November 2017.”

    Just because May says this, it by no means follows that she isn’t talking twaddle. She surely wouldn’t be the first UK pollie to open her mouth and sound like an ignoramus.

    • Bill 6.1

      Nothing happened that anyone’s taking exception to. Though a lot of people are taking exception to stuff that never happened.

      That May quote. It’s in relation to brexit, right?

      71p worth of advertising coming from accounts facebook links to Russian accounts.

      71p. That’s $1.35.

      The stuff no-one is taking exception to – as in it’s not any part of any media fueled arm waving public discourse – is the actions of Cambridge Analytica and associates.

      As far as I can tell from Russian finger pointers who commented on my post the other day, what everything’s finally boiling down to, is that what Cambridge Analytica did is okay because they were registered…and what the IRA did or didn’t do is absolutely not okay because they weren’t registered.

      Hell of a hullabaloo over a registration slip then, innit? (And that’s allowing for the argument that the IRA sought to influence the US election, though my tea strainer holds more water 🙂 )

      Here’s the link to the post.

      • Nic the NZer 6.1.1

        Understandably on noticing this topic getting TV coverage, Ad has immediately lit his hair on fire and started running.

      • Ad 6.1.2

        Every single intelligence agency in the United States is very clear that the US Presidential election was massively affected by Russia. Wikipedia sums up their collected thoughts:

        “On January 6, 2017, after briefing the president, the president-elect, and members of the Senate and House, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) released a de-classified version of the report on Russian activities. The report, produced by the CIA, the FBI, the NSA, and the ODNI, asserted that Russia had carried out a massive cyber operation ordered by Russian President Putin with the goal to sabotage the 2016 U.S. elections.

        The agencies concluded that Putin and the Russian government tried to help Trump win the election by discrediting Hillary Clinton and portraying her negatively relative to Trump, and that Russia had conducted a multipronged cyber campaign consisting of hacking and the extensive use of social media and trolls, as well as open propaganda on Russian-controlled news platforms.”

        If that happened here, I would expect the intelligence communities to react the same way, in order to protect my country.

        Germany feels precisely the same way.

        It’s time to have globally enforced rules about how social media is used, just as we have rules for nuclear energy, chemical warfare, and other conventions about conduct of states against states.

  7. AsleepWhileWalking 7

    I think it is far more important to break up the Google market dominance.

    The outright censorship of yt wouldn’t have occurred if they didn’t feel invincible. Neither would the shitty treatment of advertisers on their platforms.

  8. RedLogix 8

    Well expressed Ad; the OP makes for an interesting read, especially your point, People without the freedom of mind can be easily manipulated. This is something my own thoughts have been edging around recently as well.

    One of the few advantages of age is that not only do you care less about what other people think of you, you have the opportunity to be a bit more honest about how you think of yourself … and looking back I realise too often I’ve traded in my own freedom of thought for something less valuable.

    Freedom of thought is not a simple virtue, none of us are islands, we are all part of a collective consciousness that influences each of us profoundly. Yet each of us navigates our way around this vast geography of meaning along our own unique trajectory.

    And for most of us, freedom of thought and freedom of speech are very tightly linked.

    • Ad 8.1

      It’s telling we both need pseudonyms to express ourselves publicly.

      Facebook pulling its news feeds last week was a deep admission of power.

      • RedLogix 8.1.1

        Well three things;

        1. I deleted my FB account last week. Not that I used it much, I just couldn’t stomach having one anymore.

        2. We’ve lost touch with our adopted son in China. The censors have done something because nothing gets through anymore.

        3. In light of this and other recent events, the thought passed through my mind that I wished to delete my entire history and presence from The Standard. I think in years to come we may all yet regret our expression here.

        • Ad

          I suspect many who are knowledgeable of the spread of cyber-tyranny will be thinking like us about our exposure.

          I am not on Facebook, Twitter, or any other such platform. I don’t want to go all tinfoil hat-tish, but I don’t have any air points or other such card either.

          Really, really sorry to hear about your lack of contact with your son.

          But I’m not going to stop here on TS.
          Democracy is dimming somewhat, and I value it too much to pull back from it entirely. Within a specific realm, we have to defend the freedom of our minds.

          • Anne

            Hear, hear both Redlogix @ 8 and Ad.

            The enemy does not lie within. I have sufficient faith in our security arrangements and the robustness of the democratic processes we enjoy in NZ. There’s plenty of room for improvement of course but we enjoy a better political and economic climate than most.

            But when it comes to off-shore entities it is a totally different story. Even among our supposed allies there are elements within them that cannot be trusted or believed. Trying to differentiate the wheat from the chaff is going to become increasingly harder for all of us to achieve.

            All the more reason to stay with The Standard because thanks to the hard work of moderators and sysop, lprent, freedom of thought and expression will never be dimmed here at TS…

            nor I might add the ability to bicker and squabble when we feel like it. 😈

  9. Each of those summits has fat reports worth reading, and plenty of tough diplomatic efforts to strengthen states against sustained cyber-terrorism, which is what one country attacking another through digital devices really is.

    Actually, it’s war.

  10. eco maori 10

    Can someone please explain why the Papatuanukue /Worlds media is not taking global warming we have to get the media printed and televised media sorted out as well I know who’s minupulating that phenomenon and its not CHINA.
    YES we have to get some good rules in place to protect our sovereignty from people using social any media to minupulate the outcomes of our democract.
    But one’s finger should be pointed in the right directions. Multi national companies have used media to minupulated people for years that’s why we are being feed foods that are bad for us we are using chemicals that are bad for us and the environment and all the creations on Papatuanukue the earth Ana to kai.
    Ka kite ano

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Twenty highlights of 2020
    As we welcome in the new year, our focus is on continuing to keep New Zealanders safe and moving forward with our economic recovery. There’s a lot to get on with, but before we say a final goodbye to 2020, here’s a quick look back at some of the milestones ...
    3 weeks ago

  • Jobs for Nature funding will create training and employment opportunities
    A major investment to tackle wilding pines in Mt Richmond will create jobs and help protect the area’s unique ecosystems, Biosecurity Minister Damien O’Connor says. The Mt Richmond Forest Park has unique ecosystems developed on mineral-rich geology, including taonga plant species found nowhere else in the country. “These special plant ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    18 hours ago
  • Pre-departure testing extended to all passengers to New Zealand
    To further protect New Zealand from COVID-19, the Government is extending pre-departure testing to all passengers to New Zealand except from Australia, Antarctica and most Pacific Islands, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “The change will come into force for all flights arriving in New Zealand after 11:59pm (NZT) on Monday ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    23 hours ago
  • Bay Cadets learn skills to protect environment
    Bay Conservation Cadets launched with first intake Supported with $3.5 million grant Part of $1.245b Jobs for Nature programme to accelerate recover from Covid Cadets will learn skills to protect and enhance environment Environment Minister David Parker today welcomed the first intake of cadets at the launch of the Bay ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Cook Islanders to resume travel to New Zealand
    The Prime Minister of New Zealand Jacinda Ardern and the Prime Minister of the Cook Islands Mark Brown have announced passengers from the Cook Islands can resume quarantine-free travel into New Zealand from 21 January, enabling access to essential services such as health. “Following confirmation of the Cook Islands’ COVID ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Supporting communities and landowners to grow employment opportunities
    Jobs for Nature funding is being made available to conservation groups and landowners to employ staff and contractors in a move aimed at boosting local biodiversity-focused projects, Conservation Minister Kiritapu Allan has announced. It is estimated some 400-plus jobs will be created with employment opportunities in ecology, restoration, trapping, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Border exception for some returning international tertiary students
    The Government has approved an exception class for 1000 international tertiary students, degree level and above, who began their study in New Zealand but were caught offshore when border restrictions began. The exception will allow students to return to New Zealand in stages from April 2021. “Our top priority continues ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Tiwai deal gives time for managed transition
    Today’s deal between Meridian and Rio Tinto for the Tiwai smelter to remain open another four years provides time for a managed transition for Southland. “The deal provides welcome certainty to the Southland community by protecting jobs and incomes as the region plans for the future. The Government is committed ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • New member for APEC Business Advisory Council
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has appointed Anna Curzon to the APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC). The leader of each APEC economy appoints three private sector representatives to ABAC. ABAC provides advice to leaders annually on business priorities. “ABAC helps ensure that APEC’s work programme is informed by business community perspectives ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Govt’s careful economic management recognised
    The Government’s prudent fiscal management and strong policy programme in the face of the COVID-19 global pandemic have been acknowledged by the credit rating agency Fitch. Fitch has today affirmed New Zealand’s local currency rating at AA+ with a stable outlook and foreign currency rating at AA with a positive ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Additional actions to keep COVID-19 out of NZ
    The Government is putting in place a suite of additional actions to protect New Zealand from COVID-19, including new emerging variants, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “Given the high rates of infection in many countries and evidence of the global spread of more transmissible variants, it’s clear that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • 19 projects will clean up and protect waterways
    $36 million of Government funding alongside councils and others for 19 projects Investment will clean up and protect waterways and create local jobs Boots on the ground expected in Q2 of 2021 Funding part of the Jobs for Nature policy package A package of 19 projects will help clean up ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Zealand Government acknowledges 175th anniversary of Battle of Ruapekapeka
    The commemoration of the 175th anniversary of the Battle of Ruapekapeka represents an opportunity for all New Zealanders to reflect on the role these conflicts have had in creating our modern nation, says Associate Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Kiri Allan. “The Battle at Te Ruapekapeka Pā, which took ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Better care for babies with tongue-tie
    Babies born with tongue-tie will be assessed and treated consistently under new guidelines released by the Ministry of Health, Associate Minister of Health Dr Ayesha Verrall announced today. Around 5% to 10% of babies are born with a tongue-tie, or ankyloglossia, in New Zealand each year. At least half can ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Prisoner disorder event at Waikeria Prison over
    The prisoner disorder event at Waikeria Prison is over, with all remaining prisoners now safely and securely detained, Corrections Minister Kelvin Davis says. The majority of those involved in the event are members of the Mongols and Comancheros. Five of the men are deportees from Australia, with three subject to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Pre-departure COVID-19 test for travellers from the UK and the US from 15 January
    Travellers from the United Kingdom or the United States bound for New Zealand will be required to get a negative test result for COVID-19 before departing, and work is underway to extend the requirement to other long haul flights to New Zealand, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins confirmed today. “The new PCR test requirement, foreshadowed last ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • PM congratulates New Year Honour recipients
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has added her warm congratulations to the New Zealanders recognised for their contributions to their communities and the country in the New Year 2021 Honours List. “The past year has been one that few of us could have imagined. In spite of all the things that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • David Parker congratulates New Year 2021 Honours recipients
    Attorney-General and Minister for the Environment David Parker has congratulated two retired judges who have had their contributions to the country and their communities recognised in the New Year 2021 Honours list. The Hon Tony Randerson QC has been appointed a Companion of the New Zealand Order of Merit for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • New Year’s Honours highlights outstanding Pacific leadership through challenging year
    Minister for Pacific Peoples Aupito William Sio says the New Year’s Honours List 2021 highlights again the outstanding contribution made by Pacific people across Aotearoa. “We are acknowledging the work of 13 Pacific leaders in the New Year’s Honours, representing a number of sectors including health, education, community, sports, the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago