Collins’ really bad take on te Tiriti

Written By: - Date published: 10:21 am, May 4th, 2021 - 67 comments
Categories: Judith Collins, national, Politics, racism, racism, same old national, uncategorized - Tags: ,

Last weekend Judith Collins spoke to the Northern Regional Conference of the National Party.  The whole weekend was spent blowing hard on the good old fashioned racist whistle.  But in particular she presented an interesting take on te Tiriti o Waitangi the likes of which I have not seen before.

From her speech:

Article 1, Kāwanatanga, establishes the Queen as our sovereign and head of state.

This speaks directly to our first National Party value of loyalty to our country and sovereign.

Article 2, Tino Rangatiratanga, confirms the property rights of all people. It establishes that all iwi, families and individuals have rights over their own land and property. Property rights are again a key democratic principle and core to National party values.

Article 3, Ōritetanga, most importantly, states all people have the same rights. Those three simple concepts – nationhood, property rights and equal rights – are a powerful foundation for a country, and a powerful foundation to consider our National Party values.

The preamble to the Treaty provides the context in which it was signed and should be read. The preamble states that the intention of the Treaty was to promote peace and avoid lawlessness. Again, directly in line with National Party values of national security and strong communities.

Now, it’s important to state upfront that the Treaty was breached, and those breaches – the New Zealand Land wars – have left Māori in a different position today, to where they would be had those breaches not occurred. The inequities we see today trace back to the actions of the past.

It’s right that we look to address these wrongs and it’s right that we undertake settlements with Iwi and Hapu impacted by Treaty breaches. We are proud of our track record in settling treaty claims, and our members can be proud of the support you gave us to do that.

But this is not the debate we find ourselves in today. The debate today has moved to: what is the role of the Treaty in our democracy going forward? Did the Treaty bring us together as one people, or split us apart as two?

It is as if Judith sought expert advice from Donald Trump about what the treaty involves so bad is her take.

I should not be surprised but her comments trample on the last 179 years of academic analysis of what the treaty actually said as well as an important recent Waitangi Tribunal decision.  And remember there is an English version and a te reo version and international law dictates that the version the local chiefs signed should be the one that actually matters.

Here is a quick abridged response to Judith’s claims.

Article one ceded Kawanatanga to the Crown.  This is akin to governance.  The queen had to deal with all the day to day issues that the immigrants were causing.  If they had wanted to cede sovereignty they (or the Queen’s representatives who wrote the treaty) would have ceded Tino Rangatiratanga.  This has been one of the most critical issues for Treaty Analysis for a long time.  For Judith to ignore this and go with the redneck interpretation of article 1 speaks volumes.

Article two preserves to Maori their interests in all things of importance to them.  The English version said:

Her Majesty the Queen of England confirms and guarantees to the Chiefs and Tribes of New Zealand and to the respective families and individuals thereof the full exclusive and undisturbed possession of their Lands and Estates Forests Fisheries and other properties which they may collectively or individually possess so long as it is their wish and desire to retain the same in their possession; but the Chiefs of the United Tribes and the individual Chiefs yield to Her Majesty the exclusive right of Preemption over such lands as the proprietors thereof may be disposed to alienate at such prices as may be agreed upon between the respective Proprietors and persons appointed by Her Majesty to treat with them in that behalf.

The te reo version says:

Ko te Kuini o Ingarani ka wakarite ka wakaae ki nga Rangatira ki nga hapu-ki nga tangata katoa o Nu Tirani te tino rangatiratanga o o ratou wenua o ratou kainga me o ratou taonga katoa. Otiia ko nga Rangatira o te Wakaminenga me nga Rangatira katoa atu ka tuku ki te Kuini te hokonga o era wahi wenua e pai ai te tangata nona te Wenua-ki te ritenga o te utu e wakaritea ai e ratou ko te kai hoko e meatia nei e te Kuini hei kai hoko mona.

The  use of “taonga” in the te reo version has been interpreted as covering a wide variety of things, from te reo itself to broadcasting rights.  Basically way more than just lands and estates and forestries and fisheries.

But whoever on Judith’s staff came up with the idea that article 2 was some sort of wet dream for Act party supporters need to get a new job.  Historical understanding is not one of their strengths.  Article 2 was to preserve for Iwi what they already owned, not to say that whatever you own now is yours.

Article three said basically thank you to Iwi for articles one and two and because you did so you are now English citizens.

Even her comments about the preamble are misleading.  The most important part of the preamble was the expression of the desire to protect Māori interests from the encroaching British settlement.

Her analysis was embarrassing.  If I was her history teacher I would give it an F for fail and tell her she has to try better.

She then went on a conspiracy fuelled rant.  Like claiming the proposed Māori Health Authority would be able to veto decisions made by the Government on general health.

Sub standard takes on the meaning of te Tiriti and thinly veiled racist dogma.

Aotearoa New Zealand deserves better than this from the current leader of the National Party.

67 comments on “Collins’ really bad take on te Tiriti ”

  • Comments are now closed

  1. Gosman 1
    4 May 2021 at 10:59 am

    ".. And remember there is an English version and a te reo version and international law dictates that the version the local chiefs signed should be the one that actually matters."

    Please stop with the fiction that International law dictates that a particular version of a Treaty takes precedence. There is no hard and fast rule around this at all but the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties states the following in Article 33:

    "Interpretation of treaties authenticated in two or more languages

    1. When a treaty has been authenticated in two or more languages, the text is equally authoritative in each language, unless the treaty provides or the parties agree that, in case of divergence, a particular text shall prevail.

    2. A version of the treaty in a language other than one of those in which the text was authenticated shall be considered an authentic text only if the treaty so provides or the parties so agree.

    3. The terms of the treaty are presumed to have the same meaning in each authentic text.

    4. Except where a particular text prevails in accordance with paragraph 1, when a comparison of the authentic texts discloses a difference of meaning which the application of articles 31 and 32 does not remove, the meaning which best reconciles the texts, having regard to the object and purpose of the treaty, shall be adopted."

    https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/1_1_1969.pdf

    You have been advised of this before so you cannot claim this is new information.

    • Chris 1.1
      4 May 2021 at 12:54 pm

      It's the Treaty itself that gives precedence to the Te Reo version. There's no conflict here with the VCLT at all. As you've pointed out, the VCLT provides for one version to have greater relevance if the Treaty itelf so provides. Even if there's doubt about whether the Treaty does this (which there isn’t), you've helpfully set out the next part of the test, which is the version that best reconciles a difference of meaning in the two texts, having regard to the object and purpose of the Treaty, prevails.

      • Gosman 1.1.1
        4 May 2021 at 3:44 pm

        Ummm… no. The Treaty itself is in two languages and gives no precedence to either version

        • Hugh Youg 1.1.1.1
          4 May 2021 at 10:26 pm

          But the chiefs signed the one in te reo Māori so it is their understanding of what they signed that we need to have regard to.

          • Gosman 1.1.1.1.1
            5 May 2021 at 7:28 am

            There is no international law that supports that view.

            • Incognito 1.1.1.1.1.1
              5 May 2021 at 7:50 am

              Please, don’t comment under this post until you’ve done your homework. Today’s task is reading Article 10 of the VCLT document that you linked in to in your first comment @ 1. Subsequently, you can answer the questions you were asked yesterday about what this means with regard to ToW.

              • Gosman …
                5 May 2021 at 8:10 am

                The very fact SOME Iwi signed the English version (and not the Te Reo one) means BOTH versions are authenticated. Unless you are trying to argue there are two versions that are active and the Iwi that signed the English version did sign away sovereignty whereas the other Iwi did not. Is that your position?

                • Incognito …
                  5 May 2021 at 8:14 am

                  You didn’t read Article 10, did you? I’ve asked you to answer questions about authentication of ToW, not ask them. Your wasting our time here. Next, I will moderate you.

                  • Gosman …
                    5 May 2021 at 8:17 am

                    No I did read Article 10 and it makes not a blind bit of difference. BOTH versions of the Treat were signed and BOTH are authenticated. There is NOTHING under international law stating that a majority of people in an area have to sign both versions of a Treaty.

                    [Using capitals does not make an argument stronger. There are many issues about the so-called English translation of the Māori document and it has been argued extensively by scholars and historians, as well as Māori, what they actually signed. Thus, it is not and cannot be definitive. Thus, ToW has not been authenticated; it is still open to interpretation. to complicate matters, there are several copies too. Instead of acknowledging these issues and associated open questions about and around ToW, you take a firm position, based on your prejudice. This could lead to you being moderated and further consequences for you – Incognito]

                  • Gosman …
                    5 May 2021 at 8:20 am

                    By the way if you decide to moderate me because I followed YOUR request and addressed the question around Article 10 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treatiesin relation to the ToW and that I disagree with your interpretation of what it means in regard to an authenticated Treaty that is not moderation it is censorship of views differing from yours.

    • Caroline 1.2
      4 May 2021 at 4:24 pm

      but in what way can the treaty be said to be 'authenticated in both languages' when the signatures are on the Maori language version? Surely that makes that version the authenticated one?

      • Gosman 1.2.1
        4 May 2021 at 4:36 pm

        Do you have any evidence supporting the view that international law places more credence on a version of a Treaty in a particular language if that version receives more signatures than another version in a different language?

      • Gosman 1.2.2
        4 May 2021 at 4:38 pm

        As for the authentic version I have already shown you that according to one international law around Treaties BOTH versions are deemed to be authetic. Any disagreement over meaning has to be resolved by looking at the object and purpose of the Treaty. What was that purpose in regard to the ToW?

        • Incognito 1.2.2.1
          4 May 2021 at 4:55 pm

          If you don’t know the difference between authentic and authenticated in the context of Treaty Law then you should perhaps not comment here. You have already sucked up much of the ‘oxygen’ here and it is becoming bothersome no matter what some other ignorami here say about you.

        • Drowsy M. Kram 1.2.2.2
          4 May 2021 at 5:21 pm

          What was that purpose in regard to the ToW?

          One purpose of Te Tiriti o Waitangi was to protect the right(s) of Māori tribes to control their land(s). Trying to put myself in the position(s) of senior Māori at the time, when the number of colonists/settlers was increasing, the evident erosion of land rights would have been a logical concern – as it proved to be.

          The Covenant of Kohimarama
          A RATIFICATION OF THE TREATY OF WAITANGI
          – Claudia Orange (1979)
          'I imagine that a day will come not long hence, when the preposterous Waitangi treaty will be overruled and the ridiculous claims of the native to thousands of . . . acres of untrodden bush . . . will be no longer able to damp the ardour & cramp the energies of the industrious white man'.

          https://waitangitribunal.govt.nz/publications-and-resources/school-resources/treaty-past-and-present/section-3/

    • mickysavage 1.3
      6 May 2021 at 11:41 am

      Here you go Gosman, from the Waitangi Tribunal decision in the Te Reo Maori claim:

      "4.3.7 As to taking surrounding circumstances into account when interpreting treaties, the legal principles are well-settled especially in North America where the Courts have frequently been required to interpret treaties, many of them similar to our own and made long before it. The Ontario Court of Appeal interpreted an Indian Treaty made in 1818 in the case of The Queen v Taylor and Williams (1981) 62 CCC (2nd) 227. The terms of the treaty in question did not provide for the reservation of hunting and fishing rights but there was written evidence of the circumstances that existed when the treaty was signed. The Court declared : “. . . The principles to be applied to the interpretation of Indian treaties have been much canvassed over the years. In approaching the terms of a treaty quite apart from the other considerations already noted, the honour of the Crown is always involved and no appearance of ‘sharp dealing’ should be sanctioned. Further if there is any ambiguity in the words or phrases used not only should the words be interpreted as against the framers and drafters of such treaties, but such language should not be interpreted or construed to the prejudice of the Indians if another construction is reasonably possible. . . . Finally if there is evidence by conduct or otherwise as to how the parties understood the terms of the treaty, then such understanding and practice is of assistance in giving content to the term of terms . . .” (p 235)"

  2. Gosman 2
    4 May 2021 at 11:15 am

    Just of interest what is this "International law" which you believe exists that "dictates" the Te Reo version takes precedence?

    I think you may mistakenly believe SCOTUS rulings around some treaty interpretations involving the US Federal government and Native American groups is International law. It is not.

    • mac1 2.1
      4 May 2021 at 11:44 am

      Gosman, you wrote "Please stop with the fiction that International law dictates that a particular version of a Treaty takes precedence."

      In which language was the version of the Treaty written that most signatories signed? What is the importance of that?

      What was the first language of most of the signatories?

      Who wrote the Treaty, and who translated it?Māori or agents of the Crown?

      Remember that within a generation the two versions had such disparity that the NZ Land Wars resulted.

      • Gosman 2.1.1
        4 May 2021 at 11:48 am

        All your points are irrelevant to the claim that I am disputing which is that International law dictates that the version the local chiefs signed should be the one that actually matters.

        If you have actual evidence that there is a hard and fast rule under International law which DOES mean the Te Reo version takes precedence then please present it here?

        I suspect you won't do that though mainly because I believe you did not bother to read my original comment on this post which actually specified what one International law in relation to the interpretation of treaties in multiple languages states on the topic.

      • Gosman 2.1.2
        4 May 2021 at 11:57 am

        Please address my original comment including the reference to actual International law on this subject.

        • mac1 2.1.2.1
          4 May 2021 at 1:07 pm

          Gosman, what does the term 'authenticated' mean? (1. When a treaty has been authenticated in two or more languages, the text is equally authoritative in each language, unless the treaty provides or the parties agree that, in case of divergence, a particular text shall prevail.)

          • Gosman 2.1.2.1.1
            4 May 2021 at 1:42 pm

            I'm not answering your question until you address mine in relation to what International law dictates the Te Reo version is the one that applies.

      • Enough is Enough 2.1.3
        4 May 2021 at 1:32 pm

        While the Treaty is widely seen as a constitutional document, its status in New Zealand law is less than settled. At the moment, Treaty rights can only be enforced in a court of law when a statute or an Act explicitly refers to the Treaty

        It annoys me no end when people try to claim that interpeting the treaty is a black and white issue. A nice summary is found here:

        https://www.justice.govt.nz/about/learn-about-the-justice-system/how-the-justice-system-works/the-basis-for-all-law/treaty-of-waitangi/

    • McFlock 2.2
      4 May 2021 at 1:16 pm

      lol maybe you should look in the direction of NZ and English legal arguments. Even in 2003 your position was quaintly colonialist.

      • Gosman 2.2.1
        4 May 2021 at 1:40 pm

        First off the Privy council is not "International law"

        Secondly all you have done is provide a link to a report on a debate in Parliament where Michael Cullen CLAIMS that the Privy Council has stated something. Where is this ruling?

        • McFlock 2.2.1.1
          4 May 2021 at 2:03 pm

          I'll take Cullen's word over yours any day.

          Just out of interest, what language was the Treaty written in when signed by both parties? Did they all sign both the English and Māori versions?

          • mac1 2.2.1.1.1
            4 May 2021 at 2:15 pm

            I'll answer for Gosman. He wouldn't answer that question from me.

            The Māori version was signed by most.

            Wikipedia says, "Around 530 to 540 Māori, at least 13 of them women, signed the Māori language version of the Treaty of Waitangi, despite some Māori leaders cautioning against it. Only 39 signed the English version."

            • McFlock 2.2.1.1.1.1
              4 May 2021 at 2:44 pm

              On the other hand, Hobson or another English representative signed the Māori copies as well as the English one.

              I'd love to have gossie as an employer or landlord. The conditions at the time would be terrible, but the damages when it gets to a tribunal would be exemplary lol: "The ruling is that the applicable version of the contract is the one both parties signed, not the version that only G signed".

            • Gosman 2.2.1.1.1.2
              4 May 2021 at 3:42 pm

              There is no international law or convention that states that if a treaty is in two languages it is the one that has the most signatures that takes precedence.

              • McFlock …
                4 May 2021 at 4:53 pm

                There generally seems to be a tradition amongst national and international law that if you didn't sign a document but signed some other document, the only document that applies to you is the one you signed.

                That would be an interesting can of worms.

                • mac1 …
                  4 May 2021 at 4:56 pm

                  John Keyesian. "I can find you another Treaty version."

                  • McFlock …
                    4 May 2021 at 5:11 pm

                    lol Imagine interpreting it the way yanks look at their second amendment: "There's an errant comma in the 4th Māori copy of the Treaty signed by 5 people, that means Queen Victoria ceded the sovereignty of the UK to Ngāti Pou"

        • Chris 2.2.1.2
          4 May 2021 at 2:56 pm

          International law includes instruments such as treaties and conventions, so the VCLT you refer to itself falls under what is accepted as 'international law'. Decisions of the PC were issued from what was the highest court in our domestic jurisdiction, which generally has greater force than international instruments NZ as a country may have signed up to. Any quibbling, therefore, over whether decisions of the PC represent 'international law' or not is pointless because what ever the PC says (as part of the NZ jurisdiction) is absolutely binding on the NZ government, and generally trumps any view of what international law may indicate, if indeed it says something contrary to it, which one would hope doesn't happen too often.

          • Gosman 2.2.1.2.1
            4 May 2021 at 3:27 pm

            Discuss this matter with Mickeysavage. It was he who claimed international law dictates the Te Reo version takes precedence.

        • Tricledrown 2.2.1.3
          5 May 2021 at 1:41 pm

          Gosman the privy council had jurisdiction the UN can only make recommendations.

          The NZ supreme court now has the final say as it has superseded the Privy council.

          Maori were denied proper legal representation until the 1880's .

          Early settlers took advantage of insider trading,today's ruling against dodgy land dealings if applied to sales and stolen lands would see the return of the land plus compensation for the losses incurred and legal fees.

          This would put Maori as the wealthiest NZers as $100's of billions would have to go to those who had been defrauded.

          People like you Gosman know this and are happy to keep Maori poor and disenfranchised by belittling Maori.

  3. Byd0nz 3
    4 May 2021 at 11:31 am

    The Nats of the sunburnt neck Party have always been a disgrace to the idea of having a decent society. The very worst aspect of the Capitalist systems. So why would anyone be surprised by her inherited drivel.

    I'd be more surprised, if someone in her own party took her to task over it.

  4. gsays 4
    4 May 2021 at 12:48 pm

    To be fair, the National party was formed to stand against principles of a growing labour movement.

    Nowadays they stand against addressing gross inequalities in health.

    • AB 4.1
      4 May 2021 at 1:45 pm

      Yeah – the first purpose of all conservative parties is to assert that the status quo was justly arrived at, and can be justly maintained. The second purpose is to disguise that this is a mere assertion, and instead to make it seem like 'common sense'.

  5. veutoviper 5
    4 May 2021 at 3:20 pm

    I am not going to get into the ins and outs above re which language version of the TOW takes precedence other than to point people to the UN Declaration of the Rights of Indigeneous Peoples in relation to this issue. Below is a link to a Q & A on the TOW which gives the background to the language/precedent issue which covers this aspect from about section 51 (page 41) onwards. IMO this link is a fair summation on a quick read, so suggest this as a starting point. Plenty of other links available via Google etc.

    https://trc.org.nz/sites/trc.org.nz/files/publications/files/Q%26A%202015%20online.pdf

  6. Sacha 6
    4 May 2021 at 5:07 pm

    Very clear summary, including that contra proferentem applies: https://waitangitribunal.govt.nz/treaty-of-waitangi/meaning-of-the-treaty/

    Let's not get derailed into relitigating settled case law; Brash, Collins and their ilk would love that.

    • Gosman 6.1
      5 May 2021 at 7:11 am

      Contra proferentem is used in cases of contracts and commercial treaties. There is no rule that it applies to international treaties such as the ToW. The SCOTUS rulings referred to in the link are not intenational law and neither do they involve matters of sovereignty.

  7. Matiri 7
    4 May 2021 at 5:11 pm

    Methinks Gosman protests too much!

  8. peter sim 8
    4 May 2021 at 9:29 pm

    0at the next GE I am not sure whether to vote Green o Labour. Sigh.

    • Tricledrown 8.1
      5 May 2021 at 1:27 pm

      National trying to reheat Brash's Orewa speech .Collins desperately stirring .Saying Maori will have an upper house in parliament by 2050 vetoing everything does that mean the National Party won't win any elections in the next 30 years.

      Even John Key denounced Don Brash's anti Maori rhetoric Key won elections and demoted Collins.After the weekend conference you would think National saying it was going to stand in the Maori electorates they would be reaching out to Maori. But instead they are bashing Maori again.

      Collins should demote herself and National may stand a chance at getting its support back.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • SPEECH: To the IISS Shangri-La Dialogue 2023 by the Honourable Andrew Little MP, New Zealand Ministe...
    New Zealand’s most recent defence assessment identified climate change and geostrategic competition as the two greatest security challenges to our place in the South Pacific. To the first issue, partners engaging and re-engaging with Pacific Island Countries are finding that climate change is a security and existential threat in our ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 hours ago

  • Govt supporting more rangatahi into training and employment opportunities
    The government is continuing to support rangatahi in providing more funding into Maori Trades training and new He Poutama Rangatahi programmes across Aotearoa. “We’re backing 30 new by Māori for Māori Kaupapa employment and training programmes, which will help iwi into sustainable employment or progress within their chosen careers” says ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    11 hours ago

  • Energy self-sufficient marae reopens with support of Government investment
    Murihiku Marae was officially reopened today, setting a gold standard in sustainable building practices as well as social outcomes for the people of Waihōpai Invercargill, Regional Development Minister Kiri Allan says. “The marae has been a central hub for this community since the 1980’s. With the support of $9.65 million ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    11 hours ago

  • First major Whangārei public housing project in a generation complete
    The first major public housing development in Whangārei for decades has reached completion, with 37 new homes opened in the suburb of Maunu today. The project on Tapatahi Crescent and Puriri Park Road, consists of 15 one-bedroom, 4 two-bedroom, 7 three-bedroom, 8 four-bedroom and 3 five-bedroom homes, as well as ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    14 hours ago

  • Trade Minister to represent New Zealand trade interests abroad
    Trade and Export Growth Minister Damen O’Connor will depart tomorrow for London to represent New Zealand at the Commonwealth Trade Ministers’ Meeting and then to Paris to vice-chair the OECD Ministerial Council Meeting. “My travel to the United Kingdom is well-timed, with the United Kingdom Free Trade Agreement (UK FTA) ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    17 hours ago

  • Bill to boost national fuel resiliency introduced
    The Fuel Industry (Improving Fuel Resilience) Amendment Bill would: boost New Zealand’s fuel supply resilience and economic security enable the minimum stockholding obligation regulations to be adapted as the energy and transport environment evolves. “Last November, I announced a six-point plan to improve the resiliency of our fuel supply from ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago

  • Faster ACC payment top-ups and fairer system
    The Government is making sure those on low incomes will no longer have to wait five weeks to get the minimum weekly rate of ACC, and improving the data collected to make the system fairer, Minister for ACC Peeni Henare said today.  The Accident Compensation (Access Reporting and Other Matters) ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago

  • Compulsory code of conduct for school boards introduced
    A compulsory code of conduct will ensure school board members are crystal clear on their responsibilities and expected standard of behaviour, Minister of Education Jan Tinetti said. It’s the first time a compulsory code of conduct has been published for state and state-integrated school boards and comes into effect on ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago

  • Speech to the New Zealand Federation of Commercial Fishermen annual conference.
    Tena koutou katoa and thank you, Mayor Nadine Taylor, for your welcome to Marlborough. Thanks also Doug Saunders-Loder and all of you for inviting me to your annual conference. As you might know, I’m quite new to this job – and I’m particularly pleased that the first organisation I’m giving a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago

  • Govt to support councils with buyout and better protection of cyclone and flood affected properties
    The Government will enter into a funding arrangement with councils in cyclone and flood affected regions to support them to offer a voluntary buyout for owners of Category 3 designated residential properties. It will also co-fund work needed to protect Category 2 designated properties. “From the beginning of this process ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Government delivers changes to reduce pokies harm
    The Government has announced changes to strengthen requirements in venues with pokie (gambling) machines will come into effect from 15 June. “Pokies are one of the most harmful forms of gambling. They can have a detrimental impact on individuals, their friends, whānau and communities,” Internal Affairs Minister Barbara Edmonds said. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Government delivers 1800 additional frontline Police
    The total Police workforce is now the largest it has ever been. Police constabulary stands at 10,700 officers – an increase of 21% since 2017 Māori officers have increased 40%, Pasifika 83%, Asian 157%, Women 61% Every district has got more Police under this Government The Government has delivered on ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Minister Mahuta talks Pacific ambitions at the first Korea-Pacific Leaders’ summit
    Minister of Foreign Affairs, Hon Nanaia Mahuta met with Korea President Yoon, as well as Pacific Islands Forum Secretary General Henry Puna, during her recent visit to Korea.  “It was an honour to represent Aotearoa New Zealand at the first Korea – Pacific Leaders’ Summit. We discussed Pacific ambitions under the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Government drives $2 billion of business research and development
    The Government’s Research and Development Tax Incentive has supported more than $2 billion of New Zealand business innovation – an increase of around $1 billion in less than nine months. "Research and innovation are essential in helping us meet the biggest challenges and seize opportunities facing New Zealand. It’s fantastic ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Achieving lift off: National Space Policy launched
    The next ‘giant leap’ in New Zealand’s space journey has been taken today with the launch of the National Space Policy, Economic Development Minister Barbara Edmonds announced. “Our space sector is growing rapidly. Each year New Zealand is becoming a more and more attractive place for launches, manufacturing space-related technology ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • New science and creative technologies wharekura announced
    A new Year 7-13 designated character wharekura will be built in Pāpāmoa, Associate Minister of Education Kelvin Davis has announced. The wharekura will focus on science, mathematics and creative technologies while connecting ākonga to the whakapapa of the area. The decision follows an application by the Ngā Pōtiki ā Tamapahore ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • Freedom Camping changes a win for the environment
    Protecting the environment by establishing a stronger, more consistent system for freedom camping Supporting councils to better manage freedom camping in their region and reduce the financial and social impacts on communities Ensuring that self-contained vehicle owners have time to prepare for the new system   The Self-Contained Motor Vehicle ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • Speeding up the family court, reducing stress on families
    A new law passed last night could see up to 25 percent of Family Court judges’ workload freed up in order to reduce delays, Minister of Justice Kiri Allan said. The Family Court (Family Court Associates) Legislation Bill will establish a new role known as the Family Court Associate. The ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • UK FTA delivers benefits from today
    New Zealand businesses will begin reaping the rewards of our gold-standard free trade agreement with the United Kingdom (UK FTA) from today.  “The New Zealand UK FTA enters into force from today, and is one of the seven new or upgraded Free Trade Agreements negotiated by Labour to date,” Prime ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • Next steps to reform outdated surrogacy law
    The Government will reform outdated surrogacy laws to improve the experiences of children, surrogates, and the growing number of families formed through surrogacy, by adopting Labour MP Tāmati Coffey’s Member’s Bill as a Government Bill, Minister Kiri Allan has announced. “Surrogacy has become an established method of forming a family ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • Defence Minister to attend Shangri-La Dialogue
    Defence Minister Andrew Little departs for Singapore tomorrow to attend the 20th annual Shangri-La Dialogue for Defence Ministers from the Indo-Pacific region. “Shangri-La brings together many countries to speak frankly and express views about defence issues that could affect us all,” Andrew Little said. “New Zealand is a long-standing participant ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • New Zealand–China science relationship affirmed
    Research, Science and Innovation Minister Dr Ayesha Verrall and the Chinese Minister of Science and Technology Wang Zhigang met in Wellington today and affirmed the two countries’ long-standing science relationship. Minister Wang was in New Zealand for the 6th New Zealand-China Joint Commission Meeting on Science and Technology Cooperation. Following ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • Supporting a strong future for screen sector
    5 percent uplift clearer and simpler to navigate  Domestic productions can access more funding sources 20 percent rebate confirmed for post-production, digital and visual effects Qualifying expenditure for post-production, digital and visual effects rebate dropped to $250,000 to encourage more smaller productions The Government is making it easier for the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • Minister Sepuloni to attend 61st Anniversary of Samoa’s Independence
    Deputy Prime Minister and Associate Minister of Foreign Affairs (Pacific Region) Carmel Sepuloni will represent New Zealand at Samoa’s 61st Anniversary of Independence commemorations in Apia. “Aotearoa New Zealand is pleased to share in this significant occasion, alongside other invited Pacific leaders, and congratulates Samoa on the milestone of 61 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • Govt backs retailers with expansion of fog cannon programme
    The Government is continuing to support retailers with additional funding for the highly popular Fog Cannon Subsidy Scheme, Police and Small Business Minister Ginny Andersen announced today.  “The Government is committed to improving retailers’ safety,” Ginny Andersen said.  “I’ve seen first-hand the difference fog cannons are making. Not only do ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • Government will consider recommendations of Intelligence and Security Act review
    The Government has received the first independent review of the Intelligence and Security Act 2017, Prime Minister Chris Hipkins says. The review, considered by the Parliamentary Intelligence and Security Committee, was presented to the House of Representatives today.  “Ensuring the safety and security of New Zealanders is of the utmost ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • Govt expresses condolences on the passing of HRH Princess Sui’ilikutapu
    Prime Minister Chris Hipkins has expressed condolences on behalf of New Zealand to the Kingdom of Tonga following the death of Her Royal Highness Princess Mele Siu’ilikutapu Kalaniuvalu Fotofili. “New Zealand sends it’s heartfelt condolences to the people of Tonga, and to His Majesty King Tupou VI at this time ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • Govt expresses condolences on the passing of HRH Princess Siu’ilikutapu
    Prime Minister Chris Hipkins has expressed condolences on behalf of New Zealand to the Kingdom of Tonga following the death of Her Royal Highness Princess Mele Siu’ilikutapu Kalaniuvalu Fotofili. “New Zealand sends it’s heartfelt condolences to the people of Tonga, and to His Majesty King Tupou VI at this time ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • Security support to Solomon Islands extended
    Defence Minister Andrew Little and Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta have today announced the extension of the New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF) deployment to Solomon Islands, as part of the regionally-led Solomon Islands International Assistance Force (SIAF). “Aotearoa New Zealand has a long history of working alongside the Royal Solomon ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • Minister Mahuta to attend the first Korea-Pacific Leaders’ Summit
    Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta will travel to the Republic of Korea today to attend the Korea–Pacific Leaders’ Summit in Seoul and Busan. “Korea is an important partner for Aotearoa New Zealand and the Pacific region. I am eager for the opportunity to meet and discuss issues that matter to our ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • Agreement between Indo-Pacific partners for supply chain resilience
    Trade and Export Growth Minister Damien O’Connor joined ministerial representatives at a meeting in Detroit, USA today to announce substantial conclusion of negotiations of a new regional supply chains agreement among 14 Indo-Pacific countries. The Supply Chains agreement is one of four pillars being negotiated within the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Celebrating Samoa Language Week 2023
    Our most spoken Pacific language is taking centre stage this week with Vaiaso o le Gagana Samoa – Samoa Language Week kicking off around the country. “Understanding and using the Samoan language across our nation is vital to its survival,” Barbara Edmonds said. “The Samoan population in New Zealand are ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Nationwide test of Emergency Mobile Alert system
    Over 90 per cent of New Zealanders are expected to receive this year’s nationwide test of the Emergency Mobile Alert system tonight between 6-7pm. “Emergency Mobile Alert is a tool that can alert people when their life, health, or property, is in danger,” Kieran McAnulty said. “The annual nationwide test ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Whakatōhea and the Crown sign Deed of Settlement
    ENGLISH: Whakatōhea and the Crown sign Deed of Settlement A Deed of Settlement has been signed between Whakatōhea and the Crown, 183 years to the day since Whakatōhea rangatira signed the Treaty of Waitangi, Minister for Treaty of Waitangi Negotiations Andrew Little has announced. Whakatōhea is an iwi based in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • New Chair appointed to New Zealand National Commission for UNESCO
    Elizabeth Longworth has been appointed as the Chair of the New Zealand National Commission for UNESCO, Associate Minister of Education Jo Luxton announced today. UNESCO is the United Nations agency responsible for promoting cooperative action among member states in the areas of education, science, culture, social science (including peace and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Tourism transformation starts with people
    Tourism and hospitality employer accreditation scheme to recognise quality employers Better education and career opportunities in tourism Cultural competency to create more diverse and inclusive workplaces Innovation and technology acceleration to drive satisfying, skilled jobs Strengthening our tourism workers and supporting them into good career pathways, pay and working conditions ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Tourism transformation starts with people
    Tourism and hospitality employer accreditation scheme to recognise quality employers Better education and career opportunities in tourism Cultural competency to create more diverse and inclusive workplaces Innovation and technology acceleration to drive satisfying, skilled jobs Strengthening our tourism workers and supporting them into good career pathways, pay and working conditions ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Te ao Māori health services cheaper and more accessible for whānau
      Greater access to primary care, including 193 more front line clinical staff More hauora services and increased mental health support Boost for maternity and early years programmes Funding for cancers, HIV and longer term conditions    Greater access to primary care, improved maternity care and mental health support  are ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Te ao Māori health services more accessible for whānau
      Greater access to primary care, including 193 more front line clinical staff More hauora services and increased mental health support Boost for maternity and early years programmes Funding for cancers, HIV and longer term conditions    Greater access to primary care, improved maternity care and mental health support  are ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Government’s work for survivors of abuse in care continues
    The Government continues progress on the survivor-led independent redress system for historic abuse in care, with the announcement of the design and advisory group members today. “The main recommendation of the Royal Commission of Inquiry’s Abuse in Care interim redress report was for a survivor-led independent redress system, and the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2023-06-02T13:04:10+00:00